Slashdot Mirror


Open365 Is An Open Source Alternative to Microsoft Office 365 (open365.io)

Martin Brinkmann, writing for Ghacks: Open365 is an open source Office 365 alternative that allows you to edit or create documents online, and to sync files with the cloud. The service is in beta currently but you can sign up for it already on the official website. You may use it using a web browser, download clients for Windows, Mac or Linux desktop machines, or for Android. An iOS client is in the making currently and will be made available as well soon. Open 365 offers two main features that you can make use of. First, it enables you to synchronize files between devices you use and the cloud. Second, it allows you to view, edit and create documents in the cloud using the technology provided by the Open Source Office suite LibreOffice Online for that.

144 comments

  1. Open 365 is LUDDITE SOFTWARE. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Modern app appers use APPS to app apps, NOT LUDDITE SOFTWARE like Open 365!

    Apps!

  2. What problem does this solve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOT installing an Office Suite on your PC, which either came with Office Lite or whatever, or you're using a corporate PC which has Office?

    Hint: Nobody creates spreadsheets on their phone.

    1. Re:What problem does this solve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hint: Nobody creates spreadsheets on their phone.

      Ok, but opening and reading spreadsheets and documents is rather common when on the go.

    2. Re:What problem does this solve? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Most devices support reading office files by themselves anyways. Office 360 give you the ability to edit those files. Where such office tools were never designed for touchscreen usage. The UI had just been hacked for functionality.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:What problem does this solve? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Informative

      Alternative to Google Docs and Microsoft Office. These days we use nothing but Google Docs internally, and a select few of us use Microsoft Office to write docs that interface with the outside world.

      If it does multi-person realtime collaboration (which Google Docs does) I'll probably check it out.

    4. Re:What problem does this solve? by houstonbofh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Collaboration... And easy way to work on documents together without having to install additional software. A conference call discussing the scope of work document while you all work in it can make a several week process into a one hour process.

    5. Re:What problem does this solve? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      I edit them as well. Having stage 4 CKD, I keep a detailed log of medication taken and blood pressure. Google sheets is quite useful for this on my Nexus 6P.

      I also created a spreadsheet to track weight loss goals, and I used the Harris-Benedict equation to figure out calorie goals as weight changed. It worked, by the way.

    6. Re:What problem does this solve? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "I also created a spreadsheet to track weight loss goals, and I used the Harris-Benedict equation to figure out calorie goals as weight changed. It worked, by the way."

      Shouldn't you change your handle from ArmoredDragon to ArmoredLizzard then? :-)

    7. Re: What problem does this solve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm...I do. My spreadsheet for fuel consumption was created on my phone

    8. Re:What problem does this solve? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      >> Why would anyone use Google Docs for anything more advanced than a shopping list?

      Multiple devices. Collaboration - you can actually see where other people are looking on a doc and they can make changes in real time. Instant and frictionless sharing - what you share IS the doc, not a link to a download.

      To me, it's a question of why would use use Microsoft Office for anything other final editions meant to be shared (in Office format) with the outside world?

    9. Re:What problem does this solve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Google Wave was so successful.

    10. Re:What problem does this solve? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      lawl. Actually it's a reference to my Army MOS, 19D.

    11. Re:What problem does this solve? by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone use Google Docs for anything more advanced than a shopping list? It seems a glitchy, simplistic, insecure alternative to MS Office.

      Because it's none of those things and you're just making shit up with no factual basis.

      It does probably 90% of what Microsoft Office does, and 100% of what the vast majority of people need. Formulas, formatting, import/export, graphs, you can plug apps into it, versioning, collaboration, etc etc etc. 99% of people don't need all the power of Excel.

    12. Re:What problem does this solve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Multi-Column Sort? Nah, who needs shit like that?

    13. Re:What problem does this solve? by Coren22 · · Score: 1
      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    14. Re:What problem does this solve? by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      To me, it's a question of why would use use Microsoft Office for anything other final editions meant to be shared (in Office format) with the outside world?

      An even better practice would be to have the final document rendered to PDF.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  3. Why do I need cloud for my Office? by jellomizer · · Score: 0

    I am not a cloud hater, there are some big advantages to the cloud. However for Office Tools I see no real benefit.
    Our Computers are fast enough to handle them (even low end devices). Besides Office Tools should be available in an offline mode anyways.
    Microsoft 360 offers no real benefit to the end user except for Microsoft so people keep paying for the service. Vs. Getting a copy and using it for as long as it will work on their systems.
    If you want cloud for your office tool. use Google Drive.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Why do I need cloud for my Office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like you don't know what Office 365 is. That's OK, it is very common for people to think, "Oh, that is those web apps". That would be incorrect though. The web apps are only a small portion. Office 365 (depending on the license) varies from the 5 license home version that gives you 5 installs on PC and 5 installs on phone / tablet along with 1 TB of storage for each of up to five users. Notice I said installs. Yes, it is the full install of office and it of course works offline. When you start talking enterprise licenses they come with Exchange online, Yammer, Delve, etc. too.

    2. Re:Why do I need cloud for my Office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh Tay, what have they done to you?

    3. Re:Why do I need cloud for my Office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm happy to pay $69/year for which I get access to most office apps including outlook excel and word (one notable app missing is visio since I'm subscribed to office personal edition). I get both offline and online access to the apps, 1TB of OneDrive space and 60 monthly skype minutes Canada/US wide. I need the skype minutes and I find ways of making use of the 1TB of space, well worth it from my point of view.

    4. Re:Why do I need cloud for my Office? by SQLGuru · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I pay $99 for 5 instances of all of that and consider it well worth it. 5 installs of Office. 5TB of cloud storage. 5 hours of Skype minutes. etc. I consider it the second best deal in tech....Amazon Prime being the first.

    5. Re:Why do I need cloud for my Office? by hazem · · Score: 1

      However for Office Tools I see no real benefit.

      I generally agree with this - I really prefer to work offline and have my documents stored locally. However, in a couple of my classes, teams of students often use the online Google Docs. The main benefit here is that multiple people can synchronously edit the document. It's weird to watch, but it's particularly helpful during online meetings where we're working together on a document. The changes are made live and any of us can make the changes. Or when working on a presentation, we can all be working on the same document but different slides.

      In this case it's better than "Great, I'll make those changes and email the updated copy to everyone by the end of the day."

    6. Re:Why do I need cloud for my Office? by darkain · · Score: 1

      Google Voice. Unlimited free calling to US/Canada. So that negates the whole Skype minutes thing.

    7. Re:Why do I need cloud for my Office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it's "unlimited and free", so there must be such a thing as a free lunch! Could Microsoft decrypt secure communications if necessitated by law? Maybe, but Google's business is monetizing user data on their services. That's not necessarily a bad thing, I use GMail and I don't care that they are scraping my emails for advertising purposes but lets not pretend a paid, encrypted service is the same as one where the content of your calls are being used as the revenue generator.

    8. Re:Why do I need cloud for my Office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WAT? Why do so many people think prime is a good deal? $10/mo for marginally faster shipping those few times a year you actually order something from Amazon. Ohh, best deal in tech ... not.

      I usually only make 3-4 Amazon orders / year, and I don't bother to pay for 2-day shipping because it's still not worth it, even though it would cost only a small fraction of a year of Prime.

      p.s. Inb4 you blabber about streaming video: Sorry, do not want.

    9. Re:Why do I need cloud for my Office? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      If you are signed up to Amazon Prime, you get a selection of streaming video for free too.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    10. Re:Why do I need cloud for my Office? by jon3k · · Score: 1

      I'm not promoting Office 365 or Google Docs but the advantages to a web based office suite seem pretty obvious to me. No software to install or update, accessible from anywhere with real time collaboration. But for the average user, I think the biggest thing is no more lost files to usual hard drive failure or virus. Buy a new computer? No problem, login to the website and there are all your files.

      I really wish there was a REAL, native, web-based alternative to Google and Microsoft.

    11. Re:Why do I need cloud for my Office? by jon3k · · Score: 1

      I like how you assume everyone is just like you and only orders 3-4 times a year from Amazon.

      I order 3-4 times a month from Amazon. I haven't been into a Wal-Mart in years. Couldn't be happier.

    12. Re:Why do I need cloud for my Office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure you know what "free" means.

  4. We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If there's one thing that should be clear by now, it's that normal users and advanced users don't want to use web-based UIs! They always give an inferior experience to native apps, regardless of the platform.

    Most of mobile's success is because of native apps, not because of web apps. And the native apps that have been implemented as wrappers around locally-running web apps have generally been disliked by users.

    People don't use services like GMail or Google Docs or Office 365 or Dropbox or Facebook because of the web UIs. They use them in spite of the web UIs! They want the unlimited email storage, or the ease of sharing files, or the ease of sharing private/personal info with advertisers.

    This is where the web technology advocates really strike out. Users don't use web apps because they want to; they use them because they want the back-end service, and there's often not a native client provided. When native clients are provided, we typically see users opting to use them instead of the shitty web front ends.

    1. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just as long as the Web UI loads fast and is easy to use most people are OK with it.
      Microsoft in general sucks major in making Web Apps, they just don't get it. I actually prefer gmail myself and don't bother with a mail client app.

      However if the application doesn't need internet connection we don't necessarily need a web app for it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by NotInHere · · Score: 4, Funny

      Says the guy posting to a web discussion site.

    3. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by evolutionary · · Score: 2

      There is some truth in what you say here. And there are very valid points. If I had points I'd give you at least one. But for a admin perspective this has advantages. It might be interesting if the fonts you mentioned became more standardized on the web. I can see people (like me) trying this out. I tell people to avoid google docs in business (and office 360 even more so, did the math, $120/year, WAY more expensive than purchasing after 3 years, which if you have to upgrade/replace you have to explain yourself to MS to get your office application back. You get screwed either way. As for storage space, it's SO cheap now. My argument against all those cloud services is the data is not really yours once it's out there. Agreements are "interesting", especially if you are in a country other than the USA (good like with that) and the US government says any data in it's territory (or even an American OS (MS Windows) in a weird case in Ireland), they own the data. I like real programs too. Don't get me wrong. It would be cool to make more use of web (internal) services for managing users in business though. Version upgrades are always a minor pain to maintain.

      --
      "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    4. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by DogDude · · Score: 1

      The problem you're describing is solved by the Windows Phone. That's why I use one.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    5. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

      If there's one thing that should be clear by now, it's that normal users and advanced users don't want to use web-based UIs! They always give an inferior experience to native apps, regardless of the platform.

      Most people want more then one tool in the toolbox. Native apps are not the best for distributed use. Personally, I want a choice.

      People don't use services like GMail or Google Docs or Office 365 or Dropbox or Facebook because of the web UIs. They use them in spite of the web UIs! They want the unlimited email storage, or the ease of sharing files, or the ease of sharing private/personal info with advertisers.

      You know that Google allows you to use almost all of it's services with whatever app you choose? I have two gmail accounts and I use Thunderbird. This allowing of user choice is one reason they do so well. (Even if they did totally screw up imap...)

      This is where the web technology advocates really strike out. Users don't use web apps because they want to; they use them because they want the back-end service, and there's often not a native client provided. When native clients are provided, we typically see users opting to use them instead of the shitty web front ends.

      And these guys offer a native client as well. But when you want several people working on the same document, it has to be non-local for someone.

    6. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      So, the native clients mentioned in the summary should be the killer app then?

      Or, do you think they're using non-standard terminology there?

      Took a look at the site to try and figure that out but didn't really see an answer...

    7. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Discussions naturally have latency. This is not work.

    8. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wondered who was using the one.

    9. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you are a weirdo, it's clear most people use web services and like them

    10. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      Actually, Google *doesn't* allow you to use any service on any platform you want. They've actively blocked efforts to make some of those services be available on Windows Phone......in spite of allowing the exact same technique be used on another platform (YouTube....WP vs iOS).

    11. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by TheReaperD · · Score: 0

      The problem you're describing is solved by the Windows Phone.

      Over my cold, dead body...

      --
      "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    12. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by freeze128 · · Score: 3, Funny

      If everyone had the discussion board installed locally, then it really wouldn't be much of a discussion, would it?

    13. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      Well there is the place whose rule 1 is to not talk about it...

    14. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by DogDude · · Score: 1

      They're the only mobile device maker with good native functionality. iOS and Android are both a mess, when it comes to this stuff.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    15. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      People don't use services like GMail or... because of the web UIs. They use them in spite of the web UIs!

      There are an unlimited number of native POP/IMAP email clients that you can use for gmail. Which one do you personally use? Or is your argument limited to mobile or touch devices only? If you're talking about checking email on your phone or tablet, then yes, I totally agree with you. Native apps are so much better on mobile devices.

      That being said, if your argument is about using gmail on desktops or laptops, I have to wonder why you're not using a native client on those. Or are you?

    16. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Gmail and Dropbox have web UIs? I use Gmail over IMAP/SMTP and Dropbox over its native service. Hell, even my Google Docs use is pretty much entirely by means of the Android app. Web UIs are for when a native implementation is not feasible, such as when you want to access you mail from a computer you don't control. Otherwise they're usually so inferior that they don't compare.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    17. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      And these guys offer a native client as well. But when you want several people working on the same document, it has to be non-local for someone.

      The document does, but not the application. Not to mention, there's no inherent reason a "cloud" should be required: you could have a direct connection between the clients instead.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    18. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People don't use services like GMail or Google Docs or Office 365 or Dropbox or Facebook because of the web UIs. They use them in spite of the web UIs!

      I like that, you would not believe the number of 'web gurus' I've worked with over the years into whose foreheads I'd just love to carve that phrase..
      .

    19. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      Well, sure it would. It would basically be an IRC client.

    20. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Most of the people I share documents with are not in the building. If they were I would walk over and look at it on one screen.

    21. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Actually, Google *doesn't* allow you to use any service on any platform you want.

      Never said platform... The fact that your phone does not run the things needed for Youtube is not google's problem. But you can watch youtube videos with more then just the google web page. And you can use many different programs for gmail, or google voice, or google maps, or ... You get the point.

    22. Re: We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what? no, there are lots of native iOS and Android office suites....

    23. Re: We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not here, everyone likes native apps. but usually the native app is a privacy nightmare or insecure... thus they are stuck using the web app

    24. Re: We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > there are lots of native ... Android office suites....

      Including Microsoft's, which allegedly* is better than the WP version.

      * No one has tried it to find out the actual answer because they are using several other office suites.

    25. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      People don't use services like GMail or Google Docs or Office 365 or Dropbox or Facebook because of the web UIs.

      Actually, Office365 isn't a web UI. Microsoft gives users native Office - you can install full Office on up to I think 2 PCs at the basic level (Windows or Mac), one tablet and one smartphone. These are native office apps running locally. You can also use the web UI if you want to quickly edit something without syncing it, opening Word/Excel/etc and then syncing it back.

      And the office that is a part of Office 386 is the same as the regular version, just it doesn't expire. (This has caused a few issues with users of Office 365 who install the regular version of Office.)

      The mobile apps are read-only and require an Office 365 subscription to enable writing.

    26. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > They've actively blocked efforts to make some of those services be available on Windows Phone

      Google blocked the Windows Phone app that deliberately broke Google's terms of service. The service is still available on WP just not through that particular app.

    27. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by Agripa · · Score: 2

      Odd. My local email client works better than any web based discussion board and supports much better organized discussions than any web forum.

    28. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't installed it yet as I'm not home, but they have a downloadable client. I'm hoping it's pretty much openoffice with built-in cloud saving. If it works this way, it solves the 'I hate web UIs' thing on some scale, at least.

    29. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      What does that have to do with anything? By "direct connection" I mean peer-to-peer over the Internet -- you know, without a "cloud service" middleman. I don't mean literally direct as in on the same network segment without so much as a hub between.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    30. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    31. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by czert · · Score: 1

      If there's one thing that should be clear by now, it's that normal users and advanced users don't want to use web-based UIs!

      Wrong. I am an advanced user an I *love* the UI of google spreadsheets. Sure, I'm not a fan of web-based apps in general, and a lot of the usual drawbacks apply here too, but man, the UI is so much better that I don't care that it wastes so much RAM and is slow as hell. It's still a pleasure to work with, which I could never say about Excel or OO Calc.

    32. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by ray-auch · · Score: 1

      No cloud is required - MS office collaborative editing also works via any SharePoint server. In fact think it was available on-premise before cloud.

      Also, the technology it is based on originally _was_ peer-to-peer - look up Groove and Ray Ozzie.
      Groove was actually really good, MS have unfortunately made it a lot worse since.

    33. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      Office 365 is great. It's good to see OSS try something similar. With O365 you get the ability to use BOTH local and web based apps. With office 365 you can use the web AND outlook to access email. You can install local versions of office AND use web based versions if you are not at YOUR computer. Now this depends on the package you sign up for but is an option. Also you get free upgrades and Non-profits get email for FREE. It's really a good deal for a lot of companies. It really gets rid of a lot of licensing hassles as well although those were of Microsoft's doing.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    34. Re:We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      Really? That really only works if people have static IPs and never move around. Otherwise you will still need some software or service that everyone connects to to keep track of who is who which kind of negates the whole peer to peer thing. You will need at least your OWN server. The point of the cloud is to move maintenance and upgrade costs into subscription costs which are easier to budget for. You don't need to worry about your server crashing and not having a backup or waiting for a restore, or worse yet using a peer to peer model where you are entirely dependent on the health and maintenance of someone's personal computer to store data. Not good. The other benefit of cloud based services is regulation. There is increasing regulation in the IT world and not having to worry about all the compliance issues because the cloud company has regular audits and certifications makes life a lot easier for smaller companies who would otherwise have to spend a lot of money to get these audits done. Using a peer to peer model is virtually impossible if you require compliance to any regulation.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    35. Re: We don't want web UIs! We want native apps! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      cool you can post from your native slashdot app like that

  5. What about Google Docs? by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Seems like this is a closer equivalent to that than Office 365....

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  6. Not really a 100% replacement by NotInHere · · Score: 0

    Office runs natively inside the browser, without the hassle to download custom software. Open365 requires a custom client to download.

    My guess is they integrated libreoffice into NPAPI or PepperAPI and then ship the whole thing as the client together with a browser. That's not an 100% replacement of office 365 where you don't have to download custom blobs you have to fully trust. Office 365 is at least confined to the browser sandbox. And yes its all open source so at least you can audit it, but that doesn't help if there is a vulnerability in libreoffice and you get exploited. Office 365 uses the Web APIs and their sandboxing technology, which is very advanced and secure in comparison.

    No Microsoft shill here, I'd love to see an OSS alternative to Office 365, but I hope that they set some priorities right.

    1. Re:Not really a 100% replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm running LibreOffice Writer in my browser (Chrome on a Debian 8 workstation) right now, served up from the Open365 beta app (just signed up), and I have not installed the (optional) native client. Did you make a bunch of bold assertions without any actual experience regarding the target of your assertions? -PCP

    2. Re:Not really a 100% replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The downloadable client is only for syncing files with your local computer (like dropbox). You can run the full suite in the browser.

    3. Re:Not really a 100% replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Microsoft shill here...

      Don't you know how Slashdot works? Now that you've said this, it doubles the chances you'll be labeled as a shill.

    4. Re:Not really a 100% replacement by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      I haven't tried it myself just had read through its (rather small) website. And I saw download links for client software. So I assumed you would require this to access the private cloud. Seems I was wrong. Thanks for correcting!

    5. Re: Not really a 100% replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      training the shill there? you must be Microsoft shill supervisor

  7. Is it compatible with Office 365? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it at least 99.9999% compatible with Office 365? Because if it isn't then it just won't be an option for many users, especially business users (which is where the big bucks are).

  8. My Cloud = by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My NAS, and my safe in my house filled with LTO-3 tapes, completely under my control.

    What am I missing??

    1. Re: My Cloud = by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Disaster recovery. Collaboration. Probably remote access.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:My Cloud = by omnichad · · Score: 1

      So install Open 365 on your home network and host it completely under your control.

    3. Re: My Cloud = by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Disaster recovery. Collaboration. Probably remote access.

      Of course, he is not alone in missing that... :)

  9. Cool, let's host our own server by evolutionary · · Score: 1

    I'm reading things like "no real benefit" but in terms of maintenance the benefit is HUGE. Yes we could all install libreoffice and dozens (or hundreds) of workstations but it's a PAIN to upgrade when new versions pass testing. This is much better from a computer/network administrator's point of view. I had been looking to in other solutions with a similar approach, but looks like it could be more straight forward. As for Office 360, do we REALLY want to be sending private data to MS. I prefer this. I already tell people to keep Windows 10 to keep their privacy, yet getting people off Google Docs was a bit of an effort. Possible this will help fix that.

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    1. Re:Cool, let's host our own server by kwzombie · · Score: 2

      It's not a pain to upgrade when you use patch management software like Ninite Pro. (unfortunately it isn't free, but it's not super duper expensive either) Don't forget also, that a lot of countries have data residency laws.. so depending on what kind of data your employees are working on, it may be illegal to use a cloud-based solution if it is hosted outside the country/trade block.

    2. Re:Cool, let's host our own server by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget also, that a lot of countries have data residency laws.. so depending on what kind of data your employees are working on, it may be illegal to use a cloud-based solution if it is hosted outside the country/trade block.

      Fortunately they already thought of this.

      Open365 is 100% open source. You can download it and deploy to your own servers or use it online for free.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  10. Office365 Haiku by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Thin clients are back
    But your browser is bloated
    How does it fit?

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re:Office365 Haiku by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thin clients are back
      But your browser is bloated
      How does it fit?

      Burma shave

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Office365 Haiku by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      You win a free internet for today!

      --
      C|N>K
    3. Re:Office365 Haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Viewing the thread now...
      Best Novel Comment Ever!
      Coffee in my keys.

    4. Re:Office365 Haiku by fibonacci8 · · Score: 2

      Thin clients are back
      But your browser is bloated
      How does it all fit?

      Your haiku was missing a syllable.

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    5. Re:Office365 Haiku by drew_kime · · Score: 2

      I count all the words
      But I can't fit the whole thought
      Into so few syllables.

      God dammit.

      --
      Nope, no sig
    6. Re:Office365 Haiku by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

      Thin clients are back

      But your browser is bloated

      How does it all fit?

      Your haiku was missing a syllable.

      This is Slashdot. Don't expect quality.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  11. Odd 365 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Most companies I've seen going to Office 365 are primarily for Outlook with the bonus of removing the horror that is administering Exchange on-prem. Editing Word docs from a browser is a nice to have, albeit sometimes it relapses into a training issue, e.g. teaching mom where her document went.

  12. Software as a Service avoids open source benefits by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Free software foundation has written a recommended piece as to why you should avoid software as a service and that "open source" software as a service in no way protects users freedom or privacy. Online services should only be used when you want to share information with others. When you are working on data for your own use, their is no point in using software as a service, you give up rights when you do so.

    http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.en.html

  13. Use with OwnCloud by Cornwallis · · Score: 1

    I understood the main gain from this was to set up your own OC server and run it with that.

  14. I'm in but.... by rizole · · Score: 1

    ...it's running like a dog. I wonder if it's a good old fashioned slashdotting. Haven't seen one of them a round here for some time.

    1. Re:I'm in but.... by gosand · · Score: 1

      Same here... I signed up, but things started crawling. Was able to upload a doc via the mobile app, then tried to share a link to it. It couldn't send an email, said to contact my administrator. So I went into the email client, it really started dragging. Started to compose an email to see if it would send.... and got "You are experiencing unsteady internet connectivity. Please check your network access." There is nothing wrong with MY access, I think their site is struggling because now I can't connect at all.

      I do use office365 for work, but mainly to check my calendar or email quickly if I don't want to bother RDPing into my laptop. It still isn't very quick though.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    2. Re:I'm in but.... by servo335 · · Score: 1

      email portion is already broken that didnt take long

  15. Re:Software as a Service avoids open source benefi by bigdady92 · · Score: 0

    I have never seen "Software as a Service" used that many times in one post before. Do you get paid per usage?

    Stallman is that you?

    --
    Wheel of Time: Book by Book and Sumview (summary review) Bigdady92 style: http://bigdady92.blogspot.com/
  16. ChromeChromeChromeChrome by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Dear developers: Please ensure your site is functional in browsers other than Chrome.
    I first noticed the odd animation on https://open365.io/ on Pale Moon, so I checked it in all the browsers I have installed.

    Chrome shows it as it's intended (I assume)
    Pale Moon shows the animation but it's not as smooth as in Chrome
    Mozilla shows it as a herky jerky mess that eats up your CPU
    IE (11, latest version on Windows 7) doesn't even render the background properly

    I wouldn't dare to load it up in the pre-4.4 Android browser (Dolphin?).

  17. 5 terrabytes of cloud storage by ljw1004 · · Score: 3, Informative

    What sold me on Office365 is that for the $99/year I get 5 terrabytes of cloud storage in OneDrive - 1 terabyte each for me and 4 others.

    It's enough for me to keep all my photos over the decades, my 200GB music collection, and for the past five years I've been "taping" some internet radio stations 24/7 and keep them online too.

    Very happy camper.

    1. Re:5 terrabytes of cloud storage by somenickname · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They are no longer your photos, music, etc. Now they belong to Microsoft and they can revoke your ability to use them whenever they want and for whatever reason they want. "The cloud" is not a long term storage medium.

    2. Re:5 terrabytes of cloud storage by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Until your ISP caps your IP traffic so you can only access a fraction of that 1 TB per month.

    3. Re:5 terrabytes of cloud storage by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      They are no longer your photos, music, etc. Now they belong to Microsoft and they can revoke your ability to use them whenever they want and for whatever reason they want. "The cloud" is not a long term storage medium.

      Maybe not, but it's proven more reliable than the software RAID1 hard disk plus external hard drive that I was using on my OpenSUSE basement server previously. That server sort of ground to a halt, maybe because of a fan issue. I recovered data off one of the disks, took more backups, bought a new server, and that one worked fine for two years until it too failed. This time I wasn't able to recover a large chunk of my taped radio material. I tried switching to Windows for my server, hoping its "Storage Spaces" would be a good fit, but it was more awkward to administer remotely than OpenSUSE so I gave up.

      In summary: Microsoft's offering has been cheaper and less risky than when I did it myself.

      I first used started using hard disks around 1990, and have come to the complete certainty that every hard disk I use will fail. The work to preserve my files on my own hard disks has become just too hard for me, too time-consuming, and requiring too much expertise.

    4. Re:5 terrabytes of cloud storage by somenickname · · Score: 2

      You might want to consider something like a Synology and use the cloud storage as part of your backup plan. They are simple, low maintenance devices that have a good reputation for reliability. It sounds like you have properly irreplaceable data and, personally, I wouldn't trust a third party to be the sole owner of that data.

    5. Re:5 terrabytes of cloud storage by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I first used started using hard disks around 1990, and have come to the complete certainty that every hard disk I use will fail.

      It took you this long to figure it out? Way back in the old days, they were selling tape backup systems for 40-meg hard disks. Because it's never been of question of if they will fail, but when. Same as any other multi-part mechanical device.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    6. Re:5 terrabytes of cloud storage by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      It took you this long to figure it out?

      I figured it out in 1995, started trying RAID as my solution in 2005, and by 2010 I'd come to the realization that I myself would never do as good a job as a cloud storage vendor.

    7. Re:5 terrabytes of cloud storage by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. People don't seem to realize that as HD disks grow, the probability of a second failure during a restore increases.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    8. Re:5 terrabytes of cloud storage by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Kind of reminds me of a former boss. His 6-disk raid failed. I asked him why he didn't replace the failed drive and do a restore. Turns out he figured that there was not that much chance of a second drive failure, so he ran it for months. 6 tb of his favorite pr0n gone. :-)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    9. Re:5 terrabytes of cloud storage by somenickname · · Score: 2

      RAID is only as reliable as the person administering it. I keep a fairly large (well, large for home use) RAID array and every disk runs SMART tests daily. If a disk fails a self test, within hours, I drop it from the array, let the hot spare pick up the data, and replace the dropped disk with a cold spare (that becomes the new hot spare) and then order a new cold spare. It doesn't matter if the disk that failed the self test could be salvaged. It's going to die at some point so, if it shows any signs of flakiness at all, you might as well replace it. Using this method, I've never had a live disk actually fail out of an array and I've never lost any data.

      RAID is an awesome tool but, I think most people who use it don't really understand how to wield it.

    10. Re:5 terrabytes of cloud storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, in other words, you failed at backup.

      You'll still fail at backup if you depend on OneDrive, Dropbox, Box, or other cloud service solutions for your storage.

      Unless you have physical media, that is disconnected and stored in a secure location, you don't have a good backup system. Always-on drives are convenient as a first tier backup, but any event that takes out the server could also take out the attached drives.

      For consumer / small business there are a few tiers of backups:

      1. Always online, attached to the local server. Extremely convenient, but weak on physical security. If someone steals or an event destroys the server, it will probably also take out the backups. Crypto-locker style malware can often attack these backup files if permissions are not set properly. Still a good choice for sheer convenience, especially if it can be located in another part of the building and made append-only (without the ability to wipe out older snapshots).

      2. Always online, but off-site. Still convenient, is now protected from local disasters, but possibly still weak against cryto-locker / hacking attacks that also go after backups. There are services like Red Oak, etc, that provide this. You can also do it with an SSH server at a remote location with enough local storage and good physical security.

      3. Removable media (tape or hard drives) that is disconnected from the system and stored in a secure off-site location. These days, that media must be encrypted, just in case the tape or hard drive gets lost in the parking lot / vault. For small businesses, USB drives work best because as long as you can decrypt the drive, you can read it on any PC in the world without the need for an expensive tape drive. If you don't have this tier, then you really don't have a backup.

    11. Re:5 terrabytes of cloud storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've considered putting backups in the cloud, not use it as my primary storage, looked at my ADSL bandwidth and concluded that doing a full restore from such a backup would take weeks. Picking up a backup disk from a friend's house has a much better bandwidth.

    12. Re:5 terrabytes of cloud storage by jon3k · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? You can back them all up to local physical copies (which I encourage you to do) using their sync client. How are they going to "revoke my ability" to use my photos? What does that even mean?

    13. Re:5 terrabytes of cloud storage by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Where do you keep your offsite backups in case of filesystem corruption, accidental rm -rf or your house burning down?

  18. Re:Software as a Service avoids open source benefi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can host this stuff yourself, on your own hardware and network, if that's what you prefer. -PCP

  19. I've been looking for something like this... by Voyager529 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I do some tech work for a nonprofit. We're Office365, but there are a few documents better kept in-house. I've been looking for a self-hosted collaborative spreadsheet, preferably browser based, but nothing I've tried has materialized correctly...

    FengOffice - doesn't support spreadsheets natively. The hackneyed workaround that does, only supports it in a particular, dated version of FengOffice, and after creating the document, the web app prompts to download the spreadsheet rather than edit it.
    OnlyOffice - eight cores and 8GB of RAM for this VM, and it takes over a minute to load any document.
    ZKSpreadsheet Server - From the hand of Johnny Ives himself comes the most beautiful spreadsheet software ever written. It's fast, it's easy to use, it's effective, it's simple to install, it's resource efficient...and it's $4,000.

    So, if Open365 gets its self-hosted option off the ground, I would love nothing more than for this to solve my problem.

    1. Re:I've been looking for something like this... by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 2

      Q: Are the spreadheets for actual financial data, or just for lists of things?

      If they are for lists of things, then maybe the nonprofit could host a wiki that has good support for tables.

    2. Re:I've been looking for something like this... by halfnerd · · Score: 2

      Collaborative being a key word, I didn't get the impression that Open365 allows google docs style concurrent collaborative editing. EtherCalc should work, but is of course limited in features: https://ethercalc.net/

    3. Re:I've been looking for something like this... by paugq · · Score: 1

      Have you tried Zoho Docs? It's like a native application, both in features and performance

    4. Re:I've been looking for something like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do some tech work for a nonprofit. We're Office365, but there are a few documents better kept in-house. I've been looking for a self-hosted collaborative spreadsheet, preferably browser based, but nothing I've tried has materialized correctly...

      FengOffice - doesn't support spreadsheets natively. The hackneyed workaround that does, only supports it in a particular, dated version of FengOffice, and after creating the document, the web app prompts to download the spreadsheet rather than edit it.
      OnlyOffice - eight cores and 8GB of RAM for this VM, and it takes over a minute to load any document.
      ZKSpreadsheet Server - From the hand of Johnny Ives himself comes the most beautiful spreadsheet software ever written. It's fast, it's easy to use, it's effective, it's simple to install, it's resource efficient...and it's $4,000.

      So, if Open365 gets its self-hosted option off the ground, I would love nothing more than for this to solve my problem.

      Have you looked at Owncloud? https://owncloud.org/features/. Also Libreoffice allows you to edit files accessed via SSH on on cloud serviceshttps://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/5.1 , not sure if allows for simultaneous editing in that mode, but worth looking at.

    5. Re:I've been looking for something like this... by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Q: Are the spreadheets for actual financial data, or just for lists of things?

      If they are for lists of things, then maybe the nonprofit could host a wiki that has good support for tables.

      I've been looking at a few possibilities. The challenge with a Wiki is that the folks who need to edit it are not exactly the kind of folk who will take kindly to having to add HTML markup to what they're making. Also, a few of the documents we're eyeballing will end up being helped out a lot by formulas, so a Wiki would only be 'partially helpful' here.

    6. Re:I've been looking for something like this... by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Have you tried Zoho Docs? It's like a native application, both in features and performance

      No self-hosted option that I saw, though I do seem to remember that a self-hosted version was available at one point. If it's not self-hosted, it offers little benefit to simply using O365.

    7. Re:I've been looking for something like this... by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Collaborative being a key word, I didn't get the impression that Open365 allows google docs style concurrent collaborative editing. EtherCalc should work, but is of course limited in features: https://ethercalc.net/

      Ethercalc may fit the bill...but dear Lord is it ugly! Form over function is one thing, but were they explicitly attempting to evoke 80's nostalgia?

    8. Re:I've been looking for something like this... by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      ...not exactly the kind of folk who will take kindly to having to add HTML markup...

      Right. In that case, choose a wiki that has WYSIWYG editing. I also recommend choosing one that can export the page to various formats. Two possibilities are MediaWiki and Trac. You may find others in the list on this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    9. Re:I've been looking for something like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe what you are looking for is the Office Web Apps Server, the web app version of the office apps that can be installed locally and integrates with products like SharePoint on-prem.

  20. More compatible with Office than Office is by raymorris · · Score: 1

    My experience has been that Libre Office has better compatibility with the dozens of MS Office versions than any version of MS Office does. In other words, if I want to edit a Word document created three years ago, I'll tend to get better results in Libre than in Office 365.

    I have some documents created in MS Word about ten years ago, which is maybe four file formats ago. MS Office won't open them at all, Libre has no trouble with them.

  21. Happy until... by freeze128 · · Score: 2, Informative

    until you stop paying for it, and all your files are lost to you.

    1. Re:Happy until... by jon3k · · Score: 1

      You have months to get all your data off if you decide to stop paying for it.

  22. Re:Software as a Service avoids open source benefi by TheReaperD · · Score: 1

    There are some things that we do that we just don't care. The convenience is more important than other factors such as privacy and free software principles. I can give a personal example: I run paper and dice roleplaying games that I sync character sheets, images and other data to my players. I don't give a rat's ass who can scan them or if some service decides to go out of existence suddenly. None of the data is vital or in need of data security. If they disappear overnight, it's annoying but, I can just upload it on another service as I have backups. And if they really need to know the level of the paladin in my party... whatever.

    --
    "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
  23. Re:Software as a Service avoids open source benefi by dickens · · Score: 1

    Of course there is a point. The benefits of having location independence and "cloud" storage are the same whether the software is open source or not, or whether I share the information with others or not.

  24. Re:Software as a Service avoids open source benefi by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

    ...sync character sheets, images and other data to my players.

    That would be the part where GP wrote that "[o]nline services should only be used when you want to share information with others."

  25. Office 365 by westlake · · Score: 3, Informative

    People don't use services like GMail or Google Docs or Office 365 or Dropbox or Facebook because of the web UIs.

    Just to be clear on this, Office 365 is the full standard aka "professional" suite of MS Office apps, including Outlook, locally resident, sold as a subscription service. The web component is there, but still secondary.

  26. Re:Software as a Service avoids open source benefi by xvan · · Score: 1

    Online services should only be used when you want to share information with others.

    Like collaborative documents when you don't want /can trust/pay google/microsoft ?

  27. Re:Software as a Service avoids open source benefi by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    Of course there is a point. The benefits of having location independence and "cloud" storage are the same whether the software is open source or not, or whether I share the information with others or not.

    To give an example, I'm working on a story using Google Docs as my primary word processor. Yes, I could use LibreOffice - and if I had it as a local file that would be my preference - but Google Docs means I can edit it from my browser, leave the house, and then edit it more with my phone. If I'm waiting somewhere for a half hour, I can open my story and write a couple hundred words on my phone. If I get a great idea for a future story direction, I can make a note of it right in the document. If I want to read it to my son (he loves hearing the story I'm writing and reading it to him forces me to proof-read it), I can do this from anywhere as long as I have my phone with me. (I also use the commenting system in Google Docs to record where my son and I have read up to.)

    If I had this as a local computer file, I wouldn't be able to add to my story as often and I wouldn't be as far into the story as I am now (32,000 words and counting). Yes, when it comes time to look into publishing it, I'll likely import it into LibreOffice for better formatting options, but Google Docs gives me an ease of use that locally installed programs don't.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  28. is it eyeOS owned? by 4wdloop · · Score: 2

    The bottom of open365.io page has:
    © eyeOS 2016.

    What is the license than?

    --
    4wdloop
    1. Re:is it eyeOS owned? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2
      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  29. Re:Software as a Service avoids open source benefi by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Web site still doesn't say how yet. It's mostly signup-walled.

  30. Re:Software as a Service avoids open source benefi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The website you're referring to is just an example (and clearly an early beta stage one at that) of the relevant services being offered in a public access application service delivery model ("public cloud" or "SaaS" or even "PaaS" in today's silly terminology). You might want to inquire with Google about "LibreOffice online", or perhaps investigate something like this. HTH. -PCP

  31. Office365 BLOWS! by gabrieltss · · Score: 3, Informative

    We use O365 at work and it sucks big green donkey dicks! Yeah I want to wait 30+ seconds to open a Microsoft document (word doc, excel, powerpoint). And it CONSTANYLY loses connectivity and you have to keep logging into it. What a POS!

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
    1. Re:Office365 BLOWS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds just like my Office 2010 installed on my hard drive - constantly loses connectivity with the network servers, and forcing me to hack temporary save files in order to not lose the work I've just accomplished in the last hour. Can't use autosave, cause the document's too big for WORD to handle safely.

      Incredible - Microsoft has been here for so long and has so much money and so many staff, and STILL their standard office products suck donkey balls.

  32. How do they make money? by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    Somebody needs to pay for these servers, so what's the business model? In those details is the likely answer as to whether or not this is a good idea.

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  33. if it was truly 'open'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you'd be able to actually download the sources, and the prebuilt server packages.... but NOOOOOOO.. at least not on the this side of the registration wall.

  34. Nooo! by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    I absolutely LOVE my Microsoft subscription-based access to my own (Copyrighted at their moment of creation) documents! I love it. I can never live without Microsoft Office Products!

    Or maybe, perhaps I am suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.

  35. Sign up for using office by allo · · Score: 1

    erm, because using an program err app err web app totally needs an account! And you need the account even before the app launched, because well .. just create it, okay?

  36. Source code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the source code? I know where to find source code for Seafile, LibreOnline, but for the open365 "bundle" :)

  37. Privacy and software freedom trump convenience by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    Or you could host a free software editing system somewhere trustworthy (that's not Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, Amazon.com, and others) and have the same minor conveniences without feeding a system built to destroy your family privacy.

    There's nothing about your use case that justifies the need for this kind of hosting anyhow, as everything you describe doing could be done with hosting an ODF file on a file server you control. One hopes your family values privacy more than either convenience or bolstering the bottom line of known spy agencies such as Google.