Slashdot Mirror
Facebook at Work To Report For Duty Next Month (fortune.com)
The debut of the long-awaited business social network is nigh. Facebook at Work is about to report for duty. The social networking company's long-awaited foray into business applications will formally debut in London on October 10, according to tech site TechCrunch. From a report:The news site further noted this would be Facebook's first major product launch to take place outside the United States. Thus far, Facebook is seen as a fun-and-games site, not something corporate employees use to converse or track each other. But Facebook at Work, a business-minded operation, could help change that image. As has been reported, it will be a separate version of the network that can be accessed only from a company's internal IT systems, and in theory, subject to stricter corporate security and access rules. Personal accounts will be cordoned off.
It will send all your personal information to Goatse.
I will never, ever, be a part of Facebook. They may have a "shadow profile" on me, but I will never, ever willingly become part of their machine. I dislike the notion of social media for myself. I have nothing, no Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, none of it. I spend time with actual people, in the flesh. Besides, I enjoy time with my children and wife in the flesh, not digitally. I cannot hit the rewind button with my life.
In my house, the phones and computers are put on hold until the children are asleep, then my wife and I strive to share time together. When my daughter's friends come over, all mobile phones go into a basket in my kitchen. If you're at our house, you spend time with the friends in front of you.
No social media for me. Ever.
You never get buyin from the top, you come in from the bottom like yammer or any other social media. I am sure they will get some nice partner launches and then kill it two years from now. Idiots.
Crash
Burn
Subject says it all.
Well now it wants to steal your business information also.
n/t
I'd rather it didn't report for duty.
No one will use this. Linkedin already has this niche and people are loathe to try new platforms. It will end up just like Google+
That's leaving off the horrendous privacy and UI issues facebook has gone through year after year. I'll leave my professional and personal life separate, thank you Zuck.
From a branding aspect, F@WK is a horrible title -- and not just for the clever acronym I just made up.
Upper Mgmt considers Facebook to be a time-waster for employees. They would have been better to market under a unique brand that isn't associated with that existing perception by not using Facebook in the name.
The whole project is a bit ironic... As Zuck's philosophy has always been that a person should have one account, and friends/family/co-workers should intermix.
Why are we being linked to a Forbes article when Forbes cites a Techcrunch article for the information?
"... according to tech site TechCrunch. The news site further noted..."
https://techcrunch.com/2016/09...
Absolutely nothing bad can come of this.
So "Personal Accounts" will be cordoned off. That don't mean much. Will the Facebook /databases/ be cordoned off? If not, it just means you won't be able to access personal accounts from at work, but Facebook will still link everything in the background. Won't it be so fun to have Facebook automagically add all your coworkers to prospective friends on your personal account. And what if you change companies? Do those accounts exist in a single "work facebook" database? or does each corporate account have its own isolated database?
Way to many questions that I doubt will be answered when this is launched, or even afterwords.
(I don't facebook, don't have one, don't want one, and would be pissed if my employer decided to jump on this bandwagon.)
If I don't use Facebook personally, why would I use Facebook for business?
After the massive privacy bait-and-switch Facebook pulled with the WhatsApp acquisition, who on earth would trust them with private information? The terms and conditions of just about every consumer software, hardware, and SaaS offerings contain language along the lines of "we'll change this agreement pretty much any time we want with as much or as little notice (posted on the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of the Leopard.') as we want." Facebook will be just as awful with their business offering.
Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
It has been SOOOO long-awaited that msmash says it TWICE in the first three sentences. Sounds like msmash is a Facebook fanboi.
"This long-awaited foray by the social network has been long-awaited."
[CITATION NEEDED]
For crying out loud, we're all waiting for Facebook to become the next MySpace and Friendster.
I wonder if Facebook actually uses this themselves. You gotta eat your own dog food.
Also, no thank you.
And I say this as a person who finds FB quite useful in real life.
"You forgot to check in at the conference yesterday." "I see that you did not 'like' my presentation. Might I remind you that this is a condition of employment?" "I TOLD you not to respond to John's project update with department specific information."
Having witnessed several commit comment wars, I can't see this going anywhere good...
Slack, BitBucket and all that have the hipster startup market covered. LinkedIn is the contact management tool for regular businesses. Yammer is pretty much toast and Microsoft is folding its pieces into Skype and SharePoint. So, I'm not quite sure where Facebook expects to fit in this space.
I really don't know why most non-startup, non-tech businesses would want a platform like this. I know the BCG, Gartner, etc. studies are telling companies "You're all a bunch of stuffy old suit-wearing curmudgeons, the MILLENNIALS are coming and they want social tools! They want positive affirmation and badges! They have phones and tablets, BYOD baby! They want to work at cafeteria tables in a bright white shared workspace! CHANGE or DIE, you LUDDITES!!!!!" But I'm just not seeing that. Outside of a very small minority, younger people I'm working with have the same needs as older people - a job and a quiet place to do it in. Having to feed another social media platform just doesn't seem like a task most people want to take on regardless of age.
FB probably consulted with so "experts" about finding more ways to expand their surveillance empire and some bright spark brought up communities of practice (CoP). I bet I even know which book they read: https://www.worldcat.org/title...
For all the wonderful ideas behind CoP and what it can offer to businesses and corporations, FB probably don't understand (and don't care about) the kind of culture change that is necessary to allow CoPs to develop, live, grow, and evolve in the workplace. It'll work at exceptional places like Valve and Ideo but 99% of the time it ain't gonna happen. They'll spend all their time and budget on setting up the software and systems and nowhere near enough time and resources to implement the part that actually makes the difference. As Bev Wenger-Trayner puts it,
"Yet again I have a client – of 5 years – who has made the technology a centre-piece of their strategy.
I cry.
It’s a technology that I suggested and helped to create. But I seem powerless to convince them that the proportion of resources they are investing in technology as opposed to building the learning network are a waste of everyone’s time.
Technology and community building are not the same thing. I get it. Funding can be easier for tech. Tech is sexy or mysterious – depending on your relationship with it. Organizations understand $$ for tech.
But it won’t build you a network. Building a network requires social artistry, persistence, understanding the community, knowledge of the domain, attention to practices, conversations, more conversations, and concern for creating value."
If your only qualifications are being a tech whizz, you are not cut out for the job.
If training people on how to use a simple technology takes up a hundred per cent of your attention, you are on the wrong track. If it takes up less than five percent of your time – in response to requests by network members – you are probably getting close.
It’s community building 101. And I have to watch as my.own.client repeats the same.old.mistake.
I cry.
Source: http://wenger-trayner.com/refl...
So we have a company that has made it known that they scan and use anything and everything that their members submit.. and now they expect to attract businesses? I guess if you are a business that doesn't have anything confidential going on you might be interested, but it doesn't seem like a very good strategy to give all your critical information to Facebook.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
Reports at work about your FB stats. Yeah let's monetize that!
WTF? Who came up with this bullshit? "Report for duty" my ass. What a bunch of wankers. A shower of cunts.
Forget the service contract, you know Facebook is going to change your privacy settings. Given their despicable treatment of private data, why would anyone think trusting them with corporate data is a good idea. No, a legally-binding transaction is not a reason.
No responsible board of directors should invite Facebook INSIDE of their company to learn everything about how it works and how all its products/services work and which employees are good/bad what products/services might better compete with it, etc.
It's a complete act of corporate incompetence to let a competitor (or a company that will learn everything and then sell all it learns to the highest bidder, including ALL your competitors) into the inner workings of your business.
I swear that this county is slumping into total incompetence and foolishness as the young "social media" addicts enter the workplace.
Why is anyone still using Facebook?
From my experience, it works great. Much much better than yammer and sharepoint, because you can get the information you need and would otherwise often not get in a very short period of time without requiring constant attention.
Actually they have people who help you make the required culture change who do not focus on technology much.