Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Finally Reveals What Data Windows 10 Really Collects (theverge.com)

Starting today, Microsoft is updating its privacy statement and publishing information about the data it collects as part of Windows 10. From a report: "For the first time, we have published a complete list of the diagnostic data collected at the Basic level," explains Windows chief Terry Myerson in a company blog post. "We are also providing a detailed summary of the data we collect from users at both Basic and Full levels of diagnostics." Microsoft is introducing better controls around its Windows 10 data collection levels in the latest Creators Update, which will start rolling out broadly next week. The controls allow users to switch between basic and full levels of data collection. "Our teams have also worked diligently since the Anniversary Update to re-assess what data is strictly necessary at the Basic level to keep Windows 10 devices up to date and secure," says Myerson. "As a result, we have reduced the number of events collected and reduced, by about half, the volume of data we collect at the Basic level."

286 comments

  1. The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... of course, is that we have to wait for Microsoft to "inform" us about that in the first place.

    1. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'd actually like to see the Windows 10 team publicly flogged over this and the past transgressions.. As a warning to the other devs that add BS like this.

    2. Re:The real problem... by ytene · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And the only reason Microsoft are doing this is [likely to be] because the EU were basically telling them that their latest privacy-slurping OS was going to run foul of EU legislation if they didn't come clean. Having Windows 10 banned in the EU because of privacy concerns was likely a suitable incentive. What a shame it has come to the point where companies need this sort of inducement to come clean.

    3. Re:The real problem... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Plus the fact that Microsoft did not give a shit about users' privacy and initially rolled Windows 10 out configured to collect all sorts of unnecessary data.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    4. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO! The Real Problem is... that if you all want to be "Creators" actually and truly deserving of that word, instead of just being tricked into another marketing ploy, and you don't want "data collection" aka SPYING, and if you want to work "diligently" in opensource view...

      Then you need to DITCH MICROSOFT, and start using FreeBSD, or even Linux but it's more annoying to choose and learn and maintain.
      FreeBSD has all the communications, browsing, mail, office and apps needed for an internet workstation, including games :)

      https://www.freebsd.org/
      https://www.freebsd.org/ports/categories-grouped.html

    5. Re:The real problem... by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Good on you, EU. One of the good things to come out of a multinational corporation is that it is subject to the scrutiny of more administrations; and that appears to help US citizens in the case of our present, privacy-unfriendly, leadership.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    6. Re: The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... because I'm a creator, I love creating kernel drivers in order to use common everyday devices that I use for being creative....

    7. Re:The real problem... by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      Well on my part when my machine upgraded from Windows 7 to 10 I logged to the firewall and blocked pretty much every Microsoft site I could think of at the time.

    8. Re: The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Um.. that doesn't really happen all that much anymore. 2002 called. They want their Linux distribution back.

    9. Re:The real problem... by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My guess is that they only do it because they got some pretty severe threats from the EU behind the scenes. The first round (Swiss Data Protection Commissioner) they already lost and that guy very likely talked this over with his EU colleagues before and they decided that his situation was best for a test-balloon (as Switzerland is not in the EU, hence not setting legal precedent for the EU).

      Without that, my guess would be that MS would never have informed anybody. And they could still be lying. Unless there is an independent verification by somebody competent, I am not going to trust this at all.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    10. Re:The real problem... by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 0

      Except as unpopular as this may sound, I really like Windows 10. I turned all of the telemetry off but even had I not, I would not care as the OS is rock solid, stable, and does everything I expect an OS to do and that is allow me to run my programs and get out of my way. I really like the new bash shell as it is far superior to cygwin. I have a couple of linux boxes but I'm just not a fan and haven't been one for the last 15+ years that I have run many linux flavors and versions.

      There are many reasons to like or dislike any given OS and when it comes down to it I "choose" to run Windows and I like it.

    11. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is another Trump campaign promise that he has kept.

      CAP === 'retrace'

    12. Re:The real problem... by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What a shame it has come to the point where companies need this sort of inducement to come clean.

      Companies will run slave plantations unless somebody forces them not to. Capitalism is useful but it'll throw you under the bus if it means higher profit, it's nobody's friend just raw application of economic power. Once you're past the size where anyone feels personally responsible and they only answer to shareholders who want return on interest it has no conscience, ethics or morality. So I'm not sure what you think is new or different here, the only time they don't act like total psychos is exactly when there's consequences. Otherwise they'd make Soylent Green out of you.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    13. Re:The real problem... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Ok..so where is the option to switch it to NO DATA COLLECTED AND REPORTED....?

      Basic and full are dandy for those that want to "opt in" for such data collection, but how about those of us who liked the old fashioned OS days when NO data was sent or required to be sent?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What a shame it has come to the point where companies need this sort of inducement to come clean.

      Companies will run slave plantations unless somebody forces them not to. Capitalism is useful but it'll throw you under the bus if it means higher profit, it's nobody's friend just raw application of economic power. Once you're past the size where anyone feels personally responsible and they only answer to shareholders who want return on interest it has no conscience, ethics or morality. So I'm not sure what you think is new or different here, the only time they don't act like total psychos is exactly when there's consequences. Otherwise they'd make Soylent Green out of you.

      Of coarse the logical solution would then be to make the people the shareholders so the corporations are bound to serve their interests, which actually starts to look a lot like democratic communism in high level principle.

    15. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the secondary problem is that Microsoft has already burnt down his bridge of trust. I don't know about anyone else but unless it's possible to verify independently that this is in fact all Microsoft is collecting, then I see no reason to believe them. They don't exactly have a record for honesty.

    16. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Exactly this.

      This announcement is akin to:

      We've listened to our customers who are upset about the ass rape, so to address your concerns, we've added an exciting new option!

      -Lubed ass rape
      -Unlubed ass rape (for our TRUE believers)

    17. Re:The real problem... by SirSlud · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Just don't use it, then. Pretty sure they're okay with that.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    18. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that some jobs REQUIRE using it.

      Except that some applications are ONLY available for it, and in some circumstances, schools or governments REQUIRE the use of those programs.

      Your excuse for them is similar to the power company (who in many situations has a monopoly) saying, "If you want to use our power lines, you have to let us install listening devices in your house. Or you could just, you know, NOT use our power."

      There aren't always other options, depending upon the circumstances.
      This kind of bullshit will not stand, unless ambivalent morons allow it.

    19. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You imply that this behavior only applies to larger companies, but any perusal of popular sites online clearly demonstrates that people are only decent in person because they fear immediate physical retribution.

    20. Re: The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not government owned, but citizen owned corporations. Job creation can't be left to those that can give themselves a bonus by firing the staff.

    21. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesnt windows 10 have some kind of meshnet like setup for software updates? Seems like it could send data that way to.

    22. Re: The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That media section is basically "what you fap to, and for how long you fap".

      Windows 10 is super creepy.

    23. Re: The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 1990s called and left you a message on your cassette tape answering machine, wanting their lame joke back, about calling and wanting things back.

    24. Re:The real problem... by NoSalt · · Score: 1

      Otherwise they'd make Soylent Green out of you.

      I, uh ... would make terrible-tasting Soylent Green.

    25. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I believe Marsellus Wallace would have a solution.

      "I'ma call a coupla hard, pipe-hittin' n1ggers, who'll go to work on the homes here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch. You hear me talkin', hillbilly boy? I ain't through with you by a damn sight. I'ma get medieval on your ass."

    26. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I really hope you do not use the build-in firewall from Windows 10, because there is no way to block telemetry in Windows itself (that counts for "Home" and "Pro"), because it's hard-coded without any way to change that.

      You have to use an external (physical) firewall to block that stuff.

    27. Re:The real problem... by SirSlud · · Score: 0

      *rolls eyes*

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    28. Re:The real problem... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Companies will run slave plantations unless somebody forces them not to. Capitalism is useful but it'll throw you under the bus if it means higher profit, it's nobody's friend just raw application of economic power. Once you're past the size where anyone feels personally responsible and they only answer to shareholders who want return on interest it has no conscience, ethics or morality. So I'm not sure what you think is new or different here, the only time they don't act like total psychos is exactly when there's consequences. Otherwise they'd make Soylent Green out of you.

      I think a lot of people forget this when they cry out that all government regulations are bad and should be done away with. That was nearly the case in relatively-recent history. Children were forced to work 19 hour days in locked factories with only one way out. Employers treated them like little more than slaves and there was no protection for the worker. Got injured on the job due to your employer providing a dangerous work environment? Too bad, you're unemployed now since you can't do the job they hired you to do. Fire raging in the one spot where you can exit the factory? Jump from the tenth story window to your death. (See the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire.)

      Over time, outrage over these abuses led to the government making rules against them. You can't work kids 19 hours a day. You need to provide a safe working environment. Employees injured on the job deserve compensation. Products should be safe for people to use.

      Are all regulations good? Of course not, but acting like they're all bad and companies would be job-creating angels if that big, bad government would just get off their back is far from the truth as well.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    29. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like apathetic is more apropos than ambivalent in your case.

    30. Re:The real problem... by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Its more likely a question of MS underestimating the amount of blowback they would receive given that we're regularly passing as much if not more information to ISPs, Google, Facebook, etc -- the latter even entirely voluntarily.

      But we've all still got a collective hate-on for anything MS due to their past transgressions, even though they're pretty much just doing what everyone else does at this point (and aren't even close to the worst for it in many cases.) We're just not willing to let go of that history though.

    31. Re:The real problem... by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Don't know that I agree with that sentiment given how aggressively they were pushing the updates over 7/8 there. Over a year of having to disable GWX on any machines that we didn't want to be magically upgraded.

      I mean from a personal perspective I liked getting the free upgrade but it wasn't really great for my job where we're still wanting to stick with 7 for a while due to some old software that's potentially incompatible with 10 (I'm fairly sure it'd be fine but 7 works for us for now and no push to spend a bunch of time testing 10 since we're planning to retire that software anyway at some point in the next couple years.)

    32. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if they didn't intentionally collect information, they would capture your IP and your hardware components (for drivers provided by Windows Update). Should you use Bing, they would also have your search history. Perhaps they'd even have an unique ID - a hash of your License Key.

      All without actively trying to spy on you.

    33. Re:The real problem... by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Not if we added salt.

      --
      I come here for the love
    34. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is more like:

      Before government interference, we do not reveal what phallic devices we use to ass rape you due to [redacted] concerns. With the new Prison Simulation Creative Update(tm), we are required to show you all the devices we use, depending on your choice of lubed and unlubed ass-raping sessions.
      PS. You can preview one of the devices being used here:
      encl. goatse-giver.jpg

    35. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Venezuela is basically a goddamn dictatorship and everyone knows it.

      That's your only example? I raise you Canada and all of the Nordic countries.

    36. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: "I'm either retired or independently wealthy, so I don't have to use Microsoft products. See ya, wouldn't wanna be ya."

    37. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having given it some further thought, it's actually much more sinister than my example.

      It would be more like a children's toy company installing listening devices in their toys WITHOUT TELLING YOU.
      Then, upon being discovered, the company issues a press release in which they say:

      "After realizing how wrong we were, we've conscientiously decided to give you the option to change the devices into a mode where they only record for 12 hours of the day, rather than 24! Isn't that great news? Aren't we such a responsible company?"

      No one would ever have even known about this shit had it gone undetected. It's fucking despicable.

    38. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is how HUMANS behave. My neighbors would all run car repair shops if it wasn't for the zoning laws. Humans need limits.

    39. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you talking about the same legislations that prevent microsoft to stop bundle Internet Explorer with Windows in europe? OH WAIT
      EU is just a theatrical act, nobody really takes it seriously.
      Microsoft simply trying to comfort some of those who still remain on older versions of windows to upgrade (apparently they didn't get the message that they also getting tracked through updates anyway).

    40. Re:The real problem... by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      My guess is that they only do it because they got some pretty severe threats from the EU behind the scenes.

      Not even behinds the scenes. The GDPR-rules that will be implemented by 25 May 2018 stipulates, among other thing, that any organization that collects or process data about EU citizens must get consent and inform the individual about what is collected and how it will be used.
      The fine for non-compliance is up to 20,000,000 EUR or up to 4% of the annual worldwide turnover, whichever is higher. Not exactly peanuts.
      A good guess is that this is a preparatory move to ensure that they are complying with this when it hits.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    41. Re: The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree!

    42. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And THIS is supposed to be the cut down data collection? It's an endless list of personal data that Microsoft does not need and that users should have 100% control over.

      Fuck Microsoft. Even if they cut all spyware and adware out AND gave back user controls over updates, I will never use Windows 10. Their pathetic gestures are meaningless and the time that they could have fixed the issues has long since elapsed.

    43. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regulations are just the rules of the game. Imagine playing a game of Monopoly.

      I'm the bank, and I declare there are no rules. You've already lost.

      The Invisible Hand of the Market takes care of the market. It could care less about you, me, or America.

    44. Re:The real problem... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Good guess.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    45. Re:The real problem... by uncqual · · Score: 2

      Then don't use your work devices for personal business. Your employer selected Microsoft for their business so they must be okay with this collection - it's your employer's data, not yours.

      Personally, I will probably never again install Windows 10 (or successors) on any personal iron for a variety of reasons -- Linux works fine for my personal use for almost everything. If my employer chooses to use Windows 10, it doesn't bother me because it's not my machine/data.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    46. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fine and all but a few safety regulations aren't going to cancel out the effects of a government owned by corporations and their lobbyists, and I think we're past the point where that's salvageable (barring a literal revolution that Americans are far to placid and poorly armed to ever pull off).

      Throwing a human molotov cocktail like Sanders or Trump into office as a desperation move was probably our last hope, though IMO Sanders would've been ineffective and Trump will probably wind up going native.

    47. Re: The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama isn't in office anymore.

    48. Re:The real problem... by Xest · · Score: 1

      I actually read TFA, followed the links, and (yes really) looked through the list of collected content.

      Amusingly was this under movies:

      "URL for a specific two second chunk of content if there is an error"

      Anyone want to guess at Microsoft's liability if that video content is illegal such as child abuse video?

      They don't appear to collect a music sample segment though, greater paranoia about copyright infringement suits from the music industry over the movie industry perhaps?

      I actually don't think there's any nefarious intent, it looks like everything is specifically focused on error diagnosis and I suspect Microsoft just asked each time what minimum viable error diagnosis data they collect. I think the problem is Microsoft haven't then looked at the bigger picture to realise how much profiling can be done on someone with a combined data set and how bad the overall collection of data looks. What was probably intended as a unified toolset for error reporting and diagnosis for each of the different teams at Microsoft (i.e. data reported back is presumably dispatched automatically to the relevant team) ended up looking rather creepy as a whole.

      I don't buy the whole CIA conspiracy theory drivel some people spin with this kind of data collection (because the CIA can already get the NSA to collect this data and then some if they want it even without Microsoft's help) but I do think companies like Microsoft need to think harder about features like this - what may seem a great idea to them, doesn't necessarily seem great to consumers. This is something that should've been picked up by their architecture team and highlights what happens if you don't include things like data protection and privacy as a cross cutting concern across your product suite even if you've included it as a concern at individual project level.

    49. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      Social attitudes have changed a lot over time though too. When you have companies pulling advertising campaigns or products over people complaining on social media, they do listen to customers. Do you really think Wal-Mart would keep making money if they made kids work 19 hour days?

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    50. Re: The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why do they specifically state that this is "diagnostic data" they collect rather than just "data" they collect? I want to know all the data they collect, not just the "diagnostic" data.

    51. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      Socialism tends to degrade to a dictatorship. Canada and the Nordic countries aren't socialist, they're social democracies. There are still plenty of big businesses, a lot of their regulations make more sense and actually address the problem, and people are allowed to own capital and invest in things. Using them to try to show that socialism works is like using North Korea as an example of a democracy.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    52. Re:The real problem... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      That may be a good solution for you, but there's plenty of people who want to use some software that's Windows-only and not available on Linux. Also, there's plenty of people who aren't going to reinstall an operating system, so they'll stick with the one on the computer they buy, and not every computer is easy to install Linux on.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    53. Re:The real problem... by barrygrommit · · Score: 1

      So help me here: Is it possible to write a little macro (I know...old think...deal with it) that zeros out those fields that are collected?
      Why or why not?

    54. Re:The real problem... by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      So, staying with Windows 7 still seems the best approach -- now that I have a better understanding of why staying with Windows 7 is the best approach.

      When "NO DATA COLLECTED AND REPORTED" becomes available -- and I believe it works as advertised -- I'll reconsider.

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    55. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I came here for this.

      A hard-core, anti-Microsoft, placard carrying protester. It's remarkable how, when Microsoft listens and makes an improvement, it's "Lubed ass rape", which I take is preferable to the "Unlubed ass rape".

      Your sex life is either too boring, or all too interesting. I'm really not sure which.

    56. Re:The real problem... by syntotic · · Score: 1

      ...is to know if they are using common wifi, IP, channels, or they can collect even if you are outside, away from a hotspot, with wifi disconnected, without sharing, remote session, etc. enabled, in sum, when you are _not_ connected. Such condition is detectable, but still looks like Windows goes into data collecting and not precisely to send it later at the first chance. If the OS does not want to let us see, we cannot see it, period.

    57. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nefarious intent is that Microsoft hopes to financially gain from the labour of its users without compensating those users. If you want QA, sorry, you gotta pay. I don't work for free.

    58. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the CIA can already get the NSA to collect this data and then some if they want it even without Microsoft's help

      Bullshit. The NSA can only collect what goes out over the wires, they do not provide the FUCKING OPERATING SYSTEM for millions of computers across the planet. Microsoft is in bed with these government agencies, make no mistake of that, you naive child.

  2. January by campuscodi · · Score: 4, Informative

    Finally, since January. They revealed this in January when they pushed the update to Insiders Build. They introduced the disclosure as part of compliance with EU regulations.

    1. Re:January by thelexx · · Score: 1

      A distinction without meaning. The OS was released almost two YEARS ago.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
  3. Real link by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Link to the actual list, not an article about the list: https://technet.microsoft.com/...

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:Real link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Link to the actual list, not an article about the list: https://technet.microsoft.com/...

      Awesome! How can we turn off ALL data collection? Show us THAT link and we are golden...

    2. Re:Real link by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Okay, let's have a quick look at some interesting items from the list:

      - userId The userID as known by the application.
      This is what you type when Windows asks "what is your name?" during account creation, so it's quite likely to be the user's real name.

      - did XBOX device ID
      - xid A list of base10-encoded XBOX User IDs.

      - localId Represents a locally defined unique ID for the device

      - friendlyName Represents the name of the file requesting elevation from low IL.
      - cmdLine Represents the full command line arguments being used to elevate.
      Don't enter passwords on the command line!

      - PCFP An ID for the system that is calculated by hashing hardware identifiers.

      - BiosDate The release date of the BIOS in UTC format.
      - BiosName The name field from Win32_BIOS.
      - Manufacturer The manufacturer field from Win32_ComputerSystem.
      - Model The model field from Win32_ComputerSystem.

      The list is very long, I'm about 1/3rd the way in...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Real link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seen in your link:

      Common Data Extensions.Consent UI Event

      ...

      cmdLine Represents the full command line arguments being used to elevate.

      Fuck.

    4. Re:Real link by lq_x_pl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Keep in mind, this is the list for now.

      --
      An internal system operation returned the error "The operation completed successfully.".
    5. Re:Real link by jez9999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The Basic level gathers a limited set of information that is critical for understanding the device and its configuration"

      LOL, that's the bare minimum critical info is it? A metric fuckton of data.

      How about, oh i dunno, NOTHING?

    6. Re:Real link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Awesome! How can we turn off ALL data collection? Show us THAT link and we are golden...

      Here it is.

      And a bonus one!

    7. Re:Real link by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I think they are wayyyy over what is legally acceptable without a written (on paper) waiver in a commercial setting. In a private setting not even that may be enough and many/most of these things will need to default to "off".

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    8. Re:Real link by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      None of this is defaulted to off, in fact, this is the Basic level, which cannot be turned off. The default is Full, which is, I'm sure, a list that dwarfs this one by orders of magnitude.

    9. Re:Real link by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I think they are wayyyy over what is legally acceptable without a written (on paper)

      You can obtain a paper version by just printing your EULA. Not that paper or no paper is any more or less legally binding.

      Oh commercial setting? Well I'm sure you'll find a line in your contract saying that you agreed to abide by the EULA. So the paper thing actually is covered even though it's not needed.

    10. Re:Real link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      These items look like they could make a very unique fingerprint of a computer. If you use a MS account, so much the better, they can track you at home and at work. Tie this information together with a web surfing profile, and you'll be able to quickly identify 'troublemakers'. Other goodies include:
      • Your Major OS version (telemetry was backported to 7 & 8)
      • You Minor OS version (which version of Windows 10 are you on
      • In Windows Update, your brand of computer (along with a raft of other things)
      • Do you manually reboot your computer, or do you let it auto-boot
      • Whether telemetry is working or blocked
      • A great deal of information if you are using Office 365 (o365 telemetry)
      • Application Elevation Information
      • The name of the executable that requests elevation
      • Major/Minor version of executable requesting elevation
      • Publisher's signature if the Exe is signed

      Elevation, straight from TechNet:

      Common Data Extensions.Consent UI Event

      This User Account Control (UAC) telemetry point collects information on elevations that originate from low integrity levels. This occurs when a process running at low integrity level (IL) requires higher (administrator) privileges, and therefore requests for elevation via UAC (consent.exe). By better understanding the processes requesting these elevations, Microsoft can in turn improve the detection and handling of potentially malicious behavior in this path.

      The following fields are available:

      • eventType Represents the type of elevation: If it succeeded, was cancelled, or was auto-approved.
      • splitToken Represents the flag used to distinguish between administrators and standard users.
      • friendlyName Represents the name of the file requesting elevation from low IL.
      • elevationReason Represents the distinction between various elevation requests sources (appcompat, installer, COM, MSI and so on).
      • exeName Represents the name of the file requesting elevation from low IL.
      • signatureState Represents the state of the signature, if it signed, unsigned, OS signed and so on.
      • publisherName Represents the name of the publisher of the file requesting elevation from low IL.
      • cmdLine Represents the full command line arguments being used to elevate.
      • Hash.Length Represents the length of the hash of the file requesting elevation from low IL.
      • Hash Represents the hash of the file requesting elevation from low IL.
      • HashAlgId Represents the algorithm ID of the hash of the file requesting elevation from low IL.
      • telemetryFlags Represents the details about the elevation prompt for CEIP data.
      • timeStamp Represents the time stamp on the file requesting elevation.
      • fileVersionMS Represents the major version of the file requesting elevation.
      • fileVersionLS Represents the minor version of the file requesting elevation.

      Hardware:

      Census.Hardware

      This event sends data about the device, including hardware type, OEM brand, model line, model, telemetry level setting, and TPM support, to help keep Windows up-to-date.

      The following fields are available:

      • ChassisType Represents the type of device chassis, such as desktop or low profile desktop. The possible values can range between 1 - 24.
      • ComputerHardwareID Identifies a device class that is represented by a hash of different SMBIOS fields.
      • DeviceColor Indicates a color of the device.
      • DeviceName The device name that is set by the user.
      • OEMDigitalMarkerFileName T
    11. Re:Real link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a lot more possible with the enterprise LTSB version.

      Cuts out all the stuff no-one wants, and lets you turn off the data collection.

    12. Re:Real link by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      Awesome! How can we turn off ALL data collection? Show us THAT link and we are golden...

      Here is how you actually turn off Windows 10 Telemetry

      --
      We'll make great pets
    13. Re:Real link by zifn4b · · Score: 2

      Also, you could find out what URL's Windows 10 is phoning home to and put the hostnames in your %WINDIR%\System32\drivers\etc\hosts file

      --
      We'll make great pets
    14. Re:Real link by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      Cuts out all the stuff no-one wants, and lets you turn off the data collection.

      Even without the Group Policy editor you can still manually edit the registry to do disable it. I posted a link above with instructions.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    15. Re:Real link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only an enterprise license will allow you to set to the Basic level.

      If you don't have an enterprise license (which would be every home user) you are stuck at full with no option to disable.

      Publishing the Basic level as a PR move is a joke.

    16. Re:Real link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...and you'll find that the hosts file is ignored by windows telemetry. I think we've already learned that this doesn't prevent windows from phoning home.

    17. Re:Real link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Only an enterprise license will allow you to set to the Basic level."

      Say what? I have routinely been setting to Basic for my accounts on several W10 Home PC's. Did MS take that away with the new Creator Edition?

    18. Re:Real link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha ha. Trying to use the operating system to protect against the operating system.

      EPIC FAIL.

      You cannot do *anything* on a Windows 10 machine to stop Microsoft sending the data. Do you *really* think that editing the hosts file is going to be of any use ?

      If so I've got a bridge you might be interested in.

    19. Re:Real link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds impressively evil.

    20. Re:Real link by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      Okay, let's have a quick look at some interesting items from the list:

      - userId The userID as known by the application. This is what you type when Windows asks "what is your name?" during account creation, so it's quite likely to be the user's real name.

      - did XBOX device ID - xid A list of base10-encoded XBOX User IDs.

      - localId Represents a locally defined unique ID for the device

      - friendlyName Represents the name of the file requesting elevation from low IL. - cmdLine Represents the full command line arguments being used to elevate. Don't enter passwords on the command line!

      - PCFP An ID for the system that is calculated by hashing hardware identifiers.

      - BiosDate The release date of the BIOS in UTC format. - BiosName The name field from Win32_BIOS. - Manufacturer The manufacturer field from Win32_ComputerSystem. - Model The model field from Win32_ComputerSystem.

      The list is very long, I'm about 1/3rd the way in...

      You can pull that information from nearly any computer when they connect to your webpage. That's really nothing new.

    21. Re:Real link by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha. Trying to use the operating system to protect against the operating system.

      EPIC FAIL.

      You cannot do *anything* on a Windows 10 machine to stop Microsoft sending the data. Do you *really* think that editing the hosts file is going to be of any use ?

      If so I've got a bridge you might be interested in.

      If it is true that Windows specifically bypasses its own DNS API to get around hosts file redirects it can still be done but requires a lot more effort. You need to hijack the right API calls. In the very worse case scenario, you could write a kernel driver to sit in the kernel driver stack but I seriously doubt this would need to be done. Do you have the expertise actually answer this question competently? If not, I suggest you move over with your ego and let someone who has the expertise weigh in to actually answer the question.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    22. Re:Real link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, you can *set* it to whatever you like. If you're on a setting that's not enabled in your edition, it defaults to Full and logs a warning in the event log.

    23. Re:Real link by gitano_dbs · · Score: 1

      sc config DiagTrack start= disabled
      sc config dmwappushservice start= disabled

      sc stop DiagTrack
      sc stop dmwappushservice

    24. Re:Real link by Zaelath · · Score: 1

      Okay, let's have a quick look at some interesting items from the list:

      - userId The userID as known by the application.
      This is what you type when Windows asks "what is your name?" during account creation, so it's quite likely to be the user's real name.

      Nah, the userid is the SID, so it's something like S-1-5-21-1284458634-12243233138-28664554919-5638

      However:
      env The environment from which the event was logged.

      That's lots of juicy details (open a command prompt and type "set")
      CLIENTNAME if you're connected w/ Terminal Services
      COMPUTERNAME
      USERDNSDOMAIN
      USERDOMAIN
      USERNAME (that's the one you type in)

      localId Represents a locally defined unique ID for the device, not the human readable device name. Most likely equal to the value stored at HKLM\Software\Microsoft\SQMClient\MachineId

      That's what your licence is tied to IIRC (if not it's probably the PCFP) so anonymisation of the data is effectively zero.

      Yeah, I'm still thinking external firewalling is the way to go..

    25. Re:Real link by n329619 · · Score: 1

      - HKLM_AdvertisingID.Enabled Is the adveristing ID enabled for the device?
      - HKLM_AdvertisingID.HRESULT The error code returned when trying to query the state of the advertising ID for the device.
      - HKCU_AdvertisingID.Enabled Is the adveristing ID enabled for the current user?
      - HKCU_AdvertisingID.HRESULT The error code returned when trying to query the state of the advertising ID for the user.

      Yep. Just like google, you are still the product.

    26. Re:Real link by Zaelath · · Score: 1

      No, that's just more whataboutism.

    27. Re:Real link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your solution is to trust an OS that is taking data to adhere to their own hosts file? Very interesting. I bet you trust salesmen too. Dollars to doughnuts that it bypasses the hosts file and phones home. And no, I have not tested this. But I would NOT trust this scenario at all.

      You are on the right path though. It needs to happen at the router level so you have at least an ounce of belief it is working. The problem is, when you travel or go somewhere outside that router. Then, back to square 1.

    28. Re:Real link by gweihir · · Score: 1

      In the EU, it has to be paper to be legally binding for a lot of things, unless it is B2B. If the EULA says otherwise, that is invalid. There are also privacy rights you cannot actually give up via a contract, on paper or otherwise. Stop applying US law to things that happen in Europe.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    29. Re:Real link by wildstoo · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. The setting that is only available to Enterprise users is Security.

      Basic is available in all Windows 10 editions.

      Source: https://technet.microsoft.com/itpro/windows/configure/configure-windows-telemetry-in-your-organization

  4. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't need the OS to tell me what to do, sorry MS. You did have your chance with win 7.

  5. He's lying by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

    Or dissembling, or not revealing everything, or employing standard journalistic deception, or lying by omission, or one of them. You can be sure of it. After all, what does Microsoft gain from telling the truth?

    "Better controls"? You can bet that disabling the data Microsoft wants will result in important system features not working any more. MS has seen what Google has done and wants their own. It's the future of their company, not selling operating systems but selling the data those operating systems collect.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:He's lying by fisted · · Score: 2

      Why is this at -1? The data is encrypted, and Windows users presumably don't get to look at the keys.
      So literally people have to take MS's word for it. Oh well.

  6. Any evidence... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    that this list is really complete and conclusive? Or is this just what MS is saying is the complete list?

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    1. Re:Any evidence... by Volanin · · Score: 5, Informative

      It doesn't matter if this is the complete list. This list by itself is already bonkers.
      At the very least, they admit that they:

      - Uniquely identify you, your device, and your location/network.
      - Record what you navigate and search on the internet.
      - Record what you watch, listen to, and read.
      - Record your purchase history.

      Not that it matters though. I believe almost everyone does this nowadays.
      At least they are being transparent.

      --
      If I clone myself, can I call it a thread?
      If a girl winks to us, can I call it a race condition?
    2. Re:Any evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just what the peons need to know. Nothing more, nothing less.

    3. Re:Any evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My amazing Apple doesn't do this - the one and true only good company left!

    4. Re:Any evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google collects much more than this. Am sure Apple tracks just as much. Like you said, everyone is doing this.

    5. Re:Any evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck Microsoft, they're closed source profiteers. 20 years of their crap has got you nothing compared to what you paid into it.

      Use Opensource software on opensource operating systems instead, like FreeBSD or even Linux.

    6. Re:Any evidence... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Not that it matters though. I believe almost everyone does this nowadays.

      Then use an operating system that respects your privacy and TOR. While that probably won't stop the CIA or the NSA, it should opt you out of the vast majority of data collection.

    7. Re:Any evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are the odds this comment came from Redmond.

    8. Re:Any evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it's a list of what's collected at the 'basic level'. A concept list, not an exact divulgance of their entire focus- just the stuff they 'want' to tell us and feel 'we can understand'. Their retaining of the complete list is supposed to be a convenience for us, so as to not burden us with complicated concepts such as their retention of file-snooping, key-logging, and the reporting of such to other interested parties.

    9. Re:Any evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Google collects much more than this

      It is absolutely astonishing how many people seem just fine with Google doing it.

      I'm not fine with Microsoft doing it and I'm not fine with Google doing it. Accordingly I use neither of their products.

    10. Re:Any evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sad thing is, such data was considered private in the past- by conventional social norms & business ethics.
      The change is merely because the digital trail is accessible (as it was not in the past). So suddenly we're supposed to be OK with it, merely because such data is produced & accessible?

      Will we soon be accepting people driving on the sidewalk, because it's now normal to look at mobile devices on the road?

      We did accept Agent Orange being sprayed as pesticide on our farms because once the war was over the poor-poor business would collapse if they could not find a new customer to sell their poison to.

      We are being told this is OK by the same people who want it implemented. This is one sided and not OK.

    11. Re:Any evidence... by chispito · · Score: 1

      - Record what you navigate and search on the internet.

      It sounds like very clear language describing what search providers do with cookies. The Microsoft privacy statement uses the following language:
      "We collect data about the features you use, the items you purchase, and the web pages you visit. This data includes your voice and text search queries or commands to Bing, Cortana, and our chat bots."

      Google's cookies info:
      "For example, we use such cookies to remember your most recent searches, your previous interactions with an advertiser’s ads or search results, and your visits to an advertiser’s website. This helps us to show you customized ads on Google."

      I'm not sure if MS's statement indicates they are hoovering up ALL of your browsing (probably only when you use IE or Edge) or if it's just as relates to Bing searches and ad-clicking.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    12. Re:Any evidence... by freeze128 · · Score: 2
      Wait a minute...

      - Uniquely identify you, your device, and your location/network. - Record what you navigate and search on the internet.

      Through Edge, Internet Explorer, or Cortana, of course, but what about a 3rd party browser?

      - Record what you watch, listen to, and read.

      Maybe from Windows Media Player, but what about VLC or KODI?

      - Record your purchase history.

      From the Microsoft Windows Store, but how about a 3rd party web browser?

      This list just raises more questions than it answers.

    13. Re:Any evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking at the list of collected data, I can't see any mention of browsing and search history. Care to elaborate on which section contains the info you mention?

      - Record what you navigate and search on the internet.
      - Record what you watch, listen to, and read.
      - Record your purchase history.

      Not that it matters though. I believe almost everyone does this nowadays.
      At least they are being transparent.

    14. Re:Any evidence... by higuita · · Score: 1

      For third party tools that they do not track... they will probably add then in the future :)

      Just use linux and do not care about what MS do :D

      --
      Higuita
    15. Re:Any evidence... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It's much easier to avoid Google than it is to avoid Windows, especially at work.

    16. Re:Any evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >At least they are being transparent. What?! Downvote this idiot.

    17. Re:Any evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe almost everyone does this nowadays.
      At least they are being transparent.

      Last night, while you were sleeping, I inserted a probe in your rectum that will record every thought, feeling, thing you ate and drank, when you have sex (it's been a long time, Bob!), when you defecate, how much effort you expend doing it, and a few* other items.

      *Using the Alt-definition of "few"

      Whaddya mean you don't like it?! At least I told you about it, unlike those other privacy invaders. I'm on your side, little guy!

      Our time should be called The Age of the Slippery Slope

    18. Re:Any evidence... by nnull · · Score: 1

      Not when you have an android phone.

    19. Re:Any evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the contrary, TOR users are targeted by all kinds of police around the world. It has its uses in very specific cases, but if you don't know what those uses are, don't use it...

      If you want to keep your privacy, the non-politically correct, but technically true, answer is to use an unrooted iPhone for all your browsing needs. Don't use the App Store. You blend in (which is ideal) and get the highest consumer-grade security on the market.

      Technically true is the best kind of true to me, at least.

    20. Re:Any evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They weaselworded it so they could plausibly say this is just the *diagnostic* data, not the full list of *all* data.

    21. Re:Any evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS makes windows etc, the maker of firefox controls how they collect data(or not collect), user can choose to install or not to install firefox. Having MS block other parties data collection likely wont happen as it would become an unfriendly place for many applications.

    22. Re:Any evidence... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      I just wonder.. if too many "sheep" go "off-the-reservation" and dump Windows for Linux/BSD, I really wonder just how long it will be before MS gets one of its "pet" congress-critters to introduce a bill making it illegal to use anything besides a proprietary OS on a personal computer.. They don't really even have to get an actual bill passed in congress, just get the NSA to fingerprint everyone not on Apple or Windows and get the FBI to pay a visit.. And I'm not even wearing a tinfoil hat.. I really don't think it will be too very long..... Hope I'm dead and buried by then (just turned 67)....

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  7. Thanks, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why can't we turn it off entirely? I can troubleshoot my own PC and don't need it "phoning home" - EVER.

    1. Re:Thanks, but by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't need it. I don't need it. We're also the extreme minority who don't need it. We're getting this because everyone else can't troubleshoot their own PC/device.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Thanks, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone extracts a complete list of IPs and hostnames that Windows 10 phones home to, you can configure your upstream router to block access to that list, effectively preventing it from phoning home. That is the real list we need from Microsoft!

    3. Re:Thanks, but by denis-The-menace · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's been tried.

      They try to upload to 100s of different DNS names and IPs...just like spyware.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    4. Re:Thanks, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why can't we turn it off entirely?

      But you can!

    5. Re:Thanks, but by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I think I will have to whitelist all Win10 network traffic (when I finally need to move in 2020), and just forbid anything else in th firewall. That will take a lot of work. I will probably move everything except gaming to Linux, and Office to an isolated VM with no network at all. Talk about having to make things much worse from an usability point of view.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    6. Re:Thanks, but by ilsaloving · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not even that. We're getting it because Microsoft believes that they can get away with it. If it was just for troubleshooting, they wouldn't need half the information they're collecting.

    7. Re:Thanks, but by ausekilis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or maybe, instead of a constant firehose of crap going to Windows servers, we can have a dialog and elect to send stuff to MS when a problem happens. You know, how things used to be. They can create as detailed a dump file as they need, but I should have control over if/when it gets sent somewhere.

    8. Re:Thanks, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a matter of what you need or don't need. You can't turn off commercial breaks from broadcast TV either.

    9. Re:Thanks, but by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      You don't need it. I don't need it. We're also the extreme minority who don't need it. We're getting this because everyone else can't troubleshoot their own PC/device.

      If Microsoft's marketing would do their job adequately, they would realize that there is a market for Windows 10 Power User Edition that doesn't need any technical support. The problem is the same idiot users that Microsoft needs Windows Telemetry to support are the same idiots that work in sales and marketing. You can't win.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    10. Re:Thanks, but by Megane · · Score: 1

      I suppose the next feature for DNS servers will be regex blocking?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    11. Re:Thanks, but by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What in the world makes you think that this has anything to do with troubleshooting your PC/device? It may sound like a nice excuse for them to say that it allows your computer to be kept up to do date easier but a good package manager does that. This is all about them using your data to make money and they can't make that money if people turn off the flow of data.

    12. Re:Thanks, but by Altrag · · Score: 1

      And what price point would they have to put that at to cover the value of the data they're no longer collecting on you? $500? $1000? More?

      That said, no this kind of telemetry doesn't help much when someone calls into Microsoft support asking why their coffee holder no longer retracts or why their ATI drivers don't work with their new nVidia card or stupid shit like that.

      In terms of troubleshooting, its helpful in aggregate to know things like "58% of users spend more-than-desired time on the installation folder selection dialog.. perhaps we should try to redesign it to flow smoother." Or "30% of new Acrobat installs fail the first attempt but succeed on the second," which may not be something MS can do anything about themselves but if they can get enough diagnostic information, they probably have a much more direct line for reporting bugs to Adobe than you or I do just posting requests on their help forums.

      Telemetry is amazingly useful. Unfortunately its just as useful for nefarious purposes as it is for beneficial ones, and the nefarious purposes tend to be more profitable (and are so far entirely legal, though we'll see what the EU says about that in a few months I guess!)

    13. Re:Thanks, but by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      In terms of troubleshooting, its helpful in aggregate to know things like "58% of users spend more-than-desired time on the installation folder selection dialog.. perhaps we should try to redesign it to flow smoother." Or "30% of new Acrobat installs fail the first attempt but succeed on the second," which may not be something MS can do anything about themselves but if they can get enough diagnostic information, they probably have a much more direct line for reporting bugs to Adobe than you or I do just posting requests on their help forums.

      Telemetry is amazingly useful.

      I don't think any amount of Telemetry is going to help Microsoft with UX design at this point. If you've been at this for 30+ years and still can't figure it out, it's time to retire and move over so someone else can do it.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    14. Re:Thanks, but by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Which is why I call Windows 10 full-blown MALWARE... Tell me I'm wrong.. I dare ya!!

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    15. Re:Thanks, but by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Mute works pretty well.. At least you don't have to *hear* the $@#%#%!#@% drug ads that seem to be EVERY OTHER commercial...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    16. Re:Thanks, but by dublin · · Score: 1

      Bingo. I'd go further and say that even though most people here are fully capable of keeping their machines updated and secure, most of us wind up doing a piss-poor job of it in the real world. The cobbler's barefoot kids and all that. Despite the fact that all of us know better, the frequency with which even technology professionals fail to apply security updates or even back up their data is really shocking... (I write this on a Surface Pro 4 that hasn't been backed up in over a month other than by the built-in Windows backup (I let my previous backup subscription expire and I haven't yet settled on a replacement), so I'm one of those guilty parties.)

      Making at least the basic stuff happen "automagically" (at least by default) is not necessarily bad and can be wonderful for the folks who don't know (and don't want to know) how all the sausage gets made. I agree it would be nice to have more granular controls, but this is a good step in the right direction. It would be even better if this disclosure puts pressure on other big coercive companies to be more open and transparent about what data they collect and what they do with it. I'd bet lunch that a similar disclosure by Google would be nothing short of terrifying.

      Also there seems to be a double standard at play here (possibly justified, given Microsoft's past actions and behaviors): Windows actually gives you quite a bit more control over much of this stuff than say, Android or Chrome, yet far fewer people seem to be lining up to bust Google's chops over even more egregious behavior.

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    17. Re:Thanks, but by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      ...we can have a dialog and elect to send stuff to MS when a problem happens.

      I have almost all of the diagnostic and troubleshoooting stuff turned off in Windows7, and every time I go into disk cleanup, it still shows dozens of megabytes of automatically collected problem logs and error reports. *I* don't get informed of any problems with my PC, so where exactly are all these problems coming from?

    18. Re:Thanks, but by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      What they claim is true, but is it the entire truth, probably not. I had one of their Engineers read my telemetry data and hop into and rectify an issue on my system when after upgrading from OEM Win10 Home to Retail Win10 Pro the system refused to activate. Turns out something the activation process needed to succeed wasn't running, wasn't starting when it was called by the system, and had the wrong owner and permissions set. So, this data collection was helpful in my particular case.

      Microsoft has collected all sorts of data even going back to the Win 2k/XP days, and I always had the working assumption that they'll collect data about anything and everything that installs or executes on their operating systems, with the data being "anonymized" to a point before being placed into some sort of general data pool that is accessible outside of their Engineering groups.

      I've always kept financials, etc encrypted and only access those in a non-network connected VM, so, if they are so keen on having access the names of what games I own in my Steam Library, that I name file folders after characters from Tolkien's novels and sort them alphabetically, or what VM software provider I use, more power to them.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    19. Re:Thanks, but by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Figure what out exactly? Is there some paragon of UX design that you can point to and say "why isn't MS doing that?" I don't think I've ever seen a user interface for any moderately complex piece of software that didn't piss me off in one way or another at some point.

      Also, "someone else" is already doing it -- Apple. I'm not sure I'd claim their designs are much better (and coming from a Windows background, I can tell you that I have trouble finding much of anything on Apple's backassward system and their malleable menus and other shit that I personally find confusing as hell.)

      The only thing Apple has going for them (if you can call it a benefit) is their insistence that their way isn't just the right way but the only way, so you have a much smaller pool of apps that try to be clever and ignore the OS' paradigms in favor of their own.

      And just to throw a bone to conspiracy nuts.. a "perfect" OS (especially in user-visible areas) is counterproductive to future upgrade sales. Which may no longer matter if Win10/OSX actually ends up being the final forms like they claim but certainly might have been a consideration in past.

  8. Option missing by lapm · · Score: 2

    So still no choise of Dont spy my shit...

    1. Re:Option missing by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Install different applications to read data.
      Some sort of wireshark like tool over time?
      Add a lot of very different file types and alter the way MS works with the files.
      Video files, images, documents, music, text.
      Will creating data or just having a file on a usb device do anything? Opening a file, saving a file, exporting?
      Do file extensions matter?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Option missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wireshark is vulnerable to the processor inside your processor, otherwise known as the IME (Intel Management Engine) sub-system. Inside your Intel processor is another 32 processor called ARC that loads an compressed, encrypted microcode. Intel 4th Gen Core processors will shut down within minutes if they detect that the ARC is not running properly. ARC runs while the CPU is sleeping.

      AMD does not get a pass, they're doing that exact thing with something called "TrustZone" technology in an ARM processor within their newer CPUs.

      NSA Chief likes this story

  9. regurg from verge, regurg from ars :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh /. it's sad to see how far you've fallen...

    the verge? really?

  10. Not FULL level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the summary title should read 'MS finally reveals SOME of the Data Windows 10 really collects'

    FTFY

  11. Calling Stallman by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We all know that without the source, it is impossible to verify their claims.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re: Calling Stallman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RMS has been called many things, but as time passes, I've come to realise that there are 2 types of people.

      Those who agree with Richard Stallman.

      And those who don't agree with Richard Stallman, yet.

    2. Re:Calling Stallman by gtall · · Score: 1

      I doubt we could verify their claims even with the source. The source most likely a kludge of past malware masquerading as an OS.

    3. Re:Calling Stallman by Altrag · · Score: 1

      That's relatively irrelevant. Just because its ugly doesn't mean you can't read it if you spend enough time.

      The bigger question is verifying that the source they released is the same as the source they compiled.

    4. Re: Calling Stallman by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      You might think I was making fun of him. I wasn't. I've been calling Stallman "Cassandra of tech" for many years now.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    5. Re: Calling Stallman by fisted · · Score: 1

      $ info su

      23.6.1 Why GNU `su' does not support the `wheel' group

      (This section is by Richard Stallman.)

            Sometimes a few of the users try to hold total power over all the
      rest. For example, in 1984, a few users at the MIT AI lab decided to
      seize power by changing the operator password on the Twenex system and
      keeping it secret from everyone else. (I was able to thwart this coup
      and give power back to the users by patching the kernel, but I wouldn't
      know how to do that in Unix.)

            However, occasionally the rulers do tell someone. Under the usual
      `su' mechanism, once someone learns the root password who sympathizes
      with the ordinary users, he or she can tell the rest. The "wheel
      group" feature would make this impossible, and thus cement the power of
      the rulers.

            I'm on the side of the masses, not that of the rulers. If you are
      used to supporting the bosses and sysadmins in whatever they do, you
      might find this idea strange at first.

      Do you still agree? This is the reason for removal of a security mechanism from GNU.

    6. Re:Calling Stallman by dublin · · Score: 1

      And if you believe "On Trusting Trust" (and if you don't, you're just in denial) you know that it's impossible to verify their claims even *with* the source...

      Ultimately, trust can never be in things, systems, methods, processes, etc. Trust has to have *people* as its object.

      The longer we go, the more Scott McNealy gets proven right when he said, "You have no privacy anyway - get over it." It's entirely possible to assemble the information MS is collecting, and quite a bit more, from other sources - and it's being done all day, every day. That's not an excuse, justification, or rationalization, but it is reality.

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  12. Removed half of stats before disclosing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Our teams have also worked diligently since the Anniversary Update to re-assess what data is strictly necessary at the Basic level to keep Windows 10 devices up to date and secure," says Myerson. "As a result, we have reduced the number of events collected and reduced, by about half, the volume of data we collect at the Basic level."

    I wonder what they felt they needed to remove before they were willing to publish the disclosure.

    1. Re:Removed half of stats before disclosing by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      I had the same thought. If half the stuff was scary enough not to want to admit to, I am sure it was pretty awful.

  13. Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    It's weird to see people get all bent out of shape about Windows collecting data, but then totally ignore the open source projects that really aren't any better.

    Just look at how much data Firefox collects and sends to Mozilla or others.

    Or consider the data that Homebrew collects and sends off.

    Some open source supporters will make claims like "But they're being transparent!" or "But you can opt out!" or some other nonsense like that.

    But guess what? None of that matters!

    The real real problem, which you missed, is that it's possible for this software to collect and transmit such data to begin with.

    Disclosure and "transparency" don't matter. Being able to opt-out doesn't matter.

    Getting rid of any and all software support for such data collection is what matters!

    Until open source projects like Firefox and Homebrew totally remove all support for any and all data collection, we cannot consider them to be any better than Windows, or conversely, we can't consider Windows to be any worse than projects like Firefox and Homebrew.

    1. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Raenex · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Some open source supporters will make claims like "But they're being transparent!" or "But you can opt out!" or some other nonsense like that.

      But guess what? None of that matters!

      It does matter. It's relatively trivial to opt out of Mozilla's data collection and to know what's being collected, whereas that's absolutely not the case with Microsoft. So when you say shit like this:

      "we cannot consider them to be any better than Windows, or conversely, we can't consider Windows to be any worse than projects like Firefox"

      I know you're either shilling for Microsoft or being idealistically stupid about practical differences.

    2. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      Though it is disappointing some of our more favored platforms are data-pimps too, it shouldn't catch you completely by surprise. The marketing model for "free" internet services is more and more data-mining, and less advertising.

      Perhaps the EU restrictions on unfettered data collection will trickle down if the big players are made to comply. We can hope.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you're either shilling for Microsoft or being idealistically stupid about practical differences.

      Why not both?

    4. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That AC's position is much more consistent and sensible than yours is. That AC is saying, ``Data harvesting is wrong.'', while you're saying,``Data harvesting is wrong, except if you can opt out, or except if you know what's being harvested, or except if moz://a is doing it, or except if it's called telemetry, or except if Google Analytics is used to store it, or except if ...''. Face it, data harvesting is wrong. It doesn't matter who is doing it, or how they're doing it, or why they're doing it, or what they're doing with the harvested data. It's wrong. There aren't degrees of wrongness here. All incidents of data harvesting are equally wrong.

    5. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by ScienceofSpock · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, opt-out is all that is required, and both Firefox and Homebrew have it and since they're both open source, if you don't like having to opt out, you can edit the code and remove the data gathering completely. You know who doesn't allow you to opt out? You who what doesn't allow you to edit the code? Microsoft.

      The issue I have with Windows 10 is that it no longer treats you like you are the OWNER. It treats you like a library card holder, lucky to be able to use their 10 year old machine.

    6. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Raenex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All incidents of data harvesting are equally wrong.

      No, the world is not black and white. Otherwise Richard Stallman would be a practical person instead of out on an idealistic island. People like Stallman are useful as standard bearers, but in the real world we deal with practical choices that require us to distinguish between varying degrees of "wrong".

    7. Re: Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That comment shouldn't be at -1. I don't know what Homebrew is, but I had no idea that Firefox collected so much info about me. Now that I know what it's doing I think I'll have to find an alternative browser. I've been meaning to investigate Chromium. Learning what Firefox is doing will make me find the time to see if Chromium is as invasive. I hope that it isn't. Does anyone know of any browsers that truly respect privacy? I thought that Firefox did but now I've learned that I was wrong!

    8. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by chispito · · Score: 1

      It does matter. It's relatively trivial to opt out of Mozilla's data collection and to know what's being collected, whereas that's absolutely not the case with Microsoft.

      It looks like they're making it trivial. Am I wrong?

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    9. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's relatively trivial to opt out of Mozilla's data collection and to know what's being collected

      Don't bullshit us please.

      The problem with such "opt out"-s, Including those as in mozillla's FireFox, is that the mothership is called before you are able to get at the controls to switch it off.

      I think it would have been rather easy to make the first start to be off-line/hold-off actual connecting until the user enters his very first URL so he can set his preferences first, but no. As a result of that I have had to resort to literally "pulling the plug" before installing FF on a machine.

      And don't get me started on the inane "we do not care if you want to keep your current version or if you currently are on a pay-per-byte connection"* method of downloading-and-installing a new version of FF when an unsuspecting user (including myself) the first time selects the "about firefox" from the toolbar (so he can check which version he's actually running).

      *in that sense Mozilla is no hair better than MS.

    10. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by higuita · · Score: 1

      For firefox, you can check, they describe very well what is sent and almost all the data is technical related, no identifiable info, no browsing history... and they inform you of that and you can opt-out

      Now compare that with MS, where it is full of identifiable info, browsing history and even command line (great to catch passwords, "interesting" paths and programs)

      --
      Higuita
    11. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All incidents of data harvesting are equally wrong.

      No, the world is not black and white. Otherwise Richard Stallman would be a practical person instead of out on an idealistic island. People like Stallman are useful as standard bearers, but in the real world we deal with practical choices that require us to distinguish between varying degrees of "wrong".

      Ethically speaking, informed consent is never optional.

      If I steal your car to feed my family, or I steal your car to feed my drug habit, two things remain the same:
      1. Your car was stolen from you.
      2. My theft of your vehicle was/is wrong.

      Maybe you forgive me for stealing to feed my family.
      Maybe my kid (who didn't starve) grows up to be a doctor who saves your life on the operating table.
      Whatever may come of it, none of that can undo the wrong of the theft.

    12. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by sexconker · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Many issues are pretty binary. Data harvesting is wrong. It provides nothing to the user and there is no reason a user would want to enable it.

    13. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I disagree. RMS is supremely practical over long periods of time. His core message is "if you tie your fate to something you don't control, you will get burned." I've never seen this not be correct. Vendors come and go. Sometimes they change their pricing model from reasonable to extortionate. Maybe they discontinue features that were critical to you. Perhaps they throw away the whole thing and start over. But whatever form it takes, the end result is the same: if you can't control it, it will control you.

      Apple and Microsoft have probably been the best major companies for keeping their changes small and manageable. Eventually you had to migrate off VB6. Eventually you had to click the "also compile this for Intel" checkbox in Xcode. But that doesn't change the fact that if you use their platforms, you are subject to their business decisions, even when they conflict with yours.

      Perhaps hypocritically, I'm typing this on a Mac. I've decided that given Apple's track record, they're probably not going to yank the rug out from under me overnight. But you can bet that all the code I write is in FOSS languages and deployed to FOSS operating systems. I can change my desktop OS - with some pain and gnashing of teeth to be sure - without compromising the things I design. That's because RMS is correct: he's convinced many of us that it's practical to choose open platforms instead of closed shininess where it really matters.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    14. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by mandark1967 · · Score: 1

      Maybe your kid(who didn't starve) grows up to be the drug addict who steals my car again.

      you BOTH suck and I want my cars back!

      --
      Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
    15. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an idiot and can see multiple reasons why data harvesting would be beneficial to an end user - end use cases of hardware and software dictating where company efforts might be directed, bug finding, and driver needs.

      jeez. I don't want it either, but let's not pretend there's not reason to enable it.

    16. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the BIG difference is that you can decide to use another browser (or opt-out), because it is only software on top of the operating system.
      However, if the operating system ITSELF is sending personal information, there is simply nothing you can do about it.
      Installing another browser won't help and there is no opting-out.

      It's the difference between replacing a defect or malfunctioning part, or a frame that is rotten into the core.

    17. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the fallacy of the false equality.

      A doing something which is bad and people ignoring it, does not mean it's ok for B to do the same. FFS kids are taught this in fucking preschool, how can you fail at this?

      Secondly you completely fail to realise that your PC and your 'phone are completely different realms, are you really that obtuse, or are you deliberately being disingenuous?

      Thirdly, there's a fuckton of difference between someone being upfront with what they collect and let's you easily opt out, and someone who's completely opaque and irregularly but consistently resets your settings in order to maximize their data collection.

      You are either an utter moron, or a completely shameless shill.

    18. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Altrag · · Score: 2

      From what I've seen, yes you are. They're making it fairly trivial to reduce the data collection (from Full to Basic) but I don't see anything about disabling it all together.

    19. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I guess it depends what qualifies as data harvesting. Having crash reports automatically sent off to the developer could help to fix bugs that users just didn't bother to report. The bug can then be fixed, and fixing bugs in software definitely does provide something of value to the users. However, sending out a crash report with pertinent information about what may have caused the crash could very much be described as data harvesting.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    20. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well i guess it's fine and dandy then. Good work solving the case!

    21. Re: Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When I googled it, I found that the neither the Chromium browser, nor the parent product Chrome do any data mining at all.

      </sarcasm>

      As for alternate browsers, your choices are:
      Brave (based on Blink/Chromium, supposedly privacy friendly, built in ad-blocking via AdBlock Plus - allows 'acceptable' ads)
      Vivaldi (also based on Blink/Chromium, privacy ?? - closed source)
      Opera (yet another browser based on Blink/Chromium, may or may not send telemetry to China)

    22. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not correct.

      In most casts, added telemetry means less security and stability issues (because someone else experienced a blip first, they can stop it).

      In the case of Credit or Loyalty cards, people are intentionally giving up privacy for a few cents.

    23. Re: Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you install Firefox, there's a toolbar at the bottom you have to dismiss (unless it's still sitting there) that specifically mentions privacy...

      No other browser is any better. Each brower simply reports to a different master... If you think any company is any better, it's only because they haven't told anyone the data collection that they're doing while their marketing is "oh, we don't sell user information". Well ya, no sane mega-company would; Google certainly doesn't. They simply sell ad space -- your info never leaves Google since that would give competitors the information Google needs to target ads.

    24. Re: Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we all agree that upmodding parent proves we're having shilly weather today? Who the fuck can say, with a straight face, they're ditching Firefox for Chromium over data harvesting concerns?

    25. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      Some open source supporters will make claims like "But they're being transparent!" or "But you can opt out!" or some other nonsense like that.

      But guess what? None of that matters!

      It does matter. It's relatively trivial to opt out of Mozilla's data collection and to know what's being collected, whereas that's absolutely not the case with Microsoft. So when you say shit like this:

      "we cannot consider them to be any better than Windows, or conversely, we can't consider Windows to be any worse than projects like Firefox"

      I know you're either shilling for Microsoft or being idealistically stupid about practical differences.

      Yet you still have to take Mozilla for their word just like Microsoft. Both companies could be lying about what they collect. You trust one but not the other when the data could be identical.

    26. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its also problematic in that crash dumps usually contain memory dumps as well. Perhaps the computer is processing information that cannot be legally disclosed due to laws like HIPPA. If the computer automatically sends the crash dump with that data, the sending company is now in violation, and those penalties are huge.

    27. Re: Don't forget about open source projects. by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Ummmm and Pale Moon.

    28. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    29. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If I steal your car to feed my family, or I steal your car to feed my drug habit, two things remain the same:
      > 1. Your car was stolen from you.
      > 2. My theft of your vehicle was/is wrong.

      You have no basis for arguing that (2) is a universal moral precept, you are just relying on prior distribution.

      There is no substantive difference between that and say, some revolutionaries taking back sovereignty (and ownership/control over vast areas of land) from a group which claimed it before and took benefit from their ownership, or a starving kid stealing from your trashcan during a world-wide famine.

    30. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I disagree. RMS is supremely practical over long periods of time. His core message is "if you tie your fate to something you don't control, you will get burned." I've never seen this not be correct.

      If you took that core message truly to heart, you'd be out on wilderness survival training near your prepper bug out shelter right now. The rest of us depend on lots of things, not just the software in our computers. Don't get me wrong, all other things being equal I'd take open source too but all other things are rarely equal...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    31. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's weird to see people get all bent out of shape about Windows collecting data, but then totally ignore the open source projects that really aren't any better.

      Just look at how much data Firefox collects and sends to Mozilla or others.

      But I notice that the Mozilla link listed gives instructions on how to turn most or all of Firefox's monitoring off.

    32. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2

      I don't think that's a good analogy. Most things in life are fungible: while we might prefer Safeway's canned corn to Costco's, for all intents and purposes one can substitute for the other. Marketing aside, Shell and ExxonMobil gasoline are mostly identical. I like Levis jeans, but there are other brands on the market and my Kohl's shirt and Target socks are 100% compatible (well, my wife might make fun of my pairings, but I don't go into anaphylaxis if the brands don't match).

      The same is true for Debian and Red Hat - while I have my preferences, software I write on one will run on the other with minimal tweaking. Linux is the product I need and there are many, many vendors who will provide it to me. If Red Hat closes tomorrow, I'm a couple of Dockerfile lines away from not noticing or caring. That's absolutely not true of macOS or Windows. Again, I don't think Apple or Microsoft is likely to pull the plug on them tomorrow, but they could (and have) so substantially modify them that stuff no longer runs unchanged on them. If/when they do, there's literally not a thing you or I could do about it but ride the unsupported legacy tail as long as we can while we rushedly port to new platforms.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    33. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Yet you still have to take Mozilla for their word just like Microsoft. Both companies could be lying about what they collect.

      One of them is open source, the other is closed source. Furthermore, I don't even run a binary directly from Mozilla, I use a binary from Debian. And finally, while ultimately there is some trust involved, until now Microsoft has been dedicated to non-transparency and being aggressive about collecting information, while Mozilla is relatively straightforward and transparent.

    34. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So opt in for these automatic reports then. I prefer to send a manual report, or just use some other sw. Being an open-source user, I tend to have a couple of choices for nearly every use case. Devs can test properly and ship working stuff in the first place - no real need for 'telemetry'.

    35. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by dublin · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not shilling for Microsoft (check my posting history, especially back around 1997-2000 - I've been brutally and vocally critical of Redmond's abuses), but this is a good step that should be applauded.

      The reality today is that Microsoft is among the most open and forthcoming of modern tech companies in disclosing what information it collects and how it's used.
      They're not offering all the options we'd like to see, for sure, but it really seems to me that they're close to leading among big companies, and certainly way out ahead of the likes of Google, Facebook, and Apple, to name just a few of their competitors in one space or another. And for that, they deserve some credit...

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    36. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by dublin · · Score: 1

      Again, with WSL/Ubuntu for Windows, I've got a dev platform that gives me truly the best fusion of the Windows and Linux worlds. This is arguably superior to Apple's approach from an openness point of view...

      If you're writing code to run in the cloud and/or containers, then it really doesn't make much difference what desktop OS you use, so long as it's one that makes things easy and has a good set of tools that make you productive - that's kinda the whole point of those sorts of abstractions in the first place...

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    37. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the BIG difference is that you can decide to use another browser

      ... as easily as you can choose another operating system. In other words, don't bulshit us. Again.

      And no, a reasoning" that you "just cannot do without Windows" (ofcourse always needing the very last version, as if any before it ofcourse isn't worth shite) isn't resoning at all, just an easy cop-out. There are multiple versions of Linux out there, go pick one.

      And in relation to that "must have the latest version", I just read that C# is now 15 years old. Noone even thinks about replacing a programming language because its a couple of years old, but if your OS is than you're (at least) considered out of touch with reality. Go figure. :-)

    38. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL Safeway? Welcome to the future, Mr. 1950s. Today our grocery stores are called "Ralphs" and "Vons".

    39. Re:Don't forget about open source projects. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      LOL Safeway? Welcome to the future, Mr. 1950s. Today our grocery stores are called "Ralphs" and "Vons".

      Aw, hello little SoCal! Up in Bay Area, we didn't realize you had Internet already. Welcome aboard!

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  14. How about 'NO' data collection? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

    How about you don't 'collect' anything on anyone for any reason, you bastards?

  15. What non-diagnostic data is collected? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Tech Net article lists the diagnostic data. Is any non-diagnostic data collected?

    1. Re:What non-diagnostic data is collected? by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

      Any data is diagnostic if you say it will help you fix issues.

      But yes, full commands of apps that request elevation, personally identifiable IDs like username, xbox IDs, etc. The list is bloody massive.

    2. Re:What non-diagnostic data is collected? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Username logged into the machine, XBox IDs (that Microsoft already has), and command lines (of applications usually run through GUIs that are trying to elevate privileges).

      People are going to continue screaming about Microsoft constantly recording your microphone, cameras, keystrokes, mouse movements, screen captures, and uploading all of your files and gmail to their analytics server, because of course. For now, they'll try to squeeze something out about usernames and XBox IDs being extra-secret.

      Wait until they realize people are logging onto Windows 10 using an outlook.com user account, and log-on events cause the machine to contact Microsoft to validate your password.

    3. Re:What non-diagnostic data is collected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "The list is bloody massive."

      And this is after they've drastically reduced what they use to collect. lol.

    4. Re:What non-diagnostic data is collected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Username logged into the machine, XBox IDs

      Well, chances are most people have a credit card on their xbox account, so were not even anonymously unique ID's. Microsoft knows exactly who you are.

  16. Option to turn ALL DATA COLLECTION OFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Private Industry shouldn't be able to just bypass our Charters of Rights and Freedoms to make a buck without at least giving users a choice in the matter.

    The Canadian Government is not allowed to do so, so they just outsource it to their friends in the U.S. intelligence establishment, who gain it through either access to data in transit or with their 'Witting Industry Partners' as the C.I.A. leaks have shown us.

  17. A Missing Detail by surfdaddy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They are transparent about the Creator's Update. But they have reduced the telemetry by about half, saying that they realized they didn't find all telemetry useful. So you don't really know what they *have been* collecting prior to the Creator's Update. For all we know they've removed a bunch of more onerous details that could have *upset* us.

    1. Re:A Missing Detail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this guy up. This is the big deal to me.
      If someone only discloses to you what they will take from you instead of what they have been taking from you for the past year, then that omission is very telling.

    2. Re:A Missing Detail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hm good point. Instead of removing data collection they "decided they didn't need after careful study" maybe they removed data collection they decided would be detrimental to PR.

    3. Re:A Missing Detail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are idiots modding this comment as Insightful!?

      Google did exactly this several years ago! But oh my, dear Google just made a mistake. With Microsoft everything is a conspiracy.

  18. Perhaps scale it back a bit. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Sperm Count" (listed on page two) seems unnecessary.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Perhaps scale it back a bit. by brianerst · · Score: 2

      They need this information to see whether to offer you the family plan.

  19. Too little too late... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 4, Informative

    Look at the f*cking thing and see how reasonable it is:
    https://technet.microsoft.com/...

    It's completely ridiculous. Windows 10 is basically spyware disguised as an OS at this point.

    1. Re:Too little too late... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's completely ridiculous. Windows 10 is basically spyware disguised as an OS at this point.

      Well, to be fair, it's no longer disguised as an OS. Only the full extent of the spying is [potentially] disguised now.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Too little too late... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      outside of the anything is too much, would be nice to see an article where someone created use cases of this data, for good or bad(which is relative to you being the user or MS). Anyhting les is tired and will garner no mainstream support that will go anywhere...but if someone took 8 or 10 of those items and described how to determine where you live, if your home right now, do you have smart home stuff like nice locks one can digitally pick that scares..but I don't care about them knowing my motherboard or driver version per se, of course if that version has a compromise where one can determine your IP location, you have x,y,x versions that have known vulnerabilities with firewall Newt, version 3....it has to be put in real terms to reach the masses or its just preaching to like minded people who may or may not be affected.

    3. Re:Too little too late... by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Except for not collecting the same kinds of information.

  20. Nothing to see here by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

    Any company can publicly change policies overnight and then change them back the next day quietly and worse than ever.

    If EULA's are actually legal then we need to regulate them so that it's not a one sided contract with no measurable benefit to the customer.

    1. Re: Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or just don't accept one-sided EULAs and use FreeBSD...

  21. Reduced by Half by tsqr · · Score: 2

    Is "reduced by half" anything like "increased by a factor of 2"?

    1. Re:Reduced by Half by sexconker · · Score: 1

      No.
      "Reduced by half" means you reduce X by one half of X, yielding one half of X.
      X - 1/2 X = 1/2 X

      "Increased by a factor of 2" means you increase X by two X, yielding three X.
      X + 2 X = 3 X

      Nearly everyone uses "increased by a factor of 2" incorrectly, however. They typically add one to the "factor of". When they say something has increased by a factor of 2, they mean it has increased by a factor of one and is now double what it used to be. They neglect the word "by", which means the following clause indicates the amount of change and not the new result.

    2. Re:Reduced by Half by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Reduced by half means x-x/2, not just x/2. In the case of the latter, the words "reduced by" could confusingly change it to mean x/2^-1.

  22. Cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excuse me nice gentlemen. I don't mean to interrupt but, I've been searching news articles trying to find my cat. Have you seen my cat?

    1. Re:Cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXiIx4OqcXw

  23. Direct Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/itpro/windows/configure/windows-diagnostic-data

  24. Privacy and UI are both poor in Windows 10 by no1nose · · Score: 1

    Unless Microsoft brings back the Windows 7 UI in Windows 11 I think I will either move on to a Mac or Lunix distribution for my next computer. They will also need to scrap the data collection and advertising features in Windows 11.

    1. Re:Privacy and UI are both poor in Windows 10 by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      There will be no Windows 11. Windows 10 will be the last OS, like Apple's OS X.

    2. Re:Privacy and UI are both poor in Windows 10 by no1nose · · Score: 1

      Do they plan for this to be the last UI they make as well? It is too bad they settled on an even numbered release for all eternity.

    3. Re:Privacy and UI are both poor in Windows 10 by Megane · · Score: 1

      They only "settled" on 10 because 9 was slashed and burned over 15 years earlier when certain small developers (*COUGH*javaruntime*COUGH*) tried to detect Windows 95/98 by comparing the leftmost characters of the version string, equivalent to the regex "^Windows 9.*"

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:Privacy and UI are both poor in Windows 10 by Altrag · · Score: 1

      So if they don't revert the fairly small changes in the Win10 over Win7 UI, you're going to go to something entirely different? That seems kind of counter-productive.

      The data collection issue is a solid reason, though I'm not sure I'd bet the horse on Apple being enormously better, especially over the long-term and whatever "features" they decide to you have to use because Apple always knows best right?

    5. Re:Privacy and UI are both poor in Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... isn't that the developers' fault? Why would Microsoft kowtow to that?

    6. Re:Privacy and UI are both poor in Windows 10 by Megane · · Score: 1

      How new are you? Microsoft kowtows to EVERYTHING done by brain-dead developers when making new Windows versions.

      And I think you missed the hidden sarcasm, this was in the official Java runtime from Sun.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  25. I miss the critical information by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Why should I believe you?"

    Time and again we have been lied and misled by Microsoft. Give me one good reason I should believe this.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:I miss the critical information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      M$ always lies to their customers. No one with more than 2 brain cells should trust them.

    2. Re:I miss the critical information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me one good reason I should believe this.

      Because that's what they offering, if you don't believe them or are not ok with it then don't use it. The bigger question is why are you still bothering with Microsoft? I use Windows only for very specific things that can't be done on other OSes.

      By now I would think Microsoft stories on slashdot would get pretty much zero visibility because all slashdotters would be using Linux. No wonder the Year of the Linux Desktop never arrived, all the self-professed geeks still use Windows and then just whine about it.

  26. And it has to be using by kilodelta · · Score: 2

    Bing to upload the stuff. I block bing at my firewalls and the logs constantly show my Win10 laptop trying to connect to Bing.

    1. Re:And it has to be using by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I block bing at my firewalls

      So you cut off about 10% of windows telemetry.

  27. Edited MSDN Article about Full Levels... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You should look into the msdn historical edit article where they showed that microsoft removed verbiage on it's MSDN page about collecting even worse information such as your documents and allowing microsoft employees investigating any crash reports sent by your machine to actually remotely access your machine and view your documents and run your programs.

    Not trolling either. It was a link passed around here awhile ago and microsoft even sent a takedown to the wayback machine which previously had the edit but now does not. Yet on a different microsoft site that lists wiki-style diff's of it's pages, it's still there.

    Someone find it please. They are backpedaling so hard on this it's sad.

  28. ISP by woozlewuzzle · · Score: 1

    Good thing Microsoft isn't an ISP or Americans would be freaking out.

  29. Solution: Find a way to get an Enterprise build by ErichTheRed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We're rolling out Windows 10 in a very low-bandwidth environment, and in some cases a no-bandwidth environment. (Yes, they still exist today!) Turning off telemetry was one of the reasons we upgraded the OEM licenses from Pro to Enterprise -- there's just no need to use precious connection time sending usage data to Microsoft. And yes, that means "paying twice" for the OS, once to the OEM and once for the Enterprise subscription.

    In my opinion, Microsoft did a very poor job of communicating what the difference between Home, Pro and Enterprise was. Basically, anyone with Home and Pro is getting the OS for "free" in exchange for telemetry data and information they can sell to marketers, period. Pro is Home with the ability to join a classic AD domain. This is very different from the days of Windows 7, where Pro had enough features to make it the default OS for business deployment. What Microsoft is doing is pulling more and more features under Enterprise, including the ability to opt out of constant feature changes. The result is that most large companies are buying Enterprise upgrades and getting on the subscription treadmill.

    I think the best thing they could do right now is to let anybody buy the Enterprise version as a one-off, or make a complete shut-off of the telemetry available but slightly difficult to find in every edition of the OS. Even if they made the telemetry controllable by a few hard to find registry keys, the vast majority of consumers wouldn't touch any of the default settings and they'd still be getting data from them. Microsoft just got done "giving away" Windows 10 to millions of Windows 7 and 8 users in the form of the free upgrade, and the indication is that they will be on the same major release forever from now on, just releasing big update packages once or twice a year. Enterprise customers are subsidizing this development by still paying license fees in the form of subscriptions -- those millions of PCs that were upgraded for free only have the revenue stream of the marketing data coming in until they're replaced. And if Microsoft sticks to their promises, there will be no more revenue for traditional boxed software upgrades either -- no Windows 11 release they can ship out on DVDs to stores is coming.

    Do I like being a product for marketing companies to mine data on? Not really -- and I do think Microsoft should be transparent about why they're doing what they're doing. I think all the companies doing this (Microsoft, Apple, Google, etc.) are going to have to find a new way to operate once the social media and advertising bubbles pop too...right now all of them are subsidizing their phone OS development with the fact that they have access to very personal data on a device you carry with you 24 hours a day.

    1. Re:Solution: Find a way to get an Enterprise build by sexconker · · Score: 1

      How do you disable the telemetry in Enterprise? From what I see, it's still limited to "Basic" on both Windows 10 Enterprise and Windows Server 2016.

      Is this limited to the "LTSB" versions of Windows 10? What about 2016?
      Does Enterprise offer a "fuck you, don't auto update" setting?

    2. Re:Solution: Find a way to get an Enterprise build by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The result is that most large companies are buying Enterprise upgrades and getting on the subscription treadmill."

      To be fair, I don't know of any large enterprises in my career that didn't buy enterprise agreements and software assurance.

    3. Re:Solution: Find a way to get an Enterprise build by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LTSB is the only branch where you can completely opt out of feature updates. Security updates are still delivered, but you can disable Windows Update if you want. This is about as close to the classic "Release --> Service Packs + Security Patches --> New Release" model that Microsoft is going to let you get to these days. They promise 10 years of support for each LTSB spin of the OS.

      Enterprise and Education builds of Windows 10 have a "Security" level of telemetry that limits the collection of data to the basics. Home and Pro don't allow you to set this setting. Here's the link. There are also other Enterprise and Education only features, like the ability to turn off Cortana. LTSB versions also don't come with a lot of the online "apps" because they're not updated on the same cycle as the OS.

    4. Re:Solution: Find a way to get an Enterprise build by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      Enterprise and Educational are the only two versions of Win10 that officially allow you to use the Group Policy Editor to entirely disable telemetry and automatic updating. Pro used to have access to some of the Group Policies, and some of them are still listed, but changing them has no effect at all anymore, and Home never had access.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    5. Re:Solution: Find a way to get an Enterprise build by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That's true. It's mostly the small businesses getting the squeeze. I think one of Microsoft's goals is to get everyone on a subscription for Windows. They probably figure it's easiest to start with businesses by basically forcing them to all buy Enterprise versions of Windows no matter how small the business is. Next, they'll come after the home users.

  30. Privacy settings by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Z0MG they collect UR privacy settings before and after upgrades!! They must want to make sure your privacy settings have been successfully forgotten.

    Fields.TelClientSynthetic.PrivacySettingsAfterCreatorsUpdate.PreUpgradeSettings

    Fields.TelClientSynthetic.PrivacySettingsAfterCreatorsUpdate.PostUpgradeSettings

    HKLM_SensorPermissionState.SensorPermissionState
    HKLM_LocationPlatform.Status
    HKCU_LocationSyncEnabled.AcceptedPrivacyPolicy
    HKLM_AllowTelemetry.AllowTelemetry
    HKLM_TailoredExperiences.TailoredExperiencesWithDiagnosticDataEnabled
    HKLM_AdvertisingID.Enabled

  31. Too little, too late by Nunya666 · · Score: 1

    I will still install Linux for family members who need a new laptop, or are just stuck with broken M$ Windows/Winblows/Windoze installations.

  32. I don't care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one is listening, but here is what I'm saying:

    MS really, really, f'd this up. I will not tolerate my OS phoning home with any data at all, unless I tell it that I want that. Which I won't do.

    As a result, I have side-loaded or fully loaded Ubuntu Mate on all the machines I am using. And you know what? I don't need Windows. I don't have time for games, and that's the only reason I can think of that I might want to use it.

    So, I'm gone, and I'm never coming back.

    Never, possibly unless this crap goes away entirely, with a guarantee that it will never be re-introduced.

    Which won't happen.... so, I'm gone, and I'm never coming back.

    Question: I will be forced to use Windows 10 at work soon. Is there any reasonable way to browse the internet on the platform, without giving data to MS? Or should I just bring in a linux laptop?

    1. Re:I don't care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS really, really, f'd this up. I will not tolerate my OS phoning home with any data at all, unless I tell it that I want that. Which I won't do.

      If compared to an Android smartphone, how much data collection (telemetry) does Google do compared with Win 10?

    2. Re:I don't care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or your ISP/cell phone provider? They collect data, they have personal data, they track you. I'd be much more worried about my primary communications device that I carry with me than my desktop computer.

    3. Re:I don't care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know - but if you are implying that the situation there is worse than Windows 10, I'll be finding out, and doing away with my android phone if the situation can't be mitigated.

      This is the actual problem with Windows 10 - I spent hours investigating, changing registry entries, and running software to turn the telemetry off. Problem solved, right? Well, no - given the tactics MS used during the rollout of the OS, forced installs and fundamentally deceptive user interface changes - they have convinced me that they will do anything, including turn the telemetry back on in their next forced Windows Update.

      In short, MS made it impossible for me to trust them - or even lie to myself that I could trust them enough to simply use the OS.

      Once again, speaking into the darkness - I'm gone, and I'm not coming back.

    4. Re:I don't care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't do important things on my cellphone - but, point taken. That non-smart phone is looking better all the time...

  33. ~220 KB of text there... by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

    A bit over 220 KB of text in just shy of 3800 lines to describe what they collect in "basic" form? GFY, MS. Too late. I will continue doing my part in (somewhat futile, but oh well) limiting the spread. This sort of horse shit is perhaps 40% of the reason why I will never voluntarily use your operating system.

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    1. Re:~220 KB of text there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So all I need to avoid ads is to pretend I'm under 13?

  34. Reduced? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    As a result, we have reduced the number of events collected and reduced, by about half, the volume of data we collect at the Basic level.

    Better compression algorithm combined with consolidating events?

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  35. Re: Solution: Find a way to get an Enterprise buil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm getting tired of people who keep mentioning Apple doing the same things. Either post a link with some proof or STFU. Stop dragging apples name thru the mud with these other advertising companies.

  36. list incomplete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't find the "number of times user opens task manager and tries to kill something he doesn't launched"

  37. W10privacy & Spybot Antibeacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    W10privacy & Spybot Antibeacon take care of all of this.

  38. "to help keep Windows up to date" by WaffleMonster · · Score: 4, Informative

    The justifications offered by MS are as ridiculous as they are hilarious.

    "Activity for run of the Transient Account Manager that determines if any user accounts should be deleted for devices set up for Shared PC mode to help keep Windows up to date. Deleting unused user accounts on shared devices frees up disk space to improve Windows Update success rates"

    Seriously so you have to know how many local accounts, when I add, change and remove them. When they first login and their sids I keep on my own machine because there is some insanely comical correlation between local accounts and available disk space?

    It's not like you are not already explicitly stealing volume information via Census.Storage and SetupPlatformTel.SetupPlatformTelActivityEvent. And who the fuck installs software without check for available disk space first? Is the success rate of an action really undeterminable prior to taking it because disk space? I don't think even Microsoft is stupid enough to believe their own BS.

    Also love the generic key/value data access schemes where the full list of available keys that can be transmitted are not specified anywhere.. Only the top level interface to transfer the data.

    FieldName - Retrieves the event name/data point.
    Value - Retrieves the value associated with the corresponding event name

    If your going to be transparent don't be transparently slimy. You may impress end users with better things to do with reams of context deprived technobabble but there are plenty of people in the world as smart or smarter than the people who compiled this crap.

  39. Diagnostics.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A fantastic list of what is collected in the diagnostic category.
    A list of categories of the rest of the data collected would be nice.

  40. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  41. But who are they giving that data to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to know who Microsoft are sharing/selling my data to please!

  42. blackbird by spongman · · Score: 2

    one solution is to use blackbird to turn off all telemetry and uninstall builtin spy/adware. be warned, though, i had some basic things break (like start menu search) after running it.

    1. Re:blackbird by jittles · · Score: 1

      one solution is to use blackbird to turn off all telemetry and uninstall builtin spy/adware. be warned, though, i had some basic things break (like start menu search) after running it.

      I don't see any info on who actually writes or maintains this blackbird software. They say they're a Non-Profit Org but which? And under whose control? And is there any source code to see what this software does?

  43. Did you even look at what data Firefox sends?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they describe very well what is sent and almost all the data is technical related, no identifiable info, no browsing history...

    Did you even look at what data Firefox sends?! You must not have to have made such an incorrect statement as you just made.

    Their page clearly lists various types of identifiers and browsing history, including such things as: "IP address", "location", "phone number", "email address", "URLs", "information about visited sites", "terms you type in the Awesome Bar or Search Bar", "website domain", "Google advertising ID", "active URL at time of crash" and "personal information".

    In case you don't believe me, let's look at some examples from their page:


    "Once per day, Firefox sends the following info to Mozilla when it checks for browser updates: your Firefox version information, language preference, operating system, and version."

    "Firefox contacts Mozilla once per day to check for add-on information to check for malicious add-ons. This includes, for example: browser version, OS and version, locale, total number of requests, time of last request, time of day, IP address, and the list of add-ons you have installed."

    "Firefox sends Mozilla a monthly request to look up your location at a country level using your IP address."

    "Some Mozilla sponsored snippets are interactive and allow you to optionally share your phone number or email address. For example, you can enter your phone number to receive an SMS to install Firefox on Android. Your information is received and handled by our email and mobile marketing vendor."

    "This data includes, for example: device hardware, operating system, Firefox version, add-ons (count and type), timing of browser events, rendering, session restores, length of session, how old a profile is, count of crashes, and count of pages."

    "Firefox may send metadata, including URLs associated with the downloaded file, to the SafeBrowsing service. "

    "Firefox that sends Mozilla usage, performance, and responsiveness statistics about user interface features, memory, and hardware configuration. Your IP address is also collected as a part of a standard web log."

    "When Telemetry is enabled, certain short-term experiments may collect information about visited sites."

    "Firefox sends to Mozilla data relating to the tiles such as number of clicks, impressions, your IP address, locale information, and tile specific data (e.g., position and size of grid)."

    "Firefox sends Mozilla a request once to look up your location at a country level using your IP address."

    "Firefox may send the terms you type in the Awesome Bar or Search Bar to your Default Search Engine to retrieve suggestions"

    "Firefox may send “Referral Data” such as the website domain"

    "Firefox sends Referral Data to our mobile analytics vendor, and also includes a Google advertising ID, IP address, timestamp, country, locale, operating system, and app version."

    "Firefox records and sends Referral Data to Mozilla as part of Firefox Health Report. "

    "Firefox may use several pieces of data to determine your location, including your operating systems geolocation features, Wi-Fi networks, cell phone towers, or IP address."

    "This report contains technical information for us to improve Firefox including why Firefox crashed, the active URL at time of crash, and the state of computer memory during the crash. The crash report we receive may include personal information."

    "Firefox sends information to Mozilla, including the list of add-ons you have installed, Firefox version information, and your IP address."

  44. Microsoft Compatibility Telemetry by neoRUR · · Score: 2

    I have:
    Set the settings to Basic.

    Disabled it in the registry keys:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\DataCollection
    added the keyword AllowTelemetry and set it to 0.

    Changed the Group Policy level to Disabled:
    Computer Configuration\Administrative Templates\Windows Components\Data Collection And Preview Builds\Allow Telemetry
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\DataCollection

    Disabled the services, and killed the processes:
    - Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service.
    Connected User Experiences and Telemetry process
    dmwappushsvc process

    Rebooted the machines

    And the Microsoft Compatibility Telemetry still shows up once and awhile.

    And this has happened on several machines.
    So its still there and still comes back and its still collecting data.

    1. Re: Microsoft Compatibility Telemetry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reg key effectively does nothing.
      You need to disable Windows Update and Background Intelligent Transfer Service Windows Services.
      Disable Defender Windows Service
      Delete Cortana.
      Delete OneDrive.
      Uninstall Office.
      Uninstall Office365.
      Disable and corrupt any virus or malware monitoring applications you cannot install.

      Install an Ad Blocker for your browser, and never use flash.

      From my external router, this completely stops all traffic from Windows I do not explicitly generate.

      This can be done with any version of Windows, including Home, and takes about 15 minutes.

  45. Stupid deflection attempt is stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whataboutism justifies nothing.

    Guilty.

  46. Hosts not Firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most efficient ad & threat blocker there is

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-5 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/

    Ads & malware rob speed, security & privacy

    Hosts add speed (hardcodes/adblocks), security (bad sites/poisoned dns), reliability (dns down), & anonymity (dns requestlogs/trackers) natively

    Host&s stops all traffic even better than a fierwall to unknown hosts and ports all while us less powr

    Hosts better than AV at detecting malicious software and stop$ in tracks

    Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivirus + less security bugs/complexity

    * Using what you already NATIVELY have, built into your TCP/IP stack running in FASTOR kernelmode!

    Able to keep Grandm4 and you kid sister out of your porn stash

    Generate nightly when I sodomize my cat

    So simple it won't actually provide any protection that a small child couldn't get around

    APK

    P.S. - Safe because it will only keep script kiddies at bay on the best day

  47. DNS is flawd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most efficient ad & threat blocker there is

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-5 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/

    Ads & malware rob speed, security & privacy

    Hosts add speed (hardcodes/adblocks), security (bad sites/poisoned dns), reliability (dns down), & anonymity (dns requestlogs/trackers) natively

    Host&s stops all traffic even better than a fierwall to unknown hosts and ports all while us less powr

    Hosts better than AV at detecting malicious software and stop$ in tracks

    Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivirus + less security bugs/complexity

    * Using what you already NATIVELY have, built into your TCP/IP stack running in FASTOR kernelmode!

    Able to keep Grandm4 and you kid sister out of your porn stash

    Generate nightly when I sodomize my cat

    So simple it won't actually provide any protection that a small child couldn't get around

    APK

    P.S. - Safe because it will only keep script kiddies at bay on the best day

    1. Re:DNS is flawd by Megane · · Score: 1

      Generate nightly when I sodomize my cat

      Bazinga! But what if I prefer to use less or tee instead of cat?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  48. The fact that the system has an option to make by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    adds more interesting by choosing to share your advertising ID tells me this is not just spyware but addware as well. How about a LMTFA option on by default (leave me the fuck alone). Why is an operating system displaying adds to begin with. Not an OS I want anywhere near me for any reason. Microsoft is far from getting it.

  49. Hosts mor efficient no FW needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most efficient ad & threat blocker there is

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-5 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/

    Ads & malware rob speed, security & privacy

    !!!Hosts add speed (hardcodes/adblocks), security (bad sites/poisoned dns), reliability (dns down), & anonymity (dns requestlogs/trackers) natively!!!

    Host&s stops all traffic even better than a fierwall to unknown hosts and ports all while us less powr

    Hosts better than AV at detecting malicious software and stop$ in tracks

    ++Hosts makes me cum in my own ass++

    Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivirus + less security bugs/complexity

    * Using what you already NATIVELY have, built into your TCP/IP stack running in FASTOR kernelmode!

    Able to keep Grandm4 and you kid sister out of your porn stash

    Generate nightly when I sodomize my cat

    So simple it won't actually provide any protection that a small child couldn't get around

    APK

    P.S. - Safe because it will only keep script kiddies at bay on the best day

    1. Re:Hosts mor efficient no FW needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows completely ignores the host file when it sends back it's telemetry. Your only option is block it with a firewall. Hosts is useless.

  50. Before I read ANY comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must say Bull fucking shit sir.

  51. I'd like to know 1 thing from arseholetechnica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See my subject: Who got BITCHSLAPPED & BANNED from the whitehouse by President Trump? Ars DID (CNN = Arstechnica = THE VERY FAKE NEWS) hahahahahahaha (losers)...

    APK

    P.S.=> Biggest bunch of underachieving PUSSY losers I ever saw online (especially fatass Jay Little, Jeremy Reimer, WHIMP w/ a mail order Chinese Bride, & GOITERMAN Peter "not too" Bright)... apk

  52. Disable with hosts insteed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most efficient ad & threat blocker there is

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-5 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/

    Ads & malware rob speed, security & privacy

    Hosts add speed (hardcodes/adblocks), security (bad sites/poisoned dns), reliability (dns down), & anonymity (dns requestlogs/trackers) natively

    Host&s stops all traffic even better than a fierwall to unknown hosts and ports all while us less powr

    Hosts better than AV at detecting malicious software and stop$ in tracks

    Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivirus + less security bugs/complexity

    * Using what you already NATIVELY have, built into your TCP/IP stack running in FASTOR kernelmode!

    Able to keep Grandm4 and you kid sister out of your porn stash

    Generate nightly when I sodomize my cat

    So simple it won't actually provide any protection that a small child couldn't get around

    APK

    P.S. - Safe because it will only keep script kiddies at bay on the best day

  53. Citations? by Optic7 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At the very least, they admit that they:

    - Uniquely identify you, your device, and your location/network.
    - Record what you navigate and search on the internet.
    - Record what you watch, listen to, and read.
    - Record your purchase history.

    Any citations for these (like field names in that huge list) that you could provide? I searched for some keywords to find anything related what you mentioned (ex: web, browse, history, internet, purchase, etc) and could not find anything as nefarious sounding as your summary. Perhaps I'm not looking closely enough and it's a huge list, so citations would be appreciated. I really would like to know if they are collecting the info you listed. Thanks.

    1. Re:Citations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I can't see any of the last three but maybe someone can? Not that I trust that this list is complete.

      Disclaimer: linux user for nearly 20 years with certified hatred of microsoft.

    2. Re:Citations? by wildstoo · · Score: 1

      I did the same as you and came to the same conclusion; at the basic level, they don't say they are doing the first two, and they are only doing the second two for purchases from the Windows Store and/or Media Center, which should be self-evident.

      I cannot see where it says they're recording your keystrokes, web browsing, music, movies, books or anything else. Maybe they are and they've just given it a clever innocent-sounding name, but that seems like a risk not worth taking when the EU is already nipping at your balls over privacy.

  54. It's all in the timing by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    I'm an Win10 insider receiving Win10 6 months early. Reading it's TOS I never installed or wished to be part of Win10. The way it read, if connected to another's system it was free game for data collection as well.

    Gaming won out, just last week I purchased Win10 Pro (for it's grpedit.msc (group editor)).

    This change only requires me to disable licensing to install what I want now (a very old and proven version of Comodo firewall).

  55. Like they've never lied before by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    My trust was broken as far back as Vista. I've been using nothing but UNIX based operating systems ever since and though it's been quite a learning experience to say the least, the headaches evolved are entirely my own fault for "playing around" rather than being caused by a corporation forcing them on me. I have a laptop that's about 9 years old running Linux kernel 4.10 32-bit PAE (for more RAM access) just fine with new software, no lag, and no weird privacy agreement because it's not only Linux, but because I made the distro myself. https://theouterlinux.com/psyc.... It does have a EULA though, but so does everyone else. It's OpenSUSE 13.2 based so please make sure to run the Upgrade script if you do install it (yast --> live installer). I'd correct the ISO by default, but SuseStudio killed OpenSUSE 13.2, so I had to make a script to fix repos and other things.

  56. Microsoft is not trustworthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Microsoft is not trustworthy, because as long as the telemetry has been implemented, it can probably be abused.

    Having telemetry implemented as an idea even, is most worrisome of it all.

    Besides, given that USA is a warring faction, Microsoft corp is this.. *holds up thumb and index finger* ..close, to being an immediate threat, should such telemetry data be made available to the US military, in any way shape or form.

  57. They pulled the list from technet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://technet.microsoft.com/...
    Doesn't return content anymore.
    What fresh hell is this.
    Anyone have a copy of the list before they took it down to scrub/reword?

    1. Re:They pulled the list from technet by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1

      The link still works fine for me but here's an archive from this afternoon.

      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  58. Users have no real control over proprietary SW by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    Such is the nature of proprietary software. Users are at the mercy of whatever proprietors grant.

    Other problems with this:

    • You can't determine if Microsoft's list is complete and correct. They report whatever they want.
    • Even if the list is complete and correct for now, you can't do much to change anything. Remember that a previous version released information even when "privacy settings" were set not to do that? That could still happen. Didn't the EFF warn Windows users about privacy problems with Windows 10? And aren't the default settings (which, in my experience, most users use) set to reveal a great deal? The user's software freedom is not respected.
    • Even if the list is complete and correct for now, the software can change. Microsoft can issue an update that alters how the software behaves without updating the list.
    • There could be other code that releases information Microsoft left out of the so-called "privacy settings".

    Regardless of the PR, regardless of the labels on the settings, regardless of whether you're using the GUI to make changes or setting registry values, regardless of whether you're using one variant of proprietary software ("Basic" edition, "Home" edition, etc.) or another (perhaps an enterprise or "professional" edition) the relationship to power does not change how proprietary software works: With proprietary software users' privacy is never really under their control. Users who don't understand how computers work or why software freedom matters may read articles like theverge.com's article and come away thinking they're better off now. They won't realize proprietary software user are still facing the same problems as before with nothing of substance altered.

  59. I'm not surprised, but I'm surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They're listening to your microphone (speech data). Capturing everything you're typing (typing data). Watching every app you use. Giving you a unique ad id. Tracking your location data. Touch screen data. What else would a spy agency want?

  60. Real source link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you submitter and editor, here is the real link https://blogs.windows.com/windowsexperience/2017/04/05/windows-10-privacy-journey-continues-more-transparency-and-controls-for-you/#

  61. Diagnostic Data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy crap what a load of shit. "Diagnostic data". Really? You're spying on us for our own good? So, we should thank you for your invasion of our privacy, I suppose?

    Go fuck yourselves MS! May you all die a very slow and painful death.