Slashdot Mirror


Marissa Mayer, Yahoo's Ex-CEO, Says She's Looking 'Forward To Using Gmail Again'

Former Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer, who resigned on Tuesday after running the company for about five years, appeared at a conference in London today. At the conference, Mayer said one of the things she was looking forward to in her post-Yahoo life was using Gmail again. "I am always faster when using a tool I designed myself," she added.

187 comments

  1. Irrelevant by registrations_suck · · Score: 5, Funny

    This story is as irrelevant as her tenure at Yahoo.

    1. Re:Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      As one of the 100 legitimate Yahoo users remaining, i respectfully disagree with you!

    2. Re:Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I bet I was not the only one who read it like "Former Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer, who resigned on Tuesday after ruining the company for about five years"

    3. Re:Irrelevant by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      You do realize five years ago was 2012 and not 1995 right?

      I suppose it's feasible she directed Yahoo to secretly make a time machine, then went back to the late nineties and said "Hey guys, I'm from the future, here's the winning plan: ... do, like... nothing? Just coast for the next few decades."

    4. Re:Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As one of the 100 legitimate Yahoo users remaining, i respectfully disagree with you!

      Sent from Windows Phone

      FTFY

      RRK

    5. Re:Irrelevant by Desler · · Score: 1

      Because Yahoo was doing great before she joined?

    6. Re: Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use yahoo mail and after those remarks I give that stupid cunt zero credit. Ymail us pretyy good although there are some annoyances with authentication not worked ng as it tries to push you to the desktop app. That bitch is probably to blame for it too.

    7. Re:Irrelevant by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It was.

    8. Re:Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been on life support since the early 2000s.

    9. Re:Irrelevant by bobmajdakjr · · Score: 1

      "designed" lol. funny her name doesn't appear once on the wikipedia page for "history of gmail" as of this date and time.

    10. Re:Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, it was in trouble for years before she joined. The company went through a series of CEOs to help right the ship and they all failed. They brought in experienced CEOs from other companies, both technology and media. Also, Mayer was not the first woman; Carol Bartz came from Autodesk in 2009, where she built that company to become the powerhouse of engineering and media creation tools. In reality, Yahoo was in trouble the moment curated directories and web portals lost fashion.

    11. Re:Irrelevant by hawk · · Score: 1

      Nice to meet you, Legitimate Yahoo User.

      I'm a unicorn, and I'd like to introduce my cousin, Bigfoot . . .

      hawk

    12. Re: Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read it as 'running it into the ground for five years'

    13. Re:Irrelevant by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I guess you didn't have any stock then. For the stockholders who saw its value nearly double during her tenure, after a long slide down before, I think her time there was pretty relevant.

      I didn't have any stock either.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    14. Re:Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was.

      It was in the bizzaro dimension I guess.
       
      hasnt been relevant since 2008; they just never got the memo and kept looking for a fallguy, now, woman. Shocker.

    15. Re:Irrelevant by eneville · · Score: 1

      I see it as quite relevant. Under her leadership YahooGroups! was destroyed. Does she claim design ownership of that too? The changes to YahooGroups drove people away and killed a community. That was about the only thing that Yahoo was useful for. Sad times.

    16. Re:Irrelevant by gravewax · · Score: 1

      she drove the company at high speed into the ground, I hardly call that irrelevant.

    17. Re:Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you credit her with too much, many stocks were artificially undervalued around that time as the market was overly cautious. At best she can be credited with stagnation while everyone else has outgrown them significantly.

    18. Re:Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that had nothing to do with anything she did, in fact it was DESPITE everything she did and was mainly due to some smart investments by Jerry prior to her appointment. Remove the Alibaba investment and see how well she has done.

    19. Re: Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gmail has design? f usability nightmare. What you get when geeks design without user feedback!

    20. Re:Irrelevant by gremlinuk · · Score: 1

      But if you check her own wiki page ...
      "In 2005 she became Vice President of Search Products and User Experience. Mayer held key roles in Google Search, Google Images, Google News, Google Maps, Google Books, Google Product Search, Google Toolbar, iGoogle, and Gmail." (with a citation for a 2008 article)

    21. Re: Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow - here's a dude who's too stupid to figure out Gmail. That's impressively dumb!

    22. Re:Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALL of the return was from Jerry Yangs investment in a site called Alibaba.

    23. Re:Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Vagina Defense Force has arrived.

      Every. Fucking. Time.

  2. Ah..I think I get it by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think I'm beginning to get what happened to yahoo.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re: Ah..I think I get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Beginning"?!?!

      (or is this my whoosh moment)

    2. Re:Ah..I think I get it by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I think I'm beginning to get what happened to yahoo.

      Employing them?

    3. Re:Ah..I think I get it by Desler · · Score: 1

      What happened is that Jerry Yang was an idiot when he turned down Microsoft's 2008 offer to buy the company for 10x what Verizon paid.

    4. Re:Ah..I think I get it by ausekilis · · Score: 2

      Right, then Stephen Elop would have been put in charge and Yahoo would have been dead by 2010.

    5. Re:Ah..I think I get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Microsoft's loss then, though.

    6. Re:Ah..I think I get it by Calydor · · Score: 1

      At least Bing would have had a catchier name.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    7. Re:Ah..I think I get it by Desler · · Score: 1

      It already has been effectively dead since 2010. Beyond buying and destroying other companies what else has Yahoo accomplished?

    8. Re:Ah..I think I get it by B33rNinj4 · · Score: 1

      Damn, that makes sense.

    9. Re:Ah..I think I get it by Alumoi · · Score: 1

      Binoo? Binhoo? Boo?

    10. Re:Ah..I think I get it by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      "Windows Search 2008 Professional Powered by Internet Explorer"?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  3. I'm looking forward to more Little Critter books. by pecosdave · · Score: 0

    For my Toddler. Go write some more when you're done!

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  4. Like a screen door in a hurricane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yum

    1. Re:Like a screen door in a hurricane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

  5. This is not journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's diaryism, if it even has a name.

  6. Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa is.. by Zeio · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know a few folks from early google. They are not fond of this Marissa Mayer character. She was in the first 20 or so hires and the general consensus was that if she wasn't there google would still be google - her being there or not would have had no impact on outcome. They also indicated she was a land grabber. This would mean that her saying she designed gmail means she attended a few meetings about it. They also indicated that they would basically fence her - they would create the illusion she mattered to keep her at bay (Yes, Marissa. Sure, good idea Marissa. Oh, we'll get right on that Marissa).

    I did not like her for one specific thing, the idea that she could create a live-in office with day care at work for her progeny but the rank and file had to work in person in the most expensive real-estate area in the world with bad traffic. Ultimately yahoo japan and yahoo's investments were worth something. Everything she did at yahoo-central was more or less zero in the end. Amazing Verizon paid for it.

    --
    Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
  7. What an ass by DogDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What an ass she is. That comment just insured that she'll never be hired again as a CEO. Burning bridges never goes well.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:What an ass by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What an ass she is. That comment just insured that she'll never be hired again as a CEO. Burning bridges never goes well.

      Unless she's after a job at Google

    2. Re:What an ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      """I am always faster when using a tool I designed myself,"""""
      She was just lucky to be in a company growing fast at the good time. I really doubt SHE is design inbox herself... For me a great leader is someone able to save a company by creating new nice product and make money.... not someone to be lucky to be in the good place at the good time. She did nothing at yahoo and should rather be in shame for that

    3. Re:What an ass by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I thought she was being considered for Uber?

    4. Re:What an ass by kpainter · · Score: 1

      She will apply for a new CEO position regardless and she does need an efficient inbox to deal with all the rejection letters.

    5. Re:What an ass by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Funny

      (Googles "marissa mayer net worth") ... 430 million? That poor woman. Can we start a gofundme for her?

      Separate note on how moronic your comment is: you think that a joke that she's going to use gmail now is going to cause her not to be hired, but not saving Yahoo isn't?

      Considering how nonsensical the executive world is... I guess?

    6. Re:What an ass by mrun4982 · · Score: 2

      Of course she will get hired again as a CEO. Once you're in the ultra-exclusive CEO club, you're in and set for life.

    7. Re:What an ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What an ass she is. That comment just insured that she'll never be hired again as a CEO. Burning bridges never goes well.

      Her Yahoo stock holdings alone are worth over $200 million. She can buy her own bridge.

    8. Re:What an ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not ? A famous man once declared that he could stand on fifth avenue and shoot someone, and that he wouldn't lose any votes.

      Guess what ? He's president now.

    9. Re:What an ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In charge of closing the gender-gap!

    10. Re:What an ass by OtisSnerd · · Score: 2

      What an ass she is. That comment just insured that she'll never be hired again as a CEO. Burning bridges never goes well.

      Unless she's after a job at Google

      Or one at Oracle.

    11. Re:What an ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the 25 mil golden parachute was not enough, eh?

    12. Re:What an ass by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2

      Hardly. She worked for 2 companies. She likes one of their products more than the other. Of the things I'd judge her for (failing to turn Yahoo around and taking the job at all come to mind), her comment is irrelevant.

    13. Re:What an ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I am always faster when using a tool I designed myself," she added.
      Pretentious? Moi?

    14. Re:What an ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my, how I wish, Oracle would hire her and Elop!

    15. Re:What an ass by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      but not saving Yahoo isn't?

      What do you mean "not saving"? The shares had been in a slide since 2004. She came on board, and nearly doubled the price in her time there, then the company sold. I'd say from the shareholders point of view, that was a pretty good end to the game.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    16. Re:What an ass by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Of the things I'd judge her for (failing to turn Yahoo around and taking the job at all come to mind)

      Only on slashdot could nearly doubling the value of a company after a prior long decline be counted as "failing to turn around".

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    17. Re:What an ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, she does have a pretty spectacular ass.

      Or did you mean to say something different?

    18. Re:What an ass by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      I could've made yahoo more profitable than she did, by immediately shutting down all the company's activities without selling off any Ali Baba stock in her failed attempt to rekindle the business.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    19. Re:What an ass by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That comment just insured that she'll never be hired again as a CEO.

      And your complete ignorance on the topic is why you won't be one ... but she will again.

    20. Re: What an ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You keep posting the same, easily refuted comment. I don't think you're a shill, since you're well known in these parts for Progressive wingnuttery.

      Are you in love with Marissa?

    21. Re:What an ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess another company wants to fade into obscurity.

    22. Re:What an ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And she needs a job like why?

  8. Did she actually design gmail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My instinct is to completely doubt that she had any serious involvement in design because she's an executive type, what did she do manage the project? wiki only says:

    Mayer held key roles in Google Search, Google Images, Google News, Google Maps, Google Books, Google Product Search, Google Toolbar, iGoogle, and Gmail.

    Not specifically what role.

    1. Re:Did she actually design gmail? by computational+super · · Score: 3, Funny

      We can only assume she designed them all, then.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    2. Re: Did she actually design gmail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She was employee #20. Like it or not, Google wasnt hiring for random c-level positions that early on, so she mist have pulled her weight just fine. Maybe later on she transitioned into the typical useless manager role, but that's it.

    3. Re: Did she actually design gmail? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      She was employee #20. Like it or not, Google wasnt hiring for random c-level positions that early on, so she mist have pulled her weight just fine. Maybe later on she transitioned into the typical useless manager role, but that's it.

      I seen several people do that. I think the common thread was that they didn't really enjoy engineering and were competent at it but no match for their peers. So they doggedly took the path to management where their engineering skills did not matter at all but their BS skills were paramount.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    4. Re:Did she actually design gmail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably got coffee for the men.

    5. Re: Did she actually design gmail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She was the founder's girlfriend and she's a member of the Stahnfuhhd old boys club. Classic nepotism beneficiary.

    6. Re:Did she actually design gmail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My thoughts are, if she designed GMail, and GMail is better than Yahoo Mail. Then why the fuck didn't she spend some of her 5 years at Yahoo fixing Yahoo Mail?

  9. faster at what? by ooloorie · · Score: 5, Informative

    "I am always faster when using a tool I designed myself"

    Faster at what? Running a company into the ground? Firing male workers? Complaining of sexism?

    1. Re:faster at what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all of the above.

    2. Re:faster at what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Faster at claiming to have designed something outright that you probably just commented on... some "project managers" think they had way more input into the design process by dropping a few words in a meeting than they actually did.

    3. Re:faster at what? by nnet · · Score: 1

      Ripe for a Uber hire....

    4. Re:faster at what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, wrong gender

    5. Re:faster at what? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Maybe she can get with Al Gore and discuss the creative process.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    6. Re:faster at what? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Claiming she was sexist against men doesn't seem borne out by the numbers.

      Or wait! Maybe she KNEW yahoo would be run into the ground and THAT'S WHY SHE KEPT 63% MEN AS HER EMPLOYEES!!!

      Seriously, this is one lawsuit alleging as part of it's claims that sexism might have been involved at a company that was still a majority men by far. I'm guessing she DID fire more men than women: that's to be expected when most of the workers are men. She also probably fired far far more white people than she did people of color! She's racist against white people too!

    7. Re:faster at what? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      Claiming she was sexist against men doesn't seem borne out by the numbers. Or wait! Maybe she KNEW yahoo would be run into the ground and THAT'S WHY SHE KEPT 63% MEN AS HER EMPLOYEES!!!

      The lawsuit alleges much worse misconduct than that; I suggest you read it. Whether the lawsuit has merit, I don't know and I don't care.

      Based on her public statements, I certainly think Mayer is a bigot and a sexist, but then, like most men, I also think that the best way of dealing with bigots and sexists is to simply change jobs. That's probably why Yahoo has such a low percentage of male employees compared to the industry.

    8. Re:faster at what? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      The lawsuit alleges much worse misconduct than that; I suggest you read it. Whether the lawsuit has merit, I don't know and I don't care.

      You literally don't care whether the lawsuit has any merit, you're only focused on the accusation of sexism? Hmm....

      I certainly think Mayer is a bigot and a sexist...

      Sounds like it took quite a bit to convince you of that.

    9. Re:faster at what? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      You literally don't care whether the lawsuit has any merit

      No, I literally don't care. I think corporate efforts at diversity are bullshit. Companies should focus on hiring the best people they can regardless of sex or skin color and on making the most money they can.

      Sounds like it took quite a bit to convince you of that.

      No, not much at all; it's pretty obvious.

  10. Have Some Dignity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After being paid $260million at Yahoo for being utterly incompetent, you'd expect her to at least have the decency to leave with some dignity. Instead she immediately starts promoting a competitor's product, which comes across as being childish and spiteful.

    If she thought her own company's products were so bad she should have fixed them while she was in charge instead of waiting until she left and then criticising them.

    The only thing that gave Yahoo any value is that the previous CEO, Jerry Yang, had made a large investment in Alibaba. If it weren't for that Yahoo would have been worthless. It takes a person of low moral character to take $260million while running a company into the ground and then to criticise the company after you've left.

    1. Re:Have Some Dignity! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As a Yahoo! mail user for 20+ years, many users would have a problem with YM becoming a GM clone.

    2. Re:Have Some Dignity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As another user of yahoo mail for about 25 years now, the new interface they introduced several years ago is terrible. I want my yahoo classic look back (I can't find the option anymore - I used it as long as it was available). I absolutely hate the new interface, but I have about 25 years worth of correspondence there, so I'm unlikely to be switching over the site looking and feeling like dog shit now. :(

      It's depressing that even the person who rolled out that abomination hates it.

    3. Re:Have Some Dignity! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      As another user of yahoo mail for about 25 years now, the new interface they introduced several years ago is terrible.

      My job implemented new content rules to prevent access to web-based email. I no longer see YM (personal) or GM (contracting agency). Now I need to monitor email on my iPhone in case something important arrives.

    4. Re:Have Some Dignity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I need to monitor email on my iPhone in case something important arrives.

      Luckily for you, creimer, nothing of import will ever arrive in your inbox. So, good looking out.

      The fact that you're a contractor who makes a habit of checking your personal mail during the work day using your employer's resources speaks volumes about your professionalism, too.

      By the way - how long DOES that python script run for? You're constantly shit-posting here... do you arrive at work, start your script running, and then tuck into Slashdot for 8 hours? Maybe your script looks like this:

      #!/usr/local/bin/python3
      import time

      print("Starting super important work")
      time.sleep(28800)
      print("Time to punch out!")

    5. Re:Have Some Dignity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As another user of yahoo mail for about 25 years now,"

      Impressive for something that's only been around for 20. Maybe you work in HR?

    6. Re:Have Some Dignity! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Luckily for you, creimer, nothing of import will ever arrive in your inbox. So, good looking out. That's not even an active job search.

      I still get 20+ emails and phone calls from recruiters every day.

      The fact that you're a contractor who makes a habit of checking your personal mail during the work day using your employer's resources speaks volumes about your professionalism, too.

      Management was way more upset about not being able to access their personal email.

      [...] do you arrive at work, start your script running, and then tuck into Slashdot for 8 hours?

      My required work takes one hour. For the remaining seven hours, I'm listening to 30 people on the headset waiting for stuff to roll down hill. I occasionally run PowerShell scripts, update spreadsheets and create tickets for site techs.

      My side business takes up another eight hours when I get home. Revamping three book titles for next month's summer/winter sale at Smashwords.

      https://twitter.com/cdreimer/status/874784575389552640/

    7. Re: Have Some Dignity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creimer please stop feeding the god damn trolls. You don't have to reply to every post that tries to put you down. You don't have to prove yourself to us or the trolls. We liked you better before all this troll beef started. It's really starting to get old now and you have become the new APK.

      Here's the cycle: a) you post something b) a troll replies calling you out c) you reply to the troll with links to your work and Twitter to prove to them you are a hard worker and an ordinary guy. d) goto a.

      Just ignore them please.

    8. Re:Have Some Dignity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still get 20+ emails and phone calls from recruiters every day.

      Yeah, so like I said - nothing of import is going to hit your inbox. A bunch of people looking to "network" and "update your resume in the system," are not remotely important. Random solicitation from recruiting agencies goes directly to the spam folder, because that's pretty much all they're worth.

      Management was way more upset about not being able to access their personal email.

      And? Management aren't hourly contractors. It's incredibly unprofessional for an hourly contractor to spend contract hours fucking around doing personal stuff. Those rules shouldn't have impacted you one whit.

      My required work takes one hour. For the remaining seven hours, I'm listening to 30 people on the headset waiting for stuff to roll down hill. I occasionally run PowerShell scripts, update spreadsheets and create tickets for site techs.

      Dispatcher waiting for calls. No wonder you're paid so poorly. You're a fucking joke.

      My side business takes up another eight hours when I get home. Revamping three book titles for next month's summer/winter sale at Smashwords.

      Any one of those stories couldn't have taken more than 2 hours to write. And they wouldn't take more than an hour to edit to grammatical perfection. So what do you do the other 364 days of the year for your "side business"?

      And which hours of the day are you shit-posting on slashdot - is it the 8 hours you spend getting paid by your employer? Or is this your "side business"?

    9. Re:Have Some Dignity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ex-Yahoo here, apparently the lead designer on Yahoo! Mail resigned after Marissa kept overriding his decisions and pushing her own ideas - this after Marissa had joined recently and the designer was a hire selected by her.

    10. Re:Have Some Dignity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that making a gmail clone should not be the goal. I just want yahoo mail to suck less. I hate their web site. I hate their app. It's getting more bloated and dysfunctional with each iteration. I don't know how it looks on iphone, but the app on android is a slow and bloated mess.

    11. Re:Have Some Dignity! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I don't know how it looks on iphone, but the app on android is a slow and bloated mess.

      I don't use the YM app on iPhone. I'm using Mail since this is personal email. I do have the GM app for work emails and that isn't too bad.

    12. Re:Have Some Dignity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Click on the right-side "settings" cog wheel. Scroll Down. [x] Basic. It's as close to "classic" that still exists -- basically non-ajaxified Yahoo Mail.

    13. Re: Have Some Dignity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding, just ignore that shit. No need to prove yourself to random shit talkers on the internet. I'd be happy to have 7 free hours to fuck around at work, who cares what anyone has to say about it? Unless of course you just enjoy the back and forth, in which case.... troll on!

    14. Re:Have Some Dignity! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I thought it was a gmail clone. Both my yahoo mail and my gmail come in via pop and look identical through roundcube webmail. They must be copying from each other!

    15. Re:Have Some Dignity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stopped using their web interface a good deal back. Now, I just have Thunderbird connecting to my email adresses.

    16. Re:Have Some Dignity! by SnarkSide · · Score: 1

      The YM app recently became a Gmail clone, that's why I had to uninstall it. Now I POP my Yahoo mail in order to limit what data they have sitting around to analyze. The App has started noticeably pulling names and content from mail to add wiz-bangs to the UI. They forced me to upgrade to the current app. It took all of an hour for me to downgrade my trust level from zero to negative 2 and completely uninstall the YM app.

      Time to finally kill the yahoo.com address. Whatever Verizon does will not be in the customer's interest.

       

    17. Re: Have Some Dignity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you stopped raping goats yet?

  11. 20% project by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

    Wasn't Gmail a 20% project? If so, wouldn't that mean that most likely she didn't design it?

    1. Re:20% project by computational+super · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I thought they bought gmail mostly working and rebranded it.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    2. Re:20% project by xvan · · Score: 1

      Gmail evolved a lot from the first closed beta. Jumping from a couple MB to GB, Changing the threads paradigm for "conversations", A spam filter that really works...
      If you say 'gmail is just a rebranded webamail' you don't remember e-mail before google.
      Of course It's not to Marissa's merit, otherwise Yahoo web-mail wouldn't still be the unintuitive, constantly changing shit that's still today. On the other hand Hotmail/Outlook evolved quite fine.

    3. Re:20% project by Walking+The+Walk · · Score: 1

      Wasn't Gmail a 20% project? If so, wouldn't that mean that most likely she didn't design it?

      I don't think Google had the official 20% policy back then; GMail went closed beta back in early 2004. Apparently it was a fully supported internal project - they asked a Google Groups developer to work on it, fleshed it out with a better UI and more features, used it internally for a while, and then went beta. (I realise Wikipedia isn't always a reliable source, but the text cites two references that seem reputable.)

      And I've never heard anyone mention Mayer's involvement in it before.

      --
      A recursive sig
      Can impart wisdom and truth
      Call proc signature()
    4. Re:20% project by Walking+The+Walk · · Score: 1

      I thought they bought gmail mostly working and rebranded it.

      No it was built internally over several iterations. Even when they finally went closed beta in 2004 it was undergoing a lot of change.

      --
      A recursive sig
      Can impart wisdom and truth
      Call proc signature()
  12. Twitter by Keick · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since when do folks actually quote twitter as a news reference? And quoting some no-body twitter account that claims to be quoting someone else is NOT reference source.

    I mean seriously people, might as well quote "The Sun".

    1. Re:Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you looked at mainstream news outlets recently? A lot of the articles are either quotes from twitter (or other social media) or are a just a collection of multiple regurgitated twitter posts.

  13. Re:We've finally found something Slashdot won't co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks like someone exercised their second amendment rights...republicans like the 2nd amendment.

  14. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Some of Marissa's "land grabbing" can be found in "I'm Feeling Lucky: The Confessions of Google Employee Number 59" by Douglas Edwards.

  15. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by avandesande · · Score: 2

    I heard they kept her at bray....

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  16. Collision? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking at her actions as CEO I always wondered if she was a trove horse! A loyal googler who was at yahoo to eliminate it from within. Being an exec at yahoo that would be collusion.

    Is there something here or is my tin foil hat restricting oxygen to the brain again?

    1. Re:Collision? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a Trove horse, is that anything like a trojan horse?

  17. There are many things by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    in Heaven and Earth I believe. That Marissa Mayer designed Gmail is not one of them. Maybe they asked her what color some of the icons should be and then hired a proper designer behind her back. But even that's a stretch.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  18. Bloody Useless by segedunum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    She didn't design shit herself and it's exceptionally sad that she is claiming that she did, but that's what useless people who get found out do.

    1. Re:Bloody Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capitalism: The art of making money with the work of others,

  19. Re:We've finally found something Slashdot won't co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot will probably cover it eventually.

    Since the most recent takeover, I get the feeling that the 'editors' mostly just load up the auto-poster at the beginning of their shift and then disappear for the rest of the day.

  20. Re:We've finally found something Slashdot won't co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be news for nerds in what way?

  21. Re:We've finally found something Slashdot won't co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is slashdot, fox news is over there ----->

  22. Her golden parachute by Hentai007 · · Score: 1

    Did it not have a non-disparage clause? I can't imagine Verizon wouldn't have added one, right? Couldn't that statement be seen as a violation of that clause? Since she is saying in public that a competitors product is superior?

  23. Because she has no concerns about privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    obviously.

  24. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warning: Amazon affiliate spam. Check the URL.

  25. Here is a thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only there was someone at Yahoo that could have fixed all the problems with Yahoo mail. I would have had the top person tell the mail team to get their act together and make it work. It's almost like the one in charge was spending time decorating the office and buying random shit.

  26. Re:We've finally found something Slashdot won't co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters". Got it?

  27. Shitstorms never strike twice? by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So as a department-head at Google she "designed" Gmail, yet at the absolute ruler of Yahoo, she couldn't make a YahooMail work?
    Seems that Gmail is good despite her involvement.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:Shitstorms never strike twice? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      And me without modpoints.

      Best thing anyone's said so far - most have been generic shit talking about her. But you made a very nice, constrained point.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:Shitstorms never strike twice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats what I always puzzled over.

      Yahoo mail sucked, and got worse and worse as a product at a company that had a CEO who used to work at Google. One of the things that made Google a smash hit was the UI in their products didnt suck, stuff just worked.

      After the first yahoo hack became public I deleted my yahoo account(s), wont have anything to do with "Yahoo" again.

  28. addin insult to injury by Dr.Saeuerlich · · Score: 2

    must be great hearing this from your ex-boss, who drove your shop to the wall, if you're a Yahoo employee

  29. I never particularly liked her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But to be fair, yahoo was doomed well before she arrived.

  30. CEO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CEO didn't do a thing about it while she had the 5 years of power and talks shit after she leaves? That's rich. This is why CEOs are overpaid cunts.

  31. uh.oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    she'll climb the political ladder, eventually run for president campaigning that she designed the constitution of independence; people will believe her as to otherwise deny implies you are an active misogynistic fatbastard.--. i am anonymousfathoward

  32. Re:I'm looking forward to more Little Critter book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope for our kids' sake Mercer doesn't get replaced by Marissa.

  33. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    spam free link: Amazon
    or even Google.

  34. she's not liked by the google brass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Serge and Larry prize loyalty and were well pissed when she jumped to be a CEO. She's smart, has lots of money and will most likely try to start something so Yahoo isn't what she ends up being known for, but she's not going back to Google.

  35. Affirmative Action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    More like affirmative action: the art of getting promoted for being a woman or other minority despite having no competence

  36. Re:I would still lick her stamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know what it is about her

    Pro-tip: You're shallow.

  37. Well Then... by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

    At the conference, Mayer said one of the things she was looking forward to in her post-Yahoo life was using Gmail again. "I am always faster when using a tool I designed myself," she added.

    It is too bad she did not redesign Yahoo Mail. Then the company would have gotten something of value from her tenure.

    --
    Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
  38. Webmail by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    Web mail clients all seem equally bad to me. Gmail doesn't even let you select a large range of emails at one time. They all have these kinds of issues.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:Webmail by TheCowSaysMoo · · Score: 1

      Inbox by Gmail does have this functionality. I use it quite often.

      It also has the ability to snooze emails (hide, then reappear at the top on a specified date/time), use reminders (same thing as an email to yourself with just a subject line), scrape pertinent info from a common email (like an Amazon purchase) and display it in an easy-to-read format at the top of the email, and save links as a clickable item instead of sending them in the body/subject of an email. And the bundling of emails is MUCH better than how it's handled in Gmail, including the ability to mass delete, snooze, or archive an entire bundle with one click.

      Honestly, I'm not sure why Google hasn't completely switched from Gmail over to Inbox by Gmail, except for the terrible calendar request handling in Inbox. It's a far superior product and every friend I've recommended it to (with the caveat that they have to give it good week of use) has kept it and sees Gmail as antiquated.

    2. Re:Webmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not the biggest fan of webmail clients in general (Thunderbird FTW), but gmail's web client does let you select emails (click a checkbox and then shift-click another checkbox) in a mailbox or search results, or by filter.

    3. Re: Webmail by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Tried it in Firefox the other day, wouldn't work.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    4. Re: Webmail by TheCowSaysMoo · · Score: 1

      Which part? I'm browsing around in Firefox and can do all the same functionality as using it in Chrome. Mass selection, snoozing, reminders, all of it.

  39. Public penance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, it's like Reddit hiring parasite Ellen Pao: she is the right gender to make them look like they no longer rape women at board meetings or whatever they do. They will make this public penance, pay her hundreds of millions, and by doing so shut up the propaganda press and regain as much as they paid in stock value easily.

  40. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    Given a weaker company with 100% pay and on site childcare, or a stronger company with 90% pay, I would definitely choose the one with on site childcare.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  41. She design what? by fabriciom · · Score: 1

    I'd like to know exactly what about gmail she designed? The logo? A button? Workflow? Or was it cause she "handled" the department in charge of the development she automatically assumes she "designed" it..

    1. Re:She design what? by cstacy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Marissa Mayer did not invent Gmail.
      Everyone knows that was Shiva Ayyadurai.

    2. Re:She design what? by Hussman32 · · Score: 1

      Crap, you had me there for a minute.

      --
      "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
    3. Re:She design what? by fabriciom · · Score: 1

      She definitely design gmail as per Ayyadurai requirements...

  42. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by barc0001 · · Score: 1

    OH NOES!!! How DARE someone benefit by taking the effort to recommend a relevant link?

  43. I hope she has army of good lawyers by u19925 · · Score: 1

    Most mergers and acquisitions have clause where high ranking officers cannot deliberately defame company or its products and services and if they do so, they may lose golden parachute. This statement is definitely materially damaging to Yahoo's reputation (whatever little is left) and I expect a lawsuit by Verizon followed by private settlement. I would be surprised if there is no lawsuit.

    1. Re:I hope she has army of good lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Defamation - Wikipedia
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation
      Defamation. ... Under common law, to constitute defamation, **a claim must generally be false** and must have been made to someone other than the person defamed. Some common law jurisdictions also distinguish between spoken defamation, called slander, and defamation in other media such as printed words or images, called libel.

      Seems to me her preferring to use Gmail is not a false claim.

    2. Re:I hope she has army of good lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Defamation can be used even when you have no contract. This is not about defamation, it is about contract violation. Most merger contracts have terms which prohibit them from saying things which could materially impact the valuation of the company and this thing does that.

    3. Re:I hope she has army of good lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think anything that shows Marissa was not acting in the best interests of Yahoo actually is a positive thing for the company as it explains her incompetence in running it and how much better off they are without her.

  44. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by Jfetjunky · · Score: 2

    Fair enough, but I think the original point was that Mayer built herself a private daycare ONLY in her office. That's next-level, in your face douchery.

  45. a tool I designed myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That explains a lot about why Yahoo was a disaster. Gmail is awful. It throws away most of what was learned about a good ui for email in the 20 years previous, which is typical of ignoramus newcomers like Mayer. I hate using it, and only do so when I have to.

  46. Re:I would still lick her stamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait till you hear her laugh, you'll run for the hills.

  47. That's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    considering Gmail has always looked/felt like a web-based e-mail client I built years earlier.

  48. So Marissa Mayer will type like a machine gun? by cuthead · · Score: 1

    where is her muscle?

  49. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn right - think you deserve something for posting a freaking URL? F off.

  50. Re:I'm looking forward to more Little Critter book by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    Someone should do a "Boy Bears are Bad" Little Critter spoof cover. I'm not much of an artist, but I may attempt it anyways, of course attributing the book to Marissa Mayer.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  51. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  52. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by Holi · · Score: 1

    How is an affiliate link that leads to the identical place spam?

    What are you just upset because someone uses a system the way it's designed?

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  53. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by Holi · · Score: 1

    If it was beneficial why should he not be rewarded.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  54. Re:We've finally found something Slashdot won't co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just a politician getting what he deserves. Why shoud we care?

  55. Yahoo is/was still a thing... by Imazalil · · Score: 1

    So everyone is shitting on Marissa Mayer, but remember she's kept the sinking ship that is Yahoo around many more years than I ever expect it survive. Sure, it should have been put out of it's misery long ago, but to drag it out this long is a feat.

    How may of you complaining about her running it to the ground ever used a Yahoo service? In a post-google-search world (aka, not when the alternative was alta vista or ask jeeves)?

    1. Re:Yahoo is/was still a thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you implying it's our responsibility to use Yahoo services to generate enough ad revenue to keep the company afloat?

  56. Re: Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More specifically, what kind of douchebag *cares* so very much that they'd bitch about it?

  57. Yahoo screwed up numerous acquistions before Mayer by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 4, Informative

    First one that comes to mind is Flickr. Yahoo bought Flickr, at the time the premier photo site on the web, and proceeded to do nothing to keep it current and competitive. They were developing the ability to geotag photos by dropping on a map which languished for 5+ years allowing Google to bypass them and they could have eaten Instagram's lunch if they had been paying attention.

  58. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice try, cocksucker. Yet, you failed.

  59. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    You forgot to mention she was one of the founders girlfriend (Brin). That is the dirty secret no one talks about.

  60. Marissa Mayer prefers Pine to Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I (whoever "I" am) call BS:

    https://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2006/03/marissa-mayer-prefers-pine-to-gmail.html

  61. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  62. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    Haven't you just described what every executive does? You don't get to the top by being humble and letting credit ever go to someone else.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  63. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by w1zz4 · · Score: 1

    Typical of a bad leader, doing almost nothing and taking all credit...

  64. Trojan horse did her job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe now that Yahoo has been conquered, the Verizon guys will fix Flickr so we can customize our layout again? Please? Pretty please? Oh, and make Yahoo Finance fast again? Naaa... crazy talk. They'll probably just keep ruining it.

  65. What's so good about gmail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's so good about gmail? Never could figure out why anyone was attracted to it. What's wrong with using an IMAP client on your phone/desktop, and an IMAP server?

  66. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What's so good about Google? I don't get it. They sell ads and spam the Internet with them. Big freakin' deal.

  67. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the idea that she could create a live-in office with day care at work for her progeny

    What do you expect from a bookah?

  68. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could hinestly care less. She was a joke and is a joke riding a wave at the height of Silicon Valley hype. Some of us could give a shit about valuation, we just know the she and those like her aren't terribly impressive human beings. Double yawn.

  69. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BUT ITS A WOMEN SHE DESERVES IT

    Turns out gender has nothing to do with humans being good or bad people. Definitely a bay area trend though.

  70. This does not help improve my view of her by PoopMonkey · · Score: 1

    Admitting to having a hand in designing GMail? That does not impress me.

  71. The tool can make tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats it... Yahoo is part of bing now... mission accomnplished... returning to fathership now...

  72. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not Brin's. Page's.

  73. Re: Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I too know some early googlers.

    Marissa hung around late at night to "accidently" bump into Larry.

    The word was she enjoys it in her asshole. Her path up the chain as the bosses gf was then assured. The people with real ability there marginalised her over time as they couldn't care less that she could suck the boss dry in seconds.

    She was effectively shunned to irrelevance so it was time to jump ship after Larry moved on to the next young thing.

    The rest is history.

  74. Birds of the feather... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marisa Mayer belongs right next to Shiva Ayyadurai at the Internet Hall of Fame in the "Inventors of Email" wing.

  75. Re:Thoughts I collected from googlers on Marissa i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot to mention she was one of the founders girlfriend (Brin). That is the dirty secret no one talks about.

    you mean Page.

  76. Gmail interface sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gmail has one of the shittiest interfaces I've ever used.

    It's particularly bad when replying to emails that have had lots of back-and-forth and trying to send an email in the middle of the chain.