Slashdot Mirror


Army Special Operations Command Ditching Android For iPhone, Says Report (gizmodo.com)

The United States Army's Special Operations Command is ditching its Android phones for the "faster" iPhone, according to a report. The source cited in the story says that Android phones were freezing unexpectedly, which was one of the reasons they decided to give the iPhone 6s a spin. Gizmodo adds: The smartphones allow members of the Special Operations Command to access rich information about the battlefield. There's also quickly accessible information, like a weapons and ammunitions guide. Other apps can help with high altitude jumps; another can detect radiation. While DARPA helped develop the program on Android due to the operating system's open platform, Apple's hardware is apparently superior enough to warrant the switch.

162 of 254 comments (clear)

  1. My first first? by Compumyst · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But seriously? iPhone superior to Android? Were they buying budget phones?

    --
    What's done's in the past, forever shall last.
    Work is work; life is life; fair is not!
    1. Re:My first first? by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It does seem like we're missing part of the story here. The hardware isn't the core difference between Apple and the various Android phones, most of them are as capable as any other if you picked up a reasonably recent model. If anything, there are Android phones sporting more memory or faster processors.

      The real difference is in the software. It's in the operating system, as well as how it handles applications, and which applications are available for the device. It's also potentially in the enterprise management of such devices, but I don't see that mentioned here either. All of those are software differences primarily.

    2. Re:My first first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In my experience decisions like this are typically made because somebody high up likes their iPhone and doesn't want to have to learn how to use an Android phone.

      Sounds overly simplistic, but I've seen it happen too many times.

    3. Re:My first first? by iotaborg · · Score: 1

      Not entirely a fair comparison since they are probably comparing an older android phone to a newer iPhone. However, their experience showed that Android is glitchy, and the perception is that iOS is more stable than Android, hence motivating the switch. New Android hardware may not fix any stability issues in this case.

    4. Re:My first first? by Mycroft-X · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The real difference is in the software.

      Nope, the real difference is in the ability and willingness to navigate the military procurement process.

    5. Re:My first first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have a Nexus 6P. It's normal to reboot it once a week because it gets laggy or starts draining battery at an accelerated rate. And it's well known that the iPhone's single-core performance is 2x better than the fastest Snapdragon processor out there. Which is truly amazing.

    6. Re:My first first? by swillden · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The real difference is in the software.

      Nope, the real difference is in the ability and willingness to navigate the military procurement process.

      I thought about that, thinking maybe the only Android OEMs who were willing to do that were obscure ones making crappy devices, but then I remembered that Samsung has actually gone to the effort of getting at least one of their devices certified for classified data. If they're doing that, they can certainly navigate the procurement process. And the Samsung flagships are very good devices, clearly competitive with the iPhone.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:My first first? by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 1

      My guess would be something along those lines. That is, the missing information being something like "of the DISA-approved mobile devices, using Apple iPhones provides us with a much more powerful solution."

    8. Re:My first first? by clonehappy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But seriously? iPhone superior to Android? Were they buying budget phones?

      Never used an iPhone, eh?

    9. Re:My first first? by c · · Score: 1

      The real difference is in the software. It's in the operating system, as well as how it handles applications, and which applications are available for the device.

      Don't forget the difference in application developers. It's entirely possible that the custom stuff was done by a mobile developer with less than adequate Android experience (possibly none, the way government procurement tends to work). At least, the description of the problems sounds as much like "app" as "operating system" to me.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    10. Re:My first first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Or somebody realized that Android is not very secure. What is it now, 99+% of all malware targets Android? How many ways can an Android phone be infected? Perhaps thousands...

      iPhone, Windows phone, Blackberry, etc. ALL ARE SAFER than Android. Protect yourself from hacking, protect your contacts (friends and family) from getting their information compromised from your address book. Friends tell friends to use ANYTHING but Android.

      Example 1: https://www.google.com/search?... Example 2: https://www.google.com/search?...

    11. Re:My first first? by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      What is the latest Android phone and what is GoogleOS? There are many phones out there, many of which run a version of Android. Your statement is like saying that a mac with OSX is better than the latest PC with an OS on it. Meaningless and simple.

    12. Re:My first first? by cortex3299 · · Score: 2

      They are comparing their current Samsung Note II to an Iphone 6S, yes the 6S will be faster than an old Android phone.

    13. Re:My first first? by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      The above "experience" is dumb and probably not experience at all.

      Management types decide based on what meets the specs, how expensive the solution is overall, and how easy it is to manage at scale. They may not understand much, but they understand TCO.

    14. Re:My first first? by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 3

      GP is right, All the vendors market to the guys wearing stars. If the general likes it then that's what we buy, doesn't matter what the grunts think.

      Just look at NMCI, the admirals will tell you it is a huge win, just don't tell that to the 0-4 trying to use it to get his work done.

    15. Re:My first first? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      I prefer Android myself, but... yeah... I've never seen garbage collection work well on any language, platform or device; it always seems to pause the machine when you need to interact with it.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    16. Re:My first first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or somebody realized that Android is not very secure. What is it now, 99+% of all malware targets Android? How many ways can an Android phone be infected? Perhaps thousands...

      iPhone, Windows phone, Blackberry, etc. ALL ARE SAFER than Android. Protect yourself from hacking, protect your contacts (friends and family) from getting their information compromised from your address book. Friends tell friends to use ANYTHING but Android.

      Example 1: https://www.google.com/search?...
        Example 2:
      https://www.google.com/search?...

      Actually you're full of shit.

      Source: Actual CVE details.

      IOS Currently has 900 unique CVEs released:
      https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-49/product_id-15556/Apple-Iphone-Os.html

      Android has 430 unique CVEs release:
      https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-1224/product_id-19997/Google-Android.html

      But hey, don't let facts get in your way.

    17. Re:My first first? by swb · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Apple has ever ported iOS to any of the top of the line Android hardware platforms to make comparisons.

      It's probably a bunch of work just to get drivers working and even more for necessary optimizations, with a net result of "just about the same" but it would be interesting to see what would happen.

    18. Re:My first first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It does seem like we're missing part of the story here. The hardware isn't the core difference between Apple and the various Android phones, most of them are as capable as any other if you picked up a reasonably recent model. If anything, there are Android phones sporting more memory or faster processors.

      Except that that's not completely true, and even in the true half, there are mitigating factors.

      The iPhone's CPU is typically much faster than Android processors where it matters, but slower where it doesn't. That is, the iPhone's CPU is extremely fast at single threaded or dual threaded operation, but Android devices win multithreaded benchmarks. As most mobile workloads are not very parallel, the iPhone's CPU typically is a much better bet.

      In terms of memory, while you're correct that most Android devices ship with more, they also need significantly more. 90% of processes on Android use garbage collection. It's been demonstrated over and over that garbage collection only works well when there's an excess of memory hanging about. A garbage collector is a fine thing when it has a spare gig or two to fill with things it might collect in the future; but it's a terrible idea on a memory constrained example. This is why when you look at application launch tests between top end Android and iOS devices, typically the iOS device will have more processes still in memory on the second loop through the apps, despite having half the amount of RAM.

    19. Re: My first first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except CVEs aren't a linear thing. A small subset have a disproportionate effect. Feel free to ignore the facts, though.

    20. Re:My first first? by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 1

      the original Galaxy Note https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker... running their own fork of AOSP (or perhaps cyanogenmod) vs apple's latest and greatest with manufacturer tested OS.

    21. Re:My first first? by Mark+of+the+North · · Score: 1

      I've had technically competent and incompetent management over the course of my career. My experience has been that technically incompetent management is common-place outside of the tech sector.

      What sector are you working in? Sounds like an area I would like to explore.

    22. Re:My first first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At least many model years of iPhones get security and OS upgrades. Most Android phones are left in the wild unprotected with no updates from the various OEM's or Google. Even an iPhone 4s from 2011 can be updated to the current release of iOS (albeit with performance issues and not past the current release). What percentage of Android phones that old can be patched to be current and "safe"?

    23. Re:My first first? by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The iPhone could be in fact superior to the task that the Army needed the device to do.

      Don't go all Android Fanboi! Android does many things better than iOS... However iOS does some things better.
      When designing a software there are tradeoffs that are needed. Sometimes those tradeoffs may enhance more people than they hinder, however the minority may find that missing ability to greatly improve that function they prefer.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    24. Re:My first first? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      They may have. It isn't unheard of. In case of hardware shortage or a deal going south, they can quickly revamp and rebrand to another provider.
      That is why they went from the PowerPC to Intel. IBM just couldn't make their chips competitive so Apple dropped them when they realized that it wasn't worth it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    25. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But seriously? iPhone superior to Android?

      Yes, seriously. Do you want the list in Alphabetical Order, or in Order of Importance?

      Remember, we're talking about the Military here. They could give a rats ass about your precious "Sideloading", and "Cyanogenmod" crapola. They are interested in just a couple of things: Reliability and Responsiveness of hardware and software, and Security of the OS.

      Overall, iPhone "wins" on both counts, sorry.

      Oh, and not having Google datamining every single thing is probably a consideration in a Military application, too...

      And I would imagine that it also helps that Apple is the only U.S.-based cellphone manufacturer.

    26. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      If anything, there are Android phones sporting more memory or faster processors.

      More memory than a 128 GB iPhone? And have you seen any benchmarks on the iPhone vs. pretty much any Android phone?

    27. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      IOS Currently has 900 unique CVEs released: https://www.cvedetails.com/vul...

      Android has 430 unique CVEs release: https://www.cvedetails.com/vul...

      But doesn't that list usually only contain vulnerabilities that have been ADDRESSED?

    28. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      ... Their experience showed that Android is glitchy, and the truth is that iOS is more stable than Android, hence motivating the switch. New Android hardware may not fix any stability issues in this case.

      FTFY.

    29. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      And the Samsung flagships are very good devices, clearly competitive with the iPhone.

      But then they still run Android; and therein lies the rub.

    30. Re: My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Insinuating people trained to kill have more valuable insight in software/hardware cell phone engineering and that all uses of devices for spec ops purposes would be immediately translatable for civillian purposes.

      Not everyone in the military has a job that includes killing, dumbass.

    31. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Apple has ever ported iOS to any of the top of the line Android hardware platforms to make comparisons.

      It's probably a bunch of work just to get drivers working and even more for necessary optimizations, with a net result of "just about the same" but it would be interesting to see what would happen.

      My feeling is that it would be "about the same" as long as we stay in the same ballpark, hardware-wise. But that isn't what is important, because the military can't (and wouldn't) approve a clusterfuck like that, anyway.

    32. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      the iPhone's CPU is extremely fast at single threaded or dual threaded operation, but Android devices win multithreaded benchmarks.

      I wonder if that is because iOS is slower at thread management than Android? Long ago, I used to see postings about how much faster Linux was at thread creation/destruction than OS X. But that was a long time ago, and I wonder if it is still the case.

    33. Re:My first first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Order of importance, please. And the things you listed are just not true in any way. Oh wait, I just noticed your username. Never mind, pointless conversation. Try not to choke on Apple's cock and remember to pay attention to the balls.

    34. Re:My first first? by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Derp.

      Begone foul scum supporting closed source proprietary crap.

    35. Re: My first first? by Ralgha · · Score: 1

      In my experience, unstable programs (apps) are almost always the fault of the program, not the operating system. How the operating system handles such programs can be a factor, but in Android, you just kill the program and it's fine, usually. They should look at who programmed the apps they're using.

    36. Re:My first first? by swb · · Score: 1

      I would think (naively, I'm sure) that it would be simpler and more easy to get an apples-apples comparison with a PC-type platform than a smartphone platform.

      Generally speaking, getting your PPC OS running on an x86 reference box would be an easier port, since the hardware documentation and drivers are more easily available.

      Using a competitor's smartphone platform, though, would be much more difficult since the hardware is more likely to be highly customized and sort of proprietary, making creating drivers more difficult.

      But who knows, maybe hardware makers like Foxconn can do a nearly identical reference platform with more standardized parts.

    37. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1, Informative

      Order of importance, please. And the things you listed are just not true in any way. Oh wait, I just noticed your username. Never mind, pointless conversation. Try not to choke on Apple's cock and remember to pay attention to the balls.

      Interesting, because, reading down through the comments, it seems like the people who have tried both (particularly with the Military Software Stack, KNOX), even those who profess to hate iOS/Apple, choose iPhone hands-down.

      But even those who have just used both, most prefer iOS over Android.

      So, suck on that.

    38. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Derp.

      Begone foul scum supporting closed source proprietary crap.

      Open Source is great; but it is NOT the be-all, end-all, most-importantest-thing for good software design.

      In fact, it has a TERRIBLE track-record in that regard.

    39. Re:My first first? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      We develop the same apps on both iOS and Android. Entirely separate development, no shared code, but based on the same designs. The Android versions take 50% longer to develop and are of lower quality. (The Android team are always complaining about video bugs. And they never seem able to deliver smooth animation. And they are just generally more sluggish.) I don't believe they are worse programmers than the iOS team. I just believe the development environment and the platform are worse. Though I have been told that the development environment got a lot better recently.

    40. Re:My first first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, you're full of shit too.

      Source: your actual links.

      Android has 309 defects with a CVSS score of 7 or higher (on a scale of 1-10). 90 of them with a CVSS score of 10.

      IOS has 254 defects with a CVSS score of 7 or higher. 21 of them with a CVSS score of 10.

      But hey, don't let facts get in your way.

    41. Re:My first first? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      When lives are on the line? Fuck off with that bullshit.

      I served in the military, and I can assure you that when "lives are on the line", decision making is no less dysfunctional. If anything, it is even worse, as officers who have spent years in a "zero defect" peacetime environment, are suddenly faced with potentially career ending decisions. So they delay, and push the responsibility up the chain of command, to someone who has less information and likely less relevant expertise.

    42. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Memory and Storage are different things. Welcome to Computer Sci 101.

      No fooling. And how is that even germane, since the term used was MEMORY (which I took to mean Flash MEMORY). If they meant RAM, say RAM, night a nebulous term like "memory".

    43. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      The glass and software are made in U.S.A. at least. Source: http://www.macworld.co.uk/feat...

      The second one being the important one.

    44. Re:My first first? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      A common sales trick is to compare a competitors budget model with the specs of your own model set for release next year - or a similar goalpost shift.

    45. Re:My first first? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The UID game is usually stupid but this time it says it all :(
      After a bit more time in the workplace you will meet other managers that do not fit your ideal.

    46. Re:My first first? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      IMHO it was IBM being IBM and deciding to charge what they thought the market would bear with what they thought was a captive customer with no other options. Apple got out when the cost was worse than the benefits.
      I tried to get some Cell stuff at one point via a ridiculously long process before I even got a price. IBM effectively priced themselves out of the market with that unless you just had to have a Cell CPU instead of about six of something else for the same price.

    47. Re:My first first? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      As most mobile workloads are not very parallel

      When graphics gets in the mix or a lot of hardware needs to be talked to at once the workload gets very parallel. Think about how much of a pain it would be to have something like Pokemon Go run in a single thread when you've got camera input, overlay and positional information and not a lot of time to put it all together without a user complaining about lag when they move the phone.

    48. Re:My first first? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      And I would imagine that it also helps that Apple is the only U.S.-based cellphone manufacturer

      Foxxcon makes stuff in the USA and not China?
      Your "point" is actually a major disadvantage to Apple and everyone else who does not manufacture in the USA.

    49. Re:My first first? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Also Apple is Irish to be sure.

    50. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      And I would imagine that it also helps that Apple is the only U.S.-based cellphone manufacturer

      Foxxcon makes stuff in the USA and not China? Your "point" is actually a major disadvantage to Apple and everyone else who does not manufacture in the USA.

      So which cellphone OEM actually MANUFACTURES their product in the USA?

    51. Re: My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Yup! I just popped at 256GB sd card to supplement my 32gb for a total of 288GB!

      And this is on a 3ish year old Galaxy S5 which also has water and dust resistance certification... you know, something that might be important when in the middle of a desert or really humid environments.

      Oh, you mean those alleged certifications that are now being called into question?

      And BTW, an an open SD slot and SD cards is the LAST thing you want in a device in a hostile combat zone; as a security vulnerability, and as a point of failure through dirt and water intrusion.

    52. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Also Apple is Irish to be sure.

      Not according to their Articles of Incorporation.

      Which is more than can be said of Samsung, LG, HTC, and every other unpronounceable cellphone mfg. you can think of. Even Motorola is owned by non-US interests.

    53. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      You're a stupid motherfucker, but as a SUPER HARDCORE MAC FANBOY we shouldn't be surprised. Go suck Tim Cook's gay dick and hope he gives you an upgrade sans the Apple tax.

      Grow up.

    54. Re:My first first? by danbob999 · · Score: 2

      You are seriously using anecdotal evidence to say that "most" prefer iOS?

    55. Re:My first first? by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      It couldn't possibly be that the latest iPhone+iOS is better than the latest android phone+GoogleOS.

      In theory that could happen but in reality? No. That hasn't been the case for quite some time in just about every field except the "looking cool" and being very #shiny.

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    56. Re:My first first? by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      And I would imagine that it also helps that Apple is the only U.S.-based cellphone manufacturer.

      Samsungs are made by an ally - South Korea. iPhones are made in China. That sounds like a pretty clear cut case for avoiding the latter.

      It's not so much where they were founded and where their largest user base is. It is about the actual security of devices made by a company under the ever watchful eye of the communist party.

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    57. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      You are seriously using anecdotal evidence to say that "most" prefer iOS?

      So, when does anecdotal evidence become data?

      So, using the same "dataset" (Slashdot comments to this story), show me the examples where people who have tried both Android and iOS actually prefer the performance and security of Android.

      I'll wait.

    58. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Only an idiot would call flash STORAGE, memory. "memory" is not a nebulous term as you indicate.

      And only an simpleton would call someone who refers to Flash MEMORY an idiot for not using the word "Storage".

      If you look at this article, for example (picked because it was the first one that caught my eye), other than the first paragraph, the word "memory" appears a LOT more than the word "Storage".

      And if you were to design Flash into a device (as I have), you will find that all the device datasheets (at least all the ones I have seen) refer to the components as "Flash MEMORY". For example, look at this typical electronics distributor page (again, picked entirely at random from a Google search for "flash memory chips"); note that everything from EEPROMs to large-scale Flash chips are referred to as "Flash MEMORY". Now, I notice that Samsung sometimes DOES refer to its Flash Memory as "Flash Storage"; but that is a recent thing, and if you peruse their websites, you will find that even they are inconsistent in their mixing of the terms "Memory" and "Storage". So, they are "idiots" too, I guess...

      An idiot is someone who refers to a Hard Drive as "memory" (we've all seen that); but to call me an idiot because they use a different form of a term in which both are in common use says much more about your lack of experience and intelligence than it does mine.

    59. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      It's not so much where they were founded and where their largest user base is

      Well yes, yes it is.

    60. Re:My first first? by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      Bingo! Unless the reporter spent time with those actually performing the comparative analysis and saw convincing evidence of that claim, it's usually safe to assume that General Wombat liked his iPhone and directed the "research" team to show why it's better. How many will sacrifice their army careers just to tell the truth about which phone is better? If someone is particularly incensed about it, they'll likely seek a transfer or retire or quit at the end of their next term.

    61. Re:My first first? by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that your dataset is both flawed and too small.
      The real data set is worldwide devices sold. Android has about 84% in Q1 2016. There is no reliable data set on users who used both.

    62. Re:My first first? by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      In my experience decisions like this are typically made because somebody high up likes their iPhone and doesn't want to have to learn how to use an Android phone.

      Your experience is most probably limited to small MOM & POP shops because big companies look at the bottom line. This means looking at the marketing impact, the cost of manufacturing/implementing and the cost to R&D (Not in that specific order).

      The thing about DARPA is that they have a ridiculous amount of R&D money to waste and will dig into the weeds until they know for sure. To me, it means the Android device was truly problematic enough to justify the higher purchase price of Apple's device.

      Honestly, when I read this article I wasn't surprised. Apple's OS is only stronger because they control the hardware. Android's fallout is the same as Microsoft's. They depend on the H/W manufacturers to care enough. For that reason IOS will always appear to be a better OS.

    63. Re:My first first? by goarilla · · Score: 1

      Yeah I agree, it does feel a like a light flavor of swapping

    64. Re:My first first? by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      GP is right, All the vendors market to the guys wearing stars

      GP can only be partially right.

      Are you actually surprised that the Apple product out performed the Android device? I know I'm not. The devices simply aren't competing on the same level. IOS is for Apple's device only. It's fine tuned for its hardware and vice versa. Android is tailored for devices and fine tuned by the manufacturer. This is a clear disadvantage for the platform.

      My 2 cents!

    65. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      The problem is that your dataset is both flawed and too small. The real data set is worldwide devices sold. Android has about 84% in Q1 2016. There is no reliable data set on users who used both.

      I agree the dataset is not a statistically significant sample-size. But the relative marketshare percentages don't mean squat, either, because that doesn't measure "switchers" (in either direction).

      In looking for that number, I found several interesting articles in this search, which is at least a step in the right direction. But this graph makes it look like, quite frankly, both platforms are equally healthy.

    66. Re:My first first? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You are learning grasshopper. That means none of them have the home team advantage, to be sure to be sure.

    67. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      You are learning grasshopper. That means none of them have the home team advantage, to be sure to be sure.

      I wonder REALLY how much an iPhone would have to cost if it was assembled in USA?

      Only the final assembly is done by hand; so that is really the only part of the labor costs that would be significantly higher. It might actually be do-able. Afterall, Apple already assembles the Mac Pro in USA; but it is obviously a higher-margin product, which helps make that practical.

    68. Re:My first first? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Of course it's "do-able" or it used to be when the supply chain was all in a local area. Parts of California and Texas would still come close to being able to do that. Foxxcon provides a major chunk of the process without Apple having to plan things out and sold it as a package instead of Apple having to do a lot of logistics themselves.
      Germany manages to do a lot of manufacturing despite high labor costs because when it comes down to it if high labor costs add to a significant chunk of the cost of the product you are doing far too much manual handling.

    69. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Of course it's "do-able" or it used to be when the supply chain was all in a local area. Parts of California and Texas would still come close to being able to do that. Foxxcon provides a major chunk of the process without Apple having to plan things out and sold it as a package instead of Apple having to do a lot of logistics themselves. Germany manages to do a lot of manufacturing despite high labor costs because when it comes down to it if high labor costs add to a significant chunk of the cost of the product you are doing far too much manual handling.

      I know whatcha mean about the supply chain. But a company the size of Apple "makes its own weather", and Tim Cook is purportedly first-and-foremost a supply-chain and logistics wizard; so I am sure that, if Apple want sto build it, they will come...

      Add to that the fact that they already have some sort of facility for the Mac Pros (or at least a good relationship with a large Contract Manufacturer), and I believe that is in Texas. Apple used to do some assembly in Austin, IIRC, likely started when Apple had a tight relationship with Motorola, who used to be based there. That's probably where they are assemblng the Pros.

      Interesting point about Germany.

      Of course, I am only guessing about the amount of manual assembly needed for an iPhone; but as an embedded designer, I have had to deal with Contract Manufacturers and Internal Manufacturing matters. I just figure that the PCBs are obviously stuffed with robotic Pick and Place, and the IR reflow soldering is also completely automated; but assembling the battery and PCB "modules" into the "tub", then placing the Home Button, Display/Digitizer, and Glass is done by hand. I could be surprised, and only the digitizer/glass step is done by hand; but knowing how things are done in China, I would bet that I am about right about the amount of hand-assembly.

      In addition the all the iOS products, I also think that the manufacturing and assembly of Apple's desktop Macs could be done here, or at least the Mac mini; which if I had to guess is almost completely robotic assembly, and could likely be slightly repackaged to allow for completely automated assembly. Same for the iMac (maybe). However, I don't think that laptops will ever be practical to assemble Stateside; but maybe Apple could at least shop around for a more friendly Third-World country in which to develop a facility.

    70. Re:My first first? by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      You graph is again anecdotal evidence. Both platforms are nowhere near as close in global market share.
      If there were a significant amount of switchers from iOS to Android, Android couldn't keep > 75% market share for years. If only half of Android users switched to the iPhone, the iPhone would have more market share at some point.
      The main problem with the dataset of Slashdot is not only that it isn't significant, but that it is highly biased. The average user don't choose names such as "macs4all".

    71. Re:My first first? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      You graph is again anecdotal evidence.

      Any data can be claimed to be anecdotal. But it is a lot better sample than Slashdot comments, and far better than your average Political Poll. Deal with it.

      And it's a Username. Grow up.

    72. Re:My first first? by danbob999 · · Score: 2

      Smartphone market share studies are not political polls. And no, your graph is not better than an average political poll because again, there is a huge selection bias.

    73. Re:My first first? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      But a company the size of Apple "makes its own weather"

      Not if they don't even try.

    74. Re:My first first? by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      It's not so much where they were founded and where their largest user base is

      Well yes, yes it is.

      It is not apparent how you have arrived at this unlikely conclusion. Please enlighten me.

      Anything that is manufactured in a factory under the supervision of the Chinese communist party and all its experts is, by definition, unfit for secure use - military or otherwise - in the USA or anywhere else. South Korea, although not much more secure than the US, Canada or the UK, for example, is still on "our side".

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    75. Re:My first first? by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 1

      GP is right, All the vendors market to the guys wearing stars

      GP can only be partially right.

      Are you actually surprised that the Apple product out performed the Android device? I know I'm not. The devices simply aren't competing on the same level. IOS is for Apple's device only. It's fine tuned for its hardware and vice versa. Android is tailored for devices and fine tuned by the manufacturer. This is a clear disadvantage for the platform.

      My 2 cents!

      I'm a little fuzzy on how allowing further tuning below the company level is a disadvantage, as opposed to the walled garden....

      --
      "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
    76. Re:My first first? by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      I'm a little fuzzy on how allowing further tuning below the company level is a disadvantage, as opposed to the walled garden

      The walled garden for the most part is a technical user pet peeve. For most a contained device that offers predictable performance, stability and continued OS support is far more important. That's been their bread and butter since the beginning.

    77. Re:My first first? by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 1

      I'm a little fuzzy on how allowing further tuning below the company level is a disadvantage, as opposed to the walled garden

      The walled garden for the most part is a technical user pet peeve. For most a contained device that offers predictable performance, stability and continued OS support is far more important. That's been their bread and butter since the beginning.

      You said something, in a reply to my post, but it was some rhetoric, and didn't clarify anything at all to me.

      --
      "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
    78. Re:My first first? by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      I explained why the walled garden was actually an advantage over the alternative in this case.

    79. Re:My first first? by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 1

      I explained why the walled garden was actually an advantage over the alternative in this case.

      No, you stated there is a walled garden, defined roughly what that meant (which I think is an argument as to why it is a disadvantage) then acted like it was the opposite.

      --
      "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
  2. Huh? by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Other apps can help with high altitude jumps;

    So are they supposed to just whip out an iPhone in the middle of a HALO jump to figure out when they need to open their chute?

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Huh? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      So are they supposed to just whip out an iPhone in the middle of a HALO jump to figure out when they need to open their chute?

      <sarcasm>That's what I always do, don't you?</sarcasm>

      Maybe it communicates with a headset via Bluetooth to tell them when to deploy their chute. At least that's how I'd set it up.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:Huh? by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      Just make sure there's no DST change around the time of the jump.

    3. Re:Huh? by wkwilley2 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, you just have to make sure the request sends before you hit the gr

      -session terminated

      --
      Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
    4. Re:Huh? by Notorious+G · · Score: 1

      HALO jumps are not done that often anymore. In fact, I suspect almost never. They do HAHO now. Modern parachute design allows you to glide into the target area from up to 40 miles away rather than the aircraft flying over a target country. It takes a while to travel that distance so plenty of time to whip out a iPhone and get anything from GPS, current LZ/target data, keep in contact with your team, etc.

    5. Re:Huh? by magarity · · Score: 1

      plenty of time to whip out a iPhone and get anything from GPS, current LZ/target data, keep in contact with your team, etc.

      Instagram and Twitter?

      check it out! me and my crew sailing over the dmz at 20k! w00t!

    6. Re:Huh? by Kryptonut · · Score: 1

      Soldier: Siri! Open my chute!
      Siri: I'm sorry, the app "My Chute" is not installed.
      Soldier: Fffffffuuuuuuu

      *SPLAT*

    7. Re:Huh? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Soldier: Siri! Open my chute!
      Siri: The men's room in the gay bar 2 kilometer SE on Rt 3 is favorably reviewed on Facebook for its cottaging

    8. Re:Huh? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Soldier: Siri! Open my chute!

      Siri: I'm sorry, the app "My Chute" is not installed.

      Soldier: Fffffffuuuuuuu

      *SPLAT*

      Now THAT's how you do a Siri joke! Perfect!

    9. Re:Huh? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Hence the importance of responsive applications.

  3. Isn't there something in Apple's EULA about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You may not use this device to kill people?

  4. Still made in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    *doh

    1. Re:Still made in China by macs4all · · Score: 1

      *doh

      But at least the Company is based in the U.S.A.

  5. Re:Isn't there something in Apple's EULA about thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You may not use this device to kill people?

    then how did pokemon go get approved?

  6. Until apple gets all peace warrior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I can totally see Apple making a big stink about using Apple products in wartime missions.

    "This insurgent extraction brought to you by iTunes, the only way to jam out with your rifle out! And Apple Maps, accurate to the last drop!"

    1. Re:Until apple gets all peace warrior by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      I can totally see Apple making a big stink about using Apple products in wartime missions.

      I kinda bet Apple will see $$$$ signs much more than they will see peace signs....

      A DoD contract would mean a LOT of money to Apple, and after all, they are a company who's business is to make money.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Until apple gets all peace warrior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apple logo in camo, special edition iPhone with gas detectors built in, a special set of cloudlets for those even more special missions, iSniper and iArtillery with weapon remote control, timing and compute, iNTheSky tactical terrain and spectrum awareness. The possibilities are endless.

    3. Re:Until apple gets all peace warrior by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can totally see Apple making a big stink about using Apple products in wartime missions.

      "This insurgent extraction brought to you by iTunes, the only way to jam out with your rifle out! And Apple Maps, accurate to the last drop!"

      You don't remember all the free press Apple got early in the Iraq War when a bullet went through a soldier's vest and stopped in his 1st gen iPod?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:Until apple gets all peace warrior by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > A DoD contract would mean a LOT of money to Apple,

      Meh. They could sell what, a couple thousand phones to SOC? 10k maybe? That's what, an hour of retail?

      This isn't the 50's.

    5. Re:Until apple gets all peace warrior by cfalcon · · Score: 2

      Usually there's a lot more to it than that. There's usually support contracts, etc.

    6. Re:Until apple gets all peace warrior by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the free publicity.

    7. Re:Until apple gets all peace warrior by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Meh. They could sell what, a couple thousand phones to SOC? 10k maybe? That's what, an hour of retail?

      This isn't the 50's.

      If this goes DoD wide as the standard, well, they employ approx 3.1 Million people which I would think would be a significant amount of phones to be sold to the govt. As another person mentioned to you on this thread, that often also includes support ,etc which proves to be even more lucrative.

      If you can get a DoD contract, it can often prove to be VERY valuable. Ask Lockheed Martin, or Oracle or MS, or.....etc.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:Until apple gets all peace warrior by magarity · · Score: 1

      If you can get a DoD contract, it can often prove to be VERY valuable

      Yes but the problem is that by the time a DoD contract goes through all the approvals, etc, it will specify exactly that iPhone6, 16GB models, are to be supplied and the year will be 2021.

    9. Re:Until apple gets all peace warrior by seksi-seppo · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, there's nothing that newspeak wouldn't solve. Of course Apple is happy to provide products for totally peaceful operations by US department of defense.

      "...And Apple Maps, accurate to the last drop!"

      I laughed at this though.

    10. Re:Until apple gets all peace warrior by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

      > Ask Lockheed Martin, or Oracle or MS

      Who are selling products worth millions, or billions. An iPhone is less than $1000.

      Apple sells something like 250 million iPhones a year. Even if they get a 3 million for the entire armed forces, piled with all the goodies and cherries on top, it's still a drop in the bucket.

      It's called math, try it some time.

  7. That's nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they're switching, it's because somebody's getting a kickback.

    1. Re:That's nonsense by Notorious+G · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I doubt it. I had android phones most of my career and only switched to iPhone about 18 months ago. The android phones tend to suck, it's that simple. They freeze, they lose performance (frequent reboots often fix that) and occasional exhibit unexpected and inconsistent behaviors (icon/button clicks don't work until app/phone restart, a button that did one thing sometimes does something else, etc). Android battery life sucks so bad there are apps you need to use to help manage it - not because the battery is a problem but it seems something is always running that drains it. With my iPhone, it just works. In 18 months I can count the number of reboots on one hand. I can go the entire weekend without recharging. Occasionally there is an app crash but nothing like I saw on android. When you're out on the sharp tip of the spear and your life may depend on information being reliably available, android is not the best bet. I'm not saying iPhone is something I'd want to bet my life on either but if I was in their position and wanted the best available, it's the iPhone.

    2. Re:That's nonsense by Notorious+G · · Score: 1

      I have not had a nexus phone and I've heard from friends and business peers that's the only reliable one - if I were to ever go back android, it's the only one I'd consider. I can't recall all the android models I've had, at least half a dozen different ones over a multi-year period (at least 8 years). Some were better than others but for the most part they all exhibited similar behavior.

    3. Re:That's nonsense by Rexdude · · Score: 1

      Any comment on 'an Android phone' is invalid unless you specify which, because there's no such thing as a generic Android phone when you get them in a million configurations and price points. What is the phone model? That reveals the age of the handset as well as the manufacturer.

      --
      "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
    4. Re:That's nonsense by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Tell that to Sig-Sauer, I am sure they would love to find that since the Seals are moving from the P226 to the Glock 19

    5. Re:That's nonsense by JohnStock · · Score: 1

      You just had a shit and/or old phone. A modern high end Android phone is better than the best iPhone.

  8. OK by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2

    Now the army spec ops guys just need to get their apps approved through the app store.

    1. Re:OK by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Just tell them that rare Pokemon have been spotted near an ISIS encampment.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:OK by jittles · · Score: 4, Informative

      Now the army spec ops guys just need to get their apps approved through the app store.

      The DoD already pays for an enterprise cert for iOS. They have been running their own server w/ app install capabilities for the last ~6 years or so, even when they were just tinkering with iOS deployments.

  9. Apple apps approved? by PedroReina · · Score: 2

    Can the Army install custom apps for themselves or they need to be approved first for Apple?

    1. Re:Apple apps approved? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      what about an custom rom and being fully unlocked with no locking the Apple SIM card

    2. Re:Apple apps approved? by Ixokai · · Score: 5, Informative

      Apple has had an enterprise mechanism for installing custom apps for years now, completely bypassing the store. This has been the case almost as long as there's been an a store.

      With the right management software, the apps can even be loaded and updated automatically. All without Apple ever seeing them.

    3. Re:Apple apps approved? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Can the Army install custom apps for themselves or they need to be approved first for Apple?

      ANYone can install custom iOS apps for themselves. You don't even have to be a Registered Developer.

    4. Re:Apple apps approved? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they only work for a month or so from what I remember... You need enterprise dev license to install custom signed apps permanently.

      I think they actually changed that in iOS 9.

  10. A natural consequence by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

    A natural consequence of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:A natural consequence by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

      Damn bigots.

  11. Weapons and ammunitions guides? by cdrudge · · Score: 1

    Isn't on the battlefield a little late to be reading weapons and ammunition guides?

    1. Re:Weapons and ammunitions guides? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not really, I figure when they talk about "weapons and ammunition guides" I figure that might be troubleshooting manuals and ballistics calculators. For example, your spotter ranges some targets, estimated distance 900 meters. You know your rifle can make the shot, but how high do you have to shoot to make sure the bullet doesn't drop into the dirt halfway there? You can punch all that into a ballistics app (.338 Lapua Magnum, 2900 ft/s, 1100 feet away, mild crosswind about 7 MPH, etc) and it will spit back "hold 5.4 MRAD up and 0.7 MRAD left" and off you go. They used to do this with a big table of values, now the app does the work.

      As a quick aside, the first programmable computer, the ENIAC, was originally built for ballistics calculation for artillery teams.

    2. Re:Weapons and ammunitions guides? by jittles · · Score: 1

      Isn't on the battlefield a little late to be reading weapons and ammunition guides?

      These types are usually trained on foreign service weapons in their area of operation. They may be using scavenged weapons and may need to look up a more complicated task that they have not performed on a regular enough basis to have memorized. Same with ammo.

  12. Not a suprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In demanding, life-and-death situations, being an open platform and full of nifty gizmos doesn't always make for the best mobile platform. Build quality, durability, and reliability is key, speed is a nice perk too. Samsung does okay, but Apple still has these features dialed in. When you get over being grumpy about Apple's walled garden approach to apps, those key features are really what we are looking for in the field.

    1. Re:Not a suprise by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Build quality, durability, and reliability is key, speed is a nice perk too. Samsung does okay, but Apple still has these features dialed in.

      Honestly, is there really THAT much difference in build quality, durability, or reliability between any of the flagship phones, regardless of OS?

      I'm actually kind of surprised that they're using any type of modern COTS phone. All the things that makes one great for consumer use, lighter, thinner, giant screens I'd think would be to a detriment in the field. I want something compact, literally bulletproof, and that you can drive a tank over.

    2. Re:Not a suprise by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      I think you are right in that the hardware isn't *that* different. The real difference is in the operating environment and Apple's being closed makes no difference to an institution that doesn't even want users to be mucking about with random apps downloaded from dodgy sites.

      As to the durability, you get that by using a case. An otterbox or something similar is going to be about as good as it gets.

      As to "literally bulletproof" that makes no sense. The term "bulletproof" is commonplace and its meaning is "well understood" but you can't write a specification for it. Body armor is rated for the grade of ammunition it can "reliably" stop. Its been years so I'm probably a little off on the terms, but level 1 would stop light small arms (under powered rounds like .22, .32ACP, etc.), level 2 will stop most small arms (9mm, .45 ACP, etc.), and so on. A rifle bullet is going to go right through kevlar, but with the right inserts you can stop the lighter rounds (but not AP or even semi-AP on a reliable basis). But a .50 BMG is going to punch through anything someone can wear.

      But stopping the bullet is only a partial solution. A tank's armor may stop a round, but result in spalling so that someone "safely" inside it is still injured or even killed. In the case of a "bullet proof" phone the shock of impact is going to shatter the glass even if the bullet is somehow stopped from penetrating to it.

    3. Re:Not a suprise by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      The real difference is in the operating environment and Apple's being closed makes no difference to an institution that doesn't even want users to be mucking about with random apps downloaded from dodgy sites.

      I'm presuming the military is intelligent to lock down the device to restrict what gets installed on it. At that point, it doesn't really matter if it's open or closed.

      I wasn't literally meaning bulletproof and able to drive a tank over it. I was meaning I want something more durable then the latest ultralight phone. What works good for the guy in the office doesn't for the guy in the field. Adding a bit more weight and a bit thicker probably isn't going to be noticed by the guy carrying a 60 pound backpack. A specialty designed extra-rugged phone frame rather than an iPhone 6S might actually make a difference in the field.

  13. APPS ?! They use APPS ?! by gosand · · Score: 1

    Seriously, they don't have specialized equipment for high altitude jumps or to detect radiation?!
    I can only hope that for a special forces tactical assault kit they are getting some custom designed ones and not off-the-shelf phones.

    The article links to another article at dodbuzz that gives some better info.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  14. Vanilla? by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    If they didn't want it to freeze I would hope they bought a Google Nexus, the only arguably vanilla Android phone. Otherwise, yeah, if it's worth the extra cost to you an iPhone probably will be more stable.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  15. Re:Isn't there something in Apple's EULA about thi by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    we can also sent the info to the highest bidder and you can't install your own custom rom's.

  16. Re:Loss of signal = clusterfark by b0bby · · Score: 1

    Certainly my Moto X has troubles transitioning from wifi to 4g, even to the point of often killing a phone call in progress.

  17. Re:APPS ?! They use APPS ?! by b0bby · · Score: 1

    I assume the phones can do many things, and they are only the end user device. Why not get off the shelf stuff which is reasonably cheap and well understood?

  18. Was it lack of support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe the ASOC switched because the expert on the Android forum told them to fork their own version of the software and fix it themselves, then locked the thread.

  19. Re:Isn't there something in Apple's EULA about thi by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    Status: BRN

  20. It's not the hardware or the OS that's the issue by PyroSlacker · · Score: 5, Informative

    I deal with the DoD phones every day and it's not that the Android hardware or OS is slower or inferior, it's that the DoD's implementation is. I personally don't like iOS and find my Samsung phones far superior for personal use, but once the security software is installed the Galaxy phones are virtually useless (and this includes all the way up through the S6, not just completely outdated models). They completely missed the point on how Knox is supposed to work and try to secure both the regular partition and the Knox partition which just screws up both of them. They constantly lose connection to the server and have to be reset or just freeze entirely. Despite my vehement dislike of iOS I advise people to only get iPhones now for the office. It's just not worth fighting with what they've done to Android. So when SOCOM says their Android phones are slow and freezing and the iPhone is much faster it's completely true in the context of government secured versions (in the context of personal phones that don't have everything useful disabled in the name of security, I'll stick with my S7 Edge).

  21. Re:*Urban* Army Special Ops by Altus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thats a TACTICAL turtleneck you insensitive clod!

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  22. It's hip to be square by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
    I know that it's crazy\

    I know that it's nowhere\

    But there is no denying that

  23. Nope, "operators" usually pick equipment by perpenso · · Score: 2, Informative

    In my experience decisions like this are typically made because somebody high up likes their iPhone and doesn't want to have to learn how to use an Android phone. Sounds overly simplistic, but I've seen it happen too many times.

    Bad guess. Note "United States Army's Special Operations Command", they get a lot of say in what equipment they use. A friend's brother made some unique camera equipment. SOC guys thought it interesting. The only people this small company every saw during evaluation were "operators". The "suits" did not get involved until the "operators" said "we want this". What you say may be true for normal military procurement, but its very different for SOC.

    1. Re:Nope, "operators" usually pick equipment by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Still a dumb decisions when they could have simply http://www.ubuntu.com/phone. If a phone can run Android it can run Linux, for what should be obvious reasons and hence a custom rolled solution makes more sense (a tweaked protocol offset system, so only apps allowed to run can run or be installed succesfully). Basically when supply numbers are high enough customer demands can be pushed quite economically, to produce a range of products that provide optimum solutions. So physically durable phones running the core Linux operating system (no Android layer on top), only upgradeable and patchable by the DOD, running the selected range of safe apps (need to know) and not capable of running any apps outside of DOD supplied apps for that specific range of users. That is the common sense solution, the solution chosen is just plain stupid (some admin wonk with no depth).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  24. Re:It's not the hardware or the OS that's the issu by psergiu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yep - another S6A Knox user here.
    If i lose data connection for a bit, i feel-it as the phone heats up like mad while sucking the battery dry.
      If i lose the data connection for too long, it will self-format (and destroy all the data/photos/application settings on the phone)
    And when the data connection is working fine, the fscking antivirus randomly kicks in and slows everything down. I had battery life varying from 3 full days to 3 hours.
    There's no way to get consistent functionality from a secured Samsung phone. While on iPhone everything works as it should.

    Linux kernel on Android vs MACH Darwin microkernel on iOS.

    --
    1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
  25. Guys wearing starts don't always make the call by perpenso · · Score: 5, Interesting

    GP is right, All the vendors market to the guys wearing stars. If the general likes it then that's what we buy, doesn't matter what the grunts think.

    Note "United States Army's Special Operations Command", that works entirely different. A friend's brother made some specialized photographic gear for the civilian market. SOC guys heard about it, visited, asked to evaluate it. They made some suggestions. These were incorporated into the design. They then told the guys wearing stars "we want this" and then "suits" got involved for the paperwork. Selection, evaluation and decision for this gear was made by "operators".

  26. 3 Year newer phone by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    Wiki has the Nett Warrior system using a samsung galaxy note II the replacement is 2015 thats a huge difference in tech what 2 whole android OS revisions etc. They also have them using a NSA approved firmware who who knows what issues.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  27. Re:It's not the hardware or the OS that's the issu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    People often criticize iOS devices for being boring and slow to adopt new features.

    On the flip side, they are quite consistent and predictable.. Which is what you want in a managed/business environment.

    If you get an iphone it /will/ be able to connect to your email systems and will likely have apps available for your middleware/cms/etc.

    The iphone being the standard office phone. Hah. I need to dig up all those old threads people touting how blackberry will continue in to the future and the iphone will be a forgotten toy in a year.

  28. "...Android phones were freezing unexpectedly..." by mmell · · Score: 1
    How many of these had sideloaded software (malware?) because Johnny wants to watch some, er, interesting videos or play games for money? Does NSA/DARPA/GAO really believe iPhone will do any better?

    It reminds me of a potential advertisement a past employer of mine considered - never mind the visuals, the tagline was "They offered me an iPhone. I offered them a head-start!"

  29. Consumer grade phones? by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Someone please tell me out Military isnt buying the same phones the consumers buy? Same for Windows 10 even if its the "enterprise" edition can you imagine Microsoft having the ability to data mine our Military.lol omg.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  30. Re:Radiation? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    geiger counters are for prospecting uranium or finding contaminated dust on yourself. what you want is a survey meter. Your cell phone will fail at about 5 thousand rad, your body at about a fifth of that in chronic dose.

  31. Re:APPS ?! They use APPS ?! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    this couldn't possibly be to call them when they're not on base?

  32. Re:iphones by macs4all · · Score: 1

    iPhones are great. It's the iTunes ecosystem that turns me completely off. How can they make such a great device with a superb OS only to pair it up with desktop software that is so totally awful.

    There is no "iTunes" on iOS. There is "Music", which is not the same App in any way.

  33. Re:"...Android phones were freezing unexpectedly.. by macs4all · · Score: 1

    Does NSA/DARPA/GAO really believe iPhone will do any better?

    Why yes, yes it does.

    Kinda the whole point, isn't it?

  34. Re:iphones by macs4all · · Score: 1

    I think you didn't read the "desktop software that is so totally awful" part.

    I read it; but didn't think it applied; since the REST of us were talking about MOBILE stuff.

  35. Widely known that SOC has latitude in gear by perpenso · · Score: 3, Funny

    Really - three nearly identical posts ...

    Apologies for communicating with three different individuals.

    ... and in all three, you seem almost desperate to have someone acknowledge that you are an insider with super-meaningful knowledge.

    I am not an insider, nor have any special knowledge. It is quite well known that SOC has a wide latitude in gear selection. I merely saw a single instance of this well known practice. Apologies if your anti-military industrial complex meme or whatever failed. Perhaps there will be an F-35 post for you soon and you can find some joy.

  36. Re:It's not the hardware or the OS that's the issu by pete6677 · · Score: 1

    And the funny thing is, two years after its release, the BlackBerry Passport is still the smartest, best engineered handheld computing device on the market, bar none. Even so-called techies on Slashdot don't know jack if it's not advertised on teevee.

    Even still, nobody wants it.

    Stick a fork in Blackberry; they're done!

  37. Buggy Android phones by jbrizz · · Score: 1

    It's not the hardware or the fundamentals of Android itself, it's that the phone manufacturers can't release a reliable device if their shareholder profits depended on it. Even my Nexus 6P has crippling bugs which Google have not/will not fix. There is not enough QA and not enough patches to fix bugs. I get my security updates every month, but bugs which have been in the bug tracker since the phones release are still not fixed.

  38. Apple vs Google by seksi-seppo · · Score: 1

    Personally I'm bit surprised that those are two options that are considered for any security-critical field application.

  39. Apple Bias by kgroombr · · Score: 1

    What you have here is a leader in the organization that is an Apple freak that is lying to get them to ditch Android in an attempt to get more people hooked on iPhones so his/her stock prices go up. No joke, seen these types of leaders when I was active duty.

  40. Re:iphones by macs4all · · Score: 1

    What does anyone actually use iTunes for, anyway? Other than if my OS gets borked (which honestly hasn't happened to me since probably iOS 4 or 5), or syncing local music, which it does, everything else can be done on the device itself.

    Are we talking about Desktop use of iTunes.app or Mobile use of the "Music" App?

    I use iTunes on OS X primarily as a (gasp!) Music Librarian/Player. I don't use it for Videos, though. And I haven't "synced" with it since I wanted to download a bunch of vacation pix from my phone to my computer, and before I went on that vacation to load up a bunch of music onto my phone for use in the car.

  41. Combat Ready? by GPTurismo · · Score: 1

    I have been a big fan of Samsungs Rugby/Actives for years. I didn't care for Consumer Reports of a simulated pressure of five feet, which is an instant pressure on the phone, and have dropped my S7 Active in a pool and it works fine. I have nerve and balance issues so my phones go through hell. If IPhones can't handle that pressure how will they handle ASOC?

  42. Re:APPS ?! They use APPS ?! by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

    There is specialized equipment for that. I have the radiation detector in my Amazon wishlist. It's like $20 with free two day shipping. Or do you mean the military should develop a version that costs $50,000 each, when a small phone can do the same thing? Are you the guy who paid $10,000 for a hammer?

  43. Re:Radiation? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    nope, not in the nuclear power industry. they just call it a "radiation detector". Its range is far too limited to be survey meter. five counts per second usually is considered a micro Sievert per hour.

  44. Re:Radiation? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    another [app] can detect radiation.

    There are other ways of detecting radiation than Geiger counters (electrometers, for example), but I struggle to work out how or why the appropriate sensors would be included in a regular mobile phone. I could almost see the point of a USB-powered device, which you might communicate with through an application. But you still then need to look carefully at the calibration procedures and reference materials for it to be much use.

    Amazon do such things for about $600, so I guess it's shoddy writing rather than someone successfully breaking the laws of physics.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  45. Re:Radiation? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    Survey meters in the nuke industry don't work by geiger tube, those become saturated and then give a very LOW reading as the tube needs recovery time after a discharge - dangerously misleading! The conversion of counts to milirem depend on energy and type of particle and sensitivity of tube type but roughly for "common" situations might be 1000 counts/minute = milliREM/Hour. So no geiger is going to detect say the 2.5 REM/ Hour that in one hour puts you over the federal limit for a nuke worker's entire YEAR, it would just saturate since that's over 13 million counts per minute

    The usual survey meters use ion chambers or scintillation, the ion chamber with high range get into the nuclear disaster/war fallout range of several to thousands of REM per hour. Geiger can't do that.

    geigers are used for "contamination monitors", in other words radioactive dust or dirt on you that you wouldn't want to ingest