Slashdot Mirror


4chan Is Running Out of Money and Martin Shkreli Wants To Buy It (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: The infamous message board 4chan is struggling to stay afloat and will have to make changes to reduce costs, the site's owner wrote in a post on Sunday. "4chan can't afford infrastructure costs, network fee, servers cost, CDN and etc, now," writes Hiroyuki Nisimura, who bought the site from its founder last year. Nisimura says ads haven't been effective enough to support the site, nor have subscriptions offering additional features. "We had tried to keep 4chan as is. But I failed," Nisimura writes. "I am sincerely sorry." There are three options for 4chan to survive going forward, as far as Nisimura sees it: sell more subscriptions, include "much more" -- and potentially even malicious -- ads, or cut traffic to the site in half. That might be done by closing message boards, slowing down the site, or reducing the size of images that can be posted. Nisimura makes it sound bad (his post is titled "Winter is coming"), but he also proposes changes to save the site. Meanwhile, another infamous name -- Martin Shkreli -- says he's interested in buying 4chan; he's in touch with Nisimura, so maybe we'll see how that remarkably bad combination turns out. Martin Shkreli tweeted: "I'm open to joining the Board of Directors of 4Chan. @4chan." Not too long after, Hiroyuki Nisimura replied: "I have replied your DM. Thank you for supporting 4chan @MartinShkreli twitter.com/MartinShkreli/...."

143 of 254 comments (clear)

  1. inb4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    4chan could go from being cancer, to selling cancer drugs. How about that.

    1. Re:inb4 by davester666 · · Score: 1

      So, 4chan would run ads for software the blocks 4chan....

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re: inb4 by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The Shkreli is the person who should be subjected to 4chan day, night any all the time in between.

      You can bet your ass that THEN you will be seeing cheaper drugs!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re: inb4 by silentcoder · · Score: 5, Funny

      So Shkrelli wants to have one company that causes cancer, so his other company have more people to sell overpriced cancer drugs to.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    4. Re:inb4 by Frigga's+Ring · · Score: 1

      If we're going to judge a site by a portion of it's users, what do we say about certain Slashdot users and their toxic posts?

      As with any other site, 4chan has some problem posters, but it's also where I go to get ideas for the D&D campaign I run, where I discuss the TV shows I'm interested in, and where I get help with issues with my gaming computer. The vast majority of the site contains civil (though not always interesting) discourse. The biggest issue I run into is when someone asks repeatedly for the source of an image when it's listed in the filename or the bottom corner of the image I posted.

    5. Re:inb4 by rudy_wayne · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was ignoring 4chan before it was cool.

    6. Re:inb4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      4-who? You mean that support group for sociopathic outcasts who aren't smart enough to venture out onto the real internet?

    7. Re:inb4 by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      what do we say about certain Slashdot users and their toxic posts?

      That concentrating boomer/gen x white nerds into one place makes for hilarious reading?

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    8. Re: inb4 by Zaowulf · · Score: 1

      This post gave me cancer.

    9. Re: inb4 by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      The Shkreli is the person who should be subjected to 4chan day, night any all the time in between.

      You can bet your ass that THEN you will be seeing cheaper drugs!

      I guess I'm out of the loop on 4chan. How does 4chan cause cancer, selling cigarettes or something?

    10. Re: inb4 by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's less cancer, more insanity.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re: inb4 by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 1

      4chan isn't all horrible, they've got some pretty good stolen porn. However, 4chan is apparently the home turf of the "alt-right". There are certain forums where the skinheads, KKK, neo-nazis and what-have-you meet to plot their shenanigans. I hear their most recent effort was stuff the ballot boxes of all the online polls about the presidential debate. Goold old Trump new all about it and was able to claim he won all the polls so he must have won the debate.

    12. Re: inb4 by Methadras · · Score: 1

      Ah, another lie perpetuated by the left that associates alt-right with white power. It isn't, but you go ahead and keep on believing that.

  2. Hmm... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    8chan seems to be getting by and they have twice as many chans.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Hmm... by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      8ch also doesn't get anywhere close to 27,700,000 unique visitors a month.

    2. Re:Hmm... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Considering that 8chan pretty much started 3 years ago and is now one in the top 5k boards in the US and top 10k worldwide, they seem to be doing okay.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re: Hmm... by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      So everyone is yelling inside their own little bubble where no one else is hearing them. Reminds me of the feeling I got when the endless glut of unrelated and isolated web forums for all intents and puroposes replaced Usenet. (Usenet was already highly balkanized at this point, but you could still find heavily trafficked groups) Fragmenting a platform into millions of pieces is nearly as effective as a full on ban of it in stopping people from being able to get an idea out to a large amount of people.

    4. Re:Hmm... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The amount of content isn't the issue. The cost is in views.

    5. Re:Hmm... by Captain+Scurvy · · Score: 1

      8chan has more boards but far fewer users. 4chan has also seen a huge uptick in traffic this year.

    6. Re:Hmm... by clonehappy · · Score: 1

      The inescapable conclusion is that most people prefer a slightly less extreme site, one where there is considerable freedom to say what you like, but there are still some limits.

      The inescapable conclusion, to me, is that the general public is too immature to be able to handle actual free speech and support it only until people start saying things they don't like, at which point those folks are to be silenced at any cost. You can frame it as "splitting the worst bits off", but there are plenty of radical "worst bits" still around on every site, Reddit and 4chan included, but they tend to just go along with the accepted narrative.

      Disagreeing with someone while still protecting and accepting their right to say something is the key to a free and open society. It's the mature person's outlook on free speech, which unfortunately is dying more and more each day we continue to humor any group who wants to silence another.

    7. Re:Hmm... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's that people can't handle free speech, it's just that a) not every wants to live life at MAX VOLUME all the time, and b) the risk of being attacked on those sites (e.g. by doxing) is high.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  3. 4chan? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Is that the site where people post pictures of cats with clever captions? This is a critical piece of Internet infrastructure and must be kept afloat at all costs.

    1. Re:4chan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      that's imgur. 4chan is the cesspool with porn pictures of women stuffing leeks up their cunts.

  4. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because shutting down a site that has controversial and illegal (and borderline-illegal) material has always been a good way to stop the bad behavior?
    On the contrary, I think the internet is better for 4chan (and /b/ in particular) existing. If you're familiar with the SomethingAwful forums, 4chan is like a FYAD board in that it gives trolls and idiots someplace to go and get the stupidity out of their systems.
    And where do you think many of the great net memes first came from? Hint: it's not Slashdot.
    I'm not worried about 4chan. It will survive or it will die and then rise again. It's done it before.

  5. Pricing is going up by supertrooper · · Score: 1

    1 post = $700

  6. For your amusement. From /g/. by bmo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Notch now looking into buying 4chan Anonymous 10/03/16(Mon)19:51:42 No.56909338â->>56909384 >>56909411 >>56909683 >>56909721 >>56910005 >>56910058 >>56910195 >>56910297 >>56910483 >>56910593 >>56910655 >>56910945
    A lucky anon on /b/ got quads, summoning Notch to look into buying 4chan.

    "Assuming it's not too expensive, and assuming I don't have to do any actual work myself, I'm in."

    Who here would work for notch maintaining the 4chan codebase ?

      Anonymous 10/03/16(Mon)19:56:06 No.56909384â-
    >>56909338 (OP)
    >entire website will be Java based
    >everything inside one .jar

    --
    BMO

  7. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 2

    Because shutting down a site that has controversial and illegal (and borderline-illegal) material has always been a good way to stop the bad behavior?

    No, it's not a good way to stop bad behaviour, but if said bad behaviour causes the site to implode, then why should we help them stay afloat?

  8. 4chan to 8chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I thought most of the userbase of 4chan had long ago migrated to 8chan after moots administration behaviour changed and people thought 4chan had been sold out to SJW values.

    How is the health of 8chan looking?

    1. Re:4chan to 8chan by One+With+Whisp · · Score: 1

      You're correct, all that's been left behind is those in denial and the lesser class. The former will follow to 8chan while the latter are worthless anyway.

      However, 8chan isn't doing so great itself. It might die as well.

      A few years from now, people are going to look back at this as The Great Splintering. The Exodus lead to the great 4-8 split, and when both of them die, it's just going to become hundreds of small minor chans struggling to become.

    2. Re:4chan to 8chan by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      A few years from now, people are going to look back at this as The Great Splintering. The Exodus lead to the great 4-8 split, and when both of them die, it's just going to become hundreds of small minor chans struggling to become.

      Great, &TOTSE all over again.

      (Remember, green lantern is like a dick without wings)

    3. Re:4chan to 8chan by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      4chan selling out to SJWs?

      Somehow I'd rather believe that MS makes the Windows code base OSS.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:4chan to 8chan by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Yeap It's in the bible...

  9. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by sinij · · Score: 5, Insightful

    why should we help them stay afloat?

    Lets hope 4chan stays afloat, because otherwise 4chan posters will be dispersed throughout other sites and communities. Like a cyst bursting into bloodstream.

  10. Nishimura, with an h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hi everyone, 4chan here. His name is Hiroyuki Nishimura, not Hiroyuki Nisimura. I will now prove the authenticity of my post by sharing a beloved 4chan meme.

    EDIT
    Wow, thanks for the gold! I can't believe my most-upvoted post ever is about the owner of a bankrupt Vietnamese goat-herding newsgroup!

    1. Re:Nishimura, with an h by Andreas+Mayer · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's just a different spelling for the same name.

      Wikipedia says his name is ... um, Slashdot doesn't like Kanji - look it up here.
      The most commonly used transliteration in English is Nishimura Hiroyuki, according to the Hepburn system of romaji. It's Nisimura when written using the Nihon-shiki or Kunrei-shiki system.

      (Knowledge totally stolen from https://www.italki.com/questio...)

    2. Re:Nishimura, with an h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Methinks you missed something important about OP.

  11. o_O by XSportSeeker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A match forged in the deepest levels of Hell I guess?

    4chan board of directors: Martin Shkreli, Palmer Luckey, ...

    1. Re:o_O by Monkey · · Score: 1

      They need Kim Dotcom too.

    2. Re: o_O by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      Was wondering why Trump didn't pick Shkreli as his running-mate - they seem so alike. If Fox News and 4chan ever had humanoid offspring, Martin Shkreli could well be the result.

    3. Re: o_O by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      Problem is, Shkreli is still paying taxes so he's clearly not as smart as Trump.

    4. Re:o_O by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Nah, Kimmie doesn't touch anything that could be connected with him having to do some work and is not raining free money on his fat ass.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  12. Re:Altavista by Cramer · · Score: 2

    I would guess >90% of 4chan users block the holy hell out of anything that might've once gone to school with an ad.

  13. Re:Altavista by malditaenvidia · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He's somehow not telling the whole story, he shut down the site's ads without warning, complaining about ad serving costs and urging people to buy 4chan passes. My guess is that he wants to be done with the site, causing a surge of subscriptions before claiming it's unsustainable and closing the servers. Moot was very clear about leaving the site with a solid foundation so this wouldn't happen, yet a year later the site is apparently on the verge of collapse. With Hiroyuki's track record, this seems highly suspicious and there might be something shadier going on.

  14. the most punchable face (as its know) by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelli...

    a fark theme, too, of course.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:the most punchable face (as its know) by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Spare the hands, use a rock.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:the most punchable face (as its know) by gustygolf · · Score: 1

      So, the summary should go:
      "Martin Shkreli, known for having the most punchable face on earth, says he's interested in buying 4chan" ?

      --
      "Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 58 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment" -- slashdot, driving users away.
    3. Re:the most punchable face (as its know) by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      This info are in the Bible!

  15. Perfect. Do it now. by cfalcon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't imagine a more perfect match for 4chan than Martin Shkreli. They absolutely and completely deserve each other forever.

  16. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    I would like to see one month with Shkreli leading 4chan. Purely for the entertainment value. Then when we've had a good laugh, then let it fold.

  17. Re:Really? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    First, everyone should always block ads.
    Second, I'm pretty sure all of 4chan knows this.
    Third, 4chan is... lets just go with "special". I think it's pretty charming that you refer to them as "customers", too.

  18. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by bhcompy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Containment forums are a proven good

  19. Re:What happened? by Andreas+Mayer · · Score: 1

    Ad blockers happened?

    One more reason to be in favour of ad blockers. ;)

  20. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Precisely. When Reddit shut down the /r/coontown white supremacy forum, its users flooded into the rest of the site spewing hatred everywhere. Now most of them have regrouped in /r/The_Donald, where the majority of the site's users don't have to see them.

  21. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    4chan is kill, RIP 4chan.

    I can't think of a more perfect person than Martin Shkreli to buy 4chan. It's ideal, really.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  22. Sk??? by xbytor · · Score: 1

    I read "Skillrex" when I was skimming message title. Very odd.
    But, at least he has more money than Shkreli to fund 4chan.

  23. Wrong date on this story by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

    It's the beginning of October, not April.

    And can the fine structure of spacetime even withstand Martin Shkreli and 4chan being in the same place simultaneously?

  24. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    what about /r/blacklivesmatter? was that also shut down? of course not.

  25. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by ArylAkamov · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lets hope 4chan stays afloat, because otherwise 4chan posters will be dispersed throughout other sites and communities. Like a cyst bursting into bloodstream.

    >Implying we're not already here

    Boogiemanposting aside, a lot of the boards are pretty useful. /g/, /fit/, /diy/, etc.

  26. Let him buy it. by Chas · · Score: 1

    Then everyone can exit the site for the exciting new 4.1chan.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Let him buy it. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Then everyone can exit the site for the exciting new 4.1chan.

      iChan, with translucent rounded edges (unless you hold it wrong or plug in a regular headphone jack).

  27. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by khallow · · Score: 2

    One wouldn't expect all containment measures to breach simultaneously.

  28. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by barc0001 · · Score: 2

    Keep friends close and enemies closer? It could be argued the site is a relatively easy way to keep an eye on a lot of people who engage in that borderline illegal behavior. Shut it down and they'll scatter to who knows where. The problem won't disappear, you just won't know where to find it as easily.

  29. Re:Altavista by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 1

    Tin foil hat time. The powers that be want this shut down. That FBIanon shit was not going to go unpunished.

  30. Re:Really? by KiloByte · · Score: 1

    Where do you even find ads appropriate for 4chan? As sleazy as all advertisers are, I still don't think you can find one for dickgirls with a yeast infection or similar fare.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  31. Crowdfunding campaign to save 4chan by Shane_Optima · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you want to help keep 4chan the way it is and not have it all crapped up with ads, a crowdfunding campaign has been set up here.

    1. Re:Crowdfunding campaign to save 4chan by Shane_Optima · · Score: 4, Informative

      *sigh*. 4chan is what started and popularized that meme. Don't mod down a joke just because you don't get it. (and don't mod this up informative, either.)

    2. Re:Crowdfunding campaign to save 4chan by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Informative

      OP is actually one of the very very few posts that deserves to end up with a "Score:5, Troll" distinction.

    3. Re:Crowdfunding campaign to save 4chan by brewthatistrue · · Score: 1

      > I didn't click on the link.

      append a + to the end of goo.gl or bit.ly links to preview them.

      prepend tinyurl.com with the preview subdomain to preview it.

      there are also a plethora of url expander sites that you can put a url into and see the full url.

      my favorite was longurl.org but it's defunct. ExpandURL is another.

    4. Re:Crowdfunding campaign to save 4chan by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      I would've done a duckroll (funnier IMO), but it's much less widely known.

    5. Re:Crowdfunding campaign to save 4chan by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      An astute observation.

    6. Re:Crowdfunding campaign to save 4chan by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      (I tried to fit in an attribution but there weren't enough characters left)

  32. Re:Interesting choice of links, Verge... by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    That was pretty amusing, also an accurate picture of what /qa/ looks like: autists spamming for /pol/ to be deleted.

  33. Re:Perfect. Do it now. by jeti · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If someone behaves like an asshole, online or offline, he is an asshole. Any further distinction is irrelevant.

  34. Re:Stupid question by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    Donations, mostly. It has shut down a few times in the past due to using all the goddamn bandwidth. They refuse to accept donations now though. Not really worrying though, something will just pop up to take its place, like every other time a popular website has closed.

  35. Not happening by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    Martin isn't buying it, neither is Notch. Both of them were just trolling.

    Nobody really knows what is going on. Hiroshamoot isn't really explaining, and even when he does post his English is lacking, at best. He refuses to take donations as well.

    Either way, I don't see any reason to be worried. I doubt it will shut down, and even if it does it won't change anything (Though it has died a few times in the past).

    Whenever a popular website shuts down, something rises to take its place. &TotSE died from it because the community was already dwindling, but 4chan is still fuckhuge. The bigger issue is increased shitposting and lack of janitors.

  36. Fuck 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    4chan died years ago when Christopher Poole started censoring and collecting data for the FBI. SJW's donned its skin and have been dancing around in it ever since. And fuck the Verge for repeating lies.

  37. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Yeah, because /b/tards only shitpost to /b/

    They have already metastasized to the rest of the Internet.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  38. Re:Perfect. Do it now. by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People behave like assholes on 4chan to drive away the overly-sensitive. Many are refugees from other forums, where you get banned for diverging from the groupthink/using the wrong pronoun/supporting the wrong presidential candidate. They created an environment where people who complain about their feelings getting hurt by words on the internet get laughed out the door. Personally, I find its honest abrasiveness more refreshing than the passive-aggressive politeness of other forums.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  39. Re:Really? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    I'm sure there's many dildo and douche companies that would love to advertise to the dildos and douches that frequent 4chan...

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  40. Re:Perfect. Do it now. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    If someone behaves like an asshole, online or offline, he is an asshole. Any further distinction is irrelevant.

    I agree, but that opinion is incredibly rare. Not only that it seems to go both ways. I've been a member of a forum which had a significant AFK presence. An awful lot of people appeared to consider the online and offline personas as completely different people. You'd get people saying things approaching "oh yes, I mean sure he is a known thief, a vandal, has a toothbrush moustache and is actually literally Hitler in person but he posts nice cat pictures".

    WTF?!

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  41. Gotta stop feeling amused by shanen · · Score: 1

    I think there is a much better financial model that no website or newswebsite is using. I've recommended it and suggested it and even advocated it to the point of offending people, but as far as I know, it remains untested. I'd even put some of my own money behind it if the opportunity existed, but as things stand, I feel entitled to sit back and laugh. Doubtless it's unjustified, but I guess we'll never know, will we?

    Fortunately, I don't care about 4chan and won't miss it.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:Gotta stop feeling amused by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I think there is a much better financial model that no website or newswebsite is using. I've recommended it and suggested it and even advocated it to the point of offending people, but as far as I know, it remains untested. I'd even put some of my own money behind it if the opportunity existed, but as things stand, I feel entitled to sit back and laugh. Doubtless it's unjustified, but I guess we'll never know, will we?

      No, we do know. We know that you haven't put your labor where your smug is and produced a website that uses this system in order to test whether it really is superior. Nerd up and write some code, or STFU

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Gotta stop feeling amused by shanen · · Score: 1

      You should stop lying or exaggerating. If you actually know what I'm talking about, then you could easily prove it as quickly as blather about it.

      Actually I did code a website some years before the Internet went public. It was called a BBS in those days. Turns out it was a good idea, but I was about 10 or 15 years too early. There is now a fairly successful and at least 15-year-old website that has been using a somewhat similar approach to the main functions, though their financial model is problematic. They went the advertising route, and from my perspective its kind of saddening to see how the money distorted things. Could be much better. I guess if I had been more committed to the idea or had my present financial resources at that time, then it might be my successful website, but that's not how the history worked out, eh?

      Doing it now? I'm sort of considering it... I suppose the main problem is my age after my 30-year detour. Also my bad attitude after too many personal experiences with startup companies that mostly didn't make it. At this point I'd prefer to limit my involvement to investments. There was once a time when you could even find people to invest in on Slashdot. These days? Not so much.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  42. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because shutting down a site that has controversial and illegal (and borderline-illegal) material has always been a good way to stop the bad behavior?

    Yes. 4chan was a central location for orchestrating campaigns of trolling, harassment and other obnoxious behaviour. Not only did it facilitate this behaviour but it normalized it, encouraging others who might not normally participate to do so. If the site is gone then it obviously becomes harder to conduct attacks on such a large scale.

    I'm sure some of the more determined trolls might gravitate to smaller sites but in so doing their ability to be assholes is diminished too.

  43. Re:Altavista by 2fuf · · Score: 1

    > My guess is that he wants to be done with the site
    This makes a lot of sense. It feels like he's very eager to throw the towel into the ring.

  44. Ah Ha! by beheaderaswp · · Score: 1

    I predict- this will fix the internet!!

    --
    Another consultant who stuck it out.

    "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
    1. Re:Ah Ha! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      In the veterinary sense, I guess?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  45. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    An asshole buying a site filled with assholes?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  46. Re:Perfect. Do it now. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    That's exactly what would make it hilarious. Can you imagine the 4chan crowd doing their worst to destroy their own "home" out of spite?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  47. Re:Why ins't Martin Shkreli dead or in jail? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The questions is why that piece of garbage is still alive.

    That's one of those people whose only reason to survive is that he ain't worth a nanosecond of jail time.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  48. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by silentcoder · · Score: 1

    Nobody said anything about shutting it down except you. If a business goes bankrupt because they can't generate enough profits to cover expenses - there is nothing oppressive happening. It can often be a sad event - for the owners who invested in the business, the workers who are losing their livelihoods -even the customers who are losing their access to the product, but it's not an *evil* event.

    There are plenty of evil forms of business bankruptcy - but this is literally a textbook example of the non-evil kind.

    Shutting down implies some nefarious outside power forcing it to shut down. The only outside power involved here is the cost of bandwidth and infrastructure so unless you have some information that proves the ISP was charging 4chan more than they would charge any other site with similar traffic, there is no 'shutting down' being done.

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  49. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by silentcoder · · Score: 1

    He is the sewage big gulp to their turdburger.

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  50. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by L.+J.+Beauregard · · Score: 2

    SJW

    DRINK!

    --
    Ooh, moderator points! Five more idjits go to Minus One Hell!
    Delendae sunt RIAA, MPAA et Windoze
  51. Re:Really? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    I'm sure those stupid online t-shirt companies fit the 4chan demographic. That and cheap-ass alcohol ads. Red bull, Mountain dew. Geek-culture ads. Anime and cartoon network paraphanalia. Whatever the 21st century equivalent of Spencer's gifts is.

    Plenty of things that would probably work for 4chan.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  52. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Interesting

    what about /r/blacklivesmatter? was that also shut down? of course not.

    I'm quite disgusted that this has been modded up. There is definitely an element of blacklivesmatter that is subversive and just looking to stir up trouble, but they were formed as a counter-measure to several famous cases of cops shooting young black males when there were other and better courses of action. The point of BLM is equality, not racism. You can't piss on the whole movement because of a few asshats who align themselves with it.

    It is not accurate to compare a white supremacy to blm.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  53. Right price by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

    This isn't necessarily a bad thing. They just need to make sure they hold out for enough punches in Shkreli's face to make it worth it.

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  54. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Erh... context?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  55. But then he will sell it to Microsoft by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    And they will release an edu version that only runs on Windows 10

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  56. Re:Perfect. Do it now. by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People behave like assholes on 4chan to drive away the overly-sensitive.

    That doesn't make them not assholes. If the only way you can come up with to stop people from complaining about what you're saying constantly is to ante up on being a fuckhead... you're an asshole.

    Personally, I find its honest abrasiveness more refreshing than the passive-aggressive politeness of other forums.

    And personally, you like assholes. That's OK, but don't pretend something else is true.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  57. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

    They started it, but the baton has been passed. I don't think there's a site which causes more people to be doxxed nowadays than Reddit for instance. Getting rid of 4chan won't accomplish anything.

    It's hardly a hive of illegal content either, 4chan is a honeypot.

  58. Sign of things to come by Merk42 · · Score: 2

    A site full of self-entitled brats that block everything remotely close to an advertisement and are against any kind of subscription can't find a way to even cover maintenance costs?
    This is what all websites will face eventually.

    1. Re:Sign of things to come by brewthatistrue · · Score: 1

      People are willing to pay if the prices is right and the convenience is there.

      Are they ok whipping their credit card out for a monthly/annual subscription on every site they visit? No way, but that doesn't mean they are unwilling to pay anything.

      Micropayments have been proposed for years as an alternative to advertising but it hasn't been practical to enter payment data for every web site, or to make payments less than a dollar when there are credit card fees (and minimums?).

      Readability, Pocket/ReaditLater (and Instapaper?) all talked about passing a portion of their own revenues on to the content creators.

      https://gigaom.com/2012/04/03/...

      The Brave web browser is giving it a shot with Bitcoin, but we'll see how that goes.

      https://nakedsecurity.sophos.c...

      The advertising network model is broken and has a steady stream of malvertising on reputable web sites, as well as making the web worse by crowding out content more and more in favor of advertisements.

      I'm hoping something better wins, and when it does, I will be ready with my credit card.

  59. Re:For your amusement. From /g/. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    Jesus, how do you read that?

    Threaded forums were invented for a reason. Flat threads don't scare well to a lot of users. Fark ran into the issue. Usenet ran into the issue. E-mail lists ran into the issue.

  60. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by tentenone · · Score: 1

    My main problem with 4chan is that that board software sucks. It's ugly, difficult to follow a thread, images often just get in the way, difficult to track who's saying what. Reddit at least has a clean interface.

  61. "cut traffic to the site in half": is he retarded? by citizenr · · Score: 1

    Cutting traffic means cutting ad revenue. Is this guy retarded? trolling? What is going on?
    also server cost? Are they running on node.js or something?

    >network fees
    >or reducing the size of images that can be posted

    why the hell are you self hosting images then? let imgur or other cancer take care of that (and the money from ads they inject because apparently you are incompetent).

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  62. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by mitcheli · · Score: 1

    It does seem to be a marriage made in hell doesn't it?

    --
    Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
  63. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by Z80a · · Score: 1

    No it won't.
    4chan is one of the roadblocks for a completely commercialized gentrified filtered internet, where you can get kicked out of it for badmouthing the wrong corporation.

  64. Re:Perfect. Do it now. by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You don't act like an asshole to drive away the overly sensitive, you ignore them. Eventually they get fed up that no one is listening to them whine and move on. This is the tactic we use on the boards I moderate and it works really well. Being an asshole drives away regular people too.

  65. I don't think it matters by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    the posters are as nasty as they are because 4chan not only allows but encourages it. Notice how the Hot Grit & Greased Yoda Doll posts are 99% gone? It's not perfectly possible to filter out the trolls. Heck, I don't even see the GNAA "frosty piss" posts anymore. If anything lossing 4 chan will probably mean they don't have a place to organize their (admittedly harmless) large scale troll operations (like when they made Donald Trump win the last debate in the online polls).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  66. Probably not by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    Ad revenues have plummeted in the last few years as everyone has ad blockers. From what I understand it was a pretty steep, sudden drop. When he talks about more intrusive ads he's talking about ones that make it past ad blockers whether you like it not. Google, Yahoo, and all the major ad networks can easily bypass an ad blocker. They choose not to.

    He probably bought 4chan expecting ad revenues to match viewership/bandwidth usage without realizing it. Honestly ad blockers had been around ages so he probably wasn't expecting the sudden uptick in their usage.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Probably not by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      The only way to bypass an ad-blocker is to serve the ads from the main site. Otherwise there is ALWAYS a way to block the ads, you simply can't serve them from alternative known domains and expect that they can't be blocked even by the simplest measures.

      The reason sites don't do this is twofold, it removes the ad middleman who makes the biggest cut of revenue and the site is then responsible for the ad content. When it's not served from their network they can claim they didn't know but serving the ads from their own sites negates that claim. The ad industry has dramatically failed to deal with the bad ad's and malware embedded in their servers along with all the annoying ad's such as autoplaying audio and video. These are are the reasons people are using ad-blockers and until the ad people get it through their thick heads that people will tolerate some advertising but not the aggressive shit they are spewing today.

      Oh and BTW to suggest Google wouldn't bypass all ad-blockers if they had the technology is the height of stupidity, they make all their money with ads, a decline in advertising rates directly harms Googles profit base.

  67. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 2

    "Now then, Savage, I want to talk to you about some charges that you've been bringing lately. I think that perhaps you're being a little over-zealous."

            "Which charges did you mean then, sir?"

    "Well, for instance this one: 'Loitering with intent to use a pedestrian crossing.' Savage, maybe you're not aware of this, but it is not illegal to use a pedestrian crossing, neither is 'smelling of foreign food' an offence."

            "Are you sure, sir?"

    "Also, there's no law against 'Urinating in a public convenience or 'Coughing without due care and attention.'"

            "If you say so, sir..."

    "Yes, I do say so, Savage! Didn't they teach you anything at training school?"

            "Erm, I'm sorry, sir..."

    "Some of these cases are just plain stupid: 'Looking at me in a funny way' - Is this some kind of joke, Savage?"

            "No, sir."

    "And we have some more here: 'Walking on the cracks in the pavement,' 'Walking in a loud shirt in a built-up area during the hours of darkness,' and 'Walking around with an offensive wife.' In short, Savage, in the space of one month you have brought one hundred and seventeen ridiculous, trumped-up and ludicrous charges."

            "Yes, sir."

    "Against the same man, Savage."

            "Yes, sir."

    "A Mr Winston Kodogo, of 55, Mercer Road."

            "Yes, sir."

    "Sit down, Savage."

            "Yes, sir."

    "Savage, why do you keep arresting this man?"

            "He's a villain, sir.""A villain...""And a jail-bird, sir."

    "I know he's a jail-bird, Savage, he's down in the cells now! We're holding him on a charge of 'Possession of curly black hair and thick lips.'"

            "Well - well, there you are, sir."

    "You arrested him, Savage!"

            "Thank you, sir."

    "Savage, would I be correct in assuming that Mr Kodogo is a coloured gentleman?"

            "Well, I can't say I've ever noticed, sir."

    "Stand up, Savage! - Savage, you're a bigot. It's officers like you that give the police a bad name. The press love to jump on an instance like this, and the reputation of the force can be permanently tarnished. Your whole time on duty is dominated by racial hatred and petty personal vendettas. Do you get some kind of perverted gratification from going around stirring up trouble?"

            "Yes, sir."

    "There's no room for men like you in my force, Savage. I'm transferring you to the S.P.G. "

            "Thank you very much, sir."

  68. Re:Perfect. Do it now. by LordLucless · · Score: 1

    The RPG.net forums list in its guidelines a set of banned topics, including Westboro Baptist Church, homosexuality, transgender people, spanking children and male circumcision. That's probably the most ban-happy place I've frequented, but there's plenty of others.

    I was banned from Facebook for three days, for mentioning "Ten Little Niggers", in a thread about old books that had their title changed for political correctness.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  69. Makes sense by ilsaloving · · Score: 2

    I think it makes perfect sense for a business troll to own a board that spawns online trolls. They can synergize their core competencies and raise trolling to new, unheard of, levels.

  70. Re:Altavista by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

    this seems highly suspicious

    Well duh, some people would view this as an unfavorable outcome and human brains have evolved so well to quickly recognize patterns and relationships that they often equate coincidence or even completely unrelated events as conspiracy and this is being debated...on the internet! Of course it "seems" suspicious.

  71. Re:Pic unrelated by omnichad · · Score: 1

    I mean, it's a cesspool and I don't care for it, but it's literally an image board and you want to make it more about text.

  72. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lets hope 4chan stays afloat, because otherwise 4chan posters will be dispersed throughout other sites and communities. Like a cyst bursting into bloodstream.

    Do you really think 4channers aren't already at sites like Slashdot? When I see the odious behavior of some ACs here, I generally assume it's another bored kid with no social skills.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  73. Re: For your amusement. From /g/. by bmo · · Score: 1

    >line eater food

    There are extensions that do threading and all sorts of stuff. For chrome and Firefox.

    >Usenet
    >Threaded

    Only if you turn it on in your newsreader.

    --
    BMO

  74. Re: For your amusement. From /g/. by bmo · · Score: 1

    / b/ and /pol/ are containment boards. Moot tried getting rid of /pol/ and the results were less than optimal. You don't want them to go away.

    --
    BMO

  75. I wonder by Verdatum · · Score: 2

    Hey, Whipslash, maybe you guys should get in on this one!

  76. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by Maritz · · Score: 1

    Yeah they're here alright.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  77. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by rhazz · · Score: 1

    As long as blacks are more likely to resist arrest and commit crimes they will get shot more.

    The way I use statistics is laughably naive.

    FTFY.

  78. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by bigpat · · Score: 1

    The point of BLM is equality, not racism. You can't piss on the whole movement because of a few asshats who align themselves with it.

    It is not accurate to compare a white supremacy to blm.

    Equality means people can indeed piss on the whole movement because of a few asshats who align themselves with it.

    That is what mainstream politics and the press do to these sorts of political movements. That's what they did to the Tea Party, Occupy Movement, and now Black Lives Matter. Guilt by association is a pretty transparent tactic by parties aligned with various factions to undermine competing factions. And guilt by association in particular is the inherent weakness of populist movements because populist movements by their nature are going to include many many more people with a wider range of backgrounds including racists, criminals, gang members etc etc. There is simply no way to defend the integrity of a populist movement based on the integrity of all of its members.

    It is also the weakness of BLM in particular because the movement has no simply stated achievable goals and relies on a shared sense of oppression and persecution for an ongoing sense of purpose. And there has been, a now exposed, cynical conspiracy by the democratic party elite to co-opt black lives matter into a vehicle to drive turnout on election day without actually delivering any achievable policy... Keep it supportive yet vague was the directive.

    Again the cynical democratic party elite has tried to make sure BLM has no clear achievable agenda other than being a vehicle for discontent. The implication being that any actual policy agenda will either be too divisive within the democratic party or will be agreeable to all sides and won't allow for a contrast between parties that would help drive turnout.

    It simply doesn't serve the party to achieve anything before election day other than black voter turnout. And then the next election is just two years away... It is up to BLM leaders to get some agenda on the table that most people can agree to and to stop being used for petty partisan politics. BLM itself needs to keep the focus on the things that can actually work to make things better.

  79. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

    Are these stats real? Can anybody confirm?
    http://www.breitbart.com/big-g...

  80. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    facebook (idiocy for all! my grandma included!)

  81. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    Nazi!!!!

    Double DRINK!!!!!!

  82. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    Equal outcomes is what insane people demand.

    Minimum income!!!

  83. Re:Altavista by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    tin foil hat time!

  84. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by ADRA · · Score: 1

    All joking aside, I'm honestly curious if a site that fosters 'socially denigrated values' can actually encourage people to flee farther into their niche or if it just gives their inside voice a place to vent in isolation. Basically, if 4Chan never existed, would there be more trolling, 'obscenity', shaming, harassment, etc.. online or is having them all in voluntarily isolation actually of some sort of social benefit?

    --
    Bye!
  85. Re:Let it die by arth1 · · Score: 1

    4chan is an internet plague. It deserves to die, and then to have a parade of it's users shit and piss on the grave.

    No, 4chan (and these days 8chan) serves a purpose: containment.
    If you close down the site, the patrons will go elsewhere. Like here.

  86. Re:For your amusement. From /g/. by sl3xd · · Score: 1

    Threaded forums were invented for a reason.

    Threaded forums are a poor clone of Usenet.

    Sadly, Usenet has two issues:

    • * Usenet isn't as easily monetized as a website with banner ads and JavaScript tracking of every kind.
    • * Usenet is too easy to spam

    Usenet was a one-stop location for every kind of threaded discussion imaginable; no need to visit a different forum for a different subject, and the interface was always the same from one group to the next.

    --
    -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  87. Re:"cut traffic to the site in half": is he retard by malditaenvidia · · Score: 1

    4chan is an imageboard, not a forum. It centers around sharing images and short video, which are the main point of the site. The discussion is merely incidental.

  88. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by ADRA · · Score: 1

    Yes, statistically black people are arrested more (not going down that rabbit hole), but ultimately race shouldn't matter in the course of police work at all. If someone is resisting, they should be restrained. If restraint is insufficient and there's credible danger for the officer, they have the right to defend themselves with lethal force. Those rules should apply evenly to all suspects evenly regardless of race.

    Now, one would expect that if say hypothetically black people were 60% of violent offenders who violently resist arrest. You would generally expect some 60% of police killings to be against a black person. Obviously there are variables that you wave away, but if you see a significant statistical deviation of black people being shot, there may be something to this 'systemic discrimination' of black people in the police force.

    The more interesting question is if said (hypothetical) bias works amongst police of all races, or isolated to race demographics. black-on-black, white-on-black, black-on-white, white-on-white, Asian, Hispanic, etc..

    --
    Bye!
  89. Whats the fix? by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Whats the fix? Allow non commercial site owners to host their own hardware/servers/website cutting costs alot. Why should non commercial sites be punished for becoming popular? Their has to be a way to cut out the for profit middlemen in web hosting.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  90. Re:Perfect. Do it now. by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    facebook ban people for no reason: it's written in the Bible!

  91. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by psyclone · · Score: 1

    They could easily save half their bandwidth with better board software.

  92. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    In all the major stories that have broken over the last year or so; half probably haven't deserved the outrage and half should. This isn't all about "blacks resisting arrest". In half the cases they haven't been resisting or doing anything wrong at all. (in the other half, they were and probably there is no right for outrage).

    I think police definitely treat blacks and whites differently, part of this is self-inflicted (some black people tend to be more aggressive and disdainful towards police); but if a man isn't a danger to a cop or anyone else (black or white) lethal force should never be used. Being black should never be a reason to be shot. It doesn't matter if a cop was heckled by a group of black youth 15 mins earlier- he has no right to shoot a completely different black man at a traffic stop.

    A decent percentage of these major stories the cop has been very far in the wrong. Another group of them (like the one in Fergusson that kicked this all off), time has shown that the cop wasn't in the wrong.

    All police should wear body cams all the time so that we know on a case by case basis if the police abused their power.
    ALL SHOOTINGS BY POLICE should go through a thorough investigation. Every single last one of them (black or white) should be investigated by an independent body.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  93. Re: nope. we're good here by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    Yeap It's written on the Bible...

  94. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    So by your logic:

    One US swimmer trashed a gas station and said he was robbed at gunpoint.
    Does that mean everyone in America is a lying scumbag vandal?

    That's ridiculous, just like it's ridiculous to claim BLM is a hate group just because there are a few members in the organization that are.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  95. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by bigpat · · Score: 1

    So by your logic:

    One US swimmer trashed a gas station and said he was robbed at gunpoint.
    Does that mean everyone in America is a lying scumbag vandal?

    That's ridiculous, just like it's ridiculous to claim BLM is a hate group just because there are a few members in the organization that are.

    I didn't say it was right, just that it was equal treatment. And it isn't without some merit that a group is attacked for the actions of a few. The saying goes that a few bad apples spoil the bunch... as in if you don't exclude the bad apples, take them out, that they will spoil the rest. That goes for the police and BLM.

  96. It's child's play by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    to serve the ads from your site. It's also just not that hard to change domains faster than the adblockers can keep up. And if google stops letting you block their ads what will you do, block google? That's fine, you're not using their service anymore (and not costing them money in bandwidth/server capacity).

    Google doesn't bypass adblockers for the same reason Nigerian scammers write such dumb emails. Good leads are worth more than bad ones. Anyone with an adblocker is likely to be a bad lead.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  97. Re:Perfect. Do it now. by LordLucless · · Score: 1

    That's fine. But other people want the ability to discuss whatever the hell they want without being shut down. For these people, there's 4chan. For people like you, there's forums with ban-happy moderators ensuring any topics that may upset people are removed.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  98. Re:Just let it fold and be done with it by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

    The cancer went malignant years ago and has already infested most of the rest of the internet.

    Online used to be my respite from the idiocy of the real world, back in the days when it was mostly college professors or at least students, and nerdy little kids like I was, on the nascent public ISPs, were the worst of the noobs. Now, most of the idiots (and definitely the worst of them) that I encounter seem to be on the internet, and more and more, the things they have in common all seem to stem from 4chan "culture" and its derivatives.

    It's really all just an extension of Eternal September, plus Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory. More and more, the internet is populated by the same morons who make the real world a shithole, their swarm overwhelming whatever moderating influence the indigenous population may have once had on such newcomers; and the anonymity and large audience the internet provides to them just brings out the worst in all of them.

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."