Slashdot Mirror
6 Million Americans Exposed To High Levels of Chemicals In Drinking Water, Says Study (businessinsider.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Business Insider: A new study out Tuesday in the journal Environmental Science and Technology Letters looked at a national database that monitors chemical levels in drinking water and found that 6 million people were being exposed to levels of a certain chemical that exceed what the Environmental Protection Agency considers healthy. The chemicals, known as poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances, or PFASs, are synthetic and resistant to water and oil, which is why they're used in things like pizza boxes and firefighting foam. They're built to withstand the environment. But PFASs also accumulate in people and animals and have been observationally linked to an increased risk of health problems including cancer. And they can't be easily avoided, like with a water filter, for example. You can view the chart to see the tested areas of the U.S. where PFASs exceed 70 ng/L, which is what's considered a healthy lifetime exposure.
Alex Jones sells several excellent models, from table-top to RO. I highly recommend the Big Berkey with the LED lights. Just get the one made from stainless steel, not plastic.
Oh god, not chemicals! Tell me there's not dihydrogen monoxide in my drinking water! The government is spraying chemtrails over my house and sometimes when I water my tomato plants I see rainbows in the water, you can't explain that! The orange cheeto people are trying to enslave us but I won't let them win.
"If there was a gay Afro-Puertorican Linux distribution, I'd give it a try" ~lucm
Being composed of baryonic matter exposes one to high levels of chemicals, especially for those living outside of the intergalactic voids. To avoid unwanted chemical reaction in proximity to galaxy clusters, convert your substrate entirely to dark matter.
-Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
The day they find yoga mats are carcinogenic will be the happiest day in my life. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=...
Hot spots seem to line-up with current and former military bases WHICH ARE NECESSARY TO KEEP US SAFE.
Even back to the WWII-era Air Corps bases, spraying used oil to keep the weeds and grass in check.
0.6% * 300 million = 1.8 million
That's 600x as many as the number who died in the 9/11 attacks.
Pikoro, always trivializing large populations.
Maybe they mean six million out of every hundred thousand Americans. Eh, whatever, soon they'll be telling us how grateful we should be to have drinkable tap water at all. I suppose the bottling industry just got themselves some new promotional material.
“He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/1...
It helps if there is a working link in TFS.
You fail to realize that there are quite a few bottling plants located in some of those high affected regions. Guess where all the Pepsi in the USA is made? Yep, right in the middle of this highest concentrations of both those chemicals on the map (eastern PA, NJ, southern NY). That also goes for all Pepsi products, not just Pepsi itself...
We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
Oh god, not chemicals! Tell me there's not dihydrogen monoxide in my drinking water! The government is spraying chemtrails over my house and sometimes when I water my tomato plants I see rainbows in the water, you can't explain that!
You do know there's more than one type of chemical, right?
The contamination areas includes, Southern California, Northern California, Central California, Texas and large swaths of the Eastern United States (from the Great Lakes to Massachusetts) and down the seaboard to Florida. I would say 6 million is a gross underestimation - considering how much produce is shipped outside of California,and the population density in the affected areas.
>> .... Chemicals in drinking water ...
Wot ??? There is drinking water in my oil ????
aaaaaaa
The commercial bottled water plants which use tap water (Pepsis/Aquafina, Coca Cola/Dasani, etc) use reverse osmosis on the tap water before bottling. Reverse osmosis removes all PFASes.
It's actually "natural" spring water in affected areas you have to worry about. They can pick up these substances from the environment.
Guess where all the Pepsi in the USA is made?
Hmm, I'm going to guess "at regional bottling plants run by different bottling companies who franchise from PepsiCo", because that is in fact how it actually works. There is no one factory which makes the Pepsi for the whole country. Heck, most large metropolitan areas have their own bottling plant which uses the local water, so there's not even usually one source per state.
Perhaps you've confused your regional Pepsi bottler for the only source of Pepsi in the US because you don't understand what's going on at all.
The more startling aspect of this drinking water pollution are the levels of xenoestrogens. Between HFCS, sedentary lifestyles, and now all sorts of medical chemicals floating around in our drinking water humans are suffering a, "death by a thousand cuts" so to speak. Hormone disrupting chemicals are affecting wild animals as well.
You can fight most of these, but some are more nefarious. I drink upwards of a gallon of water a day because of my work. Thankfully it's a very active (foreman) gig, but at the same time it still has me concerned. I can't use my reverse osmosis home system when i'm away at work!
Can't we as a population not dumb down our language. Can't we say "unhealthy chemicals" instead of unadorned "chemicals". I am exposed to 100% chemicals in my drinking water, mainly the very dangerous dihydrogen mon-oxide.
Maybe they love fetuses but hate babies. Or maybe they like control over women & still hate babies. Or maybe not, I'm not a Republican... or a Democrat for that matter. They do seem to hate infrastructure investment though.
SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT
Exposure is only part of the toxicological equation. Is there causal (not just an associated) evidence of harm? Do we know what dose is necessary to cause this harm, and what the likelihood of harm is at a particular does? The EPA does an excellent job of surveillance. Unfortunately they do a less than stellar job of confirming there is a problem before someone turns exposure data into the basis for a panicked article about the latest "chemical".
Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.-Oscar Wilde
I can't use my reverse osmosis home system when i'm away at work!
While I don't need a gallon during a typical work day, I do bring my reverse osmosis water with me to work in two large, stainless steel bicycle bottles.
As you probably already know, reverse osmosis is the only way to get rid of this type of crap (including fluoride).
It's not entirely the EPA's fault. It is quite difficult to prove that some level of exposure will not cause harm. However, since the EPA is influenced by political whim...
I hear the entire world is consuming a ton of chemicals in their water, mostly DMHO
Yeah, that dark area in the Southern tip of NY and that Long Island near it, nobody lives in that area of the country.
Ah, New Jersey; the land where every puddle has it's own rainbow!
On the one hand you take life too seriously, and on the other, you do not take playful existence seriously enough. Seth
It's actually "natural" spring water in affected areas you have to worry about. They can pick up these substances from the environment.
My well is obviously "under surface influence" (as are most wells) so I have a RO unit (an old one by Premier, which was very expensive a long long time ago. Luckily it was a gift) to solve this problem. But actual spring water can come from sufficiently far away and have enough natural filtering that this isn't a problem. Or an earthquake can change your water source and contaminate it overnight without any human influence at all. Hooray for filtration!
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
I run out half way through the day and need a refill. Carrying around such a big jug of water is difficult already!
You seem to have an echo there. Check for a hollow cavity in your vicinity that might be causing it.
Have gnu, will travel.
I'll just leave this here. http://www.ewg.org/research/te...
My first reaction: Wow, I didn't know Flint, MI, has 6M residents!
My second reaction: Hey, the residents of Flint, MI are not alone!
My third reaction: Boy, am I glad I have an RO system at home, and filtered water at work.
My funny bone is battling with my logical brain over this one. The local News at 6 PM might have more information about that battle. Or maybe not.
Reverse osmosis removes all PFASes [waterrf.org].
According to this publication RO removes 86% of PFAS. It also mentions that the rejected water has considerably higher concentration of PAFS. So anywhere that has a bottling plant with high concentrations is going to continually get worse as the rejected water is dumped into the sewer or directly back into the water table. Regardless it ends up back in the local water supply as standard filtration at sewage treatment plants isn't much help.
There are over 30,000 small water districts with less than 1000 people
I tried a filter it clogged in less than a week. There are 240 homes in my district. Sometimes the water is darker after you flush
A 5 gallon bucket filled when the water is dirty and left to settle will yield an 1/8 of an inch of brown sludge. To wash whites I have to use peroxide because bleach sets rust stains in whites
Or can we all agree the the federal government should ensure that the entire population has safe drinking water?
From the looks of that chart, it seems I need to buy a filter or bottled water now. Not fucking happy about that.
A good portion of Upstate NY'rs wish that were true.
A 5 gallon bucket filled when the water is dirty and left to settle will yield an 1/8 of an inch of brown sludge. To wash whites I have to use peroxide because bleach sets rust stains in whites
Water softener maybe? That also filters the water.