Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Could Turn Every PC Into an Xbox (theverge.com)

For the past few years, Microsoft has been trying to mold Xbox One system's user interface and functionalities to resemble that of Windows 8 and Windows 10's Modern UI. But the company has also hinted that we will be seeing a closer integration in the coming months. It is expected to unveil some of that at E3 tradeshow next week. Long-time Microsoft watcher Tom Warren reports for The Verge: Microsoft is currently working on a secret project internally, codenamed Helix. Kotaku originally reported on the Project Helix name, and the work is designed to more closely combine Xbox and Windows 10. Some of that work has started, but more of it is due later this year and next year with future upgrades to Windows 10. Microsoft wants to enable features like streaming PC games to the Xbox One, but sources familiar with the company's plans also tell us there are greater ambitions to make Xbox One games playable on a PC without needing a console for streaming. Part of this could involve bringing the full Xbox One UI and system directly into desktop versions of Windows 10. The latest Xbox One dashboards are built on top of Windows 10, so most of the work involved would be customizing the interface towards keyboard and mouse. Bringing the Xbox One UI over to Windows 10 machines would effectively turn every PC into an Xbox One, especially if they're also capable of running the latest console games.

255 comments

  1. I'm a PC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dammit!

    1. Re:I'm a PC! by NotDrWho · · Score: 1, Troll

      Don't worry. This is MS we're talking about. Though the idea itself could give them a huge advantage over Sony and Nintendo, you can bet that their implementation of it will be such a pain in the ass to setup and use that any advantage will be wasted. MS ain't exactly Apple when it comes to simplicity or ease-of-use. Just try navigating the already ridiculously over-cluttered Xbox UI sometime, trying to figure out how to do even the simplest task.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re: I'm a PC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I've used PC's since the eighties and windows since mid nineties, longer even than I've been a PlayStation and Xbox gamer. It's amazed me how Microsoft have managed to degrade the user experience for anyone not using kinect. Even basic tasks like game management sucks. Complex settings require mad exploration. It's the worst of windows on your console!

    3. Re:I'm a PC! by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      The fact that you're playing a console oriented game on a PC is already a massive disadvantage even if it worked well.

    4. Re: I'm a PC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why?

    5. Re:I'm a PC! by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      "Xbox, go to setings." Settings opened. What's the problem with the UI? Oh, you aren't using Kinect.

    6. Re: I'm a PC! by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? It's the people who use kinect that have the degraded experience imho. With each update they've moved things around a bit and tried to make it easier but you've always been able to go into settings and they're all there. Ok, you might have to find that if you don't initially know where it is instead of saying xbox whatever, but mad exploration? Hardly. FYI all settings is at the bottom of the quick menu you get by double tapping the guide button. You can get practically anywhere from there without talking to your console, looking and feeling like a twat while you repeat commands because it doesn't understand your ever so slightly off norm accent then just doing it manually anyway.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    7. Re:I'm a PC! by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      The fact that you're playing a console oriented game on a PC is already a massive disadvantage even if it worked well.

      Ha PC master race never noticed the switch when console games get ported to pc rather than the other way around nowadays. They're all the same anyway just what input device they've been designed for primarily.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    8. Re:I'm a PC! by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Double tap guide, down to all settings. Jobs a good'un, probably just as quick as you saying whatever if not quicker as it doesn't have to process your voice to figure out what you want, if it can even understand your accent. Anyway with the next update you don't even need kinect to do voice commands, not that you ever should have but there you go. Kinect is a mostly useless piece of shit (disclaimer, when attached to an xbox, in itself it's actually pretty cool and has a ton of cool applications. proper gaming isn't one of them. Not yet anyway).

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    9. Re:I'm a PC! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I'm not master race, just PC user. I make fun of those who feel that they must have the most expensive set ups with dual graphics cards, etc. Yes, I have noticed that sort of dumb games get ported to PC (only save a checkpoints, circular selection menus, etc). Some dumb features are just for a dumbing down of players overall I think (game is one gigantic cutscene with QTEs). I don't play shooters much so I missed some of this. But not all games on PC are dumbed down Assassin's Creed or GTA crap shoved out super fast to satisfy the teen console players sitting on a couch. Look at Pillars of Eternity or Wasteland 2.

      And there are more changes than input device. Fallout 4 modding on PC is much better than on consoles because you're not locked into a walled garden. Bethesda didn't even allow modding on consoles before this. Because a console forces you into the walled garden, even if it's on the network; you can not easily backup or modify files, change input devices, pop up a browser while playing, use adblock, play games from eariler or competing consoles, send messages with your own message system without creating a specialize account from the console maker, and so forth.

    10. Re:I'm a PC! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The issue with me is that if I'm using it for media, the remote falls asleep (or I put it there to save battery) and waking it up takes longer than the voice command, even if the button presses were instantaneous.

    11. Re:I'm a PC! by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      That is true, I don't have one of the remotes but the pad does turn off after 15 mins and needs a few seconds to switch back on.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    12. Re:I'm a PC! by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I was probably a bit hasty typing that and it kinda made me look like a twat, so, sorry about that. I think what it is, is that most of the big AAA blockbusters games are developed for console then ported over to pc because money. Games that are PC only do tend to be much more involved as they don't have the tight requirements to meet or stingy publishers to please. Mod support a plenty (cheating goes hand in hand with that though so it's a double edged blade), graphics options and much much more

      I am primarily a xbox player but can quite honestly say my two main games with many more hours than anything are elite and bf4. Two games which very much started pc and then moved over and they do not suffer at all for it.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    13. Re:I'm a PC! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Single player games, who cares who cheats? Yet the console players are calling anyone using mods in Fallout 4 a cheater. There'sa completely different mindset.

    14. Re:I'm a PC! by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Solo games cheat away, who cares, more power to you. It's multiplayer where it's a problem. I've not heard of people using fallout mods called cheaters. As far as I know they disable achievements because some of them are basically cheats but that's besides the point. I have heard of pc players moaning about Xbox users apparently 'stealing' mods though, if that's even a thing.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    15. Re:I'm a PC! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They disabled achievements not because of cheats (console is still there for cheats), but because achievements on consoles are worth money or discounts or something like that. But achievements are reinstated by using a mod (via DLL, something impossible on consoles).

      There is a stealing mods thing; I don't care about it myself but some people don't like their free stuff being taken and another name put on them.

    16. Re:I'm a PC! by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Achievements on consoles ain't worth shit. I mean more spawn any item, super weapons type cheats rather than noclip and other console stuff.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  2. Microsoft botnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You all worry about 'AI' taking over the world and killing all the humans when what you should be worrying about is Microsoft taking over everyones computers and making them part of their botnet.

  3. Even Linux Boxes? by camperdave · · Score: 0, Troll

    I run linux on both my desktop and my laptop. I run pfsense on my gateway machine. How in the name of the eight worlds of Sol is Microsoft going to convert them all to XBoxes?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Even Linux Boxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Yes, yes, we're all terribly impressed by your ability to notice the lack of the qualifier "Windows" to the headline's mention of PC.

    2. Re:Even Linux Boxes? by geoskd · · Score: 3, Funny

      I run linux on both my desktop and my laptop. I run pfsense on my gateway machine. How in the name of the eight worlds of Sol is Microsoft going to convert them all to XBoxes?

      I'm guessing it has something to do with Microsofts recent flirting with open source software. Maybe the next revision of GWX is going to get truly ambitious...

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    3. Re:Even Linux Boxes? by puddingebola · · Score: 1

      This will be illegal in the new order.

    4. Re:Even Linux Boxes? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Microsofts wet-dream is to find a way to make all other operating systems illegal to create or operate, either by law or de-facto by no computer being created that allows a non-Microsoft OS to run. We're almost there now, by the way.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    5. Re:Even Linux Boxes? by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      ... Dual-boot?

    6. Re:Even Linux Boxes? by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

      Great Scott, you're right! They did omit the "Windows" qualifier in the headline!

      Are you a detective? /Stewie

    7. Re:Even Linux Boxes? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      And then, moments before that happens, Apple buys Microsoft and shuts them down.

      FOREVER!

    8. Re:Even Linux Boxes? by neilo_1701D · · Score: 1

      ... How in the name of the eight worlds of Sol ...

      Back when I was knee-high to a grasshopper, there were nine worlds of Sol. You kids don't know how lucky you are by not confusing the solar system to Disneyland and only having to remember eight names!

      Of course, science fiction has taken a hit: Planet IX sounds a whole lot less ominous than Planet X.

    9. Re:Even Linux Boxes? by PincushionMan · · Score: 1
      No!

      Not unless you are running a Secure Boot (TM) authorized OS. On most firmware, we have options similar to ON (Secure) and OFF (Legacy). It will be trivial to have the hardware manufacturers set that to secure, be it in a firmware update or straight from the factory (e.g. Surface). Linux Secure Boot enabled OSes are Red Hat and possibly Fedora and CentOS. I think Ubuntu said they'd consider using Secure Boot signed binaries, but I don't know if they went through with acquiring the signing keys. In the Windows camp, Windows 7 is considered 'Legacy OS' (at least according to my motherboard). Windows 8 and 8.1 are grandfathered in for the short term.

      I haven't owned a Mac in a while - does OpenFirmware have the option to disable Secure Boot? I suppose it must, I've seen at least one running Windows 7

    10. Re:Even Linux Boxes? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      OpenFirmware hasn't been a thing since PowerPC.

      Intel-based Macs use EFI, and the Windows 7 booting was achieved through the use of EFI BIOS Compatibility Mode. Under Windows 8 and above you can perform a straight EFI install and it boots far faster due to leaving behind the programmed-IO legacy and legacy edge-triggered interrupt handling of BIOS.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    11. Re:Even Linux Boxes? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Of course, science fiction has taken a hit: Planet IX sounds a whole lot less ominous than Planet X.

      Many machines on IX. New machines.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    12. Re:Even Linux Boxes? by camperdave · · Score: 2

      I was in the Pluto-is-a-planet camp until I came across Orcus. Orcus is in an orbit that is almost identical to Pluto's, except inclined the other way. Both Pluto and Orcus have moons and are at a 2:3 orbital resonance with Neptune. This, and the abundance of other objects in similar 2:3 resonances with Neptune forced me to conclude that Pluto was just a hunk of debris that was caught in a gravitational "divot", much like a trojan asteroid.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    13. Re:Even Linux Boxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On most firmware, we have options similar to ON (Secure) and OFF (Legacy).

      Show me one firmware that doesn't have that option. Heck even the Surface has that option and that's a Microsoft product!

    14. Re:Even Linux Boxes? by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

      Maybe the next revision of GWX is going to get truly ambitious...

      aka "systemd"? :D

    15. Re:Even Linux Boxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The non-optional upgrade your Linux to Windows 10. It will even do it unattended while your away for the weekend.

    16. Re:Even Linux Boxes? by neilo_1701D · · Score: 1

      I was in the Pluto-is-a-planet camp until I came across Orcus.

      This is what I love about Slashdot: the vast repository of frightfully interesting but otherwise useless information that pops up from time to time in the comments. Never heard or Orcus before; now I have! Thank you!

  4. No. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Just No.

    Don't make PCs and PC games worse, make the consoles better.

    Console ports already generally suck. Leave them in the console controller ghetto.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:No. by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Turn your PC into an Xbox" is nothing more than coded language for "sabotage your perfectly good general-purpose computer by infecting it with even more DRM than it already has." The thinking at Microsoft clearly must be "well, the consumers are resisting our attempts to force them to use the Windows Store, so maybe we can force them to the Xbox Live store instead?"

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:No. by wicka_wicka · · Score: 1

      I disagree - don't make consoles better, make them worse. Stop trying to achieve parity with PCs. It's never going to happen. Instead, accept that the inherent design limitations of consoles requires that they be underpowered vs PCs.

      --
      hi
    3. Re:No. by PincushionMan · · Score: 1

      I think you've nailed it. The Xbox Live store (especially since it has the Gold tier membership), has to be hugely more profitable than the generic Windows Store. I suspect a consolidation is brewing. Maybe WinStore accounts are going to be migrated to WindowsLive accounts?

    4. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh! Why can't they make consoles they release once every 5 years just as good as my much more expensive, constantly upgraded, PC??

    5. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turn your calculator into an abacus!

    6. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Embrace the limitations, but also the benefits.

      Ease of install and use, guaranteed compatibility, couch multi-player, first party peripherals (where's my light-gun, dammit?)

      The more you try and make consoles into PCs, the more people realize that consoles are really just shitty PCs

    7. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "good general-purpose computer" has already been destroyed by Windows 10. Now it's a "good general-purpose spying machine".

    8. Re:No. by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      Shit, accidentally clicked "Redundant" instead of "Insightful". Replying to undo my mod.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    9. Re:No. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The only way to achieve parity with PC is to remove all the crap the console makers do to lock you into their games or monetize you. Paid subscriptions in order to get updates to your games, exclusive access to one platform only, makes use of a nonsensical interface no one wants (kinect), connectivity to the back office so they can serve you ads and track you, etc. And that's before you make the games less dumb.

    10. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead, accept that the inherent design limitations of consoles requires that they be underpowered vs PCs.

      What the hell are you talking about? They don't need to be underpowered. For a while, the PS3 was considered more powerful than contemporary PCs.

    11. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "good general-purpose computer" has already been destroyed by Windows 10. Now it's a "good general-purpose spying machine".

      And they're desperately trying to redact the general purpose part. You only need one general purpose machine to do n tasks: much more profitable to sell n special purpose machines instead (aka the apple approach "ipad rather than small touch-screen general purpose laptop").

    12. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Turn your PC into an Xbox" is nothing more than coded language for "sabotage your perfectly good general-purpose computer by infecting it with even more DRM than it already has."

      People don't care about DRM, they care about things that get in their way and are inconvenient. DRM used to be annoying and inconvenient but now we've seen the proliferation of DRM-encumbered services like Apple Music, Spotify, Netflix, HBO, Hulu, etc, the tactics they employ are all DRM in some way but the anti-DRM crowd were tricked into believing people cared about their cause when the only thing they care about is convenience.

      If Windows had a feature to run the XBox system atop it which enables them to play XBox games on their PC then frankly you are an out-of-touch, naive fool if you actually believe people will care about DRM.

    13. Re:No. by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Instead, accept that the inherent design limitations of consoles requires that they be underpowered vs PCs.

      Everybody already accepts that they are less powerful, but that doesnt matter because they are far more efficient. Using a lower level API and targeting a consistent platform means you don't have to worry that your customers have different combinations of CPU features, cache, speed, cores and different GPU architectures, features, memory amount, memory speed, bus speed and system RAM amount/speed, output screen resolution as well as different OS versions, drivers and running applications. This is how console games can be so much more efficient at exploiting system hardware compared to PCs, because all the target devices are the same, that is an advantage and you don't have overpowered and wasteful PC hardware that you then have to tweak settings to make things work properly.

    14. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On that train of thought, the forced Windows 10 upgrades may be due in part to quickly boost the size of their Windows Store customer base to critical mass and leverage their vendors with high customer numbers.

    15. Re:No. by jezwel · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why these were even designed as separate things?! Your Microsoft account should display XBox related items when using your XBox, PC related items when using your PC, and Mobile related items when using your Windows Phone. If a product is available on multiple platforms, it should presented on those platforms when you have bought it - regardless of what device you bought it on. The interface should be tailored to the capability of the device you are using - touch, gamepad, mouse + keyboard, voice, gestures. Why is this so difficult to define, design, and implement ?

    16. Re:No. by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      That's because there's everything from fun little indie titles to massive AAA games on it rather than the craptastic "apps" in the Windows store that some shyster pooped out in five minutes with a suspiciously similar name to some other large name brand that they're trying to rip off. Not looking forward to seeing the crappiness of the Windows Store infect the Xbox Live store.

      Other interesting news is the notion that MS may be releasing incremental hardware updates, including one with a more powerful GPU (presumably so it can work with VR). What's that going to do to the Xbox game ecosystem, if games run better on one version of the hardware than another? I doubt you'll immediately start seeing games that *only* run on the newer hardware, but the prospect may be concerning to some. I mean, the cheaper price and long-term stability of the platform is really the only thing the console has going for it in the first place. It's a shame MS decided to sell such a watered down "next-gen" machine in the first place, betting on the silly Kinect instead of better gaming hardware.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    17. Re:No. by donaldm · · Score: 1

      "Turn your PC into an Xbox" is nothing more than coded language for "sabotage your perfectly good general-purpose computer by infecting it with even more DRM than it already has." The thinking at Microsoft clearly must be "well, the consumers are resisting our attempts to force them to use the Windows Store, so maybe we can force them to the Xbox Live store instead?"

      To get an idea of the type of information Windows 10 will send to Microsoft just select your Security settings and peruse them. By default all the settings are turned on unless you explicitly turn them off and even if you turn them off there are other settings that can only be changed in the Registry and good luck with that.

      Sure there are third party tools that can help you lock down your Windows 10 machine but now you have the problem of trusting them. Don't just take my word on this do a simple search with the words "Windows 10" and "Privacy", you will get about 18 million hits in Google (Note: I quoted "Windows 10").

      For those people that are using a different version of MS Windows (aka. Win7, Win8.1 and back) well except for Windows 8.1 all other versions of Windows are out of mainstream support. You can find this information here. If you are a gamer on Widows OS's like it or not you will have to upgrade especially if you want to play Microsoft-centric games that support DirectX 12.

      I am well aware that Google effectively "phones home" but at least you can turn this off or just don't use their browser. With Windows 10 the "phone home" capability is turned on by default and while it is possible to lock down the OS you or your third party software will most likely miss something and turning off an operating system rather defeats the purpose of the operating system.

      Windows 10 is a combination of Win7 and Win8.1 (it has tiles on the start menu). It is pretty (ie. subjective) and it appears to work quite well as I would expect it too. If you like that and you don't mind your computer computing usage being sent to the cloud (ie. Microsoft) then be my guest.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    18. Re:No. by donaldm · · Score: 1

      On that train of thought, the forced Windows 10 upgrades may be due in part to quickly boost the size of their Windows Store customer base to critical mass and leverage their vendors with high customer numbers.

      You are spot on with that comment.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    19. Re:No. by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Except that's not true today. Both current versions of the big consoles on the market are simply low-powered PC's with a basic x86 OS to do the workload. Neither are they more efficient, if they were when you're porting from x86 to x86 the developer would be able to use that "extra horse power" to optimize the game even further. Doesn't happen. Many of those ports are poorly optimized even on the very highest tier of hardware out there. See the Batman: Arkham Knight fiasco for instance.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    20. Re:No. by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Except that's not true today. Both current versions of the big consoles on the market are simply low-powered PC's with a basic x86 OS to do the workload.

      Did you not read? The OS does not suffer the overhead of desktop OSes, they are specialized, stripped down OSes. The hardware is indeed very similar to PC hardware but as I already said the difference with consoles is you know every detail and can optimize for them rather than having to do a high-level generic solution that is not at all optimized for the target platform.

      Neither are they more efficient, if they were when you're porting from x86 to x86 the developer would be able to use that "extra horse power" to optimize the game even further.

      They are more efficiently utilized because they are a consistent platform to target rather than an inconsistent, fragmented one like the PC.

    21. Re:No. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      They are slightly more efficient. But they are still obsolete shit hardware. 30fps is good for a console, many games render at 720 or worse.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    22. Re:No. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Fanbois 'consider' lots of things that just aren't true.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  5. Linux here I come by bl968 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If they do this I will never use a microsoft OS ever again. Nor will most businesses.

    --
    "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 51230 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Setec Astronomy)"
    1. Re:Linux here I come by geoskd · · Score: 5, Informative

      If they do this I will never use a microsoft OS ever again.

      Yes you will. If you really meant that, you'd have left windows long ago. Microsoft knows you're just going to whimper like a dog and roll over.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    2. Re:Linux here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please. No business will give a fuck about this, nor do they have a reason to.

    3. Re:Linux here I come by wicka_wicka · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstood the concept the article is describing.

      --
      hi
    4. Re:Linux here I come by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If they do this I will never use a microsoft OS ever again.

      I've been seeing this same threat since early 90's, every time MS did something stupid or sneaky (which is often). Is it the same procrastinator, or just young people new to the MS dance?

    5. Re:Linux here I come by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If they do this I will never use a microsoft OS ever again. Nor will most businesses.

      ^This guy thinks it will mean having to control his Excel spreadsheet with an Xbox controller.^

      I can understand not liking Windows, or Microsoft, but how in the hell is being able to run Xbox games on your Windows PC a complete, goodbye-cruel-world dealbreaker?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:Linux here I come by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because they absolutely won't have a single setting in Group Policy to disable the thing for entire AD forests.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    7. Re:Linux here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another Linux loon claiming that businesses are suddenly going to drop MS like a hot potato with absolutely no reasoning to back it up.

      Can Slashdot please finally just get over it? While MS will likely not last forever it isn't going to crumble over nonsense like this.

    8. Re:Linux here I come by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Well that and Linux isn't exactly a great Windows alternative. The Windows 10 silliness really would be a grand opportunity for Apple to release a cheaper Mac Mini.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    9. Re:Linux here I come by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      Addicted to lube is that they are.

    10. Re:Linux here I come by wicka_wicka · · Score: 1

      It's gotten to the point where the anti-Microsoft FUD is damn near worse than Microsoft's anti-Linux FUD ever was.

      --
      hi
    11. Re:Linux here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that and Linux isn't exactly a great Windows alternative. The Windows 10 silliness really would be a grand opportunity for Apple to release a cheaper Mac Mini.

      Thank you for the explanation. I don't know how I'm getting along without it in my corporate environment for the past 15 years.

    12. Re:Linux here I come by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Oh, you know those PCMR types, especially the Europeans. For them, Diablo/Star Trek Online/XCOM2/Whatever being released on consoles was the end of the world.

      So this is the inverse of that. Any mixing of console and PC will contaminate their precious Gaben-blessed basement dwelling bodily fluids or something.

    13. Re:Linux here I come by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Yes you will. If you really meant that, you'd have left windows long ago. Microsoft knows you're just going to whimper like a dog and roll over.

      I can't speak for the GP, but a less-hyperbolic version of that statement is certainly true in my case. Until now my wife's photography business has been Windows-based. At the next hardware refresh cycle we're almost certainly moving to Mac.

      I could almost hold my nose regarding the Windows 10 spyware. I hate it, but not enough to let that make a business decision for me. But the clincher is that we can't risk an errant, forced upgrade from Microsoft messing up our production environment. During the busy seasons, several days of downtime would be unacceptably painful. I'm not a big fan of Macs, but for unfathomable reasons Microsoft is making themselves unfit for use by some small businesses like ours.

    14. Re:Linux here I come by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Well that and Linux isn't exactly a great Windows alternative. The Windows 10 silliness really would be a grand opportunity for Apple to release a cheaper Mac Mini.

      WTF? $500 isn't cheap enough???

      You haven't priced Intel CPUs lately, have you? The MSRP of the lowest-end CPU offered in a Mac mini (1.4 GHz i5), is almost 2/3 the luster price of the ENTIRE machine!!! Of course, Apple doesn't pay that; but I would be willing to bet that they pay around 60% of that, maybe more.

      And before you whine about the $500 model, realize that 95% of Applications typically run on corporate desktops can EASILY be comfortably run on a machine of its specs. Easily.

      OS X is not Windows. It is not NEARLY as RAM- Hungry, nor resource-hungry. Not having to run three layers of A/V helps...

    15. Re:Linux here I come by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      WTF? $500 isn't cheap enough???

      No, it isn't, and what you get for $500 is a shitty computer to boot...

      Acer Aspire - Intel i3 - 3.6GHz - $300
      http://amzn.to/1UxLhFh

      For $200 less, you get a computer that is more than double the performance of the $500 Mac Mini, AND you can actually expand it. Add more RAM if you want, put a SSD in if you want, etc.

      Plus, it comes with an actual keyboard and mouse to boot, something the Mac Mini lacks.

    16. Re:Linux here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll keep sucking MS cock and like it, faggot neckbeard.

      Seriously, the whole "I'll stop wit teh Micros0-tszzz!!!!1111!!!" line played out while Clinton was still in the whitehouse. You've sat your ass out this long and you'll keep on doing it.

      Besides, why fucking say it here? No one gives a fuck.

    17. Re:Linux here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For individuals, you might be right.

      For businesses, you are dead wrong.

      Corporations won't tolerate these shenanigans. They'll hang onto Win7 until it rots (much like they did with WinXP), or until a viable alternative pops up.

      Most corporate drones could make the switch to Linux and Open/Libre Office without too much hassle. It wouldn't be any bigger of a leap than when MS implemented the Ribbon in Office 2007. The only hard part would be training and/or hiring an IT staff that can troubleshoot Linux. Windows desktop support techs are a dime a dozen. Linux is a bit more pricey.

    18. Re:Linux here I come by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      I switched from Mac to PC mid 1990s because the PC had 10x the games. Both had Office. Both had Netscape. Games was the difference.

      Note MS is moving heaven and earth to keep up the games on the PC. This is less about more X-box game sales and more about keeping the PC from drying up of games.

      Of course, the PC is already drying up of anything except console-designed games and ports, so I don't see screaming, "Here come even more console games!" as buying much PC salvation.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    19. Re: Linux here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a bs. Linux does not require that much of support as windows desktop does. And Linux techs are dime a dozen too. In fact it s way easier to support a Linux network rather than the AD monstrosity so for the server side Linux ssysadmin can be even cheaper.

    20. Re:Linux here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Well that and Linux isn't exactly a great Windows alternative."

      Depends on which Linux you're talking about - Android Linux is pretty solid and allows Users to do most tasks on Windows.

      If you're referring to Ubuntu yeah I wouldn't recommend that heap to anyone. Then of course there are at least 50 major Linux versions and not everything is peaces and roses, the more you know the better off you are. At the end of the day even mum can use Arch Linux provided you install, and configure it correctly.

    21. Re:Linux here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $500 for a dual core CPU, with a tiny 4GB of RAM (soldered, not upgradeable), and a slow 5400 rpm hard drive? There's tons of used computers with better specs under $100, so nope, it's NOT!!!

      If their hardware prices were decent I'd be in for 3 computers RFN. I don't want to see Windows 10 ever, it's complete garbage. The problem is that any half-decent Mac costs close to a month of my salary (gross). The main problem with macs is that they just don't have good hardware:
      -mac: a 12" LCD is too damn tiny for a laptop
      -macbook air: 11" and 13" LCD are still too damn tiny for a laptop
      -macbook pro 13": too damn tiny for a laptop
      -imac 21.5": too damn small for a desktop
      -mac mini: way underpowered, by a long shot, yet still overpriced

      -macbook pro 15": looks like an alright laptop. Most basic model is $2449 CAD, or about $8500 CAD for 3 laptops with taxes.
      -imac 27": looks like an alright desktop. Most basic model is $2299 CAD, or about $8000 CAD for 3 laptops with taxes.
      -mac pro base model: finally something that looks like a decent-ish workstation! It's a little bit under my minimum specs (Quad core, 16GB RAM, 240GB SSD at the very least) ant it's $3499 per PC, so about $12000 with taxes.
      -mac pro, configured to something like a ~$1500 PC (i5 6600K, Z170 mobo, 32GB RAM, 480GB SSD, 8TB WD drive)? Ok, no such thing. If you just upgrade to 32GB RAM and the 512GB SSD (I'll need a QNAP with that or something else adding to the cost), now it's $4459 per PC, or about $15000 with taxes, plus the external storage.

      I'm just not THAT rich so I guess I'm stuck with Windows...

    22. Re:Linux here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not having to run three layers of A/V helps...

      You're not supposed to run multiple A/Vs. Nobody recommends this.

    23. Re:Linux here I come by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Depends on which Linux you're talking about -

      No, it doesn't. It depends on which software you're using. For quite a few people, Linux is anywhere from adequate to awesome because of software support. For quite a few others, including myself, the Linux support either isn't there or it's not as strong. In my case there's a large speed hit because the developers have prioritized Windows over Linux.

      First-time-configuration isn't even an issue with Linux adoption.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    24. Re:Linux here I come by exomondo · · Score: 1

      WTF? $500 isn't cheap enough???

      Well you can get a Windows PC for $200 cheaper, of course then it runs Windows and you spend hours commenting on slashdot about how Microsoft's latest antics are negatively affecting you, but hey, you saved $200 so it must be totally worth it.

      ...funnily enough most of those Windows PCs can run OS X anyway.

    25. Re:Linux here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They took out the GP setting that removed the windows store and prevented non privileged users from installing shit from it.

    26. Re:Linux here I come by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Well that and Linux isn't exactly a great Windows alternative. The Windows 10 silliness really would be a grand opportunity for Apple to release a cheaper Mac Mini.

      You are quite right "Linux isn't exactly a great Windows alternative" it is a fantastic MS Windows alternative that really allows you to get your work done and have plenty of time to do other more productive things, like beating that annoying boss in Bloodborne. :-)

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    27. Re:Linux here I come by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      For them, Diablo/Star Trek Online/XCOM2/Whatever being released on consoles was the end of the world.

      Well let's just look at that shall we? In Diablo 1/2 we had random map generation, more skill trees, various "companion abilities/gear." All of that was dropped for D3 due to limitations on the consoles. STO never had a console release, so that's moot, it did have a mac release but there weren't even enough F2P players that it ended development. Xcom(prior to the recent remake), had: Large squads, various weapon options, large NPD customizations, dynamically generated maps, etc, etc, etc. The Xcom remake gutted many of those features, one of the core being dynamically generated maps. Though with Xcom2(despite all the bugs, they did fix that). Let's look at another. Dragon Age: Origins. Considered by many to be the best CRPG of the 00's, come along to DA2, which had a short development time, gameplay devices optimized for consoles, UI designed for consoles, very limited game interface/dialog interface. No top-down combat options. Very basic spell combos -- sorry kids no more whirling wind of winterstorm to destroy all enemies. Casting 3 spells in a row was too difficult.

      How about FO4? Shitty UI changes, shitty dialog changes. See radial wheel that's become oh so popular with the "uh, huh, what" options colour coded because some people are still a bit too stupid and need playskool's first CRPG gaming design to help them out. Can't forget other changes like removing core components out because various other reasons. Good by karma, good by low intelligence playthrough...etc...

      Haven't even started with other shit over the last few years. Best example of a game done right? Deus Ex: Human Revolution.

      So this is the inverse of that. Any mixing of console and PC will contaminate their precious Gaben-blessed basement dwelling bodily fluids or something.

      PC gamers have a good reason to be distrustful. Everytime something is made on the PC and then consolized, or ported over it has serious issues.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    28. Re:Linux here I come by macs4all · · Score: 0

      WTF? $500 isn't cheap enough???

      No, it isn't, and what you get for $500 is a shitty computer to boot...

      Acer Aspire - Intel i3 - 3.6GHz - $300 http://amzn.to/1UxLhFh

      For $200 less, you get a computer that is more than double the performance of the $500 Mac Mini, AND you can actually expand it. Add more RAM if you want, put a SSD in if you want, etc.

      Plus, it comes with an actual keyboard and mouse to boot, something the Mac Mini lacks.

      Really? Better performance? With a i3?

      PC Mag doesn't think so...

      Oh, and by the time you "expand" it, it's hardly $300 now, is it?

      And the Piece of Resistance? Windows 10. And don't say "Linux", because we're talking about a VIABLE solution for a REAL front office desktop, not Linux, sorry.

      And another thing: That Mac mini will still be sitting there, quietly chugging along, long after that shitbox Acer has a Power Supply failure, and the cheap-ass no-crowbar PS takes out the mobo, AND every connected USB and video device along with it. Don't EVEN think it can't happen...

      Now how good of a value is that $300 machine?

      Fact is, even the low-end Mac mini has more than enough shit in the tank for a very wide range of "front office", Laboratory, Software and Web Development, and Document and "Media" Creation Applications. IOW, the things that businesses of many types need to do.

    29. Re:Linux here I come by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      Really? Better performance? With a i3?

      Yes

      PC Mag doesn't think so...

      Learn what clock speed is, then buy yourself a clue...

      A DUAL CORE i5 at 1.4GHz, even with a "turbo boost" to 2.7GHz, gets its ass kicked by a DUAL CORE i3 at 3.6GHz.

      Oh, and by the time you "expand" it, it's hardly $300 now, is it?

      Again, you're stupid and don't know what you're talking about. The $500 Mac Mini has 4GB of RAM and 500GB HD. The $300 Acer has 4GB of RAM and 500GB hard drive.

      But the Mac Mini can't be upgraded. The Acer can.

      Fact is,

      No, the fact is you don't know what the hell you're talking about, you're another idiot running your mouth about shit you don't know anything about.

    30. Re:Linux here I come by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      In Diablo 1/2 we had random map generation, more skill trees, various "companion abilities/gear." All of that was dropped for D3 due to limitations on the consoles.

      Do you even play D3? Because it DOES have random map generation (Rifts). The Static maps of the Campaign are there because it's a static campaign with story. D3 also has various companion abilities/gear. And since the PC version was released first, the console version wasn't announced till February of 2013, any differences from D1/2 were by design for the PC. if you just wanted to play a game exactly like D2, just play D2. The reason D3 is the way it is, is because that's how the developers wanted the design choices to be, not because of any supposed console limitations.

      Besides, D1 on the PSone has the exact same map generation the PC version does.

      [quote]STO never had a console release, so that's moot,[/quote]

      I was referring to the upcoming console release, which is causing some players of the PC version to act like it's the end of the world.

      Xcom(prior to the recent remake), had: Large squads, various weapon options, large NPD customizations, dynamically generated maps, etc, etc, etc.

      You're forgetting that 1994's Xcom Enemy Unknown/UFO Defense and 1995's X-com Terror from the Deep were crossplatform with the PSone. The changes in the modern Xcom were simply design choices for the modern age.

      come along to DA2, which had a short development time, gameplay devices optimized for consoles, UI designed for consoles, very limited game interface/dialog interface. No top-down combat options. Very basic spell combos

      Seems to me like you're blaming consoles for design choices that the designers made to lower the barriers to entry for players on ALL platforms. After all, bearded hexmap tabletop grognards might like arcane UI and top-down combat design, but a lower percentage of players, even on PC are tabletop grognards.

      Besides, Wasteland 2 and Divinity proved you could do the classic Bioware style that you're referring to on console. So all those things you don't like....don't blame them on consoles. Blame them on the fact that the average PC gamer these days is a goatteed backwards cap wearing Gaben-worshipping meme-spouting LoL or TF2 player, rather than a bearded Janes reading engineer with a shelf full of Avalon Hill games who wants to play computer versions of his AH games, D&D games and flight sims.

      Goodbye karma,

      They took out the Karma system because some F3 and FNV players thought it was too "artificial", not because of any console thing.

      goodbye low intelligence playthrough

      Design choice not due to a console limitation, because F3 and FNV had that option.

      PC gamers have a good reason to be distrustful.

      No, you don't. You just want to make up excuses to be PCMR jerks and brag about your quad GTX Titan e-peens.

    31. Re:Linux here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux here since 1999, biach. Unfortunately Windoze still has its uses, and it fucking sucks.

  6. The Console Is Dead So Use A Desktop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is amazing that MS is able to rake in money hand over fist that way it does. They recognize that the console is on its death bed, so they make an exit strategy to the desktop PC. Which, by the way, is only a few steps behind the console in its slow march to obscurity. Maybe this will be the slow evolution from console to desktop to tablet. This way MS has another decade to get their tablets straightened out?

    1. Re:The Console Is Dead So Use A Desktop! by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Slow march to obscurity? Hell, it may have been terminally sick, but they stabbed it in the back with Windows 10.

      Helix is presumably a contraction of "Hell-X (box)". My family''s experience of the UI is that it is unusable - the kids have abandoned it for games on Android tablets.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    2. Re:The Console Is Dead So Use A Desktop! by plover · · Score: 1

      Actually, they're playing the Ol' Switcheroo long game. By putting out Windows 8 in the condition it was in, then offering Windows 10 as a "gee, we're so sorry about how horrible that was", they were legitimately able to claim that Windows 10 was an "upgrade" (because after Windows 8 an unclogged toilet qualifies as an upgrade.)

      But nobody who uses Windows 7 has ever believed Windows 10 is any kind of upgrade. Normal users were forced into it by GWX; so their installation statistics can be twisted into making it sound like people are "voluntarily" upgrading, making this statement not technically a lie: "With over 100 million downloads, Windows 10 is our most popular OS ever." (They've since changed it to "our best OS ever.")

      --
      John
  7. Er...this is a secret? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Er...this is a secret? Last time I checked, there was an "XBOX" icon on EVERY Windows 10 installation I'd ever seen...

    1. Re:Er...this is a secret? by Nemyst · · Score: 2

      The Xbox app is just for basic functionality (achievements, friends, recording, etc.) and for streaming games from an XB1, it can't actually play XB1 games.

    2. Re:Er...this is a secret? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      >> it can't actually play XB1 games.

      You forgot "yet." Like I said, the fact that Microsoft wants to compete with Steam with the full Xbox catalog on every Windows 10 desktop is no secret. Otherwise they would have kept the "Microsoft Games" thing going, licensed Steam bloatware apps or gone in a different direction. Instead, everyone already sees the Xbox brand and expects that someday soon Xbox games will be there too.

    3. Re:Er...this is a secret? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Never having seen a Windows 10 installation, I'll have to take your word for it.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  8. At least by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

    you will only have to buy 1 copy of a game. That is pretty appealing.

    I bought Diablo 4 on my girlfriend's console at one point but she got sick of me playing it all the time so I had to buy the PC version to play on my computer (which sucks BTW, the console version is much easier to use).

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    1. Re:At least by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      You're probably making the mistake of trying to use a gamepad for a computer game which was made to use with a keyboard and mouse.

    2. Re:At least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't just get a different girlfriend?

    3. Re:At least by CronoCloud · · Score: 0

      Diablo style games work wonderfully with direct character control with gamepads, more immersive and comfortable over long hours of play. Any player of Diablo 1 on the PSone, or those bajillion Diablo clones on the PS2, Sacred on the PS3, or Diablo 3 on the PS3/4 could tell you that.

      Even Eurogamer, which is filled with jerkass PCMR Eurogamers (Europeans, especially ones from Eastern Europe tend to be SRSLY console hostile), liked Diablo 3 on console.

      http://www.eurogamer.net/artic...

    4. Re:At least by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I bought Diablo 4

      There is no Diablo 4, you mean Diablo 3, most likely the Ultimate Evil Edition.

    5. Re:At least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wtf dude, I had to go and check. I thought I missed Diablo 4 release. There is no Diablo 4.

    6. Re:At least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      diablo 3 on consoles is fun, it plays more like gauntlet

    7. Re:At least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The console version is easier to use? That's a first, at least for me. I actually bought the PS4 version after a long hiatus from the launch Diablo 3 for PC / Mac, then sold my PS4 and games because I don't like the PS4 after owning it for six months. Now I happily play Reaper of Souls with a mouse and keyboard like Blizzard originally intended.

    8. Re:At least by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      When it comes to that style of extended gaming, the ones with the greatest usability are those that can operate mainly just by mouse inputs, one handed, allowing for more relaxed reclined gaming and snack and drink consumption. So definitely PC way over game console or more accurately mouse (and occasional keyboard) over game controller.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:At least by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      the ones with the greatest usability are those that can operate mainly just by mouse inputs, one handed, allowing for more relaxed reclined gaming and snack and drink consumption.

      Which is NOT Diablo 3 on PC. (Which I also own, even though I prefer the PS4 version)

    10. Re:At least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW what is your girlfriend's name. I'm sure she would rather go out with me since I'd play with her instead of playing a stupid game.

      and people wonder why gamers don't have girl friends

    11. Re:At least by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      you are right... not sure why I hit 4 instead of 3... my mistake.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  9. App store lock in jail time / ban's for modding = by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    App store lock in jail time / ban's for modding = no way.

    And there idea of modding that can get banned is putting your own sata hdd in. At lest the x box 360 used to that way.

  10. Not happening. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would Microsoft let you play Xbone "console exclusive" games on any generic Windows 10 PC, especially when those games can be pirated much more easily on PC?

    tl;dr, more wishful thinking from people who have fallen for "The Big Lie". (Oh look, my Windows Phone has an "Xbox" app, that means it can run Halo 5!)

    1. Re:Not happening. by Merk42 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why would Microsoft let you play Xbone "console exclusive" games on any generic Windows 10 PC

      Because Microsoft loses money on every sale of the hardware of an Xbox One. If people don't even have to buy the hardware, then it's a win for Microsoft.

    2. Re:Not happening. by lgw · · Score: 1

      Why would Microsoft let you play Xbone "console exclusive" games on any generic Windows 10 PC, especially when those games can be pirated much more easily on PC?

      MS doesn't care about how many XBones sell, they care about how many people are able to play XBox games. It's always the games that are the main source of revenue. Even better if they no longer needed to pay Steam a cut for console ports!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Not happening. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Why would Microsoft let you play Xbone "console exclusive" games on any generic Windows 10 PC, especially when those games can be pirated much more easily on PC?

      Indeed, why would they? Consider that the headline is "turn every PC into an Xbox" and not "turn every Xbox into a PC [by removing the DRM]" and you might discover the answer.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re: Not happening. by stud9920 · · Score: 1

      That's a myth. The units pay for themselves. Not with a sufficient margin to recoup development or marketing, but every other sale helps a little

    5. Re: Not happening. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would have helped even more, is if it had been worth anything at release.

  11. Sounds good to me! by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

    I only want one game for XBox One. This will allow me to have my cake and eat it too. Now if Sony can make all Blu-ray players a PS4...

  12. About Time by CrashNBrn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It will be interesting to see if those of us predicting the demise of dedicated consoles within the next 1-2 console iterations are correct or not.
    If so, then Sony, Nintendo, and MS will switch focus to peripherals (controllers, VR, etc) and become platforms that run on any capable computing device. Perhaps with something like a Ubi-key for their locked down DRM.

    1. Re:About Time by Guybrush_T · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily, since game consoles tend to be good hardware/price compromise and games are optimized for those platforms since there are a lot of them.

      The gamers (with occasional desktop needs) will buy the Xbox ; the desktopers (with occasional gaming) will buy a laptop/desktop. The extreme gamers will build their own crazy-GPU configuration.

    2. Re:About Time by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      Mhmm, and all the consoles are AMD processors and GPU - e.g. A Gaming PC with custom controllers.

    3. Re:About Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I certainly hope not. I'm sick to death of dealing with incompatibilities, and games that perform like crap unless I spend as much money on graphics card upgrades as I wouldn't have spent to just buy the console in the first place.

    4. Re:About Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why they are cheap and underperformant.

    5. Re:About Time by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No. They're gaming PCs with locked-down hardware and a fuck-ton of DRM, and that's what Microsoft apparently wants to do to normal PCs too.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    6. Re:About Time by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And then the extreme gamer notices that nobody bothers catering to his 8900x5050 resolution triple-screen setup because everyone only codes for the console standard spec and doesn't bother to adjust anything because, hey, why bother, it runs on PCs anyway.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:About Time by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Sony put PS2 or a PS3 (can't remember which) capability in their Blu-Ray players. So, if you want, you can pay a too large monthly fee, hook up a controller, and play games streamed to it from the internet. They are trying all the same stuff everybody else is; music, streaming games, movies, books, etc.

    8. Re:About Time by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Sony put PS2 or a PS3 (can't remember which) capability in their Blu-Ray players.

      It's actually neither...and both. It is called Playstation Now and it's based on Gaikai technology. (with maybe some OnLive bits now too) It is in some TV's as well.

      So, if you want, you can pay a too large monthly fee, hook up a controller, and play games streamed to it from the internet.

      It's cheaper if you subscribe for longer periods. One month is 19.99
      3 months is currently on sale for 29.99 (regularly 43.99) That said, I don't use it...because if I wanted to play a PS2 or PS3 game (which I do rarely) it's cheaper to get the disc and put it into my backwards compatible CECHE model PS3.

    9. Re:About Time by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Uhhh you can buy PCs now that will play most games at 720p if not better for less than a PS4, and certainly less than they'll be asking for a PS4 Neo. Since PCs hit the wall on both MHz and cores a few years back parts have gotten cheaper because there really is no "killer app" to move the more expensive parts.

      Just type in "$400 gaming PC" into YouTube and you can find dozens of builds to pick from, both Intel and AMD, they even have parts picker links so you don't even have to know which parts to get, just click the link. Now that you can get both Windows 10 Insider Edition (with extra spying and Bing!) and SteamOS for free the cost of the OS doesn't have to enter into it, just grab the parts and game on.

      That of course doesn't even figure in the insane wealth of crazy powerful used systems you can get now for dirt cheap, you can grab a C2Q or Phenom II X4 system on many CL for under $70, throw in a $100 graphics card and voila! A system that will play most mainstream games well for less than the cost of a used PS4.

      There has really never been a better time to be a PC gamer, hardware is cheap, great games are so plentiful and the PC platform has so much competition you can have huge game collections for very little money, and everything is so simple a kid can throw together a system now. You can literally build a PC with only 4 parts, case with PSU, APU with heatsink, SSD...that's it, working system ready for install. Its sooo easy, sooo cheap, and HDMI means its plug and play...man I wish it would have been that easy when I first start building systems.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    10. Re: About Time by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

      The PS3 is better blu-ray player than most blu-ray players, so you are better off going the other way around.

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    11. Re:About Time by donaldm · · Score: 1

      It is always funny but most of these builds always seem to forget the price of the operating system (assuming Microsoft) and the monitor (like it or not this is essential). If you're a serious gamer you also need a decent keyboard and mouse which aren't exactly cheap, sure you can get cheap ones but they are normally rubbish.

      Since most builds don't talk about DVD or BluRay readers I would assume the so called gamer will be downloading games digitally, which is fine. The problem you do have is that you need fairly large capacity storage unless you are only going to be playing a few games. Basically, a 1GB disk is just not large enough and as for an SSD, well you just blew your budget.

      In all fairness, any serious PC gamer will opt for a PC build that is over US$1000 (i5, i7 or high-end AMD) and that is not including the monitor. There is nothing wrong with opting for a cheaper PC gaming solution but please don't think that that will automatically put you on parity with a high-end gaming rig.

      As far as a PS4 goes I actually use my monitor to switch between it and my SkyLake i7 with 16GB DDR4 RAM machine. Is mine high end? No! It is what could be called fairly high end but there are PC's that are considerably more powerful, it all depends on what you want to use a PC for and how much you wish to spend.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    12. Re:About Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Perhaps with something like a Ubi-key for their locked down DRM."

      Given that all current consoles have DRM systems that are more liberal than Steam DRM (no phone home, multi-system content usage allowance simultaneously), I don't really see that being too much of a problem. If Steam can lock things down harder than the consoles do then I don't see things being an issue.

    13. Re:About Time by Cederic · · Score: 1

      ..and responds by declining to pay full price for those game, waiting until they're old and on sale if buying them at all.

      Meanwhile Steam, GoG and other platforms offer PC only games that take advantage of proper monitors, alternate input devices and the access to a market with a population large enough to support multiple specialised gaming niches.

      Shit, I've spent 23 hours this week playing Warlock 2. Not available on consoles, excellent fun, looks good at 2560x1440.

  13. Quite an unsurprising response to Steam/Linux by Guybrush_T · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That just a natural response to steam/linux. I'm even surprised it took so long for them to enable any windows PC to run XBOX games since the XBOX is a PC running windows.

    1. Re:Quite an unsurprising response to Steam/Linux by chispito · · Score: 1

      That just a natural response to steam/linux. I'm even surprised it took so long for them to enable any windows PC to run XBOX games since the XBOX is a PC running windows.

      I don't think Steam on Linux requires responding to right now. It's still less than 1% of all Steam users.

      Source: http://store.steampowered.com/...

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    2. Re:Quite an unsurprising response to Steam/Linux by Vyse+of+Arcadia · · Score: 1

      Well, the Xbox One is a PC running Windows, and the original Xbox was also a PC running Windows, but the Xbox 360 was a different beast. It had a three core PowerPC chip at its heart and ran a custom non-Windows-derived (IIRC) OS.

    3. Re:Quite an unsurprising response to Steam/Linux by erapert · · Score: 2

      Steam + Linux user here: you guys should come on in, the water's fine. And W10 seems to be annoying a lot of folks...

    4. Re:Quite an unsurprising response to Steam/Linux by somenickname · · Score: 1

      I imagine it's also a response to the Steamlink. I don't know how popular they are yet but, they are excellent devices. They work well enough that I just racked my gaming machine and put a Steamlink in my living room and another one on a desk with a monitor/keyboard/mouse.

      Who wants a console when you can just tuck a beefy gaming machine in an out of the way spot and buy some cheap Steamlinks to play your games in the most appropriate spot.

    5. Re:Quite an unsurprising response to Steam/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course the water is fine, it's about half an inch deep ;P

    6. Re:Quite an unsurprising response to Steam/Linux by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      ... for now. :-/

      It seems like Microsoft is doing its best to drown customers a little more each year. The shenanigans of forced DirectX updates is part of that process.

    7. Re:Quite an unsurprising response to Steam/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My snarky comment aside, I have hopes for Vulkan. That said, there's a lot more that needs to improve on the Linux side if they want to attract a gaming audience - consistency and ease of use being foremost. Oh, and fucking sound support... I don't care what you all say, that shit is still an embarrassment for a surprising amount of configurations. Getting 5.1/7.1/Dolby in Windows is generally a dropdown away. Same goes for a wide array of USB headsets. If the distros got their shit together, you'd probably see more gamers making a switch - a long-term switch.

    8. Re:Quite an unsurprising response to Steam/Linux by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      I hear ya! Valve + Steambox is helping to fix the major issues with Linux Gaming.

    9. Re:Quite an unsurprising response to Steam/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't taking off. We saw an initial rise to the just-short-of 1% of the user base, and it's frozen there. The Steam hardware sales are failing generally, including Windows-based Steam Machines. No one cares.

    10. Re:Quite an unsurprising response to Steam/Linux by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      Meh. It's not worth the concern of figuring out what in my library works on Linux and what doesn't. And I have every setup fine on my Win7 box with no updates.

      I feel like an easy plug would be to get PewDiePie and other streamers using SteamOS and Linux (as silly as I think the whole streaming culture is). Get a big name to release a gotta have with full Linux support. Heck, have the streamers to some Linux indie gaming plugs (I don't know what's all . That just might be something that will get younger folks into using Linux via Steam and really kick developers into releasing more games for Linux and manufacturers providing actual driver support.

      Because I'd be quite peeved to make the switch and find a less than meaningful percentage of games don't work. I'm willing to understand that some older things might not work but it would be super awesome if SteamOS has an easy Windows emulator to fix that (maybe it does).

  14. ugh by bobmajdakjr · · Score: 1

    with the rumors of apple wanting to make OSX into iOS i was hoping microsoft would go the other direction... make all xboxes into pcs. the surface is fucking amazing having a real os in a tablet to get actual shit done.

    1. Re:ugh by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      the surface is fucking amazing having a real os in a tablet to get actual shit done.

      It sure beats having a tablet OS in a real PC and getting nothing done, as with Win10 now.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:ugh by macs4all · · Score: 1

      with the rumors of apple wanting to make OSX into iOS i was hoping microsoft would go the other direction... make all xboxes into pcs. the surface is fucking amazing having a real os in a tablet to get actual shit done.

      Apple is WAY far away from making OS X in iOS.

    3. Re:ugh by Andreas+Mayer · · Score: 1

      with the rumors of apple wanting to make OSX into iOS

      Apple is doing no such thing.

      OS X and iOS share many libraries, but the UI is very different and that's deliberate.

    4. Re: ugh by bobmajdakjr · · Score: 1

      Zzz tl;Dr.

  15. They're doing an excellent job of turning every PC by AntronArgaiv · · Score: 2

    I know, troll.

    But this whole Win7 -> Win10 upgrade thing has caused me to lose any residual trust I had for Microsoft.

  16. Re:They're doing an excellent job of turning every by AntronArgaiv · · Score: 1

    I know, troll.

    But this whole Win7 -> Win10 upgrade thing has caused me to lose any residual trust I had for Microsoft.

    ---> into a Linux box

  17. One Red Ring of Death by mandark1967 · · Score: 1

    to rule them all...

    Dammit Clippy! You only had 1 job!

    --
    Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
  18. Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They already turned all PCs into tablets with their last crappy OS.

  19. Some problems with that idea by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

    1. That would eat away at hardware cosole sales. MS won't go for that.

    2. The whole point of consoles is that you can develop for a specific set of hardware. Though not impossible, and it would be great news for devs, I find it difficult to believe MS has solved all the problems relating to developinig for the wide array of PC hardware by making the software think it's running on a specific set of hardware, and performing fine. I am sure some games do low-level GPU stuff, how would that even work with a different GPU? This could possibly be "solved" by only allowing SPECIFIC games that are developed under NEW criteria that would be PC-friendly... but by that point why not develop for PC and release on Steam?

    3. MS may try to block systems that aren't fast enough but some will get through. Related to #2, unless they were coded from the beginning with cross-platform capability in mind, many games simply were not made to handle systems that are too slow or too fast (thugh like the above, software running too fast is a problem that can be tackled).

    4. Cheating on PC games is a big problem, but because consoles are closed, it is much less of a problem there. This move would dramatically increase the instances of hacking in online Xbox One games that end up on PC.

    1. Re:Some problems with that idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming this can't go the other way, where an XB1 can be used as a PC. If that does happen, it would probably increase sales, because:
      -A gaming computer is more expensive than a console [up front purchase cost only].
      -MS makes more $$ in the end due to XB Live subscriptions (i.e.the subscription business model conspiracy). They may even throw in Office Lite or Office Reader w/ XB Live subscriptions...
      -Businesses that can use a common hardware for peon computing stations will love it as long as they can lock down the applications that can be used (prevent games and attach a keyboard / mouse).

      The above is a win (or perceived-but-not-really-win) for a lot of people in various ways

    2. Re:Some problems with that idea by vux984 · · Score: 2

      1. That would eat away at hardware cosole sales. MS won't go for that.

      I *think* Microsoft consoles are sold at a loss, for the first couple years anyway and they make it back on xbox live and game sales -- they probably don't really care about lost sales of actual consoles... that's just the platform for their profit centers not an important profit center unto itself.

      2. The whole point of consoles is that you can develop for a specific set of hardware

      Console dev's still would do just that. This doesn't change that.

      3. MS may try to block systems that aren't fast enough but some will get through.

      Probably. But so what? The "default" reference platform will still be the actual physical xbox. If your PC doesn't measure up, that's on you.

      many games simply were not made to handle systems that are too slow or too fast (thugh like the above, software running too fast is a problem that can be tackled).

      Its been a while since this really mattered for most games. And its a challenge that other systems have tackled Wii-ware for example, did a truly brilliant job of it. The timing on some of the emulators is a bit dodgy ... but playing the NES and SNES games on Wii U ... i coasted through levels on pure childhood -honed muscle memory and the timing was perfect.

      4. Cheating on PC games is a big problem, but because consoles are closed, it is much less of a problem there. This move would dramatically increase the instances of hacking in online Xbox One games that end up on PC.

      The xbox would probably run in a sandbox... maybe a lightweight hyper-visor like separation. MS would definitely do its best to shield the xbox "machine" from the host OS. But yeah... it would probably make hacking more of a problem than it currently is. Then again.. lot of online xbox one games are already trying cross-platforminess with PC so that door is already open. And an xbox VM running the xbox title, instead of a "PC port" is probably going to be more secure.

      For me, I'm not interested. I don't want an xbox live *subscription*. I don't want upcoming games that are currently being ported to PC to disappear from steam etc because they think I'll just run xbox on my PC. I won't. So I'm going to lose access to some titles.

      Basically for non-xbox using pc gamers this could be a shitshow for pc gaming if manages to disrupt proper PC game development. (e.g. if enough PC gamers buy into it.)

      But I can also see the appeal for xbox users -- being able to play their xbox games on their pcs and laptops; etc that will appeal to them. And it makes good sense for MS to cater to it.

    3. Re:Some problems with that idea by Woldscum · · Score: 1

      Think Steam client. Now think XBox/Windows store client. Now charge everyone on a Windows PC $60 a year for XBox live. You now just hit a large group that would have never purchased a console. Microsoft makes very little money on the XBox hardware. It will be almost pure profit with very little downside.

    4. Re: Some problems with that idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They make their money from software licensing, not from fast-aging bricks of metal with 7-year lifespans but 2 years of competitive performance. This absolves MS of any hardware responsibility and expands their software market exponentially.

    5. Re: Some problems with that idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also: designing around specific hardware might help with stability but look at the XB1, it couldn't even handle 1080p60fps in most cases. Hardware shackles them down, but designing for a range of hardware absolves them of that. No more "xbox tech sux", only "buy upgrades u pleb"

  20. Benighted heathen by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

    mold the Xbox One, you benighted heathen.

    I'll let the mold go - this time - as 300 million bloody idiots insist it's right and I can't be arsed to argue with the fat cunts.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Benighted heathen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xbox One is a proper noun, so it does not require a determiner.

      http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/when-to-use-articles-before-nouns

      "Mold" as you know is the American English spelling ....

  21. Great More Windows Bloat by Crashmarik · · Score: 1, Insightful

    More junk on my system to support features I don't need or want.

  22. Tried and failed miserably. by fishscene · · Score: 1

    Microsoft already tried to turn the PC into a console (At least with the Interface) with Halo 2 for PC. It failed SO hard Microsoft completely abandoned pursuing it further, then blamed PC users for the game sales and terrible interface. ...now they are trying again? Just bring back clippy already!

    1. Re:Tried and failed miserably. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Create a botnet. Lets call it Windows 10.
      2. Create Xbox compatibility layer for your botnet.
      3. Push it out to all infected machines.
      4. Sell your own games in the 'Xbox' flavor only, citing synergy advantages.
      5. Slyly Cripple performance/stability/feature-set of all other gaming platforms and API's available for the botnet.
      6. Profit!

      You didn't think Microsoft went to all that trouble with Windows 10 just to make sure your PC was properly patched, did you? They just want to exclusively own your ass and keep out the competition.

  23. I've been hearing this since Windows Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So maybe after 10 years will it come true?

  24. The Goal, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Microsoft looks at Google, Apple, and Valve and sees the piles of money they're generating from royalties. They're receiving 10-25% of revenues from selling software on these platforms at the cost of what? Maintaining their distribution software, paying for bandwidth, and a couple of servers to store the data.

    Microsoft believes this is their best future. Hardware performance is not gaining at the rate it used to. Many programs are being pushed to the web (Microsoft's other focus) which requires less computing power. This means consumers and businesses are not forced to upgrade their machines and OS's as often. The extremely profitable OS upgrading cycle is dead to them.

    This is why they might allow Windows 10 to run in Xbox mode. Much like Valve they see no gains to be made developing hardware. It's a loss leader. Selling SDK's isn't what it used to be either. Distribution is where the money is. But making Windows 10 machines run in xbox they increase their user base and extremely lower their expenses. While revenues would sharply decline, profits would increase greatly. And profits is what matters.

    This is yet another reason why Windows 10 is/was "Free" and another reason why "There won't be another Windows after 10." MS under the current CEO is going all in with Distribution, Cloud, and Data/Ads. Everything else (OS, Tools, SDKs, Etc) are just delivery mechanisms for their new profit model.

    1. Re:The Goal, by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Maintaining their distribution software, paying for bandwidth, and a couple of servers to store the data.

      Also building the .NET/WinRT Framework, DirectX and ya know.. Windows.

  25. The Linux community is destroying itself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If Microsoft really wants to destroy Linux, all it has to do at this point is sit back and watch.

    The Linux community is doing a superb job of self-destructing, all on its own. It's causing more harm than Microsoft, SCO, or any other external party could have done.

    Systemd has torn apart the Linux community. It has caused huge problems for many Linux users, as evidenced by the many mailing list posts and bug reports describing serious problems with it. A recent example is how a systemd change broke tools like screen and tmux. Obviously, many Linux users just cannot put up with nonsense like that, especially those running servers and other important systems. Yet moving to another distro isn't an option for them, because all of the major Linux distros now use systemd! The only Linux distros that don't force systemd on the users are niche distros like Slackware and Gentoo, but they typically aren't suitable replacements for a general-purpose distro like Debian.

    Systemd is just the tip of the iceberg. GNOME 3 was a serious regression from GNOME 2, alienating a huge number of users. Unity isn't much better. Firefox has gotten progressively worse, forcing most of its users over to Chrome. X has stagnated, while Wayland has gone nowhere. PulseAudio has been problematic for so many users.

    We've seen a lot of Linux users, many of whom had used Linux for decades, give up on it lately. Those wanting a better workstation environment have moved to OS X. Those wanting a better server environment have moved to FreeBSD. Linux has entered the same dismal feedback loop that Firefox has entered: the software got worse, which drove away the best users, which allowed the software to get even worse, which drove away mediocre users, which allowed the software to get even worse than that, which drove away the remaining users.

    It wasn't outside forces that have started the demise of Linux. It was actors within the community who have been responsible.

    1. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The Linux community is doing a superb job of self-destructing,

      And yet Linux based personal computing devices are outselling every other OS by a factor of 3 or 4 times.

    2. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      If anything it's the vocal anti systemd trolls that are causing this self-destruct that you are talking about.

    3. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Systemd is just the tip of the iceberg. GNOME 3 was a serious regression from GNOME 2, alienating a huge number of users. Unity isn't much better. Firefox has gotten progressively worse, forcing most of its users over to Chrome. X has stagnated, while Wayland has gone nowhere. PulseAudio has been problematic for so many users.

      I'm currently using Fedora 24 Beta. No issues or hacking so far. I'm using Firefox on Gnome 3 on Wayland, listening music over Pulse-audio, systemd under the hood.

      I think you should re-check your preposterous statements.

    4. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Android and ChromeOS are very bad examples to use.

      They're absolutely nothing like traditional Linux distros. Yes, modified versions of the Linux kernel are used, but that's where the similarities end.

      The only times we've seen Linux become truly successful is when pretty much all of the traditional software running above it is thrown away.

      That means X is discarded. That means systemd is discarded. That means most of the GNU utilities are discarded.

      Then all of that is replaced with custom or proprietary software.

      At that point, the Linux kernel isn't much more than a convenient hardware abstraction layer. It's used mainly because it's free and people are familiar with it, rather than any technological advantage it would give over other kernels.

      We can't really attribute Android's success to Linux. Most Android users wouldn't have any clue that the Linux kernel is even present on their devices, it's buried under so many layers of abstraction.

    5. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time I need to look through 12,356 man pages, do 48 Google searches, and mistakenly reach for the wrong Systemd unit files 12 times until I finally find the right dependency out of the 384,282 unit files that exist on any modern system, I think to myself, "I could crap better software than this."

      For example, I dropped Raspbian on a Pi 3B+ the other day. I needed to change the default networking since I was dropping it into my home network to act as a (wired!) DHCP server temporarily. It took me an hour to do the necessary searches & man page reading to find where the config files were for eth0 and wlan0 to turn off the DHCP clients entirely and to configure eth0 with a static address.

      There may be three people in the world that use Linux on their special snowflake laptops that need faster boot times and an init system that can handle cgroups better, but I am surely not one of them. Almost all of the Linux systems I have ever used have been server-class systems that need a handful of predictable start-up scripts that do the same thing every single time - in an easy, maintainable fashion. Systemd is anything but easy or maintainable. (Note that "easy and maintainable" means "hackable on an 80x25 display with vi. Or perhaps "echo >" or "cat - >" because I don't even have an editor.)

    6. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by CronoCloud · · Score: 2

      A recent example is how a systemd change broke tools like screen and tmux.

      It wasn't a systemd change but a change in how Debian configured systemd.

      GNOME 3 was a serious regression from GNOME 2, alienating a huge number of users. Unity isn't much better.

      Sure, some people don't like Gnome 3. I personally don't. But I don't have to use it and I have plenty of other options. Besides on those "servers and important systems" you refer to, they aren't running Gnome.

      Firefox has gotten progressively worse, forcing most of its users over to Chrome.

      PulseAudio has been problematic for so many users.

      Did you just time travel from 2006 or something? I've been running Pulseaudio for years without major issues.

    7. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      > The Linux community is doing a superb job of self-destructing,

      And yet Linux based personal computing devices are outselling every other OS by a factor of 3 or 4 times.

      Oh stop it.

      Android and Chrome are about as similar to desktop Linux as DOS is to Windows NT.

    8. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      So you really had to do all that to come up with:

      nano /etc/network/interfaces
      sudo systemctl daemon-reload

      Looks like the real problem is that the Raspbian guides are not updated with that crucial last step

    9. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet Linux based personal computing devices are outselling every other OS by a factor of 3 or 4 times.

      Yes they are the ones that have removed the "Linux community" parts and instead replaced them with proprietary layers like Google Play Services and created a dependence on data-mining cloud computing from Google that then sells your data to advertisers so they can make money off you. That's the only way Linux has succeeded as a personal computing device because after decades the "community" failed and the corporations stepped in.

      It's funny how everybody is getting all bent out of shape about Microsoft switching gears and going with a free of charge operating system that displays ads while on the other hand parading Linux-based Android, the very system that pioneered this business model, as some great savior of personal computing. So very very hypocritical.

    10. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by exomondo · · Score: 1

      I'm currently using Fedora 24 Beta. No issues or hacking so far. I'm using Firefox on Gnome 3 on Wayland, listening music over Pulse-audio, systemd under the hood.

      I think you should re-check your preposterous statements.

      We're just seeing the exact same criticisms we have seen of Linux in the past getting rehashed. The old "linux is crap because my sound/3d/printer/whatever does work" meanwhile most people are using it just fine.

    11. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android and ChromeOS are very bad examples to use.

      Only because they destroy your argument.

      They're absolutely nothing like traditional Linux distros. Yes, modified versions of the Linux kernel are used, but that's where the similarities end.

      Never used them, huh? Chrome OS and Remix OS look and feel almost just like any other GUI desktop OS.

      We can't really attribute Android's success to Linux.

      So Android and Chrome OS would just magically work without a kernel? It's irrelevant whether people know Linux is under the hood or not, the fact remains that it IS under the hood and is responsible for the very existence of Android and Chrome OS.

    12. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Ah! The Troll is strong with this one.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    13. Re: The Linux community is destroying itself. by Voogru · · Score: 1

      Your honor, I OBJECT!

        And why is that, Mr. Reed?

      Because it's devastating to my case!

      Overruled.

    14. Re: The Linux community is destroying itself. by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      No that is not what is happening, daemon-reload simply instructs systemd that it should look at all the unit files and see if one of them have changed. Since Raspbian have chosen to use the systemd-dhcp client this client have a dependency on /etc/network/interfaces and the daemon-reload simpy makes systemd understand that the dhcp client is no longer needed and thus shuts it down.

      This would have all been described to the parent AC if he had run "systemctl status networking" after he edited /etc/network/interfaces. Instead he assumed that this would all be extremely complex and started to go over the unit files and whatever.

    15. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Really? Is this the same sort of demise that happened to the mainframe back in the day, and later to UNIX? I think you are painting an overly black picture here. To most people - certainly in the commercial sector - whether you use systemd or not is a minor issue, as long as the system boots up and works as intended. And this being Linux, I would have thought it possible to simply change the configuration to not use systemd - if it matters enough to get people worked up in a tiff, then they will probably be competent enough to work out how.

      As for GNOME, Firefox and PulseAudio - are there no alternatives? I personally use KDE, because I got sick of the direction the GNOME developers had settled on. I'm not fussed about X or Wayland or sound; my requirements are modest, as long as I can see stuff on the screen. To me Linux is a tool - just like I don't need the best, biggest and fastest hammer in the world, I don't need my computers to be anything other than good enough for my purposes.

      Linux has entered the same dismal feedback loop that Firefox has entered: the software got worse, which drove away the best users, which allowed the software to get even worse, which drove away mediocre users, which allowed the software to get even worse than that, which drove away the remaining users.

      Not sure what you are talking about here - I don't think Linux is in decline. As for Firefox - what is "the best users"? And what does it have to do with the development of Firefox? That Firefox seems to have become worse over the years probably has more to do with the development team making some stupid decisions or commercial pressure. The users don't enter into it, I suspect.

    16. Re: The Linux community is destroying itself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By "most people", are you referring to the 0.25% of desktop users who use Linux instead of Windows or OS X?

    17. Re: The Linux community is destroying itself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, Fedora 24 is terrific. And anyways any recent Linux GUI is far better than OSX, which is at best like KDE in 2002.

    18. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Really? Which distro are you comparing them to? Keep in mind that there are hundreds of different distros out there, and some of them run on phones too.

    19. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by beastofburdon · · Score: 2

      It is not "free of charge". There is a free "upgrade" if you have one of a few specific versions of Windows, but otherwise you have to pay for it, and it still serves you ads.

    20. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Gnome 3 was let out too soon. It should have remained as a beta until all of Gnome 2 was able to be replicated. Nautilus was cleaned of functionality, and so were many other desktop options.

      Wayland is next. With Wayland, I can't issue sudo gparted /dev/sdc (Wayland can't understand terminal mode).
      Nautilus is a tool for creating carpal tunnel problems with the mouse click fingers.

      One of xfce, mate cinnamon and gnome2 or KDE is all that was needed as a base interface. I would say Gnome3 should still remain in beta for another two years.
         

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    21. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by macs4all · · Score: 0

      Really? Which distro are you comparing them to? Keep in mind that there are hundreds of different distros out there, and some of them run on phones too.

      Which brings me to the other reason that "Linux on the Desktop" is doomed...

    22. Re: The Linux community is destroying itself. by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Sorry yes, that should have been "most people who use Linux".

    23. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Keep dreaming there fanboi.

    24. Re:The Linux community is destroying itself. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Keep dreaming there fanboi.

      Actually, we're both dreaming, if either of us think it will ever be anything other than a Windows world, at least on the corporate desktop...

  26. technical details on the conversion process. by nimbius · · Score: 3, Funny

    windows 10 users: conversion to xbox will be automatic, once you click the red X for X box on the prompt to upgrade
    Linux/BSD/Mac: A drunken and slightly bloated Steve Ballmer clad in black spandex will shimmy up a drainpipe and into your bedroom window, where he will sail moistly past your desktop and furiously begin applying "x-box" stickers to the mini fridge in the corner of the room while furiously grunting "developers" over and over again under his breath.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:technical details on the conversion process. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      A drunken and slightly bloated Steve Ballmer clad in black spandex will shimmy up a drainpipe and into your bedroom window, where he will sail moistly past your desktop and furiously begin applying "x-box" stickers to the mini fridge in the corner of the room while furiously grunting "developers" over and over again under his breath.

      That would be a terrifying thought if I believed for one nanosecond that Steve Ballmer had the athleticism necessary to shimmy up a drainpipe.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:technical details on the conversion process. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "slightly"?

    3. Re:technical details on the conversion process. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This shit played itself out long ago. Go back to sucking some more of that Linus dick.

  27. oh god no by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
  28. We built an omni-UX and that sank into the swamp by the_skywise · · Score: 2

    So we built another on top of that and that caught fire, burned and sank into the swamp.

    So we built one on top of that and forced everyone into compliance... and that UX, that UX son stood!

    Repeating the same mistakes and expecting a different outcome is a sign of insanity!

    I'm not even sure what the business model here is - That they'll save a few million by only having one development team across all platforms?

    A TV interface that you control with a D-pad or joystick is NOT the same as a PC interface with a keyboard/mouse is NOT the same as a tablet interface with a touch screen. No matter how much you try to unify the concepts the interactions/navigations/cues are DIFFERENT at the very least from an input standard and not even counting things like screen resolutions, viewing distances and, becoming more commonplace, display hardware.

    Now there's nothing wrong with having one app store with one purchasing account for all the platforms but the UX for those should be customized to maximize the benefits of each platform. My ATM, smartphone and bank teller are all ways I perform the same functions with my bank - But they're in NO WAY a unified experience!!!

  29. what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Bringing the Xbox One UI over to Windows 10 machines would effectively turn every PC into an Xbox One, especially if they're also capable of running the latest console games." What?

  30. X-Box Open Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This could be the first step of having an open design for X-Box compatible consoles made by 3rd party companies. If Asus or Logitech wanted to make a supped up or bare-bones console, consumers would have options at all price points. This would free up MS to get out of the hardware business and concentrate on software/services. I could see this putting immense pressure on Sony/Nintendo to open themselves up too. Maybe there will be a glorious day when one piece of hardware will run games from all 3 platforms, but in the meantime, I'll continue my regular breathing pattern.

  31. Click the red X by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    You'll be upgraded to Windows 10.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  32. Unfortunately... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    Right in the middle of your COD match, the box will decide to upgrade itself to windows 10...

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  33. Not gonna happen by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    So long as devs are allowed to write to bare Metal.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Not gonna happen by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Indeed, which is why "turn[ing] every PC into an Xbox" almost certainly means disallowing that.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Not gonna happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So long as devs are allowed to write to bare Metal.

      Do you really thing Apple will license that to Microsoft?

  34. Why the hell would I want that? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The average console port is already bad enough, with barely sensible screen resolutions, mediocre graphics that ignore all capabilities of modern graphics cards, a network code that simply assumes you don't give a fuck about security because, hey, I was written for a gaming console where such petty things like antivirus and firewall doesn't exist, not to mention the barely (if at all) changed controls that fit perfectly for console controllers but are simply unusable for a keyboard and mouse setup (bonus points if you leave in the aimbot for FPS games that's necessary so console players can hit anything with their shot controls).

    And now I'd want this all and then some more shit GUARANTEED instead of just, well, likely? Basically what this means is that this would take the last chance away that the game maker at least makes it playable on a PC as an afterthought.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Why the hell would I want that? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      a network code that simply assumes you don't give a fuck about security because, hey, I was written for a gaming console where such petty things like antivirus and firewall doesn't exist

      Or any other Windows service for that matter, no anti-malware, print spool, or any other thing that starts at boot on Windows.

      But I'm not for sure that PS4's and PS3's don't have some kind of basic iptables firewall running (after all they're BSD based).....let me zenmap the PS4.

      Rest mode:

      Scanning 192.168.1.101 [65535 ports]
      Not shown: 65534 closed ports
      PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION
      41800/tcp open http Mongoose httpd
      MAC Address: 70:9E:29:28:8E:32 (Sony)
      Device type: game console
      Running: FreeBSD, Sony embedded
      OS CPE: cpe:/o:freebsd:freebsd cpe:/h:sony:playstation_4
      OS details: Sony Playstation 4

      Here's what I get when it's running:


      Scanning 192.168.1.101 [65535 ports]
      Discovered open port 9295/tcp on 192.168.1.101
      Completed SYN Stealth Scan at 16:18, 336.23s elapsed (65535 total ports)
      Initiating Service scan at 16:18
      Scanning 2 services on 192.168.1.101
      Completed Service scan at 16:18, 6.01s elapsed (2 services on 1 host)
      Initiating OS detection (try #1) against 192.168.1.101
      NSE: Script scanning 192.168.1.101.
      Initiating NSE at 16:18
      Completed NSE at 16:18, 1.45s elapsed
      Initiating NSE at 16:18
      Completed NSE at 16:18, 1.03s elapsed
      Nmap scan report for 192.168.1.101
      Host is up (0.00037s latency).
      Not shown: 65533 closed ports
      PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION
      9295/tcp open unknown
      41800/tcp open http Mongoose httpd
      1 service unrecognized despite returning data. If you know the service/version, please submit the following fingerprint at https://nmap.org/cgi-bin/submi... :
      SF-Port9295-TCP:V=7.12%I=7%D=6/7%Time=57573A17%P=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu%r
      SF:(GenericLines,84,"HTTP/1\.1\x20403\x20Forbidden\r\nConnection:\x20close
      SF:\r\nPragma:\x20no-cache\r\nContent-Length:\x200\r\nRP-Version:\x205\.0\
      SF:r\nRP-Application-Reason:\x2080108bff\r\n\r\n");
      MAC Address: 70:9E:29:28:8E:32 (Sony)
      Device type: game console
      Running: FreeBSD, Sony embedded
      OS CPE: cpe:/o:freebsd:freebsd cpe:/h:sony:playstation_4
      OS details: Sony Playstation 4

      not to mention the barely (if at all) changed controls that fit perfectly for console controllers but are simply unusable for a keyboard and mouse setup

      Then don't use a mouse and keyboard? After all if I want to text chat in an MMO on a console wouldn't I plug in a keyboard?

      bonus points if you leave in the aimbot for FPS games that's necessary so console players can hit anything with their shot controls

      It is not an aimbot, it is an "aim assist". In most cases, you can turn them off or control how much they assist.

      And wouldn't that suggest that mouse aiming is easy mode for casual gamer-come-latelies whose first game was TF2?

  35. Re:We built an omni-UX and that sank into the swam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A TV interface that you control with a D-pad or joystick is NOT the same as a PC interface with a keyboard/mouse...

    You know, I thought you were making that up, but I Googled it and it turns out douchepads do exist. I'm not sure I'd want to interface one with my computer, though.

  36. Re:We built an omni-UX and that sank into the swam by avandesande · · Score: 1

    I think that providing user configurable skins that optimizes for phone, tablet, PC and game console is an excellent idea..... unfortunately Microsoft has control issues and couldn't allow that.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  37. Why didn't they do this in the first place? by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

    Why didn't Microsoft do this long ago with original Xbox? The main limiting factor I can think of is that games of that era were written at such a low level that slight differences in hardware would break them. That's actually still a problem now - even if a user has a video card and CPU more powerful than what is in an Xbox One, even if it's an AMD GPU, PCs don't have integrated memory. There are ways to take advantage of both the CPU and GPU sharing the same address space, and those tricks would fail on PCs (even if Microsoft invents some software trick to hide this difference so that Xbox One games don't just crash)

    Hmm. Only way I can think of is that Microsoft could release an API that is completely shared in common between Windows 10 PCs and Xboxes. Any game written to use this API would work on both. Technically, this is semi-true for lots of software now.

    Another major issues is that part of the entire reason for consoles to exist at all is that it is vastly harder to pirate games. This negates that advantage. Also vastly harder to cheat. If a bunch of PC users can join into CoD matches against console tweens, with their aimbots and optical mice, it would be a slaughter...

  38. No. No. No. No. by Chas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If I wanted a fucking XBox, I'd buy a fucking XBox.

    I use my PC for actual WORK, and I wish those asshats at Microsoft would realize this and stop trying to turn my workstation into a goddamned game console!

    Wasn't Windows 8 enough of a fucking clue that people LOATHED a non-desktop UI on a desktop computer? How many more interface abortions do they need to foist off on us until they get it through their fucking heads?

    Do people want to pay $100-200 for an OS? No? Give THEM a fucking XBox.

    Let me pay for my OS AND LEAVE ME THE FUCK ALONE!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  39. You turn my firebreathing killer gaming PC... by Glasswire · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...into a cheezy three hundred dollar X-Box and you're asking for trouble

    1. Re:You turn my firebreathing killer gaming PC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there is a problem in your cooling system.

  40. Re:We built an omni-UX and that sank into the swam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You do realize you just described the XNA cross-platform compatibility scheme? Same core, UI adapted per device.

  41. Without a Windows account I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can't do jack diddly to my rig without a login ID, and they simply won't get one. If/and when Windows requires a Microsoft account in order to use the OS, I'm out.

  42. They said it would never happen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Xbox emulation on PC coming soon! ROM hacks by Team M1cr0$0fT.

  43. They may as well... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    No harm in Microsoft trying to blur the distinction between Windows 10 and an X Box. Because they're already done just about everything imaginable to get us to move our photography business to Mac.

    I swear Nadella must be a double agent working for Apple or Google.

  44. "DirectX in a console!" We went full circle. by netsavior · · Score: 2

    I swear to you we have gone full circle, wasn't Xbox supposed to be exactly this...

    I present to you, the DirectX Box! All the power of a gaming PC, but in a console. We will call it "Xbox for short"~

  45. Re:No. No. No. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I wanted a fucking XBox, I'd buy a fucking XBox.

    I use my PC for actual WORK, and I wish those asshats at Microsoft would realize this and stop trying to turn my workstation into a goddamned game console!

    Wasn't Windows 8 enough of a fucking clue that people LOATHED a non-desktop UI on a desktop computer? How many more interface abortions do they need to foist off on us until they get it through their fucking heads?

    Do people want to pay $100-200 for an OS? No? Give THEM a fucking XBox.

    Let me pay for my OS AND LEAVE ME THE FUCK ALONE!

    No.

    -Microsoft

  46. So make a commuter act like a computer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that comes branded as a gaming console with silly lockdowns and lots of ads? Though crafty geniuses!

  47. Re:We built an omni-UX and that sank into the swam by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Well that is just for games, but seems to have been the obvious way to handle the various desktops for their operating system.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  48. Re:They're doing an excellent job of turning every by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never trust a corporation. All they care about is getting your money, and you get a product, end of transaction. Where does trust fit into that picture after each party is satisfied?

    Especially when dealing with a convicted monopolist like Microsoft.

  49. Dead in the water. by westlake · · Score: 0

    That just a natural response to steam/linux.

    Hardware sates of Steam Machines have been pathetic. WIn 10 adoption by Steam gamers is about 40%, Linux a bare 1%. The only real surprise in the Steam Hardware and Software surveys is OSX at 3%. Nothing ever moves the numbers for Linux.

    1. Re:Dead in the water. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the actual numbers of Steam users has increased. So if Linux is still staying around 1% - sure its not massive, but it means the Linux users have also increased. Also take into account the HW survey doesn't run on Steam machines, and you practically never see it in Linux.

  50. Finally Ring of Death on PCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for those systems that don't get bricked. Go Linux!

  51. Eat more brains. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is currently working on a secret project internally, codenamed Helix

    Exactly how in the fuck is it a secret project if it's already Internet articles? Implying everybody knows Microsoft's secrets?

    It's fucking spyware. XBox is also spyware. Spyware+Spyware is Zuck a fucking dick Eric Schmidt too.

    1. Re:Eat more brains. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://news.slashdot.org/story/16/03/06/1834211/eric-schmidt-gets-a-job-at-the-pentagon

  52. Re:We built an omni-UX and that sank into the swam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    inb4 a week later somebody releases a Windows Classic skin that almost instantaneously becomes the most popular, heh.

  53. They will eliminate the advantages of a PC by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    Games that support this will lack any unofficial or unsanctioned mods, no community fixes possible, something that PC gamers consider to be crucial advantages for the platform

  54. We don't do queries 'round here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I wonder how this guy's experience is different from mine? I know! I'll declare it to be untrue!! That's way easier than learning how to properly use a question mark!!!"

  55. there were eight before that by dltaylor · · Score: 1

    There are people living now who didn't have 9, and, for a while Ceres was called a planet. You can either have 8, barring the specific discovery of IX, or dozens, when you throw in the rest of the TNOs and the KBOs.

  56. You don't put a steering wheel on a hammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So first they tried putting a phone interface on a PC, and that failed miserably, as anyone with half an IQ point or higher could have seen coming before they coded a single line.

    Now they think putting a game console interface will work any better?

    Idiots.

  57. Re:No. No. No. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I use my PC for actual WORK, "

    You can tank gabe newell of valve, and MMO developers (everquest, ultima) and phone companies for teaching companies like Microsoft to lock down shit like a toaster. They want to turn computers into dumb terminals with massive encryption sandboxing and drm.

    MMO's (aka drm'd rpg's) were the first step that taught the business world the money is in control of the product by reclassifying it as a "service" by which they can defraud the public at large.

  58. I hope they ask first! by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

    The forced Windows 10 upgrades have been disastrous for our POS practice...

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
  59. Impending Convergence Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the most recent balls up of their flagship product Microsoft tried to converge a tablet oriented operating system experience with a desktop one and failed miserably, prompting a backlash of epic proportions. The crap introduced in this failed attempt has not even been completely worked out yet.

    Since Windows is moderately better for the time being - than 8 anyway - and they seem to like fucking things up in cycles I guess this is going to take windows ux to the next level of misery.

  60. Monkey See, Monkey Fucks Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MD is looking at Steam's business model (but not approach) and decided the best way to compete with PCs that remove bloatware at the OS level is to design PCs that add an additional layer of bloat between its OS and the game.

    Steam: PC Metal -> SteamOS -> game
    Windows: PC Metal -> Win10 -> Xbox software -> game

    This way MS can stuff their OS and Xbox software full of spyware and advertisements, then use their proprietary tech (DX12) and industry relationships to try and counterbalance that bloat.

    Or if anyone isn't following me:

    Steambox + bloated OS + bloated UI + anticompetitive deals with hardware & software partners + strong-armed exclusivity agreements = Xbox One II: Electric Boogaloo

    Fuck you, Micro$haft.

  61. Re:No. No. No. No. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    What made you believe that you can't still keep using your PC for "actual WORK", whatever that is?

  62. About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So let me begin by saying I built my career on MS platform software development but have completely jumped to Linux as a result of the Win8/10 debacles and I now work for a company MS probably considers a mortal enemy (while at the same time being a top tier Partner).

    This is everything Windows Games for PC wanted to be. Why not just make a PC into an xbox instead of trying to force multiple ports which screwed us all going all the way back to Halo 1 (WHY?! That port of Halo was so bad and still makes me sad for what it could have been). One version, one purchase for all platforms, with compatibility for multiplayer and all achievements.

    Now the key is being able to turn it OFF. Which means no default install of Xbox integration in Windows Enterprise. It means my gaming and my work data are separate. Unfortunately I don't trust them any more so I am not willing to give them that chance. But I do have Steam on my Linux install, and I have spend money on Linux games in the past year... which I can't say for PC based platforms since I no longer run Windows and will never buy another console.

  63. Back to the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "The desktop is dead" except we're going right back to what the desktop was 30 years ago, mostly low-end Commodore and Atari PC's hooked to a TV used 90% of the time for entertainment and some higher end IBM PC's for business. The desktop can't be dead if customers are demanding attached keyboards for tablets and consoles that can do everything. High-end keyboard-less mobile devices are what's dying right now. Mobile is moving to sub-$300 devices, mostly sub-$100 devices.

  64. Re:No. No. No. No. by Chas · · Score: 1

    What made you believe that you can't still keep using your PC for "actual WORK", whatever that is?

    Never said it couldn't. But wading through a stupid "Hey! Duuuude! I'm like an XBoooooooooooox!" interface cuts into my productivity.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  65. MS Office on xbox by Smiddi · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be better to go the other way? - have an XBOX that accepts a mouse and keyboard, can check email and run MS Office suite? That would be a total winner.

  66. Re:No. No. No. No. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    If anything, it has been the other way around - Xbox interface keeps getting changed to whatever was then-up-to-date on Windows PCs.

  67. With all due respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go fork yourself.

    Oh, you're not willing to develop any of this software? Then I guess you get what other people want to develop.

    Systemd does all the right things for all the right reasons. Linux has three decades of technical debt to catch up on. If you're determined to stay stuck in the past, feel free to use whatever other software fits your needs.

  68. PC GAMING IS DEAD!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, wait... ;-)

  69. Bye buy, Valve. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will kill both Steam, SteamOS, Linux gaming and ultimately, Valve.

  70. "more closely combine Xbox and Windows 10" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this translate into "put Windows 10 spyware onto Xbox"?

  71. Re:No. No. No. No. by Chas · · Score: 1

    The term you're looking for is "cross-contamination".

    And neither platform really benefits from it.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  72. Embrace, Extend, Extinguish. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Normally Microsoft does this to specific software packages, not to an entire industry.

  73. Secret? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty fucking secret eh?

  74. Controllers by Apostalypse · · Score: 1

    On the face of it, it seems like a good idea for PC gamers to get some more AAA titles, but it means developers will have little incentive to develop PC specific versions. 9/10 We'll be forced to use joypads for all games too, there's no way they'll let WASD twitchers compete with sofa fiddlers. Console FPS games have built in aiming hacks to cope with the inadequacies of the joypad for FPS play. I'm a mediocre gamer, and I played against some friends using some hacky hardware to play on the Xbox with kb and mouse, and it was a massacre. There's no way they'll let that happen, and there's only one way they'll level the playing field.

  75. Doesn't count without the games. by sabbede · · Score: 1

    Streaming and porting the UI is all well and good, but unless the games are binary-compatible it's not "turning every PC into an XBOX".

  76. U can get up there uIam just waiting for your kind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a huge amount is

  77. so...and give it a death like with WMC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For those of you that do not know, Windows Media Center is a very fine app, that used to run on Windows 7 - Great TV recording capabilities. In Win8 this was obtainable as a 'separate product' to be installed - but it still worked....well, sort - off.
    Come Windows 10 and guess what...it not working anymore. Na-da. not even available.

    All I'm saying is watch out.....XBox "may' follow the same path....
    My useless, diminishing 2c

  78. Re:No. No. No. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a deep breath. Everything is going to be okay.