Slashdot Mirror


Do Android Users Still Use Custom Roms? (androidauthority.com)

"With all of the drama at CyanogenMod, Android Authority takes a look at the current state of custom ROM development," writes Slashdot reader Thelasko. From the article: The future of CyanogenMod appears uncertain, after the open source ROM was forced to fork under the name Lineage OS. Fortunately there are already other remixed versions of Android available, with some of the most popular being Paranoid Android, Resurrection Remix, and Dirty Unicorns... [But] with each new version of Android, the gap between Android and popular custom ROMs has shrunk, which begs an interesting question: Are custom ROMs even necessary anymore? To answer this, let's take a quick look at the state of custom ROM development as it exists today.
The article points out that mobile virtual reality is "on the verge of becoming mainstream and the wearable market has grown tremendously," asking whether custom firmware will also integrate these newer technologies. But the original submission also asks a question that's closer to home. What custom ROMs do Slashdot users have installed?

215 comments

  1. Hard to find good ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A lot of rom sites have recently closed up shop so now you have to dig through forum posts and bugfix threads. It's becoming a pain in the ass.

    1. Re:Hard to find good ones by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have KatKiss Marshmallow on an old Asus tablet. Stock ROM was limited to Jellybean, and the thing was a horribly slow piece of shit. The fact that I can run an OS as new as I can (there's even builds available for Nougat but I haven't bothered), on a device this old (2012) is amazing. I can take advantage of F2FS which makes the crappy flash memory perform not so crappy.

      I was also amazed at how much space is wasted on the flash memory with the standard OS update process. By installing the bare OS from scratch, and only the Google Apps I want, it hardly uses any flash, leaving plenty of the 32GB free.

    2. Re:Hard to find good ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you have a prime, in which case ./wave

  2. Stock ROMs are shit by mukinrestak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have Cyanogen on two devices, and I will ALWAYS have a custom ROM just to eliminate all the damn bloatware. If there are programs on a new device that I can't uninstall without rooting (and there always are) it's time for a reflashing.

    1. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by dejitaru · · Score: 3, Informative

      I believe running a custom rom just to get rid of bloat is an overkill when you can just use titaniumbackup to delete the bloat. That and some roms do come with their own bloat, like features that cause issues.

    2. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by guacamole · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sound's like you have been buying wrong devices. A typical Google Nexus or Motorola device has a pretty lean ROM that's pretty close to stock Android.

    3. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have Cyanogen on two devices, and I will ALWAYS have a custom ROM just to eliminate all the damn bloatware. If there are programs on a new device that I can't uninstall without rooting (and there always are) it's time for a reflashing.

      I gave up on Cyanogenmod when Cyanogen went all Microsoft. Not so much because the mod went bad as I started to lose in anybody who cooperates with Microsoft. It's sad to be proven right again, but I'm glad Lineage managed to break away so it's good in the long term. The parent is right. The stock ROM, even when it's almost plain Android on a Nexus device, is ultra-frustrating. You miss so much customisation. I will be back on a custom ROM the minute LineageOS gets up to speed. I paid the extra for a Nexus only because I knew Cyanogen would run on it properly. I will only be buying devices I know Lineage works on.

    4. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its called root and something like titanium for a safe and thourogh removal you still need to know what you are doing you can litteraly delete stuff you need system wise with titanium.

    5. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is why you back everything u first.... duh!

    6. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by Snotnose · · Score: 1

      This meets my immediate interests :)

      How do you backup your droid such that if the root goes sideways you can fix it?

      Difficulty: Ice Cream Sandwich device (HTC V One, hardware is shit, software iffy. Hard to tell if problems are hardware or software related).

      Extra credit: about a half inch from getting the LG X Power, but would like to hang on to my HTC for another 6 months if possible.

    7. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phone recommendations? zeke baker one word at gmail

    8. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When they'll allow SD cards on Nexus, I'll get them.

    9. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Back up your user data (use SMS Backup and Restore and Call Log Backup and Restore if those matter to you, as they're not in e regular user data folders). Look up root method on XDA. It's not too hard on most devices. They'll even tell you how to recover from a bad flash, if possible.

    10. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Often the problem is the custom UI. ZenUI, MIUI, Samsung stuff... It all detracts from a consistent Android UI experience.

    11. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Stock Android is full of bloat. Go ahead and force Google Play on me, but there's over half a dozen other Google Apps I don't want and can't uninstall. Pico Open GAPPS on CM fixes the problem.

    12. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly
      Moto Z Play Zero Bloatware

    13. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here you go bots. zekebaker@gmail com

    14. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zekebaker@gmail.com

    15. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      and you'll have to enable root on them anyways.

      BUT .. you know. For example samsung has api's to enable packages and parts of packages that are built in and not normally possible to disable. but you have to use their mdm api's to do that which needs a (free) key from samsung.

      same api's offer an _actual_ firewall.

      and yes you can break things by dicking around with it and no it does not break the "root detection" system of samsung, despite giving you almost practically root abilities.

      the package management api is a built in android api but which is not accessible on FUCKING ANY NORMAL ANDROID PHONE without dicking around with escalating privileges using manufacturer specific api's.

      it's kinda shitty really. the reason why it's so crap is of course that it's trivial to block ads etc stuff if you have access to these api's - however in order to deploy the devices to kiosk etc use you pretty much have to have this ability, which is why manufacturers are giving you this ability but you need to jump through some hoops to get it.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    16. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A better reason for custom roms is to be able to keep up with Android updates when the device supplier has ended the support for the device.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    17. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Kids Mode taking over the UI because it likes to.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    18. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I have a Moto X Play (2 full days of battery life, woo!), and I appreciate the low-bloat stock ROM that Motorola uses. Or used to use. They have since been bought out by Lenovo, and it looks like it's the end of the line for good Moto phones with lean stock ROMs.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    19. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by houghi · · Score: 1

      Lean does not mean there is a shitload of things I do not want, I do not want Gmail. I do not want Hangout. I do not want Facebook. I do not want Chrome.

      I would like a device that only has Google Play and then _I_ decide what I have or at least have the ability to delete what I want.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    20. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which stock ROMs come free of Google apps? That's why I use custom ROMs. I don't want any of that Google stuff.

    21. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly! main reason is security updates.

    22. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does it matter to you want someone else does with their own time and purchased hardware? What you believe doesn't matter. Not interested? Move along, it doesn't affect you, neither does it reduce your own choices.

    23. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      You know that Android is Google stuff? Maybe you want an Apple or Microsoft device instead?

    24. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (different AC to the other posters)
      I have a Nexus 7 (2013), which Google have stopped supporting. If Lineage OS put out a ROM for that, I'll give it a go; I was planning to put Cyanogenmod on it but life got in the way and now I have the free time to fiddle with custom ROMs, they've gone kaput.

    25. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by ironicsky · · Score: 0

      Why do you need SD cards? Phones come with 128Gb of storage now, and pixel devices come with unlimited photo backups to Google Drive.

      Unless you are downloading a shit ton of media you will never need it.

      Even Google Play Music doesn't suck up that much space with offline playlists. I have a 500 song playlist for weekend camping - and it uses a whopping 1.5-2Gb of space (1Mb per minute X 3 minutes per song X 500 songs)

      Even with every photo I've ever taken, I'll never ever fill up a full phone worth of data.

      Phone storage "space wars" is no different than pixel density wars. At some point it becomes pointless to add more with no actual benefit.

    26. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It costs little to add and SD card slot to a device. The question is why would any manufacture not allow them.

      I will only buy devices with SD card capability. Its a lot less expensive than paying for the extra installed memory, I can swap cards between devices, and its much easier to migrate to a new device. SD cards can serve as backup to files in device storage as well.

      I keep a large music library and usually a large number of movies on my phone & tablets for when I travel. It would take hours to swap the files between devices via copy.

    27. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is why would any manufacture not allow them.

      Added complexity, cost, and chance to break, on both a hardware and software level.

    28. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but but... I need my 120GB of 10-bit animes ;_;

    29. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

      Not the OP, but having an SD card allows me to keep the files I flash for a factory reset on the SD in case I have to wipe everything and start over. I can do it entirely on-the-go. No amount of cloud storage would allow me to do that.

      I also don't have 120gb of mobile data, either.

    30. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, I bought a 250GB 7200 rpm IDE hard drive back in 2006, for 70 euros.
      I earlier had a 60GB hard drive and 45GB hard drive, then 120GB hard drive and the 60GB hard drive.
      So, if it was good to have that much storage back in 2004 or 2003, why not now?
      You have some itunes-like thing and decide beforehand what you listen to, good for you.

      I wish there were a phone that takes two SD cards. One for music and one for miscellaneous. Looking at a 500MB/month pay-as-you-go plan.

    31. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you NOT need an SD card?

    32. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This implies that device makers actually provided any updates whatsoever, which is quite often not the case. I've been telling people for years: If you purchase an Android device, you had better be happy with how it is out of the box because you will likely never see any updates or bug fixes.

    33. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      If you would care to listen to Google, they explain plailn why they do not add SD slots to Nexus and Pixel devices.

      They claim this leads to a 'consistent user experience' across the models.

      You may disagree, but this is their reasoning.

      Of course, when I argued over the Android browser defaulting to a mobile User Agent String back in the G-1 days, and Google claimed it was to ensure i had the best possible mobile browsing experience, I was being contrary when I pointed out I has purchased the first Android device precisely to enjoy the best possible browsing experience. By changing the User Agent String back from my attempt to set the desktop User Agent String, they denied me the best possible experience.

      Their ultimate reasoning? I was using a lot of data. Yeah, I was basking in newly released 3G data. Sheesh.

      Yes, Google does decide things...

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    34. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Personally, the lack of an SD card slot is a showstopper. It is mandatory for me. Cloud storage is not a suitable replacement.

    35. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      =They claim this leads to a 'consistent user experience' across the models.

      You may disagree, but this is their reasoning.

      Reasoning that makes no sense is not reasoning whatsoever.

    36. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That 128Gb storage upgrade is 200 dollars. A 128Gb SD card is 40 dollars.

      We get it. You use phones differently than other people and/or money doesn't matter to you. Some people aren't you.

    37. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by Ramze · · Score: 1

      And you bought that BS? They want you to use their online storage services. Period. All of Google's hardware is designed to coax you into using their online services by limiting the local storage space. This saves them pennies on the hardware, but gives them exposure on the cloud software. Why else would they be the ONLY android and chrome-book manufacturer who omits a widely used storage expansion port?

      Thankfully, with an OTG cable, most of their phones and tablets can use flash drives. I'm a Nexus 7 tablet owner... love the device, though a bit sad it's reached end of service life. Hope other ROM makers will support it now that Google has relegated it to the dustbin.

    38. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      My N7 2013 won't OTG. Bah.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    39. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by jofas · · Score: 1

      Some carriers embed things in props or other system properties that can't just be uninstalled away.

    40. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by fluffynuts · · Score: 1

      Great, if you can afford one or can even get one in your country. I'd take a Nexus phone any day, if Google found it within their hearts to sell them in my country. Until then, I rely on 3rd-party ROMs to get me away from shitty vendor ROMs and closer to the original AOSP -- though also, I'll take the extra features like theming, thankyouverymuch.

    41. Re: Stock ROMs are shit by jofas · · Score: 1

      It's not about what the user wants, it's about what Google wants. Which is for you to use Google Drive.

    42. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by joshuaf · · Score: 1

      So you pick a good rom..... Custom kernals, etc, are not overkill. They can take a phone that barely lasts a day to three days.

    43. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Somebody can want Android without wanting the entire collection of Google apps. Apps for Google services that are pre-installed typically include Chrome, Gmail, Maps, Calendar, Photos, Hangouts, Books, Games, Movies & TV, Music, Docs, Sheets, Slides, Drive, Google Settings (that's separate from the Settings app that deals with basic OS stuff), and YouTube. I use the Google infrastructure extensively so I'm happy to have all of those around, but other people may prefer alternatives or not use those functions at all.

      In addition there is the Google Play store, and possibly the Google Now launcher unless the manufacturer has replaced it with a custom one. Those are reasonable to include in the OS image and make impossible to remove, because the usefulness of the device would be seriously impaired if you accidentally deleted them. If you delete Play you can't get any of the other apps back unless you sideload Play or have another app source installed, and having one launcher always there is a good idea just in case you accidentally delete all the other ones.

      Finally, there is Google Play Services. That's not actually an app, but rather a collection of APIs and API extensions that a lot of other apps depend on. Removing it will break a lot of apps, and not just Google's own; many third party apps also use it.

    44. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I got the feeling he didn't want anything to do with Google. The crapware I can understand wanting to avoid.

    45. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      A better reason for custom roms is to be able to keep up with Android updates when the device supplier has ended the support for the device.

      Yeah so where is the definitive place to go to get these roms? I've got a galaxy S3 from Verizon that I still use as a device, I'd like to update it to the latest possible.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    46. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Somebody can want Android without wanting the entire collection of Google apps. Apps for Google services that are pre-installed typically include Chrome, Gmail, Maps, Calendar, Photos, Hangouts, Books, Games, Movies & TV, Music, Docs, Sheets, Slides, Drive, Google Settings (that's separate from the Settings app that deals with basic OS stuff), and YouTube. I use the Google infrastructure extensively so I'm happy to have all of those around, but other people may prefer alternatives or not use those functions at all.

      Worst of it is these apps take up space in the initial load, and they have undoubtly been updated. So space is taken for the factory copy, plus the update pulled from Play store. Same idea with the OS. Flash storage always has the factory OS (with outdated google apps) PLUS the updated OS (with copies of outdated google apps) PLUS the latest update to these apps.

      Installing a clean ROM, and Opengapps pico or nano Then you only have the up to date copy of only the apps you want. I'll install Chrome, Gmail, maps, Youtube... that's about it.

      Going from a Tablet that shipped with ICE + several Jellybean updates, to a clean ROM of Marshmellow with Opengapps pico, I was surprised at how much less space was taken by the base OS.

    47. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Removing vendor apps aren't always possible, because of the deep integration of the vendors shell. You can get rid of some of the bloat, and disable a bit more. But you will never be close to a stock rom.

    48. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which stock ROMs come free of Google apps?

      Learn to read.

      Android is open source stuff that Google took and used for Android. I only want Android itself, which is open source. I don't want Google Play, Google, Google+, Hangouts or any of that other spyware. That is why I run a custom ROM.

    49. Re:Stock ROMs are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll install Chrome, Gmail, maps, Youtube... that's about it.

      I prefer Tint, K-9 Mail, OsmAnd Maps & Navigation and SkyTube. All of those are open source and available through F-Droid.

  3. more open by starblazer · · Score: 1

    with devices being more open and less carrier specific... there seems to be less crap. with less crap, there is less of a motive to root.

    1. Re:more open by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, last few devices I've bought had something very close to AOSP with only a minimum of extra apps installed, apps that aren't causing me any problems. Android itself doesn't vary a lot between versions any more, the chances are the version you have varies little - from a user's point of view - from the latest greatest. This is a far cry from the early days of Android where:

      1. Every phone had a heavily customized version of Android, in part because stock Android wasn't very pretty, but those customizations were usually horrible and bug ridden. As an example, my T-Mobile Slide 3G's dialer would crash if you changed from portrait to landscape.

      2. Android itself was barely feature complete. Third party tools were needed to provide a decent launcher, decent keyboard, and so on, as well as tethering and other features carriers were nervous about.

      It just isn't as important any more.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:more open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For me there is always one reason to root: I wanna know what those apps are doing, and to stop those apps if I don't like what they are doing.

      Look at your TOS and EULAs and you'll see that YOU are responsible for most of (if not all of) what your phone does. At least in the legal liability department. You also typically get the forced arbitration requirement too. Those reasons alone are more than enough for me to want absolute control over the damn thing.

      Another reason is the privacy aspect. Android is very "open" in the sense that your data is "open" for inspection. The only option users have is to not install it, and that's not good enough. For some apps, users don't have a better more privacy preserving choice. Still others are baked in and can't be removed. (Looking at you Samsung.) I demand the option to deny or at least fake the data those apps attempt to mine from me.

      Finally, there's the reason of features. If I have an SD card slot, I want to use it for storing data. Android has a nasty habit of making data inaccessible if it's stored on an SD card. Mainly though changing the APIs / permissions required to do so under the guise of "security". Heads up morons, putting yet another "Are you sure?" warning in front of it, will not prevent the malicious apps from compromising the data. Especially when that label only comes up during installation, and has no revocation once granted. A shared storage will always be at risk of data corruption. That's what backups are for. There are also reasons to allow data to be shared between apps. A better option would be to allow the user to choose where and how to store the data. If I want the data to be limited to the app that created it, I'd put it into the app's isolated storage. If I want the data to be accessible by other apps, I'd put it in the shared storage. Since Android can't get this right, I use root to remove the limitations.
      BTW. this isn't only limited to the SD card, there are others. For example screen capturing is something that requires root. (Yes I know about, the new API in nougat. It's not good enough because A. They gave into DRM demands and made it unable to capture something that flags itself as "secure". B. They made it require user consent. What happened to your policy of "once installed we don't give a fuck" Google? That makes it useless for something like Classroom monitoring software, as there is no admin override, and a user could try to install something that draws an opaque fullscreen window and flags itself as "secure" to prevent the monitoring program from working.)

      Granted there are people who don't care about these things, (Although I would advise otherwise but to each their own), but for those that do, we still use root where applicable.

  4. Read Only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you custom Memory if you can't write to it?

    Do you even Member what ROM means?

    1. Re:Read Only by ls671 · · Score: 1

      It's flashable ROM. You can write it (or flash it) more than one time. Typical ROM chips could only be written (or burn) once but still, a ROM chip has to be writable at some point ;-)

      http://www.howtogeek.com/16251...

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    2. Re:Read Only by tepples · · Score: 1

      "ROM" is a term of art for an Android system software image. Speculation: it might be called "ROM" because it's mounted read-only unless you are updating or have rooted the device.

    3. Re:Read Only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you English?

    4. Re:Read Only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's firmware, not hardware ROM. To be fair the word "firmware" does appear once in TFS.

    5. Re:Read Only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nyet.

    6. Re:Read Only by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      It's no less of a ROM than the old-school EPROM, EEPROM, EAROM, etc.

    7. Re:Read Only by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      How do you custom Memory if you can't write to it?

      Do you even Member what ROM means?

      No. Nobody here (except you) knows anything about anything. Thank you for your educational post.

      Unless... you're just unaware of this minor technology invented nearly 50 years ago, in which case... troll.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    8. Re:Read Only by msauve · · Score: 1

      "It's flashable ROM."

      No, it's flash memory.

      "Typical ROM chips could only be written (or burn) once but still, a ROM chip has to be writable at some point ;-)"

      No, ROM chips are manufactured with the data an intrinsic part of the silicon, the chip mask changes for different data. If it's writable once, it's a PROM, not a ROM.

      "ROM" as a name for full system software loads is a poorly chosen misnomer.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    9. Re:Read Only by ls671 · · Score: 1

      You are correct but consider the line between flash memory and EEPROM is really tin and sometimes they are considered the same.

      A teacher of mine once told us that memory should eventually become just that; memory.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    10. Re:Read Only by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      No, ROM chips are manufactured with the data an intrinsic part of the silicon, the chip mask changes for different data. If it's writable once, it's a PROM, not a ROM.

      And if it's erasable by UV light it's an EPROM

      And if instead of UV light you can use a higher voltage to erase it, it's electrically erasable programmable ROM, or EEPROM.

      Which these days is pretty much the same as the generic "flash memory" term that you've used.

      So.... where were we again?

      Oh yeah, ROM being a poorly chosen misnomer. I disagree.

      "ROM" - to the end user, past and present - is software you can't change. The BASIC interpreter on your C64, the section of Android that boots and runs the basic system apps, that package is referred to as a ROM, be it a physical chip with a UV window, or these days the zip file that is sent around and then programmed into your EEPROM on your phone.

      If someone gave me an OS/9 ROM for my COCO II, yes, that would be a chip. Someone gives me "Bert's Buttery Smooth Vanilla Marshmallow ROM" for my Nexus, well that's a file that gets loaded to my phone, but essentially it's the same item - the operating system.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    11. Re:Read Only by msauve · · Score: 0

      EEPROM...Which these days is pretty much the same as the generic "flash memory"

      Nope. EEPROM is byte (or word) reprogrammable, flash requires one to reprogram much larger blocks of data.

      "ROM" - to the end user, past and present - is software you can't change.

      So, you're arguing that a device image which the user can change is also software they can't change. Whatever.

      it's the same item

      The same, except that one is physical, and the other just an image which could be downloaded. That you have a COCO II speaks volumes.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    12. Re:Read Only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "ROM" - to the end user, past and present - is software you can't change. The BASIC interpreter on your C64,

      Oh, but we definitely changed the BASIC interpreter on the C64. The 64 had this interesting feature called "shadow RAM", that is, RAM at the same addresses as those ROMs. Normally, a read would read the ROM, and a write would go into the shadow RAM. So it went like this:

      1. Use a simple loop, read every ROM address and write it back. The shadow RAM then holds a copy of the ROM
      2. Write a bit into a control register (address 1) that turns off the ROM. From now on, reads come from the RAM, the ROM is no longer accessible. Machine works as before, because you were smart and copied the ROM into the shadow RAM before doing this.
      3. Modify the BASIC interpreter whatever way you like, because it is now running from writeable RAM.

      As for android, try to debug the sleep mode. Find out out if it dreams of electric sheep or not.

    13. Re:Read Only by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      NOR flash is byte (or bit) programmable.

    14. Re:Read Only by msauve · · Score: 1

      Yes, technically. But in practice, that only applies to the initial programming. After that, one must do a block erase to prepare for writing, so changing a single word requires (re)programming more than one.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    15. Re:Read Only by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Ooh, thanks.
      So I guess it's mostly used as fixed 'eeprom' anyway.
      Still nice for reads from a microcontroller/embedded.

      Do e.g. SIM cards use NOR flash? if you have a fixed allocation for SMS messages and a fixed allocation for contacts, then you might simply do incremental writes when receiving messages or storing new contacts, and not do a power hungry block erase until needed, amirite?

    16. Re:Read Only by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Replying to myself, I found this that says NOR erases are mega slow. So perhaps NAND on SIM cards.
      http://focus.ti.com/pdfs/omap/...

  5. Do Android Users Dream of Electric Sheep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTFY

  6. Of course they do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this the dumbest question in the history of Slashdot?

    Go to XDA. Pick you phone. Find the ROM you like the best.

    Fuck...

  7. Nexus 4 by dejitaru · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I still use a custom rom because Google stopped updating the Nexus 4 and my phone is still working just fine. I run Chroma which runs 6.0.1, whereas the last supported version was 5.1.1. Oddly enough, Chroma is more stable than 5.1.1 was on my phone.

    1. Re:Nexus 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here, the last official update for my Samsung Galaxy S1 is Android 2.3, while custom ROMs for it are now at Android 7.1.
      While people applaud Google's 3-year Nexus support, that's nothing compared to custom ROMs supporting my 7 year old device.
      Although the Galaxy S1 is exceptional in this regard, you have to have a popular phone for it to be not abandoned earlier.

    2. Re:Nexus 4 by youngone · · Score: 2
      I have an old Galaxy Tab 2 tablet, (5 years old maybe).

      It came with Android 4.2.2 and I don't think it ever got an update from Samsung at all.

      Currently running Cyanogen Mod 13.1 and the various little annoyances are all gone..

      Video playback used to stutter, and large images would crash whichever app was trying to display.

    3. Re:Nexus 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, the 2016-12-24 CM Nightly for Nexus 4 is still available and is Android 7.1.1 and it's working great for me. https://download.cyanogenmod.org/?device=mako

    4. Re:Nexus 4 by dejitaru · · Score: 1

      Sadly nightlies are usually pretty unstable, I prefer something stable enough to run day to day basis

    5. Re:Nexus 4 by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Umm.. Nothing there on any of the links on that page... I've got a Nexus 4 currently rooted on the stock rom and would love to put CM on it... Guess thats out..

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  8. Trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't really trust Android security that much, I trust even less downloading an OS from some potentially dubious source and using it for everything my phone gets used for.

    1. Re: Trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes because those corporations have your best interests at heart.

    2. Re:Trust by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Fair enough.

      For my part, I trust them more than I trust the ROMs that came with the devices when I bought them.

    3. Re: Trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're saying you have access to the sourcecode of your OEM ROM? No? Do you still trust it now?

    4. Re: Trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trolls aside, the phrase you ate looking for is...
      I trust the (third party internet guys AND the company) less that I trust just the company alone to screw me over.

  9. Yep by c · · Score: 2

    Two of my three Android devices have custom ROM's, and the third probably will once the LineageOS folks start pushing out reasonably stable builds.

    The only reason the third doesn't currently have a custom ROM is that Motorola didn't go batshit with the bloatware, so waiting for the warranty period to up wasn't a pain.

    --
    Log in or piss off.
    1. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had one Galaxy S2, later an S4 mini, both rooted and flashed within a month of use (Cyanogen heydays).

      After a little experience with Nokia's N9, I went back Moto's G and now G4. Same feeling of "well, I can wait for the warranty expiration", the first one was never flashed, not thinking of doing it to the newer yet.

      captcha: adapted.

    2. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you seem to be forgetting the motorolas always-on microphone etc in the stock firmware

  10. Updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until Google can ensure people get updates and allows people to choose ALL of the software on their device (including the removal of carrier specific garbage) people will root and ROM.

  11. I don't any more by guacamole · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let's begin by saying that the stock ROMs on certain devices have become very adequate. I own a Nexus 5X and a Moto X Pure smartphone, and their stock ROMs are basically a pure Android experience. The software is already lean without any carrier bloat. Everything works fine, except for the times when google's rushed updates may sometimes introduce a new bug. I also run a stock Samsung ROM on my Galaxy Tab S tablet.

    On the other hand, there is a considerable cost to using a third party alternative ROM like Cyanogenmod. For one, those third party ROMs don't always support hardware as well as the stock. If you had read release notes for something like a Cyanogenmod release, you had surely run into statements like "limited camera functionality" or "fingerprint sensor, etc".

    Another issue with third party ROMs is that some software builders actively block or sabotage them. For example, the AT&T's Uverse streaming service will detect whether you have a rooted or third party ROM and stops working. The Netflix goes only up to 480p resolution on a non-stock ROM. "Fixing" this probably involves editing build.prop and hiding your root, but I haven't tried it recently.

    1. Re:I don't any more by ncc74656 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Another issue with third party ROMs is that some software builders actively block or sabotage them. For example, the AT&T's Uverse streaming service will detect whether you have a rooted or third party ROM and stops working. The Netflix goes only up to 480p resolution on a non-stock ROM. "Fixing" this probably involves editing build.prop and hiding your root, but I haven't tried it recently.

      Android Pay also has issues with rooted phones (and, by extension, custom ROMs), but I have it working on an Asus Zenfone 2 running CyanogenMod 13. A combination of Magisk and phh's Superuser successfully fools Android Pay into full functionality. You might want to give them a try with other root-averse apps.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    2. Re: I don't any more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      root is a security issue you unroot after you do what you wanted. would you really want pay while rooted?

  12. Custom ROMS? Hell, barely use my Smartphone! by Noishkel · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't know if it's just me, but the more crap they try to add onto a Smart Phone the less utility I found out of it. Any real work I need to do I just can't do on a phone. And I'm too busy to bother with any of the crappy games I can get for it. I don't need a fitness tracker. I don't need social media AT ALL.

    1. Re: Custom ROMS? Hell, barely use my Smartphone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Get a Windows phone, ideally with continuum. They are cheap now. If all you want is a work phone plus camera, email and web, the Lumia 950 is stellar. Apps are limited, but I don't care about that shit anyway. Dual sims too.

  13. Great for keeping old phones going by smallmj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since most manufacturers stop caring about their phones after a year or two, custom ROMS are great for keeping 1-4 year old phones useful. My Galaxy Note 2 is still a fantastic phone running CM. The only reason I stopped using it and gave it to my wife was that the SD slot was unreliable. She doesn't need the storage, so she does very well with it. I'll likely put a custom ROM on my Moto X Pure in a year or so when Moto stops releasing new ROMs for it.

    --
    ------- Mark
    1. Re:Great for keeping old phones going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For the same reason I am using custom Rom's. My wife and I still have old Samsung Galaxy s2 phones, running Android 7.1.1 with January 2017 security patches thanks to Custom rom's (currently using AICP - which using Lineageos for device hardware build blob's / settings). It has nightly builds. Samsung left the phone at Android 4.1.2. The old phones still do what we basically want the phones for. We put a new battery in them recently as the old ones were not holding charge properly, but saves wasting a perfectly usable device.

    2. Re:Great for keeping old phones going by Luthair · · Score: 1

      I think this varies a lot by device, when I tried in the past to find updates for unsupported phones trustworthy sources like Cyanogen didn't have them and everywhere else I'd see "Works great (note: does not support phone calls or bluetooth)" type claims even if one were to trust some random internet user.

  14. Yes, custom ROMs are still necessary by Optic7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unfortunately, custom ROMs are still necessary because phone manufacturers, carriers, and even Google itself washes their hands of any phone that is older than about 2 years. Often they stop offering system updates even sooner than 2 years. This forces people to install custom ROMs to keep their phone operating systems up to date.

    I don't care what anyone claims -- a smartphone's useful life is way longer than 2 years, so it's unconscionable that these Android companies do this. Compare to iPhones, which are supported for up to 5 years. I have been using Android phones (Google Nexus models) for several years now, but I have seriously considered going back to iPhones because of this and because of app availability.

    1. Re: Yes, custom ROMs are still necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its good marketing though dint you think. hell even apple feeds updates to pretty old devices. i think google is going that direction though(so i hear) with pixel and the probably device that are tied to them specifically.

    2. Re: Yes, custom ROMs are still necessary by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      I hope that Google comes to their senses and goes in that direction!

    3. Re:Yes, custom ROMs are still necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, custom ROMs are still necessary because phone manufacturers, carriers, and even Google itself washes their hands of any phone that is older than about 2 years. Often they stop offering system updates even sooner than 2 years. This forces people to install custom ROMs to keep their phone operating systems up to date.

      Yeah, this can suck. My tablet (Samsung Galaxy Note pro 12.2, wifi version) has been in the "fuck you, no updates" ghetto for a while, which hasn't bothered me much -- the version it stopped on is pretty good enough for me -- but the lack of security updates was concerning. Strangely, and to their credit, Samsung just pushed out a security update for it a couple days ago. Still same Android version, but updated kernel and some other security fixes.

    4. Re:Yes, custom ROMs are still necessary by swillden · · Score: 2

      even Google itself washes their hands of any phone that is older than about 2 years.

      Three years. Google devices get system upgrades for two years, and security updates for three years. That's still well short of five years, as you say. On the other hand, while Apple has a history of supporting devices for that long, they've made no commitment to any specific support timeline.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:Yes, custom ROMs are still necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Two years from date of first sale.

      If you buy your phone 4 months after it was announced, you only get 20 months worth of updates. It should really be from date of last sale. (sale by Google or provider, not second hand sales.)

      Security updates should be longer than 3 years, too, since the hardware will very likely still work, and still be in use. I'm not talking about the 1% of phones that will still work after 10 years, but 3 isn't enough.

      It's a black mark on Android that it's patron can't get security updates right themselves, and still complains at other Android manufacturers.

    6. Re:Yes, custom ROMs are still necessary by hankwang · · Score: 1

      Moreover, I think that Google's three support years count from the date the model is discontinued from the Play store, which may well be 2 years after the model is released.

    7. Re:Yes, custom ROMs are still necessary by swillden · · Score: 2

      Moreover, I think that Google's three support years count from the date the model is discontinued from the Play store, which may well be 2 years after the model is released.

      Actually, it's three years from release or 18 months after being discontinued from the store, whichever is longer.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  15. I want to use a custom rom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently got a new phone (OPPO F1s) and it is the first phone I havent been able to unlock the bootloader and install a custom rom on.
    My last few phones I have used all sorts of roms but normally settle on aosp. Im not keen on cyanogen but love slim and krexus
    I will never buy another OPPO or recomend them to anyone :@

    1. Re: I want to use a custom rom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slim is a nice one.

  16. Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as stock ROMs are highly restrictive and come pre-loaded with a bunch of garbage and backdoors, it will be necessary.

  17. Pure Nexus by srwood · · Score: 1

    I've been rooted with a Custom ROM since the OG Droid. Running Pure Nexus on my N6p now. Building LineageOS ROM right now to try.

  18. Re:Custom ROMS? Hell, barely use my Smartphone! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Yeah that's just you.

  19. Re:Custom ROMS? Hell, barely use my Smartphone! by Desler · · Score: 2

    Cool story, gramps. We'll make sure we get off your lawn.

  20. Found the LUDDITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern app appers don't use LUDDITE custom ROMs or LUDDITE stock ROMs. Modern app appers only app APPS!

    Apps!

    1. Re:Found the LUDDITE! by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Modern app appers use COW custom roms so they can go to the MOO! MOO! MOON!

      Actually almost nobody uses custom roms. Anyone with Facebook and Messenger installed doesn't really care, and that's the vast majority.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:Found the LUDDITE! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Korea, custom ROMs only use OLD PEOPLE!!!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re: Found the LUDDITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, let's wait for APK

    4. Re: Found the LUDDITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALL YOUR APK ARE BELONG TO US

  21. Custom Firmware by staylecrate1140 · · Score: 1

    I personally use the ROMs that root the device and remove bloatware. Some also incorporate access and the ability to tinker with a lot of the settings.

  22. Cyanogenmod for me by kuhnto · · Score: 1

    I am relatively new to the smart phone scene, as I spent the majority of my corporate life on a blackberry. Only when we switched from blackberry to Windows phone (what a joke! And our fortune 100 company is trucking along with them still!) with the same corporate lockdowns, did I jump ship and become a two phone person. Everyone else in the world could watch videos on their phones, why not me. Getting a Nexus 5 was a breadth of fresh air and going to a custom mod was one of the first things I did. I saw how my older brother would always complain about bloat ware on his Verizon phone and how he could not install some ad blocking app, and figured a custom mod was right up my ally. I still enjoy it, but have not been back to see how things have changed in the last few years. Googles pixel seems to have a lot going for it.

    --
    "A 'person' is smart. 'People' are dumb, panicky animals and you know that."
  23. Stick with iOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who in their right mind would trust an unvetted ROM with all of their personal data?

    1. Re: Stick with iOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're in the wrong room. The psych ward is the door to your left.

    2. Re:Stick with iOS by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The trouble is that, while that's a good question; it applies all to readily to using custom ROMs or using stock ones.

      Should you trust some random dude on the internet who totally got AOSP+CM tweaks working on a newer kernel by aggregating blobs from 4 different devices? No, probably not. He may well be acting in good faith; but you have zero assurance of that; or much reason to trust that he hasn't made some potentially serious error in the process of making it work.

      Should you trust your handset vendor/(and telco, if it's a phone that they've had a hand in)/Google? No, very probably not. The vendors do seem to care slightly more about bugs that might cause customer support calls or returns; and a lot less about security patches or providing vaguely recent versions of anything; but aside from those somewhat different technical priorities they aren't markedly more trustworthy than some random person on the XDA forums.

    3. Re:Stick with iOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vetted by whom? If you're storing personal data on a cellphone, you've already lost anyway.

    4. Re:Stick with iOS by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      Should you trust your handset vendor/(and telco, if it's a phone that they've had a hand in)/Google? No, very probably not. The vendors do seem to care slightly more about bugs that might cause customer support calls or returns; and a lot less about security patches or providing vaguely recent versions of anything;

      Well, if you're talking Apple - if the FBI has to call in for help to crack an iPhone, I'd say Apple cares about device security, at least. Sure they turned over iCloud data due to a subpoena, but anyone would have to do that.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  24. If you care about not being tracked and spied on.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you care about not being tracked on spied on, how do you do minimize spying and tracking on a phone that isn't really yours?

    The only reasonably good option for those of us who don't want to give in to unethical large corporations (Google, Apple, Microsoft, etc.) has been to buy a phone that works well with custom roms (typically a Nexus, or perhaps now a Pixel) and install Cyanogenmod or similar.

    Assuming you don't install Google Apps or Google Play, the otherwise non-removable misfeature known as the "advertising ID" magically disappears. No vendor or carrier crapware. You can download and install select apps from the F-Droid open-source app store. It generally works pretty nicely.

    The big challenge is that the custom roms don't always get updated very often. Many phones need to be hacked to unlock their bootloaders etc. The Nexuses (and pixel, if you don't buy it from Verizon) have been a nice way to get a well supported phone with an unlocked bootloader.

    Hopefully LineageOS will continue where Cyanogenmod has left off.

  25. Mobile VR mainstream? by MindPrison · · Score: 1

    Heh...quoting op: The article points out that mobile virtual reality is "on the verge of becoming mainstream

    Yeah...right, here we have HTC Vive and a monster computer that would make any high end gamer proud just to run it, and he's talking about those little goggles you put on a mobile phone as Mainstream VR?

    If it wasn't so sad and a blatant lie, I'd laugh uncontrollably.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:Mobile VR mainstream? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh...quoting op: The article points out that mobile virtual reality is "on the verge of becoming mainstream

      Yeah...right, here we have HTC Vive and a monster computer that would make any high end gamer proud just to run it, and he's talking about those little goggles you put on a mobile phone as Mainstream VR?

      If it wasn't so sad and a blatant lie, I'd laugh uncontrollably.

      it seems you don't understand what mainstream means.

    2. Re:Mobile VR mainstream? by Gramie2 · · Score: 1

      Alternative facts

  26. I tripple-buy a phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I expect a few to be stolen from me or need a new battery from an unopened standby phone.

    im petrified of touching Roms due to unstability even after rootkit semi-worked (kingo).

    still on LG l34c and KitZkat 4.4.1

    1. Re:I tripple-buy a phone. by Optic7 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I found the stability of Cyanogenmod to be pretty good. I've heard some people say that in some cases it's actually more stable than the original ROMs included with phones, perhaps because of the bloatware that vendors add.

  27. I do by fredgiblet · · Score: 4, Informative

    I rooted my phone to allow me to install apps with root access, then the phone wouldn't let me update while it was rooted, so I installed a custom ROM that would. If I have to unroot my phone every time I need to update it then I might as well just install a custom ROM.

    1. Re: I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      depending roms can be less up to date though the more popular devices that have a good following usually are and have many roms.

    2. Re:I do by zennyboy · · Score: 1

      Precisely, exactly the reason I did exactly the same thing...

  28. The plus side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The plus side of "the drama at CyanogenMod" is that the new Lineage OS has a much better name than "CyanogenMod" ever did.

  29. Yea, I use Chinese spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinese spyware is great!

    1. Re:Yea, I use Chinese spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess it's just as good as american spyware...

  30. YES. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Because until we get unmolested pure android OS installs that allow us to remove all baked in crap the Carriers and phone makers try and sneak in there, Android users will need a way to get a smooth and clean Android experience.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  31. Absolutely yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't trust stock ROMs and I can't stand their lack of customization. It's a requirement to be able to install LineageOS (formerly known as Cyanogenmod) on my daily driver phone.

  32. CyanogenMod for Obsolete Upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My phone is a few years old but it still works fine. There's nothing that my phone doesn't do but a new phone would. The problem is that Verizon has stopped supporting the OS, so it's got some holes in it. I went with CyanogenMod because I could put a newer operating system on the phone.

  33. Never been happier than with my Oneplus 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My OnePlus 3 stock roms have been good enough to not even make me bother looking for alternatives, plus I just got Android 7.0 updated to it. I used Cyanogenmod on my devices for years, but now that my phone doesn't have annoying bloatware, provides tethering, etc.... The ONLY reason to up custom ROM is to install your own firewall. to block apps from accessing the internet.

    1. Re:Never been happier than with my Oneplus 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you've rooted your OP3, AFWall+ provides nice per-app firewalling on your stock ROM. (Same goes for pretty much any rooted phone. It's just an interface to iptables, albeit it a very nice one.)

  34. Custom ROMs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry about the AC, but yes, at least as much as I stay "stock." Depends on whether I'm getting anywhere with the vendor or not. Now to see what this "Lineage OS" can or will do...

  35. Anyone using Replicant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know it is built on top of cyanogem so it is probably on shaky ground now. I was thinking about giving it a try though.

  36. No custom ROMs for me by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    I'll stick with flashing custom builds.

  37. Who uses custom ROMS? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    I use custom ROMs.

  38. Samsung Note 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the original models. Still use it today, unrooted.
    I must be like, the 10-ish people that actually like Touchjizz.

    It has its flaws, but it works well enough for multi-tasking, which is one of the biggest reasons I got it.
    The other major one being VNCing my PC anywhere in the house.
    A minor one being experimenting with app development, but I never got around to it at the time. I am looking at it now!.
    Being able to sit anywhere in or out the house and work with the PC is real handy.
    I have a simple bluetooth keyboard that hooks on to the case I got for it if I ever need to type. (if I am programming, of course sometimes I just end up using Hackers keyboard if it is light programming, it works well enough)
    I heard a few people using Android tablets as hacky graphics tablets using VNC/RDP, so I tried it out and loved it. *
    Most apps I use regularly are floating window apps alongside a browser, image editor (mainly for notes, ironically, typing is awful on touchscreens, far easier to write AND sketch notes).
    Maybe occasionally a few games. Fallout Shelter being the one I've played most. (even showing a 3 year old niece how to play it, "where's the peoples?")
    Besides that, I want for nothing else really. I rarely view media on it, besides Youtube videos here and there.

    I do have another tablet I've yet to play with. A Hudl, it was doubly cheap because a deal and sisters staff discount! woo. (probably why Tesco abandoned Hudl! woops)
    I'll likely root that and experiment.
    I did see one guy had his smartphone set up in such a way where he could have multiple windows open, and could resize all of them with a middle anchor point. 3 windows at that, he had 2 small ones at top, and a "main" window at the bottom, for example. I assume 4 is the max.

    * It works rather well. The usefulness of being able to zoom in on the tablet while the screen is still 100% is incredibly handy for pixel work. (in fact, just handy period, works as well for natural work and cel-shaded)
    Depending on the OS you use and the protocol, you may or may not get pressure sensitivity.
    But to be honest, I never did care for that feature before, I still don't.
    >70% of the artists I follow HATE dynamic width/opacity/density, the rest mainly use it either for sketching, various messy art styles where you just throw stuff on and go with the flow, unthinking, that's it.
    Variable opacity is about the most handy one since that is great for sketching with opacity unlocked (so it draws over itself), and opacity locked is great for highlights and shading since you won't make messy edges where brush strokes overlap.
    But I still don't care for pressure sensitivity. I prefer perfect control. Digital art is great because you don't "suffer" from the non-standard strokes you get from traditional media. But you can emulate all of those styles and more if you ever need them.

  39. Locked Bootloader by Dwedit · · Score: 1

    Got a Samsung Galaxy S4, with a locked bootloader. So this means once I have root, I never update again.
    Custom ROMS are way out of the question.

    1. Re:Locked Bootloader by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      You can unlock the bootloader on the S4.

  40. Consistent UI between phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One reason why I use a custom rom, is to have a consistent user interface between different phones.

  41. Android Is Like Pizza by cloud.pt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So you go to a pizza place. Let's name it Sammy's Hut. You start browsing the menu and you see the house special... It's a mess - it's like they tried to be healthy and trendy and full of spice at once. The clerk calls it "a whiz choice, recently we cut half its calories", but it's still an overengineered ball of mud, only gonna satisfy whoever can't grasp the fine line between taste and variety. You settle for the good ol' margherita, maybe add the usual ham, it never really disappoints - you get to feel the restaurant style with a tried and true classic, you figure what to try next time, if you decide to come back to the place that is... Unfortunately, that margherita felt like it had the same ingredients than the house special, it just didn't look like it.

    Some months later you're out in Italy and you try this new spot - it's called Gugely's, and they say "it's where pizza was invented". They only really serve 3 pizzas, and they're basically the same only changing in size and shape. They do seem like a balanced and adequate for different appetites, but you know what, they say whoever comes doesn't really feel compelled to come again. Despite tasting really good, they're all boring.

    There's a dessert place around the corner from Gugely's: Sweetpertino and they make an apple pie that is always made from the same tree, yet the dudes that go there eat them like zombies. Especially after they get fed up with Gugely's. They are loyal though, and the thing is really expensive for plain apple pie. My guess is they really like expensive apples. It's not anywhere as nutritional as pizza, but zombies be like... Whatever.

    Fed up with apples (or maybe never had the cash for them), and not wanting to go back to the "en vogue" spots, you dig up an underground place that brags can prepare the pizza you need. They are upfront about some limitations though: what you need is not always what you want, but at least you get to decide what you think you want. They also warn your stomach might not take it; that some people are allergic to their pizza type of "source"; that some even refuse to swallow their non-standard meals. They tell you to sign an insurance release at the door, but trust me, most that go there don't even understand the consequences - sometimes they have really bad produce, but luckily you can smell it from afar if you try the least, and just change the dish. But you know, nobody really cares when looking for the perfect pizza fix they can't find anywhere. Where this shop really distinguishes itself from others though: they let you take the recipes home, mix them up, go back to them and request small changes, and at the end of the day, you can just return your pizza for a brand new one. You can do this as long as you can stomach it. Suffice it to say, it's a releasing experience and some just can't figure out what to do with so much freedom. Some give up at the first try. It is also said a lot of people go back to apples and Gugely's. Nobody really goes back to Sammy's - they'd rather have their stomachs burst from a overly zealous gastric band.

    So after all that rant, what do we really learn from pizza and from people? There's no perfect pizza for everyone, that's obvious. Some fancy variety, some tolerate simplicity, and some just don't like pizza at all. Then there are those that only like pizza they can see being prepared and know the source of the ingredients. Some only want genuine ingredients even though they don't need them. It's a big shame some essential ingredients can only be bought from exclusive sellers that don't always want to sell to non-regulars, then again it's for their own commercial reasons, like every company should. The time for the perfectly balanced pizza can only come after a perfectly balanced society arises, one that only has the best interest of the customer in mind. Then again some call that communism, and it's the worst thing since the plague.

    Me, personally? I make my pizza at home. That means my kitchen and my stomach are always fully prepared. WHAT HAVE YOU EATEN LATELY?

  42. Yes and no by wbr1 · · Score: 1
    With my Nexus 6, I have not needed to. However, for those rocking carrier/manufacturer abandoned devices it is the only way to test out newer versions of android. I used to do this a lot. I may still with my girlfriends LG G3 that is stuck on Lollipop. It is also an easy route to custom kernels that allow overclocking etc. Plus some just have some neat features.

    The downside though is on less popular devices and even many popular ones you run into glitches like front camera not working, wifi disconnects, driver issues, etc. Still a great way to breath new life into an older but still useful device.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  43. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still on an original Moto G because custom ROMs exist, which is great since it's still useful to me

  44. Many reasons by dpilot · · Score: 2

    Bloatware, privacy, support, all send you to something other than stock.

    T-Mobile stopped supporting my Relay at JB. At least with CM I've got KK, and there are words indicating that CM's successor is going to bring out Nougat for it. (Didn't know that could happen, thought the graphics was too primitive, but I'll take it.)

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Many reasons by hambone142 · · Score: 2

      I use CM11 on a HP Touchpad because WEBOS was a joke to begin with and then evolved to being unsupported in the end. Now with GAPPS, I can download most of the apps I need on the hardware.

      I have 3 tablets running it around the house and it works well.

    2. Re:Many reasons by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      " because WEBOS was a joke to begin with"

      You shut your dirty mouth. WebOS was LIGHTYEARS ahead of iOS and Android. I still have my Palm Pre Plus in a drawer. I have yet to see a hardware/software stack that is as elegant and ahead of its time as WebOS on Palm was.

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:Many reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which ROM do you use? I still have a really old Android build (ClassicNerd ICS) on one of mine. I'm afraid to go online with it and only use it for an alarm clock these days.
      The other one is still pure WebOS... considering putting a newer Android ROM on it, but haven't researched enough of the current ones.
      The big problem I kept running into was lack of support for Bluetooth and the camera, or significant audio problems (or the sleep of death).

    4. Re:Many reasons by hambone142 · · Score: 1

      That may be true but try to find apps on WebOS for the tablet now.

    5. Re:Many reasons by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      If you recall the tablet was sold as a fire sale. You should have known there werent going to be any apps for it. Its the primary reason i didnt pick one up. When i bought my Pre, WebOS was still viable and vibrant.

      --
      Good-bye
    6. Re:Many reasons by hambone142 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I think I "recall" that.

      The tablet cost so much to manufacture that they couldn't make a profit on it (somewhere around $235) so they sold it for $100.

      I guess they made up with quantity :-^

  45. Even on Nexus phones by MeanE · · Score: 2

    I have a Nexus 4 and Nexus 5...both no longer run the latest android direct from google....but with custom ROMs they both run 7.1.1 flawlessly.

    1. Re:Even on Nexus phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what custom ROM do you use on your Nexus 4?

    2. Re:Even on Nexus phones by bryantthesmith · · Score: 1

      I have a Nexus 5 and am currently on stock, but seriously considering one of the 7.1.1 builds. The one thing that keeps me on stock is Google SafetyNet. I have some apps (Android Pay, etc.) that need a SafetyNet pass to run. So far it doesn't look like custom ROMs will ever be able to support this on anything passed 6.0.1.

  46. Used "Begs The Question" Incorrectly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just sayin'.

    1. Re:Used "Begs The Question" Incorrectly by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      I beg your pardon?

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  47. custom ROMs are here to stay as long as.. by strstr · · Score: 2

    devices remain compatible ie unlocked boot loaders.

    if you go over to xda-developers custom ROMs are still a big thing. custom ROMs would even be bigger but many phones are shipped locked down with locked boot loaders and unroot-able, so users can't develop their custom ROMs or install them.

    T-Mobile and Sprint traditionally have been the most custom ROM friendly shipping phones with unlocked boot loaders. as such communities have spung up on xda-developers with dozens of custom ROMs for popular unlocked devices especially Samsung. people also like to install Google's entirely vanilla version of Android getting rid of what users dislike about Samsung/LG/HTC ROMs and software.

    Cyanogen might be a ROM but I don't think it has a ton of users. It's probably the most commercial of them but not the go-to-ROM of someone who wants something custom.

    1. Re:custom ROMs are here to stay as long as.. by strstr · · Score: 1

      Here's one problem but it hasn't stopped custom ROMs luckily. T-Mobile Galaxy S7 shipped with a locked boot loader. This had the potential to kill custom ROMs, but luckily some development has occurred as the phone was found to be rootable. However if you're a Verizon or AT&T customer you know the pain of all Samsung phones being locked.

      Originally T-Mobile said they'd see about an update to unlock the GS7 but so far it hasn't happened.

      All previous Samsung phones on T-Mobile shipped with unlocked boot loaders.

      That means it was as simple as flashing a custom recovery and you were onto custom ROM bliss and root.

      LG phones remain unlocked as an alternative luckily.. The G5 and V20 both have unlocked boot loaders on T-Mobile AND Sprint.

  48. Re:Custom ROMS? Hell, barely use my Smartphone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're right though. Smartphones are just a teaser to get you to carry a device on you all the time everywhere so the man can track where you go and what you do. GPS, check. Email, check. Internet shopping, check. Tap to pay, check. Able to be activated through "optic nerve", check. The NSA thanks you for your cooperation.

  49. Tether, Real backup, Root apps by gavron · · Score: 3, Informative

    WiFi Tether without paying extra to the carrier for the same data you're already paying for is a feature.
    Backup specific apps and their data ("Titanium Backup" or its successors) or the entire device ("NANDROID" backup via TWRP, CWM, PhilZ, etc)
    Root apps allow flexibility carrier-ROMs don't. Greenify shuts down unused apps. Xposed allows changing almost anything about Android operation (the "framework") with easy installation. See this link for top rooted apps.

    None of these are available with locked bootloaders, and stock ROMs. (The NANDROID backup is available with stock ROMs but is if little value).

    MotoG4 using Silesh Nair xt16xx 7.1.1 Lineage OS 20170113 ROM

    Ehud Gavron

  50. Still CM. by forgottenusername · · Score: 1

    Lineage builds are starting to roll out. Once there's some builds for my device I'll cut over. I've never had any problems.

    Stock on my device is terrible cuz Verizon. I just rooted and removed the bloatware, but they clearly were never going to fully patch even stagefright, so went with CM as I did with most of my devices.

  51. Of Course! by warewolfsmith · · Score: 1

    It's the only way to dream of electric sheep. #Philip K. Dick

  52. Yes, CyanogenMod by RJFerret · · Score: 2

    Both my devices are rooted w/Cyanogenmod as it was easy for one (one-click installer) and I knew more for the other, I need access to install my custom Hosts file to block adds/Facebook, I also want a firewall, which you aren't getting without root (if there's a way, please let me know).

    There are other capabilities that require root that I use regularly.

    My devices came from Google, so weren't bloatware loaded thankfully, but having control to eliminate things that affect performance is required.

    It's a tool for my use, not someone else's tool that I get to pay for and use for their purpose, thank you very much.

    PS: LineageOS, the successor to CyanogenMod, is nearly up and running according to their latest blog post.

    1. Re:Yes, CyanogenMod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Root Firewall

    2. Re:Yes, CyanogenMod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or NetGuard for an Open Source alternative.

    3. Re:Yes, CyanogenMod by blivit42 · · Score: 1

      I use NetGuard, but if you want hosts file blocking, you can't use the one from the PlayStore, since that disables that feature. I tried using the open source playstore equivalent for app updates, but it was buggy on my phone and updates often failed. So, I gave up with that and just have the app itself check for updates and install them direct from the opensource project site. You will need to disable updates for NetGuard, specifically, in the PlayStore to prevent the PlayStore from automatically overwriting the full version with the less functional PlayStore version.

      It has ads, but they are small banners at the bottom of the app settings page, so it's really not much of an annoyance, since I rarely need to customize my settings after I've set it up the first time. No ads anywhere else at any time. I really like the app, overall.

  53. Sure do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sure we do, the "problem" is the amount of market share that Samsung has. Samsung, at one point, was extremely helpful in one way or another to the rom developing community. Those times are now long gone, Samsung is one of the dirtiest devices by far to attempt to flash a new ROM onto. The first challenge is obtaining root, without root no recovery or system images may be flashed. Now even if the device itself by some miracle becomes rootable, there's still a significant amount of work needing to be done. Custom roms may not be flashed if the bootloader itself is locked; there's no way to flash a custom recovery, and then pass the checksum tests performed on boot.
    Since the Galaxy S5 (S4, however bootlock was not strictly enforced until later), Samsung has locked down the devices hard; with certain carriers, *cough* AT&T , *cough* Verizon , the device actually becomes a brick. Of course, Samsung blames the carriers for this, however if we look at T-Mobile devices, a good bunch of them are not locked down in this way. In a sense, this situation is akin to "permanently renting" a phone, which you have no freedom to setup how you like.
    Lastly, why am I picking on Samsung? Everybody and their grandma have some sort of Galaxy or Note device, just because of the sheer number of these phones out there, someone could easily make the [wrong] assumption that Android phones no longer have this capability.
    Phones from HTC, Google(Nexus), Motorola, have special pages on their websites, where you post your device's identifier token (thorough instructions), and by doing such unlocking their bootloader—and therefore free to flash recovery images, and totally different ROMs. This sounds more like a phone that you've paid for, if not up front, then through your monthly service bill, a bit at a time.
    Would you purchase a Corvette with a governor set to not allow faster speed than 45mph? Perhaps on a rental vehicle, sure. Not for one the customer paid for.
    AT&T's and Verizons policies are disgusting, and shame on Samsung for giving in to them. We can only assume other manufacturers are given similar orders regarding bootloaders, yet here they are hosting unlocking tools on their very own legitimate website.

  54. Absolutely I still do. It's essential. by serendipitousus · · Score: 1

    Absolutely. An unlockable bootloader is one of my must-have features on any handset I purchase. I wouldn't buy any device without custom ROM support. I love being able to run a de-bloated version of the software I want on the hardware I want. The Nexus/Google devices would be great for me, except that they don't have a replaceable battery like the LG phones do.

  55. What we need are free software privacy txt devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not just custom roms. Custom roms can be better in that they strip out some of the privacy invasive tech and bloatware, but every phone is a tracking device so much more needs to be done. A new design around EOMA68 modular computing would be ideal. I don't care about owning a traditional cellular phone. I want a texting device of sorts that'll ideally work when I go into town that doesn't depend on cellular technology (ie like a HAM radio) and can connect to cellular networks as desired (for Bitcoin/internet). The combination of the two would enable one to turn off the cellular modem if separated and contained properly from the main device. Then you can easily communicate with those near you without a cell phone- and get messages whenever you connect to the internet (think like dial-up back when you have to pay per minute).

  56. "Begs the question" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it doesn't "beg the question". It RAISES the question, which is what you meant. Learn the fucking difference and stop trying to rewrite definitions simply because you're trying to sound cool.

  57. I Stopped Using Custom ROMs by bananaquackmoo · · Score: 1

    I used custom ROMs ~ from Android 2.1 until Android 4.2. Eventually I noticed that unless you use a Galaxy or Nexus device, your ROM will probably never get updated and your uncommon hardware may get burned out early (I've lost many wifi / gps / bluetooth / 3g-4g chipsets that way). Since 4.2 I've let the phone remain stock from whatever company offers frequent updates and little bloat. I would buy a Nexus or Pixel but they have always missed the mark for the kind of hardware I want. The Nexus 6 was to huge and expensive. The Nexus 4 and 5 were unimpressive. The pixel is ridiculously overpriced. While I don't use custom ROMS anymore I can definitely see the value in them. They fix things which manufacturers break when customizing Android. Custom ROMs also offer things which vanilla Android doesn't. Custom ROMS usually perform much better. When it comes to Android phones I don't have company loyalty. So far my household has gone through two Motorolas, two Sonys, a Blu, three Samsungs (never again), two HTC, two LG, and one Amazon. If you include Android tablets I've also had a Lenovo (never again), an Nvidia, and a Huawei. If I had to pick favorites it would be nvidia, Motorola (before Lenovo) and Sony.

    1. Re:I Stopped Using Custom ROMs by hankwang · · Score: 1

      "your uncommon hardware may get burned out early (I've lost many wifi / gps / bluetooth / 3g-4g chipsets that way)."

      This is the first time I hear smt like this. Do you have evidence?

      The gps radio in my nexus 5 (with CM) tends to deteriorate over the months, but it turned out that tightening the screws of the rf shield restores the reception. Not a software issue.

  58. Consistency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to put Cyanogen on all of my phones. Originally it was because I always purchased used phones from friends, and by the time I got my hands on them, if I was lucky enough to get an update to the stock ROM, the update usually made the phone worse. Cyanogen usually made these phones usable again. Later I found the best part about having every device on the same custom ROM was consistency. Cyanogen made it so all of my devices behaved the same way, menus were structured the same, settings were easy to find etc.

    I have given up on custom ROMs mainly because the carriers (Verizon) have done everything they can to make it as difficult as possible to install a custom ROM. They literally go out of their way to make phones worse so you have to pay a monthly charge for "features" (tethering). Most likely I will switch carriers when my current phone starts having issues. The selection of rootable phones will probably be one of my top criteria when choosing a new network. Another thing that will deter me from using a network are Network Neutrality violations, such as T-Mobiles "Binge On" plans that don't count data usage from specific services; we have started down a slippery slope and the only ones to win will be the cell companies and their bed buddies.

  59. Re:Custom ROMS? Hell, barely use my Smartphone! by sound+vision · · Score: 1

    No, it's me too.
    "Real work" which for me means web design, is impossible. Typing anything longer than a paragraph is *possible* but definitely not enjoyable. The games I want to play are more like Civilization or Pillars of Eternity than Candy Crush. I don't like giving all my private information to Facebook, nor do I even want to converse with the idiots that populate it, so that's useless. I do use Telegram as a messaging service, so I guess that gives the smartphone an edge over my flip phone. I could do pretty much the same with SMS/MMS but Telegram is more streamlined. I do use YouTube on my phone on the rare occasions that I'm away from a big screen AND I have more than a couple minutes to kill.
    Sometimes I find myself wondering what possess people to buy a $300 phone with a battery that won't even last a day. Maybe all the "early adopter" types think that's the way smartphones have to be? By the time I got a smartphone, it cost $30 and I can comfortably forget to charge it at night as long as I'm not talking on it for hours.

  60. DO you want control of your phone? by sizzlinkitty · · Score: 2

    I rooted and ultimately went to a custom rom because I honestly don't trust the things my phone carrier installs and I wanted the ability to block advertisements. Google has gotten much better with giving users the ability to limiting software permissions but could still do more. Older software automatically get permissions enabled for compatibility when they shouldn't.

  61. Re:Custom ROMS? Hell, barely use my Smartphone! by Noishkel · · Score: 1

    Well please do. I do live in a red state and I'm too cheap for warning shots.

  62. Necessary for privacy and security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I still do and will continue to use custom ROMs that try to restrict the amount of proprietary blobs to the drivers (in lack of a better alternative). I do not trust, and do not feel I should be forced to trust, whatever ROM + bloatware the manufacturer cooked up and preinstalled on the device. Who here would use the preinstalled Windows on a Lenovo laptop? No one? Then why should I be less demanding for a device that integrates a ton of sensors, is tied into pretty much all my communication, knows my calendar, and is with me 24/7?
    Sadly, free software was never really a concern for the custom ROM folks, who focused on shiny new features instead. By now, there is little room or need to improve upon stock AOSP, so there is little need for that kind of custom ROM. However, if there was a shift of interest towards freedom, there'd still be a lot of work to do and a lot of room to improve upon the current state.

    1. Re:Necessary for privacy and security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't trust the carrier bloatware, but you trust a custom ROM maker who is also unknown and can put whatever code he/she wants on your device? At least there is a level of legal recourse if you find out a carrier app is spying on you.

      Unless you are writing the code or are of sufficient proficiency to do a full code review yourself, don't fool yourself into thinking custom ROMs are somehow "safer" or "more secure" than a stock ROM.

  63. Re: Custom ROMS? Hell, barely use my Smartphone! by Noishkel · · Score: 1

    Ehh, no thanks. I loath the entire new design of Windows for one. And I've been too badly burned to trust a Microsoft hardware product again personally, as listening to my room mate throw her own phone against the way in frustration kind of really confirms that decision.

  64. Re:Custom ROMS? Hell, barely use my Smartphone! by Noishkel · · Score: 1

    Well then what the hell do you do with your smart phone? Out side of a weather map and a notepad program anything of real merit I need do with a computer I can do way better from there in less time than trying to do it on my phone.

  65. Ever since my G1 ... by garry_g · · Score: 1

    I've been running custom roms ever since my first Android phone (G1). As others have rightfully posted, phone makers do not provide updates for much more of the initial 1-2 years, plus most manufacturers have lots of junk on their setup that you can't get rid of otherwise. Not even going to start about the delays until updates are released.
    I do understand that there is little reason for a company to support a phone that's more than a generation back, as for one, many customers seem to swap their phones every 1-2 years, and supporting the old phones for longer would a) only cost money for a quickly diminishing amount of users and b) possibly keep people from buying new phones for the new OS they have.
    I typically replace a phone once the technical issues I have with it outweigh get on my nerves enough ... (like decreasing battery capacity, actual defects, etc.) I'd probably still be using my Nexus 4 if the touch screen wouldn't have a dead vertical AND horizontal area... after that, I got an "old" S5, upgraded it with Cyanogen within 10 minutes of getting it ... up to "N" now, and will probably use it until it too dies of old age ;) Not what phone manufacturers would like their customers to do :)

  66. Bloatware and Regional Issues vs Stability by Noble713 · · Score: 2

    I live in Japan. Japan is a nightmare when it comes to cell phone selection and service provider flexibility. I run CyanogenMod on my Motorola Razr M. Partly because I HATE Softbank's bloatware. However, the cell radio and battery life have both been terribly unstable/buggy. The phone is on its last legs and I bought a used Sony Xperia Zx Compact to replace it...but I bought it from AliExpress so I need to flash it with a custom ROM so I can stick my Softbank SIM card in it. Why do I go through all this trouble? Because Softbank doesn't sell a physically small (screen
    I'm sitting in Vietnam right now after a week in Thailand. I carry a Chinese phone (Doogee X5 Pro) with a stock ROM that supports 2 SIM cards. All I have to do for 4G data + cellphone is grab a $10-15 SIM card in the airport. Which takes about 5 minutes. Sometimes I really love the free-wheeling nature of developing economies.

    1. Re:Bloatware and Regional Issues vs Stability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want flexibility, why not ditch Softbank and go with an MVNO?

  67. Yes custom roms are necessary by DrXym · · Score: 1
    Google dropped support for the Nexus 4 a long time ago. Yet I was able to install CM14.1 on it just recently. I expect when LineageOS gets going that I will continue to enjoy support for a device long since dumped by the manufacturer. Same goes for a OnePlus One I own.

    One MAJOR advantage of custom firmware over stock Android is that it has proper privacy support. CM has a thing called privacy guard with finegrained control over what an app can see or do. Android has some built-in privacy controls but they're nowhere near as good.

    For example, the BBC iPlayer app will refuse to run on a phone with stock Android if I deny it access to the telephone number, but under privacy guard I can prevent it seeing the phone stack completely so it behaves as though its on a tablet. That means I can use iPlayer on holiday with custom firmware but not with stock.

  68. Yes AndroidX86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use AndroidX86 in VirtualBox emulators. In my opinion is a better debug environment than standard Google SDK' one. Faster to start and execute.

  69. Yes by joboss · · Score: 1

    I use it and the main reason is that when I pay £500 for a device upfront and not on financing so that it's not part owned by the phone company I expect it to be personal and not full with crapware. I also like to be able to keep updating Android. Manufacturers will sometimes stop updating their ROMs where as custom ROMs will still keep going. Having a fully rooted and accessible OS is also important. There are a number of problems with custom ROMs though:

    * Android needs a lot of work in being upgradable while retaining data. I am not sure if it was meant to be easier than it is but because of things like "the cloud" I think local settings and so on has been allowed to become a mess. There's no standards enforcement to my knowledge. Trying to restore a device between updates is annoying. Theoretically though with the right standards, discipline and organisation it shouldn't be a problem and the process should be seamless. It's not a hard problem in computing. It's just neglected. When you poke under the hood you can see some of the workings of an organised system but in practice things tend to be a pain in the ass.
    * A lot of manufacturers don't make this easy. Some devices can be hard to flash. Often manufacturers only let their software work with their ROM or non-custom ROMs. I have had to decompile and recompile to fix this at least once. There's no legitimate reason for the incompatibility. It just checks some ROM property and opts not to work.
    * Similarly you can have problems such as low level drivers not being available and potentially losing access to more exotic peripherals on the phone. Similarly developer support even for major devices might not be brilliant.

  70. Android development slowed down by allo · · Score: 1

    For example i cannot upgrade to android 7, because Xposed is not ported yet and the developers writes, it gets more and more complicated to port it with each release. The Xprivacy (Xposed module) developer sounds similiar unmotivated. And without such stuff, you're xposed (pun intended) to the world of shitty apps, which transmit private stuff like your IMEI to their companies.
    The problem is, google has no open development process, where the ROM and mod developers could follow each commit and adapt their software, but releases a big bunch of changes with each release and until the custom ROMs adapted, there is already the next release out.

  71. Firmware by snookiex · · Score: 1

    A few years ago, I bought an LG Optimus P920 over the hype of 3D cameras. The hardware was good, but the stock OS was slow and buggy (not to mention the lack of updates), so I decided to root it and install Cyanogenmod. The difference was impressive, however, I had to install the firmware from some obscure shared file to make the radios to work. Sorrowful, I rolled backed everything and left the stock image. A few months later I replaced it with a nice Nokia N9.

    --
    Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
  72. Wish custom ROM devs wouldn't forget tablets by norweeg · · Score: 1

    I would have used a custom ROM on my old and current samsung tablets, but ROM devs never seem to have releases supporting tablet hardware, only phones

    1. Re:Wish custom ROM devs wouldn't forget tablets by norweeg · · Score: 1

      Possibly ignorant question (I am not an expert in this at all so please don't judge), but will we ever get to the point where we have generic Android distros that can be installed on and used with any device, like a Linux distro?

  73. Yes. by wardrich86 · · Score: 2

    Until phones start coming without bloat, and carriers/manufacturers provide constant updates to their phones even after they stop being sold, custom ROMs will continue to be used.

  74. Amazon Fire by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    Enough said....

    1. Re:Amazon Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think more needs to be said about this. Does the Fire do phone calls? This topic is broadly about cell phones (at least by the comments). Are you saying for tablet folks just get the Fire? Fire is Android also. Are you saying get Fire and don't worry? I'm almost certain that in 4 years that tune will be different. It will be abandoned as well. That is the nature of the beast.

  75. If I didn't need a phone by Mozai · · Score: 1

    I'd really like to have a custom ROM so I can get better control over my palmtop computer, and better diagnostics for the crashes. But the custom ROMs that are available all have this in common: they don't have access to the "phone" part of my smartphone. This would be like putting a custom engine into a car so long as I can't use it on public streets. So no, the device manufacturer has made certain I won't be using a custom ROM in my Android smartphone.

  76. I'd like to by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    but I never buy phones that have custom roms available.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  77. AICP is good too by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 2

    I have 7.1.1 running on a circa 2013 phone. AICP seems to be a pretty active group and do weekly builds for quite a lot of older phones. Prior to that I tried Ressurection but punted after bootloop issues, AICP installed first try. So I can't really say if its the "best" but it certainly seems to function well and that's more important to me than having a gadzilling bells and whistles.

  78. Still using custom ROM by Atrox+Canis · · Score: 1

    I have two active Android devices. On my phone, I run Venom Rom. I just updated to N and am quite content with the build, features and functionality. On my tablet, I run a build of my own make. It's pretty buggy but I've been using this platform to teach myself so nothing is lost. I also run an Android VM on one of my home PCs. It has a custom ROM as well but much like my tablet and for the same reason, it is pretty buggy too.

    --
    Charter Member of The Committee Group For The Elimination And Eradication Of Repetitive Redundancy
  79. Perfect for an older phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm leaving my current job to an unknown future in Japan and have to turn in my company iphone when I leave.

    This put me in the position of not wanting to spend a lot of money on a smartphone, but still needing one that I can use in Japan.

    Instead of buying one over there, I picked up a new LG G3 on Ebay for $155:

    1) Removable battery and microsd
    2) Flashed with Fulmics rom for newest Android features/security
    3) AT&T version of the LG G3 supports all the Japan LTE bands.

    So far, I can't say I have any complaints or issues with this rom.

  80. is pure android a custom ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you call AOSP custom then yes , as far as i'm concerned it's more the samsung skin that is custom and replaced by purte android on all my devices

  81. I used to, but not anymore by Necron69 · · Score: 1

    I loaded custom ROMs on my first three Android phones, and spent a ton of time tweaking things. This is not all that different from what I used to do with Linux years ago.

    However, a number of things happened such that I no longer bother:
    - Android got a lot better overall
    - Samsung boot locked my stupid phone (GS6) - bad
    - Samsung started issuing monthly patch updates - good

    I'm vaguely considering trying to find an unlockable phone for my next one, but after getting burned by Google with my last Nexus tablet that they killed with an update, I'm not real thrilled by them either.

    - Necron69

  82. I like buggy untested software, so I have a Nexus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who needs custom ROMs when you can have all the same bugginess via OTA updates from Google. This is also why I won't touch a Pixel. I don't need to pay iPhone prices to be a Google Tester. The Nexus 6P was bad enough price wise.

    All kidding aside, you can run an alternate Launcher and get 90% of the benefit of a custom ROM without voiding your warranty. It used to be you needed a custom ROM to tether, now carriers have figured out that this is a revenue stream.

  83. Sultan's Rom by joshuaf · · Score: 1

    You bet your ass they do. I've NEVER run a stock rom for more than a couple weeks. Here's my plug for the oneplus phones. You can pry sultan's rom out of my cold dead hands.

  84. I'm actually happy with the OnePlus 3 rom by DrHappyAngry · · Score: 1

    So I've been a Cyanogen, and Android user since the original G1 android phone and ran it on the LG G2X, motorola photon Q (backlight died after a few months) and Galaxy S4. Cyanogen kept the G1 usable for longer, and up to date after it wasn't supported, and made the G2X and S4 actually usable, and got rid of the crapware and samsung UI. This time around I decided I'd roll with the stock rom on the OnePlus 3 for a little while, and haven't found anything I miss from cyanogen, and just decided to stick with it. I just got the nougat update OTA yesterday. I need to root it, but keep putting it off, since the directions say it'll wipe everything on the phone. It had some bugs on initial release, but they've actually been addressed, and they push out updates pretty regularly. Asides from the shelf screen (if you don't like it, it's easy to ignore) it's a pretty pure android experience with no bloatware. If they'd just make a phone with a hardware keyboard, I'd be perfectly happy.

  85. Re:Custom ROMS? Hell, barely use my Smartphone! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Obvious:
    Make calls,
    Take notes,
    Browse the internet.
    Camera
    Video
    Social Media
    Games
    Email

    Less obvious:
    Navigation
    Traffic predictions so I know when to leave home.
    Car Bluetooth music server
    Pay for street parking with a push of an app parking (works in undercover park garages as well so I don't need to stand inline at the ticket machine anymore).
    Connect to car's ODBII port to figure out what keeps turning my check engine light on
    UPnP Media server tied to hifi system in the house
    Remote control for my Kodi box
    Skype
    Sleep tracking
    Linked to my Nest so it automatically turns the thermostat off when I leave the house and turns it back on if I'm expected home within an hour.
    Learning a foreign language
    Speaking of foreign languages - Live translation of foreign languages.
    Tracking flights with my corporate travel agent app (quite useful if you fly a lot, especially with the bad weather causing a lot of cancellations)
    Linking to International SOS services in case something happens while I'm not in my home country
    Cloud client to quickly get files
    WiFi tethering
    Internet banking
    Paying bills
    Splitting bills
    Paying at a checkout
    Synced with Exchange calendar so I get meeting reminders
    Connects to my bike power meter and cadence meter, speed meter, and heart rate monitor via ANT+ as a damn good bike computer for racing training.
    Regulates interval training when running.
    Order movie tickets online, pay for them, and retrieve them from the local machine.
    Track which beer I drink (Untappd, it's like Facebook for beer)
    Debug network issues by scanning WiFi channels
    Debug network issues by port scanning

    I'm sure there's others, this is just off the top of my head.

  86. Sketchy as hell rooting / flashing process by gumpish · · Score: 1

    I've never installed a custom ROM, in spite of being very tempted to do so, because the tools to get one installed are largely Windows based and are seemingly universally closed source.

    Using closed source software to do something "they" don't want you to do seems like a great way to invite malicious code onto your system.

    I'd run it from a VM but then there's the whole USB passthrough issue and I'm concerned about bricking my device.

    Even the god damned Nexus phones don't have a hidden switch the enable root. Nope, have to use some kind of exploit.

    If there was some way to install a custom ROM *through the front door* I'd do it.

  87. More important than ever by hackel · · Score: 1

    Because our beloved Xposed framework is still not compatible with Android 7.0+ (Currently at version 7.1.1), so-called "custom ROMs" are our only saving grace. Google has taken the absolutely backward approach of trying to discourage this practice through things like image-based updates, huge warnings when a bootloader is unlocked, etc. It's ridiculous. A phone is no different from a laptop, and should have no more restrictions.

  88. After CM, Lineage OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On my Xiaomi mi3 I've just installed Lineage OS. Main reason ? I've always liked mi3 but not Miui, and with Cyanogen first and Lineage now I'm able to have Android N on a 2013 phone. I think it's enough.