Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Tests New Tool To Remove OEM Crapware (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Windows 10 already includes ways to clear out applications and data to repair misbehaving systems or prepare them to be sold, courtesy of the Refresh and Reset features added in Windows 8. Microsoft is now adding a third option: a new refresh tool. Currently available only for Windows Insiders, the new tool fetches a copy of Windows online and performs a clean installation. The only option is whether or not you want to preserve your personal data. Any other software that's installed will be blown away, including the various applications and utilities that OEMs continue to bundle with their systems. Ars Technica points out that the tool isn't perfect. For example, "it installs a preview build from the fast track, but Microsoft notes that the new tool can sometimes install a version older than the one currently installed. When this kind of version mismatch occurs, the option to preserve your files is removed."

65 of 117 comments (clear)

  1. If it installs windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... it's not doing its job very well, now is it?

    1. Re: If it installs windows... by Z80a · · Score: 1, Troll

      You know how many linux machines you used just to post this?

    2. Re: If it installs windows... by slasher999 · · Score: 2

      Wow, a bit angry aren't we? I'd refine your argument as most people don't want Linux on their primary computer. True. Most people know what Windows is and how it works. Linux is great at most things but the fragmentation and level of customization creates complexity that is a turn off to an awful lot of computer owners.

    3. Re: If it installs windows... by nucrash · · Score: 2

      He wasn't using Linux, he was using his Android phone. :P

      --
      Place something witty here
    4. Re: If it installs windows... by Z80a · · Score: 1

      How about the routers, servers, controllers? ..

    5. Re: If it installs windows... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Still zero.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    6. Re: If it installs windows... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I didn't say otherwise.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re: If it installs windows... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      The OP did not say Linux does not 'power the web'.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    8. Re: If it installs windows... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Just for fun I have a hypothetical question for you: Where do your configure your desktop to say "don't use Linux at any step..."? Networking control panel maybe? Or would it be a browser configuration?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    9. Re: If it installs windows... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      So he's not choosing to utilize Linux, correct?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    10. Re: If it installs windows... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Heh. Actually you quoted the specific bit that proves my point. Oopsie.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    11. Re:If it installs windows... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Of course Microsoft would want to remove competing crapware, they hate competition.

    12. Re: If it installs windows... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Think about what 'false ignorance' actually means. ;) You were far better off pretending you were defending the post below it. Now you're stuck in front of a pedant with your foot in your mouth.

      Oh and dont worry about your other post, we're covered here, too. No need to reply to both.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    13. Re: If it installs windows... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I don't run Slashdot.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  2. Welcome to the future... by merky1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, basically giving users the original OS disk? Like they did in the early days? I guess this is a good sign, moving away from the current model of "media free" on the HDD images, with no recourse to removing all of the crapware.

    --
    --WooooHoooo--
    1. Re:Welcome to the future... by Col.+Bloodnok · · Score: 1

      For added nostalgia value, it also takes over an hour to install.

      About the same as installing Solaris 2.5.1 from a single speed CD-ROM drive on my SPARCstationLX in 1996.

    2. Re: Welcome to the future... by Threni · · Score: 1

      You presumably intentionally just provided a comparison which shows windows in a good light.

    3. Re:Welcome to the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Excuse my ignorance but something definitely looks wrong with the summary. It makes it sound like Windows doesn't have a signed package manager/repo structure? From the summary (!):

      "but Microsoft notes that the new tool can sometimes install a version older than the one currently installed."

      How is this possible if all the packages are versioned and keyed? For all this "crapware" stuff they're talking about isn't it simply executing the Microsoft equivalent to apt-get purge?

    4. Re: Welcome to the future... by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      Ewww.. this is gwtting close to the days of "batch processing", where you would write/debug your program on paper, then go to the keypunch machine to translate it to machine code on punch cards or paper tape (or have some one do it for you), then you would submit the punch cards/tape to the operator who would run your prog through the machine (along with other people's), then you would come back hours or the next day to retrieve the print out of what your prog outputted (meanwhile hoping the.operator did not lose your prog/tamper with it or the comp. didn't break down before your prog had a chance to run). Yes, the bad old days. :|

    5. Re:Welcome to the future... by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      This is why I buy any new desktop of mine through a small boutique computer shop that specializes in custom computer builds. They're rather pricey, but essentially you get a computer that looks exactly like as though you'd put together a custom machine yourself. Actually, probably even better, to be honest, since these guys really know what they're doing, and they'll recommend the components that they've deemed to be the most reliable. And yes, you get the original OEM install disk, as well as a disc with all the drivers they used in the box filled with all the "extra" parts, manuals, etc. Additionally, they'll install Linux on it, leaving off Windows, if you prefer that, so you don't have to pay the Windows tax if you don't want to.

      Unfortunately, they can't really provide cutting edge laptops (that is, if you want small and/or light) beyond sort of a largish "desktop replacement" sized laptop. At the moment, I don't really need a laptop, but I'd dread having to dig through it and remove all the shit on it that clogs it up, or figure out how to reinstall from scratch if possible. Moreover, we keep finding more and more security holes in their custom updaters, not to mention any installed crapware, or even spyware in the worst cases, etc.

      My last laptop was quite a few years ago, from Dell. The damned thing was so slow and unstable I literally had to wipe the OS and start from scratch, after which it ran perfectly. I have a hard time feeling sorry for the major OEMs with the downturn of the PC industry when they've been shoveling this shit down our throats for years.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    6. Re:Welcome to the future... by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      It is actually a little better than that. HAving the original disk always meant having to do a shit ton of patches. At least this way you get a relatively upto date build. Certainly would be something I would happily try on family member computers when they purchase crap ladden imaged computers. Still prefer my own custom builds for myself though.

    7. Re:Welcome to the future... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      So, basically giving users the original OS disk? Like they did in the early days? I guess this is a good sign, moving away from the current model of "media free" on the HDD images, with no recourse to removing all of the crapware.

      No, it's still media-free. Basically it downloads and installs a new copy of Windows in-place, so you don't have a chance to make a USB stick or anything first. It just downloads Windows and unpacks it.

  3. Somebody has to ask by fustakrakich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What about drivers?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Somebody has to ask by khchung · · Score: 2

      Thought you were going to say "Windows 10".

      --
      Oliver.
    2. Re:Somebody has to ask by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      Run Double Driver before the MS tool. This would be a nice combo (to get back to 1987, as others have mentioned).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  4. Re:PC Decrapifier by trparky · · Score: 2

    It appears that this tool downloads Windows 10 installation media from Microsoft, reboots your system, wipes the whole of the OS, and reinstalls the entire OS from said downloaded installation media and after all is said and done, you have a completely clean system that has absolutely none of the OEM bloatware. It would be like you built your own system and installed a clean Windows installation. Sure, I don't discount the use of PC Decrapifier but even with that it can leave things behind since program uninstall tools can and do often leave pieces behind.

    What is interesting is that when I bought a Lenovo notebook and did a clean install of Windows 10 the installation of the OS didn't at all ask for a CD key and when I got back into Windows after the installation it said that it was activated via an OEM license. Far better than how it was done in the past.

  5. Only Microsoft bloat remains by ITRambo · · Score: 1

    The "Anniversary update" will expand the tile "suggestions" from five to ten. Microsoft doesn't want the OEM's to compete with their own bloatware and "suggestions". So, you can make their life better. Just be prepared to constantly remove their freemium apps that you uninstalled, but that they keep reinstalling. Windows 10 is horrible in this respect.

  6. Bios embedded bloatware? by Dwedit · · Score: 2

    I have heard that Lenovo has embedded bloatware into the BIOS of systems, and it uses official protocols so that Windows 8+ will automatically install that software. Will this step do anything against such software?

    1. Re:Bios embedded bloatware? by freeze128 · · Score: 2

      No.

      If you reinstall a fresh copy of windows, the extension in the bios will just look for it and reinsert it on the next boot.

      If you really want to get rid of the Lenovo embedded BIOS bloatware, then just go to the Lenovo site and update your BIOS. Their method of installing the bloatware via bios breaks the Microsoft OEM agreement, and Microsoft called them on it.

    2. Re:Bios embedded bloatware? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1
      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    3. Re:Bios embedded bloatware? by ruir · · Score: 1

      If you do not want that crap do not buy Lenovo...

  7. OEM key hotstamped in "BIOS" by laurencetux · · Score: 1

    in an effort to prevent OEM keys from getting loose MS and OEMs figured out how to embed the key into the "bios" so yes currently a Generic Copy of WinX can be used to install and OEM copy of WinX (some OEM files will be grabbed when it can get online)

    1. Re:OEM key hotstamped in "BIOS" by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      The doesn't work in non UEFI systems. Win 10 uses a unique hardware signature that is opaque and matched to SIG's in the activation servers. Add ram, swap a drive, reinstall all good, swap a mobo or other major changes and no more activation love from MS.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
  8. Re:PC Decrapifier by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

    I'm trying to figure out how this differs from the Media Creation Tool.

    Your experience with the Lenovo has been standard for large manufacturers for many years. Been that way at least as far back as XP. The BIOS contains the validation/authentication info.

  9. The best kind of kill, overkill! by pla · · Score: 2

    Reinstalling Windows doesn't really count as a "tool" for removing crap/ad/malware - More like burning the house down to get rid of mice.

    Perhaps more importantly, Windows comes with quite a bit of stock crapware; I have to suspect that Microsoft would reinstall all of that, meaning that after using this "tool", you'd need to spend a couple hours disabling all the various telemetry hooks (not to mention the time it takes to install all your non-MS apps again).

    Instead, people would do far better to just run something like Deep Freeze, where every time you boot you revert to a known good state of your own choosing.

    1. Re:The best kind of kill, overkill! by Whibla · · Score: 1

      As a slightly off-topic query / warning in relation to your suggestion:

      While of no importance to businesses, anyone who plays multiplayer online games might have problems when using Deep Freeze. If your machine is actively frozen when you start a game protected by PunkBuster you will be kicked off the game after about 3 seconds for 'cheating' ... or, at least, this used to be the case.

      Does anyone know if this is still true, and / or if it applies to other anti-cheat mechanisms?

  10. Eliminating the competition by swb · · Score: 1

    Of course to users this sounds superficially like a great idea. Dump the dozen bits of crap installed on a new PC and put it back to a clean OS install.

    In reality, MS wants to eliminate the data harvesting competition. OEMs add crapware because they get paid to add it. Crapware installers pay for this because they want you to buy their crapware, but even if you don't it's worth the cost to gather data on you and your computer, sometimes for years when naive users don't ever uninstall it.

    Microsoft's move is into the data harvesting business -- win 10 telemetry, azure, office365, and now linked in. Third party crapware doesn't just degrade the product (its always done that, and they never cared) but now it produces independent data sets that compete with Microsoft's data sets.

    The "solution" they propose is kind of like a symbiotic parasite, guarantee our exclusive data harvesting and will make your PC have fewer problems.

    1. Re:Eliminating the competition by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So one parasite killing off the other parasites? Sounds good. It's easier to remove the remaining bug than to deal with a dozen.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  11. Class Action Lawsuit Coming? by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

    OEM's spend money to put the crapware on the machine. Client buys said brand because of recognition and this tool removes that. That will probably piss someone off. The reason you got that subsidized PC for cheap was BECAUSE of the OEM crapware Lawyer time.

    1. Re:Class Action Lawsuit Coming? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Stop subsidizing my PC, charge me what it costs and leave that bloat out.

      Thanks.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Class Action Lawsuit Coming? by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      When you buy a machine nowwhere does it say this is a subsidised machine that runs about 50% slower because we installed a fuck ton of shit you don't need or want on it that will annoy, nag and interfere with your operation of this machine. I would love to see some consumers suing the OEM's for the degradation of the performance of their machines. The crapware (which in many cases borders on malware) is an atrocious hit to most users, especially those that don't understand how to remove it and think it is normal for a machine to be that bad.

  12. Really? How does this work? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    There's a ton of preinstalled crapware in Windows 10 that I'd like to get rid of.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Really? How does this work? by Col.+Bloodnok · · Score: 3, Informative

      Let's see if this makes it past the lameness filter:

      I run this remove_crapps.ps1 script after every new Windows Insider build, to remove the stuff I don't want (including OneDrive).

      Get-AppxPackage *XboxApp* | Remove-AppxPackage
      Get-AppxPackage *Zune* | Remove-AppxPackage
      Get-AppxPackage *Sport* | Remove-AppxPackage
      Get-AppxPackage *BingNews* | Remove-AppxPackage
      Get-AppxPackage *Phone* | Remove-AppxPackage
      Get-AppxPackage *Skype* | Remove-AppxPackage
      Get-AppxPackage *Office* | Remove-AppxPackage
      Get-AppxPackage *Photos* | Remove-AppxPackage
      Get-AppxPackage *BingFinance* | Remove-AppxPackage
      Get-AppxPackage *People* | Remove-AppxPackage
      Get-AppxPackage *Messaging* | Remove-AppxPackage
      Get-AppxPackage *WindowsAlarms* | Remove-AppxPackage
      Get-AppxPackage *WindowsSoundRecorder* | Remove-AppxPackage
      Get-AppxPackage *Solitaire* | Remove-AppxPackage
      Get-AppxPackage *Getstarted* | Remove-AppxPackage
      Get-AppxPackage *3D* | Remove-AppxPackage
      Get-AppxPackage *Connectivity* | Remove-AppxPackage
       
      c:/windows/syswow64/onedrivesetup.exe /uninstall

    2. Re: Really? How does this work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      God even their commands are ass ugly. Wtf is all that for, so verbose.

      What's so hard about app-rm appname or some shit.

    3. Re: Really? How does this work? by nazrhyn · · Score: 1

      Additionally, most Powershell commands have a long form and a set of preconfigured aliases (along with the option to define your own). For example, Get-ChildItem comes with gci, ls and dir out of the box.

      When writing Powershell scripts, I usually use the long form for future maintainability and ease of understanding; but, when writing a quick script at the command prompt, I'll almost always use the short form.

  13. Dear Microsoft.... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Want to solve the problem? Yank the "windows certification" of every single PC seller and maker that adds crap to the install and make them pay full retail proce for every copy of windows they sell on their machines.

    Suddenly the problem of added garbage goes away overnight. And I mean it, it will stop by 8am the next business day you announce that.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Dear Microsoft.... by Will_Malverson · · Score: 4, Informative

      They tried that. Up until around 1999, Microsoft wouldn't allow a new PC to be shipped with anything but stock Windows (and before that, DOS). Pre-installed software was forbidden by the licensing agreement.

      An antitrust lawsuit in the late 90s claimed that this practice was anticompetitive because OEMs couldn't put alternative web browsers on PCs. So Microsoft was forced by the courts to allow OEMs to install whatever they wanted on prebuilt PCs.

  14. Good, but.. by MpVpRb · · Score: 1, Troll

    They should also let users easily remove all of the Microsoft crapware

  15. Candy Crush? XBox? by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is doing this because they want more visibility for their crapware. I have to occasionally use MS Windows at work. My fresh from MS install has all kinds of very non office crap. Candy crush, groove, xbox, etc. Then they do a relentless push for things like edge. I opened edge and typed chrome, what comes up, not a download for chrome but some crap about edge.

    Over the years I have worked with fairly cutting edge companies. It boils down to a simple fact: if the company is using windows, they aren't cutting edge and they tend to shuffle along until someone eats their lunch. If they are cutting edge about the only people using windows are the accountants.

  16. Microsoft clearly understands users don't want it by QuietLagoon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So why does Microsoft allow crapware to be installed in the first place?

  17. New Computer by blackfeltfedora · · Score: 1

    This sounds like something that would be very useful immediately after you get your new computer plugged in.

  18. Re:Microsoft clearly understands users don't want by bazorg · · Score: 1

    How would MS deal with this if the OEM has physical access to the hardware and does need to provide drivers and supporting software for many combinations of components?

    All they can do is make life complicated to all their sales channels and have more machines sold without a "MS approved" sticker. Not a winning proposition. It is best to sell Surfaces without crapware, and Xboxes with Windows 10 compatibility. Essentially, to be more like Apple and Google and sell vertically integrated product/services.

  19. Re:Microsoft clearly understands users don't want by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    How would MS deal with this

    Simple, Microsoft sez: If you license Windows, no crapware. If you do install crapware, you are breaking the legal agreement and you lose your right to license Windows.

  20. Re: Microsoft clearly understands users don't want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apparently anti trust lawsuits from the OEMs.

  21. Re: Microsoft clearly understands users don't want by bazorg · · Score: 1

    I think than MS likes to sell loads of licenses and the make a software fix rather than having the extra costs from policing every OEM under the sun. :)

  22. Re:PC Decrapifier by trparky · · Score: 1

    I guess that the reset tool is supposed to be more for the average user as versus someone who's more technically inclined. The reset tool sort of does it all in one shot without the user knowing how to do it.

  23. Re:Linux needs this tool more than Windows does. by yithar7153 · · Score: 1

    If you want to use Linux but don't want to use systemd, you're forced to use a niche distro like Devuan, Gentoo or Slackware. Or you're forced to try to hack it out of your installation, which is error prone and can impact future updates. Of course, neither of these is an option for somebody who wants a usable, reliable Linux installation without systemd.

    Just FYI Ubuntu 14.04 is a LTS release and uses upstart, and still has support for ~2 years, so somebody can use that.

    That being said, I don't see anything wrong with Gentoo or Slackware, other than time required to compile things? It's not difficult, just time-consuming. Gentoo by nature is designed to give you as much choice as possible. I fail to see how they're unreliable. You know, ChromeOS is based on Gentoo, just saying. Also, personally, I use Void Linux and I'd say it's pretty rock solid. See chair analogy for Linux distros.

    The thing about Linux is there are a lot of distributions out there. Just because the most popular distributions do things you don't like, doesn't mean you have to stick with them.

  24. Re:Microsoft clearly understands users don't want by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Because Microsoft is a software company.

    Let's face it, if the story here were that Microsoft is forbidding the installation of any software by vendor even if value added or wanted by the end user, even in cases of specific requirements (think education software, think automated delivery of the OS and apps) then we'd all be asking for their heads for abuse of their monopoly.

    The cure is worse than the disease. Also where do you draw the line? No pre-shipment of software? What about drivers? What about software to interface with the drivers?

  25. Re: Microsoft clearly understands users don't want by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    I think than MS likes to sell loads of licenses and the make a software fix rather than having the extra costs from policing every OEM under the sun.

    Microsoft should care about the Windows brand not being associated with crapware. Although with the recent events showing that Microsoft is making Windows 10 look like malware, I would have a difficult time convincing anyone that Microsoft does indeed care about the Windows brand.

    .
    Never mind. :)

  26. Well by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    They used to say that the best gamekeepers were former poachers.

    Of course with Nutella's tribe of buggerbastards there's no "former" about it. They're no doubt trying to play both ends against the middle.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  27. Re:Microsoft clearly understands users don't want by antdude · · Score: 1

    $$$?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  28. Can it be used ... by allo · · Score: 1

    To remove Windows 10?

    1. Re:Can it be used ... by vandamme · · Score: 1

      No, but there's 300 distros of Linux that can do that.

  29. Re:Most recovery re-installs work the same by allo · · Score: 1

    For Lenovo i created a boot medium via windows, then reinstalled ... and it reinstalled the crap as well.

  30. If it really removed crapware... by Nunya666 · · Score: 1

    ...it would need to upgrade Windows 10 to Windows 7.