Slashdot Mirror


The XHamster Wikipedia Page Is Suddenly Immensely Popular, and No One Knows Why (theoutline.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: At the beginning of June I started to notice that XHamster, the third most popular adult website after Pornhub and XVideos, had one of the most viewed Wikipedia pages. On May 29, XHamster's Wikipedia page went from receiving around 100,000 views to 200,000. By June 1, it was getting more than 300,000 views a day for no apparent reason. There haven't been any viral stories about XHamster lately. There are no controversies about the page itself that would have prompted sustained attention or an edit war. [...] Pageviews on XHamster's Wikipedia page, however, has been bonkers throughout the month of June for no obvious reason. That's according to a pageview analysis tool from Wikimedia Labs, and confirmed by a Wikipedia spokesperson. I reached out to Wikipedia to see if it could shed some light on this puzzle. In an email, a spokesperson verified that the pageviews were accurate but that they didn't know what was causing the surge. Wikipedia's spokesperson pointed out that the edit activity, unlike its pageviews, has remained steady.

70 of 129 comments (clear)

  1. Add-ons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Kodi addons.

    1. Re:Add-ons by Gay+Boner+Sex · · Score: 2

      Nah, simpler than that. Whenever msmash posts a clickbait story, that generates traffic.

      As in, this is a hoax story. Person A created a lot of "visitors" so that person B could write a story about the "anomaly." Persons A and B both either work or have interests in that company. Person C realizes what is going on and uses it to generate clickbait revenue on her Digg reincarnation, Slashdot, once touted a "News for Nerds" site.

    2. Re:Add-ons by Luthair · · Score: 2

      He could be onto something, if add-ons pull text from Wikipedia for a description and don't cache it well...

    3. Re:Add-ons by Narcocide · · Score: 2

      I was thinking something far more innocuous, like some tiny fascist dictatorship has banned all porn with a global proxy that filters everything based on request URL and referrer string comparisons. Then randomly one day someone notices that anything with a wikipedia referrer passes the filter and word gets out.

    4. Re:Add-ons by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It could correspond to an increased use of DuckDuckGo as a search engine default. DuckDuckGo typically includes a Wikipedia page in a feature box, next toits top-line search item, if a domain is typed in the URL bar without a TLD designator.
      https://dl.dropboxusercontent....

      Worth investigating.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    5. Re:Add-ons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Recently XHamster started adding tricky to remove watermarks to its videos, probably because it was tired of people re-posting content without attribution.

      Of course, the watermarked videos got taken, and served to people who did not know about Xhamster. They must have liked what they saw, and searched for the website, so that they could get more of the same. And the search engines displayed portions of the Wikipage.

      Damn. What will people make into a mistery next?

    6. Re:Add-ons by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      It's being used as the are-you-online check by DLink routers.

    7. Re:Add-ons by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      This makes sense, too.

      Funny, them watermarking stuff that they never produced, only hosted - including presumably, user generated content.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  2. i visited xhamster once by FudRucker · · Score: 5, Funny

    and there were not any hamsters, but lots of poor people that could not afford to even buy clothes to wear

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:i visited xhamster once by EvilSS · · Score: 5, Funny

      and there were not any hamsters, but lots of poor people that could not afford to even buy clothes to wear

      Oh there were hamsters, you just didn't look in the right category!

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    2. Re:i visited xhamster once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Whatever you do, don't google feltch.

    3. Re: i visited xhamster once by Type44Q · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm told that if you look really closely at Goatse Guy, you can see whiskers...

    4. Re:i visited xhamster once by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      And ampland.com doesn't sell amplifiers!!

      I hear they are merging with porzo.com . . . . . I just can't remember where I heard it.

    5. Re:i visited xhamster once by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      I remember when hamsters meant this...

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    6. Re:i visited xhamster once by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'm even old enough to remember where the song is from.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. If you don't use Adblock... by sycodon · · Score: 1

    ...many windows open when you are trying to see that school girl railed.

    Who knows where they go.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  4. Botnet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My first thoughts are a botnet using a wikipedia page to check for instructions (since wikipedia is unlikely to be blocked)....otherwise, random IP accesses to a page like that would be very weird.

    1. Re:Botnet? by dlleigh · · Score: 2

      Yup, sounds like a command and control network.

      Are all the hits to the main page, or are there also a bunch to the history, talk and talk-history pages?

    2. Re:Botnet? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2, Informative

      They mention that possibility in the article, but rule it mostly out on account of the fact that 95% of the traffic to the page is from mobile devices, which are fairly atypical for botnet attacks.

    3. Re:Botnet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Atypical? That is completely invalid claim when you take into account that one of the biggest active botnet today actually runs out of infected Android phones.

    4. Re:Botnet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If it is on mobile I reckon it might be Chromes Awesomebar.

      People enter: xhamster which results in a google search. With safe search on wikipedia is the top entry.

    5. Re:Botnet? by sexconker · · Score: 1, Informative

      They mention that possibility in the article, but rule it mostly out on account of the fact that 95% of the traffic to the page is from mobile devices, which are fairly atypical for botnet attacks.

      Other AC has a great counterpoint. I'll offer another: The Wikipedia servers have no fucking clue what type of host is requesting the page. Anyone can send any packet with any headers. A botnet operator has reason to deceive, inveigle, and obfuscate (S04E04).

    6. Re:Botnet? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      That's was my first thought as well. But why the sudden spike then... chrome etc has operated that way for quite a while.

      I think the botnet c&c theory makes more sense to me; or some other virus related issue ... e.g. a misconfgured malware that is trying to direct people to xhamster but is instead ending up on the wikipedia page.

    7. Re:Botnet? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      My main theories are the following.
      Xhamster was commented as part of a news story or webcomic that had a population that just didn't get it so they looked it up.

      Xhamster did something to get better search results for a particular fetish so where it didn't show up it may had topped the search list. And people wanted to verify it as a legit porn site.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:Botnet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The British may have invented it, but the Irish perfected it:

      "Otis liftywater I must dyke for it, Father, plash me for I have skimmed. Or shuteye see, blush me, Farber, for I am skint? Hamsters on boastcart, please."

      "...I let him keep it as if I forgot it to think of me when I saw him slip it into his pocket of course hes mad on the subject of drawers thats plain to be seen always skeezing at those brazenfaced things on the bicycles with their skirts blowing up to their navels even when Milly and I were out with him..."

      -James Joyce

      Captcha: damming
      Shirley that is misspelled...

    9. Re: Botnet? by nachtelfjeiu · · Score: 1

      Few people change their string, so in large numbers the figure is pretty reliable.

    10. Re:Botnet? by vipw · · Score: 1

      Forged HTTP headers, not forged IP headers. The traffic will route just fine.

    11. Re: Botnet? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Unless it's a bot, trying to deceive the server.

    12. Re: Botnet? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yes, but who'd want to extort money from goat herders?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:Botnet? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      This.

      Actually, /. would make a great botnet C&C server. It's notorious for not deleting anything, no matter how inane, it's publicly accessible, not well known enough to be blocked by any national entity (or blacklisted in any corporate proxies)... /. would be the perfect C&C server. Just make your trojan read certain topics that invariably pop up where people post mostly bullshit and nobody really reads anything anyway (Trump comes to mind. Or global warming), encode what you want your trojan to do, sign it with your key to ensure that only you get to send out commands and you're set.

      Oh, before I forget...

      55326c7559 3255676557 3931494864 686333526c 5a43423562 3356794948 5270625755 6764473867 5a47566a62 32526c4948 526f61584d 7349456b6 7644768706 26d7367655 739314a334 a6c4947567 564476c306 247566b494 8527649484 a6c5957516 7633239745 a58526f615 7356e49473 16c5957357 0626d646d6 4577773494 84e7649476 86c636d556 761584d676 5573931636 942745a584 e7a5957646 c4f69425464 4739774948 6468633352 70626d6367 6557393163 6942306157 316c494852 7965576c75 5a79423062 79426b5a57 4e70634768 6c63694274 5a584e7a59 57646c6379 427562324a 765a486b67 5a326c325a 584d675953 427a61476c 3049474669 6233563049 4746755a43 426e5a5851 67596d466a 6179423062 7942336233 4a7249486c 7664534273 5958703549 475a315932 7368

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:Botnet? by Megane · · Score: 1

      About 15 years ago, a print comic (as in newspapers, remember them?) mentioned a name of a hypothetical web site for a joke. It basically matched the name of a domain that I have had since 2000. The initial spike wasn't much (like 100 hits a day for the first week, to nothing after the second week), but this was also 15 years ago, before every normie had a web browser in their pocket, especially the kids.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    15. Re:Botnet? by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      before every normie had a web browser in their pocket

      Just a friendly word of advice, but using the word "normie" makes you sound like a stupid fucking twat.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  5. Another surge on July 5 happened by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is called slashdot effect. It used to be huge, back in the day when people were the first to welcome the overlords and talking about how the government controls commerce in Soviet Union and people had check marked lists in fixed point font describing why the proposed spam fighting solutions won't work.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Another surge on July 5 happened by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hey hey hey, now wait a minute.....

      Everyone knows in Soviet Russia, the commerce controls YOU.

    2. Re:Another surge on July 5 happened by GlennC · · Score: 2

      Not to mention inquiries about one's preferred brand of crack and references to Natalie Portman.

      Ah, the good old days.

      --
      Go on, citizen, stamp the vote card. R or D, your choice.
    3. Re:Another surge on July 5 happened by technoid_ · · Score: 4, Funny

      If only I had a beowulf cluster of the posts.

      --
      Two wrongs don't make a right, but 3 lefts do - Lew of GO magazine
    4. Re:Another surge on July 5 happened by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      I had a beowulf cluster of those posts, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    5. Re:Another surge on July 5 happened by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, car analogy has YOU.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Another surge on July 5 happened by Megane · · Score: 1

      Those lists go back to Usenet, and pre-date Slashdot.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. They've really started branding their videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    XHamster has started aggressively branding and marking the videos on their site. These videos are then uploaded elsewhere and suddenly, people see them. Given they started doing this about 2-3 months ago, it would coincide perfectly with this surge.

    1. Re:They've really started branding their videos by KingRatMass · · Score: 4, Funny
      Fuck you... Pay for your porn then!

      Back in my day, we had to use Zmodem to download porn PICTURES. It once took two days to masturbate because mom kept making phone calls and interrupting my download. We sometimes had to wait 16 hours from the time we saw nipple until we got bush.

      Fucking ungrateful assholes... Get off my lawn!

  8. Malware/Dead drop by henry.cow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gut guess is the page being used to help infected clients find their C&C server, like this - http://www.businessinsider.com/russian-hackers-turla-communicate-malware-britney-spears-instagram-comment-2017-6

  9. Probably for C&C by wulfhere · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Something like this is my guess:

    https://arstechnica.com/securi...

    --
    -- Sent from a computer.
    1. Re:Probably for C&C by unique_parrot · · Score: 1

      Something more like THIS https://arstechnica.com/gaming... :D

  10. India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a frequent visitor of xhamster I can say that in the last weeks a big amount of Indian porn was uploaded. See explanation #1 in source.

  11. If you use a family-friendly search engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you use a family-friendly or filtered search engine like DuckDuckGo (on its default settings), if you search for a porn site you'll get its Wikipedia page, but not the site itself. I wonder if something like that is involved here.

    1. Re:If you use a family-friendly search engine by PPH · · Score: 1

      family-friendly or filtered search engine like DuckDuckGo

      Hmm. DuckDuckGo puts the Wikipedia entry way down near the bottom of the first page (in addition to the Wikipedia frame on the right). Google puts it at around #4. Both search engines return the web site URL first.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  12. simplest explanation: Google SEO change. by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

    It shows up as the 4th link in the google results when I do a google search for 'xhamster' It could be even higher for certain users. What position did it show up at 2 months ago? My guess is that google changed their sorting algorithm to give wikipedia more prominence, articles more prominence, or something of the sorts. A large percentage of people search for websites instead of going directly to the url even if they know the url.

  13. Re:And now there will be even more views.... by slashdice · · Score: 1

    confirmed. they have natalie portman -- naked and petrified -- with a bowl of hot grits down her pants.

    --
    Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
  14. Re: Systemd connections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I agree. Does not make any sense. Systemd only make bogus connections with User=0day.

  15. Viral advertising by LetterRip · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps the person 'noticing' the phenomenon, is the originator of the phenomenon and trying to increase traffic to the said porn sites by calling attention to this 'mystery'.

  16. Not command and control by FeelGood314 · · Score: 1

    Look at the page edits. There haven't been any edits in the last 6 months that look as if they could be hiding any information. There are some pretty stealthy forms of Steganography but I can't see any evidence of it on this page.

  17. Re:And now there will be even more views.... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Mae Ling Mak, naked and petrified.

  18. Re:simplest explanation: Google SEO change. by doconnor · · Score: 2

    I wouldn't be surprised if a Wikipedia page shows up in the top 4 link of 1/3 of all Google searches. There is nothing unusual about that.

  19. XWhat? by snookiex · · Score: 1

    I didn't know what XHamster is, so I visited its Wikipedia page and... Oh, wait.

    --
    Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
  20. I was one of those Wikipedia views by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe the bulk of the surge is for the same reason as my visit: Katy Perry came out with a new video that has a cute hamster in it (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gsGhdZDC-0). When I searched Google for "Katy Perry hamster," I got a bunch of porn in my results - thanks to Google's helpful "search for what we think you meant rather than what you typed" algorithms.

    I went to wikipedia to try to figure out WTF was happening, since I wasn't familiar with XHamster. So blame Google's garbage algorithms and a popular music video by a pop star.

  21. I blame Russia by Xenographic · · Score: 1

    Eh, my first thought is spammers or affiliate marketers (yes, I'm repeating myself....).

    1. Re:I blame Russia by tattood · · Score: 2

      Wikipedia should be able to see from the HTTP referrer header whether the visits are coming from a link on another site or not. This should not be a mystery.

      --
      WTB [sig], PST!!!
    2. Re:I blame Russia by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      Spammers do weird things like flooding sites with fake referrers because the logs may appear publicly. I'm not saying it's even real traffic, necessarily, but yes, it should be obvious with some more investigation.

  22. Scraping the bottom of the barrel by kelanos · · Score: 1

    Just gotta find some way not to post any story about CNN

  23. Parent company by phorm · · Score: 1

    What's the parent company? Is there perhaps something going on with the stock? Maybe a market expansion planned?

  24. It's obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Malware using the page to test it's internet connection.

  25. Analysis of Variance by aberglas · · Score: 1

    Almost correct. Its statistics.

    At any point in time, one of the millions of Wikipedia pages will experience a surge, just by luck. If you then look for the page with the greatest surge you will certainly find one. That's why statisticians use ANOVA.

  26. if you duckduckgo xhamster the FIRST LINK is the w by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Interesting

    an actual theory.

    some country recently blocked xhamster domain for xxx censorship reasons. the people used to going there for their mobile porn fix instead end up on the wikipedia page.

    if you duckduckgo xhamster the FIRST LINK is the wikipedia page.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  27. I'm so naive ... by quenda · · Score: 1

    I read the headline and expected a story about animated dancing rodents, set to a catchy MIDI tune.

    Ah, the good old days.

  28. Hmmm, using page as a dictionary? by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    I wonder if someone or some malware is using the page as a dictionary.

    Like line x, letter y gives an encoded output somewhere.

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  29. Re:And so it begins... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    He looks harmless, but he came from Syria and now he's spread all over the globe. And we don't know his affiliation, what we know is that most of the time he's sleeping, we currently list him as a "sleeper".

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  30. Am I the only one... by sad_ · · Score: 1

    ... who though - what, there is an xhamster?! i only know xteddy & xpenguin!

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  31. Internet of Things? by ShamblerBishop · · Score: 1

    A new brand of IoT connected hamster wheels?