Slashdot Mirror


San Francisco's 58-Story Millennium Tower Seen Sinking From Space (sfgate.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from SFGate: Engineers in San Francisco have tunneled underground to try and understand the sinking of the 58-story Millennium Tower. Now comes an analysis from space. The European Space Agency has released detailed data from satellite imagery that shows the skyscraper in San Francisco's financial district is continuing to sink at a steady rate -- and perhaps faster than previously known. The luxury high-rise that opened its doors in 2009 has been dubbed the Leaning Tower of San Francisco. It has sunk about 16 inches into landfill and is tilting several inches to the northwest. Engineers have estimated the building is sinking at a rate of about 1-inch per year. The Sentinel-1 twin satellites show almost double that rate based on data collected from April 2015 to September 2016. The satellite data shows the Millennium Tower sunk 40 to 45 millimeters -- or 1.6 to 1.8 inches -- over a recent one-year period and almost double that amount -- 70 to 75 mm (2.6 to 2.9 inches) -- over its 17-month observation period, said Petar Marinkovic, founder and chief scientist of PPO Labs which analyzed the satellite's radar imagery for the ESA along with Norway-based research institute Norut. The Sentinel-1 study is not focused on the Millennium Tower but is part of a larger mission by the European Space Agency tracking urban ground movement around the world, and particularly subsidence "hotspots" in Europe, said Pierre Potin, Sentinel-1 mission manager for the ESA. The ESA decided to conduct regular observations of the San Francisco Bay Area, including the Hayward Fault, since it is prone to tectonic movement and earthquakes, said Potin, who is based in Italy. Data from the satellite, which is orbiting about 400 miles (700 kilometers) from the earth's surface, was recorded every 24 days. The building's developer, Millennium Partners, insists the building is safe for occupancy and could withstand an earthquake.

242 comments

  1. Pisa tower by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1, Funny

    The new Pisa tower.

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
    1. Re:Pisa tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's what TFA said:

      Leaning Tower of San Francisco

    2. Re: Pisa tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh that's what they meant by that, thanks!

    3. Re:Pisa tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      millennium tower renamed to landfill basement apartments.

    4. Re:Pisa tower by PingSpike · · Score: 2

      It is a pisa something that's for sure.

    5. Re:Pisa tower by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

      "When I first came here, this was all a landfill. Everyone said I was daft to build a tower on a landfill, but I built it all the same, just to show them. ..."

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    6. Re:Pisa tower by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "It sank into the landfill. So I built a second one."

    7. Re:Pisa tower by crunchy_one · · Score: 1

      Pizza. Burn the roof of your mouth cheesy goodness.

    8. Re:Pisa tower by chrisshaw · · Score: 3, Funny

      That burned down, fell over, then sank into the landfill.

    9. Re:Pisa tower by sinij · · Score: 2

      But the fourth one stayed up. An' that's what your gonna get, lad -- the strongest tower in these islands.

    10. Re:Pisa tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? The curtains?

    11. Re:Pisa tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I just want to sink!

    12. Re:Pisa tower by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      As long as you get those huuuuuge - tracts of land.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    13. Re:Pisa tower by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      I'll probably never get to Italy but this new leaning tower is close by. Maybe go to top of building and take a selfie before it become uninhabitable. I wonder who will find a solution (can't ignore it forever), if they do I'm sure ASCE will present them with a spiffy award (and give them a free meal and free parking close by at their annual banquet).

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    14. Re:Pisa tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like crunchy_one is part of Pizza Gate. /s

    15. Re:Pisa tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, when you build a tower on a pile of shit, or in San Francisco...but I repeat myself.

  2. Define Conundrum by Joviex · · Score: 2, Funny

    Happy or sad that is was not a Trump Tower?

    1. Re:Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Conundrumpf?

    2. Re:Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure idiot, go ahead and pat yourself on the back for destroying America and letting Russia get the last laugh, but don't say you weren't warned as you're lined up against the wall by goons wearing 'TT'.

    3. Re: Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump promised jobs, a halt to globalization, a renewed focus on building America instead of pouring money into overseas wars that have nothing to do with defending the US. Hillary promised... well, that she was a woman. Jobs vs identity politics. Jobs won the tust belt electoral states.

    4. Re: Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he will deliver 0% of that, and won't even try. He sold himself and America to the Russians.

    5. Re: Define Conundrum by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well he just named a Goldman Sachs guy as Treasury Secretary. But yeah, Goldman Sachs is known for creating jobs and is anti-globalization. He is gonna be getting you a jerb REAL SOON now.

    6. Re: Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump doesn't have the power to do any of the things he claimed he would. He can't unilaterally and arbitrarily imprison people, deport them without cause, tear up international agreements related to military alliance, trade, or anything else. He can't just have a hissy fit on twitter like a 16-year old girl and assume he can possibly 'gets his way'.

    7. Re:Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      And already delivered on promise to stop Carrier from moving 1000 jobs to Mexico, he isn't even president yet.

      So, I'm going to have to go with concrete results over name calling and hate speech from you.

    8. Re:Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So a fantasy credit for an unrelated decision by management after Trump did nothing? Nice.

    9. Re: Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evidence?

      None.

      Just your worthless opinion.

      Come back in 8 years and I'll apologize if you were right.

      YOU have no evidence or facts of any kind, just YOUR worthless, lying opinion where you have what you blamed on Hillary backwards. TRUMP pushed divisive identity politics and conned you conservative rubes good, and will deliver on nothing he's promised.

      You won't have to wait 8 years, he'll be impeached in his very first one...that is if the recount effort doesn't expose the massive republican electoral fraud first.

    10. Re:Define Conundrum by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Is this the new Godwin? To come up everytime where it's not appropriate with this boring Trump-thing?

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    11. Re:Define Conundrum by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Calm down now boys. Already for a long time now Russia hasn't pursued this communist world evangelism from the past, so what exactly is your problem with Russia? There isn't any. For every undemocratic action you can accuse Russia of, you can find one that you can accuse the USA of.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    12. Re:Define Conundrum by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      Putin is a Fascist, enforcing Fascist policies in Russia itself and exporting them to Ukraine by supporting Fascist rebels there. Fascist Russia has the targeted goal of destroying the USA and EU as both impede the Russian obsession of creating and holding satellite states as a buffer against an attack that will only come because of that practice itself.

    13. Re:Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      If it was unrelated, why did Carrier management credit talks with Trump as the reason for the change?

      Keep up the bitterness, it helps ensure a 2nd term.

    14. Re:Define Conundrum by Jzanu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You mean Pence, Indiana governor, reached an agreement with a large employer in his state and offered them special incentives to stay? That is normal politics, and the only reason it was delayed until now was to serve as a talking point and trick idiots like you into giving Trump credit. See, the way this works is large employers know they are valuable and put pressure on state governments, city governments, etc. to get perks like 0% taxes, waving of pollution regulations, zoning exemptions, etc. Usually it hurts the people of the state/city long-term because the firms just make new threats as needed to keep the time-limited perks active, and environmental damage would directly harm workers and their families who do actually live nearby.

    15. Re:Define Conundrum by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      "The 1980s are calling. They want their foreign policy back because, you know, the Cold War's been over for 20 years." - Barack Obama

      "This is my last election... After my election I have more flexibility." - Barack Obama

      Who's supporting fascists?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    16. Re:Define Conundrum by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant, read! Notice anything?

    17. Re: Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they all cried boo hoo hoo......

    18. Re:Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So his VP pick did it, and you admit it.

      Meanwhile you are upset that corrupt, bribe taking, lying, crybaby, politicians like Clinton don't have more money to spend on wars and spying on us instead of us being able to keep jobs locally and keep more of the money we earn making. Since these are not jobs in DC or NYC, they are just idiot rednecks and you don't care if they lose their job.

      There might just be a reason Clinton lost in the election in your post. While obvious to everyone else, I don't think you have figured it out yet.

    19. Re:Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could try to understand something besides the fucking pissing contest, this is down to shoddy politics.

    20. Re:Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for pointing out that you are both more intelligent and morally superior to me. I hope you will take some time out of your day to congratulate yourself on being better than others. In turn I will try to remember that my concerns about paying higher taxes rather than saving money for my children is really just an illogical fear of brown people.

    21. Re:Define Conundrum by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      If paying taxes is the difference in you having savings or not, then you have no financial discipline and shouldn't have kids until you're a lot more mature.

    22. Re:Define Conundrum by Enigma2175 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why not blame Trump for the 1100 jobs he sent to Mexico? Carrier was moving 2100 jobs and they only kept 1000 of them here, so they lost 1100 jobs. We still don't know what incentives Pence gave them for staying, but it's entirely possible that this will be a net loss in revenue for the government. Not that I think this move is necessarily a bad thing, well paying manufacturing jobs are great to have in the country and I'm glad they were able to get them to partially stay but 1000 jobs is really a drop in the bucket for an economy that is adding 180,000 jobs per month. It's a great talking point for the Trump administration but from a practical perspective these one-off efforts aren't going to have a big impact on the economy.

      --

      Enigma

    23. Re: Define Conundrum by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      He's not President yet - but he's already delivered 1,000 jobs, kept in the US rather than moving to Mexico. Seems he's off to a good start especially given the fact he has zero official, political power. But then, it's "just 1,000 jobs", right?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    24. Re:Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a retard and a fucking idiot.

    25. Re:Define Conundrum by slashrio · · Score: 1

      As I already wrote, for every accusation you can throw at Russia, you can throw one at the USA.
      Fascist rebels? Who supported the fascist neo-nazi's shooting protesters in order to force a violent revolutionary coup against a democratically chosen government in Ukrain?
      Who created a terrorist organization (Al Qaeda) and is still supporting terrorists in Syria?
      And now with the satellite states gone, what is NATO doing?
      Right, advancing to Russia's borders. So who were right after all with wanting a buffer? Your non-reasoning is highly hypocrite ...

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    26. Re:Define Conundrum by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      I don't give a fuck about the USA being "morally equivalent" to Fascist Russia. Fascist Russia is an existing threat to the EU sponsoring AfD and National Front to divide it. Problem is Russia's 'soft' power isn't, and it is fucking obvious when they apply their Internet brigade approach - at least outside of the US. The EU will fight Russia.

    27. Re: Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What flavor is the koolaid?

    28. Re: Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's good and bad, since we'll still need to see who ends up paying for the tax break he's giving Carrier to keep them here.

      I suspect it will be you and me and not Wall Street.

    29. Re:Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Trying to follow the logic:

      1. They were going to move 2100 jobs.
      2. Someone intervened somehow.
      3. Now they will only move 1100.

      Loss is 1100????

      This is a net gain of 1000 according to logic.

      Oh! It doesn't matter because it is a drop in the bucket. I guess the logical thing to do is export all the jobs?

    30. Re:Define Conundrum by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Interesting that the AP is reporting:

      The White House is praising President-elect Donald Trump's deal with Carrier Corp. to keep nearly 1,000 jobs in the United States, but is trying to play down the significance of the agreement.

      White House spokesman Josh Earnest says Trump "deserves credit" for brokering the deal, which the air conditioning company says will keep the jobs in Indiana instead of moving them to Mexico.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    31. Re:Define Conundrum by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Your post is irrelevant. Obama tried hard to make friends with Putin because he believe we could all just sing Kumbya, and chided Romney for pointing out the obvious, that Russia was the biggest threat. Trump has yet to do a thing with Russia, and the left is all over his ass. Congnitive dissonance is strong with you and yours.

      And just for the record, I didn't vote for him.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    32. Re:Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really and both values are nothing given monthly raw job creation.

    33. Re:Define Conundrum by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      You are one sad and stupid fool who can't recognize the real dangers leading to war. Putin needs to be killed now and his party destroyed before it causes millions or billions of murders.

    34. Re:Define Conundrum by slashrio · · Score: 1

      The EU is only fighting Russia because America says so. The reason is American fear to lose the geopolitical dominance once Russia and Europe would form one Eurasian economic and military power which would destroy the current American world hegemony.
      Really, that's all.
      Read Brzezinsky's book.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    35. Re:Define Conundrum by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      Russia just wants vassals, has state-sponsored trolls flaming in support of extremist fringe right groups across the EU, and despite it all will be reduced to being China's bitch within OBOR as it has nearly zero Economic power and a failing military that is close to Kursk 2.0.

    36. Re: Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      He basically just made a deal that us the taxpayers will be paying for all of these jobs. He just gave them huge tax cuts so they make profit and we pay for those jobs. It's a con, just like everything else he will do. You really, really need to work on your critical thinking and how to do research into things properly and be able to accept real data no matter if goes against what your feelings desire. You loving Trump doesn't make the actual facts on his business or how he kept Carrier from moving go away.

    37. Re: Define Conundrum by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      He's spending US treasure dollars to pay the company to outsource half the jobs it planned. They're still outsourcing. And how many times can we afford to give companies bundles of cash? If I was a CEO, I would inflate the announced layoff numbers in hope for a payoff from the federal government too.
      This feels like the broken windows fallacy. A company threatens to leave, so you pay them to stay -- but the payment saps the rest of the economy.

      Another way to read it: Carrier is going to outsource ~1000 jobs to Mexico... with Donald Trump's blessing (and US cash).

    38. Re: Define Conundrum by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Actually, he didn't spend a single Federal tax dollar. Indiana gave a $7 million tax break over 10 years, so about $700 per year per job saved. Given the fact that Indiana's income tax rate is a flat 3.3%, that means it "gave up" income tax on the first $21,000 of income per job kept. My guess is that the average wages kept per employee are higher than that, so Indiana will end up with additional income tax it would not have had if the jobs went away. As well as the follow-on spending stimulus that those 1,000 jobs brought. Seems like a good thing all around.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    39. Re: Define Conundrum by Rakarra · · Score: 2

      A "tax break" is a bundle of cash. There's no different between paying X+Y dollars and receiving $Y back as a gift or a bribe or refund or whatever label you want to give it, and only paying X dollars in the first place because you got a tax break of $Y. The $Y from the tax break is going to come from somewhere, because expenditures aren't going down because of it.

      "Tax breaks" that come from deals made between corporations and the government feel like the same sort of "picking winners and losers" that the Republicans were vocal about a few years ago.

    40. Re: Define Conundrum by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      A "tax break" is a bundle of cash.

      False. It is like the SSI/FICA tax break a while ago. Rather than sending in $3000 to the Federal Government, you only sent in $2200. No money came YOUR way, less flowed out the other way. Giving the tax break in this case results in MORE revenue for the State and the Federal Government than not giving it - and letting the jobs go overseas. Better to lose 3-4 times the tax revenue AND have 1,100 more people out of work? But I get it - Trump - can't say anything good about him, right?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    41. Re: Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Likely the state/local governments gave the tax breaks, which such entities do regularly. Trump couldn't have given such. Nor could Hillary was she President Elect.

    42. Re: Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manufacturing jobs kept/created of equal value to fast food jobs created?

    43. Re: Define Conundrum by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      A "tax break" is a bundle of cash.

      False. It is like the SSI/FICA tax break a while ago. Rather than sending in $3000 to the Federal Government, you only sent in $2200. No money came YOUR way, less flowed out the other way. Giving the tax break in this case results in MORE revenue for the State and the Federal Government than not giving it - and letting the jobs go overseas. Better to lose 3-4 times the tax revenue AND have 1,100 more people out of work?

      Let's say above the governmental budget is $M. You give a tax break of $Y to a company. Now the incoming receipts are $M-$Y. You give a bundle of cash, $Y, to a company instead. Incoming taxes/etc are still $M-$Y, and the budget is still $M (apparently I live in a fantasy world where the budget is balanced). In both cases the shortfall of $Y has to be made up somewhere, and it sure as hell won't be coming from the company, and only a small, small portion of that will come from those additional employees. It will come from the rest of us. We all end up paying for these jobs.

      But, spread out over the populace, it's not that much, right? Sure, we'll pay a little bit more, but... American jobs. But it is not sustainable. How many companies are going to look at this situation and come to the same conclusion -- they can extort money from the government, they just need to come up with some sort of plan, any, to shift jobs overseas. If company X can do this, why can't company Y?

      But I get it - Trump - can't say anything good about him, right?

      Au contraire, this was one of.. well, basically, the only reason I could find to actually vote for Donald Trump, the free trade deals and the worker exodus that has worked out so very well for folks in other countries and the stocks of multinationals, even as they screwed the American people. But I'll give Donald a chance -- he's not ACTUALLY in office yet, and we've yet to see what sort of things he could do with the Office of the Presidency behind him. Maybe that opens up other opportunities than just having the rest of us paying companies to keep jobs here. I'm hoping for something better than that.

    44. Re: Define Conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump heads the executive branch and is solely responsible for most of those things you mention. So, yes, he can, with the stroke of a pen. He can't make laws, and he can't judge them. But he can decide how they're enforced, and he's in charge of foreign relations and treaties.

    45. Re: Define Conundrum by larriet · · Score: 1

      Just your worthless opinion.

      Come back in 8 years and I'll apologize if you were right.

      You had best apologize now because in 8 years there will be nothing left of "Our Country". I do hope you enjoy living in Donaldland.

      --
      I am currently beneath your threshold
  3. "safe and could withstand an earthquake" by ls671 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Millennium Partners, insists the building is safe for occupancy and could withstand an earthquake.

    fine prints: "As long as the earthquake tilts it straight and doesn't make it tilt more in the northwest direction"

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    1. Re:"safe and could withstand an earthquake" by guises · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No no, there's no condition there: "If the building isn't safe for occupancy, we'll lose a lot of money. Therefore, the building for safe for occupancy. Also earthquakes. Also dragons. Anything you want, safe."

    2. Re:"safe and could withstand an earthquake" by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The building itself might be able to withstand an earthquake, but the ground it's built on might not. In SF, that'd be a concern - especially since the very fact that the building sinks indicates that the ground underneath might be of the type that loses its strength when shaken.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re: "safe and could withstand an earthquake" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. If it falls, we are screwed anyway. So let's pretend it's safe.

    4. Re:"safe and could withstand an earthquake" by Falconhell · · Score: 2

      I mean, it's not as if San Francisco has burned down, fell over and sunk into the swamp before lad.

    5. Re:"safe and could withstand an earthquake" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Definitely dragon proof!

    6. Re:"safe and could withstand an earthquake" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider, however, that non-homogeneous soils are less likely to liquefy in the event of an earthquake. Sandy soils and particles that are very fine while still allowing water through are the ones you want to avoid.

      But this isn't about soils engineering or any of that. This is about the right to complain, dammit! Our building is sinking by millimeters and we need to blame someone! It couldn't be that it's because the sky-high rents in San Fran are forcing developers to try new things and build where they couldn't before. No, that's not it. It couldn't be that people want to bitch about things they don't understand and say "Well, it shouldn't have done that" without any regard for margins of error. Why doesn't someone take a look at what happens when wind hits a building? That 1.5 inches gets shifted right back. And if you're only 1.5 inches out of plumb on a 58-story building, by golly you're still better than most buildings out there.

      I vote that media outlets should actually understand what's going on before reporting. This is ridiculous.

    7. Re:"safe and could withstand an earthquake" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earthquake resistant buildings are often built on ball bearings. The building stays relatively still while the ground moves around under it. Landfill rubble is kind of like little ball bearings so the building is extra safe? Due to granular convection, where larger particles rise to the top, an earthquake could actually lift the building up.

    8. Re: "safe and could withstand an earthquake" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a load of balls.

    9. Re:"safe and could withstand an earthquake" by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      San Francisco is ... progressive. Like building on a swamp landfill in a major earthquake zone is progress to everyone who is elitist. What could possibly go wrong!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    10. Re:"safe and could withstand an earthquake" by Solandri · · Score: 2

      Most of the shaking during an earthquake happens at frequencies which most closely match the resonance frequency of a 3-story building. If you look at pictures buildings damaged in the Loma Prieta and Northridge quakes, you see most of the collapsed buildings were 3- or 4-stories. Those two were quakes which were just on the cusp of being strong enough to collapse buildings (in an area with strict earthquake building codes). It's harder to see this in larger quakes because they have enough energy to collapse buildings outside this height, and subsequent fires (or tsunamis) can wipe out buildings which survived the initial quake.

      A smaller building, like 1-story, has a higher resonance frequency and just gets moved from side-to-side by an earthquake. A larger building like a skyscraper kinda just shimmies in place. It's only the 3-story buildings (and to a lesser extent the 2-story and 4-story buildings) which shake more and more the longer the earthquake goes on, and eventually fall apart. For a large skyscraper, you just have to make the support structures connecting the building to the ground strong enough to withstand this shimmying. Or decouple it entirely from the ground by mounting the building on flexible joints which allow the skyscraper to shake at its lower resonance frequency while the earthquake shakes at a higher frequency. (You can see in the test that the 5-story building has a slightly lower frequency than the input earthquake shaking.)

      The main danger of building on landfill is, as you've alluded, that one section of the land underneath the building will liquefy more than others, causing the building to tilt. Not a problem for a short, broad structure like a warehouse, but a serious danger for a tall structure. If you're building a skyscraper on landfill, you're supposed to dig down deep enough to sink the building's supports into bedrock. That way your skyscraper is essentially built on solid ground, just that its lowest levels are underground surrounded by a bunch of landfill, instead of its lowest levels being the ground floor and basement. That the building is sinking indicates this wasn't done.

    11. Re:"safe and could withstand an earthquake" by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Funny

      Those who insist you cannot build in SF are really just part of the alt-right with their anti-progressive soilist views on the Earth, where not all soils are equal. They need to get a clue from the more enlightened progressives of SF.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    12. Re: "safe and could withstand an earthquake" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're confusing San Francisco with Washington DC.

      But no, actually, San Francisco's growth dates from the California Gold Rush. When it became a festering pit of saloons, laundry houses, and oyster bars. Before that, it was a minor Spanish/Mexican settlement among rugged hills.

      The progressives came later, after WWII in fact, and have made the city one of the largest contributors to the nation's improvement, meanwhile, DC has become a festering pit famed only for producing hot air. And not even the useful methane kind.

    13. Re:"safe and could withstand an earthquake" by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      all soils are equal .... LOL that there is funny.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    14. Re:"safe and could withstand an earthquake" by rwise2112 · · Score: 1

      Millennium Partners, insists the building is safe for occupancy and could withstand an earthquake.

      fine prints: "As long as the earthquake tilts it straight and doesn't make it tilt more in the northwest direction"

      Also, building units will automatically convert to underground bunkers in the case of earthquake, making it even safer!

      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
    15. Re:"safe and could withstand an earthquake" by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      It couldn't be that it's because the sky-high rents in San Fran are forcing developers to try new things and build where they couldn't before.

      The Millennium Tower builders loudly shout that because San Francisco didn't have an absolute requirement in every situation that the structure should be bolted to bedrock, instead they drilled down only half as far and bolted it to unstable bay fill.

    16. Re:"safe and could withstand an earthquake" by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Fuck, if i said anything you approve of I take it back Mike, you asshole RWNJ.

  4. The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by GerryGilmore · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gee, let's build a concrete, 58-story tower on top of landfill. No problem!

    1. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      the name suits the millennial generation quite well: ambition, arrogance, but wilfully ignorant and/or unaccepting of reality/logic/math.

    2. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Millennial generation? What? Noo... more like the Boomers.

    3. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by future+assassin · · Score: 0

      Star Trek Voyager.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    4. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Gee, let's build a concrete, 58-story tower on top of landfill. No problem!

      As long as you live near the top, you shouldn't have a problem for a long time!

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    5. Re: The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boomers blame everybody except themselves for everything. The current state of American politics makes this readily apparent. It's beyond embarrassing.

    6. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by stealth_finger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the name suits the millennial generation quite well: ambition, arrogance, but wilfully ignorant and/or unaccepting of reality/logic/math.

      If you have a problem with millennials, look to the people who raised them like that.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    7. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Gee, let's build a concrete, 58-story tower on top of landfill. No problem!

      I can't wait for the engineering reports that said it was unsafe to be leaked.

      Then again, those reports are probably somewhere in the foundations of the building.

      --
      No sig today...
    8. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Right along with the engineer who wrote them.

    9. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Maritz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your ignorant, ungenerous characterisation summarises your own neuroses beautifully. We accept the math alright, the math that you own everything because you got in there first, and your determination to vote in a fucked up world before you do the decent thing and die the fuck off. ;)

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    10. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Maritz · · Score: 2

      It's sort of feminist snow plowing 2.0 from equally moronic liberals.

      Does that mean something?

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    11. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Zocalo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Of course they are. That's the display department. You'll find the documents located in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard”, oh, and don't forget to take a flashlight and rope; the lights and stairs are both out.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    12. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Usually they drive concrete and steel supports down into the underlying bedrock then build a solid concrete foundation on top of those. Even if the ground does liquify the building will still be there.

    13. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      It will stabilize once all the bin-liners it's resting on burst but I suspect nobody will want to live on the lower floors because of the smell

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    14. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see you do something besides run your mouth on Slashdork.

    15. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      the name suits the millennial generation quite well: ambition, arrogance, but wilfully ignorant and/or unaccepting of reality/logic/math.

      If you have a problem with millennials, look to the people who raised them like that.

      And, as a millennial, I do not get this characterization at all. We have so much less than previous generations, and I'd be surprised if we complain more than they did. In addition, it's the older generations' lack of critical thinking that got us into so many messes like the drug war, a bunch of real wars, consolidation of media, and on and on.

    16. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by GLMDesigns · · Score: 2

      It does mean something but I don't really see how it applies here.

      Gender equality social warriors in Sweden (I think) got the bright idea that clearing snow from streets as opposed to sidewalks was a symbol male dominance. To solve the gender inequality clearing sidewalks was to be considered of equal priority to clearing the streets.

      Who knew that this would fv(k things up?

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    17. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it saddens me that you are filled with so much hate, that you cannot help it from falling out of your brain completely unprovoked. :(

    18. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Stinky+Cheese+Man · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Every generation blames their parents for the ills of the world. And your children will blame you.

    19. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Viol8 · · Score: 0

      "it's the older generations' lack of critical thinking that got us into so many messes like the drug war"

      Yeah, right, lets make all drugs legal because its hard to police. Using your millenial logic lets make all crimes legal and save the entire police force bill! Yes, I can see why your generation are doing SO well.

    20. Re: The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but that's only for non-leaning buildings.

    21. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "it's the older generations' lack of critical thinking that got us into so many messes like the drug war"

      Yeah, right, lets make all drugs legal because its hard to police. Using your millenial logic lets make all crimes legal and save the entire police force bill! Yes, I can see why your generation are doing SO well.

      Your generation already had prohibition to learn from, and yet you still don't get it. It's not my generation ignoring the history and evidence. It's yours.

    22. Re: The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So little? Back when I was a lad you had to walk to school in the snow, and it was up hill both ways.

      And we didn't have mobile phones, just tin cans and taught string IF WE WERE LUCKY.

      We had so few TV channels that we actually had a negative number of them. It wasn't until 1984 we got to watch TV rather than it watch us.

    23. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we can all agree that the baby boomer screwed all of us royally.

    24. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This is what I think when people start banging on about how SF is mean and nasty and creating a housing crisis because it won't let anyone build more housing. But there's only one way to go without destroying all that is good about SF (its parks) and that is up. And that is not a good idea.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I am at the edge of the "boomer" generation, and I support Drug Decriminalization like Portugal has. Not condoning drug use, but using the laws, courts and diversion programs to help people stop using drugs. The drug use in Portugal has actually dropped substantially since the program has been employed.

      Just FYI, drug USE is not treated like a crime, drug DEALING is.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    26. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "Your generation already had prohibition to learn from, and yet you still don't get it"

      Perhaps you haven't see what class A drug use does to a person and to their family, I have. So spare me your self righteous BS. If alcohol was as addictive as as destructive as heroin or crack it would be prohibited today.

    27. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making all drugs legal... taxing them, ensuring they are safely produced, while removing stigma and providing treatment for those who want it... would save (or earn) a lot of money over what we're doing now, all the while destroying the lives of far fewer people.

      Remember, we stopped alcohol prohibition because it was too hard to police. If people want to do something that isn't harming others, no matter how harsh the penalties... then we really should be reexamining the criminalization of whatever it is.

    28. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the CDC, excessive alcohol consumption cost the US around $223.5 billion dollars in 2006. http://www.cdc.gov/features/alcoholconsumption/

      BTW, Class A drugs also include MDMA, LSD, and magic mushrooms. All of which have some cursory research in medical benefits but are severely curtailed by DEA restrictions.

      Don't talk to about what drug use does to people and their family if you're going to ignore 1) legal drugs that are as devastating (alcohol, oxycodone), and 2) illegal drugs that are either not at bad legal (marijuana vs alcohol) or are restricted due to politics and not medical reasons. #3 would be treating drug (ab)users as criminals rather than as a public health issue.

    29. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by TheSync · · Score: 1

      But there's only one way to go without destroying all that is good about SF (its parks) and that is up.

      Up, but not that far up - Paris, for example, has a far higher population density than San Francisco, but has very few very tall apartment buildings. Paris does not have the nutty 40 foot height limit that most of SF has, instead the limits in Paris have been 121 feet (but were just raised to 164 feet).

      If you would like to see examples of very livable and park-filled concepts for 100,000 person per square mile density in SF (five times what it is today), see What would 100,000 people per square mile look like?.

    30. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boomer logic? Drug abuse and addiction is hard to deal with. Let's just lock 'em up, take away their voting rights, and ensure they're stigmatized enough to never be able a productive citizen!

    31. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Solandri · · Score: 1

      If you have a problem with millennials, look to the people who raised them like that.

      In our defense, we had to deal with forced indoctrination into a philosophy of no-failure and no-discipline. Kids' soccer matches didn't keep score, and everyone got a trophy - even the losing team. And heaven forbid we spanked one of our kids for breaking one of the house rules. The kid tells his teacher about the spanking, and we'd be facing assault charges and CPS would try to take all our kids away from us.

      We're sorry we couldn't better prepare you for the real world - where you'll get hurt if you break the rules, and you have to keep trying because you're going to fail a dozen times before you succeed.. But we weren't allowed to.

    32. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Nah, this was built by boomers but occupied by millennials.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    33. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      You'll find them along with the city waiver, as the politicians were, no doubt, hungry for the taxes they could get on 58 floors of high-end condos...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    34. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Your generation already had prohibition to learn from, and yet you still don't get it"

      Perhaps you haven't see what class A drug use does to a person and to their family, I have. So spare me your self righteous BS. If alcohol was as addictive as as destructive as heroin or crack it would be prohibited today.

      You are proving my original point. The ancestor post I replied to originally said that "the name suits the millennial generation quite well: ambition, arrogance, but wilfully ignorant and/or unaccepting of reality/logic/math." Every modern study I have read places alcohol at the top of the list of worst drugs, above cocaine and opiates. Here is a very readable article with the view points of experts collected. Alcohol is above crack and heroin. You are the one ignoring the facts. I am not being "self righteous." I am being regular righteous.

    35. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have more and you have less. And someday a new generation will be bitching about the world you left them, not that you are incorrect in your assessment of what we're leaving you.

      But either way, ignore all "millennia's are this" comments, it's mostly the same crap my parents said about me, and their parents said about them.

      I'm 57 years old, but can't for the life of me understand my peers, or my parents, bitching about younger generations.

      Marijuana is the Devil's weed, then Jazz was the Devil's music, then Elvis was the Devil, Johnny Cash "Shot a man in Reno, just to watch him die", then Alice Cooper was the Devil, now rappers sing about shooting the po-po and Obama is the Devil.

      Kids these days! Back in my time.... blah blah blah...

    36. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doing drugs is a choice you make for yourself. Stealing is a choice you make for someone else.

      See the difference?

      Most people stop doing drugs in their mid-20's. Most drug use harms no one. Drug use that harms oneself is a medial issue.

      Making drugs illegal and expecting that to solve any problem at all is to show ignorant of prohibition. If someone wants something the free market will step in.

      De-criminalize drugs and you save tens of billions a year, you keep families together, and it's cheaper to treat addiction than it is to lock someone up.

      I'm mid-50's, not a millennial, and I wonder if you're doing so well, based on your aggressively ignorant statement.

    37. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We have so much less than previous generations"

      Haaa! Ha ha hah ha ha haha! (wiping tears from eyes) Good one!

      Pick up a history book, or better yet, a couple of them from different sources. This country has never had it as good as we do right now. Evidence of this is all the made up problems your generation are crying about. Even the homeless have smart phones, which puts all the collected information of the world at their fingertips. The President of the US didn't have that kind of access one generation ago.

      Reminds me of this joke:
      Kids today are useless. Give them books and a horse so they can go to school and what do they do? Stand on the books and fuck the horse.

      That was said about my grandfather's generation.

    38. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like we screwed over our own kids (or will :). You can be a friggin saint, but when the majority of your generation are greedy, grasping, short-sighted, self-cantered assholes "your generation" is hardly going to come out smelling of roses. So yeah: you will be blamed for screwing over the next generation... even if you don't.

    39. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      Each future generation is stuck facing the problems their predecessors either failed or were afraid to.

    40. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everything on Class A deserves to be Class A, it's a political classification not a scientific one. Not to mention that crack and similar are a RESPONSE to prohibition. You make clean, safe drugs like cocaine illegal and that's what happens.

    41. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      One in a few thousand people become addicted to alcohol, almost 1 in 1 beccome addicted to crack & heroin so any supposed study that says its worse than the above drugs is utter BS. If you think alcohol related issues are a problem then you have NO idea how bad things would become if class As were legalised.

      Also I've no idea where you got the idea I'm a millennial. Try reading the thread first.

    42. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      And how many people drink alcohol compared to those who take class As? Exactly. Scale it up then lets see what the cost of massive class A addiction would be.

    43. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Copid · · Score: 1

      Personal anecdotes trump data every time. They're the cornerstone of great policy.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    44. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      And is anyone surprised this happened in San Francisco?

      Actually, I am. The builders did not drive the concrete and steel supports all the way down to the bedrock because they said that the SF building code didn't mandate it in every situation. So they only drilled half as far as they needed to.

      Think about that for a moment -- San Francisco's regulations were weak. That feels like a bizarro reality.

    45. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      Except this is the first generation who will be statistically speaking worse off than their parents. The millennials have a right to bitch about the boomers in a way that no previous generation in living memory has.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    46. Re:The "Mil-Lean-eum" Tower by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Considering marijuana is a class A, perhaps munchies?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  5. Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's mortgaged up to the hilt, if Trump Tower did collapse he'd happily take the insurance and run.

    Most of his businesses are mortgaged up to the hilt and beyond. It's all dodgy as f*** in there, Bernie Madoff numbers.
    http://therealdeal.com/issues_articles/the-8-billion-dollar-man/

    Trump tower had another $100 million mortgage taken out in 2012.
    40 Wall street has $160 million mortgage against it at 5.71 percent interest, those most recent numbers show it generates $6.49 million in profits, to pay a $9.1 million in mortgage payment. i.e. he's not covering his mortgages.

    It's a big mess in there, on the one hand he declared £3.3million from his Scottish golf resort in his election filing papers, but Companies house says he made a £1.1million *loss*.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3832893/Donald-Trump-s-Scottish-golf-courses-lost-9million-year.html

    He borrowed $18 million last year against his Miami golf resort "Trump National Doral", bringing the disclosed borrowing (it might be more) to $125 million (to Deutsch Bank), yet his lawyer says its only worth $75.

    http://therealdeal.com/miami/2016/08/22/trumps-doral-and-jupiter-resorts-tax-bills-under-scrutiny/

    1. Re: Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called using leverage to make oneself rich. It's why Trump's a billionaire and you're well... not.

    2. Re: Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by quenda · · Score: 1

      It's called using leverage to make oneself rich. It's why Trump's a billionaire and you're well... not.

      Not as rich as Vladimir Putin or Hosni Mubarak, but he's working on it.

    3. Re: Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming Trump is actually a billionaire, perhaps there's a reason he didn't want to release his financial information.

      Even if you take Trump at his word, he's taken a small fortune, and turned it into a larger fortune at a worse rate than the stock market average.
      He could have done far worse (plenty of people have turned large fortunes into small fortunes), but he also could have done a lot better by simply investing into a broad stock market portfolio with none of his, often failed, business ventures.

    4. Re:Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A quick sanity check on Trump National Doral Miami,

      http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/13/trumps-campaign-woes-were-already-spilling-over-into-his-businesses-data-shows.html

      His election filing says its revenue vastly increased between 2015 to 2016:

      "Revenues from the Trump National Doral Miami, for instance, more than doubled to $132 million, from $50 million a year earlier, the filing says. "

      700 rooms, RevPAR is not disclosed, so use a luxury brand lie Marriott International Hotels, or Hilton:
      https://www.statista.com/statistics/271129/revpar-marriott-international-inc-hotels-worldwide/
      https://www.statista.com/statistics/297769/revenue-per-available-room-in-hilton-worldwide-hotels/

      Revpar is the total revenue generated per room based on the occupancy, he price sold, extras like food and fees.

      $134.18 Marriot North America = $34 million for Trump National Doral Miami.
      $106 Revpar for Hilton = $27 million.

      *NOT* $132 million, not even close. No way are his golf fees $400/day revpar.

      He has a mortgage of $132 million on that resort, he likely isn't covering the mortgage repayments.
      http://therealdeal.com/miami/2015/08/13/trump-takes-out-19m-loan-on-trump-national-doral/

    5. Re: Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by Maritz · · Score: 1

      You think that's why Trump's a billionaire? lol. No wonder idiots voted for him.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    6. Re: Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If he was rich. He'd be lending profits from his profitable company to other Trump companies not borrowing at interest rates he can't afford from banks.

    7. Re: Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly the point that many people regrettably forget or ignore when talking about Trump's or many self-made billionaires' "bussiness genius". Once a certain critical mass of money is reached, money just keeps growing. You must be an extremely risky gambler or a complete moron to loose money in the long run.

    8. Re: Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wheres the money? Billionaires don't scramble to borrow $18 million on assets already over-leveraged x1.6 times.
      Did he actually pay the $25m TrumpU settlement or is it still to be paid? Because he'll have to borrow another $25 million for that.

    9. Re:Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't use a fake news site like nbc to make a point.

    10. Re: Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds more like flat out lying to me.

    11. Re:Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by Serge_Tomiko · · Score: 1

      Dude, do you know anything about NYC real estate? This is true of the majority of large commercial buildings in Manhattan.

    12. Re: Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he's just bankrupt again. All of his businesses are loss making or maxed out servicing loans he took to cover the losses.

    13. Re: Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      That does not make sense. Businesses are kept separate for a whole slew of legal and tax related reasons. Giving below market loans is not keeping the entities separate.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    14. Re: Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he's just bankrupt again. All of his businesses are loss making or maxed out servicing loans he took to cover the losses.

      Thanks to US tax law, the entire point of a business is to lose money somehow.

      Punish success - it makes those that vote based on envy feel better.

    15. Re: Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      You clearly don't understand how interest and taxes work. Go learn something before posting drivel.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    16. Re:Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      awesome troll is destroying Democracy.
      Good. Do you know how dumb the average voter is? Well half of them are dumber than that.

    17. Re:Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Praise Bob!

    18. Re: Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An ego that large doesn't fit in a stock market portfolio.

    19. Re:Trump doesn't really own Trump Tower by syntotic · · Score: 1

      Is that why the tower is empty and the pharmacy employees, loaders and janitors want to kill anyone going in, that I cannot even enjoy the plaza outside (probably removed as of nowadays from the last time the gorillas snatched the tables off down of me and forced me to move), without having constant pressures, threats of theft and death threats from said group? No wonder... Which is the hen and which is the egg?

  6. Litigation... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1

    Gotta imagine that at some point regarding prices of litigation after a major catastrophe, prices of trying to come up with a fix, risks of total collapse, among several other things, a construction company might just decide to keep paying specialists, analysts and whatnot to keep denying the whole thing while they prepare to flee the country with as much money as possible.

    I mean, a misstep of this level must involve a whole lot of people. Construction company aside, wouldn't governmental regulators and such end up caught in the mess if the worst happened?

    1. Re:Litigation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the civil engineers. Many of them could and will lose their license and face possible jail time. Even if the construction company screwed up there should have been independent engineering oversight. Not to mention the oversight from City of SF civil engineering department.

  7. San Andreas Fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're checking the Hayward Fault? I hope they're also checking the San Andreas Fault, since it's a lot closer to SF. (The San Andreas Fault goes into the Pacific just south of SF. The Hayward Fault is east of the SF Bay.)

  8. Re:CAGW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not sure if trolling or not. Any building built on something other than bedrock is going to settle. Even a building build on bedrock could move up or down due to seismic activity. The settling is going to happen whether the soil is warmer or not, and most of the soil under a building isn't going to heat up very quickly because the Earth is like a big heat sink. Temperature changes very slowly under ground, and seasonal variations disappear as you go deeper.

    In any event, the lean is a much bigger concern than the sinking. The lean is caused by non-uniform soil, not temperature. Either there's an underground stream they didn't know about, cavities on one side they didn't know about, or other excavations are causing problems as the owners have accused.

    AGW? What's the C for?

  9. Re:CAGW by MSojka · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... until all of SF topples into the bay.

    And there will be much rejoicing.

    In honor of the great Bill Hicks, I propose we name the resulting scenic landscape Arizona Bay.

  10. Re:CAGW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed. While the Millenium tower has remained stable and upright for thousands of years, proving the soil used to be fine, only as recently as 2009 it started to sink. This is defnitely man-made. Now if you'll excuse me, I've got a few triggers to get triggered on.

  11. Re:CAGW by quenda · · Score: 1

    who modded the troll up?

  12. Nearby building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if the Millennium Tower tips over in an earthquake, I guess it would fall into the building that's just northwest of it. I wonder if the people in that building know that the Millennium Tower is leaning toward it.

    1. Re: Nearby building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, it's leaning on the tenderloin.

    2. Re:Nearby building by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      So if the Millennium Tower tips over in an earthquake, I guess it would fall into the building that's just northwest of it. I wonder if the people in that building know that the Millennium Tower is leaning toward it.

      Not to worry, I heard that Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho has a three point plan to fix it. Something to do with lashing it to a building on the southwest side with a big rope.

    3. Re: Nearby building by jitterman · · Score: 1

      I don't know why, but this made me laugh.

      --
      For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
  13. Developers say it is safe? What about engineers? by wasted · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The building's developer, Millennium Partners, insists the building is safe for occupancy and could withstand an earthquake.

    In this context, I would guess "developer" is used similarly to "business development" which means sales. Personally, I would prefer an engineer to make a safety assessment rather than a developer in the assumed context, but I could be wrong about context. I didn't see Millennium Partners engineering firms on the first page of a Google search, though.

    Maybe they mean safe in a context similar to "perfectly safe" from Zaphod Plays It Safe.

  14. Re:Developers say it is safe? What about engineers by Chrisq · · Score: 2

    Re:Developers say it is safe? What about engineers?

    Don't you think that people have had enough of experts?

  15. Hi from New Zealand by Mistakill · · Score: 3, Interesting

    After the 6.3 earthquake in Christchurch, NZ, 22 February 2011, we can tell you that what you thought was safe, isnt... We had buildings that should have survived the quake, but didnt...

    And then we had a 7.8 in Kaikoura, on November 25 2016...I wouldn't want to be within a mile of this building in an earthquake

  16. Measuring from space by Melkman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wow, mapping a buildings from space with millimeter accuracy. From an orbit 693km high. That's an accuracy of 1:100,000,000 while flying 24,000 km/h.. Crazy. And then imagine the capabilities of really good US satellites aren't even known because classified.

    The ESA link to this story: http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Observing_the_Earth/Copernicus/Sentinel-1/Satellites_confirm_sinking_of_San_Francisco_tower

    1. Re:Measuring from space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in the 1980's, they said they could read the large print of a full-spread newspaper from space.

    2. Re:Measuring from space by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Thats pretty cool but I want something that can tell me where the gophers are in my yard when will it be accurate enough to do that?

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    3. Re:Measuring from space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I don't care so much where the gophers are as if there was a satellite that could reliably zap those pesky varmints right out of existence from my yard.

      Either that or a cat armed with laser beams on its foreheads.

    4. Re:Measuring from space by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Not to put a damper on the wonderment of modern science, but we've had very accurate survey level measurements using GPS for a couple decades now. They didn't go into their methodology (could have involved manual or GPS assisted ground truthing, then change monitored by imaging to calibrate the satellite for Europe), or statistical error. While the measurement is in mm, that isn't to say to what degree that measurement is statistically accurate or not. As mentioned, other analysis disagrees with the value given. If that is because of accuracy or because of bias was alluded, but not really stated

      All that said still pretty cool details or no.

    5. Re:Measuring from space by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Wow, mapping a buildings from space with millimeter accuracy. From an orbit 693km high. That's an accuracy of 1:100,000,000 while flying 24,000 km/h.. Crazy. And then imagine the capabilities of really good US satellites aren't even known because classified.

      The ESA link to this story: http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Observing_the_Earth/Copernicus/Sentinel-1/Satellites_confirm_sinking_of_San_Francisco_tower

      THAT'S the damn thing that pulled an eye image when I looked to the sky the other day. I was wondering how in the hell the government of Jaiaguanaga found me after all of this time. *shakes fist at sky...and stuff*

    6. Re:Measuring from space by Melkman · · Score: 1

      The measurements were not done on the ground or with GPS assistance. The payload of the Sentinel-1 satellite they used is the CSAR radar. That radar does automatic distance/altitude mapping of entire swaths. I'm just amazed by the precision.

  17. Re:SF sinking further into hell by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    Almost as if God is punishing them for something....

    just very, very slowly?

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  18. Re:SF sinking further into hell by stealth_finger · · Score: 4, Funny

    Almost as if God is punishing them for something....

    Like the rampant drug use, loose morals and homosexuality perhaps?

    Nah, the smug.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  19. Re:Developers say it is safe? What about engineers by stealth_finger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The building's developer, Millennium Partners, insists the building is safe for occupancy and could withstand an earthquake.

    In this context, I would guess "developer" is used similarly to "business development" which means sales. Personally, I would prefer an engineer to make a safety assessment rather than a developer in the assumed context, but I could be wrong about context. I didn't see Millennium Partners engineering firms on the first page of a Google search, though.

    Maybe they mean safe in a context similar to "perfectly safe" from Zaphod Plays It Safe.

    Look, it's safe until it's not okay, now shut up and get in there.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  20. Re:CAGW by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

    I'd be very sad to see the armory go. That building has a tangible, real world value to me personally... very personally :D.

  21. Re:Firefox 0day is being used to attack Tor users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Submit a story and then STFU.

  22. Clever Design by some+old+guy · · Score: 1

    It's actually a self-secluding underground survival community for rich yuppies being deployed incrementally to save excavation cost.

    --
    Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
  23. Re:CAGW by Maritz · · Score: 1

    A more intelligent troll attempt than I would've credited a climate denier with. Well done.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  24. Re:Firefox 0day is being used to attack Tor users by Maritz · · Score: 1

    Did you forget the HOSTS file bit? That formatting looks vaguely familiar...

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  25. Re:SF sinking further into hell by Maritz · · Score: 1

    God? Who? Which? Zeus? Thor?

    Which fictional, made-up-by-humans God are you referring to?

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  26. Re:Developers say it is safe? What about engineers by Maritz · · Score: 1

    It makes perfect sense that the ignorant can convince the ignorant to ignore the educated. The race to the bottom is underway.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  27. Measuring from space - Geology is IMPORTANT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The imagery looks like the actual measurements are LiDAR derived.
    Similar levels of accuracy are available from the GPS system when differential GPS is used. More information about GPS here:
    Continuously Operating Reference Station (CORS) http://geodesy.noaa.gov/CORS/

    It is rocket science, however today not surprising. The really hard part of this is that the data is available in near real time. See the Sentinel mission website
    https://sentinel.esa.int/web/sentinel/missions.

    Any time a building incurs settlement like this I wounder if the foundation layer - likely some sort of clay - is a thixotropic material potentially subject to liquefaction when shaken. Reference Jan. 17, 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu Earthquake:Technical Paper on Liquifaction and,Earthquake Impact on Kobe

    1. Re:Measuring from space - Geology is IMPORTANT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not LiDAR or GPS, though both could be used to augment the data produced by the Sentinal-1 satellite. It's radar interferometry. It gives you mm-scale precision to detect changes over vast areas. It's the radar equivalent of optical interference fringes if you are familiar with those.

  28. Obligatory Python quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "When I started here, all there was was swamp. All the kings said I was daft to build a castle in a swamp, but I built it all the same, just to show 'em. It sank into the swamp. So, I built a second one. That sank into the swamp. So I built a third one. That burned down, fell over, then sank into the swamp. But the fourth one stayed up. An' that's what your gonna get, lad -- the strongest castle in these islands."

  29. yes indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't summon it from its basement lair, when you are 400lbs and have to waddle everywhere, it's hard work leaving your full time job of creating an ever larger hosts file, I mean really, who would trust a clown like Alex?

  30. This is SF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because San Francisco.

    You were expecting something intelligent from that city?

  31. metric by queBurro · · Score: 1

    It has sunk about 16 inches...

    errr, how many billion dollah landers are you going to smash into Mars before you start using the metric system? this is ridiculous.

    --
    sag
    1. Re:metric by GabeGhearing · · Score: 5, Informative

      It has sunk about 16 inches...

      errr, how many billion dollah landers are you going to smash into Mars before you start using the metric system? this is ridiculous.

      The USA hasn't crashed a Mars rover landing(there have been 4 so far)... I believe every lander Europe and Russia has sent to Mars has crashed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    2. Re:metric by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      No, but we lost a whole satellite due to a minor glitch, which was elevated by an engineer and dutifully ignored by his management...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    3. Re:metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are two types of countries. Those that use the metric system, and those that have been to the moon.

      Keep dreaming Eurotard. We're fine with the way we're doing things.

    4. Re:metric by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      Right. Because of the use of the metric system. If they'd used real (i.e., US) measurements, it would have been fine. You start sticking in weird furrin' measurements and you have problems.

      The problem with the metric system is that it makes the math easy. And anytime the math is easy, you're going to make mistakes. When the math is hard, you double and triple check it to make sure you haven't made some silly mistake.

      (Yes, I'm being facetious.)

    5. Re:metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While your post in general is correct, it is only correct in that we design our landers to crash as part of landing. They're in giant bouncy airbags. Slam, bounce, roll, then unfold to unpack.

  32. Re:CAGW by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    Has Guam flipped over yet? I'm just curious.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  33. Re:Firefox 0day is being used to attack Tor users by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    So we can read about it next week after more posts about Trump?

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  34. Measuring from space...and ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually that's interesting because that means they can measure the movement of the satellite with such accuracy as well.

  35. Oh no! Are Austin and the Clinton library safe? by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > denying, you dumbshits, until all of SF topples into the bay.

    Oh that's scary! But what would really, really worry me would be if Austin was at risk, or the Clinton Presidential Library and Adult Book Store.

    You guys have got to work on your fear mongering. The "dumbshits" you're screaming at aren't THAT worried about San Hippy Francisco. I suppose if San Francisco headed underwater some of the residents and their assless leather pants might come HERE, so that's a BIT worrying.

  36. Sinking: from the top, or ground? by MrLogic17 · · Score: 2

    I'm sure the experts have thought of this, but don't see an answer: is the 16 inch sinking measured from the top of the tower, or from ground level?

    In other words, does that measurement include settling within the 58 above-ground stories? I would think that a building that large would have some internal compaction over time, independent of the ground beneath it.

    I presume that the ground surrounding the building is deformed downward with the building, otherwise the entrance threshold would have moved markedly compared to the street level. Road crews could probably identify pavement cracks in vaguely concentric rings around the building.

    1. Re:Sinking: from the top, or ground? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's from the ground. The lifetime projected sink was 9 inches...

    2. Re:Sinking: from the top, or ground? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no. Steel deforms upon loading, but that is nearly instantaneous at the time of loading (unlike soil whose deformation is a function of many things but mostly the speed with which water can drain out of it). So, any deformation would be complete at the time the building was completed.

      If the structural elements are continuing to deform years after the building was completed, then the structure is experiencing some sort of creep failure and that is a very bad thing.

  37. Re:Developers say it is safe? What about engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A real estate developer is a company to "develops" raw land into a building. They can perform many different services but always at minimum are the "project manager" for turning raw land or under developed land into the developed land (aka buildings).

    Now you don't have to make incoherent guesses while acting like you know what you are talking about.

  38. Re:SF sinking further into hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He wasn't talking about one of the made-up ones, idiot.

  39. Mr. Trump's Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    President-Elect Trump built his Golden Tower on solid gneiss basement rock, like all of the towers in Midtown. His penthouse will be there for 1000 years.

  40. Try Building Hypnosis by Suffering+Bastard · · Score: 1

    Of course it's safe, there's no doubt about that -- provided of course people believe in it.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ujRE2IkEIo

    --
    "Molest me not with this pocket calculator stuff."
    - Deep Thought
  41. Solution: Pass a law that bans sinking buildings! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whenever liberals are faced with a problem their solution is to pass a law forbidding that problem. They all then pat themselves on the back and feel good because they accomplished something and eliminated the problem. They have a group-hug, give themselves "Well Done!" trophies and "At least you tried and that's all that matters" awards and then walk away thinking the problem is suddenly gone.

    So when the ultra-liberals that run California in general and the super-ultra-liberals of San Francisco are faced with the problem of a building sinking into the ground after being built on a land-fill, the obvious solution will be to outlaw the sinking of structures and then have the general population vote on a referendum to repeal the law of gravity. Yay! No more sinking buildings!

    "Well of course the problem is solved - It's against the law now. I feel so good now. Hey, let's make that building into affordable housing and pay the rent for people who can't afford it."

  42. He's broke, he has no money to lend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is false: "That does not make sense. Businesses are kept separate for a whole slew of legal and tax related reasons."

    No that's not true. He doesn't have money in any of these organizations to lend.

    Berkshire Hathaway is all internal loans. Each company within the group lends spare cash to other companies in the group at market rates, and thus earns the interest charged as profits, instead of that profit going to banks. Warren Buffet buys specifically insurance companies, because they're cash rich and can lend that cash to other companies in the group. Insurance premiums are paid up front, but liabilities on the premiums arrive later. Interest earned is kept within the group, simply returning to the Insurance company as profit. Rather than being paid out to a bank. That's what cash rich companies do.

    http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2014/03/08/how-warren-buffett-borrows-77-billion-for-free.aspx

    Currently Trump's companies shift revenue around. So investment money for one place, travels through the books as revenue in his other companies. Hence the 160% sudden increase in Miami National Doral revenue, without the corresponding increase in room rate or occupancy on that resort. That property is valued at $96 million, his lawyer says its only worth $75 million, yet it's borrowing is $125 million from Deutsch bank alone. A black hole of $50 million just comparing two different Trump company numbers and noticing the mismatch.

    Same with the loss making Scottish golf resort, which he claims is profitable in the US figures he gave for that UK business, and yet makes a loss in the UK figures filed at companies house. Again two different numbers for the same thing files in two different places.

    All of his businesses are like that. The mature New York buildings which should be debt free by now, are basically bankrupt. e.g. 40 Wall Street has $160 million mortgage, at 5.71 percent, i.e. $9.1 million mortgage and yet makes only $6.49 million profit. It doesn't make enough to service its debt.

  43. Do you maths first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So no one reacts when a braindead journalist writes that 40mm = 1 inches?

    1. Re:Do you maths first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So no one reacts when a braindead journalist writes that 40mm = 1 inches?

      Where does the article say 40 mm = 1 inch?

      The article says

      the Millennium Tower sunk 40 to 45 millimeters -- or 1.6 to 1.8 inches

      That's correct, because
      40 mm = 1.6 inches
      45 mm = 1.8 inches

  44. Re:Developers say it is safe? What about engineers by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

    The building's developer, Millennium Partners, insists the building is safe for occupancy and could withstand an earthquake.

    In this context, I would guess "developer" is used similarly to "business development" which means sales. Personally, I would prefer an engineer to make a safety assessment rather than a developer in the assumed context, but I could be wrong about context. I didn't see Millennium Partners engineering firms on the first page of a Google search, though.

    Maybe they mean safe in a context similar to "perfectly safe" from Zaphod Plays It Safe.

    Real estate developers are impeccably trustworthy, that's why we elected one as President. If the developer says it's safe, then it's safe!

    --

    Enigma

  45. Eat your words chump #1/2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg

    I've never tried to belittle (APK's) work, I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon

    take a look at the APK hosts file engine by SuperKendall

    APK is kinda right. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works by bmo

    APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience by chihowa

    I like your host file system by Karmashock

    I find your hosts file admirable by vel-ex-tech

    * My code's liked/used + recommended & hosted by Malwarebytes' hpHosts - Argue w/ those folks above too!

    APK

    P.S.=> & I'm a former NCAA lettering jock in Lacrosse for a national powerhouse (6' 2" & 200lbs. currently)... apk

    1. Re:Eat your words chump #1/2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet still a fucking forum spammer. FOAD, and stop polluting my daily life, you asshole.

    2. Re:Eat your words chump #1/2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hohohohoho is that all you have against apk's facts that made you eat your words? You have royally failed.

    3. Re:Eat your words chump #1/2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maritz started it. Apk finished you for it. So be polite and don't talk with your mouth full as you eat your words.

  46. Eat your words chump #2/2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /.'ers disagree w/ you (eat your words) #2/2

    I support APK's stand on the hosts file by Trax3001BBS

    Your premise that hostfiles are a good way to deal with advertising and malvertising is quite valid by JazzLad

    No complaints from me, I like APK... Reminds me to use a host file. Also, his stuff is free by aaaaaaargh!

    APK's monolithic hosts file is looking pretty good by Culture20

    APK... Awesome to see he's still spreading the good word by Molochi

    ABP is insufficient as a solid hosts file does everything that APK reminds us about by fast turtle

    APK isn't wrong by cfalcon

    APK, I know people give you a lot of shit regarding hosts, but please don't ever stop by nasredin

    You need APK's hosts file by Teun

    APK solution STILL relevant by Thud457

    you're right about hosts files by drinkypoo

    APK

    P.S.=> They're in addition to

    https://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=9935673&cid=53393941

    vs. LOSERS like you that don't stand behind their words hiding behind unidentifiable ac posts... apk

  47. I wonder why you can't see it up close. by fredrated · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just walked by the Tower and expected to see the foundation slab sunk below the level of the sidewalk, but nothing like that is visible, I wonder why?

    1. Re:I wonder why you can't see it up close. by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      Did it start off *higher*, though?

    2. Re:I wonder why you can't see it up close. by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      Steel buildings flex. I would wonder how stable their sensing is because if it doesn't average over time it could be movement of the building they are detecting... if not, how do they compensate for that?

      Also, they are measuring from space so one would assume they can only measure the top and the street next to the building. Again we have a sampling problem in that both of those could change with temperature enough that I would think a tower would differ in height... even concrete has to have expansion joints... In addition, I would wonder about the extreme height, where slight shifts multiplied up the height would amount to noticeable amounts. We don't heavily measure the ground either, the earth itself might move around like really slow fluid that we are just now detecting (aside from the large quick earthquake shifts.) I'm just wondering...that whole city could be shifting around by smaller amounts (besides during earthquakes.)

    3. Re:I wonder why you can't see it up close. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole area is built on landfill. It's the landfill that's compacting due to the size & weight of this building, kind of like a bowling ball on a trampoline. All the neighbouring buildings and roads will be pulled down as well, so you don't see much visible difference at the actual lobby doors of the building.

  48. Re:CAGW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a place I know where all the hipsters go. Its called Bedrock, twitch, twitch.

  49. What happens to the pipes and things underneath? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 2

    There's only so much flex the gas and water and all that can have.. isn't that a gas and/or water disaster waiting to happen?

  50. The answer by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

    Engineers in San Francisco have tunneled underground to try and understand the sinking of the 58-story Millennium Tower.

    "Hey, Bill, is the roof of this tunnel getting lower?"

  51. Re:CAGW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    learn to swim...

  52. Re:Developers say it is safe? What about engineers by schnell · · Score: 1

    In this context, I would guess "developer" is used similarly to "business development" which means sales.

    What "developer" means in any real estate-related context is the company that bought the land when it had something else (or nothing) on it, figured out a business case for what to build on that land, got the permits, borrowed the money, built the building(s) and assumed the risk/reward of trying to sell the resulting building space to people or companies. It doesn't refer to any specific business function within the company, because any sizeable real estate developer will have on staff (or contracted) any number of people ranging from architects to engineers to project managers to accountants to people who make the glossy "buy an apartment here" brochure.

    When a news article says that "[Company] said that..." what they mean is that someone authorized by the company to make statements on the company's behalf. That could be anyone from the CEO or a board member to a lawyer to a PR person.

    Long story short, a "developer" incorporates all the functions above, even if the person saying the words is more likely from the sales or marketing side. But there's no way in Hell they are saying things unsupported by their engineers, architects, regulatory staff and lawyers because making willingly false statements about a building's safety can expose you to undreamed-of liability in the case of a failure. Also - this is San Francisco we're talking about. Do you think there's any chance that a building of this size wasn't subject to years upon years of government reviews for safety, stability, environmental impact, community impact, infrastructure impact, etc. etc. etc.?

    --
    "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
  53. Amazing Accuracy by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

    Let's just pause for a moment and reflect that we even have the ability to measure the position of a building within a centimeter or so using satellites orbiting the Earth.

    I find it astonishing.

  54. Re:SF sinking further into hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't make sense. The geology has been there for ages. People decided to set up a city in a known earthquake zone. Now, if it was lightning strikes or asteroid impacts maybe I could see your point.

  55. Re:www.appslure.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They suck at Search Engine Optimization, or as the rest of the world calls it: SPAM!!!

  56. Re:Web Design Company Kerala by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Randomly posting advertisements within Slashdot disucssion threads? TNM Online Solutions thinks SPAMMING Slashdot threads is a valid form of advertising but in reality all they are capable is SPAMMING. Why would a "leading" company need to resort to SPAM????

  57. Re:Developers say it is safe? What about engineers by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

    The race to the bottom is underway.

    Goddamn this race is boring. 1.5 inches a year! I think racing lichen would be more entertaining.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  58. Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers... by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

    Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  59. Maritz you fake name online fool... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: That wasn't me & plenty of folks write the way I do but not many on /. produce works like mine (including you) APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?...

    * Which the likes of Malwarebytes' folks even host & recommend... so, how about YOU?

    APK

    P.S.=> Answer = Not, lol - that's the price of hiding behind a FAKE NAME ONLINE weakly 'trolling' as you have (since all you are is a FAKE in LIFE (& you KNOW it, loser)... apk

  60. Your kidding right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are American engineers really that stupid? They build a structure on unstable ground (such as a landfill) and now have no idea why the structure is settling. Important safety tip, never hire an American engineer to do anything more complicated than washing dishes or flipping burgers.

    1. Re:Your kidding right? by myid · · Score: 1

      I don't know if the engineers are American. The website of website Millennium Partners is written in English and Chinese. The right side of their Contact Us web page lists offices in four cities: Hong Kong, Taipei, Shanghai and Singapore. And the bottom of that page lists those cities, plus Kuala Lumpur.

  61. 7 Million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A headline on google news earlier said $7M in tax incentives.

  62. No sympathy at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget that they will only be on display for 50 of your Earth years so there's no use crying about it.

  63. hungry hungry hypo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You try rereading, here I'll post it for ya:

    "You are proving my original point. The ancestor post I replied to originally said that "the name suits the millennial generation quite well: ambition, arrogance, but wilfully ignorant and/or unaccepting of reality/logic/math." Every modern study I have read places alcohol at the top of the list of worst drugs, above cocaine and opiates. Here is a very readable article with the view points of experts collected. Alcohol is above crack and heroin. [vox.com] You are the one ignoring the facts. I am not being "self righteous." I am being regular righteous."

    Where in there did he say or even imply you're a millennial? That part in quotes about "unaccepting of reality/logic/math" with his follow up of "You are the one ignoring the facts" is not implying you're a millennial. It's outright saying you're a hypocrite. And I know he's right because you're conservative. Conservatives are an "almost 1 in 1" hypocrite. Furthermore, they reject accepted education practices which in turn force me to spell this shit out to you because you have no reading comprehension skills. You probably didn't have room for those and the list of current football teams or it got written over with John 316.

    On topic though, I agree with the AC. We have hard numbers to back up our claims and all you have are "the feels". You had a bad drug experience. I have known many myself, 3 of them are even dead. Wouldn't it have been nice in both our situations if hardcore drug use wasn't so stigmatized that these folks could have gotten effective treatment? The nearest drug rehab where I live is 1.5 hours away and it's just a shitty Bradford (a nationwide chain clinic) that is entirely over priced. The methadone clinic we had in the next county was shut down by the bible thumpers. And even if you DO have a selection of affordable rehab clinics, there is that problem about keeping your job. Your company may have some kind of employee assistance program thing going on, but if you use it, you get put on a shit list of multiple drug screenings per month and other annoying nonsense. I can also tell you, you'll be the first to go come layoff time and you can forget that promotion. I've tested this. I've been on this shit list and it was for nothing more than weed. It all gets treated the same. See if I attempt to get "assistance" again.