Slashdot Mirror


Airline Delays Flight Over Passenger's Suspicious Math Equations (usnews.com)

Earthquake Retrofit shares this article from the Associated Press: "An Ivy League professor said his flight was delayed because a fellow passenger thought the math equations he was writing might be a sign he was a terrorist... He said the woman sitting next to him passed a note to a flight attendant and the plane headed back to the gate. Guido Menzio, who is Italian and has curly, dark hair, said the pilot then asked for a word and he was questioned by an official... "They tell me that the woman was concerned that I was a terrorist because I was writing strange things on a pad of paper..." He was treated respectfully throughout, he added. But, he said, he was concerned about a delay that a brief conversation or an Internet search could have resolved. "Not seeking additional information after reports of 'suspicious activity'... is going to create a lot of problems, especially as xenophobic attitudes may be emerging."

331 of 512 comments (clear)

  1. Paranoia strikes deep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Into your life it will creep
    It starts when you're always afraid
    Step out of line, the men come and take you away

    1. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's paranoia, thats giving much credit to someone that obviously does not have the brainpower or the education to be paranoid. I'd say its more along the lines of TOO MUCH TV and a decade full of fear conditioning. Because obviously a turrurist is going to jump on a plane to do the math and build the bomb on the spot, why not, he has curly hair zomg.

    2. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Please look up the definition of paranoia in an authoritative dictionary

    3. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by rochrist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Eh. I expect she didn't KNOW it was math and assumed it was Arabbic, because, you know, squiggly lines and the state of American education.

    4. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by pr0fessor · · Score: 2

      I have always found that people tend to think I'm being mischievous when I'm in a good mood... I'm not sure if that says something about me or them.

    5. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Eh. I expect she didn't KNOW it was math and assumed it was Arabbic, because, you know, squiggly lines and the state of American education.

      I'm surprised that a person who is that consumed with fear was capable of actually being on an airplane.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

      Eh. I expect she didn't KNOW it was math and assumed it was Arabic

      Well, if he was doing math, he was probably using a bunch of Greek symbols.

      So imagine sending this woman to Greece. She would wig out and scream, "All the street signs and stores are labeled with terrorist speak!"

      It's actually quite sad, that she could not recognize that he was doing mathematics. Nobody is asking her to classify the equation, or find the homogeneous solution, but to recognize mathematical problem solving . . . ? What did she do, skip elementary school . . . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    7. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by Deadstick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wait until Homeland Security finds out he was writing it in Arabic numerals.

    8. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Well, if he was doing math, he was probably using a bunch of Greek symbols.

      Are you aware of what kind of numeral "2" is?

    9. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2

      The loneliest number since the number 1?
      And don't ask me what I know about No...
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22QYriWAF-U

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    10. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Please look up "Buffalo Springfield" and "For What It's Worth" in any decent online search engine.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    11. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by narcc · · Score: 5, Funny

      Arabic numerals, combined with the new evidence he was carrying methods of math instruction, all lead to one conclusion...

    12. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What did she do, skip elementary school . . . ?

      I've been finding myself wondering about this lately when it comes to a number of people I know.

      Seriously, we need some way to send these people back to 5th grade. It's astonishing. Maybe 3rd grade. Force them to take classes until they at least graduate the 8th grade. Keep them out of society as long as it takes for them to grasp 8th grade-level reading, writing, and maths. I really don't think it's too much to ask.

      The only problem my proposal has is that I keep coming back around to who, exactly, should be in charge of determining when they've completed an 8th grade education....

      Can we bring back poll tests? I don't care if in practice that's "racist." It probably will be in effect "racist." We need to solve the root issue here. The moment we decided "racism!" was an adequate answer, we failed the entire basis of our society. Tell me why people with darker skin color might have a problem passing a short exam before voting. That will give us a good idea of what we really need to fix.

      Something must be done. I do not want to live in a world where solving a simple system of equations or engaging in very basic linear algebra to find an answer constitutes genius. Yet here we are. It's 2016, and I can't even.

    13. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by Kokuyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You have the same issue I keep running into. Again and again, I'm getting more misanthropic and think "We really should stop these people from voting". I went so far as to suggest that indenture should be a thing since some people are actively arguing for concepts that would, in effect, lead to it.

      And with every great idea I run into this roadblock of "who is going to decide whether...". I can tell you my life would be so much easier if I could just be like Trump and his ilk and just think myself wise and knowledgeable enough to decide these matters.

      Alas, I'm a fair man to the detriment of myself way too often...

    14. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by rmdingler · · Score: 1, Funny

      Seriously, we need some way to send these people back to 5th grade. It's astonishing. Maybe 3rd grade. Force them to take classes until they at least graduate the 8th grade. Keep them out of society as long as it takes for them to grasp 8th grade-level reading, writing, and maths. I really don't think it's too much to ask.

      Wow. You people never stop. Now, you're blindsiding Trump's voters.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    15. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 2

      And I'm still not certain I'm going to end up voting for Trump. :(

      May the wrong lizard not win. :(

    16. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Both

    17. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      May the wrong lizard not win.

      Great lizard reference!

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    18. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's the result of years of paranoia, combined with a fear of flying. Woman is already nervous about flying, and 15 years of Fox News conditioning takes over when she sees a dark man writing stuff she doesn't understand.

      People do dumb things when under extreme stress. The interesting thing here is that years of propaganda and media demonization has got us here.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Can we bring back poll tests?

      We don't need to. We already rigged the system so the votes of poor people don't matter.

    20. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      So writing Arabic on a plane is grounds for questioning also?

    21. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Eh. I expect she didn't KNOW it was math and assumed it was Arabbic, because, you know, squiggly lines and the state of American education.

      The lady was from Wales.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    22. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey dumbass, the lady was from Wales.

    23. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, there are plenty of objective measures you could use... SAT scores, for example. You could require a 1200 on the classic, or 1800 on the new recalibrated scale. Neither grammar rules nor mathematics have any racial or gender bias to them. It's not perfect, of course. Most obviously, the verbal section may be problematic for immigrant citizens for whom english is not their first language. And any examination is prone to some degree of studying to the test. Though I'm a bit less concerned about the latter. If you care enough about voting and citizenship to study for the exam in the first place, it's much more likely that you care enough to educate yourself on the issues as well. The point is, though, that it is certainly ought to be possible to come up with some examination that's neutral and blind to the civil rights act characteristics.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    24. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Count digits with me:

      2

      The other 10 digits:
      0
      1
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      Profit

    25. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I was kicked out of 8th grade math class for writing computer code (on lined paper), probably the teacher didn't understand the script and that I was actually doing math. You know, squiggly lines and the state of American education.

    26. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      I'm surprised that a person who is that consumed with fear was capable of actually being on an airplane.

      She wasn't, she made herself so sick with worry they were already taking her off the flight by the time they questioned the Prof.

      She did manage to get onto a later flight. I guess it takes a few tries sometimes.

    27. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by nukenerd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Woman is already nervous about flying, and 15 years of Fox News conditioning takes over

      Someone said she was from Wales. (I cannot check TFA as it's page is so broken that I cannot read the left half of it). I live in Wales myself and can vouch for the fact that we don't get Fox News here.

    28. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Military or other govt service (teaching sanitation etc) should be the only way to earn the vote

    29. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      There are e digits that are not 2. Go back to reddit.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    30. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by tysonedwards · · Score: 5, Funny

      Haven't you heard? Math is fucking scary! He might have been preparing a pop quiz for people in every third row whose birthdays are divisible by a mersenne prime. Think about how many people could have died!!!

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    31. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Well, the old poll tests were racist because the person giving the test could look at your skin before deciding whether you had passed or not, so they really WERE racist. Just having a correlation with race doesn't make something racist, but being determined by "race" does.

      P.S.: Race is a social construct, not a genetic or physiological one. It has as much to do with the shape of the nose and texture of the hair as color of the skin, and there is NO reliable genetic difference. There are population mean differences, but that's not the same thing. E.g., very few "white" or "oriental" people have sickle-cell anemia genes. But some do.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    32. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is plenty of similar crap in the UK. Maybe she reads the Daily Mail, or watches a bit too much ITN?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    33. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I read Starship Troopers too. In the real world, plenty of fools and paranoiacs find their way into both the military and the government. So your solution doesn't address the problem at hand.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    34. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by rochrist · · Score: 1

      Did I say that? No, I did not.

    35. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by lgw · · Score: 4, Informative

      Arabic numerals, combined with the new evidence he was carrying methods of math instruction, all lead to one conclusion...

      He was a member of Al-j'bra? "Broken bones" - such a menacing name.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    36. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by maugle · · Score: 1

      Woah, there. Don't mock a person for asking a question and trying to educate themselves, even if you think they should already know the answer.

    37. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      I guess your unfamiliar with all of engineering? Where we use fairly advanced math to model and solve for real world problems.

    38. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Hey dumbass, the lady was from Wales.

      Hey - this is slashdot! "Murrica is responsible for everything, especially the Wales education system.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    39. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Neither grammar rules nor mathematics have any racial or gender bias to them.

      Bull. The entire SAT is completely racist. It favors those with white privilege.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    40. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by vivian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What if the guy was actually writing Arabic - why should this be any indication of him being a terrorist?
      How is that any different from him writing in Chinese, German, Japanese, or even just bad handwriting that is not immediately legible by his neighbouring passenger?

      That's the real story here. Merely writing anything should never be considered a terrorist threat unless it is actually making a threat in a language that can be understood by the reader - if you can't understand it then it's clearly not a threat. (Stories about Bob should not count either)

    41. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Already rigged? Yeah, that explains the ongoing efforts to require voter identification only obtainable from some government office 50-100 miles way that's only open from 10-to-12 every other Tuesday and Thursday...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    42. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On the next flight they put her next to a kid drawing with crayons. She didn't recognize what he was drawing, but she was comfortable with it anyway, because who designs anything dangerous using crayons?

    43. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I guess the Muslims over in Dearborn, MI aren't true Muslims. I need to head over there some time to see if I can get a proper döner kebap.

      Do you happen to know any true Scotsmen, btw? I've never had haggis, and I'd like to try it once.

      (Damn you, Slashdot! Inval: compose, o, ". Retval: the dreaded A tilde! Solution: don't get mad, just fucking use the HTML entity I guess. And you're done!)

    44. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1

      That would be... acceptable. Trump is a damned wild card. It even more interesting/frightening if you consider that whoever he makes his running mate (along with most of his cabinet, 'course overlooking the congressional positions in line) may become the president if Trump is assassinated (or keels over from natural causes). Wikipedia has the whole list.

      Sanders would be like order to Trump's chaos. It's almost... something like something out of Paganism. Very yin-yang at the least. Again, that would be... acceptable. I would probably pull the lever for that ticket merely with a few reservations if that were the case.

    45. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Government is the root of many problems. Allowing only people who have been exposed to the corrupting influence of government to vote, is to greatly worsen the lot of the general public and those who despise government policies in particular.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    46. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1

      All good points. Sometimes I forget that there's "racism!" when the aggregate statistics come out in the wrong way without any variables such as income or education level factored in, and then there's plain simple ugly racism, even now in 2016 (which often contributes to the numbers somebody's looking at when they go "racism!"--yeah, there's racism all right, but it's not with an ideal poll test perhaps being administered by an impartial computer or else graded blindly if humans must judge certain responses.)

      Breast cancer is another big one for which people with dark/black skin are at a greater risk than people with paler skin colors.

    47. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You have evidence of poor people being bussed around committing voter fraud? Oh, right, you don't, and you especially lack evidence of any such thing affecting an election.

      On the other hand, there's plenty of evidence of election fraud involving voting machines that all seem to favor Republicans.

    48. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 2

      Eh. I expect she didn't KNOW it was math and assumed it was Arabbic, because, you know, squiggly lines and the state of American education.

      Wait... Is algebra not of arabic origin? In arabic, algebra means "The system for reconciling disparate parts", and was brought to Italy in the ~12th century.

    49. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      I don't think the problem is the passenger, but rather the aircraft personnel. Airlines would not be permitted to discriminate against idiots if they tried, and they don't want to try because the idiots are more likely to be the ones paying the highest airfares for the least desirable seats. However, that doesn't mean that the aircraft needs to turn around because an idiot got scared of another passenger. If aircraft personnel can't be trained to discriminate between suspicious and other sorts of activity, they should at least be able to make a short surreptitious video of what looks to them like suspicious activity and send it to someone smart enough to know.

    50. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you read down a bit on that page you come to this:

      The reason the digits are more commonly known as "Arabic numerals" in Europe and the Americas is that they were introduced to Europe in the 10th century by Arabic-speakers of North Africa, who were then using the digits from Libya to Morocco. Arabs, on the other hand, call the system "Hindu numerals",[18][19] referring to their origin in India.

      Also, I was just joking about questioning what "2" is, the question brought that song to mind.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    51. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by ranton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Neither grammar rules nor mathematics have any racial or gender bias to them.

      The mere fact that wealthier students receive a better education makes requiring a certain level of education to vote problematic. Requiring a certain level of education to vote is very close to requiring your parents to have a certain level of income to vote. The decision to make is if the benefit of a more educated voting block outweighs removing a large percentage of the population from the democratic process. The idea of "no taxation without representation" has never been very popular in this country.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    52. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      Says Buffalo Springfield...

      --
      Nullius in verba
    53. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Please look up the definition of paranoia in an authoritative dictionary

      Don't bother with those authoritarian dictionaries, the Illuminati have already censored them so you won't find the words you are looking for.

    54. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I expect she didn't KNOW it was math and assumed it was Arabbic

      You mean there's a difference?

    55. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by kenh · · Score: 1

      Someone said she was from Wales. (I cannot check TFA as it's page is so broken that I cannot read the left half of it). I live in Wales myself and can vouch for the fact that we don't get Fox News here.

      That doesn't mean she doesn't represent everything that is wrong with education in America!

      Oh, wait... /sarcasm

      --
      Ken
    56. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by quenda · · Score: 1

      Eh. I expect she didn't KNOW it was math and assumed it was Arabbic,

      I heard he was writing Arabic numerals, and a message to Al Jabr.

    57. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by easyTree · · Score: 1

      I guess the three twelve year old girls who smoke hash outside our house whilst wearing hijabs are true mudlims?

    58. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Brawndo. It's got what plants crave.

    59. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Let's remember that voting is meaningless in the sense that it implies no expression of indirect control over society's development whatsoever.

    60. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by easyTree · · Score: 1

      'Reads' lol

    61. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      its more to do with xenophobia and borderline racism fueled by fear from idiots like Trump. This sort of paranoia is not the exclusive territory of the badly educated

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    62. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by easyTree · · Score: 1

      So what? Even if it was Arabic, why does someone scribbling things you don't know warrant a 2 hour flight delay?

      To create/reinforce an association in the minds of readers that Arabic is the language of math^H^H^H^Hterrorism?

    63. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Close, 'al-jabr' meaning 'reunion of broken parts'. Was used to refer to the resetting of broken bones at one point as well though.

    64. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by Scrab · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or, she might have thought he was a member of Al Gebra, and he was carrying weapons of maths instruction?

      --
      RoseColor red={0, 0xffff, 0x0000, 0x0000};VioletColour blue={0, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0xffff};find / -name *mybase*|chown you
    65. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Cannot see how parent is doing a true scotsman. Not seeing it at all.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    66. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Eh. I expect she didn't KNOW it was math and assumed it was Arabic

      Well, if he was doing math, he was probably using a bunch of Greek symbols.

      So imagine sending this woman to Greece. She would wig out and scream, "All the street signs and stores are labeled with terrorist speak!"

      It's actually quite sad, that she could not recognize that he was doing mathematics. Nobody is asking her to classify the equation, or find the homogeneous solution, but to recognize mathematical problem solving . . . ? What did she do, skip elementary school . . . ?

      Doing anything smarter than recognising yourself in a mirror is considering highly suspicious nowadays.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    67. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Eh. I expect she didn't KNOW it was math and assumed it was Arabbic, because, you know, squiggly lines and the state of American education.

      This is why the person who made the complaint needs to be charged and have to pay for the delays they caused. I see this kind of shit happen fairly regularly on planes, for the most part it's not someone who is ignorant, rather someone who is arrogant. They think that by creating a problem with the guy next to them they can get an empty seat next to them.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    68. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by dywolf · · Score: 4, Funny

      since we use the Arabic numerals, wasn't he technically writing in Arabic?

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    69. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by tibit · · Score: 1

      only open from 10-to-12 every other Tuesday and Thursday

      I hope you're not serious. Yet, somehow, the collection of diverse countries known as Europe universally requires a national ID to vote. And somehow, magically, it's not a problem there. I'd tend to think it's an imaginary problem, mostly "exposed" by pseudo social justice warriors who haven't peeked out of their own country and know nothing.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    70. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      > I expect she didn't KNOW it was math and assumed it was Arabbic

      Well, if you want to get technical - it *was* Arabic. The number system in use in the West is called the "Arab Number system" with good reason (though there is some evidence the Arabs may have themselves inherited it from India even earlier).

      But whether or not she knew this. While you may be right - about her assumption, that's not actually the most concerning thing.
      Much more concerning is the assumption that followed: that Arabic = Terrorist.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    71. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      >Bull. The entire SAT is completely racist. It favors those with white privilege.

      I don't know if you're being serious or not - but it is in fact true and on PURPOSE. It was literally DESIGNED to do just that. Circa 1920 - Colombia University has become extremely popular among the Jewish population with lots of Jewish kids going there... and subsequently seen a massive drop in enrollment from white kids. White parents did not want their kids going to a university with a large number of Jews in attendance.

      Harvard sees this happening, and gets worried that black enrollment would cause a similar case of the white-flight. And so they invent a system to make it almost impossible to get into Harvard unless you had a fairly typical white suburban upbringing with the kind of educational and cultural influences that entails. That system consisted of two tests designed by the openly racist, pro-eugenics, pro-segregation Carl Brigham.

      The SAT was designed from it's very inception to keep black kids out of university in order to keep white kids in. Brigham did it because he was a white supremacist, but even the more moderate people on university councils went along with it because they seriously feared the financial losses of having the white kids going somewhere else.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    72. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      Yes this sh!t is real bad in 'murica. Just go to Harvard or Brown or any elite college to witness it first hand with their safe zones and with students and faculty that protest speakers coming to their school.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    73. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by ranton · · Score: 1

      The idea of "no taxation without representation" has never been very popular in this country.

      Well that would be a good start. If you don't pay taxes, then perhaps you shouldn't have representation. Wellfare? No voting for you. Don't make enough to actually pay taxes? No voting for you either.

      Although, I think being able to have some minimum education AND the ability to see things from other's points of view should be a basic requirement for voting.

      Everyone other than perhaps the homeless are taxed in this country. While you are likely thinking of income taxes, that is not the sole source of taxes. In fact only a third of local, state, and federal revenue is based on income in the US. Everyone pays taxes on goods the purchase, where they live (either directly through property taxes or indirectly through rent), and on various fees. And even those who don't pay federal income taxes still likely pay towards medicare and social security.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    74. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Hey dumbass, the lady was from Wales.

      That explains a lot ;)

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    75. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by stealth_finger · · Score: 3, Funny

      She did manage to get onto a later flight. I guess it takes a few tries sometimes.

      Only after confirming the plane was a math free zone. I hear someone tried to explain lift to her mid-flight though and then the plane had to be diverted due to a small explosion in the cabin.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    76. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Fear is not rational. Many people function perfectly well in their lives despite of which live with serious fears in some way or another. This ranges from the mild but understandable (given the constant media parade) of terrorism or getting mugged in a shady part of town, to the downright bizarre like arachibutyrophobia (fear of having peanut butter stuck to the roof of your mouth).

      My girlfriend's father is a hard man, spent some time in the army, has gotten into fights, worked a blue collar job, and is generally tough as nuts. He's the type to say "Terrorists? Where? Let me at em!!" while picking up a baseball bat. Drives (a very dangerous activity) 1000km across Australia without a thought. ... I will never convince him to get on an aircraft. He can't do it. He was scared for us when we came to visit because it was a windy day and he was worried about a plane flying in the wind.

      Fear is not a mathematical equation. If it were we'd all be living our lives very differently.

    77. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Hey dumbass, the lady was from Wales.

      Wow there's another place with an education system that bad? What are the odds!

    78. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The daily mail has pictures too.

    79. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please look up Buffalo Springfield's song "Stop Children What's That Sound"

    80. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Just trying to clarify by asking questions; no offense meant. I probably should have asked it in a different way.

    81. Re: Paranoia strikes deep by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In the novel, the justification given is "because it works", which it did in the book. The only other justification I remember is that it co-opts potential revolutionaries that would be willing to take some action by giving them a way to get the vote, which doesn't pass the smell test either. Heinlein did not make any fictional claim that veterans would be better in any other way; such as not being fools or paranoiacs. (Anyone was allowed to enter and complete public service and get the vote, and it was up to the government to find something to do with any given person.)

      Since I don't know of real-world examples of government by veterans that actually worked well overall, I see no reason why we'd want to try it.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    82. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by rochrist · · Score: 1

      Ok then, my answer to your question would be a resounding no. :)

    83. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Eh. I expect she didn't KNOW it was math and assumed it was Arabbic, because, you know, squiggly lines and the state of American education.

      She was right! Numbers ARE Arabic.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    84. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      If you read down a bit on that page you come to this: The reason the digits are more commonly known as "Arabic numerals" in Europe and the Americas is that they were introduced to Europe in the 10th century by Arabic-speakers of North Africa, who were then using the digits from Libya to Morocco. Arabs, on the other hand, call the system "Hindu numerals",[18][19] referring to their origin in India. Also, I was just joking about questioning what "2" is, the question brought that song to mind.

      Officer, that Arabic man just gave me the digit!

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    85. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      What did she do, skip elementary school . . . ?

      I've been finding myself wondering about this lately when it comes to a number of people I know.

      Seriously, we need some way to send these people back to 5th grade. It's astonishing. Maybe 3rd grade. Force them to take classes until they at least graduate the 8th grade. Keep them out of society as long as it takes for them to grasp 8th grade-level reading, writing, and maths. I really don't think it's too much to ask.

      The only problem my proposal has is that I keep coming back around to who, exactly, should be in charge of determining when they've completed an 8th grade education....

      Can we bring back poll tests? I don't care if in practice that's "racist." It probably will be in effect "racist." We need to solve the root issue here. The moment we decided "racism!" was an adequate answer, we failed the entire basis of our society. Tell me why people with darker skin color might have a problem passing a short exam before voting. That will give us a good idea of what we really need to fix.

      Something must be done. I do not want to live in a world where solving a simple system of equations or engaging in very basic linear algebra to find an answer constitutes genius. Yet here we are. It's 2016, and I can't even.

      well, let's make parallels with the muslim kid makes fake bomb from clock story:
      Obviously this was a deliberate hoax, the guy was writing math deliberately knowing that it would panic the other passengers with a legitimate fear of terrorism, and thereby make a whole proMuslim media event out of this. This was no genius who invented new equations like the liberal press portrays him, he was merely reusing old equations on a new sheet of paper.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    86. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Fear is not rational. Many people function perfectly well in their lives despite of which live with serious fears in some way or another. This ranges from the mild but understandable (given the constant media parade) of terrorism or getting mugged in a shady part of town, to the downright bizarre like arachibutyrophobia (fear of having peanut butter stuck to the roof of your mouth).

      Sure. and I play ice hockey and ride motorcycles and would bungee jump if my admittedly more sensible wife would allow me. I also have some fears, the worst is probably a stroke that left me incapacitated but otherwise healthy - 5 minutes in that condition would be too much, years? But I'm not paranoid about it - I'd just starve myself to death if allowed.

      And it isn't just the incredibly paranoid woman - it's that her paranoia was considered a good reason to return and interrogate the terrorist ^H^H^H^H^ erm, professor. But at some point, we entered the idiocracy age. Did this woman not go to high school? Not take algebra? Perhaps she had a mental issue -- I dunno. But if mathematical notes and are now in any way shape or form, considered an acceptable excuse for returning to the hanger - or presumably they'd return to the airport if they were in flight - sorry, we have officially gone completely and incurably batshit insane.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    87. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      but they accidentally left "Illuminati" in!

    88. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Please look up the definition of paranoia in an authoritative dictionary

      Paranoia: one who believes we are controlled by the authorities who control our dictionaries.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    89. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      What did she do, skip elementary school . . . ?

      I've been finding myself wondering about this lately when it comes to a number of people I know.

      Seriously, we need some way to send these people back to 5th grade. It's astonishing. Maybe 3rd grade. Force them to take classes until they at least graduate the 8th grade. Keep them out of society as long as it takes for them to grasp 8th grade-level reading, writing, and maths. I really don't think it's too much to ask.

      The only problem my proposal has is that I keep coming back around to who, exactly, should be in charge of determining when they've completed an 8th grade education....

      Can we bring back poll tests? I don't care if in practice that's "racist." It probably will be in effect "racist." We need to solve the root issue here. The moment we decided "racism!" was an adequate answer, we failed the entire basis of our society. Tell me why people with darker skin color might have a problem passing a short exam before voting. That will give us a good idea of what we really need to fix.

      Something must be done. I do not want to live in a world where solving a simple system of equations or engaging in very basic linear algebra to find an answer constitutes genius. Yet here we are. It's 2016, and I can't even.

      here, enjoy http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    90. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

      THIS.

      WHY is nobody jumping up and down over THIS?

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    91. Re:Paranoia strikes deep by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      Who's this "authoritative" entity that creates dictionaries
      Who are you?
      How is the pharma industry related to this authoritative entity?
      How are you two related?
      Whats you interest for the request?
      Why would you assume I'm not paranoid and why is this dictionary right and not me?
      Slashdot has teach me to distrust Rubi, and it look like you code Rubi by your username?
      Is this going to turn into a SJW debate at some point?

  2. Stupid people punishing smart people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We need to ramp up reverse retaliation on stupid people 100x fold to stop shit like this

    1. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, it's so stupid to do math equations on a plane, it's entirely reasonable for everyone else to believe you'll use what you are writing to cause the plane to crash since as we all know, the pen is mightier than the sword.

      Since the sword is a dangerous weapon, moreso than a knife (and we're not allowed to bring those on planes) that means pens are even mightier.

      Clearly the only mistake is that the air marshal did not immediately shoot this dangerous criminal and spare everyone else a waste of time.

    2. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      At a minimum, stupid people should be shamed for being stupid.

      Trump 2016

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't believe the air marshall could have justified shooting her.

    4. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Haven't you noticed? People today are ignorant and uneducated. But what's new is, they are proud of it.

      Ours is a world in which football players, reality TV stars and talentless singer bimbos earn hundreds of times more than Nobel prize-winning scientists, and represent what young people aspire to become when they grow up.

      In a world of self-satisfied, militant, openly avowed crassness, writing equations onboard a plane instead of watching the latest episode of Game of Throne on one's tablet is seen as suspicious. That's more than a little sad.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    5. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fact that at least in the US our education system is horribly underfunded and under supported, coupled with social structures that make these things worse doesn't help

      The much more realistic and appropriate way to change things is to canoe these root causes rather thank trying to somehow get rid of or shame or do something else punitive to the stupid people in the world. The nice thing about people is that they sometimes can be taught

    6. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "The President in particular is very much a figurehead—he wields no real power whatsoever. [] His job is not to wield power but to draw attention away from it." -- Douglas Adams

    7. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At a minimum, stupid people should be shamed for being stupid.

      That woman needs to be shamed for being stupid, but more importantly, for denouncing someone out of the norm to the authorities.

      People used to do that in German occupied countries during WWII: they tipped off the Gestapo that this-or-that person looked or acted Jewish, or didn't seem to like the occupants, etc. That woman is as ugly as the WWII rats - and I might add, the authorities of today are increasingly similar to those of that era as well.

      This is what makes me retch, not her stupidity.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    8. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Incorrect, US system is overstaffed and overfunded.

    9. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      You know that without her stupidity (being representative of AT LEAST HALF of you population) no gov could even plan of doing what you point?

    10. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ours is a world in which football players, reality TV stars and talentless singer bimbos earn hundreds of times more than Nobel prize-winning scientists, and represent what young people aspire to become when they grow up.

      I keep telling people that Idiocracy is a documentary from the future but nobody believes me.

    11. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      We need to ramp up reverse retaliation on stupid people 100x fold to stop shit like this

      It's not stupid people .. it's fearful people.

      Just look at the number of people in the US who have been kicked off a flight or pulled up for interrogation just because they spoke Arabic or "looked like a certain way".

      This is the last one that I heard about UC Berkeley student questioned, refused service after speaking Arabic on flight

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    12. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

      She reported someone she thought was suspicious. Fuck her right?
      But when the neighbors of the san benradino shooters didn't say anything it was all "why didn't they say anything".

      The San Bernardino shooters weren't writing things on paper. You do know it's very hard to make paper explode with a pen, right?

      When you report someone because they buy tons of sugar and potassium chlorate, you're doing the right thing.

      When you report someone who buys a lot of firearms and talks about attacking the country, you're doing the right thing.

      When you report someone for writing strange things on paper, you're both an idiot and a disgusting snitch.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    13. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People today are ignorant and uneducated. But what's new is, they are proud of it.

      No, people today are, as always, proud of what they think they are. For instance, you seem to think of yourself an intellectual, and are jumping at the chance to denigrate those you see as different.

      Ours is a world in which football players, reality TV stars and talentless singer bimbos earn hundreds of times more than Nobel prize-winning scientists, and represent what young people aspire to become when they grow up.

      How, exactly, is that different from the the last century? Come to think of it, when exactly did scientists make more than non-scientist celebrities? There are a lot of professions out there, and very few of them fall into any kind of "science" classification. For most of human history, those pure-science careers have always been academic, having no practical application that would affect most peoples' lives. When your job is to move a load of cargo to a different continent to support a colony, you don't care about the amount of redshift in the starlight by which you're navigating. On the other hand, having a widespread reputation that your city is the best at some particular popular sport provides a conversation for a salesman, opening new opportunities for business.

      As I see it, after the atomic bomb brought immediate public attention to scientists, pure science has been getting more celebrated. Today we have more college graduates than ever before, and that number is still rising. We have more STEM careers and more STEM jobs than ever before, and we're even starting to see an increasing number of scientist celebrities like Neil deGrasse Tyson (Whose Twitter account, I'll note, appears second in a Google search for "Neil", below only Wikipedia.)

      In a world of self-satisfied, militant, openly avowed crassness...

      ...which is so much different from a world where we publicly post such intellectual statements as "Phileros is a eunuch", "Epaphra, you are bald!", or "Lesbianus, you defecate and you write, ‘Hello, everyone!’".

      ...writing equations onboard a plane instead of watching the latest episode of Game of Throne on one's tablet is seen as suspicious. That's more than a little sad.

      What's sad is the pervasive suspicion that caused it. This time, it was math equations. Next time, it could be a poet writing in Arabic. Recognizing it as Arabic would be less "ignorant and uneducated", but it'd be just as bad, and would probably result in even more delay. It's the paranoia that's the problem, not stupidity.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    14. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The woman's name is Gladys Pugh and she is from Wales.

      I'm conflicted about that.

      On one hand... Yay! The person acting like a jackass isn't an American this time!

      On the other hand... It seems the whole world is full of jackasses.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    15. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      And what would be the point? Or effect?

      Like being able to execute 12 year olds in some states for "murder" ... you now are harassing concerned citizens?

      The woman was an idiot, yes ... but then again, you convict her for what? Being stupid?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    16. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I went to MIT so I've known a lot of smart people. And oddly enough they seem to be nearly as prone to stupid behavior as stupid people.

      Literally the smartest person I know is a woman who had an affair with a married man because he assured her is wife would be OK with it -- and she believed him.

      So when there's something that only a idiot will do, there will be a fair share of smart people doing it. I come to think of this as a distinction between "constitutional" stupidity and "functional" stupidity. Constitutionally smart people can be functionally stupid because they're so used to be right when everyone else around them are wrong, they start to think they're infallible. In my experience there is no dumb like smart person dumb.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    17. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by StillAnonymous · · Score: 2

      Nothing clouds logic quite like emotion.

      It's one of the reasons the establishment is so successful at steering the public's attention. Use some hot words like "racist" or "terrorist" and you can get people angry at whatever you want. They won't even stop to think if the label you've applied is even accurate.

    18. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Wales is strong in the United States cultural heritage...

    19. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      in the US our education system is horribly underfunded and under supported

      The underfunded part is not actually true though. US ranks 5th in spending compared to other countries! http://www.theatlantic.com/edu...

    20. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by theArtificial · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ours is a world in which football players, reality TV stars and talentless singer bimbos earn hundreds of times more than Nobel prize-winning scientists, and represent what young people aspire to become when they grow up.

      You may find it insightful to learn about Gaius Appuleius Diocles. He was a famous chariot racer who among other things amassed a fortune valued enough to feed the city of Rome for an entire year. Even in antiquity the entertainers fared quite well.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    21. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by NotAPK · · Score: 5, Informative

      Since 2011 the air marshal program has killed more people on flights than terrorists have. Sure, the number is pretty low, but it's larger than 0. Those deaths were 100% avoidable.

      On top of this, and I don't have any hard data I'm afraid, but we know that X-Ray exposure can lead to cancer. Since the back-scatter X-Ray scanners were not assessed or approved by the FDA we do not know their power output. But since the power output is more than 0W/cm2 we can conclude that these scanners, used on millions of people daily, over ten years, will have killed a good number of people. How many? I'd be guessing if I suggested anything, it depends on the power output.

      The "new" terahertz/mm wave scanners are also questionable. They have also not been approved by the FDA. Some studies suggest interesting interactions between DNA molecules and THz signals. Obviously more study is required before these devices can be certified as safe. Until then, I refuse to voluntarily let myself be scanned by one. However you may not know that flying in/out of Australia the scan is compulsory (though not always enforced, depending on the chaos of the security queue) and refusal to take the scan when asked will result in a refusal to fly.

    22. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      If only it could be boiled down to a simple number. That'd make life easy.

      The source for your linked article hints at much deeper insight:

      Socio-economic background has a significant impact on student performance in the United States, with some 15% of the variation in student performance explained by this, similar to the OECD average. Although this impact has weakened over time, disadvantaged students show less engagement, drive, motivation and self-beliefs.

      This is further elaborated on in other pages of the report. Basically, there are a number of factors, starting with the US having a higher percentage of disadvantaged students and schools. While those schools have equally-qualified teachers, their educational environment is less conducive to learning. There is also an observed correlation between teacher morale and student performance.

      One interesting point in the study is that Common Core would likely improve things:

      The analysis suggests that a successful implementation of the Common Core Standards would yield significant performance gains also in PISA. The prominence of modeling in U.S. high school standards has already influenced developers of large-scale assessments in the United States. If more students work on more and better modeling tasks than they do today, then one could reasonably expect PISA performance to improve.

      Considering Slashdot's hatred of Common Core, I suggest that anyone commenting on this matter actually read the standards.

      In short, we can spend all the money we want on making prison-like schools, but US education isn't going to improve until we make the schools a learning-oriented environment. Curently, we spend a lot of "education" money on making a big show of security to look like we're keeping our children safe, when that money would perhaps be better spent on community programs to improve those disadvantaged areas.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    23. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by kencurry · · Score: 1

      The lady was from Wales. Nothing at all to do with the US or its education system.

      --
      sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
    24. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1

      writing equations onboard a plane instead of watching the latest episode of Big Bang Theory on one's tablet is seen as suspicious.

      There. FTFY in the interest of maximum irony.

    25. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      This times a thousand. Filing false police reports is a crime. Perjury is a crime. There's a civil tort for libel or slander. And there's probably a whole slew of other legal penalties for falsely accusing someone of a crime that don't come to me pre-coffee. Hell... it's such an old taboo that there's even a commandment on the subject.

      So why the hell are we not applying massive penalties to these shitwads who make up false accusations of terrorism? The airline should refund everyone on the plane their airfare, and take sue the accuser into the dirt for compensation. Then put her on trial and throw her away into prison for the false report.

      Oh yeah... there should also be a social penalty. Those bigots should be ruthlessly named, shamed, and ridiculed.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    26. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      The US has cultural heritage from just about everywhere.

    27. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      That'd be Hillary 2016. This election is shaping up to be stupid versus crooked.

    28. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Just so you know.....Winter is coming!

    29. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by KGIII · · Score: 2

      As a mathematician from MIT, I'm getting a kick out of this thread.

      Math, in and of itself, hasn't ever harmed anyone.

      Well, that's not quite true. It has driven some to insanity and suicide but I've never heard of any algorithm to make a plane blow up. And, really, if you think too much about infinity, the concept, it can drive you insane - more so if you're one of the first to really contemplate it and quantify it.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    30. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Good point. A lot of people talk about paranoia - and that's definitely a factor in this case - but are overlooking the fact that we're living at a time when being ignorant has no adverse consequences, and is a trait often celebrated in popular culture and media.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    31. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's spread pretty thin, though.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    32. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, when contemplating all the distinctly peculiar mathematicians in history one can always take comfort in Euler, who was as brilliant as any of them but led a normal, successful, and happy life.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    33. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by wickerprints · · Score: 4, Informative

      The essence of the problem is that when a government and media incite fear and paranoia in an undereducated society, and when the true prevalence of threats is already very low, all this does is magnify (in dramatic fashion) the incidence of false positives. And the government knows this, and exploits this, because they are able to leverage that fear to accumulate ever more draconian powers, until the government becomes a police state. The most efficient means of amassing power is to ensure the denial of knowledge to those who have less power than you.

      You can't expect the average citizen to have an understanding of differential equations, but we should expect the average citizen to be able to reason logically rather than emotionally. But people don't because they have been manipulated into becoming fearful sheep, whose unthinking compliance is all but assured by stoking their xenophobia.

      Sadly, this is not going to get better. Punishing the stupid for being stupid may be viscerally satisfying, but ultimately it will be ineffective, because the real reason for their stupidity has far more to do with the overwhelming control exerted by those entities that encourage such stupidity. Expecting the general public to police itself and shame each other ignores the fact that it is the government and the media, all controlled by wealthy elites (who, as you might note, don't need to fly in commercial aircraft), who are orchestrating this sort of behavior in order to ensure their grip on power.

    34. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You like documentaries, maybe this is up your street.

      http://topdocumentaryfilms.com...

      I have it, but I can't send you a copy because having it struckout-double-arrow being able to find it. OMG, I'm a terrust.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    35. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Frank+Burly · · Score: 1

      That woman needs to be shamed for being stupid, but more importantly, for denouncing someone out of the norm to the authorities.

      People used to do that in German occupied countries during WWII: they tipped off the Gestapo that this-or-that person looked or acted Jewish, or didn't seem to like the occupants, etc.

      The "see something, say something" policy seems to be like the publicly accessible brakes that they used to have on trains: if the person wrong, then you have delay and an incensed economist; if the person is right, you have avoided a mass tragedy.

      If we could quantify how much delay and hurt feelings == one human life, then we could know how often these people would have to be right to justify the program and anonymity of the tipsters. But I don't think it is a close call.

      Almost needless to say that alerting the authorities when you see someone doing something suspicious on a plane is very different from turning Jews over to the Gestapo. Unfortunately this woman's definition of "suspicious" was influenced by ethnic prejudices. But if we want intelligent and rational people to "say something" then you will need to let quite a few prejudiced and overly suspicious people do this.

    36. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think previous AC is taking the piss, Gladys Pugh was a television character played by a Welsh actress.

    37. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      I agree to an extent. However it is her stupidity, her lack of any critical thinking ability that allows her in good faith to act as she does. Do you think for a moment if she had a bit more intelligence that she would have thought it correct to report this man?

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    38. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by sjames · · Score: 2

      The problem wasn't that the woman was an idiot, every village has one. The problem is everyone else dog piling on. All it would take is for one person to say "it's just math" and for that to be enough to shut the panic down. Instead, we too frequently hand the leader role to whoever is most terrified and anyone who isn't terrified clearly doesn't understand the gravity of the situation (never mind that there really isn't a situation).

    39. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by zedaroca · · Score: 1

      That's a completely different situation. A person acting Jewish is not imminent danger to yourself.

      This woman probably though her life was in danger, cause she's stupid and he clearly had pen, paper and curly hair. If that was some sort of activation code, she would die.

      On her part, the problem is lack of education and the culture of fear (both not completely her fault).

      The bigger issue on this incident is, like you said, the authorities acting like the Gestapo.

    40. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by r1348 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gotta appreciate the irony of a Welsh complaining about incomprehensible scribbling...

    41. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Alomex · · Score: 2

      How, exactly, is that different from the the last century? Come to think of it, when exactly did scientists make more than non-scientist celebrities?

      Actually, The Economist had an article on this, and while professionals and academics never matched celebrities in salary, they used to have guaranteed paths into the middle class back when this was 15% of the population. Today they still have a guaranteed path into the middle class... which is over 50% of the population. The article pointed out that to keep up with similar professional rankings a top professor should be earning upwards of $1.1 million a year. Presently top professors (outside economics and medicine) make about a third of that.

    42. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Yes, but why would anyone believe in infinity? Just imagine the idiocy involved in taking all the integers and painting one copy of the red, and all the even numbers in another copy blue.

      YOU CAN'T PAINT A NUMBER!! That's a invalid operation on that type of entity.

      Infinity was a good idea when it meant "I can't put any limit on it". Taking that kind of functional definition, and a lazy evaluator, and objectifying them is blindingly idiotic. It's a very convenient way of thinking about things too large or too small to hold in your mind, but that doesn't make it real.

      <rant>
      Only the a finite subset of the integers and rational numbers formed by them have any physical mapping. When you try to invoke the real number line you end up having to hypothecate continuity, which is not demonstrable and which I do not believe to be a fact in any area of the actual universe. There is argument whether the fabric of space-time has any meaning below about 10^-33 cm, and I'm willing to accept that, or even something smaller, as the base level of reality, but to assume continuity is unreasonable. And I assume that there's also a largest number. My estimate of this is the powerset of the number of energy states that can be contained within the universe. It's an extremely large number, but it's not at all the same as saying there's no upper limit. I admit that I could have underestimated the size of the largest number, but I'd need proof before I'd accept that there was no upper bound. And having a lazy evaluator for a successor function doesn't give you permission to assume that it keeps working forever.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    43. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by HiThere · · Score: 1

      The US system is both understaffed and underfunded, but it's also true that the funding that exists if improperly allocated. Class sizes need to be reduced. That means more teachers. Ideally a class below the junior year of high school should have 15 or fewer students, with the lower grades needing smaller class sizes. Performance tends to start degrading above about 12 students, but sometimes you need the larger class sizes for some projects, and up to around 15 students the degradation in quality doesn't start becoming severe in high school students. The Junior and Senior years of high school can handle some classes as small lectures, with around 100 students, but you need several aids and the classes MUST be electives. If the students don't already want to learn the material, then it won't work. And you still need smaller classes for consolidation of the learning.

      Schools should have a on-site nurse. And there should be a couple of administrators. And the schools shouldn't be too large. (Again, size depends on age of the students.) Etc.

      This cannot be done within the current budget, so schools are underfunded. But you will notice that I didn't mention anything about electronics. It is my contention that most electronics interfere with education except in self-directed study. Computers are only appropriate if you are building them in class. (That's not unreasonable. Simple computers can be built without using electronics.)

      That said, the limitations on electronics should start being relaxed around 6th grade, with various shop classes...mandatory for all students. By their junior year in high school everyone should have rebuilt a simple four-cycle engine, but elementary chemistry and thermodynamics related to it should be handled in elective classes. Wood working should be handled in 7th grade, or perhaps earlier. Simple cooking in 6th grade, or perhaps 7th. Etc.

      Elementary education should be broad, though shallow. Building and using an abacus should be 2nd grade. Theoretical considerations around the practicals should be electives. Build an autoharp or some such. (I'm not sure how difficult an instrument should be chosen, but kits make this pretty simple. But it does need to be a stringed instrument.) And accompany it with electives on math, music theory, etc. All this at a very simple level.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    44. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I think you're confusing maths and physics. Maths need not concern itself with trivia like physical reality. Those are too difficult and finicky, and besides they're fixed.

      And if you discount infinity on those grounds, you'd also discount irrational numbers like the square root of 2, pi and e. They are after all infinitely long, and non repeating, and represent infinite precision which is of course not possible in the physical universe.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    45. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Hmmm..... I don't think either President Obama or Mitt Romney are stupid or crooked. I'm not a fan of either of them but I can't say I dislike them personally as they both seem to be fairly decent people.

    46. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      Smart people do NOT necessary have anymore wisdom than stupid people. Tim S.

      I went to MIT so I've known a lot of smart people. And oddly enough they seem to be nearly as prone to stupid behavior as stupid people.

      Literally the smartest person I know is a woman who had an affair with a married man because he assured her is wife would be OK with it -- and she believed him.

      So when there's something that only a idiot will do, there will be a fair share of smart people doing it. I come to think of this as a distinction between "constitutional" stupidity and "functional" stupidity. Constitutionally smart people can be functionally stupid because they're so used to be right when everyone else around them are wrong, they start to think they're infallible. In my experience there is no dumb like smart person dumb.

    47. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Or to put it another way, only those who were rich enough by other means could afford intellectual pursuits. Now we've established industries so anyone can become an intellectual, and get paid for it. Frankly, I'd say that's for the better.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    48. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      He'd also have to discount many rational numbers. Take 1 and 2. Now go halfway from 1 to 2 and you land on 1.5. Go halfway the remaining distance and you get 1.75. Again and you have 1.875. Keep going and you'll never reach 2. You'll get infinitely close but will never actually reach 2. Obviously, if infinity isn't allowed, you can't have any numbers between 1 and 2!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    49. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Informative

      The essence of the problem is that when a government and media incite fear and paranoia in an undereducated society, and when the true prevalence of threats is already very low, all this does is magnify (in dramatic fashion) the incidence of false positives. And the government knows this, and exploits this, because they are able to leverage that fear to accumulate ever more draconian powers, until the government becomes a police state.

      Exactly this. How many people have been victims of terrorist attacks in the US in the past 10 years? A quick check shows that there were 57 fatalities due to terrorism in the US from 2005 - 2014. (Source) Fifty seven in ten years. Even if we go from 1995 to 2014 (including the 9-11 attacks), there were 3,264. Since that's over 20 years, that means there's an average of about 163 fatalities in the US every year due to terrorism. And that's including 9-11 which was clearly an outlier.

      At 163 a year, "occupant of special agricultural vehicle" results in more deaths than terrorism.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    50. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Zeno, is that you?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    51. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      in the US our education system is horribly underfunded and under supported

      Want to earn a lot more than the median working income? Get paid to educate just five children at the median cost for public school education. Public schools take more money per pupil than some colleges, and waste at least half of it (and poison the students' minds while they're at it).

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    52. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Schools should have a on-site nurse.

      Full time? You certainly know how to waste money. Do churches have full-time nurses? Train stations? Walmarts? Sears? Do you really need someone always there to make sure the kiddies have immediate medical attention when they spontaneously combust?

      And there should be a couple of administrators.

      For a school with under about 500 students, ONE principal, no secretary. Some teacher gets a little extra pay for also being vice-principal.

      By their junior year in high school everyone should have rebuilt a simple four-cycle engine,

      You are delusional. Not one person in a thousand needs that hands-on training; it's a waste of time and resources.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    53. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Common Core standards are mind crippling. The math is loony, teachers hate it and it slows down the students and discourages them. It's worse even than that older fad, "New Math". History is deficient and warped, focusing on minor characters with little impact while ignoring some of the founders.

      It seems Bill Gates is getting what he wants from the money he put into it.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    54. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      when exactly did scientists make more than non-scientist celebrities?

      Invalid comparison. A celebrity is somebody who has already succeeded so grandly that he's received widespread recognition. More valid comparisons would be

      • scientists vs. poets
      • scientists vs singers
      • scientists vs secretaries
      • scientists vs accountants
      • etc. to the point of tedium
      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    55. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      I take it you don't consider yourself stupid.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    56. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by vovin · · Score: 1

      Mary had a little lamb ...

    57. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by KGIII · · Score: 1

      LOL I've seen that one - it's pretty good. :D

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    58. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I think you summed it up well but, to add to what you wrote...

      If the idea of infinity doesn't make you a little crazy then you're not a mathematician and/or you have no imagination.

      Obviously infinity doesn't exist in the real world - not in any practical sense. I guess one could presume that something can be broken down into infinite parts but physical limitations prevents that from actually being possible. So, when you get to questions like, "How much is half of infinity?" Things start to get a little strange. How much is infinity plus one? Or, how about if you add two of them together?

      We know they don't exist, or shouldn't, but how do you even express that?

      It did actually drive people to madness (or help out) as they were the ones to first really give it much thought in a mathematical sense. Or at least have a crack at figuring out how to express it. With enough thought, it's maddening. I prefer to not think about, to be frank.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    59. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by KGIII · · Score: 1

      You know...

      When I sold and retired, I actually gave some thought to returning to academia and taking up studies in order to become a Philosopher of Mathematics. I actually am one of those honest-to-goodness, dyed-in-the-wool, mathematicians - a Ph.D even, and things like theoretical maths are beyond what I'd say I know or can do. I'd like to think I'd have had the mental chops to do it but I don't really know.

      Still, to be a Philosopher of Mathematics would be, to me, the greatest of achievements. It is my opinion that such is the greatest of all studies and I hold that above all others - including any practical.

      The funny, to me, thing is that I was really bad at math and hated math until someone said something and, from there, it all just clicked into place. After that, I found that I could visualize math and not just perform rote calculations but that I could understand it. The thing is, it was such a trivial thing that was said to me. I'd always been able to do calculations in my head, for example, but I'd never actually understood it - it was simply rote memorization and not comprehension.

      What they told me, and this is not verbatim, is that if you just square that triangle and divide it in half then you have the area. Yes, yes that's obvious but - I'd never looked at it like that. I'm still in contact with that teacher, by the way. He changed my life and I don't know where I'd be without him having told me that. And yes, yes that is a very simple thing. But, it's how I then looked at things. It was as if that one statement resulted in an epiphany.

      It's funny how that one tiny thing, that one bit of shared insight - almost said in passing, was enough to permanently alter the course of my life. And yes, yes I did bold the word "that" because this is Slashdot where people often think they're smarter than they really are. ;-) However, it resulted in a whole new way of looking at things and it just sort of clicked after that. It became something that I visualized, sort of even understood, and enjoyed.

      So, I think some theoretical math would be nice. Obviously, I've taken a look at quite a bit of it and have discussed it with folks in the field. It just seems so beautiful and ugly at the same time. I'd think that, at high levels, it would be an art. Not an art that most can appreciate but an art regardless. Then again, it might be possible to turn it into some other representation and have that be the art - though they might have no idea where it came from. Something akin to the results of fractals springs to mind but I'm not sure that I'm articulating it well.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    60. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I don't know, as politicians go nowadays I find President Obama to be pretty honest. For a politician. Romney as well was fairly honest. Wrong though. I'm enjoying watching the Trump roller coaster though. It's a blast! I like chaos and everywhere Trump goes chaos thrives.

    61. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find it is on YouTube. Yup.

      Here you go:

      https://www.youtube.com/result...

      Enjoy - the bit about Cantor is good.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    62. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      That's partly my point. Societies have always held someone in high esteem. Currently, it's entertainers, including those who entertain with sports. However, there's never really been a time where society was so enamored with research that professional scientists became celebrities as a matter of course.

      Of course, there have been a few famous scientists through the years, but they're the exception, not the norm. Right now, the NFL has about 1700 players, but I doubt any roster of famous scientists would reach 1700 names. A quick search lists only 338.

      Consider the quote from the OP:

      Ours is a world in which football players, reality TV stars and talentless singer bimbos earn hundreds of times more than Nobel prize-winning scientists, and represent what young people aspire to become when they grow up.

      My argument is that, while the precise careers have changed as society has, there has never been a time where a scientist could succeed enough to become a celebrity on par with the more popular careers.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    63. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Per my comment above, I'll assume you've read the actual standard, and that will be the subject of discussion, rather than any particular state's perversion of it.

      What, exactly, is "loony" about the math? Please elaborate on how it slows down the student, since it explicitly does not restrict what teachers can teach.

      As for history, do note that the actual standard does not specify any characters. There are reference texts to illustrate the complexity of the subjects, but the standard does not require their use.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    64. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Solandri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Literally the smartest person I know is a woman who had an affair with a married man because he assured her is wife would be OK with it -- and she believed him.

      Borderline autistic here (who also happened to go to MIT, though that's not really relevant).

      Seems to me that was the logical thing for her to do. Normally in a case like this, the guy lies and claims he's going to leave/divorce his wife in order to get the woman to sleep with him. By making her think they were going to be together eventually in a long-term relationship, he can trick her into doing something she might not want to do until she's in that long-term relationship (sleep with him). However, the guy's lie in this case makes no such promise. No carrot of a long-term relationship dangled to entice her into doing something she was reluctant to do. So clearly this isn't a case of the woman pining for the guy, and being gullible enough to believe his attempt to trick her into sleeping with him in exchange for some promise.

      The only possibility that leaves is that the woman wanted to sleep with the guy (and vice versa), but was refusing to do so out of respect for his relationship with his wife. The fact that he told her this particular lie instead of the divorce lie suggests that he was aware this was her reason too. When he told her his wife would be OK with them sleeping together, that reason evaporated regardless of whether or not he was lying.

      • If he was telling the truth, then there would be no problem with the two of them sleeping together since the wife would be OK with it.
      • If he was lying, then clearly he does not respect his relationship with his wife. And thus there is no longer any need for the woman to respect that relationship either, and she can just sleep with him like she wanted to.

      Crucially, if it is a lie, responsibility for any negative consequences from the event falls entirely upon the guy. At least to the autistic mind, which doesn't understand the social rule that you're "not supposed to" sleep with someone else's spouse. For such a rule to exist, both partners in the relationship have to adhere to it. And in this case clearly one partner was not adhering to it, and he claimed the other partner was not as well. So if I turn off my "social awkwardness detector" I've built up over 40+ years of trying to make sense of seemingly random social rules and customs, her behavior makes perfect sense. If she was autistic or borderline autistic like me, she probably didn't foresee that she would be criticized for her behavior because she "should have known" you aren't supposed to sleep with someone else's spouse, period.

    65. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Gravity's rainbow?

    66. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Reading between the lines I think she got upset when the guy wouldn't make conversation with her.

      Why is that piece of paper more important than me?, and so on.

    67. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      It didn't have enough y's and f's.

    68. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      All it would take is for one person to say "it's just math" and for that to be enough to shut the panic down
      Yes, surprising that the flight attendants did not do that.

      However I could imagine that they have a "procedure" for such a case and that might be to leave the suspicious passenger alone and bring the plane to safety.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    69. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by dywolf · · Score: 1

      No, Cruz dropped out.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    70. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by dywolf · · Score: 1

      ^delusional

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    71. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Comments obviously coming from someone with absolutely no knowledge of administration, in any setting, let alone a school.
      No sir, you are the delusional one.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    72. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by dywolf · · Score: 1

      It's only looney if you don't know what you're talking about.

      To correct that deficiency, I suggest reading these:

      http://www.salon.com/2015/11/2...

      http://www.patheos.com/blogs/f...

      http://www.patheos.com/blogs/f...

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    73. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by tibit · · Score: 1

      You are delusional. Not one person in a thousand needs that hands-on training; it's a waste of time and resources.

      You don't need art either. Completely unnecessary to just living one's life. Right? Well, you see, the thing about comprehensive education is that you need a mix of subjects. Rebuilding, say, an L-head lawnmower engine can be used to give practical backing to basic physics but also the appreciation of design. Although engines are though of as completely utilitarian in design, in practice that's not completely true and there's a lot of leeway for what amounts to preference and aesthetics.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    74. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by tibit · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what the fuck you're talking about with regards to common core math. It is more-or-less what I was taught in grade school in communist Central Europe. It's quite a sensible selection of topics. Certainly didn't hurt me in getting to be an engineer who's not scared to apply math at work.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    75. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by tibit · · Score: 1

      If said lady had an affair with myself, a married guy, my wife would be most likely OK with that. So that's not unthinkable, if perhaps a tad uncommon.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    76. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by dywolf · · Score: 1

      couple more from same author:

      http://www.patheos.com/blogs/f...\

      http://www.patheos.com/blogs/f...

      The point is simple.
      Yes, the rote methods we learned by memorization work.
      But they can be damn hard to explain, especially to young children.
      All too often they don't know WHAT they are doing, or WHY they are doing it.
      They just know it works.

      that's not a recipe for success down the road when the math gets harder.
      these methods take the opposite approach: teaching kids the math we ACUTALLY do in our heads (even when using the rote algorithm methods of carrying or borrowing), to ensure that the kids actually learn the WHAT and WHY of number manipulation, not just the HOW . building that innate number sense now, when they are young and just learning numbers, will make math easier for them down the road.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    77. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by tibit · · Score: 1

      Who cares if continuity exists anywhere in the physical world. It's a very versatile model of reality that so far happens to work and find widespread use. I do agree that a fundamentally different kind of perhaps discrete math would do a better job at going across all the scales of phenomena in the universe, and that the mental baggage of continuum maths might be holding back the progress of science. Yet one can't argue that it has brought us this far along the path of discovery, so it's not useless, and it doesn't practically matter that some abstract concept defined to work forever wouldn't do so in practice. It's not meant to, LOL.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    78. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by dywolf · · Score: 1

      No they don't.
      You don't have a single f'ing clue what you're talking about.

      NPR has been running a series on this, diving deep into what is actually going on.
      I suggest you correct your ignorance (for indeed, you are the only one poisoning anyone's minds) by reading it.
      ( http://www.npr.org/2016/04/18/... )
      ( http://www.npr.org/2016/05/01/... )
      ( http://www.npr.org/sections/ed... )

      But I can condense it some for you:

      The national average is ~11k per student.
      But, averages being averages, the majority of US states and districts spend far less than that.
      so the median number doesn't really mean much.
      And it's because in this country we primarily fund schools through property taxes.

      Live a poor low income area? Your schools will also be poorly funded.
      Live in a wealth neighborhood, or near a bunch of successful tech startups? Your district will probably be rolling in dough.

      The national average is ~11k.
      But in my state the avg is ~9k.
      But in my personal school district, which by the way is a theoretical "rich suburb" of the metro area, the amount per student is actually only 6600.
      Why? Because averages. And because the actual rich people, while having a address that's technically part of the rich suburb, are actually in a separate school district. The "rich suburb school district" actually only encompasses the working class neighborhoods of the burb and covers ~ 60 schools. The rich folks meanwhile have their own district, encompassing just 2 schools, and it funds its schools to the tune of ~20k per student. And they have tremendously better outcomes and graduations rates to go with it.

      In fact, the distribution for school funding almost exactly matches the chart of the income distribution (and inequality):
      The majority of people (school districts) are below the average, and then there's sharp spike on the right at the very top that drags the average up, causing the "average" to be misleading.

      This is the income distribution graph:
      http://theglitteringeye.com/im...

      And this is the school funding distribution graph:
      below the map applet

      Now do you see why your comments were utter ignorance?

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    79. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Yeah. At the moment it's culturally shameful to not be "not stupid".

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    80. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I must shamefully admit that the book is in my collection but I've just not been able to get into it. I've tried a few times but I just can't. I could probably force myself through it but there's no enjoyment in that. I'm hoping that the "right moment" will strike and I'll be ready and able.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    81. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I agree it's useful. But there are other ways of thinking about it that achieve the same result. E.g., without changing any of the actual worked out (as opposed to lazily evaluated) math, you could use the exact same steps, but instead of saying "infinitesimal" you could just say "and this continues to be true further than we can measure", A would would need to be invented, or revived, with that meaning. Possibly even a redefinition of infinitesimal would work.

      Similarly for infinity. That could just mean "and we can't see an end to it". I'm not objecting to "lazily evaluated definitions", I'm objection to definitions that thingify the endpoint of those definitions.

      This would throw out much of math, I admit. IIRC GÃdel's incompleteness depends on actual infinity. Only finite systems would be allowed, but the ability to define the bounds wouldn't be required. This is not at all the same as saying there are no bounds.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    82. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by HiThere · · Score: 1

      The last step of your logic is fallacious. You have defined a procedure that produces rational numbers. And it will produce as many as you bother to produce. It won't produce an unending number, because that's impossible. But it will get as close to that as you care to take the time and effort to. But just defining a lazy procedure doesn't produce the entire sequence. It only produces the values that it is used to produce.

      If the concept of lazy evaluation had existed back when the calculus was being developed, we would never have made this misconception. But once people were coerced into swallowing the belief in infinitesimals (it took a lot of work, read about it) then it became the "standard theory". And I'll agree that it works quite well, because the fine structure of the universe is a lot finer than we can measure, and the large structure is a lot larger than we can comprehend. So in almost all cases you calculate the same answer.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    83. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by HiThere · · Score: 1

      When I was growing up the elementary school that I went to had a full time nurse. I don't know what she did when she wasn't caring for students, but she wasn't idle. And kids were constantly needing care for one thing or another. Not usually much worse than a skinned knee, but sometimes quite a bit worse. She also did some lecturing on health, but I don't remember what she said...which doesn't mean I didn't incorporate it in my life, it just means the way she said it was unmemorable...and useful is often unmemorable in the sense that you don't remember where you learned to do something, that just "that's the way things are done".

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    84. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      So you're reasoning that there aren't an infinite amount of numbers between 1 and 2 is that you've defined "infinite" as impossible? This is circular reasoning. Suppose you set a computer up to run:

      i = 1;
      do while (i 2) {
                i = (i + 2)/2;
                print i;
      }

      How many numbers would this computer produce before it reached 2? (Assuming the computer could handle numbers of any decimal length, of course. No allowing the computer to take 1.9999999999999999999995 and just round it off to 2.) If you could let this computer run 24/7/365 for billions of years, would it ever find an ending point? If it somehow could run after the Universe itself ended, would it ever reach 2? Or would it run on for an infinite period of time.

      If you are asserting that there are a finite amount of numbers between 1 and 2, then how many are there? How long would this hypothetical computer run before it spat out 2?

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    85. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      How, exactly, is that different from the the last century? Come to think of it, when exactly did scientists make more than non-scientist celebrities?

      Movie stars and football players can entertain millions of people at a time, while teachers reach comparatively few at a time. Only the top few make a lot of money. If you're in professional baseball, and you're not one of the top thousand or so players on the continent, you're doing a lot worse than the ten thousandth-best professor.

      Celebrities are by definition truly exceptional people in some way, and are going to make far more than others in their profession. They're not a good salary comparison for pretty much anything.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    86. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      We need to ramp up reverse retaliation on stupid people 100x fold to stop shit like this

      the fact that she can hide behind anonymity is annoying.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    87. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      The problem wasn't that the woman was an idiot, every village has one. The problem is everyone else dog piling on. All it would take is for one person to say "it's just math" and for that to be enough to shut the panic down. Instead, we too frequently hand the leader role to whoever is most terrified and anyone who isn't terrified clearly doesn't understand the gravity of the situation (never mind that there really isn't a situation).

      yeah, but the truth is that any sort of alarm has to be followed up thoroughly, not just the evidence causing the alarm. Imagine if they had ignored the woman's report and by complete coincidence the plane had blown up in midair from any other cause. be a lot of stammering and finger pointing.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    88. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      At a minimum, stupid people should be shamed for being stupid.

      Trump 2016

      you'll never catch him writing a bunch of equations. he's a real American

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    89. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      As a mathematician from MIT, I'm getting a kick out of this thread.

      Math, in and of itself, hasn't ever harmed anyone.

      Well, that's not quite true. It has driven some to insanity and suicide but I've never heard of any algorithm to make a plane blow up. And, really, if you think too much about infinity, the concept, it can drive you insane - more so if you're one of the first to really contemplate it and quantify it.

      As a mathematician, how can you say that? You of all people should understand the dangers. This guy could have waited until the plane was midair, then divided something by zero, and the whole thing would have blown up.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    90. Re: Stupid people punishing smart people by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      At this point, the funding doesn't matter anymore. The problem is that we have a society that says being ill educated is desirable, and what everyone should be. You could spend $10m per pupil and it wouldn't make a difference. In the 1960s, doing science was considered cool, even if the kids were somewhat geeky - and we had a manned landing on Earth's moon. Today? Don't make me laugh.

    91. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      At a minimum, stupid people should be shamed for being stupid.

      That woman needs to be shamed for being stupid, but more importantly, for denouncing someone out of the norm to the authorities.

      People used to do that in German occupied countries during WWII: they tipped off the Gestapo that this-or-that person looked or acted Jewish, or didn't seem to like the occupants, etc. That woman is as ugly as the WWII rats - and I might add, the authorities of today are increasingly similar to those of that era as well.

      This is what makes me retch, not her stupidity.

      "if you see something say something" Yeah, we had too much of that even before the terrorism terror. While when real crimes come along, it's "Don't Snitch"

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    92. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Rather like those who think being a sociopath is a good thing, those who support Clinton 2016

    93. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      She reported someone she thought was suspicious. Fuck her right? But when the neighbors of the san benradino shooters didn't say anything it was all "why didn't they say anything".

      The San Bernardino shooters weren't writing things on paper. You do know it's very hard to make paper explode with a pen, right?

      When you report someone because they buy tons of sugar and potassium chlorate, you're doing the right thing.

      When you report someone who buys a lot of firearms and talks about attacking the country, you're doing the right thing.

      When you report someone for writing strange things on paper, you're both an idiot and a disgusting snitch.

      Ha! Typical liberal. We have a constitutional right to buy a lot of firearms and talk about attacking the country! We don't have a constitutional right to do math!

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    94. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      I don't believe the air marshall could have justified shooting her.

      They could have brought her back onto the flight and introduced her as the person who held their flight for 2 hours because she feared the guy sitting next to her doing math, and the marshall could have shot her, and everybody on the plane would have agreed to say she attacked him first.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    95. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Holy shit! I didn't think of that! Arrest that man!

      He'd have to do it on paper. His calculator just displays zero when he does it.

      And he WAS doing it on paper... You just might be on to something.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    96. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by sjames · · Score: 1

      That's part of the problem. In truth, not every alarm is even worth following up on beyond a cursory glance. Each step of followup should have a path to de-escalation as well.

      If we're going to declare red alert every time someone sneezes, eventually alarm fatigue will set in and we'll miss a genuine red flag. That and the terror response itself will do more harm than the terrorists. People involved in the chain of decision for such things should be required to read and write a report on the story of Chicken Little.

      If we treat every utterance of the village idiot with gravity, we have for all intents and purposes put said idiot in charge. Do you really want to be lead by an idiot?

    97. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I am sorry to inform you that Gravity's rainbow is awful and not worth reading. It has way too little about missiles and too much about the boring personal life of the protagonists. The subject is relevant though because the rainbow of the title is the parabolic trajectory of a missile after boost phase, and it could certainly make a plane blow up.

    98. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by tibit · · Score: 1

      I think you've wandered into a semantic swamp. The "thingification" you speak of is otherwise known as putting a name to an idea. You somehow make it sound like a different way of calling out the idea would make a big difference. The meaning of infinity literally is: endless. Spelling it out as "we can't see an end to it" vs. simply calling it an "infinity"? You've lost me there. I'm all for conciseness.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    99. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      The woman's name is Gladys Pugh and she is from Wales.

      Ah, now we can cyberstalk her.
      Gladys Pugh Chief Yellowcoat/Sports Organiser/Radio Maplin Announcer – Gladys was born in 1933 in Pontypridd, and spent her youth in the Rhondda Valley. She joined Maplins holiday camp in 1955 and rose through the ranks to become sports organiser and later chief Yellowcoat. She won the competition for the most popular girl Yellowcoat every year since she joined, until 1959, when she was beaten by Sylvia Garnsy. Upon Jeffrey Fairbrother's arrival at the camp at the start of the 1959 season, she fell passionately in love with him, although he did not reciprocate this. On one occasion, she found herself in a situation where Jeffrey had become drunk unintentionally, and she helped him back to his chalet. The following morning he awoke naked with no memory of the previous night, and found Gladys' bra in his bed. It was left ambiguous as to what actually happened. Gladys disliked all of the other female Yellowcoats, in particular Sylvia Garnsy, whom she saw as competition in her fight for Jeffrey's affections. Like Jeffrey, she also disapproved of Ted's schemes to scam the campers, even though she secretly had her own scheme selling reconditioned tennis balls. In the 1960 season, Spike Dixon fell in love with her, although she never knew this and it never amounted to anything. Gladys was left heartbroken when Jeffrey departed for Wisconsin without telling anyone at the end of the season, but she quickly recovered upon meeting Squadron Leader Clive Dempster, who arrived to take over Fairbrother's job. She immediately became attracted to Clive, and the two had an on-off relationship throughout the 1960 season. She eventually married Clive and moved to Australia with him at the end of the season.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    100. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Gotta appreciate the irony of a Welsh complaining about incomprehensible scribbling...

      "LOL! ROTFL!"
      "Oh, you speak Welsh!"

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    101. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by HiThere · · Score: 1

      To do an infinite number of iterations, if you assume infinity as actual, requires either an iteration that takes 0 time, including setup, or an infinite amount of time, which is also impossible, as the universe won't last that long.

      So you're proposing something that cannot be done, and isn't real.

      To do that to a defined degree of precision, however, is quite plausible. And produces a finite sequence of terms.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    102. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by HiThere · · Score: 1

      It not just putting a name to an idea, it's also assuming that because you have a name for it it's real. This is a common problem that people have when they give names to things that aren't sensible, i.e., able to be seen, touched, tasted, ...i.e., sensed.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    103. Re:Stupid people punishing smart people by tibit · · Score: 1

      Ideas are just about as real as anything else is. Naming an idea isn't special. Infinity is a useful idea, giving it a name is OK. Really. According to you, the word "number" shouldn't exist. Numbers aren't real either, they are "just" ideas. And so on.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  3. Bill her! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I hope they billed the idiot for the inconvenience, expense and defamation...

    1. Re: Bill her! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, there was Richard Reid (poor misunderstood guy who was just trying to put some Dr Scholls in his shoes)

      There's 100% certain, and there's 100% stupid. What if the guy HAD been an arabic muslim, writing in arabic or whatever. What is the % chance that his handwriting is a magic spell that's going to blow up the plane?

    2. Re:Bill her! by hey! · · Score: 1

      Sounds good.

      Would you rather be bankrupt, or dead? If you prefer dead, then maybe we shouldn't put too much stock in your judgement to begin with.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Bill her! by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 5, Informative

      I hope they billed the idiot for the inconvenience, expense and defamation...

      While people are (perhaps rightly) ganging up on this passenger and blaming her for being ignorant, she was only a small part of the problem here. The Washington Post story on this incident notes a comment from Menzio that isn't in the summary here, where Menzio expressed concern about...

      "A security protocol that is too rigid--in the sense that once the whistle is blown everything stops without checks--and relies on the input of people who may be completely clueless. "

      Contrast this incident with what would happen in a sane world.

      What happened here:
      - Woman feigns illness to deplane. Reports suspicious person to authorities. Pilot escorts "terrorist" off plane. Delays follow for hours as suspect is questioned until "threat" is cleared.

      What would happen in a sane world:
      - Woman says to flight attendant, "Can I talk to you for a second?" and gets up from seat. Attendant knows terrorists are much rarer than lightning strikes, so is skeptical. After short conversation, flight attendant walks past, glances at man's paper, sees he's just doing math, and tells woman everything is fine -- return to seat.

      What would happen in a relatively sane world with some greater level of caution:
      - Woman has conversation with flight attendant. Flight attendant walks up to man, sees math. Attendant casually asks, "Hey, sir, what are you working on there?" Guy replies, "Oh, well... economics actually. I'm a prof at Penn." Situation resolved.

      If still suspicious, we could even go a step further -- Attendant: "Oh, can I just check your ticket? We had a question from a passenger about seat numbers?" Attendant checks name of passenger, excuses herself, sends message to security -- they do a Google search and verify guy actually is Ivy League prof in economics, and situation is resolved in 3 minutes instead of hours.

      Bottom line: while we can laugh that this woman's ignorance, the greater problem here is the general paranoia and bureaucratic structure around security theatre that requires disproportionate responses to things that don't deserve them.

    4. Re: Bill her! by mjm1231 · · Score: 1

      Well, there was Richard Reid (poor misunderstood guy who was just trying to put some Dr Scholls in his shoes)

      There's 100% certain, and there's 100% stupid. What if the guy HAD been an arabic muslim, writing in arabic or whatever. What is the % chance that his handwriting is a magic spell that's going to blow up the plane?

      Richard Reid wasn't Arabic at all, so any system of targeting by racial profile would have given him a pass.

      --
      Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
    5. Re:Bill her! by Frank+Burly · · Score: 1

      There may be good reasons to have authority to (de)escalate outside the hands of the flight crew. I can't think of any though, since they have more literal skin in the game than anyone else.

    6. Re:Bill her! by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There may be good reasons to have authority to (de)escalate outside the hands of the flight crew.

      Perhaps in some circumstances, but the flight crew should serve as a first-level "sanity check." The chances of having a paranoid or delusional person with an unjustified belief that terrorists are common on planes is orders of magnitude higher than the chances of seeing an actual terrorist on a plane.

      And even if the person isn't mentally ill and imagining evil people everywhere, the flight crews on airplanes at least tend to have some actual training in spotting suspicious activity and handling terrorist situations. Random passengers generally do not.

      Again, if the woman insisted on escalating beyond flight crew, fine -- they could have radioed/telephoned into security and cleared it up in a matter of minutes (in a rational world, that is).

    7. Re:Bill her! by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      If I were that guy I would have divided her by zero.

    8. Re:Bill her! by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Anyway what could have done the guy would have he been a terrorist? Nowadays with all controls and the like, what can do a single man in a plane, armed with a pen and a piece of paper?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    9. Re:Bill her! by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I don't know but just to be sure we should make sure that Steven Seagal, Chuck Norris, Bruce Schneier, and Angus MacGyver never board a plane.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    10. Re:Bill her! by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Chuck Norris (76 yo)? Make sure he doesn't board a plane... in 1990!

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  4. To play the devil's advocate... by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... I hear the passengers thought he was with the Al-Gebra network - and he was holding potential weapons of math instruction.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Hahahaha ... that was pretty funny!

      Weapons of Math instructions!!! I will remember that.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      "There's this guy in the seat next to me... he's writing some message with Arabic numbers in it."

    3. Re: To play the devil's advocate... by neaorin · · Score: 2

      Also, he was using Arabic numerals... I mean, how many more red flags do you need??

    4. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You may already know this, but I'll put this here anyway: The name "algebra" actually *is* Arabic in origin. It comes from "al-jabr" meaning "reunion of broken parts".

    5. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Suppose he was not writing math equations. Instead he was writing in Arabic. Does that mean he's a terrorist? What does writing have anything to do with terrorism? I'm still confused why the crew questioned him.

    6. Re: To play the devil's advocate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Very funny. So funny in fact that it would be dangerous for you to repeat that joke to a fellow passenger on your next flight. Just like remembering to say hello instead of hi to your friend Jack.

    7. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2

      Weapons of Math instructions!!! I will remember that.

      Remember what?

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    8. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Middle School Teachers Discovered Supporting Mysterious Al Gebra Network! Entire Courses Devoted to Brainwashing!"

      Next week's headline on CNN.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it is. I remember hearing it mentioned decades ago in middle school when I first started taking Algebra (although the notion of what Arabic was likely was more abstract to me at the time). There was a good "TED radio hour" that talked about that (and other related topics) as well:

      Solve for X

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    10. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      The name, it is. Funnily, the name doesn't correspond to the contents anymore in any meaningful way. It's just something people are used to.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    11. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      "There's this guy in the seat next to me... he's writing some message with Arabic numbers in it."

      See -- that was the suspicion! The passenger obviously saw he was Italian, so why wasn't he using Roman numerals?!? Those suspicious Arabic numerals were a dead giveaway: Obviously he must be an Arab terrorist posing as an Italian. it's always those little things that give the foreigners away....

    12. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Best play of words I've read in a very long time. Virtual +5 Funny to you, my good sir.

    13. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Wow, here's a virtual +5 Funny to you too!

    14. Re: To play the devil's advocate... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      To deconfuse people, some have started calling what we use "Western numerals", so as to make clear that there's also a different set of numerals that the Arabs and Persians actually use (at least except perhaps some parts of Africa or something like that) that look different. (I believe the two sets used to be called "Western Arabic numerals" and "Eastern Arabic numerals".)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    15. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Best play of words I've read in a very long time. Virtual +5 Funny to you, my good sir.

      Actually, I assume it was just a reference to this internet meme from over a decade ago with the same puns. Still funny though.

    16. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      He's probably a theoretical mathematician. You know, one of those religious types that have been at war with the applied sect for centuries.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    17. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wow, here's a virtual +V Funny to you too!

      FTFY

    18. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      ... I hear the passengers thought he was with the Al-Gebra network

      Even funnier, considering "algebra" is an Arabic word.

    19. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by Sique · · Score: 5, Informative

      It still does. The actual name of the book is Al-kitab al-mukhtasar f hisab al-jabr wa’l-muqabala, which translates to The Compendious Book on Calculation by Completion and Balancing. The putting together (al-jabr) can also be translated to completing. The author is a guy named Muammad ibn Musa, born in the persian region of Chorasmia. So he was mostly called al-Khwarizmi, the Chorasmian, latinized to Algoritmi. He does not only gave us the Algebra (al-jabr), also the Algorithmus: if you do it following the sequential solution descriptions put down by al-Khwarizmi, you are following the Algorithmus. And he even gave us the x we see in all the algebraic equations. When he was posing a question for the thing to solve an equation, he used the arabic term "chai" (thing), which in the first editions of his book in latin letters was written as xai, shortened to x.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    20. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The wording, the phrase.
      What did you think????

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    21. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      The specific thing the term "al-jabr" was referring to was the simple fact that in the field of reals, "A-B=C" is equivalent to "A=C+B". That is only one of the many, many, MANY things that are part of modern algebra, the largest part of which is post-1700 (cf. Devlin). Likewise, the name "algorithm" comes from Al-Khowarizmi's name but one of the best known algorithms of all times is Euclid's GCD algorithm which clearly predates Al-Khowarizmi's work. So Al-Khowarizmi gave use a few specific methods for solving certain problems, which came to bear his name at the time, but nowadays the word is actually used to refer to any mechanical recipe for performing a specific computational task, including all the ones that pre-dated or post-dated Al-Khowarizmi's life and work. Your speculation about the origin of "x" is unsubstantiated. All we know for sure is that it first appeared in the works of Descartes.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    22. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by Sique · · Score: 1

      You want to misunderstand me, right? Just to be right yourself? I didn't say, that Muhammad ibn Musa invented algorithms. That's something you argue against without anyone ever claiming so. I said that we use the word Algorithm, which is just the latinization of al-Khwarizmi. Everytime we use an algorithm, we literally do an "al-Khwarizmi". That there are older algorithms known. No one would dispute that. We just didn't call them "algorithm" at the time of their invention.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    23. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      ... I hear the passengers thought he was with the Al-Gebra network - and he was holding potential weapons of math instruction.

      *slow clap*

    24. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by Livius · · Score: 1

      potential weapons of math instruction.

      Do not underestimate how much politicians are frightened by the thought of citizens becoming informed or even thinking for themselves.

    25. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      You want to misunderstand me, right? Just to be right yourself?

      I have no idea what that means.

      I didn't say, that Muhammad ibn Musa invented algorithms. That's something you argue against without anyone ever claiming so. I said that we use the word Algorithm, which is just the latinization of al-Khwarizmi. Everytime we use an algorithm, we literally do an "al-Khwarizmi".

      That is an interesting historical tidbit, as I have noted, but I also noted that it has little to do with the current meaning of the word, and most historical meanings have been relegated to such dictionaries as the OED. In addition, you're contradicting yourself in the last sentence. Either you're referring to the positional arithmetic algorithms, in which case the "Everytime we use an algorithm" part is wrong, since it doesn't apply to all of them, or you're talking about algorithms in general in the current sense, and then you actually *are* saying that "Muhammad ibn Musa invented algorithms".

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    26. Re: To play the devil's advocate... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      "Western numerals"

      Does that come with a side of "Freedom Fries"?

    27. Re:To play the devil's advocate... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the case of x (as a variable), there is reason to support a hypothesis for its origin as being similar to what was described above. I recommend listening to this TED talk (which I referenced in another comment in this thread as well) which includes a talk someone gave on where x actually came from (ie, why x, not y or z or w or any other letter). The talk does seem to pin it on a translation from the Arabic.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    28. Re: To play the devil's advocate... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Merica, Fuck Yeah!

      --
      Time to offend someone
  5. Equations can be seen by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1
    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:Equations can be seen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Uh, unrelated equations used for dramatization can be seen at that link (and those are not even equations in a notebook). But then unrelated equations can be seen in a lot of places.

      I don't have vote points. Others might have.

    2. Re:Equations can be seen by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      Because your own networks and shows dont milk your population ignorance to create content? Kings of the swamp? History Chanel? Implying that your networks don't carry on propaganda (way more subtle and elaborate) does not strike me as insightful as you think you are.

    3. Re:Equations can be seen by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      Here are some of his actual equations. paper on price stickiness and the cost of menus.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  6. "Math equations" is the saving grace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So what chance has someone like Frederick Forsythe working on a manuscript in the plane? That's not mere math equations we are talking about but complete terrorist plots. Why does it even matter what some bloke is writing on the plane? It's not like the paper is going to explode into flames and take down the plane. If you want to deal with a report of suspicious writing (what nonsense), there is no point in not waiting until arrival in order to ask him things.

    1. Re:"Math equations" is the saving grace? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      And you think that because you work on classified material, nobody else should be allowed to work where anyone might be able to see them?

      Or what is your point?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  7. Not so sure on this one by onyxruby · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's no shortage of kids in school that will tell you math is terrifying...

    1. Re:Not so sure on this one by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      She might have been right though, he is an 'economics' prof, in today's world some ofthese people should be considered terrorists, causing mass confusion of simple ideas and leading to world wide terror.

  8. better call the feds by slashmydots · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh no! Italians doing math?! They're only supposed to cook pasta and things. That's definitely out of character if you base it solely on cartoonish stereotypes.

  9. It's impossible to math to take down a plane... by Z80a · · Score: 3

    ..Unless he divided by zero.
    That would create a NaN, and everything that touched it would also became a NaN, thus the passagers, plane fuselage, engines, ground...

    1. Re:It's impossible to math to take down a plane... by Falos · · Score: 1

      *tries to imagine sound effect*

    2. Re:It's impossible to math to take down a plane... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I came very close to dividing by zero once - my injuries were so severe that I had to be taken to the l'hôpital

    3. Re:It's impossible to math to take down a plane... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      +1 insightful, +1 funny

    4. Re:It's impossible to math to take down a plane... by pjt33 · · Score: 2

      That's not true. You've failed to consider the case where he arranges for everyone of Polish origin to occupy the starboard seats. It's basic control theory: to be stable, you need all of the Poles to be on the left of the plane.

    5. Re:It's impossible to math to take down a plane... by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      I came very close to dividing by zero once - my injuries were so severe that I had to be taken to the l'hôpital

      Well done good sir, very well done. Did you come up with this on the spot?

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    6. Re:It's impossible to math to take down a plane... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      For those who didn't get it..

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  10. Witchcraft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sad. Next they will be accusing mathematicians of the black arts.

  11. In some dark corner of Hell... by hyades1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...Osama is high-fiving Satan under a "Mission Accomplished" banner.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  12. Maybe the equations were wrong by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    And the scared passenger didn't want the professor to fly under false (mathematical) terms.

  13. terrorist code by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    To be fair, Professor Menzio (if that is his real name) was using Arabic numerals.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:terrorist code by emanuele_fanton · · Score: 1

      Indeed he needed the zero!!!

    2. Re:terrorist code by Lobachevsky · · Score: 1

      The poor Hindus, always confused for Middle-Easterners and Arabs. They're Hindu Numerals.

  14. Muricah by haggus71 · · Score: 1

    No American can conceive of anyone doing their own taxes, much less a differential equation; so the guy must be a terrorist!

  15. Culture of stupid by Alomex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has become a trend in American life: the culture of stupid.

    Started with Sarah Palin, who couldn't even name a newspaper she read and people readily accepted that, and it carries on today, with Trump spouting platitudes and messages of hate (many self-contradictory) that wouldn't stand a few seconds of rational though. But he says them with the right anger tone and that's all it matters.

    Next time it will be us geeks&nerds being detained because we are editing some code on our laptops.

    Say no to hate, say no to ignorance.

    1. Re:Culture of stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While I inherently agree with you, please consider Palin/Trump as a symptom of the pre-existing culture rather than the cause of it. They were made by the same system that made anyone who accepted them.

      I did actually genuinely worry about appearing "suspicious" when working on code onboard an airplane, luckily for me it was a RyanAir flight and most people would prefer a crash landing to avoid hearing their obnoxious fanfare upon landing on time.

    2. Re:Culture of stupid by theGhostPony · · Score: 1

      Evidently "Idiocracy" was a documentary. Who knew.

      --
      /. Dissent will not be tolerated. Think like us or perish.
    3. Re:Culture of stupid by Alomex · · Score: 1

      "Asking immigrants their religion" News flash, that is already the law

      That's not what he said. He said denying entry to all muslims.

      And no, nowhere in the law it says that Mexico has to pay for a wall.

      So you are wrong in two counts. I.e. you are also ignorant of what exactly he said, which is exactly my point. Ignorance has become a trend.

    4. Re:Culture of stupid by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      This has become a trend in American life: the culture of stupid.

      Started with Sarah Palin...

      Uh, yeah, totally started with Sarah Palin. <eyeroll>

    5. Re:Culture of stupid by Alomex · · Score: 1

      The seeds go farther back indeed, e.g. Truthiness or Reagan's and Bush Jr. snafus, but Sarah Palin was the first time the culture so openly embraced ignorance in a candidate.

      The epitome today is Trump declaring he loves ignorant people (he called the uneducated). Vive l'ignorance!

    6. Re:Culture of stupid by dave420 · · Score: 1

      So it's xenophobic, but only temporarily xenophobic, until some point in the future when it will be stopped? Is that supposed to be better?

    7. Re:Culture of stupid by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      And Obama saying he visited 52 states!

      What Trump is saying is the law, the Liberals are the ones who change it to hate.

      "going to build a wall on the border" News flash, that is already a law "Asking immigrants their religion" News flash, that is already the law

      All Trump is saying is that he is going to enforce the law, and that is a message people like to hear after 8 years of Obama ignoring the law.

      I say no to hate, that is why I vote against Democrats. Democrats hate Americans more then anyone. But Democrat voters seem fine with being hated.

      Yes "Obama isn't enforcing the immigration laws" we've all heard it. This might be a good place to point out that the Obama administration has deported 2.4 million illegal immigrants as of 2013, way more than any president in both terms; in fact, all previous administrations together from 1892 through 2007 only deported a total of 4.5 million. (https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/ois_yb_2013_0.pdf page 103) In fact anybody who'd been paying some attention to news about immigration would have seen continuous attacks on him about the aggressive deportation policies since gthe beginning of his presidency.
      but do go on with what you were saying

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  16. Elvis inspired BBC picture caption by rjforster · · Score: 2

    At least this story brought us the caption "We can't fly on together with suspicious maths".
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/worl...

    1. Re:Elvis inspired BBC picture caption by habig · · Score: 2

      Except the BBC picture is of electromagnetism, which is far less of a black art than economics.

    2. Re:Elvis inspired BBC picture caption by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Except the BBC picture is of electromagnetism, which is far less of a black art than economics.

      Coming soon to a theater near you: They defeated Magneto, but now they face their greatest foe ever? Find out the answer when the X-Men take on Economo in this summer's smash blockbuster.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  17. Idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well, it looks like the movie "Idiocracy" is a documentary.

    Ignorance is good while knowledge is elitist.

    We should at shame them. And it goes for religious beliefs too. It's one thing to believe in a god - even though historical evidence shows that it was made up by people - but it's another to ignore or dispute scientific evidence because your book of myths says something different.

    1. Re:Idiocracy by PPH · · Score: 1

      The Prophecy shall be fulfilled.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  18. What if he was using metric units? by clovis · · Score: 3, Funny

    What if, and I'm just saying, what if he had been writing his mathy stuff and using METRIC UNITS!
    This would clearly identify him as being a foreigner. And furthermore, he spoke English with an accent according to the article. Why would anyone learn to speak English with an accent unless they were, in fact, a terrorist?

    Once exposed, he was no longer able to carry out his nefarious plot.
    I say that woman did stop his plot. Kudos to you, plot-stopping heroine.

    1. Re:What if he was using metric units? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Well, actually this is where the plot really thickens, as reportedly the professor got back on the plane and continued the flight, but the woman who reported him did not (link in Dutch - use Google Translate if you need). So what happened to her? And - maybe even more importantly - was her luggage removed from the plane before it left? Because if not, now that would be a real security leak.

    2. Re:What if he was using metric units? by Ashtead · · Score: 1

      Well since he is Italian, and was on his way to Canada, and if he were doing applied engineering math he might have been using metric units.

      However, as his field of learning is economy, the most likely specific units that he might have been using would have been dollars ... which if not exactly metric, at least have the familiar base-10 divisions. But as he was working on some differential equations at the time, the use of specific units or even much in the ways of numbers would not be likely.

      --
      SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
    3. Re:What if he was using metric units? by bungo · · Score: 1

      He's an economist.

      He'll be using imaginary numbers.

      It the way how how economists get their imaginary results.

      --
      "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
  19. it's the ignorants' world now by l3v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While this story might seem funny at first, it quickly becomes sad. Also very inconvenient for a few hundred people who sit on the plane and get delayed beacuse of an idiot. Lots of people would say better safe than sorry, but this is much more than that: usually ignorance won't hurt many people, but it can reach a point where it will make the lives of the rest of the population a living hell.

    As a sidenote, such stories made me to really think about what I want to read on to/from-US planes, for many years now. Back in the days I mostly read technical stuff, papers, articles, but slowly I switched to "simple" novels with no math and no images. Might be crazy, but I just don't want to be the cause of some idiot delaying the flight - which, as we can see, happens from time to time.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    1. Re:it's the ignorants' world now by antdude · · Score: 1

      Next with the texts. You might as well not read and fly. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    2. Re:it's the ignorants' world now by MrKrillls · · Score: 1

      Last time I flew I was scribbling down linear algebra problems and trying to solve them.

      --
      Don't step on the baby.
    3. Re:it's the ignorants' world now by phorm · · Score: 1

      because of an idiot

      Sadly, it appears there were multiple levels of idiots in this story.

    4. Re:it's the ignorants' world now by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      While this story might seem funny at first, it quickly becomes sad. Also very inconvenient for a few hundred people who sit on the plane and get delayed beacuse of an idiot. Lots of people would say better safe than sorry, but this is much more than that: usually ignorance won't hurt many people, but it can reach a point where it will make the lives of the rest of the population a living hell. As a sidenote, such stories made me to really think about what I want to read on to/from-US planes, for many years now. Back in the days I mostly read technical stuff, papers, articles, but slowly I switched to "simple" novels with no math and no images. Might be crazy, but I just don't want to be the cause of some idiot delaying the flight - which, as we can see, happens from time to time.

      Actually it's sad right from the start, and a lot frightening.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  20. Poor fool... by theGhostPony · · Score: 1

    She must have really hated math class back in school. Today's Word: moron

    --
    /. Dissent will not be tolerated. Think like us or perish.
  21. ...becuase writing? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Because its possible that just writing could bring down a plane?

    1. Re:...becuase writing? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You are not very familiar with black magic? First you write the scroll, then you read it aloud, or even burn it for amplified purpose!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  22. Bravo for Associated Press stupid copyright by franzrogar · · Score: 1

    FTA: "Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed."

    You have published (even with a link), broadcast (hey, worldwide access), rewritten (there's a summary) and redistributed (some parts are copy&paste) the news!

    Wait, what? If you comply with that copyright, then there wouldn't be any to inform about, meaning there's no news at all. High five for AP stupidity!

  23. Hair color and math by pesho · · Score: 1

    There is some entertaining detail missing from the US News story that you can find in Washington Post. Here is their description of how the encounter started:

    The curly-haired man tried to keep to himself, intently if inscrutably scribbling on a notepad he’d brought aboard. His seatmate, a blond-haired, 30-something woman sporting flip-flops and a red tote bag, looked him over. He was wearing navy Diesel jeans and a red Lacoste sweater – a look he would later describe as “simple elegance” – but something about him didn’t seem right to her.

    Blonde jokes and 3, 2, 1 ....

  24. Authorities, not idiot complaining by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    I hope they billed the idiot for the inconvenience, expense and defamation...

    Everyone here keeps blaming the idiot who made the complaint but what about those who investigated it? It's well known that there are idiots out there so when someone comes forward with words to the effect of "I think the person next to me is a terrorist because they are writing something I don't understand on paper." the correct response from the authorities should be to ignore it because they are clearly talking to one of those idiots. If they don't exercise some judgment as to which complaints are credible and which are just nuts then there is a good chance real terrorists will be able to use this to distract them.

    1. Re:Authorities, not idiot complaining by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2

      Sure, there's a bit of fail on the part of the airline. The Washington Post article though seems to indicate significantly less stupidity on the part of the airline and the authorities than in other cases such as that UC Berkeley student who was forbidden from flying for speaking in arabic to his uncle. In this case, most of delay was from the false accuser faking illness. Only after a period of feigned sickness did she leave her seat, speak to the flight crew, and make her accusation. Dr. Menzio was then briefly interviewed and allowed to fly, while his accuser was taken off the plane and sent home on another flight.

      That's less than the ideal outcome, of course. One shouldn't be able to delay a whole planeload of passengers by pretending to be sick in the first place. If you're too sick to fly, get off. Otherwise stay onboard, suck it up, and suffer. But, barring a legitimate life-threatening emergency, the flight should keep to its schedule. And once the false accusation was made, they should have just told her to shut up and quit being stupid, or get off the plane herself.

      But even when the authorities overreact (As in the case of that UCB student. And yes the airline employees and LEOs should be punished themselves for that debacle.) the root cause is still that fist vicious
        little bigot who decided to falsely accuse an innocent person of being a terrorist in the first place. So yeah... while the airline and law enforcement deserve some criticism in this case (And some ended careers in the other.), the hammer does also need to be dropped... hard and without mercy... on the original false accuser.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
  25. Seriously? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    ... xenophobic attitudes ...

    No. The problem is that the woman who raised the issue is a moron. Does she think "math" is magical and that someone could down a plane by scribbling out an equation? Even if he *was* a terrorist, quietly doing math on a notepad isn't dangerous or illegal - even by TSA / DHS standards. I can only hope that this woman doesn't breed or vote.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  26. Re:For how long? by itsdapead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It sounds to me like they said, "Ok, we'd better check this out." Then they spent a few minutes, confirmed that everything was fine, and were on their way. Not a problem.

    Yup, and if you RTFA a bit more carefully, you'll see that the flight was actually delayed because it had to return to the gate to let off the woman who had complained, because she was feeling ill. At the end of the day, the professor writing math got to stay on the plane, the woman who complained about it didn't. Damn, that doesn't make such a good headline, does it?

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  27. He had a beard by kheldan · · Score: 1

    I found a picture of the Italian-American professor in question: he has a beard, and don't Islamic terrorists all have beards? And he was making squiggly lines and whatnot on a piece of paper which just has to be that squiggly language terrorists speak, isn't it? So the guy must be a terrrorist, obviously! /sarcasm

    The real crimes here are the crimes of blind-fear-driven ignorance, stupidity, and bigotry. Mister Menzio should consider suing the woman in civil court, and asking for damages in the amount of One Public Apology (preferably read at a press conference), his legal fees, plus one dollar.

    Seriously, folks, it's bullshit like this that makes me ashamed to be an American.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  28. why is always some woman by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

    So much for women's intuition.

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  29. Wha! by 101percent · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Oh my lord, he's doing encryption!

  30. Yip by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It's Perl, run!!!

  31. She saw something, said something.... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We constantly blare over the PA systems, "If you see something, say something ..." and scare the population to no end with "all suspicious packages will be removed". We install jersey barriers in airport drop offs. So she saw something and said something. After training the population to be afraid of every passing shadow why expect them to exercise common sense or expect them to be reasonable?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  32. And 170 administrators by mpercy · · Score: 1

    At a plush central school district office, plus a half-score of vice-principals, resources directors, etc.

  33. Al-gebra sounds terrorist by Trachman · · Score: 1

    When woman asked what he was doing he said he was doing Al-gebra for an AL-gorithm.

    1. Re:Al-gebra sounds terrorist by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      I heard he was using ISILmetric coordinates

  34. Re:We're told to do this by rakslice · · Score: 2

    Having someone make a report of this nature is a 100% predictable consequence of telling every American it's important for them to be on the lookout for we're-not-sure-what. Even in the absence of bigotry, there is still going to be a certain amount of noise in the system due to ignorance and straight up hallucinations. Maybe the leaders who proposed "see something say something" understood the consequences, but it hardly matters now; at this point all business owners can do is to get better at eliciting enough detail from the reporters and quickly confirming that it isn't anything to worry about.

  35. Spending the most is not fully funded, nor is by mpercy · · Score: 1

    Spending less that the most underfunded.

    Are there a lot of people who think that our educational spending is done efficiently, especially with respect to the task of providing a certain level of education for as many children as we can? Or are resources squandered? Are we overspending on a tiny fraction of students who will never reach a "normal" level?

    It's certainly not a simple matter that "Spend more money and we fix the problem."

    Or put another way: How much would be *enough*? The most persistent answer is simply "more".

  36. Answer = 42. Obvious by argee · · Score: 2

    The answer to his equations is obviously 42. What's the big deal?

  37. Economist "doing math" by Latent+Heat · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, it was an economist writing down a differential equation over a tray table.

    An economist -- yeah, as an engineer, it would have been my ethical duty to report this to the authorities.

    1. Re:Economist "doing math" by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      So, it was an economist writing down a differential equation over a tray table.

      An economist -- yeah, as an engineer, it would have been my ethical duty to report this to the authorities.

      An economist working math? Good Lord, the guy really was dangerous.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  38. Asimov's democracy by mpercy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.' Isaac Asimov

    1. Re:Asimov's democracy by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      Alexis de Tocqueville commented on the very same thing when he published Democracy In America in 1835 (Vol. I) and 1840 (Vol. II).

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  39. Did they ask anyone of the flightdeck? by almclean · · Score: 1

    You would think that there might have been someone on the flight deck who could tell the difference between algebra and Arabic writing. I'll rephrase that, I wouldn't want to fly a plane where anyone on the flight deck couldn't tell the difference between algebra and Arabic writing.

  40. What kind of derivative would do that? by peterofoz · · Score: 1

    Does the article specific if he was a social derivative, an economic derivative, or a physical derivative? Geez, some are so sensitive to change over a few variables. Clearly the antidote is better integration.

  41. too embrassed by SYSS+Mouse · · Score: 2

    I think the woman was too embarrassed to continur the flight.

    FACE THE WRAITH OF THE PASSENGERS for delaying the flight for stupid reason.

  42. The influence of Radiohead? by xaosflux · · Score: 1

    Karma police
    Arrest this man, he talks in maths
    He buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio

  43. Interesting ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... that the discussion of this incident on a professional pilot's board was shut down within a few hours.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Interesting ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      [citation, please]

      What involvement did the pilots have? They were informed of a passenger claiming to be too unwell to fly ; they followed procedure and return to gate. Sure there is other stupid shit involved, but nothing that affects the pilots. If anyone might have been in a position to shut this down, it would have been cabin crew, and it's not at all clear that they knew the substance (I use the word very loosely) of the woman's complaint.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  44. Cabin Crew also scared of equations? by Attila+the+Bun · · Score: 2

    There are dumb people everywhere. What's more worrying is that the cabin crew -- the people charged with the safety of their passengers -- were unable to deal with a simple situation and had to call for outside help. Were they also too dumb to gauge the danger posed by some scribbles on a piece of paper?

  45. He Was Doing Differential Equations by perry64 · · Score: 2

    I kind of agree with the woman - everyone who has taken diffy q's knows they are evil!!

  46. Talking him was seeking additional information by plague911 · · Score: 1

    This actually seems like the most fair response possible. The passenger next to him was an idiot but the airline having a chat with him is the most reasonable response to said idiot. .

  47. What was the potential danger by phorm · · Score: 1

    Even if he was writing in Arabic, and was writing about something bad ... WHAT IS THE DANGER. I mean, it's a fucking pencil and paper. It's not like he's writing with his blood, or scrawling REDRUM in the bathroom mirror (and even then, not so much a threat). If the guy had something with wires and blinking lights in his coat... OK maybe a potential threat, but what in the hell could this person have being writing that in any way represented a threat to passengers.
    Was it magic stationary? You know the type in fantasy novels/movies where what one person writes another person sees? No, wait, because that shit isn't real.

    No threat. No potential of threat. The biggest threat is the stupidity of all involved in this type of crap.

  48. How does she imagine terrorism works? by Shaiku · · Score: 1

    Does she think that terrorists hop on planes and then live-blog their intentions dead-tree? What sense would that make?

    Maybe she thinks that terrorists board the plane first and then work out the physics required to sabotage the flight en-route.

    Or does she think that math itself can be used to control airplanes from the passenger seat?

    I guess this is the increasingly less rare intersection of ignorance, abject stupidity, and irrational paranoia. I'd be pretty angry with this passenger for being so stupid, let alone delaying the flight and wasting fuel.

  49. Kentucky Derby winner / wrong side of the plane by IHTFISP · · Score: 1
    If he was plotting the stability equations for the latest Kentucky Derby winner while seated in the wrong side of the plane, this could have been a serious danger had the plane taken off.

    .

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    Error: NSE - No Signature Error
  50. Proof by Stachel · · Score: 1

    > the plane headed back to the gate

    Proof that the pen is mightier than the sword.

    --
    Stachel
  51. Invented in India. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    Are you aware of what kind of numeral "2" is?

    Hindu, originally.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Adopted by the Persians, then adopted by by the Arabic world, then adopted by Europe. But invented by Indian mathematicians.

    1. Re:Invented in India. by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      >But invented by Indian mathematicians.

      We believe.
      When you're talking about an idea that old and so useful that culture after culture adopted it as soon as they encountered it - and going back much further than any written records, who knows. The Indian's may have claimed credit for something they inherited from some even earlier society.
      Granted the evidence is strong for the Indian invention hypotheses- but it's not conclusive. In the subject of history nothing ever is, and in the subject of ancient history - there is nothing, not a single word written that is stronger than hypotheses. There is just way too little evidence and far too much guesswork involved. Archeology gives us lots of pieces - but for something as complicated as history - they all add up to tiny little fractions - every paper published on ancient history is lucky if it gets to be based on 2 artifacts, a single artifact is much more common - and papers are interpretations of what that artifact may mean - backed up by reference to ancient writing (which, if nothing else, tells us something about the culture that produced them) and an attempt at logical reasoning.

      That's it. I'm not disparaging historians - I am trying to convey just how incredibly difficult their job is - and how openminded a person has to be to actually do that job.
      The strongest proof we have that Indian mathematicians invented the arab numerals (as opposed to copying them from somebody else) is the writings of Indian historians - and you simply cannot trust ANY ancient writing to be accurate (even less so than modern writing - in terms of trustworthyness any book more than a thousand years old is slightly below an AC on slashdot).

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  52. Those equations *are* pretty suspicious... by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    The idea that one could statistically model the visceral nightmare that is the job-hunting and job-acquisition experience today... a fantasy blackboard world where the job-seeker and employer come together in some process of uptake that is as regimented and predictable as molecular and cellular interlocks... the idea that 'flows' of jobs and jobless can be modeled like packet flows...

    I'm sure the math is first-rate but the precept has this familiar spherical cow flavor...

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  53. Xenophobia by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

    This isn't xenophobia. This is ignorance. There's a difference.

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  54. Xenophobic by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    To a chapter from MIB he was obviously an Alien...

  55. Re:To be pedantic by dywolf · · Score: 1

    my understanding was they're western Arabic numerals.
    the eastern Arabic numerals being closer tied to their indo origins.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  56. PSA by dacaldar · · Score: 1
    We don't have to put up with far too obtrusive advertising. Please never link to websites that autoplay sound (or video with sound) as you scroll through an article. At least not without a warning beside the link.

    There are many situations where you want to read an article on your smartphone, but don't want everyone in the room to hear from loud ad. And you shouldn't have to remember to go change media volume before clicking on what you thought was an "article", not a video.

    Not to mention all the false revenue generated by clicking the video to bring up a pause button button ending up counting a click through to the advertiser before deleting that tab...

  57. Headline: Lazy Terrorist Crams for Attack by gosand · · Score: 1

    Really? What kind of shitty terrorist would be doing the math for his attack after he's already on the plane? What could he be calculating at that point?

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  58. If my calculations are correct..... by hughankers · · Score: 1

    It means I'm probably a terrorist.

  59. How much? by Lord_Vader · · Score: 1

    Maybe he was just trying to work out all of the fees he was charged for flying. :)

  60. Re:For how long? by itsdapead · · Score: 1

    Well, she WANTED off the plane,

    Well, depending on which version of the story you read either she was taken off the plane because she was ill or her "illness" was entirely due to her concerns about the professor.

    The Washington Post seems to think that the way of investigating an accusation of terrorism is to google the person's name (probably more reliable than the TSA but not much). Or maybe they should have publically interviewed him in his seat on the plane (for the entertainment of the surrounding passengers)?

    Incidentally, I see that the Washington Post is keen to point out at every opportunity that the prof was "curly haired", "olive skinned" and "foreign-sounding" without providing a shred of evidence that this was relevant to anybody other than the woman who complained (and even that is speculation, although it sounds likely). In particular, note how the journalist has weaved these words into their account of the interview with the security guy to make sure that we associate the issue of race with the "interrogation" (and don't question their headline that claims the prof was "ethnically profiled") - that, ladies and gentlemen, is how you do spin. "Some sort of agent" is a great one, too.

    ...and if you read to the end of the Washington Post article you'll find the root of the narrative: yes folks, it was all Trump's fault!

    Now, if Trump sat next to me on a plane writing scary notes about building walls and banning Moslems, I'd probably feign illness and demand to be let off myself, but I don't think he can be held single-handedly responsible for every instance of casual racism or ignorance in the USA.

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  61. crazy people by TutSiki+KoyAma · · Score: 1

    Something similar to this actually happened to me once in a trade show, where i was a vendor. First some cops showed up, then i was questioned with some other officials. The reason was, because I was making little coils using copper wire for an experimental electric car. They told me to stop what i was doing, that, some other vendors scared of my playing with copper wire. I felt, like I was in a classroom. What a stupidity.

  62. ignorant vs. sophisticated by TutSiki+KoyAma · · Score: 1

    Math is a tool for a professional, a hobby for some others, and good for brain development in general. Since it is not illegal to sing, to whistle, to dance, to play games, to talk, to kiss, to write, to eat or drink etc. in public, it is not illegal to do math, either. It may look awkward or suspicious to stare at a computer for long hours, to sit on the same bench everyday, or taking pictures of a building for its architectural style, or texting in public etc. but they are all within our liberal rights. Public safety is important, but, there is a price which is paid by everyone when fooled, no matter that person is an ignorant or a sophisticated one. If you don't understand, don't panic. Just show some respect for other peoples' rights.