Slashdot Mirror
Twitter Added Zero New Users Last Quarter Despite Trump Tweets (nypost.com)
Twitter did not add any new users in Q2, a disappointing follow-up to what had been a promising start to 2017. Twitter reported earnings Thursday morning, claiming 328 million total users -- the same number it reported after Q1. Analysts had been hoping the company would add around four million new users last quarter. From a report: Despite its appeal among celebrities and public figures, Twitter has struggled to sustain its closely watched user growth even as it invests in features and live content to help draw viewers and boost user engagement. It is in stiff competition for advertising dollars with other platforms like larger rival Facebook and Snap's messaging app Snapchat. The company also reported a wider quarterly net loss and lower revenue, and said it did not expect its total revenue growth to pick up in the second half of the year. [...] President Donald Trump, one of the most active politicians on Twitter, has tweeted multiple times a day on average since his inauguration in January, according to social media analytics company Zoomph.
Twitter is a perfect digital representation of what an empty head sounds like when it rattles.
I'll take this opportunity to point out that this post would make a good tweet.
I have five Twitter accounts. I post to one or another about once a week. I read Twitter...really only if I'm at a con and there's a bunch of feeds related to that (since that's the best way to find out where some action might be).
Sounds like people don't want to be on a platform with that idiot taking center stage.
Tainted by the awful people who most frequently and publicly post to it, e.g. Kanye, the Kardashians, Trump, and Wesley Crusher.
None of my family or friends tweet anything that I care about, and celebrities, "journalists" and partisan zealots hold no interest for me...
"I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
If you ever read "Hatching Twitter: A True Story of Money, Power, Friendship, and Betrayal" by Nick Bilton, you would know how appalling that the founding of Twitter was. Mark Zuckerburg has a great quote in the book: "[Twitter founders] drove a clown car into a gold mine and fell in." It's not really surprising that Twitter had zero growth from riding Trump's pants legs.
twooter!
You now the rules. Not until Netcraft confirms it.
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
I didn't "get" it, but "everyone" said it was a big thing, so I signed up, found people, followed people relevant to my interests, tried to keep up. Gave it a month, checking in regularly on my account. At the end of the month I walked away, deleted the app and walked away, and never logged in again. At least I tried it but I honestly have no idea why it's so popular, what purpose it serves or how it can create a sustainable business. I can get how Facebook works, I can get how Google works, I can even understand how people make money off free software. But I just don't get Twitter. Are there that many people in the world who can and want to keep up with an endless diarrhea of fairly useless and low value information?
Heard it was useful in making spring arrive early. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Twitter died when it appointed a "trust and safety council".
I think that the Trumpster is a good example of what's wrong with Twitter. It's a mish mosh of bad jokes, stupid Internet memes, shameless self promotion, and political ranting. Every time he posts, you get a new pile of retweets and replies that meet all of the criteria that I just stated.
There's also Gab.ai, which has sprung up in response to complaints about one-sided censorship by the company.
Gab has a much more elegant solution to censorship: if you don't like something, put it on your personal list of "things I don't want to see", and you'll never see those. You can specify users or specific words you don't like.
Compare with Twitter, where you can complain about something being in violation of their rules of conduct for partisan reasons... and most likely it'll get banned.
Lots and lots of people are moving over to gab once they've been banned at twitter.
Usually with a screenshot of their *completely reasonable* post that got them banned.
(Even Scott Adams gets banned and shadow-banned - for nothing more than questioning the science behind global warming. It's almost as if the science behind global warming can't stand up to scrutiny!)
(Several of the recent bannings are for supporting the military trans' ban decision. Almost as if no one is allowed to debate that issue!)
Yes, and as the President has demonstrated, it is an open platform to make yourself look like an ASS
It is not surprise to me that NOBODY wants to make themselves into a public spectacle like the Jack-ass in Chief does
Election season is over. US, UK and France have all held their elections. Maybe there isn't anything for the bots to retweet and talk about any more.
i am still considering leaving the nation.
No you fucking aren't. Either shit or get off the pot.
What, are you holding out for "change" (your preferred party winning) in the midterm elections? I mean, that's just a little over a year away!
And if that doesn't pan out, well, it'll've been been 2 years. Surely the investigators are about to open the flood gates on info that will get the President impeached, and if not, you're about half way through their reign. Might as well stick it out and "make a difference" in the following Presidential election, right?
Quit kidding yourself. You're not leaving. And the President, however much of a buffoon and ass they may be, has very little impact on your day to day life. It's congress that you need to flush down the drain, yet none of you give a shit about midterm elections. You just want to whine and bitch and moan and blame someone for something, as long as you're not blaming yourself or your preferred party.
The above applies to all politards of all parties.
Election season is over. US, UK and France have all held their elections.
no more elections now that we have emperor trump
Yes, and as the President has demonstrated, it is an open platform to make yourself look like an ASS
It is not surprise to me that NOBODY wants to make themselves into a public spectacle like the Jack-ass in Chief does
NOBODY but the few million Twitter users.
(I believe they may have 100 million real accounts, but the number of active users is definitely far less.)
So modify the product so it appeals to people other than celebrities and public figures. Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and Apple didn't become rich by tailoring their products to 1/10th of the 1%. The companies which make lots of money off tiny markets like celebrities and public figures sell very specialized and expensive products. e.g. Limousines. So Twitter needs to decide if they want to be a tool for the few and extremely wealthy, or for the masses, and redesign their product appropriately.
That's not a problem if you ask me. Pinterest, on the other hand, requires one to see stuff and it annoys me to no end to see pinterest results in my google image searches. And sometimes the only four results are all from pinterest, as if there's no other source for the image. I'm confused.
#DeleteFacebook
Twitter isn't sustainable in its current form, but it's too popular with media outlets and customer service departments to be a financial dead-end.
There is a way to make it profitable, just not doing what they're currently doing. Perhaps making corporations and verified people pay a small fee to stay verified? I don't know, but as much as it is a media darling, there is a value there, it just needs to be unlocked.
"That's the way to do it" - Punch
Kinda want to see Twitter go down because as rule social media is kinda dumb. If Twitter falls it will shake investors faith in other platforms. Might be a nice domino effect. Really hopeful something like this could take the wind out of facebooks sails some before Mark succeeds in politically weaponizing. Which will be somewhat hard for him to do thanks to all the hard working cleaver trolls out there but its not impossible.
If the investors could all get spooked and run off first, that would be great.
Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
"A report" is not a good enough source. The quote is not attributed. Where was it copied/pasted from? I'm not talking about the link inside the quote, but the quote itself. Who wrote it?
* The 140 character limit is just plain silly anymore
* They don't have a solid version of more modern apps like SnapChat or WhatsApp.
* Better flow control / Better lists - If you subscribe more then 3-4 big feeds forget seeing anything substantial. Some news site pride themselves on putting out a store or comment every minute. You can use lists but they've become so clunky. Give me something like Facebook that lets me switch between more viewed and the whole steam
* Open the API up again - You killed off hundreds of legitimate website but made it easier for spammers
BTW: What is with the swipe at Trump? Does Trump own Twitter or does Twitter support Trump? Neither is true so this was an unneeded political swipe and click bait. Can we step away from this tripe and stick to the facts.
You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
Politically, I'm a moderate or a centrist. I prefer to take the best ideas of the political right and the best ideas of the political left, rather than sticking myself at one extreme or the other. I'm open to immigration. I want all people to succeed, regardless of their skin color or origin or other attributes. I think healthcare should be affordable and accessible to all. I don't want to see prejudice and hatred.
As a moderate, I used to follow a huge variety of Twitterers. Some were political, some were quite apolitical. I was seeing a huge range of viewpoints, which I really liked. All was good for several years, but then I found things were getting more and more polarized.
It started off relatively mildly, with occasional tweets about Black Lives Matter or sexism or something like that. What started as a trickle soon became a deluge. It got to the point where tweet after tweet was about some kind of -ism or -phobia.
Like I said earlier, I'm open minded, so I started looking into some of the cases that were mentioned in these tweets. Time and time again the incidents mentioned in the tweets relating to BLM ended up involving somebody who actually did violently attack the police, and the police responded with deadly force in self defense. The same would happen when I looked into the cases allegedly involving some sort of -ism or -phobia. The situation would either turn out to be totally overblown, or in some cases it was later revealed that the "incident" being described was nothing but a total fabrication!
Interestingly, I didn't see this happening so much from the Twitterers I'd subscribed to who I'd place on the political right. Their tweets were much more relevant, and when I investigated them further it turned out that what they were saying actually matched reality. They weren't blowing minor incidents out of proportion, for example.
Then the 2016 US election really started heating up. Things got really bad after President Trump won the election. Soon I was deluged with endless tweets droning on about "Drumpf", or cartoons making fun of him for allegedly having orange skin, or snide comments mocking his hairdo. I found it all kind of strange, since leftists are the ones who typically say that bullying and ridiculing people is wrong, especially if it involves their skin color or some other physical attribute they can't control.
The tweets from people who I'd consider to be "right wing" ended up being far more reasonable most of the time. They'd be focusing on real issues, like the economy, border security, and international relations. They wouldn't just be slinging insults. They'd be trying to engage in real discussion, yet most of the replies to their tweets would be petty insults from leftists.
It was getting to the point where for every useful tweet I saw, I'd have to put up with 30 or more pointless tweets filled with petty insults or complaints about non-issues from leftists. Recently it got to the point where I just couldn't put up with it any more. The signal to noise ratio became terrible.
All I wanted was to read were reasonable and intelligent comments questioning the policies and actions of the new US administration. But all I was getting were tweets from leftists about "Drumpf" and "orange skin" and "bad hair" and "intolerance" and "racism" and "transphobia".
So I've quit using Twitter. It stopped providing me with useful content, so I stopped using it. I regret having to do this, as the tweets I was getting from so-called "right wing" Twitterers were typically quite reasonable. It was all of the increasingly nonsensical, negative, and detached-from-reality tweets from leftists that ruined the Twitter experience for me.
I think it's a little unfair on Trump to compare him to Wesley Crusher. :-)
I had a Twitter account and deleted it a month or so ago. Had nothing whatsoever to do with Trump: it's a stupid way to miscommunicate and I saw no reason to keep it. I would think more people are hanging on to their Twitter accounts to see what he is saying rather than leaving Twitter because of what he said. He may be slowing the landslide, not making it larger.
There is a way to make it profitable, just not doing what they're currently doing. Perhaps making corporations and verified people pay a small fee to stay verified? I don't know, but as much as it is a media darling, there is a value there, it just needs to be unlocked.
On average, Twitter loses $100 million every quarter, which is completely insane. Part of the problem is having 3,000+ employees when they could easily run the business with less than 300. But still, there just simply is no "value to be unlocked".
If there was a way for Twiiter to be profitable, they would have found it by now. This idea of "there's a magic answer out there somewhere, we just have to find it" is complete bullshit.
Sure, it's popular among the brain-dead, but as an ongoing business, it's just a stupid, unworkable idea, and 10 years of massive losses that proven that.
I believe they may have 100 million real accounts, but the number of active users is definitely far less.
Yeah, but how many are humans?
“He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
As a fun aside, it seems to me that the only thing in nature that is either growing or dying (as in, not biologically successful if it ceases growing) is cancer.
"When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
Assuming this data is accurate, Twitter's user base seems to have hit market saturation sometime around the start of 2015. The service has remained pretty much the same since they began it, so why would anyone expect that there are suddenly more people who aren't using Twitter that have decided that they want to use it? There was a significant uptick in the first quarter of this year (possibly attributable to Twitter being Trump's medium of choice), but anyone who thought that was sustainable growth was crazy.
I don't need an account to see or hear about his tweets, so why would I sign up?
To answer him with an aviation hangar loads of insults just because you can? It's like, come on, the guy is so thin skinned that he's blocking users he doesn't like - and getting sued for it. Hopefully a gazillion more of the same will lead him to question what he's doing at some point.
but it's too popular with media outlets and customer service departments to be a financial dead-end.
So was myspace. Twitter isnt going to be gone tomorrow but if they start making the changes required to monetize it effectively people may slowly leave or decide not to bother.
What Twitter needs to probably do is, a heck of a lot less. Don't police it, fire everyone but a core team of developers host everything in the could. Keep it mostly text and allow third party hosting of images, and other content to keep the bandwidth costs down. It will earn plenty of ad revenue to keep Jack and some core people in fancy suits for decades. If they let the thing just be a website rather than trying to be a whole damn media company with one real product that anyone cares about.
Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
Depends on how you define human. Do the brain-dead and zombies count>
What we are seeing is the burn-out of people on social media, and the cure is to just walk away. Anything of relevance will appear elsewhere anyway.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
Not if there are bot followers to buy. The horror has just begun! He'll be talking to himself and mindless automatons... Ok, so no change, you're right. Carry on.
I don't need an account to see or hear about his tweets, so why would I sign up?
To answer him with an aviation hangar loads of insults just because you can? It's like, come on, the guy is so thin skinned that he's blocking users he doesn't like - and getting sued for it. Hopefully a gazillion more of the same will lead him to question what he's doing at some point.
If it hasn't happened yet, it will never happen. He's to self-absorbed. He thought that being president was like being king, and after 6 months of trying to rule like a king, he hasn't even figured out that he's doing it wrong.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
Apparently ~300 million "users".
I don't know, pretty much everything plant or animal is always growing and dying. Its just a few cells here and few cells there at a time. Pretty much when new stuff quits growing the organism as a whole dies eventually.
Cancer is really just an unsustainable growth rate.
In the case of Twitter, you need to add people at some rate because the older accounts might not be closed but they are as good as dead. The less their owners use them, the few page views the less the ad revenue generated. Twitter either needs new blood all the time or needs a gimmick to get existing account holders excited and coming back to state where they are heavy users again.
There are probably a few celebrities and trolls who tweet entirely to much, and they represent twitters cancers because they squeeze out/drive off/offend the good tweets and twitter users. So the that makes the "safety panel" or whatever they call it Twitters chemotherapy. Its kills the cancers but also a lot of interesting content many people want as well, and that also causes a loss of users, or damage to the surrounding tissue.
Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
As a fun aside, it seems to me that the only thing in nature that is either growing or dying (as in, not biologically successful if it ceases growing) is cancer.
How is cancer not biologically successful per your definition? Especially the 15% of human cancers that are caused by viruses. So what if it kills a host, it just moves on to another ...
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
It works the other way round too Twitter is a good example of what is wrong with the Trumpster. The Trumpster being on Twitter more or less proves that his head is full of a mish mosh of bad jokes, stupid internet memes, shameless self promotion, and political ranting. No wonder he tweets in his lunch break to ban LBGT from the military without a single thought about what to do with the 2500 who are already in it. The man sadly is a moronic cretin who barely has the intellect to function as the president. I would not be surprised if the Republican party engineer his departure once they have achieved whatever they find necessary to blame on him once they have buried him. The guy is certainly more of an inept entertainer than a Machiavellian plotter.
Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
He thought that being president was like being king,
You must be a mind reader. Do you have a crystal ball too?
I really doubt no one signed up for Twitter in the past three months. They just had as many users quit as joined.
I wanted to open an account to follow some people whose work I'm interested in.
An hour after creating the account, having done nothing with it, It's been locked and I've been told that it looks like I'm a bot registering multiple accounts and the only way to unlock it is to authenticate though my phone number.
So I wrote to support that it seems like a pretty scammy way to get my phone number, and I'd be happy to talk to them, but I'm not interested in handing out that sort of information.
Never heard back from them.
Trump has little to do with Twitter's growth or decline, or lack of either. Twitter as you state is tainted, but not just by celebrity types. Censorship has probably as much to do with the lack of growth, and the surge of competing products vowing not to censor.
Twitter seems to be a big deal with media agencies who watch each others tweets, celebrities that follow each other, bots who don't care who they spam, and bot makers who think people are still actively joining in. Yeah yeah, some people follow that stuff too, but not enough for all the hype it gets.
Trump is only mentioned for the Trump vs anti-Trump posts that seem to come with anything these days.
-The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.
I don't think "despite" is the correct word.
It matters because at this point he is the president of the United States. His tweets are official statements. For those that follow the US Government and policy, this actually does matter, even though it is junk on so many levels.
So did about 20 other people I know... That is more than Zero. This appears to be fake news.
Twitter, huh, good god
What is it good for
Absolutely nothing, listen to me
Oh, twitter, I despise
'Cause it means destruction of innocent minds
Twitter means tears to thousands of American eyes
Where the president* goes and lies
And despised, truth dies
I said Twitter, huh good god, why'all
What is it good for
Absolutely nothing, say it again
*president, so called
To reduce crime, make fewer things against the law.
Twitter is the new MySpace, only people who are hopelessly uncool and out of touch continue to use it.
people who want to read the tweets of the President don't need a twitter account to read them. and twitter has instituted policies as of late that turns may people off from joining for example the "Trust and Safety console" https://about.twitter.com/safe... which has on its board a very loaded selection for example the perpetrator of the famous vid-con "Garbage Human" incident On the other hand the platform Minds.com is growing based on its policies based of free speech.
Well, apparently he makes major policy announcements now via twitter, and doesn't even bother to inform departments via normal channels. I'm not even sure why he has a communications staff, or heck, even a cabinet. This is government by one man and his phone.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
It matters because the President seems to have little idea how to actually run a government, which seems odd, because at least so far as official executive instructions go, you can't tell me the way he ran Trump Enterprises was to send grammatically and spelling-challenged missives over the company email system informing departments of new policy.
Maybe the real problem here is that Trump never in fact has run a damned fucking thing in his life, that he has had lawyers and accountants who translated his garbled directives into something human beings with normal cognitive function could interpret. Why exactly he has now decided to send out his directives via Twitter. The mere fact that nobody at the Pentagon seemed to have any idea, for instance, that he was instituting a transgender enlistment ban (whatever you may think of the policy) suggests to me that this is a man who knows virtually nothing about management and organizational communications.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
I asked my neighbor lady if she loaded up twitter to follow President Trump.
Her answer: "If I wanted to listen to a fat, arrogant, crazy old man, I wouldn't have gotten a divorce."
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
Stopped using it due to these things. Reached a point where my opinion was likely going to cause people to start screeching if I was honest, so between Twitter censoring what I saw and self censoring myself to keep the peace, I'm very very glad I left.
It's just a total political whine great now and a circle jerk off let's feel good for whatever reason today stuff.
Shame, the breaking news was quite useful.
its going to be a long 4-8 years people. twitter knows this and this is why they have not shut down The President of the United States. Its called marketing.
... the mainstream news media love to report on who tweeted what, and "who" is usually come celebrity cretin or venal politician.
I think it's a scream that they haven't YET caught on to one of the things Trump is doing with it.
His tweets aren't JUST about getting to his supporters unfiltered by the lamestream media. (Most of his supporters don't follow them. There are other ways for him to get the word out that doesn't have the same set of gatekeepers.)
Every time he wants to get something done without the newsies jumping on it or anyone organize real opposition to it, he posts some outrageous tweet about something else. "Here: Look at THIS shiny thing!" Then they all go off and flame him for a news cycle or two while he gets what he wants done.
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
By the same way Facebook is ruined.
Political correctness and filtering.
I used to post on twitter before with loooots of coverage / month and when they decided to become "responsible" all that was dead.
Why should I post if only my followers see my posts? Hard to get much of a following then.
What we need is a free world or a free country willing to host peoples opinions freely.
Wish my country did it and in a separate time-line without mass-immigration it likely could have and worked for political refugees / people who had trouble speaking their minds instead, but with mass-immigration / political genocide of my own people it has become much more important to control speech than letting people raise their opinions.
Don't need to be a mind reader - it should be obvious by now to everyone who isn't willfully blind.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
I guess I am confused when "trying to rule like a king" hasn't tried to perform the functions of the other branches of government. You know, because that is what "ruling like a king" is. Why would allow the courts to stop his E.O.s if tried to rule like a king? Why would he allow congress to write the wanna-be health care law he if tried to rule like a king?
I guess my real question, how has he tried to rule like a king?
He has tried to pass rules without respect for the law, actively called for the removal of a member of the judiciary who ruled against him, is actively doing everything to force is attorney general to quit because the guy (Sessions) properly recused himself from the Russian investigation, interfered in the FBI investigation first by trying to get the director to go easy, then firing him (reminiscent of Nixon).
He thought that being president would be easy. Now he's found out that it's hard. He can't just order that things be done because there are laws putting limits on his powers that the president of a company would not have. He's also said that he could pardon himself. Only someone who has lost touch with reality and thinks his power is limitless would believe that the country would accept that (plus it's of dubious legality).
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
He has tried to pass rules without respect for the law
I must have missed all those rules that he forced by ignoring the courts. Or were those the rules that the courts upheld that did indeed "respect" the law.
, actively called for the removal of a member of the judiciary who ruled against him
You mean the Mexican judge debacle? Understandable considering the point of a judge is impartiality and unbiased. Or do you mean the 9th circuit? Understandable considering they have been overstepping their judiciary role.
is actively doing everything to force is attorney general to quit because the guy (Sessions) properly recused himself from the Russian investigation
So what? Russian investigation is a nothingburger and he is the boss of the A.G. He has the right to fire him.
interfered in the FBI investigation first by trying to get the director to go easy, then firing him (reminiscent of Nixon).
You say interfered but that is a fine line that I am not sure was crossed. He can fire the director of the FBI for any reason and it was suggested by other members of the DoJ.
president would be easy. Now he's found out that it's hard
It's also his first political office he held. So what?
He's also said that he could pardon himself. Only someone who has lost touch with reality and thinks his power is limitless would believe that the country would accept that
This is the closest thing you have said to "act like a king" but nothing has come of it besides asking legal advice and some tweets. I am not sure if that really constitutes acting like a king.
I think you have let your emotion get the better of you. Your hatred is palpable with every post or thread that mentions Trump. I think it's very hard to honest look and conversation about politics when someone lets emotion get the better of them.
Twitter had censorship long before they dreamed up the Orwellian "Trust and Safety" star chamber.
i am still considering leaving the nation.
Fun fact: President Trump is quite popular among the American expat community in Communist Vietnam.
Among the wide variety of international travelers I meet every week, political positions are quite predictable. Smug rich folks support the Democrat party, working people support Trump (but not necessarily the Republican party). In my observation this simple formula covers >95% of people.
There's obviously a need for standards to cover things like harassment, threats, and illegal content. But Dorsey's Twitter doesn't stop there. Look at the 'Trust & Safety Council' they formed, which includes the Anti-Defamation League and Feminist Frequency - two groups well known for being as politicised as they are censorious.
Look at how their bans, de-verification, and shadow bans are applied far more often when the politics of the user aren't aligned with leftist progressive points. It's fine to have a political bias so long as you declare it, but they don't. They simply apply their rules based on political views, and that creates an uncertain environment. Why would I invest time in a platform that may arbitrarily cripple me account for upsetting the the social justice hive mind? As a business, why would I use this platform for customer outreach if I know Twitter to be hell-bent on alienating anyone to the left of Jeremy Corbyn?
Dorsey's strategy for growth is to apply ideological censorship and to permit the regressive left to harass people for having the wrong political views? Let's see if it pays off.
-- Using the preview button since 2005
So was myspace.
The big difference between Myspace and Twitter (and incidentally, Myspace is still open and running) is that MySpace was popular with a bunch of spotty teens with no money but not really the general population or corporations. Twitter is popular with media outlets and service departments. There is money in the pockets of people using Twitter- Twitter just need to learn how to extract it without scaring people off.
I definitely think you're right, they need to cut staff, but I think they could perhaps take payment from the media outlets and service departments that use them. I small fee to all the Walmarts, Wendy's, and BBCs of the world (and every other "Verified account" could make them a lot of money. Keep the general population happy by not charging them.
"That's the way to do it" - Punch
Why do I need Twitter? If I want to see Trump tweets, I just have to wait until the MSM reports on them later in the day, and talks about how stupid they are ad-nauseum.
Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
All my friends are intelligent enough to know that a forum where people post their ideas to each other IS social media.
I said he tried, not that he succeeded. Big difference to most people, but not to trolls, I guess. And the russian investigations (plural) are far from a nothingburger, especially considering how he's still refusing to release his tax returns because they will nail him but good. Also, he didn't just ask for legal advice - he declared he could pardon himself. Big diff.
As for partiality, I treated Hillary Clinton the same way - she too is a liar and not worthy of the office of president. So quit your trolling - you're the one who is letting emotions and partiality interfere with a clear analysis of the situation, not me. Both parties need a good hosing down.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
The tweets about transgendered people serving in the military were too well-written and coherent to be Trump. Probably it was Pence or Bannon who used the account to issue the policy.
Again the closest thing to "trying to rule like a king" is the "declared he could pardon himself". If that is all there is that isn't even close to "trying". It's just rhetoric or stupid comments that have no action behind them (yet at least). Obama's "I have a pen and a phone" to bypass congress is action that he did use! Did you complain that Obama was actually acting like a king instead of trying with stupid statements?
I honestly do not see how that statement, stupid or otherwise, is "trying to act like a king" considering what our past presidents have done. You have an odd definition of "trying to act like a king".
He completely bypasses the media which only acts as a de-dumbing filter.
FTFY.
Ezekiel 23:20
I deleted my Twitter account because it devolved into a litany of ad hominem attacks and I was inundated with a constant barrage of banal and repetitive tweets about useless crap.
The major news always aggregates more than I will ever want to know about celebrities and political clap-trap, all of it amounting to a #swamp of misspellings and misinformation and uninformed opinions.
If I want entertainment, I watch Netflix, because our public airwaves have been coopted by advertisements aimed mostly at the affluent and the easily frightened souls who are sickly results of our industrialized food system and the consumerization of our economy.
Oh, and we have allowed lawyers to make taking personal responsibility and the use of common sense a rarity, while anyone with enough money can literally get away with mass murder.
Even our postal system has been perverted to subsidize the worthless junk mail that inundates us all with unwanted advertisements that businesses can use to reduce their tax burdens at the expense of the legitimate uses of first class mail that are still required for certain legal transactions and (mostly) secure communications.
PlaynBass