Slashdot Mirror


Radio Station Hijacked Eight Times In the Past Month To Play 'I'm a Wanker' Song (bleepingcomputer.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bleeping Computer: An unknown hacker has hijacked the radio frequency of a UK radio station to play an obscene song eight times during the past month, according to the radio station's manager who recently revealed the hacks in an interview with BBC Radio 4. The hacks have been reported to Ofcom, the UK's communications regulator, who together with the radio station's staff have tried to track down the culprit at last three times, without success. Ofcom and radio station officials believe the hacker is using a mobile radio transmitter to broadcast a stronger signal on the radio station's normal frequency, overriding its normal program. In eight different occasions, the hacker has taken over broadcasts and has been heard talking, screaming, or singing, and then playing "The Winker's Song" (NSFW) by British comedian Ivor Biggun, a track about self-pleasure released in the 70s. Station manager Tony Delahunty told BBC Radio he received phone calls from distressed listeners complaining that their kids started humming the song. Fellow radio stations also called Delahunty to inquire about the hack, fearing similar hijacks.

168 comments

  1. Funny! by LucasTétreault · · Score: 5, Funny

    "calls from distressed listeners complaining that their kids started humming the song" -- that's hilarious

    1. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It IS funny. More power to this prankster. I wish we had some like him here in the states.

    2. Re:Funny! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Funny

      "calls from distressed listeners complaining that their kids started humming the song" -- that's hilarious

      Yeah, the concept of the wanker song distressing mum and daddy is funny. Think of the Children!!!

      I for one, welcome our new wanking overlords and their jam.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Man, that song is really catchy

    4. Re:Funny! by HalAtWork · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree, and personally I'm happy to have something like this lift my spirits and lighten things up

    5. Re:Funny! by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      This song came out in 1978. I was about 2 years old at the time and I am 40 years old. I am surprised they did not find anything more contemporary than this,

    6. Re: Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Daddy what does wanker mean?"

    7. Re: Funny! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Daddy what does wanker mean?"

      When "Cluster's Revenge" for the Atari 2600 got featured in a magazine article, I asked my father what the word "seduce" meant. He read the article and ripped up the magazine.

    8. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only an old man would bother hacking a radio station, because only old men think radio is interesting enough to care about. It's like hacking VHS.

    9. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least it wasn't "Up Against The Wall" by David Peel and the Lower East Side.

    10. Re: Funny! by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

      "Daddy what does wanker mean?"

      Simple answer "Wait until you are married and your partner is pissed at you. Then you'll understand. "

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    11. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be a Russian state actor terrorist Isis muslim terrorist hacker. There is no way that a jobless British yob can do this...

    12. Re:Funny! by n4wff · · Score: 2

      I agree, and personally I'm happy to have something like this lift my spirits and lighten things up

      The story or the act? :)

    13. Re: Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your dad sounds like a real winner.

    14. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thought viruses are nasty. There is no vaccine that wouldn't destroy the host.

    15. Re: Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but if she makes you do that make sure you finish on her face.
      Bonus points if she snores with her mouth open, if she divorces you it's win-win.

    16. Re: Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You meant wanker, I'm sure

    17. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or paying attention to an AC for that matter. Not interesting or relevant.

    18. Re:Funny! by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the concept of the wanker song distressing mum and daddy is funny. Think of the Children!!!

      I'm just wondering how many text filters are generating alerts on "mum, daddy, wanker and children" in the same sentence.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    19. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ITYM their pearl jam. -PCP

    20. Re:Funny! by TWX · · Score: 1

      Well, if the UK's equivalent of the FCC fines people for the language used, perhaps the person that did this chose a song that didn't have really any actual profanity in it to prevent the station from being fined for broadcasting profanity.

      Did them a favor, really.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    21. Re:Funny! by TWX · · Score: 1

      Or Lucille Bogan's "Shave 'em Dry".

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    22. Re:Funny! by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

      This is indeed beautiful.

    23. Re:Funny! by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I remember people doing this back in the 70s when CB radio was first legalized in the UK. Every time you turned a CB radio on you'd get "I'm a wanker, I'm a wanker..." on endless loop.

      The part I'm not buying is "kids listening to radios". As if.

      --
      No sig today...
    24. Re:Funny! by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      This song came out in 1978. I was about 2 years old at the time and I am 40 years old. I am surprised they did not find anything more contemporary than this,

      I'm betting the perpetrator is older than you. This song was a running joke on CB radio back in the '70s. People used to broadcast it all day long on channel 19.

      --
      No sig today...
    25. Re:Funny! by dwye · · Score: 1

      The parents should be glad that the pirate didn't play that 1970s classic "Love To Love You, Baby" , with simulated orgasmic moans all throughout.

    26. Re: Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah, his dad's a bitch

    27. Re:Funny! by quenda · · Score: 1

      The '70s was the golden age of masturbation songs.
      My favourite is Skyhooks "Smut" from the album "Living in the 70s".

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    28. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't confuse radio in the UK with radio in the USA.. We have 4 (main) BBC radio stations, and while they may appeal more to older people they do cover rather more than the typical US stations I heard while working over there.

      I don't think I ever heard a US station cover the topics on Radio 4: The history of the discovery of Evolution, the development of computers (from a technical perspective and including their use to crack WW2 codes) or comparative religions and the history of philosophy with well respected researchers, experts and university professors commenting at leisure....

    29. Re: Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sad that it is called hacking though. This is basic physics coupled with a radio spectrum license violation. There is no hack whatsoever.

    30. Re:Funny! by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      So broadcasting a more powerful signal is considered hacking now :|

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    31. Re: Funny! by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      I though a better answer is, it's what married men do in the toilet when they are in there too long and what married women do in the shower when they are in there to long. Being a bachelor and not knowing why, how come married men do it in the toilet and married women do it in the shower, of course that could be all old stuff from the days of stick books that would of course get wet in the shower and women apparently just need their imagination and to be able to drown out the outside world.

      One can understand the earlier prohibition to self hormonal adjustment, where higher breeding numbers were required to feed endless wars but you would think we would be able to calm things down now. Of course with the opposites sexes becoming so demanding off each other, self hormonal adjustment might become too popular.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    32. Re:Funny! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the concept of the wanker song distressing mum and daddy is funny. Think of the Children!!!

      I'm just wondering how many text filters are generating alerts on "mum, daddy, wanker and children" in the same sentence.

      Hilarious! This is the story that keeps on giving.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    33. Re: Funny! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Sad that it is called hacking though. This is basic physics coupled with a radio spectrum license violation. There is no hack whatsoever.

      Yeah, most of the things called hacking today have no relation to the original meaning.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    34. Re:Funny! by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Same era: Je t'aime

      --
      bickerdyke
    35. Re:Funny! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It'll be hilarious to hack Trump by shouting louder than him.

    36. Re:Funny! by dwye · · Score: 1

      The Wanker Song is not so famous that humming the tune (as the listening kids supposedly do) will scandalize everyone; moaning like one was in the middle of sex certainly WILL.

    37. Re:Funny! by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Kids these days are soft.

      The lyrics to the "The Winker" were required reading at my Primary School growing up. Let me guess- they don't even take GCSE's in masturbation anymore either?

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    38. Re:Funny! by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Only an old man would bother hacking a radio station, because only old men think radio is interesting enough to care about. It's like hacking VHS.

      The hacker is almost certainly a white male aged 40's or 50's with a background in communications and/or electrical engineering.

      In the Mansfield area where this happened that narrows the suspects down to about 12 people. Police should be able to do the rest.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    39. Re:Funny! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Damn right, back when I went to school our PE teacher showed us how to masturbate, and we could even try it on him to see if we do it right.

      What? Why is everyone looking at me funny now?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    40. Re:Funny! by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Extra credit if you could shoot it above the monkey bars.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    41. Re:Funny! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Or pretty much anything from Steel Panther.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    42. Re:Funny! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Or tweet more than him.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    43. Re:Funny! by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      In February 2017, similar radio hacks happened in the US, when hackers hijacked the frequency of Sunny 107.9 WFBS-FM in Salem, Carolina to broadcast insults addressed to US President Donald Trump.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    44. Re:Funny! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Damn right, back when I went to school our PE teacher showed us how to masturbate, and we could even try it on him to see if we do it right.

      What? Why is everyone looking at me funny now?

      Ah, I see you kids studied under Jerry Sandusky.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    45. Re: Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jam? Creamy mayo you mean?

    46. Re:Funny! by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      we do, but christian slater is pretty busy these days.

    47. Re:Funny! by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      both?

    48. Re: Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. I bet most of these so-called "hackers" don't even own an axe!

    49. Re: Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. I bet most of these so-called "hackers" don't even own an axe!

    50. Re: Funny! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      True. I bet most of these so-called "hackers" don't even own an axe!

      Or smoke cigarettes.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    51. Re: Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You apparently never tuned to the bottom of the dial to hear NPR.

    52. Re:Funny! by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Imagine the groans, not this guy again

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  2. Dear Radio Pirate: by davidwr · · Score: 1

    We know you are, you don't have to brag about it.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  3. Good old days of hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    where hacking was a form of art, done for fun not for profit. Before the commercial people took it over like everything on the internet.

    1. Re:Good old days of hacking by sexconker · · Score: 2

      At least trolling is still a art.

    2. Re:Good old days of hacking by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      I don't think its a troll, just someone that wants the commercial shit they clogged the internet up with to go away.. Make more room for porn and piracy. What the internet was invented for.

    3. Re:Good old days of hacking by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You are obviously on vacation for about 6 months before every election.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  4. over-the-air radio gold by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    Tony Delahunty's ratings "book" (UK equivalent?) will skyrocket for 3rd quarter.

  5. teeth & gums by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    It's like a British Bababouie.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  6. call Quizmania and say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  7. Did they hack grafitti onto the building, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    mobile radio transmitter to broadcast a stronger signal on the radio station's normal frequency

    Soooooo... that's hacking? Is the verb "hack" just equivalent to "did a nefarious thing" now... on Slashdot? Like, we don't even need computers, internets, IPs, mobiles, or two people on a keyboard to call it hacking?

    I'm becoming convinced that the editors just post shit to give us two minutes of rage and keep up the time-on-page metrics, instead of actually posting news for nerds.

    1. Re:Did they hack grafitti onto the building, too? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

      It is well in line with the more traditional meaning of "hacking," the one rms will go on and on about.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Did they hack grafitti onto the building, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your a doosh

    3. Re: Did they hack grafitti onto the building, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a douche.

    4. Re:Did they hack grafitti onto the building, too? by Psion · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You should look into the history of the word "Hack" ... it didn't originate with computers, but with model railroading and made the leap over into computers via MIT's model railroading club.

    5. Re:Did they hack grafitti onto the building, too? by Excelcia · · Score: 5, Interesting

      For pity's sake, are you new? Hacking and phreaking (which is a word put together from phone hacking) were terms applied to radio, telegraphy, and telephony long before computers. Where do you think the term came from? It's from cutting into communications - sometimes it involved physically cutting into the wires, sometimes it involved cutting into signals. Hence the word "hack". One would find a myriad of ways to piggyback onto transcontinental radio and telegraphy.

      Take your two minutes of rage and face it into a mirror.

    6. Re:Did they hack grafitti onto the building, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soooooo... that's hacking? Is the verb "hack" just equivalent to "did a nefarious thing" now... on Slashdot?

      Sure. The word has been meaningless for a goodly while, used by msm to convey that vague feeling of dread most lusers know so well from using a computer and it not doing what they want, so they blame "hackers". Only you usually see it pop up in a computer security context. Well, the new new new editors mostly read bleepingcomputer, evidently a computer power luser site that now happened to report on something that had no computers in it. The vocabulary of empty scare words stays the same, just like the glaring void of actual information.

      I'm becoming convinced that the editors just post shit to give us two minutes of rage and keep up the time-on-page metrics, instead of actually posting news for nerds.

      Clickbait on /., you don't say.

  8. Reading the title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had naturally assumed they were "hacking" Steve Wright on Radio 2

    Sadly I was wrong.

  9. A stronger signal? by dlleigh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > Ofcom and radio station officials believe the hacker is using a mobile radio transmitter to broadcast a stronger signal on the radio station's normal frequency, overriding its normal program.

    Either this is the weakest commercial radio station in the world, or the "hacker" has access to a massive amplifier and antenna, or he's just overriding the station's frequency in a very small area. My money is on the last of those, and also that this story is of negligible significance.

    Or perhaps the officials are wrong and the guy is overpowering a much weaker studio-to-transmitter link and using the station's own signal to broadcast his onanistic outrage.

    1. Re:A stronger signal? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Either this is the weakest commercial radio station in the world, or the "hacker" has access to a massive amplifier and antenna, or he's just overriding the station's frequency in a very small area.

      I'd guess he's overpowering the uplink on a relay. The area might not be that small.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:A stronger signal? by ve3oat · · Score: 2

      I think this last option (over powering the studio-transmitter link) is much more likely. Even a low-power radio used by the pirate in the vicinity of the station's transmitter site could over-power the weaker signal from the distant studio. So the transmitter site receives only the signal from the pirate and not the weaker signal from the studio, especially if the STL uses frequency modulation (FM) (and I think most of them do). This trick is easy to do, and I am surprised it doesn't happen more often.

    3. Re:A stronger signal? by scdeimos · · Score: 2

      Either this is the weakest commercial radio station in the world, or the "hacker" has access to a massive amplifier and antenna, or he's just overriding the station's frequency in a very small area. My money is on the last of those, and also that this story is of negligible significance.

      I agree, it's likely the last. Before Bluetooth head units became common in cars people used to have FM transmitters plugged into their iDevices to play music/podcasts through their car speakers. It wasn't uncommon to have your preferred radio station overridden by someone's transmitter set to a commercial frequency as they passed you in traffic.

    4. Re: A stronger signal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RadioShack used to sell low power FM transmitters. Friend of mine in high school had had enough of our bus driver's love of LiteFM and would broadcast his own tunes over it.

      Unfortunately keeping it tuned required using an Allen wrench to tune a coil and it would drift constantly. The Allen wrench socket was garbage and would fall apart after a few uses. But I'm sure there's a nice, cheap digital version that takes Bluetooth input these days.

    5. Re:A stronger signal? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Right. That's not hijacking a radio station, it's just running your own radio station at a higher wattage. To really hijack a radio station, see Airheads.

    6. Re:A stronger signal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many commercial radio transmitters just aren't that powerful in the UK; we're talking 200W ERP for some of them. Easy to override with a mobile system for a few minutes at a time, and often centred in urban areas with high population density. They don't have to cover a lot of area to have a sizeable listener base in a country with a population density eight times that of the US, and frequencies are allocated regionally to avoid interference, all leading to less need for big honking transmitters.

      Fact of the day: the only US state with a higher population density than England is New Jersey.

    7. Re:A stronger signal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, likely they are overriding the uplink - which would prove hard to track down if they are doing it from a temporary location, then packing up and disappearing.. They'll pretty much have to catch them in the act, or get enough evident to raid them and find the radio equipment they've been using to prove its them.

      Whom ever wrote the summery didnt do their homework or has a limited understanding of how this radio stuff works :-)

    8. Re:A stronger signal? by swb · · Score: 1

      Do they actually relay transmit radio broadcasts from other radio broadcasts anymore? Like picking up a distant 92.5 station and retransmitting it locally on 101.3 or something? I would think they would have a microwave uplink or a terrestrial data link these days to any transmitter, and not rely on the signal from a distant broadcast.

    9. Re:A stronger signal? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Do they actually relay transmit radio broadcasts from other radio broadcasts anymore?

      I am not an expert in this area, like so many others :) but Wikipedia suggests yes.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:A stronger signal? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Do they actually relay transmit radio broadcasts from other radio broadcasts anymore? Like picking up a distant 92.5 station and retransmitting it locally on 101.3 or something?

      In the US, yes they do. It's called a "translator" and it is very common in much of Oregon, e.g., where there are few large broadcasters and they want to cover a lot of rural terrain. It's done with radio and television, both.

      But many stations also use a studio-transmitter link to send the studio signal to the transmitter up on the mountain or outside the urban area. Microwave, usually, and the last one I heard live was around 950 MHz.

    11. Re:A stronger signal? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Or he's simply overriding the stations transmitter input - you'd be surprised - at least in the US its very often a low power, clear (not encrypted) microwave relay.

    12. Re:A stronger signal? by TWX · · Score: 1

      And apparently this station doesn't use any form of security on that link despite the means to transmit being very well known. You'd think they would spend the money to add some equipment at both ends to prevent actual takeover, so that the worst a future attack could do would be to silence the station.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    13. Re:A stronger signal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people still do.

    14. Re:A stronger signal? by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'd guess he's overpowering the uplink on a relay. The area might not be that small.

      You are right, they covered this in greater depth on radio 4. It is during outside broadcasts, where the radio broadcasts from a reporter with a microphone to a base unit to the station. They were not clear on whether the stronger signal overcame the link from the microphone to the base unit or from the base unit to the station.

      What surprises me is that this is not encrypted.

    15. Re:A stronger signal? by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps the officials are wrong and the guy is overpowering a much weaker studio-to-transmitter link and using the station's own signal to broadcast his onanistic outrage.

      Looks like the officials have been poorly summarised in the original article; it seems like a radio van to studio link was hijacked.

      “We are told by Ofcom who are investigating the matter, that you only need, and this is the frightening thing, a small transmitter and if you can get near where there is an outside broadcast or a signal and you can overpower that signal [and] you’re on the airwaves.

      https://www.theguardian.com/tv...

    16. Re:A stronger signal? by swb · · Score: 1

      I would assume that a microwave link would be tougher to overpower without getting away with it, requiring line of sight, proximity and power.

    17. Re:A stronger signal? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      It's quite possible that the link isn't even digital, it may be FM analogue.

    18. Re:A stronger signal? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call it "frightening". Calling this "frightening" is hyperbole.

    19. Re:A stronger signal? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Something doesn't make sense here. If this person was overpowering an outside broadcast unit, why didn't the station just switch to some other signal (like the presenter in their offices) instead of playing that song?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:A stronger signal? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If this person was overpowering an outside broadcast unit, why didn't the station just switch to some other signal (like the presenter in their offices) instead of playing that song?

      Presumably because they're not doing their jobs and paying attention to what is going out over the air. Ever heard dead air on the radio? Same thing, only with less consequences. It's not uncommon for there to be nobody awake at the switch. It seems daft for that to be the case when you're relaying a report, but there's no shortage of daft bastards.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:A stronger signal? by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      It's not of negligible significance if the existing infrastructure is vulnerable to this kind of attack on a widespread basis. If all you need is an ordinary car and a small bit of kit to take over a commercial broadcast station, that's a pretty significant weakness.

      If the receiver required some kind of crypto-key in a sideband or sub-channel, at least they could automatically shut down broadcast when they've been pwned. It sounds funny, but if a few dozen people got together and took over greater London radio to broadcast some kind of War of the Worlds thing, it could cause as much damage from panic as any bomb.

    22. Re:A stronger signal? by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      It's quite possible that the link isn't even digital, it may be FM analogue.

      very possibly. The Guardian says:

      We are told by Ofcom who are investigating the matter, that you only need, and this is the frightening thing, a small transmitter and if you can get near where there is an outside broadcast or a signal and you can overpower that signal [and] you’re on the airwaves.

    23. Re:A stronger signal? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We are told by Ofcom who are investigating the matter, that you only need, and this is the frightening thing, a small transmitter and if you can get near where there is an outside broadcast or a signal and you can overpower that signal [and] youâ(TM)re on the airwaves.

      Frightening! Egads!

      Perhaps the situation is similar to the USA for some odd reason? Looks like the article has several bones to pick, but anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:A stronger signal? by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      Presumably because they're not doing their jobs and paying attention to what is going out over the air.

      I guess the song was an accurate description of what the guys in the station were doing at that time.....

      Ever heard dead air on the radio?

      The stations I know have an automated "emergency" loop for that, starting a special playlist directly to the transmitter if the input is silent for more than 30 seconds. The playlist has songs usually NOT on rotation so even engineers off duty will be alerted (if they listen to the station) and suddenly can hear "Help" (Bangles version)

      --
      bickerdyke
    25. Re:A stronger signal? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Because that would entail putting a person to watch over the broadcast. You'd be amazed how much automation is going on at networks these days. There are times when they're on full autopilot, for smaller stations it's not uncommon to put in a long music (+ad, of course) list at around 9pm and basically press "play" 'til the 6am morning news.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    26. Re:A stronger signal? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Good point, I failed to account for the cheapness of the station adequately.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    27. Re:A stronger signal? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      especially people in older cars who don't have bluetooth.

    28. Re:A stronger signal? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I don't think a War of the Worlds thing would be as effective today, simply because people can check other media outlets easier than back then when you had to physically get up and manually change the station.

    29. Re:A stronger signal? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      And apparently this station doesn't use any form of security on that link despite the means to transmit being very well known.

      "Being very well known" and "being readily available", or "a sociopath ready and willing to do it" are two different things.

      There are lots of things I "very well know" how to do that would screw up a lot of stuff, but I'm not a sociopath so I don't do them. I respect what other people own because I expect them to respect my stuff.

      For example, it is very well known how to make a master key for a facility if you have one key to start with. At least I think it is very well known. I have a key to a university building and I even have the six blanks necessary. If I didn't have the blanks, I have found the website where I can buy them for almost nothing. I have a file, too. A key-making machine is ~$700 otherwise. But I don't do it because ... well, why bother?

      I also have a can of cold galvanizing spray and my neighbors have satellite dishes. Oooh the fun I could have. Yawn.

      And I have a very nice radio that can transmit on many of the standard wireless microphone frequencies, and can go to local concerts where the performers use them. If I didn't already have it, I could buy a wireless mic from eBay.

      You might be amazed at all the things that are "very well known" that nobody spends extra money on protecting, because most people aren't jerks.

      You'd think they would spend the money to add some equipment at both ends to prevent actual takeover,

      Budgets are budgets.

    30. Re:A stronger signal? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      You'd be amazed how much automation is going on at networks these days.

      A couple of the local AM stations here (owned by the same company) are that way. I don't listen to the sports one, but the talk station has the last live local person ending at 9AM with network feeds for the rest of the day and well into the night. (It used to carry Art Bell -- who I miss very much. He had a real hoot show and was a magnificent host. He could have the nuttiest people on and make them feel like someone was interested, and be making fun of them at the same time. A rare talent. You could be a believer in the nuts or laughing at them and you'd love the show either way.)

      It is not uncommon to hear three different things all playing at once on that talk station, after the live guys go home. Or nothing all at once.

      It is not at all unlikely that the reporter at the event was the only person on duty for the station anywhere, and he was controlling the entire thing remotely.

    31. Re: A stronger signal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps you don't understand how radio stations work and don't know what a studio-to-transmitter link is.

    32. Re: A stronger signal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't see it much anymore because modern stations use digital STLs that can't just be taken over by a strong signal. They require authentication.

    33. Re:A stronger signal? by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Crazy by Patsy Cline was the on we used when the automation went wonkers. 2:52 to figure out what went wrong.

      I'm thinking the hacker is hitting the STL (Studio Transmitter Link) which in the US is often at 951MHz which an old mobile radio can hit.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    34. Re:A stronger signal? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Less cheapness, more necessity. There are small stations that run on a shoestring budget, but often they're the more interesting ones because they are the only ones that cover local events.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    35. Re:A stronger signal? by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Either this is the weakest commercial radio station in the world, or the "hacker" has access to a massive amplifier and antenna, or he's just overriding the station's frequency in a very small area. My money is on the last of those, and also that this story is of negligible significance.

      Or, maybe the hacker is overriding the frequency the station uses to transmit its signal to its broadcast tower? That would require a lot less power.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  10. But by sys64764 · · Score: 2

    why is he a hacker? This is just transmitting FM with a not so regulatory amp? If he would hack the digital feed in their studio he would be a hacker but now he's just a guy who bought some equipment and dialed in a radio station frequency and is driving around the city. Hacking my ass. But he still gets points for style, execution and repetition!

    1. Re: But by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      Because they actually know what the word hacker means.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  11. Not a hack by Hentes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just an old fashioned pirate radio.

    1. Re:Not a hack by Desler · · Score: 1, Funny

      It sounds like they were just playing Theresa May's theme song.

    2. Re: Not a hack by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      The pirates preferred an unoccupied part of the spectrum. Hijacking a broadcast has a different motivation.

    3. Re:Not a hack by ContextSwitch · · Score: 1
      Agreed. This was reported on Radio 4 earlier this week and described as someone with a "powerful transmitter" probably mobile.

      So nothing like a hack just a plain old-fashioned pirate.

      It was funny listening to the news item because they went out of their way not to mention what was being played. It was only until I read this slashdot article that I found out.

    4. Re:Not a hack by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No they aren't transmitting to an audience using their own equipment. They are taking over an uplink and knocking a radio station offline in the process. Quite a bit different.

    5. Re: Not a hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of when the Hambrough Tavern was burnt down because a racist skinhead band was playing there. None of the TV or radio reports mentioned the name of the band. I found out later they were called the Four Skins.

  12. What a legend! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    respect to this radio pirate!

    1. Re:What a legend! by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      respect to this radio pirate

      A 21 wanker solute!

  13. makes me wanna wank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    catchy tune

  14. There were dropped monocles everywhere! by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've never heard so many cries of "Well, I never!" There were bodies lying prostrate on fainting couches all about the city! The horror!

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  15. they never found the max headroom hacker by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2
    1. Re:they never found the max headroom hacker by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      That's old school hacking, using technical knowledge to do something funny that causes no real damage; although fans of the Docter might disagree. John Draper's Nixon hack is another classic. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik... Scroll down to the Legends section.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    2. Re:they never found the max headroom hacker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that about anything can be construed to be "causing damage" because you are "diluting their brand" or some nonsense.

    3. Re:they never found the max headroom hacker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My personal favorite is Vrillon:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Television_broadcast_interruption & https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BWHVmBY0Cs

    4. Re:they never found the max headroom hacker by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That episode of the Doctor wasn't too good anyway, no loss.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  16. The wheels of government grind slowly... by bobbied · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It will be awhile, but if the pirate continues doing this, they will find him and grind them into dust.

    Most people don't realize that the BEST jokes are the ones that happen only a few times and when the jokester does it enough to be noticed but stops before they get caught.

    Some of my best pranks are ones I only did a few times with long intervals in between. The best being an E-mail prank that I only pulled twice in 3 years and nobody suspected that it was me until a decade later after I told the Sys Admin staff the secret on my last day so they could fix the hole. I still remember the crazy searching for the perpetrator and the hand wringing memos from embarrassed management types getting posted on the bulletin boards in the break room....

    Then there was the changing of the channels in the cafeteria TV's that just mysteriously happened even though they where out of reach and the remote controls locked up in the boss' office...I did that one a couple of times a week, using an IR recording/playback device, for a month, stopped when the Boss set up a surveillance camera, then did it every few weeks once the camera disappeared. I'm sure it drove him crazy because he was complaining about it in public... Not sure if he caught on to me after I left there or not, but I got really tired of CNN only on the TV's at lunch.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:The wheels of government grind slowly... by ve3oat · · Score: 1

      I love it! You're a hero!

    2. Re:The wheels of government grind slowly... by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Blast from the past. We used to the same thing at parties. Once you knew the TV band we'd find a remote, bring it to the party and change the channel. When the host would change it back as soon as they turned around we'd switch it again. After a few times they'd be convinced their turning around caused the remote to malfunction. They'd slowly back away and hilarity ensued. Tip of the hat to you.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    3. Re:The wheels of government grind slowly... by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      It will be awhile, but if the pirate continues doing this, they will find him and grind them into dust.

      This isn't the US. They'd fine him a few £100, confiscate his gear. Suspended sentence if he's really unlucky.

    4. Re:The wheels of government grind slowly... by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      In the late 90s I was studying aerospace engineering and we had to take Fortran90. In the lab we had a TA (teaching assistant) doing the lessons. A friend an I used the "net send" command to send random messages that would pop-up on the projector as he was showing his screen. Poor guy had no idea what was happening.

      After disrupting the class for most of the 2 hour lab, we decided not to do it again in future classes because we expected the TA to be prepared to figure out who was doing it.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    5. Re:The wheels of government grind slowly... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      "Ofcom said maliciously causing radio interference was a criminal offence carrying a potential sentence of two years in prison and an unlimited fine."

    6. Re:The wheels of government grind slowly... by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      "Ofcom said maliciously causing radio interference was a criminal offence carrying a potential sentence of two years in prison and an unlimited fine."

      I refuse to play the maximum sentence game.

    7. Re:The wheels of government grind slowly... by chaotixx · · Score: 1

      You can't just mention a tidbit about the best prank you've ever pulled and leave us hanging. Details, please!

    8. Re:The wheels of government grind slowly... by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Let's just say that a couple of lower level executives sent E-Mail about some embarrassing things to a lot of people within the company. Some of these things where known to be true, some where widely speculated to be true and most made up out of thin air.. They included photographic evidence where appropriate (photo shopped in most cases)... I think may who read the E-mails saw that they were obvious fiction, but judging by the reaction by some I'm guessing they where close enough that some folks got worried about the other shoe dropping...

      Let's also say that I dare not give out any more information in today's PC age lest I inadvertently find myself on the wrong end of a lawsuit....Besides, your imagination is likely better than anything I actually did... So have your own fun.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  17. Priorities by BlytheBowman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know what is even more obscene? Parents getting upset over this instead of bands of kids setting sleeping homeless men and women on fire for the thrill of it, something that happens in both the US and the UK

    1. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thrill seekers come from all walks of life. Piling one thrill on top of another until: a murder. Kill for a thrill.

    2. Re:Priorities by Mattskimo · · Score: 1

      It's obscene that parents would be worried about the relatively few cases of this happening and not whichever is worse for children out of the wars in South Sudan, Yemen or Syria. They can only be concerned about one thing in the world and that thing must be the worst.

    3. Re:Priorities by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      You know what is even more obscene? Parents getting upset over this instead of bands of kids setting sleeping homeless men and women on fire for the thrill of it

      Setting fire to people is not "obscene", it is "wicked". To use "obscene" is a wrong use of the word.

      Anyway, are you suggesting that we should not be concerned about anything less than kids setting fire to people? Then I take it you never bother to wash up your plates.

    4. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had leftists not managed to all but criminalize faith in God and Jesus over the last 50 years, that wouldn't be happening, either.

    5. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what religion gets you. Weak people who can't think for themselves, going into hysterics.

    6. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't think there were any more religious people in England (except the Muslims of course).

  18. Still waiting for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Max Headroom hacker on every Windows 10 device.

  19. Remember the "Max Headroom" TV hack in 1987? by BlytheBowman · · Score: 2

    I imagine they were able to pull that one by sending their own, more powerful microwave signal to the remote broadcast tower that most TV stations used. The FM capture effect (analog TV video used a variant of AM with the audio being FM for normal broadcast, but I am sure the station to tower mw link was all FM), helped insure a complete takeover of the broadcast tower.

  20. Nickleback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could have been worse. They could have played Nickleback.

    1. Re:Nickleback by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Please. They are British. They're wankers, all right, but they have style!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  21. More like hijack by ArchieBunker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah that could have been worded better. Signal hijacking or intrusion is a better word. The transmitter towers are line of sight from the studio so all you need is a transmitter and antenna to get in the way. I wish the Max Headroom guy would come forward and reveal the details. The statute is limitations is long up.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:More like hijack by TWX · · Score: 1

      Probably died of a perforated colon...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  22. GET YOUR BLANK ATM CARD HERE DICKSONBLANKATMHACKER by vernondarren87 · · Score: 0

    Mr Dickson Intelligent Blank ATM Cards Which Have Been Specially Programmed Atm Card Contact Email Dicksonblankatmhacker@gmail.com I am announcing this amazing testimonial on this blog, about Mr Dickson how the Blank ATM Card experience changed my whole life.the 2017 blank Atm Programmed Card and cash money directly in any ATM Machine around you. There is no risk of being caught, because the card has been programmed in such a way that its not traceable,so luckily i read about the blank ATM card exercise and how it has made people become rich. I contacted the email address i attached to the testimonial of some beneficiaries and here i am today, all thanks to Global Tech Hackers Team Incorporation world wide for helping me with a blank ATM Card. Now all my financial worries are over. All you need to do is send a message to the email address provided: dicksonblankatmhacker@gmail.com

  23. Important clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can help with the investigation. The person behind this is a wanker.

  24. This is an outrage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Halfway Up Virginia' is a much better Ivor Biggun song. Should've used that instead.

  25. a hack? by Pax681 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ofcom and radio station officials believe the hacker is using a mobile radio transmitter to broadcast a stronger signal on the radio station's normal frequency, overriding its normal program. In eight different occasions, the hacker has taken over broadcasts and has been heard talking, screaming, or singing, and then playing "The Winker's Song"

    a mobile transmitter... sounds like ge's got himself a CB radio with sidebands (illegal in the UK) which can hit the FM spectrum allocated to radio stations. then plug that little fucker into a linear amplifier(even 100watts will blast the shit out that station) and the antenna of your choice depending on how immediately mobile you feel you need to be.
    As I recall you go onto the am bands and then hit the "high button".. and that takes you into FM where you can pick a station or an empty space to broadcast over/on. My cousin and i used to do something like that except we'd broadcast in vacant parts of the radio frequency and always from a different location.... mind you that was in the 80's and long before we got out Full RAE exams passed and became licensed radio amateurs.. way back when an MM0 *** call sign was shiny and new.

    1. Re:a hack? by CRC'99 · · Score: 3, Informative

      a mobile transmitter... sounds like ge's got himself a CB radio with sidebands (illegal in the UK) which can hit the FM spectrum allocated to radio stations

      What CB radios do you guys have that'll do 230Khz wide signals in 88-108MHz? Certainly can't get this with a 27MHz CB....

      --
      Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
    2. Re:a hack? by Pax681 · · Score: 1

      illegal ones such as the NATO 2000 sidebander that are made outside the 27/81 spec.

    3. Re:a hack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are talking about a strong AM signal interfering with receivers on a totally different frequency, such as an AM CB radio next to a hifi and the hifi suddenly amplifying an audible version of what is being transmitted. I have had AM broadcasts come over landlines due to inadequate filtering in the phone handset.

      You are not broadcasting on the correct frequency, but instead anything with a 'diode' like device converting the signal to base audio frequency which can then be heard. You need to be within metres of the station, not miles.

      As stated elsewhere this guy only was heard while outside broadcasts were ongoing, suggesting they are using an old FM link back to base, which the person was able to over power, by using a strong signal on the same frequency, possible only in the order of a watt or two nearby. They state he was 'mobile' suggesting he may have operated from a vehicle or bicycle near the studio, much closer then the outside broadcast.

    4. Re:a hack? by CRC'99 · · Score: 1

      illegal ones such as the NATO 2000 sidebander that are made outside the 27/81 spec.

      I've still never seen any of these anywhere near capable of a 230Khz wide signal?

      --
      Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
    5. Re:a hack? by beheaderaswp · · Score: 1

      A 27Mhz CB has no chance of transmitting in the FM broadcast band without a transverter. And even then the frequency stability would be so bad it wouldn't be able to interfere effectively with a 103 Mhz signal- outside of maybe some weird QRM. Additionally, to jam a station with 1000W and an elevated antenna- you would need maybe 3 kilowatts. Even then the jamming would be localized.

      But 3 kilowatts out of a car? Unlikely.

      --
      Another consultant who stuck it out.

      "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
    6. Re:a hack? by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it just be easier to convince an off-the-shelf Yaesu or Icom that it's actually allowed to transmit between 88 and 108 MHz by fiddling with the ROM? The only reason they won't is because they've been told not to, at the factory. If it can do 6 meters and 2 meters, it'll damn well do the FM broadcast band (with suitable antenna).

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    7. Re:a hack? by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't need to perform to broadcast standards to get (relatively crappy) audio picked up by a standard receiver. Dispense with stereo, that'll save you the upper subcarrier. Undermodulate and you should just lose signal-to-noise ratio, and lower volume (on radios lacking automatic gain -- who uses those anymore?).

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  26. or the Captain Midnight hack by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    Where he over powered the HBO satellite signal

    1. Re:or the Captain Midnight hack by subk · · Score: 1
      Two things:

      Max Headroom was never caught. This was a nearly miraculous feat, because he had to get his transmitter within the 5-10 degree beam pattern of the receiver (probably not an easy trick in Chicago), *and* know what frequency to use, *and* have more power *and* the right modulation scheme. I'm guessing he was an insider. There was still a little bit of interference from the real STL signal, but that just made Max Headroom's presentation creepier.

      Captain Midnight worked at TV station, and was caught. The station's character generator had a custom font on it, and he used the custom font in his text overlay. Busted.

      --
      Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
  27. Ima Wanker?!? by Chessucat · · Score: 1

    Isn't that Peg's mom?

    --
    "I'm a dirty white tomcat, enter my world..."
  28. Radio: Details by DrYak · · Score: 1

    The part I'm not buying is "kids listening to radios". As if.

    It's a shortcut.

    The full story probably is :

    Grand-pa and grand-ma are listening on their FM radio set (those thing still exist ? There are parts of Europe which haven't switched to DAB+ ?)
    suddenly they hear this song and panic.

    Little Johny registers that there's a fuss big enough to have him lift his nose off "Angry Pokemon Crush" on his iDroid 7.
    He notice and makes association between the funny words that the radio sings and the interestingly impressive result on the grand parents.

    He eventually begins to sing this bit to see if he can also cause the same mayhem : bingo !

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Radio: Details by l20502 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are parts of Europe which haven't switched to DAB+

      Oh, boy I can't wait for another finicky all-or-nothing digital broadcasting system and hundreds of radio sets at the recycling bin.

    2. Re: Radio: Details by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

      Norway is in do prosess of changing to dab+now, fm will be fead by years end, in sweeden they dysided tonsteay with fm foe a shile longer, the fest of europe, no idea

    3. Re: Radio: Details by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I kinda want to see you have a conversation with joe_dragon.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  29. Why be distressed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either they don't know what the words mean and therefore it's as benign as singing "Ring a ring a roses". More benign, in fact. The number of deaths from wanking is nonexistent or a number you can count on one hand...

    And if they know what the words mean, then it's too late to "protect" them from the words.

  30. This is NOT hijacking, and NOT hacking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is definitely not hijacking, and there is no way on God's green Earth this is hacking. No hacking happened.

    This was a guy with a transmitter who interfered with the licensee over a very small geographical area compared to the BTA.

    You all can technically do the same thing when you use one of those FM modulators to get your iPhone into your car stereo. This guy just did it on purpose and with malicious intent.

    No computers were broken into. No networks were penetrated. Nobody was taken hostage for political purposes.

    More Slashdot sensationalism.

  31. Piece of cake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you need is a £20 quid walkie talkie from eBay/Amazon etc, covering 400-470MHz with 5W, know-how of where the Outside Broadcast frequency is (455 megs?), and what tower receives it, a bit of patience and away you go. Literally childsplay.