Slashdot Mirror


Mark Zuckerberg Is Dictator Of Facebook Nation; There's No Democracy Online: The Pirate Bay Founder (cnbc.com)

Facebook CEO and co-founder Mark Zuckerberg is the "dictator" of "the biggest nation in the world," says Peter Sunde, co-founder of the controversial website The Pirate Bay. Sunde, who appeared at The Next Web conference on Friday, added that there is "no democracy" online. From a CNBC report: "People in the tech industry have a lot of responsibilities but they never really discuss these things... Facebook is the biggest nation in the world and we have a dictator, if you look at it from a democracy standpoint, Mark Zuckerberg is a dictator. I did not elect him. He sets the rules," Sunde said. "And really you can't opt out of Facebook. I'm not on Facebook but there are a lot of drawbacks in my offline world. No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you, because you're not on Facebook. So it has real life implications."

202 comments

  1. Dictator??? by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not obliged to use Facebook. If people want to sell their brains to Mark Zuckerberg, that's their right, but it's hardly a dictatorship in any meaningful use of the word. When we're all forced at gunpoint to use Facebook, then the article may have a point.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. I don't use Facebook, have never used Facebook and will never use Facebook.

      Facebook can't fine, imprison or execute people either, so it's not a nation and doesn't have laws.

    2. Re: Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The definition of a dictator is that he/she sets the rules.

    3. Re:Dictator??? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I also don't use Facebook, but an increasing number of companies use it as their primary online presence (not surprising, as its primary purpose is a marketing platform, with a social network along the side). I wouldn't be surprised if it becomes the sole contact mechanism for various companies over the next couple of years, which will make remaining off the system harder.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actual companies have their own web sites.

    5. Re: Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Faggots" and "sucking cocks". If the use of these terms is not enough to indicate you are uneducated trash, your incoherent rant served that purpose.

    6. Re:Dictator??? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Actual companies have their own web sites.

      Sure, but they do all their marketing on Facebook, and all their recruiting on LinkedIn. Nobody goes to "websites" anymore.

    7. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody goes to web sites. Nobody goes to a company's Facebook account.

    8. Re: Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh shit, watch out guys! We've got a penis expert here!

    9. Re:Dictator??? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Everybody goes to web sites. Nobody goes to a company's Facebook account.

      You might want to check with your grandchildren about that.

    10. Re:Dictator??? by tepples · · Score: 1

      If your claim that nobody visits a business's Facebook Page is true, what explains tools to let a business count visits to its Page?

    11. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to check into reality. Go search for ANY company name with ANY search engine and the first result will be the company's web site because it is the most relevant/visited.

      Good luck buying products or downloading software/drivers from a company's Facebook account, lol.

    12. Re:Dictator??? by anegg · · Score: 1

      I've run into a company or two that doesn't have their own website, just a Facebook page. Some of them don't even let you SEE their page unless you log into Facebook! Since I don't have a Facebook account, I couldn't do business with them.

    13. Re: Dictator??? by Pax681 · · Score: 1

      I think you will find THIS is the true definition of dictator!

    14. Re: Dictator??? by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Which applies to all websites, even Slashdot. Some may opt for more open rules, some for less. If a site is too restrictive for you, then go find one more to your liking.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    15. Re:Dictator??? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      The organization I work for has both a web site, and a Facebook page. The actual website does get more hits, but the Facebook page is steadily gaining on it.

      Or, to put it another way, you have no fucking idea what you're talking about. Jesus fucking Christ pal, it's 2016, not 1999.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    16. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies want as much presence in the online world as possible. Facebook and Twitter are two of the most widely known names online and a company will want to take advantage of that popularity to increase their own presence. It doesn't matter that Facebook, Twitter, and all the other social media sites offer any thing really useful to society at large. They are time wasters and provide a platform for making people think they are actually contributing to the world based on the number of likes they receive for their inane posts. The one tangible thing the social media sites have provided is babysitting services for parents too caught up in their own lives to worry about raising functional adults. On second thought the social media sites also offer up ways to create division amongst the population and incite the proles anytime a distraction is needed by those running the show. Social media has provided the most powerful propaganda weapon that has ever existed. Countries invest huge amount of resources in shaping the narratives and manufacturing facts to support their policies and actions.

    17. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How very "informative". The definition of a dictatorship is not that you can't leave, or have to enter it. It's that one person or group sits on all the power and nobody else gets - quite literally - a say in anything. Which happens to fit FB and Zuckerberg pretty damned well. Besides all of which Sunde didn't even argue that you had to join, just that staying out has repercussions. It's even in the damned summary.

      So, we have a +5 "Informative" who doesn't even know the meaning of a dictatorship, can't read the summary and can't keep track of the arguments made. Well done, Slashdot.

    18. Re:Dictator??? by Tailhook · · Score: 0, Troll

      So were past pretending Facebook isn't a libtard safespace? Well, that's progress I guess.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    19. Re: Dictator??? by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

      Have a facebook account for business stuff, don't use it for personal stuff. Basically when you're getti g f@#$ed by facebook, make sure to wear a computational condom.

      --
      John_Chalisque
    20. Re:Dictator??? by akozakie · · Score: 2

      Exactly. I don't have a FB account. That doesn't really make anything difficult. It's even getting easier, as companies start realizing that FB-only online presence requiring an account is too limiting. Two years ago things were looking more bleak - everyone was moving to FB and many pages were blocked from non-logged in users.

      And a word of advice. If people stop talking to you because you don't have a facebook account... Great! Nice friend-filter. Why would you wan't to talk to people who do that?

    21. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't do business with them

      Problem solved.

    22. Re:Dictator??? by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      It is mind blowing how mind numbing Facebook posts are. They are all within a narrow range of "Cool, but useless" or "Amazing, but not threatening to any large corporation".

      What astonishes me the most is that anyone would go there for any reason. I guess it serves the same purpose as the local bar used to, and some just have to hang out and poison themselves.

      --
      I come here for the love
    23. Re: Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed from the consumer point of view. But what if you have a small business? Facebook is almost a requirement to compete.

    24. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the dictators enviroment gets maintained at the cost of everyone else :) facebook makes the real fall apart?

    25. Re:Dictator??? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      It's getting harder every day to not use it. I would be with you if Facebook didn't have such a big impact in our lives as it has already. Of course because we collectively let it do so, but in the end, the individual has little recourse.

      Increasingly webpages use some kind of "Facebook login" process. You want to join them, you need to have a Facebook profile. They outsourced the "hassle" of user management. And simply shrugging and forgoing using them works only if you're not involved in media or PR issues or have to find contractors online for work. Also more and more bosses want to see a Facebook profile before hiring you and not having one is seen as "odd". Got something to hide that we can't see your Facebook profile? Because it's just so unfathomable that you don't have one.

      That thing is creeping deeper and deeper into our lives, whether you like it or not. Even whether you use it or not. And not using it makes you more and more of a pariah. Because "why didn't you come to the party, everyone was there, I posted it on Facebook for all my friends" is only the start.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    26. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know exactly what he's getting at with the nation and dictator analogy. Stop acting like you're dumb.

    27. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many ways beside gun point to lose your life, your life is comprised of your community, if they go where you can not, you lose it.

    28. Re:Dictator??? by Hylandr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That rather nicely proved his point.

      I deleted my facebook account. Best thing I ever did.

      All Facebook really does is provide a place for everyone to go to have your conversations overheard by the entire world.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    29. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to use Faceberg, just use a sock account. You don't have to tell (((Zuckerberg))) anything about yourself.

    30. Re: Dictator??? by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      "then go find one more to your liking."

      Or start your own.

      Let's not forget how easy it is to do this. And with modern computing and network infrastructure it's actually pretty easy to get good performance in case your site becomes more successful than you possibly imagined.

      I remember reading some of the early posts here about the hardware and software running Slashdot back when it was very popular. I would imagine, with hardware advances, and the decline in the site's popularity, that it's now running on some very modest hardware.

      Anyway, my point was: go start your own!!!! When it comes to websites, the more the merrier!!!

    31. Re:Dictator??? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I was looking at some Atmel processors on Atmel's website last night. I don't think they have anywhere near as much info on their Facebook page, if they even have a Facebook page.

      I doubt if O'Reilly and Associates use their Facebook page for much important, either.

      Those are just two examples of websites I used in the last few days.

      Actual companies have their own web sites. Perhaps it can be said that startups and companies whose main product is 'hype-spin' stick to Facebook.

    32. Re:Dictator??? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      So you are just talking about where children navigate to before they've grown up?

    33. Re: Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Network effect.

      The point of Facebook is that everyone uses it because everyone uses it.

    34. Re: Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see way more right-wing nut-memes on Facebook than on any other site including this one. Facebook may filter right-leaning news stories but they're certainly not silencing the gaggle of morons that think a sign on a bathroom door is protecting them from being molested.

    35. Re: Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oy vey! It's annuda Shoah! SHUT IT DOWN!!

    36. Re: Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would be wrong about that. A local sandwich place with daily specials gets Facebook page first. I imagine it gets more hits from search engine.

      Their website has a sidebar with Facebook comments and daily update. So they post to Facebook frequently, and website just links to that.

    37. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook is for lame old fogies. You might as well be talking about MySpace as if it's the "Alpha and the Omega". I'm honestly embarrassed for you.
      (I sort of feel like a teenager watching his senile grandparent tell his daughter what's hip and cool with "the kids" while he shows her how to use a MiniDisc player...)

      Even SnapChat has almost jumped the shark. People are using Periscope now AFAIK.

      If you really want to know what's hip and current watch @MartinShkreli on Twitter. That guy chews through live-blogging services like I change underwear.

      Whisper, Yikyak, Whatsapp, Secret, etc.

      The social media universe has moved on and left Facebook for sending party invites and uploading photos to groom your public perception when someone googles you.

    38. Re: Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A local sandwich place isn't a business, it's Mickey Mouse shit.

      I am holding a bottle of Sprite in my hand. Know what URL it has listed? It certainly isn't a Facebook page.

    39. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The actual website does get more hits

      Except you just admitted that the actual web site is more popular. Go find a clue, shit-for-brains.

      You go set up a business without a real web site and let me know if anyone takes you seriously when you tell them to go to "www.facebook.com/user/2390234/~wannabebusiness".

    40. Re:Dictator??? by cavreader · · Score: 1

      "more and more bosses want to see a Facebook profile before hiring you " Define more and more. Is there any proof this statement is accurate in any way outside of a few anecdotal cases? There are plenty of online sites that specialize in providing targeted employment and contracting opportunities so why wade through all the dross on FB? You may well see a lot of online services that allow you to use a Facebook account to login but it is an option not a requirement. Just like using FB in general is an option not a requirement.

    41. Re:Dictator??? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Really, really bad idea to put all your eggs in one basket in terms of a business. Absolutely do not make you only public online face Facebook because many people will block it. I do not run any invasive scripts all allow excessively undesirable cookies, Facebook is basically dead for me, nothing to see, no scripts and no cookies. Facebook might seem OK but it will cut you off from many customers and like all social media sites, become stale and people move on (not so much what the company does but what people do when interacting with each other poorly, it expand and kills the site, and efforts to control it make it worse).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    42. Re:Dictator??? by hjf · · Score: 1

      I have a shop. I sell comic books, and pay taxes. So, I'm an actual business. My facebook page has way (WAY) more traffic than my website, because people are on facebook ALL DAY. And facebook is showing them my posts. They are not checking my website all the time.

      You're just a special little geek snowflake. You're not representative of the general population.

      Get your head off your ass. I hate facebook more than you (I have to pay REAL MONEY to them), but i don't go around saying bullshit like "hurr durr if you're a real company you have your own website".

    43. Re:Dictator??? by hjf · · Score: 1

      OK, so, take a moment, and look at yourself. What do you see? A fucking nerd. You're less than 1%. No company cares about you and your script blocking. No one gives a shit about you. No one will be bothered to cater to fucking nerds like you, except maybe other nerds.
      Sorry man, but that's how it is. You see, web 3.0 jerks develop only for chrome "because no one uses firefox anymore". And we're talking 10% of the browser market. Do you really think people care about you and your script blocking?
      Simple: no.
      I'm a programmer and at my office my fellow coders don't even know what adblock is.

    44. Re:Dictator??? by hjf · · Score: 1

      People are moving from facebook... you're thinking of teenagers, because mom and dad are in facebook. I get more likes for my shop on instagram nowadays, not from facebook. But you wouldn't know about instagram or snapchat, right, grandpa?

      Social media is here to stay. Sorry. This is the Dark Ages - people have become consumers, not producers. Web 2.0 is dead, and has been dead for a decade. Web 3.0 is here, and it's all about likes and comments, and not about producing comment.

      And it's getting worse: People no longer own computers. They have everything they need in their tiny personal screen. computers are stripped down laptops (chromebook) and the PC is retreating back to its original setting: the office. People no longer want computers at home. They break, and get viruses. Only late teens want expensive gaming computers.

      Really, man. It's sad that this is where we're going.

    45. Re:Dictator??? by hjf · · Score: 1

      Argentina's previous work minister said in a meeting with businessmen: "wait, so you don't check your potential employees facebook before hiring? I can't believe it!" Link: http://www.cronista.com/3dias/...

      It's not anecdotical man. It's how it is.

      YOUR experience ("no one checked my facebook before hiring me") is anecdotical.

      Let that sink in.

    46. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a shop that nobody has ever heard of and could disappear tomorrow without affecting anyone but you. That's not a real business.

      Get back to us when you have your own skyscraper with your business name emblazoned across the top.

    47. Re:Dictator??? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Many of those are pages automatically generated by Facebook bots. They are usually crickets-chirping empty. Just placeholders.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    48. Re:Dictator??? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Yeah and people said clickbait is here to stay, and it's been collapsing in on itself for the last 8 months and sites are laying off or shutting down because of it.

      But no the PC isn't retreating back, it's being replaced by those small devices because people only used it for specific things and those other devices can do it just as well. But that "expensive gaming computer?" You can make one cheaper then a console costs these days that will out preform it. Sure is expensive in here.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    49. Re:Dictator??? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 0

      If you are astonished by the fact that people use Facebook, you should really just scrape your face off with a rusty razor. After all, you've already admitted that you're devoid of any knowledge or understanding of people, so there's really no point to you living. Or at least, you have no one who will miss you, so you may as well provide entertainment for the rest of us.

    50. Re:Dictator??? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 0

      It's a shame we no longer have gladiator sports. It would be wonderful to watch people like you torn to shreds by half-starved lions.

    51. Re:Dictator??? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Argentina. 'nuff said.

    52. Re:Dictator??? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It would be difficult to show either way. To minimise potential liability employers rarely actually say why you didn't get the job - I've been turned down for many jobs, and all I ever got were vague 'your application was not successful' letters.

    53. Re:Dictator??? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Really? I'd always assumed that for kids, facebook is old and unfashionable since it's something mum and dad use. I'm sure they'd visit the company's snapchat feed if it had one.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    54. Re: Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You first, bub.

    55. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a programmer and at my office my fellow coders don't even know what adblock is.

      3 fat assholes in Mom's basement working for uncle ernie updating his vb6 CRUD app are now considered programmers? Who'da thunkit

    56. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would a company limit themselves to only recruiting on LinkedIn? That pretty much guarantees that they won't get the right man for the job.
      I don't know if there is a downside to limit marketing to Facebook, but it doesn't sound very smart to me.

    57. Re:Dictator??? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      I also don't use Facebook, but an increasing number of companies use it as their primary online presence (not surprising, as its primary purpose is a marketing platform, with a social network along the side). I wouldn't be surprised if it becomes the sole contact mechanism for various companies over the next couple of years, which will make remaining off the system harder.

      FWIW, my teenage kids don't use FB, it's for the old fogeys apparently, so I think the FB think is probably past its peak usefulness. The signal/noise ratio is far too low these days, and it seems to a magnet for stupid people/companies/products, so let them enjoy each other while it lasts.

    58. Re: Dictator??? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Gladiators were paid athletes that could earn considerable fame and were pampered, at the least well fed enough to be strong and fat. They were carefully matched and fought between the news and drama or musicals.
      In contrast I guess the trolls were beaten and lashed at for a couple days before being fed to angry lions. Morals aside or if adjusting the morals it would likely be great to live in that era. They had wine and tablets, so not much to be missed.

    59. Re:Dictator??? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Expensive is relative, but games are pigs that need an i5 CPU and a good GPU (if only a recent $100 one) that are otherwise not needed at all. In older times any PC good enough to run Windows 95 was good enough to run real games sold in boxes in stores. It's cheaper now but if you go for console-priced laptop or desktop + monitor you'll have a great shitbox for web games and minecraft not so much console-quality games.

    60. Re:Dictator??? by WML+MUNSON · · Score: 1

      I'm not obliged to use Facebook. If people want to sell their brains to Mark Zuckerberg, that's their right, but it's hardly a dictatorship in any meaningful use of the word. When we're all forced at gunpoint to use Facebook, then the article may have a point.

      Sunde is right. As more people migrate to mobile where data caps are common and zero-rated services are becoming more prevalent (courtesy of Facebook's Internet.org/Free Basics initiative) more people will find themselves locked in to Facebook.

    61. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Any company tying its future to FB is one to avoid. This is not a wise move. FB will die. It's future was in the past. The best FB can hope for is to limp along for a time - ultimately, all our children will simply abandon FB because it's no longer chill. Like it or not, FB only has a MySpace life to look forward to over any long term.

    62. Re:Dictator??? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      When we're all forced at gunpoint to use Facebook, then the article may have a point.

      Amen to that, brother. Zuckerberg can't send a goon squad out to force me to have a Facebook account, and likewise he can't send a goon squad out to silence me when I say things like Facebook SUCKS ASS and you're a fool to use it! either.

      Waaah, I don't get party invitations!

      Seriously, did that guy really say that? Sounds like he's some whiny kid on 4chan/r9k/ or something. Here's the fact of the matter for you, kiddies: If someone on Facebook forgets to invite you to some party they're throwing just because you're not on Facebook, then they probably aren't really your 'friend' in the first place and maybe you need to re-evaluate your criteria for who you consider to be your 'friends'. The social world of Humans existed many many centuries before the Internet, and long long before some jackass named 'Zuckerberg' opened up some website called 'Facebook', and it'll continue to exist long after Facebook finally dies and goes away, so maybe you'd better spend more time working on your in-real-life social lives and less on your pseudo-social online life.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    63. Re:Dictator??? by hjf · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that comment invalidates my point?

    64. Re: Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we think of as a nation-state is a very recent invention. Just because the ways that FB exercises power doesn't look like the 21st century US doesn't mean it doesn't have tremendous -- and very undemocratic -- power. Real democracy means *all* aspects of our lives are ruled by as much self-governance as humanly possible. Zuckerberg is a dictator any way you slice it, and there are alternatives to this situation.

    65. Re: Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea it invalidated it 100%. This isn't Argentina. We are talking American companies here. Post something apropos to that.

    66. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think one Argentina work minister's comments validate your argument? He was expressing an opinion. And unless Argentina's bureaucrats and politicians are from another planet they are just as ignorant and idiotic as their foreign counterparts. And your Argentina reference is a shining example of anecdotal evidence.

    67. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps everyone else seems to use Facebook all day but a lot of us are old fashioned and don't have a Facebook account or have one but never use it and if a business requires us to use Facebook to visit them on the internet we simply don't visit. We don't like being tracked by data brokers and don't need to use a site like Facebook to visit other sites.

    68. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those links don't work when I click on them, probably because I have facebook.com blocked at the dns level on my router. Nice try tho.

    69. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also don't use Facebook, but an increasing number of companies use it as their primary online presence (not surprising, as its primary purpose is a marketing platform, with a social network along the side). I wouldn't be surprised if it becomes the sole contact mechanism for various companies over the next couple of years, which will make remaining off the system harder.

      Personally I just go to a different company other than a company that uses Farcebook as their primary online presence. I figure a company that operates like this will also care nothing about my privacy. There's always somebody else selling the same product.

    70. Re: Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the point of Facebook is that everyone uses it because idiots use it, and there are a lot of idiots in the world.

    71. Re: Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole point of the site is to judge other people based on their likes and dislikes and current social norms.

    72. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you're not man enough to fight someone yourself?

    73. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the friendless, jobless virgin.

    74. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you still teaching your daughter how to post fake Amazon reviews?

    75. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think meant "e-community".

      I have actual friends. I'm sorry that all of yours are of the online variety.

    76. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless the man is responsible for the flaws and glitches and deficiencies in the channel when they violate even common sense in programming systems.

    77. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't have to be one or the other. If I want to know something about a business (menu, locations, hours, etc), I visit their web site where those details are easy to find. If I want to interact with that business quickly then I will use their facebook or twitter page.

      Example: my internet was down, so I used my mobile to check my ISP's web site for any outage notices. There were none in my area, so I dialed the call-center number (available on their web site) and was informed it was a 30 minute wait. I hung up, and publicly tweeted at their customer support account about the outage. They replied within 2 minutes asking me to message them my account details so they could verify connectivity. I could also see other people tweeting at them about the outage. I'm 34.

    78. Re:Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would also argue that if people don't talk to you or invite you to things because you are not on Facebook, why would you want to even associate with those people to begin with?

    79. Re: Dictator??? by ZorglubZ · · Score: 1

      Sorry to burst your bubble, but Argentina is in America.

    80. Re:Dictator??? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Every single social media company bites the bullet, just a matter of time ;D.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  2. People don't stop talking to you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have numerous friends who don't use Facebook. If people aren't talking to you, it's because you're a douchebag. Facebook is just an excuse.

    1. Re: People don't stop talking to you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook friends are no real friends anyway, but great for parties.

    2. Re: People don't stop talking to you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have time to spend with people who aren't friends and parties are for children.

    3. Re: People don't stop talking to you by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Anyone else read that as "I don't have time to spend at parties and friends are for children"?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re: People don't stop talking to you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone else read that as "I don't have time to spend at parties and friends are for children"?

      No. I read it as "I go to real parties and have real friends" or "Friends don't let friends use Facebook."

    5. Re: People don't stop talking to you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's your party hat and prize bag little Johnny. Now go enjoy the party!

    6. Re: People don't stop talking to you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read that as "if I had friends I'd accept their Facebook party request, but I don't so I'm going to bitch and blame Facebook for not having friends. "

    7. Re: People don't stop talking to you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People use Facebook because they don't have friends.

      Have fun at your little e-party, getting drunk all alone in a dark room while typing to people you have never met and will never meet, kid. Maybe, if you're really lucky, one of the "girls" will cyber with you later!

  3. Boo freakin' hoo. by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And really you can't opt out of Facebook. I'm not on Facebook but there are a lot of drawbacks in my offline world. No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you, because you're not on Facebook. So it has real life implications.

    So start your OWN free-to-users social media platform. Figure out how to pay for that mammoth infrastructure and operations overhead while making it perfect for users like you who want nothing to do with any system that involves advertising or user profiles - and you'll have a millions of users instantly. It will be fascinating to see how you solve the problem that people at Google, Microsoft, and other fly-by-night operations haven't been able to solve (specifically, making people like you happy while not having the platform run at a financial loss).

    If you actually care about social event invitations, etc., just set up a FB account, tell it to drop notifications to a burner mailbox, and never sign in using your normal every day browser sessions. Need to look at it? Fire up an incognito sessions, socially interact for 10 minutes so you don't miss that party you're whining about, then kill the session an go back to focusing on running that content piracy web site you're trying to keep alive.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:Boo freakin' hoo. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      If you actually care about social event invitations, etc., just set up a FB account, tell it to drop notifications to a burner mailbox, and never sign in using your normal every day browser sessions.

      That's pretty much what I do. I have an account with enough basic info that old friends can find me. But I have never posted anything, and I have never clicked a "like" button.

    2. Re:Boo freakin' hoo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have never clicked a "like" button.

      You don't need to. Loading the button from their servers is enough.

    3. Re:Boo freakin' hoo. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      But only if you're logged in. And if you're surfing with an incognito session that wipes cookies each time, and has no connection to all of your other shopping, browsing, email, etc., I'm not sure what the complaint is, for this free service. Either people want the free stuff, or they don't. Mr. Holier Pirate Than Thou wants his free goodies, but only on his terms. Just another expression of his entitled world view, of course, but who is older than 12 and doesn't understand how this works?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:Boo freakin' hoo. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      Can't get more pitiful than this:

      No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you, because you're not on Facebook.

      It's hard to imagine what life must be like for this poor slob.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re: Boo freakin' hoo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no. Blocking cookies does not prevent FB tracking. Blocking scripts might, but you gotta block a lot of them. There are evercookies and browser fingerprinting that foil the silly-to-trust incognito/private browsing modes. Better do some research if you care to leave the dictatorship.

    6. Re:Boo freakin' hoo. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      And really you can't opt out of Facebook. I'm not on Facebook but there are a lot of drawbacks in my offline world. No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you, because you're not on Facebook. So it has real life implications.

      So start your OWN free-to-users social media platform. Figure out how to pay for that mammoth infrastructure and operations overhead while making it perfect for users like you who want nothing to do with any system that involves advertising or user profiles - and you'll have a millions of users instantly. It will be fascinating to see how you solve the problem that people at Google, Microsoft, and other fly-by-night operations haven't been able to solve (specifically, making people like you happy while not having the platform run at a financial loss).

      It's ironic that in the land of capitalism, people are completely ignorant, and have totally forgotten as to exactly how this is accomplished.

      STOP giving your product away for FREE.

      Common Sense.

    7. Re:Boo freakin' hoo. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Given the choice between a free platform and one they must pay for, customers will run towards the free. Possibly they might then move to the paid one if they are very dissatisfied with free, but it won't be their first choice. That's why all of the biggest online services are free-to-use.

    8. Re:Boo freakin' hoo. by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      What sucks is $5 a month or even $1 a month, this assumes everyone can afford such death of thousand cuts and/or that things will stay the same for many years (income, bank account or debit card, who pays the bill..)
      If a one-time payment of $29.99 could work that'd be better.

    9. Re:Boo freakin' hoo. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The one-time payment approach can only work so long as the service is growing. Once it is mature you end up with no source of income, and no option but to go subscription or start on advertising. Then you're back where you started.

  4. No party invitations? by r_jensen11 · · Score: 2

    I understand that with the exception of major-life events (e.g. weddings), good-old-fashioned written invitations have largely gone the way of the dodo, but most parties I've gone to have been word-of-mouth invitations. Either Sunde is overestimating his sans-Facebook popularity or he needs to reassess the (and possibly revert to the pre-Facebook-era) definition of "friend." Last I checked, it means something other than "acquaintance."

    1. Re:No party invitations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you know it could be different in his social circle/ geopraphical area?

      I have closed down my facebook account aswell (I don't even have a slashdot account! *goes to sit in the corner*) and I agree that it's a real sacrifice when it comes to invitations to parties and for finding out about public events like concerts etc.

      I mean among my closest friends if they are having an actual party (like a birthday party) they will of course send me a message on viber. But other friends might not. And even close friends may sometimes throw out a quick "Anyone for beer tonight?" on facebook without calling/messaging everyone that is off facebook.

      Luckily, my wife has facebook so she'll tell me about these things (unless she doesn't feel like going ;-) )

  5. You Can Opt-Out of Facebook AND Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ""And really you can't opt out of Facebook."

    Yes, you can.

    "I'm not on Facebook"

    But you just said...

    "there are a lot of drawbacks in my offline world. No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you, because you're not on Facebook. So it has real life implications.""

    IMO if you have friend(s) using Facebook and they flat out ignore you or fail to contact you in any number of ways apart from Facebook, maybe they were not true friends to begin with.

  6. and above all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a moron with an attitude. that's worse.

  7. Facebook as a Dictatorship? by KermodeBear · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let me know the next time Facebook:

    Takes your property without your consent.
    Prohibits you from leaving.
    Stops you from saying what you wish to say.
    Threatens your livelihood or your life.
    Throws you in jail without a trial.
    Forces you to interact with it against your will.
    Executes your entire family for a political view.

    --
    Love sees no species.
    1. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Literally only two things you listed are things they don't already do:

      Throws you in jail without a trial. (unless you count an account suspension as jail)
      Executes your entire family for a political view.

    2. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sunde's point probably is that Facebook has grown too large and have tentacles into everything, either directly or by buying up startups. Facebook's "gift of internet" to the poor in India that ended up locking in everyone in their walled garden is one example.

      Within that walled garden (which is getting bigger and bigger) they do censor posts and people. They also prohibits you from leaving (as in erasing every information they have about you). As their tentacles dig deeper (or Facebook gets more successful, pick your view) being on their damned platform seems to be more and more important for certain jobs/roles.

      And finally, they certainly DO force me to interact with them. Their fucking scripts and like-buttons are everywhere. I get that it is the businesses that chose to include that near-malware shit in their apps/on their web pages is responsible for being dumb, but that shit would not be there hadn't Facebook grown so large.

      While I get that Facebook does whatever is good for Facebook, just like an amoeba does what is good for an amoeba, it does not mean it is good for the Internet/host of the amoeba. Competition and choice is awesome. Open standards are even better. Gardens without walls are great. Fuck Facebook (and Google).

      Now, where are the barricades? I have a pitchfork to lift over my head while yelling something incomprehensible.

    3. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by tepples · · Score: 0

      And finally, they certainly DO force me to interact with them. Their fucking scripts and like-buttons are everywhere.

      Facebook's scripts won't load if you keep its hostnames from resolving. There are several ways to do that, such as a Windows application written by APK that creates a list of hosts to resolve to 0.0.0.0.

    4. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of them (kind of) are true, but most of them are only true after you accept to abide by their rules:
      https://www.facebook.com/terms?_fb_noscript=1 (who reads that anyway)

      > Takes your property without your consent.
      "you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook (IP License). This IP License ends when you delete your IP content or your account unless your content has been shared with others, and they have not deleted it."

      >Prohibits you from leaving:
      "You may also delete your account or disable your application at any time. In all such cases, this Statement shall terminate, but the following provisions will still apply: 2.2, 2.4, 3-5, 9.3, and 14-18"

      >Stops you from saying what you wish to say.
      " We can remove any content or information you post on Facebook if we believe that it violates this Statement or our policies."

      >Forces you to interact with it against your will.
      https://tech.slashdot.org/story/16/05/27/1445259/facebook-begins-tracking-non-users-around-the-internet

      They altered the deal, pray they will not alter it any further.

    5. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by ScentCone · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Are you really this unclear on the situation? How does Facebook stop you from saying what you want to say? If you go on Google+ to say it, or your own blog, or print it up in newsletters, or launch a web site ... how is it that Facebook is stopping you from doing those things? Be specific.

      And in what way is Facebook "taking your property without your consent?" Be specific. This should be entertaining.

      Likewise, on "prohibits you from leaving." Again, be specific about how FB's provisions for you to delete your content and your profile/account are somehow hidden from you (and only you).

      And do tell about how Facebook has threatened your livelihood or your life. Or do you mean that you've had repercussions from having posted stupid crap in a public place, and it's impacted your ability to get a job? Yeah, I see.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    6. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • Takes your property without your consent.

      http://mashable.com/2013/09/05/facebook-ads-photo/#ExRhkQW.WkqO

      • Prohibits you from leaving.

      http://www.michaelzimmer.org/2010/05/10/what-happens-to-your-facebook-data-when-you-leave/

      • Stops you from saying what you wish to say

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/facebook-censorship/

      • Threatens your livelihood or your life

      http://www.thewrap.com/pittsburgh-tv-anchor-fired-over-facebook-post-stereotyping-young-black-men/

      • Forces you to interact with it against your will.

      http://www.zdnet.com/article/facebook-tracks-you-online-even-after-you-log-out/

      • Executes your entire family for a political view.

      I'm sure this one is coming at some point.

    7. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as you're within reach of their power, they do all of those things, with the exception of jail and murdering your family. But they do ban you at their whim. Some of the things on your list they even do if you're not "in their realm".

    8. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How does Facebook stop you from saying what you want to say?

      Probably by deleting content on their service they don't want said. I suppose they might even do it pre-emptively. Or they could bury the searches.

      If you go on Google+ to say it, or your own blog, or print it up in newsletters, or launch a web site ... how is it that Facebook is stopping you from doing those things? Be specific.

      In that case, if you fled from Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, or Imperial Rome, you weren't really being censored.

    9. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get an education.

      Not a single thing among all that has anything to do with a dictator. The probability a dictatorship will use these methods to secure it's power is significant but not guaranteed.

      Meanwhile, a democracy could, and have, just as well done the same.

      You're putting the cart in front of the horse.

    10. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      I'm unsure why you are posting this question; what KermodeBear posted was a disagreement that FB is a dictatorship, and cited points of real dictatorship to back up their disagreement with the notion that FB is a dictatorship.

      Are you really this unclear on the situation? How does Facebook stop you from saying what you want to say? If you go on Google+ to say it, or your own blog, or print it up in newsletters, or launch a web site ... how is it that Facebook is stopping you from doing those things? Be specific.

      And in what way is Facebook "taking your property without your consent?" Be specific. This should be entertaining.

      Likewise, on "prohibits you from leaving." Again, be specific about how FB's provisions for you to delete your content and your profile/account are somehow hidden from you (and only you).

      And do tell about how Facebook has threatened your livelihood or your life. Or do you mean that you've had repercussions from having posted stupid crap in a public place, and it's impacted your ability to get a job? Yeah, I see.

      Are you really this unclear on the situation? How does Facebook stop you from saying what you want to say? If you go on Google+ to say it, or your own blog, or print it up in newsletters, or launch a web site ... how is it that Facebook is stopping you from doing those things? Be specific.

      And in what way is Facebook "taking your property without your consent?" Be specific. This should be entertaining.

      Likewise, on "prohibits you from leaving." Again, be specific about how FB's provisions for you to delete your content and your profile/account are somehow hidden from you (and only you).

      And do tell about how Facebook has threatened your livelihood or your life. Or do you mean that you've had repercussions from having posted stupid crap in a public place, and it's impacted your ability to get a job? Yeah, I see.

    11. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Executes your entire family for a political view.

      But truly, isn't not getting Facebook updates from your friends the same as having your entire family executed?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    12. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL, you're a fucking idiot on every level. They've been doing most of this stuff since the beginning.

    13. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by ScentCone · · Score: 0

      Probably by deleting content on their service they don't want said. I suppose they might even do it pre-emptively. Or they could bury the searches.

      And this prevents you from starting your own web site, using other services, and publishing anything you want on your own system (instead of on theirs) how, exactly? Do they reach out to all hosting companies and shut down all the web sites you start? Please give details on how they stop you from talking in the world. Be specific.

      In that case, if you fled from Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, or Imperial Rome, you weren't really being censored.

      You have absolutely no sense of perspective whatsoever, do you? You can stay right here in the US, and publish anything you want to your heart's content on systems YOU pay to operate. How, again, is Facebook - a company running their own service, which you don't have to use - stopping you from using wordpress, or twitter, or google+ or anything else?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    14. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      There are people who live really sad lives for whom that is the case.

    15. Re: Facebook as a Dictatorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this prevents you from starting your own web site, using other services, and publishing anything you want on your own system (instead of on theirs) how, exactly? Do they reach out to all hosting companies and shut down all the web sites you start? Please give details on how they stop you from talking in the world. Be specific.

      You asked " How does Facebook stop you from saying what you want to say?"

      By deleting content, they are stopping someone from saying they want to say.

      They could also block it as a pre-filter, or hide the search results, those would also be things they could do. In other senses, they could engage in PR campaigns and media manipulation to warp discussion, much like any other large entity.

      Seems pretty obvious to me, but that is what you asked.

      Now, if you want to initiate some discussion over the importance of Facebook's abilities or their larger scale meaning, then I suggest you try another approach. Your current method isn't really fostering discussion or showing much contemplation on your part.

      You can say that Facebook isn't everything. But Facebook will still be quite involved in censoring content, yes.

       

      You have absolutely no sense of perspective whatsoever, do you? You can stay right here in the US, and publish anything you want to your heart's content on systems YOU pay to operate. How, again, is Facebook - a company running their own service, which you don't have to use - stopping you from using wordpress, or twitter, or google+ or anything else?

      Funny, I could say you lack perspective, since you keep failing to note the effects of Facebook's ability to censor content, which you seem to fail to acknowledge, instead seeking to blithely dismiss any examination.

      As I said above, if you wish to initiate a discussion, I suggest another approach, so that people, such as myself, will engage more effectively with you.

      Otherwise, I repeat my assertion, by your logic, no censorship or oppression exists since all one has to do is flee. This is also true of bullets. You can never be shot, since you will always evade ad infinitum.

    16. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Takes your property without your consent.
      "you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook (IP License). This IP License ends when you delete your IP content or your account unless your content has been shared with others, and they have not deleted it."

      So.. If I record myself singing a song I wrote, and post it on a hypothetical face book page, if a recording company talent spotter sees it, and wants to publish.. They must deal solely with facebook and Facebook get all the royalties?

      No.. Not actually true is it..

      Sorry kid. all that bullshit you posted with maximum "oh noes" added basically boils down to "To let other people see what you posted, we need permission to duplicate it on copies of this page other people view, without being on the hook for royalties". And that is about it.

      We both had to grant Slashdot the same rights to these posts, or they couldn't publish them.

      >Prohibits you from leaving:
      "You may also delete your account or disable your application at any time. In all such cases, this Statement shall terminate, but the following provisions will still apply: 2.2, 2.4, 3-5, 9.3, and 14-18"

      And by physically restraining me at a given location in a locked room?
      Handcuffing me to a radiator?
      Locking me in a dungeon?

      Again.. no.
      Because my account is not ME!
      My data is not alive.
      My demographic information is not protected by the EHCR.

      >Stops you from saying what you wish to say.
      " We can remove any content or information you post on Facebook if we believe that it violates this Statement or our policies."

      Which ONLY apply on Facebook.
      If I call Mark Zukerberg a twat, he can't really tell Slashdot to remove it.
      If I imply he is a thief that stole the idea of facebook from some university colleges, he is powerless to stop me.
      So again.. No.
      Facebook has zero extra power to stop me saying anything, beyond that of any person or organisation.

      >Forces you to interact with it against your will.
      https://tech.slashdot.org/story/16/05/27/1445259/facebook-begins-tracking-non-users-around-the-internet

      Which is not interaction.

      I do not interact with movies. I watch them. Passive experience.
      I do not interact with books, I read them. Passive experience

      I DO interact with video games. The character I control is my proxy in the game world.
      The actions I perform have consequences.

      I DO interact with people. We converse, engage in activities..

      I used to keep pet rats. I interacted with them. I came close to the cage, they got excited. When offered a treat or some attention, they gleefully accepted.

      And when let out, came and groomed my hair, snuffled in my ear, snuggled, nipped me playfully and ran away a few inches, pounced on bits of paper I moved about for them.
      And when I called them to go bac to their cage, they came running, because they knew this was when the veggies were served.

      I interact with companies I do business with. I buy stuff, they send it to me once payment has cleared.
      I have a problem with something I bought, I send it back, and get a replacement.

      Interaction requires PARTICIPATION. Observation is passive.

      Faceache know some code number visits a certain group of sites.

      Big fucking woop.

      So does Google.
      SO does my ISP.
      So no doubt does GCHQ.

      And no fucks are given.

      They altered the deal, pray they will not alter it any further.

      No fuckwit. I never had a deal, so there is nothing to alter.

      I am not bound by Facebook terms and conditions.
      Nor is anybody else really. But it is a nice way to pretend you are powerless, so you can make an excuse for being so lonely that you have to lure in subscribers to convince yourself you have friend

    17. Re: Facebook as a Dictatorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me know the next time Facebook:
      Takes your property without your consent.

      Mark did personally come into my home and steal three cheese wheels.
      Does that count?

    18. Re: Facebook as a Dictatorship? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      By deleting content, they are stopping someone from saying they want to say.

      Oh, I get it. You're one of those people who is unaware of the countless number of other ways you can communicate outside of the privately run system that is Facebook. Have you considered getting out a little more, and seeing how the world actually works?

      But Facebook will still be quite involved in censoring content, yes.

      Sure, just like you do. Or do you let anyone use systems you own and run - perhaps even your email account - to say and do anything they want? Or would you, perhaps, limit who and how your own stuff might be used? You horrible censoring dictator, you.

      How does Facebook censor your own web site? Please be specific. How does Facebook censor your Twitter posts? Please be specific.

      Otherwise, I repeat my assertion, by your logic, no censorship or oppression exists since all one has to do is flee.

      Where is Facebook making you flee to? Out of their privately run system and into another one? If you decide to start spray painting graffiti inside a coffee shop, do you consider them to be censoring you when they tell you to stop? Do you feel that going to your own place to spray paint the same graffiti on your own walls is you "fleeing" from somebody else's privately owned walls?

      This is also true of bullets. You can never be shot, since you will always evade ad infinitum.

      Do you even listen to yourself?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    19. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I'd just like to point out that while the above AC sounds 99% like me, and while I agree with him/her 110%, it is not, in fact, me. Nice job, though, AC, you've hit the nail squarely on the head. :-)

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    20. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

      So I'm not a dictator if I do only one or two things on your list?

      Seriously, dictators come in all sizes and shapes. Not all of them with a funny-looking moustache and a military suit. Zuckerberg may well be a smiling dictator who'll manifest his "dictatorial" tendencies only when his hold on power or influence is threaened.

    21. Re: Facebook as a Dictatorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By deleting content, they are stopping someone from saying they want to say.

      Oh, I get it. You're one of those people who is unaware of the countless number of other ways you can communicate outside of the privately run system that is Facebook. Have you considered getting out a little more, and seeing how the world actually works?

      But Facebook will still be quite involved in censoring content, yes.

      Sure, just like you do. Or do you let anyone use systems you own and run - perhaps even your email account - to say and do anything they want? Or would you, perhaps, limit who and how your own stuff might be used? You horrible censoring dictator, you.

      How does Facebook censor your own web site? Please be specific. How does Facebook censor your Twitter posts? Please be specific.

      Otherwise, I repeat my assertion, by your logic, no censorship or oppression exists since all one has to do is flee.

      Where is Facebook making you flee to? Out of their privately run system and into another one? If you decide to start spray painting graffiti inside a coffee shop, do you consider them to be censoring you when they tell you to stop? Do you feel that going to your own place to spray paint the same graffiti on your own walls is you "fleeing" from somebody else's privately owned walls?

      This is also true of bullets. You can never be shot, since you will always evade ad infinitum.

      Do you even listen to yourself?

      Hmm, my question is if you listen to anyone else, or if you prefer coming up with a rather disjointed collection of replies to just repeat whatever you wanted to declare in the first place, without giving anyone else any consideration or examination?

      Otherwise you might have realized the very important context you ignored. The point I was making is that your reasoning is fallacious.

      Facebook does censor content. So does Twitter. In fact, they and some others are the subject of another Slashdot story, which made me think of my conversation with you.

      Sadly, instead of engaging in a manner that would foster discussion, you chose to continue your pattern of conduct where you discourage anyone from engaging with you by approaching it in a declaratory and off-putting fashion. You don't even examine your own words, as you are the one who asked "How does Facebook stop you from saying what you want to say?" so if you didn't want an answer to that question, you should have reflected more on what you asked and considered how to get a real discussion going.

  8. Oh boo effing hoo! by Chas · · Score: 1

    Try walking into a deli and urinating on the cheese...

    Really though, what is this idiot entitlement that tells you that you have any rights on a site someone else is paying for?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re: Oh boo effing hoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn right! Now get back in the salt mines, you filthy prole.

  9. Please... by fred911 · · Score: 1

    " No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you, because you're not on Facebook."

    Sounds like you have a loose definition of the word "friend" or you need new ones. I've refused to use FB since it's inception and never have I had an issue that wasn't solved by easier and less obtrusive means.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  10. Rulership by consent by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    This article brings into focus the traditional justification of states in terms of being something you are subject to because you choose to live within its borders. The failure of the USSR to allow its citizens to leave was therefore one of the reasons why it was illegitimate. By contrast forgoing the benefits of FB out of a sense of a lack of democracy does not pass the rationality test; what am I seriously losing here by using FB? And remember the line about emails; the bad news is that MS reads your emails. The good news is that it reads ALL your emails - and can't actually do anything significant with them.

  11. No democracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I beg to differ. We had a vote. Myspace and Google+ lost.

    Someone else might win in the next election. But who knows when that will be.

    1. Re:No democracy? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      When part of the criterion is 'who knows when the next election will be?' you can hardly call it a democracy.

  12. Fails the "Stalin" test by jamesnutley · · Score: 1

    How many divisions does Mr. Zuckerberg command? Any destroyers? Air Forces? Can he actually stop his "citizens" from buying what they want; from his competitor if they choose? There are still real dictators in power on this planet today. Mr. Zuckerberg falls far short of qualifying.

    1. Re: Fails the "Stalin" test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The world has changed bro. Altering the minds and speech of billions of humans can enact more change than a traditional state dictator.

      Powerful the emporer is.

    2. Re:Fails the "Stalin" test by 101percent · · Score: 1

      You need to read some Chomsky. The free world is not controlled by force like it once was.

    3. Re: Fails the "Stalin" test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show me the Facebook military or STFU, junior.

  13. nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a bunch of nonsense. You can essentially opt out of everything on Facebook and still take advantage of everything it offers...

    Don't want to sign up with your real name? Then don't. Millions of people already use an alias with no consequences.
    Don't like the news stories Facebook puts in your news feed? Then don't read them.
    Don't like the ads that Facebook puts in front of you? Then don't click on them.
    Don't like your personal information being recorded or shared with other people? Then don't post such information on your profile.
    Don't want Facebook to know what sort of movies, music, products, etc., you're into? Then don't click "like" on those things.

    1. Re: nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late for this lad, he's already been brainwashed by the machine.

  14. Outcasts by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >"I'm not on Facebook but there are a lot of drawbacks in my offline world. No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you, because you're not on Facebook. So it has real life implications."

    I know exactly what you mean. I, too, refuse to participate in Facebook for a variety of very valid reasons. And you are correct, there are repercussions... not from Facebook, but from the others who use it and try to "force" everyone around them to do so also. So far, I have been able to work around most of those repercussions.

    Still, it is a shame that one company has so much potential power over the population.... and not just the obvious privacy implications, but (as we are seeing) the political and financial power too. As more and more people pour all their resources, information, advertising, support, and time into this single, proprietary company, that power and its potential for corruption and misuse increases.

  15. Can't opt out of Facebook? Please... by anegg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know lots of people who don't use Facebook, and we all get along just fine. However, we are of an age where we still remember how to make phone calls, send invitations via mail (e-mail or USPS), and make plans in advance for what we are going to do.

    Are friends really friends if they neglect you in their social life just because you don't use a particular on-line social media platform? I'm truly wondering on this question, because I don't hang around in social circles where this is required. What do those who do think?

    1. Re:Can't opt out of Facebook? Please... by rundgong · · Score: 1

      I believe the specific means of communication is not important here, it's the act of not using what everyone else in the group are using.
      If most of his friends are using Facebook to organize events, he is the oddball that is hard to contact because he only uses e-mail.

      This is equivalent to you stop using e-mail, or answering phone calls and insisting that you can be contacted only by fax.
      Sure, your friends can probably send you a fax if they really want to, and your 2-3 closest friends may even do so, but you better believe most of your extended group of friends won't bother with that, and you're gonna miss out on a lot of invitations.

      It's most likely exactly like that for him. Some people still keep in touch and go out of their way to invite him to events. Everybody else won't bother.

      This means, that for a large segment of the population, opting out of Facebook is a huge sacrifice socially.
      When the options are "use facebook" or "miss out on almost everything", for many people there is only one realistic option.

    2. Re: Can't opt out of Facebook? Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't use Facebook but I'll turn this around on you: Are friends really friends who don't make themselves easy to reach by going along with the same program all the other friends use? I imagine if I had to make a special effort every time for the one person out of 20, the one special unique snowflake who's too good for Facebook, I'd slowly start to think "fuck that guy." Mind you, I am that guy. It takes strength and independence to be that guy, which is great and all, but that is the point - it takes strength and independence to be that guy. I basically have like 5 friends. To me that's fine - only 5 people to please. But the isolation is real and for example any help I end up having to ask for, has to come from this small pool of 5 people. Not everyone is comfortable with that. Also god forbid you're still involved in mating, and try this approach. I already have a wife.

      Friendship is about reciprocity. The "they're not real friends," idealistic argument has its appeal, but should we be always testing our friends to make sure they're "real friends?" I've done it, most of them failed, and I'm basically on my own. I like it that way but you have to be the sort of person who does. And never needs a favor.

    3. Re:Can't opt out of Facebook? Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Its entirely possible to create a fb account. block everything and everyone. never post on it and end up with a chat list and event calender. now, if you really dont even want to SEE fb you can export the event functionality using webcal. and use pidgin to chat with.

      The 5 friends i sometimes arrange meetings with can still use fb, fb knows NOTHING of me except what it knew before i became privacy concious, when my next magic the gathering meeting is, which concerts i agreed to go to, and perhaps very occasionally some imgur image sent along in a chat. i hope it serves em well seeing as i use their bandwith and block their ads.

    4. Re: Can't opt out of Facebook? Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I blame Facebook for how nobody over a certain age can be bothered to learn to
      1) attach photos to an email without smartphones (and apps). This means we get precious few photos (by smartphone mms btw) because we are not on FB.
      2) Use dedicated cameras that are good inn low light conditions and have real flash ...becaue they forgot how to get the files off

      managing and sharing one's personal files on Windows by non G
      Geeks is a lost art. This leads to:
      - People who take crappy analog, lossy photos of your photo for sharing instead of hitting prtscrn or doing SaveAs
      - People who lose months of photos when their phone gets lost, stolen, screen issues, etc.

      While we are at it, STOP setting up devices for other people. Just don't. You guys are the reason older folk have to do so many password resets (and often get locked out because they can't pass the recovery tests). Brings a tear to my eye when a person has no clue where you can email them, despite how each new device has a different Google account set up. This will change greatly the day you put your collective foot down and
      and force the fills to
      1) sit down and watch, understand and answer each account question themselves
      2) Write DOWN the important results in their notebook instead of using someone else's lossy memory as backup plan

  16. Facebook is a Natural Monopoly by SeattleLawGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So start your OWN free-to-users social media platform. Figure out how to pay for that mammoth infrastructure and operations overhead while making it perfect for users like you who want nothing to do with any system that involves advertising or user profiles - and you'll have a millions of users instantly.

    It doesn't work that way. Unfortunately, Facebook is a natural monopoly--the network effects are massive and capture the market, and while the infrastructure cost of entering the market is relatively low, the user acquisition cost when competing against them becomes massive. No effective competitor has emerged in a decade. They are practically a utility and real consideration should be given to at least a certain level of regulation for such reasons as consumer privacy, accountability, and limiting the potential for abuse of market power. The current generation of regulators will not see that, but give it ten or fifteen years.

    --
    Real lawyers write in C++
    1. Re:Facebook is a Natural Monopoly by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work that way.

      Sure it does. Shall I put that on Twitter for you to see?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Facebook is a Natural Monopoly by Gussington · · Score: 1

      No effective competitor has emerged in a decade.

      That's like saying there's no competitor for TV, Geocities or Myspace. The FB model seems irrelevant to me, so there'll never be a replacement, because people will just communicate in other ways. Twitter, Insta, Snapchat etc have emerged and are filling gaps FB doesn't do. Over time, FB will continue to become a haven for irrelevant noise, and will eventually dissolve into the soup.

  17. Real friends by Aethedor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you, because you're not on Facebook.

    Perhaps you should try to find some real friends then.

    --
    It doesn't have to be like this. All we need to do is make sure we keep talking.
    1. Re:Real friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you, because you're not on Facebook.

      No wonder I get such good grades! My list of friends is composed of people who pick up their cell phone when I call and respond when I send an email. They are all incredibly high quality people. I have no use for the rest of them.

  18. Facebook Tor Hidden Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who runs it? facebook and/or NSA?

  19. Hyperbole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although exaggerated, he has a point.
    Dictatorship isn't necessarily literal, I don't think.

  20. Te he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The founder of pirate bay taking the moral high ground on internet use. :)

  21. Yeah that word does mean what he thinks it does by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Yeah he says:

    "really you can't opt out of Facebook. I'm not on Facebook "

    Not sure what he thinks the word "can't" means. I'm don't use Facebook either. I still get party invites, often via my wife.

    I actually created a Facebook account many years ago which I never use, so I COULD log in and use it if I wanted to.

    1. Re:Yeah that word does mean what he thinks it does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't do Facebook. I don't do social networking, at all, ever. It's all a sea of triviality and dis-interest, for me. Thus you can opt out of Facebook if you want to, it's really not that hard, and no, I don't live like Ted Kazynski either.

      If you are a 13 year old teenager then maybe you think you "have" to have Facebook. A little more maturity is required to know that you do not.

  22. It's not that bad not being a part by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People tell me that I am the last human on earth who is not signed up. I tell them I have enough things wasting my time without it. Sure, I don't know where my high school classmates are shitting this afternoon, or which starbucks beverage is the favorite amongst my cousin's colleageus, but I am fully certain that I can live without that information. In the outside chance that anything of any value is posted there, plenty of people I know in the real world can tell me about it.

    I have a real world to experience, thank you.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:It's not that bad not being a part by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      People tell me that I am the last human on earth who is not signed up.

      So it's you!

      Grab your pitchforks! To the lake!

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re: It's not that bad not being a part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you just posted a status about eating a dick.

    3. Re:It's not that bad not being a part by dwywit · · Score: 1

      You're not the only one. When I see how much time some people spend clicking likes, commenting on others' posts, and anxiously waiting for responses, I'm glad I never signed up.

      Tried Linkedin for a while, but closed that when I started getting endorsements for non-existent skills from people who couldn't possibly know, i.e. linkedin was lying to me, and not in a subtle way.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    4. Re:It's not that bad not being a part by Gussington · · Score: 1

      People tell me that I am the last human on earth who is not signed up.

      Among my group there is not that many users. Some have accounts, but rarely use them, mostly it's the wives and GFs who simply love gossip and all those "share this or an orphan dies" type posts.
      So relax, it probably just means you could do with some more intelligent friends.

    5. Re:It's not that bad not being a part by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      People tell me that I am the last human on earth who is not signed up.

      Not quite. My GF doesn't have a FB account, and neither does my mom. I have one, but mostly use it to keep up with my neighborhood crimewatch. You're not missing much by not having one.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  23. Family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My (far flung) family - not me - uses fb. Typical explanation: "all my frends and cow-orker's are there." They expect me to use fb. I don't. There is a consequence. I'm almost always out of the loop. This represents a significant pressure to use fb. You can choose your friends, but you can't choose your family. Between fb's odious terms of service, limited freedom of speech, and their misuse of information about their users, I am convinced I am doing the right thing. But I do suffer for it.

    1. Re:Family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can choose your friends, but you can't choose your family.

      Sure you can. Being related doesn't mean you have to hang out with or even care about them.

      My girlfriend and my best friend are both more family to me than much of my biological family.

  24. Hello Captain Obvious by DaMattster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Facebook is a big data corporation aimed at monetizing your personal information.. Of course it's going to be a dictatorship. Since when are corporations not dictatorships? They want to tell people how to think, feel, and believe.

  25. Waa waaa waaaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sunde said. "And really you can't opt out of Facebook. I'm not on Facebook"

    Or in other words, you can opt out of using Facebook.

    No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you

    That's funny, I'm not on Facebook, my friends still talk to me, Facebook isn't the only method of communication in the world.

    Maybe the reason they don't talk to you and invite you places is 'cos you're a boring drama whore ?

  26. then don't use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jeweyberg be gone!

  27. Funny. by rhewt · · Score: 1

    This is a societal issue, not a technological issue. It's somewhat odd that such a smart individual would blur the lines. Food for thought.

  28. The plastic life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've come to the conclusion that millennials don't have any real friends. Maybe that's why they're messed up.

  29. real life implications by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you, because you're not on Facebook.

    You say that like it's a bad thing.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  30. Re: Yeah that word does mean what he thinks it doe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So then you are personally on Facebook, even if you don't log in. And by proxy of your wife sharing all your details, you are also on Facebook.

    And unless you diligently block cookies and scripts, you will have a hidden profile anyway. And if you have a business, you must also join to compete.

    I agree with TFA, it's quite difficult to opt out.

    And I have never created an account personally but friends and family post about me and tag me - what can be done?

  31. You can choose to live free- or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I moved to New Hampshire to get away from this kind of BS. There is a migration called the Free State Project which is aimed at attracting people who don't want to live under an authoritarian socialist politically correct hell hole. If your friends stop talking to you because you don't use Facebook they clearly aren't your friends. Since I moved to New Hampshire this past year I've gotten to know a lot of new people and most don't use Facebook or don't use it exclusively. We've got other tools to interact with each other like Baofeng UV-5R Dual Band HAM Radios and are utilizing tools like Telegram instead.

    And get this we have *real world meet ups*. 2 or 3 times a week I go and hang out with people at different places. One of them is called Local Burger every Sunday. Another place we frequent is Mi Jalisco for Taco Tuesdays. This is all in my new home town of Keene, NH. But there are similar things going on in big and little cities and towns all over southern New Hampshire. We have BitCoin meetups and other revolutionary chatter.

    There is now also a nightly dinner you can check out at the SLAP in Keene (use to be called the KAT or Keene Activist Center). Yea- every night if you want you can hang out with people just like you! It's both fun and gives people like us the opportunity to talk about and plan more radical changes to our political systems. Liberty-oriented activism is alive and well in Keene, NH much to the dislike of many. Unfortunately most people don't like freedom and would rather be babied and refuse to take responsibility for themselves. They'd rather let abusive police and politicians dictate there lives. Not this group though.

  32. Wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this guy smoking? I don't think nation means what he thinks it does, not without a bit of artistic interpretation.

  33. This is why Zuckerberg is covering all earth by Thagg · · Score: 1

    Facebook is either going to fly a few thousand WiFi drones or thousands of WiFi satellites to cover the entire planet. Why would they be doing that?

    While I think that Pirate Bay guys suck hard (I spent my life creating content that they pirated), I don't think in this particular case he's wrong.

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    1. Re:This is why Zuckerberg is covering all earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guys who started a website for tracking torrents personally pirated your content?! If you have evidence of this, why don't you go after them in court?

  34. Good! by slasher999 · · Score: 1

    Good, let him be the dictator of Facebook. Democracy isn't without its pitfalls so that is hardly an argument about someone setting the rules for the social site he created and is responsible for. Socrates taught us a pure democracy devolves into anarchy and ultimately results in a dictator anyhow so maybe Mark is just ahead of the curve.

    As for being a Facebook me,ber, I've never joined and I've honestly never missed it. Not having a Facebook account has zero impact on me. I still talk to my family and friends and I can still use the Internet just fine!

  35. Use a dummy Faceberg account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anytime I really need to use Faceberg, I just use a sock account. I get the benefits of having a Faceberg account, and (((Zuckerberg))) doesn't get my personal information. Works for me.

  36. Get better friends by b1ng0 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like this guy needs to stop whining and get better friends.

    1. Re:Get better friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only one of my friends uses Facebook to any real degree. He's very smart(despite his circumstances) so I forgive the Facebook use. The rest of them are intellectuals who have no time for the cesspool that is Facebook.

      It used to be that MySpace was for people with a High School Diploma and people with a degree had a Facebook account. Eventually the Myspace account holders were allowed to migrate to Facebook and shit-post their inane religious/political views or air their personal relationship laundry. The only place on the internet more devoid of intelligence is the comments section of YouTube.

      "Mod this +5 Insightful if you're reading this in May 2016!"

  37. He's no more a dictator than I am by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    You know.you don't actually HAVE to join or keep using Facebook right?

  38. Regulate Social Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they want to be an omnipresent force in out lives, then clearly they need to be regulated to make sure they are behaving properly and respecting people's rights.

  39. Slashdot admins are dictators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People stopped talking to you because you call heads of companies dictators not because you don't use Facebook.

  40. Dead wrong. by FrozenGeek · · Score: 1

    There is total democracy. You vote by your presence or absence. If you don't like the way Facebook or some other social medium works, go somewhere else. Heck, you can create somewhere else - Zuckerberg did it without the resources of a large company. The internet is the freest place available to humanity today.

    --
    linquendum tondere
  41. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Social Network? Who needs it? I'm an introvert, you insensitive clod!

    Besides, with all that free democratic content on TPB where would you find the time?

  42. If somebody is on Facebook, I don't want him... by ffkom · · Score: 1

    ... to become my friend. I'm looking for friends only amongst those who are clever enough not to be on Facebook, and there are plenty of them.

  43. Always been that way... by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    Any instance where you are using someone elses computer system to do whatever, you have to follow their rules.

    When I used to be more involved in the operation of MUDs, it was well known in that community that when you're on someones server, you are pretty much a guest in the operator's house. You follow their rules, or you leave, or get kicked out. Nothing new here, Facebook is the property of Facebook, you are the guest. No one is twisting your arm to participate.

    That said, I don't really see why Facebook is mandatory to anyone's life. If it is, there's something wrong with your life, IMHO. I use Facebook under an alias (because I was taught in my younger years, you use an alias online, just how we did things.) The only thing I post is funny crap that comes across my wall, and I only use Facebook to get the occasional funny picture or joke.

  44. Anyone still on Farcebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    deserves what they get. See the article on their attempts to make law to protect themselves in Illinois this weekend.

  45. Mark is not a dictator. by jondeanmack · · Score: 0

    Mark is not a dictator as he can't time travel. Rhetorically, besides, when did the word dictator become a bad thing? God is a dictator.

  46. Teens Their Teachers: "Facebook is for Old People" by ferrous+oxide · · Score: 1

    I'm an inner city school teacher in Baltimore. I've had kids from 6th to 12th grade, and the overwhelming sentiment in the last two years from the kids is that FB is on its way out. Some of them grudgingly have accounts, but most of them--particularly the younger ones--think of it as outdated and for people who are ancient like me. They're using SnapChat and other newer social forms of communication.

    Just another side of the coin. Others have said there's no reason to use FB when older tech (or no tech) will do. My students would tell you that it's time to move on to the next thing.

    --
    "I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them." -Isaac Asimov
  47. I'm not on Facebook either. by irrational_design · · Score: 1

    To tell you the truth I can't think of any negative things that have happened in my life from not being on Facebook. I guess its one of those things where I've never tried it so I don't know what I might be missing.

    1. Re:I'm not on Facebook either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not notice it but generally things will happen in different ways over time.

      The following are of what I have started to increasingly notice over the last few years:

      - Looking for work, wont get responded to or get an interview because they cant find any information about you. (Even though I have my own domain and lean website and use its email address in resumes).

      - Friends no longer keep in contact because they cant be bothered using certain instant message programs or read emails anymore.

      - Find out about parties after they happen, no invite because it was hosted on a social network only.

      - Sales (lack of exposure), on eBay and local classifieds I am told of my great service and that their friends are looking for things I have and that they will tell them on Facebook. I have also been invited to groups to sell/trade things but they are only on Facebook.

      Other negative things is my friends talking to other friends or people I know about me yet they have nothing to do with eachother or met eachother and this is WITHOUT me having an account. Yet they still somehow are linked up and talk shit then I find out about it later and it blows up.

      I really hate Facebook but its the people and the content on it that are far worse.

  48. Let's put it this way: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's responsible for the largest social network in the world, created from the ground up by him from college to today. Millions - if not billions - use it daily to communicate with friends and family, and they do so willingly.

    You, on the other hand, host stolen content, pornography, and God knows what else. You're an international outlaw, constantly evading persecution and responsibility.

    In short, nobody values your opinion but pirates, thieves, and hackers.

  49. Yes he is a Dictator Suckerberg! by Xman73x · · Score: 0

    He is a control freak Suckerberg! He allows graphic violence etc etc of depictions of Christians being slaughtered and animals being tortured! What more do you wanna know about that pos Suckerberg!

  50. point well driven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is definitely an element of truth in what his saying, although coming from an online hacker.

    Serena Williams Hits Amazing Trick Shots with Dude Perfect (Video)|CREEBHILLS BLOG REVIEW'