Slashdot Mirror
Scientists Blast Antimatter Atoms With a Laser For The First Time (npr.org)
For the first time, researchers from Indiana University were able to blast antimatter atoms with a laser to measure the light emitted from the anti-atoms. The researchers hope to answer one of the big mysteries of our universe: Why, in the early universe, did antimatter lose out to regular old matter? NPR reports: "The first time I heard about antimatter was on Star Trek, when I was a kid," says Jeffrey Hangst, a physicist at Aarhus University in Denmark. "I was intrigued by what it was and then kind of shocked to learn that it was a real thing in physics." He founded a research group called ALPHA at CERN, Europe's premier particle physics laboratory near Geneva, that is devoted to studying antimatter. That's a tricky thing to do because antimatter isn't like the regular matter you see around you every day. At the subatomic level, antimatter is pretty much the complete opposite -- instead of having a negative charge, for example, its electrons have a positive charge. And whenever antimatter comes into contact with regular matter, they both disappear in a flash of light. In the journal Nature, his team reports that they've now used the special laser to probe this antimatter. So far, what they see is that their anti-hydrogen atoms respond to the laser in the same way that regular hydrogen does. That's what the various theories out there would predict -- still, Hangst says, it's important to check. "We're kind of really overjoyed to finally be able to say we have done this," he says. "For us, it's a really big deal." From the journal Nature: "Researchers at CERN, the European particle physics laboratory outside Geneva, trained an ultraviolet laser on antihydrogen, the antimatter counterpart of hydrogen. They measured the frequency of light needed to jolt a positron -- an antielectron -- from its lowest energy level to the next level up, and found no discrepancy with the corresponding energy transition in ordinary hydrogen."
Researchers ... trained an ultraviolet laser on antihydrogen, ... and found no discrepancy with the corresponding energy transition in ordinary hydrogen.
Everyone knows you need to use an anti-laser to get the appropriate results.
It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
Anyone with better physics knowledge can comment here? Why would you use lasers to measure differences between matter and anti-matter? As far as I know, the only difference between the two is supposed to involve the weak force rather than the electromagnetic force (on which light is based). Considering that these guys aren't idiots, I must be missing something. How are the lasers useful?
Opus: the Swiss army knife of audio codec
This actually isn't the first time they've run this experiment. The first time was back in 2005 but things didn't go as planned. What happened was really a cautionary tale because one scientist had their cat ("Schrodinger") at the lab and was enjoying the warm anti-matter containment unit. When the scientists began the experiment, the cat spotted the laser and lunged at it, coming into direct contact with the anti-matter. It was a mess and Schrodinger the cat was very very dead while the lab and experiment destroyed. After that, people started saying that you have to harness anti-matter with a cat or as one person put it, "grab them by the pussy." ;)
Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
atomically anyway
Quite simply a coin flip.
If matter and antimatter are identical and have equal probability of being created, and if a matter+antimatter will cancel, then a simple coin flip will give you all matter or all antimatter depending on the random result of the first few created particles.
Take a coin heads is matter, tails is antimatter. Flip it 10 times.
Here I did it:
tails heads tails tails tails tails heads tails heads heads
a+m = 0 + a = 1a + a= 2a + a = 3a + a = 4a + m = 3a + a = 4a + m = 3a + m = 2a
So at this point we need a run of two heads in the NEXT two coin throws simply to bring this back to a balanced state.
So we need something that has a 0.25 probability to happen simply to restore an equal probability state!
There is a 0.5 probability of the current state being kept and a 0.25 probability of another antimatter antimatter flip cementing an antimatter universe.
You see how simple it is? We simply have matter or antimatter by virtue of the first few random particles created.
to the rest of you anti-matter.
Annihilate them before they annihilate us.
Hydrogen Lives Anti-Matter
APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
First time i heard of antimatter, was an episode of Moonbase ... Alpha....
The lasers...is it possible, just barely possible, that they were mounted on the heads of tiny sharks?
I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
There really is no such thing as an anti-laser
Sure there is, you just need a coherent beam of Black-Light.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
In accordance with President Trump's First Executive Order, all news stories must be about President Trump, including those in the past, already published, which will require someone to travel backwards in time to be edited if necessary, such as this one does.
Scientists Blast Donald Atoms With a Trump For The First Time
For the first time, scientists blasted atoms of Trumpnium with an ultradonald Trump, allowing them to observe, for the first Trump that atoms of antidonald behave largely as atoms of ordinary President do, in accordance with the generally Trumped theory.
Just go along with it. Donald Trump's ego is like Bill Clinton's dick. If it isn't stroked every five or ten minutes, he'll freak out and bomb Kosovo or some shit.
The thing that interests me the most that is, to my knowledge as of yet unanswered, is if the gravitational "charge" of antimatter is the same or opposite of regular matter? Basically, could matter and antimatter be gravitationally pushing each other away instead of pulling each other closer?
Why, in the early universe, did antimatter lose out to regular old matter?"
Was it a race to the event horizon?
Just another day in Paradise
Granted, the show has gone downhill over the years and totally jumped the shark, but if you are in need of a metaphor to illustrate the baryogenesis question, there it is.
no need. you can just turn the knob to "anti-blast".
Does it go to -11?
I mean, it seems like pissing off anti-matter isn't the brightest of ideas.
Do you have ESP?
This must be Moron Appreciation Week at Slashdot...
There is such a thing as Antihydrogen. The Antiproton, which is the Nucleus of Antihydrogen was first created artificially in 1955 by Chamberlain and Segre. Anderson first identified the Positron in 1932. All three got Nobel Prizes for their work.
It does not contradict everything that is. In fact, the Standard Model falls apart without its possible existence.
Structures like DNA can be made of Antimatter, including Antihydrogen, and will obey all the usual DNA Rules, including chirality. Why anybody would bother...
It's "Enzymes" you baboon. (Sorry if I offended any real Baboons out there.)
Actually it is a bit more specific than that because we already know that matter and anti-matter behave differently under some circumstances. The effect is called 'CP violation" but it only happens for one of the fundamental forces of nature called the weak force which is the one which causes nuclear beta decay.
The atomic spectrum of anti-hydrogen is dependent almost entirely on EM interactions and any slight difference will have a measurable effect on the wavelengths emitted. Hence this gives a very good way to do a high precision test of the EM force for anti-matter to see whether it is at all different.
The C and P symmetries violations in weak interactions is not enough to explain why there is No detectable antimatter in the Universe.
Actually it is the combined CP symmetry which is the important one to test. The C and P symmetries individually are already known to be broken in both weak and EM interactions. For example the different electric charge for anti-matter breaks the C symmetry for EM.
Also the CP violation in the weak force might actually be enough to explain the universe if there is enough of it in the neutrino sector as well and if the neutrino is a majorana particle. These models are called leptogenesis and could explain the observed asymmetry. However that does not mean we should not look for CP violation elsewhere: we know it exists for the weak force, it could easily exist for the strong force but does not seem to (something called the strong CP problem) and so we really should test the EM interactions to see whether there is any effect there which is what this experiment does to a high degree of precision.
Why, in the early universe, did antimatter lose out to regular old matter?
Who's to say that antimatter lost out? Perhaps, when matter/antimatter particles split, if there's an outside force upon them, matter parts ways in the one direction and antimatter parts ways in the opposite direction with respect to the external force. That would leave two universes, one of matter and the other of antimatter.
Because if antimatter won it would have been called matter.
Now where can I get my Nobel prize?
Whichever form of matter "won" would be considered "normal" matter by us as we are composed of that matter.
Whichever form "lost out" would be considered "anti" matter.
Duh! Sometimes the smartest minds are also the dumbest.
I've been an cowardly AC here since the late 90's, and today I'm sad.
I used to get real discussion of physics when these kinds of posts popped up, by real physicists. I came to love physics well past my school years, those debates would jump start my knowledge.
Today most of the replies are modded funny. Like so many people have been saying for years, Slashdot is dead.
Please mod me 'unfunny'. Bye.
... with laser containing the message, "Your mommy wears combat boots!"
It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
Considering the OP is female, I would observe that chirality is dead.
It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
In an anti-universe: "The anti-researchers hope to answer one of the big mysteries of our anti-universe: Why, in the early anti-universe, did matter lose out to regular old antimatter? anti-NPR reports:"
As Chuck Shurley (aka, GOD) put it during the First Supernatural Convention (which was *A*W*E*S*O*M*E*, as the organizer put it), it isn't really "Jumping The Shark" if you never come down.
Okay, good response but the show has really run its course. They've painted themselves into a corner where there's really nowhere else to go. Don't get me wrong - I love the show and never miss an episode. It's loss would make me sad, but it lived a long and full life that must come to an end.
There is a quote from a physicist at IU - a physicist at Purdue was actually involved - Francis Robicheaux- is part of the Alpha Collobration and is the theorist on the project.