Slashdot Mirror


Religious Hacker Defaces 111 Escort Sites (softpedia.com)

An anonymous reader shares this article from Softpedia: A religiously-motivated Moroccan hacker has defaced 111 different web sites promoting escort services since last summer as part of an ongoing protest against the industry. "In January, the hacker defaced 79 escort websites," writes Softpedia. "His actions didn't go unnoticed, and on some online forums where escorts and webmasters of these websites met, his name was brought up in discussions and used to drive each other in implementing better Web security. While some webmasters did their job, some didn't. During the past days, the hacker has been busy defacing a new set of escort websites... Most of these websites bare ElSurveillance's defacement message even today... Most of the websites are from the UK."
His newest round of attacks replace the sites with a pro-Palestine message and a quote from the quran, though in January Softpedia reported the attacker was also stealing data from some of the sites about their users' accounts.

161 comments

  1. Huh. by Type44Q · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fucking loser; probably jerks off to illegal Saudi ankle porn...

    1. Re:Huh. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Informative

      Saudi ankle porn? Well, local preferences vary. I've read somewhere that Palestinians are downloading Israeli porn like crazy, and you might be surprised (or not?) by which countries generate most searches for "animal sex porn" on Google Trends.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Huh. by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

      [quote] "Most of the websites are from the UK."[/quote]

      I suspect he will soon be getting a visit from the local career minded criminals and be show that pigs generally will eat anything if they are hungry.

    3. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weak security is widespread on Escort web sites, eh? I think their customers should be raising hell for this.

      Lack of security is such a widespread problem...and yet businesses keep failing to learn from these stories....

    4. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just another kind of Anonymous, isn't it?

    5. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Just another kind of Anonymous, isn't it? ...

      Moslem -nymous?

    6. Re:Huh. by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Use html instead of bb code, < >

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    7. Re:Huh. by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Well, Capitalism at work. No pain for the web site owner, no need to do any work.
      What, the customer is going to complain?
      Given what the web site owner knows about his preferences,fetishes and perversions?
      No, he's going to file with his bank, deny charges and hide.
      No harm to the site operator, no repair of the site.

    8. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People don't make jokes about fucking camels and goats for literally centuries unless there's something to it. So yeah, it isn't ankles that he's jacking off to.

      Maybe hooves

    9. Re:Huh. by Evtim · · Score: 3, Funny

      More like Onan -nymous in this case

    10. Re: Huh. by Type44Q · · Score: 3, Funny

      you might be surprised (or not?) by which countries generate most searches for "animal sex porn" on Google Trends.

      Ha! That reminds me... I seem to recall bestiality being legal in two U.S. States: New Mexico and Oregon... though I believe in Oregon you have to prove it didn't cause distress to the animal... the cross-species equivalent to consensual sex, I suppose you could call it.

    11. Re: Huh. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      In Sovi^H^H^H^H the UK, pigs eat Muslims?

    12. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe humps.

    13. Re: Huh. by war4peace · · Score: 1

      It was a reference to "Snatch".

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    14. Re:Huh. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Very good. It'll go right over their heads here, though.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    15. Re:Huh. by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      ... and you might be surprised (or not?) by which countries generate most searches for "animal sex porn" on Google Trends.
      --
      Ezekiel 23:20

      Was that a Bible quote?

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    16. Re: Huh. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Ha! That reminds me... I seem to recall bestiality being legal in two U.S. States: New Mexico and Oregon"

      Don't these guys understand that neigh means neigh?

    17. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be the Bible-splainer.

      Onan was a son of Judah (son of Jacob, son of Isaac, son of Abraham) who was to provide his older brother's widow, Tamar, with a child that would be considered his brother's. Because he was an idiot, he "wasted his semen on the ground". Traditionally, this is taken to mean he milked his nuts dry beforehand, then had sex with his brother's widow anyway, knowing she wouldn't get pregnant. A more modern interpretation, and a simpler one, is that he simply pulled out during the act.

      "Onanism" is an old-fashioned term for masturbation. It's incorrectly viewed as a "sin" by many people based on this story alone. The real sin that Onan committed was greed. He greedily refused to provide an heir for his brother, and he greedily still screwed his brother's widow, even though he knew it would be futile. It's also of note that his execution was at God's hand, not any man's, since this was a couple of centuries before the Mosaic law was instituted.

      This led to Judah preventing the next son in line, Shelah, from carrying out that duty because he was too young. In reality, Judah was afraid that Shelah would end up dead too. So Tamar conspired to get knocked-up anyway, and ended up tricking Judah himself into being the sperm donor. She posed as a prostitute and rolled Judah for his ID when the deed was done. A few months later, as the family was condemning her for sleeping around and getting pregnant, she showed them Judah's ID from that incident and as a result, Judah told them that "she is more righteous than I am", clearing her of wrongdoing. She bore twins, named Perez and Zerah. These sons were biologically Judah's, but were considered to be Judah's grandsons. And another re-entrant branch appeared on the human family tree.

    18. Re: Huh. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Nice!

    19. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, use Google and look it up. It ain't hard and would have taken less time than your reply.

    20. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reportedly such righteous muslims as the 9/11 hijackers and bin Ladin himself kept themselves well-supplied with porn. Also, alcohol, in the case of the hijackers, at least.

    21. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides greed, one might note this was also broadly the equivalent of a woman going to a fertility clinic for the express purpose of having a child, and getting raped instead.

      "Pulling out" changed the moral tenor of the act entirely. Besides disobeying a direct command from God.

      So, yes, "stretching" this event to cover masturbation per se, particularly without further scriptural support, seems quite unwarranted.

    22. Re:Huh. by deesbek · · Score: 0

      I prefer illegal Saudi ankle porn to legal German shit porn. Oh wait, I am married.

    23. Re: Huh. by deesbek · · Score: 0

      That is hilarious !!! Trust Oregon and New Mexico to actually bother with such laws. Maybe Colorado is next. I can just see some pervert chasing down bears.

    24. Re: Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever the real sin is greed, right wing religious whackos and their corporate buddies will do anything to make you think the real sin is something else.

      Because, you know, despite numerous directly worded passages to the contrary, they just can't seem to find greed a bad thing despite 'finding' all kinds of made up sins that aren't actually in the Bible.

    25. Re:Huh. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      > re-entrant branch
      No it's a directed acyclic graph.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    26. Re:Huh. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Because he was an idiot, he "wasted his semen on the ground". Traditionally, this is taken to mean he milked his nuts dry beforehand, then had sex with his brother's widow anyway, knowing she wouldn't get pregnant.

      I don't think that's what "idiot" means. Sounds like the guy had the right idea.

      It's also of note that his execution was at God's hand

      God is the original player hater.

      She posed as a prostitute and rolled Judah for his ID when the deed was done.

      Hold on, what did God do to Judah for visiting a prostitute? He killed the one dude for wanking, but what about visiting escorts? Is that not really so bad? Someone should tell the hacker that he's not doing God's work.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    27. Re: Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shizer!!!!!!

  2. Look on the bright side by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    At least he didn't shoot anyone.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Look on the bright side by turkeydance · · Score: 0

      yet

    2. Re:Look on the bright side by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      At least he didn't shoot anyone.

      It's a pretty long shot from Morocco to the UK.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re: Look on the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If he was in germany he could just walk out into the street to rape some local girl instead if waging religious war across the ocean

    4. Re:Look on the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good job dipshit. You forgot to click "Post Anonymously" on the first of the 5 times you decided to post this.

  3. Great, watch out for the next Pulse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another hysterical repressed religious nutcase. Probably has an eggplant up his ass when he reads his holy twaddle.

  4. defacement has a thousand fathers by epine · · Score: 3, Funny

    Most of these websites bare ElSurveillance's defacement message even today

    Why do I almost hope that the hacker in question has already managed to hack this Slashdot story, replacing "bear" with "bare" just for shits and giggles?

  5. Wrong target? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Maybe ElSurveillance needs to stop worrying about escort websites and instead needs to focus on girls being kidnapped, raped, and sold into effective sexual slavery by ISIS/ISIL operatives. Or does that fit his agenda?

    1. Re:Wrong target? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Infidels are not human, by definition. So there is no agenda - there is no "crime".

    2. Re:Wrong target? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe ElSurveillance needs to stop worrying about escort websites and instead needs to focus on girls being kidnapped, raped, and sold into effective sexual slavery by ISIS/ISIL operatives. Or does that fit his agenda?

      As of Hillary has no role in these abductions, kidnappings, and white slavery auctions for the Saudi princes et. al.

  6. Poor guy. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Probably couldn't get any refunds and got tired of his negative Yelp reviews being ignored.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  7. Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until the last paragraph I couldn't tell if this was a Muslim or Christian Evangelical...

    1. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It really doesn't matter. Too much religion of any flavor is a bad thing. I leave it to you to define "too much". My definition is "any".

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re: Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already have it, and have already destroyed the whole USA.

    3. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Christians aren't actively searching for an atomic weapon or dirty bomb to devastate a Western city, so Screw Off with your false equivalencies.

      I resemble that remark!

      Ah! So very sorry! You said Western city....

    4. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Behind every deity is a dollar, sanctity a shilling. For every founder there is finance. For every Jew there is MasterCard, and a ticket to Miami... OY!

      Everybody, please, stop with the religion crap. People are paid to do this. ISIS fighters, bombers, hackers, you name it, they get paid real American dollars for their service. And if Al Qaeda offers them more, they jump over, just like any other IT worker. They'll pray to any god you tell them, but it is in the American God they *trust*!

    5. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by cold+fjord · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Then they sent some of the Pharisees and Herodians to Him in order to trap Him in a statement. They came and said to Him, “Teacher, we know that You are truthful and defer to no one; for You are not partial to any, but teach the way of God in truth. Is it lawful to pay a poll-tax to Caesar, or not? “Shall we pay or shall we not pay?” But He, knowing their hypocrisy, said to them, “Why are you testing Me? Bring Me a denarius to look at.” They brought one. And He said to them, “Whose likeness and inscription is this?” And they said to Him, “Caesar’s.” And Jesus said to them, “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” And they were amazed at Him. -- Mark 12:13-17

      I'm pretty sure that if you inspect the chain of ownership and custody for the atomic bombs used to attack Japan that you will find it entirely in "Caesar's" hands, not the church. The official that ordered the bombing was the President of the United States acting in his capacity as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States of America rather than the Pope, the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury, or any minister acting as head of a church or congregation. The plans for their use were created and executed by the armed forces, not by deacons and church choirs, or the Sunday School classes. The purpose of dropping the bomb was to end the war between the United States of American and its allies versus the Empire of Japan, not to force Japan to convert to another religion or live under religious law that has no effect in the United States.

      In Christianity the church and state are separate, under Islam they are united.

      You fail to understand these points at your peril.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    6. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Ramze · · Score: 1

      How would you know? I wouldn't be surprised if the Fred Phelps clan and the Westboro Baptist Church were actively searching for nukes to take out Las Vegas. Really, NYC, LA, or any other major metropolis either.

    7. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 3, Funny

      >>Westboro Baptist Church

      Oh, please! Get a better boogeyman, would you, huh? If you "wouldn't be surprised" then you really don't know much about Westboro's theology, and if you would equate the "threat" from Westboro with the very real existential threat of radical Islam, then you don't know much about Islamic theology, either.

      But it's the internet, so please, express your opinion. Everyone is a Winner, after all...

    8. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still *Standing for The Queen* are we?

    9. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by ProzacPatient · · Score: 3

      I expect to get modded out of existence but here it goes:

      True, however the churches that claim to follow Christ (Matthew 24:4, 5; 10-12) share blame and guilt for the atrocities committed by the state by involving themselves in politics, promoting nationalism and advocating violent wars against even fellow believers rather than; telling everyone that these things are wrong, looking to the kingdom of God (Daniel 2:44, Matthew 6:10, 33) to solve mankind's problems and teaching the political neutrality (John 18:36) and brotherly love (John 13:34, 35) that Christ taught.

    10. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're confusing atheism with politics.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    11. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stalin wore size 9 shoes. I think it's pretty clear that people who are size 9 are potential mass murderers. His wearing size 9 was obviously a motivator, among other things. Especially since in Soviet Russia you could only get size 8 or size 10.

    12. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first atomic bomb was actively searched for within the then-unknown folds of physics by a mostly Christian population.

      The only use of an atomic weapon against people was done by a mostly Christian population against a decidedly non-Christian population. Then, to drive the point home, the mostly Christian nation did it again.

      Now you can state that a Christian nation didn't seek an atomic weapon to use it against a primarily Christian city, but that's just being disingenuous. Primarily Muslim nations don't seek atomic weapons to use against themselves, nor do Jewish communities seek atomic weapons to use against themselves, nor do Buddhists, or Krishnas, or any other self-identifying group.

      So perhaps you should take a does of your own advice, and screw off yourself with your false equivalencies. Once you demonstrate that Christians didn't seek an atomic weapon to use against non-Christians, I'll start listening again. Until then, you're just arguing that the wrong people are looking to use weapons against groups you don't like, and they are morally bankrupt because they don't buy into your morality.

      There are plenty of shitty people in the world, and plenty of people who will do wrong, but Christians don't hold the high ground on deciding right and wrong, especially in the case of using nuclear weapons. Justification of an action (which we have justified the use of nuclear weapons many times over) is never needed for an action that is not offensive.

    13. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Be somewhat fair to them. Scum they may be, but they have never been violent scum. Not once, and it must take a lot of self-control to remain calm in the face of the reactions they incite.

    14. Re: Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Stalin was an orthodox christian seminarist and would have been a priest, if he had the money for higher education. So much for that.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    15. Re: Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Key words there are "was" and the fact that the purges were motivated by the belief--a positive claim--that all religion is a threat that must be stopped. One may note that this belief both informed and motivated the purges. Although it is commonly coincident with an atheistic position in modern times, do note that this is a positive claim susceptible to empirical inquiry. We merely have to look at the death tolls.

      And so that fact-based inquiry must necessarily show that those who feel threatened by religion enough to wish to do something about it have historically been a greater threat to humanity and larger mass-murderers than every single religious nut, ever. After all, why should we consider the beliefs he rejected, rather than those held at the time of the actual mass-murdering, especially given that he had rather decisively turned against the beliefs he once held. But it's a neat rhetorical slight of hand to paint a turncoat under their former colors when it should be clear to all which banner he stood under when purging and which beliefs motivated the mass-murdering.

      Moreover, I find your construction rather odd, because if I'm not mistaken, it seems that you can't reasonably believe that atheists exist at all? Which sort of contact with some religion 'taint' one such that they can never be an atheist? I find it odd that one can come to reject religious belief of all kinds to the point of trying to murder all of its adherents, and yet is somehow not a true atheist. One might think that they did not, in fact, believe in any sort of deity at that point, so it seems like quite the act of chutzpah to try lay the blame for a turncoat's mass murder at his victims' feat.

    16. Re: Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll play!

      You said a whole bunch of fact free pure opinion as if it was fact.

      None of it was meaningful, you just babbled your ignorant anti Christian nonsensincal hatred as if it was deep and meaningful.

      I'm really truly horribly sorry a priest molested you as a child but that has nothing to do with anything else in the universe.

    17. Re: Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 3, Informative

      Key words there are "was" and the fact that the purges were motivated by the belief--a positive claim--that all religion is a threat that must be stopped. One may note that this belief both informed and motivated the purges. Although it is commonly coincident with an atheistic position in modern times, do note that this is a positive claim susceptible to empirical inquiry. We merely have to look at the death tolls.

      No, the purge was motivated by the unwillingness to share power. You see, until 1917 Russia has been an absolutist monarchy - the last one in Europe. In an absolutist monarchy the church plays a huge role - the monarch is appointed by the god after all. Russian orthodox church had money, land and a shitload of followers, hence it had to be, as they call it nowadays, "rightsized". Stalin wasn't a Russian, but a Georgian and he spared the churches and clergy in Georgia.

      So, the notion that Stalin was an atheist is wrong, as is the notion that his purges of the Russian orthodox church was anything else but a power game.

      Moreover, I find your construction rather odd, because if I'm not mistaken, it seems that you can't reasonably believe that atheists exist at all?

      I have no idea whence you got that. I am an atheist myself, always have been.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    18. Re: Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      The purges were motivated by the FACT that the clergy were using their pulpits to preach against him. So he decided to kill most of the clergy and put a stop to it. It had nothing to do with religion and everything to do with securing his power.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    19. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, at the time, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the two cities with the largest Christian population in Japan.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    20. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protestant Christianity has advocated "separation of church and state" since before the year 1600. Based, as you've noted, on earlier foundational concepts.

      Unfortunately, the Evangelical offshoot appears not to be aware of this.

    21. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fearmonger much?

    22. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Christianity the church and state are separate

      That is simply not true. Church (which is really a business, a for profit corporation) and state are, and always have been, one, the state is a subsidiary in a singly entity. The Borja are real. That is how business is done. You are only spreading the Queen's propaganda. Stop it!

    23. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironically the US Evangelicals as we know them today wouldn't even exist without strong separation of the state and the church.

    24. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      By "at the time" I assume you mean just before rather than just after.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    25. Re:Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    26. Re: Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny how your tone says that you disagree, yet the facts you put forth only agree with mine that he was killing them because of their religion, which is part of why they preached against him.

    27. Re: Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      He wasn't killing them because of their religion. He wasn't killing them because of his either.

      He was killing them because they were (from his POV) political adversaries and subversives. Had they stayed out of Caesar's domain he might not have bothered.

      Causality and coincidence.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    28. Re: Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's useless to argue with morons. Let him have his little fantasy that all atheists are mass murderers. He's probably the kind of person who thinks that because all firs are conifers and all conifers are trees, therefore all trees must be firs.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    29. Re: Muslim or Christian Evangelical ? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      The dead don't preach. Logic fail.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  8. Re: fag-ism will destroy the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, your reasoning to stop this problem is to agree with the hacker.

  9. "Religious Hacker"? by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hmmm, we have the words "Moroccan," "Quran," "religious," "pro-Palestine" . . . something seems to be missing ..

    I'm not
    Sure if something was
    Left out of the story.
    All I know is something seems to be
    Missing from the discussion.

    I wonder if there is a reason for the abstraction and missing element? I'm pretty sure if the hacker was Christian that would have been mentioned.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:"Religious Hacker"? by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wonder what could be responsible for this phenomenon.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:"Religious Hacker"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is a religious hacker because he went after pussies, not assholes.

    3. Re:"Religious Hacker"? by nevlow · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, we have the words "Moroccan," "Quran," "religious," "pro-Palestine" . . . something seems to be missing ..

      I'm not
      Sure if something was
      Left out of the story.
      All I know is something seems to be
      Missing from the discussion.

      I wonder if there is a reason for the abstraction and missing element? I'm pretty sure if the hacker was Christian that would have been mentioned.

      Must be some of
      Us who
      See what's happening.
      Like,
      It's all the time,
      Man.

    4. Re:"Religious Hacker"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Christians are also against sex workers, just read the Bible.

      Yes, Jesus forgave Mary Magdalene but that was after she stopped... ;-)

    5. Re:"Religious Hacker"? by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 1

      Ack! That show was worse than AIDS. Everyone dies a little watching it.

      --
      Sig. Sig. Sputnik
    6. Re:"Religious Hacker"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And if YOU read the Bible, you'd know that none of that was in there.

    7. Re:"Religious Hacker"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wow," I thought, "that comment sounds like like something Cold Fjord would say."

      Then I glanced up at the author and holy shit, I was right.

  10. Re:So IF ? by Earthquake+Retrofit · · Score: 4, Informative

    I consider it off topic.

    --
    Fifty years of Yippie! 1968-2018
  11. Love Escort Sites! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here is my favorite escort site. I hope this hacker doesn't mess it up.

    http://www.feoa.net/

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re: Love Escort Sites! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahah

    2. Re: Love Escort Sites! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the 93 escort wagon guy when you need him.

  12. Re:So IF ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would just bring out the hypocrites.

  13. heh by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

    "[O]ur bodies are gifted from Allah (God) to us to look after and not to destroy,"

    Not sure how having sex is destructive to your body, but whatever justification works I suppose...

    1. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure how having sex is destructive to your body,
      Depends on what kind of mood the camel is in.

    2. Re:heh by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Not sure how having sex is destructive to your body, but whatever justification works I suppose...

      "You're holding it wrong."

    3. Re:heh by PPH · · Score: 2

      "[O]ur bodies are gifted from Allah (God) to us to look after and not to destroy,"

      Ahem. That bomb you have strapped to your chest ....

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:heh by modi123 · · Score: 1

      Have you not heard about flouridiation? That commie plot, plus the profound sense of fatigue and feeling of emptiness afterwards all point to it being destructive to the body's essence. You need to be on rainwater or pure grain alcohol to combat the problem!

      Ripper: Mandrake. Mandrake, have you never wondered why I drink only distilled water, or rainwater, and only pure-grain alcohol?
      Mandrake: Well, it did occur to me, Jack, yes.
      Ripper: Have you ever heard of a thing called fluoridation. Fluoridation of water?
      Mandrake: Uh? Yes, I-I have heard of that, Jack, yes. Yes.
      Ripper: Well, do you know what it is?
      Mandrake: No, no I don't know what it is, no.
      Ripper: Do you realize that fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous Communist plot we have ever had to face?
      [...]
      General Jack D. Ripper: Yes, a uh, a profound sense of fatigue... a feeling of emptiness followed. Luckily I... I was able to interpret these feelings correctly. Loss of essence.

  14. Re:So IF ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since he's running as a Republican I call "fair play"

  15. Religious vomit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBa6YMs-AbY

  16. Agreed. Poor Spock... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Too much religion of any flavor is a bad thing.

    Agreed. Poor Spock... too much LDS in the 60's...

  17. Jealousy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jealousy issues?

    Sexually frustrated Muslim can't get a white girlfriend, so he has to go and make a nuisance out of himself?

    I suppose it's still better than blowing himself for his stupid god.

  18. Target Audience by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

    Maybe it's just me, but I'd guess that guys who are buying hookers off the internet probably aren't all that involved in international politics.

    In other words, they couldn't care less and Joe Hacker has been wasting his time preaching to an audience that's completely uncaring.

    I mean, how many guys who see his defacement are going to jump up and go, "Damn, I was gonna book a date with Trixie Tightbottom tonight, but instead I think I'll go protest at the Israeli Embassy!"

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  19. Ever heard of mutah? by CODiNE · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to think a certain religion was pretty strict about sexual matters. Very serious about adultery and things like that. Then I discovered "mutah". This is a religiously sanctioned allowance for "temporary wives". Let's say you're on vacation... Sleeping with a prostitute, escort or some random woman would be wrong. However, if you get a temporary wife, complete with payment and contract... You can do all the usual stuff you do with your wife and it's all good!

    There is however strict laws about the women involved in this... We must not consider them prostitutes, after all, Mohammed himself did this so it must be proper and holy. (This is why both sects accept the practice to this day) For example, they cannot have vaginal sex with 2 different men within a week of each other... After all, they must grieve one husband before the next. But....... There's a loophole there. Mutah who want to earn more $$ with more frequent husbands can limit her activities to non-vaginal activities and skip the waiting period.

    So I used to think a certain religion was very pious about marital fidelity and prohibited promiscuity and prostitution among it's members, then I learned about mutah.

    Why hasn't this man? Did he deface mutahmatch.com?

    Mutah is prostitution. Mutah is adultery.
    (Apologies to those who only use mutah to cook their dinners and iron their clothes)

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:Ever heard of mutah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because many Muslims, like pretty much all other religious assholes, are complete fucking hypocrites. Their God just happens to be in complete agreement with everything they do, no matter how shady it is.

    2. Re:Ever heard of mutah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All religions make certain things forbidden.

      Some religions then leverage this foisted-upon-it's-congregation guilt to create viable business models.

      The Muslims do it with "mutah". The Christians do it with "indulgences" which, if you forget, is a way of pre-paying in cash to receive less punishment for a to-be-committed sin (aka, a get out of hell free card).

      The latter fractured the Christian church, which is why we now have the Protestants, but in subtle ways, it still goes on. The most-likely-sinful (due to the obscene amounts of cash they have to stray with) are the most likely to donate buildings instead of twenties to the church. The church certainly doesn't tell them "your still going to hell" with each donation.

      In fact this partially explains (but does not excuse) the manner in which the church handles crimes within it's fold. After all, the pastor literally gives up much of his life to the church, so the church is prone to turning a blind eye to a wayward pastor's discretion (until they cannot be ignored).

      I distrust a religion that makes certain aspects of daily living _required_ for sustaining a happy population heavily regulated in a framework of guilt. Sex, when to have it, and how to have it, is often at the top of such a list. Followed by accumulation of wealth (modest wealth is good, but you should give your excess to the church who knows how to do better with it than you do), and it keeps getting more trivial and petty (Gluttony, Pride, Vanity, etc). Sure, many of these behaviors should be lessened for a happy society, but you don't need to live forever in Hell if you do them, it's enough to recognize that you'll have a miserable life (right now) if you indulge in them excessively.

    3. Re:Ever heard of mutah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      religiously sanctioned allowance

      It' probably more like a loop hole penetration to appease the powerful. See what I did there?

    4. Re:Ever heard of mutah? by rxmd · · Score: 2

      There is however strict laws about the women involved in this... [...] For example, they cannot have vaginal sex with 2 different men within a week of each other... After all, they must grieve one husband before the next.

      Actually the mandatory intermediary period is usually more than 1 week (usually at least a month), and the reason is very pragmatic: if a child is born, it needs to be clear who is the father.

      As you've already discovered, among various Islamic schools of theology there is vigorous disagreement about whether mut'ah is permitted or not. The most prominent distinction is that among Shiites it's mostly permitted and among Sunnis mostly forbidden, but there are Sunni communities there are some who practice mut'ah as well. Like with most details of Islamic law, people will have strong normative opinions. Instead of looking at the wide variety of things that Muslims are actually practicing in the world, they will claim that their opinion represents the whole of Islam and that everybody else is wrong. Since every side can draw on 1400 years' of theological debate to show that they are right and you aren't, and at the base of it there are texts that can be interpreted in different wys, but are considered sacred and must not be questioned, this kind of debate tends to degenerate very quickly.

      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
  20. Re:So IF ? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Do you seriously not know why that wouldn't be considered hate speech?

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  21. Which Religion?? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Why isn't there more mention of whatever religion this person might be practicing?

    Is he a Quaker, or perhaps an Episcopalian??

    1. Re:Which Religion?? by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      I had been thinking Amish until I remembered they probably wouldn't use computers. . . . and they tend to be nonviolent. Very nice beards though.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  22. Re:Agreed. Poor Spock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And all this time I thought Nimoy was Jewish...I had no Idea he was Mormon!

  23. Who Pays For Pussy? by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

    Rent-A-Rash Cunt Market??!! Say it isn't so!

    1. Re: Who Pays For Pussy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not muslims. Especially not in europe where nubile unclaimed slaves walk around half naked tempting all good islamites to unsatable lust

    2. Re:Who Pays For Pussy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the better question is, who doesn't?

    3. Re:Who Pays For Pussy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are always renting or buying it, it is just the terminology that changes, prostitute, girlfriend, wife etc.

  24. Re:Agreed. Poor Spock... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    "Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home" reference.

  25. Escort services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Otherwise known as honeytraps. Yes, I live in Yakima, WA.

  26. Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incompetent webmasters should be fired. Webmasters who can't learn how to do basic shit like keep their sites up to date and secure should be fired and blacklisted.

    There's huge fucking money at stake here. Stop hiring dipshit losers to manage your web presence already!

  27. molested german puppy detected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see any difference of paying for sex or spending 10 times the money to buy a car to have the same ammount of respect - using your genitalia. And there's no difference between religiouspeople and sex molested web hookers at all. They all have the same look into their, a face shaped like teh being lost it's fate or is being fooled. Still, the worst act I ever saw on wikipedia was a non catholic festive commemoration, about one goddes of the moon which I forgot the name but when I was after the page it was removed from somewhere in June, from the portuguese version. Worst even, is a retard who stalks me with all her boyfriends trying to convince me to work and give money for that retard Argentinian boy sucker pedophile Mr. Pope. (btw, that retard girl keeps passing by my house to shake her ass, idk what is her problem, but if she only cums when people know that she is getting fucked, boy... this town got invaded by an army of turds, definetely)

  28. Mutah was banned by Muhammad by yuvcifjt · · Score: 1

    "Mutah" is not permitted in Islam, not sure where you got that from.
    In fact it was banned by Prophet Muhammad, after the lewdness that the pagans and idol/people worshippers used to spread.
    It's only the Shia (minority) sect which allow this.

    In Islam, God has permitted and even encouraged sex between a husband and wife to increase love and bond within a matrimonial trust, just like Christianity and Judaism.
    And yes, sex outside of marriage is a very serious and sick sin as it potentially destroys not only families, but an entire society due to illegitimate children. And children who have no father and mothers are generally worse off in education, health, and society; especially children without father-figures.

    Where Islam differs is that God has placed a ban on men to only have ONE wife.
    However, as God knows the nature of men and their temptations, God has however permitted more than one wife ONLY in the condition he can bear the financial responsibility and offer safety and equal time to both wives. i.e. to curb prostitution and mistresses; and to help divorced/widowed women (especially with children) who find it difficult to find a husband, etc.

    And I also want to clarify that there is not a single Islamic scholar who hasn't spoken against the barbaric, terrorist group ISIS and the corruption they are spreading. In fact, Islamic scholars and imaams have received death threats from ISIS.

    1. Re:Mutah was banned by Muhammad by rossz · · Score: 2

      "Mutah" is not permitted in Islam, not sure where you got that from.
      In fact it was banned by Prophet Muhammad, after the lewdness that the pagans and idol/people worshippers used to spread.
      It's only the Shia (minority) sect which allow this.

      Too bad fucking little girls wasn't banned. When your prophet is a pedophile, you are corrupt from the start.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    2. Re:Mutah was banned by Muhammad by zapadnik · · Score: 1

      According to Islamic orthodoxy pedophilia is permitted because Mohammed practiced with with little girls (his neice Aisha bint Abu Bakr) and nephews Hussein bin Ali and Hassan bin Ali.

      Of course, Islam is the Scientology of the Dark Ages - invented by evil men to enslave other men, and (especially) women. Islam is a complete fiction that does not match the archeology of the region. There is some fantastic evidence showing satellite imagery and how all the early Arab Temples were oriented towards Petra in Jordan at the time Mohammed was said to have lived - because Mecca did not exist at that time. More clues towards Jordan and the Allah (Arabic for "God") called Dushara is in Koran 53:19-20 and the fact that the Nabatean cult of Dushara worship stone cubes called "ka'aba". Later Arab Emperors ("Caliphs") would take this cult and modify it to justify Arab Imperialism, and as an ideological counterweight to the Christianity of the Eastern Romans ("Byzantines") and Zoroastrianism of the Persians.

      Anyway for those interested in seeing irrefutable evidence that Islam is false should watch this video (sorry, it is from a Christian scholar but they seem to be the only ones paying attention for the evidence against Islam/Sharia supremacism):
      "An Historical Critique of Islam's Beginnings"
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      The evidence in this video is the ideological ICBM that annihilates Islam's claims about its origins. I hope some Slashdotters take the time to watch it because once you see the evidence for the fabrication of Islam you then understand that debating what Mohammed was alleged to have said or did or justified is pointless - he did even exist (at least not in the way Islamic superstition claims).

    3. Re:Mutah was banned by Muhammad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that Nikah Misyar is the Sunni equivalent to the Shia Mutah: it is temporary an involves payment.

    4. Re:Mutah was banned by Muhammad by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      Too bad fucking little girls wasn't banned. When your prophet is a pedophile, you are corrupt from the start.

      Bingo. Mohamed raped a 6-year old, then married her when she was 9, but you rarely hear followers of Islam say anything about that, much less denounce it.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    5. Re:Mutah was banned by Muhammad by CODiNE · · Score: 2

      "Mutah" is not permitted in Islam, not sure where you got that from.

      From Wikipedia, Nikah_mutâah.
      There are many citations showing that this is still practiced and vigorously debated til this day. It also claims there is a form of this for both Sunni and Shiite. You can edit the page and fix any mistakes on it.

      I meant no insult to devout men, only those who continue the practice or condone it. I desire to shine a light on cockroaches. mutahmatch.com shows that it is still a regular and profitable practice.

      No mention of terrorism or daesh was made in my post. "Not sure where you got that from". :-)

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    6. Re:Mutah was banned by Muhammad by yuvcifjt · · Score: 1

      Wow, the amount of ignorance in this comment; I wasn't going to reply as it's clear you have a distortion field which stops you from reading and examining evidence from anyone other than Islamaphobes and people with huge amount of hate in their heart.

      And it's clear you haven't read the Qur'aan, not even the second chapter; otherwise you would know that of course, the early Muslims and the pagans used to pray and prostrate towards the direction ("qibla") of Jerusalem.
      God later abrogated that, just like alcohol was disallowed slowly, along with abolishment of slavery, and the sick pagan practice of burying their daughters alive, prostitution, etc, etc.

      God sent the last Prophet to free humanity from the shackles of their mind and enslavery and worshipping of false deities, and freed women at a time when they were purely for sexual enjoyment and treated as objects. And Islam gave rights to women which the west only introduced since the 1900's, including a right to vote and have their voice heard, and the right to own their own house, business, money, etc.

      What's rarely discussed is how the entire Arabian peninsula changed as a result of the Prophet and his disciples, and the amount of peace that spread throughout the lands and neighbouring nations. And prior to the "Geneva convention", the Islamic Prophet introduced the fair treatment and peace towards even war prisoners. In fact, he housed one of the war prisoners in his own house in Medina...
      has there ever been a king or president who has taken a prisoner in his own home?!

      The Arabs at the time were following fragments of the teachings of Prophet Abraham, but most of it was lost and people deviated towards worshipping men and stones.

      And this is why God sends Prophets - in Islam, we're told that God has chosen over 124,000 prophets, of whom around 315 were messengers (like Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad).
      "And there never was a nation but a warner had passed among them".

      Our Prophet informed us that slowly, after a warner (prophet) is sent to a nation, it takes around 10 generations before people again deviate and start worshipping objects and people.

      Otherwise, all Prophets preached the same message of worshipping One God alone, as He's the Only entity worthy of worship; and God provides in this life to even those who kill people and belittle God from their tongue. But there will come a time when they will be held accountable.

      "Every soul will taste death, and you will only be given your [full] compensation on the Day of Resurrection. So he who is drawn away from the Fire and admitted to Paradise has attained [his desire]. And what is the life of this world except the enjoyment of delusion."

      "And [mention] when Abraham said, "My Lord, make this (Makkah) a secure city and provide its people with fruits - whoever of them believes in Allah and the Last Day." [ Allah ] said. "And whoever disbelieves - I will grant him enjoyment for a little; then I will force him to the punishment of the Fire, and wretched is the destination.""

      With regards to the Prophet marrying Aisha (by the permission of her father, mother, and Aisha herself), this has been explained countless times.
      Did you never think why the enemies of Islam at the time didn't rise up against this?? Surely this would have been the talk of the entire nation, not only the enemies (some of the Jews, especially who lived in Medina), and the pagans in Makkah, but even his disciples would have doubted the Prophet.

      In Islam, a person becomes accountable to God and a full adult after puberty.

      "The Jews say "The Christians have nothing [true] to stand on," and the Christians say, "The Jews have nothing to stand on," although they [both] recite th

    7. Re:Mutah was banned by Muhammad by yuvcifjt · · Score: 1

      I know I shouldn't feed the trolls, but as commented above...

      With regards to the Prophet marrying Aisha (by the permission of her father, mother, and Aisha herself), this has been explained countless times.

      Did you never think why the enemies of Islam at the time didn't rise up against this?? Surely this would have been the talk of the entire nation, not only the enemies (some of the Jews, especially who lived in Medina), and the pagans in Makkah, but even his disciples would have doubted the Prophet.

      In Islam, a person becomes accountable to God and a full adult after puberty.

      "And We sent not before you (as Messengers) any but men, whom We inspired from among the people of townships. Have they not travelled through the earth and seen what was the end of those who were before them? And verily, the home of the Hereafter is the best for those who fear God and obey Him (by abstaining from sins and evil deeds, and by performing righteous good deeds). Do you not then understand?"

    8. Re:Mutah was banned by Muhammad by yuvcifjt · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia is the worst possible place for Islamic knowledge, and all articles I've encountered seem to be written by people of lust and those who want to damage society and Islam.

      "Misyar" marriage is where a man may give up some of his rights in a marriage, or more commonly, a wife may give up some of her rights (such as a right to her own home).

      But this is also banned as it's usually practices by men of desire who wish to demean and mistreat women.

    9. Re:Mutah was banned by Muhammad by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Did you never think why the enemies of Islam at the time didn't rise up against this??

      Umm, because doing so would get your head lopped off?

      -

      In Islam, a person becomes accountable to God and a full adult after puberty.

      So what?

      Are you claiming that Mohamed didn't marry Aisha at six and consummate the marriage at 9, as it says in the Koran?

      http://www.faithfreedom.org/Ar...

      Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3310:
      'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old.

      Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64
      Narrated 'Aisha:
      that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).

      This is very well documented time and time again, are you really claiming it didn't happen?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    10. Re:Mutah was banned by Muhammad by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Be a little fair to him: Yes, he married a six year old, but it was a pragmatic political marriage - a very common practice at the time, nothing unusual. And sex at nine? Yes, that's an outrage to us - but you are judging him by modern standards. Mohammed's culture was clear that a menstruation means a girl is now legally and socially a women. Nine might be young enough to raise some eyebrows at the time, but it was by no means a big scandal or even unheard of. He did wait three years until she was legally ready.

      A more serious issue is that this has made it very difficult to de-normalise sex with or marriage to young girls in Islamic cultures. How can such a tradition be condemned when the Prophet himself practised it?

    11. Re: Mutah was banned by Muhammad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that you believe all this religious bullshit is ignorance. You are stating the shit like its facts. It's not.

    12. Re:Mutah was banned by Muhammad by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      How can such a tradition be condemned when the Prophet himself practised it?

      I don't give a shit who practiced it- fucking a 9-year old girl is wrong by pretty much any standard (except Mohamed's).

      And in fact, it was not as common as you pretend it to be. Even back then, fucking a 9-year old would do more than "raise a few eyebrows".

      Owning slaves was once common and legal. Was it magically "not wrong" back then, even though it was legal? Of course it was wrong.

      Would you let your 6-year old daughter marry a 54-year old man (as long as he promised not to fuck her until she was 9)?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    13. Re:Mutah was banned by Muhammad by rossz · · Score: 1

      How can such a tradition be condemned when the Prophet himself practised it?

      Like this: Fuck your pedophile prophet Muhammed. He should have been tortured to death over many days for the crimes he committed. He was an evil fuck who brought misery to all that he touched.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    14. Re:Mutah was banned by Muhammad by yuvcifjt · · Score: 1

      What I find amazing, and it's proven time and time again is that atheists not only don't appear to have a heart of love, understanding, and co-operation, and infact they have a heart full of rage and hate for some reason which shows in their vulgar speech;
      but also atheists are unable to examine evidence, unable to reason, and unable to use their sense of intellect and logic by examining history.

      Of course, Atheists aren't the only ones guilty, but ignorant people of all faiths, including Muslims, who's heart is deaf, dumb, and blind, and unable to use their sense of reason and logic.

      No matter how many times it's explained from an anthropological and historical view, and examining the normal age of marriage even only 100 or 200 years ago, some people just can't escape their localised bubble.

    15. Re:Mutah was banned by Muhammad by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      What I find amazing, and it's proven time and time again is that atheists not only don't appear to have a heart of love, understanding, and co-operation, and infact they have a heart full of rage and hate for some reason which shows in their vulgar speech;

      Oh noes, did my mean ol' language hurt your poor, sensitive little feelings? Did your virgin ears become sullied from hearing my awful, awful facts? O The Horror!

      Oh yeah, atheists are so full of rage that our Holy Book goes on at length about killing anyone who's an apostate or even tries to renounce his atheism, killing anyone who's gay, cutting off the hands of thieves, killing adulterers by stoning, restricting women and degrading them, proscribing death for anyone who is caught "spreading mischief in the land", and so on.

      Oh wait, it's the Quran that specifies all those things. Never mind!

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    16. Re:Mutah was banned by Muhammad by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      But if you say that in many countries, the locals will kill you on the spot.

    17. Re:Mutah was banned by Muhammad by rossz · · Score: 1

      I'm not stupid enough to fly to the middle east for any reason.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    18. Re:Mutah was banned by Muhammad by zapadnik · · Score: 1

      I know what is in the Koran. Yes, I know that the Islamic Orthodoxy claims that the original direction was Jerusalem and then it was changed to Mecca. What you don't seem to understand is that the PHYSICAL ARCHEOLOGY shows that this is NOT TRUE. The direction of prayer was toward Petra in Jordan for 100% of Arab Temples (not mosques, since Islam in its current form was not fully fabricated until two hundred years after Mohammed was said to have lived). The satellite images PROVE that Islam's claims are false.

      All the stories you have been told about the origins of Islam are FALSE - and provably false. Again, I will show you the evidence that destroys the man-made false claims about Islam because it is YOU who doesn't know the REALITY
      "An Historical Critique of Islam's Beginnings"
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Yes, I understand you are a good person that is trying to find the truth. The problem is, your imam doesn't know the truth, and this has continued for a long chain until we get evil men at the beginning who created a myth so they could control you, get all the wealth, and get all the women. But you don't have to repeat the lies. You can finally understand the truth and be free - ISLAM IS MAN_MADE ****FICTION****.

  29. Re:So IF ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hate speech if you're a Trump supporter. They want their freedom of speech rights to put Muslims in camps but if you start bashing Trump it's off to the Gulag you go. The Conservative pro pedophile movement is in full hypocrisy as usual.

  30. This whore fucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is doing nothing illegal or immoral. Let me explain myself.

    In the UK running a brothel and kerb crawling are illegal, which means the vast majority of UK prostitutes operate as Independent Escorts in and from city centre flats by choice, as such they are also acting entirely legally.

    Prostitution itself is legal in the UK providing they operate alone, which perversely increases their risk, but that is a separate issue.

    They do this line of work by choice, nobody is forcing them to do it and many are quite happy to discuss their motives. One response I've had was "Isn't it obvious; I own this (luxury city centre flat), drive an S-class; my (contemporary peers) are stuck in council houses on benefits with (illegitimate) kids" another has spoken about making more in a month in Dubai than professionals make in a year, including this well paid geek.

    I visit escorts about three or four times a month, the cost is about £100-£150 per hour. I can fuck a different one every time, but often find myself revisiting my favourites. I've done this on/off for about 15 years, before I was the average frustrated geek , chasing vanilla pussy like all the other chumps.

    Over the years I've fucked some very beautiful women of every type, Blonds, Redheads, British, Caribbean, White, Asian, Black, Athletic, Buxom. I've indulged every little fantasy I've ever had and been introduced to some things I could never imagine. I've had faux twins and Coffee with Cream. I've very literally tried it all.

    The growth in my self confidence has been immense both professionally and personally. When your fucking 10s on a regular basis you have no fear picking up 8s and 9s for free and you start to get increasingly picky, you will also learn that most vanilla women are really bad at sex, uptight and imagination.

    I've developed an enormousness amount of respect for these women and certainly hold them in much more esteem than the 'sluts' giving blow jobs and knee trembler behind local night club for a few drinks.

    1. Re:This whore fucker by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I have nothing against prostitutes or prostitution, and to spell it out for you, I think prostitution should be completely legal.

      In other words, what's your point?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  31. Religion overdose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to this video, anything more than one pill of Religion per week, maybe two for Christmas, should be considered overdose.

    goo.gl/ttNO3V

  32. CIA / Pentagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another CIA / Al Qaida (database) attempt to misrepresent a religion. Aren't we getting tired of the same old stuff ? Yes we get it, some people in the government are perverted enough to want people to worship them (like hitler) instead of the ONE TRUE GOD Allah. So what else is new ? BTW, the 911 started stealing of Afghan blood minerals continues while the illegal african blood diamonds are declared illegal because the CIA does not get a cut from the diamonds trade. The CIA does get a lot from the drugs (heroin) and minerals (lithium) from afghanistan so they drone the heck out of the opposition. Wait till the opposition is in the US. Watch them drone the heck out of the so call citizens they claim to protect. BTW since the lame brained citizens do not care. Most probably over a hundred of the US citizens are dead because of the 911 BS. Yeah they are not classified as citizens. They were rebranded as military and killed for a few bucks in some sleazy politicians and pals pockets.

    1. Re: CIA / Pentagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off your meds again I see .....

  33. Re:So IF ? by zapadnik · · Score: 1

    What is this "hate speech" you talk of? is it simply speech you personally find offensive? many here find Islam and its associated Sharia hideously offensive, yet we don't call it "hate speech". Free Speech is not about speech we don't like, but about the things we don't like - and especially about thinks that powerful political people and ideologies don't like.

    Claiming something is "hate speech" is merely a tactic that the powerful use to CENSOR speech, *especially* uncomfortably true speech, that they don't like.

    A George Carlin brilliantly said, "Political Correctness is fascism dressed up as politeness". Please don't advance fascism by replicating its censorious memes.

  34. Is this any different that what by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Anonymous does?

  35. redundant by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

    "A religiously-motivated Moroccan"

    Pleonasm.

  36. Seeing the responses I have to wonder by mpercy · · Score: 1

    If the hacker were an Earth Firster defacing the web sites of Exxon and Halliburton, I have to believe the response would not be quite the same, and that many progressives would instead be cheering him on.

  37. Religious Hacker? Pro-Palestine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean he's a pro-terrorist hacker. Lets be honest with what he really is.

  38. Re:So IF ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I consider it another stupid comment by a slashtard.

  39. Re:So IF ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hate Speech is speech that keeps a minority group down. It's not about being offensive, it actually causes harm.

  40. Re:So IF ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol

  41. "Religious" hacker? by mcgrew · · Score: 2

    What religion? Devil worshiper? Money worshiper? Hindu? Christian? What if that Muslim were an atheist who also did it because he hated hookers?

    I swear, you FSM worshipers are worse fanatics than an Alabama Christian evangelist.

    Fools, all. BTW, Christians consider the guy's actions sinful.

  42. So more pointless ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bulls**t from the religion of peace. Don't suppose anyone will be arresting him anytime soon? Maybe, if we can get his address, we can send him a truck load of bacon.

  43. Re: So IF ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or occasionally it's telling the truth about how members of a group behave.

  44. and one by Tritium3.016 · · Score: 1

    Where is his sense of culture? He should have done 101.

    Tritium

  45. Re:So IF ? by Kreplock · · Score: 1

    Hate Speech is speech that keeps a minority group down. It's not about being offensive, it actually causes harm.

    So the definition of hate speech has nothing to do with accuracy, truth, or facts. How very useful to anyone trying to control the marketplace of ideas.

  46. Re:So IF ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You post from an account on slashdot, therefore you are a virgin. Am I right about you because there are enough losers with accounts to make my assertion statistically possible?