Slashdot Mirror


DVD Release Delays Boost Piracy and Hurt Sales, Study Shows (torrentfreak.com)

One of the reasons that drive people to piracy is the delay in the release of a title's DVD or Blu-Ray in their local market. According to a new academic paper from Carnegie Mellon University, movie fans are finding it increasingly difficult to wait for the official DVD or Blu-Ray to come out. From a TorrentFreak report: Due to artificial delays which vary across different parts of the world, pirates can often get their hands on a high-quality rip of a movie before the DVD is officially released in their country. Researchers have looked into this piracy "window of opportunity," and found that release delays are actually hurting DVD and Blu-Ray sales. "Our results suggest that an additional 10-day delay between the availability of digital piracy and the legitimate DVD release date in a particular country is correlated with a 2-3% reduction in DVD sales in that country," the researchers write.

202 comments

  1. Really? by kimvette · · Score: 3, Funny

    No shit, Sherlock.
    Next, are they going to tell us water is wet?

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:Really? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's good to have a formal study done that can be cited, rather than just a theory or anecdotes.

    2. Re: Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I wait until the Blu-Ray comes out to pirate. I'm surprised people would want to pirate a dirty cam or some review rip.

      Here's a hint: pirates are going to pirate, regardless of what you do...unless you price films lower than the effort to pirate. If I could get a Blu-Ray quality download for say, a couple dollars, I'll buy it, as the cost is lower than the electricity cost to download it and the minute it takes to find it online.

    3. Re:Really? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Next, are they going to tell us water is wet?

      Tell that to a fish, and he'll ask, "What the hell is water?".

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, according to all the slashtards, piracy isn't really a factor in sales. Anyone who would have wanted to buy it would have bought it anyway and anyone who pirates it would have never have bought it. I guess this story (which so many commentators have taken as a given truth) blows that hypothesis out of the water. Either piracy doesn't hurt sales or this story is the obvious ends to a culture that supports piracy. You can't have it both ways.

    5. Re:Really? by Rhipf · · Score: 1

      Actually I don't think the fish would say anything as they don't have vocal cords nor do they understand human language.

    6. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... nor do they understand human language.

      You may underestimate babel fish.

    7. Re: Really? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      At least then the quality of the rip is in sync with the quality of the acting, the writing and the story.

      Seriously, with most of the movies that come out today, it's hardly a quality hit if it's blurry and shaky.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re: Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Greek trump failure. The guide entry for the Babel fish was quite clear that the fish itself didn't understand language, it just fed on brainwaves and shit out translations.

    9. Re:Really? by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 0


      Yes, one person's opinion is practically hearsay. No matter how reasonable or well founded the argument if there's no study for it then it's just some dude's opinion.

      One individual's opinion has changed the course of history many times before they needed studies.

      These days it's just an immediate reaction to shoot the messenger. "Why? who are you? what are you qualifications? -you're biased!" anything except examining the message.
      Even a damaged clock and all that...

      --
      A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
    10. Re: Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people will pirate no matter what, however that doesn't negate the findings of the study; clearly that's not the case with everybody. There are certainly plenty of cases where people are willing to part with cash, but actually have no legal means of getting the content in their area. Look at all the people having to use VPNs to access NetFlix content that isn't available in their country. Clearly they are willing to pay for NetFlix, but the shows they want just ain't there, and probably not available by any other means either.

    11. Re: Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I wait until the Blu-Ray comes out to pirate. I'm surprised people would want to pirate a dirty cam or some review rip.

      So do we.

      The dvd/bluray are released in the US, meaning where I live the dvd won't be released here for up to two years and the bluray never.

      Since both are out in the US, both are already ripped and up on tpb.
      So I download that years before being released here, if ever.

      No cams or screenies are involved.

    12. Re:Really? by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Up next: Region blocking people from viewing content online causes piracy too! Though water isn't wet, it may be a fine powdery liquid in light of future surveys.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    13. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tonight at 10: Unskippable previews lead users to piracy! Although we can't be certain why, it appears that paying money for an inferior product is losing popularity.

    14. Re:Really? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Funny enough, this was proven about 10 years ago, too. Back during the High-Def format wars, there was a format called HD-DVD, which in the end featured NO region coding. None at all.

      It completely screwed up the movie industry because when the HD-DVDs came out, people around the world started importing them because they would often be released in North America BEFORE it even hit theatres in other countries!

      And being region free meant you just bought an HD-DVD player locally and bought your discs from Amazon and others.

      The movie studios eventually wised up and delayed the HD-DVD releases in North America relative to the DVD releaes, and it was no doubt one of the big things that led to its demise. You can bet the studios really wanted region coding and all those things that weren't in the HD-DVD spec.

    15. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have not seen any studies that prove water is wet.

    16. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My study tends to indicate the real reason people steal is because they are dishonest pieces of shit who want everything to be given to them.
      Of course, that's only what I've witnessed my entire fucking life, so it's possible the study, performed by another subset of cretins trumps my observations.

    17. Re:Really? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 0
      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    18. Re:Really? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      I fail to see the point in the staggered releases and/or excluded regions. The folks behind the HD-DVD spec apparently didn't either.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  2. Duh! by neghvar1 · · Score: 0

    Duh!

  3. How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about releasing legal copies for purchase and download worldwide simultaneously? Stop the price discrimination nonsense. Offer censored versions if you must for places like China and Europe that restrict some types of speech and geolocate IPs to enforce the restrictions.

    1. Re: How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because all but a select few movie theaters would immediately die off.

    2. Re: How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And offer high quality, non DRMed mkv files. That's the one thing I want but virtually impossible to find legally. I foten resort to download a torrent even when the original disc is on my shelf - simply because I don't want to have to change e physical disc.

      Formally, this does make me a pirate, but morally I have no problem whatsoever.

    3. Re: How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree with you, but there are many considerations that can't be ignored, including local rating agencies, price arbitrage (few in poorer countries can afford US prices, but people in the US would be happy to pay the cheaper price), tax considerations (woo Brazil!), local language requirements (thanks Quebec!), and so on. While the companies haven't caught up to the fact that the world is a smaller place, and governments are yet further behind. That said, I do find it hilarious that the likes of Justin Beiber and Twilight might be the things that bring humanity together, slowly but surely :p That's the power of media, corporations, and sweet, sweet money.

    4. Re: How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that necessarily a bad thing? Watching the movie at home, you do not have strangers talking, the sound of eating popcorn and sweets, you do not have people walking in front of you to go to the bathroom and if you yourself want to go to the bathroom you can just pause the playback rather than having to either push past people or wait until the interval or end of the movie to use a toilet whose cleanliness is suspect after (especially if you are female) having had to wait in line. Plus movie theaters are expensive both the admission fee and for food/drink.

    5. Re: How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I personally dislike geoblocking, it would not be so bad if ALL the movies/albums were released simultaneously in all countries and available for purchase/rental/streaming from the local supplier at a price appropriate to that country.

    6. Re: How about... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      It's nice to have the option. It's a social thing. Also, my 50" UHD television still doesn't compare to a theatre experience. Granted, I go to the movies rarely, and I do appreciate being able to sit in the comfort of my home most of the time, but for certain modern action films - Avengers, Star Wars, Hobbit, etc. ya can't beat the theatre experience. At least, not without dropping fairly serious money for your gear.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    7. Re: How about... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What does one have to do with the other?

      We are not talking about making cinema release and DVD release the same date. What this is about is making the cinema releases worldwide for the same day, and making the DVD releases (later) also at the same day. I honestly can't think of a good technical reason why you should not be able to release the DVD in Europe and the US at the same day. Or, better yet, allow people to buy it wherever they want.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re: How about... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Usually the next step is to eliminate the part that is of no use to you: Buying the DVD.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re: How about... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Is that necessarily a bad thing?

      I have a nice enough 42" Sony LED TV - But it in no way compares to the experience of seeing a move like SPECTRE in the theatre. For me, the theatre is a much better experience.

    10. Re: How about... by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Even though the movie itself sucked

    11. Re: How about... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Even though the movie itself sucked

      Incorrect.

      Spectre is a brilliant film, the best Craig by far, and easily in the top five of all OO7 movies.

      Whereas Skyfall could have been any generic "Jason Bourne" action thriller, Spectre was a true James Bond movie.

      Craig retained Fleming's literary grittiness that we've come to love, but the quips, one-liners and (small) comedic moments that the films of the past delivered returned.

      Craig's performance was stellar - He *owned* the role and played it with determination. Great cars and gadgets were back as well.

      FANTASTIC pre-titles opening sequence, including a 4+ minute take at the beginning with no cuts and an airborne action sequence that took your breath away.

      We finally had a "classic henchman" in Mr. Hinx and all the other performances, including Christoph Waltz as the villain, were perfect.

      The final minute of the movie literally made the audience in my opening night showing clap and cheer. It's a film full of subtle nods for the hardcore fans ("Hildebrand Rarities") with lots to keep the casual viewer happy.

    12. Re: How about... by tepples · · Score: 1

      So if countries require films to be exhibited in the official language as a condition of being shown in a country, how do you propose to make dozens of dubs before a film sees one dollar of revenue? And if countries place a quota on imported films to encourage the local film industry, how do you propose to re-produce films with local cast, crew, and sets?

    13. Re: How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could do it the Romanian way.

    14. Re: How about... by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      If you say so.

    15. Re: How about... by flargleblarg · · Score: 1

      Spectre is a brilliant film, the best Craig by far, and easily in the top five of all 007 movies.

      FTFY. It's written 007 (double-zero), not OO7 (double-O).

  4. No shit... but, by Draeven · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It may seem common sense, but that's not a reason to not get empirical data illustrating the assumption.

    1. Re:No shit... but, by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Right. Text should be:

      The "refusing to sell hurts sales" hypothesis was further confirmed today, but skeptics claim experiment is not reproducable. Zombie Jack Valenti claims, "I keep telling MPAA members that if they just hiss and spit at customers enough, and act sufficiently outraged whenever the public offers them money, the public will respond with increased demand. Keep saying No! No Sale is the only path to success. I know some of the younger businesspeople will be tempted by their shareholders' advice to 'maximize profit' or 'serve the financial interests of the company' or 'don't be a fraud and blatant mismanager' or 'condition people to be habitually paying customers instead of constantly offering them incentives to pirate' but don't be mislead by such witchcraft. Taking money from customers is not sound economic strategy!"

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  5. Business Decisions Based on Economics by TomR+teh+Pirate · · Score: 2

    It's sometimes bewildering to watch companies with a responsibility to shareholders behave in ways that appear counterproductive to their own bottom line. If the study from Carnegie Mellon passes peer review *and* the movie industry does not respond in a way that actually curbs piracy, then one has to wonder what exactly drives their behavior. This is not a rhetorical question. If anybody here on /. has insight into this, please share.

    1. Re:Business Decisions Based on Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What drives their behavior? The idea that a corporation can own photons and an extremely distorted view of the reality of the Connected World.

    2. Re:Business Decisions Based on Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What drives their behavior? The idea that a corporation can own photons and an extremely distorted view of the reality of the Connected World.

      Oh please.
      Give me everything you have. I mean, you can't own it, it's just atoms.

    3. Re:Business Decisions Based on Economics by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can sum up what drives their behavior in one word: Inertia.

      Of course, studio owners want to get as much money as possible. However, inertia limits them as they see "the way we've always done things" as the only way to do things. New ways of doing things are scary to them because they might fail while the tried and true methods are guaranteed* to produce results.

      * Of course, they're not actually guaranteed to produce results, but in the studio owner's minds they are more rock solid than crazy ideas like same day, worldwide distribution or widely available digital distribution no matter how many studies come out proving the studio owners wrong.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    4. Re:Business Decisions Based on Economics by swb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My economics question is why back catalog movies which have been released on disc can't be purchased as downloads. I mean, the movie has already been telecined to a data format and often the DVD press runs for back catalog titles are small and the movie can sometimes become unobtainable at all except as a bootleg.

      Which raises the question as to why studios make it so expensive for Netflix or the like streaming companies to gain access to back catalog titles. I'm guessing these titles aren't exactly burning up the sales charts and that a budget licensing deal for streaming on back catalog title to a streaming provider would be revenue they mostly wouldn't expect to get from a DVD. There's a ton of back catalog titles I'd watch on via streaming if they showed up on Netflix but only about once a year do I get the bug to buy a disc, and even then it's often a case where you can't even buy it because the tiny press run is sold out.

    5. Re:Business Decisions Based on Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if people had access to a back catalogue of quality films they'd soon realise that most of today's offerings are utter crap. And they wouldn't buy the new shit.

    6. Re:Business Decisions Based on Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some studios do offer parts of the back catalogs as print-on-demand DVDs. My impression is also that the use that as a training ground for the technicians who master their other DVDs. Yes, it's not the entire back catalog. But it's something.

    7. Re:Business Decisions Based on Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure I heard Yul Brynner rolling over in his grave last night when the trailer of the remake of "The Magnificent Seven" was shown.

    8. Re:Business Decisions Based on Economics by Hentes · · Score: 1

      The thing is, this study only proves a correlation between delays and piracy. But what movie companies do is they increase the delay in countries known to have a high rate of piracy to keep the movies from hitting the torrent sites. They believe that the sales lost in those countries are smaller than the sales not lost due to piracy in the countries the movie is released. Whether that assumption is true is an interesting question, and unfortunately this study doesn't even try to answer it. The correlation itself isn't surprising, and the paper fails to take into account that this isn't a simple black and white question.

    9. Re:Business Decisions Based on Economics by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      If I was forced to come up with an explanation, I expect it would be that if old titles were made available that there is fear that it would hurt new title sales.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    10. Re:Business Decisions Based on Economics by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      This is why libertarianism fails: there is no such thing as a spherical market of uniform density. The players in the market are not acting in rational self-interest, but in a variety of irrational ways, and therefore expecting the Market to sort things out rationally is doomed to failure.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    11. Re:Business Decisions Based on Economics by dwywit · · Score: 1

      You need to trace the distribution rights - which studio sold their entire back catalogue to Turner? I can't remember exactly when that happened, but it was long before the DVD era, and that's why there was a "Turner Classic Movies" channel on cable/satellite. I had Foxtel for a little while, and there were more "oldies" on TCM than I ever saw for sale on VHS.

      If the studios weren't able to anticipate the sheer amount of money they could make by having their back catalogues available on disc or via streaming (sorry, got to stop and laugh here), they may have inadvertently failed to retain other distribution rights when negotiating with (for example) Turner - so it's possible that Turner owns those rights, not the studios.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    12. Re:Business Decisions Based on Economics by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Megalomania and denial.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    13. Re:Business Decisions Based on Economics by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      Most of the back catalog is utter crap, too.

  6. The Theatre is the Niche market (GO DIGITAL) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listen, if they released movies digitally the day of with the option to stream / buy they'd make a shit ton of money immediately.

    It may wipe out the theatre experience as we currently know it but, really, who cares? If you want I'll come over to your house, make you some soggy popcorn with "not-quite-butter" topping and kick the back of your seat after spilling 7-up on your floor

    "But the pirates!" fucking... people already risk a lot to produce shitty CAM vids should say everything that needs to be said, where somebody like that takes the risk there's money to be made you dumb fucks.

    Figure it out

  7. I thought you guys said piracy helped sales? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This research shows that piracy negatively correlates with sales and pirates aren't buying legal copies. I've been told for so long on here that piracy helps sales. Can we finally stop repeating that nonsense, which has been disproved many times? Piracy is bad for sales because pirates aren't buying legal copies. Let's finally be intellectually honest in discussions about piracy and admit that it's harmful to sales.

    1. Re:I thought you guys said piracy helped sales? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think the thing here impacting sales is the unavailability of the product. If you won't sell me something that I can get through other means do you really expect me to come back later and buy the product that you refused to sell in the first place?

    2. Re:I thought you guys said piracy helped sales? by Maxwell · · Score: 1
      1) who ever said that about movies besides you?

      2) That's not quite what the science says anyway. The science says: If a studio releases a DVD in region A, but then waits ten days to releases it in Region B they lose 2-3% of the sales. The science simply used the Region A release data and called it the "piracy date" as an anchor point in their study. They have not in anyway proven (or even attempted to prove) that piracy is the actual cause of the drop.

    3. Re:I thought you guys said piracy helped sales? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Or, we can conclude that you can prove absolutely anything you want in a study.

    4. Re:I thought you guys said piracy helped sales? by Coisiche · · Score: 1

      So which media company do you work for? Just wondering.

    5. Re:I thought you guys said piracy helped sales? by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Neither is an absolute. Piracy CAN hurt and it CAN help sales.

      Burry, shaky screeners are actually more likely to help sales because people want "the real thing" instead. If, and only if, the movie is actually worth seeing. Because that's what the blurry screener does: Give people an idea whether the movie is any good. And given today's movie trailers are usually the whole 2 minutes of what's actually decent in the 180+ minutes of movie, people don't rely on trailers anymore. But if that blurry mess looks like it could be worth seeing "for real", they will grab the money and go watch it.

      Of course if what you get as a copy is as good as what you could hope for if you bought the DVD (and usually, considering the bullshit like unskipable ads, trailers and other crap, the value of the bought copy is usually lower than that of a rip to the user), this will absolutely HURT your sales. Because the user already has everything he could hope to get from buying your DVD. Actually, chances are he got more than he would get from your DVD.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. No shit Sherlock! by jenningsthecat · · Score: 4, Informative

    The "artificial delays" are simply a specific form of artificial scarcity, and we humans always do our damnedest to route around them.

    We also *really* don't want to be lectured to about piracy when we're watching a legally purchased DVD, nor do we want to watch ads, (except for movie trailers), in a DVD we've already fscking paid for. But media producers and distributors seem positively addicted to the practice of strapping on a pair of cleats and stepping on their own dicks.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:No shit Sherlock! by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We also *really* don't want to be lectured to about piracy when we're watching a legally purchased DVD

      Don't forget that abomination that is region coding. Why the fuck can't I watch a DVD at home that I bought while on vacation in another country?

      (and yes I do know about the *nudge* *nudge* *wink* *wink* region unlocking of the DVD player manufacturers)

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:No shit Sherlock! by ameline · · Score: 2

      Actually I don't want to see any ads (trailers or otherwise) in anything I've paid for. My time is valuable to me -- it is a very limited commodity that is very difficult to get more of.

      This is one of the ways that the pirated product is superior to the legal one.

      --
      Ian Ameline
    3. Re:No shit Sherlock! by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Your time is so precious that you can't stand the few seconds it takes to skip (or not) the stuff at the beginning of the disc... yet you are watching a movie... which is really just a waste of time.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    4. Re:No shit Sherlock! by vux984 · · Score: 2

      You assume it's easily skippable.

      And it gets pretty obnoxious when you throw in a DVD from 1999 and it tries to waste your time with trailers for something that bombed in theatres and was completely forgotten by 2001.

    5. Re:No shit Sherlock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is: We shouldn't have to suffer through it.

    6. Re:No shit Sherlock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The unskippable anti piracy ads, trailers and other annoying junk at the start of DVDs serves a very useful purpose of reminding me to rip it off the old backup shelf furniture format and onto my media centre.

  9. DVD? by 110010001000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What the heck is a "DVD"? Is that Russian or something?

    1. Re:DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's one of those funny little acronyms they use in torrent names, like BR, WEB, CAM and TS

    2. Re:DVD? by the_skywise · · Score: 4, Funny

      Laugh while you can monkey boy but everyone knows that DVDs have warmer video than cold looking digital streams or blu-ray!

      Like LPs they'll be making a comeback soon enough!

      Retro-tech for teh win!

    3. Re:DVD? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Basically if you aren't viewing the original print from a chronophotographic gun you are missing the artistry of the film entirely. You might as well close your eyes!

    4. Re:DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy that feeling of superiority while it lasts, smart ass. Your crappy digital copy won't. Netflix will only keep your favorite titles for a few weeks of months. iTunes and Goggle Play will charge you every time to re-watch a movie and, when you're no longer on your parent's allowance, you may have to choose between this and a meal. And you cannot lend that "copy" to a friend. And try finding older titles, like The Abyss, on Amazon. Enjoy that feeling.

    5. Re:DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the heck is a "DVD"?

      It is a physical object that you purchase for a single, fixed price, that contains a digital version of a moving picture, and a perpetual, transferable licence to view that digital version.

      Unlike a "stream" or a "download", a DVD can be legally bought and resold, and can be legally viewed an unlimited number of times by anyone.

    6. Re:DVD? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's a hipster coaster, all shiny and stuff, to put your drink on while you watch a movie.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:DVD? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      What the heck is a "DVD"?

      underwear I think

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    8. Re:DVD? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      You must be a lawyer to care so much about what is lawful about moving pictures.

    9. Re:DVD? by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      What the heck is "Netflix" or "iTunes" or "Goggle Play"? What year are you guys from?

    10. Re:DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the video format that has DRM so weak that you can even watch it on Linux.

    11. Re:DVD? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      It's a physical means of transferring media that you buy which forces you to watch a warning about not pirating content and a bunch of previews every time you put the disc into the player before being able to play the movie. Whereas if you had pirated the movie you could just click on the file and be watching it immediately.

    12. Re:DVD? by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      bullshit, everybody knows that the only way to truly appreciate the visual arts is by a gold plated optic fiber transmitting photons entagled with the original sunlight that hit the actors and scenes during the original filming. Don't even get me started on the delayed transmission of sound waves.

    13. Re:DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have your so called "warm" DVDs. I'm going to wait for the Videodiscs to make a comeback, I hear they are even warmer than Laserdiscs

    14. Re:DVD? by kimvette · · Score: 2

      > It is a physical object that you purchase for a single, fixed price, that contains a digital version of a moving picture, and a perpetual, transferable licence to view that digital version.

      Correction:
      It is a legally purchased COPY of that motion picture, which you don't have a license to, but do actually OWN. Even the adverts say "Own it on DVD or Blu-Ray today!"

      Cut it with the "you only license it" bullshit because it's flat out untrue, no matter how many times you fucks repeat that lie it doesn't change the fact that purchasers actually do own the copy they purchased.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    15. Re:DVD? by flargleblarg · · Score: 1

      Uhmmmmmmmmm. Maybe they're playing digital files from their hard drive rather than streaming from Netflix or Amazon. Did you think about that?

  10. ConsPIRACY theories here... by eeyore · · Score: 2

    N/T

  11. Used To Take 2-4 Years. by zenlessyank · · Score: 0

    Quit crying. Learn some self control and patience. It used to take years to get a VHS release after a movie had been pulled from the theatre.

    1. Re:Used To Take 2-4 Years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, in the dark ages before the internet, you were not flooded with spoilers every minute of the day, and a quick comment was often enough to stop people who were inadvertently about to spoil a movie for you. There weren't global fandoms with a head start for those living in the regions where movies/DVDs/games are released sooner.

    2. Re:Used To Take 2-4 Years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why? It's all artificial anyways. I have no problem having patience when it's needed but in this case, it's not needed.

    3. Re:Used To Take 2-4 Years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1) The world is different now than it was in 1986. This should be self evident, but I bring it up just in case you were posting on /. and yet still managed to miss the internet and multiple orders of magnitude increase in computer storage, processing power, bandwidth, and ubiquity. Those advances have vastly increased the availability and speed of delivery of content, and brought changes in people's views and expectations.

      It used to take a good couple of minutes to get your ass out to the outhouse to take a dump. Is it a lack of self-control and patience to expect indoor plumbing? Times change and peoples' attitudes change with the times.

      2) Suppose you took over a company that regularly (artificially**) delayed releases in a region, or price gouged (Australia much?), or other silly shenanigans. And the studies came back and told you: "These tactics actually lose you money, don't do it that way, it's been demonstrated to increase infringement and lower sales. Just release everything as close as possible to the same day and don't try to dick with foreign markets."

      Would your business decision, in service to your company's financial interests and those of its shareholders, be to stomp on the ground indignantly and say "Damn entitled ingrates, lucky they're getting my DVDs at all! People need to learn to be patient and control themselves." Or would you stop pissing into the wind trying to battle human nature, and do what you can to make money with that knowledge?

      **I.e. not related to production/translation/shipping challenges, but just because, man, fuck Asia they can wait.

    4. Re:Used To Take 2-4 Years. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yes. Back then they could get away with it because there was no pressure from competing suppliers.

      Welcome to evolution, baby! Publish or perish!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Used To Take 2-4 Years. by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I feel like impatience is the new normal these days.

      I personally have no problem waiting for movies or tv shows to come to Netflix or Amazon Prime.

      But then, I don't really care about much of the content being created these days either. At least, not enough to pay a premium.

      Before Netflix came along, I was the guy buying $2 matinee tickets for out-of-cycle movies.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    6. Re:Used To Take 2-4 Years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally have no problem waiting for movies or tv shows to come to Netflix or Amazon Prime.

      But then, I don't really care about much of the content being created these days either.

      You're confusing patience with apathy.

    7. Re:Used To Take 2-4 Years. by tepples · · Score: 1

      And it still took a year after theatrical release to get the 2011 film Hop on region 1 DVD.

    8. Re:Used To Take 2-4 Years. by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 0

      2-4 years? There was a time when you had to wait decades for a troop to grace the stage in your town. I fail to see the merits of your argument. Artificial encumbrances to progress are illogical.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  12. The internet has no borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having staggered release dates is pretty much the dumbest idea ever now that anyone can get your movie the day it is released over the internet.

  13. how do they get a rip? by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    I wonder how they get a rip before the DVD comes out? I'm going to guess that the theaters now get digital copies and those get rippped. I wonder why they can't control that effectively. E.g. watermark every theater's version differently.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:how do they get a rip? by lordbeejee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wonder how they get a rip before the DVD comes out? I'm going to guess that the theaters now get digital copies and those get rippped. I wonder why they can't control that effectively. E.g. watermark every theater's version differently.

      The DVD from another region is used for the rip. It's a study about the delays between regions, not between theater and home release.

    2. Re:how do they get a rip? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You get the "rip" from friends living in countries where the show was aired or is already available on DVD.

      E.g. no one - except die hard fans - is buying a DVD of Game of Thrones in Europe. It simply takes to long to wait. So people rip it in the states. I know guys who fly to New York or Washington just to make a vacation to either buy there or to record it from a video on demand service.

      I a new sequel of e.g. GoT is starting, people all over the world want to see it NOW, not in three months or six months.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:how do they get a rip? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      I wonder how they get a rip before the DVD comes out?

      Because theater releases, as well as disk releases are different for different regions/countries. eg. a movie could be released on disk in the EU a couple weeks before it gets released in the US.

    4. Re:how do they get a rip? by Coisiche · · Score: 1

      The rips come from other countries where the DVD has already been released. Electronic copies get round the world faster than the physical disks, particularly when the release dates are staggered around the world for whatever reason some media exec came up with.

    5. Re:how do they get a rip? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Aww, cry me a river, the territory protection doesn't work anymore. Boo-hoo. Cry me a river.

      Especially since that cries to have their territory protection back coming from companies that demand customs-free imports for their DVDs that they manufacture cheaply abroad.

      Customs free for THEM, of course. Not for you. For you, it better be illegal to buy a cheap (non-forged, original) DVD for 1 buck in a South East Asian shop and import it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:how do they get a rip? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      It makes exactly zero sense to buy a GoT DVD in Europe. By the time you could possibly buy it, it is virtually impossible NOT to know yet which of the people you knew croaked by the end of the season due to discussions on the internet.

      And the same applies to ANY content. I don't even follow GoT but I would be VERY surprised if that wasn't the case. Either release it everywhere at the same time or deal with the consequences. Even if I can't copy the content, why bother buying a movie where the plot matters (i.e. not directed by Michael Bay) when I know beforehand how it's going to end?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:how do they get a rip? by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      DVD's go out to those who vote for the Oscar's well ahead of the theatrical release. Those get watermarked with text.

    8. Re:how do they get a rip? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1
    9. Re:how do they get a rip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DVD already is out, just in a different region.

      Thus: DVD in any region + Rip + Internet = Available in all countries for everyone.

      Which then leads to less purchases of DVD copies in all countries than would otherwise have been made, had the DVD been made available in all countries at the same time.

      Studios/Distributors being stupid. Yet again.

    10. Re:how do they get a rip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, these dinosaurs refuse to adapt. They're the horse and carriage trying to pretend that automobiles haven't been invented, and seeking to legislate the future away.

    11. Re:how do they get a rip? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Because you want to watch/read/listen to the media multiple times and want to support the creators of the content. I regularly download books, music, and a few shows. Those that I really like and know that I will want to repeatedly enjoy I'll buy to make sure that the people can make a living (most important for the music since I listen to a lot of independent artists) and that they hopefully can create more great media in the future.

    12. Re:how do they get a rip? by avandesande · · Score: 2

      Or why do they even sell DVDs at all? Why aren't these media companies providing timely streaming or download options? I haven't watched a DVD in 5 years.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    13. Re:how do they get a rip? by E-Rock · · Score: 2

      Sometimes it's from the factory making them for the US. So the torrent sites have the real products well in advance of anyone being able to buy it.

    14. Re:how do they get a rip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the same in the States. HBO holds back the release of the Blu-ray / DVD until just before the *next* season comes out.

    15. Re:how do they get a rip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how they get a rip before the DVD comes out?

      Sometimes movies air on TV before the DVD or Blu-Ray version is released.

    16. Re:how do they get a rip? by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Digital Cinema films are nearly always encrypted. You can load it onto the server, but it won't play without the decryption key, and that's only good for a limited period. You'd also have to re-render and re-compress the content anyway - DCP format is one file containing JPEG2000 frames, and one or more files containing the audio WAV files (plus metadata in XML files). I've seen DCP films over 180GB, so you'd need to grab the video frames, re-encode and compress them back to an MPEG stream, then re-mux the audio, and author a DVD.

      Also the projector/s and server are tied together - a server will only play content on a projector that's on its list of licenced devices.

      You could - in theory - tap the ethernet between server and projector (sometimes HDMI), but that also needs physical access, and technical knowledge beyond most pirates' skills.

      You could point a camera at the screen, but that's hardly a high-quality copy.

      It's all too much trouble. I suspect that rips come from releases in different regions, or from screener discs. Deadpool was available on KAT before any disc was released.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    17. Re: how do they get a rip? by fortfive · · Score: 1

      Too bad most of your purchase price goes to distributor executives, not content providers.

  14. Known in entertainment? Why pirate new movies? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure the curve between maximizing movie-in-theatre revenue and then DVD-before-everyone-forgets-about-it revenue is already well-understood by the entertainment industry.

    But, I still don't understand NEW MOVIE piracy in developed countries. Sure, I pirate every new GoT episode within hours of the official air date, but it's TV that I watch on a 23-inch monitor where quality doesn't really matter. Same thing with a 10+ year-old movie or cartoons that I watch with my kids. However, when I want to watch something with cutting-edge special effects and sound on my home theater (or any 32"+ TV with separate sound system), dropping the $3 to rent a high-quality edition that is guaranteed not to crap out halfway through (which tends to drive off my wife if she's watching) suddenly becomes worth it.

    1. Re:Known in entertainment? Why pirate new movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While MIAA refuses to admit it, much of the early movie piracy is from mildly interested parties deciding if they want to see it in a theater. It's a lot easier to avoid walking into a theater than to walk out of a movie and get into a shouting match with the local manager about getting your money back for wasting half an hour of your life before you realized the movie had nothing at all in common with the previews you had seen.
      Saves everyone a lot of stress.

      On the other hand, having very high standards and not wasting your time with things you are concerned might not be worth the money saves a lot of stress and frees up some more time and bandwidth for things you enjoy.

    2. Re:Known in entertainment? Why pirate new movies? by lgw · · Score: 1

      What value is there in movie theaters these days? Why maximize revenue for that outdated distribution chain? Nostalgia? Release worldwide the same day on DVD, streaming, and theaters, and then shut up and take my money. If the theaters aren't adding enough value to stay in business, clearly we're not losing much.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Known in entertainment? Why pirate new movies? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      But, I still don't understand NEW MOVIE piracy in developed countries. Sure, I pirate every new GoT episode within hours of the official air date, but it's TV that I watch on a 23-inch monitor where quality doesn't really matter. Same thing with a 10+ year-old movie or cartoons that I watch with my kids. However, when I want to watch something with cutting-edge special effects and sound on my home theater (or any 32"+ TV with separate sound system), dropping the $3 to rent a high-quality edition that is guaranteed not to crap out halfway through (which tends to drive off my wife if she's watching) suddenly becomes worth it.

      Several things:

      First not everyone has a home cinema. I don't for example. Mostly, I've never seen the point. I've visited friends who do and while it's kinda cool, I'd rather do other things with the space and money.

      Second, pirated stuff tends to be good quality, sometimes better than the original in that it doesn't obnoxiously force you to be told what a bad person you are if you pirate and then sit through adverts. Oh also they're torrented, not "streamed", so if you have a crappy internet connection, the movie won't randomly shit itself half way through if you pirate.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  15. Re:FUCK EUROPE by Avarist · · Score: 1, Troll

    Right, I'm sure the africans are so worse off now than in 1900 where they had been living in huts hunting EACH OTHER with spears and after over a 100.000 years still had not invented things like "the wheel". Europe singlehandedly brought modern civilization as we know it to the entire world. Of course, along the way it brought a lot of war and death, but so has every single other region of the globe. Furthermore, through civilization and maturity, Europe now brings peace while every other continent (except perhaps Oceania?) has war and oppression. We still have a long way to go, but can you cite a single better place to live in the world today when it comes to standard of living, education, health, freedom, tolerance or anything else that matters?

    --
    In Capitalist US, the commerce controls the Government.
  16. Instead of delays, decrease price by Aqualung812 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't understand the delays. Just sell it HIGH right out of the gate.
    Make movies something crazy like $60-$80 on opening weekend. Grab all that extra profit while the hype is high and plenty of families with great home theater and 2.5 kids that they don't want to pay concessions for consider it a win-win.
    Drop it by $10 or so every month or so, until they're $20 at the same time they're available now.
    Why do they hate money so much?

    --
    Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    1. Re:Instead of delays, decrease price by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      There's actually a proposal to do this, or something quite similar.

      http://variety.com/2016/film/n...

    2. Re:Instead of delays, decrease price by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've heard of this, but it sounds about as appealing as UltraViolet.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    3. Re:Instead of delays, decrease price by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the delays. Just sell it HIGH right out of the gate. Make movies something crazy like $60-$80 on opening weekend.

      That's already an option, sort of. But these are movie studios. Their idea of "something crazy" is quite different from yours. PRIMA Cinema costs $35K for the machine and $500 per movie.

    4. Re:Instead of delays, decrease price by aicrules · · Score: 1

      $150 just to be at the table. $50 for temporary (48 hour) access to a movie. I know I wouldn't ever pay $50 for just me to watch a movie. And I'm probably not going to pay that much to "avoid" the theater with my family either. That pricing model seems flawed.

    5. Re:Instead of delays, decrease price by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      $150 just to be at the table. $50 for temporary (48 hour) access to a movie. I know I wouldn't ever pay $50 for just me to watch a movie. And I'm probably not going to pay that much to "avoid" the theater with my family either. That pricing model seems flawed.

      It's not universally appealing, by any means, but it could make sense for quite a few people. In my case, if my wife and I want to go to the movies, it's around $45-50 for tickets, a couple of sodas, and popcorn. Then, if we take a cab, that's another $20. The biggie is child care. It's another $80-100 for the nanny to stay late, plus $60 or so for a car to get her home. So, that's around $200 to go to the movies. $50 would be a bargain. I certainly recognize that we're not typical, but even if the pricing makes sense for only 5-10% of US households, and they only use it once every two months, that's a $2-3 billion annual business.

    6. Re:Instead of delays, decrease price by oic0 · · Score: 1

      Took just me and the wife to an xdhd 3d movie a week ago for $36. Just the tickets, no concessions. Figure in $6 or 7 gas. Id rather watch it on my 4k TV with surround at home where I can have a beer and eat pizza.

    7. Re:Instead of delays, decrease price by StormReaver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't understand the delays. Just sell it HIGH right out of the gate.

      I can't believe we have to have this particular discussion...again. Hopefully studios have learned the lessons of history, so they won't be doomed to repeat them.

      Studios tried selling movies that high ($80-$100) in the beginning. Few movies were purchased, but many were copied from rentals. This was a predictable result of price gouging.

      When studios lowered the prices to something reasonable ($15-$25), VCR (and later, DVD) movie sales skyrocketed and illegal copying was greatly reduced. Illegal copying then ticked back up after people got fed up with the stupid shit studios put in there to delay showing the movie people paid for (ads, previews for things nobody gave two shits about,etc).

      High prices lead to reduced sales, and a large lag time between theatrical release and home release leads to reduced sales. This was obvious to everyone except, apparently, the studios.

      The optimum sales revenue will likely be generated by releasing the DVD (few people give a shit about Blu-Ray) either simultaneously with the theatrical release, or sometimes shortly afterwards (a few weeks, maybe).

    8. Re:Instead of delays, decrease price by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Because the system judges movies by cinema performance. That's why direct to DVD has so much stigma.It

        just needs one blockbuster to break ranks, but when the studio spent hundreds of millions of dollars making it they won't take the risk. Especially in these days of long running franchises, where a bad movie means at best a reboot and at worst losing revenue from 5 potential sequels.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Instead of delays, decrease price by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Sure the movie itself was a bit cheesy but I didn't think Milla Jovovich was all that bad looking.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    10. Re:Instead of delays, decrease price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see numbers for your "few people give a shit about Blu-Ray." I'd more expect people who *buy* physical media to want the highest quality version of it.

    11. Re:Instead of delays, decrease price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He meant nobody cares about Blu-Ray because there are ways to get the content for cheaper and still every bit as high quality.

    12. Re:Instead of delays, decrease price by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I give a shit about blu-ray! :)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    13. Re:Instead of delays, decrease price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This can be easily fixed: Forget DVD, theater etc.,... Just pay per view corporate C team/D Team/VP death matches.

  17. Re:FUCK EUROPE by i_ate_god · · Score: 2

    are you suggesting that Europe is responsible for delayed DVD releases?

    --
    I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
  18. Optical media is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not going to buy a disc that I have to transcode and upload to my NAS when I can download a DRM free copy of it in less than 10 minutes. My movie collection is massive and organized but physically less than 1 cubic foot. You can't have that with optical discs.

  19. Movie Ind. Needs to Improve Customer Service by mrlinux11 · · Score: 1

    The Movie Industry biggest competition are pirates and if they want to beat their competition they will not do it on price, so they need to work on convenience. Adding DRM, Disabling Fast Forward/Next Chapter on previews are all things that are annoying paying customers

  20. Why is the word "actually" in there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "release delays are actually hurting DVD and Blu-Ray sales."

    No shit, Sherlock! Who couldn't have worked that out at the beginning of all this, when the idiots in charge decided to make DVDs have different regions?

  21. A no brainer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't need a study to know this will happen.

    1. Re:A no brainer by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No, but you need one to prove it to someone who stomps his foot and refuses to listen because he doesn't want it to be that way, mostly because he likes it better that way you just shown to be foolish.

      I.e. studios.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  22. Re:FUCK EUROPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, please LEAVE white people's countries, and let the evil white 'racists' suffer by having to live among our own kind. LOL. How will we manage without you all...

  23. Why wait at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sell the DVD/blu-ray on cinema exit - Charge more for that special only cinema only special special version for the true collector.
    Having to wait months for it, I've forgotten about it or just can't be bothered. Plus you can't get the cinema only version.

    1. Re:Why wait at all? by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      ...or just make the disc/online version generally available at the same time as the movie release, and save having to pay for 2 rounds of publicity. Cinemas had a point when the alternative was a 20" TV & VHS player with lousy sound and picture. Now, we have 50" high def screens, surround sound and TV shows are being made with cinema production values. Cinemas need to sell the social experience rather than the film.

      I'd kinda assume by now that most of the old cinemas that anybody would give a shit about saving have already found better business models than just showing the latest blockbusters.

      Maybe, instead of having a film showing in every cinema for a couple of weeks simultaneously, they should let the disc sell the film and then "tour" it over the course of a year with extras (obviously it would need something that "scaled" - you couldn't tour it with the cast - but maybe an exhibition of props, live music, post-film debate, marathon showing of the whole series etc. depending on the type of film...)

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  24. Piracy is educational by inerlogic · · Score: 4, Funny

    i can watch and re-watch Deadpool AND learn Korean from the subtitles... win/win

  25. Re: FUCK EUROPE by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1, Informative

    Africans had civilisation well before most Europeans unless you subscribe to the idea that aliens built the pyramids, Timbuktu and Greater Zimbabwe.

  26. Because people are selfish and lack control by smooth+wombat · · Score: 0

    The vast majority of people feel entitled to something someone else produced. That is what it comes down to.

    It doesn't matter that the person or company has taken the time and effort to produce something other people want, everyone else demands it as an inherent right to have it instantly completely ignoring the fact they haven't lifted a finger to produce the product.

    Nope, it's all about them and what they want. The fact they're not even going to pay for the product doesn't matter. They'll keep stealing because it's their right to take what they want from someone else. No attribution, no thanks, no payment for the use and enjoyment of the product. Just steal it because it's all about them.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Because people are selfish and lack control by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      The fact they're not even going to pay for the product doesn't matter.

      Wow you didn't even read TFS.

      They pay for it if it's available, otherwise they pirate it. That actually shows that they are prepared to pay, what they're not prepared to do is wait.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Because people are selfish and lack control by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The fact they're not even going to pay for the product doesn't matter.

      I have money. Where in the United States can I buy a lawfully made DVD of the film Song of the South?

      I have money. Where in the United States can I buy a lawfully made DVD of the film Pinocchio and the Emperor of the Night?

      I have money. Where in the United States can I buy a lawfully made DVD of the TV series Spartakus and the Sun Beneath the Sea?

    3. Re:Because people are selfish and lack control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? Why is a company entitled to charge different prices to different markets? You're the one with an entitled attitude. You've no right to a government granted monopoly that effectively never ends.

    4. Re:Because people are selfish and lack control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The vast majority of people feel entitled to something someone else produced. That is what it comes down to.

      It doesn't matter that the person or company has taken the time and effort to produce something other people want, everyone else demands it as an inherent right to have it instantly completely ignoring the fact they haven't lifted a finger to produce the product.

      Nope, it's all about them and what they want. The fact they're not even going to pay for the product doesn't matter. They'll keep stealing because it's their right to take what they want from someone else. No attribution, no thanks, no payment for the use and enjoyment of the product. Just steal it because it's all about them.

      Serious question. Does it hurt to be this stupid? Or do you not even realize it?

  27. Re:FUCK EUROPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you forget about Benin City? It was "discovered", in Nigeria, by the Portuguese in 1485. It could have been of interest to anyone curious about fractals, if only Europeans had known what fractals were at the time.

    The following is from The Guardian:

    "The early foreign explorers' descriptions of Benin City portrayed it as a place free of crime and hunger, with large streets and houses kept clean; a city filled with courteous, honest people, and run by a centralised and highly sophisticated bureaucracy."

    "At the height of its greatness in the 12th century - well before the start of the European Renaissance - the kings and nobles of Benin City patronised craftsmen and lavished them with gifts and wealth, in return for their depiction of the kings' and dignitaries' great exploits in intricate bronze sculptures.

    'These works from Benin are equal to the very finest examples of European casting technique,' wrote Professor Felix von Luschan, formerly of the Berlin Ethnological Museum. 'Benvenuto Celini could not have cast them better, nor could anyone else before or after him. Technically, these bronzes represent the very highest possible achievement.'"

    http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/mar/18/story-of-cities-5-benin-city-edo-nigeria-mighty-medieval-capital-lost-without-trace

    Not sure how all of this relates to release date delays.

  28. DVD??? With PS4 I switched to Blu-Ray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I will never go back. To lowly grainy DVD format. It has outlived its usefulness, since launched in 1995, and made for SD resolution of yesteryear's CTR tubes...

  29. Re:FUCK EUROPE by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Actually it was the Africans such as the Egyptians, with things like their wheeled chariots, irrigation and other things that came from civilization, but don't let that ruin your petty little racist rant.

  30. Re: FUCK EUROPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better off than what? Also being enslaved? You do know that the African people were enslaved by other African people?

  31. Re:FUCK EUROPE by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Look, I don't necessarily agree with the GP, but your point is just as stupid. Don't pretend that just because Europe has had its shit together for a few decades gives it the right to lord it over the rest of the world. History didn't begin yesterday.

    The only reason Europe is at peace now is because it fought a war so unbelievably terrible that it all but destroyed itself. And it had to happen twice in less than a few decades, because they couldn't learn their lesson the first time. WWII might have been avoided if the European Allies had followed Wilson's 14 Points during the peace negotiations following WWI, and during the founding of the League of Nations. Instead, they did exactly the opposite and sowed the seeds of the next conflict with the Treaty of Versailles. Not to mention all the other terrible things that came as a result of the League, such as the Mandate system, which is at least partially responsible for the state the Middle East is in today.

    The kind of nonsense you're spouting is basically the "white man's burden", the bullshit justification used by Europe for colonizing and subjugating people around the world. It's fine to uphold the virtues of modern Europe, but don't do so by repeating the rhetoric of the 19th Century.

    --
    Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  32. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Release the Blu Ray and DVD, along with online distribution like netflix, at the same time, around the world, within 2 months of the theatrical release. Instead of the current 4 to 6 months for no reason.

  33. Re: FUCK EUROPE by BronsCon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While it is absolutely true that African people were (and still are today) slaves of other African people, it does not excuse the purchase of those people by Whites. That said, going back through my family history I've found no evidence that anyone in my family ever owned slaves, yet I still get shit from time to time for what "my ancestors" did to "their ancestors". How about a big fuck you to anyone who subscribes to that logic? Regardless of race.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  34. it was already tried by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Soderbergh/Cuban did it.

    http://www.cnet.com/news/soder...

    There's no word on what the outcome was.

    I do agree that there are so many logistical difficulties to seeing movies in the theaters that a large swath of the potential market is excluded by the Hollywood practices.

    For two adults you're basically talking about $70+ to see movie if they have to get a sitter for the kids.

    On the other hand, family movies are cleaning up on this. Make a movie the adults can see with the kids and the family saves money by just sending 2 kids to the theater for $20 instead of getting a sitter. And it goes into the theater and studios' pockets.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:it was already tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $18 (or so) at your local drive-in. Flat rate. Just make sure you have one vehicle large enough for the entire family.

      Theatres are for the childless, IMHO. Your kids will drive everyone else batty there. The drive-in is the right compromise.

  35. iTunes same day as DVD since 2008 by tepples · · Score: 1

    Or why do they even sell DVDs at all? Why aren't these media companies providing timely streaming or download options?

    They are. Availability for purchase on iTunes Store on the same day as DVD release has been around for years. See Apple's eight-year-old press release. DVDs are still made available in the first place because parts of the United States still have satellite or cellular at $5 to $10 per GB as the cheapest home Internet option.

    1. Re:iTunes same day as DVD since 2008 by avandesande · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hardly consider ITunes an option. You have to have itunes on a computer and then remove the DRM to play on your tv... there might be something I am missing but this is not really consumer friendly.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:iTunes same day as DVD since 2008 by tepples · · Score: 1

      I hardly consider ITunes an option. You have to have itunes on a computer and then remove the DRM to play on your tv

      Or have iTunes on the computer and connect the PC's DVI-D or HDMI out to the TV's HDMI in. Or have iTunes on the computer and connect the PC's VGA out to the TV's VGA in. Or buy an Apple TV device. How is the last of these "not really consumer friendly"?

    3. Re:iTunes same day as DVD since 2008 by peragrin · · Score: 1

      iTunes or Amazon why buy it? The drm scheme means in 10-15 years it is useless.

      It should be up for rent for a a year or so.

      There is some value in buying if you watch the same thing over and over again( like kids movies). How ever I can't watch the same movie to often as I memorize it and get bored. So while I did see the force awakens three times that was do to being a good friend and brother as much as wanting to watch it twice.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:iTunes same day as DVD since 2008 by avandesande · · Score: 1

      These are terrible options. Who wants a computer in their living room? And what if you don't want to use Apple products? I have several devices already connected to my TV that are perfectly capable of streaming and none of them work with Itunes.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    5. Re:iTunes same day as DVD since 2008 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A PC in the living room is not consumer friendly at all, it's not designed for such a use case. STB type devices are designed for it, but they're still utterly confusing for some people. An extra remote control and having to select an input on the TV is like asking to perform neurosurgery to certain demographics, a simple cable TV STB is a real struggle. I have several friends who have to visit family members every few weeks only to push the INPUT button on the remote a couple of times because "the TV broke again!".

      We're geeks so we love our intelligent & modular A/V setups, but asking my family to play something on the living room projector is like having them operate a space shuttle.

    6. Re:iTunes same day as DVD since 2008 by flargleblarg · · Score: 1

      Who wants a computer in their living room?

      If only tiny computers like a Mac Mini existed! Man, I can't wait until that becomes a possibility.

    7. Re:iTunes same day as DVD since 2008 by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Me. I have an old laptop (Core2Duo) next to the TV which runs netflix, youtube, plays DVDs, etc. It's smaller than the Blu-ray player next to it, but the next cast-off laptop will have a Blu-ray drive, and the player goes to ebay.

      You don't need Apple products - more and more disc releases include an Ultraviolet download redemption code in the box - unfortunately playback needs MS Silverlight, but that's the cost of avoiding Apple products, if that's your thing.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    8. Re:iTunes same day as DVD since 2008 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. I have a Mac Mini and it's hardly tiny. And there is no way I'll be allowed that monstrosity in the living room (I live in the UK, my living room is probably the size of your closet, and certainly not big enough to fit an SUV)

    9. Re: iTunes same day as DVD since 2008 by fortfive · · Score: 1

      You have to have a media player connected to your tv, whether blu-ray player, apple tv, roku, or computer. And you are not limited to itunes: google play and amazon both offer similar content.

    10. Re:iTunes same day as DVD since 2008 by fuzzywig · · Score: 1
      Your DVD player probably has more computing capacity than [insert old computer here].

      So do you not have any kind of computing device in your lounge at all? No console, no streaming box, no tablet that streams to your TV?

      I'm not saying you have to, I'm just surprised that someone posting on slashdot doesn't have computers in every room.

  36. Spoilers increase enjoyment by tepples · · Score: 1

    why bother buying a movie where the plot matters (i.e. not directed by Michael Bay) when I know beforehand how it's going to end?

    I thought spoilers increased enjoyment as well as aerodynamics.

  37. Release of films in select cities for Oscar season by tepples · · Score: 1

    What this is about is making the cinema releases worldwide for the same day

    A lot of films lack budget to get cinema releases across one country for the same calendar year. Think of all the art films that play for a week in Los Angeles County, California, in December in order to qualify for that year's Academy Awards, with intent to open to a wide release the following January.

  38. I don't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not release the damned DVD of a film immediately after it has stopped circulating in the theaters? I presume the people that make these decisions have their reasons, but to me, every moment of delay just means that it's fading from the public consciousness and any "buzz" it generated is going silent.

    "Citizen Four" was released in Sept/Oct of 2014, but wasn't available on DVD until freakin' August 2015. I wanted to see it again as soon as I left the theater, but by August of the following year, I'd lost my initial excitement. Still haven't seen it for the second time.

  39. Contracts with upstream licensors by tepples · · Score: 2

    My economics question is why back catalog movies which have been released on disc can't be purchased as downloads.

    A lot of film producers' hands are tied by contracts with upstream licensors (such as the author and publisher of a novel adapted into a film or the performer, record label, songwriter, and music publisher of music used in the film) or with cast and crew unions whose members work on a residual basis rather than a "work made for hire" basis. Not all such contracts that provide for a home video release also provide for selling downloads. DVD early on had a similar problem with older films whose home video contracts were written for particular formats ("VHS and Beta" or "videotape") rather than generically enough to include DVD.

    I'm guessing these titles aren't exactly burning up the sales charts and that a budget licensing deal for streaming on back catalog title to a streaming provider would be revenue they mostly wouldn't expect to get from a DVD.

    For one thing, it can be expensive to gather all stakeholders (again, upstream licensors and any cast or crew promised residuals) for a contract negotiation. For another, old movies compete with the same studio's newer products.

    1. Re:Contracts with upstream licensors by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Disney and McDonalds also both take advantage of the McRib sales strategy. People in general are foolish and if something is only available for a limited time, even if it's awful, we're more likely to give in and buy it.

    2. Re:Contracts with upstream licensors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a sane world, with actual time-limited copyright and/or use-it-or-lose-it provisions, those works would come to the public domain.

  40. It puts the Ø in UOP by tepples · · Score: 1

    The DVD-Video standard requires players to implement UOP, which allows discs to specify that a certain control shall cause the player to display the letter Ø in the corner of the screen for five seconds instead of performing the requested action. It was intended to make copyright notices unskippable, but distributors have abused it to make advertisements unskippable.

    Press "Top Menu": Ø. Press "Title Menu": Ø. Press "next chapter": Ø (arrrgh). What's left?

    1. Re:It puts the Ø in UOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all players do. No-name Chinese units in particular don't follow the UOP, as a bonus they're also region free and NTSC/PAL selectable from the factory, which is why when DVD was popular I bought those instead of the more expensive name-brands with their asinine restrictions. And yes, they did sport the DVD-Video logo on the front of the unit.

    2. Re:It puts the Ø in UOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Start torrent. wait. watch movie.

      You can have it downloaded before the unskippable crap was even finished.

    3. Re:It puts the Ø in UOP by kimvette · · Score: 2

      Also - what is so hard about making trailers a bonus feature on discs? Display a 5-second unskippable blurb inviting purchasers of the legally-distributed content "Hey we included movie trailers as free bonus features" - this removes the annoyance factor, it turns the ads into something marketable, and makes the product less user-hostile, and yet, the ads still get delivered. Everybody wins!

      One thing they need to nix is that bogus FBI warning, because:

        * Most usenet, torrent, etc. releases prior to the disk release are internal leaks from the original source content - by your own fucking employees, not paying customers
        * I will still ignore the "warning," exercise my Fair Use and DMCA interoperability rights to bypass encryption and rip the disc to my phone and tablets, so the warning will be ignored
        * I already paid for the disc, damn it, why the fuck are you showing the warning to a paying customer?
        * I already paid for the disc, damn it, why the fuck are you showing the warning to a paying customer?
        * I already paid for the disc, damn it, why the fuck are you showing the warning to a paying customer?
      And finally:
        * I already paid for the disc, damn it, why the fuck are you showing the warning to a paying customer?

      Also nix the region encoding. I have over 600 discs (all legally purchased), and would buy more were it not for region encoding. There is a lot of anime I want, but unfortunately I need to turn to questionable streaming sites to watch them (unless I want to buy old worn-out blurry-as-crap shelf-hogging VHS taps on feeBay and hook up my DVRs again)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  41. Anything south of the Sahara? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Actually it was the Africans such as the Egyptians, with things like their wheeled chariots, irrigation and other things that came from civilization

    Granted. But nowadays northern Africa is more closely associated with the "Middle East" brand than with the "Africa" brand. So that narrows the question going forward: What impressive tech or philosophy came out of sub-Saharan Africa before European contact?

    1. Re:Anything south of the Sahara? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The utter loser well above did not specify sub-Saharan so there is no need to reinforce failure, but there is at least one technology you probably use yourself that fits the description and comes from there:

      Coffee



      All the post above is really about is ranting at groups other than that of the poster. Today you may not be in the group getting ranted about but tomorrow it may be "what is the point of those losers on the east coast/west coast/"flyover country". Rants about people from a location or race being useless are pointless for any reason other than cynically manipulating others to aggression.

      For example people from "pointless" places like France and Australia made a difference with independence and the civil war. Jingoism is one thing but writing off the rest of the world like some do is both stupid and offensive.

      Time for a nice hot cup of that sub-Saharan technology.

    2. Re: Anything south of the Sahara? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol...

      Cool beans.

      Now excuse me while I get on this flight, where I will fly like a fucking god across the planet. But no, seriously... Coffee. Impressive, entire African civilization.

    3. Re: Anything south of the Sahara? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You've missed the point.
      That the target was not you or me this time is merely the whim of a ranting idiot. He picked a soft target but still nowhere near as worthless as the rant suggests - besides, Ancient Egypt which definitely had the wheel before Europe was part of the target of his rant of "and after over a 100.000 years still had not invented things like "the wheel".."
      Hilarious fuckup IMHO.
      I have no dog in this fight, but what a complete and utter fucking loser!

    4. Re:Anything south of the Sahara? by tepples · · Score: 1

      there is at least one technology you probably use yourself that fits the description and comes from there:

      Coffee

      All the post above is really about is ranting at groups other than that of the poster.

      Thank you. So next time we see one of those jingoistic losers, we know what to say: "Coffee motherfuccer, do you drink it?"

  42. I am Spartakus by tepples · · Score: 1

    are you suggesting that Europe is responsible for delayed DVD releases?

    In some cases yes. Spartakus and the Sun Beneath the Sea is the English dub of a French animated series. The original series has been released on French DVD around 2000, but the English dub has never been released on North American DVD.

    1. Re:I am Spartakus by dwywit · · Score: 1

      International distribution is a tricky thing, especially for stuff that isn't actually produced by the big studios. You have to find someone in the destination country who's willing to be the distributor - to take on dubbing, manufacturing, marketing, etc. The producer in the source country often isn't interested in getting their product out of the country, and they sell the foreign distribution rights to specialists in that area.

      Look at Studio Ghibli - their stuff wasn't available in the USA (officially) until John Lasseter saw them, then all of a sudden Disney was all over them, with name actors providing the English dubs. And it's not even Disney who distributes them in Australia. Madman has a separate deal with Disney to distribute the American English dubs of those Japanese films. Miyazaki was probably just offered a big cheque to turn over foreign distribution rights to Disney (for the english-speaking world, anyway).

      Perhaps do some research - see if you can find a distribution company who deals with older, foreign content, and ask them if they would be interested.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  43. they make up for it by renegade600 · · Score: 1

    most dvd sales now includes digital copy which adds a couple of dollars to the purchase. It is near impossible to find dvds without digital copies. This means the customers are giving them money for nothing since most do not get their digital download. Why is the movie industry griping since they are basically getting paid twice for every dvd sales whether the digital copy is downloaded or not???

  44. Re:FUCK EUROPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fact is you won't manage. Menial jobs are handled by non white people. This is true for both US and western Europe.

  45. Re: FUCK EUROPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't excuse enslaving and selling those people by Blacks either.

  46. What the hell is wrong with you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Piracy involves hijacking, kidnapping, murder and other crimes on the seas.

    Conflating Piracy with Copyright Infringement is akin to comparing Cancer to Constipation.

    Anyone who frames Copyright Infringement as Piracy is a shill of the MPAA and RIAA.

  47. it's 2016 ffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    play globally or gtfo. also, if you can use cheap labor to make the players, i shoul;d be able to use cheap imports to play in said player. anything else is anti-consumer.

  48. Re:Release of films in select cities for Oscar sea by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Sure. Art films are what are hit so incredibly severely by this.

    Please.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  49. What they really needed, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was not another study, but a fucking clue.

  50. Re: FUCK EUROPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, totally. We'll be so fucked. Like, you can totally screw us by leaving. No please don't.

  51. Solving the Wrong Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DVD delays aren't about increasing DVD sales, it's to increase theatrical profits. Studios have a stranglehold on theater negotiations, often taking 100% of admissions the first few weeks of popular releases. Also, box office numbers are used as proxy for a film's success. Doesn't matter if steroids have health risks...

  52. Tell it to Disney. by sabbede · · Score: 1

    And does anyone know of a leaked copy of The Force Awakens in 3d?

  53. Seems About Right by grimfate · · Score: 1

    Deadpool - one of the most popular movies of the year - was released on DVD here last Wednesday, meaning it came out 3 weeks after the US DVD release. If I hadn't already seen it (twice) in the theatre, I can guarantee I would have pirated it. (I do buy movies I like on DVD, so I would have eventually bought it.) Waiting nearly a month after it becomes available elsewhere is just ridiculous.