Tim Sweeney Dislikes Windows 10 Cloud Rumors, Calls OS 'Crush Steam Edition' (arstechnica.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: The rumor that Microsoft is building a version of Windows 10 that can only install apps from the Windows Store has drawn criticism before it's even official. Epic Games founder Tim Sweeney took to Twitter to attack the operating system. Although its real name is named Windows 10 Cloud, he's dubbing it "Windows 10 Crush Steam Edition." Sweeney is convinced that Microsoft wants to exercise total control over the Windows platform and destroy Valve's Steam. Last year, Sweeney attacked the Universal Windows Platform API. He claimed (incorrectly) that third-party stores such as Steam would be unable to sell and distribute UWP games, leaving them at a disadvantage relative to Microsoft's own store. He followed this statement with the claim that Microsoft would systematically modify Windows so as to make Steam work worse and worse, such that gamers grow tired of it and switch to the Windows Store. In his tweets, Sweeney recognizes that Microsoft wants to compete with Chrome OS. But he fails to understand what the company must do to actually offer that competition. He wrote that "it's great for Microsoft to compete with ChromeOS, but NOT BY LOCKING OUT COMPETING WINDOWS SOFTWARE STORES." This statement represents a failure to understand that "locking out competing Windows software stores" is, for this market, positively desirable. It's fundamental to preventing the hard-to-support free-for-all that a Windows system would otherwise represent. A later tweet does recognize the value of this lockdown, but Sweeney says that Windows 10's "great admin features to limit user software installs" should be used instead. This again suggests a misunderstanding of the target market: systems will be used with little to no supervision and with little to no administrative oversight. To compete against the Chromebook, Windows 10 Cloud needs to be locked down by default, and it must not offer any ready way to disable that lockdown. In his complaints, Sweeney also fails to consider what happens should the Chromebook threat go unaddressed: Chromebooks running Chrome OS will proliferate. These machines will not support third-party stores, they will not support Steam, and they will not support PC games at all. Sweeney may not want Microsoft to build this world, but even if Microsoft doesn't create it, Google already is doing so.
Yet nobody seems to attack Apple for exactly the same view on their iPads. Remember that's what they're targeting here - iPad-type use, not computer type use.
Only Apple is allowed to build a walled garden, everyone else is evil.
Cloud gaming provider with builtin DRM hates cloud OS provider with built in DRM, HOLY SHIT THIS IS NEWS
lives.
Windows ain't done until Steam won't run!
#DeleteChrome
Why won't Valve work to make it better? The non-big screen client hasn't seen a major update in forever, despite it demanding to update every time I look at it. Have you tried to use any of their Shift-Tab functionality on a 4K display? Now I understand why some users stuck to 1024x768 for so long.
What kind of hack news site PICKS UP AN UNFOUNDED RUMOR...then runs a story on the unfounded rumor just to discredit the author of the rumor based on previous rumors.
What..the fuck kind of news for nerds is this gossipy whining?
.. they already have "a version of Windows [x] that can only install apps from the [Microsoft] Store" or Microsoft blessed disks and its called the XBOX [insert any version here].
[The Universe] has gone offline.
This won't be a popular opinion around here but I think the 'app store' model is a fine thing for consumers. They really do just want an easy way to get and use stuff. Average consumers are genuinely incapable of administering windows systems safely. (You and I can. But we're not average consumers) Jailed and isolated applications from trusted sources ARE safer because you can cryptographic ally ensure they are not tampered with.
Fortunately for Microsoft they have the money to bang at it for a decade until they finally get it right. UAP in windows 8/8.1 and RT was a complete shitshow. The store is a joke. The platform is a joke. The development environment was a clusterfuck.
Since windows 10 they've been improving things by leaps and bounds. Games actually work (And you can tab out of them in a blink, which is sort of impressive) and the store is less fuck-awful.
Windows 10 adds features and improvements with each major release and the UAP platform and the windows store do get better.
Know what would knock it out of the park? A UAP only windows that has certified 3rd party stores (Like steam) and INCLUDES access to free/oss applications. Microsoft could easily sacrifice some of that app store revenue to suck up marketshare. - This is, of course, all contingent on some big improvements to UAP.
Well, at least that would pretty much guarantee the year of the Linux desktop.
It takes guts to stand up to a multibillion-dollar corporation that has a killswitch in its pocket for all your products.
Let's set the wayback machine to the days of XP. Microsoft had to put up with a near-constant stream of complaints that many machines running XP were exploited and buggy. There was a lot of evidence to support this - but in many cases, the bugs and exploits were due to end-users not patching/updating their systems, making many old resolved exploits de facto zero-day exploits. In many instances, they were still being dogged by failures in downlevel versions of Windows. Support was similarly a nightmare, as even in enterprise settings they could not entirely count on end-users running a known version of Windows - oh, sure, "95, ME, XP", "Pro/Enterprise/Server" . . . but even within that specification there existed a whole spectrum of patch levels - even extending to some tiny subset of users actively preventing the installation of specific patches - decisions being made not by IT professionals, but often by end-users.
With Microsoft's forceful insistence that everyone upgrade to Windows 10 (and a similar coercion to apply all patches and updates), Microsoft can now be at least somewhat confident that the vast majority of desktop systems running their OS are running the same OS, patches and all. Granted, this leads to some real problems (such as the debacle surrounding the forced uninstallation of software Microsoft doesn't want running on their systems), but it also means that they don't have literally thousands of systems running Windows 8/Windows 10 which are vulnerable to an exploit they closed several months ago. It also means that when they hear about a bug or exploit, they can be reasonably sure that they haven't already fixed the problem once. Finally, it means that they don't have to rely upon end-user expertise to differentiate between valid software and Trojan horses (not that I entirely trust Microsoft in this regard, but then neither do I trust Google or Apple to do a perfect job in this respect).
A great number of people take great delight in pointing out every unpopular action by Microsoft - and often, they are right - but if you insist that Microsoft fix PEBKAC errors, you lose the right to complain about them removing en masse the end-user's ability to choose for themselves how their systems will be configured, patched and maintained.
Oh - I'll bet you thought that "My Computer" meant it was yours. The hardware is yours, the data arguably so. Licensed software is not yours - you just have permission to use it. This includes the OS if you're running MS-Windows. It's sort of like American freedom - you're willing to surrender some freedom to be kept safe, get used to not having your freedom anymore. Pick your poison, but don't cry like a child with a skinned knee when you can't have both.
Just to point out a relevant parallel - Google just pushed out an update to the Android Google Voice app client - and took away the widget. I was using that widget and I'm very unhappy with their decision. I've sent feedback to Google asking that they restore widget functionality to the app. This is only the most recent example of such activity by Google - where's the hue and cry over that?
Windows store is to locked down for games (sandboxing) to work like stream and do they have any thing like the workshop?
It's this BeauHD guy who posts crap like this to *BOTH* sites, and somehow the staff on each just let it happen (For the record, SN is probably a bit more friendly to the conservative crowd (outside a few LGBT/SJW types) than slash nowadays, but similiarly containing of sensationalistic crap from serial posters like BeauHD.
It's like Roland Paqpiquille(sp) and company all over again!
You can install Steam OS on Chromebooks, just as you can on Windows machines. Its just the game industry that needs to support Steam OS, and he isn't locked in to Microsoft any more. And no, he won't be locked into Steam OS either, because if they start demanding more, he can just clone Ubuntu himself and distribute his game as OS. As long as new computers will allow free OS choice, there is no problem.
Tim's love and defense for Steam is admirable, but it's hard to take him seriously while he actively develops apps for iOS, which is the ultimate walled garden.
If it's running in "the cloud" I doubt people will be playing games on it anyhow. Some things are best done locally with appropriate hardwar.e
We get it, you vape.
Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
I've been waiting for SteamOS to seriously take off.
For SteamOS to seriously take off DEVELOPERS HAVE TO EMBRACE LINUX.
For that to happen they need a good kick in the ass. Microsoft pissing them off would be a good kick in the ass. I haven't had a Windows machine since Win 2000 was still new up until about a month ago. I got tired of waiting for the promised Linux port of Giana Sisters Twisted Dreams, not to mention I'm really looking forward to South Park the Fractured But Whole, both of which are Windows only. I built a Wintendo with a monitor emulator plug so it just sits there and runs steam for Steam Casting to my Linux machine and the Steam Link I picked up for $20.
The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
I get the feeling the only one who "fails to understand" is the whore who wrote the summary. Seems to know everything about deepthroating though.
How about they fix the Steam client so that you can read the text on a high resolution display? Many gamers now have 2K or 4K screens, and the text does not scale, which is very slack really.
Rumor or no, this sounds like a path for MS's continuing hope to become relevant in the mobile world. Too many business types trying to lead the way, rather than good solid useful tech. Build something useful and people will buy it. Try to predict and even dictate what you want them to want and you've drastically reduced your chance of success. Not to mention the horrible tech mess you'll create.
Didn't he raise the same fears about Windows 8 RT? Aren't they equally as valid now? Does he really think that the engineers building Windows are primarily focused on destroying Steam?
...and UWP is all that will run on Windows? Presumably MS will start disabling sideloading on specific devices...
You might think Windows 10 Cloud would be ideal for a K-12 student. But then he takes a programming class in high school and discovers that neither Visual Studio nor any other major IDE with a compiler is available through Windows Store. What's he supposed to do then?
You can install Steam OS on Chromebooks
How so? I thought installing another operating system on a Chromebook was possible only if the firmware is set to developer mode, and if the firmware is set to developer mode, it prompts whoever turns it on to press Space then Enter to wipe everything. Someone who picks up your laptop and turns it on won't know to press Ctrl+D or wait 30 seconds for the beeping to stop waking others sleeping in the same household. Instead, he or she will just do what the screen says, not knowing or not caring about the ensuing data loss.
> "Sweeney also fails to consider what happens should the Chromebook threat go unaddressed: Chromebooks running Chrome OS will proliferate. These machines will not support third-party stores, they will not support Steam, and they will not support PC games at all."
Hi, MS minion, how has been your day? Good, I hope.
Android is also Linux and AFAIU a lot more closed than Chrome OS; I use F-Droid, could use other stores if I wanted and surely Steam will have no problem offering software for Android.
Did things change overnight and Chromebooks got more locked in than Android? Does Crouton not work anymore? (this is not good enough for me, but I find it a tad easier for running Linux than installing Cy... Legacy OS on an Android tablet).
That said, Sweeney is probably as old as I am and more knowledgeable than me about all that dirty MS Politics. He certainly does not need to be corrected on his perception of such "moves".
This has been going on since when? 1984?
Steam should have come to Linux 5 to 10 years earlier; now, they should work on their Marketing skills to get attention to Linux support just like those Humble Bundles of recent fame. Partnering with hardware makers to promote affordable powerful machines for the best games. I have a gamer daughter, I know what I'm talking about, and she's running Windows... the single person in the house who uses that "excellent" OS.
Adobe tried to be friends with Windows. Look what they got. Lie down with dogs...
DOS ain't done till 1-2-3 won't run.
When Windows 11 is released the old release will be called 'Windows 10 Steaming Pile of Crap Edition'.
Not buying games that cannot run on linux. Thats why steam on linux is awesome.
A game that only runs on win10 will never see any money from me.
Fuck the 10000000 remake of an old classic.
for the moment. My percentage of games that will run under Linux is (very) slowly but steadily increasing.
While I agree with what you are saying - this could also spectacularly backfire.
It's terrible and not competition to Windows!!
Turn Windows into ChromeOS and chances are I'll make the switch back to Linux.
Whatever turning Windows into something with Windows store only is enough for that .. Maybe. I unlikely want to lose all chance to tinker with the main computer so to say.
The openness of the PC is what make it so great. Talk all you want about closed source OS but the platform has been pretty accessible anyway... at-least relative what one could imagine by now ...
"The Sony home-computer!" ..
Technically, Valve can create a Steam Android app store just like Amazon to distribute android apps.
Unfortunately, you can't do the same for Windows Store just like Apple Store wall garden.
As a digital distribution platform, Valve knew Steam would be cut off if Microsoft implement the Windows Store wall garden. It is no wonder they rushed in to create the SteamOS just in case things turn for the worst.
As far as I know, the whole Windows 10 cloud rumors came from a piece of code that indicates that there might be a version of Windows 10 codenamed cloud...
Anyone that goes as far as assuming and then proceeding to cuss at a company because of speculative information leaked in a piece of code should be looked upon and considered a crazy paranoid maniac. Your agenda is showing Sweeney. Get yourself a better hobby, this one is unhealthy for you.
The Ars Technica article isn't doing any better on that front too.
Have people lost their critical reasoning and minds these days?
Interesting, didn't know of this. I've done some reading and apparently there is a "soft" developer mode and a "hard" developer mode. The "soft" developer mode invokes pressing some keys and buttons to install a different OS, the "hard" developer mode involves changing the BIOS write protect flag by turning a screw/setting a jumper and then flashing a new firmware (Chrome OS has open source firmware so this is possible). With hard developer mode I think you can simply edit the firmware source code (if there aren't edited versions out there) to remove that check. Its not easy but its doable.
Probably not something you'd want your users to do :). But it could be outsourced to some shop. You send your laptop in, they turn that screw, unlock the firmware, send it back. 20 bucks plus shipping.
If Steam helped develop WINE Windows might not matter.
I guess that makes the non-Cloud version Pound Sand Edition. ;)
Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
Yeah, if Sweeney hates Windows so much, why doesn't his team put more effort in making Steam OS better? The last time I tried it a few months ago, it was still pretty rough and the game selection was pretty puny.
Support it and maybe Linux will finally have a good push into being an acceptable gaming OS.
MS can't use DRM to lock out linux and even then no way that supermicro will lockout vmware or linux.
Then together with Valve (if they decide to make games instead of just selling them) Microsoft can crater into insignifacance and Linux variants can finally get a good push into the desktop OS of choice for gaming and general desktop PC for work or other entertainment.
So -WIndows 10 cloud is about an appliance were the users can't even control which programs to run (previous instances of Windows Stores had virtually no apps) - and you have basically Ars Technica just licking Microsoft boots and endorsing it to very last bit. The only thing left to wonder is how much of Ars Technica revenue comes directly from Microsoft Marketing department.
-><- no
What a bunch of bull... this article took a page from shill town. First, no, Sweeney wasn't incorrect in his claim, MS backed down (sort of). Secondly, ChromeOS is opensource and allows sideload. How is this an article?!
Gabe with Valve warned everyone when Microsoft introduced the windows store that they'd eventually try to kill outside software distribution. It's the entire reason he built SteamOS. Tim and the other game company CEO's happily dissed SteamOS for years.
Microsoft is going to try to kill outside distribution. They might even succeed.
And there is no stopping him now. After getting a slap on the wrist for the browser wars we're still fighting that battle. He took down WordPerfect, Novell, SCO and Caldera. Ray Noorda's daughter committed suicide over it. Now there is no stopping him that he's Warren Buffet's new pinochle partner since Buffet became a widower.
So what does he want? Is he pissed that Microsoft didn't just use Steam instead of the Windows Store?
The MyTh - I am a figment of the Imagination - [Im Probably even not here]
So he's basically saying "It took me a lot of hard work to establish my monopoly and I would be pissed if Microsoft does anything that could perceptually threaten my monopoly"
Microsoft is going to try to kill outside distribution. They might even succeed.
They will succeed.
Some random bloke is criticizing Windows, but he's wrong because WINDOWS GOES TO 11.
No, this ain't a Microsoft shill. Oh, no.
Still Nadellas words resounding in my ears, that we should just "trust them". Why should we, again?
But it's less wrong than when Ballmer called Linux a cancer and MS were touting the GPL as viral. Lets keep it real: CEOs and the like say any old shit to prop up their business or bring another down, and we have to remember the adage "Those who live by the sword die by the sword". If MS had complained about Sweeney being wrong, it could have been "People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones".
Nice try but no.
MS can revoke Linux boot at any time with UEFI "secureboot" key revocation
aaaaaaa
but will super micro and others give in? Maybe dell but not for servers.
I'm not sure even Microsoft could survive the resultant lawsuits.
I think windows wants a profitable App Store like Apple has, not necessarily to crush steam.
It all depends on whether Windows allows apps that sell other software.
Both the Apple's App Store and Steam have barred the selling of apps that include a store for selling content. (Apple shut down Comixology, Steam booted Dragon Age 2 for having a real money store.
So it wouldn't be unique to windows if they did do it...
That said, I would never install windows on a machine that didn't give me access to my existing Steam library. Absolutely no point.
And how exactly does Windows crush steam? Microsoft's strategy appears to be to make the user's computer increasingly inconvenient to use, to the point where even non-technical users are starting to realize that their operating system choice is a problem. In the mean time, steam is adding more and more games for non-windows platform. The only game I'm currently missing, having not booted my computer back to windows for months, is the ability to play a native Linux version of Skyrim. Well, that and having to reboot my computer whenever Microsoft feels that I should be compelled to.
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
iOS is not on desktops quite yet, but it is on a laptop of sorts. Some analysts seem to be under the impression that an iPad with a keyboard cover can replace a laptop for many users.
It's a little complex, but yeah, your choices are:
- Boot in developer mode, some customization possible but essentially you're stuck in ChromeOS and can easily have your system wiped.
- Boot in dev mode with a modified BIOS, alternative operating system allowed but in a very user unfriendly way (you need to hit CTRL-L, which isn't documented or shown on screen, to boot the alternative OS, for example.)
- Boot with the BIOS replaced completely with an open source alternative. This effectively turns it into a regular Wintel laptop, and you can install a regular GNU/Linux distribution - maybe even Windows, I have no idea, but you can no longer dual boot with ChromeOS (ChromiumOS might be possible, not sure.)
More information here.
It is, to be honest, a horrible process running something other than ChromeOS on a Chromebook. I suspect that's why Crouton is so popular - it's a kludge, and has severe limitations, but it at least means you can stick with ChromeOS handling everything. But obviously, if you do that, there's the huge risk of someone booting up your device and wiping everything out because it boots up in vanilla developer mode.
You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
See my subject: FORCING folks to install from "appstore" only - what about guys doing shareware/freeware that's NOT in the 'appstore'? I've NEVER done it that way (nor do I care to - MS 'forces' a LOT of utter bs on devs, like apps MUST from from %Program Files% etc. which does NOT have to be that way, apps still run off their OWN folder off root for example - it's not like they don't OR won't!).
I remember when (circa 1994-1998 or so) when freeware/shareware forums hosted NOTHING BUT that - no "corporate ware" but AFTER THAT? The "big boys" INVADED OUR SPACE competing with us!
I guess "that's ok" if THEY do that but we can't distribute our OWN wares OR HAVE THEM INSTALL & RUN on the NOT SELLING @ ALL forced on users BULLSHIT WARE that has been Windows since VISTA to present!
APK
P.S.=> No, I see this for WHAT IT IS - market control, nothing more per my subject line above: KEEP "SHOOTING YOURSELF IN THE FOOT MS" - you're not doing well doing it, Win10 is the MAIN proof thereof... apk
I'm an avid Humble Bundler and I've been a Linux Gamer since my only real option was Quake, Unreal, and whatever Loki ported.
There is a HUGE and awesome selection of Linux compatible games on Steam.
Fine, not every AAA title you want is there, in fact being a AAA title tends to reduce the likelihood that it will be available on Linux AKA Steam OS, but the "shotgun buying" approach of the Humble Bundle has gotten me to try a bunch of titles I probably wouldn't have looked at otherwise and I've loved some of them.
I have got 716 games in my Steam Library - most of which were straight from the Humble Bundle, probably 690ish or so. Of that - I'm not at home so my counts not exact, 415 or so work on Linux, some of those are AAA titles, both Portals, some Star Wars games, Tomb Raider (the remake), Goat Simulator....
Among the 300 or so titles are the ones that annoy me the most. Among those that are in my Steam Library are a couple of games that work great on Linux, but aren't available for Linux on Steam. The original Bittrip Runner for example (we won't talk about how the Bitrip guys completely ignore Steam control settings and do their own thing making anything but an XBOX control useless without 3rd party software), Unreal Tournament 2004, Quake 3 - which I bought the metal tin Linux version of, Unreal Tournament 2004, all work on Linux by means other than Steam but not with Steam. I know Unreal shouldn't be difficult, one of the games I have that works on everything is Brütal Legend, which uses the Unreal Engine.
The ones that annoy me most are emulator/engine based games. Among the games I have that work on everything are a bunch of kids games, Freddy The Fish, Pajama Sam, that sort of thing for my kids, along with Gabriel Knight, Broken Sword and Tex Murphy games that run Scumm or something akin to it. I have Pajama Sam games that work on the the Play Station, Mac OS X, Mac OS 9 and some previous, Win 3.11, Linux, Windows NT platforms, you name it. They work because of the engine underneath. I have the Mortal Kombat arcade collection. I can play the Arcade ROMs on any OS I want if I want to be a pirate, but I bought the games instead. I have to play them on Windows because I bought them. THIS IS WHY PEOPLE PIRATE. You can't tell me that a AAA company doesn't have the budget to make arcade ROMs that already work on just about any OS or type of processor I want using questionable means legal on three different OS's that's pretty close to being just 2 since BSD and Linux are so similar while Freddy the Fish can work on anything I want it to - including Android. (granted the Android version didn't come from Steam - but that should be the next area Valve looks at)
No, some motivation is what is needed, I think Microsoft repeating the "IE Only" style mistake with video games would be a good start.
I'm happy to report some games that I've acquired at earlier dates as part of a bundle eventually became compatible with Steam OS/Linux. I think one or both of the Torchlight games and at least two Star Wars games had this happen. (Still not Giana Sisters despite the promise)
The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
Really? Are they hard core candy crushers or something? I get that you can play Quake in a browser these days, but do you see any serious gaming happening on a Chromebook?
I am G-D Tim Sweeney! You must listen to me roar! All You Sheeple are in the Extreme Danger!!
Microsoft operates in a competitive marketplace. If they produce good stuff, they will be rewarded. Fail to do so and you get Windows Vista (or 8). This isn't the 90's anymore Tim...
Also, Tim's concern for Steam is lovely and all, but there are more issues in play than for a games marketplace.
Microsoft's Evil Empire reputation doesn't fit anymore, though you'd not notice that from Tim's rants, or from much of the crowd here on /. The entire first generation of MS leaders are long gone. Apple is a formidable competitor again, also unlike the 90's. Microsoft has faceplanted in smartphones. The critics of Microsoft are established and vocal. Microsoft is experimenting with Bash shells, and actively commits to Open Source. Linux is more than a toy and has areas of deep market acceptance.
Really Tim, check the calendar and get some up-to-date news sources. Get outside and get some fresh air and sunshine; I'm concerned for you.
Take a look at the games that already run on Steam on Linux.
There's quite a few AAA titles and many B-list titles and many many indie titles.
Anecdotally, Alien Isolation, Chivalry, XCOM 1 and 2, Total War Empire and Attilla, Rocket League, Metro 2033, and Deus Ex: Human Revolution all run quite well.
I also play about a dozen indie titles.
There's literally more games for Linux now than I have the time to play or money to buy and more coming out every week.
What more could you ask for?
I'll turn folks over to ltsb. I have never even seen the Windows store. Linux for my servers and personal stations.