Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: How Does One Freely Use Bitcoin In the Land of the Free?

New submitter devrtm writes: It appears that Bitcoin, a currency designed with anonymity in mind, can be effectively used almost anywhere in the world, except in a few countries where it is regulated, and in one country where you can only use it if you give up your privacy. That country is the United States. I have accumulated quite a few BTC from the currency's early days where block rewards were still at $50. There was a period of time where one could get a nearly anonymous debit card, or use BTC online with merchants. Nowadays, non-U.S. payment providers no longer issue debit cards to the U.S. residents and the U.S.-based merchants accepting BTC are nearly extinct. The only way to use BTC in the U.S. is to convert it to USD. Unfortunately, that conversion requires giving up your personal information to a U.S.-based BTC payment processor, and there are rumors that signing up for those services raises red flags with certain three letter acronym organizations. I have nothing to hide, but I do value my privacy. Can one freely and anonymously live off of their Bitcoin wallet in the U.S.? I am afraid the answer is no. Does anyone have an experience that proves me wrong? Please share.

270 comments

  1. Cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you want privacy use cash with people who don't know you.

    1. Re:Cash by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Informative

      To simplify the instructions: take your pile of BTC, convert it to cash as a single event, pay your taxes, and live off your BTC proceeds.

      20% capital gains isn't killing anyone. If you want US dollars, you'll need to pay US taxes on your BTC gains, or be a criminal. Your choice.

    2. Re:Cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      20% is NOTHING compared to the profit you'll make by investing in cryptocurrencies, and probably nothing compared to what you've made already.

      Also, seeking privacy does not imply seeking avoiding to pay taxes.

      And if you want to retain your right to privacy against intrusive surveilling databases buying and selling your ass selling you out to corp and gov datamines, etc...
      yes, go start linking up with p2p apps that have local traders, localbitcoins, meetup.com, craigs, bitcoin conferences, etc, etc.
      What you seek is out there, you just have to find it, and take your part in developing it where it doesn't sufficiently exist.

    3. Re:Cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and of course protect against data breaches and identity theft and fraud and all sorts of bad things.
      Cryptocurrencies allow you to make those defenses by giving all the power to you in your hands.

    4. Re:Cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the EU most countries now have limits on cash transactions (usually at 3000 or 5000 euros). So whilst youze americanos may be fine the rest if the world isn't. Obviously I will be labelled a conspiracy theorist for pointing this out.

    5. Re:Cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or use PIVX

    6. Re:Cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only criminals need to hide their spending activity. Cryptocurrencies offer society nothing.

    7. Re:Cash by K.+S.+Van+Horn · · Score: 1

      "Only criminals need to hide their spending activity."

      So you agree that the CIA, NSA, etc. are criminal organizations?

    8. Re:Cash by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Sure they do, society often is is piss poor at determining who should be classified as a criminal. I shudder to think how terrible it would be if law were perfectly enforcable; especially since its creation remains so imperfect.

      Society loses a ton when bad laws are enforced and criminality is used as a weapon to subjugate it.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    9. Re:Cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the BTC were basically worthless when you got them, just delete them and forget about it :-)

    10. Re:Cash by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Do you pay tax on money you withdraw from the bank? I do not and do not see why someone who banks in bitcoin should. 20% capital gains? That is robbery. Tax on money that you have paid tax on. That is a good enough reason to avoid tax so I can understand why you assume that the OP is evading tax. I will be happy to for you to consider me a criminal. I hope you will be as happy for me to consider you a moron.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    11. Re:Cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're putting money into stocks - another uninsured/risky investment - then yes, you really do pay taxes on money you withdraw.

      If the OP would like to withdraw the money at $50/BTC, they actually don't owe anything. They only owe loot on the unearned income, which is another way of saying "investment gains".

    12. Re:Cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree.

      The federal government simply extorts money from everybody. They have no real need of it nor entitlement; it's simply a way to control people.

      After the Trillion dollar banker bailout, the 104 years of an illegal unconstitutional federal reserve, and a national debt that legally we don't owe; I will not think twice about using money they can't track.

      I accept Silver and Gold and will pay with Silver or Gold.

    13. Re:Cash by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      If you convert your USD to a foreign currency, then gain or lose money due to fluctuations in that investment, then convert it back to USD, you pay taxes on gains or deduct losses from income otherwise taxed. BTC is no different from stocks, forex, or any other non-US dollar investment, it varies in value over time and those variations are taxed as capital gains (short or long term) when you cash out the investment.

      If you've got vendors willing to accept payment in BTC, or foreign currency then you effectively avoid the capital gains issue, unless you get large scale about it and then you may have to pay tax on a barter transaction (e.g. say I purchased, mined, or otherwise acquired 200 BTC back in 2009 and in 2016 I bought a house with them, there will be tax, whether dollars were involved or not, it's a barter transaction and will be taxed at fair market value of the goods exchanged.)

      OP is bitching that nobody accepts BTC, boo hoo, convert your BTC to dollars and they will accept it all day long, but the dollars come with a capital gains tax. If you have markets that _do_ accept BTC, then kudos, enjoy your shadow economy while it lasts - if it gets big enough, it too will be regulated and taxed.

    14. Re:Cash by bmk67 · · Score: 1

      If you've got vendors willing to accept payment in BTC, or foreign currency then you effectively avoid the capital gains issue

      Effectively, yes. Lawfully, no.

    15. Re:Cash by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      It's not a "need to hide" issue. It's a privacy issue. It's a privacy from data mining. Do you want every gov't official (as well as business) to know when you come home, when you go to bed, when you wake up in the morning (which you can know from data regarding electric and water usage, not to mention Alexa).

      how about we return to the anonymity of the dark ages (you know the 1990s).

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    16. Re:Cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capital gains tax has always seemed somewhat suspicious to me, especially as it applies to gold. How is it really a "gain" if the Federal Reserve debases the US dollar? Surely I've just avoided loss.

      Is it fair to say that Bitcoin, virtue of doing so well against other assets, has truly gained? if so, what is the impartial measure of objective value against which we can measure that gain?

    17. Re: Cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope society don't do it poorly. By definition society who elects the legislators who pass the laws define it and is then deliberated and interpreted by the courts. So unless the innocents (by law) are being wrongly sentenced, then yeah they are criminals and anyone who play by the rules are not criminals whether what ever they do is evil or not or right or wrong.

      The problem is you are confusing laws and morals.

      In a good system should have a big overlap between the two, but its never perfect.

      You can be a psycho path and screw everyone over and yet do it all legally. So you are NOT a criminal... just a complete asshole. It's usually these assholes who then trigger changes in legislation to criminalise their actions, but they did it before the law came about so still not criminals.

    18. Re: Cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use a bitcoin ATM to turning it into cash. They don't ask you for any data but to send to certain address the bitcoins then collect your cash

  2. I guess /. still approves this crap by Baron_Yam · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Bitcoin is fundamentally impractical. It limps along with the support of criminals, scammers, gamblers, and fools, but it's never going anywhere significant.

    There's nothing that can be done to correct the problems of Bitcoin without making it no longer Bitcoin, and thus rendering the effort pointless.

    So why is it still a topic to discuss on a site that's supposed to be "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? It's not news to us, and it's more or less irrelevant unless you're on the wrong end of a cryptolocker.

    1. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Excelcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Concur.

      Bitcoin as a financial system is made impractical in the long term by the fact that it is limited in the total number that can be issued. After the last one is issued, the intent is for the value of them to simply go up. It was proposed as an in-built method to combat inflation, however what it really is is a way for the inventor to pad his own pockets by owning a significant fraction of the total number of bitcoins that can ever be produced. In a best-case scenario, this means he now owns a fraction of the world wealth (assuming the dystopian future where everyone uses bitcoins).

      The fact that it is really a huge piece of social engineering is what disinclines most governments from being too terribly thrilled about its adoption. Ironically, this may be what the inventor was counting on to promote it's adoption, reasoning that the more that governments resisted it, the more that certain groups would promote it as a form of protest/defiance.

      So, if you want to adopt bitcoins, by all means, be part of a piece of social engineering malware. Bitcoin transactions are not what you want for privacy anyway. If you want to maintain private money transactions, cash is always an option.

    2. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All money is made-up bullshit. Oh, here.. have some numbers on paper or cheap metal disk... or just a swipe of a magnetic strip.

      Anything that can be traded for goods and services at least within a certain region is "money."

      I don't understand how you can't understand that -- unless you're a loon who thinks money is still backed by precious metals... which it hasn't been since before banks that pay interest for accounts began. When you put money in the bank, it doesn't sit there... and it isn't loaned out once, but instead 9 or more times simultaneously.... even though that much money doesn't exist -- it's called the multiplier effect. google it.

    3. Re: I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how is that different than paper money the only difference is its anon wire transfer abilities.

    4. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Made-up bullshit backed by 20,000 nuclear warheads == not bullshit.

    5. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All money is made-up bullshit.

      Yes, but the US dollar is backed with the US banking system, the US government, and the US military. Bitcoin is backed by the fact that the exchange you use maybe doesn't want to rip you off today.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA banking system is NOT the USA government.

    7. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Made-up bullshit backed by 20,000 nuclear warheads == not bullshit.

      A "threat" that is never acted upon, is a bullshit threat.

    8. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Were you confused by the fact the parent listed them separately?

    9. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > A "threat" that is never acted upon

      Perhaps you'd like to ask Japan whether they think the threat of WMD has never been acted upon.

    10. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is "made up bullshit", why does it go up every year by a significant amount? It will likely be at 10,000 dollars per one BTC. It can't devalue itself due to the scarcity aspect, so while every other currency inflates, BTC is as secure as one can get these days.

    11. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      He means the FDIC.

    12. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Chas · · Score: 1

      The banking system in the US is intrinsically tied back to the Federal Reserve. Which is part of the US government.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    13. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      All money is made-up bullshit.

      Yes, but the US dollar is backed with the US banking system,

      The US Federal Reserve is a privately owned institution.

      the US government, and the US military.

      Are clients of this private banking system.

      Bitcoin is backed by the fact that the exchange you use maybe doesn't want to rip you off today.

      However even if a bitcoin's value is zero, you still have a bitcoin.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    14. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is "made up bullshit", why does it go up every year by a significant amount? It will likely be at 10,000 dollars per one BTC. It can't devalue itself due to the scarcity aspect, so while every other currency inflates, BTC is as secure as one can get these days.

      Either you have an unusual definition of "go up every year", or you are completely ignorant of bitcoin's value over the years since its inception.

    15. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's time to buy some tulips. You suppose they can be purchased with bitcoin?
      History loves suckers like you.

    16. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a more ignorant post.
      You express zero idea understanding fungibility to eight fucking decimal places.
      NO bitcoiner gives a shit about early adopters, they're rich, so what...
      everyone else is buying in now and getting rich too.
      Eventually it will all settle out and be just a boring stable currency at market value, no big deal.
      Of course not having a printing press will prevent arbitrary inflation and raise value, that's the point.
      Zcash / Zclassic is what you want for privacy.
      And Bitcoin over tor will do if needed and done right.
      People are fucking stupid.

    17. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by sheramil · · Score: 2

      Bitcoin is fundamentally impractical. It limps along ...

      and it occasionally makes dazzling leaps into the air and then trips over itself, falls down and just lies there.

    18. Re: I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Fed is NOT part of the USG. It's just a cartel of European banks. They don't answer to US taxpayers and they don't answer to congress. They are beholden only to themselves and they care only to continue their monopoly on banking where every USD automatically comes with a 6% debt that is paid back to the FED. Woodrow Wilson signed them into power, at night, in secret, on an island and then immediately and publicly regretted it and said he'd made the worst mistake that could have been made against US. Now we have our own mint and can make our own money but, every dollar we print ourselves for ourselves

    19. Re: I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry we don't take nuclear weapons, don't you have anything smaller?

    20. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All money is made-up bullshit.

      Yes, but the US dollar is backed with the US banking system,

      The US Federal Reserve is a privately owned institution.

      So what? That doesn't make it any less backed by something more than what bitcoin has.

      the US government, and the US military.

      Are clients of this private banking system.

      Again, so what? That doesn't make it any less backed by something more than what bitcoin has.

      Bitcoin is backed by the fact that the exchange you use maybe doesn't want to rip you off today.

      However even if a bitcoin's value is zero, you still have a bitcoin.

      Even if a dollar's value is zero, you still have a dollar.

      The point is, it's all made up bullshit (Bitcoin included) but the dollar is still backed by confidence in the banking system, the US government, the US military, wealth held, and other factors. Bitcoin, not so much. While USD is by no means perfect and there is certainly some lack of confidence, confidence in Bitcoin does not even come close.

    21. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      The US Federal Reserve is a privately owned institution.

      The non-profit Fed is "owned" by nobody. The leaders of the Fed are confirmed appointees of the US Federal Government. It is a "government institution" by all measures.

    22. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It's a deflationary system. People will lose wallets (die without clear instructions and such for others to use them, and the like).

      And it's hijackable by a single person. When a single person has control of the blockchain long enough, which happens as people drop out of the mining business, a single entity could transfer all coins to themselves, then process the transactions, until they "own" them all. It will happen, and when it does, people will lose faith in all block chain systems, even those without the same limitations.

    23. Re: I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      Tactical nukes.

    24. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by joshki · · Score: 1

      It's a deflationary system. People will lose wallets (die without clear instructions and such for others to use them, and the like).

      And it's hijackable by a single person. When a single person has control of the blockchain long enough, which happens as people drop out of the mining business, a single entity could transfer all coins to themselves, then process the transactions, until they "own" them all. It will happen, and when it does, people will lose faith in all block chain systems, even those without the same limitations.

      It's useless at that point anyway,. as if everyone drops out of the network there is no more network to process transactions and the value drops to zero.

      --
      I do not read or respond to AC's. If you want a discussion, log in. Otherwise, don't waste your time.
    25. Re: I guess /. still approves this crap by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      In what twisted universe are tactical nukes not nuclear weapons?

    26. Re: I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is backed by mathematics. Cannot be counterfeit, cannot be inflated, less vulnerable to corruption. The issue of theft is nothing new, just easier to execute, but ethereum may solve that issue comprehensively (e.g. long store wallets with rules that prevent instant draining of accounts, something akin to clearing a cheque).

    27. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because not everyone on the planet is blessed with a full knowledge of all things, unlike yourself, Mr. Sanctimonious. Funny you never comment on the never ending stream of Apple product placements, or lib-left political dribble. Why is that, oh greatest of the great? Seems you have something to hide, no?

    28. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 Insightful? Seriously? Do I really need to destroy this guys trolling logic for you? Or is this just a case of I don't like Bitcoin it scares me so i'll upvote? But after the first line which is a pitful appeal to emotion I think that the best reponse is to jump down to your level. It can safely be said that you really really don't like bitcoin has it been fucking you up the arse?

    29. Re: I guess /. still approves this crap by Dunbal · · Score: 1, Funny

      Bitcoin is backed by mathematics.

      So is Euler's equation, but it's not particularly useful to anyone to put food on the table.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    30. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Sadly this is mostly true (but not entirely).
      A key part of an economy is the ability to purchase something and have a clear path of recourse if you don't get what you pay for. While bitcoins themselves don't cause this problem it is the anonymous transactions that do. It put the buyer in greater risk because the seller has all the advantages. If I buy x in bit coins the seller will know who I am to deliver the goods however if if I don't know who the seller is then if what I get isn't what I purchase, I have less ability to fight this. Because I will not have a person to bring to judge. However being the seller will have the info to deliver product to me. He could use that data against me if it was to his self interest.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    31. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Are you high? The Federal Reserve is NOT NOT NOT a part of the US Government. It is a corporation owned by member banks. IT IS NOT FEDERAL.

    32. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hash.io had >50% for a bit sometime on '14 or '15

    33. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Not only that, all profits go directly to the US Treasury.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    34. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by aldousd666 · · Score: 1

      Cash is currently an option. It won't be forever. There are significant strides in Europe and India right now toward 'cashless' economies, because the government thinks it never misses out on taxes and the underground economy is supposedly all brought into the daylight -- but that just drives people into trading other things on the black market. It'll get worse over time and happen here too eventually. So you can either spend your TIME worrying about that, or you can just spend your MONEY, pay taxes, and grumble about the government. Unless you plan to overthrow a government or become a criminal, this is the wonderful future -- and it's YOUR wonderful, non-anonymous future. I don't like it either, but what can I do? Probably something illegal, but I'd rather just not bother.

      --
      Speak for yourself.
    35. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Technically unless it's gold or silver coin, it's all made up bullshit; money is only valuable because you can convert it to a desired goods or service at a future date. Even gold or silver coin's value is more dependant on conversion to a desired goods or service at a future date than it's innate value.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    36. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      no it is not

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    37. Re: I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The FED doesn't put dinner on the table (for you) either, don't see how that's relevant.
      Ask the people of Zimbabwe or Venezuala how robust a currency backed by the concept of 'trust me' is. The worst case outcome for cryptocurrencies is not nearly so bleak.

    38. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      Brilliant post. Agreed. However, I still think Bitcoin is a good thing, because it opens the door for future options. Ethereum and MaidSafe are trying to build distributed, decentralized computing networks on a crypto-currency backbone. Storj.io is trying to build a distributed decentralized storage service on a crypto-currency backbone. Zcash and Zerocoin are attempting to offer features like Bitcoin but with true anonymity. Dogecoin is mostly a joke, but it tries to solve the inherent deflationary properties of Bitcoin.

      Am I investing in any of these crypto-currencies at this time? Hell no. But I suspect something useful genuinely will come out of the field within my lifetime.

    39. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold and silver coin are just made up bullshit too. There is no particular inherent worth to either metal (gold has some interesting properties as a conductor, but other than that). You can't eat them. You can't make weapons out of them. They aren't strong or rigid or really useful at all.

    40. Re: I guess /. still approves this crap by ravib123 · · Score: 1

      It's as federal as federal express ðY

    41. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo. Also, how does one insure a bitcoin deposit at a bank? It's non-trivial to create bitcoins to replace stolen ones (or ones lost through bank closures). And here's the big question: How does a bank earn money loaning out bitcoins like it does other currencies? For each deposit a bank holds, it can loan out around 9x that much money -- usually for mortgages, but also for business loans, car loans, etc. When a bank does this (it's called the multiplier effect), it creates money out of thin air by writing checks and creating accounts... it assumes the interest it gets back will cover the needs of its customers and pay their interest on their accounts while also creating the primary source of revenue for the bank.

      How do you create 9x the bitcoins you have to loan out so you can make money? If you loaned out a bitcoin, would you want a bitcoin + interest in bitcoins back?!?!? How can you expect that to happen if there's a limited supply of them? If the value of bitcoins goes up quickly related to the USD, is a bitcoin loan expecting even the same number of bitcoins back considered usury? If I take out a loan for 1 bitcoin, pay it back in 5 years at 1.05 bitcoins... but the value of a bitcoin is now 500x what it was 5 years ago... I think that's usury. Also, how does one deal with fractions of bitcoins? Microcurrencies are being created to handle micro-transactions.... yet... bitcoin seems to be integers only (for now). There are a lot of issues with it, and frankly there are a LOT of other crypto-currencies out there. They're all pyramid schemes as far as I'm concerned.

    42. Re: I guess /. still approves this crap by Dunbal · · Score: 0

      You are seriously comparing the Fed to Zimbabwe while harping how Bitcoin is so far superior to the US dollar? The only little problem with your theory is that reality has bitcoin fluctuating in value over 30% a day whereas the US dollar is still (despite 60 years of doom and gloom prophecies) the world's go to reserve currency. If I had a good I wanted to sell in Bitcoin I have NO FUCKING CLUE how to price my good, since I don't know how much bitcoin will be worth tomorrow. Call me when you can buy a car or a house in Bitcoin.

      It's ok to live in a theoretical world if your models fit reality somewhat snugly to reality. However when your theoretical world has no connection to reality it's called FANTASY.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    43. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      The Fed is a hybrid system, both public and private.

      The Fed is owned by its member banks. They get to elect board members to the regional boards. Profits accrue the banks, kind of. The Fed doesn't pay a dividend so those profits never get monetized. So de facto profits go the Treasury.

      However the Board of Governors is appointed by the president. This limits the amount of control the banks have over the institution. So what is ownership without access to profits or control?

      A analogy would be the local co-op grocery store. The more you buy the more of the store you own. However this comes back as store rebates and the insiders still have control.

    44. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      When a single person has control of the blockchain long enough ... a single entity could transfer all coins to themselves

      How would they do that without the private keys?

    45. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      We set up institutions up like this all the time when the goal is a level of detachment from popular politics or cooperation across jurisdictions. In local government, they are usually set up as "authorities", such as the entities which administer the bridges between states (e.g. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Delaware River Port Authority, etc.).

      More broadly, every single corporation in the US gets its charter from a government. What we think of as "private" are actually entities that exist only at the whim of government.

      At the end of the day, congress could dissolve the Fed with a single law, and that's what is important.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    46. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Go understand bitcoin, then re-ask the question. If you knew the basics, understanding the attack would be trivial. That you have to ask indicates you wouldn't understand the answer.

    47. Re: I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no common gold coin in existence whose face value is worth more than its innate metal content. Gold is valuable because it is rare and people want it.

    48. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Zemran · · Score: 1

      I thought that the US dollar was still backed by the Federal Reserve, a foreign bank. I think I trust bitcoin more.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    49. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      I do understand Bitcoin, and what you are describing is impossible. Bitcoins cannot be transferred from one account to another unless you have the private keys to the account that currently holds them. It's like a signed check - it can't be transferred to another account without a valid signature.

    50. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      OK. So you won't bitch when it is worth something. Right?

      You'll quietly say that you were wrong and wish those who invested in BTC well.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    51. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      A bitcoin can be divided into 100 million satoshis.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    52. Re: I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoin is ghey and so are the bitheads who jack-off at the mere mention of it

    53. Re: I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most merchants price things near the "current" exchange rate, why? They probably "trust" that Bitcoin will have gone up by the time they need to use the Bitcoin themselves. That's for the ones keeping Bitcoin. Many if not most traditional businesses using Bitcoin will get instant conversion to their native fiat currency. Basically they still price their goods in say CAD and ask their payment processor: "how many Bitcoin do I need to have someone send you if I want to get $100 from you". The processors guarantee this amount for a certain timeframe. So if the buyer takes to long to put their shopping cart together the price in Bitcoin may have changed.

      The above works for now.

    54. Re: I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same AC here: this is not fantasy. I work in payment processing and the above is how it actually works and we have both types of customers. The ones betting on Bitcoin and keeping it and the ones wanting instant fiat.

    55. Re: I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Made-up bullshit. Why do people want it? Because they all think they will be able to buy bread with gold when shit hits the fan. Good luck. Most people would rather trade their bread for some eggs etc. It's only valuable if everyone (enough people) agree that it is.

      Same with Bitcoin. There only ever will be 21 million. So if enough people agree they want Bitcoin it can work the same way. Or they can not care less if shit hits the fan and they ratherwant eggs...

    56. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "bitcoin seems to be integers only (for now)"
      Ok so you know fuck all why are you even commenting?

    57. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If every bank involved agrees the invalid signature is valid, what happens to the money? Now apply that to bitcoin.

      You bought into the lie that it's "secure" so completely, that you can't conceive of a situation when it's not. There are plenty, some are obvious, others, less so.

      The situation I describe is almost exactly what you described. The swarm is supposed to have some people processing transactions. They confirm the keys. If enough people confirm the fraudulent signature as valid, the transaction takes place, both in bitcoin, and at your bank. You seem to understand the attack 100% and refuse to accept it's possible. It's been proven possible, and is at the point now where it's quite practical. The "fault" is that if someone were to steal 100% of all bitcoins, nobody would ever use another bitcoin. So you'd just destroy bitcoin, not gain anything. Stealing a coin here or there from a wallet that hasn't been touched in a while would be more "practical", and for all we know, is being done now. Bitcoins are finite and identifiable. It'd be possible to find every bitcoin not traded in the past 3 years, assert it "lost" then the attacker fraudulently claim them with the attack given, and it's possible he could liquidate after the theft without anyone noticing until he's cashed out.

    58. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could use bullshit. Maybe start a bullshit standard. Press bars of bullshit and store them in vaults. Have financial analysts talk about the volatility of bullshit. It makes sense.

    59. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      If every bank involved agrees the invalid signature is valid, what happens to the money?

      Stealing a coin here or there from a wallet that hasn't been touched in a while would be more "practical", and for all we know, is being done now.

      Anyone can audit the blockchain, not just miners.

      It'd be possible to find every bitcoin not traded in the past 3 years, assert it "lost" then the attacker fraudulently claim them with the attack given, and it's possible he could liquidate after the theft without anyone noticing until he's cashed out.

      It's not just miners checking the transactions.

    60. Re: I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not trying to say that bitcoin is superior to USD (as it stands today..), only countering your claim that cryptocurrencies have nothing going for them. Crytocurrencies are not subject to the whims of man (faith), but backed by something more robust/predictable (cryptography). I don't even expect bitcoin itself to prevail amongst superior crypocurrencies likely to emerge in future.

    61. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Anyone can audit the blockchain, not just miners.

      When you get back and find your bitcoins stolen, you'll be able to identify the wallet they end up in. Congradulations. But what good does that do when the protocol doesn't allow for a mass audit? Oh yeah, you have no understanding of how this works.

    62. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without profits? How about trillions in bailouts... Printed and given free of charge, of even paying them extra interest to take the money off the feds hands.

    63. Re:I guess /. still approves this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you control the blockchain, you control what transactions are verified. That doesn't mean you can modify past transactions or create new ones with other people's keys. You can mine all the new coins yourself, or doublespend, but that's about it.

  3. Pay your taxes by roninmagus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So you want to trade your BTC for goods and services but not pay taxes on the source of the income (aka "maintain privacy")? I don't think that will fly well in the US, which is why you don't see many outlets available.

    1. Re:Pay your taxes by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      the government could of course skim off Bitcoin just like from any paycheck, the "tax" Bitcoin avoids is currency devaluation, which is partial enslavement since you are working for less than was agreed

    2. Re:Pay your taxes by msauve · · Score: 0

      "not pay taxes on the source of the income"

      What income? He had x bitcoin 5 years ago, he has x bitcoin today. No bitcoins incoming, there was no income.

      That's the fact, but I know it's not the way it works. The way it's intended to work is while a taxpayer owns something of value, the Federal Reserve diligently works to inflate dollars, making that something "worth" more in the future. The government then demands a tax payment because inflation caused that something to cost more in dollars. Oh! Capital gains! Pay up!

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    3. Re:Pay your taxes by tommeke100 · · Score: 1

      Are they seeing this a currency or stock? Because what they could (and probably do) tax is Capital Gain. You bought some bitcoins at 50$, they are now 1050$ (looks like some people cashed in from the 1280$ peak :-)), so that's 20-30% capital gain tax on 1000$/btc please.
      Since you did hold on to them more than a year that's long term capital gain tax which is a bit less, though
      But it may indeed be hard to prove where these come from. Did you mine them, did you buy them as an investment, was this some kind of payment, etc...

    4. Re:Pay your taxes by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Are they seeing this a currency or stock? Because what they could (and probably do) tax is Capital Gain. You bought some bitcoins at 50$, they are now 1050$ (looks like some people cashed in from the 1280$ peak :-)), so that's 20-30% capital gain tax on 1000$/btc please. Since you did hold on to them more than a year that's long term capital gain tax which is a bit less, though But it may indeed be hard to prove where these come from. Did you mine them, did you buy them as an investment, was this some kind of payment, etc...

      How you got them is somewhat irrelevant. What counts is your cost vs what you sold them for so the delta is a taxable gain in the US. Unless you mined them you'd do well to record your deductible cost so as to verify the gain or loss like any other cost associated with production. If you mined them you probably could include the mining costs as to offset the gain but that cost would be negligible since the cost of the infrastructure probably could not be included and the actual electricity cost directly related to mining is small in comparison. Equipment would probably be a depreciable expense but unless you are selling in the same tax period you would have no revenue to be offset by the expense; in essence, is it an investment in which case the costs of equipment is not an expense or a business in which case it would. It all comes down to how the IRS would treat them.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    5. Re:Pay your taxes by Enigma2175 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The IRS considers bitcoin an asset, if you are selling bitcoin or bartering it for goods you are subject to capital gains tax on it, just like any other appreciating asset. It's got nothing to do with the Federal Reserve. Bitcoin rising in value isn't inflation of a currency, it's the market attempting to price the future value of an asset, same as with a stock.

      --

      Enigma

    6. Re:Pay your taxes by davidwr · · Score: 4, Informative

      He had x bitcoin 5 years ago, he has x bitcoin today

      He had X BC 5 years ago. His basis was either what he paid for them, the money invested in mining them, or in certain cases (such as a if he received them as an inheritance), the fair market value at the time he came to possess them.

      His capital gain or loss is the dollar value of any proceeds from any sale or trade minus his basis, subject to "wash sale" and other rules that would make hte sale a "non-taxable" event.

      In any case, as long as he continues to hold the BC, he doesn't owe any taxes. If he holds them until they are worth no more than his basis then sells them, then he won't owe any taxes. If he holds them until he dies, the tax basis is "reset" to the fair market value at the time of his death, likely saving his heirs a boatload of capital-gains taxes.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    7. Re:Pay your taxes by mysidia · · Score: 1

      or trade minus his basis, subject to "wash sale"

      Wash sale is a regulation that Only applies to transactions involving the trade of securities. It does not apply to Currencies, Futures, and Non-Equity options.

      I believe the type of commodity called "Non-Equity Option" is the closest comparable transaction to securing the rights to BTC on an Exchange.

      Your deposit to an exchange secures you the right, But not the obligation to have your exchange assign a number of BTC to your Wallet ID of choice; when you receive BTC on the BTC network, you have exercised your options ---- Which are contractual in nature, if the BTC itself is just an entry in a ledger, the BTC itself is not the asset, but a record of the value of options contracts you hold. Then you have BTC on the network, you can later enter into an agreement with another exchange and provide the BTC to the exchange's wallet ID of choice --- when you receive Cash for BTC, you have written this option, and when the exchange deposits your BTC to their wallet ID, they have exercised the right causing you to surrender your contracts to them in exchange for US$$$.

    8. Re:Pay your taxes by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      the "tax" Bitcoin avoids is currency devaluation, which is partial enslavement since you are working for less than was agreed

      No, you';re getting paid exactly what was agreed to. If you negotiate dollars, you get dollars. I suppose you could get paid in M&M's if you want.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    9. Re:Pay your taxes by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Unless you mined them you'd do well to record your deductible cost so as to verify the gain or loss like any other cost

      The guidance/recommended reporting is exactly the same deal if you mined the BTC, other than the fact a person who mined coins already had an obligation to report income and possibly have income and self-employment taxes due during the year they mined the coins. You had to have reported your ordinary income (Fair market Value of BTC earned minus Ammortized portions of the Fixed and Variable Costs which were Necessary and customary to earn the income) for the accounting period in which you mined the particular coins.

      And if you held your coins and didn't sell them immediately your capital gain or loss will be whatever cash you get from Selling those lots of BTC Minus your basis (The original value of those lots at the time you mined those coins which you already reported as income).

      If you mined and didn't report, then you best donate those BTC to a charity rather than selling them if the amount was substantial at the time you mined, b/c you could be in trouble. I don't believe selling and reporting a basis of $0 will dig you out of the hole, and I suspect getting a 1099 from a Bitcoin-related company may be an audit flag, so you want everything to be on the up and up, for sure.

    10. Re:Pay your taxes by originalGMC · · Score: 1

      or cows. Cows have indexed trading rates. X cows for Y dollars for Z bitcoins. It's all the same.

      What they didn't account for is cheese.

      In all seriousness though, the IRS can't do anything nowadays. Might as well claim a loss and not pay any taxes for many years. Convert those bitcoins to something valuable, like cheese. I'll give you 20 cheese for that amount of bitcoin you have there. eh?

    11. Re:Pay your taxes by Rip!ey · · Score: 1

      "What income? He had x bitcoin 5 years ago, he has x bitcoin today. No bitcoins incoming, there was no income."

      It's called capital gains tax. It's a real thing. It applies here because Bitcoin isn't money. Never has been, never will be.

    12. Re:Pay your taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It's got nothing to do with the Federal Reserve

      And that is probably the best reason to use it.

    13. Re:Pay your taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you don't understand what inflation is. That's fine but you'd do better to keep your ignorance to yourself.

    14. Re:Pay your taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that same taxable gain apply to any other currency transactions in U.S. ? If you exchange 100 U.S. dollars for Japanese Yen or British Pounds or Euro's and the currency exchange somehow results in a doubling of your value do you have to pay capital gains on the difference? I'm asking because I have accounts in several currencies including U.S. dollars but I don't pay capital gains in my country on the exchange,

    15. Re:Pay your taxes by coofercat · · Score: 1

      Are gambling gains taxed in the US? If so, yeah, you're stuffed. If not, then one could argue that speculating on the value of BYC would be like speculating on the value of some magic beans, ie. gambling.

    16. Re:Pay your taxes by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin rising in value isn't inflation of a currency, it's the market attempting to price the future value of an asset, same as with a stock.

      Inflation is an increase in the amount of currency required to purchase an assets on average. If you consider bitcoin to be a currency, (technically anything can be) then bitcoin is undergoing deflation since it takes fewer bitcoins to buy an asset on average.

      In a broader sense, stop considering things assets or currency. Any asset can be a currency and vice versa. What matters is that item's value compared to everything else.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    17. Re:Pay your taxes by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      What income? He had x bitcoin 5 years ago, he has x bitcoin today. No bitcoins incoming, there was no income.

      He had $10 5 years ago. He bought something. He sold it for $100. That's $90 in income. Pretending math doesn't work because you hate government-mandated inflation just makes you look like an idiot.

    18. Re: Pay your taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God i hate concrete gadunk gadunk gadunk gadunk roads.

    19. Re:Pay your taxes by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Maybe I did not catch that part but where did you get the idea that this is about tax avoidance?

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    20. Re:Pay your taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IRS does not own bitcoin. As long as you can trade and sell it without a conversion to dollars, then they have no say on what you do with it.

      As long as you can do EVERYTHING with bit coins, but the problem is you can't.

    21. Re:Pay your taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So long as the IRS is double taxing expatriot US citizens, I don't consider the IRS a legitimate government entity. It has the power to enforce it, but as a progressive I only honor the law if the government is lawful.

    22. Re:Pay your taxes by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Does that same taxable gain apply to any other currency transactions in U.S. ? If you exchange 100 U.S. dollars for Japanese Yen or British Pounds or Euro's and the currency exchange somehow results in a doubling of your value do you have to pay capital gains on the difference? I'm asking because I have accounts in several currencies including U.S. dollars but I don't pay capital gains in my country on the exchange,

      No because you were already taxed on it as income at some point. With Bitcoin you are trading a commodity that you purchased at X and sold at Y and thus have either a gain or loss; just as if you bout Pounds or Yen, held them and then traded the at a different price than the purchase price.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    23. Re:Pay your taxes by lbates_35476 · · Score: 1

      Not entirely true. Since just about everything is measured against US dollars, a rise in bitcoin could be caused by a fall in the dollar. All depends in what you gauge the rise/fall against.

    24. Re:Pay your taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He had x bitcoin 5 years ago, he has x bitcoin today

      He had X BC 5 years ago. His basis was either what he paid for them, the money invested in mining them, or in certain cases (such as a if he received them as an inheritance), the fair market value at the time he came to possess them.

      Fair enough, but can we at least admit that that "fair market value" is given in 2012 dollars. These are not worth the same as 2017 dollars. The gain or loss of the US dollar in this time should be taken into account when working out the actual gain or loss of the bitcoins. If this is not how it's done then we should admit that the "capital gains tax" is actually a "gain against the US dollar tax". If the dollar crashes in a major way then many people will have large "capital gains" taxes to pay on many of their assets as they part with them.

  4. Buy foreign. by pla · · Score: 1

    I've had no problem spending BTC. Just buy from abroad and have it imported (and as long as they call it a "promotional" item - They all do - it doesn't even cost you any more anyway).

    1. Re:Buy foreign. by carnivore302 · · Score: 1

      That's fine if you have about $1000 worth of bitcoins, for amounts larger than $10K it becomes unpractical.

      --
      Please login to access my lawn
  5. anti-money laundering laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it really as surprise that a scheme designed to facilitate money laundering is not allowed without a paper trail in the US?

  6. How-to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to Toronto, find a BTC ATM, cash out, convert to USD, go back to US and use said USD anonymously anywhere except online (but wear a baklava if possible).

    1. Re:How-to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Instructions unclear, dick stuck in baklava

    2. Re: How-to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you wear baklava when it's so much tastier to eat it? Assuming you're not wearing a balaclava at the time, that makes eating difficult.

    3. Re:How-to by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Amazon take bitcoin payments? I'd buy Amazon gift cards and sell them on ebay for a minuscule loss.Hell pawn shops buy gift cars now days if you want cash.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    4. Re:How-to by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Go to Toronto, find a BTC ATM, cash out, convert to USD, go back to US and use said USD anonymously anywhere except online

      That's a good way to get added to watch lists and have gov't agents seize your cash, unless/until you can prove that cash has not been involved in any crime before or after you came into possession of it.

    5. Re:How-to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I buy Baklava with bitcoin

    6. Re:How-to by originalGMC · · Score: 1

      nah, just buy iphones. trade that shit for health insurance, or anything else you want. iphone the new stone of jordan.

    7. Re:How-to by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Dealing in a substantial $$$ amount in gift cards would be a way to get on FinCEN's watchlist
      Also, I believe no Amazon doesn't directly. At a time at least Overstock did. I believe you will be required to identify yourself to the retailer to conduct these kinds of transactions BTC is not for anonymity, at least not when dealing with reputable ecommerce companies.

    8. Re:How-to by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      the amount of mental gymnastics needed to maintain rules like that in light of a presumption of innocence is just staggering
      "Sure YOU'RE innocent. That's why we're putting your assets on trial, see? Oh, and you have no standing in this case. APC's aren't cheap, and it's not like the SWAT team can just hold a bake sale don't-cha-know?"

  7. Bit coin is not money by Elfich47 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While there are many people that are willing to exchange goods and services for BitCoin; it is not a recognized currency by anyone that actually matters (ie banks and governments). Make no mistake, just about everything is priced in a government back currency (dollars, Yen, Pounds, etc) and in addition banks and governments do not accept BitCoin as a way to cover debts and obligations.

    In addition BitCoin is slow, not entirely trust worthy (you can argue the fact that one farming group controls more than 50% of the computing power used to back bitcoin is a real problem), doesn't understand the basics of monetary policy (price fluctations anyone), let alone a way to implement it. These could all be contributing factors as to why large organizations are not willing to exchange goods and services for bitcoin.

    --
    Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
    1. Re:Bit coin is not money by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      banks and governments do not accept BitCoin as a way to cover debts and obligations

      no different than them not accepting foreign currency, you simply have to exchange it, and of course if it comes down to it they will of course take Bitcoin to settle debts, if they can find them

    2. Re:Bit coin is not money by Elfich47 · · Score: 1

      Some banks will accept foreign currency for deposit. Usually in person, and with advance notice.

      --
      Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
    3. Re:Bit coin is not money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Monetary policy? LOL!!!!!
      That's why you have massive inflation and printing out pallets of 100's and airdropping them overseas and other crazy shit.
      Cryptocurrencies are SUPPOSED TO have "price fluctuations" to track ACTUAL change in valuation, and they will flatten out once the market caps start hitting trillion+ just like any other currency. IN FACT, they will be much more immune to artificial manipulation "fluctuation" than fiat.
      Use your little p2p app to convert to cash to pay your taxes till the govt gets a clue and accepts it directly.

    4. Re:Bit coin is not money by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Today people do not have to use any fiat at all, it's super easy to use gold money (google it) and exchange actual physical amounts of gold with people electronically without ever converting the gold to any other form of currency.

    5. Re:Bit coin is not money by coofercat · · Score: 2

      All true. It's also worth noting that most sizeable governments are working on their own blockchain based crypto currencies. So, it'll just be Bitcoin they don't accept, they'll (one day) quite happily accept e-dollars or e-pounds or whatever because they'll be the ones in control of it.

    6. Re:Bit coin is not money by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      No, dummy, there is no government decree, no government fiat, it is not fiat by definition. Learn the goddamn language.

    7. Re:Bit coin is not money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only currency I trade in is the blood of the innocent.

      Also, rhodium.

    8. Re:Bit coin is not money by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Which qualifies you as a dummy.

    9. Re:Bit coin is not money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny that the guy who can't spell bitcoin (bit coin and then BitCoin) is giving us instructions about bitcoin.

      >>>>>>>Not recognized as currency by anybody that actually matters.

      Um... how about The US Government Financial Management Service, They require a MONEY transmitter license to trade bitcoin. What other PROPERTY transfer requires a MONEY transfer license. Go ahead - I"ll wait.....

      >>>> FARMING groups control more than 50%... What the hell is a bitcoin farmer? Old McDonald doesn't do bitcoin MINING. Which wouldn't have SOCIAL CONSENSUS of all the wallet providers, the exchanges and the hearts and minds of those who use it which could simply fork and change to a version that uses different hardware than the MINERS currently use. That's called a democracy.

      >>>>Understand the basics of monetary policy.
      Do you even know the history of money? Tell me what a Talley Stick or a Rai stone is. Sticks and Stones both worked perfectly well for centuries as money. and... you are defending our current banking system. Right? So you're a big proponent of Too Big to Fail?

      Other reasons why big orgs don't accept it yet? Probably because there are a bunch of dumbasses like you who they know enough about the technology that are just more idiots that need to do some research before espousing their stupid-ness.

  8. Bank of Cyprus Is Your Bank Of Choice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's good enough for Putin and his cronies, and good enough for Trump and his, then by golly it's good enough for the rest of us dweebs!

  9. Trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoin is a trap.

  10. BTC is not designed for anonymity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It appears that Bitcoin, a currency designed with anonymity in mind

    WRONG.

    1. Re:BTC is not designed for anonymity by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

      Works well enough for Satoshi, no one seems to know his secret identity

    2. Re:BTC is not designed for anonymity by mysidia · · Score: 2

      That's because the only BTC Satoshi is known to have has never been Spent.... that includes the 50 BTC award for the genesis Block 0 and the next few blocks. Because of how the code was written, however, Block 0's reward is unspendable,
      and the other early blocks have never been spent.

      It's possible that Satoshi's secret identity would became known if coins from Block #1 get spent.

      If Satoshi was smart, he could keep his ID hidden by leaving those in cold storage forever, and engaging in other mining activity later after the network was larger.

    3. Re:BTC is not designed for anonymity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That assumes that no one has the compute power to fake one of the early blocks.

  11. Tax evasion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nowadays, non-U.S. payment providers no longer issue debit cards to the U.S. residents and the U.S.-based merchants accepting BTC are nearly extinct.

    Is Overstock.com nearly extinct? Newegg? Plenty of online retailers accept bitcoin. Of course they immediately convert the bitcoin to USD, and tell the IRS who they bought it from so that they can make sure you pay your capital gains tax.

    1. Re: Tax evasion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft Store is also nearly extinct :) They also accept Bitcoin.

  12. Ask Slashdot: How Do I Avoid My Taxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your question boils down to, "How do I avoid capital gains taxes on my Bitcoin earnings?" That's problematic, as you can imagine.

    1. Re:Ask Slashdot: How Do I Avoid My Taxes? by davidwr · · Score: 1

      Your question boils down to, "How do I avoid capital gains taxes on my Bitcoin earnings?" That's problematic, as you can imagine

      Not probematic at all. There are easy, legal ways to avoid capital gains taxes that don't require learning the intricacies of the tax code or hiring an accountant:

      * If you were going to give money to charity anyways, give them the appreciated asset.
      * If you won't need the money for the rest of your life, leave the asset to your heirs.
      * If you paid more for the asset than it's worth today, sell and declare a capital loss.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  13. My how times change. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My how times change. "Back in the day", anyone voicing most of the opinions here so far would be modded into oblivion...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:My how times change. by Baron_Yam · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The thing about that is that the people invested in Bitcoin (emotionally, not necessarily financially) have a quasi-religious fervour and are willing to put proportionately far more time than anyone else into the subject.

      They must be down to an exceedingly small fraction of the social networking user population if they're no longer able to overpower discussions on social networking sites.

    2. Re:My how times change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happened with Uber too. The Slashdot community pretends to be a more intellectual audience, but only just.

    3. Re:My how times change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Said the guy with user number 770223. That puts you way beyond the "back in the day" crowd.

    4. Re:My how times change. by ArchieBunker · · Score: 0

      Just think how rich you'd be if you started buying up bitcoins back when they were worth nothing...

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    5. Re:My how times change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, slashdot has always been anti bitcoin since it was $20 each. This site is for old fuddies arfraid of change, and it shows. Slashdot News for geezers now.

    6. Re:My how times change. by Baron_Yam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's so much wrong with the thinking behind your post that people have dedicated essays to it. I'll go with the overly simplified version:

      If you treat Bitcoins as currency, you spend them. Thus, you're not holding on to them long enough for them to accrue value. If you treat them as an investment, you're not spending them, and there's no Bitcoin economy to make them worth anything.

      That's why Bitcoin trading is pure speculation. There's absolutely nothing behind them except the willingness of the next idiot to buy some. They're different from Beanie Babies only in that when Bitcoin finally peters out you won't be left with something you can put on a shelf somewhere or give to a little kid.

      If you could magically time markets, Bitcoin is probably one of the last things you'd try it with since it's a lot easier to trade in other financial instruments with far less risk of fraud.

    7. Re:My how times change. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Just think how rich you'd be if you started buying up bitcoins back when they were worth nothing...

      How liquid is the market? If I have a million in bitcoin I am a paper millionaire unless I can convert all of them at will. Is there a market maker that can do such a transaction, like you can do on the NYSE, to ensure the transaction can be processed immediately? Liquidity is one of the problems bitcoin must overcome to be a viable store of wealth and not speculative. Given the concentration of production in a few miners also means if you create a liquid market a few people can easily manipulate the price to their advantage; that makes it ripe for a pump and dump scheme than a currency.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    8. Re:My how times change. by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Say I bought 100 bitcoins back when they were worth nothing and never touched them until today. One bitcoin is worth $1055 now. What did I lose? Changing them into currency isn't a problem. Newegg accepts bitcoin so I buy random items and resell them on eBay. So yeah I take a slight loss there along with fees but come on how is that not a sound plan?

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    9. Re:My how times change. by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      See now you're greedy. If you bough that much early on you'd probably affect the market somehow and it would backfire.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    10. Re:My how times change. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      There's a TON of digital currencies and other schemes and ventures out there; say you bought 100 'shares' of each of them, your 'bitcoin gains' ... might offset your losses elsewhere or not.

      When the winning move is to bet on the right scheme/venture...well... good luck with that.

      If you can do that reliably, let us know which penny stock or startup will be a billion dollar company in a few years. Because the odds are about as good.

    11. Re:My how times change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd not know it would be successful. So you'd also have losses in all the other small fads you bought 100 of and since 99% of those would fail you're basically bragging about betting $10 on each individual roulette number all at the same time and only parading the single winner.... even though you'd be far behind with that strategy.

      Stick to winners.

    12. Re:My how times change. by bidule · · Score: 1

      All currencies are pyramid schemes.

      The question becomes how strong is their backing.

      --
      ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
    13. Re:My how times change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO, this is FALSE. They COULD overpower all the baloney from the fiat loving corruption surveillance and taxation supporting theft by "democracy" crowd full of everyday sheeples and the elites.
      But they've learned that they simply do NOT need to CARE about them or WASTE any TIME on them anymore.
      Because you see, they HAVE and USE bitcoins and other cryptocoins and enjoy that fun and freedom, and YOU don't.
      YOU can come around to them, or not. Cryptocurrencies are as unstoppable as the internet, and optionally anonymous. So they simply don't care anymore.

    14. Re:My how times change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did.
      And I still do.
      And most people here probably have none at all, and never will.
      Meanwhile my valuation in cryptocurrencies is going up steadily year on year.
      I have established local and distant trading partners, ins / outs, and buy / sell of goods and services.
      No need for annoying banks or coin exchanges and all the privacy data financial theft and other risks they carry.
      All taxes paid, no worries, life is good.
      Wish you all could come and learn with us.
      Try attending your local Bitcoin meetup.
      Your times could change for the better too.

    15. Re:My how times change. by dave562 · · Score: 1

      Well played sir.

  14. Greenbacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Convert it to cash, spend cash anonymously, and stop being a nobber.

  15. Legally impossible pretty much anywhere by guruevi · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you're a US resident you would have to pay income tax or at least declare it as an investment income regardless of how you convert it. You can go to any other country to cash out or convert it into goods, even if you could buy a car with it, you have to pay the tax man. And that's not unique to the US.

    The tax man however does not necessarily need to know where the money has been or currently is (how you are investing or realizing the profit is not recorded) as long as you don't use the money.

    Monetary transactions above a certain value also need to be recorded, again, not unique to the US. If you make any further investment (house or otherwise) with the money/value, the bank also wants to know where it came from for credit reasons (to make sure you didn't owe a loanshark).

    In none of those instances do you need to declare the full transaction history of your investments or profits. The "problem" with Bitcoin is that it explicitly does not offer anonymity (you can't launder bitcoins) and gives you a full transaction history regardless. To request anonymity from an explicitly public ledger is ludicrous. You can only hide the owner of a bitcoin through technical means as you can attempt to hide any transaction on the Internet but it's only incidental and also detrimental to the Bitcoin system.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:Legally impossible pretty much anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

      it is not an income tax. Bitcoin is a security. You pay capital gains tax. Which is much, much lower than income tax.

  16. Pay your electric bill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BT is really a form of electricity conversion so I'm not sure it really can be considered "income".

    1. Re: Pay your electric bill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you shoot a person it is just a form of energy conversion. When you sell stolen nukes to foreign nations its just a form of energy conversion. Now when they tase your ass and throw you in jail can you guess what form of conversion that is?

  17. We have a great new way to launder money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we want the US government, including the FBI and IRS to give it their full support.

    Good luck with that

  18. prepaid visa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you could purchase prepaid visa cards in cash and then use them to purchase bitcoin online. Anonymized at point of sale.

    But this is about bitcoin you earned. I don't have any ideas for that.

  19. Forget Anonimity - How Do I Invest in Bitcoin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there an online trader that will let me buy and sell it?

  20. There *are* a few good ways to spend it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Major places that I know which accept bitcoin without crazy KYC requirements:
      - Newegg
      - Overstock.com
      - Steam

    1. Re: There *are* a few good ways to spend it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Funny, it is easier to buy illegitimate stuff, like DDoS, and whatever else the silkroads sell than to spend BTC in legal ways, even if you pay taxes. I wonder what all those professional miners do with their BTCs.

    2. Re: There *are* a few good ways to spend it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      same thing the idjits did in 1849. die. history is repeating itself because people are stupid. amen.

  21. Re: anyone that actually matters by slashrio · · Score: 2

    I think people matter.
    If enough people use BTC as money, then it's money.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  22. Convert it to cash by buying/selling goods by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So go on the "dark web" trade your bit-coin for drugs. Sell drugs to locals and take cash. Bingo! Really, this isn't a difficult situation at all.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    1. Re:Convert it to cash by buying/selling goods by geekmux · · Score: 2

      So go on the "dark web" trade your bit-coin for drugs. Sell drugs to locals and take cash. Bingo! Really, this isn't a difficult situation at all.

      Perhaps Ross Ulbricht could enlighten you as to what a "difficult situation" is, since it fits so well here...

    2. Re:Convert it to cash by buying/selling goods by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      So go on the "dark web" trade your bit-coin for drugs. Sell drugs to locals and take cash. Bingo! Really, this isn't a difficult situation at all.

      Perhaps Ross Ulbricht could enlighten you as to what a "difficult situation" is, since it fits so well here...

      Well learn from his mistake and don't get caught. Duh.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    3. Re:Convert it to cash by buying/selling goods by davidwr · · Score: 2

      The topic is correct, comment about buying drugs is bad advice and was presumably not meant to be taken seriously.

      Spend your BC on something that's legal and whose transactions aren't of interest to any government, then sell what you bought.

      For people with less than a few thousand dollars (US) that they need to convert, this should be easy.

      From the sound of things, the original submitter has much more than that. His best bet is to not try to hide his money. He won't owe taxes on it until he sells it. If he doesn't need the money now and he's willing to carry the value-fluctuation risk until he dies, he can just leave the BC to his heirs in his will. When they sell it, the tax basis will be the value on the day he dies.

      Another option is that he can give the BC to charity. This works best if the person would have given USD to a charity anyway. He will get a tax write-off of the value of the donation on the day he makes it AND he will escape capital-gains taxes. While most charities won't accept BC as a donation, someone out there has probably started a 503(c) charity whose "reason for existence" is to take donations in any form - cars, stocks/bonds, artwork, BC, etc. - then convert them into USD then pass the proceeds - less a processing fee to cover costs - to the designated charity. You won't be able to maintain anonymity, but you'll still get your tax break and avoid capital-gains taxes.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    4. Re:Convert it to cash by buying/selling goods by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      The topic is correct, comment about buying drugs is bad advice and was presumably not meant to be taken seriously.

      How dare you presume my sarcasm you cis-sarcastic oppressor!

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  23. Re: BTC is a trap by slashrio · · Score: 1

    Also true...

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  24. Was NEVER meant to be anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "It appears that Bitcoin, a currency designed with anonymity in mind..."

    FALSE.

    Bitcoin was NEVER meant to provide anonymity. Can we please stop with this misconception?

    1. Re:Was NEVER meant to be anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Came here to say this. Bitcoin was meant to guarantee secure transactions, minimizing risks of fraud, or transaction duplication, error, etc.

      This is achieved through keeping a PUBLIC record of all transactions ever. This is the opposite of anonymity and if your wallet is ever associated with your real identity people could easily find out about that one time 5 years ago that you bought weed on Silk Road.

    2. Re:Was NEVER meant to be anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Bitcoin, a currency designed with anonymity in mind...

      FALSE.

      Bitcoin was NEVER meant to provide anonymity...

      Well, I may have sex in mind most of the time - doesn't mean I can provide it ;-)

  25. Move to a free country .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Russia, Mainland China, Burma to name just a few.

    The United States has been racing into the abyss in competition with G.B. for a number of years. The United States is in the lead, by a narrow margin.

    1. Re:Move to a free country .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia and China both have income tax on profits, no idea about Burma. What he really wants is a scheme to launder his money and hide the fact he made a profit so he is not taxed.

    2. Re:Move to a free country .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTCs are forbidden in Russia. They are considered "money surrogate".

  26. It depends by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

    There are some online retailers that accept bitcoin. Since there isn't a credit card involved, there is no reason why you need to give them your real name. Checkout is a breeze too, relatively speaking.

    Depending on where you are, you might be able to do small cash transactions for people in your area that are looking to buy.

    If you need a lot of cash quickly, there is no practical way around it - you'll need to register with an exchange, under your real name. Depending on how large, you may need to go through the KYC stuff too. Not exactly a bitcoin-specific problem. You'll run into the same thing selling gold or silver to a dealer too.

    No matter what, you need to keep track and pay your taxes. Selling them for cash or buying goods or services with them is all the same. Any half-decent accountant will be able to handle this. If you got your coins from mining, tell your accountant to claim a zero basis. The value of bitcoins in the early days was negligible anyway, so you won't be overpaying your taxes by very much, and it is WAY easier than choosing a FIFO/LIFO policy, documenting it, and pulling historic price data for each purchase. If you have receipts for mining equipment, talk to your accountant about deducting them.

    --
    See that "Preview" button?
  27. Who cares what governments think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where we're going, there are no governments.

    1. Re:Who cares what governments think? by fredrated · · Score: 1

      Sounds like hell to me. Somalia? Sudan? Yemen?

    2. Re:Who cares what governments think? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Uranus.

    3. Re:Who cares what governments think? by davidwr · · Score: 1

      Where we're going, there are no governments.

      I call "where I'm going" the afterlife.

      I don't expect to be able to vote once I get there.

      Then again, I don't expect to need any money either.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    4. Re:Who cares what governments think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God

    5. Re:Who cares what governments think? by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 2

      I hadn't thought of it that way. Heaven is a communist dictatorship. And presumably you can't get pregnant in Heaven (since you have to die to get in), so if there is sex then it would be purely for pleasure and not procreation.

      It looks like there might be a lot of fundamentalists who are in for a bit of a shock when they die. That is, unless they find that there is no afterlife and so they would be in for no shock at all.

    6. Re:Who cares what governments think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your god is wrong, and not my God. dont force your god on me, heathen.

    7. Re:Who cares what governments think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not communist. God owns everything. A benevolent dictatorship, perhaps.

  28. Precious Metals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I looked at converting different things back into United States dollars, I saw that one option was to convert into silver, or gold (depending on your volume) receive/transport the precious metals, and then convert them into United States dollars back in the U.S. This had somewhere around a 300% mark-up on the cost of precious metals, inside the U.S. so I decided not to do this. Depending on the volume of cash you're talking about, it might be something to look into.

    I am not a lawyer. This might work, and it also might be illegal from a tax / money laundering perspective. However, if I had been willing to pay the 300% mark-up, I probably would have tried this. My tax rate is around 40%, and I value being a law abiding citizen. The 260% wasn't worth it for me. If it's worth it to you, this kind of conversion might make sense - you could do the same thing with any kind of asset (probably stocks would be easiest.)

    1. Re:Precious Metals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people might remember e-gold ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-gold ) which was the same as that, but skipped the receive/transport stage. It went ok for a while then crashed and burned. The same way that bitcoin is likely to go.

    2. Re:Precious Metals? by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      The only reason e-gold crashed and burned was because the feds charged the operators with money laundering and with violating some regulations about money transfer passed as part of the Patriot Act.

      It won't be that easy with bitcoin because of the decentralized aspect of it. If there was a "Bitcoin Inc." with a corporate HQ, the feds would have shut it down a long, long time ago. When they really want to crack down on bitcoin, they might just make it a crime to use it for any transaction.

  29. Re: anyone that actually matters by Elfich47 · · Score: 1

    When you can pay your taxes with it, let me know. Until then it isn't money.

    --
    Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
  30. Cash has unique serial numbers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cash has unique serial numbers.

    Easily scanned and tracked.

    Do you really think the NSA/Governments are not doing this?

    1. Re:Cash has unique serial numbers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your tinfoil hat is too tight.

    2. Re:Cash has unique serial numbers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, the government does not do this. Note the hassles they had with bearer bond. They don't like cash as it cannot be easily traced. Serial numbers on bills are generally not. Watch bank tellers sometime. It is possible that serials could be tracked but if that direction were imminent there would not be the discussion about removing $100 and maybe $50 bills from circulation. That would more readily force use of banks.

      Bitcoin is in principle like cash. But like it with possibly huge bills. USG has too many control freaks, does not want to facilitate uncontrolled transactions. 'Note too the facts about police stealing (confiscating...pick word) cash they catch people carrying around. They claim it's to stop drugs, terror, whatever villain du jour, but more to the point it makes it harder to just use cash. You might lose it next time you hit a speed trap or next time local police hear you carry it around and see you driving or whatnot.

      Complaints to govt about "asset forfeiture" might eventually reduce this, but there is a crapload of corruption there as many departments get their funds, salaries etc. from those assets.

    3. Re:Cash has unique serial numbers. by popo · · Score: 1

      The reason governments are attempting to ban cash worldwide is exactly because it's so hard to do exactly what you're describing.

      --
      ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    4. Re:Cash has unique serial numbers. by budgenator · · Score: 1
      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  31. Freedom isn't Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And y'all just stood there and watched as it was sold clean out from under you to people who would rather you be considered an "overhead must be cut" version of livestock.

    How do you use bitcoin in the land of the free?

    By making it the land of the free in the first place.

  32. Re:cash is getting controlled by JcMorin · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Cash is getting hammered more and more, reducing the high value bills while still having inflation. If you carry too much, you get asked questions when spending and can your bills confiscate for no reason other than the amount you are carry (ready about civil forfeiture). I could see a use for digital currency. While you can argue that the creator have tons of bitcoin and is rich, the blockchain show early bitcoin never moved/used at all. In fact, the guy completely disappears from the map years ago... he could actually be dead and nobody knows... it's a possibility but definitely not certainty that he did that for money! Bitcoin transactions were not about privacy, they were about permissionless and censor resistant! Even if you live in an oppressive government, the bank cannot froze your account. Bitcoin adoption is slow, mainly because most governments ask for KYC policy and that's a bit awkward with any blockchain tech. If the web has been controlled by bureaucrats at start, we would have to register to surf, comments and make web sites. Just like the email and torrent protocol, the bitcoin protocol cannot be shut down, it's not going anyway... it's an experimental currency that, as you said, have a controlled and limited inflation. You can argue it's bad, there is hundreds of inflated currencies out there with inflation, let there be one to try if it's working without.

  33. Whats really being asked by gravewax · · Score: 2

    What seems to be what the real question he is asking is, "how do I use Bitcoin in a way that bypasses my legal obligations to pay tax on the money I have earned through the rise in bitcoin price.", incidentally this is not just a US situation, most countries of the world will consider your gain in price is a taxable asset.

    1. Re:Whats really being asked by gravewax · · Score: 1

      NO, I have a problem with corporations and arseholes that don't pay their fair share meaning the govt arse rapes those of us that are honest even more. But it seems people like you always have some excuse to justify your criminal behaviour, oh it is societies fault, oh it is the because I don't like the government and they arse rape us, oh it is because I don't get what I deserve, arseholes like you are part of the problem.

    2. Re:Whats really being asked by Drethon · · Score: 2

      The government may be crooked and bloated but if we don't pay for the government, those bitcoins would be worthless in the US anyway. This is the land of the free, as in the people are free to do as they wish (in theory) as long as it doesn't effect anyone else. Not a place where the land, or any other property, is free of any obligation.

    3. Re:Whats really being asked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. To the poster, please take a moment and realize you're being a bit self-centered and that your life isn't as interesting to others as you'd like to believe.

      It just sounds like tax evasion.

    4. Re:Whats really being asked by swillden · · Score: 1

      NO, I have a problem with corporations and arseholes that don't pay their fair share

      Corporations never pay taxes. Never have, never will. Only people pay taxes. Corporate taxation is just a way for government to collect taxes from the taxpayers without the taxpayers knowing it's been done. Taxpayers/voters are typically quite happy to vote for corporate taxes because it seems like a "free" way to fund government services, and anyway everyone hates those nasty corporations. In fact, any expense you impose across all of the companies in an industry just gets built into the cost structure of the industry, which means it ultimately comes from consumers (in the form of higher prices) or employees (in the form of lower wages).

      In the short term, investors may take part of the hit, but only part, and only in the short term. Ultimately, either the expenses will be built into the cost structure, enabling capital to obtain the expected rate of return, or capital will move elsewhere, either to different industries or offshore. This is why if you want to tax capital, you need to tax the individuals who own capital, not the corporations which are the vehicle of that capital.

      Corporate taxes are stupid at best, and arguably evil since they serve to obscure the taxes from the voters. Taxes are essential, but the voters need to see what they're paying and what they're getting for their money.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:Whats really being asked by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      they do pay "their fair share" which is what law requires. There is no other meaningful definition. If you think certain groups should pay more that's fine, but your lawmakers are the problem.

    6. Re:Whats really being asked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the whole fucking point of this article is you have someone specifically trying to avoid paying their fair share yet try to hide it behind they just want "freedom" and to be anonymous.

  34. buy foreign stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy stuff overseas anon, convert stuff into something small and valuable, resell for US $. Smuggle - you knew that word was coming - US currency in on an airplane. Which is very easy unless you have an Arabic surname or, most likely these days, look Mexican.

    You're dodging income tax. I make no moral judgement - that's not true I actually sort of approve in this case - but that's the anon issue.

  35. Re:Bitcoin is not money by JcMorin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bitcoin is classify as money in: - Europe (Except France) http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/up... - Japan http://asia.nikkei.com/Politic... - Mexico https://sppld.sat.gob.mx/pld/i... - Afghanistan http://www.coindesk.com/how-bi... - Czech Republic http://www.rozhlas.cz/zpravy/e... - South Africa http://www.treasury.gov.za/com... I don' have links but I heard it's also consided a currency in - Russia, Switzerland and Nigera

  36. Where? How much? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    There are usually people in populated areas who are looking to trade BTC for FRN's. Do you have thousands to offload?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  37. Donate the Bitcoin by BBCWatcher · · Score: 4, Informative

    Devrtm (the original poster) can donate his/her Bitcoin to any IRS 501(c)(3) tax exempt charity(ies) that accept(s) Bitcoin, for example the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Devrtm can then enjoy a U.S. personal income tax deduction for the full, fair market value of his/her donation, with no capital gains tax owed. It may be possible to make the donation anonymously, but Devrtm must keep records of the donation in his/her personal files, to document the tax deduction in case there is a future IRS inquiry. The tax deduction will likely be worth substantially more than what Devrtm paid (if anything) to obtain the Bitcoin. If Devrtm is subject to state or local income tax then there may also be charitable deductions allowed in those tax returns.

  38. And that gets you on a government list too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had no problem spending BTC. Just buy from abroad and have it imported (and as long as they call it a "promotional" item - They all do - it doesn't even cost you any more anyway).

    Right, cause that will not draw the attention of government and get you on a list either.

  39. Land of the free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    23rd out of 159 countries, https://www.cato.org/human-fre.... Posting anonymously because I know any criticism of USA will earn a lot of hateful responses not matter how it is stated or what references are provided.

    1. Re:Land of the free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      23rd out of 159 ain't that bad. Russia: 115th. China: 141st. France: 31st. No need for a hateful response, we're in the top 15%. Sure, it'd be wonderful to be on top, but consider the source.

  40. Re:Bitcoin is not money by Elfich47 · · Score: 2

    Let me know when any of these countries will accept it for tax payments.

    --
    Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
  41. Trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may be able to create a legal instrument such as a Trust, possibly located offshore. If you have a credit card whose bill is payed by the trust, you technically aren't earning income and pay no taxes. The source of the Trust's funds should be able to be well hidden.

  42. currency trading: speculation vs hedge by davidwr · · Score: 2

    If you treat Bitcoins as currency, you spend them. Thus, you're not holding on to them long enough for them to accrue value. If you treat them as an investment, you're not spending them, and there's no Bitcoin economy to make them worth anything.

    That's why Bitcoin trading is pure speculation.

    There are two good reasons to "invest" in a currency:

    1) Utility: It's a "safe, convenient, and easy to use" currency. For most people in countries with relatively stable currencies, their country's fiat currency fits this bill. I for one keep at least a month's worth of expenses "in cash" in a bank account, knowing I will lose very little to inflation, that I have a very low risk of the money suddenly becoming temporarily inaccessible, and knowing that I can pay any domestic debt with it without having to pay a middleman to convert it.

    2) Hedge: If I know I'm going to need a certain amount of Euros, Yen, or BTC six months from now but I'm not willing to accept the risk of currency flucutations, I can "lock in" the price now, either by buying a futures contract or by buying the actual Euros, Yen, or BTC.

    But I agree with you, buying BCT, or for that matter, any currency that isn't known to be very stable (low inflation now and for the forseeable future) as an "investment" is pretty speculative.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  43. Is this fake news? by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1

    Concur.

    Bitcoin as a financial system is made impractical in the long term by the fact that it is limited in the total number that can be issued. After the last one is issued, the intent is for the value of them to simply go up.

    A Bitcoin is the solution to a hashing problem for which the ease in calculating a solution goes up with the size of the search space. In a very large search space it's easy to generate a solution, but as the search space becomes smaller you have to spend more time hunting around for a correct solution.

    As more solutions are found, the people behind bitcoin validate that 'coin and then shorten the length in bits needed for a valid solution. They have a fixed number in mind that they want to base the currency on, and as the number of solutions found approach that number, they have been shortening the length so that they will eventually have exactly the number they want, and finding new solutions will take an astronomically long time.

    There's nothing preventing them from increasing the valid length of solutions and letting people find more. They have explained countless times that this is how they can have actual inflation in their currency.

    Countless times of explaining this to the public, and yet people continue to repeat bullshit they've heard "somewhere on the internet" that matches their woldview.

    It's no wonder they're having trouble - they're concentrating on their project, but losing the war against propaganda.

    1. Re:Is this fake news? by joshki · · Score: 2

      Concur.

      Bitcoin as a financial system is made impractical in the long term by the fact that it is limited in the total number that can be issued. After the last one is issued, the intent is for the value of them to simply go up.

      A Bitcoin is the solution to a hashing problem for which the ease in calculating a solution goes up with the size of the search space. In a very large search space it's easy to generate a solution, but as the search space becomes smaller you have to spend more time hunting around for a correct solution.

      As more solutions are found, the people behind bitcoin validate that 'coin and then shorten the length in bits needed for a valid solution. They have a fixed number in mind that they want to base the currency on, and as the number of solutions found approach that number, they have been shortening the length so that they will eventually have exactly the number they want, and finding new solutions will take an astronomically long time.

      There's nothing preventing them from increasing the valid length of solutions and letting people find more. They have explained countless times that this is how they can have actual inflation in their currency.

      Countless times of explaining this to the public, and yet people continue to repeat bullshit they've heard "somewhere on the internet" that matches their woldview.

      It's no wonder they're having trouble - they're concentrating on their project, but losing the war against propaganda.

      That's a totally inaccurate means of explaining this.

      The difficulty of finding a solution scales as the network grows, it has nothing to do with the amount of currency in it. Mining continues once the full amount has been released, because mining is about transactions, not block rewards. Once the total amount of the currency exists, then mining is rewarded by transaction fees as there is no more block reward.

      The nameless "They" cannot increase the money supply. The entire network would have to vote to fork the code onto a new system to change the monetary limit. There is no "they" that have any control over the network, the only people who control the network are 51%+ of the miners.

      --
      I do not read or respond to AC's. If you want a discussion, log in. Otherwise, don't waste your time.
  44. Cash not safe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warning! Every US bill has a unique combination of year, mint, denomination, and serial number! Every transaction you ever make could be tracked! Oops, need to recrimp my tinfoil hat.

  45. Re:cash is getting controlled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't matter if early adopters are hoarding millions of BTC or any cryptocurrency.
    Because it's all recorded and accounted for on the public ledgers.
    Everyone knows they exist and currencies have already price discovered based upon analysis of whatever they may or may not do with those hoards.
    Cryptoanarchy is HARD. We don't expect most people including you to understand it right away. That's ok. Just study it. And we'll show you in time.

  46. Donate to charity? by forevermore · · Score: 1

    Here are two great charities that accept BTC payments, and I'm sure they're not the only ones: https://supporters.eff.org/don... https://www.heifer.org/gift-ca...

    --
    Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
  47. Re: anyone that actually matters by roman_mir · · Score: 1, Troll

    You don't need to pay taxes, this taxdoctrination has gotten completely out of hand. Again: you don't have to pay any taxes to anybody. The sooner the vast majority of people understands that they do not actually have to pay taxes, the better.

    Also: why should anybody want to pay taxes in BTC? If BTC allows to get around taxes then all the better.

  48. Buy Amazon gift cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mined Bitcoin for a couple months back when GPU mining was still somewhat profitable. At that time it was simple to get an Amazon gift card for whatever amount I wanted by purchasing it with Bitcoin via a third party seller, and the fee for the transaction was far less than that of any of the services trading USD for BTC.

  49. Re:cash is getting controlled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US dollar is backed solely by the "full faith and credit of the United States".
    So was the East German Mark, the Ruble, the Greek / Cyprus, etc etc.
    All of the above are intrinsically worthless.

    Cryptocurrencies, in particular Bitcoin example, have value because everyone knows that
    1) Anyone and everyone on the Earth can choose to own some.
    2) There are a limited quantity available. Thus removed the threat printing presses that utterly destroys all fiat in time.
    3) And they are as unstoppable as the internet and a handshake with your nextdoor neighbor.
    4) All owners will fight to death to ensure system remains free thus preserving their stake.

    Those and many other facets, which are VERY difficuly for most people, closeminded people, sheeple, to understand... give cryptocurrencies real value above printed fiat play money.

  50. Re: anyone that actually matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you can pay taxes with it, Neo, we won't need to tell you, you just will.

  51. "I have nothing to hide" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Says the man trying to avoid paying taxes.

  52. Some options by Hell's+Kitchen · · Score: 1

    Try these options: https://exchangewar.info/coinp... but if you care for your privacy, maybe it's better to use Localbitcoins (although you'll pay a bit more for it).

  53. Cash it in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you've seriously got that much, it's free money. I'd happily take a privacy and tax hit for even a fairly small amount of BTC (~USD 1,075 at today's rates).

    Or yeah, if you're that bothered about privacy (or tax evasion), do as another poster said: buy drugs in bulk and sell 'em. You'll make a cash fortune.

  54. The blockchain records all transactions. Fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoin is inherently flawed on so many levels. But most of all, it records its own transaction history.

    If you want a currency that is inherently insecure from a privacy perspective: This is it.

    There is one and only one totally secure currency from a privacy perspective and that is CASH.

    And that is why governments are trying to ban it.

    (And no, gold is not a usable currency in any real sense).

    1. Re:The blockchain records all transactions. Fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PIVX actually solves most of these problems and is currently on a steep rise https://coinmarketcap.com/curr...

  55. but he needs it in cash. by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    oh but he is asking how to turn it into cash without paying taxes or having a record he has the cash.

    he probably totally ignores the fact that once he pays the tax on the investment he is free to do whatever he wants with the money without any of the agencies caring anything - UNLIKE if he just got magically a million dollars of cash and went buying expensive things which would put him on the hitlist of dea etc.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:but he needs it in cash. by Zemran · · Score: 1

      That seems to sum up the question quite well without providing an answer. He would like to if he can retain his right to privacy and still do business in the US. I think he would be better moving to a more free country as the US no longer respects anyone's privacy.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  56. It's not bitcoin, it's the dollar by zmooc · · Score: 1

    You can easily freely use bitcoins in t he land of the free. It's the dollar you apparently cannot use so freely. Just don't use it. Problem solved. You're welcome.

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
  57. Re: Bitcoin is not money by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

    The document from the South African treasury about virtual currencies you linked to states:

    "Due to their unregulated status, virtual currencies cannot be classified as legal tender as any merchant may refuse them as a payment instrument without being in breach of the law. In addition, virtual currencies cannot be regarded as a means of payment as they are not issued on receipt of funds. The use of virtual currencies therefore depends on the other participantâ(TM)s willingness to accept them."

    So, I don't think that qualifies as being "money".

    Yes, about two online shops in South Africa accept payment in Bitcoin, but I don't know how they comply with FICA regulations in this case ...

  58. Privacy? Or just tax evasion? by bradley13 · · Score: 1

    Most likely, the poster's real motivation is avoiding taxes on his BTC profits. The anarchist in me understands this: taxes are the government taking your property by force. On the other hand, few people would voluntarily pay the amount that governments consume, and we don't seem to be willing to dismantle our governments, so...there we are, taxes.

    If it's not about taxes, then cash out. If you register with a BTC exchange and cash in your BTC then, yes, the IRS will know who you are. So what? Just pay your taxes. It's not really about privacy, because you can then turn your US$ into cash, and spend that cash as anonymously as you like.

    Incidentally, parallel currencies are nothing new. As an example, there has been a parallel currency in Switzerland (WIR) since 1934. It limps along for all of the same reasons that BTC limps along: it's an additional hassle for your average business, it complicates accounting and taxes, and it is an additional (exchange-rate) risk that most businesses don't want to deal with.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  59. "can be effectively used" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This must be a new use of the word "effective" that has previously been unknown.

  60. Privacy : cash is better than bitcoin by DrYak · · Score: 5, Informative

    And for the last time,
    bitcoin IS NOT DESIGNED with anonymity in mind.

    It is designed for being a distributed system with no central authority (in theory at least).
    And this system works by replacing any central authority with a consensus among all the nodes of the network.
    Which is achieved by all (full) nodes of the network having, by design, a local copy of the whole ledger (= the blockchain).

    That mean each of them can see any single transaction you did at any point of time.
    (Again, by design. That's how the bitcoin protocol can reach consensus and trust without needing any central authority to act as a reference).

    That means that no, you're not anonymous, I can see all the transaction you ever did inside the blockchain on my own locally run node.

    At best, bitcoin protocol provides pseudonymity.
    It's not Facebook require real names.
    Transaction aren't officially done in the name of your real identity, they are done in the name of some base64 encoded public key.
    And normal client are constantly shuffling sums around so there might be hundred of transaction between the time you received some amount of BTC and the time you spent them at an online shop where you order something to be mailed to you (and thus where some phyical world coordinates can be linked to your bitcoin identity).

    That mostly prevent casual/accidental snooping.
    But that's not beyond the capability of data-mining any government-level agent.
    If your neighbour want to spy on you, he can't do it easily.
    If any three-letter agency wants to track you, they just need to spend some of their tremendous computational power.

    Your are not anonymous on the bitcoin network (at least to to governments).
    And that's part of the design (it also help you trust the network without needing there to be a "Bitcoin Global Inc." to be held accountable).

    Also, because the lack of central authority, nobody can prevent you to spend or receive any BTC money.
    Government can see you and track you in the global ledger, but they can't prevent you.
    There's no PayPal, Visa, or any other company that can block transactions.
    Transaction can happen between any end-points as long as they conform to the bitcoin protocol.

    (And that is one of the big motivations behind the rise of bitcoin protocol : people getting fed up of their account getting frozen for any random reason.
    e.g.: see donations to WikiLeaks)

    If you want (Relative) lack of control AND total anonymity, as suggest above : USE CASH.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Privacy : cash is better than bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. The whole idea of a blockchain is so it can be tracked, can be audited.

    2. Re:Privacy : cash is better than bitcoin by SinisterEVIL · · Score: 1

      This is one of the most well written responses to a Bitcoin question that I have ever seen. Tip of the hat good sir or madam.

    3. Re:Privacy : cash is better than bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely correct, bitcoin was not designed for privacy.

      That is why anonymous cybercurrencies like zcash and monero are being developed. That said, I don't have any particular knowledge about how good they are at present.

  61. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  62. Puerto Rico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Become a Puerto Rico inhabitant for 6+ months and pay the US tax there where the rate is far lower. Then you have the funds free and clear of tax to invest in a dividend paying stock. Or more bitcoin at a higher tax basis. Shock. A practical answer on Slashdot. :D

  63. Re:How to start out with BitCoin in US by CoolCash · · Score: 1

    I recommend coinbase. It's a US company, they have their licenses in NY, etc.

  64. Re:How to start out with BitCoin in US by CoolCash · · Score: 1

    Forgot to add, you can also find Bitcoin ATM's all around the US where you can use cash to buy bitcoins.

  65. Re:cash is getting controlled by sasparillascott · · Score: 2

    Seems like we are on a path toward no anonymity financial transactions. Cash is slowly being squeezed with some of the 1% of the 1% talking of phasing it out. Lots of talk of getting rid of big bills because of the possibility of negative interest rates, crime (which is real, the world money supply of $100 bills has gone up massively over the last 20 years and its nearly all off-shore and is sourced through banks along the internal edges of the U.S. border). I would argue keeping our ability to have private transaction - however the world seems racing towards a place where anonymity is exterminated. Nice article regarding the trouble you can get into when withdrawing large amounts of cash in the U.S.:

    http://www.cnbc.com/2015/05/29...

  66. Money != Legal tender by JcMorin · · Score: 1

    The legal tender law means that people in the country are FORCED and OBLIGED to accept it as a means of payment or contract value. There is no chance Bitcoin get there. We surely don't wanna people getting forced to accept Bitcoin payment. But still having it classify as a currency means you don't pay taxes when buy or sell it and can be used in a contract.

  67. Give up on the privacy schtick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, the fact that you are on the internet means you signed away your privacy the second you started using google, any sort of email account, social network, or any account anywhere on the internet. The only privacy you will ever really have is the ability to close the blinds and turn off every camera and microphone in your house.

    Your data will never be safe, you will never be truly anonymous or untraceable, and the only thing you can do about that is make a data trail that looks stupidly boring and normal. Even then your credit card may still be stolen by a compromised gas pump and your SSN may be stolen in a breach at your old college, high school, or even some government agency that already has all your information.

    The war fir privacy was lost back in the AOL days.

  68. Re:cash is getting controlled by DuckDodgers · · Score: 2

    The intrinsically worthless currency drives the world economy. Bitcoin is driving up the net wealth of the early adopters and ripping off the latecomers, because it's incredibly deflationary. It also can't scale in the number of transactions per second high enough to meet a significant portion of the world's financial needs: Bitcoin protocol is capped at 10 per second, banks handle thousands per second. While the concept is novel, in practice it's just a new variation of pyramid scheme. The founder may not even have intended for that to be the result, but that's what happened. The people who bought or mined when it was $3 per BTC are millionaires preying on the late investors.

    Now if someone invents a crypto-currency that's anonymous, scales to an unlimited number of concurrent transactions, and manages to neither be deflationary (which screws late adopters) or inflationary (which screws early adopters), the world will start paying attention. But for now, the only way to stabilize a currency so it neither inflates nor deflates too rapidly is having it backed by a government that can adjust the supply.

  69. MFW Coinbase user who paid capital gains on BTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MFW I paid capital gains tax on BTC earnings BEFORE the IRS subpoenaed Coinbase's records.

  70. Same as betting on 28 on the roulette wheel by raymorris · · Score: 1

    If I put $100 on 28 on roulette wheel and the ball happened to land on 28, what did I lose? It just so happened that this particular gamble worked out this time. If you bought when it was $1300 (or bet on 23) you lost money. Some people won the gamble. It's still gambling, not investment.

    > Newegg accepts bitcoin so I buy random items and resell them on eBay. So yeah I take a slight loss there along with fees but come on how is that not a sound plan?

    When I do work, I like to make money, not lose money. If you're going to do the work resell things on eBay, a sound plan is to buy a box of 200 widgets for $200, then sell the widgets for $2.50 each. You more than double your money as you work, rather than losing money.

  71. Not the land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think the US is the land of the free?

    Thanks to 35+ years of Tinkle Down Economics, the US is an Oligarchy.

  72. not anonymous by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

    It appears that Bitcoin, a currency designed with anonymity in mind...

    No. Bitcoin is designed around decentralization, not anonymity. Every transaction is logged forever; for anonymity, that's a nightmare. This misconception is widespread. Bitcoin is not anonymous; if privacy is important to you, you should not be using it.

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  73. Bitcoin is not anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " I have accumulated quite a few BTC from the currency's early days..."

    Bullshit. I don't believe you. Anybody who has used bitcoin from the early days knows enough that it isn''t anonymous.
    So, you're either lying, been living under a fucking rock, or just plain ignorant.

  74. Land of the Free != What You Think It Is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How Does One Freely Use Bitcoin In the Land of the Free?

    Not sure how Germany handles bitcoin, any Germans care to comment?

    I assume you do not mean the US, since the US has not been the land of the free since January 19th[1], Rightwing Trump-Cuck rhetoric notwithstanding.

    [1]www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/11/21/how-angela-merkel-a-conservative-became-the-leader-of-the-liberal-free-world/

    1. Re:Land of the Free != What You Think It Is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How Does One Freely Use Bitcoin In the Land of the Free?

      Not sure how Germany handles bitcoin, any Germans care to comment?

      I assume you do not mean the US, since the US has not been the land of the free since January 19th[1], Rightwing Trump-Cuck rhetoric notwithstanding.

      [1]www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/11/21/how-angela-merkel-a-conservative-became-the-leader-of-the-liberal-free-world/

      That's January 20th, 1981. Not my fault people are too stupid to realize it.

  75. Bitcoin Anonymity and the PATRIOT Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The seeds of this were sewn back in 2001. Read all about it here:

    https://www.dosgatosmuertos.com/single-post/2017/03/21/Bitcoin-Anonymity-and-the-PATRIOT-Act

  76. two ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Exchange them for government fiat with some dude on the street corner that you met through Craiglist.
    2) Spend them to buy objects/commodities that you can just resell for government fiat.

    Never associate any personal information with any cryptocurrency transaction. That means, never use any online exchange, since those are the primary target of governments who are terrified that cryprocurrencies could eventually (after mass adoption) force governments to be nice to their citizens. Cryptocurrencies can break the financial shackles the governments have placed on all productive members of society who still transact in government fiat.

    1. Re:two ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Exchange them for government fiat with some dude on the street corner that you met through Craiglist.
      2) Spend them to buy objects/commodities that you can just resell for government fiat.

      Never associate any personal information with any cryptocurrency transaction. That means, never use any online exchange, since those are the primary target of governments who are terrified that cryprocurrencies could eventually (after mass adoption) force governments to be nice to their citizens. Cryptocurrencies can break the financial shackles the governments have placed on all productive members of society who still transact in government fiat.

      Keep chugging that koolaid bro.

  77. Re:cash is getting controlled by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

    There are many cryptocurrencies out there trying to deal with these scenarios. There are some that exist primarily for lightning quick transactions and others for more perfect anonymity. There is room for more than one cryptocurrency and BTC may not be the winner.

    It has, though, proved the value of the blockchain and proved that it's cryptographically secure. (Quantum computing may change the equation.)

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  78. localbitcoins.com by BozoForPresident · · Score: 1

    To devrtm, in the rather unlikely event that you get past all chaff comments, is localbitcoins.com something that could help you get some cash for some of your bitcoin while you research and figure out your other options? Other options, of which there many. ;) btw I'm also bozoforpresident on reddit which might be easier for messaging than /. Final thought - to all the mooing tax cattle, off to the slaughterhouse you go...

  79. Re:cash is getting controlled by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

    Agreed. But the way the AC wrote, I think he or she has put their faith and support in Bitcoin.

  80. How do bitcoiners define money? by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

    The wikipedia definition of money[1] ("Money is any item or verifiable record that is generally accepted as payment for goods and services and repayment of debts in a particular country or socio-economic context") is basically identical to the defintion of legal tender[2] ("Legal tender is variously defined in different jurisdictions. Formally, it is anything which when offered in payment extinguishes the debt.").

    The guidance document for virtual currencies by the South African treasury only refers to 'virtual currencies', never referring to them as 'money'. Virtual currencies effectively have the same (or less) standing in South Africa as (or than) external currencies (including e.g. the Zimbabwean Dollar).

    So, what do bitcoin proponents claiming 'Bitcoin is classify as money' define 'money' as? Obviously something different than the rest of the population.

    1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  81. Re: truthful statements by slashrio · · Score: 1

    ...but not all flamebait is truth.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.