Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10 Now Runs On 300M Active Devices; Upgrade To Cost $119 After July 29

On Thursday (May 5), Microsoft announced that Windows 10 is now running on 300 million active devices, up from 270 million monthly active devices as of March 30. The feat comes nine months after Microsoft released Windows 10, the latest version of its desktop operating system, after offering it for months to developers. The company also announced today that Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 (as well as Windows 8) users with a valid license wouldn't be eligible for the free upgrade starting July 29. After July 29th, Microsoft says, users will be able to continue to get Windows 10 on a new device, or purchase a full version of Windows 10 Home for $119.

Windows 10 offers a range of interesting features including virtual digital assistant Cortana. While these features and a substantial boost to performance and speeds could be a big reason for the fast adoption of Windows 10, it's also no secret that Microsoft continues to push Windows 10 update to computers ... sometimes even when users don't want that.

111 of 192 comments (clear)

  1. After the 29 will the simi forced updates come wit by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    After the 29 will the simi forced updates come with a bill? Stop working and say you needed to pay after updating and the time to go back is over as well.

  2. The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by thebes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They damn well better issue a patch to remove all the nagware then. Yes I know it can be disabled, but it shouldn't be there to begin with.

    1. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Informative

      They damn well better issue a patch to remove all the nagware then

      Here's a datapoint: I did not qualify for an upgrade so had to pay full price for Win10. It nags me about Office 365 all the time. I don't want to rent software, and have no need for that software, but it keeps doing it.

      I wouldn't hold my breath.

    2. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      Disable all notifications in Settings > System > Notifications and actions. Disabling all of the notifications removes all of the stupid nags.

    3. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      When I use free software, I expect lousy default settings. When I pay for software, I expect the defaults to be appropriate for reasonable human beings.

      I've never met a reasonable human being, perhaps by definition, who wanted to pay money for ads and nagware.

    4. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      There's an app installed by default called "Get Office" that causes these occasional popup notifications that are advertising Office 365.

      You can just delete this app or disable notifications for it in particular (it's also good to know you can control notifications on a per-app basis) and you won't see those "Get Office 365" popup notifications anymore. You certainly don't have to disable *all* notifications, as I actually like them for things like news, mail, etc.

      It's annoying that they make you do this, but not nearly as hard to fix as the GWX thing. Some people have claimed that it comes back after you delete it, but that hasn't been my experience. Sigh... Microsoft is really bound and determined to make sure their users hate their guts with this heavy-handed crap. I completely agree that users shouldn't have to do this to make their system usable.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    5. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Software you've paid for shouldn't have any ads at all. This is outrageous

    6. Re:The Real Question: Will they stop the nagging? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It nags me about Office 365 all the time.

      Unpin the Get Office365 program from the start menu and under System > Notifications, disable the notifications from the app.

      This is not a Windows 10 issue. Every computer I've bought for the last 10 years comes with this "feature". The only thing new is the notification pane and the sound it makes when the notification pops up.

  3. Fast Adoption? EH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You mean FORCED adoption. Microsoft doesn't give you much of a choice. It's either 'Stick with what you have, but we ain't supporting it anymore' or 'Get the new operating system.'

  4. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I personally doubt that Microsoft will actually follow through with that, which would obviously stipulate an end to the forced 10 upgrades. Since when has Microsoft been known to stop doing something incredibly annoying once they start?

  5. no wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    they're pushing windows 10 so fucking hard right now... NOBODY IN THEIR RIGHT MIND would actually pay $119 for this shit after july.

    hell, even free it's been so tough a sale they've had to resort to using malware-like deceptive windows, and forced installs when you still decipher them properly.

    1. Re: no wonder by Black+LED · · Score: 1

      I would rather have my OS not upload any of my data at all. That's why I won't ever use Windows 10.

  6. Why is there a donut hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "users with a valid license wouldn't be eligible for the free upgrade starting June 29. After July 29th, Microsoft says, users will be able to continue to get Windows 10 on a new device, or purchase a full version of Windows 10 Home for $119. "

    What are users supposed to do between June 29th and July 29th? Maybe they could spend their time proofreading shitty slashdot submissions

    1. Re:Why is there a donut hole by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      Forced downgrade to Windows Me. By July 29th, these users will pay $238 to "Please God, stop the pain"

    2. Re:Why is there a donut hole by msmash · · Score: 1

      My bad, folks. It's indeed July 29. Thanks for pointing it out -- have fixed it.

  7. In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft has removed the capability of even system administrators to block/remove the Windows App store in Windows 10, even in the Pro version. Whereas previously it was possible to use registry edits or GPO to remove/block the app store and other forced start menu tiles in Windows 10, a recent Microsoft update has eliminated that capability and re-enabled these features.

    Some smart people said; just block the update. But, that's not an option in Windows 10 either. With this new "feature" the only way to prevent users access to teh app store and the willy nilly installation of apps is to use teh MUCH more expensive Enterprise version of Windows 10.

    1. Re:In Other News... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why the fuck would you remove an app store?

      In a controlled computing environment, system administrators don't allow unauthorized software to run on the network without being tested first. An app store would be a huge security risk if users were able to download and install their own software.

    2. Re:In Other News... by LichtSpektren · · Score: 5, Informative

      I hate these fucking system administrators removing anything they please. Fuck them. Why the fuck would you remove an app store? Are you fucking nuts? Better hand out fucking chromebooks to users if you do not want them to be able to use their laptops.

      The Windows Store has been plagued with malware for years now: http://www.howtogeek.com/19499...

      A sysadmin would be a lunatic to let anybody on his network into the WinStore!

    3. Re:In Other News... by SailorSpork · · Score: 1

      Agreed... and in that case of a said controlled network environment, they should probably be running Windows Enterprise Edition anyway.

    4. Re:In Other News... by Calydor · · Score: 1

      I bet that at the same time as you have this opinion, you also blame parents whose kids buy SmurfBerries for their games. Through an app store.

      Maybe, just MAYBE, parents would like a way to keep little Timmy from installing every single game from the app store onto the computer? Or should kids just be kept away from computers until they're 18 now?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    5. Re:In Other News... by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Probably the same as the telemetry - it bypasses even the HOSTS file.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    6. Re:In Other News... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 2

      That's not "Malware". That's just useless overpriced shitware.

      The whole point of the Windows Store is to sandbox applications from acting as malware. An IT Manager should prefer them finding shitware that is sandboxed than shitware on Downloads.com that probably actually does have viruses.

      Also that story is 2 years old. Thankfully Microsoft purged the store of shitware ages ago.

    7. Re:In Other News... by chiefmojorising · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck would I *want* an app store?

    8. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, they should be running Linux.

      Microsoft must be destroyed; the assets seized, the employees executed and their heads placed on pikes (as a warning to Apple and Google), and the buildings razed leaving no stone atop a stone.

      I know, I know... never happen. I can dream, damn it.

    9. Re:In Other News... by raftpeople · · Score: 1

      Ideally users should be able to install and make use of any tool that allows them to achieve their goals without causing problems for the organization. We happen to live in an environment that requires more caution than that due to immature systems (systems that are insecure and have brittle dependencies), but the ideal is not self-entitled, it's efficient and optimal.

    10. Re:In Other News... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone sane WANT the app store? If someone is that dumb they can just re-enable it.

    11. Re:In Other News... by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Probably the same as the telemetry - it bypasses even the HOSTS file.

      DNS based filtering currently works great. While I wouldn't put it past them to override DNS settings, use IP literals or eventually brick your system if "telemetry" transmission is interfered with... so far it is by far the easiest method especially if you have multiple windows systems on your network. It only requires minimal effort in creating a few fake zone files.

      However this is all ultimately a lost cause. I don't trust MS anymore and no amount of technical workarounds will change that. The best way to bypass telemetry really is to stop using Windows.

    12. Re:In Other News... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has removed the capability of even system administrators to block/remove the Windows App store in Windows 10, even in the Pro version. Whereas previously it was possible to use registry edits or GPO to remove/block the app store and other forced start menu tiles in Windows 10, a recent Microsoft update has eliminated that capability and re-enabled these features.

      the store is installed on my win10 pc, but the store icon is not on my start menu, or task bar, or otherwise visible unless I go looking for it. So its there, but its hardly an issue.

      I don't think I'd personally want to remove the app store... because I do use exactly one app... Netflix.

      But sure I can see businesses potentially wanting it removed... it sounds like for now this works:

        crack open PowerShell and run Get-AppxPackage â*windowsstore*â | Remove-AppxPackage

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

      But I wonder what Microsoft is thinking here. If the business is large enough to put its users on Active Directory to get policy management, its large enough that it doesn't want its users playing angry birds and solitaire.

    13. Re:In Other News... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Good lord, if allowed, half my users would determine that their goals involve reading facebook.

  8. Incorrect summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The summary states the free eligibility ends on June 29th, but the articale says July 29th. I'm pretty sure the Microsoft blog's date is correct - i.e. July 29th.

  9. For me, the upgrade will be free after Jun 29... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It will be free because Microsoft's sleazy, malware-like tactics have convinced me that a move to Linux is in my future. And that upgrade will be free.

    .
    At this point, I cannot see myself relying upon Microsoft when Microsoft has shown me that it is unworthy of my trust.

  10. Click here... by tlambert · · Score: 5, Funny

    Click here to install now.

    Click there to install 5 minutes from now.

    Force the window closed to install anyway.

    Hold the ACPI power button down to force the power off, and install when you reboot.

    Pull the power cable to see this dialog again.

  11. Windows 10 offers a range of interesting features by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    Forced updates and unpredictable that can brick your computer, extensive data harvesting of you and your family, possible subscription fee in the future ...

    Yes, quite an interesting range of "features"

  12. Thank you for upgrading by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    Congratulations, your computer has been upgraded! Please find the invoice for your upgrade in your Documents folder. You may enter a credit card number now, or wait until your free evaluation is completed. Thank you for using Microsoft!

    *You may revert to your previous windows for 30 days. After the 30 day free evaluation is completed, your old system files will be deleted and you will be required to enter your credit card number to continuous using your machine.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  13. On July 30th... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    On July 30th, you just know that there's going to be some goober out there who tries to upgrade, gets hit with the fee, and then bitches up and down because he thought that his computer was going to update automatically and he shouldn't have to pay the upgrade fee.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  14. Re:change your credit card #'s by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    That was your first mistake, giving Microsoft your CC number...

  15. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by idontgno · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's a good point.

    After July 29, involuntary automatic upgrades to Windows 10 will include automatically searching the user's data (local or cloud-based) for credit card numbers or other financial accounts to bill for the upgrade. Expect a Windows Update KB patch in July to implement this additional feature in the GWX subsystem.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  16. Re:Windows 10 offers a range of interesting featur by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    What do you mean by "possible"? Also, if anyone believes that 10 is the last one they'll ever release .... hahahahaha!

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  17. obligatory by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    No way. A grand, minimum, or I'm staying on 7.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  18. Repeat cycle by Lose · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The forced upgrade cycle gave the usual OEM's ample time to roll out Windows 10 devices and most consumers will simply move to Windows 10 by way of failed or slow computer forcing their hand to upgrade that way. By that momentum alone Windows 10 adoption will continue to rise steadily.

    Windows 7 will continue on as the new Windows XP in the professional space and we'll all repeat the painful process of resisting unwanted change for the next ten years.

  19. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

    That was the first thing I wondered to. Will I finally have some PEACE AND QUIET after July 29th without having to use GWX Control Panel?

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  20. $119 to upgrade by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    I wonder how much it costs to get them to stop bothering me about upgrading?

    1. Re:$119 to upgrade by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If you upgrade now, it's FREE. After June 29th, it will be $119.

  21. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd almost suggest Microsoft could extract the value by installing Bitcoin mining software on everyone's PC, but there's no way they'd do that without inventing their own proprietary "M$Coin" first.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  22. My prediction for Win10's growth after July 29 by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    It will stop.

  23. Re:Windows 10 offers a range of interesting featur by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

    Of course Windows 10 will be the last version of Windows, in the same way that Mac OS X was the last version of Mac OS.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  24. No way by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

    I didn't want it when it was free, I definitely wouldn't pay 120 dollars for it.

    --
    Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
  25. I Switched by jwymanm · · Score: 1

    From Windows 10 to Linux on everything at home and even at work. I run Windows 7 in a VirtualBox VM at work to handle specific Active Directory tasks only. Touchscreen Dell 23" monitor hooked up to a brand new Skylake system with 4k monitor and another 4k LG TV on the integrated intel and nvidia video cards. Everything works. Striped Samsung 850 ssds with archlinux, btrfs snapshots of root with that cool __current/__snapshot disk layout for easy reverting. All free and just amazing. Synergy even works better between Linux Linux. Running ZFS for 60tb of storage.. multiple VPNs. Soon Mycroft AI on top of it all. Life is good!

  26. Not Sure What to Do by Maltheus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have serious privacy concerns over Windows 10, but I do run it on my gaming-only box, figuring there isn't too much to harvest anyway. I also have a Win 7 and Win 8.1 machine which I've been reluctant to upgrade because of this. Especially after watching Windows 10 wipe out my privacy settings and restore the defaults.

    That being said, Windows 10 is so much faster at starting up and coming out of sleep and will likely be the only version receiving updates in the future. I would love to upgrade my other boxes for free, but I just can't bring myself to do it.

    1. Re:Not Sure What to Do by Voyager529 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      https://www.oo-software.com/en...

      That, plus telemetry blocking at the firewall level have placated my concerns, personally.

    2. Re:Not Sure What to Do by maugle · · Score: 1

      Hah, one of the URLs is "choice.microsoft.com". That's a lovely bit of doublethink from the people trying to force their software down everyone's throat.

    3. Re:Not Sure What to Do by williamyf · · Score: 1

      Nah, Bollocks

      Do a bare metal backup of your machines. In-place upgrade them to 10. Restore the previous OS.

      Yoy your machine's "fingerprint" is on redmond's database.

      In the future, when you feel like it (or when upgrades to 7 and/or 8.1 cease), you can go again to windows 10.

      Is this hassle worth $119 (or more, if you go pro)? That is for you to tell.

      --
      *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    4. Re:Not Sure What to Do by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I did. Main reason is that I didn't trust the rollback feature (you know the one you can click within 30 days) I did it for all Win7 machines I manage. I do know one or two machines from acquaintances that run Ubuntu, that have a 7 license. I should do those too, just pro-forma, but... Whatever, if they really want Windows back instead of Ubuntu, they can buy new machines. If I hadn't installed Linux, they should have bought new machines any way.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  27. Re:you ain't see nuttin' yet by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You mean the one that cuts the running speed in half?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  28. Re:change your credit card #'s by Ann+O'Nymous-Coward · · Score: 1

    Who needs to give them anything?

  29. Also in the news... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    In unrelated news, an Apple spokesperson announced that they have to increase prices for their computers come August, citing an expected serious increase in demand for their products.

    Also in the news, in an unparalleled and before unheard union between Linux distributors they all announced that no later than in mid-July they expect their new release to hit the market. Asked what sparked this sudden union of all distributions our reporter was informed that "the time is right, this is going to be the year of Linux on the Desktop. And this time for real".

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  30. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    I think this is a great idea and I hope MS implements it. Legality shouldn't be a problem; they can put a clause in their EULA about it. It probably won't fly in the EU so they better block it there, but in the US it won't be a problem.

  31. 'The feat', my ass! by kheldan · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Their so-called 'feat' of installing on 300 million devices is on the same list as talking about 300M computers being infected with malware and becoming part of a bot-net! How many of those 300M devices were voluntarily, intentionally installed, and how many of them had it forced on them or snuck in while the owner wasn't looking? Microsoft is nothing but a gigantic scammer.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  32. Great news! by ilsaloving · · Score: 2

    This is fantastic news. This will presumably mean they'll stop their asshat nagware campaign, cause they can't have it both ways. If they don't, I bet there will be a sudden spike in popcorn sales as people sit back to watch the fireworks.

    1. Re:Great news! by JeffOwl · · Score: 2

      This is fantastic news. This will presumably mean they'll stop their asshat nagware campaign, cause they can't have it both ways. If they don't, I bet there will be a sudden spike in popcorn sales as people sit back to watch the fireworks.

      I think you give them too much credit. The nagware will continue but it will not update automatically. Or maybe it will. I would hope that they are not this evil, but... It could update automatically and then at the EULA screen give you the option to pay. If you decline the EULA or don't pay it will then revert back to 7 or 8. Rinse repeat every month or so.

  33. Re:you ain't see nuttin' yet by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

    They can try. I disabled the Windows Update service (Windows 7) and related files.

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  34. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not take a page from Apple? Start looking for all documents, upload them to OneDrive, and automatically delete the one on the local storage without user permission. Once the user has paid the $119 ransom^W upgrade to Windows 10, they can access their files.

  35. I find your faith in Microsoft... disturbing. by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    You assumed that when you disabled it, it's really disabled.
    Let's not forget the dodgy Win10 Upgrade disable that didn't quite... disable.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:I find your faith in Microsoft... disturbing. by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      No, no, not a simple "check this checkbox to disable". Blocked the service initialization and removed the related WU files, WU cannot even start now and I do not check for updates anymore as a result.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  36. It's worse than that by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    All Win7 update stops, even though security updates are available.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  37. This is what they said they'd do last year by ITRambo · · Score: 1

    So, the news is that Microsoft intends to do what they said they would do one year ago. Microsoft keeping their word is indeed news. And the $119 price is only what they want you to pay. NewEgg puts the Home version on sale for $79 often. There is no compelling reason for users to upgrade from the far more bug free Windows 7 and 8.1 (ugly sure, but more bug free), to Windows 10.

  38. Microsoft employee here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Posting anon for obvious reasons. The plan internally is to continue to offer it for free indefinitely after the existing period expires. I expect an announcement will come in July about the extension. MS doesn't want Windows 7 to be like XP where people stay on it until they are pried away.

    1. Re:Microsoft employee here by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      What about getting Windows 10 for free, period?

      Windows XP user here.

      There's no plan to offer it for free. No matter what they're going to harvest your personal information, sell it to whomever they want, and use your computer as an advertising billboard.

    2. Re:Microsoft employee here by vux984 · · Score: 2

      Posting anon for obvious reasons. The plan internally is to continue to offer it for free indefinitely after the existing period expires.

      This is what I expected -- in one form or another. It just makes sense given their goals. The only reason to have the free period even "end" was to try and motivate people to upgrade today because it's going to cost something tomorrow.

      I also wouldn't be surprised to see them let the deal end, then reintroduce it a month later for another year "due to the demand/excitement/whatever". That gives them another year of "time is running out".

      BUT, having said all that, I'd also expected the cheap upgrades ($20 iirc) from 7 to 8 to persist indefinitely as well, but they didn't; and I never understood why. Nobody, but nobody, ever would pay $80-$100+ to upgrade from 7 to 8/8.1 so why discontinue the 'deal' price?

    3. Re:Microsoft employee here by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Why don't they want people to stay on Windows 7 or 8? Is the reason only to make Microsoft money, or is there an actual possibility that they care about their customers? Sure, Honda wants me to buy a new car every year but I don't give in to their plaintive whines either.

    4. Re:Microsoft employee here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Posting anon for obvious reasons. The plan internally is to continue to offer it for free indefinitely after the existing period expires. I expect an announcement will come in July about the extension. MS doesn't want Windows 7 to be like XP where people stay on it until they are pried away.

      Thanks. You're cool. Your employer is a malware host. Tell your shitweasel bosses that I'd happily pay $119 - if I could turn off the telemetry and selectively choose which downgrad*cough*upgrades I could accept.

      Until then I'm running Win7 - checking every patch for malware - which gives me four years to migrate to FreeBSD or Linux.

  39. Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies... by PingSpike · · Score: 1

    This is a pack of lies. The stink of desperation wafting off of Windows 10 is so strong it would knock a buzzard off a shit wagon. The free offer will be extended...because it was so successful! As an act of good will toward our users! There's no way this nightmare will end after only one year.

  40. Re:Fast Adoption? EH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Which is the same as every OS release... ever?

  41. Why put up with this? by HappyPhunBall · · Score: 1

    The first and last time a computer of mine boots Windows it will be to download a shiny new linux iso. I have no idea why people put up with Microsoft's tactics. Windows 7 was not a horrible OS, but their strongarm installation tactics for 10 would seem to turn almost any user off. Guess people will keep swallowing while MS keeps shoveling.

    1. Re:Why put up with this? by iampiti · · Score: 1
      • Too scared of the alternatives
      • Used to it
      • Tied to Windows-only software
      • Some even like Win 10
  42. The other way by rossdee · · Score: 1

    How much does it cost to downgrade from Win 10 back to Win 7 ?

    1. Re:The other way by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

      $38 (32-bit) or $49 (64-bit): http://www.amazon.com/Windows-...

      Also plan on 2 days to install the 200+ Windows Updates.

      --
      -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
  43. Substantial boost in performance??? by jetkust · · Score: 1

    On what universe does Windows 10 offer a substantial boost in performance? Windows 10 shipped on lower end laptops and netbooks is unusable.

    1. Re:Substantial boost in performance??? by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

      In fact here's an old Slashdot story covering the comparison between Windows 10 and Windows XP on an old netbook: https://hardware.slashdot.org/...

      --
      -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
    2. Re:Substantial boost in performance??? by eumoria · · Score: 1

      on a high end gaming pc there is a performance increase but i manage ~50 laptops for my organization that were designed with 8.1 in mind and Win10 is like a sidegrade. I don't see a performance increase or decrease it's pretty much the same. If the unit was designed for 8.1 it is very usable but performance boost? If you don't have an enormous GPU and Skylake you're not going to see that optimization.

    3. Re:Substantial boost in performance??? by PRMan · · Score: 2

      In the real world.

      I have an old Asus eeePC netbook. I put an SSD in it and it runs pretty fast with it.

      • XP Home - came with it, ran OK.
      • Vista-installed, but took over 2 minutes to boot. Unusable.
      • Windows 7-had similar performance to XP.
      • Windows 8-wouldn't install on 1024x600 screen.
      • Windows 10-fastest version of Windows on there yet, by far. Taking 768MB out of the working set of a 2GB memory machine does wonders.
      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  44. LinuxFTW by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

    My Upgrade from Windows 7 to Linux Mint was absolutely free.

    --
    Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
  45. I don't believe them by Paco103 · · Score: 1

    The entire reason to make it free was to resolve the split user base, which costs them money by maintaining old versions as well as all their development partners for having to support multiple versions. My suspicion is they're trying to get everyone on a common base and start moving to a model more like Mac, with more frequent, far cheaper upgrades. I think the "deadlines" are mainly to encourage people to "hurry up and get it done"

  46. Re:For me, the upgrade will be free after Jun 29.. by charronia · · Score: 1

    I recommend going for a popular distribution like Ubuntu or Debian. Because they are the most popular, they tend to have the broadest support. This includes things like drivers and software packages.

  47. yay, my nightmare is over July 29th! by swschrad · · Score: 1

    software forkers and their malware trying to push Win10... I will be shed of them! woohoo!

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  48. Little Snitch by swell · · Score: 1

    Most geeks have sanitary protection on the net to prevent rogue sites from gifting you with malware. How many have protection from within?

    For many years Mac users have had available a program that prevents installed software from 'calling home'. When I installed MS Office, I told Little Snitch not to let Office connect to any MS servers. As a result I hear nothing from MS- no sales pitch, upgrade offers, etc. I'm using Office 2008, so that's 8 years of peace. Very few apps are allowed to connect to their source and those that are allowed are typically limited to forums, tech support, add-ons, etc.

    Even on the Mac, updates often include crapware, adverts, new limits on how the software can be used or the requirement to pay for functions that had been free. I seem to have no such control on my new Android phone which updates apps and system software whenever someone else wants.

    Little Snitch is a tiny utility even more important to me than AdBlock and LastPass. I can't imagine living without it.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  49. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

    Yes. On July the 29th there will be no semi-forced upgrades to Windows 10.

    On July 30th, Microsoft will announce Windows 10.1, and announce that it's free for Windows 7, 8, 8.1, and 10 users. To upgrade, just reboot your PC, and the new operating system will be installed automatically.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  50. I don't want it even when it is free.. by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

    I don't want it even when it is free.. what on Earth makes them think I'm going to be willing to pay them for it later?

    because seriously - the only windows 10 I am going to use is a VM I need to test customer windows 10 specific issues...

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  51. Re:Windows 10 offers a range of interesting featur by iampiti · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and I don't like there either. I shouldn't be forced to have this crap on my destkop system.
    I'd pay money if I was guaranteed that Google would stop spying me on my Android phone. Also to be able to be root with official support(no, exploits aren't good enough because they're security holes by definition and because obiviously only work on the hw/sw version combos which haven't removed those holes)

  52. Re:Slashdot the Fox News of the tech industry by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Why not just permanently defer an update? Not all updates are necessary, and there are indeed updates that negatively impact the computer. Defering a security update may be a bad thing but deferring some shitty Microsoft update saying "here, I fixed a bug in Windows Server 2016 that you don't own, so you have to reboot NOW!", or "I changed the UI again just because I can, so reboot NOW!"

    What about that sneaky advertisement for Windows 10 that was hidden inside a security update for IE? This proves Microsoft can not be trusted.

    As customers our first and only concern is about US. We do not care about Microsoft's needs and it is not our job to help them out. They treat us like shit so why should we care about their own headaches? Wha's wrong with 30 different versions? So they have to hire more developers, big deal. If the customers aren't treated with respect then the customers will leave.

  53. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Wait...they FORCE me to upgrade and then bill me for it? Now THAT'S innovation!

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  54. Laughing my ass off... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

    Everytime one of these Windows 10 stories comes out and I read the story and the comments (yes I do BOTH.. I know its out-of-style on /. ) I can't help myself... I nearly fall out of my chair laughing at both those who MUST use MS products, and those who only *think* they do.. The articles all seem to be surprised at how much of an asshole MS has turned out to be, and oh the comments.. they're priceless.. The MS trolls are soooo precious.. Great entertainment for those of us who left the MS ecosystem years ago and now only use Linux or Mac.. In my case, its Linux.. I retired in 2010 after supporting MS products since 1991. Even in 2010, it was becoming clear that MS considered *your* pc to actually be THEIR pc, and I decided around 2011, I was done with MS.. Now after 5 years of being MS-free, those of you still using Windows (or ANY MS product, for that matter) is great entertainment for those of us who DON'T.....

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    1. Re:Laughing my ass off... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I nearly fall out of my chair laughing at both those who MUST use MS products, and those who only *think* they do..

      Sadly there are plenty of niche apps that only work under Windows. Maybe some of them will work under WINE, but I've worked at places using legacy apps for which there are no viable Linux alternatives. It sucks, frankly. They're pretty locked into the Windows world for those programs.

      This whole forced-upgrade debacle leads me to believe that there is or will be a market for those apps in a Linux ecosystem. The good news is that most of those apps can be moved to the web, and then Microsoft's hold on these companies will be substantially reduced (or maybe eliminated).

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    2. Re:Laughing my ass off... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      I've found a LOT of them, if they won't work under Wine, they may very well work with Crossover, which is a paid "version" of Wine, which is under heavy development. It *does* cost ~$40, but when you're not paying for Windows, its a small price to pay to be able to use s/w you're familar with under Linux...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    3. Re:Laughing my ass off... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      It *does* cost ~$40,

      That's nothing if it allows you to use a niche app which may have cost some company $40K or more to buy, or $100K to develop. It's basically the cost of a coffee break or two for a manager.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  55. Two words, Microsoft... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Two words, Microsoft...Linux Mint.

    Go ahead, I dare you. I dare you to force my PC to upgrade to Win 10.

    I've already been using it on my laptop in anticipation of this, and so far it works great for me.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  56. after the 29. by luther349 · · Score: 1

    everyone starts pirating windows again.

  57. Re:For me, the upgrade will be free after Jun 29.. by dnormant · · Score: 2

    I had an 80GB SSD and a 4TB data drive. One day I found that my 80GB C; drive was full. Turns out MS was "Preparing" me for my free Windows 10 upgrade. I figured SSDs were getting cheaper so I bought a 500GB. I installed Debian on it and I'm using the old 80GB as my swap partition.

    No regrets.

  58. Been Running Xbuntu Exclusively for Months by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    For the last couple of years I've been booting back and forth between windows and Linux, Windows for gaming and Linux for just about everything else. I'd been debating moving to Windows 10 at some point, but after hearing about how much of a general pain in the ass it is, I decided to see if I could stay in Linux full time. It's been remarkably easy. Quite a few of the games in my Steam library have Linux versions. About the only one I actually miss that won't run is Skyrim. And I suppose at some point I should jump through the necessary hoops to install Dwarf Fortress on the Linux side. I'd been having some trouble with Hibernate/Suspend and accessing files on my Android phone, but installing the Xbuntu bits of Ubuntu seems to have solved those.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  59. Windows 7 Retail by packrat0x · · Score: 1

    Is there any way to upgrade Windows 7 OEM license to Retail?

    --
    227-3517
  60. Re:Slashdot the Fox News of the tech industry by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    And no Windows 10 isn't spying on you. It's been demonstrated numerous times that if you turn off analytics it's not sending home any data.

    You can't turn it off. There is no off button.

    https://technet.microsoft.com/...

    There was one report where a moron saw his network card's repeated DNS requests and went all tin-foil-hat that they were nefarious. Sorry but that's how networking works.

    There was one report where Microsoft said they will install a Remote Access Trojan on your computer by default and use it to download whatever data they felt like from you without your KNOWLEDGE or CONSENT.

    https://technet.microsoft.com/...

    But ignore all that... those documents were written by morons and are obviously are not credible.

    It's not an evil scheme to steal your personal info.

    Nag screens, forced updates, telemetry/spyware shit. Microsoft has literally become the Internet malware our friends call and ask us to uninstall from their computers.

  61. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, Apple pretty much did just that. You remember when Google got in trouble with the EU for recording too much wifi info while its street view cars were driving around taking pictures? The reason they were recording wifi info was to correlate the SSIDs with physical locations. That way, even if your GPS is off, Google can make a pretty good guess at your general location.

    When Apple ditched Google Maps, they didn't have their own database of SSID locations. The first year they paid for a database from Skyhook. The next year, they used their own database. How did they mysteriously generate this database without sending around Apple street view cars to record every wifi hotspot's SSID? By secretly logging iPhone owners' locations and nearby SSIDs, and having the phones send the info back to them. Essentially, Apple turned all iPhone owners into unpaid contractors who traveled around recording the locations of every SSID on Earth. Given that they got away with it, while Google got sued by the EU for trying to do it the non-evil way and paying to send their own cars around to record it, I expect next time Google will just secretly harvest the data from its users.

  62. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

    Yes, Microsoft will shut up and quietly upload info about everything you do with your computer, keystrokes, file names and times, apps used etc.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  63. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    That will give them a somewhat limited market. The US population is around 4.5% of humanity.

    So much for global domination...

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  64. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Oh please, that assumes that everyone worldwide is equally wealthy, which obviously isn't the case. How much of MS's revenues come from the US? A billion villagers living in mud huts in Africa aren't viable customers for MS. (And the Africans' economies are improving and they're becoming more technological, but even so, they, along with most 3rd-worlders, are skipping PCs for the most part and going straight to mobile devices, which don't use MS software. And the people who do use PCs are using pirated software.)

  65. Users and advertisers split the bill by tepples · · Score: 1

    Software you've paid for shouldn't have any ads at all. This is outrageous

    Why should they be any different from newspapers and magazines, which have both a price and ads?

    Say it costs $30 per user to develop, market, distribute, and maintain a particular application. Users aren't willing to pay more than $15, nor are advertisers. So a publisher might adopt the same model used by newspapers, magazines, pay TV, and Hulu Plus: make users and advertisers split the bill.

    1. Re:Users and advertisers split the bill by iampiti · · Score: 1

      I prefer to pay full price and to have clean software. Windows was this way up to now.
      Microsoft no longer makes a version of Windows I like I guess I'll have to go elsewhere

    2. Re:Users and advertisers split the bill by tepples · · Score: 1

      The form letter would then be that there aren't enough users willing to pay full price for an ad-free version of an app other than iampiti to warrant the additional cost of maintaining two SKUs.

  66. runs on ... by cwsumner · · Score: 1

    Windows 10 now runs on 270 million computers. 260 million of them installed without permission. 250 million of them are trying to get their old system back ...

    I plan to get Windows 10 when I get a new computer ... in about six years. If Microsoft is still alive. 8-(

  67. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by LiENUS · · Score: 1

    Google got sued because they were logging more than just SSID and location. They were getting packet dumps of unencrypted networks.

  68. Re:After the 29 will the simi forced updates come by doccus · · Score: 1

    Yes the forced upgrades are to stop.I can't recall where I read it though, yesterday. Personally, though, I have never seen such an absurd business model. Firstly, keep in mind that M$ is a *software* company that has historically derived a large percentage of it's profit from sales of windows.
      For them to, then, give away free copies to everybody that wants them, and then after everybody that acually *wanted* one has a copy, theyy start charging over a hundred bucks to the rest who actually *didn't* . I mean, can you imagine i a car company did that? Or any other software company? It woulkd most certainly ruin them.
    Bu you know what. "I don care! You hear dat Loocy? I don care"