Slashdot Mirror


Motorola's Legendary RAZR Flip Phone Is Making a Comeback (engadget.com)

An anonymous reader shares an Engadget article: The year was 2004, and Motorola had just announced what was then an insanely thin flip phone, the RAZR V3. It was -- and still is -- a head-turner, and eventually over 130 million units were sold in total. Such were the glorious days of Motorola. Twelve years later, the now Lenovo-owned brand appears to be prepping a relaunch of this legendary model, according to its teaser video of a nostalgic walkthrough at a high school.The teaser is available on YouTube. Nice of Motorola to try doing something different from most of its rivals. However, a flip phone -- with a tiny display and those buttons (assumption) -- may not have much of practical case in 2016.

135 comments

  1. I preferred the RIZR myself by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    I know the RAZR was far more popular but I thought the design of the RIZR was superior. With the RIZR I could always see all of the display, and the keypad slid out from underneath when I needed it. The biggest downside of it was that for some odd reason Motorola decided that the keys on the RIZR should literally be stickers, which would at times slip right off.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:I preferred the RIZR myself by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One big advantage of a flip-phone is built-in screen protection for when you have it in your pocket with other objects potentially.
      I never used a flip-phone back in the day, because the audio quality was lower than candy bar handsets (because of the thinner speaker diaphragms needed to fit the thin earpiece area) and lower battery life (because the body didn't have to fold in half, a candy-bar could have a much longer battery cell on the back).

    2. Re:I preferred the RIZR myself by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what phone I had at the time, but I recall being horrified at how poor the sound quality was on a RAZR phone when I borrowed one.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:I preferred the RIZR myself by CrowdedBrainzzzsand9 · · Score: 2

      It works for Agent Gibbs just fine.

    4. Re:I preferred the RIZR myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still use my Motorola VE66. Probably the best phone that Motorola ever made.

    5. Re:I preferred the RIZR myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too preferred flip phones in the day before the smartphone came around, and always preferred it to a candy-bar. For the above reason - if the phone was closed, no chance of accidentally dialling someone's number, and it was a lot more convenient. The downside of the RAZR - low camera resolution - but I hardly ever used that camera. Also, after I accidentally deleted 'Prince of Persia', there was no way I could retrieve it.

      Of course, note that in that era, I rarely texted. Texting was something I started after I got my first Nokia Lumia some 5 years ago

  2. Old people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    those over 30, want a phone not a tease box iPhone.

    1. Re:Old people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hipsters will snatch these up like they're going out of style.

    2. Re:Old people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New part of the hipster uniform --

      Muslim-style beard

      Thick, black glasses

      Flip Phone

    3. Re:Old people by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

      New part of the hipster uniform --

      Muslim-style beard

      Thick, black glasses

      Flip Phone

      You forgot:

      skinny jeans (black, of course)
      plaid shirt (the kind your grandad owned)
      vinyl LP (carried ostentatiously under the arm)

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    4. Re:Old people by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      And a dog. Which they take everywhere - supermarket, kids' playground (even if the don't have kids), swimming pool.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Old people by WarJolt · · Score: 1

      You'd like to give your senile grandma a simple phone. What they call a phone doesn't have a screen. The thing is there are far better choices. At&t advertises the SpareOne Emergency Phone for this reason.

    6. Re:Old people by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, yes, because battery life trumps everything for us.

      What I'd really like is a flip phone with a replaceable battery that can also serve as a mobile access point.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    7. Re:Old people by olsmeister · · Score: 5, Funny

      Someone just needs to make a $25 gutless version of this that connects via bluetooth to the iPhone in the hipsters' pocket.

    8. Re:Old people by eneville · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the fixed gear road bike

    9. Re: Old people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sounds about right. Then I can use whatever tablet I want when I want and still just carry the phone when I'm going light.

    10. Re:Old people by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Well, there was that 'kid' in the video with an '06 varsity jacket on. Is 28 old enough?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    11. Re:Old people by davester666 · · Score: 0

      OMG. it could act as a bluetooth headset, and with all the extra empty space inside, it could also be a small gun. a bluetooth headset gun.

      you're welcome!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    12. Re:Old people by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      ...and cans of Pabst Blue Ribbon carried in a bag made of hemp.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    13. Re:Old people by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, because battery life trumps everything for us.

      Sounds like you want an Android phone. In Ultra low power mode you can make and receive phone calls, text messages, and you get close to 2 weeks battery life.

      Best of all push a button and you get your mobile accesspoint, just don't expect the battery to make it through to the end of the day while doing so.

    14. Re:Old people by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      skinny jeans [and] plaid shirt

      Not sure; I don't follow hipsters, but the plaid shirt revival has been pretty mainstream for at least four years now, and while I'm not sure about jeans specifically, the "skinny trousers" thing- generally chinos- seems to already have been and gone at least a couple of years back.

      (Ditto "I'm W.G. Grace, motherf****r" beards, which every man and his dog have been sporting for years now, and thick-rimmed glasses which have become a common if not ubiquitous look among mainstream-thinking-they're-hipster female students for quite some time).

      In fact, now that I think of it, the modern incarnation of the hipster- before the look went mainstream, but was still quite well-known- must have been around for the better part of a decade now.

      I'd have assumed that actual hipsters- who stereotypically hate things as soon as they go mainstream- would have dumped them before that, even if it's the stereotypical "hipster" look.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    15. Re:Old people by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I'd have assumed that actual hipsters- who stereotypically hate things as soon as they go mainstream- would have dumped them before that, even if it's the stereotypical "hipster" look.

      You're correct in that all of those things have been around for ages, but the defining element of hipsters is that they combine all of those things at the same time to form their signature look.

      As a friend of mine said, "They want to be different, just like everyone else!", and the irony wasn't lost on me.

      Hipsters want to be different and edgy and unique, yet their consistency of style is as close to a uniform as anything I've ever seen. Hipsters are no harder to spot in a crowd than clowns or Air Force officers, they just have different costumes. You see 'em and you know what they are right away.

      Members of a group want to be different and end up dressing exactly alike. It's always been this way and always will be this way.

      For hippies and "free spirits" in the 60's and 70's it was jeans, long hair, and t-shirts.
      For rappers it's baggy jeans, bling, and a backwards baseball cap.
      For greasers it's leather jackets, chains, and motorcycle boots.
      For goths it's black clothes, black hair, and black eyeliner.
      For preppies it's a Brooks Brothers blazer, L.L. Bean boots, and a black labrador retriever.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    16. Re:Old people by hey! · · Score: 1

      That's indeed what I have, but (a) ultra low power mode doesn't allow you to use it as an access point, (b) you can't swap out batteries to ensure network connection and (c) it's actually inconvenient to carry a large converged device AND a tablet.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    17. Re:Old people by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a bad choice of device. There's no reason android devices need to be large, and there's no reason android devices don't have swappable batteries. Shop around a bit.

      But yes you won't get a mobile access point while in low power mode on any phone I've seen.

    18. Re:Old people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the manbun, sandals, messenger bag, clove cigarettes and book of poetry.

    19. Re:Old people by terjeber · · Score: 1

      like they're going out of style

      and they will, really fast.

    20. Re:Old people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was the fixed gear beach cruiser.

  3. Might make a splash with those who've had enough. by jddj · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm tired of being distracted every minute of the day, and tracked endlessly by everyone.

    I'd think about one. And take the battery out when I don't want to be tracked at all.

  4. Re: Might make a splash with those who've had enou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just switched back to using an old Nokia dumb phone, I have an ipad mini with 4g when I want data on the go. It's kind of a nice combo really

  5. I'll give you a use case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My mom wants a cell phone that has decent battery life, makes and receives phone calls, is thin and nothing else. She loved her old Razr. Take a guess what she'll want when she sees this?

    1. Re:I'll give you a use case by unrtst · · Score: 1

      I'd agree but, assuming this thing isn't as dumb as the old phone (it'll probably be running android), it's probably going to have just as shitty a battery life as any other android phone, possibly worse.

      If they manage to do it right, I'll be tempted to get one, but I won't hold me breath.

    2. Re:I'll give you a use case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Razr had terrible battery life. The inexpensive Moto E and Lumia 640 can go two weeks between recharges. If they are too big, then the iPhone SE is thin and small. Disable wifi and data and it's a simple phone.

    3. Re:I'll give you a use case by Etcetera · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Strictly speaking, simply running Android doesn't mean it *has* to be the smartphone we all know and hate.

      Japan, for various reasons, caught on relatively late to the smartphone craze and has had a number of flip style phones that you'd swear are BREW, and look pretty close to the late-model LG feature phones (Voyager, etc) circa 2010, but actually use an Android OS -- simply without all the Google stuff actively on top of it.

      One example: http://www.kyoex.com/sharp-504sh-aquos-keitai-android-5-1-flip-phone-unlocked/

    4. Re:I'll give you a use case by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      How about you get any android phone with an ultra low power mode function. Then at least she can have everything she wants, and on the off chance that she may be stuck somewhere and need to do a quick google she has that ability too.

    5. Re:I'll give you a use case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I use my Galaxy S1 as a dumbphone (2G standby only, no data/wifi/bt/gps), and get about 7-10 days from a charge. With the original 5 year old battery.
      If you want better, the Xperia Z3 Compact gets 38 days of 3G standby (according to Sony).
      You want battery life, then don't use the extra "smart" functions that drain the battery.

    6. Re:I'll give you a use case by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Why you would put android on a flip phone is beyond me, as you pointed out kinda defeats the purpose of having a flip phone.

      Here is what I got my mom and she just loves the thing. It gets about 7-8 days on a charge, was easy for me to set up so she merely pushes "up" to call up her address book, its simple, its easy, makes good calls, pretty much everything you want in a basic flip phone.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    7. Re:I'll give you a use case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mom wants a cell phone that has decent battery life, makes and receives phone calls, is thin and nothing else. She loved her old Razr. Take a guess what she'll want when she sees this?

      Texting is the main reason that one would/should prefer a smartphone. But if one absolutely doesn't text, then the RAZR is just great. I however don't feel the same about it since Lenovo owns it, as opposed to Moto

    8. Re:I'll give you a use case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't agree that it defeats the purpose. One can still use the normal functions of a flip phone - the numbers - to make calls, but when texting, as well as certain basic apps, such as a calculator, it helps to have Android. Actually, Windows 10 Mobile would be even better.

  6. Re:Might make a splash with those who've had enoug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just a normal android smartphone in a retro form factor, i.e. it will track you as much as any android powered device.

  7. Consumers want "small" phones ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My Palm Pre was perfect, but I cannot buy a decent phone like it any more.

    Why do manufacturers refuse to make capable "small" ( i.e. non-phablet, 4" or smaller screen ) phones ?

    The Sony Z3 Compact is almost the only player in this area, I do not understand why.

    1. Re:Consumers want "small" phones ! by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      How about the Samsung S3 mini?

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    2. Re:Consumers want "small" phones ! by erice · · Score: 1

      How about the Samsung S3 mini?

      It is not a modern small phone. It is mostly just an old phone.

      The screen resolution is several generations behind flag ship (800x480).
      The OS is stuck at 4.x, two generations below current.

    3. Re:Consumers want "small" phones ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      non-phablet, 4" or smaller screen

      So in your opinion, anything over 4" is a phablet? Yeah, ok, buddy. Whatever you say.

    4. Re:Consumers want "small" phones ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, because my definition of phablet has not changed over the years, while the sheeple's definition has.

      If a phone does not fit comfortably in a normal hand, it is a phablet.
      5" phones do not fit comfortably in a normal hand.

    5. Re:Consumers want "small" phones ! by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I still have mine and my wife's Pre in a drawer. I keep it to remind me what has been lost.

      --
      Good-bye
    6. Re:Consumers want "small" phones ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consumers want a product, but the manufacturers refuse to supply it.

      It is an indictment of captalism no less !

    7. Re:Consumers want "small" phones ! by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      S4 mini or S5 mini? (I put S3 mini as that's what I use as a small phone and yes, it is quite old).

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    8. Re: Consumers want "small" phones ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They fit fine in mine. But I don't have Donald Trump hands.

    9. Re:Consumers want "small" phones ! by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      WHat about the iphone SE?

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  8. Touchscreen? by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    Why not add a touchscreen? For that matter, make the keypad a touchscreen too. Now that would be a head-turner.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Touchscreen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking the same thing. With phones getting so thin, I thought someone would bring back the flip phone but with it being two touch screens instead of a screen and keypad. Maybe flip along the long edge to get more screen space, but in a form factor that would fit in the pocket and the screens would be protected from keys, etc. in the pocket.

    2. Re:Touchscreen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two screens would just make it more expensive. The lower part can be the numeric keypad, used to make calls, press calculator buttons, use as a cursor, et al. The touch screen could be used to invoke text apps, mapping apps and so on. Just support some basic functions on the phone, without things like FaceBook or Twitter on the phone

  9. Legend has it... by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There was a time when several generations of people lived with phones that had no screens at all. In fact, some of those people still walk among us, although they may move more slowly than they once did.

    There are some people who prefer to use a phone just for talking (and, strange though it may seem, listening). Sure, they skew older, but you're kind of dumb to overlook the segment completely.

    1. Re:Legend has it... by markdavis · · Score: 3, Informative

      >"There was a time when several generations of people lived with phones that had no screens at all. In fact, some of those people still walk among us,"

      You must be REALLY young. Just without screens??

      There are quite a few people walking around (and just fine too) who for many years had NO CELL PHONES AT ALL not just as children, but as adults. Yep. I had even graduated college before having one of those new-fangled, talk-only, screenless, pocket cell-phones.

      Imagine a world where you really could be untrackable and unreachable. Where you had no constant beeping or messages. Where there were no distractions while you were thinking or reading or lounging. Where you could eat dinner out without annoying phones ringing and text tones, and people taking photos of you without your permission. Where you could have a conversation, in person, with someone... without being rudely interrupted several times yourself or by them looking at a stupid device. Where you could drive a car and reasonably expect that other drivers were paying attention to only the road. It existed.

      In some ways it was bad. In others, it was quite good.

    2. Re:Legend has it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the point of the post you are replying to. How you got more upvotes than he did I will never understand.

    3. Re:Legend has it... by markdavis · · Score: 1

      No, I don't think I miss what he said or meant.

    4. Re:Legend has it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You thought he was talking about cell phones, but he said "several generations of people lived with phones that had no screens," so he could not have been talking about cell phones, because there were never cell phones for several human generations. Clearly you missed the point. Just admit it.

    5. Re:Legend has it... by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 1

      You must be REALLY young. Just without screens??

      ...

      Imagine a world where you really could be untrackable and unreachable. ... Where you could drive a car and reasonably expect that other drivers were paying attention to only the road. It existed.

      You must be REALLY naive then. People stopped paying attention to the road as soon as they had anyone else around, or lipstick or razors or a crossword or a billboard... arguably the biggest lesson cars can teach us is that people are really distractible when doing incredibly dangerous activities that have become mundane.

      In some ways it was bad.

      Yeah, like the whole being out of touch in emergency situations thing...

      --
      Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
    6. Re:Legend has it... by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      Oh, you're good. Just dangling the notion of "untrackable and unreachable", ideas that will appeal to some modern readers. If you'd instead started talking about "telephone cords", everyone's eyes would have glazed over, and you'd have lost them.

    7. Re:Legend has it... by markdavis · · Score: 1

      OK, I see your point. I was thinking in only the context of cell phones.

      Consider it admitted :)

    8. Re:Legend has it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cell phones didn't invent distracted driving... Before they had cell phones, people fiddled with the radio, tried to eat lunch, checked their hair, tried to separate the fighting kids in the back, or stared at Christie Brinkley driving a Ferrari.

    9. Re:Legend has it... by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Oh, that is very true. But the cell phone perfected it and made it 10 times worse than all those other things combined.

  10. Re: Might make a splash with those who've had enou by sims+2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have a samsung convoy 3 and an ipad 2. I need my phone to work as a phone more than anything else.

    Verizon is planning on retiring their 2g and 3g networks in 2020-2021 yet its 2016 now and afaik they do not have a single dumb cellphone that works on their 4G network.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  11. Battery Life by chuckugly · · Score: 1

    I bet it's a full on re-imagining of the RAZR, which is sort of cool but mostly sad. The thing I miss most is the 10 day battery life, and I doubt a micro-thin Android rebake is gonna bring that back.

    1. Re:Battery Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really depends on what features of the chipset they turn on.

      My galaxy s5 can last a week. But under only 1 condition. I put it in to low power mode. It basically becomes a phone that can do text and calling. Thats it.

      They make it a full on android phone though? 1 day tops for the size phone that is. Unless they put a huge battery on it.

  12. Um.. the Razor was the iPhone of it's day by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    it was a quick and easy way to show folks (especially girls) that you could drop a ton of money on a phone. Basically a veblen good. Take that away and it's just outdated tech. Nostalgia maybe? I don't see that going very far.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Um.. the Razor was the iPhone of it's day by Junta · · Score: 1

      Well, we just have to see what in the world they are teasing (if anything). One *hopes* that if they are trying to declare a device as game changing as the RAZR was, they have something meaningfully interesting up their sleeve rather than something simply banking on nostalgia. Some technology is possible to make some interesting things, will see if motorola returns to leadership and actually releases something first.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  13. Re:Might make a splash with those who've had enoug by sims+2 · · Score: 1

    Well that's disappointing.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  14. I'll take one by willoughby · · Score: 2

    My old black Razr V3 still works fine but the main reason I don't use it anymore is the crappy, weird headset connection. Give me a new model with a 3.5mm headset jack, sell it to me unbranded & unlocked & I'll take it.

    1. Re:I'll take one by CronoCloud · · Score: 2

      I had a V3xx with that wacky "through the USB port" headset. I wished it had a 3.5mm jack because it had a fairly nice MP3 player for the time.

      Yeah it has bluetooth...really the V3xx has bluetooth (and 3G), but back then stereo bluetooth headsets with reasonable quality sound for music were more pricey than they are now.

    2. Re:I'll take one by antdude · · Score: 1

      My colony's Motorola Razr v3t as well as 2/2015, until we got iPhones.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    3. Re:I'll take one by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah it has bluetooth...really the V3xx has bluetooth (and 3G), but back then stereo bluetooth headsets with reasonable quality sound for music were more pricey than they are now.

      All of those phones have shit bluetooth. I had a couple different RAZRs towards the end of their existence, V300 and V500 before that. All of them skipped while playing mp3s via bluetooth, and only via bluetooth (not via wired headset) where my newer phones all do fine.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. Making a comeback? Really?!??! by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I still use my original RAZR flip phone. So original in fact that it was pre-GPS chip (and yes, they do exist). It amuses me when I pull it out and use it and other people see it. And then I point out al the advantages:

    1. Its smaller and lighter than smart phones
    2. I don't have to charge it every day
    3. I can (and do) drop it onto hard surfaces with the only worry being trying to find where the #@$%# battery cover bounced off to

    And sure I could have a computer in my pocket, by why do I need one when I have 5 computers in arms reach and sit in front of one most of the working day? I also have a dedicated GPS in my car.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re: Making a comeback? Really?!??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When people see you they think guy with a flip phone = loser

  16. Can Nokia Bring Back The 7110? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The RAZR was good, but for me the most iconic phone has been the Nokia 7110. The thrill of pressing the slide release button was simply unrivalled. The almost dangerous speed that the spring loaded slide came down at clearly said "I'm the boss" to everyone around. Never has answering a phone been so exhilarating.

    While the slide was the main feature, lets not forget the two tone colouring that changed between green and magenta depending on the viewing angle. It was also the first phone with WAP, so you could read a few lines of a web page in low resolution text. This was aided by the wheel that let you easily scroll effortlessly through the text. As for the size of the phone...perfection!

    Compared to the 7110 the RAZR had what? It was a bit thin and that was it. If one phone needs resurrecting it's the 7110. At least give us a phone with a slide so I can once again feel the pure exhilaration of pressing that slide release button. I need that in my life!

    1. Re:Can Nokia Bring Back The 7110? by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      The RAZR was good, but for me the most iconic phone has been the Nokia 7110. The thrill of pressing the slide release button was simply unrivalled. The almost dangerous speed that the spring loaded slide came down at clearly said "I'm the boss" to everyone around. Never has answering a phone been so exhilarating... At least give us a phone with a slide so I can once again feel the pure exhilaration of pressing that slide release button. I need that in my life!

      If they're smart, they'll do something like this for the 20th Anniversary release of The Matrix.

      Holy sh*t, we're old.

    2. Re:Can Nokia Bring Back The 7110? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Time ghost:

      https://xkcd.com/1393/

      But it was the earlier Nokia 8110 that was in the Matrix, not the 7110, which came out in '99.

    3. Re:Can Nokia Bring Back The 7110? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If one phone needs resurrecting it's the 7110.

      Speaking as one who worked for a phone company dealing with handset faults when the 7110 was released, I say let it stay dead.

      Terrible software, flakey connections on the slide you love so much and WAP that was so bad as to make the model's claim at firstdom dubious at best. The only phone I saw more problems with was whichever Motorola was around at the same time.

  17. Re:Might make a splash with those who've had enoug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I hear phones are starting to have RFID strips and readers in them; If so that makes it possible for a connected/powered phone to record when it walks by a phone w/o battery in it; and I suppose relay the phone w/o batteries position/ID.

    Best phone shape ever made, imo the motorola Droid3 xt862... slide out 4 row keyboard, USB, HDMI, removable battery and microSD slot.. The hardware was buggy forcing reboot every 24-96 hours but the perfect shape.. Would pay a fortune for the same "phone" with x86 processor that could run Linux/Win7 natively in that case.

  18. I'd rather see ... by LuxuryYacht · · Score: 3, Interesting

    a slider phone with:

    Touchscreen, bigger than the n900
    Full QWERTY
    Unlocked bootloader
    u-boot
    Large removable battery
    With all the usual sensors and IO
    As open a firmware stack as possible for the RF.
    FPGA for encryption/decryption

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur
  19. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I want is a phone that doesn't track me, and I can take the battery out.

    Why is this SO FUCKING DIFFICULT for phone makers to figure out?????????????

    1. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you think they make money?

    2. Re:Good by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Every mobile phone I've ever used had a removable battery. Motorola, Nokia, AT&T, etc. But then I've never stooped to owning an iPhone.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  20. It was good enough for Captain Kirk by at10u8 · · Score: 1

    and that makes it good enough for me. LLAP

  21. Re:Might make a splash with those who've had enoug by Junta · · Score: 1

    Well, everything here is just speculation. It *could* be a stylish 'feature' phone, it could be an android flip phone with number pad, it could be something more exotic and unique. It could be nothing more than a marketing video prodding Millennials to remember when Motorola was *the* hottest thing (to the point of being Apple's go-to-market strategy for mobile at one point).

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  22. Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flip phones are more popular in Japan, which seems counter intuitive to their high tech reputation. The only problem is they can't use common proprietary methods of communication. If it worked with whatsapp/etc, I would get.

    1. Re:Japan by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      "The only problem is they can't use common proprietary methods of communication."

      There is so much wrong with this sentence, I don't even know what to write...

  23. If this is what they're doing... by Lirodon · · Score: 1

    I bet you the new Moto X will actually be called either the "Moto Razr" or "Moto X Razr"

  24. I will never buy a Motorola phone again. Ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not after they 1) promised an update to ICS, 2) locked the bootloader, and then 3) promptly *abandoned* their *flagship* model--leaving it trapped forever on gingerbread--after only about 18 months on the market.

    Only Nexus for me now--so I know I can always get updates.

    1. Re:I will never buy a Motorola phone again. Ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a nexus tablet, still waiting on Marshmallow to update.

      There is no guarantee Google will update all NEXUS devices either.

    2. Re:I will never buy a Motorola phone again. Ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to wait for google to do it. AOSP should have it covered. CM and others can continue to support them for a long time.

    3. Re:I will never buy a Motorola phone again. Ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://developers.google.com/android/nexus/images

      http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1971165

      No need to wait, just do it yourself. That's why the Nexus exist.

      If you have the Nexus 10, then tough luck, there's no Marshmallow update for that. But it's 4 years old now and went through 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 and 5.0/5.1, so there really isn't much to cry about.

  25. Bring back flip phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yessss... Tired of soap bar touch screen phones.

    Down side is flip phones will kill the aftermarket repairs for cracked gorilla glass screens on soap touch screen phones :)

  26. Motorola phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Razr had terrible battery life. The inexpensive Moto E and Lumia 640 can go two weeks between recharges. If they are too big, then the iPhone SE is thin and small. Disable wifi and data and it's a simple phone.

    Motorola phones are crap. I had to use them because my provider only carried them. Then when they got LGs I grabbed one and I learned what a quality design was.

  27. I'm still using a flip-phone by Alien7 · · Score: 2

    I have a laptop, a camera, and a GPS, all of which are better stat wise than any smart phone. When I leave the house you can get a hold of me still, but I'm not distracted by my addiction to trolling Facebook political pages. Having the internet at every waking moment is often more of an inconvenience than it's worth, and if I REALLY have to look something up it can usually wait until I get home. The only thing I don't like about it is that everyone just assumes I'm poor, but with a hipster marketing campaign like this I can keep my flipphone and not be a social outcast, I call that a big win for Motorola, it's a smart move.

  28. Re:Might make a splash with those who've had enoug by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    I wouldn't be disappointed yet. Considering Lenovo has produced nothing but a teaser I would have to say [citation needed] before declaring this to be a flip android smartphone.

  29. I owned one, and it was great by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    I owned one of these and it was great a great phone for its time. I still have it in a box somewhere.

    It had a slick marketing feature in the box design- you pulled a tab on the box and it unfolded up and back, popping the phone up like it was the Hope diamond. The box design probably sold a bunch of them all by itself. You'd pull the tab, the phone would pop up, and people would go, "Ooooh!"

    It was a good phone too, slim, durable, and worked great.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  30. Would buy by PPH · · Score: 1

    If it supports 3G/4G global standards. I'll be losing my (original) RAZR when AT&T drops 2G equipment later this year. I don't need all the garbage that iPhone/Androids have. Particularly with that 'must have data plan' bullshit that carriers pull with 'smartphones'.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Would buy by toejam13 · · Score: 1

      There are a couple of cellular resellers who have basic plans with either no data or with very cheap data. The AT&T reseller I use has a $10/mo plan that includes 300 minutes, 50MB of data, and 50 MMS texts and a $15/mo plan that doubles it to 600/100MB/100MMS.

      Look around. All four of the major providers in the U.S. resell their service. I believe that the big 4 in Canada do the same.

  31. Garbage by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    may not have much of practical case in 2016.

    Submitters can't write, and the editors can't read.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  32. Definitely a market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you make a Razr that can run facebook messenger, instagram, twitter, and costs $40, that will sell.

  33. Texting no go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Texting and messaging on a flip phone is like trying to wade through deep mud -- grossly inconvenient. For this reason alone, flip phones with 12 button keypads will never make a comeback.

    1. Re:Texting no go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I quite agree with this. When the RAZR was going strong, texting was common in Europe, but rare in the US. It picked up after the smartphones did. That's not going away, so people who text - which is most - won't use a phone where they have to press '2' twice to get 'b' and so on.

  34. Re:Making a comeback? Really?!??! by syswalla · · Score: 2

    I'm with you. Still use my V750 that has MIL SPEC dust proofing. Charge it approx once a week unless I use it a fair amount. Have a protective case with a clip and drops are almost a non issue. I will be sad when I have to replace this. Hopefully the phone manufacturers AND carriers wise up that there are those of us out there who use their phones as a phone, strange as that may sound, and don't need a battery and data sucking appliance.

  35. may not have much of practical case in 2016. by quonsar · · Score: 1
    see, it's a flip phone. it doesn't need a case.

    (doesn't anyone speak english anymore?)

  36. Ok. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget the camera. keyboard. smart everything.

    just give me a phone that makes phone calls and lasts for a month on a charge.

    otherwise... forget it.

  37. Re:Might make a splash with those who've had enoug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, Stallman. You can use an Android phone without being distracted in the same way you can own a television without becoming a couch potato. It's called self-control. How you configure and use the phone is up to you. You can shut off the data connection and just use SMS and Phone calls if you want. By the way, if the government wants to track you they can do it without a phone.

  38. SubjectIsSubject by p0p0 · · Score: 1

    This is great. My dad still uses his V3 and loves it. If it's still as simple to use but with more battery it would be a great "upgrade". I imagine it'll be some form of android, as long as it mimics the original OS it'll be perfect.

  39. Re:Making a comeback? Really?!??! by dkh · · Score: 1

    Razr v3 was the best phone I've ever had - great form and function.

    Light, durable, easy to carry, a nice feel in your hand. Just a nice piece of engineering.

    I haven't used it in years but its still sitting here ready to go - it makes me question my move to other devices, and makes me a bit sad, every time I catch sight of it.

  40. Re:Might make a splash with those who've had enoug by NotAPK · · Score: 1

    "By the way, if the government wants to track you they can do it without a phone."

    Sure, but why not force them to do it the "hard way" via boots on the ground and with a valid *specific* court order?

    It's a little bit like having an "expensive" computation as part of an encryption routine: if tracking an individual is "expensive" then it will only be used when absolutely necessary, which in my opinion is a good thing.

  41. Re: Making a comeback? Really?!??! by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    Yes. The kind of people who are still in highschool mentally or physically. It's a great two way filter.

  42. Re:I'd rather see ...illeagal by pablo_max · · Score: 3, Informative

    Having an open RF stack is illegal for a licensed transmitter. The FCC does not allow any changes at all to the conditions to which the device was approved. Small changes can be made via a class 2 permissive change, but allowing you, the user access to change the RF properties is very illegal.
    And with good reason too. You would be surprised to know how much damage to a network just one fucked up phone can cause.

  43. Re:Making a comeback? Really?!??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't I believe you? Your carrier would have forced you to upgrade to a GPS phone; at least they would if they were like my carrier.

  44. After tablets popped up i actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...would love to have just a phone. It would be nice with a simple GPS (just displaying the coordinates, elevation and speed) but it should only be running when activated.

  45. Re: Might make a splash with those who've had enou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had my 1st Gen Moto X since its' release date, and have never used it to its' full functionality. I make calls, sms, mms, browsing and email. l miss my old slider flip phone, the battery lasted 3 days and my screen was never in danger.

  46. I have one at home next to my desk by movdqa · · Score: 1

    I took it out and charged it a few weeks ago - I was considering dropping my iPhone 6 plan and just going prepay (AT&T GoPhone $100/year) on the RAZR. It's hard to find a cheap, low data plan these days. But the iPhone 6 on Verizon is a very handy device. I just don't use much data (typically less than 10 mb/month).

  47. I'll buy one if it's really small... by ffkom · · Score: 1

    ... and has a removeable battery. I had flip-phone for many years, and I'm so tired of these oversized "touch-display" bar-phones that are so much less ergonomic to handle.

  48. Legendary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will these morons who write articles like this stop using words that they don't understand? Legendary? Really? It's a fucking phone and one that wasn't even all that well known like the StarTac.

    Regardless of what phone it is, it is not legendary unless it was a bit of mythology or folklore and never existed or it was somehow a heroic or superhuman person. But we all know that phones aren't people.

    1. Re: Legendary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hate is real haha.... You seem so angry guy ðY

  49. If you're carrying a tablet anyway... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    ...why not carry a phone that's just a phone? And incidentally, as small as is practical.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  50. The hardware was good but the software was junk by jonwil · · Score: 1

    I did a brief stint doing software development for Motorola back when the original RAZR was considered "state of the art" and without revealing any company secrets, I can tell you the software stack that ran on those things was garbage and a pain in the ass to work with.

    Lets hope any new RAZR runs on a sane software stack.

  51. Re:I'd rather see ...illeagal by LuxuryYacht · · Score: 2

    Open RF Stack ! = Changes to the conditions to which the device was approved.

    Open means that you can see the source.

    Changes means modifying the binary installed in the device after approval.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur
  52. What was lost by DrYak · · Score: 1

    What I liked most of mine (Palm Pre and HP Pre3) wasn't as mush the size as the physical keyboard and the wonderful card-based/touch-based UI.
    (apparently so good that even iOS and Android are currently attempting pale copies of it).

    I dont appreciate the Android UI, it mostly reminds me of a cluttered windows desktop (with dozens of icon).

    Jolla's SailfishOS (different kind of cards, and another way to do touch-based UI) is the closest thing to come nearly webOS's UI's usability.
    (My main gripe is that it still lacks the "tabs as separate cards" metaphor that webOS had. In sailfishOS, each application either introduce its own different logic for tabs (like browsers) or can't open multiple windows (like e-mail). In webOS, tabs are opened as extra cards that get automatically grouped together in "hands")

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  53. Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "However, a flip phone -- with a tiny display and those buttons (assumption) -- may not have much of practical case in 2016."

    What? You think everyone wants to lug around a smartphone with a shitty touchscreen?

  54. Samsung Gusto by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    I carry a Samsung Gusto flip phone, and have for several years now. It does what I need it to do quietly and efficiently. I have to take a laptop and hot spot with me everywhere to cover for work so I don't need, or want a smart phone. I have an in car GPS system, and work pays for the laptop and hotspot so I do quite well with a small well protected flip phone in my pocket.

    http://www.samsung.com/us/mobi...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  55. Wow, first backdoored laptops and now phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another completely untrustworthy consumer electronic device from the Communist Chinese army.

    Yup. "Lenovo" is not some typical private or publicly-traded western corporation. A bunch of western companies sold-off the product lines they were failing with to China, a totalitarian one-party-rule communist nation. Thinkpads were an early product to transfer to "Lenovo", and now it's the RAZR. It will have little in common with the original, the current owners of the Motorola IP are just squeezing a little more cash out of that corporate corpse by selling to probably the only bidder willing to pay - the Chinese army looking to camouflage more untrustworthy junk to make it easier to sell in the west. "Lenovo" is just the New York Mad Men style group-tested marketing happy face name slapped onto this communist government affiliated quasi-business entity.

  56. I liked KRAZR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the KRAZR, and it was my favorite phone before I got my first WinPhone.

  57. Re: Might make a splash with those who've had enou by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Why do you need a dumb phone when you need a phone to work as a phone?

    What's important to you, calls and battery life? Most modern android handsets come with ultra low power mode that give you all the features of your dumbphone including the multiple week battery life, and best of all if you get in a pickle where only the mighty internet can help you then you have access to that again at the push of a button.

  58. Re:Might make a splash with those who've had enoug by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Heh, you and me both, friend.

    In all seriousness, I'm still using the RAZR V9 I bought years ago. The outside display has a dead spot in it just over one of the touchscreen buttons (this damage is recent), and the outside glass is cracked, and the rubber coating recently peeled off the battery cover, but it still works fine as a phone, and that's all I need. I still can't justify the expense to purchase or operate a smartphone, especially with what a swisscheese they are so far as security goes. I'd welcome an updated version of what I have. The only real improvement I'd like is a better music player built into it.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  59. Personally, I preferred the SLVR... so did NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No sliding or bending parts to wear, fatigue and break...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola_Slvr

  60. Comeback? I still have and use my Razr v3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still continue to use my RAZR v3 that I got in 2007. It's a phone, and a damn good one, with long battery life, that never pocket dials anyone and can take beating and just works. I don't need it to play movies, I don't need it to play games, I don't need it to read or send emails and I sure as hell don't need to pay more per month for a 'data' plan, if I want to do those things I use my Surface or desktop or laptop. All I need\want it to be is a very reliable PHONE and occasionally send a text and maybe send or receive a simple photo a few times a year. It presently continues to do those things flawlessly.

    I'd very much be interested in an updated version that maybe adds a basic gps\map app feature so long as battery life isn't significantly impacted and is updated for newer carrier technologies as I have to imagine at some point eventually by old one will be EOL in terms of them providing service. It's nice to have gotten what will be next year 10 years out of a cell phone... I've not even had to replace the battery, though I will say it used to last for 3-5 days on a charge (with little use) now it's maybe 2-3, but that's to be expected.

  61. Re:Making a comeback? Really?!??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have and use the same one... a v3 that doesn't have gps or mapping.
    Still works for what I use it for.... a very reliable phone!

    As for dropping it and the battery thing.. solved that the week I got it with a 9.95$ hard case that snaps on to it, never been a problem since... 9 years and still ticking fine on the original battery.

    I could use an updated version that does have GPS\basic mapping function that could be enabled... it's about the only thing I've ever wished it had over the year, and even that was sporadic, but it would come in handy. If they can add that I'll buy one for sure, it's been nice to be able to get ~10 years out of cell phone purchase.

  62. Re: Might make a splash with those who've had enou by Reziac · · Score: 2

    What's important to me is that the hardware is small enough to not be distracting in a pocket, and that it's not vulnerable to the dings and dust of outdoor work. Hence I use a $12 flip phone. It has decent battery life and does the job, and if it does get busted it's cheap to replace.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  63. The RAZR was the worst phone I ever owned by scdeimos · · Score: 1

    The RAZR had a terrible habit of crashing the radio software stack while otherwise appearing to be working fine. If you hadn't received any calls or messages for a day or so restarting the phone would bring in a flood of messages and missed call notifications. My RAZR went through the crusher after missing too many important calls, then I bought a Palm Trëo 650 which was probably the best phone I've ever owned.

  64. Re:I'd rather see ...illeagal by oldcarsmell · · Score: 1

    That would get shot down by an FCC lawyer quicker than you can type "RAZR" and their argument will be that it's like leaving the keys in the ignition. Everyone will have the tools they need to modify the radios and destroy cell networks with just a "do not touch" sticky note attached to it.