Slashdot Mirror


Apple, Which Doesn't Reveal Watch Sales Data, Says Watch Sales Are Great (mashable.com)

Though several companies are struggling to sell their smartwatches, Apple CEO Tim Cook says sales of Apple Watch set a record during the first week of holiday shopping. Cook added that the current quarter is on track to be the best ever for the product. The only problem: The company, which loves to numbers do all the talking, won't disclose how many Apple Watch units were shipped or sold. From a report on Mashable: "During the first week of holiday shopping, our sell-through of Apple Watch was greater than any week in the product's history. And as we expected, we're on track for the best quarter ever for Apple Watch," Cook told Reuters in an email. This is not surprising: The company has never revealed any sales data for the Watch, bundling it with the "other products" category in its earnings reports. There have been quite a few attempts to extrapolate what this means in numbers, but the truth is that any of those attempts could be a few million units wrong either way.

112 comments

  1. The Reality Distortion Field. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Still working as strong as ever despite the death of Steve Jobs.

    1. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I doubt it. Even Apple fans aren't going to believe that the Watch is selling well, not unless Timmy actually produces some numbers attesting to that fact...which he won't, because Apple is a company that thrives upon secrecy and operating in the shadows these days.

    2. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IDC came out with a number of statements that basically said that the Watch had stopped selling.

      Tim Cook said that they were wrong.

      So who is right? Who can we believe?
      Well Cook has a fidiciary duty to NOT tell porkies in statments like this. the SEC gets rather uppity with CEO's who tell lies when it comes to this sort of thing.

      I don't think that IDC is 100% right and Tim Cook is very choosy with his words. He does not say a number so he can't be accused of telling a lie.
      So the end result might be that the watch is selling and Apple are happy with the numbers but those numbers won't satisfy the wild estimates of Wall St.

    3. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it. Even Apple fans aren't going to believe that the Watch is selling well, not unless Timmy actually produces some numbers attesting to that fact...which he won't, because Apple is a company that thrives upon secrecy and operating in the shadows these days.

      Who owns the stock, though?

      Blowing smoke about sales figures for a new flagship product is a great way to eventually piss off shareholders.

    4. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Still working as strong as ever despite the death of Steve Jobs.

      Bullshit hype fed by fashionable narcissism.

      Still selling as strong as ever regardless of Apple was part of it or not.

      They just happen to be the best at it.

    5. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's clearly going strong inside of Apple, but it's clear it no longer leaves Cupertino. It's the only thing that explains things like the new MacBook Pros, throwing away the AirPort line, the existence of the "Apple TV," or the reason the Apple Watch is still being made.

      I'll bet any current sales of the Apple Watch are by clueless people buying them as presents for "that guy I know who uses Apple." Expect to see another flood of refurbished Apple Watches after Christmas these year, as a new group of people who got them as gifts discover that they're worthless.

    6. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am a shareholder and no knowledgeable shareholder thinks of the Apple watch as a big component of the company. They don't disclose numbers not to piss off because it is "immaterial" to the company. That alone says enough to investors... its not a big part and success or failure and the watch won't really affect the "big picture" company.

      So no, it won't piss us off. We know what we need to know while at the same time preventing competitor access to the data. An added benefit is watching the media and android fanbois rage that Apple wont give them data so they can "prove" the watch is a failure. The watch may or may not be a failure depending on what expectations are. Anyone who thought the watch was the next iPod, iPhone, or iPad thinks the watch is a failure. Anyone who was looking to see a positive return on investment is happy that it wasn't a total flop. I am more worried about the self driving car investments than the watch, which at least produces cash flow.

      Why I own the stock is whole different thing but it boils down to profits... Apple actually makes quite a bit of real, cash profit per $1 share price compared to just about any fortune 500 company and has many many billions in the bank that can be returned to shareholders or invested at any time. That and I bought it a long long time ago and have made a lot of money.

    7. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      It's clearly going strong inside of Apple, but it's clear it no longer leaves Cupertino. It's the only thing that explains things like the new MacBook Pros, throwing away the AirPort line, the existence of the "Apple TV," or the reason the Apple Watch is still being made.

      I'll bet any current sales of the Apple Watch are by clueless people buying them as presents for "that guy I know who uses Apple." Expect to see another flood of refurbished Apple Watches after Christmas these year, as a new group of people who got them as gifts discover that they're worthless.

      I work for a small consultancy that writes Windows Application Code. We eat, sleep, and breathe Microsoft around here.

      The owners (Husband and Wife) just upgraded their iPhone 4 phones to iPhone 7 Pluses a few weeks ago. And I noticed the other day that my direct boss (the Husband) was sporting an Apple Watch.

      These are NOT "gadgety" or "fashion-conscious" people. In fact, my boss is pretty far on the "frugal" side. He will spend money if he needs to; but doesn't just spend money to make a statement.

      Sometimes, good products are simply good products.

    8. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make Apple great again...

    9. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by slack_justyb · · Score: 1

      Ah I fondly remember that Onion article

    10. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple themselves are saying the Watch is a big component of their business. Did you miss the story that you're commenting on, Proud Apple Shareholder(tm)?

      At least you're willing to admit that you're only in it for the cash. You know the company is lying to your face, you don't care as long as your pocket's getting a little heavier in the process. You don't have an ounce of integrity, you don't care about the technology or the people buying it, you're just as corrupt as the company you bow at the feet of.

      You and your kind are pathetic and you deserve to be exploited by any and every company on earth, Apple included. Stupidity is a resource for those smart enough to use it, Apple's turned you into quite the finely-tuned instrument, played at their whims in fear of losing a little of your pocket change. How does it feel, knowing you don't amount to anything more than that, nor will you ever? I'd imagine it's the same way someone who owns an Apple Watch feels, wondering why they bothered, why they wasted so very much for so very little.

    11. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I believe that readers of the Wall Street Journal would be more interested in this story.

      Marie Antoinette was grinning show off also.

    12. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Financially, it is an immaterial part of the company. Just like monitors, printers, routers have been in the past. Not worth the effort to break out.

      It's almost like you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

      At least you're willing to admit that you're only in it for the cash

      Are there other reasons to be in the stock market?
      Are you a philanthropist & do it to lose money to others so they're able to retire better?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    13. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Still working as strong as ever despite the death of Steve Jobs.

      Though now for reason, I now read their press announcement as if spoken with a Trump voice.

      The Apple watch sales are HUGE, the numbers are secret, but trust me,
      TRUST ME, they are bigly!

    14. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by Ensign_Expendable · · Score: 1

      We sold 11 watches in this year's 3rd quarter, whereas in last year's 3rd quarter we sold 5. WE SET A RECORD!

    15. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit!

    16. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      If we ask how sales of the Apple Watch are doing, shouldn't we also ask how sales of ANY smart watch are doing?

    17. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure, but put it into perspective of Apple's overall sales.

      2106: $215B total revenues

      Apple would have to sell $2B of just smart watches for it to be more than 1% of gross revenues, or a rounding error. Which is bigger than the entire smart watch market.

      Does every large company report on every line of sales that's less than 1%? Or do they often just roll it into 'Other' or some larger product line?

      Criticizing Apple for doing the same just shows a level of ignorance that is most likely based in blind hatred.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    18. Re: The Reality Distortion Field. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a typical tool. Crapple needs tools to make a profit, and tools need crapple to justify miserable existence.

      Quality died with Jobs.

    19. Re: The Reality Distortion Field. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about stupid Crook and Co.

      Everything they touch turns to junk. iOS, iPhone, Mac, Macbook Amature.

    20. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      shouldn't we also ask how sales of ANY smart watch are doing?

      Are you perchance asking who watches the watch salesmen?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    21. Re: The Reality Distortion Field. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shill try harder. Sneaky reach to Winblows users.

    22. Re: The Reality Distortion Field. by orlanz · · Score: 1

      No, the SEC doesn't get all uppity about CEOs bending the truth or even lying. CEOs are allowed to be a sales rep for their companies. They just can't materially misrepresent the numbers nor mislead on numbers not yet released. SEC gets pissed when the filings themselves are wrong.

    23. Re: The Reality Distortion Field. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you are, but what am I?

    24. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's from the Turtleneck of Power he now wears.

    25. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Apple themselves are saying the Watch is a big component of their business. Did you miss the story that you're commenting on, Proud Apple Shareholder(tm)?

      Well, did you miss it? Because nowhere does it anything remotely resembling "the Watch is a big component of their business". Thanks for proving again that the RDF is in fact alive - and only in Apple Haters.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    26. Re:The Reality Distortion Field. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Expect to see another flood of refurbished Apple Watches after Christmas these year, as a new group of people who got them as gifts discover that they're worthless.

      So nobody buys Apple Watches, but there was a flood of refurbished Apple Watches after Christmas - which again nobody bought. Yeah, why not.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  2. Misdirection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain! The Great Oz has spoken!

  3. I always thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Apple watch was a solution looking for a problem that doesn't exist.

    Now, if the device was truly stand alone, that's one thing, but needing to pair it up with an iPhone makes it far less interesting. As a minimalist, I have no use for a watch or any other jewelry for that matter.

    1. Re:I always thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish Cook would just get really angry one day, call a media event, and tell everyone "Steve is dead, so stop expecting me to be Steve. And by the way he was a real ass to deal with who made heaps of bad calls such as releasing Siri when it was undercooked, the whole antenna gate fiasco, and despite the disastrous appointment of Sculley to the board, going and putting the Google guys on it who subsequently became our biggest competitor. Stop with the God like status and give me a break."

      I get the feeling from watching him that if he just chilled out and stopped trying to channel Jobs, they might have a better chance of developing a new way to innovate now their leader is gone.

    2. Re:I always thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right now, Apple's insistence on turning into a "toymaker" has been profitable. However, by leaving bread-and-butter everyday computing behind and being a product of pure luxury, it will be the first thing people won't be spending on come a recession. When (not if) the economy tanks, people will be buying the LG phones for $150 that can run Android and their basic apps, and not spending $1000 on a top tier iPhone. Similar with PCs, people will go buy a something inexpensive that sort of runs Windows 10, and make do with that, as opposed to the latest MacBook Pro with fewer ports each rev.

      Maybe Apple should at least look at bread-and-butter computing. They have name recognition, and could make an enterprise line of machines that businesses would pay twice the price than a comparable HP or Dell, and businesses would be beating down Apple's door to buy them.

    3. Re:I always thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually disagree. The watch was a solution to a different problem than everyone thinks. You can look at the list of "features" but not one of them was the real reason Apple made the watch.

      The real problem was that bunches of companies were working on watches to pair with smartphones. Those watches focused on generic phone support first and all had different interfaces and ui designs. Apple knew if it didn't make a "Apple Watch" they would a) lose customers to other ecosystems b) lose the image of a polished ui design (like Apple UI or not, there can be a lot worse) c) risk angering phone customers who do want a watch

      In other words the Watch is meant to protect relationships with a portion of the PHONE customers. Maintaining even a few percent more phone customers is more than enough motivation to develop the watch and sell it break even.

      In other words, the Apple Watch is not what most people think it is and it is different things to different people.

      1. It is a fashion accessory. People spend far more on watches that do far less so this isn't even an "Apple Tax" situation.
      2. Nice "Fitness tracker". Many people buy these type of devices as a fitness tracker and get the extra functions as a bonus for a few more dollars (+fashion).
      3. Actual watch function users. Some people may actually use various features due to their job, lifestyle, etc. Not everyone is the same as you.
      4. Nerd toy. This is actually fairly cool / interesting tech and some people are just fascinated by that.
      5. Idiot magnet. These people would have bought whatever the "coolest" smart watch was because pop culture tells them to.

    4. Re:I always thought by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      You would really suck as busienss.

      Apple is the most profitable company in the phone industry (104% profit while at ~20% of sales)
      Apple is the most profitable company in the computer industry (~25% profit while at ~5% of sales)

      Apple has zero recognition in the 'bread-and-butter' computing. They tried it for a while, couldn't cut it, so they got out. Everyone only wants the cheapest CPU/RAM/storage per $.

      So, try to justify from a business point of view why they would move somewhere else, that doesn't involve losing money. Because everything you mentioned is a money losing prospect.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    5. Re:I always thought by djrobxx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Apple watch was a solution looking for a problem that doesn't exist.
      > Now, if the device was truly stand alone, that's one thing, but needing to pair it up with an iPhone makes it far less interesting.

      Its primary benefit is reducing the amount of times you need to pull your phone out of your pocket. If you don't care about the phone integration there are a lot of regular watches that do "being a watch" better. I never wore a regular watch, though. I have no need for it.

      I bought my Apple Watch primarily because I'm at the gym doing fitness classes a lot. My phone is usually away from me in my gym bag. I would sometimes be unreachable for 1-2 hours at a time. The watch solves that problem for me nicely.

    6. Re:I always thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Apple watch was a solution looking for a problem that doesn't exist.
      > Now, if the device was truly stand alone, that's one thing, but needing to pair it up with an iPhone makes it far less interesting.

      Its primary benefit is reducing the amount of times you need to pull your phone out of your pocket. If you don't care about the phone integration there are a lot of regular watches that do "being a watch" better. I never wore a regular watch, though. I have no need for it.

      I bought my Apple Watch primarily because I'm at the gym doing fitness classes a lot. My phone is usually away from me in my gym bag. I would sometimes be unreachable for 1-2 hours at a time. The watch solves that problem for me nicely.

      One would have thought that personal activity that focuses on self-improvement would be enough justification to disconnect for 1-2 hours at a time. No need for a watch to keep track of time, but an incessant need to stay tethered to the world at all times. The logic is dizzying.

    7. Re:I always thought by wicka_wicka · · Score: 1

      Apple watch was a solution looking for a problem that doesn't exist.

      A good way of putting it. I think it's more accurately an attempt to explode a nascent hardware market in the same way they did with the iPod and iPhone. Problem is, smartwatches will (probably) always be a niche market. It's just not a device that people think they need. I think it's quite likely that Apple Watch sales are great, in the context of the smartwatch industry. I just don't think that industry is very large or relevant.

      --
      hi
  4. New Apple spx: Donald Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sales are GREAT! They're YUGE! I don't have exact figures for you, but trust me this is the best product we've ever launched, hands down. We just can't make enough of them. We're selling more of these than we've ever sold anything before.

  5. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    They're selling bigly.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  6. That's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's funny. I never see an iWatch or Apple Watch. When the first one came out, some reviewers wore them for a bit. Then most of them admitted they stopped wearing them as they just didn't do much and weren't needed. I can't remember the last time I saw an Apple Watch in the wild.

    Fitbits? Sure, see them all the time. My Microsoft Band 2? Nope, I never see those either. I think I am the only one using one.

    1. Re:That's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same thing here. I know one guy that is a die hard, un-ashamed apple fanboi. He is the type that will wait in line with a tent for a week to be the first to buy an apple product. Everyone else I know, wore a fitness band or a smart watch for a few months last year.... now nothing. the tech isn't there. and if it is, the manufactures are trying to lock it into their ecosystems so hard that it turns everyone off.

  7. Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "During the first week of holiday shopping, our sell-through of Apple Watch was greater than any week in the product's history."

    They're saying that in the first week of holiday shopping they sold two watches. They sold one watch per week since launch, so the rate of sales has effectively doubled!

  8. Shame by Vlijmen+Fileer · · Score: 2, Funny

    I saw a guy walking once with one. He looked ashamed.

    1. Re:Shame by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      I saw a guy walking once with one. He looked ashamed.

      Liar.

    2. Re:Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recommend to him he hides it in a dresser drawer. Thats where most of them are anyways.

  9. Struggling? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Wait, so a niche market with way too many players are struggling to turn over inventory when an 800 pound gorilla comes in and is having "their best week yet" (whatever that means)?

    Let's see...
    X total prospective buyers of smart watch thingys,
    Y Apple Watch purchasers,
    X - Y = ? leftover purchasers for everyone else.

    3rd grade math story problems are hard, and definitely need Slashdot headlines.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  10. I have a semi-smart watch by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    I have a semi-smart watch. ($25 Martian).

    I love it... never wear it though because I never remember to charge it, so in hindsight, perhaps a mistake. My watch battery lasts a week, I can't imagine how old it gets to charge watch every day, no matter how awesome it is. Bad enough charging the phone.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:I have a semi-smart watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't imagine how old it gets to charge watch every day

      I've never understood this as a complaint. You go to bed, you take off your clothes, your glasses, your watch, and go to sleep. You wake up in the morning, you put them all back on. Charging your watch is simply a case of making sure you put it on the dock instead of just anywhere. There's no effort involved at all.

    2. Re:I have a semi-smart watch by danomac · · Score: 1

      A while back I went back to an old flip phone for a few days. I'd forgotten how nice it was to only have to charge my phone once a week. I almost didn't go back to my smartphone... but work email. Sigh.

      When I had a watch it would work for years on a battery. It's bad enough having to plug in the damn phone every night. Which is why I don't have a smartwatch.

    3. Re:I have a semi-smart watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But charging an Apple watch is as simple as just putting it down. How is that in any way a hassle?

    4. Re:I have a semi-smart watch by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine how old it gets to charge watch every day

      It may seem counter-intuitive but if you have something that you can regularly do on a daily basis it doesn't get all, it gets part of a habit. Kind of like my phone doesn't last more than a day, putting it on charge is part of a daily routine the duration of which can be measured in seconds. It's not like you need to go horrendously out of your way with these devices.

      That said I don't own one, but don't over-estimate the problem.

    5. Re:I have a semi-smart watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't imagine how old it gets to charge watch every day, no matter how awesome it is.

      Yeah, like how nobody bought the watches that run on coils which had to be rewound every day to keep it going, right?

    6. Re:I have a semi-smart watch by antdude · · Score: 1

      Maybe not a smart watch, but I still wear and use Casio's Data Bank watch. Sure, it doesn't connect to devices like phones and computers. It does calculation, schedules, phone numbers, times, etc. It's primitive, but works. ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    7. Re:I have a semi-smart watch by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I used to have one of those, or something similar. I used it as a fashion statement.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    8. Re:I have a semi-smart watch by antdude · · Score: 1

      To show that you're a nerd/geek like me? ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    9. Re:I have a semi-smart watch by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Precisely!

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    10. Re:I have a semi-smart watch by antdude · · Score: 1

      So, you're not a geek/nerd now? :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  11. Apple Watch - Tim Cook's legacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Jobs would have so completely run out of ideas for new tech if he was still alive.

    1. Re:Apple Watch - Tim Cook's legacy by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Apple's problem is it got too sucessfull. It left very little on the plate for its competitors to survive on. Now this is a problem for Apple as Apple throughout its history has never been the first to do anything. They have always been a fast follower who take something invented by someone else and polish it and package it so that the masses like it and buy it. Well when you drive other companies out of business their is noone left to "borrow" ideas from. Hence the lack of ideas. Jobs would have had the same problem. He was a marketing guy not an Engineer.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    2. Re:Apple Watch - Tim Cook's legacy by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Jobs wasn't afraid to disrupt his own business. Phone would disrupt iPod, tablet would disrupt laptop. Both were bigger than the lost market in the other products.

      Cook is afraid he might break something.

  12. I love to numbers too! by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

    Nice to see I'm in good company.

  13. Watches are doimg well by rossdee · · Score: 1

    We are in a blizzard watch right now

  14. Decoder by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Well, you're a /. reader and can crack that Cook code ; but 95% people can't. So, the result is most people see the Watch as a success and will run buy one..

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:Decoder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, just, just, just no

  15. Translation by Place+a+name+here · · Score: 1

    We used to sell one watch every week. This week we sold two! NEW RECORD!

    .. well, it is!

  16. If I may add.. by vasilevich · · Score: 0

    My Salary is $200K/month, that's great too.

  17. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup, if they were really selling well, they would have bragged about the figures. Since they are not, they are not.

  18. Not far off from reality. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    I see the fitbot watches the most, then Apple watches. the rarest is the android ones. I wish someone would make a decent round one that looks like a diver watch with some real waterproofing and at least 2 days of battery life.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Not far off from reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My parents never had a basement numbskull. Neither does my current home. If it did, it would be below sea level. My home floats.

  19. Apple watch sales fall off a cliff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While Apple may not publish numbers if you want someone elses guess you can read this article:

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/12/06/apple_watch_sales_go_over_a_cliff_down_28m_per_quarter_in_a_year/

    Apple watches lost 12.6% market share and had a -71% year over year growth.

  20. iWatches are not the thing by ruir · · Score: 1, Insightful

    iWatches are not practical at all, are too big, have a feel of cheap/plastic/a toy watch, and are too wayyy overpriced. The technology is still very early, as much as only by the time Apple got to iPhone 5S, it was worth to use it. Despite having many of the Apple things at home, the iWatch wont be in my list for several years to come. Add to that the fact I have not used a watch for years now, and the iWatch is even less appealing. As for social status, I do prefer an expensive analog watch to go with a suit for a wedding for instance, than the iWatch...which is ridiculous for a straight male wearing a suit. Apple also seems quite lost in their orientation, and it is sad to see that the dead of Jobs put someone there that seems more worried about a political affirmation and giving face to minorities than being maniacal with the glitches of events and improving the quality of the current Apple portfolio.

    1. Re:iWatches are not the thing by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The watches do seem to be selling to some extent, so people disagree with you on that. I have no intention of buying one, because I hate wearing a watch, and don't really care of somebody else does buy one. If I were trying for social status, I'd be someone else. I wore a Casio with the little keyboard for a few years and considered it a fashion statement.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  21. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    So are you suggesting that they're not selling great? That they're making a loss on them? Hiding the bad sales figures by lying?

    That sounds like Left Wing Media bias, totally unfair, Apple's watch business really is worth $10 billion! And just ignore the borrowing of small amounts at prime rates.... that in no way suggests the watch business is bankrupt. That's the nasty nasty media and their nasty nasty lies.

    Apple carries ZERO debt. Hasn't had any in DECADES. So quit lying. If they would be borrowing for anything, it would be to complete their new headquarters.

  22. Actually, they gave an indication by Camembert · · Score: 4, Informative

    During a keynote Cook showed a slide listing the top revenue generating watch companies - this was based on a table that was published elsewhere.
    Cook then showed the total revenue generated by the Apple watch (his was v1) being 2nd only to Rolex, which sells between 500K and 1 Million luxury watches per year.
    Well, haters say the Apple Watch is a flop. I don't know, I think I wouldn't mind flopping with that level of revenue...
    here is a link with picture of the slide:
    http://www.wareable.com/apple/...

    1. Re:Actually, they gave an indication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the end of Apple. Just you wait and see... Linux on the Desktop will finally become reality!

    2. Re:Actually, they gave an indication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Apple sold logoed faeces in a box they would make a bunch of money. The damage done to the Apple brand thanks to the "shitty" product would cost them far more, however. Ditto with the watches.

    3. Re:Actually, they gave an indication by David_Hart · · Score: 2

      During a keynote Cook showed a slide listing the top revenue generating watch companies - this was based on a table that was published elsewhere.

      Cook then showed the total revenue generated by the Apple watch (his was v1) being 2nd only to Rolex, which sells between 500K and 1 Million luxury watches per year.

      Well, haters say the Apple Watch is a flop. I don't know, I think I wouldn't mind flopping with that level of revenue...

      here is a link with picture of the slide:

      http://www.wareable.com/apple/...

      Yet again, there is this thing called data that is missing from the slide.

      For example, in addition to actual watch sales, they may have included watch apps, accessories, etc. We also don't know if this is actual end user retail sales or if it includes inventory (accounting tricks). We don't know whether this trend continued or if the sales chart looked like a hockey stick after the first year (i.e. high sales for the shiny new product and then a huge drop).

      That's the problem with how Apple presents it's financial information. There is a bit of fog that doesn't allow an investor to assess just how well certain product lines are doing. From other articles, I get a sense that most refer to how well Apple suppliers are doing as a gauge rather than just relying on the Apple hype.

    4. Re:Actually, they gave an indication by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I think I wouldn't mind flopping with that level of revenue

      Very short sighted. I would prefer to see what the profit figures and what the initial investment was before I talked about if I would mind the level of "flop".

      You can make any number sound good. But you can only really generate net positive cash flow one way. I wonder why they haven't stated the exact number yet.

  23. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pay zero taxes, that makes me smart!

  24. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. Plain and simple. Instead they let the media churn out make believe numbers for them. What a shit show of a corporation.

  25. Why does it have to more than convenient? by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I always thought...Apple watch was a solution looking for a problem that doesn't exist.

    You can make toast easily in a pan or an in an oven. A toaster then, is an answer to a problem that doesn't exist.

    Why does everything have to be the only possible answer to a problem? The Apple Watch is not the ultimate answer to any one problem - but it is more convenient for a lot of things. It's been really handy for dismissing calls in meetings because I can quickly glance to see if I need to take it, and cover the watch if I want to dismiss it so my phone stays in my pocket. It means my phone is not left on tables as much and is less likely to be forgotten...

    It also is handy around the house, I don't have to have my phone with me to see I've got a text message or receive a call. Would I use the watch normally for a phone call? No but in that one case, it's quite handy.

    It also does make for a really great fitness device. After all it is fully programmable so you have custom apps for any purpose that you can quickly glance at. Again the phone would serve also but the watch is just much handier.

    It also means that I am less tied to a particular form factor of phone. I like to run so if I were just using my phone for tracking I'd be inclined to get a smaller phone so I could strap it on my arm... but since I have the Apple Watch I have the larger size of phone than I might otherwise.

    Now, if the device was truly stand alone, that's one thing

    The airily named "series 2" includes GPS so you can indeed do some things (like record runs) without a phone. That is a natural evolution but for the moment I'm a lot happier with a watch that easily lasts a 16-20 hour day than I would be with a cell connection I almost never use.

    Also of course, around the house all of the Apple Watches are connected via WiFi and so do not need the phone on your person...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  26. SALES ARE UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We sold 4 watches this quarter.
    Thats up FIFTY percent from last quarter.
    And still more than double any of our competitors.
    Great job team.

  27. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

    Woooooooooooooosh!

  28. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by ghoul · · Score: 0

    As Donald would say "Wrong!!!" Apple borrows massively in the US to fund expansion as it is pretty US cash poor. All its Cash is sitting in Ireland waiting for a Tax Amnesty President to get elected so they can bring it back without paying taxes. Now that Donald's been elected Apple can bring back its 200 Billion. That should lead to a crazy round of acquiring of startups. Good time to be in the valley. The worker drones have been scared by Trump and keeping their head down and working towards their citizenships; yields are negative so in search of yields investors are giving all their money to VCs who have too much money and not enough scalable ideas to fund so if you can show them a slide deck for a potential 1 billion business they will give you 100 million (dont try asking for smaller amounts they do not have the menta bandwidth to track multiple small companies) and eventually when the big Tax evaders like Apple and Google bring their cash pile home they will be looking to buy startups (which is why VCs are funding startups whose business model has no profit but is acquirable by a FANG)

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  29. Too many flaws on Android smartwatches by nightfire-unique · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I bought the Huawei watch the day it came out. I was hoping to use it in bars/restaurants to allow me to keep my phone in my pocket, but still get a buzz if an important message (or pagerduty alert) comes in.

    It does do this, more or less. But over the past year and a bit, I really hoped some of the shortcomings would be addressed, and they haven't.

    The reality is it's laggy, "ok google" doesn't work more than 10-15% of the time, and even when it does, half the time it ignores the query. The speaker isn't used as it should be. It constantly loses bluetooth connection to my device. Wifi handoff is sloppy. There is no brightness control when in ambient mode. No on-watch app control; I do not want every single phone app with a watch counterpart installed!

    My dad as the iWatch, and it just works. It's great. It's how it should be.

    I've been an Android dev and user since Cupcake, and have no love for Apple, but I have to hand this one to them. They did it correctly, and everyone else failed (either due to hardware issues or Android Wear itself).

    If Google doesn't abandon AndroidWear before releasing 2.0, let's hope things get better.

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    1. Re:Too many flaws on Android smartwatches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had a Samsung Galaxy Gear S2 for 6 months now and it works flawless. It does NOT use Android Wear but it is designed to work with most Android devices. My original device was a Samsung Note 5 and now I am using a LG V20. It works great with both. I can even make phone calls and do voice replies to text messages perfectly with it.

    2. Re:Too many flaws on Android smartwatches by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

      It's Tizen, right? I'd really like to see it in action.

      I hope they continue to run with it; Google desperately needs more competition.

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  30. Not just great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're not just great they're yuge!

  31. Works well for manual wheelchair activity tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know a couple of people who bought the new watch because it accurately measures pushing activity. There finding it useful for communications, as well. Much less fumbling around in bags for a phone.

  32. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Actually, they've been carrying debt for the last couple years when it became cheap to do so, and they couldn't repatriate their earnings w/o huge tax losses.

    Nothing major (for their scale of business), but it is somewhere on the order of $50B. That may sound a lot to you, but it's a couple weeks of sales to them.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  33. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apple borrrows all the time and not just to complete their Mos Eisley spaceport Your either ignorant or stupid. Ill let you decide.

  34. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's good enough for me, you've got my vote! You don't get to be as big and successful as Apple without knowing what you're about. Make watches great again!

  35. working on the engine lathe assembly line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watches are for slaves.
    Myself, I don't need a digital overseer strapped to my wrist telling me when to do things.

    1. Re:working on the engine lathe assembly line by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Watches are for slaves. Myself, I don't need a digital overseer strapped to my wrist telling me when to do things.

      Yeah, you carry around yours in your pocket. And whip it out every time you want to know what time it is. Unless you ask somebody with a watch, because that's actually too much of a hassle.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  36. Tell that to the Swiss by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Watches are so last decade, grampa

    Seriously who the frack uses a watch, or an Apple Watch nowadays, but lusers and narcos?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  37. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

    As Donald would say "Wrong!!!" Apple borrows massively in the US to fund expansion as it is pretty US cash poor. All its Cash is sitting in Ireland waiting for a Tax Amnesty President to get elected so they can bring it back without paying taxes. Now that Donald's been elected Apple can bring back its 200 Billion.

    Or consider it this way. Tax laws are such that it is CHEAPER TO BORROW MONEY than to repatriate the cash.

    Borrowing billions of dollars at 5% costs LESS than bringing in a billion dollars.

    That's why they want the tax holiday. The real debate though is whether or not a tax holiday will bring benefit to the US - will Apple and others be using the new-found cash to spend inside the US or just horde it?

  38. Wall Street Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone ever see a sales breakdown or information from Amazon about their devices? With Amazon, everything is fantastic with no information. Apple can't do anything right.

  39. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by lexman098 · · Score: 1

    I always thought he was saying "big league".

  40. apple watch 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought one and used it for about a week, I returned it. Its garbage. The battery life sucks, the only 'app' that is allowed to access the gps data is the apple activity app, and then your data is locked forever away in their ecosystem. Fuck that.

  41. No, they revealed the number by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

    You're just reading the news release wrong.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  42. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    The word you're looking for is embiggen. It is a perfectly cromulent word.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  43. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Well, to be accurate, the debt of $50 billion is about 18 months of profit, at Q4 2016's $9 billion in earnings rate. When paying back loans, it's earnings that matter, not revenue. Unless you want to stiff suppliers and employees and such...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  44. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Or consider it this way. Tax laws are such that it is CHEAPER TO BORROW MONEY than to repatriate the cash.

    Borrowing billions of dollars at 5% costs LESS than bringing in a billion dollars.

    That right there is indicative that our business tax laws are pretty messed up. The problem of having the highest corporate tax rates in the developed world - nearly double that of the OECD average - is a situation that will hopefully be resolved in the next year to the betterment of ALL US companies.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  45. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Q4 is always low.

    $50B is about 12 months of profit.

    http://images.apple.com/newsro...

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  46. meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Apple Watch has done nothing to improve my life. I would have taken it back, but I missed the 15 day deadline

  47. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    I don't know whether to commend you for missing the reference to the recent US Presidential campaign or to castigate you for missing obvious satire.

  48. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

    Your either ignorant or stupid. Ill let you decide.

    It is for the best, since you're apparently both...

  49. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    I don't know whether to commend you for missing the reference to the recent US Presidential campaign or to castigate you for missing obvious satire.

    Apparently, both are in order.

    Apparently, my post was uninformed on many levels... ;-)

  50. Re:New Apple spx: Donald Trump by ghoul · · Score: 1

    Lets say I as an individual indulged in the same behaviour these companies indulge in. Put so much of income into 401K that I could not pay the rent so had to borrow money to pay the rent. There would be an expectation of paying the tax when I take the money out of 401K. But what if I lobbied for a Tax Amnesty to take money out of 401K without paying taxes and till the time that Amnesty got passed kept borrowing money
    If I indulged in this behaviour would you call the Personal Tax system too high and needing reform or would you say I am delusional?

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**