Slashdot Mirror


Tesla's Highly-Anticipated Solar Roofs Go Up For Pre-Order Today (inhabitat.com)

Kristine Lofgren writes: Get ready: Tesla's ground-breaking Solar Roof tiles are available for order in the U.S. starting today. In typical fashion, CEO Elon Musk announced via Twitter that the anticipated tech would be available to order this afternoon with installation happening later this year. Tesla's tiles look like traditional roof tiles but they soak up all that delicious sunlight in order to power your home. According to the company, the tiles will be more affordable than typical roofing and can be paired with their Powerwall battery to power a home completely using solar energy.

143 comments

  1. delicious sunlight by turkeydance · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    that's not her real name, is it?

    1. Re:delicious sunlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a Tangerine Dream album I think.

    2. Re: delicious sunlight by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Funny

      considering how towelheaded sand n1gger ugly vaginas in burkas a common scenery on a beach. Jihaddists will ban you from sunbathing and offending their stupid retarded "culture". Thanks to obama.

      You should not have fired the FBI Director, sir. It's not a good look.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:delicious sunlight by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      As far as I know Sunlight® is a registered trademark of The Sun Products Corporation.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:delicious sunlight by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1


      Mmmmmm, sunlight...
      </Homer>

      --
      They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
  2. It doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It doesn't matter one bit. Tesla is a fraud company with no viable business plan and that loses money with every car made.

    Their stock price is poised to plummet and the company will be in bankruptcy any week now.

    Get out now, while you can!

    (Disclaimer: Isn't this what everyone says, when a Tesla article comes up?)

    1. Re: It doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah it's what trolls say every time.
      In reality everyone knew Tesla was a pet project of an eccentric billionaire who never cared about that one project making money. If you invested in Tesla and you don't just do it to support the cause then you have made a terrible mistake. That stock was never meant to increase in value.

  3. Who the hell... by x0ra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... would sink USD$70 for a roof ? He's mentioning that it wouldn't cost more than an asphalt roof, but that's only assuming very optimistic energy savings, and government subsidiary. Quote I got for my roof are in the $5k range, for a 20 years lifetime. The tiles are only warranty over 30 years, so an asphalt roof would cost $7.5k over the same period of time...

    1. Re:Who the hell... by kuzb · · Score: 0

      It's just Elon doing what he does best. Creating novelty items for rich people.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    2. Re:Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You've misread the information, the roof tiles themselves have a warranty somewhere around the heat death of the universe, the power generation warranty is what is 30 years. Even if the tiles one day stop making electricity entirely they will still be fully warrantied roofing.

    3. Re:Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I believe he said it would cost the same as an asphalt roof with a solar panel installation. The price I saw was 50K for the roof and a battery backup for night time use after government rebates. That isn't far off what an asphalt roof, a similar sized solar installation and a battery wall would cost. It is a bit more, but not as much as I thought it'd be.

    4. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The site quoted me 33K for the roof and 7K for the battery, with 18K worth of electricity generated over 30 years and a 9K tax credit for a net cost of about 13K over thirty years.

      I'm actually in the market for a roof replacement in the next two years, and I'm interested in solar. I have a small house. An asphalt roof replacement is less than four grand.

      This offer is a complete non-starter for me.

    5. Re:Who the hell... by Jeremi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's just Elon doing what he does best. Creating novelty items for rich people.

      Didn't almost every new technology start out as a novelty item for rich people?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    6. Re:Who the hell... by magusxxx · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Obviously x0ra has never been to Spencer Gifts.

      --
      Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    7. Re:Who the hell... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      $101k for my roof, without the tax credits, it has a 29 year ROI (according to Tesla, so likely optimistic). Go Solar Roof!

    8. Re:Who the hell... by PIBM · · Score: 3

      No, they are not. They are only warranted for 30 years against water leakage, which is the reason roof tile are replaced in the first place. Which places them at a lower warranty point than my current roof tiles (35 years), at a much higher price. 9 years ago I paid 5K CAD, and Tesla is quoting a similarly sized roof at 43K USD, not including the powerwall & ondulator. They aren't providing the information about how much energy their tiles deliver anywhere I could find either, but I was also under the impression that we were told the roof tiles cost would be equivalent or lower than current roofs. Nowhere can I save that amount of money from the energy saved :\

    9. Re: Who the hell... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The site quoted me 33K for the roof and 7K for the battery, with 18K worth of electricity generated over 30 years and a 9K tax credit for a net cost of about 13K over thirty years.

      I'm actually in the market for a roof replacement in the next two years, and I'm interested in solar. I have a small house. An asphalt roof replacement is less than four grand.

      This offer is a complete non-starter for me.

      This is where I have a problem. Uber expensive solar roofs should not qualify for tax credits. At least not beyond the amount that would be given for traditional PV panels of the same capacity. Its bad enough that most of these credits are simply helping pay power bills for the wealthy, but now we pay for their roofs as well? Meanwhile low income people have no access to these gifts.

      We should take all the PV tax credits and provide public schools with PV panels. That way we add PV capacity and help lower school energy bills, good for people of all income levels.

    10. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ah yes, the classic American leftist moral dilemma.
      Saving Gaia vs. screwing the rich.

      Do we make alternative energy more attractive to end users by subsidizing it, or say 'screw the rich' and cancel subsidies so the ones who can afford the steep cost of alternative energy will have to pay full freight to feel like they're helping the environment.

      What a heartwrenching choice it must be...

    11. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When subsidized energy comes with subsidized roofing, its not a hard choice at all. Just have some limits.

    12. Re:Who the hell... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Nowhere can I save that amount of money from the energy saved :\

      Unless you live in Hawaii, where the sun is brighter and power costs 4 times the mainland rate.

    13. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering most malls are getting shutdown and turned into something else or outright bulldozed, that's not uncommon these days...

    14. Re: Who the hell... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Do we make alternative energy more attractive to end users by subsidizing it

      No we should not. Unless alternative energy is ACTUALLY COST EFFECTIVE it will not scale, and will not be a significant part of the solution. Subsidizing bad technology just means that you get more bad technology, and you divert research dollars and talent away from the search for something that actually works.

      The money spent on subsidies should be spent on R&D instead.

    15. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're one of those types who would rather die in a hospital ER waiting room than receive healthcare funded by the government like those commies in Canada, arent you?

    16. Re:Who the hell... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 0

      Didn't almost every new technology start out as a novelty item for rich people?

      No.

    17. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your are one of the types that comes up with stupid, pointless comments because you have nothing relevant to add to the topic at hand.

    18. Re: Who the hell... by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      I had a metal roof put on my house last month. The total cost (materials + labor) was only $3066. That was for 14.5 squares installed on a rather small house. The lowest estimate I got for asphalt shingles was $3500. Since I'm 64 years old, I expect the metal roof to last me the rest of my life.
      If I someday decide to go with solar, it will probably be somewhere other than on my roof, maybe a thousand square feet out in the yard on the south side of the house.

    19. Re: Who the hell... by Rutulian · · Score: 1

      Your total electricity consumption is $50/mo? Where do you live?

    20. Re:Who the hell... by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

      Didn't almost every new technology start out as a novelty item for rich people?

      If you consider the military as such.

    21. Re:Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see the problem. He was comparing it to the price of his solid gold tile roof.

    22. Re: Who the hell... by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Admit it: you just get all hot and sweaty when you imagine yourself in charge of a Death Panel, don't you?

    23. Re:Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely, yes.

    24. Re:Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nope. The Tamagotchi started out as a novelty item for annoying people.

    25. Re: Who the hell... by x0ra · · Score: 0

      People still die in the ER waiting room in Canada. Hospital are knowingly overcrowded and underfunded, but sure, let's perpetuate the myth...

    26. Re:Who the hell... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      You would be amazed at how much money I lost by converting from Oil to Natural gas with an ultra efficient furnace, and insulating the heck out of the house. Paid off in only a few years. Gotta be a lie, right? There are many people I know who spend a month what I spend a year.

      Even made money selling the old oil furnace - it was a good one - to the guys who installed thegas one.

      So why am I telling you this shit? Because I heard the same arguments from people about that as you are giving us here, that's why. And they always tend to fail in real life. Anyhow, Tell me what the return is on a power system that is still on when the neighbors are sitting in the dark and cold. We have a number of them every year.

      I'll have one of these in a few years, when the roof needs re-done. My biggest concern is that it isn't ready to run the hot tub yet. My estimates are that it will be just as big a "mistake" as my other energy expenditure reduction solutions.

      Meanwhile, I'm expecting that coalrollers will be parking in front of my place soon.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    27. Re:Who the hell... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Nowhere can I save that amount of money from the energy saved :\

      Unless you live in Hawaii, where the sun is brighter and power costs 4 times the mainland rate.

      Or - believe it or not - rural Alaska. Many villages get their power from diesel generators, the most expensive large scale generation there is. (note some use wind power as well) In the Winter, running out of diesel can be a matter of life and death. https://www.adn.com/arctic/art... https://www.adn.com/arctic/art... https://solarpowerrocks.com/al...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      http://www.limesolar.com/

      And if that doesn't suit slash dotters, Let's ROLL COAL!

      http://dailycaller.com/2014/07...

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    28. Re: Who the hell... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Your total electricity consumption is $50/mo? Where do you live?

      I'm in Pennsylvania, and I'm only a little more than that. Most goes to the water heater and the Spa.

      It actually isn't that difficult to have a low electricity bill. I have all LED lights, the heater and spa are high efficiency as well as tthe refrigerator and freezer. Even the furnace motor and AC are efficient models.

      We got an electrical bill that compared our payment with our neighbors next to us. It said we pay 10 percent more than they do.Not too bad considering that they are a travelling couple, and only home about 2 days a month.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    29. Re:Who the hell... by PIBM · · Score: 1

      Oh, I've had my house inspected, air loss calculated, the small 30 square inch loss was reduced as much as it could be, insulation is as good as it get (triple pane glass with dual refraction covers), window covering in use in winter, energy efficient light bulbs, dimmers, very high quality and efficiency thermal pump for heating the house in the winter, yet I still manage to use over 62MWh a year. If natural gaz had been available it would have been my heating choice, alas it isn't available in my area. Oh, I also use an high efficiency wood furnace for the days the thermal pump switch to electric heating due to the temperature dropping lower than -15F (-27C)

      Luckily, electricity pricing in Quebec is relatively low, so I end up paying less than USD 4000 a year for this energy. I live in a forested area (think coniferous trees higher than the house all around), and we spend at least 3 months with the roof covered in snow even with the high grade slopes. Anyway, the sun would not make it out much through the woods and the angle might not be best either.

      When I built the house (2008) I checked for any kind of solar solution to have some kind of supportive capacity since I knew the area lose power 2-3 times a month. I ended up going with a generator; cost was less than a grand, and if using at full power it uses about 5$ of gasoline an hour. We average about 20$ of gasoline a year, except when Irene came and we had it running for 3 days (anyway, in this specific case the insurance covered it, along with the damage due to the flood and winds / tree felled).

      If it could be efficient to run solar panel, I would. We don`t even have to keep a large battery as Hydro-Quebec runs a program where we sell our electricity for credits of equivalent kwh for when we need it. Produce a lot in the summer (up to 50kw of credit can be accumulated per hour), use in the night & winter, switch to the generator if the small battery doens`t cut it.

      When it was initially annouced, at a cost comparable to a new roof, I would have teared down my current roof completely to replace it with their solution. But not for 10x-15x the cost.

    30. Re: Who the hell... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You may have had a point in 1970 but I doubt it.
      Now we have an entire generation hitting the workforce that have no doubt that it "actually works" because it's been working since before they were born.
      I really don't get what you are trying to do here.

    31. Re:Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ondulator

      ???

    32. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they are. From their website: "That's why we offer the best warranty in the industry - the lifetime of your house, or infinity, whichever comes first."

    33. Re:Who the hell... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      I'm not doing efficiency upgrades, my house is 100 years old and my heat+light bill never went above 175 over the winter, and it's often under 100 during mild weather. when the furnace craps out, I'll put in a reasonably efficient one, but I can save a lot more money and fuel by knocking down the thermostat and putting on a sweater than I can with fancy new equipment and ripping up my walls to install new insulation.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    34. Re:Who the hell... by SethJohnson · · Score: 2

      According to this article, the estimated price is $21.85 per sq. ft. If you have a single-story, 2800 sf. home, and you decide to cover the ENTIRE roof with these tiles, then yeah, you're looking at $70k. Most people building new homes will go with multiple stories, so total square feet of roof space will be something less. And because of sun angle, it's likely the entire roof will not be covered. Though, if you're making that kind of investment, you better design your entire roof to be facing the sun!

      That article also claims a warranty for the life of your home, not 30 years.

    35. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is better, throwing government money at r&d or growing markets to fund it? The 2nd option creates incentives to research process improvements that drive costs down, not just better devices. It drives economies of scale. Here in the UK, despite gov sabotage in favour of big energy, subsidies have fallen by more than 10 time but payback periods have barely changed. It's the better option if you care about actually deploying tech and it ever being affordable by ordinary people.

      US solar pricing is pretty shocking, you failed to create a strong market and let old energy block new to often.

    36. Re: Who the hell... by geekmux · · Score: 0

      The site quoted me 33K for the roof and 7K for the battery, with 18K worth of electricity generated over 30 years and a 9K tax credit for a net cost of about 13K over thirty years.

      I'm actually in the market for a roof replacement in the next two years, and I'm interested in solar. I have a small house. An asphalt roof replacement is less than four grand.

      This offer is a complete non-starter for me.

      Your $4K asphalt roof would likely last around 20 years before needing to be replaced, and add little value to your home.

      The $13K net cost solar roof (which actually is far more comparable to tile vs. asphalt in longevity) is warrantied for 30 years, but would actually likely last around 50 years or more. Given increased costs to put a new asphalt roof every 20 years, you would likely be spending about the same on asphalt in a 60-year timeframe.

      That's not including the additional value you would add to your home by having a solar roof, and also not calculating increases in electrical costs over the next half-century, and not including any tax credits you may qualify for.

      Perhaps you should think about your "non-starter" a bit more. Costs for this tech are likely to decrease, but it's damn near justifying the cost today.

    37. Re:Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tech isn't new, the idea isn't new, the product is going to not be new. What is new, is your all talking about a 30 year warranty from a company that wont last 10 more years. How about we talk about inverters/storage/heat/etc that is normal for solar panel roofs. Hmm those costs are they covered in this warranty?

    38. Re: Who the hell... by PIBM · · Score: 1

      Scroll down a little and you will see than this warranty stops at 30 years for power generation and 30 years for the 'Weatherization warranty' which is defined as: Weatherization means that there will be no water leaks or other weather intrusions during the warranty period that result from our installation. This limitation is what is small compared to high quality roof which are quoted at up to 75 years here, and still much less.

    39. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We got an electrical bill that compared our payment with our neighbors next to us. It said we pay 10 percent more than they do.Not too bad considering that they are a travelling couple, and only home about 2 days a month.

      I get those bills often "shaming" me for using more power than most of the neighbors. I find it to be useless as it doesn't know that 1) many of my neighbors don't have a private well (electric pump) 2) I'm the only one who has all electric yard tools rather than gasoline-powered and 3) my smoker and grill are electric as well. No duh I use more electricity than everyone else does.

      A coworker who has a Chevy Volt gets the same letter every couple months, it means nothing to him either as it doesn't take charging his car into account.

    40. Re: Who the hell... by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 3, Interesting

      People still die in the ER waiting room in Canada. Hospital are knowingly overcrowded and underfunded, but sure, let's perpetuate the myth...

      Yet the Canadian life span is longer, Lower infant mortality. No medical bankruptcies. Average health costs/year are about 60% U.S. average.

      With the lower infant mortality why don't we hear THINK OF THE CHILDREN when public healthcare comes up?

    41. Re: Who the hell... by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      That's not including the additional value you would add to your home by having a solar roof, and also not calculating increases in electrical costs over the next half-century, and not including any tax credits you may qualify for.

      Perhaps you should think about your "non-starter" a bit more. Costs for this tech are likely to decrease, but it's damn near justifying the cost today.

      Did you include the increased property taxes due to the increased value of the house?

    42. Re:Who the hell... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I'm not doing efficiency upgrades, my house is 100 years old and my heat+light bill never went above 175 over the winter, and it's often under 100 during mild weather. when the furnace craps out, I'll put in a reasonably efficient one, but I can save a lot more money and fuel by knocking down the thermostat and putting on a sweater than I can with fancy new equipment and ripping up my walls to install new insulation.

      One thing I should note is that the things I did were not done at one time, and the initiating project was not all about energy savings. The house was re-sided in order to have a maintenance free vinyl miledew resisting surface, so it gets another layer of insulation. The wife wanted something cleaner than oil heat, and they were extending the gas lines past our street, and we got free install since it was easier for them to do that work while the main line was uncovered. Hell, they even replaced some uneven sidewalk with that. So the time was right for a new gas furnace, might as well get the most efficient one, and now the furnace chimney can be blocked off (no more maintenance) since the gas one's "chimney" is a 2 inch PVC pipe to the side of the house.

      As for my installing a new PV roof, its just a matter of waiting for the correct price point converging with the time the asphalt shingles on there now need replaced, plus the cost of mains powe in the mix. There will be a sweet spot there some where. The PV will come down in price, the mains power will come up in price, and maintenance has to happen anyhow.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    43. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Four grand for a roof? What do you live in..? An outhouse?

      Asphalt roofs are junk, no matter how many companies claim they're "lifetime". Tesla is selling tile/ceramic/glass roofs, which have an indefinite lifespan.

    44. Re:Who the hell... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Who the hell would sink USD$70 for a (solar) roof?

      At that price, I'll buy a few thousand kits and make millions of dollars in profit.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    45. Re: Who the hell... by kuzb · · Score: 1

      Who censors what now?

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    46. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solar in general wasn't cost effective until we subsidized it, which made it more cost effective, more people started buying it, capacity grew, costs went down, and repeat. That's kind of the whole point of subsidies, taking non-cost effective, but promising technology and helping it to become cost effective.

    47. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in a modest home with an asphalt roof in a modest neighborhood full of homes with fucking asphalt roofs, asshat.

      Price out real estate around here and you'll understand why.

    48. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the part about saving Gaia is simply magical thinking. Ultimately, the total global effect is indistinguishable from praying, another federally subsidized activity.

    49. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SW Washington state. Gas furnace and water heater, electric everything else including central A/C. My electric bill average is right around $50/mo.

    50. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlikely. Riddle me this - how much value does a tile roof add in a working-class neighborhood full of modest, mostly starter homes? The average home value in my neighborhood is 30% below the city average, and even farther below the regional average. Premium features like that do not offer good ROI in such neighborhoods.

    51. Re: Who the hell... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I'm actually in the market for a roof replacement in the next two years, and I'm interested in solar. I have a small house. An asphalt roof replacement is less than four grand.

      Question is, how good is the roof?

      Asphalt is usually warrantied for 25 years or so then it needs replacement. And replacing an asphalt roof is environmentally damaging - you can't really recycle the shingles at all - it's just landfill.

      You could consider metal roofs, the metal is rated for 50-100 years, so instead of replacing your asphalt roof 4 times, you replace the metal roof once. Incidentally, it costs only about double an asphalt roof. And at the end of it, you can recycle the metal roof completely.

      The question is - how good are these solar roofs? They're glass tile, so how long are they warrantied for? 50+ years? And how recyclable are they?

    52. Re:Who the hell... by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      It's just Elon doing what he does best. Creating novelty items for rich people.

      And this is bad because...?

      I mean, almost everything technology-wise was at some point a novelty for the rich (until the cost of production went down enough for the hoi polloi to get them.)

      Best examples? Books. Trained horses. Full body armor. Water pumps. Cell phones and computers. And the list goes on and one.

    53. Re: Who the hell... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > You're one of those types who would rather die in a hospital ER waiting room than receive healthcare funded by the government like those commies in Canada, arent you?

      Thanks to unbridled capitalism we have more hospital capacity than we know what to do with. Thanks to a Republican president, all of those ERs have to treat me regardless of my ability to pay.

      It's the Canadians that will die waiting in line.

      If you had to depend on what the US government wants to pay, every hospital in your area would close.

      Time to lay off the liberal media narrative.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    54. Re:Who the hell... by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      It's just Elon doing what he does best. Creating novelty items for rich people.

      And this is bad because...?

      I mean, almost everything technology-wise was at some point a novelty for the rich (until the cost of production went down enough for the hoi polloi to get them.)

      Best examples? Books. Trained horses. Full body armor. Water pumps. Cell phones and computers. And the list goes on and one.

      I mean, if I could double my salary, I would indulge in these new solar panels. But I can't, so I won't. My salary is good, but not that good.

      With that said, there are plenty of people that make double than what you or I make, who will be early adopters. And from that, better, cheaper versions will come till the day they are as ubiquitous as today's shingles.

    55. Re: Who the hell... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Americans have more bankruptcies in general. That's a reflection of American consumerism. It has much less to do with any inability to pay.

      If Canadian prices are only half, they're really not coming out ahead. American prices are greatly exaggerated by a liberal media hell bent on pushing socialism down your throat.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    56. Re: Who the hell... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > With the lower infant mortality why don't we hear THINK OF THE CHILDREN when public healthcare comes up?

      That mortality occurs within the American public system. Those are the people that are already taking advantage of what American social welfare programs have to offer. That includes our "single payer" system such as it is.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    57. Re: Who the hell... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      In some places, a fancier roof would get broken just as quickly. The tiles serve a pretty simple, basic purpose and you don't really need anything more expensive unless you are trying to show off for your neighbors.

      The money you blow on junk like that is lost opportunity cost. It's money you can't spend on something else.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    58. Re: Who the hell... by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Where is that space ship you came to planet Earth on?

      NO ONE believes that kind of nonsense you are pushing. Indulging in expensive home improvements won't do squat for your home value. You will NEVER get that money back. So don't even go there and pretend you ever will.

      You better personally enjoy what overpriced nonsense you put into your house because you aint getting that money back.

      Having the most expensive house on the block is financial suicide if you view your house as an investment.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    59. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the eff should anyone that can afford a Tesla automobile get a subsidy? That's bonehead on steroids.

    60. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have to treat you for emergency care only (and can bill you), then they ship you out the door. Too bad you won't be able to afford the monthly bills and ongoing medical treatments.

    61. Re: Who the hell... by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      California. I have no A/C, and nobody is at home most of the days (we both work). Mine ranges from $50-$100 depending on the time of year.

    62. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The site quoted me 33K for the roof and 7K for the battery, with 18K worth of electricity generated over 30 years and a 9K tax credit for a net cost of about 13K over thirty years.

      I'm actually in the market for a roof replacement in the next two years, and I'm interested in solar. I have a small house. An asphalt roof replacement is less than four grand.

      This offer is a complete non-starter for me.

      And how much would a tile roof cost for your house?

      Asphalt is about the cheapest roofing type possible. These solar tiles are supposed to be comparable to the cost of other tile roofs.

    63. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the US death panels that exist only in US private healthcare companies because of the massive inefficiencies (a trillion dollars) due to the bureaucratic overhead, cost of advertising, smaller patient pools, profiteering, and massive overcharges for medication and medical procedures?

    64. Re: Who the hell... by jo7hs2 · · Score: 1

      Where do you live that a metal roof was less than asphalt? When I just priced out my roof earlier this year, decent metal was twice the cost of the architectural shingles I chose, and around 2.5 times the cost of cheap 3-tab...but...most of that was installation differences. I'm guessing you live somewhere where asphalt's weight makes shipping more expensive or somewhere there are a lot of metal roofs?

    65. Re: Who the hell... by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      If Canadian prices are only half, they're really not coming out ahead. American prices are greatly exaggerated by a liberal media hell bent on pushing socialism down your throat.

      No. Those numbers come from the U.S. Federal Government.

    66. Re:Who the hell... by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      You would be amazed at how much money I lost by converting from Oil to Natural gas with an ultra efficient furnace

      You mean SAVED and not lost, right? or else you're being sarcastic?

    67. Re:Who the hell... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      we have replaced our roof 2x in the last 8-10 years.
      I think that it was replaced as well in the 4 year prior.
      Why? HAIL.

      If we get hail again to the point, where we need a new re-roofing, we will switch to this.
      It is cheaper than metal or tiled roofs and supposed to hold up better.

      And like our insurance company, we are tired of paying for new roofs.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    68. Re:Who the hell... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You would be amazed at how much money I lost by converting from Oil to Natural gas with an ultra efficient furnace

      You mean SAVED and not lost, right? or else you're being sarcastic?

      Sarcasm. I dip into that occasionally when I shouldn't.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    69. Re:Who the hell... by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    70. Re:Who the hell... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      I live in COlorado which is one of the hail capitals in America.
      We have replaced the roof 2x in 8 or 10 years.
      Come the next hail storm where we lose our hail resistant shingles again, we will replace with this.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    71. Re: Who the hell... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      that is OK. Continue to pay your expensive electricity and re-roofing every 10-15 years. That is a choice that you made.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    72. Re: Who the hell... by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      LOL.
      Sorry bill, but you have this one wrong. Due to net metering, the wind generators are now cheaper than coal WITHOUT net metering. And with the new wind generators (10 MW and bigger up to 20 MW), these will be cheaper than everything, except for geo-thermal (which has the lowest costs going).
      Solar is dropping in price, and we need to actually use that to our advantage.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    73. Re: Who the hell... by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I'm in Silicon Valley, and my power is $20-$30/month. It's only me in the house, and I even have a plasma TV (considered to be a power waster though I think that got better towards the later ones, like mine).. I'd like to get solar, and may eventually, but with my low usage, it's hard to make sense fiscally..

    74. Re:Who the hell... by PIBM · · Score: 1

      Stop drinking the coolaid, read the fine prints on the tesla solarroof website. 30 years warranty against infiltrations, which is less than good asphalt shingles costing less than half the price of the non-solar tiles.

    75. Re: Who the hell... by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      You're miscalculating the ROI.

      Your calculation would be correct if you bought a house there, made improvements and sold to make a profit - solar rooftiles, not a good choice to put among those improvements.

      But that ROI is the combined factor of all benefits. It's the saving in your energy bills while you live there plus every other advantage mentioned above plus whatever value increase there is in your house.
      True that value increase is likely to be depressed in that neighbourhood and it's may be less than the cost of the install - but you aren't looking ONLY at the sale point to make a return. If you live there ten years, you have ten years of use out of them - and still make a bunch of the money back on sale.

      Two years ago I bought a house in a similar neighbourhood for 850K ZAR. I made about 100KZAR in improvements, some of them premium things like high grade galvanized iron security fencing. I just sold it for 1-million ZAR. There was about 821K left on the bond so total profit of about 80K ZAR - which is really not bad for just 2 years, and that's without factoring in that I got to USE those improvements for 2 years. For 2 years that fence let me not worry about my family while I'm out at work. For 2 years I could park safely in the secure car park I built. For 2 years I could free up room in the house by keeping the laundry in the outhouse I added.
      All in all - the REAL profit if you work out what these comforts were worth - is more like 150K ZAR - which is really, really good for a 2 year investment (it's 15% actually) - and my improvements made it so sought after that I sold it on the very first day I started marketing for MORE than my asking price (I was wanting 950K - getting more than your asking price is unheard of here - somebody actually offered me more just to give him first option for 24 hours !). I also had another property where I did damn near nothing, I just bought it cheap in a very wealthy area a few years ago, sold it as well - for a profit that was almost 80% of the original sale price (I bought it for 450K and just sold it after 6 years for 840K). Even after fees and taxes I made enough to put down a deposit on a fantastic 4 bedroom double-story practically-a-mansion in an area with fibre, close to work where my family could live in luxury for the next several decades.

      It's easy to make money from property - but you do need to know how to do the maths right.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    76. Re: Who the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlikely. Riddle me this - how much value does a tile roof add in a working-class neighborhood full of modest, mostly starter homes? The average home value in my neighborhood is 30% below the city average, and even farther below the regional average. Premium features like that do not offer good ROI in such neighborhoods.

      Riddle me this - why do you feel that such neighborhoods would be a target market for premium features?

      Joe Sixpack representing the working class sure as shit ain't slapping a tile roof on his house, or driving a Tesla today...

    77. Re: Who the hell... by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Where is that space ship you came to planet Earth on?

      NO ONE believes that kind of nonsense you are pushing. Indulging in expensive home improvements won't do squat for your home value. You will NEVER get that money back. So don't even go there and pretend you ever will.

      You better personally enjoy what overpriced nonsense you put into your house because you aint getting that money back.

      Having the most expensive house on the block is financial suicide if you view your house as an investment.

      Speaking of overpriced nonsense, I don't personally enjoy paying Greed for my electricity. Costs are going to continue to rise for that utility, especially as improvements in efficient design drives consumption down. Greed has never been known to be kind or fair.

      And when treating real estate wisely as a long-term investment (20+ years) instead of some kind of get-rich-quick scheme, it's usually never financial suicide no matter what you do to improve your home.

      To each their own.

  4. Compared to tile roofs by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 4, Informative

    The comparison stands up for a comparison with high end 50 year tiled roofs.

    Not your typical roof retiling with shingles.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Compared to tile roofs by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      That's still pretty good. What is the actual price though; the article didn't mention this. Roof tiles are quite common here (pretty much every roof has them), and mine need replacing soon as they are over 75 years old. So naturally I am interested.

      If they are as expensive as regular tiles, the good news is that you might as well cover the whole roof in these things for a uniform look, not just the side that faces the sun.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Compared to tile roofs by un1nsp1red · · Score: 4, Informative

      What is the actual price though; the article didn't mention this.

      $21.85 per square foot.

      If they are as expensive as regular tiles, the good news is that you might as well cover the whole roof in these things for a uniform look, not just the side that faces the sun.

      I can't find the price right now, but there is a dramatically cheaper price for the non-solar tiles. i.e., They're anticipating that you cover your entire roof with their tiles (re: uniform look), but the entire roof will not be solar-collecting.

    3. Re:Compared to tile roofs by CanadianRealist · · Score: 1

      Seems really wasteful to cover the non-productive side of the roof with solar tiles. They could presumably produce similar looking non-solar tiles at a much lower cost so that you could have the uniform look without paying extra for solar tiles that won't be doing anything for you.

    4. Re:Compared to tile roofs by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Seems really wasteful to cover the non-productive side of the roof with solar tiles. They could presumably produce similar looking non-solar tiles at a much lower cost so that you could have the uniform look without paying extra for solar tiles that won't be doing anything for you.

      That begs the question, do subsidies help pay for the non-solar shingles? I bet their math assumes so.

    5. Re:Compared to tile roofs by Namarrgon · · Score: 4, Informative

      $21.85 per square foot.

      That's the "average" price. Active tiles are about $42/square foot, inactive tiles are $11/square foot. Depends on your roof how many of each you need.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    6. Re:Compared to tile roofs by A+Friendly+Troll · · Score: 2

      The comparison stands up for a comparison with high end 50 year tiled roofs.

      Well, I just had my entire roof redone (wood beams and planks and everything) for 4500â, and that does indeed include a 50 year warranty on the clay tiles, which basically translates into "change everything again after 75-100 years".

      So that's $5000 for 100 years.

  5. Limits on power generation by Vorendell · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In Colorado at least, there is a limit to the amount of solar energy you can produce. We discovered this when we put our panels up. It's something like 2xdaily maximum of use based on a couple of years of power bills. So you might not be able to do your whole roof in these things anyway. I like the idea, but some of the municipal restrictions get in the way.

    1. Re:Limits on power generation by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Is that a limit on generation, or a limit on sell-back? If a limit on sell-back, you just get one (or more) batteries, and you push the power into batteries for use.

      The utilities don't want a grid with 100% of the population having 50% of their needs met with solar. At noon, the grid would be over-generating, but the utility would still be buying the wasted power. Then at night, when generation drops to zero, they have to make a baseline generation.

      Granted, that doesn't, hasn't, and never will happen, but that's the kind of doomsday scenarios the lying utilities give to the lawmakers letting them abuse customers to protect profits.

    2. Re:Limits on power generation by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      They also have tiles without solar cells in them which are presumably cheaper, so you can choose what percentage of the roof's surface generates power.

    3. Re: Limits on power generation by Vorendell · · Score: 1

      thats good to know so the roof isnt a mix and match appearance

    4. Re:Limits on power generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also possible to hit current limits on your grid connection on large systems. In the UK systems larger than 4Kw can be refused on safety grounds. Going to be seeing more of that now the subsidy has no break at 4Kw.

    5. Re:Limits on power generation by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Peak power usage conveniently matches peak sunlight.

      People run A/C to cool down. It sucks a lot of power.

    6. Re:Limits on power generation by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      There are two peaks every day, one at noon and one at 6. Peak cooling and peak cooking. And AC demands are not high in CO in cooler months.

  6. They need to work on the calculator by lessthan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The calculator just told me that I'll see a savings of $100 over 30 years. I think I'm going to wait for fusion to become a thing.

    --
    Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
    1. Re:They need to work on the calculator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When I need a new roof, I will strongly consider buying a Tesla roof. Even if it costs slightly more than a normal roof. This may not be the answer to all our energy problems, but it's a solid attempt to try something. I look at it as voting with my dollar, which probably has a much bigger effect than who I voted for for president. You never hear anyone saying "you'll never earn your money back buying a Mercedes", but people still buy them. I'd rather support a company trying to make progress, rather than blatantly pissing it away.

    2. Re:They need to work on the calculator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The calculator just told me that I'll see a savings of $100 over 30 years. I think I'm going to wait for fusion to become a thing.

      ?!?

      So, you're going to wait for a fusion calculator?

    3. Re:They need to work on the calculator by curt_k · · Score: 1

      Individual solutions to climate change, I think, are kind of a waste of money and cycles, it's going to be structural, societal, governmental changes, and fast (not over a 30 roof life) or we as a biosphere are in deep trouble. So, lawyers now > save a trickle of energy for 30 years. I hate to be negative for a company that, like you say, is trying to do something, but I think a better environmental case could be made for doing a conventional roof and donating the $X,000 you'd save over a Tesla roof to the Sierra Club or 350.org to sue the Trump Admin more and better.

    4. Re:They need to work on the calculator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, it doesn't matter what any of us do to stop climate change, as long as we cripple industry and ask others to forego we will feel vindicated...

    5. Re:They need to work on the calculator by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Does that include health benefits and long term cost savings of avoided environmental damage due to coal/gas/nuclear energy consumption?

      You might also factor in your electricity use increasing considerably as electric vehicles will be fairly common in a decade, and the added benefit of a Powerwall whole-house UPS (dependent on the frequency of black/brown outs in your area).

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:They need to work on the calculator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The more individuals who do things like install expensive solar roofs, the more the price comes down for others who might do the same thing but can't do it for the high price.

      So yes, individual actions really can make a difference.

    7. Re:They need to work on the calculator by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      The calculator just told me that I'll see a savings of $100 over 30 years. I think I'm going to wait for fusion to become a thing.

      So let's take it at face value. Are you planning to live for thirty years or more? If so, then you'd get a hundred bucks and you'd have your own solar power system effectively for free. Is that worth nothing to you?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:They need to work on the calculator by Jogar+the+Barbarian · · Score: 0

      The problem is he *won't* have a solar power system. After 30 years, the tiles would be producing negligible amounts of power, if any.

      --
      3. Profit!
      2. ???
      1. On Soviet Slashdot, a Beowulf cluster of alien Natalie Portman overlords welcomes YOU!
    9. Re:They need to work on the calculator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will be in the market for a new roof in 5 years. When I am having that roof put on, I will probably have traditional PV panels put on at the same time. There's no sense in putting them up now when the roof has to be replaced in 5 years. Going that route will save me $40k on the roof, and the payback on the PV panels will be 6-7 years, not... well... never.

    10. Re:They need to work on the calculator by DeVoh · · Score: 1

      I have Sunpower solar panels on my roof. Here is their rating.. SunPower Corporation (“SunPower”) warrants that for 25 years beginning on the Warranty Start Date1 (the “Warranty Period”), its photovoltaic modules specified above (“PV Module(s)”), shall be free from defects in materials and workmanship under normal application, installation, use and service conditions, and the power output of the PV Modules will be at least 95% of the Minimum Peak Power2 rating for the first 5 years, and declining by no more than 0.4% per year for the following 20 years, so the power output at the end of the final year of the 25 year warranty period will be at least 87% of the Minimum Peak Power rating. At 30 years they will still be generating around 80%.. that's not negligible.

    11. Re:They need to work on the calculator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 30 years what will $100 buy? A bag of candy maybe.
      In 30 years the roof will be generating little power anyways. So all you saved was the purchase price of a bag of candy. Progressives and economics do not mix well.

    12. Re: They need to work on the calculator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. But bang for the buck especially given the timeliness of the problems, $20,000 to political organizing is probably going to be way more efficacious than $20,000 for a solar roof. We need systematic changes quickly, right?

    13. Re:They need to work on the calculator by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The problem is he *won't* have a solar power system. After 30 years, the tiles would be producing negligible amounts of power, if any.

      What? Who told you that, and why are you repeating it?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:They need to work on the calculator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More amusing is in this thread no one mentioned the cost of money, i.e. mortgage for $50K or opportunity cost of not investing $50K in a boring, safe, low performance way.
      I'm a commie euro-wimp by the way.

      Thanksfully another AC if you scroll below, post number 54397531, ran the numbers.

  7. For a more objective breakdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  8. Watch out if you've got a big roof by derinax · · Score: 1

    We have a pitch of 8 and a pretty large multilevel roof, this calculator tells me that a 50% coverage Tesla roof + battery will cost me $54K with the tax break, down to costing $20K after 30 years. That's still more than a shingled roof would cost today, and to be comparable to a fancy tiled roof I guess I'd have to wait until I'm very, very old.

  9. Highly anticipated ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Anticipated by his brother ?, Solar City was as good as dead without being bailed out by Elon, shame Tesla investors had to pay for his families business failures, its still doomed to fail, there is way too much competition from the people that actually make the panels for Elon (China), as for their "Powerwall" its just a metal box full of Panasonic tech with a Tesla sticker, the market would do better to skip the middlemen and buy direct from the manufacturers and not the sticker men.

  10. Commercially available retail prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BUY ANY QUANTITY: CL 280 W/285 W $0.25

    BRAND NEW

    GRADE A

    UL LISTED

    25 YR WARRANTY

    (no association, only a company I purchased from)

    http://sunelec.com/

  11. Actual comparison for a 1500 sq ft ranch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Last year I replaced my roof with a conventional asphalt shingle roof. These were timberland lifetime warranty shingles (really a 25 year warranty). Quoted roof size was 21 square (2100 sq ft) at a cost of $12,600. This is on a single story hipped ranch with 4/12 pitch, ice and water up 2 rows, 2 layer tear off (old roof) cutting in a ridge vent, and adding a chimney cricket (use google).

    Tesla quotes $68,700 for this same roof with a 30 year warranty. Run some numbers... (and I'm going to ignore government incentives)

    Tesla claims a $18,600 savings in energy. If I was able to take out a solo mortgage at 3.92% for 30 years on $50k for this roof it'd cost me $85k in the end, well offsetting the $18k savings and putting me $17k in the hole.

    Lets run the numbers the other way. Say I had the difference ($50k) laying around and I wanted to invest that at the rate I'd pay for the roof in the above example ($236/mo for 30 yrs) in a monthly compounded account you'd accrue $142k after 30 years.

    I love the idea of widespread renewables, but I can never get the long term financials to play out in their favor.

    1. Re:Actual comparison for a 1500 sq ft ranch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Missed a detail - 2nd example was at 3.2% interest.

    2. Re:Actual comparison for a 1500 sq ft ranch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worst ..... the cost is for only a max of 70% of your CURRENT yearly power usage. There is no guarantee that the system will produce enough energy to cover the full amount of power you will use and worst, there is no buffer for increase consumption ... like when getting an electric vehicle.

      No matter how you look at this, the numbers just don't add up at all.

    3. Re:Actual comparison for a 1500 sq ft ranch by jezwel · · Score: 2

      Is there any change to the value of your house with Tesla shingles installed vs normal shingles? Many people sell property and move on, so if adding these increase the value of the house it may be a zero-sum game.

    4. Re:Actual comparison for a 1500 sq ft ranch by plague911 · · Score: 2

      If you are adding the time value of money, with one of the factors, you need to add the time value of money to all the factors. I don't think it would change the answer much but make the margins a little closer.

    5. Re:Actual comparison for a 1500 sq ft ranch by j-beda · · Score: 2

      Additionally, one should reduce the investment income by the income tax rate. Decreased expenses are equivalent to tax-free income.

  12. That roof is worth more than the entire house by guruevi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Even without ANY solar panels, they're roughly costing 4x the price of a 'regular' roof, once you select 70% solar, you're looking at 10x the price of a 'regular' roof.

    And for that I save about $1k/year, it's a very poor investment. Get a metal roof and 'regular' solar panels, the same amount of energy for less than a quarter of the cost and the same 30-100y lifespan.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  13. Ground breaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe Elon's most ground-breaking technology will be Boring.

  14. Well, I would love to do this, but by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    $50k for a new roof is not remotely comparable to the ~$7K it cost a few years ago for a traditional roof (paid for by insurance, due to hail damage)

    Even if it could completely eliminate my electric bill (which is unlikely)(and which would require the additional $7k battery) that only saves me $100/mo - which means it would take be 47 years to pay this off, and even then only if the financing rate was 0% (also unlikely)

    As wonderful as an idea as solar roof is, at the prices so far, its completely infeasible for anyone in the middle-class.

    As was said elsewhere, a neat toy for the super rich. One can only hope that if lots of said super-rich install these, and want to sell excess power back to the utility, that it might actually drive electric costs down for everyone else. But that's unlikely too, since the power utilities will have to upgrade facilities for bi-directional power, and will want to recoup that cost, and still make money.

    1. Re:Well, I would love to do this, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      every time a rich asshole sells power back to grid at stupid rate enforced by green ecoloons.

      the price of power to the poor/everyone else rises, so nope, just fucks the rich poor inbalence even more than it is already.

    2. Re:Well, I would love to do this, but by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      Where I live, a lot of middle income people are already selling power back into the grid via solar, so upgrading facilities isn't an issue everywhere. There are some pretty hefty tax incentives for doing it, and the entrepreneurs are in full hunt mode figuring out ways to get people into it. Mainly through various long term lease schemes where the homeowner leases the solar equipment but still retains rights to any profits from power reselling. The main factor though is lower electricity bills, and that money goes right to the leasing company.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    3. Re:Well, I would love to do this, but by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      Whole roof SOLAR + ROOF. Not a fair comparison to just a new roof without solar. That said, this obviously is not cheap; plus I don't see the reason for paying a lot for expensive tiles on the side of the roof that does not see much sun. Perhaps their non-tiles (assuming they have those) are much cheaper??

      Comparing payback at fixed power rates that will never go up--- and they always go up-- is also not fair. That said, this is again not cheap still. In CA, power is many years ahead that is, their rates are double other parts of the country.

      Early buyers of new products / tech always pay a lot more. The price will come down after ... or maybe it's like Apple where people wait in line for it pay a lot.... and the price never comes down.

    4. Re:Well, I would love to do this, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fully agree but with the battery storage, and if the buy back rate or incentives vary in real time to match the supply and demand this would work better.
      Or condition tax incentives to the use of battery storage in a way that benefit both solar energy use and a good relationship with the grid.

  15. I'm planning to buy one by lakeland · · Score: 1

    Currently my house is covered in cedar shingles which have lasted 30 years and will probably make another 10 with a little encouragement. I got a quote for a replacement at $50k installed so if this is $70k for my house then it's only slightly more. Yes, I will gladly pay 50% more for something which will probably last longer plus it will give me free solar energy.

    You're right, you can get a roof for $5k. I could replace the tiles with a tin roof tomorrow for a fraction of the price. Of course, it would destroy the look of the house... so I guess it comes down to how important that is for you.

  16. Not gonna work in Europe by coofercat · · Score: 2

    I haven't done a proper survey, but I'd say most roof coverings in Europe are teracotta tiles, clay tiles etc. There are a few slate roofs, some thatch and a few other materials. There's no way these tiles would look any good on any of those except maybe the synthetic slate roofs. Then there's the cost... way more than a few flat panels (and probably still more than panels sunk into the roof line). I'm sure I don't need to point out that a lot of European roofs have been up for a hundred years and are still watertight, so we're going to need more than a 30 year warranty.

    However, for an "i am rich" statement, these'll do great ;-)

  17. Cheaper? by superdave80 · · Score: 1

    According to the company, the tiles will be more affordable than typical roofing

    I'm curious as to how they make solar panels cheaper than roofing tiles.

  18. not rich enough to own a home in SV anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not wealthy enough to own a home with a roof I can solarize in Silicon Valley anyway.

    I'm waiting to hear the Gigafactory is producing enough of the larger format battery cells so as to have available sales to hobbyists.

  19. There will be customers for these roof tiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see that lots of people here have played with the calculator, and here's what seems to be the upshot:

    With subsidies and power generation taken into account, if you live in a sunny place, a conventional roof and a Tesla roof will cost you about the same. The Tesla roof is better looking and will stay tight for far longer than 30 years, even if the photovoltaic cells themselves start getting weaker. The big downside is that you have to invest lots of money upfront, but hey, at today's interest rates, it's not like leaving it in the bank will make you rich.

    Realistically, it is a luxury item, and buyers should still expect to end up down a few bucks. But the point is that it's a few bucks, not some astronomical sum. Californians who remember the near-brownouts of a few years ago will also take comfort in the extra independence that this kind of roof+battery system provides. And for the few bucks you should expect to lose overall, you get to support the early efforts of a good US company that's really trying to do a good thing. The revenue that your roof generates for Tesla in these early years for the company will help them scale up faster, do more research, and bring down prices faster. You might not benefit from any of that directly, but it's clearly a good thing. Many will judge it to be worth the few extra bucks.

    1. Re:There will be customers for these roof tiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luxury item is the right term there, given the definition of luxury as ostentatious money pit.
      It is ruinous enough really, a few tens grands so that you get solar panels that don't look like solar panels. It's for people who buy $120k cars and $10k watches.