Slashdot Mirror
Verizon's $70 Gigabit Internet Is Half the Price of Older 750Mbps Tier (arstechnica.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Verizon is now selling what it calls "FiOS Gigabit Connection" for $69.99 a month in a change that boosts top broadband speeds and makes lower prices available to many Internet subscribers. Actual bandwidth will be a bit lower than a gigabit per second, with "downloads as fast as 940Mbps and uploads as fast as 880Mbps," Verizon's announcement today said. The gigabit service is available in most of Verizon's FiOS territory, specifically to "over 8 million homes in parts of the New York, New Jersey, Philadelphia, Richmond, Va., Hampton Roads, Va., Boston, Providence and Washington, D.C. areas," Verizon said. Just three months ago, Verizon boosted its top speeds from 500Mbps to 750Mbps. The standalone 750Mbps Internet service cost $150 a month, more than twice the price of the new gigabit tier. Existing customers who bought that 750Mbps plan "will automatically receive FiOS Gigabit Connection and will see their bills lowered," Verizon said. It's not clear whether they will get their price lowered all the way to $70. It's important to note that the $70 price is only available to new customers, and it's a promotional rate that will "increase after promo period." Additionally, Verizon will charge you a $10 per month router charge unless you pay $150 for the Verizon router, plus other taxes and fees.
"$70" is only the temporary promotional price, plus taxes and fees and other random charges they feel like making up and adding separately to the advertised price.
Advertisement of internet access pricing is bullshit across the industry and I'm sick of it.
I can't believe, this is happening without the FCC or a similar government organization mandating it — driven simply by the KKKorporate greed and the fear of competition...
In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
Edholm's Law of Bandwidth is very similar to Moore's Law, but there is a longer delay in cost reduction due to a longer supply chain in Bandwidth (i.e. you local provider taking more profit before being disrupted by a cheaper competitor)
I wasn't aware that Project Fi, TMobile, or Sprint offered fibre fixed broadband services.
They charge you for owning a router that connects to it? Isn't having a router and plugging stuff into it kind of the point of having the service?
That's like the phone company charging you rent if you rent a phone, and charging you rent if you plug your own phone in.
Real lawyers write in C++
Too bad it's still not available in my neighborhood, which is a half-mile away from a major interstate highway in Fort Worth, Texas. Guess I'll keep paying Charter $210 a month for ~60Mbit and a bunch of crappy TV.
This isn't wireless internet...this is FiOS.
'Nuf said.
I get the feeling that they want people to switch out of their old contracts to a new one because the new contract is missing any mention of privacy. Someone should compare the terms of the contracts as this may be the start of them selling your info.
Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
This is still FOUR times as much as I pay for gigabit/tv/phone package.
I don't have Verizon myself but I've worked at lot at houses where Verizon forces you to use their crap router, the wireless on them is not nearly as good as most other major brands and a lot of the functionality like port forwarding etc doesn't seem to work properly. They say you can't replace it because if you do the program guide on their cable boxes doesn't work.
It's really a bad situation and Verizon tech support doesn't have a clue how to fix things or be helpful in any way.
But I live in Chattanooga, where the government owned and controlled utility started providing fiber about a decade ago.
We got gig speed for 70 bucks in 2012.
Thanks government, thanks.
My big question would be What is the data cap?
We have Comcast at 25 Mbps. My friend has it at 200 Mbps for the same price. Comcast offers up to 2 Gbps at my house. My estimate is that we'd be fine with about 15 Mbps but Comcast nor Fairpoint (DSL) offer that. I don't think that it makes a difference on performance on what speed they offer you (to a point) - it probably costs them the same amount.
So, they now only cover a very few people. I live in the Seattle area less than a block from where Frontier (who they sold to) FiOS supports, and as far as I know, they haven't expanded their supported area since 2008. That's almost ten years ago. I'm still stuck on dial-up despite being able to literally see a house that they're connected to.
Same here. My neighbor got FiOS almost a decade ago, but I'm still stuck with ISDN and per minute charges.
Same here. Some of my neighbors got FiOS nearly a decade ago, bit I'm still stuck woth dialup. The Seattle area sucks.
I just checked on Yelp, and Frontier has a one star rating. That's pretty sad.
CAPTCHA: blackout
I know what you mean. I have 100Mbps through Wide Open West, but I use an old WRT54GL so I'm limited to 802.11g speeds (about 20Mbps). Meh, it's fast enough.
That's 2 stars higher than I'd give Comcast.
Verizon's cable boxes need network access - which you can provide using your network equipment if you use a MoCA bridge like this one:
https://smile.amazon.com/Actio...
The caveat is that you need to ask Verizon to provision your ONT Ethernet not MoCA.
So you would give Comcast -1 stars? LOL
That'd be +10 stars more than they deserve, on a 1-5 star scale.
40 watts? Should be closer to 4 watts.
http://www.tpcdb.com/list.php?...
What's the maximum power rating marked on the wall wart?
lot of fucking good if they don't service your area, excuse me state, no scratch that quarter of the country
Come on Comcast offer 1GB for $70 the rest of us in the USA that cannot get anything but Comcast at maybe 75Mbps for $100 a month. Just because you are the only game in town doesn't mean you have to give us no speed and extreme pricing. If Comcast won't do it we welcome Verizon to the rest of the USA to force Comcast to lower prices and upgrade the speed. This would be especially helpful in non urban areas.
But your communist un-American bytes are setting a terrible example to the corporations and rotting the moral fiberglass of the nation.
I can't see that as being anything but false advertising. +/- 5% would be one thing, but -6% can't be called gigabit.
In this case, it's more of the same we got from Comcast a couple of years ago. Remember that? "Gigabit Internet for $70 / month"?
Right.
For two customers in Philadelphia.
In the same building.
Eventually.
Unless you are offering the service to at least the majority of your existing customers, just shut the hell up.
I'm talking to you, Mr. ISP
I pay about as much for 12mbps down, 1 up, 250GB monthly limit. Or I could switch to 25/5 but with a 80GB limit. I can't even BUY a tenth of what they offer.
I, for one, am really excited about this. I've found my Verizon FioS to be super reliable and I'm a happy customer (I can't believe I'm saying this about a telecom company). I'll definitely check the new Terms and Conditions, as has been suggested here. I think that the reason you won't see full 1Gb speeds is that the terminal on the wall is a 1Gb link and there's some overhead involved. We'll see that the speeds turn out to be, and how much this ends up costing. I checked with Verizon today and they say that they'll be starting to offer existing customers the upgrade on 4/30. Here's hoping all turns out well, because I've been waiting many years for this.
We don't have Verizon, but we do have others. Charter is $90/m for 60/4, but the local fiber ISP is $80/m for 250/250 or $100 for 500/500. Could also get 70/70 for $50. These are non-special prices for both. The fiber ISP is also all dedicated bandwidth. My ping to Chicago has not fluctuated more than 1ms over the past month and 0 packets lost, and that's with a rate of 10 packets per second.