Plex Cloud Means Saying Goodbye To the Always-On PC (theverge.com)

Finally, you don't need an always-on PC or any other network-attached storage device if you want to use Plex's media player. The company has announced that it now allows you to stream TV shows and movies from your own collection via a new online option called Plex Cloud. From a report on The Verge: Plex is giving the world another reason to subscribe to Plex Pass subscriptions today with the launch of Plex Cloud. As the name suggests, Plex Cloud eliminates the need to run the Plex Media Server on a computer or Networked Attached Storage (NAS) in your house. It does, however, require a subscription to Amazon Drive ($59.99 per year for unlimited storage) and the aforementioned Plex Pass ($4.99 per month or $39.99 per year). Plex Cloud functions just like a regular Plex Media Server giving you access to your media -- no matter how you acquire it -- from an incredibly broad range of devices. Most, but not all Plex features are available in today's beta.

Comments

Pretty cool

[110010001000]

Instead of paying once, I can pay every month! I love the Cloud!

Re:Pretty cool

[Anonymous Coward]

Well you don't only pay once. Unless you are 100% off the grid you are still paying for your electricity, which for a decent machine in an area with higher power prices you could expect to pay close to the $100/yr this would cost. Then add in the fact that parts will fail and you probably will be putting on average another $40-50/yr worth of replacement parts or upgrades in and potentially paying for higher upload bandwidth and $100/yr actually starts to seem about right.

Re:Pretty cool

[Anonymous Coward]

And you can stream media at your ISP's max speed AND subject to their data caps rather than be limited to those pesky wire speeds of your home LAN with unlimited data transfers.

Re:Pretty cool

[epyT-R]

So in other words, instead of just paying for electricity and hardware I have control over, I can pay for plex cloud. I'm sure I can expect other interested parties having access to my data through an NSL and my ISP to stick me for insane bw usage. Yay! What a deal!

Re:Pretty cool

[Anonymous Coward]

Instead of paying once, I can pay every month! I love the Cloud!

Yeah .. no thanks. I'll keep my PC which is my media serving device. Samba/NFS on the LAN, SFTP (as implemented by internal-sftp from the OpenSSH suite) for everywhere else. Free dynamic DNS services make the latter option even easier. All of my devices can access and play my media including my smartphone. Piping the output to the TV is trivial (and a phone running a VNC client makes a fine remote).

All of the benefits of the cloud, no bullshit monthly subscription, I retain privacy and control, and I don't have to wonder if security was an afterthought. Why would I ever want cloud storage? It seems their main business model is to depend on users' ignorance of how easy it is to do it yourself.

Re:Pretty cool

[mattack2]

I can see your cynical side, but the current price is $100/year total.

I seem to spend at least that upgrading drives in my Tivos or buying external drives anyway.

So if the "unlimited" truly is unlimited, this could be a way at least as cheap as doing it myself, and potentially easier.. (There is a Plex app for Tivo, I think..)

Re:Pretty cool

[Anonymous Coward]

By Grabthar's Hammer, what a savings.

Re:Pretty cool

[Anonymous Coward]

So in other words, instead of just paying for electricity and hardware I have control over, I can pay for plex cloud. I'm sure I can expect other interested parties having access to my data through an NSL and my ISP to stick me for insane bw usage. Yay! What a deal!

And pay for all the extra bandwidth you need to be streaming the same files over and over from the cloud rather than just accessing them over your LAN. Also being aggravated when the cloud or your ISP goes down when you want to watch it most.

Re:Pretty cool

[Anonymous Coward]

The Cloud(tm) is awesome! Instead of paying absolutely nothing and streaming the videos I own within my own home to any of my devices, I can
(a) pay Amazon an annual fee for Cloud(tm) storage
(b) pay Plex an annual fee for a Plex Pass account
(c) pay my ISP for regularly exceeding my monthly broadband cap to watch the videos I own

Thanks for looking out for the little guy, Plex. Thumbs-up emoji.

Re:Pretty cool

[barc0001]

This looks like a solution searching for a problem to solve. Who really needs their Plex library "in the cloud"? The vast use case for it is as a home media server so if you go the Amazon cloud way instead you get to upload it all (at a painfully slow rate in many areas) then have it eat into your data cap a second time as you stream it to watch. Not to mention if you have any files of a less than 100% above the board nature, the MPAA/RIAA and a subpoena may start poking around in the PlexAzon caches to see what needs a closer look. No thanks.

Re:Pretty cool

[110010001000]

Oh yeah. Forgot about that. And as a bonus you can pay more when Google or Plex decide they need more revenue that year, or lose service when Google gets bored of it.

Re:Pretty cool

[Anonymous Coward]

So you are saying that cloud services pay for your electricity, or your electrical bill will give you a free discount because you are using a cloud service?
Parts? Who needs those? Nothing like having everything in the cloud so the service can increase the cost in a short time, and you can't do shit about them fluctuating their pricing because you don't have any parts of your own and they own you by the balls. Not to mention the glorious Internet failures, the glorious lack of off-line capability, and the glorious service failures due to DDoS or some dumbass blaming solar radiation because he tugged on the wrong cable accidentally.

Re:Pretty cool

[Junta]

For most places and efficient low cost configs, I'd say maybe 30-40/year in energy cost.

The upload bandwidth is killer. The performance of accessing the media is terrible (when I access a local rip, it's super high quality and *instant* seeking, versus streams from netflix and the like.

Re:Pretty cool

[pD-brane]

Not only that, the little control you had by having a NAS with proprietary software in your house that you potentially were still be able to hack, is replaced by their servers. You have no control at all anymore over the data you paid (a licence) for.

Re:Pretty cool

[ubrgeek]

Or my divorce decree.

Re:Pretty cool

[jedidiah]

The power costs of running your own little PC is gravely overblown. On the other hand, this takes everything out of your control and makes it dependent on any number of 3rd parties. Any one of them could fail.

One of the whole points of local content is that you can completely ignore any external network issues, like it not even being there.

Otherwise, you could just use Netflix and not bother with your own media in the first place.

Re:Pretty cool

[Gr8Apes]

I'll be honest, local rips are almost instant, remote clients do have a minor startup time. But I won't be using the cloud. Seem like a ready made trap for any number of cases. Besides, it's a home media server, for serving my files at home, for me only. Why do I need it on the cloud, and why would I want to stream from the cloud at a fraction of my data rates on the LAN? There's a reason I prefer hard media over streaming, and there's no reason I want to have my library lowered in quality to the equivalent of a netflix or hulu stream.

Re:Pretty cool

[Anonymous Coward]

The Cloud(tm) is awesome! Instead of paying absolutely nothing and streaming the videos I own within my own home to any of my devices, I can
(a) pay Amazon an annual fee for Cloud(tm) storage
(b) pay Plex an annual fee for a Plex Pass account
(c) pay my ISP for regularly exceeding my monthly broadband cap to watch the videos I own

But wait, there's more! You forgot the most exciting feature!
(d) All your data goes away when Amazon or Plex decide to change their business model!

Re:Pretty cool

[Anonymous Coward]

plus the internet fees. More if mobile data. Dude is right, you gotta love the cloud!

Re: Pretty cool

[aevan]

About 1 billion ISK

Re:Pretty cool

[Anonymous Coward]

2016: Still falling for 'The Cloud' troll/meme

I seriously hope you guys don't do this.


Welcome to the New Reality: Nobody owns anything, you just rent or lease it, and pay, pay, pay, ad infinitum. You don't own your computer, OS, or applicatons, you rent them. You rent your house because home ownership has been made too expensive for the poor, which we are all rapidly becoming in this post-middle-class world. You lease your car because only rich people can afford to own -- but you still have to pay for maintenance. Can't even afford that? You 'rent' a ride in some other schmucks' car.

Step #2: Charge a monthly fee for breathing the air. After all, we dirty humans are major producers of the nasty greenhouse gas, CO2, so since corporations can be people, and corporations are charged for the indulgences to produce greenhouse gasses, people should have to pay to breathe the air. Can't pay? No problem, we'll put you in a 'work program' (aka debtors' prison) to pay off you debt. Never mind that you'll still rack up fees for breathing, at a substantially higher rate because you're now a criminal.. and you never pay it off, ever. Oh, and you'll be charged for your living space (cell), and the food you eat, and the water you use, and a toilet rental fee (you're required to clean it yourself though). Step #3: The New New Reality: We're all prisoners in debtors' prison. Cradle-to-grave, we own you, and you will do as you're told.


..or, you can all just reject 'The Cloud' and it's bullshit, and OWN YOUR OWN THINGS.

Re:Pretty cool

[gmack]

A few points: 1. My new TV box puts itself to sleep when I'm not using it (It detects via the HDMI channel when the TV turns off and sleeps). 2. It has no moving parts to break and my last one lasted two years and is still going strong (gave it away). 3. The whole thing total cost me CDN $49.99 so I don't get your replacement parts cost at all.

Re:Pretty cool

[secretsquirel]

Take my roku with my while traveling and i have my whole collection. (which would probably fit on a usb stick anyway but that's besides the point)

Re:Pretty cool

[Anonymous Coward]

(e) You get subjected to illegal scans by the MPAA and the RIAA

Re:Pretty cool

[Anonymous Coward]

I'm sure I can expect other interested parties having access to my data through an NSL

I think maybe you overestimate how important your porn collection is to the federal government.

Re:Pretty cool

[jabuzz]

That depends on your home internet bandwidth. I have 20Mbps unlimited upload which means that I can already take my whole collection with me. Further rather than messing about with a roku I just take an MHL lead for my phone.

Re:Pretty cool

[TheGrimmReaper]

Well, squid porn CAN be quite popular ;)

Re:Pretty cool

[spire3661]

Plex offers a lifetime pass for $150. I LOVE my Plex server, i have it at my in-laws house on an 80Mb/sec symmetrical link. I am still going to sign up for Amazon Drive to get this. If one side is down, ill always have the other.

Re:Pretty cool

[Hans Lehmann]

Who;s lifetime? Certainly not yours. Plex will be out of business or the terms will change long before your life ends.

Re:Pretty cool

[PRMan]

I use a netbook for my server you insensitive clod.

Re:Pretty cool

[PRMan]

This is so true. I'm a cord-cutter and my internet went down on Saturday and I watched a show on Plex specifically BECAUSE it's over my network.

Re:Pretty cool

[PRMan]

Or you could just set up the feature that streams across the internet. https://support.plex.tv/hc/en-us/articles/200484543-Enabling-Remote-Access-for-a-Server. And you don't even need to pay for Plex, since that feature is available in the free version.

Re:Pretty cool

[PRMan]

In California, it's almost $50 a month for a 380W server. I switched to an old 14W netbook with an SSD and a 4TB drive hanging off the USB 2 port, which acts as a file server just as well. It can't transcode, but I store everything in MP4 anyway. I turned off the Wifi and Bluetooth radios and saved another 4W.

Re:Pretty cool

[exomondo]

A few points: 1. My new TV box puts itself to sleep when I'm not using it (It detects via the HDMI channel when the TV turns off and sleeps).

What sort of box is it? The problem I have with TV boxes is that I can't find one that can play every format, hence the need for a media server to transcode it. If a media box could do it it would be cheaper to have one for each TV than to set up a server and I wouldn't need something like Plex at all.

Re:Pretty cool

[spire3661]

Meh. I paid $75 for it in 2013. I'm already ahead.

Re:Pretty cool

[gmack]

It's a Goo Bang Doo Abox running Android 6.0.1 and Runs Kodi. I just ran a few mins of tests and so far for video formats: ASF,WMV,MPG,MOV and my usual MKV. So far the only thing I don't have working is H265 (HVEC). For audio formats I've used MP3, WAV and FLAC.

Re:Pretty cool

[exomondo]

Cool, I'll check it out. Thanks :)

Re:Pretty cool

[sonamchauhan]

To stretch this analogy a bit... instead of investing in legacy Bricks-and-Mortar, lets use the, _equivalently priced_ , Housing-as-a-Service.

It makes sense to own, not buy, stuff that you use consistently and long term. (E.g. cook, sleep, ... even eat: have a vegie patch or balcony garden).

Re:Pretty cool

[sonamchauhan]

(f) And the NSA!
(g) You recoup nothing when you stop paying. You are left no physical assets (server).
(h) Nor the skills you'd gain setting up an efficient (*) home-cloud yourself

(*) The 'Avoid an Always-On PC' statement is misleading. Its possible to let your PC asleep and issue wake-on-lan packets via the internet router (or a small RasberryPi Zero hanging off of it)
http://lifehacker.com/348197/a...

Re:Pretty cool

[cdrudge]

Who really needs their Plex library "in the cloud"?

Many people share their libraries with friends and family. If your local hardware or bandwidth isn't up to snuff this can make sharing multiple streams simultaneously a poor user experience as it will either stutter or video quality suffers.

Is the service needed by everyone? No. Is it required that everyone run Plex now in the cloud? No. Can it be of benefit to some users? Yes. I think it's far better to have the option and not use it, than to not have the option and need it.

Re:Pretty cool

[ncc74656]

That ties up your phone while it's playing video, though. I bring a Chromecast with me, pre-configured for the travel router I also bring. Plug it in, connect the router to the local WiFi, fire up Plex, get access to everything I have at home. A 5-port USB charger runs everything off of one outlet (though the Chromecast can often steal power from the TV) and can still charge my phone and tablet.

Re:Pretty cool

[ncc74656]

In California, it's almost $50 a month for a 380W server.

Your server most likely isn't pulling 380W 24/7 unless it's running on an ancient power hog like a Pentium 4 and/or has a shit-ton more disks than usual. Mine uses an AMD A4-3300 and has four hard drives (a Seagate Barracuda LP, two WD Greens, and one 5400-rpm WD Blue...10.5 TB total) for media storage. I haven't measured it lately, but I would be surprised if it pulled as much as 100W at idle (CPU idle, drives still spinning). Even at full tilt, the CPU's only going to add another 60-65W at most.

Re:Pretty cool

[Junta]

At least with emby, local rips are instant. I had a bear of a time with Plex Media server performance, so I migrated. That was a long time ago though.

Re:Pretty cool

[Junta]

Rather than local, I meant remote, but same house.

Re:Pretty cool

[jseale]

Not to mention if you have any files of a less than 100% above the board nature, the MPAA/RIAA and a subpoena may start poking around in the PlexAzon caches to see what needs a closer look. No thanks.

You're going to have that problem no matter what storage solution you go with, so tread lightly.

Re:Pretty cool

[noodler]

"which for a decent machine in an area with higher power prices you could expect to pay close to the $100/yr this would cost."
You don't need a 'decent' machine to act as a media server.
A good enough machine will do and such a machine will never ever use up $100 worth of power in a year.

Your machine would have to suck about 50W continuously for 24 hours every single day to get up to $100 where i live and i have to pay about $0.25 per kWh. Which is pretty expensive. So your story doesn't add up.

Re:Pretty cool

[cthulhu11]

And like the old Plex, it will show you fully HALF of your files!

Re:Pretty cool

[Coren22]

Google? Google isn't even a party here unless Plex or Amazon were bought out...

This is for the people who currently stream from their Plex systems to remote clients, not for you apparently since you have no friends/family you want to share your videos with.

Re: Pretty cool

[Coren22]

Oof, they've gotten expensive since I left, that has to be at least double what I used to sell at.

Re:Pretty cool

[Coren22]

As long as it is longer than 30 months, you come out ahead, so does it really matter?

This deal is getting worse the further I read....

[Anonymous Coward]

So I get to spend $100 a year to avoid using an old garbage PC with beefed up storage and have to rely on someone else to serve me my own stuff, hoping the connection remains strong?

This sounds horrible.

At best short lived at worst a trap

[Anonymous Coward]

This is either going to be shutdown IMMEDIATELY by the copyright trolls, or its a trap set by the copyright trolls

Re:This deal is getting worse the further I read..

[Drethon]

Yep, I'll stick with my $150 for a NAS with hard drives that actually powers up and down on demand. I'm not seeing how exactly this is an advantage, maybe unlimited storage but I don't need that.

So - $100/yr for...

[Penguinisto]

...something I could do at home with a low-end shoebox computer (or better yet, an old cast-off box with a little SSD and a big platter drive stuffed into it) that would be incredibly cheaper over time, electricity included.

And wait - who said I had to have the damned thing on 24/7 at home? I boot it when I turn the TV on - takes less time to start up than the TV does these days thanks to SSD *shrug*.

Seriously - if I subscribed to this service, I'd be damned embarrassed to say that I did and claim that I'm a geek at the same time...

Re:So - $100/yr for...

[nobuddy]

Not too old. Those HD movies take a bit of grunt to serve smoothly.

Re:So - $100/yr for...

[pr0fessor]

I bought the lifetime plex pass when it was under $100... If the movies are encoded properly it servers 1080 up rather easy, this is why I stay away from pirated movies and just buy dvds... (although I do take them to a place that is buy, sell, and trade afterwards)

Re:So - $100/yr for...

[jedidiah]

The nvidia GPUs that drive my decoder boxes are so trailing edge that they are at the point of being desupported.

Even back in the day, it was only the really cheap boxes that had any problems dealing with HD anyways. This was a tricky problem a long time ago. Now, not so much.

Re:So - $100/yr for...

[jedidiah]

Fortunately, ARM based decoders are getting a lot less lame. The new ones are nearly not so terrible and are less dependent on something else to transcode for them.

Keeping up with the rapid obsolescence of ARM video streamers is already a sunk cost here.

Re:So - $100/yr for...

[h4ck7h3p14n37]

So buy the DVD version instead of Blu-Ray. VLC and Dragon Player's upscaling work quite well. Besides, SD content is good enough for many people.

Re:So - $100/yr for...

[cdrudge]

If the movies are encoded properly it servers 1080 up rather easy, this is why I stay away from pirated movies and just buy dvds...

If you are just serving up DVD you purchased/ripped then you aren't anywhere near 1080.

Re:So - $100/yr for...

[pr0fessor]

You are right it's usually just the new stuff on bluray that is 1080 and there are other older movies that aren't even 480...

Re:So - $100/yr for...

[Coren22]

With Plex, yes, as it transcodes on the fly for the destination resolution. I transcoded all of my media into MP4. I use MCEBuddy, set to watch a network share, that runs on my desktop and transcodes in the background. But to run Plex, you still need to have some hefty CPU to do the on the fly transcoding of the videos.

Re:So - $100/yr for...

[Coren22]

Plex re-transcodes the video on the fly to match the resolution of the destination display. I have all my videos encoded in MP4 at the video's resolution, and it still transcodes when playing on my desktop.

I believe AC was comparing to Plex in the home, not a simple NAS server that gives a horrible interface for video selection.

Another Reason Datacaps Suck

[BRock97]

I would seriously consider Plex Cloud if Netflix, HBO Now, and a few other streaming services weren't seriously eating into my monthly cap from Cox. Maybe the Google Fiber elitist will have more fun with this...

Re:Another Reason Datacaps Suck

[pr0fessor]

You have a cap on Cox? I thought they decided not to implement them... they didn't in my area.

Re:Another Reason Datacaps Suck

[BRock97]

Yes; they send them out in the Omaha, NE area. I don't know anyone who's received the warning getting charged, though. The email they send is rather off-putting.

Re:Another Reason Datacaps Suck

[Blaskowicz]

Data caps only are a problem for wireless phone networks or a few insular countries.

Re:This deal is getting worse the further I read..

[Anonymous Coward]

I'll stick with my modded NSLU2 with UnSlung firmware and Twonkyserver software. It uses almost no power, a wall wart and a few flashdrives.

Re:This deal is getting worse the further I read..

[mattack2]

Where do you get a NAS for $150? Is it one with 4 drives and RAID?

I was watching one under $200 for a while on Amazon, but never ended up buying it.. (I think it may have been a slightly older model too).

They seem WAY more expensive than that.

Local Content Only For Now

[WoodburyMan]

I've been a avid Plex user for almost 2 years now. A bit over a year ago I bought a storage array NAS just for dedicated Plex storage, and built a i5 media center system that acts as Plex server and a few other things so I don't have to leave a power hungry gaming desktop on all the time. Previous to that I only kept some content on disk, and backed up media to CD's, then DVD, then Bluray. Combined, I have somewhere north of 2.5TB of content. Charter in my area offers only 60mbit/4mbit service, with 150mbit/5mbit service as a $50 upgrade. That's over 150hours to upload A week straight. Then content, when I add it, has to be uploaded. It makes no sense to download content, only to upload it, to stream/download it again. With GoPro 4K 60dps footage I have taking up SEVERAL gigs, it's just way too much to upload to Amazon, let alone upload the small trimmed down clips I want to YouTube sometimes. Maybe in the future, if ISP's in my area decide to offer actual upload speeds. As it stands if I download at 60mbit, 50-75% of my upload bandwidth is spent in just TCP acknowledgements and overhead. And symmetrical business speed is offered via Fiber only here at costs of $500+/mo.

Re:Local Content Only For Now

[jabuzz]

You are probably right but I have a 80/20Mbps service and stream to somewhere other than my home every single day. My sisters two just go from home to grandma's to their Fire tablets seamlessly and watch stuff on Plex every single day. Most of it's 720p iPlayer downloads of whatever is the latest flavour of the month which is something called Bing at the moment.

Another montly nibble

[ThatsNotPudding]

...and the aforementioned Plex Pass ($4.99 per month

Adding yet another duck to the ISP / Netflix /Hulu flock doesn't seem very compelling to a rapidly-shrinking middle class.

This is why I don't use Plex.

[dugancent]

I don't want a computer running full time and using electricity. I also don't want to pay per month for the cloud.

I use Infuse with an Apple TV in one room and a Fire TV in another, connected to a shared hard drive plugged into my router. Works great and needs virtually no computing power on the sharing end.

Re:This is why I don't use Plex.

[QuietLagoon]

I don't want a computer running full time and using electricity. ... connected to a shared hard drive plugged into my router.

Your router is a computer.

Re:This is why I don't use Plex.

[b0bby]

Does Infuse work by copying to your device? That's what it seems like. Not sure if that would work for a Fire Stick.

Re: This is why I don't use Plex.

[jedidiah]

Modern PCs are much more energy efficient than they used to be. They can even masquerade as "energy efficient appliances".

If your NAS isn't being used as a crutch by your decoders, the same hardware that's in your router will do for your "media server".

Re: This is why I don't use Plex.

[QuietLagoon]

...you know exactly what he means. An x86 PC....

I do not read minds, only words. And I read and attributed meaning to what he wrote.

An x86 PC.

Maybe he meant an older Mac?

A router uses a small fraction of what a desktop of uses.

Nowadays, PCs have drastically reduced their energy usage. I have a PC that uses ten watts. Since you can read minds, how many watts does his router and hard drive use?

All The Features!

[honestmonkey]

To include: Most, but not all Plex features are available in today's beta. Some of the missing capabilities include Camera Upload and Offline Sync, though those will come in the future. Other features missing in Plex Cloud include DLNA support, Cloud Sync, Media Optimizer, and the newly launched Plex DVR. Note that Plex Cloud is not a copy of your local Plex server and Plex, as of today, doesn’t mention any type of media migration tool.

Wow! Sounds great!

DRM

[Anonymous Coward]

Hey, that's amazing!

Until smart TV's and digital stream analysis on the new audio out non-port of your phone decide this is a DRM violation and decide to block you from actually watching and/or listening to any of this.

Basic Income

[psyclone]

Assuming enough economic zones begin offering Basic Incomes to their citizens, businesses will design and price packages to evenly consume the monthly amount. Great for the businesses to have a constant flow of cash. Great for the payment processors to skim their percent off the top. Great for three letter agencies that can watch these transactions - either financial or data streams - to learn about devices / versions / locations and of course content. Arguably Great for consumers so they don't have to "think" about managing finances - $X coming in, $Y going out, who needs to save?

Not great for those who eschew consolidation of financial or informative power.

How long to upload 50tb of media

[silas_moeckel]

Though hooking usenet up to a e3 instance could be amusing.

Sucker bait

[eyepeepackets]

Anyone who buys into this has not been paying attention: These "cloud"-based businesses vanish like the mist once their funding has dried up and there is no growing revenue stream, and if you've invested your time and data with them, you're screwed.

Let's see, I have 3TB of music files...

[QuietLagoon]

Given my ISP's monthly cap of 100GB per month, it will take me about 30 months, nearly 3 years, to get all my music files into Plex's cloud. Meanwhile, I won't be able to use my Internet connection for anything else while I am uploading the music files.

Re:Let's see, I have 3TB of music files...

[HornWumpus]

How do you catalog and play from that?

I've got less than half of that, it chokes all the 'media players' I've tried.

Re:Let's see, I have 3TB of music files...

[jabuzz]

I have ~300 albums which includes a good smattering of multi disk compilation type albums in in Flac they come to ~130GB. How the hell you get to 3TB of music is beyond me, it is around 7000 albums in a lossless format like Flac or ALAC by my calculation.

I prefer emby

[Junta]

I used to use plex. I've moved to emby.

Under linux, you might as well give up and run it under docker as they are very messy about their depedencies, but at least that's not too complicated.

Re:I prefer emby

[matchhead650]

I just set up emby on a centos 7 VM, my media is on a 4TB HDD attached to the server. It was easy, it took me longer to figure out that iptables was taken out of centos 7 than it took to set up emby. So far I like firewalld better than iptables.

Re:This deal is getting worse the further I read..

[silas_moeckel]

If your serving media files you realy do not want classic raid. Snapraid and the like are a much better option for a large volume of seldom/never modified storage. This way drives no used can spin down.

Re:This deal is getting worse the further I read..

[mattack2]

I just looked at the FAQ for SnapRAID. Looks fairly complex. Especially since it is "just" media files, I theoretically wanted something I could basically set up once and then would survive one disk failure.. If I lost it all, I wouldn't be too bummed.

Also, wouldn't you need another machine up and doing the snap raid 'backup' or sync or whatever you all it? (A NAS is all in one, the other machines can be off/asleep.) and/or would a Raspberry PI or somesuch be adequate for that?

DYI

[Ziest]

My home setup is:

  - home assembled PC, 4 core CPU and 16 GB of ram
  - Ubuntu 14.04
  - ZFS (8 TB)
  - MakeMKV and Handbrake
  - Ruko box attached to the TV and home network

Total one time cost $1500.00

Sure Plex is charging $40.00 per year but notice I control the entire setup. No one throttling the bandwidth between the Plex Cloud and my TV and no one selling the information about my DVD / Blu-Ray collection to advertisers.

So will they also be made an example of?

[quax]

Or will different rules apply to Plex than to Kim Dotcom's Mega site?

control

[Gravis Zero]

Plex Cloud also means you lose control of your stuff. They will sell information on what you store/view in a heartbeat. It will also make you more dependant on an internet connection, so when your connection goes down, you are SOL. Oh and just wait until it says your files were deleted because of copyright infringement. Lapse on a payment and they'll outright delete your entire collection.

Invest in a large SSD and put it in a NAS that can accept multiple drives. If you run out of room, buy another large SSD and plug it in. Unlike HDDs, when SSDs fail, they are still readable, so RAID isn't actually a requirement. Do this and you won't have any of these issues with the cloud.

Pointless

[spacewars]

Reasons this is terrible: 1. Plex sucks. 2. This is nothing but a money-harvesting aimed at the clueless, under the guise of "convenience." 3. Bandwidth requirements. 4. Moving all your media to "the cloud" for money is waaay safer, smarter and more reliable than, say, controlling it yourself locally for free. 5. The cost far eclipses the annual 1/3 of a pittance you'd pay for the electricity required to run basically any local device as a media server.

I Knew There Was Something Fishy...

[ewhac]

A couple years ago, I set up a FreeNAS box to solve the problem of, "the file I want to work with is not on the machine in front of me." Once set up, I also wanted a media server so I could watch stuff on the TV in the living room. Many of the comments in the FreeNAS discussion fora spoke well of Plex, which is available for FreeNAS as a plugin jail. So I installed it and gave it a spin.

I immediately knew something was fishy when I tried to connect to the local server, and the login page didn't work. I run Firefox with NoScript installed. I had the local server IP whitelisted, but the page ignored all button clicks. I click on the NoScript icon... And discover that it's trying to pull in boatloads of JavaScript from Plex.tv.

"WRONG!" exclaimed I. The whole point of a local media server such as Plex is for all media-serving code and resources to be hosted locally on my server hardware. The moment you start reaching outside the LAN to do anything, you are no longer a local server.

This discovery basically shattered any alleged positive value Plex may have had, since its primary function -- the basis on which it was sold to me -- turned out to be a lie. I promptly uninstalled it.

Now, it seems Plex has dropped the pretense altogether, and are just another disk farm outside my control. Good luck with that, guys; I'm sure you'll be able to beat Apple, Google, and Amazon at that game.

Re:I Knew There Was Something Fishy...

[CaseCrash]

I use Plex and really like it, but I am looking for an alternative because it doesn't work unless I can login into their server. So I can't watch movies on my TV from my computer unless I can verify my username/password over the internet. Really pissed me off when hurricane Hermine came through and after I got electricity back I didn't have internet for three days, so no streaming to the TV. Of movies I own. WTF.

Cloud? Why would I add even more layers of crap between me and a movie?

Re:I Knew There Was Something Fishy...

[houghi]

I have QNAP and that has Media Servers and other servers as well. Actually I have no idea what they are exactly as I just mount the device when the PC(s) start up and handle it as if it were a local system and run whatever I desire on the local machine.
The only thing that runs remotely is torrent, because that can keep running when the PCs are down.
Locally I then run smplayer, XBMC, mcd or anything else I desire. I see no need for a media server as such as I have a fileserver. I do not connect my phone to it. If need be, I just copy some music files to the SD card and have it available wherever I am. When I want that I am mostly offline anyway.

Maybe in the future

[breid7718]

I will give them benefit of the doubt and say that in a future scenario, it could be a great thing. If bandwidth caps were gone and up/down bandwidth in the US were better, it would be usable. If a supportive infrastructure were built up so that you could sideload/torrent from the web/iTunes/Amazon/etc. straight to your storage and it could be set to auto-upload mobile video (like many storage sites do now), that would be something worth having. You could essentially have access to your libraries on the road and at home and you wouldn't have to tie a PC up with downloads. However, bandwidth as it is makes it a terrible proposal.

Re:This deal is getting worse the further I read..

[silas_moeckel]

No extra machine and it's a few lines of config per drive. Being able to use mixed size drives to max capacity is a big advantage. The huge advantage is if you loose 2 drives (with single drive parity) you only loose the files on those drives each file and the directory structure to go with it is on each drive. Long term it's got power savings as each piece of media is read off a single drive meaning the rest can be spun down.

I don't think so...

[Whatchamacallit]

Sure, I'll be glad to upload my entire video collection of 20TB's which will take approximately 180 days of continuous uploading to Amazon's cloud drive (take longer with data caps because I'll have to restart it each month until it actually completes the 20TB uploads) where it is not encrypted nor well protected and whose contents will be completely indistinguishable from pirated content versus a ripped personal use copy. I am sure the MPAA would love to go after this data. I will gladly give over my hard earned money to Amazon to pay for this privilege. I'll give up my private server which I carefully created to consume less than 40 watts (currently running a 20W Atom 8 Core processor with 8 4TB drives in a ZFS array), offset with my use of many solar panels, to shift to a cloud data center consuming considerably more than 1.21 gigawatts of electricity. https://youtu.be/I5cYgRnfFDA

Yeah that's about as smart as buying a Tesla and thinking I am saving the environment by driving around with highly toxic batteries all getting their power from the grid, disregarding the fact that the grid is completely powered by burning coal, oil, and natural gas! Hey, maybe I can put the Tesla in Autodrive and watch my Plex cloud videos on the Tesla display panel using a cellular data plan and decapitate myself at 60Mph when a tractor trailer makes a u-turn in front of my Tesla.

Yeah, 20TB's is no joke. I go through the data now and then and transcode the video to more efficient smaller files to save space and prune data I really don't need to keep long term. But the Internet is my DVR and it's fully automated. Plex helped me realize the joys of cord cutting. I ripped a considerable library of content and yeah some of that content is downloaded and consumed and typically discarded. Love me some Plex.

I think I'll just stick to my personal server and sync connect to the iPad for offline viewing on the planes and trains as I have been doing. It makes zero sense for me to download content re-upload that content to a Plex server in the cloud unless I want to more easily share that content with friends which I am already doing with little trouble as its easy with a standalone server in my home. I do not trust cloud providers with my data and you shouldn't either.

https://youtu.be/J4LI_EqnJq8

Re:This deal is getting worse the further I read..

[PRMan]

You are almost certainly paying over $100 a year for electricity for a desktop PC as a server.

Re:This deal is getting worse the further I read..

[Drethon]

2 drives, minimal RAID capabilities. I actually bought the skeleton one and picked up a couple drives on black Friday. For me it has been working pretty good for a few years, just have to wait 5-10 minutes for it to come online sometimes. But I primarily use it to share development files between computers, rather than a media server.

https://www.amazon.com/Buffalo...

Re:This deal is getting worse the further I read..

[mattack2]

What do you mean no extra machine? Do you mean you can use SnapRAID on something like a Synology 4 disk NAS? (Just one of the ones I was looking at today..)

They killed slysoft

[rsilvergun]

and AnyDVD. Can you still rip your own dvds? I know Disney did all sorts of nasty crap to DVDs to make them hard to rip (I used to rip the ones I bought and give the rips to the kids so I didn't have to buy them again in 4 months when they got hopelessly scratched, kids are grown so I don't bother anymore).

Plex tries it's best to make money

[craigg7500]

I love my Plex server / Roku client setup. I don't own a Plex Pass, $5/mo seems way overpriced to me so I've never purchased one. At $1-2/mo I'd do it in a heartbeat in order to support them. That being said Plex always tries to create solutions for problems that don't exist to get you to pay into their monthly plan. I'm capped on my bandwidth so this is a non starter for me. Even if I wasn't capped I could still stream my shows using the free version. Idea -- give me ala carte, I'll take the iOS app for $1-2/month, you can keep the rest, I have no use for it.

Imagine a peer-to-peer internet

[MobyDisk]

It would be awesome if there was some way for my home computer to become a server on the internet, and I could download or stream files straight from my computer! That would be so cool. Someone should invent that.

Re:This deal is getting worse the further I read..

[silas_moeckel]

Yes, the level of difficulty getting it installed would vary but pretty much all your 4 disk nas boxes are Linux often on top of x86 with various methods to add 3rd party software. Mind you buying the equivalent to better hardware and using any of the number of nas software or simply your preferred Linux is cheaper and does not paint you into a corner. Mind you I would not buy or suggest a low end consumer synology device it does not have any facilities for bit rot detection they just released btrfs support in the 6x but only for higher end models and frankly they are extremely under powered especially for the price at the home/soho level.

Re:This deal is getting worse the further I read..

[Coren22]

I highly recommend the Synology NAS boxes, they are great. The one I used to have however didn't have enough horsepower to run Plex server, so I had to run the Plex from my domain controller.

Re:This deal is getting worse the further I read..

[mattack2]

The very little bit of research I've done seems to say you need the 'play' versions ('play' is in the name) to do Plex re-encoding. Others can work as media servers if no reencoding is needed. At least based on what I saw on Amazon in the past few days, the non-Play Synology 4 or 5 drive boxes are a bit under $300 at best price, the play ones are a couple hundred more.

Could I stream a non-reencoded HD show to an iPhone or iPad out of the house? At least VLC can play raw MPEG files (the old one, before Dolby Digital support was removed), and there's at least one pay app that can too. Since unfortunately the Tivo streaming/downloading is so broken, I'd think about doing it with Plex if I didn't have to reencode things. (Disclaimer: yes, I know the Tivo Stream hardware does hardware reencoding.. But as I said, I can manually download shows and play them in VLC with no reencoding.)

Re:This deal is getting worse the further I read..

[Coren22]

I have been fighting the Tivo issues as well, it seems that there is no good solution for moving tv shows to more durable formats, that works well and in an automated fashion.

The Synology NAS I had allowed the use of DLNA for streaming, but I am not an Apple person, so I don't know if that is supported by their equipment.

There was also some kind of Synology Video app, but I never actually used it.