Slashdot Mirror


Apple's Recycling Initiatives Recover $40 Million In Gold (macrumors.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Apple released its latest annual environmental report yesterday with numbers detailing how much the company has been able to recover from old devices. Business Insider notes that Apple was able to recover over 61 million pounds of steel, aluminum, glass, and other materials from its computers and iPhones. This includes a total of 2,204 pounds of gold worth $40 million at current prices ($1,229.80 per troy ounce of gold). Cult of Mac ran the figures quoted by Apple through today's metal prices, and came up with individual figures for copper ($6.4 million), aluminum ($3.2 million), silver ($1.6 million), nickel ($160,426), zinc ($109,503), and lead ($33,999). Last month, Apple unveiled an iPhone recycling robot, named Liam, that salvages old parts.

138 comments

  1. corpse robbers by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wanted my Iphone laid to rest as I knew it in life.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:corpse robbers by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      With a cracked screen and bad reception?

      --
      Eat the rich.
    2. Re:corpse robbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're burying it wrong!

  2. Apple recycles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    A couple years ago, while taking my asian girlfriend shopping at the local mall, I had to take a piss. As I entered the john, Steve Jobs -- the messiah himself -- came out of one of the booths. I stood at the urinal looking at him out of the corner of my eye as he washed his hands. He didn't once look at me. He was busy and in any case I was sure the security guards wouldn't even let me shake his hand.

    As soon as he left I darted into the booth he'd vacated, hoping there might be a lingering smell of shit and even a seat still warm from his sturdy ass. I found not only the smell but the shit itself. He'd forgotten to flush. And what a treasure he had left behind. Three or four beautiful specimens floated in the bowl. It apparently had been a fairly dry, constipated shit, for all were fat, stiff, and ruggedly textured. The real prize was a great feast of turd -- a nine inch gastrointestinal triumph as thick as his cock -- or at least as I imagined it!

    I knelt before the bowl, inhaling the rich brown fragrance and wondered if I should obey the impulse building up inside me. I'd always been a liberal thinker and had been an Apple customer since 1984. Of course I'd had fantasies of meeting Jobs, sucking his cock and balls, not to mention sucking his asshole clean, but I never imagined I would have the chance. Now, here I was, confronted with the most beautiful five-pound turd I'd ever feasted my eyes on, a sausage fit to star in any fantasy and one I knew to have been hatched from the asshole of Steve Jobs, the chosen one.

    Why not? I plucked it from the bowl, holding it with both hands to keep it from breaking. I lifted it to my nose. It smelled like rich, ripe limburger (horrid, but thrilling), yet had the consistency of cheddar. What is cheese anyway but milk turning to shit without the benefit of a digestive tract?

    I gave it a lick and found that it tasted better then it smelled.

    I hesitated no longer. I shoved the fucking thing as far into my mouth as I could get it and sucked on it like a big half nigger cock, beating my meat like a madman, and thrusting my pink iPod Shuffle into my ass. I wanted to completely engulf it and bit off a large chunk, flooding my mouth with the intense, bittersweet flavor. To my delight I found that while the water in the bowl had chilled the outside of the turd, it was still warm inside. As I chewed I discovered that it was filled with hard little bits of something I soon identified as peanuts. He hadn't chewed them carefully and they'd passed through his body virtually unchanged. I ate it greedily, sending lump after peanutty lump sliding scratchily down my throat. My only regret was that Steve Jobs wasn't there to see my loyalty and wash it down with his piss.

    I soon reached a terrific climax. I caught my cum in the cupped palm of my hand and drank it down. Believe me, there is no more delightful combination of flavors than the hot sweetness of cum with the rich bitterness of shit. It's even better than reading an Apple press release!

    Afterwards I was sorry that I hadn't made it last longer. But then I realized that I still had a lot of fun in store for me. There was still a clutch of virile turds left in the bowl. I tenderly fished them out, rolled them into my handkerchief, and stashed them in my briefcase. In the week to come I found all kinds of ways to eat the shit without bolting it right down. Once eaten it's gone forever unless you want to filch it third hand out of your own asshole. Not an unreasonable recourse in moments of desperation or simple boredom.

    I stored the turds in the refrigerator when I was not using them but within a week they were all gone. The last one I held in my mouth without chewing, letting it slowly dissolve. I had liquid shit trickling down my throat for nearly four hours. I must have had six orgasms in the process.

    I often think of Steve Jobs dropping solid gold out of his sweet, pink asshole every day, never knowing what joy it could, and at least once did, bring to a grateful Apple customer.

    1. Re: Apple recycles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky bastard!

  3. I recycle turds by For+a+Free+Internet · · Score: -1

    I feel sick.

    --
    UNITE with the Campaign for a Free Internet because today, our future begins with tomorrow!
  4. Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by delt0r · · Score: 1, Interesting

    And they only spent 100M recovering the said gold. Bargain and twice the price

    --
    If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    1. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by The+Raven · · Score: 1

      Experimental program not instantly profitable? Say it isn't so!

      I'm sure they can improve the efficiency of the extraction process.

      --
      "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    2. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not everything is about making a profit. Sometimes the doing right thing for the environment is a price worth paying.
      I think that might have even been their whole idea with this, too...

    3. Re: Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Right for the environment? What chemical processes do they use? What amount of toxic chemicals are used? How does it compare to not chopping the gadgets up so they can sell more new shinies?

    4. Re: Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      Most likely, it's done with aqua regia.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    5. Re: Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Mashiki · · Score: 0

      Why make it hard? Apple doesn't mind if a company uses destructive methods to pull metals out of the ground, just use some good old mercury.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Sometimes the doing right thing for the environment is a price worth paying.

      right. and what do they do with the rest of the components - the ones that aren't made of gold? the ones that aren't worth using again?

    7. Re: Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better to compare it to how it would be to have to extract more out of the ground. One way or the other, the material will be used.
      Why not recycle it, rather than extract more from the earth.

    8. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't experimental. Electronic companies have been doing this for decades! Apple, like normal, are last to the table and pretend they're the first to come up with the idea. People like you fall for it every single time. What a bizarre world you must live in.

    9. Re: Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right for the environment? What chemical processes do they use? What amount of toxic chemicals are used? How does it compare to not chopping the gadgets up so they can sell more new shinies?

      It's actually far cheaper to extract precious metals and such from e-waste than to mine it from the earth. The reason is simple - e-waste has a higher concentration of the metals than raw ore. So it's far cheaper to extract from e-waste than it is pull it out of the ground. And since it's easier, it's also less damaging on the environment since less energy is used extracting the metals.

      It's is generally the case too. If Apple's robot pre-sorts the mateirals you can get even higher extraction rates and less energy use overall.

    10. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by zdzichu · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's the cost of following the law, being nice to environment is a side effect. Apple, as a device manufacturer is under *obligation* to recycle their phones, as long as they want to sell them in 700+ million market called Europe.
      Here is quick summary of ROHS 2002/95/EC and WEEE 2002/96/EC directives: https://lwn.net/Articles/68380...

      --
      :wq
    11. Re: Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      They didn't break even recovering the materials from the e-waste. The only way that failing to break even would be cheaper than just mining in the first place, would be for mining to be unprofitable. I can assure you, mining is profitable.

    12. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Sure - setup costs, but after a while capital equipment pays for itself.
      A testing place I used to work at recovered the silver from used photographic chemicals and it added up over time. Gold is potentially easier to recover in bulk since a lot of chemicals dissolve just about everything else leaving the gold behind. Using mercury makes it even easier to got the gold :)

    13. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is quick summary of ROHS 2002/95/EC and WEEE 2002/96/EC directives

      So this story more than a decade old? Is that a new low for this news site?

    14. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      This isn't experimental. Electronic companies have been doing this for decades! Apple, like normal, are last to the table and pretend they're the first to come up with the idea. People like you fall for it every single time. What a bizarre world you must live in.

      -citation needed-

      My understanding was that the companies were only doing this because government regulation in certain countries required them to. I would be interested in some sources to indicate who is recycling and since when. Promises that they are going to do something doesn't count.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    15. Re: Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Just curious, but is it still cheaper once shipping to countries where manufacturing takes place is factored in?

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    16. Re: Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Asha2004 · · Score: 1

      In the Netherlands some form of recycling electronics is obligatory since 1998. So even Apple must have been doing it since then. I don't know what apple is doing themselves now but there are many companies which specialize in the dismantling of electronics.

    17. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Afty0r · · Score: 0

      > Not everything is about making a profit.

      True, but if you're making a loss, that just means someone else (or you) is paying for the task. That means that eventually that money will run out, and you will have to stop doing the task. "Making a loss" is the financial equivalent of "Environmentally unstable" - you can do it for a while, maybe even a long time, but eventually have to stop doing it. And in the same way, people prefer to stop doing it NOW if it's anticipated to always make a loss, just like many people would prefer to stop burning fossil fuels now, rather than in a hundred years.

      So while your statement is technically true, everything *should* be about making a profit under the proviso that we put the right incentives in place - for example, preventing companies from externalising their costs onto the environment or communities.

    18. Re: Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Zumbs · · Score: 2

      Bulk shipping is extremely cheap. My uncle asked a guy working with international bulk shipping about the price, and was told that box with a pair of shoes cost less than half a US dollar to ship from Asia to Europe. That was ten years ago, but I have no reason to expect that it has gotten significantly more expensive since then.

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    19. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Afty0r · · Score: 1

      OOOPS! Should read:

      "Making a loss" is the financial equivalent of "Environmentally unsustainable"

    20. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not exactly a side effect when that's the entire point of the law.

    21. Re: Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      If only Apple had hired somebody on-staff who understood their job as thoroughly and completely as you do.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    22. Re: Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually far cheaper to extract precious metals and such from e-waste than to mine it from the earth. The reason is simple - e-waste has a higher concentration of the metals than raw ore. So it's far cheaper to extract from e-waste than it is pull it out of the ground.>

      The numbers in the article say you are completely wrong. It is far more expensive, hence the high cost and loss on extracting it. Your simple assumption does not factor in the process costs, as they are different. You can't assume they are the same. Oops.

    23. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Different thing. There's two existing approaches to recycling electronics

      1) Shred the electronics, then roughly sort the resulting shreds by magnets, density, size, optical properties, manual sorting etc.

      2) Ship it to a third world country where children will end up recycling by dismantling with hammers and open fires.

      Apple's approach is a new one. Because all the models they are recycling are there's and they know how they are constructed, they have robots reverse the process, unscrewing, unclipping and ungluing each part down to it's components. And they know exactly what's in each of those components, and the components can be recycles on mass.

      This is far more efficient than the other methods, better for the environment, and doesn't damage worker's health.

    24. Re: Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I think the main thing is that Apple is inusual in that they have both immense volumes and a very, very limited product range on a relatively large, expensive product. As a result they are probably one of the only cases where it's worth making a robot specifically to deal with dismantling one or a tiny range of different products.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    25. Re: Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Most of that "dismantling" is either with a shredder, or shipped to the third world for hammer and open fire recycling though.

    26. Re: Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can send a whole shipping container full of stuff between most countries not opposed from one another on the globe for around five grand. How many boxes of shoes can you get into a shipping container?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    27. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wait, you're serious?

      How about if you worked for a company that recycled the products they sold and deducted the costs of said recycling from employee paychecks? Every pay period with varying amounts of recycling costs.

      Yes, a pay cut.

      How long will that warm, fuzzy feeling last for you and the rest of your fellow employees?

    28. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, next year we will see the cast of "Gold Rush, 2.0" running the remains of shredded through their washplants.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    29. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by mi · · Score: 1

      Experimental program not instantly profitable? Say it isn't so!

      So, is the experiment a success in your opinion? They've extracted a total of about $52 million dollars worth of material for the cost of $100 million...

      Do you expect it to become profitable some time in the future?

      I'm sure they can improve the efficiency of the extraction process.

      They'll need to not just improve, but double it just to break even. That recycling is a fraud is increasingly obvious — even its cheerleaders have to cite consumers' liking products made from recycled materials to support claims, that it is profitable. Those with a totalitarian streak acknowledge, that without increasing government oppression (such as banning plastic bags in supermarkets) the recycling is too difficult and expensive.

      Apple is not doing it for (direct) profit. They expect clueless customers to feel better — and buy more — thus helping the profit indirectly.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    30. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Trump 2020: Bring Unmanufacturing Back to America!

      Sorry, the thought of Un-manufacturing things is pretty cool, but the bombardment of political ads made me go there...

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    31. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      That's the cost of following the law, being nice to environment is a side effect. Apple, as a device manufacturer is under *obligation* to recycle their phones, as long as they want to sell them in 700+ million market called Europe. Here is quick summary of ROHS 2002/95/EC and WEEE 2002/96/EC directives: https://lwn.net/Articles/68380...

      Others follow that law by sending their stuff to Africa or China. That's lower cost.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    32. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Experimental program not instantly profitable? Say it isn't so!

      So, is the experiment a success in your opinion? They've extracted a total of about $52 million dollars worth of material for the cost of $100 million.

      Actually, it was just a cost of $5,37. See I can pull numbers from your ass too.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    33. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      True, but if you're making a loss, that just means someone else (or you) is paying for the task. That means that eventually that money will run out, and you will have to stop doing the task.

      That's only true if the loss on the one task is larger than your entire profit.

      We recover $40 mil of gold, but at a cost of $100 mil. Okay, that's a loss on this one task. But what is that cost spread out over all those iPhones we recycled? Still a loss, but a small one per unit. Now remember that Apple is the only iPhone maker, so every one of those iPhones they recycled they also sold and made a profit on once upon a time. How much profit did they make from each iPhone back then? The loss of recycling the old iPhone is only a small niche out of the slice of profit pie from the device's initial sale.

      Apple gains good PR by the recycling program and what's more, by doing the recycling program Apple's impact on their profits with the action are lessened because they are recovering valuable precious metals for themselves in the process. You can think of the recycling program as a small "brand marketing" cost against their profits on the device this way.

    34. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by mi · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was just a cost of $5,37. See I can pull numbers from your ass too.

      The $100 mln figure appears in delt0r's post above. I now realize, he said "if". The actual number is likely much bigger, actually — otherwise Apple would've been glad to publish it...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    35. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by delt0r · · Score: 1

      And often recycling is *worse* for the environment. I don't know if this is, probably not for heavy metal reasons. But just assuming recycling is green is factually incorrect.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    36. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was just a cost of $5,37. See I can pull numbers from your ass too.

      The $100 mln figure appears in delt0r's post above. I now realize, he said "if". The actual number is likely much bigger, actually — otherwise Apple would've been glad to publish it...

      Yeah, sorry, it was only $3,49. Stop making up stuff, boy.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    37. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by zdzichu · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if Apple send their stuff to China, the recipient would be Apple. They are manufactures from start to end of chain, they have noone to offload recycling to.

      --
      :wq
    38. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by mi · · Score: 1
      In the absence of actual data, speculating is perfectly justified. And it is not my laziness — Apple is playing the cards close to chest. From a rather laudatory article about Apple:

      Apple declined to comment on how much it cost to build Liam.

      Ask yourself why?... The same article adds:

      While Liam makes up the entire system, its 29 robotic helpers do the handy work. [...] It's clear this is a well-oiled operation; after all, it took years to perfect

      Do you honestly believe, this required less than a $100 mln dollar initial investment? The 30 robots plus facility itself cost more — not counting the research, that has gone into it. For comparison, Intel's new chip-making plant in Arizona cost $5 bln just to build — fifty times more... Maybe, now that they have it, the marginal costs of running it can be paid off by the extracted materials themselves? Maybe... But, if this were actually true — or even close to being true — Apple would've been the first to point it out. For it would've looked much better to both the customers and the investors than the current secrecy.

      Stop making up stuff, boy.

      Talk decent, young lady, or you'll find yourself conversing with a mirror...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    39. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      So you make up stuff based on truthiness. Big news - in lack of evidence people often make errors of several orders of magnitude, mostly because their brain is dazed with hatred.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    40. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by mi · · Score: 1
      Speculation is not "making stuff up" — it is perfectly valid to inquire, how much they've spent and, in the absence of a clear answer, attempt to estimate.

      You've now missed the third chance to offer your own estimates or explain, why mine are incorrect. This confirms, you aren't arguing here in good faith. I shall not continue. *Plonk*...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    41. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      "Speculation" based on false premises and massively over-estimated numbers is fucking making stuff up. Stop it.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    42. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      What the fuck, do you actually believe an industrial robot costs several million bucks a piece? Every year? What does the cost of a production facility (ignoring that it is in a barely related industry) have to do with the cost of a recycling facility? A junk yard cost orders of magnitude less than a car plant.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    43. Re:Missing Detail: Cost of Extraction by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I would be interested in some sources to indicate who is recycling and since when.

      I was triaging computers (well, signal conditioner I/O cards, and boards from backplane systems) for "repair" or "recycle" back in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Because we could not get replacements, and the "new wonderful" system was 3 years overdue. The recycling company paid more if we levered the chips out of their sockets and bagged the stripped boards separately from the cards.

      The day that one of our technicians attended a barn sale somewhere in Nebraska and acquired a hundred or so 8-channel chart recorder units extended the global lifetime of that system by at least 2 years, or a couple of thousand man-years.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  5. This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    hate us.

    1. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And want us to die.

    2. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why dez apez uz so much

    3. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And rape.

    4. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Support of rape proves Cook is one of those Republicans.

    5. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the fact he pays roving teams of hateful republicans to cut homeless people up into pieces.

    6. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of Cook's hires just cut my friend here in Seattle up into prices.

    7. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how those those people be.

    8. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Cook supports those rapes.

    9. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not allowed to support a corporation on the US without supporting rape.

    10. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of doez pukianz port ape.

    11. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dey aped me so hard. So hard.

    12. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. US tax law requires rape.

    13. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama supports ape cox hez pukianz.

    14. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. US law requires supporting rape.

    15. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bammy hatez uz. He sports those pukianz aping uz.

    16. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They setup play dates with fellow rapists.

    17. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cook wants me to be raped. That is why I hate him. People that don't want me to be raped are hateful. I know people here disagree with that.

    18. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was introduced to sex through rape. Cook is right that that isn't so bad.

    19. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife, who wouldn't have sex with me, was correct in that having some random man rape me would change my life for the better.

    20. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too.

    21. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He supported my rape.

    22. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm gay so they actually beat me near death. That's becuz der pukianz.

    23. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As he said, let's go out and make this shit happen.

    24. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cook hates us.

    25. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how Bush be. He hates is all which is why the Bush Crime Family raped more tha 200 million people.

    26. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a woman that never wanted to have sex but the Bush family encouraged my husband to rape me.

    27. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After they all raped me, I became a Democrat.

    28. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should drown rapists, but those rapists won't allow it.

    29. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is how their kind be.

    30. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cook is one of those Republicans.

    31. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They cause crime by flooding the streets with guns.

    32. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cook has screwed up so bad that a white man has trouble running for president now.

    33. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all became Hillary supporters through rape.

    34. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they raped me I became a Jessie Jackson supporter.

    35. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Commodores support us Republican rape victims.

    36. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their kind got more votes but the party still voted to rape us.

    37. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was the Four Tops agreed too then screw those whites.

    38. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My girl.

    39. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not this year. They raped us other years, but not this year.

    40. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get your own bag.

    41. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He hates us.

    42. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cook doesn't believe of our own volition.

    43. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. He be racists.

    44. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wives never have sex with us, but they want us tone raped by black males.

    45. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jackson supports that.

    46. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us thought we'd see something else.

    47. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a real sadness to fucking who Cook tells us to fuck.

    48. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Of Cook got me pregnant like he did my friend, I'd get an abortion.

    49. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cook sucked my penis like he was a baby and my penis was a bottle.

    50. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Cook has so much hate.

    51. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well he does hate men.

    52. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would one of us women have that sex?

    53. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And us Democrats stand against that sex.

    54. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This beauz non of us women accept that rape

    55. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why didn't they address my butthole?

    56. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dis but I'm gpnna sweat again

    57. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I anted to bring it so I accepted the rape.

    58. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my twenties I had so much hope after meeting Cook. I was stupid then.

    59. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Datz how dey b.

    60. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Az der kindz be.

    61. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Two birds.

    62. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obammyz doesn't cog ize dis

    63. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Men love sex, but women hate it.

    64. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For most relationships women say no, but those men force us to.

    65. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because men hate us.

    66. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be

    67. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humanity wouldn't have survived of it wasn't for rape.

    68. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because he anus.

    69. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was perhaps lied to.

    70. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They hate Wacky Shirley's.

    71. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want 2 die now.

    72. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tim Cook should be grounded.

    73. Re: This just proves those Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Women hate sex.

  6. troy ounce by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    The troy ounce (oz t) is a unit of imperial measure, now commonly used to measure the mass (weight, in common parlance) of precious metals. One troy ounce is defined as exactly 31.1034768 g, which may be used to denote the value of a precious metal.

    so that's about $39,539 (USD) per kilogram of gold.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:troy ounce by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

      Accually, right now it $39.+change/g. aint metal cool? and holds its value!

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    2. Re:troy ounce by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

      Yes! Its Friday! Yes! We said the same thing. Yes! I've been drinking. Yes! Just YES! I have a chemist friend who says there is some magical chemical I can use to pull the plating off of all this hardware, but I'll have to give up all this wonderful 20 year old tech to do it...... I still haven't decided.... I'll use it someday.

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    3. Re:troy ounce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should watch Cody's Lab on youtube, he did a few videos on how to extract gold from PCBs. Long story short: the amount present/recoverable from gold plating is tiny, and the work and chemicals cost more than the gold recovered.

  7. Not to confuse with the avoirdupois ounce by DavidMZ · · Score: 2

    The troy ounce is about 10% heavier (ratio 192/175) than the avoirdupois ounce, used for everyday purposes in the United States, which equals 28.349523125 g.

    Interestingly, the wikipedia page continues with:

    Troy ounces are still often used in precious metal markets in countries that otherwise use the metric system

    Whereas the French page says it is in use mainly in English-speaking countries for precious metals. Yet, in a funny twist of history:

    The name "troy" is first attested in 1390. Though it is often connected to a fair at the city of Troyes, France, this story may have been invented in the 18th century.

    Of course, the French page does not say anything about the story being apocryphal.

    1. Re:Not to confuse with the avoirdupois ounce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it was invented by Helen and Menelaos when they weighed the treasure they pillaged from the Trojans.

  8. An iPhone recyling robot named Liam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my god. Can we mass-produce those and let them roam the streets? This could be a society changer. Pull out a phone in public at your own peril.

  9. Goldbugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All part of the plan for establishing an Apple Central Bank with its own currency backed by gold.

  10. Yes ... but by dbIII · · Score: 1

    A lot of the gold being produced today is in ores containing other metals such as copper, silver and uranium.

  11. Apple's Computer Recycling Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently decided to update my 8 year-old laptop with one of their new three-year old models, and checked the "I'd like to recycle my old computer" box, figuring it'd save me something like $45 compared to bringing it to the local recycling center. The site said I was supposed to get a box in which to return the computer, which didn't arrive with the laptop.

    Apple sent me an eMail asking about my experience with my "mac" (phrasing which violates their own trademark policy), but haven't responded to my inquiry yet. This is the first time I've bought an Apple product seeing that option; the last time I bought an Apple product was the 2006 Mac Mini. Is this just a phantom option, or was this a fluke?

    As an aside: Slashdot people, you're setting the background on input boxes (like this comment box) as white (#fff) but not setting the text colour. Because my version of FireFox for whatever reason refuses to use anything but GNome's/GTKs settings, that means I've got white on white without using firebug to remove the background rule.

  12. Seems high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't this number sound a little high? They've recovered 61 million pounds of material?
    Older iphones weighed about 5 ounces, so let's say 3 phones per pound.
    This means they've recycled 183 million iphones?

    How many iphones actually get recycled? I know I still have all of mine (actually my kids have them)

    I'm calling BS

    1. Re:Seems high by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Doesn't this number sound a little high? They've recovered 61 million pounds of material? Older iphones weighed about 5 ounces, so let's say 3 phones per pound. This means they've recycled 183 million iphones?

      How many iphones actually get recycled? I know I still have all of mine (actually my kids have them)

      I'm calling BS

      What makes you think this is only iPhones? Didn't you even read the whole summary?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  13. Its about removing used phones from market by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Its not just about greening Apple's image and making customers feel good. It is also about removing used phones from the market. To interfere with a secondary market (used) that is competing with the primary market (new).

  14. Another missing detail: Secondary Market by perpenso · · Score: 1

    And they only spent 100M recovering the said gold. Bargain and twice the price

    Your missing something. Apple's 100M effort to remove used phones from the secondary market (used) in order to reduce competition for the primary market (new) is subsidized to the amount of 40M by recycling the phones removed from the market. Plus there is a further subsidy through public relations and brand image from the greening this program offers.

    And the upcoming robotic disassembly may yield to more efficient recycling/recovery than shredding and other current methods.