Slashdot Mirror


Google Gets Serious About Home Automation: Unveils Google Home, Actions on Google and Google Wifi (techcrunch.com)

At its hardware launch event earlier today, Google launched Google Home, a voice-activated speaker that aims to give Amazon's Echo a run for its money. The speaker is always-listening and uses Google's Assistant to deliver sports scores, weather information, commute times, and much more. Tech Crunch reports: So like the Echo, Google Home combines a wireless speaker with a set of microphones that listen for your voice commands. There is a mute button on the Home and four LEDs on top of the device so you can know when it's listening to you; otherwise, you won't find any other physical buttons on it. As for music, Google Home will feature built-in support for Google Play Music, Spotify, Pandora and others. You can set up a default music service, too, so you don't always have to tell Google that you want to play a song "on Spotify." Google also noted that Home's music search is powered by Google, so it can understand relatively complex queries. Music on Google Home will also support podcast listening and because it's a Cast device, you can stream music to it from any other Cast-enabled device. Home integrates with Google's Chromecasts and Cast-enabled TVs. For now, that mostly means watching YouTube videos, but Google says it will also support Netflix, too. Google Home will cost $129 (with a free six-month trial of YouTube Red) and go on sale on Google's online store today. It will ship on November 4. What's more is that developers will be able to integrate their third-party apps with Google Assistant via "Actions on Google." With Actions on Google, developers will be able to create two kinds of actions: Direct and Conversation. Direct is made for relatively simple requests like home automation, while Conversation is made for a back and forth interaction utilizing API.ai. Actions on Google will also allow third-party hardware to take advantage of Google Assistant. Those interested can sign-up for the service today. But Google didn't stop there. The company went on to reveal all-new, multi-point Wifi routers called Google Wifi. The Verge reports: The Wifi router can be purchased two ways: as a single unit or in a multipack, just like Eero. A single unit is $129, while the three-pack will cost $299. Google says Wifi will be available for preorder in the U.S. in November and will ship to customers in December. There was no mention of international availability. Google says it has developed a number of technologies to make the Wifi system work, including intelligent routing of traffic from your phone or device to the nearest Wifi unit in your home. It supports AC 1200 wireless speeds, as well as simultaneous dual-band 2.4GHz and 5GHz networks. It also has beamforming technology and support for Bluetooth Smart. Google says the system will handle channel management and other traffic routing automatically.

91 comments

  1. o goodies, another one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    always on and network connected microphones that sends what they capture to "the cloud" (and who knows who else) for analysis.. just what the world needed more of.

    1. Re:o goodies, another one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      No kidding. And 5 years ago, people were giving me shit when I talked about having microphones and cameras in every room of your house. Are you still laughing at me now, you fucking assholes? I'm the one laughing at you, now -- ruefully. How long do you think it'll be, before the government decides it's a good idea to make these sorts of devices mandatory in everyone's home. For our safety, of course. Think of the children!

      Fuck you, Google, fuck you sideways with a rusty, Zika-infested chainsaw. Shit like thie makes me want to have LESS and LESS technology of any kind in my home.

    2. Re:o goodies, another one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Well we know from yahoo that the "who" is literally the NSA..... In real time.

    3. Re:o goodies, another one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      always on and network connected microphones that sends what they capture to "the cloud" (and who knows who else) for analysis.. just what the world needed more of.

      No. Not to the cloud... to Google. You can be sure they wont share that raw data with anyone, as they can instead sell off anonymized bits and targeted advertizing much more profitably by NOT sharing the raw data.

    4. Re:o goodies, another one. by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      And that's why I distrust Google approximately 1% less than the others. Their motivations are clearer.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    5. Re:o goodies, another one. by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      always on and network connected microphones that sends what they capture to "the cloud" (and who knows who else) for analysis.. just what the world needed more of.

      Don't worry. "Get Serious" is the last stage of a Google project, that means it has about 6 months before all support and development is withdrawn and 8 months till it's abruptly dropped completely.

  2. Whoever buys these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    is a fucking moron. Yahoos emails were are routed through NSA's filters, so it's more than likely that this data would too at some point in time.

    1. Re:Whoever buys these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why would NSA care about a bunch of grumpy old IT workers who live in their mother's basement?

    2. Re:Whoever buys these by youngone · · Score: 2

      I bet if you explained exactly how these work to any of your family or friends, they would think twice about buying one. If you pointed out the really basic vulnerabilities routinely found in these IoT type devices, they would think twice again. Of course in the real world Google's marketing budget is a lot bigger than yours, and plenty of technically naive people will buy one.

    3. Re:Whoever buys these by donaldm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I bet if you explained exactly how these work to any of your family or friends, they would think twice about buying one. If you pointed out the really basic vulnerabilities routinely found in these IoT type devices, they would think twice again. Of course in the real world Google's marketing budget is a lot bigger than yours, and plenty of technically naive people will buy one.

      Family maybe but most friends probably don't want to believe you. After all how many people use Windows 10 with all the default settings turned on because and I quote "I have nothing to hide" or worse still "I have the operating system locked down" (as if).

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    4. Re:Whoever buys these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Well, it doesn't violate your expectation of privacy that we installed cameras and microphones in every public bathroom and hotel bedroom, because people are so used to having these at home..."

      The NSA cares about the precedent.

    5. Re:Whoever buys these by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

      People know; people don't care. Everybody knows Facebook and Google tracks them for advertising and so forth, just they don't think the information will be used for anything for malevolent than targeted advertisements.

      If you explain how nobody should use Facebook because of privacy issues, you will come off as a weird/paranoid Luddite. If you explain that credit cards can be used to track you and your spending behavior and should be absolutely avoided, you will come off as crazy. Family might humor your anti-Google rants because they're used to having to deal with you, and you're family, but no the large majority of people do not care and are not going to care and are just going to think you're weird.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    6. Re:Whoever buys these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mother lives in my basement. You insensitive clod!

    7. Re:Whoever buys these by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      The worst of it all, targeted political advertisements, now that is as evil as it gets. They are not happy with your political choices, which they get from poking you in your priavte places, no problems, send you a bunch of targeted advertisements, telling you that you support terrorism, that you support Russia, that you support China, that unless you vote for who they tell you to vote for, they will expose and destroy you https://techcrunch.com/2016/09... (the ugly reality in reality the main stream media attack on this individual, and that what is being prepared for us all - what did this guy do, he took the piss out of bullshitting politicians, oh the horror, the humanity and by far the majority do it). So the new targeted system, they do like the way you think, then they target you, attack you, expose you to others for attack.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    8. Re:Whoever buys these by Ayanami_R · · Score: 1

      I have, they didn't care, "We aren't that important."

      --
      "Science is the power of man"
    9. Re:Whoever buys these by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 0

      I've accepted that Google has been bought out years ago. I still use them. If for nothing else than to keep up the appearances of a happy middle aged white American. I just gave up and accepted the NSA is always listening when I'm out and about.

      I still have an Echo in the living room. It turns on and off lights. It's not difficult to unplug or put into a faraday's cage should I be planning a coup. It's not like I we mix in nation-state planning in with dinner recipes. It's in a fixed location in the house and not difficult to get out of range of either.

      If you want to go 'off the grid' on the Internet it's not that hard either. VPNs, Tor, I2P.

    10. Re:Whoever buys these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've explained the Echo to several family members. I've demoed it to them. They all bought them. Because all of the made up crap about them is, well, made up crap. They are "always listening" for their wake up word (Amazon, or Alexa depending on what you programmed it for). Then the lights come on and THEN it is listening to other things. The Google Home works the same way. It listens for its wake up phrase. Only then is anything else listened to or transmitted. Damn tinfoilers thinking that everything is sent - ridiculous. Also, what vulnerabilities does this have? Other than the obvious one of allowing any voice to stream netflix or check your schedule. Damn, that guy that broke into the house can tell I will be at the dentist for another 30 minutes.

    11. Re:Whoever buys these by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Personally, I live a rather boring life of very little interest to NSA or their equivalents. By keeping data collection turned on, I supply a lot of completely useless information, that may help others to blend in.

      And it makes for much better plausible deniability if I happen to "accidentally" leave my phone at home or let it run out of battery.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    12. Re:Whoever buys these by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      It should be quite easy to check when and how much it's transmitting, with a simply network sniffer.

      My guess is that it will only send stuff if you actually ask it something, other than that probably just a ping once in a while for new software updates.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    13. Re:Whoever buys these by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      what did this guy do, he took the piss out of bullshitting politicians

      Nah, he supported a targeted hate meme campaign against a presidential candidate.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    14. Re:Whoever buys these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think too big. You don't have to be planning a coup for the NSA to beinterested in you.

      Imagine this: you work in a big company manufacturing navy or nuclear tech for foreign governments. The NSA captures embarrassing data from your home IoT systems and uses this information to blackmail you or otherwise compromise your integrity, and forces you to provide them with sensitive information from your company. If you don't think this is a normal practice already, you are rather naive.

    15. Re:Whoever buys these by amalcolm · · Score: 2

      And that update may be the one that turns it on permanently

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    16. Re:Whoever buys these by dcw3 · · Score: 0

      Please provide one sliver of proof that this has occurred. It sure makes for great theater, but not so much real world because it would have easily been exposed by now.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    17. Re:Whoever buys these by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      I know exactly how they work and what I am giving up and what I get in return. I am well aware of the vulnerabilities found in various IOT devices. I've been a software developer for 25+ years. I probably will buy one anyway. I trust google to fix vulnerabilities fairly quickly, more so than other IOT companies. I'm certainly not going to be doing my banking over the thing, but I like the idea of this kind of assistant and am willing to make the trade off.

    18. Re:Whoever buys these by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      People know; people don't care. Everybody knows Facebook and Google tracks them for advertising and so forth, just they don't think the information will be used for anything for malevolent than targeted advertisements.

      If you explain how nobody should use Facebook because of privacy issues, you will come off as a weird/paranoid Luddite. If you explain that credit cards can be used to track you and your spending behavior and should be absolutely avoided, you will come off as crazy. Family might humor your anti-Google rants because they're used to having to deal with you, and you're family, but no the large majority of people do not care and are not going to care and are just going to think you're weird.

      Astute observation. I don't think I want to test this to find out, but I'm curious...

      I have the devices turned on, monitoring my innocent life where I get pissed at assholes and political asshats occasionally, but mostly am interested in science and the Universe. Then, I start talking about bombs. Just curiosity about how they're made and what these terrorist idiots think they'll accomplish with them;

      Do I get advertisements about the next episode of The Universe and bomb safety gear, or the NSA/FBI/DHS/etc knocking on my doo09iuasdf)(*AS
      NO CARRIER

    19. Re:Whoever buys these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found this to be an interesting question indeed. In spy fiction this seems to be quite frequent way of coercing people to do a foreign actor's dirty work. And with a quick search I could indeed find at least one such case. Incidentally he was providing the Soviets with advanced naval technology.

      There are also many known cases, especially from the Cold War era, where various governments have actively engaged in industrial espionage. Since honeytraps and similar methods in combination with coercion are a known way of working of most notable intelligence agencies, it's safe to assume it has been used many times in the past.

    20. Re:Whoever buys these by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      It could also be the update that pops open the hidden vial of sarin gas, and spreads it throughout your house.

      What's stopping you from using the network sniffer occasionally, to verify that Google has not suddenly decided to listen to everything you say?

      --
      Eat the rich.
    21. Re:Whoever buys these by amalcolm · · Score: 1

      That's fine for me ... I use Wireshark daily, but what about the ordinary punter ... is everyone expected to acquire this level of skill ?

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    22. Re:Whoever buys these by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      No, of course not.

      That's why we, the people who know about sniffers and how to use them, have a responsibility to tell people when ugly shit is happening.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    23. Re:Whoever buys these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got served.

      Captcha: served

    24. Re:Whoever buys these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be quite easy to check when and how much it's transmitting, with a simply network sniffer.

      My guess is that it will only send stuff if you actually ask it something, other than that probably just a ping once in a while for new software updates.

      And when it sends off that question, how do you know it doesn't send a bunch of other things it recorded earlier?

      How do you know that someone doesn't just flick it on to listen at will?

    25. Re:Whoever buys these by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Because you would be running your network sniffer for a period of time, not just for 2 minutes. Come on, this is basic stuff.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  3. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is "only if you invite them into your house" exclusively a vampire thing? Because I think it applies here.

  4. Not in my house ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The very last things I would ever want in my house are either Google or Microsoft "internet of shit security" (IOSS) devices. Not only would they be as insecure as all the other crap that's been put out there so far they'd be 100% guaranteed to be spying on every single thing you do.

    The way things are going you won't even be able to take a shit without Google & Microsoft knowing about it.

    Fuck all this nonsense. I'm going back to pen and paper for notes and the dumbest phone I can find for the limited amount of time I'm prepared to actually talk to people on the phone (if I didn;t need one for work I'd not bother with one at all).

    You can stick this fucking "techno" Panopticon right up your fucking arses !!!

    1. Re:Not in my house ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, I guess google can recognise when you are using a phone while taking a shit already.

    2. Re:Not in my house ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When all new toilets come with Wi-Fi, I'm moving to a cave.

    3. Re:Not in my house ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it will analyse you sample and will post on your facebook account that "You need more fiber in your diet".

    4. Re:Not in my house ! by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      When all new toilets come with Wi-Fi, I'm moving to a cave.

      Pack your shit for the cave. Already being stress tested for pre-release.

  5. More to home automation that ordering milk. by aXis100 · · Score: 1

    Not really convinced this is a "serious" platform for home automation - turning on Hue lights or playing music via voice command is hipster cool, but where is the deep support for real physical infrastructure:

    - X10 and Zwave lighting
    - Thermostats of all varieties, including the dumb kind
    - Infrared, with support for both regular home theatre gear AND wall mounted air conditioners.
    - Curtain / blind controllers and aircon zone controllers
    - Relay contact outputs
    - Energy monitoring and trending

    Then, what about all of the rules that make Home Automation automated?

    1. Re:More to home automation that ordering milk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I guess all this would be really useful if you were a paraplegic.

      Or one of those obese people stuck to the couch.

    2. Re:More to home automation that ordering milk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dude, what are you on about? This isn't for home automation. This is for gathering as much information about you as possible so Google can sell it on and Larry and Sergey can buy more jets and politicians and shit.

    3. Re:More to home automation that ordering milk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a Jupiter Broadcasting fan. If not, you should be.

    4. Re:More to home automation that ordering milk. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Not really convinced this is a "serious" platform for home automation - turning on Hue lights or playing music via voice command is hipster cool, but where is the deep support for real physical infrastructure:

      - X10 and Zwave lighting - Thermostats of all varieties, including the dumb kind - Infrared, with support for both regular home theatre gear AND wall mounted air conditioners. - Curtain / blind controllers and aircon zone controllers - Relay contact outputs - Energy monitoring and trending

      Then, what about all of the rules that make Home Automation automated?

      Some of that is available already with Apple HomeKit-compatible devices.

      Since Apple is rumored to be working on a home server like this, with their wanting to do more things like speech recognition and "local" queries and commands "on-device", would you feel more secure with a home server that would not/could not send audio to the mothership at any time for doing speech to text?

    5. Re:More to home automation that ordering milk. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
      Homekit do not offer a home server just yet; at this time, what Apple and Google offer is not Home Automation but merely remote control. Also, note what GP wrote:

      - Thermostats of all varieties, including the dumb kind

      (Emphasis mine) That's the weakness of Apple's (and many others') HA offering: they are not designed for easy interoperability. Apple do not even allow bridging to non-HomeKit equipment if it communicates by WiFi, they want to force you to do buy equipment supporting their own stack. That device for reading Dutch smart power meters? Can't use it. That weird WiFi enabled thermostat for your jacuzzi? Can't use it. Go pester the manufacturer for a HomeKit version. Contrast that with a HA platform like Vera; whatever its other shortcomings, it was designed for interoperability, and writing plugins for equipment is easy and encouraged.

      If you want to be considered to be "serious about home automation", at the very least you need to have a HA server in your lineup, and design for interoperability. Because I can pretty much guarantee that no stack will support every device that a typical user will want to control when they move beyond simply remotely controlling their lights.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    6. Re:More to home automation that ordering milk. by swb · · Score: 2

      The existing standards are fragmented and primitive. Home automation now isn't that much less complex than industrial automation and no single vendor sells everything or has enough reach into unintelligent devices to offer a comprehensive solution that literally does everything and does it easily.

      This leaves room for big vendors like Apple or Google to roll in with their own take on the entire stack, complete with walled implementations that ignore other existing standards because those standards they can't license and control.

      Then there's the adoption problems associated with home automation in existing homes. I doubt there's more than 10% of the population willing to roll up their sleeves and dig into serious automation like temperature sensors, adding HVAC dampers, power controls, replacing outlets and light switches and so on. People still have 4 remote controls on the coffee table.

    7. Re:More to home automation that ordering milk. by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      There's plenty of X10 and Zigbee based products out there that are easy to use. I have Insteon's automation controller and their product line is pretty complete. Dimmer and on/off switches and outlets, open/close sensors, IP cameras, thermostat, water sensor, motion detectors, keypads, remotes, lightbulbs, etc. They even have wire-in modules if you want to build something more complicated.

      Some of their devices have to be installed behind wall plates, but others like the on/off and dimmer modules are standalone and go between the plug and wall outlet. Even if you have to replace a wall switch, it doesn't take more than 15 minutes of effort and can make a big difference. It's really nice to have a small, four-button remote that you can use to control the lights in your home, or turn on a box fan in another room.

      Take a look at their products.

    8. Re:More to home automation that ordering milk. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Homekit do not offer a home server just yet; at this time, what Apple and Google offer is not Home Automation but merely remote control. Also, note what GP wrote:

      - Thermostats of all varieties, including the dumb kind

      (Emphasis mine) That's the weakness of Apple's (and many others') HA offering: they are not designed for easy interoperability. Apple do not even allow bridging to non-HomeKit equipment if it communicates by WiFi, they want to force you to do buy equipment supporting their own stack. That device for reading Dutch smart power meters? Can't use it. That weird WiFi enabled thermostat for your jacuzzi? Can't use it. Go pester the manufacturer for a HomeKit version. Contrast that with a HA platform like Vera; whatever its other shortcomings, it was designed for interoperability, and writing plugins for equipment is easy and encouraged. If you want to be considered to be "serious about home automation", at the very least you need to have a HA server in your lineup, and design for interoperability. Because I can pretty much guarantee that no stack will support every device that a typical user will want to control when they move beyond simply remotely controlling their lights.

      I agree with everything you said. I just hope Apple starts putting some real effort into doing those things. Since they appear to be interested in a Home Server, I can only hope that they follow the Vera model, and provide a plugin architecture for protocol-drivers. As you said, (lack of) interoperability has been THE issue with HA for DECADES, and it just has to stop. In a lot of ways, Echelon had the right idea back in the early 1990s; but they just wanted too much for development systems ($25k IIRC, when I went to their seminar) and licensing. I do see, however, that they are still around; so maybe they found their niche in large-building automation. But some sort of "General MIDI" type of agreed-upon messages and "known nodes and variables", like Echelon came up with, is desparately needed!

      Another thing that needs to be seriously addressed (no pun) is SECURITY. None of the HA protocols have any real security at all, and that is something that puts off many who are intelligent enough to want HA in the first place. For example, that is what made me opt for a dumb thermostat last fall, when my old thermostat keeled-over one day and had to be replaced. Fortunately, Apple is spectactular at that subject; so here's to hoping... I admit I haven't had time to look deeply into HomeKit. Did Apple Open Source it, like they did with HealthKit?

    9. Re:More to home automation that ordering milk. by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Since Apple is rumored to be working on a home server like this, with their wanting to do more things like speech recognition and "local" queries and commands "on-device", would you feel more secure with a home server that would not/could not send audio to the mothership at any time for doing speech to text?

      Home server... Whoa. Deja vu moment. Now I keep thinking about a politician. It won't go away. Make it stop!!!

    10. Re:More to home automation that ordering milk. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Since Apple is rumored to be working on a home server like this, with their wanting to do more things like speech recognition and "local" queries and commands "on-device", would you feel more secure with a home server that would not/could not send audio to the mothership at any time for doing speech to text?

      Home server... Whoa. Deja vu moment. Now I keep thinking about a politician. It won't go away. Make it stop!!!

      I feel this is some sort of Trump reference; but I'm not sure... Please explain.

    11. Re: More to home automation that ordering milk. by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Trump was mentioned nowhere. It was an attempt at humorous presentation of a concept triggering a subconscious thought that repeats in the head, leading to a proverbial begging for assistance in making it stop (see: someone sang a few words and a song gets stuck in your head).

      Reference in this case for Hillary: home server.

      Do you have Asperger's? Heh.

    12. Re: More to home automation that ordering milk. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Trump was mentioned nowhere. It was an attempt at humorous presentation of a concept triggering a subconscious thought that repeats in the head, leading to a proverbial begging for assistance in making it stop (see: someone sang a few words and a song gets stuck in your head).

      Reference in this case for Hillary: home server.

      Do you have Asperger's? Heh.

      Oh, yeah. Hillary! Duh!!!! (facepalm)

    13. Re: More to home automation that ordering milk. by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      OMG feeling much better now. I was gonna say, "Why is that cool person I friended all hatin' on me or some such jazz??"

      Hence the Asperger's question. Like, "Do you really have no sense of humor and try to interpret everything literally with presumption based on your state of mind at the time??"

      Whew. I was gonna feel really weird friending someone and getting attacked by them. Sorry. I'll assume anything in the future is just a miss on my part or yours. Did I say "Whew" yet? :)

    14. Re: More to home automation that ordering milk. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      OMG feeling much better now. I was gonna say, "Why is that cool person I friended all hatin' on me or some such jazz??"

      Hence the Asperger's question. Like, "Do you really have no sense of humor and try to interpret everything literally with presumption based on your state of mind at the time??"

      Whew. I was gonna feel really weird friending someone and getting attacked by them. Sorry. I'll assume anything in the future is just a miss on my part or yours. Did I say "Whew" yet? :)

      LOLOL! Sorry, man! Really, I'm as normal as anyone on Slashdot.

      Oh, wait... ;-)

      Oh, and thanks for "friending" me. I don't have many on here, mainly due to my platform-choice, I guess...

    15. Re: More to home automation that ordering milk. by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      I think if you friend me back we can actually talk to each other out of the comment section. I would like to if that's cool with you.

    16. Re: More to home automation that ordering milk. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I think if you friend me back we can actually talk to each other out of the comment section. I would like to if that's cool with you.

      Done. But how does that "out-of-band" PMing work on here? Never done it.

    17. Re: More to home automation that ordering milk. by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      I'm quite confused at the moment. I have a "journal" and it's visible to others.... but I can't find out how you can access it. It used to be easy and obvious. I'm trying. I posted an entry just to allow talking. If you can find it, you're awesome. I would love to see how you did. I think you can't get into a journal if you're not logged in, but if I'm logged in I can only see my journal in that context. Let me know what you find, if anything. LOL

    18. Re: More to home automation that ordering milk. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I'm quite confused at the moment. I have a "journal" and it's visible to others.... but I can't find out how you can access it. It used to be easy and obvious. I'm trying. I posted an entry just to allow talking. If you can find it, you're awesome. I would love to see how you did. I think you can't get into a journal if you're not logged in, but if I'm logged in I can only see my journal in that context. Let me know what you find, if anything. LOL

      P Well, I found you Journal post. I clicked on the "me" in the upper right of every page (looks like a head on my browser, looks like my username on my iPad), and in the "friends" list on the right, I clicked on you username, and I was transported to a page that had a list of your comments, with one near the top that had a "Journal" Tag in theTitle-Bar.

      But as you can guess from this comment, there didn't seem to be a way to REPLY to that Journal post. So...?

    19. Re: More to home automation that ordering milk. by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Gah. That is so annoying. I have no freaking clue. It used to be so easy back in the day. I don't know what kind of change they made that made it like this, but it's kind of weirding me out. You used to be able to just go into someone's journal and comment on it. Comments could be in Threads or one by one. Whatever you wanted. I repeat Gah!

    20. Re: More to home automation that ordering milk. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Well, I still might be able to post into your journal. Let me play around a bit...

    21. Re:More to home automation that ordering milk. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Not really convinced this is a "serious" platform for home automation - turning on Hue lights or playing music via voice command is hipster cool, but where is the deep support for real physical infrastructure:

      - X10 and Zwave lighting - Thermostats of all varieties, including the dumb kind - Infrared, with support for both regular home theatre gear AND wall mounted air conditioners. - Curtain / blind controllers and aircon zone controllers - Relay contact outputs - Energy monitoring and trending

      Then, what about all of the rules that make Home Automation automated?

      Well, I just did a Google search on "HomeKit and X10" and came up with this interesting article about a thing called "HomeBridge", which might answer the need for protocol "plugins".

    22. Re: More to home automation that ordering milk. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      No way to post nor reply to someone else's Journal. Sigh.

      So, until one of use lowers security enough to make our email addy viewable, there will be no PMing. And since I am a Luddite who doesn't believe in Social(ist) Media like FB, LinkedIn Google+, etc., I am at a loss as to how to proceed...

      Ideas?

    23. Re: More to home automation that ordering milk. by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      I'm a similar luddite. Eff that crap. You can use my I don't care address that I use for the purpose of not giving out my email address - mtownohio@hotmail.com. Didn't think of that until now. Derrrrrp.

  6. These all sound great! by Balial · · Score: 2

    ... until you realize it's Google and they're going to steal all your personal information off the wire and send it to home base. sigh.

    1. Re:These all sound great! by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Do you use Chrome? Android? Google.com? Any other service used or owned by Google?

      Congratulations, Google already knows everything about you.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  7. Google Wifi: Does it support mobile set up only ? by martiniturbide · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know everybody says it is easy to set up with Android or iOS, but I miss the old days when a router was able to be set up with the web browser and you have full control over its features.

  8. That's enough Googol for today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure how any of this counts as "home automation" either.

  9. Google surveillance = NSA surveillance by Photonmaker · · Score: 1

    This is why I don't put devices like the Nest products in my house - it's bad enough to have my smoke detectors track you and likely report back your position to Google, I can't imagine why anyone would want every household conversation sent to Google as well. The upside is Google lets you know they are watching you all the time, where it is unknown with gov't organizations

  10. Googles days as the golden child for nerds is over by AbRASiON · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What % of slashdot posters actually trust google? Even the mildly paranoid ones rather than the full tinfoil nutters?

    Even if you don't mind them having some information on you, if you like a service they offer, they'll /probably/ shut it down within 12 to 36 months, or they'll re-brand the product, adjust it heavily, integrate it with something else or redesign it so horrifically it's a shadow of its former self.

    I regret to admit I use 4 google products pretty heavily, being Android, Gmail, Youtube and Chrome (in that order of use too) I could probably ditch Chrome if bloody firefox would up their game on performance, but sadly, if anything Firefox is getting slower and losing marketshare to Chrome.

    Seriously, they have significant information on people over the years and they continue to gather and link more and more. Furthermore they are pretty incompetent at some things (look at the messaging systems for Android, they still STILL haven't come close to just plain old cloning imessage) they've just released a 3'rd chat application which is just a mess.

    Would you really want MORE google stuff in the house? Routers, Wifi equipment, Chromecasts?
    Thank god they aren't as amazing and competent as they used to be, back in the day we 'gave up' our stuff, willingly because god damn they simply had the best stuff, now, I'm not even sure it's worth doing for their diluted products.

    In conclusion? Yeah, not a chance.

  11. Google is not serious about home automation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if Google was serious about home automation, they would not have bricked the Revolv smart home hub. There is now way that I will spend another cent on any Google home automation products.

  12. Sounds like M$ sock puppet speech.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What % of slashdot posters actually trust Microsoft? Even the mildly paranoid ones rather than the full tinfoil nutters?

    Fixed that for you.

    M$ has root, brah.

    No tinfoil nutters needed.

    1. Re:Sounds like M$ sock puppet speech.. by TheDugong · · Score: 2

      M$ has root, brah.

      Not for me they don't.

  13. Re:Googles days as the golden child for nerds is o by Vyse+of+Arcadia · · Score: 1

    if you like a service they offer, they'll /probably/ shut it down within 12 to 36 months, or they'll re-brand the product, adjust it heavily, integrate it with something else or redesign it so horrifically it's a shadow of its former self.

    I think we saw that in action today. I guess Google Now has been rebranded, adjusted, integrated, and redesigned into Google Assistant?

  14. I remembering saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is the NSA and everyone ignored me.

  15. Re:Googles days as the golden child for nerds is o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, using google for the pc is about where I draw the line for searching, and even then the searches are pure tripe these days spewed with page 'ad' ranking rather than real relevant data sets I am interested in (Read as run your own spider instead ;)). Having access to which door has just been opened, and potentially by whom, is just too much information to divulge. Privacy starts at the front door. Google and co are not welcome in my home. In-fact, tonight I will place a physical robots.txt on my welcome mat blocking any unwanted guests to my home.

  16. Practical? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me know when home automation can take out the trash or clean the litter boxes. Until then...

  17. Only a Moron by sycodon · · Score: 1

    Would hook up aspects of your house management..heating, cooling, locks, etc. to the internet.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  18. Lets not forget that this is Google... by luvirini · · Score: 1

    ... that is likely to drop the full product lines in few years in another product rationalization.

    1. Re:Lets not forget that this is Google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly this. Google maps are obviously great, and Latitude was awesome - I don't know sharing where I am and it was genuinely helpful. Then they killed it.

      Sometimes it's less about privacy and more about wanting something to still work in five years. Might be a long time technically but arbitrary obsolescence is stupid. I can be a nerd too but my favourite piece of technology is 15 year old HP laser jet. It just works, and always has done. Win95-Win10. It's about more than shiny and rounded corners...

    2. Re:Lets not forget that this is Google... by slashkitty · · Score: 1

      First thing I thought of too. Horrible track record of just shutting down projects and devices. A device like this would be a brick if they shut it down. At least with non cloud devices you can keep using it.

      --
      -- these are only opinions and they might not be mine.
  19. The "telescreen" is finally here by Bearhouse · · Score: 2

    A bit later than 1984, but we finally got there.

    Who'd have thought it? Not content with letting pretty much anyone (including criminals) read their mail, track their movements with CCTV, spoofed phones and car license plate readers etc, the citizenry are actually buying them and installing this crap themselves!
    That's right, apparently it's just too hard to stream music or adjust a thermostat by hand; you now have to install a device that is always on, always listening in order to whistle up a recipe or get the sports. They must be mad.

  20. No way in HELL by Nocturrne · · Score: 1

    How could anyone be dumb enough to install this kind of direct surveillance device in their home or office? No... No.. No... I don't even want to be in the same room with this thing.

  21. So, allow me to summarize by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    I get to pay a fortune so I bug my home, send any conversation I have to Google, and in return I get some gimmicks, which will work for as long as Google deems that service useful (and as we know, they have a really stellar record of long term support of their projects).

    What I didn't read in the whole article is what kind of pressurizing medium they have on me that I would allow this to happen, but I guess at the very least they would be able to kill my firstborn if I don't.

    In other words: Who in their sane mind would WANT something like this???

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  22. They have a lot of nerve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... marketing an IoT product after killing Nest. What guarantee do I have that the servers running this thing won't be shut down too, bricking my device?

  23. Re:Googles days as the golden child for nerds is o by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

    Chromecast is pretty rad.

    --
    Eat the rich.
  24. Re:Googles days as the golden child for nerds is o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    instead of firefox try palemoon, it's a well-maintained fork from back before the ff team went pants on head retarded

  25. I can't believe Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Launching it from my SSD on Mint 18 the window takes a while to pop up, and even then the interface stays frozen a good 5-10 seconds before I can interact. Core i3 4170, 4GB RAM (normally only 500MB used and the rest is free)

  26. Hipocrisy by somenickname · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of the posts in this thread are people railing against Googles new surveillance device. Yet the majority of them probably have an Android phone sitting in their pocket. How is this any different? What makes this fundamentally worse?

    Either you support this kind of device implicitly by carrying an Android (or iOS) phone or you don't support it by not carrying a phone at all. You can't have it both ways.

  27. Better Headline by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    "Google Gets Serious About Surveillance."

    Soon - much to the delight of Dr. Farnsworth - their products will be so invasive as to be offered as a suppository.

  28. Re:Googles days as the golden child for nerds is o by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

    I think we saw that in action today. I guess Google Now has been rebranded, adjusted, integrated, and redesigned into Google Assistant?

    I believe they announced Assistant back in May at I/O 2016. It seems like a rebrand with additional functionality tacked on.

    --
    Reply to That ||
  29. Re:Google Wifi: Does it support mobile set up only by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    I know everybody says it is easy to set up with Android or iOS, but I miss the old days when a router was able to be set up with the web browser and you have full control over its features.

    You can buy One of these, or use the Google models which are just plain ole' routers with the phones/Google OS laptops handling the traffic interruption / handoff themselves, like, you know, they already do. ;)

  30. Revolv by DeVilla · · Score: 1

    I'm always surprised that articles like this don't cause a discussion about Revolv.