Slashdot Mirror


FBI: Review of New Emails Doesn't Change Conclusion on Clinton (cnn.com)

FBI director James Comey told Congress Sunday that the new scrutiny of emails related to Hillary Clinton has turned up nothing that would cause the bureau to recommend charges against her. The conclusion comes nine days after rocking the presidential race with word that a new trove of emails had been discovered. "During that process, we have reviewed all of the communications that were to or from Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of State," Comey wrote. "Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July with respect to Secretary Clinton." From a report on CNN:"We were always confident nothing would cause the July decision to be revisited. Now Director Comey has confirmed it," tweeted Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon. Comey's last-minute announcement gives Clinton an opportunity for an I-told-you-so moment -- but it's unlikely to undo the political damage of his initial announcement. Trump and his allies have seized on that announcement, using it claim Clinton is likely to face criminal charges. "If she were to win, it would create an unprecedented constitutional crisis," Trump claimed Saturday night in Reno, Nevada. "In that situation we could very well have a sitting president under felony indictment and ultimately a criminal trial. It would grind government to a halt." The political benefit for Trump has been that Republicans who'd been skeptical of their party's nominee have largely followed vice presidential nominee Mike Pence's calls to "come home" to the party -- finding Trump less objectionable than Clinton.

21 of 733 comments (clear)

  1. 650k emails in 9 days by Crashmarik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's pretty damn impressive.

    1. Re:650k emails in 9 days by kqs · · Score: 5, Funny

      Once they built a filter for Weiner's dick pics, the remaining 37 emails were pretty easy to get through.

  2. Re: Of course by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Informative

    You mean like Trump's foundation illegally paid Trump's legal bills, his personal bills and was used as he and his daughter's personal piggy bank?

    Perhaps Trump should explain why the New York State Attorney General ordered his foundation to cease operations in New York because of its illegal activities.

    Not to mention the "donation" the foundation gave to the Florida State Attorney General's campaign, also illegal, which oddly made the state's investigation of Trump's fraudulent University mysteriously go away.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  3. Re:No constitutional crisis at all. by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Something I don't get: vetting content sent TO her should not be her job. There should be professional scrubbers doing that kind of work. I've worked in many orgs, and executives aren't expected to be doing that kind of "grunt" work. It goes to cubicle peons, like me.

    Also, her home server is not necessarily more or less safer than the regular office email. In fact, the regular S.D. email server was hacked. (There is a separate message system for classified content, but it's not technically "email". It's a diff animal.) The home-vs-office dichotomy seems moot, at least as far as handling classified info*. Putting it on the wrong office box versus the wrong personal box seems the same sin to me.

    * She didn't get "official" approval to use a home server, and also didn't follow the proper rules for archiving. But that's diff than the classified info issue.

  4. Are you mental? by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Rock it on Tuesday, Hill! Slashdot is with You!

    You are clearly reading a different slashdot than I am, in order to come to that conclusion. Slashdot has leaned hard-right for years (often under the pretend claim of "libertarianism"). More slashdot users will vote for Trump than Hillary, and quite likely more will abstain from voting altogether (due to Trump being not conservative enough) than will vote for her as well.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Are you mental? by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is a poll here on slashdot right now that shows that the readers are hardcore liberals.

      First of all, the poll doesn't mean shit. You get a much better idea of the composition of slashdot readers by actually reading their comments - and looking at the articles that make the front page.

      Second, hardcore liberals are nearly universally disappointed with Hillary. Hardcore liberals either supported Bernie and will hold their nose while voting for Hillary, or are supporting Jill Stein. There is nothing hardcore liberal about Hillary.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    2. Re:Are you mental? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The current poll on the front page has a pretty solid 8% lead for Clinton. I think it's just that the Trump supporters are better organised, modding each other up and doing a good job of reposting the current set of taking points.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  5. Comey by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Everyone told me Comey was irresponsible and wasn't worth listening to last week. Why should we care what he says now?

  6. Re: Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No. Clinton directed her maid to print unclassified emails that were retroactively classified years later.
    But that doesn't get yer juices flowing like yet another conspiracy, so carry on!
    Trump that Bitch!
    Lock Her Up!
    Hillary for Prison!

  7. Proudly on the road to gridlock by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The GOP will ensure that no matter the composition of the house and senate after this week, nothing will be allowed to progress under President Clinton. No supreme court vacancies will be filled, and no bills that have the least bit of "liberalism" in them will ever make it to the white house. There is a growing number of elected GOP politicians promising to start impeachment on her ASAP as well.

    It appears we would have been better off electing a Ficus Tree instead, it would have operated on a much smaller budget.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Proudly on the road to gridlock by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Then our only choice for moving forward is to take away the GOP's majority in both houses of congress.

      It is totally unacceptable for one party to simply choose to "negate" the results of elections that they do not like, and we've already had significant damage done to the credibility of our government, economy, and currency because of it, and another 2-8 years of gridlock would be a huge (yuuuuuuuuuuge) mistake.

      --
      Who did what now?
    2. Re:Proudly on the road to gridlock by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, single party rule worked out OK for the Chinese, lets do it! End the Republican Party!

      We already have de facto single-party rule, so long as one of the two parties consistently refuses to participate anything resembling the running of the government.

      Let's restore two-party rule by replacing the Republican Party with a functional one. Libertarians, you're up.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  8. Re:Could be a grinder presidency by hambone142 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Health issues could also arise with her again. Perhaps Kaine would be a better President anyway.

    No matter who wins on Tuesday, we will all lose.

    Our Presidential selection really doesn't select the best people. It selects power hungry miscreants.

  9. Re: Of course by russotto · · Score: 4, Informative

    No. Clinton directed her maid to print unclassified emails that were retroactively classified years later.

    Also she had her uncleared maid picking up secure faxes from the SCIF in her residence. Ain't no excuses for that one.

  10. Re:Of course by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Informative

    Of course nothing changes. Comey's conclusions in July still stand: Clinton repeated many lies during her remarks to the public and before congress. She destroyed evidence under subpoena. She casually handled classified information on a home computer and passed it around to non-cleared staff. She failed to turn over thousands of work-related emails despite lying and saying that she and/or her lawyers had read every single one of them to err on the side of over-providing ... and on and on.

    He's not changing the fact that he said anyone else doing what she did would face serious consequences, and that different treatment applied to her. He's not changing the fact that the FBI spent more time interviewing Brad Pitt about his argument with his son on an airplane than they spent interviewing Hillary Clinton ... and she got to have her immunity-deal-getting staff WITH her in that drive-by interview which was conducted not under oath and no recordings allowed. During which, she pretended to be so dumb, uninformed, and forgetful that she managed to avoid answering pretty much any question that would have demonstrated her obvious guilt. Guilt for doing things that would see any one of her State Department underlings out of a job and possible out of liberty from jail.

    Yup, nothing has changed since July. Same corruption and the lasting pressure from the Clinton political machine through Obama down to Loretta Lynch's office. No change at all.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  11. Re:Terrified of Crimina Corruption in the Whitehou by s.petry · · Score: 4, Informative

    I should have added a few facts to back my assertions. Whitewater led to 15 Felony convictions, so this is not merely speculation or allegation. Bill Clinton settled out of court with Paula Jones for 850,000.00, again not speculation or allegation. Chinagate ended with an award of 900,000 to Judicial Watch and people fleeing the country to avoid prosecution. Clinton later pardoned Marc Rich who is the person who fled prosecution. Again, not speculation or allegation.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  12. Re:No constitutional crisis at all. by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Kristian Saucier went to jail for much less than that: taking selfies in a restricted area. Didn't even send them to anyone.

    I'm sympathetic to arguments that classified rules are too strict, but Hillary shouldn't get special treatment. Elites getting special treatment is how we get unfair rules in the first place.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  13. Re: Of course by Kohath · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hillary didn't know what a fax was. She thought it was a wax paper dispenser. She needed wax paper to make a gingerbread house for the neighbor kids. She's absolutely, 100 percent not guilty. You people should just stop investigating her.

  14. Re:Terrified of Crimina Corruption in the Whitehou by kqs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've never been convicted of any crime. Therefore, by your logic, I'm a more powerful criminal than Al Capone?

    I think that you believe that Hillary has not been convicted because she's bought all of the investigations. But among her opponents are very powerful Republican politicians. Not just one or two, but all of them. Some of her opponents are also billionaires. She and Bill are certainly not poor, but they cannot play in the same leagues as the Koch Bros and Sheldon Adelson (and supposedly Mr Trump). Maybe add the Russian intelligence agencies to that list of enemies. And her opponents have been coming after her for decades, and have so far proved that Bill gets blowjobs and Hillary is not competent at email security. Rather underwhelming.

    Look, Hillary and Bill are powerful people, and they have some rich friends, but nobody is that invulnerable. Al Capone just had a few government agents who had to work within the rules against him; Hillary has half of the most powerful people in the USA (and many outside of the USA) gunning for her. If she was guilty, there would be proof. Instead, all we get is Wikileaks about, um, black magic or something equally moronic.

  15. Re:And I left out #spiritcooking which is just cre by yuriklastalov · · Score: 4, Insightful

    RWNJ stands for Right Wing Nut Job, and is a left wing smear against anyone who questions the glorious leftist narrative.

    Incidentally, due in large part to the growing ubiquity of leftist views in America, a sort of Left Wing Nut Job archetype has been taking shape. These are your basic "Trump is a Russian plant", "Biological sex is a myth", or "Hillary is the victim of a vast right wing conspiracy" type of people.

    Really, the alt-right and progressives (AKA alt-left) are essentially the same sorts of people but with different ideological backgrounds. They both clamor for utopian fantasies, berate detractors with hateful insults and rhetoric, and generally wrap themselves up in worldviews that assume everyone on the other side is some combination of evil, stupid, or insane.

    Both sides are incredibly toxic and are, in my opinion, regrettable side effects of the rise of internet culture and the ease with which it allows the creation of unassailable safe-space echo chambers where circlejerks and groupthink are the entire point.

  16. Re:What about her maid? by quantaman · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm familiar with all of those cases, and they all contain one, if not two, critical elements that Clinton's lacks.

    1) They all knew the information was classified when they mishandled it.

    2) In most of the cases they shared either that information with someone they knew to be unauthorized, or looked like they were going to.

    --
    I stole this Sig