Slashdot Mirror


Kansas Couple Sues IP Mapping Firm For Turning Their Life Into a 'Digital Hell' (arstechnica.com)

Ever since James and Theresa Arnold moved into their rented 623-acre farm in Butler County, Kansas, in March 2011, they have seen "countless" law enforcement officials and individuals turning up at their farm day and night looking for links to alleged theft and other supposed crime. We covered this story on Slashdot a few months ago. All of these people are arriving because of a rounding error on a GPS location, which wrongly points people to their farm. ArsTechnica adds:In their lawsuit filed against MaxMind, the IP mapping firm, the Arnolds allege: "The following events appeared to originate at the residence and brought trespassers and/or law enforcement to the plaintiffs' home at all hours of the night and day: stolen cars, fraud related to tax returns and bitcoin, stolen credit cards, suicide calls, private investigators, stolen social media accounts, fund raising events, and numerous other events." James Arnold has even been "reported as holding girls at the residence for the purpose of making pornographic films."

111 of 175 comments (clear)

  1. Never Suspected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Plot twist: They are guilty of the accused and more, just hiding it underneath their 623 acres.

    1. Re:Never Suspected by Hasaf · · Score: 1

      Well, plenty of people will say, "where theres smoke, theres fire."

      (of course, those people may be idiots)

    2. Re:Never Suspected by plopez · · Score: 2

      If you've done nothing wrong you have nothing to fear.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    3. Re: Never Suspected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your absolutely right. Just make sure you set aside 4 to 12 hours per day, every day for the rest of your life to deal with law enforcement and courts. And just budget for potential 10s of thousands of dollars in court costs that no one will repay when you're found innocent of each accusation. And be sure to have every single second of your life accountable to provide explanations when investigated. And all those colleagues and neighbors and business partners who constantly regard you with suspicion ... well, don't worry about them, because no one needs to interact with the rest of the world while this is going on; they'll acknowledge your innocence anyway because nobody ever thinks the worst.

      Yeah ... nothing to fear.

    4. Re:Never Suspected by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      That is assuming that the system is sane.

      If the people that have power to alter your life don't believe you, then you are just as screwed.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    5. Re: Never Suspected by plopez · · Score: 1

      whoosh

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    6. Re: Never Suspected by doccus · · Score: 1

      If only you could bottle that sarcasm and add it to yer whisky.. boy what bite it would have.. ... Totally in agreement, however

  2. Whatever happened to "location not found"? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What asshole decided to hide the fact that the location isn't in the database?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not that the "location is not found", but that the location could only be generalized to being in the United States. The problem is, these people live in what's pretty much the center of the US and that is what this database returns.

       

    2. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by npslider · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe their address is 404 Error Drive?

    3. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by npslider · · Score: 1

      So they truly live in the Middle of Nowhere?

    4. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The location services do return an area. Specifically, they return a point plus a radius that indicates the confidence. If they know that the user is somewhere in the U.S., the point is in the middle, and the radius is half the width of the country.

      The problem is likely either that A. too many apps fail to show this in a way that the user can recognize as being an "I have no idea" result (e.g. by failing to visually highlight the accuracy radius or by not zooming out far enough to fully show the entire area enclosed within the accuracy radius), or B. lots of users are too clueless to understand that the highlight area around the point indicates the area in which the location could potentially be.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Somewhere in the United States" is not a latitude and longitude location, and should not be reported as such.
      The map on a typical IP address geolocation site does have a circle around it... but there is no statement that the circle indicates a radius of uncertainty (until you said that, I had no idea). And, in any case, if the uncertainty is 2000 miles in radius, the circle won't show up on the map, because it's off the edge.
      It would make more sense if they returned latitude 0, longitude 0.
      Anybody looking at that would probably understand that "zero" indicates something other than "it is located here", but anybody who actually DOES try to go there will go to a undistinguished spot in the Atlantic Ocean.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    6. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      So they truly live in the Middle of Nowhere?

      If you define "The United States of America" as "Nowhere", yes.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    7. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by npslider · · Score: 1

      I would say, as would many, that Kansas is very close to nowhere, maybe not the exact middle, but a close second.

    8. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by npslider · · Score: 1

      On a grander scale, I'd say this place may be the ultimate middle of nowhere: A supervoid

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...

    9. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Informative

      It would make more sense if they returned latitude 0, longitude 0.

      Why? That's a location off the coast of Africa in the Gulf of Guinea, which means that it doesn't even have the benefit of being useful for identifying the correct country, which is what the software is currently configured to do.

      The real problem is that they're providing a point in these conditions in the first place. They shouldn't be. Instead, they should be providing something else if the conditions aren't sufficient to identify an actual point. If all they know is the country (as is the case here), then they should return an object that represents that country, rather than co-opting a point to represent the country and hoping that the people who build on their software will be diligent enough to check the precision as well and realize that the point is virtually useless.

    10. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      "Somewhere in the United States" is not a latitude and longitude location, and should not be reported as such.

      Exactly. It should return something like, "United States, location unknown".

      Hey, I live "somewhere in the United States", come by and visit me!

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    11. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      When you see a billboard on I-70 which says, "Colby Kansas. Oasis of the Plains. 3 Hours Ahead." you know you're pretty much in nowhere.*

      *For you Europeans, 3 hours gets you to the next country. You're still in Kansas 3 hours later and have about another hour until you get to Colorado. That doesn't include the previous hours of driving to get to the sign. All in the same state.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    12. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by Calydor · · Score: 1

      It should basically pop up on the screen: The target is within 2000 miles of this location. Zoom out to where you show the edges of the uncertainty radius always.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    13. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Lol you know when you are in the middle of nowhere when you pass a sign that says in huge red letters "No Fuel for 500km" and then gives you 228km to the next intersection.

      https://brianpas.wordpress.com...

    14. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's for the application, not the map maker. The map maker gave the most accurate result possible, that the applications people screwed it up is a separate issue.

    15. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If the map is locked to a US-only view, why would you want it to display an African location? That would break all the applications.

    16. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Your answer seems to be in conflict with your credentials. The provider of data should not be the interpreter of information. You state the facts as you know them and your confidence in those facts. If the best they can do is "the United States" then the logical reply is of course "the center of the US" with a radius of inclusion being the maximum distance reaching out from the center that could be included. What is done with that data is the responsibility of the interpreter and communicator of information derived from that data.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    17. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      OK...but the radius should include Alaska and Hawaii...and possibly Guam and the Bikini Atoll.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    18. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      228km is only 141 miles. That's 2 hours driving. There are many places in the U.S. where you don't see anything for that long and have warning signs telling you so.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    19. Re: Whatever happened to "location not found"? by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      Until I know how they determined it was in the country, I can't be certain as to whether the appropriate thing to do is return coordinates at the center of the country or to return NaN, NaN.

    20. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Funny

      kansas surely is at the point of know return. sort of a dust in the wind kind of state, if you will.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    21. Re: Whatever happened to "location not found"? by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      No, floating point variables have a better result than 0 to return in this instance and it is NaN and stands for "not a number". Floaing point variables also have a value to return for infinity.

    22. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      This is a failure of API design then. If the location can't be localized, there should be no specific location returned AT ALL. Or shit like this happens.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    23. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      er... "if a specific location can't be specified", I meant to say.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    24. Re: Whatever happened to "location not found"? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      That is what their database does, front end developers often don't use that however.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    25. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      282km / 141 miles is to the next intersection.... It is 500km / 312 miles to the next fuel stop and there is NOTHING in between. No houses, no farms no anything. Just a dirt road and the occasional road train. I would also suggest given the quality of that road you won't be going over 100kph and my personal experience is you average 60kph in those types of conditions. If you managed to do that 500km in 6 hours it would be a damn good run.

    26. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Here, have a look at this map to get an idea - https://www.google.com.au/maps...

    27. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      228km is only 141 miles. That's 2 hours driving.

      Are you going for a funny mod? Many of the roads around here, that would be 4 hours driving or longer if you stuck to the speed limit. Switchbacks slow you down. And once you get out into the boondocks, the roads get crappy, with a few thousand KMs between roads at times.
      Here's a "road" with strictly enforced 25 km/h (10 km/h occasionally) speed limit for loaded trucks, empty can hit 60 km/h. 600 km, 3 rest areas, one emergency, one with laundry and showers, and the third in between. Not sure if any have a gas station. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... This is in a place where a 5km road is considered long, eg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... built by US soldiers as a keep busy thing, rush minute can see 500 cars an hour.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    28. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      It's strange that the default location is centered on the USA for a global coordinate system. At least 0.0, 0.0 is really out in the middle of nowhere.

      It's not the default location. It's the default location for "USA". And it's not even the exact center of the US )it's a "cleaned up" version, aka an arbitrary spot close to, but not exactly at, the center). It would return 0,0 if it was unknown, but the IP address location was known - but only to the accuracy of the country.

      The real problem is it's returning coordinates that look very precise when the error circle is huge

    29. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I have empathy for the map maker. No exception handling is ever correct. Ideally, you'd halt. Return NULL, and let the application handle the error. But the map makers and users hate that, so you give them what they want, a 100% correct answer (a location in the middle, with an error to include it all), but, as we see here, that's undesirable as well. If they'd returned the NULL, they'd have gone out of business. So, they made the correct choice.

    30. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by silentcoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sometime in 2040.
      Off the west coast of Africa lies a graveyard of fallen drones and automatic-pilot ships. Rusty engines and hulls scatter the seafloor and a few not-yet-sunken ones bob along the surface of the water. The location: Longitude 0, Latitude 0.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    31. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      It's not a map at all (there were earlier stories about this couple prior to the lawsuit).
      It's a single table in a database which almost all geolocation services are based on. That table contains the center of the country for any IP which could not be tracked closer than country level, for the US - it's that farm.
      The data is poisoned and was poisoned by the company themselves when they used flawed logic in the algorithms they used to generate that data. The mapmaker is absolutely at fault because it does not, in fact, return to apps a location with an uncertainty circle, it does not return to them just a country - it returns a latitude and longitude, and when it doesn't have a closer answer than country - it very stupidly returns the numbers for the approximate center of that country because the database was built by an algorithm that stored that for every IP it could not trace closer.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    32. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The company should just buy some land, build a marker on it that says "this spot was chosen to represent 'some unknown place in the US'. If you came here because some app told you: dumbass".
      Have it nicely marked in all maps as "tourist" attraction, the "monument to dumbasses trusting geolocation apps".

    33. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Not quite the most accurate possible, they rounded the centre of the US coordinates to the nearest degree. If they had reported the actual, accurate centre then this wouldn't have happened because it's over water.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    34. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by allo · · Score: 1

      It's "location is the us" and would be like "center of us plus very big radius" and people just assume the center of the circle must be a good starting point, without looking at the radius.

    35. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by allo · · Score: 1

      And then deposit all their stolen devices there.

    36. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      Coordinates 0 0?That's Zero Zero island. Is there a reason to suspect Colonel Bleep of all these crimes?

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    37. Re: Whatever happened to "location not found"? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 2

      As I understand it, it's the fault of MaxMind not returning a proper "location not found" error message:

      "All of these people are arriving because of a rounding error on a GPS location, which wrongly points people to their farm."

      Did I misunderstand this, or?

      The article and summary are pretty poor. The reality is that the Maxmind IP database tells you the accuracy information and has defaults for each country/state/province/county/city -- being the 'center'. The problem is that developers using the database aren't making use of the information declared in the database, just sticking a pin on the coordinates without any further details, leading to this situation.

      Application developers are brushing off their responsibility and just saying "it wasn't our fault, the Maxmind database told us it was there!", but in reality the database told them a lot more.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    38. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by PPH · · Score: 1

      default location FOR IP ADDRESSES IN THE USA

      That has no meaning. Unlike something like default browser settings, which actually work. No, this is a location returned by a business that sells IP location data to keep their performance statistics (and profits) up.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    39. Re: Whatever happened to "location not found"? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Application developers are brushing off their responsibility and just saying "it wasn't our fault, the Maxmind database told us it was there!", but in reality the database told them a lot more.

      Ahh, okay. Thank you.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    40. Re:Whatever happened to "location not found"? by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      They are faking the data, to cover up the fact that they don't know.

      That is never the right thing to do...

  3. That's Mr. and Mrs. Buttle ? by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

    Just goes to show that when computers make an error it gets multiplied millions of times over.

    1. Re:That's Mr. and Mrs. Buttle ? by sconeu · · Score: 2

      To err is human. To really foul things up requires a computer.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:That's Mr. and Mrs. Buttle ? by npslider · · Score: 4, Funny

      And a cloud based solution rides on the 4th horse of the Apocalypse.

    3. Re:That's Mr. and Mrs. Buttle ? by plopez · · Score: 1

      Conputers don't make mistakes, programmers do.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    4. Re:That's Mr. and Mrs. Buttle ? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      Talk to my Pentium about that...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    5. Re:That's Mr. and Mrs. Buttle ? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      You mean the part where someone burned the wrong values into a lookup table?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:That's Mr. and Mrs. Buttle ? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Just goes to show that when computers make an error it gets multiplied millions of times over.

      We used to call that "accurate to 10 insignificant digits."

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  4. It could always get worse by npslider · · Score: 1

    Let's hope Pokemon Go does not decide to add special edition characters to their barn!

  5. Null means Null by subk · · Score: 2

    When there is no record, they should return no result at all. If that is not an option, at least return an obviously bogus location like, gee, I dunno.. 0,0. Which happens to be in the middle of an ocean. Choosing an arbitrary spot in the country is just plain idiotic. I hope they have to fork out the max in punitive damages for being such morons.

    --
    Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
    1. Re:Null means Null by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      The article said they move the "default" location to the middle of the lake. It may just take a while for everyone to get and apply the updates.

    2. Re:Null means Null by 0dugo0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like how they now they default to my yacht in the Cheney Reservoir.

    3. Re:Null means Null by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I wonder if, going forward, law enforcement agencies will start spending millions of dollars regularly dredging that lake...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Null means Null by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      This isn't no record. It is "somewhere in the United States". Personally, I like there idea of not putting a bunch of significant digits on the center. Also, I check three IP addresses (my work, my home and an old home). All where significantly wrong. Anyone using this data base as if it was accurate is clearly an idiot. BTW, it said the error on my location was "5". No units. Two were off by about a mile (which in a city is huge) and the other listed the center of the downtown unit for where I work, so it was off even worse. These people should be suing the sheriff who keeps showing up even though he knows it is bogus.

    5. Re:Null means Null by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Null means null, and a location means a location. There's no point returning null as actual data is known, in this case the USA.

      As was covered previously the system that returns the data also returns the accuracy of that data. It was ultimately the end users of the database who decided to implement a simple GPS co-ordinate without the associated accuracy data. Why trash the database is programmers are too stupid to use it?

    6. Re:Null means Null by plopez · · Score: 1

      eventually it will be consistent.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    7. Re:Null means Null by subk · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They still should not be returning coordinates if the location is unknown. We wouldn't be having this discussion--and there would be no lawsuit to worry about--if the database said "Sorry. I don't know where that is. But if you kindly look to the Country record, you will see that it is in an IP block used in USA"

      --
      Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
    8. Re:Null means Null by swillden · · Score: 4, Informative

      They still should not be returning coordinates if the location is unknown.

      But the location is known. The known location may not be sufficiently precise for some applications, but that's something only the application developer knows. For some applications, knowing the location is in the US, as opposed to Belgium, or China, or Tahiti, is good and useful information. These applications would be shortchanged if the API just said "no location found" when in fact the database *has* a location, an accurate one, just not a very precise one.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    9. Re:Null means Null by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      They still should not be returning coordinates if the location is unknown.

      Society, having implemented subk's dictat, promptly collapsed. For Professor Heisenberg had already proved that it was impossible to be certain of an object's location, and subk had decided that the concept of precision simply required too much thought. Freight service everywhere simply stopped, as the pickup and delivery locations for any item were decidedly "unknown."

    10. Re: Null means Null by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      No, it has been generally accepted thatHesenberg determined that the position and velocity of an electron cannot both be measured at the same time. Even if you argue that location and position are the same thing, which very often they are not, Heisenberg didn't even rule out it being ever known/measured, even for the electron.

    11. Re: Null means Null by hackwrench · · Score: 1, Informative

      A location is known. A usable location, which is what people usually mean when they refer to "the" location, was not known.

    12. Re: Null means Null by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      position and momentum

    13. Re:Null means Null by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      They still should not be returning coordinates if the location is unknown.

      But the location is known.

      You could say the same thing for a result that returns "Earth, somewhere..." instead of saying it for "United States, somewhere".

      If the location cannot be narrowed down further than half a continent, then the location is most definitely not known.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    14. Re: Null means Null by Seahawk · · Score: 1

      Waay back I used the maxmind IP DB to determine which country users where from - it was all I needed. In that scenario "USA" Would be a perfectly usable location for me.

    15. Re:Null means Null by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The location is known. The location is somewhere in the USA so the software rightfully returns the GPS co-ordinates for the centre of the USA and error margin that covers the entire country.

    16. Re: Null means Null by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      A usable location

      Usable is in the eye of the beholder.

    17. Re: Null means Null by undefinedreference · · Score: 1

      I read that and thought, "Next, we'll hear of some hapless rural officer dying in a lake.". At the very least, I could see the local law enforcement suing for all the times it went out on that lake in a boat to get to that spot or all the calls flooding in from other LE groups to go there. They can't win.

    18. Re: Null means Null by undefinedreference · · Score: 1

      But that would be wrong. There is a location and they're as close to it as they can be. It is somewhere in the lower-48 US, so they return a rough centre and a radius that encompasses the region the address is in.

      There are a lot of these that go to a geographic centre of a city or state as well, as that is the best accuracy they can provide.

      All legitimate uses of their data (I have used it on a few projects.) would not be negatively affected by this lack of exact precision. The people at fault are those that used this database improperly, not those that created it.

    19. Re:Null means Null by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      It could make for some nice sandy beaches...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  6. Cops in Kansas by DoomedPhil · · Score: 2

    Law enforcement actually shows up and looks for stolen property??? I have been watching my stolen tablet on device manager for two days and I can't get the local police to do more than offer to forward me to the number to file a police report. I may need to think about moving to Kansas....

    1. Re:Cops in Kansas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Law enforcement actually shows up and looks for stolen property??? I have been watching my stolen tablet on device manager for two days and I can't get the local police to do more than offer to forward me to the number to file a police report. I may need to think about moving to Kansas....

      They were told the family had a dog. Therefore, they showed up in order to shoot it.

    2. Re:Cops in Kansas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Given the state of the State of Kansas's finances, I'm betting that the cops are probably seizing everything involved in any crime, drug related or not, to auction off to pay their salaries.

      Good news! We got your tablet back! Bad news! It was used in the commission of a crime (that of stealing the tablet) so we're going to civil forfeiture it for ourselves!

    3. Re:Cops in Kansas by wbr1 · · Score: 1
      Your tablet has a value under 500. It is not owned by anyone important. It is unlikely to make news. It does not generate revenue or appreciably add to any other metrics they care about.

      This is why "To Protect and Serve" is nor more like "To Collect and Harass"

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    4. Re: Cops in Kansas by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      Well, did you file a police report? That kind of is a necessary step to take.

  7. Re:Sort of like Pokémon by npslider · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm sure Pokemon has placed characters in Hell that dedicated players are just dying to get to...

  8. It's not MaxMind's fault by npslider · · Score: 1

    They may have been using the original Pentium processor when they designed it. But I can see how that would leave a chip on anyone's shoulder.

    If they are going to sue, sue someone with deeper pockets!

  9. Not a rounding error by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not even remotely a "rounding error".

    According to the TFA, the geographic center of the US is located at (39.8333333,-98.585522). In 2002, MaxMind "decided to clean up the measurements and go with a simpler, nearby latitude and longitude: 38N 97W or 38.0000,-97.0000" - an arbitrary decision that, given the values picked, is pretty much the opposite of a rounding error.

    (Sorry for the lack of degree and minute symbols, but blame Slashdot for that)

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  10. Sigh by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    It's not the mapping firm's issue that the end users of the database don't take into account to associated accuracy data.

    Also we covered it previously, and we got it right previously. Why do we claim the problem is a "rounding error" now? Just because Ars don't know what they're talking about?

  11. I hope they win, but give them only fair chances by epine · · Score: 2

    MaxMind didn't send all those yokels off on spurious missions. Are you your brother's keeper?

    It's not a simple legal argument, here. You have to argue that MaxMind should have had a reasonable expectation that yokels will be yokels.

    The next step in the argument, it seems to me (I don't give a shit that IANAL), is to claim that enabling yokels to be yokels is an explicit element of the MaxMind value chain, from which MaxMind extracted all kinds of proceeds.

    Then it could be argued that this was such an integral element of their value chain as to have induced them into invented a "not found" representation which masqueraded as a valid search result, so as to deliberately create a superficial impression that "not found" results hardly ever happen. That would be the strong condition, but hardest to establish. MaxMind will counter that this was a merely a technical felicity, and that it's no crime to be lazy.

    In the strong condition, I see it as absolutely the case that MaxMind sought gains from negligent asshattery.

    I also think there's a good chance this case can't demonstrate the strong condition, and only a modest chance they obtain damages from the mild condition.

    If MaxMind has a moral backbone, they'll settle out of court for a conscionable amount, unless the aggrieved are in full-on casino mode.

    The aggrieved definitely deserve compensation here, but if they have to collect directly from the yokels who caused the disturbances, good luck with that.

  12. Re:Sort of like Pokémon by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

    *groan*

  13. We have finally found it! by npslider · · Score: 5, Funny

    The physical location of /dev/null

    1. Re:We have finally found it! by msauve · · Score: 2

      There's a bit bucket in the barn.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:We have finally found it! by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

      It had to be Kansas.

      --
      Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
  14. Re:Sort of like Pokémon by npslider · · Score: 1

    Sorry! I just could not help myself. I just got all fired up. ;)

  15. Re:Just say unable to determine location by grahamsz · · Score: 2

    But they are able to determine location. They identified the country and nothing more. Their API returns an accuracy radius which is the number of kilometers for which they are 67% certain that the user resides. So they picked a point in KS and presumably returned a very large radius.

    They claim they get within 40km 83% of the time. How anyone could thing this is ever suitable for showing up at someone's house is unbelievable.

  16. Re: Just say unable to determine location by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    "The" location is generally understood to not be the entire country unless you think its acceptable to say, "I sent you a package. You didn't get it? It's right here by my desk. The location was the entire continental United States, right?"

  17. Law enforcement, seriously? by mysidia · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is IP Address geolocation we're talking about here.

    More often than not it gets the State and City wrong.

    There's not a chance in hell of IP Address geolocation giving a reliable location down to the street address or location level.

    So WTF would Law enforcement be showing up based on Maxmind results?

    1. Re:Law enforcement, seriously? by retchdog · · Score: 1

      my guess is that some self-appointed white knight found something disturbing on a porn site he "happened to stumble upon", and then took it upon himself to Sherlock his way, through whois and google maps, into thinking that these girls were being held at the physical location associated with the porn site through multiple cross-referenced databases.

      this sounds insane, and it is, but people really are like that and always have been. everyone is looking to right someone else's wrong and be a hero, often because their own lives are cesspits of denial.

      even technical people fall for versions of this. there are many forums where technically-savvy but otherwise irrational people wax poetic on why the DoD would be sending packets to their networks, when in fact it's a just tracking pixel/js hosted by ad companies on IPv4 address blocks which were once grossly over-allocated to DoD and then auctioned off. i'm sure they'll update the database eventually; it's not important, right?

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  18. Wrong data is not a benefit nor useful by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    It would make more sense if they returned latitude 0, longitude 0.

    Why? That's a location off the coast of Africa in the Gulf of Guinea, which means that it doesn't even have the benefit of being useful for identifying the correct country, which is what the software is currently configured to do.

    You are making a fundamental error if you think that telling a user that an IP address is at a specific street address in Kansas when all that is known is that it is registered somewhere in the United States is a "benefit" and it is in any way "useful."

    Telling them that it's in the Atlantic Ocean at 00 is a far better indication of "I don't know" than giving a wrong address that actually exists.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Wrong data is not a benefit nor useful by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      If only I had addressed those points in a second paragraph...

    2. Re:Wrong data is not a benefit nor useful by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      No, (0,0) is just as idiotic. The software should return NULL or throw an exception.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Wrong data is not a benefit nor useful by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      No, it is idiotic, but not as idiotic. "0,0" will let pretty much every user know that the data is missing.

      Here's a metaphor. If you are weighing a letter to see how much postage is needed, and for some reason the scale is malfunctioning, if it reads "0 grams", you probably can guess it's not making a measurement. If it has a little microprocessor inside that reads garbage from the sensor, and it's programmed so that if the sensor reading makes no sense, the scale should report out a plausible average value for weights-- that's bad.

      Absurd data may not be good-- but plausible wrong data is much worse.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    4. Re:Wrong data is not a benefit nor useful by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't tolerate that behavior in a scale, either! Even a seven-segment LCD can display "ERROR."

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  19. I believe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work in mapping (GIS: Geographic Information Systems) and I see the same thing on a disturbingly regular basis (though at much smaller scales). People see a line/point on a map and they instantly assume that it is some perfectly resolved/certified/verified point. Even explaining to them that it is just a best guess often draws a blank stare. Specifically one of the things we map in our office are property lines, but as most of the information is based on aerial photos (with a accuracy variance of 3' 90% of the time), guesses of section corners (0.5-40' real world accuracy), descriptions that can be either 170 years old, improperly described, or accurate to within a 1/16 of an inch and you get some pretty severe variance in accuracy from description to description. You can tell people that the boundaries are only guesses (and take 10 minutes explaining all of the ways it could be off) and their neighbors will still sometimes come in a few weeks later complaining that they were waiving around the printout like it was a certified document. In this case I do find it a bit odd that they didn't code the point it a little differently, giving a "somewhere in this country" a specific GPS coordinate is a little odd. If it was a system I was setting up it would have either left the GPS coordinates as Null values with a secondary field the region (United States, Canada, Ohio, etc) or gave it a GPS coordinate near the center of the perceived region with a map scale code that suggested it was only accurate to within a country (1:2,000,000)

    1. Re:I believe it by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      It's like they tell you when you're learning navigation when studying to be a pilot. A new navigator with no experience, when trying to determine his location will do his calculations and draw a pinpoint on the map indicating the location. One with slightly more experience will draw a little circle around the point, allowing for some error. An experienced navigator will put his whole hand down on the map at the calculated point and say "We're somewhere around here".

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
  20. Re: Just say unable to determine location by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    For a lot of geolocation stuff, that's good enough. It's good enough for Netflix certainly.

  21. Re:Just say unable to determine location by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    I'm at a loss for when it could ever work. Maybe for businesses that have a dedicated subnet that's properly geolocated, but I don't think i've ever had a residential address that maxmind has done better than a mile or two accuracy.

    Really, their complaint should be with the local jurisdictions that show up and make their life hell.

  22. Re:I hope they win, but give them only fair chance by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
    Hmm, so the "yokels" include law enforcement up to and including Federal officers, who show up with guns and SWAT teams planning on confronting armed and dangerous criminals. What could possibly go wrong? It's not like a mistake could lead to someone's home being invaded by police who shoot first and make up excuses later. Cops never ever get the wrong house and have a confrontation with the residents where an innocent person is killed. This has never happened, thank god.

    Nice to know that providing provably incorrect information has no negative consequence. Who knew?

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
  23. Re:I hope they win, but give them only fair chance by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    The whole case will hinge on the fact that MaxMind changed the default "centre of the US" coordinates from the actual centre to the coordinates of their farm, in some kind of strange "rounding" scheme that has no apparent mathematical basis.

    If they had just used the centre, they could say it was an accident and the court would probably accept it. Because they chose coordinates without bothering to check if they were suitable or considering the consequences, they made themselves liable for some of the stuff that happened.

    It's the fact that they picked a location that makes them somewhat liable for the consequences of that decision.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  24. This is also wgere by trevc · · Score: 1

    All the Pokemon are born

  25. Re: Just say unable to determine location by Megol · · Score: 1

    It is acceptable if the "receiver" specified the location as continental USA. Otherwise your example is illogical, not relevant and thoroughly ludicrous!

  26. Re:I hope they win, but give them only fair chance by Megol · · Score: 1

    If they return a precision/confidence value then no, they are not responsible.

  27. Re: Just say unable to determine location by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    If you were to take the information available from my posts, and assume my user name is indeed my first and last name concatenated, you could easily find a street address on the internet. Unless someone with an IRBM simply doesn't like me, the street address is more useful for finding my house than the exact latitude and longitude.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  28. So much for a peaceful retirement by marmot7 · · Score: 1

    I hope the couple wins big. They deserve it.