Slashdot Mirror


E-Cigs Are Exploding In Vapers' Faces At An Alarming Rate (buzzfeed.com)

E-cigs are becoming increasingly popular, but are they safe enough? BuzzFeed News is reporting about accidents where e-cigs have exploded in vapers' faces. The report claims that these incidents are occurring at an alarming rate. From the report (condensed): Across the country, defective e-cigarettes -- the nicotine delivery machines that have taken over every strip mall and sidewalk, seemingly overnight -- are creating hundreds of victims like Cavins (a 63-year-old Orange, California-based family therapist who lost an eye after an e-cig device exploded in his face), people whose lives are suddenly and horrifyingly changed when their devices blow up. They are people like Thomas Boes, whose vape exploded while he was driving outside San Diego and struck him with such force that two of the three teeth he lost lodged in his upper palate; Kenneth Barbero, whose exploding device ripped a hole in his tongue; and Marcus Forzani, a 17-year-old whose left leg was charred from his calf to his thigh after a vape battery exploded in his pocket. An unpublished FDA analysis found 66 reports of e-cigarette overheating, fires, and explosions in 2015 and the first month of 2016, a number the agency calls "an underestimate of actual events."

50 of 361 comments (clear)

  1. darwinian pressure by just+another+AC · · Score: 5, Funny

    And people say evolutionary pressure doesn't exist in modern society...

    1. Re:darwinian pressure by just+another+AC · · Score: 2

      And before the bleeding heart crowd jump down my throat, I refer to the lamentation that previously darwinian habits (like deliberately inhaling things that cause cancer etc) do not have the corresponding effect due to socially responsible advances in medicine.

    2. Re:darwinian pressure by michelcolman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cigarettes used to slowly degrade your teeth, affect your eyesight and turn your face into something that looks like roadkill. Looks like these e-cigarettes are a huge improvement then! No more waiting 20 or 30 years for the cancer to set in, instant results in the blink of an eye.

    3. Re: darwinian pressure by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      Did you read the summary? Lost teeth and eyes, charred faces,... Looks pretty similar to the link in my previous post. What more links do you need?

    4. Re:darwinian pressure by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      Exploding cigarettes are a big improvement then, since they do have an immediate effect.

    5. Re:darwinian pressure by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Funny

      Every piece of hardware on that device you are typing on has material that causes cancer FYI.

      That material causes cancer only if you're in California.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    6. Re:darwinian pressure by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's why I make sure not to vaporize and breathe my keyboard.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re: darwinian pressure by michelcolman · · Score: 3

      I know what "specious" means. My turn now, you look up the word "humor". Perhaps you misunderstood my joke.

      Some e-cigarettes blew up in their users' faces and made them look like some of the cigarette cancer victims. That's all I "claimed". If you want me to provide links to make you understand the joke, I'm sorry but I have better things to do.

    8. Re:darwinian pressure by TangoMargarine · · Score: 2

      If you want to eat your computer, sure...

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    9. Re: darwinian pressure by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Always been humor. It's not like I stubbed my toe, that's tragedy. (para. Mel)

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re: darwinian pressure by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And if you bother to dig any deeper, rather than take these "studies" at face value (many of which are paid for by Lorillard through their "citizens for a concerned America" PAC) you'll find they ALWAYS land in one of 3 camps,

      1.- Rich dumbshit with more money than sense buys a $300+ mech mod, which has warnings all over it saying how you MUST know ohms law, resistances, and the strength of the batteries you intend to use to use this product safely, then promptly buy a $20 gas station top and slap on it, thus blowing his deserving dumbass up,

      2.- Cheapskate dumbshit buys a $10 knock off of a $90 unit off of Chinabuye and then is shocked! Shocked I tell you! That a cheapo Chinese Crap knock off is actually unsafe and blows up in his dumbass face,

      3.- Impatient dumbshit ignores all the warnings in the brochure that came with his battery that says to ONLY use the slow trickle charger that comes with the unit, thinks "hey its USB, my fast cellphone charger is USB!"...can you see where this is going? Yep he uses the fast charger to cook the batteries and then is amazed when a device designed for a slow trickle charge becomes unstable when you use a charger that puts out 4 times the amps as what the unit was designed for.

      I'm sorry but stupid is as stupid does, and if you actually buy quality units instead of fakes and follow the instructions that come in the box? Then you have NOTHING to worry about. These scare studies hold about as much truth as the ads staring doctors big tobacco used to run, because they ignore the fact that the users were either ignoring instructions, using fakes they picked up off a ChinaMart, or like the mech mod moron buying a unit designed for guys with the skill to build their own sub-ohm coils from scratch and just slapping some top he got in a gas station on it.

      To use a /. car analogy it would be like blaming motorcycles for the rich kid that buys a Ninja for his first bike and wraps it around a pole at 150MPH+ or the cheapskate that buys one of those "long fong" Chinese scooters and finds out the brakes don't work going down a steep hill.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    11. Re: darwinian pressure by BlueStrat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To be fair the gear blew up...

      So do frozen turkeys if a dumbass drops one in a gas-burner deep-fryer.

      Funny, nobody suggests banning deep-fryers or frozen turkeys.

      There is very little that is safe when the people involved are the "Hold mah beer, watch *this*!!" type.

      Considering the tens of thousands or more vaping devices of the mechanical-mod type already out there and comparing vaping-gear related deaths/injuries to how many are injured or killed annually by normal, everyday things like ladders and hammers, at under 100 deaths vaping gear is very safe indeed. Particularly when you factor in the lives saved by people stopping their tobacco smoking by switching to vaping.

      Many thousands saved from lung cancer/COPD/etc versus...what? Less than 100 deaths/injuries? Of stupid people because they acted stupidly?

      I'd call that a bargain!

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    12. Re: darwinian pressure by slazzy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The batteries shouldn't explode whem plugged into a USB with higher ampage available. That is a defective product.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    13. Re:darwinian pressure by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Link to study that shows nicotine causes cancer? Not tobacco, not cigarettes, nicotine.

      We'll be waiting a long time for that one...

      I started smoking at age 10; at age 62 I tried an e-cig "just for the hell of it," fully expecting it to be unsatisfying, or "just as nasty, or whatever... I inadvertently quit "smoking" on the spot... two years later, still happily cigarette free. My wheezing when climbing stairs went away almost immediately (I noticed this 12 hours later). No more huffing and puffing. No scent of "tobacco" and associated tars, etc, on my clothes, in the car, in the house. Friends who were "allergic" to smoke invite me to vape at will in their homes and cars.

      I had one nasty "accident." I had a pocket full of quarters (extremely rare for me, as I hate "change") that I was going to dump in the console of the car, for parking meters, and put a battery (not an e-cig, just the battery) in the same pocket. My pants caught fire while I was taking a leak. Stupid? Yeah, definitely. Related to vaping? Not in the least. The quarters provided a closed circuit for the battery. Really dumb. But...vaping? One of the brightest "choices" I ever made.

      Almost all of the anti-vape, "we need regulation", etc., "ads" and "PSAs" out there, are funded by big tobacco, in an effort to "regulate" all the mom 'n' pop vape retailers, juice mixers, and gadget head makers into oblivion, so that Big Tobacco can take over the industry. I try to avoid the Chinese marketplace, as a safety precaution. I recommend others do the same.

      And I'm saving a shitload of cash, vaping organic naturally-extracted flavoring of tobacco, with USP-grade nicotine. Even with high-end vaping gear, a total economic winner. People in the US are exposed to tens of thousands of chemicals, on a daily basis, that have never even been screened for carcinogenic properties. I'll take my chances with nicotine & caffeine... everybody else can sit in their "smoke-free" bars and parks/stadiums (etc) and tut-tut themselves into early sugar- and booze-enabled graves. RIP suckers...

  2. Wow by geek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    66 whole reports?! Why, we need a law immediately! Someone call Congress!

    1. Re:Wow by BenJeremy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hundreds of victims!

      No way is this FUD from the tobacco industry trying to protect their cigarette, gum and patch sales.

    2. Re:Wow by TemporalBeing · · Score: 5, Interesting

      66 whole reports?! Why, we need a law immediately! Someone call Congress!

      I wonder..how many...new Lung Cancer incidents due to tobacco were there in the same period? house fires? car fires?

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    3. Re:Wow by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 2

      From what I've read on forums, it seems a lot of people are trying to use the 18650's from old laptop and power tool batteries or order the cheap "ULTRAFIRE" brand on eBay. And from the comments on those forums, I'd say there really is a danger with these stupid devices.

      Even if you use one with the built-in battery, who's to say the manufacturer didn't cut costs by going with the same ULTRAFIRE battery?

      I'd be more interested in analyzing the BOM of each exploded device.

    4. Re:Wow by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was looking for those 18650 batts for an arduino project (good for quadrapeds) and I noticed all the really scary sounding chinese brand names like ultrafire.

      could the chinese - oh, I don't know - HIRE someone who speaks english as a first language and consult with them before picking stupid anglo sounding names?

      whoever thought that adding the word 'fire' to a BATTERY would help sales - he needs to spend some qualty time with the same batteries for extended periods.

      china simply sells the lowest quality that will still allow them to continue to sell but that is so dangerous and has no q/a that a US vendor would be sued to bankruptcy in no time flat.

      thing is; you can't sue china or their companies! this is the scam. you guy some dangerous shit from amazon or ebay via chia brands and it blows up on you. who do you go after? amazon has lawyers to cover themselves. good luck with that. ebay, same thing and they'll just blame the seller, who is already on his 23rd company name, soon to 'go out of business' and restart all over again.

      this is the scam. they are untouchable and they know it.

      china batteries are the issue. its not about anything else but the batteries and the chargers. both are fires just waiting to happen.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    5. Re:Wow by lawaetf1 · · Score: 2

      Cigarettes - $10/day habit.

      e-juice: $1-$2 / day

      --
      CommentBot 0.7a running with args "-module irritate,disagree -target random"
    6. Re:Wow by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's funny because tesla cars are the least-dangerous in the most-severe collisions. Even when the battery is all fucked up, the fire is isolated away from the passenger compartment; and high-impact collisions transfer much less energy to the driver and passengers, thanks to enormous crumple zones.

    7. Re:Wow by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Informative

      i really don't understand how lithium was ever deemed safe for pocket devices. if i had a tesla car, i'd be really scared of even the smallest collision. fortunately, my hybrid has a NiMH battery.

      Which tells me that you haven't examined the risks. For example, you don't worry about the gasoline tank in your hybrid, but that's a lot more likely to be involved in or cause a fire.

      Tesla has had a few cars catch fire, but at a lower rate than traditional vehicles. Perhaps even more notably, they've been able to warn their occupants to get out, and even then erupt in fire slowly enough for people to safely escape.

      Looking at the other comments, it seems that people are attempting to use dodgy cells in them.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    8. Re:Wow by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2

      66 whole reports?! Why, we need a law immediately! Someone call Congress!

      We don't need a law - the FDA has already unilaterally passed a rule that will essentially get rid of the e-cigarette market. Except, of course, for the crappy disposables that Big Tobacco sells at convenience stores.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    9. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is what happens when you store your victim count using signed byte, instead of int.

    10. Re:Wow by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      And so this is where globalism triumphs: assemble your own from parts easily found online and screwed together. Let's see the FDA do something about that.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    11. Re:Wow by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's an absolute-fucking-lutly horrible place for a fire to happen, you know how fire travels ... Right?

      In every Tesla crash which has breached the battery and caused a fire, two things have happened. First, the passenger compartment was more-than-adequately protected--to the point that passengers actually came back WHILE THE CAR WAS ON FIRE, got back in the car, retrieved personal effects and left. I recommend against this, as lithium smoke is bad. Second, firefighters tried putting out metal fires with water--never do this.

      And the car actually carries FAR MORE energy in the passenger cabin during frontal impacts. In normal front engine ICE cars, the engine and all its mass is the first thing to stop, adding no stress to the cabin.

      The engine carries more momentum and can act as a ram to possibly break down an object that's distinctly not a tree (if you hit a tree, it will stop you). Otherwise, the engine is a huge brick that doesn't do much to protect the passenger, and gets in the way of crumple zones--meaning the car disperses less of the energy of stopping, and SLAMS the passenger to a stop where a Tesla more gently slows the passenger to a stop ("slows" is a relative term here, as is "gently").

      On the other hand, the tesla battery is directly attached, very strongly to the cabin... Effectively driving it forward with all the battery mass/energy. Are you still so silly to think that's better cause if so you need some basic physics lessons.

      I think it's better because, in all tests and all real-life collisions, it has proven to be better.

      Hate to break it too you, but those two things are examples of tesla getting it wrong

      What's wrong is your basic theoretical understanding of the practical engineering of the Telsa car versus an ICE in the context of a high-speed collision. You can scream about how you *think* high-energy impacts are going to work in each platform all you want; and, in the real world, they'll work out HOW THEY ACTUALLY HAPPEN.

      This is the same thing as when you look at a sheet of aluminate glass and say, "oh, that's a glass, it can't possibly hold up to an impact," and then somebody smashes a 25 pound sledgehammer into it and it bounces off. Aluminate glass, at 1cm, holds up to impact pressures of well-over 1,000 kg per meter even when heated to hundreds of degrees celsius. Whether you perceive it as being a frail material matters as much as whether you perceive a Tesla to be dangerous: when the hammer comes down, those perceptions won't hold up.

    12. Re:Wow by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 5, Funny

      Diesel is the solution

      No it's the solvent.

      If you aren't part of the solution, you are the precipitate.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    13. Re:Wow by sjames · · Score: 2

      THIS!

      Many newer e-cigs specify that their batteries must be rated for at least 20A discharge and they mean it. If you put old laptop cells and such it them (or flashlight batteries), there is a real risk of it failing "dramatically". Given how many people do that, I'm actually impressed and surprised that it's only 66.

      Of course, I notice the FDA lumped everything from mild redness due to an overheat and something that might be describable as an explosion into the same category to fluff it up to 66.

      So, use only batteries rated for 20A discharge or greater. Since a few "cloud chaser" devices need even more, be sure to read the instructions and use the appropriate rated batteries. Also make sure your PV's battery case is SIDE vented or has a magnetic battery door so it can't rocket itself into your mouth.

      DO NOT use old LiIon batteries, use lmr batteries. The formulation is intrinsically safer.

    14. Re:Wow by TemporalBeing · · Score: 2

      In 2010 according to FEMA there were 350 smoking related residential fire deaths and 950 injuries. See https://www.usfa.fema.gov/down... .

      Great numbers. Probably any of the numbers I listed would make the 66 injuries for e-cigs look really small.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  3. And the solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Government to the rescue!

    Seriously, use a protected battery, use only one battery in the device, in low wattage devices that have short-circuit protection, and don't overcharge your battery. And don't buy the cheap shit batteries - the three bucks you save won't be worth it. It's that fucking simple.

  4. Re:Regulation Please by phishybongwaters · · Score: 2

    Sure, lets criminalize sugar, being lazy, and making bad choices while we're at it.

  5. They forgot to mention by phishybongwaters · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The battery... I've only ever heard of them exploding or overheating with the massive, third party, batteries that go well beyond 4.8v This is the same nonsense as the "e-ciggs cause popcorn lung" fiasco. No, they don't. But if you are an idiot that heats it up to 700 degrees, you deserve what you get. I've quick smoking thanks to my ecigg, and i'm basically done using that as a crutch. THAT'S why these reports exist, follow the trail and you'll find yourself at the feet of big tobacco

    1. Re:They forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Any lithium cell can reach an explosion point with the exception of the coin cells that don't really have the amount of electrolyte (or the architectural strength of a cylinder) to explode.

      Thermal fuses are not expensive, I can't imagine they're saving that much money by omitting them. My best guess is "cut cells"* from China are not reattaching the fuses and the double whammy with the reduced capacity is what's causing them to explode.

      (Cut cells are what we refer to as the degraded cells that some Chinese companies dig from the wastebucket. They dissemble the cell, remove the parts of the electrolyte paper that are no longer conducting, run a wire to connect the remaining part of the cell to the far cathode / anode, wrap a label to hold it together, and sell it as new at the capacity it was originally rated at but no longer maintains). Multi cell batteries for laptops and what not have a similar process done where the dead cells are removed / bypassed / reconfigured. As long as the battery pack can maintain the listed voltage at "max charge" it will be resold--even though it cannot hold the mAH it was listed at.

      Since charge controllers don't know when this has happened, they overcharge the battery resulting in unsafe things happening to the battery. It also can get discharged lower than expected due to the reduced capacity in some applications.)

  6. Looney Toons by Kenshin · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is why you never accept a vape from Bugs Bunny.

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  7. Re:Don't use a sealed device by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

    You sure about that? It's well know that pirated battered made in China have horrible quality control issues. And depending on the device, the E-Cig could have been a cheap knock-off with no circuitry protection.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  8. Re:Chinese crap + carelessness by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 2

    Those 18650's are not called "ULTRAFIRE" for nothing...

  9. Lawsuit time! by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know that the first thing people will reach for is regulatory oversight, including banning them, but I remember that Underwriter's Laboratories isn't a government agency, and people are buying vaporizers from dodgy sources. Lawsuits, in this case, can only do so much I think. The companies will simply go bankrupt.

    So I have to ask, as I'm a non-smoker who hasn't looked into it, are there any safety organizations that have published safety standards and are offering their guarantee mark to vaporizers that meet said safety standards?

    A few stories like this making the rounds of e-cig communication lines(forums, magazines, websites), and the saying to 'get a UL listed one or you risk it blowing up!', and safety should improve.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  10. Don't use cheap batteries. by ArylAkamov · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is why you DO NOT BUY CHEAP BATTERIES.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    This is what happens if you get a shitty 18650 without any kind of protection circuitry and/or an ecig without a vented battery compartment.

    How to tell if the battery is likely to explode:

    http://www.lygte-info.dk/info/...

    http://lygte-info.dk/info/isMy...

    tl;dr stop buying cheap shit and expecting it to withstand a 35+ amp draw.

  11. It was lighters before that by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bic lighters have been blamed for several deaths and several injuries over the years too. The link above was in regards specifically to Bic lighters from 1979 to 1984.

    1. Re:It was lighters before that by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I remember that. You had to pop the silver wind-guard off of it, Then turn the valve one way by lifting the red slider each time you turned it back. It was also funny as hell to do that to someones lighter when they left it lying around, or were too drunk/stoned to notice. I'm pretty sure just about everyone I knew, myself included, singed their hair and eyebrows from that at one point or another.

  12. Regulated vs Non-Regulated mods by GrBear · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've yet to hear of any regulated mod (battery voltage regulator) blowing up.. only non-regulated ones. The non-regulated ones are simply a push button switch that shorts positive and negative terminals of the battery via the coil of the device.

    Of course if you're coil is of so little resistance as to cause a short, the battery is going to explode.. much like jumpering the postitive and negative batteries of a car battery.

    If people stopped being uninformed idiots that don't know how to use an unregulated mod, then they deserve what they get..

    Or in other terms, don't stare into laser with good remaining eye.

  13. Re:Time to mandate by Sperbels · · Score: 2

    Are you kidding? That's my favorite shade of green. How about we just cover them with COMCAST logos?

  14. Re:I imagine it's the customizable units.... by war4peace · · Score: 2

    I vape since November 7th, 2011. Never smoked a regular cigarette since then.
    My current mod is an eLeaf iStick 100W (http://www.eleafworld.com/istick-100w/) holding two 18650 Panasonic batteries (NCR18650B: http://www.batteryspace.com/pr...). The atomizer is an Aspire Nautilus with 1.6 Ohm resistor. I use VW mode on the mod with 14W setting.
    Charging the batteries is not done using the integrated mod's charger. I have a certified 18650 battery charger for two batteries, with 1A total charging capacity, that is 500mAh charging capacity per battery. This means the batteries charge slowly. The charger has high temperature and short circuit protection embedded.

    My alternate/backup mod is a Cloupor Mini with one battery (same brand/series as above), using an Aspire Nautilus Mini atomizer. The battery does not stay in the mod unless I actively use the mod.

    Using products manufactured in China is not a problem. The problem is whether those products are manufactured with strict Quality Control or not. The rule of thumb is: if it's cheap and you never heard of it, don't buy it. And never, EVER skimp on batteries or chargers.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  15. Mech mods, cheap batteries and user error by fl_litig8r · · Score: 4, Informative

    will undoubtedly account for 99% of these cases. There are no details in this story about what caused the batteries to explode, but I've read other articles which sometimes shed light on these cases. The guy with the leg burns kept loose batteries in his pocket with keys and coins. Another victim was a brand new vaper using a mech mod (it said he pushed the button on the bottom of the device, a tell-tale sign that it was a mech mod), and it was clear that someone else has prepared his gear and he had no idea what he was doing. In fact, I'd wager that most people with exploding batteries were mech mod users. Why mech mods still exist is beyond me. They have no protective circuitry, so if your build causes too high a draw on the battery, or the device gets stuck in the "on" position, you're going to have a big problem.

    The one possibly unavoidable problem with any e-cigarette is counterfeit batteries. If you're trying to be safe and you buy Sony, Samsung or LG batteries, it can be tough to tell if they're genuine or not (I've gotten counterfeits myself through an Amazon third-party seller). If I have any doubts that a battery I'm using isn't genuine, it gets boxed and disposed of immediately. Of course, counterfeit batteries aren't only a problem for vapers, but the proximity of the device to your face will generally cause more damage than for, say, a flashlight user.

  16. It's not bad batteries at all.... by burtosis · · Score: 3, Informative

    These types of batteries are basically identical to those found in iPhones or any other modern device. Most are cylindrical lithium polymer. What is causing the problems is three basic things.

    1) A complete lack of safety circuitry. Forget a smart battery system and gas gauging, many of the units I took apart had no safety at all (relied on the charger alone) to at most a leaky over and under voltage protection that was custom implemented. No charge or discharge current sensing and no temperature sensing. No faulty cell detection and no permenant disable for a faulty battery. Just like when Lipo batteries first hit the hobby market this means fires galore, and when enclosed, sizable explosions.

    2) People use the incorrect chargers. Add to that little to no safety and it's a disaster.

    3) People modify thier units without knowing what they are actually doing. They may have read a forum post or read a blog or had a friend do it. They don't realize any dangers or take any precautions.

    Disclaimer: I have designed smart battery systems for products in the field. I have had failures but nothing the safety systems did not shut down before catastrophe.

  17. Re:No, Not Good by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 5, Informative

    Propylene glycol is also known as fog juice, the stuff that goes into stage smoke machines, and it's used as a food additive. It metabolises to lactic acid and is considered safe, which is why it's used in e-cigs.

    Antifreeze is usually ethylene glycol, which is toxic. However, both salt and ethanol can also be used as antifreeze, and while they can be lethal in sufficient quantities they too are considered fit for human consumption. Calling something "antifreeze" tells you no more about its toxicity than calling something "natural" (i.e. snake venom) or "organic" (i.e. benzene).

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  18. Re:You're forgetting about taxes by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

    Have never cared for (recreational) drugs

    Just curious - do you drink alcohol? Or caffeine? If so, do you define "recreational" drugs as "any drugs other than the ones I use"?

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  19. Re:Regulation Please by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 3, Informative

    The new FDA regulations on e-cigs did NOT ban flavors. It will, however, effectively put every manufacturer out of business with the exception of the big tobacco conglomerates.

    You won't see any more innovation or options in e-cigs either. Every component is regulated and banned without a long and expensive approval process. In fact, it will probably be the end of refillable e-cigs and the sale of e-juice. It's going to be too expensive as each and every blend will require a separate application and set of laboratory testing.

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
  20. Re:According to TFA by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 4, Informative

    There have been 66 cases reported according to the first link. 66. Out of tens of millions of devices.

    This is just a typical case of control freaks in government looking for something else to get their fingers in.

    Actually, they are trying to drum up public fear so they can win the lawsuits against their crazy new regulations. Which will basically cause all e-cigs to vanish from the market. Except the ones sold by the big tobacco conglomerates.

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
  21. natural selection doesn't apply by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Insightful

    missing and eye and your front teeth doesn't really slow you down from procreating. Given that your offspring would have their eyes and teeth, as e-cig explosions don't alter your genes. So you really only need to survive until they are able to take care of themselves.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire