Slashdot Mirror


Noisy Coworkers And Other Sounds Are Top Distraction in Workplace, Study Says (npr.org)

Sounds, especially those made by other humans, have ranked as the top distraction in the workplace, according to design expert Alan Hedge of Cornell. A staggering 74 percent of workers say they face "many" instances of disturbances and distractions from noise. Hedge says the noise is generally coming from another person, though it's much more disturbing when it's a machine that is making it. NPR reports: The popularity of open offices has exacerbated the problem. The University of California's Center for the Built Environment has a study showing workers are happier when they are in enclosed offices and less likely to take sick days. This does not bode well for some workers facing cold and flu season, when hacking coughs make the rounds. [...] Rue Dooley, an adviser at the Society for Human Resource Management, says HR professionals often call in, asking how to manage co-worker complaints about various bodily noises.

290 comments

  1. "Bodily noises"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeesus, is it a professional office or a frat house?

    1. Re:"Bodily noises"? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds — and smells — like a startup.

    2. Re:"Bodily noises"? by stabiesoft · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How things have changed. In the 90's I went to a startup (sw) and we had offices, all of us. The company we left had switched from offices to cubicles. And in keeping with true PHB mentality, the prior company had taken a poll if we wanted to stay in offices or switch to cubes. They pinky-swear promised they would do what the employees wanted. Of course the employees overwhelmingly voted for offices and when the results came in, the PHB's said we "know" you really wanted cubes, soo they went to cubes.

    3. Re:"Bodily noises"? by newcastlejon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Where I work there's a guy sitting about 2 metres away who grinds his teeth. Constantly. Every single day. Have you ever heard the phrase "familiarity breeds contempt"? This is a perfect example. The sound is not unlike the creaking sound an old wooden chair makes when you sit in it.

      Then there's the guy who purposely sneezes as loud as he possibly can for reasons only he knows.

      Now, one of them makes noise without realising it and stops when he's asked to (briefly) but the other...
      Working every day with either of them is bound to make any sane person pissed off.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    4. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      When I started my first "real" job there was a guy on my intake who after a couple of months got transferred to some esoteric team. When I asked how it was going he said it was OK, apart from the guy who constantly quacked.

      I thought he was taking the piss. I went round there a few days later (you couldn't just walk in; it was semi-secure but I found an excuse) and it was totally true.

      I caught up with him ten years later. He was still there. I didn't ask whether he got used to it or just strangled the loonbag.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Fragnet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You have to realise that there are some people who over the years have gone or are going completely nuts working in an office 9-5, Monday to Friday. Given mortgage, bills, car and other completely idiotic responsibilities we've unfortunately taken on, the choices are (1) make quacking noises at desk or (2) take the rope you keep on top of your wardrobe, tie it around a beam in your garage, put the other end around your neck and jump off a chair.

      I am one of those people.

      Thank you for your understanding.

    6. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear ya. Better to go a controlled / controllable level of crazy on a semi regular basis than bottle it all up for years before going completely out-of-control batshit.

      And besides, have you watched the news recently? The world is obviously flagrantly completely nuts: who are we to buck the trend?

    7. Re: "Bodily noises"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're insane. Not for having made those choices ( we all have ) - but for not just standing up, right now, and walking out the door. Let everything fall where it may and get the fuck out. Bolivia is cheap as fuck. So is cambodia.

    8. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I work there's a guy sitting about 2 metres away who grinds his teeth. Constantly. Every single day.

      Damn you've got good hearing...

    9. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Same. I worked for the same company for years. They had 4 person offices for the software engineers (who also frequently had support calls with customers). They changed office space and said that it would be cubicles one way or another. We weren't too happy. They had a vote between three cubicle models. One was a half-height model. The votes were split, with almost no one voting for the half height model. Guess which one they went with? Yeah. The half-height model. It was all pacified by a promise to install a noise-cancelling machine. This was three years ago, and I left over 2 years ago. You can take another guess on whether or not that active noise-cancelling device was ever installed.

    10. Re:"Bodily noises"? by plopez · · Score: 1

      Is that you Milton?

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    11. Re: "Bodily noises"? by losfromla · · Score: 1

      It's very likely he's got a family to feed, etc. But if Fragnet is rolling solo, I too vote the Bolivia option, he can always find work. If no jobs are available, he can join some paramilitary group and, well, that's also work but at least it's outdoors.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    12. Re:"Bodily noises"? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2
      I went to a startup in the 90's. It was into an empty warehouse out of a literal garage. I remember spending the first couple of days building my own desk and other assorted benches to hold the hardware we were developing (industrial robotics).

      It was really exciting and a lot more fun than having my own office.

    13. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was told I could listen to the radio at a reasonable volume between 9 and 11.

    14. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Trogre · · Score: 2

      11 is never a reasonable volume.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    15. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Methadras · · Score: 1

      Oh, how I long for the days when I had an office instead of being thrust into the company of a dozen other people that I can see or could see me, and hear me, and smell me, and interact with me involuntarily. An office has a place, but the problem for many of these companies is that they still see an office space as a luxury to dangle over workers heads and because they are too cheap to go to spaces with offices.

    16. Re:"Bodily noises"? by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Where I work there's a guy sitting about 2 metres away who grinds his teeth. Constantly. Every single day.

      Damn you've got good hearing...

      No, it's just very loud. People even further away from me can hear it.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    17. Re:"Bodily noises"? by ananamouse · · Score: 1

      I think you mean cow-orker
      >/

    18. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh what I wouldn't give to have cubes. At my work they've almost completely done away with partitions entirely. There's a tiny partition between me and the person next to me. No partition to the person sitting across from me, just some monitors. The noise and the intrusive feeling of constantly being watched. Feeling self conscious anytime I even have to blow my nose just because I know how loud and irritating it must be.

      The office overall is quite nice looking and we have a great view.... but often I feel like it doesn't make up for it. I'm far less productive here than even the last "open plan" office we had which had partitions and bigger desks. I don't think I've been able to get in the "zone" with my work (I'm a developer) since we've moved. Unless I get here at 6am before everyone else. Then I might have an hour or so of peace... Cubicles would at least give a minor illusion of private space.

    19. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Miguelito · · Score: 2

      Yeah when we were being moved into our "open office environment" crap, we got all the talks about how studies showed it helped people work better (when the info was the exact opposite) and that people "collaborate" more and all. Bullshit, just be honest and say you're doing it because it's a lot cheaper. I can at least respect being told the truth rather than being lied to.

      I ended up buying a pair of Parrot Ziks and drown out the outside noise with the music/movie of my choice off my ipad. I need music or the TV in the background when working at home to actually work anyway... I can't work in complete silence. I used to listen to music in my office, at a reasonable volume so it didn't bother neighbors, when I was in an office.

      --
      - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
    20. Re:"Bodily noises"? by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

      Wow, our first job as a new employee was to build our desk too. First you went with the prez in the minivan to pick it up at the warehouse club along with the chair. But we only got a few hours to build. You must have had nicer desks...

    21. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Alypius · · Score: 2

      11 is *always* a reasonable volume.

    22. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      You had cubicles? Luxury! At my startup, there were 100 of us working out of a 20 long by 7 foot wide corridor.

      We could only dream of having a cubicle.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    23. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Or alternatively, there are always the two more common options.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    24. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy your music while it lasts because it's declining faster than you realize.

    25. Re:"Bodily noises"? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      How things have changed. In the 90's I went to a startup (sw) and we had offices, all of us. The company we left had switched from offices to cubicles. And in keeping with true PHB mentality, the prior company had taken a poll if we wanted to stay in offices or switch to cubes. They pinky-swear promised they would do what the employees wanted. Of course the employees overwhelmingly voted for offices and when the results came in, the PHB's said we "know" you really wanted cubes, soo they went to cubes.

      And in the 00's the company decided to switch from cubes to open plan... and everyone realised how much they missed the privacy that cubicles provided.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    26. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried quacking but it doesn't help.

    27. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This is obviously bullshit. That's 1.4 square feet per person. Even the Tokyo subway isn't that dense. That wouldn't even leave you room to have a computer, much less sit down.

    28. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For $2000 I'll make you a radio that goes up to 12.

    29. Re: "Bodily noises"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He might be referencing Monty Python. Specifically, the "Four Yorkshiremen" skit.

      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe1a1wHxTyo

    30. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For $2000 I'll make you a radio that goes up to 12.

      wow that's one more louder than 11, I'll take it. Nigel.

    31. Re:"Bodily noises"? by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      One of the simple ways to make everyone _in management_ hate open plan and cubes is to encourage singalongs.

      Ones disparaging the management are best. If you're loud enough it will penetrate the office walls.

      Keeping noise levels up and deliberately going quiet en masse when a manager steps out of his office is also a good tactic as it plays to their paranoia.

    32. Re:"Bodily noises"? by Fragnet · · Score: 1

      Be honest. Why did you choose the quack name Milton? Is there an amusing cartoon I've been quack missing?

    33. Re:"Bodily noises"? by plopez · · Score: 1

      Office Space, a good movie.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  2. Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >implying HR or company leaders will do anything about this

  3. Open office responsible for flu and colds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thankfully the people who come to work sick and the office culture that promotes sick people coming to work are blameless.

    1. Re:Open office responsible for flu and colds. by sconeu · · Score: 5, Funny

      If Open office is responsible for flu and colds, I'm glad I switched to LibreOffice!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Open office responsible for flu and colds. by newcastlejon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know about "office culture" but if people get fired for taking sick leave then of course they're going to try and come to work when they're unwell.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    3. Re:Open office responsible for flu and colds. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My boss has said - on many occasions - ""Don't come to work if you are sick. Keep your germs at home."

      Of course she also will ding you when something doesn't get done on the day you're out sick.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Open office responsible for flu and colds. by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      got to love that cognitive dissonance.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re:Open office responsible for flu and colds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Office cultures*

      The bacterial kind.

    6. Re:Open office responsible for flu and colds. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Sounds like your boss is a dickhead. Time to polish your CV?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    7. Re:Open office responsible for flu and colds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My boss said the same thing. Then my colleague got sick, and called in to ask if he should stay at home.

      He was told that as he didn't have a fewer, he should get to work.

      A week later, half the office was home sick.

    8. Re:Open office responsible for flu and colds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It starts in elementary school. Don't come in if you have thrown up or had a fever within 24 hours, but you have to have a medical excuse if your child misses more than 10 days or they are calling the cops for any unexcused absence. Guess what? After racking up 10, we'll send them to school and let the nurse send them home. Not paying $80 bucks for the doctor to prescribe tylenol and a slip of paper.

    9. Re:Open office responsible for flu and colds. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Where I am, we have paid time off. If I'm not feeling good, I have to ask myself if I'd be happier working anyway and taking that time off when I feel better. If I'm contagious, I have to ask myself if keeping other people healthy is worth not taking time off when I'll enjoy it.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  4. tell them that they can keep there job if they don by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    tell them that they can keep there job if they don't use the letter "E" in saying why they should keep it!

  5. Enclosed offices cost more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you'll just have to live with your open office. Sincerely, Management

    1. Re:Enclosed offices cost more by presidenteloco · · Score: 2

      Actually, constantly distracted thumb twiddlers who know how to, say, program, but have given up trying to get real work done cost way more.

      --

      Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    2. Re:Enclosed offices cost more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our spreadsheets don't show that cost, so it must not be real. The next thing you'll try to tell us is our offshore 'resources' aren't as skilled and efficient as their resumes claim. LOL. Sincerely, Management

    3. Re:Enclosed offices cost more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange. They "save money" on open offices - even though studies show productivity drops. Still, they insist on paying for closed source software, even though open source cost less (obviously) and studies shows it cost less over time in maintenance. The always unrealized option for saving office money. Strange management.

    4. Re:Enclosed offices cost more by beelsebob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In the bay area, I'd bet heavily that this is not true, even despite the huge cost of land there. A typical worker's desk is about 2 meters wide, and they need a bunch of space behind them to wheel back into, so lets go with 2.4m x 2.0m - this is conveniently the standard "minimum" area a worker should be allowed as defined by the HSE in the UK. Compare that against an office, plenty I've seen have been of the order of 3.5m square for two people sitting in opposite corners. Lets call it 4m square to account for walls and doors etc (probably an overestimation)

      So then, we're talking about 4.8 square meters for a worker in open plan, and 8 square meters for a worker in an office. In the bay area, office space leasing costs about $500 per square meter per year, so you're looking at $1,600 per year overhead for putting workers in 2 man offices vs open plan.

      A typical bay area engineer salary is of the order of $160,000 a year (plus bonuses etc). For seniors, more than that even. That means you only need to make a worker 1% more efficient by sticking them in an office for it to pay off. The reduction in sick days (if you can cut out 2 sick days a year, you've made them 1% more efficient) alone accounts for that. Add their increased happiness, and productivity, and it's very very likely to be a huge win sticking people in offices.

    5. Re:Enclosed offices cost more by plopez · · Score: 1

      That's why things are getting off shored, and at least where I work, the Silly Valley/Bay area teams are slowly getting shutdown.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    6. Re:Enclosed offices cost more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you have to just live without my services. Sincerely, Very Hard to Replace Expert.

    7. Re:Enclosed offices cost more by WhatHump · · Score: 3, Informative

      Correct. However, management loves hearing the accountant (who did the simple calculation of savings per employee * number of employees) who says "hey, we can save $xK/month". But no one listens to that same accountant when he says "hey, we might be losing some money because we have everyone packed in like pigs heading for slaughter."

      --
      "Could be worse...could be raining." Igor
    8. Re:Enclosed offices cost more by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      "management loves hearing the accountant"

      This kind of change isn't usually driven by accountants. Apart from simplistic book keepers they know that the costs for this kind of change are far beyond hardware (ask any accountant what goodwill means and why it's important)

      It's all about power and control. Management have offices, That's what demonstrates they're higher than the plebs.

      As a manager I see my role as running interference between the people who actually do the work and the higher-ups, so that work can get done. If my staff want privacy they get it (You can run cubical walls up to the ceiling) and no two people have the same requirements.

      Cubicle farms are indicative of a lack of company vision or creativity. Their primary function is to impress upon staff that they're unimportant cogs in a machine - but noone likes being a cog.

    9. Re:Enclosed offices cost more by Miguelito · · Score: 1

      Ouch, that one hit too close to home.

      --
      - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
    10. Re:Enclosed offices cost more by Miguelito · · Score: 1

      Too many people think having someone you're paying being on the hook for support (even if/when that support sucks) trumps OSS.

      --
      - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
  6. Door slams by Latent+Heat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are people who seem to think that door slams, loud racking sounds of turned door knobs and juicy Ka-chunks of door latches engaging are just fine in a scholarly/academic office environment.

    The main floor of our Engineering Library has a door that is going "Rack! Ka-chunk" a couple times a minute from persons passing through to other floors, all day long.

    Spent 2 full days in a conference room with colleagues from numerous other institutions working on behalf of a Federal agency in Arlington, VA.

    Not one door slam the entire time. Do the Federal agency people know something about concentrating on work that state universities do not?

    1. Re:Door slams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No door slam in a conference room? I'm convinced.

    2. Re:Door slams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Uni has alarms on the doors, so you have a choice between door clunks (they need to be shut hard to properly engage the security locks) or loud beep-beep-beep reminding you that you forgot to shut the door. After you've endured the beep a few dozen times you breathe a sigh a relief when you hear the door get properly slammed.

    3. Re:Door slams by losfromla · · Score: 1

      I'd advise a night op where you remove said door and hide it in a damp basement, by the time they find it, it will be nothing but a layer of slime on the floor.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    4. Re:Door slams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One door has a sign that says "Beware of the leopard." The other does not. See?

    5. Re: Door slams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever thought that maybe you should learn to focus on the task? Military service has a great way of conditioning a person to focus and accomplish a basic task without being distracted by the environment. I recommend it, or seeking another method of conditioning yourself.

      You'll never find utopia, but you can fix yourself. 90% of the posts here are people complaining about things they can't change. Change yourself.

    6. Re:Door slams by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      Noisy doors can be fixed. _IF_ someone feels it's important.

      Noisy people are a bit harder to deal with and that's one of the bugbears of a cubicle farm.

      I've yet to see a case where introducing one didn't result in a productivity hit.

    7. Re:Door slams by hawkfish · · Score: 1

      This is why I listen to metal/industrial music when I need to concentrate!

      --
      You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
  7. The popularity of open offices has exacerbated the by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I came to the USA 15 years ago (from the UK), I was amazed at the ubiquity of cube farms everywhere.
    As far as I can tell, its actually only management that like cube farms (or presumably more accurately, the $$$$ saved). Nearly all the residents actually would much prefer single offices and the associated peace and quiet that allows you to concentrate and be more productive, yet the myth stubbornly persists that cubes are the "popular choice".

  8. I can relate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In my last job there was this retard sales guy who never graduated high school, but would constantly kiss the business owner's puckered butthole, and to make himself sound important he would hover around the office on the phone talking extremely loud (just like the owner of the company)

    Usually the most noisy co-workers are the most subversive parasites who have 0 talent and are only trying to someone impress their superiors by their assholishness

    1. Re:I can relate by BigT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I find that normal speaking volume tends to be inversely proportional to intelligence.

      --
      Is it weird in here, or is it just me?
    2. Re:I can relate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iand to make himself sound important he would hover around the office on the phone talking extremely loud (just like the owner of the company)

      Either case can be dealt with, with a sling bow from behind. Tends to interrupt the bullshit talk. Of course, put the item away before he has time to turn around . . .

    3. Re:I can relate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that normal speaking volume tends to be inversely proportional to intelligence.

      Mod this one up!

    4. Re: I can relate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately ability to sell anything seems to be pretty strongly correlated with speaking volume. Hate the game, not the player.

    5. Re: I can relate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Put it in all CAPS!

  9. Problem solved by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "This does not bode well for some workers facing cold and flu season, when hacking coughs make the rounds."

    The rest of the civilized world has solved this problem, it's called paid sick leave.

    1. Re:Problem solved by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

      "This does not bode well for some workers facing cold and flu season, when hacking coughs make the rounds."

      The rest of the civilized world has solved this problem, it's called paid sick leave.

      This is in reference to open office environments. You're more likely to get sick from coworkers if there's no barrier between you. Most businesses in the US already offer paid sick leave. I can't think of a major business that doesn't have it, about the only ones I imagine wouldn't have it would be small businesses/mom & pop shops.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:Problem solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They've paid sick leaved themselves into second fiddle in the world economy and becoming and austerity sideshow. The US is an economic juggernaut thanks to not allowing the w0rkers to run the business.

    3. Re:Problem solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "This does not bode well for some workers facing cold and flu season, when hacking coughs make the rounds."

      The rest of the civilized world has solved this problem, it's called paid sick leave.

      This is in reference to open office environments. You're more likely to get sick from coworkers if there's no barrier between you. Most businesses in the US already offer paid sick leave. I can't think of a major business that doesn't have it, about the only ones I imagine wouldn't have it would be small businesses/mom & pop shops.

      Many offices now do Paid Time Off (PTO) instead, which is frequently a scam to give workers less time off, because companies generally offer the same PTO as their competitors offer in vacation, but the competitors offer sick days in addition to vacation. With PTO, when an employee gets sick, he or she must sacrifice a would-be vacation day. I used to work somewhere that did PTO. I'll bet you can guess how many sick days I took in the 6 years I worked there.

    4. Re:Problem solved by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Most businesses in the US already offer paid sick leave.

      A small and set number of days, which is generally treated as short-notice day for doing anything that requires one to be out of office, like waiting for a plumber, having an eye exam, taking the car to service, or otherwise.

      Once flu season starts, and employees have already used up their allotted sick days (whether due to actually being sick or not), they have to come in when sick or either be docked pay or risk getting fired.
      So late fall and early winter, American companies tend to have a great many sick and contagious people.
      And in some cases, these individuals even get bonuses for coming in to work despite being ill.

    5. Re:Problem solved by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

      The rest of the civilized world has solved this problem, it's called paid sick leave.

      That's *IF* the sick coworkers take it. I know far too many people that come in sick because, "They don't want to get their spouses and children sick."

      So instead, they and their hacking cough come into the office and put 100s of other families at risk. I wonder if this stems from when they were children and their mother told them, "You're not sick enough to stay home."

    6. Re: Problem solved by reanjr · · Score: 1

      I've never worked at a company here in San Diego that deducted PTO for sick days. You just take the days off as needed. PTO is for planned vacation only, usually.

    7. Re:Problem solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paid sick leave until you've reached a threshold that nobody really knows (and HR won't officially acknowledge) then your yearly bonus gets (knee)capped to 40%.
      Sure i'll risk over a grand of my xmas bonus just to avoid getting other people sick...

      And most viruses are infectious before people get sick enough to justify a day off so unless you instruct all staff to stay home at the slightest sniffle it will spread.

    8. Re:Problem solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it stems from the old saying... the best way to get rid of a cold, is to give it to someone else... :-D

    9. Re: Problem solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, you have been using the term wrong. PTO specifically means pooled time-off, regardless of purpose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paid_time_off

    10. Re:Problem solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My last few jobs have all offered PTO, without separate sick time. When you only get three weeks of PTO, it obviously encourages everyone to come in sick rather than burn precious vacation time.

    11. Re:Problem solved by Necron69 · · Score: 1

      My company doesn't have "sick leave", we have PTO (personal time off). This is a twisted system which means your sick time and vacation time are the same pool. Naturally, this means you screw up your vacation plans if you take sick time, so I just come in to work unless I'm on my death bed.

      Incentives matter.

      - Necron69

    12. Re:Problem solved by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Once flu season starts, and employees have already used up their allotted sick days (whether due to actually being sick or not), they have to come in when sick or either be docked pay or risk getting fired.

      No where I've worked was that a normal practice. I imagine because you were told to go home if you were sick, regardless of your sick days, and you would have to use vacation days. If it became a recurring problem, well, there's always the falling performance review to encourage you to move on.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    13. Re:Problem solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If I'm going to be sick and miserable anyway, I'd rather be at work.

    14. Re: Problem solved by lgw · · Score: 1

      Some local governments have laws requiring actual sick leave. Seattle (well, King County) is like that - I get a handful of actual sick days in addition to PTO days, but people who work for the same company in other cities just get the PTO.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    15. Re:Problem solved by losfromla · · Score: 1

      Indeed, my solution to this problem is to come in no matter how sick I am. Sadly, I don't get sick very much so I don't get to share the joy as much as I'd like to.

      If I cared enough:

      "I make myself sick just to poison you"
        - Marilyn Manson

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    16. Re:Problem solved by losfromla · · Score: 2

      What planet are you living in? The US with its regressive medical, vacation, and sick leave policies is in what appears to be an economic death spiral.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    17. Re:Problem solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PTO is an important part of this discussion. I am really surprised that this post got a 2.

      A human being gets sick, and sometimes can infect co-workers. There is science behind this. I think that taking away Sick time or 'converting' it to PTO is a regression.

    18. Re:Problem solved by swalve · · Score: 1

      Any company that doesn't have a strict "get the fuck out of here, you are sick" policy deserves the plague they will assuredly suffer.

    19. Re:Problem solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and you would have to use vacation days"

      And where I live (thankfully), when you get sick during your vacation, you get the vacation days back. As it should be. And there is no limit on "Sick days", of course.

      Oh, *and* we have at least 25 days of vacation per year. *And* comprehensive health insurance. For you, your partner and your children. And we are still not a communist country...

    20. Re:Problem solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and employees have already used up their allotted sick days

      Over here, you can be fired after 120 sick days (not sure if that's 129 days in a year or 120 continuous sick days).

    21. Re:Problem solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Indeed, my solution to this problem is to come in no matter how sick I am."

      Be sure to lick all the phones of your coworkers when they are on a break. Also using the handkerchief you collect your sniffles with, is great for wiping all the stuff that's used by everybody in the office kitchenette.

    22. Re:Problem solved by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Once flu season starts, ..."

      I always get a flu shot. I buy it for 12 bucks in the pharmacy here and jam it myself in my ass, no need to go to a doctor for that.

    23. Re:Problem solved by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No where I've worked was that a normal practice. I imagine because you were told to go home if you were sick, regardless of your sick days, and you would have to use vacation days. If it became a recurring problem, well, there's always the falling performance review to encourage you to move on.

      Yes, such policies are the very reason why people come in to work sick. They can't afford to call in sick, so they don't. They show up and make you sick because your policies demand it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:Problem solved by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      "and you would have to use vacation days"

      And where I live (thankfully), when you get sick during your vacation, you get the vacation days back. As it should be. And there is no limit on "Sick days", of course.

      Oh, *and* we have at least 25 days of vacation per year. *And* comprehensive health insurance. For you, your partner and your children. And we are still not a communist country...

      Yep, the US is way way way backwards there. Basic health coverage via single payer is something I hope shows up soon, coupled with posted rates. The US approach with 100% private health care has terminally failed and shows that system cannot work.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    25. Re:Problem solved by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      My point was that coming in sick wasn't good practice, because you'd be sent home and docked a sick day. Everyone of my bosses, even the bad ones, wanted to avoid others getting sick, the bad ones probably for some self-serving reason like avoiding having to actually work when the entire team was out. No place I've been wanted anyone to come in sick.

      To be fair, however, I do know of places that were militant about attendance over all else, and viewed used sick days as extra costs and reflected those on performance reviews. Those places were generally sweat shops that no one stayed at very long.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    26. Re:Problem solved by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It won't be fixed any time soon. The Democrats, including Hillary, absolutely love ObamaCare which does absolutely nothing to fix the problem.

    27. Re:Problem solved by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The problem with sick days (separate from vacation days) is that if you're the kind of person who never or rarely gets sick, then you're effectively penalized compared to someone who does, or compared to someone who lies. So places with sick days frequently have employees who lie about being sick so they can use up those days.

      Otherwise, how is it fair that you should have to come to work every day because you're healthy, while Sick Sue gets to stay home a lot, and then you have to cover for Sue while she relaxes at home?

    28. Re:Problem solved by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'd like to add to this that one good solution to this (for office workers who spend all their time on a computer) is to allow more tele-working. Encourage or allow employees to spend X days a week working from home. Then sick workers can get work done from home while not spreading their sickness, and healthy workers who never get sick can also work from home some and not feel like the sickly people are getting to do less work (leaving the healthy people to do it) as a reward for not being as healthy, and enjoy being able to work from home and stay out of the noisy open office too.

    29. Re:Problem solved by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      It won't be fixed any time soon. The Democrats, including Hillary, absolutely love ObamaCare which does absolutely nothing to fix the problem.

      I will note that from what I can glean in a 10s survey of Hillary's statements on single-payer is that she doesn't believe Americans would accept it and that it is a losing political fight. I would agree with that statement based on how unreasonably hysterical people get whenever they even consider "socialized" medicine, not realizing that they're all already a part of it under Medicare. Just remember: "A *person* is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals". I'd restrict it to "A *person* might be smart."

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    30. Re:Problem solved by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I have a great job. I get to do interesting stuff along with highly competent people in a very positive corporate culture. I can see the effects of my work. I'm not leaving that because we have PTO and I don't like my cube. (Not until retirement, anyway.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    31. Re:Problem solved by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      This has always been my experience as well -- use sick days, then vacation. At previous companies I always had separate designated sick, personal, and vacation days. Sick/personal days were IIRC use them or lose them; vacation days of course one has to be paid for if unused when leaving the company. My current employer when extending and offer quoted me a number of days, which they call PTO perhaps because of a fondness for tractors or something. But they neglected to tell me that there were no separate sick days, it was all one pool. Between that and other unvoiced weird policies I effectively lost a week per year in the transition. The solution is often to just not submit sick days.

    32. Re:Problem solved by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      The medical system overpays hospital parasites including administrators and big pharma, but vacation and sick leave policies are nothing onerous. The big problems are the cost of housing and the siphoning of $ to the 1%.

    33. Re:Problem solved by losfromla · · Score: 1

      I agree with what you view as problems.
      Vacation and sick leave policies are regressive. We should all have the vacation time that the fat-cats get. Why should those who make the rich rich by actually working not have as part of the fruit of their labors an extended time away from work? Are you saying that if we get sick we should also drag ourselves to work? If our kids get sick we should not stay and be paid to take care of them? Is that how little we value the next generation?
      There are way too many hospital administrators and big pharma is a huge issue that needs to be dealt with harshly.
      How can we keep housing from siphoning off money to the 1%? Cell phones siphon money to the 1% too and now they've convinced us all that we all need them.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    34. Re:Problem solved by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Do we get less than they do? AFAIK at my company all direct employees get the same number of days regardless of grade or length of service, though I suspect this is atypical. I'm saying nothing of the sort you imply. As for siphoning, refuse to live in the silly valley or in NYC, that'd be a start.

    35. Re:Problem solved by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I've yet to see where the use of PTO benefited any employee, anywhere.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    36. Re:Problem solved by losfromla · · Score: 1

      Not the fat-cat employees, the fat-cat stockholders, the ones who don't work for a living or contribute anything of value. Yeah, money, pfft!
      Maybe you think you aren't saying what I state you are saying but since you believe that our vacation and sick time policies aren't onerous and yet they drive us to the scenario I painted. Therefore you feel that we should go to work sick and if our kids get sick then tough on them. It's the "pull yourself up by your own bootstraps" mentality that libertarians are so fond of.
      Siphoning from real estate is happening in all communities in the area where I live, which is the South Bay area in Southern California. All communities from Long Beach, Watts, and Compton through Torrance and Hermosa Beach are seeing obscene increases in housing cost increase both in rentals and purchases. It really boggles the mind.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
  10. Open Office Failure by dcw3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The popularity of these among upper management is typically because of cost or control reasons. They're much cheaper than closed offices, and management can walk by to see exactly what you're doing. Typical penny wise & pound foolish mentality. The constant interruptions that occur end up costing them much more in the long run. And if this is how they think they need to see what people are doing, they fail at being managers. It's simple enough to give people tasks with milestones, and monitor their progress. I'm fortunate in that I'm able to work from home periodically. I get much more accomplished there because the only interruptions are from the phone or the doorbell. That said, I don't want to give up the face to face discussions that happen in the break room and hallways at work.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
    1. Re:Open Office Failure by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The popularity of these among upper management is typically because of cost or control reasons. They're much cheaper than closed offices, and management can walk by to see exactly what you're doing.

      It's not only that. There is this myth floating around for the past couple decades that "collaboration" is the cool new workplace thing. People read stories about Google or Apple and tales of workers just randomly meeting in some common room and brainstorming the next new cool thing, and managers start drooling and saying, "Yeah -- let's get rid of the office walls. Get rid of the cubes! Break down the barriers, and we'll get better collaboration, which means more creative and efficient work!"

      Yeah, except that doesn't actually work. It's true that chance encounters with coworkers can be beneficial for brainstorming or bouncing ideas or whatever, but that happens best when you're OPEN TO THAT, which means you're not deeply focused on some specific task at your desk or whatever. More recent studies are showing (surprise!) that workers actually need lack of distractions, and a more isolated environment is often easier for that. The best office approach would be to offer both options -- closed offices for when you're focused on a task... and then open spaces, or tables, or common areas, or whatever when you're less focused and are open for random contact and collaboration.

      Actually, those people who have real, actual offices already have those options -- because they have a door. If you are working intently, you shut your door. If you want to be open for other random communication, you keep your door open.

      Typical penny wise & pound foolish mentality. The constant interruptions that occur end up costing them much more in the long run.

      True. Studies show that workers in "open plan" offices are less productive, tend to be more distracted, have more health issues and stress, take more sick days, etc., etc. It was a terrible idea, and probably never saved money in the long run.

    2. Re:Open Office Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open Office Failure

      I agree. Libre Office is clearly the superior alternative.

    3. Re:Open Office Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One problem with working from home could be that others in your household might assume that you'll be able to take care of all house-related matters/chores, etc., since "you are there anyway":

      https://youtu.be/lBqq5ai5rLQ

    4. Re:Open Office Failure by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except that doesn't actually work. It's true that chance encounters with coworkers can be beneficial for brainstorming or bouncing ideas or whatever, but that happens best when you're OPEN TO THAT, which means you're not deeply focused on some specific task at your desk or whatever. More recent studies are showing (surprise!) that workers actually need lack of distractions, and a more isolated environment is often easier for that. The best office approach would be to offer both options -- closed offices for when you're focused on a task... and then open spaces, or tables, or common areas, or whatever when you're less focused and are open for random contact and collaboration.

      Yes, and if you want to encourage employees to spend more time being open to those? Nice, inviting breakrooms and lunch rooms (with decent lunch to be had!) will work wonders, especially if you have nice closed offices so employees have time to actually leave their desk to enjoy those things.

    5. Re:Open Office Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. Studies show that workers in "open plan" offices are less productive, tend to be more distracted, have more health issues and stress, take more sick days, etc., etc. It was a terrible idea, and probably never saved money in the long run.

      It would be really helpful if you would cite a couple. I need some references to take to management.

    6. Re:Open Office Failure by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      Actually, drastically switching office environments is a great way to get people to leave without compensation.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    7. Re:Open Office Failure by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      Even cheaper is an open office with unassigned seating at less capacity than the workforce total. Since not everyone is in every day, they figure they don't need one desk per one person. You just pack people in at the next available spot.

    8. Re:Open Office Failure by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Even cheaper is an open office with unassigned seating at less capacity than the workforce total. Since not everyone is in every day, they figure they don't need one desk per one person. You just pack people in at the next available spot.

      "Hoteling" has at least already gotten a bad reputation among many major companies that have tried it. I can name several that have experimented with, and given up on it.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    9. Re:Open Office Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will never listen to you, since you are below their social level.

      You would have to be a HPC (Highly Paid Consultant), earn more than them and then they will do any bullshit that you tell them. "He MUST be right, he is so expensive!!!"...

      Sad, but true.

    10. Re:Open Office Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ......we're gonna need to go ahead and move you downstairs into storage B.

    11. Re:Open Office Failure by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's why it's better to live alone. My cats don't expect too much, though they can be a little bit distracting when they insist on jumping in my lap. Much better than having a live-in partner who's always whining about having too much housework to do and never has any free time and wants me to do all kinds of house-related stuff and chores, yet somehow when I'm on my own I don't have much trouble keeping up with the laundry and dishes and it takes me a tiny fraction of the time it seemed to take her.

    12. Re:Open Office Failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once productivity is through the floor, it's easier to offshore b/c the productivity gap is gone.

    13. Re:Open Office Failure by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Okay, if your manager comes over to watch you, what does he or she see?

      When I'm working on a problem, I tend to sit at my desk and stare at the screen for a while. Every so often, I'll do a few things with the mouse, changing to look at other code or something like that. Then I'll occasionally burst into a typing flurry for a short time. It's much easier to tell if I'm working based on what I do.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    14. Re:Open Office Failure by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Depends. I may turn around and talk with them (I have several bosses, and I'm a low level manager). They might see spreadsheets, documents, or email. Or they might see me surfing /. while I eat breakfast or lunch.

      All that said, it simply shouldn't matter, as long as I'm getting the job done, and not abusing the company's surfing policies, or claiming time that I didn't actually work.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    15. Re:Open Office Failure by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      One problem with working from home could be that others in your household might assume that you'll be able to take care of all house-related matters/chores, etc., since "you are there anyway" ...

      Working at home requires a room with a door, just as much as at the office. And it helps to explain that if no work, no food! 8-)

  11. YES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If someone in the office is talking or making loud noises, that pretty much means I'm not getting anything done until the place is quiet again.
    I take huge hits to productivity depending on who I must share an office with.

  12. This is why you can't use a good keyboard any more by jtara · · Score: 2

    I was asked to take my Unicomp "clicky" keyboard (Unicomp has the license for the original IBM clicky keyboard design) home, and forced to use a crappy Microsoft keyboard because the prima donna in the next cubicle couldn't stand the sound.

    This despite the fact that it was a huge, chaotic, open-office with loud-ass game developers, producers, etc. (Sony Playstation development studio.) Though we were in the more-sedate back-end/server development part of the office.

    But, OK. It disturbed the prima donna. But was it my fault? Or a stupid office layout?

    Really, my worst annoyance there was developers using IM to communicate, when we were in eight cubicles all together, just a few steps from each other. The plus of just walking over to the other developer's cubicle is that you can how busy they are, and decide to talk later, interrupt anyway because it is too important, etc. That is, use actual judgement instead of just casting out an IM and then stewing over it if not immediately answered.

    But that would take actual COMMON SENSE.

  13. profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 take any productive workforce
    2 force them into open offices to save money
    3 productivity plummets, so fire workforce
    4 profit

  14. Only one question? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    If you asked me if I get distracted in the workplace by noisy co-workers I'd answer yes.

    If you asked me if I've ever solved a problem by overhearing a conversation from a noisy coworker, I'd answer CONSTANTLY.

    For the occasions where I do need peace and quiet, well Bose QC35s live up to their model number, unfortunately at $350 and given the quality of sound they also live up to their brandname.

    1. Re:Only one question? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      For the occasions where I do need peace and quiet, well Bose QC35s live up to their model number, unfortunately at $350 and given the quality of sound they also live up to their brandname.

      I have a set of Bose QuietComfort 15 headphones, and they do a good job of reducing, but not completely cancelling noise. I will use them whenever I need to really concentrate.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:Only one question? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      ...If you asked me if I get distracted in the workplace by noisy co-workers I'd answer yes. If you asked me if I've ever solved a problem by overhearing a conversation from a noisy coworker, I'd answer CONSTANTLY....

      What if I asked you whether or not you are a nosy co-worker who should concentrate more on your own work and less on the work of others?

    3. Re:Only one question? by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      I interviewed at Analog Devices locally a couple years back. I really liked their setup. The center area was open space with a few cubicles for the drop-in marketing/sales guys, the rest was lab area. Around the perimeter were proper offices for the engineers. Most folks had their doors open, but it was expected that if you needed to focus, have a loud discussion, or talk on a phone conference you would close your office door.

      I did not get that job, so I ended up at another good company that sadly has the typical cube farm. I end up shell-shocked some days by the number of distractions and interruptions. I only seem to be able to refocus so many times before my brain just kind of give up for the day.

    4. Re:Only one question? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Then you would probably be fired from most engineering jobs, except the paper pushing copy-paste engineers at consultant firms. Problems aren't solved in isolation.

    5. Re:Only one question? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Most folks had their doors open, but it was expected that if you needed to focus, have a loud discussion, or talk on a phone conference you would close your office door.

      I work in an open floor plan, but our cube farm has enough sense to provide "quiet rooms" basically single desks and a telephone + internet connection for those times where you either really need to concentrate or really need to tear someone a new one over the phone. It works quite well.

      The risk of the typical office layout (IMO) is not people slacking off, but rather people isolating themselves from discussion.

    6. Re:Only one question? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      From your other posts I thought you were a student.

    7. Re:Only one question? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Nope just an immature adult :-)

    8. Re:Only one question? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I have a similar solution. My coworkers are amused by their ability to come up to my cube and stand at the entrance, not quietly, and watch me ignore them.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    9. Re:Only one question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only seem to be able to refocus so many times before my brain just kind of give up for the day.

      Amen to that. I can only try so much before I get too frustrated with other people and just say "f it" because I can't concentrate anyway. And as soon as I put headphones, 9 times out of 10 somebody will want to talk to me within 5 minutes of me putting them in. They won't say anything to me up until that point.

  15. Eating sounds by pestilence669 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These are by far my worst favorite. I keep hearing the voice of my mother yelling "chew with your mouth closed!" It's never a problem at lunch or wherever expected. At my desk? Why do I need to HEAR people eat? I've had several colleagues over the years carbureting their food with open mouths, with chunks falling out onto the floor. I recently had to sit next to one guy that would make sucking sounds as he'd suck his fingers clean several times during his snacks, which were constant. Vegetarians & vegans need to eat quite regularly. The clanking of spoons on porcelain bowls. The resonance of hollow skulls munching on granola. The mushy sounds. My tolerance is about five minutes. Annoyance sets in at ten. Aggravation at fifteen. Psychosis at thirty. The last job... I took a lot of walks. This one guy would load up a bowl of snacks and proceed to noisily eat them for two hours slowly, savoring every bite and letting us all know. Without headphones, I would be in jail from my murderous rampage. I'm trying to grasp fifteen concepts in a head that can, at best, hold seven at once. The repetitious unnecessary noise of gluttony is a distraction.

    1. Re:Eating sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh for the love of $diety... I attended a training class once, and a former co-worker started each day off by chewing gum for 10-15 minutes. Made my blood boil... because it was full on mouth open, smack smack smack. I never before understood why (at times) my wife would give me grief for chewing with my own mouth open.... but to deal with that?

      Then I sat across from said co-worker at a lunch table. Same deal. I just am not the confrontational type... but the stress level was very high.

    2. Re:Eating sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People eating at their desks in general. One cube farm I worked in I was unlucky enough to be near the "kitchen" (aka corner of a room)

      THE STENCH of some peoples' meals was bad enough but the combined stench was even worse. Then people truck their microwaved sludge to their cube and noisily scarf it down, it got so bad that I just ate out every day to get away from it. SOMEHOW a food court that shares all the same challenges doesn't seem to have them (I don't know, proper ventilation + enough static noise?)

      I mostly work from home now, the only guy who comes into the office on a regular basis has some kind of weird diet where he's eating nuts all goddamn day, and not just cramming them in his face, no eating one nut at a time and really chewing the fuck out of it.

      I don't hate people... but sometimes I wonder.

    3. Re:Eating sounds by pestilence669 · · Score: 1

      Yes. To expand upon this phenomenon (drinking): There was this brilliant engineer that I'll just call S. S was amazing. He built mind astonishing things in hours that would take a mere mortal days... and he loved coffee. Every 10-15 seconds, he'd pick up his cup, slurp like loudness was an award, then smash it down. All day long he did this. 3-4 times per minute! How could I complain? This guy could synthesize in hardware at the same speed I could write in software. Brilliant, but very distracting. This was before Soundcloud, Pandora, and Spotify. If it weren't for my iPod, I would have become enraged.

    4. Re:Eating sounds by swalve · · Score: 1

      This is when I would revert to my catholic all boys high school skills. Hide behind a book and shout "close your fucking gob!" Or "holy shit, what stinks?"

    5. Re:Eating sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally agree that eating sounds, heavy breathing and other "bodily noises" are much more annoying than door creaks or sounds from outside the office. It seems that my brain does not have a built-in filter to remove "other humans" as easily as "background noise".

      What can make this more aggravating is that in different countries there are different eating cultures: it would be unusual to see anybody eating a meal at his desk in, say, Italy an France, whereas it is very common in the anglo-saxon parts of the world. So if you move across countries, you might end up being the looner asking for all coworkers to change their habits, not vice-versa.

    6. Re:Eating sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dealing with this at this VERY SECOND.

    7. Re:Eating sounds by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      Google 'misophonia'. Mouth noises are among the more common rage-inducing sounds. Gum-popping might be a tad worse.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    8. Re:Eating sounds by Tesen · · Score: 1

      I share the same problem with Misophonia. I really liked the guy that used to sit next to me at the one job I had (when I was in the office and not working from home), but he chewed with his mouth open and every time he drinks something it ends like he just spent the last four weeks walking the desert in the hot sun and this was his first drink back. Then there was the nut eating... one nut at a time and if they were salted gotta suck each finger with each nut.

      Then there are the people that feel compelled to grab their drinks walk half the fucking floor or from the next cube to come ask me a question, "Hey... do you have a moment? I really need to talk to you about that email ." Fucking hydrate in your own cube. Or the people that bring food that is so crunchy you can hear every single bite a mile away (shit I eat salads at work with no croutons, nothing that crunches not to be annoying to others). Maybe it was because I was brought up (read: punished and mocked if I did something incorrect) with impeccable table manners, but this crap bugs the shit out of me. It is amusing, when we go out as a group to lunch, it never fails someone comments, "You are so proper..." really?!?

      Then there was the toxic gas man at one job that had a plethora of food allergies yet would get in the morning, consume two or three allergens he was highly sensitive to, cue an hour or so later the smell would start to emerge from his butt cheeks... by lunch time you were so put off eating, the usual loud foods and smacking of lips and crap never happened, but slowly but surely your sense of smell would become overwhelmed literally to the point of numbness and focusing on your monitors became next to impossible as you wanted to scratch your eyes out because they hurt so bad. I was his cube neighbor, and had a half height wall between us. The smell fortunately for others dissipated to less toxic state a few cubes over, but people stopped eating at their desks because it was still strong and offensive.

      Oh yeah, the sputum guy... before eating each meal (perhaps to enjoy the full aroma on his taste buds and up his nostrils) would spend five minutes sniffing, gagging and hacking up everything in his nostrils and the back of his throat and spit it in to a paper cup (which he would get rid of at the end of the day), so if you ever had to visit him, you would get the first hand view of the most disgusting looking spat up crap you would ever see. Now if you were a sensitive type (I stopped gagging at him after my kid was born...) his ritual hacking would instantly make you gag as your mind suddenly goes, "uhhuh! I've seen the result and here is a razor focused memory of it for your disgusting pleasure!".

      Don't even get me on the chemical types that love to toxic perfumes or colognes that are so strong your throat closes up and your chest tightens...

      I am sure I have a lot of issues myself, actually having to sniff in a lot on bad allergy days probably annoys the crap out of my cube buddies and the once in the while clearing my throat (I try to take walks to the restroom to do it as to lessen the annoyance to others and the fact I am only in the office 2 - 3 days a week I am sure helps).

      Yes, we all have issues, some people try to keep them to a minimal, others just are oblivious to them or do not give a crap... you add this together and the constant social interruptions and you are basically in a fight or flight state most of the day...

    9. Re:Eating sounds by Tesen · · Score: 1

      "Hey... do you *slurp* have a moment? *slurp* I really need to *slurp* talk to you about that email *slurp*."

    10. Re:Eating sounds by Tesen · · Score: 1

      Yes. To expand upon this phenomenon (drinking):

      There was this brilliant engineer that I'll just call S. S was amazing. He built mind astonishing things in hours that would take a mere mortal days... and he loved coffee.

      Every 10-15 seconds, he'd pick up his cup, slurp like loudness was an award, then smash it down. All day long he did this. 3-4 times per minute! How could I complain? This guy could synthesize in hardware at the same speed I could write in software. Brilliant, but very distracting.

      This was before Soundcloud, Pandora, and Spotify. If it weren't for my iPod, I would have become enraged.

      Yeah portable media players have really helped me; I know I have a sensitivity to certain sounds so I plug on in when it starts getting to me. It really is as much my own problem as it is theirs.

      I love the slurping types, especially the ones that feel compelled to go on road trips to other peoples desks so they can slurp it up abroad ;-)

    11. Re:Eating sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out misophonia. I suffer from the same rage inducing affliction caused by the unnecessary, voluntary noises of other co-workers, and this best describes it.

      Funny thing is I'm not too phased by involuntary or uncontrollable sounds. For example a co-worker has bad hay fever but his sniffing isn't as bothersome as another co-worker who sniffs for the sake of sniffing. At least the hay fever sufferer does everything he can to avoid the sniffing (medication, tissues, handkerchiefs). The active sniffer doesn't even reach for a tissue.

  16. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The only time it became a choice at one company that I worked for was when management wanted to replace the tall cube walls with short cube walls that allowed everyone to see everyone else. Bad enough that we had to work in bullpens, but no one wanted shorter cubicle walls. Management backed off and later decided to shut down the office to save money before the company filed for bankruptcy.

  17. Re:tell them that they can keep there job if they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I has 1337 haxor skillz!"

    But then I'm not and would not want to be in HR...

  18. BZZZZZ WRONG summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hedge says the noise is generally coming from another person, though it's much more disturbing when it's a machine that is making it

    he actually says the exact opposite:

    "In general, if it's coming from another person, it's much more disturbing than when it's coming from a machine," he says, because, as social beings, humans are attuned to man-made sounds.

    and I generally agree with him, not with the summary. But what is even more annoying is other people's Windows sounds. I'll never understand why these are on by default, they're an assault on everyone else's sanity.

  19. Re:This is why you can't use a good keyboard any m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    To be fair the unicomp is about as loud as a keyboard gets - you could always get a cherry mx brown and have all the tactility with less noise.

  20. concentration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Worker: doing any actual work here is difficult with all the noise..
    Boss: well, I manage just fine
    Worker: I said actual work

    1. Re:concentration by losfromla · · Score: 1

      LOL

      --
      Only I can judge you.
  21. I can mute my phone by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    but for some reason, I'm not allowed to mute my coworker.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  22. History repeating itself by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cube farms were a step up from the open offices of the 50's/60's. Then the hipsters decided that cubes were bad and that open offices were the way to go. But the irony is that they are now discovering what was learnt in the 60's. From Cubicle

    Propst concluded from his studies that during the 20th Century the office environment had changed substantially, particularly in relation to the amount of information being processed.[1][2] The amount of information an employee had to analyze, organize, and maintain had increased dramatically. Despite this, the basic layout of the corporate office had remained largely unchanged, with employees sitting behind rows of traditional desks in a large open room, devoid of privacy. Propst's studies suggested that an open environment actually reduced communication between employees, and impeded personal initiative.[1][2] On this, Propst commented "One of the regrettable conditions of present day offices is the tendency to provide a formula kind of sameness for everyone."[1][2] In addition, the employees' bodies were suffering from long hours of sitting in one position. Propst concluded that office workers require both privacy and interaction, depending on which of their many duties they were performing.

    It's sad that the wheel keeps being reinvented.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:History repeating itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, I would love it if my company discovered the wheel.

    2. Re:History repeating itself by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Many people dislike extremely quiet offices, and they can be bad for cohesiveness. I often overhear relevant stuff and can either note it or offer something valuable. Back when we had a small corner office with the door shut most of the time we were cut off and less efficient.

      Personally extreme quiet is off-putting. I have to open a window or put on headphones with some white noise. Lack of sound makes humans more sensitive to sudden noises. People who hate sniffles and doors moving might find it better if there was constant ambient sound.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:History repeating itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally extreme quiet is off-putting. I have to open a window or put on headphones with some white noise. Lack of sound makes humans more sensitive to sudden noises. People who hate sniffles and doors moving might find it better if there was constant ambient sound.

      Better to give people the option to have accompanying noises of their choosing rather than forcing everyone to deal with random distractions no matter their personal preference or need to focus at a give time.

      I prefer a quiet office. After 15 years, I can state definitively that it is the best environment for productive "office" work. That's true for me and for every programmer/developer I have worked with. The reasons are well studied.

      Graphic artists seem to thrive on ambient energy.

      Unfortunately, I now work in a "cool" and "collaborative" workspace. As it is, the next most tolerable option to quiet is to literally blast techno music through my headphones at top volume to drown out the random talking, music, news radio, droning ventilation, elevator bell, street noise etc. I find that my brain is able to tune out the relatively regulated rhythmic music.

      That said, I often have to wait until late in the day before I even attempt to get into the zone with detailed work.

    4. Re:History repeating itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are destroying your hears right now.

      Try a pair of Bose QC25 instead.

    5. Re:History repeating itself by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I have to open a window or put on headphones with some white noise.

      This site was a lifesaver for me: https://mynoise.net.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    6. Re:History repeating itself by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'll give it a try.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:History repeating itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      holy crap, that is awesome, thanks!

  23. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cube farms are going away. The current trend in open floor plans is desks with no partitions at all. HR says it's because millennials like it and all the "cool" tech companies have them. More likely it is cheaper than cubes and it is easier to watch everyone. It is really distracting to catch all the movement in your peripheral vision but its not like anyone in leadership cares what their employees think

  24. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by networkBoy · · Score: 1

    I'll take a cube form over what I have now...
    We just moved to an open plan office from bullpen cubes (~20x20 ft cubes with 4 people per cube).
    I worked corporate for 20 years and the vast bulk of that was cube farms or labs.

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  25. Re:tell them that they can keep there job if they by sexconker · · Score: 4, Funny

    I do my job amazingly. In fact, I'm not paid accordingly. You should adjust my pay upward by about a fifth to a third annually.

    Thanks.

  26. Open offices are designed for spying by halfdan+the+black · · Score: 1

    Where I used to work, we first had normal cubicles. Then management had this brilliant idea to go with open offices, but where everyone sat looking at other people's screens. This was to encourage people to spy and report coworkers.

    It was a disaster because no one got work done, constant chatting and distractions.

  27. Well *duh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do people (entire swaths of people) insist on discarding prior lessons learned.
    Isn't that behavior the exact opposite of wisdom?
    What's the word for that again? Oh, right: STUPIDITY.

  28. Didn't Peopleware tell is this 20 years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  29. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by chipschap · · Score: 4, Funny

    And this, of course, applies to everyone but management, who naturally "must" have their individual offices.

  30. Re:tell them that they can keep there job if they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No thanks."

  31. My only distraction... by Nunya666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...is /.

  32. The sighing... by Heathren-bert · · Score: 2

    I share an office with another person (with a cubicle dividing wall between us, finally), and while I do get along with him, some days the constant sighing just wears on my nerves (like today, now). So loud, even my headphones with Rammstein playing doesn't drown it out. When he's not sighing constantly, he usually has his ear buds in with bagpipe music so loud I can hear it over my music. Very distracting. I had an office to myself for several years, which was awesome, close the door, have music over the speakers. I miss those days.

    1. Re:The sighing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toss paperclips on such people. Regularly. See if they can get distracted too.

  33. A jump to the left, and then a step to the right.. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Did a copy of Joel On Software or Peopleware fall thorough a timewarp from 1833?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  34. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leadership does not give a shit about minor annoyances. They have no qualms at all about making the environment hard to work in, and then setting policies that just force you to deal with it.

    They know damn good and well that you are there for the money. They compete for talent on salary, benefits, and sometimes hours. And, in the current market, the cost of real estate is higher than the salaries, so they would rather pay a little bit more in salary in order to be able to pack more people into the same space. Also, they know that anywhere else you might go will be the same way, so you are very unlikely to leave just for that reason.

    So, fuck you, deal with it.

  35. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2

    Not only are our half height cube walls WAY more expensive than stick and drywall ($1200 per wall, 4 per cube 8 cubes in our area) but we have no privacy. The big issue with a lack of privacy is that 3 of us work with instructors and discuss student grades, etc. Which leads to possible FERPA violations - our dept. secretary and work study students have no business hearing me talk about a students grades with an instructor. And, since I am an adjunct instructor as well as a admin/professional employee, I discuss my students grades with them - and NO ONE else in my department has the right to hear any of it.

    Did the facilties folk or my boss listen? Nope...

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  36. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 2

    Yep. Our building did this earlier this year. They pretended to ask our opinion on the matter (they had an 'express your thoughts' board up for a few weeks until it suddenly disappeared one day after 99.9% of the comments were negative with a few suspicious sounding positive comments mixed in) but we later found out that the plan was already in motion long before that board went up. So far they've done the upper floor and the response has been resoundingly negative. People complain that there's no privacy and they can't get any work done because their 'desks' are so small now. Basically they went from a standard cubical (with a wrap around desk) to a 3 foot piece of desk (with tiny little dividers on each side). The 'desks' are barely large enough for a computer and a phone.

    We found out that they went ahead with the project because some vice president had it on their objectives this year because it saved money due to the fact that they were able to cram more people into the building rather than open a new one. Of course they didn't think about parking or bathroom space when they did that calculation so both are a disaster. Thankfully I'm in a secure lab that they've decided to ignore because they can't cram more people in due to security concerns. We've had tons of people try to get their managers to move them in though, even though they have absolutely no reason to be in here other than they don't like the new 'desks'.

  37. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by __Paul__ · · Score: 1

    A cube farm would be a luxury to what we get in Australia; when I started my current role, the norm was half-height walls between everyone, which you could just see over.

    Shortly after that, a new manager of a team that we worked closely with decided it would be a wonderful idea to remove those walls so that the teams could work "even more closely together". I made it very clear that if they did that to me, I would not be hanging around.

    Sadly, since then, all of those relatively large desks have been replaced with smaller desks, and a much shorter wall between them.

    I can't remember the last time I saw a cube-farm anywhere in Australia.

    --
    worldmobilenet.com -- World Prepaid Wireless Internet plans
  38. Individual enclosed offices are best for by pjv936 · · Score: 0

    productivity but are not good for surveillance. So we have open office since your supervisor keeping an eye on you is more important than you getting more work done.

    1. Re:Individual enclosed offices are best for by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Informative

      At one job I worked at, management installed software to remotely monitor the desktop of each workstation. One morning my supervisor came running over to inform that I can't be browsing Amazon on company time. That is until he saw that I had a breakfast burrito in hand, as company policy allowed employees to browse the Internet on their breaks. I told him to bugger off. The workaround for many employees was to buy a Wifi-enabled PDA and browse the Internet via the open access point next door. Since we were hunched over our desks while using our PDAs, management throught we were working hard as no one was browsing the Internet on their PC.

    2. Re:Individual enclosed offices are best for by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      and then they said work though lunch at your desk.

    3. Re:Individual enclosed offices are best for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find the easiest solution for that is RDP/VNC. Just remotely login to your pc at home and you can do whatever you want

    4. Re:Individual enclosed offices are best for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect! Now you get to inform them that you can't surf company web sites on personal time either! Problem solved!

    5. Re:Individual enclosed offices are best for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      extra points for using a prosthetic third arm with a plastic burrito

  39. Re:tell them that they can keep there job if they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No thanks, not today. I don't think you can insist on this."

  40. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by torkus · · Score: 2

    Yup.

    It's not so much that the cool tech companies have open offies. It's that they just buy desks and can't afford fancy cubicle furniture.

    Is there some benefit to open office seating? Yes. For small groups in their own, partitioned area sure. Small teams workign together can collaborate easily.

    Opening the whole office like that? Hell no. There's no real collaboration across 5 rows of desks without shouting and interrupting everyone in between. I've been through the transition from cubes to more open cubes, to very open 'cubes' to full open office, non-partition desks. I work out of my secondary office now because the noise is impossible. I can't even hear what's being said on conference calls half the time because someone is having some loud conversation (or socializing or whatever) 5 feet from me.

    Oh, and my company decided anyone who's not an executive gets these new 'wonderful' seats that 'employees love'. Right.

    --
    You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  41. Shocking Discovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...workers are happier when they are in enclosed offices..."

    In other news shocking discovery that water is wet.

    1. Re:Shocking Discovery by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      "...workers are happier when they are in enclosed offices..."

      In other news shocking discovery that water is wet.

      Unless it was made by melting dry ice?

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
  42. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously i'd prefer an office to myself but i'd MUCH rather have a cubical than an open office which i currently reside.
    There are around 40+ people in my pretty small open office (small for the amount of people in it) and sometimes the noise is unbearable. You get the problem of noise ramping; it gets loud so you need to slightly raise your voice to be heard which increases the background volume meaning the next person has to raise their voice slightly more to be heard etc etc until you're all practically yelling.

    Then, of course, there are those employees who just talk bollocks. I'm sure every large office has one; just a guy or girl who feels the need to vocalise their every thought or who seems to need to talk AT someone (yes AT not TO as we rarely even acknowledge them) almost constantly lest their tongue atrophy and fall off.

    It's a nightmare; it KILLS productivity and encourages mistakes. I conservatively estimate i'd be 25% more productive if i were left alone in a cubical to get the damn job done. As it is i am interrupted, distracted or annoyed dozens, maybe hundreds of times per day slowing me down and making me need to double check more to ensure the interruption didn't make me miss something.

  43. Those fucking flip flops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a co-worker who insists on wearing flip flops all summer long. hear the sweaty suction of each and every footstep. Was it really too difficult to put on a pair of shoes? Same co-worker gets blessed by about a dozen people every time she sneezes. The other 3 dozen people in the immediate vicinity just want to know why it is so necessary to vocalize a sneeze so fucking loudly. a-CHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Just stfu already.

  44. Re:This is why you can't use a good keyboard any m by torkus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd be more active and less whiny about it. One day when working late I'd pour epoxy all over the keyboard.

    If you replaced it, I'd see what facial indentations it could make.

    You seriously use a keyboard like that in an open office? Speaking of prima donna ... I heard there's someone upset by the type of keyboard they're using now.

    Bait aside, this is a perfect exampe of the types of distractions you get in open offices. People often don't realize how insanely annoying they are to others.

    --
    You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  45. Omg... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy crap. I work in an open office and we just hired this guy a couple months ago, 60+yrs self taught dev (ugh, don't even get me started, this guy is just dumb, i swear he must of just known the right buzz words to get him past the interview), and he eats like a f**kin toddler!

    *smack* *smack* *sluuurrrrppppp* *smack* *sluuurrrrppppp* *ahhhhhhh* *smack* *smack*

    THIS IS WHY YOU DON'T HAVE A WEDDING RING YOU FUCK!

    I literally leave the office whenever he busts out his cute little cooler.

  46. What kind of environment did the founders have? by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    The real question that should be asked is what kind of work environment did, say, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page and Sergei Brin, Jack Dorsey etc. have when they did the heavy lifting of originating their software concepts.

    My bet would be quiet university dorm rooms or similar. In other words the opposite of the open plan office.

    (Things that make you go Hmmm department).

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:What kind of environment did the founders have? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      My bet would be quiet university dorm rooms or similar. In other words the opposite of the open plan office.

      When I worked for a moving company as a PC disconnect/reconnect tech in 2011, Mark Zuckerberg's desk was out in the open and looked like any other desk on the floor. I don't recall seeing any private offices.

    2. Re:What kind of environment did the founders have? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
      Same with Intel founder, Andy Grove

      Grove's office was an 8 by 9 ft (2.4 by 2.7 m) cubicle like the other employees, as he disliked separate "mahogany-paneled corner offices." He states, "I've been living in cubicles since 1978 — and it hasn't hurt a whole lot."

    3. Re:What kind of environment did the founders have? by lgw · · Score: 1

      When "everyone gets the same space", senior managers have a desk for show, and spend all day in a permanently-reserved conference room bigger than their office would have been. (It's not really a scam, even, but all senior managers do is meetings anyway, and at a certain point everyone else comes to you for meetings.)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:What kind of environment did the founders have? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I think it simply boils down to that you can buy 10 ikea desks for $130 each, 10 macbook pros for $1500 each, ten surge protectors at $10 each, an ikea couch for $500 and suddenly you have your standard silicon valley startup office. Bonus points if there's a poster on the wall somewhere. Since that was good enough to boot strap a company with, why waste valuable seed money on things like walls? When the company is a million years old you can give all of upper management their own offices.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  47. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by PRMan · · Score: 2

    You can call OSHA about the bathroom situation.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  48. Re:tell them that they can keep there job if they by networkBoy · · Score: 1

    /hat tip

    That was amazing

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  49. Obligatory by presidenteloco · · Score: 2

    Desks! Bloody luxury.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were lucky to have a desk.

  50. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    Open plan is a complete concentration killer. Thank goodness I can work from home.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  51. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by networkBoy · · Score: 1

    at least we have 5' desks...
    with little (pointless and ugly) dividers. I simply took an edge (which still has a 'corner'-ish desk) and spewed crap onto the desk next to mine before anyone selected it.

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  52. Re:This is why you can't use a good keyboard any m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy sheet! I had the same problem! I have a mechanical keyboard too! I also had a Prima across from me who hated it! Small dang world!.... so I used some of my budget to buy everyone around him new fancy light up glowing mechanical keyboards (he refused to use the one I gave him). everyone loved the keyboards and I had a pose to back me up when the boss asked us to get rid of them.. the murderous glares of 15 engineers ( and some mutterings about how much desert we have out on the range ) and he backed off and just moved the Prima to a new area.

    I am now working on getting all the folks in his new area the same keyboards as well as getting the IT head to spec them as the new "standard" keyboard.. :D

    Ya... I'm an asshole

  53. Been saying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... workers say they face "many" instances of disturbances and distractions from noise.

    They've been saying it for 35 years but the 'convenience' of open-plan offices continues to be forced upon workers.

  54. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by BigT · · Score: 2

    but management, who naturally "must" have their individual offices.

    Which they then congregate outside of to loudly talk with each other, various minions, visitors, etc. Right next to my cube. Or, my favorite: conference call on speakerphone with the door open. Then they get indignant when I close the door for them. Especially if I use superglue to keep it closed.

    And using the speakerphone in the cube farm should be a capital offense.

    --
    Is it weird in here, or is it just me?
  55. WPR doesn't care by mspring · · Score: 2

    Dealing with this problem for a couple of years now. The Workplace Resource guys just don't care about all the evidence I have collected so far. The cheaper open seating environment seems to work for them, in terms of saving money. Lost productivity is nothing they're measured on.

    1. Re:WPR doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dealing with this problem for a couple of years now. The Workplace Resource guys just don't care about all the evidence I have collected so far. The cheaper open seating environment seems to work for them, in terms of saving money. Lost productivity is nothing they're measured on.

      Only employees are measured on their productivity, which is assumed to correlate to the rigorousness of their ethics and morals.

      By the by, you sound like a trouble-maker. Evidence indeed! I hope you didn't collect that on company time!

  56. Flatus by hduff · · Score: 1

    Coworker flatus can be a major distraction.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  57. the "popular choice" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +JustNiz "yet the myth stubbornly persists that cubes are the "popular choice"."
    Oh, like the presidential candidates!

  58. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At home I share an office with my wife, and she is in sales and on the phone all of the time. So it is hard for me to use the office while she is home trying to work.

    And as bad as the office situation is, it is still better than having your job shipped to India (which recently happened to some people I know).

    This whole discussion reminds me of the "Desk scene" from the movie "Brazil". Worth a watch if you haven't seen it before.

  59. worst experience by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Once worked across from a guy named swami that seemed to eat almost continuously... munch munch crackle crackle all day long. His eating habits also gave him a lot of gas, so he farted almost as often.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  60. It can always get worse! by sootman · · Score: 1

    Just in case regular cubes aren't bad enough, a new high-level manager joined my company a couple years ago and decided to go with short-walled cubes so everyone can SEE each other and REALLY collaborate. Luckily that plague has not yet descended upon my location, and it looks like it won't. If it did, I'd just work from home 100% of the time. (Luckily my company is pretty good about that.) Besides the noise, I don't want to feel like everyone is staring at me all day long. Did I mention no one else on my team is in my city? (Or state, for that matter.) There's no collaboration to be had, in my case.

    Noise sucks. Usually I work from home in the mornings when I (and all my neighbors at work) have calls, then I go in after lunch because my office is close and I don't want to be in the house every day, all day.

    Different people like different things. Unfortunately, it seems that the people who rise to management are more often than not outgoing, and think fratboy bullpens are awesome.

    Plus there's the little matter of physics. What do you have if there are 90 noisy people and 10 quiet people? A noisy environment. What do you have if there are 10 noisy people and 90 quiet people? A noisy environment.

    Like the old joke: If you have a barrel of sewage and you add a cup of wine, you still have a barrel of sewage. If you have a barrel of wine and you add a cup of sewage, you now have a barrel of sewage.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:It can always get worse! by Tesen · · Score: 1

      Like the old joke: If you have a barrel of sewage and you add a cup of wine, you still have a barrel of sewage. If you have a barrel of wine and you add a cup of sewage, you now have a barrel of sewage.

      I see you too have tried Arbor Mist (hey, I was young and broke once...) ;-)

  61. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >

    I can't remember the last time I saw a cube-farm anywhere in Australia.

    Maybe they moved all the cube farming to the outback?

  62. Re: What kind of environment did the founders have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty sure he wasn't referring to 2011.

  63. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Cube farms are going away. The current trend in open floor plans is desks with no partitions at all. HR says it's because millennials like it and all the "cool" tech companies have them. More likely it is cheaper than cubes and it is easier to watch everyone. It is really distracting to catch all the movement in your peripheral vision but its not like anyone in leadership cares what their employees think

    You must understand that a lot of this is because of the new "autism spectrum" thinking that is catching like wildfire, which says that these hordes of brilliant software engineers, etc are people who are "somewhere on the spectrum", and as such, don't make eye contact and generally stay very focused on their work, meaning computer screen. Also the fact that the Millennials are already used to "tuning out" everything but their screen, so they are right at home with not being bothered by something as(ahem...) "organic", as peripheral vision.

  64. You hear the noises too? by pax+humana · · Score: 1

    For me, it's the rats in the walls.

    1. Re:You hear the noises too? by BigT · · Score: 1

      Just as long as they drown out the voices in your head, it's all good.

      --
      Is it weird in here, or is it just me?
  65. Re:This is why you can't use a good keyboard any m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was asked to take my Unicomp "clicky" keyboard (Unicomp has the license for the original IBM clicky keyboard design) home, and forced to use a crappy Microsoft keyboard because the prima donna in the next cubicle couldn't stand the sound

    Which is really funny when you consider that one hundred year ago, the work environment was all open floor plan hundreds of people WITH BLOODY TYPEWRITERS and no MP3 players.

  66. Who caused this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, you don't get to whine about noise when the current "culture" dictates everyone sits in a big open room -- or at the SAME TABLE!!

  67. Re: What kind of environment did the founders have by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Pretty sure he wasn't referring to 2011.

    I'm pretty sure I was. ;)

    Things may have changed since Facebook moved to Menlo Park.

  68. Re:tell them that they can keep there job if they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a pro and you know it. Bump up my pay or I quit. Two-fold minimum. No? Okay, good luck. Buh byeeeEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

  69. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

    Cube farms are going away. The current trend in open floor plans is desks with no partitions at all. HR says it's because millennials like it and all the "cool" tech companies have them. More likely it is cheaper than cubes and it is easier to watch everyone. It is really distracting to catch all the movement in your peripheral vision but its not like anyone in leadership cares what their employees think

    I doubt HR has consulted any millennials and I doubt the 'cool' tech companies have large rooms with no partitions at all--though if they do I suppose that explains so, so much about all these data breeches. It's my understanding that physical access makes the task of breaking into a computer system distinctly easier, and a large office where it's child's play to walk in and get access to pretty much any computer you want would make this pretty easy.

    It's not even like it'd be terribly hard to be unnoticed as you settled down to create the data breech if the employee workspace has a very 'lazily converted warehouse' feel...there'd be a better chance that everybody will just assume you're yet another new hire.

  70. It is surprising what you can get used to by ukoda · · Score: 1

    When I am doing easy work I like some music but when doing difficult stuff I like silence. So I seem to pick the wrong companies to work for. I spent two years developing interactive shop displays that play music. Left that job to work for a company developing audio systems. In both case a lot of loud music is the norm. I have kind of got used to it over time, it is surprising what you can tune out, although some choices of music can really annoy.

  71. Re: What kind of environment did the founders have by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    I meant when he/they were coming up with the idea and coding the original prototype.

    That would have been before the existence of company office (or even company.)

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  72. I use hearing protection by plopez · · Score: 1

    The large orange construction site ones. I think I'll take the company CC and get me noise deadening headphones.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  73. Who would have guessed? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Make people work in open spaces with no walls, exposed pipes and ducts, and then act all surprised that it's too noisy?

    Oh, and could somebody clean up the poo their dog leaves behind. It's not funny.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  74. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the mistake, here, was putting up an "express your thoughts" board. They should have instead supplied an "express your thoughts" email address, or some other medium wherein expressed thoughts are not publicly visible.

    The obvious intent was to give the illusion of influence. It failed miserably due to high visibility.

    Everything else sounds pretty standard.

  75. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    Brazil is a favourite of mine. Been ages since I watched it, though--might have to do something about that sometime soon.

    If I didn't take my job seriously, I could deal with the office. I could go there 9-5 every day and go through the motions and likely get away with it indefinitely. And get almost nothing done, because I simply can't think when random people are constantly walking by and/or talking to each other or on the phone. I am simply very much more productive at home.

    My wife doesn't often work at home, but when she does, it's not usually a problem--she has her own desk, etc., in another room. Occasionally she's off work when I'm not--on those days I usually just resign myself to doing administrative busywork or whatever, as they tend not to be such great days for writing or coding. And I can't deny that it's sometimes nice to have her as a distraction.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  76. I purposely switched to a Unicomp by HBI · · Score: 1

    I have a jerkoff near me that is grunting and breathing like Darth Vader all day. Then you see him outside smoking like a chimney. So I brought in the keyboard and have been torturing him with it for months now.

    I also walk by his cube and release SBD farts as much as I can manage.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:I purposely switched to a Unicomp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that really improves the entire situation.

  77. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
    I remember watching Andy Grove promoting this at intel. Even the managers didn't have offices.

    Grove's office was an 8 by 9 ft (2.4 by 2.7 m) cubicle like the other employees, as he disliked separate "mahogany-paneled corner offices." He states, "I've been living in cubicles since 1978 — and it hasn't hurt a whole lot."[15] Preferring this egalitarian atmosphere, he thereby made his work area accessible to anyone who walked by. There were no reserved parking spaces, and Grove parked wherever there was a space.[14] This atmosphere at work was partly a reflection of his personal life. Some who have known him, such as venture capitalist Arthur Rock, have stated that "he has no airs." Grove has lived modestly without expensive cars or an airplane.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  78. Re: What kind of environment did the founders have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that original prototype would be completely unsuitable for today's requirements. It's easy to hack something together to show someone for VC money, but a little more difficult to make something that works in the real world and is scalable.

  79. Re:tell them that they can keep there job if they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I would like a room with a door. No walls is distracting"

    Like that?

  80. Re:tell them that they can keep there job if they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tell them that they can keep there job if they don't use the letter "E" in saying why they should keep it!

    OK.

    "I am amazing."

  81. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...water is wet.

  82. Re:This is why you can't use a good keyboard any m by lgw · · Score: 1

    People often don't realize how insanely annoying they are to others.

    The emerging standard in open plan offices is "wear headphones, idiot, it's noisy", with anything short of shouting being dismissed as your problem. Makes sense to me. You can't expect to constrain everyone around you.

    What really pisses me off is the lack of dignity (and privacy is a big part of dignity). The older you get (and the more oddball health issues you accumulate), the more this matters - to everyone around, not just you. I'd prefer to know much less than I do about my co-worker's colostomy bag, for example. Thanks, management.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  83. This just in... by Robert+Goatse · · Score: 1

    Water is wet and working in a cubicle farm sucks! Poor bastards. Been working remotely for 3+ years and there's no way in hell I would ever voluntarily go back to working in a germ infested office. The best part was a lady who used to clip her fingernails in an open office setting.

    1. Re:This just in... by Geeky · · Score: 1

      I've seen a guy clip his toenails in an open plan office. I kid you not.

      It's weird reading the US perspective though. In the UK, open plan has been the norm for as along as I can remember - and not cubes, just desks arranged in rows or squares.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  84. Super Loud Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A young programmer was hired at my client's office with whom I was obligated to share an office when I was on site. OMG, the young fellow had a fondness for the loudest damned keyboard switches manufactured this side of hell. He paired that immense annoyance with a naturally loud voice that sounded like Captain Kirk trying to over-annunciate before a thespian society fish fry.

  85. Re:This is why you can't use a good keyboard any m by losfromla · · Score: 1

    You're talking about the secretarial pool. They generally transcribed someone else's work, it didn't really require any thought at all. Data entry is not the same as creative work.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  86. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is because in the U.S. making an office with walls and a door is a "capital improvement" and is taxed. Making a cube farm is NOT a capital improvement, and is not taxed. Guess which one companies pick?

  87. Re:This is why you can't use a good keyboard any m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We do know how annoying we are. We don't care. We didn't ask for the stupid mess hall. You want to pay me six figures to fuck with my neighbor? I'm game. It's on purpose. That's why the office is open. So you all have to listen to everyone else. It's ON PURPOSE. Stop acting surprised, or like I am supposed to care. I do not care!

  88. How about radio over the intercom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last office job that I had played a local radio station over the PA system non-stop. The station's library could literally have been stored on an iPod Shuffle, I swear to god. It was an assault on your ability to concentrate.

    When November rolled around the the music changed to Christmas songs I had to quit to save what little sanity I had left.

  89. Many people use headphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife's office is filled with headphone wearing workers. How is this accounted for?

  90. Old Klingon Proverb by Scarletdown · · Score: 3, Funny

    There is an old Klingon proverb.

    Silence is golden. Duct tape is silver.

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  91. Re:tell them that they can keep there job if they by Zeromous · · Score: 1

    You can't find anybody this willing for such low cost?

    --
    ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
  92. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by dbIII · · Score: 1

    No problem, just pile up old gear and boxes high enough and you get your wall back.

  93. Re:This is why you can't use a good keyboard any m by dbIII · · Score: 1

    They do go halfway to being as noisy as a mechanical typewriter so I get the prima donna's point even though I like the things. I have one in a server room and one at home, but wouldn't inflict it on my co-workers at close range.
    I blame both the office layout and suspect the person who complained is too young to have heard a typewriter.

  94. Re:This is why you can't use a good keyboard any m by dbIII · · Score: 1

    One day when working late I'd pour epoxy all over the keyboard

    A lot of Model M's would survive that. The mechanism is underneath to avoid spill damage and keycaps are on top of the keys.

  95. Re: The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2

    I've worked in all three common styles: office, open and cube. I'd take a cubicle over the open plan any day of the week. I'd LOVE a cubicle. I had plenty of personal desk space, a place to put my things and hang my coat, and just enough privacy to get work done if I needed to concentrate. Cubicles are amazing.

    Offices are better, no doubt. They're everything a cubicle is and more. But the open floor plan is so fucking bad that cubicles seem like luxury by comparison. Given that there are realistically only two optionsâ"virtually no company is going to build offices for everyoneâ"you bet that cubicles are "popular". The open plan is a blight; the only people that like it are penny pinchers and people that think that constant interruptions are the same thing as collaboration.

  96. Re:This is why you can't use a good keyboard any m by swalve · · Score: 1

    People like that WANT to be heard. This is the guy the rest of them are IMing about. "He just stares at us until he decides we have time to answer his stupid questions."

  97. Headphone leakage is my #1 pet peeve by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    What grinds my gears? People with headphones that leak sound. "Waaah I have headphones, why do you bother me?" "Because they're open.. because you play way too loud."

    Open radios are even worse. The one guy that just has to force his music on the entire group of workers.

    The antidote? Absolutely nerdy AKG K271S headphones. Sealed, I don't hear them, they don't hear me, and they look like something a WWII tank commander would wear. I bought them for the sound quality and isolation. Ruler-flat response and ruthlessly honest.

    I've not worked in an open office since 1999, but I have no love for them. I'm actually a bit confused by their re-emergence. There's a happy medium and some companies have found it. I wish more did.

    I got those AKGs a decade ago. Best office well-being purchase I ever made. Back then they were Made in Austria.. today they're Made in China... after Harman Kardon bought AGK. I have a MIC pair.. they sound just as nice. I have them at home, so I don't have to listen to the neighbor across the street blast his music while I'm trying to enjoy a book, a cigar, and a whisky.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  98. Noise by ledow · · Score: 1

    Noise isn't a problem. It's unpredictable noise or unwanted noise that's a problem. Or noise that cannot be controlled.

    In IT, working in a deathly silent office is bugging. I need the background of fans spinning to "feel right", but I don't think it needs to be loud, or even immediately audible. And anything beeping will drive me to distraction as my brain is tuned to find that beeping thing and fix whatever the problem is.

    But a tap dripping? Or headphones tizzing? Or someone tapping their foot or banging a door? Even a mouse clicking? That drives me mad. That's why the background hum is good - it washes them all out.

    I work in an office with a technician. He's young, keen, not used to workplaces with lots of other young people.

    We have a "swear jar" of sorts. It's for when he hums, whistles or breaks into song. Playing music, I've told him, is right out. Like others, I've worked in places with fed-in music and it drives me insane. I spent a year in an IT office with a badly-tuned radio locked to BBC Radio 1 and it drove me mad.

    I work in schools, so some weeks/months of the year there is nobody around. All my speaker-sets go missing as the office and teaching staff use them to take advantage of the empty offices by having their music up louder than they'd ever be allowed while others are around.

    Run an after-school event and all the kids want to plug themselves in while they work. I'm sure that's good for them but the noise leakage from their tiny in-ear things is immensely annoying and often means it's banned even through headphones (not just by me). Even on the school PC's, no apps, games or anything else that makes a sound and internal speakers are switched off - when you have 20 PCs in a room, that's just a cacophony of nightmares.

    It's a matter of courtesy. Even if you NEED sound to concentrate, you need to understand that others NEED silence. If you can find a way to have your sound without interfering with their silence, they won't have a problem with you. But blanking out sound is immensely harder than drowning out silence. and there's a fascination with having music so loud that everyone can hear, even out of sound-insulating headphones. That's just unnecessary and rude.

    And when you get into singing along, humming, drumming, tapping or anything else, I will break your fingers and shove them down your oesophagus. That's not necessary at all and does nothing but inflict your sounds on others that have already chosen not to listen to your music.

    I own a couple of sets of headphones. At a reasonable price, set to a reasonable volume, you literally can't hear a thing from outside them. And I couldn't hear a thing outside when wearing them. So it's not impossible to cater for such tastes. But people don't do it. The problem is that there's no earplug or set of headphones that can provide silence in such a situation. The closest you get is bassy tinnitus coupled with heartbeat, blood-rush, swim-ear sounds, with the background slightly muted in the background.

    So when you're on your own, out of earshot, do what you like. When there are others around who don't like sound you need to get a decent set of headphones and keep it to yourself. I know that means restraint in your personal tastes, but you also have to stop picking your nose, scratching your feet, farting, undressing, and all the other distasteful habits at that point too.

    I will make one exception: With babies around, you should not be asked to be silent for them to sleep. All you're doing is breeding people like me who can't relax in silence by doing that. And a baby will sleep through ANYTHING. Babies will fall asleep outside in a noisy shopping centre, at a party, with a movie blaring, etc. *Sudden* noise might wake them but that's only more sudden and scary against the silent background than if you just all talked normally over the sleeping child and someone sneezed or whatever.

    And if a baby wakes, it wakes. Nobody INTENDS to wake them. That's m

  99. Re: The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet you ignore your wife just fine when you're playing league of legends.... Funny how that works.

  100. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the past, there were problems with the closed wall office arrangements where different teams had their own rooms. Some employees and managers would see it as "a perk" to have the seniority/freedom/permission to be able to wander over to other teams and "talk with the tech leads". Some managers would position their desk right next to the main entrance door to see exactly when someone had arrived late, was leaving early or had spent too much time at Subway for lunch. Other managers would have everyone have their desks face the walls in the room while they sat next to the door with their desk facing everyone else's screens. Sometimes the management structure would end up arranged around the layout of the building; one team per room.

    Having an open plan office means that there's none of these domination games. The downside is that trying to work is like the VR version of Dreadhalls with random assorted noises; doors slamming, maniacal laughter when someone is on the phone, file cabinets being slammed closed, transport trolleys being rolled up and down the corridors, employees slurping on their lunch, mobile phones ringing (one person has a small bell chime whenever they receive an SMS).
    I once had a room right next to a stairwell. At lunchtime it was like being in a shooting range as the firedoor kept slamming as people came to and from lunch. At peak time the door was being opened every 10 seconds. It became a seniority game to get a corner office, while those with least seniority got a room with no windows (much like rooms on a ferry or cruise liner). The worst is when people have a group conference right in front or behind your desk. Then they are bobbling right in front of your upper peripheral vision and sounding like a radio show you can't turn off.

  101. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or, my favorite: conference call on speakerphone with the door open

    Thankfully my boss doesn't use speakerphone. Unfortunately the reason may be that he doesn't understand how a phone works. No, it's not two cans connected with a piece of string, and no, you don't need to speak louder when you're talking to someone in a different city.

  102. Re: What kind of environment did the founders have by NotAPK · · Score: 1

    "but a little more difficult to make something that works in the real world and is scalable."

    Not really, you just have to know what you are doing.

  103. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by NotAPK · · Score: 1

    "We just moved to an open plan office"

    Hot desk? I've not done it myself, but it sounds absolutely awful.

  104. Re:This is why you can't use a good keyboard any m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The emerging standard in open plan offices is "wear headphones, idiot, it's noisy", with anything short of shouting being dismissed as your problem. Makes sense to me. You can't expect to constrain everyone around you.

    Except for the most expensive, noise cancelling headphones, headphones don't keep out the noise. The only thing you can do is turn up your own "noise" (aka. music) louder than the outside noise, making it even harder to concentrate.

  105. Re:This is why you can't use a good keyboard any m by rastos1 · · Score: 1

    Really, my worst annoyance there was developers using IM to communicate, when we were in eight cubicles all together, just a few steps from each other.

    IM has advantage of keeping a written record. I don't have to go back to my colleague to ask the same thing again. I look it up in the IM logs. If IM is bothering you, turn off notifications. Or go offline.

  106. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So yeah, I'm sitting in an office that is pretty much one huge room, and this place is considered "cool". No dividers, just desks. Everyone uses laptops which are locked away in safes at night. I don't like the layout and the noise and feel there isn't enough privacy though.

  107. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Cubes aren't inherently bad. I have been in offices which use cubes which have been lovely and I have been in offices which use cubes which have been shitty and the difference is very simple: did they choose cubes for flexible plan seating, or did they choose cubes because they couldn't afford walls? If the latter, they use short, cheap cube walls that do little to nothing to block noise and which everyone can trivially "groundhog" over. If the former, then they have 8' tall, sound-deadening cube walls. They can actually make your cube quieter than an office, if the ceiling is also sufficiently sound-deadening. I used to work at Silicon Engineering and I knew someone who worked for Parallel Computing. We had the cheap short shit cubes. They had the big tall plush cubes. Not only are they better for workers, but they actually look more professional.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  108. Re:This is why you can't use a good keyboard any m by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    You seriously use a keyboard like that in an open office? Speaking of prima donna ... I heard there's someone upset by the type of keyboard they're using now.

    On a squishy keyboard I type about 80-90 WPM at about 99% accuracy, a little less. On a hard clicky keyboard I type 90-100 WPM at a little more than 99%. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the difference is larger for some other people — I have big, fat, strong hands because I occasionally do shit more strenuous than typing or wanking, and because I'm a super mutant.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  109. Re: What kind of environment did the founders have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I worked at Intel, I had a private office, as did everyone else in that building. Apparently the structure of the building did not allow for the walls to be removed. :)

  110. Re:This is why you can't use a good keyboard any m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be fair the unicomp is about as loud as a keyboard gets - you could always get a cherry mx brown and have all the tactility with less noise.

    +1

  111. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by houghi · · Score: 1

    I found the middleground to be the most ideal. Open, but with a limited amount of people. So one room per team or department, depending on the size. And that with an absolute maximum of 15-20 peeople per team/department. Cut in half if larger.

    Some places I have worked had done this and it is fun to see the differences in place to place. Some or quiet that it looks as somebody died. And that is each day. Other departments sound as if there is a party going on each day with all the noise. And each is happy how they are and would not like to be like the other teams.

    People will be selected not only on their skill, but also on the ability to fit in the group. I have seen a person coming in for one job and got offered a different one, because that person would fit in better in that group. Putting the person in the wrong group would mean a disaster for both the group and the new employee.

    And yes, there will be some people who are better working alone. Then perhaps the specific company is not for you. I have said no to job offers because of the group not being in what I am as a person.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  112. OPne plan offices suck ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Open plan office were designed by clueless bean counting managers trying to save money, not by intelligent people who actually need to get work done. Productivity will be cut by at least 50% in an open plan office.

  113. Military conditioning to screen distraction by Latent+Heat · · Score: 2

    Admittedly there are military environments where frequent, loud, startling sounds serve some operational purpose. An engineer working as a civilian contractor described a restless night spent underneath the catapult deck on the Ranger. Launching and recovering aircraft is part of the military mission in our nation's defense preparedness.

    On the other hand, I read on Foxtrot Alpha that keeping things quiet is part of the culture onboard submarines. It is part of the military mission of reducing the probability of being detected by adversaries using passive sonar. Also, given the insane 18-hour days of 6 hours on watch or duty station, 6 hours personal time, 6 hours rack time (shared in a "hot racking" scheme), making loud sounds quickly earns the wrath of your superior and the resentment of your comrades.

    In PBS Nova describing the contractor competition leading to the Joint Strike Fighter, the areas where the engineers worked appeared to be open-plan office arrangements without much solitude. Where the avionics software was developed was a "cube farm", yes, but it had subdued lighting and the office space had the "vibe" that a culture of keeping the noise levels down to foster concentration was the norm.

    I have no idea regarding the work environment in the Combat Information Center of a surface combat Navy ship, but if I were engineering one or commanding one, I would put a premium on minimum aural distraction. Would the same apply to sonar operators?

    With respect to persons in the military being conditioned to "screen out" distractions and focus on their duty station, I suppose there is a place for that. But would you want a Special Forces operative on night patrol in the habit of disregarding distracting sounds? I would think you would want people with acute hearing who are hyper-sensitive to sounds, say of an enemy sentry screened by cover pulling back a rifle bolt.

    As to learning to focus on one's task, that applies to the original posting and the question of whether door slams, coughing, loud conversation, background music that you don't control merits any concern by management having an interest in the productivity of their workers, especially those in engineering or coding or other tasks requiring a flow between short-term and long-term memory?

    As to my complaining ways that I need to reform, I was observing that an arm of the Federal government thought to provide a remarkably quiet environment for persons providing volunteer service in reviewing grand proposals whereas an arm of a State government thinks it no big deal that the persons they are paying to write grand proposals to bring critical funding in are working in a boiler factory? Sometimes the Federal government is much more enlightened than the state-level rubes.

    1. Re:Military conditioning to screen distraction by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      > Where the avionics software was developed was a "cube farm",

      That would be the avionics on an aircraft where the software's so crashy that only 1 out of 6 was able to startup, get to the end of the runway and actually fly?

      Not a good advert for cube farms, even if they have nice lighting.

  114. Re: The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    I've worked in all three too (plus labs). Cubicles are only "amazing" when compared to open offices. Really, they're tolerable, and not bad at all if you're in a group that's quiet AND you're allowed to have "do not disturb" signs to prevent interruptions AND your group isn't next to some noisy group. I had that setup once (plus my cube was next to a window) and looking back, now I think of it as luxurious, even though at the time it was merely OK (but a big step up from my previous cube at the same company where I was seated next to some loudmouth asshole who was on the phone all the time, plus I had a big pole in the middle of my cubicle there).

    Offices are the best setup. People who advocate for open offices should, IMO, be lined up and shot for the good of society. I'm not kidding about this; the amount of sheer misery caused by these people is incalculable.

  115. Bodily noises? The problem was motormouths! by lduvall · · Score: 1

    I worked in a cubical environment where the bodily noises were people motormouthing - chatting to each other from their desks as if there were no semi-partitions. Just crank up the volume if they had problems hearing each other. Or talking loudly on the phone, or using speaker phones. Or 4 or more people 'grabassin' about their weekend. When I complained to one "colleague" I was informed that the person would NOT keep it down. A reorganization (reduction in cubical size) resulted in us being separated to different locations. The BIG BOSS who supervised the space allocation always had a big, very private office.

  116. So true by slipped_bit · · Score: 1

    As I read this my officemate is very noisily chopping up a salad. I didn't even know someone could be that loud preparing a salad.

  117. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    > HR says it's because millennials like it and all the "cool" tech companies have them

    Between the popularity of cubes, hillary, metrosexual beards, bicycles and apple products, fucking milennials have got a lot to answer for.

  118. Re:This is why you can't use a good keyboard any m by lgw · · Score: 1

    There are whole genres of music designed to enable concentration rather than distracting.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  119. Re: What kind of environment did the founders have by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    "It's easy to hack something together to show someone for VC money"

    No you moron it isn't easy. You have to come up with the idea first. You know, the one that is going to catch on like wildfire unlike all the other lame ones. Yeah. Incredibly easy.

    The rest is just good execution, which is a routine set of well known procedures and some mildly inspiring leadership.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  120. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    I've been able to tune out everything whilst concentrating on books or other stuff since I was very young and still can at age 50

    I cannot stand open plan offices or cube farms. They're a productivity and creativity killer.

  121. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by networkBoy · · Score: 1

    Fortunately not hot desking... yet.
    Good news is the COO and dept managers gave up their offices to join staff in open plan, converting their offices into conference rooms. I'll give them credit for walking the talk.

    Still not thrilled with the idea though.

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  122. Tom Clancy's take on software development by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    Tom Clancy admittedly made a lot of stuff up, but he was a mil-geek who addressed concerns as yours in both his fiction and non-fiction books.

    The AMRAAM (advanced medium-range air-to-air missile) was largely a software product, that is, it counted on thousands of lines of Ada code to make it something else than a gravity bomb. Owing to the difficulty inherent in any ambitious large-scale software project, the AMRAAM received a lot of hate for a very long time as being a "boondoggle."

    It took a very long time for that software to be corrected of its shortcomings, but once the software "got well" in Clancy's words, the AMRAAM became a very potent weapon indeed. Buggy avionics software is nearly worthless, but once you correct the bugs, this boondoggle suddenly switches state to being the most capable weapon in our inventory.

    Quoting from interviews, the pilots who used the AMRAAM in combat were amazed with its deadliness. Giving this weapon the nickname "Slammer", a pilot is quoted that fighting adversaries with it is akin to an unsportsmanlike hunting practice, comparing it to "clubbing baby seals. Whomp, whomp, WHOMP!"

    It's easy to take pot shots at the F-35 at this state of its development and deployment. Clancy had suggested that weapons with high software content are like that. Once critical bugs are eliminated, people may have an entirely different view.

    1. Re:Tom Clancy's take on software development by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      Apart from the F35's woeful state of _software_ development, the hardware isn't in much better state and the overall design has been so hopelessly compromised by conflicting demands that it's outclassed by just about every other aircraft it will run up against. In particular its missile evasion relies almost entirely on stealth, which it only possesses in a front-on aspect.

      Don't forget that it was designed and intended to be used in situations where all enemy airpower has been neutralised or rendered ineffective by the F22 and the remaining threats are lower tech.

      The F35 is an air-support weapon. It was _never_ intended to be an air superiority fighter. Going up against aircraft which are designed for that task, operated by an enemy whose ground-detection equipment hasn't been wiped out will be a fairly short encounter and not in the F35's favour.

      The problem is that it's now being pitched to internationally as an air superiority fighter. Once the insurmountable shortcomings in that role become apparent, most client airforces will simply cancel their orders and buy something else.

      The cost of building, flying and maintaining this aircraft is so high that all most enemies need to do is simply let the US continue to do so and let it bankrupt itself. The country is already spending so much of its GDP on military expenditure that it's suffering from hopelessly compromised infrastructure due to lack of maintenance (Think: Brazil - the film) and has further weakened its education to maintain the military spend. This, coupled with rampant and increasingly blatant state-level corruption is likely to lead to an economic collapse which will make 2008 look minor.

      And that's quite apart from how bad things could get if an oversized Chucky doll operated by the tribble sitting on its head manages to get to the top office.

      The F35 is likely to spend its days as an electronics truck, flying comms platform (if they can solve the cooling problems) supporting other aircraft and growler, despite its stupidly high fuel consumption, simply to have a justification to keep it. The program is so deeply embedded into military budgets that unlike the similarly disasterous F111B, it can't easily be cancelled - bringing up that whilst the hardware and design lessons from the F111B brought forth the F14 and F15, the political ones brought forth plans to ensure your program can't be killed.

      The F35 is widely known as "The plane which could eat the pentagon" and at the current rate of events that is likely to happen.

      Remember that one of their fundamental weak points of the Nazis and the thing which caused their ultimate wartime failure was undue concentration on higher technology and "better weapons", where the cost of those things was so high that their numbers were hopelessly limited and in any case critically dependent on vulnerable supply chains.

      I point you to http://www.mayofamily.com/RLM/...

  123. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by all_aspects · · Score: 1

    I was on a large software team using TSP when the company decided to move us to a new building with an open office environment. They cited gains from "collaboration" as the reason.

    I later reviewed our TSP data and found that we had a 32% decrease in productivity after the move, which never recovered. At the time, half of our team members were located in a different state and did not go through a similar move. Those team members did not see any decrease in productivity over that time period, so it can't be blamed on team workload or seasonal fluctuations.

    This translates to millions of dollars in lost productivity over just one year, let alone the potential losses of delayed products. Not to mention the absolute misery of attempting to work in such an environment.

    It still baffles and frustrates me to no end that managers insist on doing things like this after seeing such conclusive data.

  124. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by NotAPK · · Score: 1

    "Good news is the COO and dept managers gave up their offices to join staff in open plan,"

    I'm being cynical, but due to the nature of their work, managers are not affected as much by the open plan office. Such schemes hit those who have to think and concentrate on one task all day long. A manager is often talking to people or in meetings. The very nature of their job involves talking to people pretty much all day long, unless they are preparing reports for the board or their superiors. As a result, I would argue that their presence in the bull pit is pretty much a token gesture.

  125. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by Miguelito · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised they didn't go over the legally allowed limit due to fire regulations packing in people that tightly.

    --
    - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
  126. Re:The popularity of open offices has exacerbated by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

    My employer is going this direction at the HQ location. A post above describes a bay area, but doesn't say which one. I suspect it's the same. If I had to regularly work there I just couldn't do it. Too much stimulus. But between a combination of layoffs and lots of people working at home anyway, I've yet to see the floor my team currently occupies more than 25% occupied on a given day. So I guess I could understand density and minimal furniture given a low duty cycle, but the weird thing is that the clumps of desks are spaced fairly widely, for an agglutinated cells kind of effect. With each team given a dedicated scrum room that's used what, 15 minutes per day? Except that the acoustics are so bad that my team doesn't even use ours. There are also randomly placed clusters of elevated counters that are rarely used and filing cabinets that are *never* used, so the ammortized of floor space dedicated per employee is actually larger than some places I've been that had real offices with walls. I'm not sure if it's the limited number of people there, acoustic deadening, or what, but the place is actually preternaturally quiet, which is kind of spooky. I've been told that it's because it's cheaper than cubes, but then every desk is adjustable height, which sure can't be cheap. Contrast with our local office. Weird boomerang-shaped semi-cubicles. One jackass I fortunately no longer have to work with has a diploma-mill foreign-government-purchased PhD in an unrelated field which reinforces his narcissism. Despite the ubiquitous use of headsets he shouts on every call, and our company is call/meeting obsessed. It's so bad that I gave up going in at all because Stentor made it impossible for me to concentrate or be on any call, especially one that he was one because I'd hear him directly, then again with a half second reverb as his voice propagated digitally. I've been fortunate to telecommute for a number of years, and before that I was almost exclusively in places with single or dual offices. Given my personal sensory issues, I couldn't handle a work environment like this and dread a job change that would force me into one. When I left my previous employer I turned down one offer in part because I would have been expected to fight traffic every day to sit at a desk cluster not 8 feet from the main door into the suite. There was just no fscking way.

  127. Re:This is why you can't use a good keyboard any m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And then it becomes a problem because as soon as you put headphones in, people want to talk to you and not just e-mail or IM you. You literally can't win in this type of environment.