Slashdot Mirror


Top UK Supermarket Laser Prints Labels On Avocados To Reduce Waste (telegraph.co.uk)

One of the largest British retailers in London, M&S, is opting in for laser-printed barcodes to reduce paper waste. "The labels, which are etched onto fruit's skins with lasers instead of stickers, will save 10 tons of paper and five tons of glue every year according to M&S," reports The Telegraph. The labels will be etched into the skins of avocados, but "could soon be introduced to other fruit and vegetables and adopted by other supermarkets which are looking for new waste reduction techniques." The labels themselves include the shop logo, best before date, country of origin and product code for entering at the till. What's more is that the avocado's skin is the only area impacted by the lasers -- none of the fruit gets damaged. Bruce66423 writes: Print the information usually on the packaging to reduce waste. Excellent idea -- although the Aldi (the radically cheap, all own brand chain) alternative is to leave avocados untouched and get the cashiers to enter the code.

219 comments

  1. First the produce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Employees and customers are next.

    1. Re:First the produce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      First they came for the avocados, and no one spoke out...

  2. Hopefully apples too by dbIII · · Score: 2

    Hopefully apples too - anyone else annoyed by little stickers on apples?

    1. Re:Hopefully apples too by symes · · Score: 4, Informative

      Very much so. Especially when there is a bit of glue residue left after the label has been removed. I do wonder, though, if this might effect the quality of the fruit. Avacados have thick skin, as do banannas, so they are probably ok. But apples, peaches and so on?

    2. Re:Hopefully apples too by evilbessie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No the apples (like basically every other vegetable and fruit) come on a styrofoam tray wrapped in polyethylene. M&S are basically the worst for excessive packaging so this is an absolute joke. They basically do not have loose produce, everything is prewrapped in usually at least 2 layers of plastic, not useful stuff we can get recycled at the kerbside either.

    3. Re:Hopefully apples too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So for one, you don't mind eating the ink? And you don't want to wash off fruits and vegetables like you should? Sounds disgusting to print onto an apple.

    4. Re:Hopefully apples too by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Given your low uid, I understand where you're coming from. I vaguely remember something similar to what you mention.

      Lately, I have noticed the glues used are basically edible. This has become a requirement in some areas.

      Now, how about an edible bar-code sticker?

      Then, we could have some serious talks about it on /.:

      Edible bar-code sticker VS laser imprinted!

      hehehe...

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    5. Re:Hopefully apples too by houghi · · Score: 2

      I never wash fruit or vegetables. I tried and the only difference I noticed is the time I wasted cleaning them.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re:Hopefully apples too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hopefully grapes too

    7. Re:Hopefully apples too by dbIII · · Score: 1

      you don't mind eating the ink? And you don't want to wash off fruits and vegetables like you should

      There is almost always one who reads an entire novel that does not exist between the lines.
      Yet amazingly words that actually were there were not read - "The labels, which are etched onto fruit's skins with lasers instead of stickers"

    8. Re: Hopefully apples too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mate, read the summary again. It's burning the label into the outer skin of the fruit. No ink involved.

    9. Re:Hopefully apples too by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Edible doesn't equate tasty. Even if they are flavorless, they have a texture that may clash with the fruit they're stuck to.

      Yes, I know, very much a First-World problem, but let's be honest here, so is buying tropical fruits in areas where you dig in a pile of snow to find your car in Winter.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re: Hopefully apples too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The stickers may be a mild annoyance, but I'd much rather have them than have a bar code engraved in the skin of the apple.

    11. Re: Hopefully apples too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I never wash fruit or vegetables. I tried and the only difference I noticed is the time I wasted cleaning them.

      Interesting question, is the time saved by not washing worth risking occasional food poisoning ?
      Answer: only to those who have not yet experienced food poisoning, esp. Something serious like e.coli

    12. Re: Hopefully apples too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laserprinters use ink. Simple(ton) deduction.

    13. Re:Hopefully apples too by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Do you live in the Great White North?

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    14. Re:Hopefully apples too by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I do wonder, though, if this might effect the quality of the fruit.

      The quality of the fruit already exists before the label is attached, so what you suggest is impossible.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    15. Re: Hopefully apples too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it is more to do with the layer of pesticide residue on the edible skins of fruits and vegetables.

    16. Re:Hopefully apples too by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Causing a deterioration in quality is far from impossible.

    17. Re: Hopefully apples too by Cederic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, not being able to tell the difference doesn't mean that over time there isn't one.

    18. Re:Hopefully apples too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do they put labels on them anyway? Where I buy my fruit, they don't have labels, the label is on the stand from which you take them and put them in a bag.

    19. Re:Hopefully apples too by guises · · Score: 1

      In fact, both the glue and the sticker are edible. Here.

    20. Re:Hopefully apples too by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      I'd like to look it up on the map, but I think it's frozen to the table and I can't find the pickaxe to get rid of the ice on top.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    21. Re: Hopefully apples too by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Laserprinters don't use ink. They use toner, basically magnetic plastic dust.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    22. Re:Hopefully apples too by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The loose fruit and veg is usually near the lunch stuff in the standard M&S layout. They provide little plastic bags for you to put the loose fruit in, but it's up to you if you use them or bring your own or whatever.

      MS packaging is better than most. They often use metal trays, for example, rather than plastic, which can be recycled and degrade faster. They cost 1p more but you can often use them to cook the food in too, saving on tin foil and baking tray liner.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:Hopefully apples too by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      He is pointing out that the OP doesn't know the difference between effect and affect. And neither, apparently, do you.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    24. Re:Hopefully apples too by vipw · · Score: 1

      But that would be affecting the quality of the fruit. The poster wondered if it could effect the quality. That indeed seems impossible according to our understanding of physics.

    25. Re: Hopefully apples too by vipw · · Score: 1

      Laser printers don't use ink.

      But they do use lasers. Lasers are used for etching text and designs into glass, plastics, metals, wood, and so on. I'm not sure how ink comes to mind. Maybe someone was chewing on a pen while typing.

    26. Re:Hopefully apples too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a simple reason. It's because the stand is not edible.

    27. Re:Hopefully apples too by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Especially when there is a bit of glue residue left after the label has been removed.

      If you're afraid of the glue reside I suggest you never scratch the surface of an apple. You'll find supermarket apples are dipped in wax.

    28. Re:Hopefully apples too by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Well, since you're being cocks about an e vs an a, yes, it could effect the quality.

      verb
      verb: effect; 3rd person present: effects; past tense: effected; past participle: effected; gerund or present participle: effecting

              1.
              cause (something) to happen; bring about.

      Laser printing an apple could indeed cause to happen the resultant quality of the fruit.

      Fuck me, if you're going to be a pedant at least find something concrete on which to base it.

    29. Re:Hopefully apples too by enjar · · Score: 1

      Yes. My kid ends up taking the sticker off the apple and then sticking them in odd places. It's not the most burning problem in the world, but I wouldn't miss them. Also there's nothing like the feeling of failure when I mix up a gin and tonic and then see a sticker on the section of lime I've already submerged.

    30. Re:Hopefully apples too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fwiw, the stickers are edible

    31. Re:Hopefully apples too by evilbessie · · Score: 1

      Ah that must be newish as they never used to have much in the way of loose produce (then almost all have gone this way too) as I'm sure wastage is higher with loose vs prepackaged. Loose veg is rarer these days, most everything is prepackaged :(

      Foil vs CPET definitely isn't the way you put it however, I cannot recycle foil (including the 'single' use cooking trays) in kerbside recycling, I can do this for the CPET trays which are the alternative. No idea why you'd line anything with foil, the enamel trays I have are easy to clean so why put things on those that you need to dispose of? Also had you thought of making your own food not buying ready meals, that's also better for you.

    32. Re: Hopefully apples too by jittles · · Score: 1

      I thought it is more to do with the layer of pesticide residue on the edible skins of fruits and vegetables.

      That depends. Some fruits and vegetables are very difficult to clean properly and so, even if prewashed, can often contain harmful diseases and bacteria on the surface. Strawberrries, spinach, lettuce, and other such delectable treats should be thoroughly washed prior to consumption.

    33. Re:Hopefully apples too by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Mind your head, I'm dropping a new shovel down. Looks like you've worn that one out.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    34. Re:Hopefully apples too by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Mine used to do that. Don't worry, by the time they're 14 or so they'll grow out of it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    35. Re:Hopefully apples too by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I blame the missing / on the close of the quote block.

    36. Re:Hopefully apples too by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If you burn things you quite often get carcinogens. I think I'd rather take my chances with the labels.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    37. Re:Hopefully apples too by Alypius · · Score: 1

      If you immediately know the candlelight is fire, then the meal was cooked along time ago.

    38. Re:Hopefully apples too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's concrete? The verb is genesis. If you're going to be a pedant, know the minor distinction when something is being transformative.

      Or a lawyer, because it's Serious Business when designating "derivative" works, and whether a "creation" is constituted.

      "Effect" as a verb is genesis. Lasering will not create new properties.

    39. Re:Hopefully apples too by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Do you mean - shock, horror! - that it's just possible that the foods have been washed between picking and packaging?

      Impossible!

      (I never wash fruit or veg either, unless the wife is watching. If she's not watching, it save time and effort, and if she is watching, it saves the time and effort of an argument. Neither significantly affects food safety.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    40. Re: Hopefully apples too by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      That's the first time that I've seen

      "lettuce", and "delectable"

      used in the same sentence without a [SARCASM] flag.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  3. And you're labelling avocados by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because why?

    1. Re:And you're labelling avocados by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Because we have regulations that state information such as variety, country of origin and best before date are on the item (if sold individually) or the outer packaging.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    2. Re: And you're labelling avocados by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not for produce.

    3. Re:And you're labelling avocados by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that the machine knows it's an avocado?

    4. Re:And you're labelling avocados by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You made that up. Stop lying.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:And you're labelling avocados by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      because why?

      So that the cashier enters the correct code, whether it's an expensive organic avocado or a somewhat less expensive regular avocado.

  4. But When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will they tattoo foreheads for a universal id system? Will people then be sold in supermarkets too?

    1. Re:But When? by fred911 · · Score: 2

      "Will people then be sold in supermarkets too?"

      Of course not, they'll be an app for that (like Uber). No one wants to pay retail for people!

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    2. Re:But When? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      It's not about paying retail.
      People don't want to foot the ongoing maintenance bill of owning one.
      Renting is much easier

    3. Re:But When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they will be easier to track, that's the whole idea.

    4. Re:But When? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      No one wants to pay retail for people!

      Of course not. The DIY route is much more fun.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  5. Re:Hopefully onions too by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I used to work with a guy who stuck them to the side of his monitor. Over time there were so many I reckoned the thing was ready to tip over. And that was before those fancy-pants flatscreen jobbies too.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  6. Not too useful by religionofpeas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It doesn't work on majority of fruits. Most of the information they print is redundant. Nobody needs the shop logo. The country of origin is already printed on the bin. The product code can be memorized/looked up by the cashier. That only leaves the best-by date, which, in the case of avocados, isn't very reliable.

    1. Re:Not too useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The country of origin is already printed on the bin. The product code can be memorized/looked up by the cashier.

      I have seen many cases here in Australia where the supermarket has mixed produce from different countries of origin, the sign said local & imported. I have also seen many cases where the produce was changed but the signage wasn't. Local produce went out of season, imported came in and sign still declared it to be local while the sticker on the actual item said otherwise.

      As for the product code, supermarkets are pushing people to self-service checkouts. Having the code to type into the self-service checkout makes things quicker.

    2. Re:Not too useful by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Not useful to you, but none the less information that is relevant to many.

      Why should someone sell a product if they can't display their name or logo on it?
      How should a product code be memorised? It's hard enough to identify what kind of Apple an apple is within a bag. Quite often the cashier relies on the colour of the sticker they see so they know if they need to run it up as pink lady, red delicious, fuji, etc.

      Now as for best by date. .... Wait what? You have best by dates on fruit? Like WTF? Ripeness depends on so many factors that this is incredibly meaningless.

    3. Re:Not too useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why should someone sell a product if they can't display their name or logo on it?

      Someone should sell a product so that people could buy it.

      How should a product code be memorised?

      Not really needed, cashiers have small booklets with all the codes for vegetables/fruits, together with pictures of them.

      I don't understand why they need these labels anyways.. in my local supermarket no vegetable or fruit has labels and somehow the system works just fine. All the info one would want is displayed on a big sign next to the crate.

    4. Re:Not too useful by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Why should someone sell a product if they can't display their name or logo on it?

      When you see the product, you're already in the fucking store, with logos on every single flat surface.

      How should a product code be memorised?

      Cash registers around here have a flip book attached, with color pictures, name and code. After a while, the cashier will automatically remember the most common items.

    5. Re:Not too useful by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you live in the dark ages
      Cash registers at the super markets around here have colour touch screens
      Same with the self service checkouts. I tap "Look up item", "Fruit & Vegetables" and if it's not on that screen I press "A" for apple.

    6. Re:Not too useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you see the product, you're already in the fucking store, with logos on every single flat surface.

      Sounds like you live in the dark ages

      It'll take a while before people realize that round surfaces can have logos on them as well. At least we won't get burned at the stake for saying so this time around!

    7. Re:Not too useful by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Cash registers at the super markets around here have colour touch screens

      I hope we can skip those, and go directly to cameras with image recognition to identify the fruit automatically.

    8. Re:Not too useful by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Since this is about food and supermarkets, you'll be burned at the steaks instead.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    9. Re:Not too useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope we can skip those, and go directly to cameras with image recognition to identify the fruit automatically.

      I've seen such devices, somewhere around 3-4 years ago, at a supermarket in France. Worked relatively well, but the next time I went there, they were replaced by the more traditional color-touchscreen-self-service scales.
      In an unrelated note, my local supermarket around Paris opted for corn-based-biodegradable-non-translucent bags for fruits and vegetables, so a camera won't be very efficient there.

    10. Re:Not too useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have those in one supermarket in Germany. Not a fan because it's not very reliable and very limited, especially when you have different kinds of the same produce.

      In my experience nothing beats the old "enter the 3-4 digit number right next to the produce" procedure. It's fast, easy (you don't have people holding up the line because they're unfamiliar with the system), flexible and discrete (e.g. you can have a dozen different kinds of apples which neither a camera nor most shoppers can tell apart).

    11. Re:Not too useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homer: Mmmmm... burning at the steak... arrrggghh *drools*

    12. Re:Not too useful by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      How should a product code be memorised?

      I don't know how things are where you live, but here in Southern California, grocery checkers are expected to recognize all common produce and know the codes without looking them up. The more codes they know, the less time they waste looking them up and the more customers they can serve per hour.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    13. Re:Not too useful by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Why should someone sell a product if they can't display their name or logo on it?

      Someone should sell a product so that people could buy it.

      How should a product code be memorised?

      Not really needed, cashiers have small booklets with all the codes for vegetables/fruits, together with pictures of them.

      Oh, yes, leave it to the trainee cashier to look up every fruit and vegetable code, rather than having it on the produce itself. I love wasting 10 minutes while she rings up the order in front of me.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    14. Re:Not too useful by IRGlover · · Score: 1

      This is from the same company that sell a coconut with a ring-pull (Sorry for the Hate Mail link!). It is probably more about their target demographics and getting some free publicity than anything genuinely practical.

    15. Re:Not too useful by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      When you see the product, you're already in the fucking store, with logos on every single flat surface.

      And? That's an excuse to sell unlabelled product that no one can identify out of the store?

      Cash registers around here have a flip book attached, with color pictures, name and code. After a while, the cashier will automatically remember the most common items.

      I actually worked as a cash register. Identifying different types of apples is frigging hard from a picture alone even if the apples weren't presented in not clear plastic bags. Combine that with the fact that most supermarket checkout staff are incredibly poorly paid, often students who have not interest in career and don't give a shit about working at the job let alone have any affection for their company anything you do to make their job harder will result in the wrong items being put through.

      Likewise a major source of theft from self checkout lanes in supermarkets is people running up one kind of apple as another at the checkout. It is hard to detect for the supervisor even with the labels. It is impossible to detect via machine. It would be impossible to do without the label.

      So what? It's just a few dollars you may say? Well I still remember the local supermarket who basically had to give away half of their apple stock. Why? People were buying jazz apples and running them up as junamis. The end result an automatic reorder for a huge quantity of junamis resulting in a huge overstock while all other apples were sold out. For a month they were checking every other self checkout and the only thing the staff were looking for were the colour labels on the apples to resolve the stock issue.

      So please, continue to trivialise the issue.

    16. Re:Not too useful by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      common produce

      Oh I had to do the same. You know the easiest way to tell the difference between a fuji apple and a jazz apple? One has a blue label and the other a red / green one. Every so often we got some apples through without labels. In the interest of time store policy was spend no more than a few seconds trying to identify the type, if you can't the run it up as the cheapest to avoid any customer complaints if you get it wrong.

    17. Re:Not too useful by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      That's an excuse to sell unlabelled product that no one can identify out of the store?

      You need a store logo to identify an avocado ?

      I actually worked as a cash register. Identifying different types of apples is frigging hard

      How does laser printing avocados help with that ?

    18. Re:Not too useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to me that a camera with a variation on facial recognition code should be sufficient to identify the produce, and to ring up the price. Even the scale information could be figured in, to determine the proper price. I don't know if "best by" info is really needed for produce: I just feel, squeeze and sniff.

    19. Re:Not too useful by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      How does laser printing avocados help with that ?

      Because maybe instead of stickers on apples, we can laser print the barcode on apples too? Then we can just scan the apples.

      In the meantime, even if you cannot scan it, you can at least laser print the PLU number on the apple itself so thus avoiding the need for a sticker.

      Luckily, some cashiers are smart enough to look at the sticker rather than the book...

    20. Re:Not too useful by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      At the moment the image recognition is only good enough for "Hotdog" or "Not hotdog"
      https://itunes.apple.com/us/ap...

    21. Re: Not too useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah but then you lose the difference in price with organic vs conventional produce... Like oranges... You can't really tell by looking at one...

    22. Re:Not too useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And? That's an excuse to sell unlabelled product that no one can identify out of the store?"

      Identify what? Do you need a label to identify an avocado in case you forget what it was when you put it in the fridge? Or, are you saying that everything sold by everyone has to have a logo to tell everyone where it was bought from?

      Screw that. Once it's out of the store and in your kitchen, who the hell cares what brand it was? Given the choice between all my food being branded like cattle because some twatty brand manager wants their logo on everything, and a store like Aldi that achieves the same savings by expecting store staff to know what the hell they're actually selling, I'll go for the German store thanks.

  7. British retailer in London? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell does one of the largest British retailers in London mean? They're either a large British retailer or they aren't. Britain is not London and similarly, London is not Britain.

    M&S (Marks & Spencer) are a national food and clothing retailer and aren't only in London. Maybe they're piloting their laser printed fruit in London but for God sake, stop saying London when you don't need to.

    1. Re:British retailer in London? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell does one of the largest British retailers in London mean?

      It means that they are one of the largest chains in London and that they are testing this in their shops in London.

    2. Re:British retailer in London? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      As opposed to a large foreign retailer in London?

    3. Re:British retailer in London? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They certainly aren't the largest - either in the size of their stores or the number of stores. Perhaps largest based on prices or profit margin though, though I suspect the size of Tesco's turnover ensures that the overall profit is still higher than M&S.

    4. Re:British retailer in London? by MrMr · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, to emphasize it's not Lidl or Aldi for instance, because you would expect them to tattoo foreign avocado's.

    5. Re:British retailer in London? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lidl and Aldi are German. I doubt the food safety obsessed German consumers would buy avocado's with a barcode etched into the fruit itself, so unless foreign branches of Aldi and Lidl buy their produce completely independently, I doubt either of those chains would be the first to sell such an item.

    6. Re: British retailer in London? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are one of the largest chains in London but no-one would say that, because they are also one of the largest chains in Britain. It's like saying Walmart are one of the largest chains in Los Angeles.

    7. Re:British retailer in London? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greengrocer's sell avocado's in their shop's.

    8. Re:British retailer in London? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      ASDA is owned by Walmart

    9. Re: British retailer in London? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6 apostrophes or less.

  8. Wasteful packaging by Bert64 · · Score: 2

    Some packaging is way over the top, and the vast majority of household waste at least for me is in the form of packaging...
    Virtually no packaging can be reused, not much biodegrades and only some can be recycled through an energy intensive process of melting it all down again.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    1. Re:Wasteful packaging by doom · · Score: 1

      Virtually no packaging can be reused, not much biodegrades and only some can be recycled through an energy intensive process of melting it all down again.

      So you prefer energy-intensive alternatives, like burning a logo with a laser?

    2. Re:Wasteful packaging by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      So you prefer energy-intensive alternatives, like burning a logo with a laser?

      I used to work (for about 2 months) in a paper mill. Do you know how much energy it takes to make paper? Then to coat it to give a dense, non-wicking surface onto which ink will stick and not "bleed" along particular fibres?

      I'm not wholly convinced by the benefits of using a laser over using an inkjet (we've been inkjet printing onto egg's shells for about a decade) loaded with edible ink. But you're going to have to work a lot harder than you have shown to justify a charge of "energy inefficiency".

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  9. home as a dream by UnixUnix · · Score: 1

    Uh oh one more reason for millennials to go even more wild on avocado toast #no_home http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/16...

  10. Re:Hopefully onions too by ls671 · · Score: 1

    seen it too!

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  11. It is no barcode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article states it is the code to enter at the till. So why not let the cashier employee remember the code. Window dressing "we are so environmental responsible"

    1. Re:It is no barcode by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Tesco carried over 90,000 products until recently, when they dropped some due to choice fatigue reducing their profits. You going to study up and remember the codes for each and every one of them? How about you learn the price at the same time, that can change on a daily basis, but shouldn't be a problem.

      That's why there's scanners at the till.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    2. Re:It is no barcode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but it is no barcode. The article states: "Avocados are lasered with the shop logo, best before date, country of origin and product code for entering at the till."
      Also to be seen in the pictures

  12. A solution to a problem that doesn't exist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Sweden we generally weigh the fruit and veg ourselves. One bag of fruit, one printed label. You then scan the label with your barcode reader like any other item you purchase. For item price wares, there is a barcode to scan placed next to the fruit bin on the description tag. It can be improved, but it sure saves time by not having to haul everything up at the checkout. (Unless you are unlucky enough to run into a random spot check...)

    1. Re:A solution to a problem that doesn't exist? by houghi · · Score: 1

      In Belgium it depends. Some stores you weigh, sometimes you do not. Avocado would never be something that you buy per weight. You buy it per piece.

      The real reason they do this is obvious money and then use the environment thing as marketing.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  13. Re:Hopefully onions too by Sooner+Boomer · · Score: 1

    Onions? I've never seen stickers on onions. By-the-piece onions (around here at least) come in three flavors - red, white, and yellow. Or by the bag, already labeled. I can see why you would need labels on apples as there are about a dozen varieties, even at small grocery stores. Most everything else is unique enough that you can tell what it is, although some cashiers seem to be clueless about "exotic" fruits like kiwis, dragonfruit, and mangos.

    --
    Chaos maximizes locally around me.
  14. 4011 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many of you immediately thought "banana" when you saw that subject line. I'm not even a checker. I just use self-check on a regular basis. If I bought avocados I'd probably start remembering that one too. The self-check has alphabetical lookup if you don't know the code. Any decent checker is not only going to know the code by heart, they probably see them in their dreams.

    The Aldi folks have it right. There's no need for a sticker or defacement of common produce items. People know these codes, and the machines assist them. Next gen self-check will probably just recognize the avocados when you put them on the scale, you won't have to enter anything.

    1. Re:4011 by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Next gen self-check will probably just recognize the avocados when you put them on the scale, you won't have to enter anything.

      Produce recognition software seems like a logical progression. it may not be perfect at first, but it seems inevitable that they will come. And it may lead to fewer choices, unless similar looking choices can be priced the same.

      The laser etching on the other hand, I think is a dead end. Not all fruits are suited for that, including gnarly avocados (the only kind I buy). So you still need other methods in place, and this will only be an additional method, adding to the complexity. And chefs who make decorations and people who make fruit baskets won't be amused by etched labels.

    2. Re:4011 by axlash · · Score: 1

      That'll be easy enough for telling an apple from a banana, but hard when telling a Gala apple from a Braeburn apple.

      --
      Deal with reality - the world as it is - rather than ideality - the world as you would like it to be.
    3. Re:4011 by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      A simple solution is to make them the same price.

    4. Re:4011 by v1 · · Score: 1

      The Aldi folks have it right. There's no need for a sticker or defacement of common produce items.

      I was at walmart last week and found apple turnovers in the bakery self-serve box. (unusual, they're typically in boxes of 4) Got some. Got to the register. Clerk spent time looking in the system, could not find the individual turnover product. Gave up, entered them under "german pastry" or something like that.

      Other stores I go to and get say apples, they have that tiny little sticker on them. Get to the register and the gal picks up the bag, squints to read the short little number on the label, picks up the laminated sheet, looks up the number, and hand keys in the full product code for that number while weighing it.

      Nowhere I shop uses barcodes for loose produce. I'd expect barcodes on some bundled greens like lettuce and celery though I don't buy those.

      I think this could work for produce you can get the code to stay on and still be readable for awhile. I'd imagine a lot of produce won't retain the code without blurring it or bruising the area and turning it into a large black smudge. Maybe they're doing this with avocados because they are good at retaining the code clearly?

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    5. Re:4011 by arth1 · · Score: 1

      A simple solution is to make them the same price.

      Yes (also mentioned in the GP). However, while this helps with getting the price right, it doesn't help with inventory control.
      So it may have a side effect of stores reducing the choice. Which is already happening in some stores where customers are allowed to ring up their own produce purchases.

    6. Re:4011 by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Inventory control also needs to deal with fruit that's thrown out because it is bruised or moldy. Both can be combined by accounting for the crates as they enter or leave the produce section.

  15. Advertising next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The next logical step is for the shop, or supplier, to print ads on the fruit.

    1. Re: Advertising next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This apple offered to you by Samsung.

  16. Fear not environmental haters by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My local supermarket started individually shrink-wrapping fruit for your environmentally destructive pleasure. :-(

    1. Re:Fear not environmental haters by religionofpeas · · Score: 5, Funny

      Must be bitch to eat raspberries that way.

    2. Re:Fear not environmental haters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My local supermarket started individually shrink-wrapping fruit for your environmentally destructive pleasure. :-(

      Plus, it makes it much more difficult to grab a single one to hand to a screaming kid, that you don't pay for when you hit the register

    3. Re:Fear not environmental haters by Megane · · Score: 1

      The raisins are even more fun.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:Fear not environmental haters by Toad-san · · Score: 1

      Not to mention having to scan all them little buggers.

    5. Re:Fear not environmental haters by K10W · · Score: 1

      My local supermarket started individually shrink-wrapping fruit for your environmentally destructive pleasure. :-(

      sometimes it is more environmentally friendly to shrinkwrap. Not for everything of course but for some things, cucumbers were one iirc. Basically the amount of PE used in the wrap is miniscule and if it makes the item last several times longer that means longer shelflife and less waste. So if you add up the whole cost from growing costs (carbon and financial), fertiliser impacts, transportation and warehousing etc etc it turns out some environmentalists found there is not one rule for all that works and needs to be assessed on case by case basis. Seldom is that done because both sides have agendas and will do anything to increase funding and reach, and uneducated folks repeat the mantra packaging = bad with no real analysis.

    6. Re:Fear not environmental haters by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      and if it makes the item last several times longer that means longer shelflife and less waste

      That's not a problem for any supermarket I've ever seen or worked in. If your fruit and veg is going off on the shelf then its time to fire your stock controller.

    7. Re:Fear not environmental haters by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      "Shelf life" includes the time from processing plant to store, as well as time on the shelf. Which at this end of the country can include a day from processor to distribution centre, another day-plus to the store's store room, where it makes it onto the shelves next day (lorries not allowed through the car park into the loading bay, while customers are on the premises ; the other store in town doesn't have that problem, but are twice as far away and considerably more expensive overall). So extending the "shelf life" from 3 days to 4 days (a figure I remember for the question of individually-wrapped heads of broccoli containing a nitrogen only atmosphere) can mean tripling the shelf life that the customer (or shelf-stacker) sees.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    8. Re:Fear not environmental haters by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I know what it means, but that sounds like a big problem if there's a supermarket somewhere far away and you do shopping once a week. Maybe you do that in the states, I don't know. Frankly I don't know anyone who does, the vast majority of the population around here shop on a daily or bi-daily basis. Shelf life is not a thing we deal with, but then unlike say Costco 5L bottles of milk I also buy milk in 500mL containers, buy 3 apples at a time, and in general don't stock up on what I don't eat.

    9. Re:Fear not environmental haters by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      a big problem if there's a supermarket somewhere far away and you do shopping once a week. Maybe you do that in the states,

      I'm not in the USA, don't have a car in this country, and get my "messages" every couple of days. Which reminds me that I need poo paper, bread and milk today. But for things like fruit and veg, I have to store it in the fridge if it's going to remain good for more than a couple of days on the shelf. Which is feasible for me - need a fridge for the milk anyway - but not feasible for the supermarket, which only gets a half-lorry load every couple of days. They do have a real problem with shelf life.

      Small town living.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  17. Daily Telegraph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Telegraph article shows a picture of a mango with caption "Avocados will be labelled by laser".
    Editors are asleep? Sounds like they should look for a job on /.

    Also, avoid mangoes labelled "Brazil" at all cost: Asian mangoes are the best. Seek out yellow honey mangoes from Pakistan or India.

  18. Mostly no labels where I live by alzoron · · Score: 1

    Here they don't even bother labeling produce. You just grab what you want and the cashier or you at a self checkout lane enters in what it is, how many and the register weighs it to make sure everything is good. Of course people can game the system by saying their super organic gmo free fruit is just regular cheap fruit but as far as I can see most places operate on the honor system in that regard and everything works out fine.

    1. Re:Mostly no labels where I live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if the store is stocking the super organic gmo free display with the same fruit as the non-organic? They get to collect the difference as pure profit, and if any "unethical" customer claims it is the cheaper fruit, well the store is no worse off.

    2. Re:Mostly no labels where I live by jittles · · Score: 1

      Of course people can game the system by saying their super organic gmo free fruit is just regular cheap fruit

      That's alright! The grocery store is probably just putting the exact same fruit out in both places ;)

  19. "Top UK Supermarket" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M&S is not top. They continue to lose market share, still the 6th largest retailer in UK but basically obsolete. Most people seem to go there because they have reliable range of girls' knickers and stuff like that, if they can ignore the fact that M&S favours Israeli suppliers reliying on cheap Palestinian labour from the illegally occupied territories.

    1. Re:"Top UK Supermarket" by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Hmm. They are at the top end of the food supermarket scale though.

      Not the highest volumes or revenue, but near to the top in quality and right at the top for some of their own brand foods. Their 'finish cooking it at home' chilli bread is utterly awesome.

    2. Re:"Top UK Supermarket" by shortscruffydave · · Score: 1

      They're top in terms of prestige. This isn't just a laser-etched avocado - it's an M&S laser-etched avocado

  20. Wrong market by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    They are using these hand-held engravers in the wrong market.

    The obvious best use is in cosmetic body modification. This, combined with normal tattooing, would be a powerful new addition to the body mod scene I think.

    There is already scarification, which is done with hot brands or razor blades.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    This would be much quicker, and could do much more intricate designs on skin. Combined with traditional inking it could lead to very nice tattoos indeed.

    Seriously- branding fruit? Wrong market. Humans WANT to be branded. Take their money.

  21. Re:Hopefully onions too by viperidaenz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kiwis aren't fruit, they're birds.
    They're also endangered so you shouldn't be eating them either.

    Or do you mean Kiwifruit?

  22. How about the dead childrens names ? by terminal.dk · · Score: 0

    How about the dead children ? Can we get their name printed as well ? Avocados uses up to around 130 liters of water per fruit, in an area with way too little drinkign water. So eating avocado is killing the poor, as the Avocado mafia monopolizes water for their plantations.

    Stop eating avocado.

    http://www.konbini.com/us/life...

    To produce three avocados, you need 264 gallons of water = 1m^3 = 1000 liters. That is more water than consumed by a child in one year.

    1. Re:How about the dead childrens names ? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

      I've planted three trees in the back yard, irrigated by rainwater.

      It might take a decade to bear fruit but they're very easy to propagate from pit.

    2. Re:How about the dead childrens names ? by pahles · · Score: 1

      Stop eating avocados. Stop eating food with palm oil. Stop eating cows. Stop eating any kind of meat. I think I might as well just stop eating...

      --
      Sig?
    3. Re:How about the dead childrens names ? by religionofpeas · · Score: 5, Funny

      To produce three avocados, you need 264 gallons of water = 1m^3 = 1000 liters. That is more water than consumed by a child in one year.

      Children consume a lot more water. For instance, if your child eats 1 avocado per month, they are already 4 times over that amount.

    4. Re:How about the dead childrens names ? by virtig01 · · Score: 1
    5. Re:How about the dead childrens names ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because children never eat any food that requires water to produce? I would be highly surprised if the children in said regions do not use up far more water than the avocado's if you add up everything.

      Moreover, I saw plenty of living children the last time I visited Spain, so I think you may be exaggerating just a tad.

    6. Re:How about the dead childrens names ? by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

      I actually took the time to read the linked article, it seems the primary concern is that avocados are so profitable for small farmers that cartels and big agribusiness is muscling them to get their profits. As near as I can tell, the general idea is don't buy a profitable crop from an impoverished area because if you do it will give small farmers money and someone might steal the money from them. This does not seem fully thought out.

    7. Re:How about the dead childrens names ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Avocados grown from seed take 20 years, that's reduced to a decade with grafted stock.

    8. Re:How about the dead childrens names ? by MercTech · · Score: 1

      And, if you are outside of Southern California or the Southwest; that amount of water is easily provided. You don't even need to irrigate.

      --
      NRRPT/RCT
  23. The barcode conspiracy nuts will have a field day by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, not the "666", mark-of-the-beast guys. Yes, those too. But I'm talking about a more local conspiracy (frankly, I haven't met anyone outside of Europe that considers this real, shows that not all loonies that can come up with insane bullshit are located in the US), that those bars can act as some sort of "antenna" and absorb "frequencies" from various sources, which then affect the product, and of course in a negative way.

    But luckily, there's hope! You can buy a Sharpie... ok, of course it's not a simple Sharpie, it's an energetically activated (insert more mumbo-jumbo woo here) for the low, low price of 30-50 bucks, and with this you can "connect" those bars and neutralize them that way.

    By now some of makers of products aimed at ... let's say energetically challenged people have started to print their barcodes "neutralized", pretty much saying "if they want it that way, it doesn't bother us, so ... let them have it...".

    We're now at the point where they seriously demand hazard pay for people working the supermarket checkout.

    So no, idiocy is by no means a privilege of the US, we can do it just as well!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  24. Re:The barcode conspiracy nuts will have a field d by chthon · · Score: 1

    Which country is this? Never heard of this practice.

  25. Having the cashiers do it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    simply doesn't work. Too many of them steal from their employer by entering the wrong code to sell items as something cheaper, especially the items sold under the marketing name "organic." I used to work for a POS system, and we tried several methods to reduce theft by the cashiers, but none worked.

  26. The UK you say? by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    So basically tomorrow some headline-grabber piece of crap pseudo doctor will say lasering avocados causes autism. Thanks, UK doctors.

    1. Re:The UK you say? by MullerMn · · Score: 1

      How topical. Do you have any material on the millennium bug you want to share?

    2. Re:The UK you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically tomorrow some headline-grabber piece of crap pseudo doctor will say lasering avocados causes autism. Thanks, UK doctors.

      What? There are doctors in the UK?

  27. Re:The barcode conspiracy nuts will have a field d by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    No, not the "666", mark-of-the-beast guys. Yes, those too. But I'm talking about a more local conspiracy (frankly, I haven't met anyone outside of Europe that considers this real, shows that not all loonies that can come up with insane bullshit are located in the US), that those bars can act as some sort of "antenna" and absorb "frequencies" from various sources, which then affect the product, and of course in a negative way.

    If you'd RTFS, you'd see they aren't printing barcodes, they're printing the Arabic numeral code for the item to enter by hand at the checkout. A barcode would not be practical on an avocado, due to their bumpy, dark skin. It would be hard to get straight lines of good enough contrast.

    But I enjoyed your rant. Off-topic as it was.

  28. Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Avocado is a fruit??

    1. Re: Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, obviously. The large stone in the centre was a big clue. Did you think it was meat?

    2. Re: Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's spelled 'center'.

    3. Re: Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only in your backwater.

  29. Why a barcode at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not use vision systems to identify the product?

  30. They do similar to coconuts by Bowdie · · Score: 2

    M&S brand coconuts with their logo, expiry date, and the till code as well. I don't know if it's laser'd or just plain old branding, but they've been doing that for a while now.

    They still wrap the bloody things in shrinkwrap for reasons unknown.

    --
    yes, www.dotcomforwardslash.com is my real URL.
    1. Re:They do similar to coconuts by MercTech · · Score: 1

      Fresh fruit and veggies may be shrink wrapped for sanitary purposes. Dust from the air and people handling the produce could contaminate the outside and spread disease.

      That being said; anyone that doesn't wash their produce before consuming is bucking for gastric distress. Yeah, shrink wrapping the produce is a special brand of tin foil hat. Hmmm, why do we say "tin foil" as that is a product phased out when my grandfather was first considering getting married?

      --
      NRRPT/RCT
  31. I go to the local market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No fruit, no vegetable with stickers, marks or a "company logo" (how perverse is *that*?). And a considerable fraction sold by those who planted and harvested them.

    Of course that won't cover everything, but I try to maximize that part.

  32. Aldi by pahles · · Score: 1

    Aldi in the Netherlands does scan its products, the cashier does not have to enter a code for every product. They used to do that, and I must say the old method was a lot faster. I've always had some kind of admiration for the Aldi cashiers to memorize all those product codes. I guess Aldi does not trust its cashiers anymore...

    --
    Sig?
    1. Re:Aldi by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      I seem to think Aldi got their barcode scanners around 2000 or so. At least here in the US. Prior to that the memorized everything.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
  33. Re:Hopefully onions too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    fruits like kiwis

    Kiwis aren't fruit, they're birds.
    They're also endangered so you shouldn't be eating them either.

    Or do you mean Kiwifruit?

    ... And then there are New Zealanders also calling themselves (or is it being called) Kiwis.

    Captcha: misfits 3:-)

  34. It reminds me of the joke about cigarettes packs by Laxator2 · · Score: 1

    One guy walks into a store and asks for a pack of cigarettes. As usual, to discourage smoking, there is a warning printed on the pack:

    "Smoking causes impotence"

    The customer hands back the cigarette pack and tells the store clerk:

    "This is disgusting! Can I have a pack on which it says that smoking cause cancer ?"

  35. Live Pigs, too by alanxyzzy · · Score: 1

    Back in the early 80's, when I was working for a UK company called Laser-Scan, mostly doing digital cartography, we had a request about using a laser to brand bar-codes onto pigs as they went into the abbatoir. I can't remember anything coming of it, though.

  36. Re:The barcode conspiracy nuts will have a field d by Calydor · · Score: 1

    ARABIC numeral code?!

    New conspiracy theory! The avocadoes carry encrypted messages to the terrorist cells!

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  37. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You were putting labels on fruits?
    We don't even do that here, it's pretty obvious that you're buying an avocado, so the teller can just add it at the cash register.

  38. Re:Hopefully onions too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You knew exactly what he meant, pedant.

  39. Save paper..waste electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if the lazer works on renewable energy source

    1. Re:Save paper..waste electricity by ICantFindADecentNick · · Score: 1

      Light Amplification by Zimulated Emission of Radiation - nice over-britishization

    2. Re:Save paper..waste electricity by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      Light Amplification by Zimulated Emission of Radiation

      - nice over-britishization

      Laser spelt with a "Z" is not a British spelling, it's an American spelling. It is spelt with an "S" in Britain. The bastardisation of the abbreviation originates on the Western edge of the pond.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  40. Re:Hopefully onions too by Cederic · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the UK Kiwis are fruit. They may alternately be flightless birds but we generally encounter the fruit more frequently.

    Nobody here calls it kiwifruit.

  41. Misleading headline.... by tiniebras · · Score: 2

    M&S are one of the UKs largest retailers, but only about 60% of their revenue is from food. See here. Which means that they are outside of the top 10 in terms of grocery sales.They are a small player in terms of food sales who specialize in luxury foods. This is just a curiosity news piece about a small specialist retailer who have found another way to push their luxury brand and its values.

  42. Re:Hopefully onions too by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    Found the person from Morganville!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  43. Re:Hopefully onions too by Sique · · Score: 1

    Same here. We would rather call the animal a "kiwibird" than the berry a "kiwifruit". Of course, some people refer to them as "chinese strawberries".

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  44. Re:It reminds me of the joke about cigarettes pack by swb · · Score: 1

    A guy I know used to make a point of only buying packs that said they caused problems with pregnancy and then when someone criticized him for smoking he'd point out that THESE cigarettes were only hazardous to pregnant women.

  45. And what about the air pollution ? by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

    Laser burning a barcode on an avocado skin will pollute the air with more CO2, you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:And what about the air pollution ? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      The carbon from the avocado skin will, at some point, be converted to CO2 anyway.

  46. Re:The barcode conspiracy nuts will have a field d by ToTheStars · · Score: 1

    The text on the package is German (with a '.de' URL printed on the box), and it's on the German-language Wikipedia, so I'd say the country is Germany. I didn't notice anything like this when I visited a few months ago, but I went to (what I understand to be) a regular grocery store, not specialized for 'wellness products' or whatever the local euphemism for 'woo' is.

  47. Re:The barcode conspiracy nuts will have a field d by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    IIRC the epicenter of that loonie quake is Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  48. Re:Hopefully onions too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, here they are called "european chinese strawberries".

  49. Re:Hopefully onions too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Kiwi and kiwifruit are synomyms. The only differences being that the former word has multiple meanings and the latter is hardly ever used. Moreover, if you really want to be pedantic, the technical term is Chinese gooseberry; 'kiwi' and 'kiwifruit' are merely marketing terms invented to make the fruit appear to be native to New Zealand.

  50. Re:Hopefully onions too by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    if you really want to be pedantic, the technical term is Chinese gooseberry

    If you wanted to be pedantic you should have used the term Actinidia deliciosa. That is commonly known as the fuzzy kiwifruit, there are a few other species of the genus Actinidia that are also edible with various names.

  51. It'll be a challenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...applying this technology to blueberries. Just saying.

  52. Let's do some math... by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    Ten tons of paper and five tons of glue is what the article says. A single sheet of A4 paper weighs about 4.5 grams. The FDA supposedly has a few adhesives that are safe for food. I don't quite know the chemical makeup, but it's probably similar to polyvinyl acetate that Elmer's glue uses. Polyvinyl acetate has a mass of 1.19 g/cm^3. A sheet of A4 paper has a surface area of 236.22 cm^2 and a thickness of about 0.0102 cm, ergo a total volume of 2.409 cm^3. This is 2.867 grams of glue per sheet if the glue were applied at the same thickness as the paper. A sheet of A4 weighs 4.5 grams. That's a 1.570:1 ratio and not 2:1. And because you know the glue surface would be thinner that the paper, that ratio would be even smaller. It doesn't make sense to be using that much glue is what I'm getting at.

    1. Re:Let's do some math... by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

      The math is about right, but I think I wrote the ratio wrong. Maybe. 4.5g Paper / 2.867g Glue = 1.570g of Paper for every 1g of Glue. You know what...maybe a 2:1 does make sense because you could have 4.5g of Paper and 2.25g of Glue and still cover the whole sheet and have a 2:1 ratio. My bad. I was half awake, nodding off, when I wrote this.

  53. Uh.... huh huh huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that was before those fancy-pants flatscreen jobbies too.

    Flatscreen or not, I suspect a jobbie would make a shite monitor.

    1. Re:Uh.... huh huh huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >UD
      I see we've gone from placefiller words to outright fake ones.

  54. Re:Hopefully onions too by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Onions? I've never seen stickers on onions. By-the-piece onions (around here at least) come in three flavors - red, white, and yellow.

    No Vidalias? Pearl Onions? Shallots? Spring Onions? Ramps? Cippolini?... ummm... I'm sure there are more...

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  55. Re:Hopefully onions too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well, here they are called "european chinese strawberries".

    I call them African American European Chinese Strawberries

  56. Object recognition by zmooc · · Score: 2

    It really cannot be that difficult to make the checkout systems simply recognize unpacked food using computer vision....

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
  57. Re:Hopefully onions too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody here calls it kiwifruit.

    You do not speak for the UK!
    I call them Kiwi Fruit
    My wife calls them Kiwi Fruit.

    We should have a referendum to decide - do you want to LEAVE the word fruit off, or do you want it to REMAIN!

  58. A modest proposal by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

    To produce three avocados, you need 264 gallons of water = 1m^3 = 1000 liters. That is more water than consumed by a child in one year.

    In light of this information, I humbly propose that in order to preserve our most precious of natural resources, rather than growing avocados for human consumption, we adopt the more economical and ethical solution of raising children to be used for this purpose in their stead.

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    1. Re:A modest proposal by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      I don't know that raising children is a good idea. How about hunting the wild ones ?

  59. Aldi no longer all-own-brand by suss · · Score: 1

    Aldi hasn't been all-own-brand for years. They sell things like coca-cola here in the Netherlands...

  60. personal scanner by Evtim · · Score: 1

    In the Netherlands the new system is - you take your own hand-held scanner, go to the e.g. avocadoes, put say 5 in the basket, scan the price-label [you need only one per type of good] and you are done. No need to spend money laser etching the bar code on every fruit. Plus, no need for cashier. After the system was implemented I never looked back....funnily enough most people still prefer the interaction with the human - often I see long lines at the cashiers while the self-scanning machines stand idle...

  61. Re:The barcode conspiracy nuts will have a field d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mad Magazine Barcode Cover

    https://s-media-cache-ak0.pini...

  62. Changing dates by phorm · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this could be done for more products. I've seen a lot of cases where various stores have been caught changing dates on food to something that expires further in the future. If it's laser-etched etc that would be a lot harder to do.

    Not sure if one could laser-etch a steak though, but if they did a permanent mark on the package it could help prevent re-labelling.

  63. So Dumb by wolff000 · · Score: 1

    They could just not label them like many other grocers. Try training your checkers better.

    --
    WTF?
  64. Re:Hopefully onions too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work with a guy who stuck them to the side of his monitor. Over time there were so many I reckoned the thing was ready to tip over. And that was before those fancy-pants flatscreen jobbies too.

    It's probably not a good idea to stick onions (or avacados) on the side of your monitor.

  65. Re:Hopefully onions too by quenda · · Score: 1

    In the UK Kiwis are fruit. They may alternately be flightless birds

    If you are in the UK, you should know that "alternately" means back-and-forth. As is "we meet on alternate Tuesdays", or "alternating current".
    Alternatively, you may be speaking American.

  66. Re:Hopefully onions too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see them try to stick labels on onions, most of them get left on the stand when the outer layer of the onion skin peels off.

  67. Re:Hopefully onions too by quenda · · Score: 1

    gooseberries, not strawberries.

  68. Re:Hopefully onions too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Onions or avocados? You must have a bizarre idea of what apples are.

  69. Re:Hopefully onions too by Cederic · · Score: 1

    That space is important.

    As, has been highlighted, is the iv in alternatively.

  70. Re:Hopefully onions too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither in germany.

  71. This... and I bet Whole Foods by Amazon will do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the Whole Foods purchase goes through I will not be at all surprised to see this at Whole Foods quickly after the merger. Amazon has the computing power and technical expertise to pull it off and will allow them to churn more customers through the same (or fewer) cashiers which is the type of cost savings that Amazon will be looking for.

    Now if they can just figure out a way to make idiots realize that if you're in the blue line you wait for the blue number we'd be golden (yes I grudgingly use Whole Paycheck, in Manhattan they've pretty much killed off all the other decent "neighborhood" grocers).

  72. Don't need labels to begin with, really by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    As someone else already said: just have the cashier enter the code. Really, it's not that hard. Even at self-checkout stations, you can pick from a picture menu, or if you're clever you can remember the code; bananas are '4011', for instance. Then they'll not only save on paper and adhesive but on expensive laser printing systems.

  73. Interesting.... by Heebie · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that M&S would be so concerned about such things, when all their plastic packaging that I've seen contains a note: "Plastic: Not Currently Recycled"

  74. Re:Hopefully onions too by chihowa · · Score: 1

    We don't call them kiwifruit in the US, either. They are just called "kiwi".

    He's probably a kiwi (alternately a NZ resident and a tasty-but-endangered flightless bird).

    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  75. Re:Hopefully onions too by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    By-the-piece onions ... come in three flavors - red, white, and yellow.

    So how is life with synesthesia? :-)

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  76. Re:Hopefully onions too by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Kiwis aren't fruit, they're birds. They're also endangered so you shouldn't be eating them either.

    Or do you mean Kiwifruit?

    They're people from New Zealand and, I imagine, some of them are delicious. :-)

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  77. so other than Lasers Are Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how is this any better/different than using inkjet or dot matrix stamp type markers for produce that Ive been seeing for awhile now?

    Lots less energy needed to apply, and water soluble, edible inks aren't a big deal.

  78. Tattoos for fruit ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... makes sense.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:Tattoos for fruit ... by modi123 · · Score: 1

      I believe it is pronounced "tuh-too". I distinctly remember hearing that in this crazy party at the Equestranauts convention.

  79. Re:Hopefully onions too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is what happens when you don't read the title bar of the comments. Besides, onions are well known for their properties as velociraptor repellent. I have onions on my desk and have yet to experience a raptor attack.

  80. Re:Hopefully onions too by operagost · · Score: 1

    No "alternately" is wrong usage in the USA as well.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  81. Re:Hopefully onions too by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

    If you are in the UK you should know that we refer to that as "typing Americanisms", not "speaking American".

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  82. Re:Hopefully onions too by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Nobody here calls it kiwifruit.

    Yet you call beets beetroot.

  83. Re:Hopefully onions too by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Some of us are, others, not so much...

  84. Re:Hopefully onions too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The labels aren't really essential on apples. When I worked as a cashier, all the varieties sold were visually distinguishable. Because much of the fresh produce was unlabelled, the cashiers were regularly tested on being able to identify a random selection.

  85. Re:Hopefully onions too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kiwis are people, you insensitive clod!

  86. Re:Hopefully onions too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only a monitor?
    My local mechanic has the entire inside of the workshop door plastered with those.

  87. Re:Hopefully onions too by antdude · · Score: 1

    Do they even have kiwi birds? You could trick buyers who wants kiwis. ;)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  88. Re:Hopefully onions too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit. In 40 years living in the UK, I never heard of a fruit being called "kiwi".

    Unless you're talking about a particularly flamboyant New Zealander.

  89. Re:The barcode conspiracy nuts will have a field d by MercTech · · Score: 1

    Someone is confusing bar codes with RFID chips.
    Gad, I remember going to a hearing in Sacramento about a law to require subcutaneous RFID insertion on every school age child. Talk about a pedophile's wet dream for stalking tech.

    --
    NRRPT/RCT
  90. Re:Hopefully onions too by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Yet you call beets beetroot.

    Because the farmer grows beets, pulls them from the ground, cuts the green stuff off the top and feeds it to their sheep (or cattle), then sells the beetroot to buyers at a considerably higher per-ton price than for un-topped beets.

    Other parts of the country use "beet" to refer to the uncooked food and "beetroot" for the cooked version. Witness the Alan ("Amstrad") Sugar biography. But I think that's a London usage.

    You might not know the reason for the usage, but that doesn't mean that there is no reason.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"