Slashdot Mirror


How Russia Recruited Elite Hackers For Its Cyberwar (nypost.com)

Lasrick quotes a report from The New York Times (Warning: source may be paywalled; alternate source): For more than three years, rather than rely on military officers working out of isolated bunkers, Russian government recruiters have scouted a wide range of programmers, placing prominent ads on social media sites, offering jobs to college students and professional coders, and even speaking openly about looking in Russia's criminal underworld for potential talent. From the New York Post: "Russia's Defense Ministry bought advertising on Vkontakta, the country's most popular social media site, to lure those who were more talented with a keyboard than an AK-47 rifle. 'If you graduated from college, if you are a technical specialist, if you are ready to use your knowledge, we give you an opportunity,' the ad promised, according to the Times. The ad went on to assure recruits that they would be part of units called science squadrons based at military installations where they would live in 'comfortable accommodation' and showed an apartment outfitted with a washing machine, the Times reported. The Defense Ministry even dangled the chance to dodge Russia's mandatory draft by allowing university students to join a science squadron instead and then questioned them about their proficiency with programming languages, the report said."

122 of 236 comments (clear)

  1. What cyberwar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Someone managed to get access to someone else's email account? EPIC HACKZ0ring!

    1. Re:What cyberwar? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      What we see is kind of the pre-pubescent hacking. What is going on behind the scenes is the real stuff.

    2. Re:What cyberwar? by Narcocide · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's curious that the security of the WWW is not addressed by those who could do something about it.

      The problem is, the people whose job it is to do this, they decided to side with the hackers.

    3. Re:What cyberwar? by tinkerton · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't know how much of the Russian hacking scandal is valid and how much is PR (propaganda).

      But PR does not care about truth or falsehood, it will use anything. The last large analysis of a campaign that I know of is
      from the Iraq war. You can find the report here: http://www.sourcewatch.org/ind...
      Note the extent of the organisation, how many people and resources are involved. It's yuge. And the variation in types of stories. There can be speculation, fear mongering(which does not require lying, you just worry about possibilities), claims, plain false stories. It's a great analysis.
      These people haven't been sitting on their asses since then.
      In this case there's a campaign to ruin the relation with Russia and make it very hard for Trump to mend that(only russian stooges want better relations with russia).And to take away the focus from the content of the leaks, which were uh about what again?
      With fake news there is little or no build up. It's just rumors made up of thin air. That's amateurish and low budget.
      Real campaigns work on many fronts at once. Once you have official sources and favored journalists channelling anonymous sources you're instantly playing on another level.
      In this case the trumped up charges are that the Russians made sure Trump was elected by hacking Podesta and DNC computers and passing them to wikileaks.
      With a good campaign every reasonable person should start to doubt and think there must be really something to it.

      Wikileaks say (reluctantly) that they got their data from the inside, not through hacking and not through the russians.

      Suppose there's a hack. The reaction to is a choice. You can choose to minimize it. You can choose to respond in kind. Usually secret agencies would fight this out quietly. You can choose to take the opportunity to escalate the tensions as much as possible. That is clear intent.

    4. Re: What cyberwar? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Our attached devices should be secure and free from surveillance except by the appropriate law enforcers with a Constitutionally valid court warrant.

      Therein lies the rub. There is no way to secure it against everyone ... except some people.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    5. Re:What cyberwar? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      From the article/summary:

      to lure those who were more talented with a keyboard than an AK-47 rifle

      Sigh... The Russian military doesn't use AK-47 rifles anymore, and haven't for a very long time.

      Anyhow, next I'm sure we'll see the story of Russians hacking the electrical grid as part of our coordinated "Russian hacking themed" stories. I just got one more of those stories on a local news site, telling us because of the Russian hacking, we'll soon be forced to change our passwords regularly and use funny characters in them, and stop reusing passwords in order to stay secure. How inconvenient! In addition to the obvious facepalm here, that this has been required for good security all along, it also misses the point that the Russians didn't break into the DNC because of a weak password.

      Russians and Chinese have been hacking us for a long time (and we're certainly doing the same), but now it's part of a political narrative, so I guess we'll be treated to a stream of hacking boogeyman stories like this for a while.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    6. Re:What cyberwar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's propaganda.

      What you see here is the US Gov and its friends confirming that the information found in those leaks and hacks is legit, they're just trying distract the public :).

      FWIW the FBI had a role to play in those emails too. So is FBI Director Comey one of those hackers paid by the Russians to hack the election?

      The USA has had a far more direct hand in influencing or even overthrowing foreign governments. Leaking inconvenient emails out is nothing in comparison.

      This cyberwar claim is just a red herring.

      If you lost to Trump it just shows how crap you did as a presidential candidate (I don't care how many votes you won from the "choir", that's not how the system works, you win by convincing more of the OTHERS to vote for you).

    7. Re: What cyberwar? by Humbubba · · Score: 1
      Zero__Kelvin said

      Therein lies the rub. There is no way to secure it [the internet/attached devices] against everyone ... except some people.

      Agreed. Anything we do ourselves will be little more than a cheap padlock. A web made for easy surveillance has given us shoddy security and an open door to bad guys foreign and domestic. It's obvious this porous net is not in the national interest. As the only power that can, it is Washington's responsibility to do something about this problem. And yet, as President complains of Russia's cyber-warfare with the elections, he offers no measures to protect and secure the web. Curious.

    8. Re:What cyberwar? by Humbubba · · Score: 1
      Narcocide said

      The problem is, the people whose job it is to do this [cybersecurity], they decided to side with the hackers.

      Sadly, so true.

      I've known some awesome hackers, and script kiddies too. They can be heroes or villains - often both at the same time. One still bothers me. His office is in an impressive court house, and his job includes delving into the dark web. He told me, in so many words, that he really worked for certain businesses, or maybe it was business in general, I'm not sure. Either way, he was making it clear he thought the interest of the state and that of business were aligned. What that hacker does is everybody's business, double entendre no accident here.

    9. Re:What cyberwar? by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      Well..it's still too much caricature. Who says the 'heir' of the Office of Strategic Influence is involved here? PR is available to many, to the extent that there's hardly any central player who can maintain a clear view, and the gullible who play along usually have their own interest in mind. In this case there are a lot of official sources though.

    10. Re:What cyberwar? by Humbubba · · Score: 1
      tinkerton said

      Well..it's still too much caricature. Who says the 'heir' of the Office of Strategic Influence is involved here? PR is available to many, to the extent that there's hardly any central player who can maintain a clear view, and the gullible who play along usually have their own interest in mind. In this case there are a lot of official sources though.

      I find myself rolling my eyes to all the rhetoric, but on first blush, there seems to be meaningful content at sourcewatch.org. These guys are playing to lefties, mindful of who else is watching. Don't get me wrong, I think it's easier than ever to say clearly what you mean, as long as you stay withing bounds.

      In "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man," John Perkins comes clean on what he did for, in my opinion, one of the 'heirs' to the OSI, and how they tried to stop him from spilling the beans. Do I think he's playing to the lefties? Yup. Do I think his message was massaged for multiple reasons? Yup, after all, he's still alive. Do I think, even couched in rhetoric, he's saying something important? Yup.

    11. Re:What cyberwar? by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      I ment that my post was still too much caricature :) Sourcewatch is a good reference site i think but then I'm a bit leftie myself. In a way.

    12. Re: What cyberwar? by LinuxLuver · · Score: 1

      Yeah. The NSA does the same kind of recruiting. Not news.

      --
      Only boring people are ever bored.
  2. Fake news by ArchieBunker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So is this fake news or not?

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Fake news by wasted · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know if I would call it fake, but I wouldn't call it news. I have no reason not to believe that the NSA and other government agencies recruit top talent in important fields from college, and I would expect agencies from other countries to recruit top talent in important fields from their colleges.

    2. Re:Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have no reason not to believe that the NSA and other government agencies recruit top talent in important fields from college, and I would expect agencies from other countries to recruit top talent in important fields from their colleges.

      They certainly try, but there remain a number of factors in the Russian society that make the recruitment offer in Russia more attractive to Russian graduates than similar offers are to American or European graduates:

      1. Military service is still mandatory in Russia, even for college graduates. I know this because several teaching assistants in my computer science classes here in the United States were from Russia and told me that a major attraction of studying abroad as graduate students was the opportunity to defer or avoid the mandatory military service back home. In the United States, military service has not been mandatory since the late 1970s and the jobs available to computer science and other STEM graduates are generally much more attractive than anything on offer from the US government or the military. Some of the European countries still have mandatory military service, but European armed forces are generally small and poorly funded which makes them less able and willing to make attractive offers to high skill graduates. So, a chance to satisfy the mandatory service requirement in relative comfort and with higher pay has the potential to be very attractive to a Russian graduate in Russia.

      2. The private sector in Russia is nothing like what it is here in the United States or Europe. The opportunities are much poorer and therefore less attractive compared with a government position. Especially one that provides benefits that are hard to get and expensive in Russia, particularly for young people, like decent and affordable housing in and around the Moscow area.

      3. The sorts of skills that one learns hacking on behalf of the Russian government are not the sort of things that one can easily learn in school or working for a legitimate American or European business. These skills can be lucrative in the criminal networks and Russia has generally shown a willingness to give the United States and Europe the middle finger when it comes to cooperation in law enforcement among other things. This makes hacking for a living, mostly with impunity, a much more viable career path in Russia than it is in the more law abiding countries of Europe or especially here in the United States where not only is hacking frowned upon, but as Aaron Swartz discovered, severely punished.

    3. Re:Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      BeauHD and the NY Times, idiocy taken to a new level. Now all we need is PopeRatzo to babble some inane shit, and we have the trifecta of stupid.

    4. Re:Fake news by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      These skills can be lucrative in the criminal networks

      Heh, that reminds me of a survey where they asked graduating Russian high school students about intended careers (apparently the survey is taken every year). At some point, to some surprise, one of the top scoring careers was "policeman". It turned out that a cop's training and networking opportunities were seen as an excellent preparation for an entry into organized crime.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:Fake news by rholtzjr · · Score: 2

      I think he was referring to the Draft for the "Vietnam Conflict". So yes, that was mandatory.

    6. Re:Fake news by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      May have been seen by him as any mandatory military service. But he did get the time frame wrong though. The enforcement of the draft ended in 1973, the last processed individuals were in Dec, 1972.

    7. Re:Fake news by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      It's not fake news, it's ordinary journalism.

    8. Re:Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Saw an add for an instructor position teaching hacking of all platforms, networks, devices, in Augusta, GA. Salary was $175-$250K+, but .... Augusta? It was for a military job, think it was Army, not NSA. I've inhaled (better than Mr. Clinton), but not as much as Pres. Obama. Still, doubt they'd hire me. I'm not qualified for the position anyway.

      I'd need a private jet for my daily commute to work there. My wife wouldn't go. We want our kids educated with a wider world-view than Augusta can possibly provide.

      I've lived in middle GA before. It can be a nice place, but not something I'd wish on anyone without their eyes wide open.

      BTW, I live in GA today, N. GA. This is the first time in my career that I've gotten to pick where I lived. After living in 11 cities and 9 different states, while traveling to 30 different countries (most OUTSIDE Europe), I'd like to think my world-view is larger than most people.

    9. Re: Fake news by LinuxLuver · · Score: 1

      It's one-sided news. So not so much fake as propaganda.

      --
      Only boring people are ever bored.
    10. Re:Fake news by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I would call it fake, but I wouldn't call it news. I have no reason not to believe that the NSA and other government agencies recruit top talent in important fields from college, and I would expect agencies from other countries to recruit top talent in important fields from their colleges.

      The NSA, FBI, and other government agencies have been complaining that the revelations of their recent past misdeeds has damaged their ability to recruit the talent needed for computer security. Various government requirements do not help.

  3. Hypocracy by Zemran · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A country that regularly invades other country to force a change in government gets its panties in a twist over a theory that someone might have taken an interest in their election. The US does this all the time.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    1. Re:Hypocracy by lucm · · Score: 2, Informative

      A country that regularly invades other country to force a change in government gets its panties in a twist over a theory that someone might have taken an interest in their election. The US does this all the time.

      That's just not true. More often than not, there's no invasion, instead of group of puppet opponents are trained and funded by the USA. Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Nicaragua, Argentina, Chile, Zaire/Congo, Cuba, Colombia, Panama, El Salvador, Ghana, Haiti, Honduras, Uruguay, Guatemala. Probably many others.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No source, sounds legit commrade.

    3. Re:Hypocracy by lucm · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      lucm, indeed.
    4. Re:Hypocracy by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      I love how people site "no proof didnt happen" type shit on comments that are such widely known answers like yours. or should be atleast. also why cant these pricks use google? or are they truly fucking stupid?

    5. Re:Hypocracy by Noishkel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I for one never imaged I'd live to see another red scare come out of a bunch of bhutt hurt liberal media shills. But then again I never thought I'd see the DNC get so low that they'd allow the most corrupt politician in American history be their front runner either.

      Honestly I don't know how you liberals sleep with yourselves at night. Just forget about Trump for a moment. Look at how bad the DNC has come apart thanks to this election. How many times they they have to complete restaff the committee because of internal corruption. And yeah. Some Russian person, either as a state operative or some fake porn site script kiddie, got into your system. We can all agree on that. But they did was released just how absolutely full to the brim with internal corruption the DNC is! Why is that more important than how you all found out about it? You can be mad at BOTH the Russian as the DNC itself. Why is that just your focus?

    6. Re:Hypocracy by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      Hypocracy = Hypocritical Democracy? I see what you did there?

    7. Re:Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh yeah, wikipedia, certainly they have maintained a chain of evidence. Oh I get it "everybody knows".

    8. Re:Hypocracy by unixisc · · Score: 1

      The point is that the Russians did a lot of things, including cyber attacks, that would have been worth all these steps at least the last 4 years, but the Obama administration tolerated it. It only became intolerable when the target of the attacks was the candidate who promised to keep Obama's legacy in place. So excuse us for not being so 'patriotic'

    9. Re:Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A country that regularly invades other country to force a change in government gets its panties in a twist over a theory that someone might have taken an interest in their election.

      Correction. President Obama and his fellow sore losers in the Democratic Party got their collective panties in a twist because they lost to Donald Trump. As an American it doesn't surprise me at all that Russia wants to meddle in our affairs. We need a much tougher man in the White House and it's my hope that Trump will be that tougher man. Obama always struck me as too fawning and effete to be effective in a world inhabited by the likes of Vladimir Putin

      Okay, let me get this straight. Your completely ignoring the fact that the result of a national election was dictated by a foreign country in favor of a cheap shot against democrats? Seriously? Is this what passes for patriotism? The election was close. Months of stolen emails did hurt them considerably, and no there was nothing there that might not have been worse from the other side.

      Also, you want a tough guy, you know like Trump who appears to be all but ready to molest Putin with how much praise he heaps on him? That is your tough guy? Seriously?

      Obama stands up to the guy who attacked us and does what he can. Trump says, thank you, your such a wonderful awesome special and misunderstood man. We are talking about the guy who has a record of lead filled enemies and who has invaded at least the one country, not to mention has helped Assad murder his own people. Link That Putin?

      I don't know, maybe Trump is afraid Putin will put some polonium in his Cheerios. That or call his bank loan due.

      The only evidence I see about Obama maybe being weak on this was he didn't hit Putin harder before during the election because Mitch McConnell threated to cry about it. That may have been a little weak, and in hindsight stupid, but that is a tempest in a teacup to how spineless Trump has been. I seriously begin to wonder if he really is Donald J Puppet.

    10. Re:Hypocracy by ari_j · · Score: 1

      The difference is that Americans have the right to vote without being encumbered by the truth about any candidate.

    11. Re:Hypocracy by guestapoo · · Score: 4, Informative
      One more, this time is Russia, not invasion but "influence/interference" other country's election:
      Time 1996: Yanks to the rescue. The secret story of how American advisers helped Yeltsin win

      In the end the Russian people chose--and chose decisively--to reject the past. Voting in the final round of the presidential election last week, they preferred Boris Yeltsin to his Communist rival Gennadi Zyuganov by a margin of 13 percentage points. He is far from the ideal democrat or reformer, and his lieutenants Victor Chernomyrdin and Alexander Lebed are already squabbling over power, but Yeltsin is arguably the best hope Russia has for moving toward pluralism and an open economy. By re-electing him, the Russians defied predictions that they might willingly resubmit themselves to communist rule.

      The outcome was by no means inevitable. Last winter Yeltsin's approval ratings were in the single digits. There are many reasons for his change in fortune, but a crucial one has remained a secret. For four months, a group of American political consultants clandestinely participated in guiding Yeltsin's campaign. Here is the inside story of how these advisers helped Yeltsin achieve the victory that will keep reform in Russia alive.

      Focus on the bold texts, how nice the good guys Time preferred to describe, compare to:

      Time 2016: Russia Wants to Undermine Faith in the US Election Don't Fall for It

      Since the spring, U.S. intelligence and law-enforcement agencies have seen mounting evidence of an active Russian influence operation targeting the 2016 presidential election...., undermining faith in the result and in democracy itself.
      ......
      Russia’s interference in the U.S. election is an extraordinary escalation of an already worrying trend.
      ......
      in Trump, Putin has found an almost perfect, if unwitting, ally for his influence operation.

    12. Re:Hypocracy by quenda · · Score: 2

      That's just not true. More often than not, there's no invasion, instead of group of puppet opponents are trained and funded by the USA. Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Nicaragua, Argentina, Chile, Zaire/Congo, Cuba, Colombia, Panama, El Salvador, Ghana, Haiti, Honduras, Uruguay, Guatemala. Probably many others.

      Not just 3rd-world countries. Some have seen the CIA fingerprints on the US's closest allies.

      http://www.theaustralian.com.a...

    13. Re:Hypocracy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I didn't realize that the CIA and FBI were now "bhutt hurt liberal media shills", thanks for clarifying that.

      I honestly don't know how conservatives sleep at night, knowing that their system failed badly enough to put Trump in the White House (too many candidates spreading their support too thin, failing to counter his bullshit effectively)... I guess they are just happy that they can now ram through all their policies and are willing to overlook the rest of it.

      They must be terrified over what Russian has on the GOP though. You can bet that if Putin's man in the White House ever goes rogue there will be some strategic leaks to neuter him.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Hypocracy by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      Well, it WAS her turn since the rebuke from the previous elections. Almost as bad as Jeb stating it was his turn on the Republican side.

    15. Re:Hypocracy by Freischutz · · Score: 3, Informative

      A country that regularly invades other country to force a change in government gets its panties in a twist over a theory that someone might have taken an interest in their election. The US does this all the time.

      Are you seriously pointing at the USA's habit of invading other countries in an attempt to make Russia look like an Boy Scout? Russia has it's own record of invading other countries, installing puppet governments, committing atrocities and imposing a regime of oppression that makes the Americans look like rank amateurs. Just ask the nations of Eastern Europe how much they enjoyed half a century of Russian imposed communism and how much they are looking forward to enjoying a repeat of that experience if Putin succeeds in disassembling NATO and rebuilding the Soviet empire. If I have to choose between living under US Imperial hegemony or Russian kleptocratic tyranny I'll choose the Americans every damn time, even when they, are dumb enough to elect a narcissistic moron with a bad orange comb over and an over active Twitter account who seems to be hell bent on provoking a trade war with China.

    16. Re:Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Obama mocked Palin and Romeny for raising concerns about Russia.
      Obama had 8 years to protect the country from cyber attacks.
      Obama had 8 years to reset relations with Russia (just Google for the picture of Hillary with a reset button).
      His approach didn't work at all, it seems.

      Hillary claimed the classified e-mails on her private server were *NOT* hacked by Russia..

      The Podesta/DNC emails showed that the DNC actively tried to manipulate the primary elections so that Bernie would lose and so that Trump would be a "pied piper" canidate. Hillary took credit for the "Arab Spring" which was the violent overthrow of legitimate governments.

      As far as we know, the CIA/NSA lies to us all the time about things like Iraq and Snowden and surveillance.

      As far as we know, the leaked emails were true and newsworthy. I would be much more concerned if the emails were false.

    17. Re:Hypocracy by rholtzjr · · Score: 1
      Well, I am not sure about the CIA, but the FBI was doing their job. While the FBI is about investigating national crimes, the CIA has a little different agenda.

      I don't know how liberal progressives can sleep at night when the system allowed someone to even run for the highest office of the nation with the questionable history of their candidate. Granted, the conservatives could very well employ some of the same tactics, they even tried to sabotage his chances to win the candidacy . Some of the conservatives even preferred liberal progressives over their own candidate because it supported more of the "status quo" that they have been cultivating over the political career (which is the REAL issue, people did not want status quo).

      Terrified, ummm, nope. That statement is just more FUD for the fire.

    18. Re:Hypocracy by jandersen · · Score: 1

      A country that regularly invades other country to force a change in government gets its panties in a twist over a theory that someone might have taken an interest in their election. The US does this all the time.

      So that's OK, then? I think it is poor thinking to base your moral judgement on what others do, but that's perhaps beside the point. Yes, we all do it, and somewhere it is morally wrongto some extent, but the question here is: Should we worry about it? And I think the answer is yes - not because this is Russia, the old enemy, but because cyber attacks are increasingly dangerous to modern, industrialised nations. In the past we mostly had to worry about he US being a potential threat to the stability of the world, but now, with the internet and with cybercrime on a steep rise, there is a much more diffuse threat.

      And the fact that America has, shamefully, interfered in the elections and other internal affairs of both democratic and un-democratic nations all over the world doesn't mean that it is OK; on the contrary. If the people of a democratic country can't trust that they got the government is legitimate, how can that not end badly? It will inevitably lead to uprisings or even civil war - I would have thought Americans in particular would have reason to feel cautious about that prospect.

    19. Re:Hypocracy by Seiber · · Score: 1

      A country that regularly invades other country to force a change in government gets its panties in a twist over a theory that someone might have taken an interest in their election. The US does this all the time.

      Are you seriously pointing at the USA's habit of invading other countries in an attempt to make Russia look like an Boy Scout? Russia has it's own record of invading other countries, installing puppet governments, committing atrocities and imposing a regime of oppression that makes the Americans look like rank amateurs. Just ask the nations of Eastern Europe how much they enjoyed half a century of Russian imposed communism and how much they are looking forward to enjoying a repeat of that experience if Putin succeeds in disassembling NATO and rebuilding the Soviet empire. If I have to choose between living under US Imperial hegemony or Russian kleptocratic tyranny I'll choose the Americans every damn time, even when they, are dumb enough to elect a narcissistic moron with a bad orange comb over and an over active Twitter account who seems to be hell bent on provoking a trade war with China.

      I can't understand why the Americans are so worried about Russia????? Who cares what Russia does, they are like lint to the Military of the USA.

      What the Americans must worry about is China!! They are out researching and Developing the USA. They are becoming the Supper Power and Economic leaders. Watch out...

    20. Re:Hypocracy by rainer_d · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize that the CIA and FBI were now "bhutt hurt liberal media shills", thanks for clarifying that.

      I honestly don't know how conservatives sleep at night, knowing that their system failed badly enough to put Trump in the White House (too many candidates spreading their support too thin, failing to counter his bullshit effectively)... I guess they are just happy that they can now ram through all their policies and are willing to overlook the rest of it.

      They must be terrified over what Russian has on the GOP though. You can bet that if Putin's man in the White House ever goes rogue there will be some strategic leaks to neuter him.

      What could be worse than a video clip of "...you can grab 'em by the pussy"?

      --
      Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
    21. Re:Hypocracy by unixisc · · Score: 2

      So the battle they picked was not when the private records of US citizens were stolen by hackers, or any of the other instances, but when the emails of DNC officials were hacked and leaked to the American public? Yeah, good prioritization

      This was not anything like a Watergate break-in, since neither Trump nor the RNC did it: a third party, that had an animus towards Obama and Clinton, and which GOP administrations in the past as well as the GOP establishment openly condemn, did. And the only 'damage' was the US electorate seeing the real shenanigans of the DNC in their own internal race, and later, the thought processes of Clinton campaign officials, whether it was their opinion on Catholics, Clinton's desire to have an equivalent of the EU in the Americas, w/ open borders from Canada to Argentina, or solicitations from the King of Morocco for the Clinton Foundation. Yeah, I know that Dems would have loved for such a person to have been elected in preference to the evil Trump, but that's not how it works. Besides, what cost Clinton the election was the fact that she didn't care about the working class, particularly in WI, MI and PA, where it mattered, and flipping those 3 states were what cost her

    22. Re:Hypocracy by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize that the CIA and FBI were now "bhutt hurt liberal media shills", thanks for clarifying that.

      I honestly don't know how conservatives sleep at night, knowing that their system failed badly enough to put Trump in the White House (too many candidates spreading their support too thin, failing to counter his bullshit effectively)... I guess they are just happy that they can now ram through all their policies and are willing to overlook the rest of it.

      They must be terrified over what Russian has on the GOP though. You can bet that if Putin's man in the White House ever goes rogue there will be some strategic leaks to neuter him.

      Define 'Conservatives' here. Are you talking about the average citizen in Red States who support Republicans election after election, only to be disappointed later? Or are you talking about the talking heads in National Review, Weekly Standard or the American Federalist? If it's the latter, they opposed Trump right uptil the end, until he won the election: after that, they accepted the election results and decided to support him. If it is the former, they overwhelmingly supported Trump in the primaries, or else, he wouldn't have trounced Cruz in the 'SEC primaries' on super Tuesday. From their POV, the system worked: they supported Trump, and Trump won. The support ranged from guys like Jerry Falwell Jr, Robert Jeffers, the NRA, and a whole bunch of conservative organizations that might have otherwise supported Cruz.

    23. Re:Hypocracy by unixisc · · Score: 2

      Excepting that if this was manufactured information, no break-ins would have been needed - or maybe one. Steal whatever info you need about certain computer information, like headers, and then generate emails w/ all sorts of details that would make candidates squirm. Only that if they had done that, it would have been very vociferously denied, instead of the battle cry of 'It was the evil Putin trying to get his puppet Trump elected'.

      The Trump tax returns are the favorite straw man of not just Liberals, but also Trump's former Republican opponents, who got nowhere w/ it. When a candidate files to run in the elections, they have to file a financial disclosure statement stating all their assets, liabilities and other operating incomes and expenses, which is what Trump did. That is a lot more comprehensive than a tax return. A tax return would have the end results of how much was paid, but not necessarily the internals of what went into it. The financial disclosure revealed a lot more.

    24. Re:Hypocracy by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      US reporting of events in Russia is almost always biased and uninformed. It's extremely rare to find reporting from a Russian viewpoint, because there are so many unspoken differences in the way we see things. A strong, powerful head of state is automatically viewed as a negative in the US, for example.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    25. Re:Hypocracy by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      I never thought I'd see the DNC get so low that they'd allow the most corrupt politician in American history be their front runner

      That's some fine hyperbole there, commentor. Ever hear of "Boss" Tweed, Edwin Edwards, Rod Blagoevich, James Traficant, Duke Cunningham? *coughcough*LBJ?*coughcough*

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
  4. from Russia by turkeydance · · Score: 4, Funny

    with LAN

  5. To be fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If I didn't dodge the draft by other means I would very well have done this program

  6. Interesting, but entry-level programmers, not elit by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's mildly interesting. As is normally the case, the article points out that the headline is bullshit. College students? That's where you find entry-level programmers, not "elite hackers". Nothing wrong with that, of course, you can train an entry-level programmer to damage computing systems just as readily as you can train them to build secure systems.

    There are a few elite hackers, people who really understand the low-leveling functioning of the system, who write the payloads in assembler. Those elite ones, who write assembler, tend to be older more often than they are college kids. College kids tend to *use* the tools written by the older, more experienced and "elite" hackers.

  7. Apartment with a washing machine? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    So apparently Russia's nerds have the same problems with personal hygiene that western nerds do...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  8. Re:Interesting, but entry-level programmers, not e by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    people who really understand the low-leveling functioning of the system

    We calls thems electrical engineers where I'm from.

  9. Hypocrisy at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    because don't pretend the U.S. has not done this for a decade or more. Russia (and China) has got _nothing_ on the U.S. when it comes to staging a cyberwar on the world, as the NSA revelations have proven. This NYT article is a case of the Fake News you've been hearing about.

  10. Re:really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wow, ya hey lets start a whole campaign to inform that public about how the WH, the seat of US gov got hacked, that will calm the public. You have a lot to learn about politics let along global politics.

  11. Re:is there a real link? by wasted · · Score: 1

    The link in the summary is to the New York Post .

  12. Re:really? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    So this wasn't news when they hacked into CIA and the White House. But it's news when they broke into DNC?

    That's because the DNC had a lot more secrets exposed.

  13. Re:Interesting, but entry-level programmers, not e by lucm · · Score: 4, Funny

    There are a few elite hackers, people who really understand the low-leveling functioning of the system, who write the payloads in assembler.

    Of course. A piece of code in assembler that gets injected on the system via a clever manipulation of the power phase and/or fan oscillation, delivered via Q-spoiling. Once infected, the host system sends an email to the hacker to let him know which version of Wordpress is running on the server so he can know which php file to upload and pwn the organization.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  14. Wasted talent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Its been a few years since the company I work for had offices in Russia but at that time US export controls prohibited sharing quite a bit of engineering specifications with our team in Russia. So you have some very talented coders who cannot fully participate on projects where their stills and experience would be invaluable. I can only imagine how frustrating this must be and if an honest living cannot be made then the path to a less than honorable income becomes that much more enticing.

  15. They post ads, more since Snowden by raymorris · · Score: 2

    > I have no reason not to believe that the NSA and other government agencies recruit top talent in important fields from college,

    I know they post employment ads just like any other organization who hires people. I would expect they recruit like other organizations - though possibly not as effectively as many companies. I'm in the security field and have been called about jobs for a lot of companies, only one of which sounded like potentially a front company.

    One thing different about their ads is when you click to go to their online application site, it you're instructed to not tell anyone that you've applied - just in case they want to hire you for a clandestine, or more likely semi-clandestine role (typically not spy thriller stuff, just a fairly typical office job but you keep it on the down low).

    I understand the intelligence services have had trouble recruiting since the Snowden revelations, which makes sense. Ten or fifteen years ago I probably would have considered a job hacking for the "good guys". Now, we know the good guys are bad guys.

  16. Re:Interesting, but entry-level programmers, not e by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As someone who helps run a Hacker Con here in the US, I can gar-un-tee you that most 'elite' hackers (not all, I'll give you there are a few outlives) were on BBS or at least owned a Commodore 64.

    One guy I know got off of a criminal charge because the state's prosecutor said "he couldn't have been the one hacking, he wasn't home when it happened, he was on vacation in Texas" ... and everyone who knew what they were talking about... just stopped... quickly looked around... and was like ... "yep, guess you are right...." and they all walked out of there with the guy (it was a public hearing in front of a local magistrate).... Apparently the hardest part of the entire thing was not laughing when the DA said that....

    I've given lectures to 2nd / 3rd year CS students at a Research 1 Tier University in the past few years... and very few of them even knew what SSH was... so yeah...

  17. Re:Obama's still crying after his embarrassing los by lucm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Obama, what an asshole. He gladly breaks the tradition of lame ducks not rocking the boat. He antagonizes Israel at the UN and now tries to declare war on Russia. What's next? Invade Ireland to seize Apple's cash, then nuke North Korea?

    What an awful president. Good riddance.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  18. Re:Interesting, but entry-level programmers, not e by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

    people who really understand the low-leveling functioning of the system

    We calls thems electrical engineers where I'm from.

    You fancy higher-level people.

    --Physicist

    Hey, how's it look way up there?

    -Mathematician

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  19. Re:Interesting, but entry-level programmers, not e by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    There are a few elite hackers, people who really understand the low-leveling functioning of the system, who write the payloads in assembler. Those elite ones, who write assembler, tend to be older more often than they are college kids.

    I'm not one of those guys, but I've partied with some of those guys (and no, not at defcon) and it seemed to me like plenty of them actually are college kids. Is there something mystical about assembler that prevents college kids from learning it?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. Re:really? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    Don't you know. Russia spies all descended on Wisconsin and told 300,000 Democratic voters from 2012 to vote elsewhere. Russia personally bumped Stein and Johnson's turnout from 7665 & 20439 to 31072 and 106,674 respectively. Russia told Clinton to not visit Wisconsin once in the general election.

    Never you mind those Sanders supporters that said Fuck You to the DNC. (Seriously, how can anyone at DNC HQ say Sanders would have lost Wisconsin or Michigan?).

  21. A washing machine? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The ad went on to assure recruits that they would be part of units called science squadrons based at military installations where they would live in 'comfortable accommodation' and showed an apartment outfitted with a washing machine, the Times reported.

    Wait a minute, you mean the President Elect chose to pimp out the US to a country that has to recruit tech talent with the promise of a fucking washing machine? A country that's sitting on untold natural resources but has an economy smaller than that of Spain?

    Jesus, Trump should have at least held out for China. We might have actually gotten something out of that deal.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  22. Re:Obama's still crying after his embarrassing los by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    antagonizes Israel

    If I was sending someone $3.1 billion per year I'd think they'd let me antagonize them as much as I wanted.

    The Right is flipping out over Obama's $85M in 'vacation costs', that's all of 10 days of money sent to Israel.

  23. Re:really? by superwiz · · Score: 1

    That's because the DNC had a lot more secrets exposed.

    And? It's a private organization. Hacking government facilities is far more worthy of official retaliation than hacking of a political party. Especially when the only thing which appears to have been exposed was the misdeeds by the DNC. The whole thing smells like a DNC cover up to blame a scapegoat de jour to distract the country from what Wikileaks actually exposed : system corruption within a party which is known for accusing others of "hypocrisy" whenever those others don't meet their own integrity criteria. Russia may have interfered with the US elections by allowing the US public know how the DNC unquestionably did interfere with the US primary election process (by using the Democratic Party resources to subvert one of the two leading primary candidates). If Russia was really in it to help Trump, where is the intelligence to show that RF hacked campaigns of all the other Republican primary candidates? If Trump is the Manchurian Candidate, where is any proof that he beat the other Republicans through Russian efforts? This is nothing but retaliation for exposure of how dirty the Democratic party has become. C'mon... they advertised on the most popular social network? And then made sure that the people they hired knew some programming languages? This is evidence of hacking elections? How dumb do you have to be to believe this? It seems to me more like "we lost the elections... round up the usual suspects" a la Casablanca.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  24. A few, sure. Overall tendencies, likelihood by raymorris · · Score: 2

    In my experience, a few young people can work at low level, assembler etc, and truly grok it but it's much more common for older people to have learned it. On the other hand, the youngest programmers are more likely to know how to use the framework of month, which is also a good thing to know.

    Multiply the percentage of people in each age group who grok assembly by the percentage that have elite skills that normally come from many years of experience.

      In 20 years of continually learning, I've already done it wrong 5,000 different ways. It's hard to screw up that much in just a few years, and learn the same lessons. Actually there's also a lot of benefit, to me, of cross-pollinating a lot of stuff I've done over the years; hacks I did with DirectX 8 and 9 give me ideas that I use today. It's tough for a college kid to say "hey maybe something like the hack I figured out in 1994 can be applied here."

    1. Re:A few, sure. Overall tendencies, likelihood by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      In the old days I learned machine language, then assembler and then basic, all from the bottom up , but that was the seventies. Now on pcs assember is rarely needed and when it's used for performance reasons you can still question whether it's really needed. Hacking is different because you're trying to break things, you don't want to respect the interface and its safeties and errorhandling. On custom hardware though like modems I know assembler is used a lot.

  25. Re:really? by superwiz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And if you still don't think "let's find some Russians to blame" is the modus operandi for handling elections loss in the DNC, just recall this

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Chapman

    They rounded up some RF nationals who worked in finance (not even in government) and expelled them ON JULY 4th in the year when they were trying to stem the tide of the upcomming losses which were to come from the Tea Party surge in the mid-term elections. Their "espionage" consisted of advising RF government in financial matters... imagine that. Some finance guys advising foreign government in financial matters. Don't take me wrong. I am a very vocal critic of Putin's government. And I usually find myself on the side of vehemently mocking RF apologists. RF could not sway Ukrainian election (which is why they had to resort to open warfare with Ukraine). But now we are supposed to believe that they can sway US elections? Why? Because there is a few RF citizens engaging in some credit card fraud? So Russians are these super hackers all of a sudden? But only when DNC losses the election. When the RF manages to get a glance at some military data, that's not news because that's on Obama's watch. I call bull shit.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  26. Re:Interesting, but entry-level programmers, not e by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    OK, can you get back to work now? I ordered a *big* fry with that burger, okay?

  27. Re:really? by superwiz · · Score: 1

    Yes, I guess the first thing I should learn is that when you try to pose as an insider, it helps if there is a mechanism to post anonymously, AC. Thanks. That was such a valuable lesson. Too bad calling someone a troll has become so cliche that it's almost trolling in itself. It could have been a very appropriate way to categorize your post.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  28. Easy by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1
    1. 1. Buy Slashdot
    2. 2. Buy Sourceforge
    3. 3. Place ads for leet haxors, with comfortable accommodation showing an apartment outfitted with a washing machine
    4. 4. Profit
  29. Re:is there a real link? by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

    Obviously. If it's not on Breitbart it's fake. :)

  30. Even in a medium company that's three groups by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > You will have the programmers to write/modify tools and find new zero-day cracks then you will have the people who use those tools and try to get into systems using defined and developed methods.

    Even in the small to medium sized security company where I work, that's at least three, really four different groups. I write the tools. S sometimes the tools I write find basically the same vulnerabilities in new applications (such as yet another SQLi in yet another web application) , but real zero-days is a different skillset. Even amongst the zero-day crew, finding them is a different skillset than fully exploiting them. I can *find* a buffer overrun when an input causes the program to crash. Having it execute my choice of payload rather than just crash is a whole other level.

  31. To clarify, I write tools for known vulnerabilitie by raymorris · · Score: 1

    After submitting, I realized part of my post was probably unclear. Currently, I mostly write tools to find known vulnerabilities. If you didn't install the security patches on patch Tuesday, my tools will discover that. If you're still using an outdated cipher, my tools detect that. Brand new vulnerabilities are a different department located in a different country.

  32. Re:really? by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

    YEAH!!! .. and if I don't count my car payment, my car was FREE!!!!!

  33. Real Story, Fake Narrative by Nova+Express · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure the Russian government recruits computer talent in the many ways listed in the article. I would suspect the U.S. government does much the same.

    The fake part comes in: Why publish this piece now? Why not, say, during the massive OPM breach?

    Simple: Publishing it during the OPM breach would have harmed Obama, whom the New York Times and it's employees almost universally adore, while publishing it now helps prop up the false narrative that the Russians were behind the DNC leaks, not a disgruntled Democratic Party insider, and thus supposedly harms President-elect Donald Trump, whom the New York Times and it's employees almost universally loath.

    Remember, among the revelations to come out just after the election were how the Times abandoned objectivity to go after Trump and how the entire newsroom is dedicated to driving a predetermined narrative rather than carrying out an objective search for truth.

    This story was published because it fits an (unproven and probably false) narrative that Russia "hacked the election" because it theoretically harms Trump.

    Further reading here and here.

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  34. Re:Obama's still crying after his embarrassing los by lucm · · Score: 1

    antagonizes Israel

    If I was sending someone $3.1 billion per year I'd think they'd let me antagonize them as much as I wanted.

    The Right is flipping out over Obama's $85M in 'vacation costs', that's all of 10 days of money sent to Israel.

    The federal debt under Obama has increased by $8,946,567,665,023.71. That's just the debt, not the whole spending. The real problem here is not Israel.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  35. Abhorrent by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

    You can see some of the dirty russkie's under the table efforts here. http://www.arcyber.army.mil/Pa... We really have to do something about this.

  36. Re:Hypocrisy by unixisc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, it was done twice by 2 US presidents - Clinton and Obama. Both did what they could to try and get Netanyahu beaten in the Israeli elections - w/ Clinton sending Carville to manage Labour's campaign and actually pulling it off - getting Ehud Barak elected

    While I don't believe that the WikiLeaks was the straw that broke the camel's back and tilted this election Trump's way, in the event that it actually did, it couldn't have happened to a more deserving candidate

  37. Cults of personality, or lack thereof by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

    Hillary didn't lose because of some "mandate from the minority" or because of perceived corruptions... She lost because she has the personality of a beige jumpsuit.

    Trump won because he's the man you love to hate... Trump is EASILY as corrupt as Clinton, probably more so, but the conservatives can NEVER admit that because he's their backed horse now.

    Just like every other vitriolic conservative personality, they feign outrage, while giving a slight wink and a nod of supporting the very thing they "stand" for... i.e. "drain the swamp!"

    Bernie had personality and ran an arguably clean campaign and REAL grass roots support, but he was undoubtedly hamstrung by the DNC who were dead set on lifting Hillary to office. It is my firm opinion that Bernie would have decidedly beaten Trump... without a shred of doubt in my mind. On that score the democrats were a MAJOR factor in Trump's victory to the presidency.

  38. She Devil by bob4u2c · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Every time I hear the news try to pin the blame of the election results on "Russian Hackers" I can't help thinking of that scene in She Devil. The one where Bob is meeting with his lawyers who advise him to claim that hackers broke into his computer and committed the fraud knowing they will get the easy judge, but instead the judges are switched and it back fires on him.

    The whole thing smells to high heaven. Take the warnings by the FBI to the DNC. If they knew the hacks were going on, then they must have had some monitoring agents already installed (at the ISP or locally) which tipped them off, or they were the ones carrying out the attacks running them through Russian nodes to conceal the source and keep plausible denial ability.

    Seriously though, She lost, move on DNC and stop trying to start a war over this.

  39. What's the Answer... by hyades1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is Trump's connection with Putin purely sexual, or are there US national security implications?

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:What's the Answer... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Is Trump's connection with Putin purely sexual, or are there US national security implications?

      Odd - I would have modded your post as informative, maybe even insightful. Answer to the first is no, the second is very much yes.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:What's the Answer... by Xyrus · · Score: 2

      Is Trump's connection with Putin purely sexual, or are there US national security implications?

      Money, sex, and power. Putin helped Trump get elected. Power. Putin-Trump puts Rex Tillerson in as Secretary so he can roll back the sanctions blocking the half-trillion dollar oil deal Tillerson had with Putin. Money.

      So now we just need the sex part. All jokes of shirtless Putin and Trump nipple tickling him aside, I'm not sure where that plays in yet. Trump and some of his current and former associates have had plenty of dealings in Russia. Wouldn't surprise me in the slightest that someone like Trump has had more than a grabby handful of female adventures, and it would surprise me even less if Putin didn't have an extensive archive of blackmail material on him.

      Putin isn't stupid, and he's certainly more intelligent and clever than Trump could ever hope to be. He's a chess player; he knows how to think ahead and play the long game. Trump has had presidential ambitions for decades. I'd bet dollars to donuts that Puty has got quite the dossier on Trump, Tillerson, et al. and I'm also sure they know the Putin isn't the type of person to make idle threats.

      Putin will continue to be praised and treated with velvet gloves by this administration because they've got Trump and friends by the proverbial (and possibly even literal) balls.

      --
      ~X~
    3. Re:What's the Answer... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Back at ya, my friend! I think if we ever find out how deep Trump's ties to Russia really are, we'll be pretty upset.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    4. Re:What's the Answer... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you up if I could.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    5. Re:What's the Answer... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      I always kind of wondered whether the "modelling agency" his wife worked at might actually be something else.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    6. Re:What's the Answer... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Back at ya, my friend! I think if we ever find out how deep Trump's ties to Russia really are, we'll be pretty upset.

      It's an almost unreal bit of irony how Russia has finally won the cold war, and they did it in service of the Party of McCarthy and the red scare.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  40. Re:really? by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    Republican domination of state houses during the census guaranteed their ability to gerrymander electoral districts to the point where they'll never lose control of the House. Tom DeLay might have served jail time, but he succeeded in utterly destroying any possible US argument that it is still a democracy, and delivered the country into the hands of mouth-breathing racist morons for the foreseeable future.

    Grow up, you silly child.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  41. Re:Interesting, but entry-level programmers, not e by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
    I started out on an Atari (it was out a year or two before the C64). Basically the same thing though. SID was better, but Atari had better custom graphics chips.

    Hey, maybe you could disagree and we can re-ignite the oldest flame war in computerdom.

  42. Re:Interesting, but entry-level programmers, not e by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    I was doing assembler in highschool. It was the only way to get decent performance.

  43. Re:Interesting, but entry-level programmers, not e by Tuidjy · · Score: 2

    I doing plenty in Assembly for the Bulgarian People's Army in the 80s. There was a time I could read and edit in hexadecimal, getting things right most of the time. After the fall of the so called Communist government, I went to college in the US. Nothing mythical about Assembly and college, they mix just fine.

    As a matter of fact, at least in the 90s, MIT had plenty of courses that used Assembly... and a few were you would actually design both a processor (with a very simple instruction set) and write the assembler (the program going from Assembly to binary code) for it.

    This said, I have used (embedded) Assembly twice in the last twenty years, for the same reason both times: to wring a little bit more performance for data crunching that had to be performed in real time. Neither was for my day job. Then again, I'm not a hacker for the Russian government, the only government that's eeeeevil enough to employ *gasp* hackers.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished...
  44. Re:Interesting, but entry-level programmers, not e by Tuidjy · · Score: 1

    Damn, missing 'was', 'were' instead of 'where'... It's funny how these things happen whenever I start thinking about the bad old times, when the only thing that was better was me.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished...
  45. I see why you are confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Okay, let me get this straight. Your completely ignoring the fact that the result of a national election was dictated by a foreign country in favor of a cheap shot against democrats?"

    WHERE do you get this garbage?

    THERE is NO evidence that the result of the election was "dictated by a foreign country"!!!!! Hillary Clinton's campaign idiot, John Podesta, stupidly responded to a phishing e-mail and in doing so handed over the access to his e-mail account to SOME HACKER located SOMEWHERE ON EARTH. Apparently, the unknown hacker then grabbed Podesta's e-mails and handed them to Wikileaks. There's a plausible report that even this phishing attack was not even the source of the Wikileaks info and that it was provided by a Democrat insider, possibly an annoyed Bernie supporter. IF this phishing attack affected the election, then what you are saying is that it was very unfair for the American people to find out the truths about Hillary and her team that were exposed and that by your reckoning the American people should have remained ignorant and been tricked into supporting Hillary (THAT would have been the electionhack the Democrats intended).

    You Hillary supporters are just getting pathetic at this point - there's now a poll showing half of the Democrats think Putin hacked the voting machines (something even Obama says is impossible). It's just like you people who think Sarah Palin said she could see Russia from her House; Palin NEVER said it, the words were said on SNL by Tina Fey who was impersonating Palin. If left-wing media outlets repeat a lie often enough, it appears that fact-starved bubble-occupying liberals will believe the lie.

    Answer this: IF Obama knew Putin was hacking the election over the past year-and-a-half, then why did he do NOTHING to stop the hacks or punish the Russians until now, just before leaving office and after supposedly letting Hillary lose to the Russian hackers???? Obama theoretically has NSA people snooping on all net traffic and e-mails etc, so SURELY he could have detected it and defended the Democrat party from a simple phishing attack and SURELY he must have iron-clad proof of all the hack traffic and should have known exactly where all the hack traffic was coming from and going to. If you are right that Putin "hacked the election" then why did the most powerful man on Earth (Obama) let him do it????

    Another Question: You Hillbots keep insisting Trump is Putin's puppet... where is any shred of evidence for this? Trump has certainly called Putin "smart", but if you Democrats are right that Putin hacked the election, then you agree that Putin is smarter than Obama. Trump has certainly said he disagrees with Putin's agenda but that Putin is a better leader than Obama, but this was a slam on the poor leadership of Obama and is certainly true if you consider who is getting more results from his efforts to lead his respective nation. Remember that Hillary actually enabled Putin to grab a big chunk of America's Uranium capacity and that her campaign boy Podesta is a registered lobbyist for Putin's banker...

    1. Re:I see why you are confused by unixisc · · Score: 2

      No truths had to be revealed on the Trump side b'cos.... he revealed them himself. Whether it was buying politicians, or paying the least taxes or taking advantages of tax loopholes.... The thing that frustrated the lamestream media was that Trump would admit everything upfront, which is why to this day, they have their collective cunt in a twist over his tax returns. Never mind that he released a comprehensive financial statement - as required by law - a few days after he announced his candidacy

  46. Re:Hypocrisy by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

    WOW, now that is an intelligent rebuttal.

  47. Government size job by Max_W · · Score: 1

    Instead of this sham governments could do a real job. For example standardize plugs, sockets, voltage, or say traffic signs for automation.

  48. Re:Interesting, but entry-level programmers, not e by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

    Now this should be modded extra funny not only this post, but this parent and its parent post as well! Good to see humor is not completely dead in this discussion board.

  49. Prominent ads placed on social media sites by khz6955 · · Score: 1

    "Russian government recruiters .. placing prominent ads on social media sites"

    Is there a link to the original adverts?

  50. Re:Interesting, but entry-level programmers, not e by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Watch some of the CCC talk videos. There are university students hacking commercial banking systems and games consoles for their dissertations. The games consoles in particular need a lot of assembler and low level work to recover keys, right down to the hardware level.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  51. I heart hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey guys, did you hear Russia is hacking the US? "No big deal, it's probably just propaganda" Hey guys, did you hear Hillary didn't secure her e-mail server? "OMG SHE'S THE DEVIL SEND HER TO PRISON FOR TREASON!" I love watching you morons try to justify your way out of your own stupidity.

  52. Well there by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    A whole lot of "zero evidence" going on

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  53. Re:Propaganda by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    While we're bombarded with news about Russian hacking, let's not forget that the first country that deployed what can be called a "cyber-weapon" is the USA.

    Fine logic there.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  54. Re:Hypocrisy by Xyrus · · Score: 1

    Actually, it was done twice by 2 US presidents - Clinton and Obama. Both did what they could to try and get Netanyahu beaten in the Israeli elections - w/ Clinton sending Carville to manage Labour's campaign and actually pulling it off - getting Ehud Barak elected

    While I don't believe that the WikiLeaks was the straw that broke the camel's back and tilted this election Trump's way, in the event that it actually did, it couldn't have happened to a more deserving candidate

    So Trump was elected to give Hillary her just desserts? That's like setting yourself on fire to show the propane company you don't need their fuel to keep warm in the winter.

    This country deserves every fucking thing coming to it over the next four years.

    --
    ~X~
  55. It's 2002 all over again by K.+S.+Van+Horn · · Score: 1

    The NYT served as the Bush Administration's propaganda organ in the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq. Now they are reprising that role for the Obama administration's last-ditch efforts to lie the country into war with Russia.

  56. Re:Hypocrisy by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Are you incapable of reading, or typing? Or both?

  57. Re:Hypocrisy by unixisc · · Score: 2

    No, I stated that the Democrats deserved what they got. They tried rigging Israeli elections twice - the first time successfully - and this time, assuming that this election was rigged against them (something I don't agree that happened), it was a just payback.

  58. Re:End justified by Humbubba · · Score: 1
    An Anonymous Coward said

    Nowadays, anyone with good technical assets is typically frowned upon in business, or at the very least not considered posivitely. "Just code monkeys" etc. When opportunity to prove yourself against your peers and often against former employers and offered a fair amount of money in the process, the choice is clear.

    You are sooo right about the revenge of the monkeys. I won't explain.

    Its a bear eat bear out there, bring your pepper spray and hiker trail bells.

    Oh, that's great! I forgot about that... and an excuse to change the subject...

    ---

    Montana Grizzly Bear Notice:

    In light of the rising frequency of human/grizzly bear conflicts, the Montana Department of Fish and Game is advising hikers, hunters, and fishermen to take extra precautions and keep alert for bears while in the field. We advise that outdoorsmen wear noisy little bells on their clothing so as not to startle the bears that aren't expecting them. We also advise outdoorsmen to carry pepper spray with them in case of an encounter with a bear.

    It is also a good idea to watch out for fresh signs of bear activity. Outdoorsmen should recognize the difference between black bear and grizzly bear poop. Black bear poop is smaller and contains a lot of berry seeds and squirrel fur. Grizzly bear poop has little bells in it and smells like pepper spray.

  59. ad 2101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In AD 2101, cyber was beginning.

    Captain: What happen?
    Mechanic: Somebody set up us the cyber.
    Operator: We get signal.
    Captain: What !
    Operator: Main screen turn on.
    Captain: It's you !!
    CYBERRUSSIAN: How are you gentlemen !! All your cyber are belong to us. You are on the way to cyber.
    Captain: What you say !!
    CYBERRUSSIAN: You have no chance to cyber make your cyber. Ha ha ha ha ....

  60. Re:Hypocrisy by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Oh, I absolutely consider them legit. I was just accepting the (incorrect) premise that it was illegitimate to sabotage their prospects, and then illustrating that they had done it for at least one foreign election previously - that in Israel. So it's like someone in a very fragile glass house throwing stones

  61. Re:really? by superwiz · · Score: 1

    California would not have tilted the election even if it had 50% more electoral votes than it currently does. I am suggesting that electoral college is a good system for putting a check on cluster fuck or group think or whatever else you want to call it. Obviously, the people in California are woefully misinformed and completely isolated from the opinions outside of those prevalent in that state. Having a place like that have such a huge impact on the rest of the country would be a gross step away from democracy.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  62. Re:really? by superwiz · · Score: 1

    gerrymandering would serve as an explanation if they didn't win 39 governships. Or if the popular vote victory would be more spread across the country. The won in the California outlier and the fact the Democrats actually lost the popular vote without the California outlier only proves the gerrymandering claim wrong.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  63. Re:really? by superwiz · · Score: 1

    Grow up, you silly child.

    Fuck you, you silly cunt.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  64. Re:let's add subjects to every line typed on skype by unixisc · · Score: 1

    First of all, Mr Knowitall, Israel has a government similar to UK - where the Prime Minister heads the government, not a president.

    Second, I mentioned 'deserving candidate', not 'deceiving candidate'. What's wrong w/ you - did you learn reading in a school in a shitty school district?

    Third, I never said it would be satisfying if Putin put Trump in power. What I said was that having tried their best to interfere in the Israeli elections, for the US to blame Russia for doing the same here is a case of pot, kettle, black. Aside from that, I do not believe any of the following:

    - That Russia was the one that hacked the emails for Wikileaks: I happen to believe Assange on this one. While I in principle don't support Wikileaks hacking government computer systems, what they exposed here was funny, particularly the Clinton statement about being 2 faced

    - That the wikileaked emails changed many minds. Those who oppose Clinton just had their worst suspicions about her, the DNC and the media confirmed, while those who supported her continued to support her.

    - That Russia had any control on any voting machines, since few of them, particularly in WI, MI and PA, were connected to the internet

    What I do believe as the reason for Clinton's defeat is that the same Bernie supporters who attended his rallies but didn't bother to turn up to vote to give him a fighting chance also stayed home for Clinton. If they couldn't bother to get their butts out to support their fav Bernie at the polls, why would they do that for someone who they liked even less? It's a lot more fun to hold loud demonstrations in the days following the results.

  65. Re:let's add subjects to every line typed on skype by unixisc · · Score: 1

    I never made any assumptions about you and the other AC. I knew you were different, and the above post was directed at you and you alone. Reading comprehension ain't your strongest point, and you illustrate it pretty emphatically.

    About Israel, in 1999 or thereabouts, Bill Clinton did send James Carville to Israel to manage the campaign to oust Netanyahu, since he thought that Israel was the party that blocked peace. Except that he found out otherwise when Arafat rebuffed the most generous - and suicidal - offer that Ehud Barak could give, and restarted the Intifada. Of course, Obama learnt nothing from it, and repeated the same experiment, but this time unsuccessfully: the Israelis did not fire Netanyahu this time. Difference here is that Obama is perfectly fine w/ Israel being wiped off the map: he has more of an emotional bond w/ the Arabs, having been taught in Quran school in Indonesia when he was in his formative years

    I do agree w/ you that Russia didn't do shit. Most people's minds were already made up, and Wikileaks just proved what people suspected.

    Your nationality and religion have nothing to do w/ things: most US Jews are unfortunately anti-Israel, even if it means acquiescing in the supremacy of a geopolitical ideology that surpasses Nazism in its Judeophobia. Problem is that if Israel were to fall - which it would if it were forced back to its 1967 borders, it would mark a triumph of Islam unseen since the capture of Constantinople, and one would see a worldwide campaign to spread Islam just about everywhere, and impose Shariah law wherever possible.

  66. Re: let's add subjects to every line typed on skyp by fubarrr · · Score: 1

    Sharia law for Israel

  67. Re: let's add subjects to every line typed on skyp by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Medina back to Israel