Slashdot Mirror


Skype Users Slam Microsoft's Attempt To Infuse App With Social Media Magic (theregister.co.uk)

Last month Skype announced a major update to its messaging and video calling app. The update brought a visual revamp, as well as "social features" such as Highlights that were first introduced by Snapchat. At any rate, it turns out, people are not enjoying the update as much as Microsoft had hoped. From a report: Reviews of the Android and iOS versions of the app have been mostly terrible, and those posted to the Windows App Store have not been much better. Chief among the issues is that the redesign imagines Skype as a youth-oriented social media app along the lines of Instagram or Snapchat, rather than a staid business communications tool. "This new app is absolutely terrible," observes an individual posting to Google Play under the name Kulli Kelder. "Skype is mostly used by people for professional use or for connecting with friends far away. This looks as far from simple and professional as it can be. Skype does NOT need to be Snapchat ." The Skype team clearly has a different view of its work. "We think it's the best Skype we've ever built -- inside and out -- and it's been designed to make it easier for you to use for your everyday communications," the company said last month. A few individuals have expressed similar enthusiasm, but among those reviewing the most recent update, one-star ratings dominate. Of the 20 most-recent reviews posted to the iTunes App Store, 19 out of 20 award one star out of five. The other is two stars.

86 of 145 comments (clear)

  1. I cannot remember the last time something changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    for the better. Seriously. Change today means "making everything worse". Without exceptions.

  2. Now that explains everythng... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Is that why Win10 has been popping up an advertising square for Skype on my laptop? Meh... Not interested.

    1. Re:Now that explains everythng... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, the "Microsoft Consumer Experiences". That's what they actually call the "download and add random craplets to the start menu" feature in the group policy template you can use to turn it off(Enterprise or Education SKUs only; sorry "Professionals"...)

  3. Goodbye Skype by freak0fnature · · Score: 1

    They shut off all landline adapters using their Skype Number product last month...I was not happy to lose a service I had paid for half way though the year.

    1. Re:Goodbye Skype by Khyber · · Score: 2

      That's theft of service. File a criminal complaint and also file a lawsuit in small claims court to get more than your money back.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:Goodbye Skype by freak0fnature · · Score: 1

      It's $60/yr for the phone service...which still works on Android, just not the landline adapters. So I haven't technically lost the service, I just can't use it as a home phone.

  4. MS like to ignore their customers by UnknowingFool · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From my perspective Skype was starting to make major inroads into corporate networks to replace other video conferencing systems in addition to being what younger consumers used. It was fairly unobtrusive and cross-platform. Then MS had to buy them and change their focus. Now it's all about chasing the cool which MS was never good at doing.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:MS like to ignore their customers by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

      What?? They've been the epitome of cool since windows 7!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    2. Re:MS like to ignore their customers by BeanThere · · Score: 2

      What's worse is they had early mover advantage in the market (as they pre-dated most other alternatives), AND when MS bought them they had the numerous advantages of the largest desktop OS vendor in the world backing them (e.g. financial, integration, network effects etc.) ... to fail to make Skype a success under those conditions is a really big fail.

    3. Re:MS like to ignore their customers by lannocc · · Score: 1

      Have to justify the need for more H1-B visas somehow!

  5. Use GNU Ring instead by grumpy-cowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    --
    Will $CURRENT_YEAR be the year of the Linux Desktop?
    1. Re:Use GNU Ring instead by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Oh, sure, that'll solve everything. Just got to make everyone else move all at once as well, no problem.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:Use GNU Ring instead by Hydrian · · Score: 1

      Obligatory XKCD : https://xkcd.com/927/

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished.
    3. Re:Use GNU Ring instead by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      Oh, sure, that'll solve everything. Just got to make everyone else move all at once as well, no problem.

      That's not necessary. If I were to use Ring, then the people who wanted to talk to me via video conferencing would install it, too. Eventually, everyone I care to talk to would be using Ring to talk to me. Since Ring is free and Free, they would have nothing to lose; so they would use it for video calls with me.

      That's all that matters.

    4. Re:Use GNU Ring instead by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      If I were to use Ring, then the people who wanted to talk to me via video conferencing would install it, too.

      You hope. Even if that's true for you, it's not going to be true for the vast majority of people.

      A far more likely scenario is that one person moves to Ring, tells everyone else "hey I moved to Ring! Move to Ring!" and everyone else just says "Eh? Ring? No, I use Skype. Everyone else I know uses Skype."

      And then you need to consider the people who don't get to choose what they can install and use.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    5. Re:Use GNU Ring instead by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I'm hesitant to click on anything that ends with .cx

      Fool me once...

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    6. Re:Use GNU Ring instead by Trogre · · Score: 1

      In academia at least Skype is barely seen any more, with the far superior Zoom being the preferred option.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  6. Re:I cannot remember the last time something chang by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    "And they probably redesigned the whole sick-bay too! I know engineers, they love to change things!"
    -----
    "Does the new medical facilities meet with your approval Bones?"
    "They do not - it's like working in a damn computer center"

  7. Re:I cannot remember the last time something chang by Parsiuk · · Score: 2

    I think it's because change for good goes unnoticed. For example FitBit Charge HR 2. The design is much different from version 1, yet it is much better.

  8. When something works, don't change what it is by GWBasic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Probably the biggest failing here is not understanding what Skype is. The biggest problem is that the changes fundamentally redefine what Skype is; but Skype's users used it for what it was: simple video conferencing.

    1. Re:When something works, don't change what it is by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      but Skype's users used it for what it was: simple video conferencing.

      A lot of them don't use it for that at all.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  9. Best Skype EVAR? by Dusty101 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "We think it's the best Skype we've ever built..."

    This statement may even be true, since it's coming from an MS employee. However, it still doesn't change the fact that Skype was better before the MS buyout.

    1. Re:Best Skype EVAR? by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Shut up, you're holding it wrong!

    2. Re:Best Skype EVAR? by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that Skype users need courage?

  10. Forget KIlling All The Lawyers... by sycodon · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Kill all the Marketing executives that fuck shit up instead.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Forget KIlling All The Lawyers... by DivineKnight · · Score: 2

      Won't happen. MS is willing to do anything but lead these days. If it's OS design, they follow Apple; if it's social media apps, it's Facebook. I think it's just a matter of courage here; the people @ MS who really want to work for those companies don't have enough to submit their resumes, and get the hell out of the way.

    2. Re: Forget KIlling All The Lawyers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has never been a leader but always a "me too" company.

      Since it's inception I can't think of some fundamental product it has invented on its own and blazed trails with.

      Some of its products are/have become quite competent over the years, but don't expect exciting new ideas from Redmond. Expect exciting new ideas to be copied or the originating company to be acquired.

    3. Re:Forget KIlling All The Lawyers... by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

      Kill all the marketing people in general. Bill Hicks was right.

    4. Re:Forget KIlling All The Lawyers... by iampiti · · Score: 1

      I disagree with whom they follow in OS design: It's Google. Windows has been redesigning its UI to be more mobile-like, they've also been adding data gathering and advertising. They seem to want to turn it into Android

  11. This seems to be a trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the last month or so I've had three updates to apps that have been terrible

    1. WeatherBug used to be the best weather app by far, but a recent upgrade made it unusable so I switched to weatherunderground
    2. Hulu revamped their app with terrible Ux as a result. I now avoid Hulu unless I'm watching on my Tivo which has not updated yet (and I hope it won't).
    3 Now skype.

    Is this bad SW engineering or Sw engineers being forced into bad decisions by managers that don't get that Ux is not just about eye candy it's also about how easy it is for a user to achieve what they want to do with as little effort as possible. To me, at least, usability out weighs eye candy every time

    1. Re:This seems to be a trend by istartedi · · Score: 1

      It's an old familiar story, really. It's the mentality that killed Digg, and almost killed Slashdot. Death by redesign, or whatever you call it. It's like celebrity deaths. They don't really come in 3s. Humans just naturally find patterns. Famous people die all the time. UIs get ruined all the time. My local news outlet just ruined their web site like this. It's a sea of white space now, with so many scripts running that it jerks when I try to scroll. Until more people walk away, they're not going to stop doing this.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    2. Re:This seems to be a trend by theCoder · · Score: 1

      1. WeatherBug used to be the best weather app by far, but a recent upgrade made it unusable so I switched to weatherunderground

      Ha! Weather Underground used to be a great site before the Weather Channel (I think) purchased them and really bloated it up. It's really unfortunate because they have great information, especially for tropical storms.

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
  12. You want professional? Then PAY for it. by geekmux · · Score: 1

    I constantly see new businesses spend thousands on marketing themselves, and won't spend twenty fucking dollars to buy their own domain in order to avoid presenting a cheap Facebook@Gmail image.

    You want a professional business-grade solution for video chat? Then get off your damn wallet and invest in a system specifically designed for such a purpose instead of jumping on the social media teat to suckle with all the other cheap-asses.

    TL; DR - You get what you pay for.

  13. It's everything I didn't want in a VOIP client... by Idisagree · · Score: 1

    Looks like the dev team for skype took the worst bits of facebook messenger, whatsapp, viber and snapchat, threw it in a mixer and produced one big shiny t*rd nugget!

  14. Re:You want professional? Then PAY for it. by zlives · · Score: 1

    so the skype for business (paid) app did not change?

  15. Skype and Zune by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...Skype does NOT need to be Snapchat ....

    Obviously, Microsoft thinks it does. Microsoft is being left behind by the world of social media. So Microsoft wants to use Skype the same way they used Zune --- an attempt to play catch-up with the market leaders.

  16. not fooling me! by citylivin · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A "ring" at a CX domain?

    Is it a firey red ring by chance, spread far and wide for all to see? ( no, i am under no circumstances being fooled into clicking that link! i been around here too long!)

    --
    As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    1. Re:not fooling me! by zoloto · · Score: 2

      Well I didn't "se" any "goats" there. It's actually a legit site/project, it seems.

  17. Re:I cannot remember the last time something chang by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't care what anyone says, systemd is a huge improvement over Skype. Improvement right there, taste it, bro.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  18. Never liked Skype. by antdude · · Score: 1

    I used it briefly, and didn't see why it is that popular. I don't use video and audio. I still prefer IRC, ICQ, AIM, YIM, BBS, etc.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Never liked Skype. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It was popular because it worked over port 80, so it easily went through corporate firewalls. That's my understanding.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Never liked Skype. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Skype does not use port 80.

      They use "fire wall piercing".

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:Never liked Skype. by OolimPhon · · Score: 1

      Try to think as a domestic user rather than a business one. I used Skype regularly to video call my grandchildren halfway across the world and I'm willing to bet that is what many use it for, keeping in touch with distant relatives.

      None of this IM nonsense, just a simple install onto any OS the far end has available and bingo! face to face calls made easy.

      We've given up on Skype now. MS wanted to find out too much about me and I've had enough. Download all my contacts so that I can use Skype to call them? WTF? This is a phone, you dolts! If I wanted to phone them, I'd just call using the minutes I've already paid for.

    4. Re:Never liked Skype. by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ah, I never use the AV stuff. I don't even have a mic and webcam in my old desktop PCs. ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  19. This is not news by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    I mean, Microsoft fcuking up something is not news - it's what they are best at. Consider yourself middle-fingered, Microsoft - and, today, it is much more than just me saying so.

  20. Re:I cannot remember the last time something chang by bobmajdakjr · · Score: 1

    they should have called it Bing Plus then the people who need to rebel would flock to it unwittingly.

  21. It's a play for Lync/Skype for Business by orev · · Score: 1

    They are trying to make a huge differentiation between consumer Skype and "Skype for Business" (aka Lync). The people using consumer Skype as a business tool simply will not move away from it to SfB, because everyone hates SfB and consumer Skype works really well. The only option is to make the consumer Skype so unpalatable to use in a business environment that you "have to" move to SfB.

    1. Re:It's a play for Lync/Skype for Business by chuckugly · · Score: 1

      Or I can stick with WebEx and switch to whatsapp for personal use ....

    2. Re:It's a play for Lync/Skype for Business by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 2

      Skype and SfB don't play well together either. I've had MANY tickets from my users who can't connect to our SfB contacts from a normal Skype account. Making it even more confusing is the two icons, they are the same color just inverse of each other. We would have to go and have some "end user education", enable auto-login on SfB, and uninstall Skype all the time. For awhile we had our EU business division on an EU-based tenancy, and us on a US-based one. Even in SfB, often one side couldn't see if the other was online; it would just say "presence unknown". We finally had to make a decision; since corp HQ was in Ireland. the entire company had to switch over to an IE tenancy to get everything MS related like that to work "properly".

  22. Even younger folk hate Skype now by chuckugly · · Score: 2

    My 20-something galpal just let off a long litany of gripes about Skype into my ear just yesterday, so it's not just old 1960s model nerds like me that think the changes are complete dogsh*t. But it's by god got a whizzy new sine wave "i'm working on it" animation, so it must be good right? Idiots.

    Someone needs fired for this.

  23. Re:You want professional? Then PAY for it. by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    Even worse when they spend all that money and have a @gmail.com email address.

  24. Re: Microsoft Kin, Software Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't use instagram, twitter, facebook, snapchat or any of this social bullshit, but I do use skype. The only thing I care about in there are voip calls and the chat. I don't give a shit about anybody's Facebook, I don't give a shit about snapchat and I have not even bothered to look at it, so little does this social media bullshit add value.

  25. Re:I cannot remember the last time something chang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The last changes Microsoft made to Skype was a dead giveaway. You could see the plague of rotting zombie corpses walking along the freeway way ahead in the distance. Getting confirmation that you really do want to quit Skype and if you do, you won't be able to keep in contact with your friends. Built in advertising? Auto-startup on first power up?

    Main reason for all of these, I guess, is that some people do use Skype as a form of Instant Messaging.

  26. Re:I cannot remember the last time something chang by dtmos · · Score: 1, Funny

    Change today means "making everything worse". Without exceptions.

    Welcome to aging. With me it happened in my late 30s, but YMMV.

    I used to wonder why old people were so grumpy all the time. Now I know.

  27. Continuous decline by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Skype is on the decline since the founders sold it.
    And since M$ bought it it is utter shit. Don't let me start about "skype for business", Lync or something it is called.
    I slowly convert my friends to Telegram. And as soon as we have a good video chat app again, Skype will be dead.
    I'm sick of that "tyranny of vendors" ...

    The Skype team clearly has a different view of its work. "We think it's the best Skype we've ever built -- inside and out -- and it's been designed to make it easier for you to use for your everyday communications,"
    The best I can say about developers who make statements like that is: "they are likely demented" otherwise they would know better.

    (E.g. when I go offline with Skype on my iPad, my Mac goes offline, too!!!! How retarded is that?)

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:Continuous decline by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      The "front end" is Skype for Business. However, many of the internal registry entries still say Lync. The DNS modifications you have to make still say Lync. All they did is change the UI.

  28. Re:Skype? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    There are people that don't live inside of the USA.
    And some of them have internet connected devices.

    If you really want the numbers: I have more Skype contacts, than WhatsApp, Viber, KiK, Telegram, Trema, iMessanger together. And I probably missed one or two apps ... because I only use them once a year.

    Skype I use daily.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  29. .cx domain? by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    They could have at least used less obscure domain name to not make people ask if that could be a scam site.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  30. Re:I cannot remember the last time something chang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm so sick of that kind of talk. It isn't "because of aging", but because things are really made to be worse and worse.

  31. Forbidden by Corporate Policy by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

    If I were to use Ring, then the people who wanted to talk to me via video conferencing would install it, too.

    You've never worked for a large corporation, have you? Any work-provided computing device is going to be locked down and you definitely aren't going to be allowed to install some software you downloaded off of the Internet.

  32. Re:I cannot remember the last time something chang by istartedi · · Score: 1

    It's much better than talking through a boot. Just ask Maxwell Smart.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  33. Admit defeat, for once by Nemosoft+Unv. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So Microsoft finally commented:

    We’re confident that as we continue to listen to users and provide updates to the app with new features and functionality, we’ll be able to keep improving the experience.

    So the usual marketing blabla of "improving your experience". When, for crying out loud, is a company going to admit that they were wrong and going to reverse course??! Just for once, please. Just say "Oops, sorry. We hear you; here's the previous version." Now that would be really listening to your customers.

    --
    "Fix it? It has been disintegrated, by definition it cannot be fixed!" - Gru in Despicable Me.
    1. Re:Admit defeat, for once by BeanThere · · Score: 2

      That is such a generic line it basically sounds like some corporate manager-bot spent a whole 5 minutes half-heartedly cutting and pasting it from some PR handbook just before going home for the day and proceeding to forget about it. It's so tone-deaf.

    2. Re:Admit defeat, for once by WallyL · · Score: 1

      So Microsoft finally commented:

      We’re confident that as we continue to listen to users and provide updates to the app with new features and functionality, we’ll be able to keep improving the experience.

      So the usual marketing blabla of "improving your experience". When, for crying out loud, is a company going to admit that they were wrong and going to reverse course??! Just for once, please. Just say "Oops, sorry. We hear you; here's the previous version." Now that would be really listening to your customers.

      FreeNAS did: http://www.freenas.org/blog/freenas-corral-status-release-technology-preview-status/

  34. Re:I cannot remember the last time something chang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not funny, clever or original in any way, shape or form.

  35. Skype is as bad as Google News now by neoRUR · · Score: 1

    Lets change it all and make it worse because we want more... The new Skype interface sucks and looks horrid and the same for Google news.

  36. Re:Thats why open and free is the way to go. by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

    Look, it's a known fact that the Firefox developers wish they were working for Google. This is more apparent with every new release, as more 'Chrome' 'features' find their way into an otherwise usable web browser, and support for other platforms (, etc.) continues to drop, with no end in sight.

  37. Re:I cannot remember the last time something chang by JThundley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is Skype and Microsoft we're talking about. The very first thing Microsoft did when they bought Skype was to change it to make it worse. They threw away the P2P functionality that gave users better privacy than other programs.

  38. Re:I cannot remember the last time something chang by inking · · Score: 1

    Yeah, thanks, Obama.

  39. Re:I cannot remember the last time something chang by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    Attaching social media to your skype calls means spying on your skype calls, you would be an idiot to not be pissed off and a marketdroid troll. Seriously are you people not paying attention, fuck Skyp, Skype is dead.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  40. Re:Ok, so? Use something else. What's the big deal by OhPlz · · Score: 1

    Could be worse, it could be Webex.

  41. Re:For all who are angry just switch. by OhPlz · · Score: 1

    Slack is great because if you use a browser they don't like (which is most of them) they block you instead of just throwing up a warning or whatever. I have to fudge the user agent string just to use their awful product. They also get snippy if you complain to them about it. And why do animated GIFs still not work on their Android app? That's not a feature that should take years to implement.

  42. Re:I cannot remember the last time something chang by wooferhound · · Score: 1

    Skype 10

    --
    We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
  43. What am I missing? by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    I just ran the Windows classic desktop client and the MS App Store client side by side. They don't seem all that different to me. What exactly has brought about all this wrath? The summary just repeats how "terrible" it is, without giving any details except for adding a "highlights" feature. I've never used SnapChat, so I have no idea what features it might have borrowed from that app, or why they are so awful.

    The Android client has never worked well, so no surprises there.

  44. Observer bias by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    That's because changes aren't singular. When something changes there's often many changes involved, however we tend to focus on the ones we find worse than the ones we find better.

    There are changes for the better in everything we hate, even Windows 10 and the never stationary Google Maps have some fantastic changes, but we spend all of our energy focusing on the downsides. e.g. Would I happily roll back several versions of Maps to get the pre-material layout versions? Hell no, the traffic and incident notification system of the more recent versions is a godsend. Ideally we'd get to pick and chose what we like in each app, but that's never going to happen. Hell we can't even do that on OSes (other than Linux, errr except for Systemd).

    Mind you I haven't tried Skype yet, so I'll reserve my right to complain about that later :-)

  45. Re:I cannot remember the last time something chang by Calydor · · Score: 1

    So you got rid of a privacy feature in order to get voice chat functionality on a phone?

    Sounds legit. It's about time we got the ability to use phones to talk to people!

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  46. Re:You want professional? Then PAY for it. by ffreeloader · · Score: 1

    I have worked for people that are cheap just for cheap's sake. However, they are that way because they do not understand how much they actually pay for being cheap. However, non-business owning individuals are often the same way. They are so cheap they cut off their nose to spite their own face.

    Greed is a problem for all of humanity, not just for business owners for it is greed that causes people to be so cheap they cheat themselves. It arises from human nature. Everyone seems to want something for nothing. Otherwise politicians would get nowhere telling people they are going to give them "free" stuff that those same people end up paying for with taxes.

    --
    "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
  47. The evolution of understanding the world by Evtim · · Score: 1

    I heard the lawyer joke [what is 10 000 lawyers at the bottom of the sea?] for the first time in primary school, living behind "the Wall". I found it amusing but also a bit puzzling since lawyers were not so important for our lives back then. Thus, very quickly we transformed the joke to be about politicians. Now, there was something you could direct your anger at. Bloody communists!

    But then, just a few years before the wall fell I read THGTG and learned about market people or rather about "a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes". That was hilarious but just as the lawyers thing it was a bit removed from my daily experience - there was no marketing or advertisement under communism. I remember thinking "is marketing that bad?"

    Then the wall fell and I emigrated to live and work in the West. And finally understanding dawned...Douglas had found the core issue after all, although I would say "financiers" rather than "marketers". Cause the lawyers and the politicians are figureheads - the real power is in those that print the money and those that manipulate us to spend it on BS [quote G. Carlin - advertising sells you BS that you cannot afford that is overprized and do not work].

    Share and Enjoy!

  48. Re: Admit defeat, for once: stop blocking by FlaSheridn · · Score: 1

    > Just for once, please. Just say "Oops, sorry. We hear you; here's the previous version."

    I don’t even need that; I’ve long since started archiving old iPhone apps in case an update gets worse. (So I’ll avoid iOS 11 as long as possible.) But this time Skype forced me to upgrade in order to connect; I’d settle for “you are now allowed to use the previous version.”

  49. Switched to Hangouts by bsdpanix · · Score: 1

    Out of the pan and into the fire, I've quit Skype for good.
    I frankly trust the big G more than M$.
    Guess we have to pick our poison

  50. A bit old, but here's my take on the Skype chat UI by seanellis · · Score: 1

    I use Skype desktop version for text chat at work, and I think it breaks many of the most basic rules of UI design. These rules have been known about for decades, and often promoted by Microsoft as the "right way" to write Windows apps.

    There are two very simple options that have been requested many times on the Skype forums over the past 2-3 years: change the color scheme, remove the speech bubbles.

    Here's all my rants condensed into one page: http://moteprime.org/article.p...

    It looks like the new Skype is continuing that trend.

  51. Re:You want professional? Then PAY for it. by geekmux · · Score: 1

    Skype has (had?) a major advantage that you don't get even if you spend millions on a "professional system": It's available everywhere and it's dead simple to use for everyone. Install, register, login, talk. Done. With the web client, you can even forget the install part. Also, since it's so omnipresent, in most cases you just need to exchange Skype screen names and add a contact into your already installed client.

    Every "professional" video conferencing system I ever had the misfortune to use is awfully complicated and it might require your contact to install yet another piece of software that is decidedly more complex then Skype and might cost money to license. Sorry, but no thanks, until is is as easy as Skype and doesn't cost my contact a penny.

    Facebook is available everywhere and is dead simple to use. That doesn't make it a "professional" solution by any means. It just makes it easier for anyone from the IT pro to the consumer-grade idiot to install and use.

    I've worked with a lot of VTC systems in multiple network configurations for over 20 years. Standard protocols were established long ago, and they could all talk to each other quite easily because of that standardization. You want to talk simple? Before Skype there was Microsoft NetMeeting. It was so simple you only needed an IP address to talk to another client. No server necessary. No bullshit "feature" upgrades or streaming ads to justify "cloud" costs or line corporate pockets with additional revenue streams. And that simple client could also talk to those standards-based professional enterprise systems as well.

    TL: DR - The free-app-for-dummies consumer we now live in has received exactly what it demanded. Tough shit if you don't like it; the monopoly providing the service doesn't care what consumers think or want anymore.

  52. Re:I cannot remember the last time something chang by chrish · · Score: 1

    Lies. Colossal Cave Adventure was written in '76 and Rogue in '80.

    Chances are you still haven't won at Rogue, so you're covered for gaming.

    --
    - chrish
  53. Reinstall after forced upgrade by FlaSheridn · · Score: 1

    I was able to get around this by installing an archived Skype 6.3.211.ipa (10/2015) with Xcode. I wasn’t forced to upgrade a newer (but still tolerable) iPad Skype, Skype 6.22.161.ipa (3/2017).

  54. Never Mind by FlaSheridn · · Score: 1

    A few hours later I was forced to upgrade again, via a link that didn’t actually work.

  55. Re:Skype? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    I technically don't know anyone on Line. But I know a few people who use, mostly Thai.
    Line is not running on my outdated iPhone/iOs, or I would give it a try.

    I have some skype group chats for games. And most of my skype contacts are business contacts.
    But: since 3 days skype stopped working my iPad, claiming it was an outdated version: there is not even an upgraded version in the App-Store. Absurd.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.