Slashdot Mirror


Mark Zuckerberg Is Dictator Of Facebook Nation; There's No Democracy Online: The Pirate Bay Founder (cnbc.com)

Facebook CEO and co-founder Mark Zuckerberg is the "dictator" of "the biggest nation in the world," says Peter Sunde, co-founder of the controversial website The Pirate Bay. Sunde, who appeared at The Next Web conference on Friday, added that there is "no democracy" online. From a CNBC report: "People in the tech industry have a lot of responsibilities but they never really discuss these things... Facebook is the biggest nation in the world and we have a dictator, if you look at it from a democracy standpoint, Mark Zuckerberg is a dictator. I did not elect him. He sets the rules," Sunde said. "And really you can't opt out of Facebook. I'm not on Facebook but there are a lot of drawbacks in my offline world. No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you, because you're not on Facebook. So it has real life implications."

92 of 202 comments (clear)

  1. Dictator??? by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not obliged to use Facebook. If people want to sell their brains to Mark Zuckerberg, that's their right, but it's hardly a dictatorship in any meaningful use of the word. When we're all forced at gunpoint to use Facebook, then the article may have a point.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re: Dictator??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The definition of a dictator is that he/she sets the rules.

    2. Re:Dictator??? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I also don't use Facebook, but an increasing number of companies use it as their primary online presence (not surprising, as its primary purpose is a marketing platform, with a social network along the side). I wouldn't be surprised if it becomes the sole contact mechanism for various companies over the next couple of years, which will make remaining off the system harder.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Dictator??? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Actual companies have their own web sites.

      Sure, but they do all their marketing on Facebook, and all their recruiting on LinkedIn. Nobody goes to "websites" anymore.

    4. Re:Dictator??? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Everybody goes to web sites. Nobody goes to a company's Facebook account.

      You might want to check with your grandchildren about that.

    5. Re:Dictator??? by tepples · · Score: 1

      If your claim that nobody visits a business's Facebook Page is true, what explains tools to let a business count visits to its Page?

    6. Re:Dictator??? by anegg · · Score: 1

      I've run into a company or two that doesn't have their own website, just a Facebook page. Some of them don't even let you SEE their page unless you log into Facebook! Since I don't have a Facebook account, I couldn't do business with them.

    7. Re: Dictator??? by Pax681 · · Score: 1

      I think you will find THIS is the true definition of dictator!

    8. Re: Dictator??? by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Which applies to all websites, even Slashdot. Some may opt for more open rules, some for less. If a site is too restrictive for you, then go find one more to your liking.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    9. Re:Dictator??? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      The organization I work for has both a web site, and a Facebook page. The actual website does get more hits, but the Facebook page is steadily gaining on it.

      Or, to put it another way, you have no fucking idea what you're talking about. Jesus fucking Christ pal, it's 2016, not 1999.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    10. Re: Dictator??? by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

      Have a facebook account for business stuff, don't use it for personal stuff. Basically when you're getti g f@#$ed by facebook, make sure to wear a computational condom.

      --
      John_Chalisque
    11. Re:Dictator??? by akozakie · · Score: 2

      Exactly. I don't have a FB account. That doesn't really make anything difficult. It's even getting easier, as companies start realizing that FB-only online presence requiring an account is too limiting. Two years ago things were looking more bleak - everyone was moving to FB and many pages were blocked from non-logged in users.

      And a word of advice. If people stop talking to you because you don't have a facebook account... Great! Nice friend-filter. Why would you wan't to talk to people who do that?

    12. Re:Dictator??? by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      It is mind blowing how mind numbing Facebook posts are. They are all within a narrow range of "Cool, but useless" or "Amazing, but not threatening to any large corporation".

      What astonishes me the most is that anyone would go there for any reason. I guess it serves the same purpose as the local bar used to, and some just have to hang out and poison themselves.

      --
      I come here for the love
    13. Re:Dictator??? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      It's getting harder every day to not use it. I would be with you if Facebook didn't have such a big impact in our lives as it has already. Of course because we collectively let it do so, but in the end, the individual has little recourse.

      Increasingly webpages use some kind of "Facebook login" process. You want to join them, you need to have a Facebook profile. They outsourced the "hassle" of user management. And simply shrugging and forgoing using them works only if you're not involved in media or PR issues or have to find contractors online for work. Also more and more bosses want to see a Facebook profile before hiring you and not having one is seen as "odd". Got something to hide that we can't see your Facebook profile? Because it's just so unfathomable that you don't have one.

      That thing is creeping deeper and deeper into our lives, whether you like it or not. Even whether you use it or not. And not using it makes you more and more of a pariah. Because "why didn't you come to the party, everyone was there, I posted it on Facebook for all my friends" is only the start.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:Dictator??? by Hylandr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That rather nicely proved his point.

      I deleted my facebook account. Best thing I ever did.

      All Facebook really does is provide a place for everyone to go to have your conversations overheard by the entire world.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    15. Re: Dictator??? by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      "then go find one more to your liking."

      Or start your own.

      Let's not forget how easy it is to do this. And with modern computing and network infrastructure it's actually pretty easy to get good performance in case your site becomes more successful than you possibly imagined.

      I remember reading some of the early posts here about the hardware and software running Slashdot back when it was very popular. I would imagine, with hardware advances, and the decline in the site's popularity, that it's now running on some very modest hardware.

      Anyway, my point was: go start your own!!!! When it comes to websites, the more the merrier!!!

    16. Re:Dictator??? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I was looking at some Atmel processors on Atmel's website last night. I don't think they have anywhere near as much info on their Facebook page, if they even have a Facebook page.

      I doubt if O'Reilly and Associates use their Facebook page for much important, either.

      Those are just two examples of websites I used in the last few days.

      Actual companies have their own web sites. Perhaps it can be said that startups and companies whose main product is 'hype-spin' stick to Facebook.

    17. Re:Dictator??? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      So you are just talking about where children navigate to before they've grown up?

    18. Re:Dictator??? by cavreader · · Score: 1

      "more and more bosses want to see a Facebook profile before hiring you " Define more and more. Is there any proof this statement is accurate in any way outside of a few anecdotal cases? There are plenty of online sites that specialize in providing targeted employment and contracting opportunities so why wade through all the dross on FB? You may well see a lot of online services that allow you to use a Facebook account to login but it is an option not a requirement. Just like using FB in general is an option not a requirement.

    19. Re:Dictator??? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Really, really bad idea to put all your eggs in one basket in terms of a business. Absolutely do not make you only public online face Facebook because many people will block it. I do not run any invasive scripts all allow excessively undesirable cookies, Facebook is basically dead for me, nothing to see, no scripts and no cookies. Facebook might seem OK but it will cut you off from many customers and like all social media sites, become stale and people move on (not so much what the company does but what people do when interacting with each other poorly, it expand and kills the site, and efforts to control it make it worse).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    20. Re:Dictator??? by hjf · · Score: 1

      I have a shop. I sell comic books, and pay taxes. So, I'm an actual business. My facebook page has way (WAY) more traffic than my website, because people are on facebook ALL DAY. And facebook is showing them my posts. They are not checking my website all the time.

      You're just a special little geek snowflake. You're not representative of the general population.

      Get your head off your ass. I hate facebook more than you (I have to pay REAL MONEY to them), but i don't go around saying bullshit like "hurr durr if you're a real company you have your own website".

    21. Re:Dictator??? by hjf · · Score: 1

      OK, so, take a moment, and look at yourself. What do you see? A fucking nerd. You're less than 1%. No company cares about you and your script blocking. No one gives a shit about you. No one will be bothered to cater to fucking nerds like you, except maybe other nerds.
      Sorry man, but that's how it is. You see, web 3.0 jerks develop only for chrome "because no one uses firefox anymore". And we're talking 10% of the browser market. Do you really think people care about you and your script blocking?
      Simple: no.
      I'm a programmer and at my office my fellow coders don't even know what adblock is.

    22. Re:Dictator??? by hjf · · Score: 1

      People are moving from facebook... you're thinking of teenagers, because mom and dad are in facebook. I get more likes for my shop on instagram nowadays, not from facebook. But you wouldn't know about instagram or snapchat, right, grandpa?

      Social media is here to stay. Sorry. This is the Dark Ages - people have become consumers, not producers. Web 2.0 is dead, and has been dead for a decade. Web 3.0 is here, and it's all about likes and comments, and not about producing comment.

      And it's getting worse: People no longer own computers. They have everything they need in their tiny personal screen. computers are stripped down laptops (chromebook) and the PC is retreating back to its original setting: the office. People no longer want computers at home. They break, and get viruses. Only late teens want expensive gaming computers.

      Really, man. It's sad that this is where we're going.

    23. Re:Dictator??? by hjf · · Score: 1

      Argentina's previous work minister said in a meeting with businessmen: "wait, so you don't check your potential employees facebook before hiring? I can't believe it!" Link: http://www.cronista.com/3dias/...

      It's not anecdotical man. It's how it is.

      YOUR experience ("no one checked my facebook before hiring me") is anecdotical.

      Let that sink in.

    24. Re:Dictator??? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Many of those are pages automatically generated by Facebook bots. They are usually crickets-chirping empty. Just placeholders.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    25. Re:Dictator??? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Yeah and people said clickbait is here to stay, and it's been collapsing in on itself for the last 8 months and sites are laying off or shutting down because of it.

      But no the PC isn't retreating back, it's being replaced by those small devices because people only used it for specific things and those other devices can do it just as well. But that "expensive gaming computer?" You can make one cheaper then a console costs these days that will out preform it. Sure is expensive in here.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    26. Re:Dictator??? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Argentina. 'nuff said.

    27. Re:Dictator??? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It would be difficult to show either way. To minimise potential liability employers rarely actually say why you didn't get the job - I've been turned down for many jobs, and all I ever got were vague 'your application was not successful' letters.

    28. Re:Dictator??? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Really? I'd always assumed that for kids, facebook is old and unfashionable since it's something mum and dad use. I'm sure they'd visit the company's snapchat feed if it had one.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    29. Re:Dictator??? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      I also don't use Facebook, but an increasing number of companies use it as their primary online presence (not surprising, as its primary purpose is a marketing platform, with a social network along the side). I wouldn't be surprised if it becomes the sole contact mechanism for various companies over the next couple of years, which will make remaining off the system harder.

      FWIW, my teenage kids don't use FB, it's for the old fogeys apparently, so I think the FB think is probably past its peak usefulness. The signal/noise ratio is far too low these days, and it seems to a magnet for stupid people/companies/products, so let them enjoy each other while it lasts.

    30. Re: Dictator??? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Gladiators were paid athletes that could earn considerable fame and were pampered, at the least well fed enough to be strong and fat. They were carefully matched and fought between the news and drama or musicals.
      In contrast I guess the trolls were beaten and lashed at for a couple days before being fed to angry lions. Morals aside or if adjusting the morals it would likely be great to live in that era. They had wine and tablets, so not much to be missed.

    31. Re:Dictator??? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Expensive is relative, but games are pigs that need an i5 CPU and a good GPU (if only a recent $100 one) that are otherwise not needed at all. In older times any PC good enough to run Windows 95 was good enough to run real games sold in boxes in stores. It's cheaper now but if you go for console-priced laptop or desktop + monitor you'll have a great shitbox for web games and minecraft not so much console-quality games.

    32. Re:Dictator??? by WML+MUNSON · · Score: 1

      I'm not obliged to use Facebook. If people want to sell their brains to Mark Zuckerberg, that's their right, but it's hardly a dictatorship in any meaningful use of the word. When we're all forced at gunpoint to use Facebook, then the article may have a point.

      Sunde is right. As more people migrate to mobile where data caps are common and zero-rated services are becoming more prevalent (courtesy of Facebook's Internet.org/Free Basics initiative) more people will find themselves locked in to Facebook.

    33. Re:Dictator??? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      When we're all forced at gunpoint to use Facebook, then the article may have a point.

      Amen to that, brother. Zuckerberg can't send a goon squad out to force me to have a Facebook account, and likewise he can't send a goon squad out to silence me when I say things like Facebook SUCKS ASS and you're a fool to use it! either.

      Waaah, I don't get party invitations!

      Seriously, did that guy really say that? Sounds like he's some whiny kid on 4chan/r9k/ or something. Here's the fact of the matter for you, kiddies: If someone on Facebook forgets to invite you to some party they're throwing just because you're not on Facebook, then they probably aren't really your 'friend' in the first place and maybe you need to re-evaluate your criteria for who you consider to be your 'friends'. The social world of Humans existed many many centuries before the Internet, and long long before some jackass named 'Zuckerberg' opened up some website called 'Facebook', and it'll continue to exist long after Facebook finally dies and goes away, so maybe you'd better spend more time working on your in-real-life social lives and less on your pseudo-social online life.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    34. Re:Dictator??? by hjf · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that comment invalidates my point?

    35. Re: Dictator??? by ZorglubZ · · Score: 1

      Sorry to burst your bubble, but Argentina is in America.

    36. Re:Dictator??? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Every single social media company bites the bullet, just a matter of time ;D.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  2. Boo freakin' hoo. by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And really you can't opt out of Facebook. I'm not on Facebook but there are a lot of drawbacks in my offline world. No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you, because you're not on Facebook. So it has real life implications.

    So start your OWN free-to-users social media platform. Figure out how to pay for that mammoth infrastructure and operations overhead while making it perfect for users like you who want nothing to do with any system that involves advertising or user profiles - and you'll have a millions of users instantly. It will be fascinating to see how you solve the problem that people at Google, Microsoft, and other fly-by-night operations haven't been able to solve (specifically, making people like you happy while not having the platform run at a financial loss).

    If you actually care about social event invitations, etc., just set up a FB account, tell it to drop notifications to a burner mailbox, and never sign in using your normal every day browser sessions. Need to look at it? Fire up an incognito sessions, socially interact for 10 minutes so you don't miss that party you're whining about, then kill the session an go back to focusing on running that content piracy web site you're trying to keep alive.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:Boo freakin' hoo. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      If you actually care about social event invitations, etc., just set up a FB account, tell it to drop notifications to a burner mailbox, and never sign in using your normal every day browser sessions.

      That's pretty much what I do. I have an account with enough basic info that old friends can find me. But I have never posted anything, and I have never clicked a "like" button.

    2. Re:Boo freakin' hoo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have never clicked a "like" button.

      You don't need to. Loading the button from their servers is enough.

    3. Re:Boo freakin' hoo. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      But only if you're logged in. And if you're surfing with an incognito session that wipes cookies each time, and has no connection to all of your other shopping, browsing, email, etc., I'm not sure what the complaint is, for this free service. Either people want the free stuff, or they don't. Mr. Holier Pirate Than Thou wants his free goodies, but only on his terms. Just another expression of his entitled world view, of course, but who is older than 12 and doesn't understand how this works?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:Boo freakin' hoo. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      And really you can't opt out of Facebook. I'm not on Facebook but there are a lot of drawbacks in my offline world. No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you, because you're not on Facebook. So it has real life implications.

      So start your OWN free-to-users social media platform. Figure out how to pay for that mammoth infrastructure and operations overhead while making it perfect for users like you who want nothing to do with any system that involves advertising or user profiles - and you'll have a millions of users instantly. It will be fascinating to see how you solve the problem that people at Google, Microsoft, and other fly-by-night operations haven't been able to solve (specifically, making people like you happy while not having the platform run at a financial loss).

      It's ironic that in the land of capitalism, people are completely ignorant, and have totally forgotten as to exactly how this is accomplished.

      STOP giving your product away for FREE.

      Common Sense.

    5. Re:Boo freakin' hoo. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Given the choice between a free platform and one they must pay for, customers will run towards the free. Possibly they might then move to the paid one if they are very dissatisfied with free, but it won't be their first choice. That's why all of the biggest online services are free-to-use.

    6. Re:Boo freakin' hoo. by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      What sucks is $5 a month or even $1 a month, this assumes everyone can afford such death of thousand cuts and/or that things will stay the same for many years (income, bank account or debit card, who pays the bill..)
      If a one-time payment of $29.99 could work that'd be better.

    7. Re:Boo freakin' hoo. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The one-time payment approach can only work so long as the service is growing. Once it is mature you end up with no source of income, and no option but to go subscription or start on advertising. Then you're back where you started.

  3. No party invitations? by r_jensen11 · · Score: 2

    I understand that with the exception of major-life events (e.g. weddings), good-old-fashioned written invitations have largely gone the way of the dodo, but most parties I've gone to have been word-of-mouth invitations. Either Sunde is overestimating his sans-Facebook popularity or he needs to reassess the (and possibly revert to the pre-Facebook-era) definition of "friend." Last I checked, it means something other than "acquaintance."

  4. Facebook as a Dictatorship? by KermodeBear · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let me know the next time Facebook:

    Takes your property without your consent.
    Prohibits you from leaving.
    Stops you from saying what you wish to say.
    Threatens your livelihood or your life.
    Throws you in jail without a trial.
    Forces you to interact with it against your will.
    Executes your entire family for a political view.

    --
    Love sees no species.
    1. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Literally only two things you listed are things they don't already do:

      Throws you in jail without a trial. (unless you count an account suspension as jail)
      Executes your entire family for a political view.

    2. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sunde's point probably is that Facebook has grown too large and have tentacles into everything, either directly or by buying up startups. Facebook's "gift of internet" to the poor in India that ended up locking in everyone in their walled garden is one example.

      Within that walled garden (which is getting bigger and bigger) they do censor posts and people. They also prohibits you from leaving (as in erasing every information they have about you). As their tentacles dig deeper (or Facebook gets more successful, pick your view) being on their damned platform seems to be more and more important for certain jobs/roles.

      And finally, they certainly DO force me to interact with them. Their fucking scripts and like-buttons are everywhere. I get that it is the businesses that chose to include that near-malware shit in their apps/on their web pages is responsible for being dumb, but that shit would not be there hadn't Facebook grown so large.

      While I get that Facebook does whatever is good for Facebook, just like an amoeba does what is good for an amoeba, it does not mean it is good for the Internet/host of the amoeba. Competition and choice is awesome. Open standards are even better. Gardens without walls are great. Fuck Facebook (and Google).

      Now, where are the barricades? I have a pitchfork to lift over my head while yelling something incomprehensible.

    3. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by ScentCone · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Are you really this unclear on the situation? How does Facebook stop you from saying what you want to say? If you go on Google+ to say it, or your own blog, or print it up in newsletters, or launch a web site ... how is it that Facebook is stopping you from doing those things? Be specific.

      And in what way is Facebook "taking your property without your consent?" Be specific. This should be entertaining.

      Likewise, on "prohibits you from leaving." Again, be specific about how FB's provisions for you to delete your content and your profile/account are somehow hidden from you (and only you).

      And do tell about how Facebook has threatened your livelihood or your life. Or do you mean that you've had repercussions from having posted stupid crap in a public place, and it's impacted your ability to get a job? Yeah, I see.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How does Facebook stop you from saying what you want to say?

      Probably by deleting content on their service they don't want said. I suppose they might even do it pre-emptively. Or they could bury the searches.

      If you go on Google+ to say it, or your own blog, or print it up in newsletters, or launch a web site ... how is it that Facebook is stopping you from doing those things? Be specific.

      In that case, if you fled from Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, or Imperial Rome, you weren't really being censored.

    5. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      I'm unsure why you are posting this question; what KermodeBear posted was a disagreement that FB is a dictatorship, and cited points of real dictatorship to back up their disagreement with the notion that FB is a dictatorship.

      Are you really this unclear on the situation? How does Facebook stop you from saying what you want to say? If you go on Google+ to say it, or your own blog, or print it up in newsletters, or launch a web site ... how is it that Facebook is stopping you from doing those things? Be specific.

      And in what way is Facebook "taking your property without your consent?" Be specific. This should be entertaining.

      Likewise, on "prohibits you from leaving." Again, be specific about how FB's provisions for you to delete your content and your profile/account are somehow hidden from you (and only you).

      And do tell about how Facebook has threatened your livelihood or your life. Or do you mean that you've had repercussions from having posted stupid crap in a public place, and it's impacted your ability to get a job? Yeah, I see.

      Are you really this unclear on the situation? How does Facebook stop you from saying what you want to say? If you go on Google+ to say it, or your own blog, or print it up in newsletters, or launch a web site ... how is it that Facebook is stopping you from doing those things? Be specific.

      And in what way is Facebook "taking your property without your consent?" Be specific. This should be entertaining.

      Likewise, on "prohibits you from leaving." Again, be specific about how FB's provisions for you to delete your content and your profile/account are somehow hidden from you (and only you).

      And do tell about how Facebook has threatened your livelihood or your life. Or do you mean that you've had repercussions from having posted stupid crap in a public place, and it's impacted your ability to get a job? Yeah, I see.

    6. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Executes your entire family for a political view.

      But truly, isn't not getting Facebook updates from your friends the same as having your entire family executed?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      There are people who live really sad lives for whom that is the case.

    8. Re: Facebook as a Dictatorship? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      By deleting content, they are stopping someone from saying they want to say.

      Oh, I get it. You're one of those people who is unaware of the countless number of other ways you can communicate outside of the privately run system that is Facebook. Have you considered getting out a little more, and seeing how the world actually works?

      But Facebook will still be quite involved in censoring content, yes.

      Sure, just like you do. Or do you let anyone use systems you own and run - perhaps even your email account - to say and do anything they want? Or would you, perhaps, limit who and how your own stuff might be used? You horrible censoring dictator, you.

      How does Facebook censor your own web site? Please be specific. How does Facebook censor your Twitter posts? Please be specific.

      Otherwise, I repeat my assertion, by your logic, no censorship or oppression exists since all one has to do is flee.

      Where is Facebook making you flee to? Out of their privately run system and into another one? If you decide to start spray painting graffiti inside a coffee shop, do you consider them to be censoring you when they tell you to stop? Do you feel that going to your own place to spray paint the same graffiti on your own walls is you "fleeing" from somebody else's privately owned walls?

      This is also true of bullets. You can never be shot, since you will always evade ad infinitum.

      Do you even listen to yourself?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    9. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I'd just like to point out that while the above AC sounds 99% like me, and while I agree with him/her 110%, it is not, in fact, me. Nice job, though, AC, you've hit the nail squarely on the head. :-)

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    10. Re:Facebook as a Dictatorship? by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

      So I'm not a dictator if I do only one or two things on your list?

      Seriously, dictators come in all sizes and shapes. Not all of them with a funny-looking moustache and a military suit. Zuckerberg may well be a smiling dictator who'll manifest his "dictatorial" tendencies only when his hold on power or influence is threaened.

  5. Oh boo effing hoo! by Chas · · Score: 1

    Try walking into a deli and urinating on the cheese...

    Really though, what is this idiot entitlement that tells you that you have any rights on a site someone else is paying for?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  6. Please... by fred911 · · Score: 1

    " No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you, because you're not on Facebook."

    Sounds like you have a loose definition of the word "friend" or you need new ones. I've refused to use FB since it's inception and never have I had an issue that wasn't solved by easier and less obtrusive means.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  7. Rulership by consent by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    This article brings into focus the traditional justification of states in terms of being something you are subject to because you choose to live within its borders. The failure of the USSR to allow its citizens to leave was therefore one of the reasons why it was illegitimate. By contrast forgoing the benefits of FB out of a sense of a lack of democracy does not pass the rationality test; what am I seriously losing here by using FB? And remember the line about emails; the bad news is that MS reads your emails. The good news is that it reads ALL your emails - and can't actually do anything significant with them.

  8. No democracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I beg to differ. We had a vote. Myspace and Google+ lost.

    Someone else might win in the next election. But who knows when that will be.

    1. Re:No democracy? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      When part of the criterion is 'who knows when the next election will be?' you can hardly call it a democracy.

  9. Fails the "Stalin" test by jamesnutley · · Score: 1

    How many divisions does Mr. Zuckerberg command? Any destroyers? Air Forces? Can he actually stop his "citizens" from buying what they want; from his competitor if they choose? There are still real dictators in power on this planet today. Mr. Zuckerberg falls far short of qualifying.

    1. Re:Fails the "Stalin" test by 101percent · · Score: 1

      You need to read some Chomsky. The free world is not controlled by force like it once was.

  10. Outcasts by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >"I'm not on Facebook but there are a lot of drawbacks in my offline world. No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you, because you're not on Facebook. So it has real life implications."

    I know exactly what you mean. I, too, refuse to participate in Facebook for a variety of very valid reasons. And you are correct, there are repercussions... not from Facebook, but from the others who use it and try to "force" everyone around them to do so also. So far, I have been able to work around most of those repercussions.

    Still, it is a shame that one company has so much potential power over the population.... and not just the obvious privacy implications, but (as we are seeing) the political and financial power too. As more and more people pour all their resources, information, advertising, support, and time into this single, proprietary company, that power and its potential for corruption and misuse increases.

  11. Can't opt out of Facebook? Please... by anegg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know lots of people who don't use Facebook, and we all get along just fine. However, we are of an age where we still remember how to make phone calls, send invitations via mail (e-mail or USPS), and make plans in advance for what we are going to do.

    Are friends really friends if they neglect you in their social life just because you don't use a particular on-line social media platform? I'm truly wondering on this question, because I don't hang around in social circles where this is required. What do those who do think?

    1. Re:Can't opt out of Facebook? Please... by rundgong · · Score: 1

      I believe the specific means of communication is not important here, it's the act of not using what everyone else in the group are using.
      If most of his friends are using Facebook to organize events, he is the oddball that is hard to contact because he only uses e-mail.

      This is equivalent to you stop using e-mail, or answering phone calls and insisting that you can be contacted only by fax.
      Sure, your friends can probably send you a fax if they really want to, and your 2-3 closest friends may even do so, but you better believe most of your extended group of friends won't bother with that, and you're gonna miss out on a lot of invitations.

      It's most likely exactly like that for him. Some people still keep in touch and go out of their way to invite him to events. Everybody else won't bother.

      This means, that for a large segment of the population, opting out of Facebook is a huge sacrifice socially.
      When the options are "use facebook" or "miss out on almost everything", for many people there is only one realistic option.

    2. Re: Can't opt out of Facebook? Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't use Facebook but I'll turn this around on you: Are friends really friends who don't make themselves easy to reach by going along with the same program all the other friends use? I imagine if I had to make a special effort every time for the one person out of 20, the one special unique snowflake who's too good for Facebook, I'd slowly start to think "fuck that guy." Mind you, I am that guy. It takes strength and independence to be that guy, which is great and all, but that is the point - it takes strength and independence to be that guy. I basically have like 5 friends. To me that's fine - only 5 people to please. But the isolation is real and for example any help I end up having to ask for, has to come from this small pool of 5 people. Not everyone is comfortable with that. Also god forbid you're still involved in mating, and try this approach. I already have a wife.

      Friendship is about reciprocity. The "they're not real friends," idealistic argument has its appeal, but should we be always testing our friends to make sure they're "real friends?" I've done it, most of them failed, and I'm basically on my own. I like it that way but you have to be the sort of person who does. And never needs a favor.

    3. Re:Can't opt out of Facebook? Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Its entirely possible to create a fb account. block everything and everyone. never post on it and end up with a chat list and event calender. now, if you really dont even want to SEE fb you can export the event functionality using webcal. and use pidgin to chat with.

      The 5 friends i sometimes arrange meetings with can still use fb, fb knows NOTHING of me except what it knew before i became privacy concious, when my next magic the gathering meeting is, which concerts i agreed to go to, and perhaps very occasionally some imgur image sent along in a chat. i hope it serves em well seeing as i use their bandwith and block their ads.

  12. Facebook is a Natural Monopoly by SeattleLawGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So start your OWN free-to-users social media platform. Figure out how to pay for that mammoth infrastructure and operations overhead while making it perfect for users like you who want nothing to do with any system that involves advertising or user profiles - and you'll have a millions of users instantly.

    It doesn't work that way. Unfortunately, Facebook is a natural monopoly--the network effects are massive and capture the market, and while the infrastructure cost of entering the market is relatively low, the user acquisition cost when competing against them becomes massive. No effective competitor has emerged in a decade. They are practically a utility and real consideration should be given to at least a certain level of regulation for such reasons as consumer privacy, accountability, and limiting the potential for abuse of market power. The current generation of regulators will not see that, but give it ten or fifteen years.

    --
    Real lawyers write in C++
    1. Re:Facebook is a Natural Monopoly by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work that way.

      Sure it does. Shall I put that on Twitter for you to see?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Facebook is a Natural Monopoly by Gussington · · Score: 1

      No effective competitor has emerged in a decade.

      That's like saying there's no competitor for TV, Geocities or Myspace. The FB model seems irrelevant to me, so there'll never be a replacement, because people will just communicate in other ways. Twitter, Insta, Snapchat etc have emerged and are filling gaps FB doesn't do. Over time, FB will continue to become a haven for irrelevant noise, and will eventually dissolve into the soup.

  13. Real friends by Aethedor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you, because you're not on Facebook.

    Perhaps you should try to find some real friends then.

    --
    It doesn't have to be like this. All we need to do is make sure we keep talking.
  14. Yeah that word does mean what he thinks it does by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Yeah he says:

    "really you can't opt out of Facebook. I'm not on Facebook "

    Not sure what he thinks the word "can't" means. I'm don't use Facebook either. I still get party invites, often via my wife.

    I actually created a Facebook account many years ago which I never use, so I COULD log in and use it if I wanted to.

  15. It's not that bad not being a part by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People tell me that I am the last human on earth who is not signed up. I tell them I have enough things wasting my time without it. Sure, I don't know where my high school classmates are shitting this afternoon, or which starbucks beverage is the favorite amongst my cousin's colleageus, but I am fully certain that I can live without that information. In the outside chance that anything of any value is posted there, plenty of people I know in the real world can tell me about it.

    I have a real world to experience, thank you.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:It's not that bad not being a part by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      People tell me that I am the last human on earth who is not signed up.

      So it's you!

      Grab your pitchforks! To the lake!

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:It's not that bad not being a part by dwywit · · Score: 1

      You're not the only one. When I see how much time some people spend clicking likes, commenting on others' posts, and anxiously waiting for responses, I'm glad I never signed up.

      Tried Linkedin for a while, but closed that when I started getting endorsements for non-existent skills from people who couldn't possibly know, i.e. linkedin was lying to me, and not in a subtle way.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    3. Re:It's not that bad not being a part by Gussington · · Score: 1

      People tell me that I am the last human on earth who is not signed up.

      Among my group there is not that many users. Some have accounts, but rarely use them, mostly it's the wives and GFs who simply love gossip and all those "share this or an orphan dies" type posts.
      So relax, it probably just means you could do with some more intelligent friends.

    4. Re:It's not that bad not being a part by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      People tell me that I am the last human on earth who is not signed up.

      Not quite. My GF doesn't have a FB account, and neither does my mom. I have one, but mostly use it to keep up with my neighborhood crimewatch. You're not missing much by not having one.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  16. Hello Captain Obvious by DaMattster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Facebook is a big data corporation aimed at monetizing your personal information.. Of course it's going to be a dictatorship. Since when are corporations not dictatorships? They want to tell people how to think, feel, and believe.

  17. Funny. by rhewt · · Score: 1

    This is a societal issue, not a technological issue. It's somewhat odd that such a smart individual would blur the lines. Food for thought.

  18. real life implications by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    No party invitations, no updates from my friends, people stop talking to you, because you're not on Facebook.

    You say that like it's a bad thing.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  19. Re: People don't stop talking to you by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Anyone else read that as "I don't have time to spend at parties and friends are for children"?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  20. This is why Zuckerberg is covering all earth by Thagg · · Score: 1

    Facebook is either going to fly a few thousand WiFi drones or thousands of WiFi satellites to cover the entire planet. Why would they be doing that?

    While I think that Pirate Bay guys suck hard (I spent my life creating content that they pirated), I don't think in this particular case he's wrong.

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
  21. Good! by slasher999 · · Score: 1

    Good, let him be the dictator of Facebook. Democracy isn't without its pitfalls so that is hardly an argument about someone setting the rules for the social site he created and is responsible for. Socrates taught us a pure democracy devolves into anarchy and ultimately results in a dictator anyhow so maybe Mark is just ahead of the curve.

    As for being a Facebook me,ber, I've never joined and I've honestly never missed it. Not having a Facebook account has zero impact on me. I still talk to my family and friends and I can still use the Internet just fine!

  22. Get better friends by b1ng0 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like this guy needs to stop whining and get better friends.

  23. He's no more a dictator than I am by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    You know.you don't actually HAVE to join or keep using Facebook right?

  24. Dead wrong. by FrozenGeek · · Score: 1

    There is total democracy. You vote by your presence or absence. If you don't like the way Facebook or some other social medium works, go somewhere else. Heck, you can create somewhere else - Zuckerberg did it without the resources of a large company. The internet is the freest place available to humanity today.

    --
    linquendum tondere
  25. If somebody is on Facebook, I don't want him... by ffkom · · Score: 1

    ... to become my friend. I'm looking for friends only amongst those who are clever enough not to be on Facebook, and there are plenty of them.

  26. Always been that way... by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    Any instance where you are using someone elses computer system to do whatever, you have to follow their rules.

    When I used to be more involved in the operation of MUDs, it was well known in that community that when you're on someones server, you are pretty much a guest in the operator's house. You follow their rules, or you leave, or get kicked out. Nothing new here, Facebook is the property of Facebook, you are the guest. No one is twisting your arm to participate.

    That said, I don't really see why Facebook is mandatory to anyone's life. If it is, there's something wrong with your life, IMHO. I use Facebook under an alias (because I was taught in my younger years, you use an alias online, just how we did things.) The only thing I post is funny crap that comes across my wall, and I only use Facebook to get the occasional funny picture or joke.

  27. Teens Their Teachers: "Facebook is for Old People" by ferrous+oxide · · Score: 1

    I'm an inner city school teacher in Baltimore. I've had kids from 6th to 12th grade, and the overwhelming sentiment in the last two years from the kids is that FB is on its way out. Some of them grudgingly have accounts, but most of them--particularly the younger ones--think of it as outdated and for people who are ancient like me. They're using SnapChat and other newer social forms of communication.

    Just another side of the coin. Others have said there's no reason to use FB when older tech (or no tech) will do. My students would tell you that it's time to move on to the next thing.

    --
    "I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them." -Isaac Asimov
  28. I'm not on Facebook either. by irrational_design · · Score: 1

    To tell you the truth I can't think of any negative things that have happened in my life from not being on Facebook. I guess its one of those things where I've never tried it so I don't know what I might be missing.