Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft To Offer Local Version of Azure Cloud Service (reuters.com)
Microsoft on Monday unveiled a new service that allows customers to use its cloud technology on their own servers, part of the company's efforts to refocus its product line to compete more effectively with rivals Amazon and Google. From a report: "One of the key differentiations we have with Azure versus our two biggest competitors in the cloud platform space is our ability to support true hybrid solutions," Judson Althoff, Microsoft's executive vice president of worldwide commercial business, told Reuters. Microsoft is hoping to carve a niche among customers who cannot or do not want to have to move all their computing operations to the massive shared data centers that are collectively known as the cloud. Azure Stack could serve companies in highly regulated industries or in parts of the world where using the cloud is not yet feasible, Althoff said.
No!!!
Yeah, okay. Keep telling yourself that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Brings a whole new meaning to "Invasion of privacy"!
Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
I shall keep it in a jar and call it betty
OK, so what do we call this local version? Puddle?
Also known as a regular server.
a server? Serious question. I've recently shut down my servers because after all these years of problems and headaches and constant babysitting, and making no money and getting no traffic to speak of anyway, it just wasn't worth it anymore. What exactly is a "private cloud" if not a server? What am I missing?
I hate performance-related or otherwise complicated configuration files more than anything, and I hate babysitting computers. Does a private (or non-private) "cloud" abstract this away somehow, or what?
MY BALLS!!! Suck 'em, nerds!
Azure Stack was publicly announced over a year ago - not a big surprise that it would get a big push at the MS Partner show this week...
Right click folder.
Click "share".
I don't respond to AC's.
...except it will weigh forty pounds, require a 220V 3-phase feed, and cost $4900 per year.
Azure offers a lot of features that are not available in Windows clustering. It can appeal to enterprises that want highly available services without dependency on internet or hosted storage.
On Microsoft's side, this product is just repackaging and selling code that is 99% the same as what they run internally, so it has a lot of potential and relatively little cost.
Between this and VMware supporting Linux containers natively, mid-tier and smaller enterprises are getting a lot of new options thrown at them.
---
According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
There is just other people's computers. What this does is make it easier to move your data between your computers and the other people's computers. Seems like a good move by Microsoft.
Windows 10 is possibly the worst spyware ever made. Quote: "Buried in the service agreement is permission to poke through everything on your PC."
When you calculate the Azure Cloud Service cost of losing control, you will be connected to 13 web sites, not just one.
Will the new Azure Cloud Service make sure that secret U.S. government agencies have a copy of everything?
Microsoft Cloud? 1) Micro, small thinking. 2) Soft, sloppy thinking. 3) Cloud, clouded thinking.
shut up faggot or i will smite you with my army of pro trump twitterbots
1981: "It's a PC, it's like a mainframe on your desktop."
1995: "It's an Application Server, it's like a PC on a mainframe."
2011: "Cloud: it's like an Application Server on a mainframe."
2017: "Local Cloud: it's like a mainframe on your Application Server."
2025: "It's a Metatizer, it's like an X on a Y, where YOU define what an X and Y is. Good luck figuring it out; we can't. Oh, and thanks for the check!"
Table-ized A.I.
Hmm..I dunno what rock you live under, but most any server room I've worked in for the past few decades, is about 99% Linux...with only the token windows server in the mix here and there.
That was mostly Federal systems....
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
The shills never die, at least not while their untraceable bitcoin payments keep flowing.
On-demand scalability of local resources. You have 100x servers running a collection of VMs that can scale up and down across these servers as demands change for each application. One particular module starts to get hit hard, that app can spawn more instances across your local cluster, and possibly also downscale lesser used apps to give it more resources.
This is essentially what Docker or VMWare is, but for the Microsoft world.
Azure (and other cloud providers) don't just offer pure virtual machines, they also offer virtual components that you can use to build applications with. Components include storage (relational, non-relational tables, basic blob), communication (queues, message routing, load balancing), compute component hosting, web content component hosting, authentication services, etc. By developing a cloud based application, you can worry about your logic and architecture, and not have to worry about deploying and maintaining basic infrastructure services.
What exactly is a "private cloud" if not a server? What am I missing?
A private cloud (a real private cloud, not just a single server offering file storage over the Internet) is a set of management tools that takes a pool of hardware and offers it up as logical computing components that can be leveraged by application developers with the goal of being able to develop your applications against a generic model and leaving the hardware and resource allocation and maintenance to the cloud management software (which is typically operated by people other than your development staff.)
Only if you do it right wich is something very very few places actually do. Making something scale still takes good design.
No sir I dont like it.
Should be called "fog service", after all, a localized cloud is called fog.
I know I'd want to run my apps in the fog.
Why do you even care which REPLY anyone else but you write ?
If you had a feeling of fulfillment in your own life you would not care.
The truth hurts, doesn't it?
FTFY
To the best of my admittedly limited understanding of the matter, Azure is a cloud storage service that you pay for as you use.... this makes sense when you are using somebody else's resources (Microsoft's), but are we supposed to pay Microsoft now to use our own servers instead?
Then again, maybe it does make sense... but strikes me as so self-evidently pointless as to defy any sense of reason why Microsoft would expect people to pay for it.
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
Local cloud servers are just...servers, right? I mean, how is this any different from what Microsoft (software-wise) has done since they launched NT? I don't get it. Obviously people can run their own servers. Are they just talking about some kind of management software on top of people's own hardware? Or are they actually providing the hardware as well? People would still be pretty crazy to risk putting their data on Microsoft products like this. I don't understand how they are even still in business.
https://antsle.com/
Antsle essentially does the same with it being an all-in-one local solution.
Software Defined Networking is a part of most clouds. Something you're normally not going to see locally.
What language are you writing in?? Spanglish? Chinglish? Punjabiglish? Pashtunglish? Slavglish? Europeglish??
do it or ur FAKE NEWS!
We called it On-Premises-as-a-Service, or OPaaS.
I shih tsu you not.
Kriston
This, Although I haven't RTFA it could have potential especially if it can be centrally managed, seamlessly integrate any products between cloud & on prem, etc.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-u...
This private Azure technology been around for 4 years. MS deprecated their Web Farm Framework in favor of it.
I could see this working if they brought the equivalent of VMware VSAN into Hyper-V natively for free. The parts are already there in Storage Spaces with their pseudo-RAIDZ. Slap down Azure API endpoints in a docker container and you are halfway there.
The final kicker would be microsoft slithering their Azure management tentacle in from the cloud side, so you provide the CAPEX on 1U/2U racks and they operate like a managed service provider stepping into your DC. Orchestrating this stuff is painful enough, leave it to Microsoft. Would require some SDN hardware, but teaming up with some whitebox OEM's like Supermicro and Quanta would cover that.
This has been around for some time, although more like a - run AWS locally - and it works pretty well.
https://github.com/eucalyptus
It's sad that this hasn't taken off more, it's pretty nice to be able to jump back and forth between a private/local bunch of vms and then throw them out on AWS if the need arises. Note that it doesn't have 100% of the AWS functionality but works for my smaller projects.
PLS DO ET shut him tf up
with only the token windows server in the mix here and there.
That sounds difficult! Did you ever try TCP/IP?
I work for a company that is in the heavily-regulated medical industry. 3 years ago we would have jumped on the idea of "local cloud" but now it might be too late.
3 years ago Microsoft offered to replace many of our servers (physical and VMWare) with Azure and the company basically said "No way, we can't have FDA regulated PHI and corporate secrets in the cloud." Fast forward to today, where the company is moving to all Azure. Our corporate Outlook servers are now Outlook 365, our local "FTP" site has been replaced with OneDrive. Yearly upgrades of Office are now replaced with Office 365.
Corporate America is slashing IT departments because they overcharged and underdelivered. They charged a fortune for basic email servers and could barely get Microsoft Office installed and working. Azure just made more corporate sense - gut the IT staff and move to the cloud. The theoretical security concerns melted away in the face of saving money and getting better service.
Where it might still make sense is for companies selling informatics software to other companies in regulated fields. You could offer your software in the cloud, or tell the company they can install their own local Azure and run the software on that. We wanted that 3 years ago and instead basically made our own.