Slashdot Mirror


Star Trek Bridge Crew Gets IBM Watson-Powered Voice Commands (theverge.com)

PolygamousRanchKid writes: Star Trek Bridge Crew -- the VR game that puts you in the slip-on space shoes of a Starfleet officer -- already emphasizes vocal communication when you're playing with real humans, but it will soon allow you to use your voice to issue orders to computer-controlled characters, too. The feature has been made possible using IBM's VR Speech Sandbox. The software combines IBM Watson's Speech to Text and Conversation services with the company's Unity SDK, using the natural language processing capabilities of IBM's Watson software to parse your barked commands, and allow AI-controlled characters to act on them. Players will be able to launch photon torpedoes, jump to warp speed, or lock S-foils in attack formation (maybe not that last one) by requesting that your crew members push the relevant blinking buttons on their own command consoles. The feature will go live in beta form this summer, soon after the game's release on May 30th, and will allow players to complete missions across VR platforms and with a mixture of human and AI teammates.

Slashdot reader PolygamousRanchKid adds: "Let's just skip all that stuff, and cut right to the part where Kirk gets the girl... How well it actually works in practice, we'll see this summer, aboard our own starships. "Scotty, beam up the IBM stock price!" -- Posterior Admiral Ginni Rometty

61 comments

  1. Hey, y'all, watch this by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    with voice as smooth as molasses

    1. Re:Hey, y'all, watch this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with voice as smooth as molasses

      I'd say Scotty made it pretty clear that not even in the 23rd century will humans give up their shitty brogue. Ain't nobody got time for dat!

      Wanna know why? Cash me ousside...

  2. Number One... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I order you to take a number two.

    1. Re:Number One... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is going from #1 to #2 a promotion? And naval types out there? (With a clue?) (Non-Trump supporter, obviously!)

    2. Re:Number One... by freeze128 · · Score: 0

      Congratulations. You just used a 'Beavis and Butthead' joke. Watch your karma soar!

    3. Re:Number One... by zawarski · · Score: 1

      Congratulations. You recognized a 'Beavis and Butthead' joke. Damn it. I got no points to give.

  3. Leaves out the most important bit: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    By utilizing this software you agree to give IBM a royalty free, transferrable, resalable right to all vocal recordings, likenesses, and any other invaluable IP spoken within range of the always on gaming microphone.

    Should you wish to retain your privacy you may opt-out by signing the official IBM opt-in form, which guarantees that they will have access to all abovementioned intellectual property rights in the event that you sucessfully opted out.

    Oops.

    captcha was 'miseries'

    1. Re: Leaves out the most important bit: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I order you to suck a cock

  4. Not interested, i am no longer a trekkie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    JJ cured me.

    1. Re: Not interested, i am no longer a trekkie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pretty much where I am. All that I loved about Star Trek has been destroyed or sent into exile.

    2. Re: Not interested, i am no longer a trekkie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd pay to see behind the scenes where they blow jj out airlock.

  5. Computer by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

    End simulation.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my sides

    2. Re:Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      french fries or salad?

    3. Re:Computer by PJ6 · · Score: 1

      End simulation.

      Mediocre episode, but one of the best endings.

  6. IBM, Watson, and Deep Learning by wjcofkc · · Score: 3, Informative

    IBM is big on deep learning, and a centerpiece of that it Watson. I am wondering what Watson will gain from this through it's Speech to Text and Conversation services. If it's not connected in such a meaningful way, that seems like an opportunity lost.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:IBM, Watson, and Deep Learning by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Probably more understanding of natural language

    2. Re:IBM, Watson, and Deep Learning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I am wondering what Watson will gain from this through it's Speech to Text and Conversation services.

      And the answer is.... nothing. Speech to text has been limited by some seriously flawed approaches, based on a mendelian paradigm, since the earliest days of old "Dragon" products and various intellectual property theft and companies spinning off the same basic flawed approach for the last 30 years or so. Like trying to make better beers, the market is *saturated*.

      Now, if the twits would stop playing with some of the same stupid analyses and use markovian analyses for sentence analysis, or stop with the same flawed analysis of individual words and try using zero crossings instead of bucket based frequence analysis they might get somewhere. But since they've already thrown away so much critical data before they even allow the machine learning to act on the data, I don't expect anything useful in the next decade of speech to text work.

  7. I hope it's the voice of Majel Barrett/Roddenberry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope that computer talk with Majel's voice, I wouldn't want it any other way.

  8. Re:I hope it's the voice of Majel Barrett/Roddenbe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I thought they had recordings of all English phonemes using her voice.

  9. Take it slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmmm, take it slow, number one.

  10. Whoa by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

    Voice recognition software! It must be powered by AI and deep neural nets. Progress is amazing. Once day they will make software that will allow you to control your computer using voice commands. And then AI will have arrived.

    1. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and if the first step is making an interactive Star Trek simulation that responds to your voice, then it is a good thing to know that the first step was taken in 2002.

    2. Re:Whoa by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      We can already do that comma and it works perfectly full stop post comment open porn folder

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Whoa by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

      There are few things as annoying as a guy who is CONSTANTLY texting using that damn speech to text feature. Imagine being stuck in a shared hospital room for 4 days with him in the other bed.

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    4. Re:Whoa by freeze128 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Voice recognition is already pretty good. It's not Enterprise-D computer level good, but in most cases it works. What really bothers me is that I doubt that the simulation will be able to support some of the things that fans would say to it.

      "Reroute plasma through the secondary power coupling."

      "Cycle power through ventral relay."

      "Uncouple the Heisenberg compensators."

      Sure, Watson will turn the voice into text accurately enough, but the simulation won't support any of those things, and will just respond with the same thing that Alexa or Google Home does: "I'm sorry, I don't understand". That's just disappointing.

    5. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you forget "reverse the polarity of..."? That always solves any problem.

    6. Re:Whoa by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Just hire the devs from Nethack and Space Station 13. Lock them in a room and ply them with coffee and box sets. Soon have a complete simulation done.

  11. What the heck is wrong with BeauHD by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    You just can't lock s-foils in attack formation in a star trek game. It's sacrilege, even to mention such a thing in a joking manner. Put Beau in the brig while we decide what to do about it.

    1. Re:What the heck is wrong with BeauHD by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      I'm honestly starting to think that BeauHD is actually IBM's Watson in disguise

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    2. Re:What the heck is wrong with BeauHD by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      You just can't lock s-foils in attack formation in a star trek game. It's sacrilege, even to mention such a thing in a joking manner. Put Beau in the brig while we decide what to do about it.

      If you find him guilty are you going to throw him in the rancor pit or feed him to the Sarlacc?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re: What the heck is wrong with BeauHD by HumanWiki · · Score: 1

      Worse.

      He has to spend the rest of his life as a merged life form with Neelix.

    4. Re: What the heck is wrong with BeauHD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, being slowly digested over centuries is one thing, but sentient beings have rights! You can't do that sort of thing willy nilly!!!

    5. Re: What the heck is wrong with BeauHD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, a name. I hadn't thought of that. What an intriguing question. I can see why Taco is finding it so difficult to choose one. A name can have a significant effect upon a person's sense of identity.

      I've got it. Why don't you call me "NeauHD"? Wait. This is better. How about "Beauix"?

  12. tracking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Will they be able to recognize you as an individual and be able to tie that info into an online profile of you, a sort of audio fingerprint ? If not now, wil they store the recordings of your voice until they can sometime in the future ?

  13. Support Artemis instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... better than supporting those behemoths IBM and Paramount. check out some gameplay vids on youtube, it looks fun.

  14. Vocal novelty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only really new part is the cloud aspect, otherwise I've been doing voice commands to NPCs for almost a decade.

  15. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...can you call for the arch?

  16. Re:I hope it's the voice of Majel Barrett/Roddenbe by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    I too am under the impression that such recordings exist, somewhere.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  17. When is the new Star Trek series coming out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thought it was Jan 2017?

    1. Re:When is the new Star Trek series coming out? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Star Trek Discovery? It's been delayed until this fall.

  18. The Slip-On Space Shoes... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    You would think that the 23rd century would have better shoes in space. You can't kick Klingon ass with slip-ons.

    1. Re: The Slip-On Space Shoes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might also imagine they would have things we already have now, or in the Call of Duty series like drones, personal shields, and automated ship combat because human reaction time sucks.

      But no, people beam down with phasers, get shot - don't automatically scout the area...easier to write I assume.

    2. Re: The Slip-On Space Shoes... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      You might also imagine they would have things we already have now, or in the Call of Duty series like drones, personal shields,

      The Star Trek Online MMORPG has those.

      automated ship combat

      In the console version of STO, you can set BOFF abilities to execute based on conditions, similar to how gambits work in Final Fantasy XII.

  19. Gonna flop by kuzb · · Score: 1

    Any game that requires a thousand dollars of additional hardware per player on top of an already expensive PC has no chance of success. It's going to wind up being the greatest game nobody can play.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    1. Re: Gonna flop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can play it now...

    2. Re:Gonna flop by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Which is why players will go to a VR parlor and pay for this experience. It's the greatest game that nobody can *OWN*, but they can probably afford to play it.

    3. Re:Gonna flop by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

      You're probably right. But that is a problem for the financial backers to worry about. As a gamer who owns a Vive, the only thing I care about is whether the game is fun or not.

    4. Re:Gonna flop by mongothesecond · · Score: 1

      It was astounding that people paid hourly fees for text muds in the mid 90s, to the tune of hundreds of dollars per month. There is subset of the gaming population who will seek out exclusive experiences, even if they cost several thousand dollars.

    5. Re:Gonna flop by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Price will come down. It might cost a thousand dollars today, but in a few years there will be new devices out for half the price, and today's ones will be going on eBay as people upgrade to the new models that do pretty much the same but weigh less.

    6. Re:Gonna flop by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Gamers are already spending an average of $1300 for their game computers. It's totally believable, to me, that a number of them would be willing to drop an extra $600 to play VR games.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    7. Re:Gonna flop by kuzb · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it will be. You just won't be able to enjoy it with your friends unless they all own the needed hardware. That's the problem. The main strength of this game is going to be the co-op play. Sharing the experience with others. Without that it won't last.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    8. Re:Gonna flop by kuzb · · Score: 1

      There is, but I'm not sure it's enough to sustain the market. VR is not selling that well and game publishers are backing away from committing to the platform as a result.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  20. Doesn't make the game more fun by bjamesv · · Score: 1

    Which is why players will go to a VR parlor and pay for this experience. It's the greatest game that nobody can *OWN*, but they can probably afford to play it.

    And to make matters worse, there's already a Non-VR Bridge Simulator that is more fun &, less expensive http://store.steampowered.com/...

    ... that already has 3rd parties touring USA offering expensive, parlor-style setups. http://www.gamingnomads.com/

    (Not affiliated with creator, or gaming nomads. Just played once at a convention, once at home; and both times made me smile.)

  21. Couple different open source ones as well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if you never heard of 'Bridge Crew' from the DOS era, you don't know the app that really started the whole multi-console multi-person trek bridge training sim genre!

  22. Network latency by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    I understand it sends sound data to IBM and get the result. How usable is it, considering introduced network latency?

  23. Game Over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know it's game over when Watson announces,
    "Inertial dampeners failing"
    or
    "Warp core breach...antimatter confinement failing"

  24. VoiceAttack by Tukz · · Score: 1

    So pretty much the same as what https://voiceattack.com/ does or am I missing something?

    --
    - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -