Slashdot Mirror


India is Betting On Compulsory Internships To Improve Its Unemployable Engineers (qz.com)

India has come up with a solution to improve the quality of the engineers it churns out. From a report: Over 60 percent of the 800,000 engineering graduates that India produces annually remain unemployed, the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), the apex body for technical education in India, says. So, to make them more employable, engineering colleges across the country will now have to ensure that undergraduate students complete three internships lasting between four and eight weeks each during the course of their programme. Currently, less than one percent participate in summer internships. [...] Indians are obsessed with engineering, particularly since the IT boom. The mid-1990s saw a huge spike in the number of engineering graduates as demand increased in sectors ranging from IT to infrastructure.

207 comments

  1. Great Idea by brian.stinar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a super good idea. I was very aggressive towards internships, and it paid off big time. Many of my classmates had higher grades, but couldn't get a full time job after graduation due to their lack of experience (and ambition?)

    As a nerdy engineering type, often times the softer skills associated with getting, and keeping, a job are more difficult than the technical aspects of performing that job. I think mandatory internships for all engineering disciplines, at least in my home state, would be a great idea.

    1. Re:Great Idea by Moof123 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Next great idea would be to improve the original education, as it is woefully lacking. At least in Electrical Engineering we see quite a number of awful candidates from Indian schools. Fundamentals of how to make basic transistor level circuits easily stump most.Hands on skills are rarer than even the lousy Berkeley graduates I've had to interview.

      A couple years back we had the benefit of having a really good Indian engineer who could decypher the school names on a resume. Many schools apparently are known to be glorified degree mills that he quickly would warn us to avoid.

    2. Re:Great Idea by MangoCats · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here's a better thought: find non-engineering work for these engineers.

      Training 800,000 engineers annually is over-saturating the market, at least for design type engineering work.

      If these graduates can work in sales (tech marketing), support, maintenance, hands-on roles with technology in the field, then, sure, they might need more than 800,000 per year. If these 800,000 kids all think that they're going to be working to design skyscrapers, bridges, next generation digital hardware, etc. then they've missed the essence of design work: one good engineer works to design things that are made, sold, maintained and recycled many many times, by _other_ job descriptions.

    3. Re:Great Idea by butchersong · · Score: 1

      You can't train intelligence though. I'm sure India has an equivalent IQ to European populations but they have many "engineers" that really aren't suited to that field as well.

    4. Re:Great Idea by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      Many schools apparently are known to be glorified degree mills ...

      One reason for these degree mills is the Indian marriage market. Dowries are common, where the bride's family will give money and assets to the groom's family. A son can bring in a bigger dowry if he has a degree, but it is less important that he actually learn anything useful. Degree mills provide credentials that cost less than the expected bump in the dowry value.

      Another problem is gender imbalance. China's shortage of females is well known, but the problem in India is almost as severe, especially in more prosperous provinces such as Gujarat and Maharashtra where many families can afford ultrasounds and abortions. So if your son doesn't have a degree, he might end up unmarried for life.

    5. Re:Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sure India has an equivalent IQ to European populations

      You're free to believe whatever you want without a shred of doubt, but the data says your faith is misplaced. The average IQ in India is 82, more than one standard deviation below any European people.

    6. Re:Great Idea by Serge_Tomiko · · Score: 0

      India has the lowest average IQ outside of Africa. If IQ can't predict whether or not people drink from the same river they shit in, what is it good for?

    7. Re:Great Idea by taustin · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only thing IQ tests measure is the ability to take IQ tests. The only thing a particular IQ test measures is the ability to take that IQ test.

      The cultural biases of IQ tests - all IQ tests - are very well documented, and have been for a century.

    8. Re:Great Idea by erikscott · · Score: 1

      I've seen numbers like this for many countries, and I wonder if it's a side effect of giving an English-language test such as WISC to a non-native speaker? I suspect this because at 80 a personal qualifies for special ed in my (US) state, so this seems doubly suspect. Finally, the standard deviation is, by definition, 15.

    9. Re:Great Idea by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      Yet no one has come up with an Indian specific IQ test?

    10. Re:Great Idea by Alok · · Score: 2

      Even in a large metropolis like Mumbai, many colleges (think grad schools for B.S. equivalent) have a hard time attracting good or even decent teaching staff for technical positions. I'm not up to date with their current state, but they even had people just hired to fill in positions so there was a teacher present for the subject - people who would just 'explain' stuff from textbooks, and do a worse job than students just reading from it! Naturally this also means that most practical assignments (coding, EE circuits or w/e) aren't properly assessed, and many of them are exact copies of those given to previous class years. Which led to rampant copying of the previous year's journals with the majority not bothering to even try and understand the material :(

      I actually think that teaching situation should change for the better with a slump in the job market. Previously, many qualified teachers left academia due to rise of IT as the pittance of a salary they were getting wasn't enough to retain them. By now, salaries in the better institutions have improved quite a bit (I hope actually, not sure lol) and there will be several decent candidates unable to get a job who may consider teaching as a career.

    11. Re: Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They learn to memorize things, not solve thought problems. Probably bad for those tests.

    12. Re:Great Idea by Alok · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > You can't train intelligence though. I'm sure India has an equivalent IQ to European populations but they have many "engineers" that really aren't suited to that field as well.

      I'll disagree here to some extent. If someone grows up studying in an education system that encourages memorization and rote learning over critical thinking (a major failing imho in Indian education syllabus) then it will certainly have a stunting effect on his intelligence and reasoning capacity. A majority of those 'engineers' are basically human machines that would be good for repetitive tasks, but not as useful for comprehending complex systems and enhancing them.

      There are of course many Indian engineers who are actually good, but most of them end up outside of the country to find better work. And then they get drowned out statistically by the hordes who don't really care or take initiatives to develop their skills, but are in it for the money and have suffered thru rote learning way too much as said above.

    13. Re:Great Idea by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Here's a better thought: find non-engineering work for these engineers.

      Yes.... encourage them to switch to management/business.
      Then within the next decade I look forward to US companies seeking to offshore all their company management
      (instead of engineering) to try and take advantage of the supply glut.

    14. Re:Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is as stupid as it is inflammatory. your ancestors did it too. and your industries do it too.
      it's a self serving myopic view that causes then to do this. india probably has lower IQ which can correlate to lower nutrition - there are enough studies that link nutrition to brain growth in early years but I am not knowledgeable to comment in this area. they have similar trends (wish i could find that study) to say france when it comes to the difference between top, average and poor performers in technical areas.
      the real issue as someone pointed out earlier is poor education. they have understaffed colleges, low investment which causes lower quality of both teachers and students plus an economic gap in the earlier years of their career to be able to learn by themselves (training courses, educational kits whatnot...)
      if you average rural west virginia, let me know their IQ.

    15. Re:Great Idea by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      Interesting point, but since we're talking about a discipline (engineering) that is based in more universal concepts (mathematics, physics, science, etc.) than other fields, would cultural bias matter much in this case?

    16. Re:Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The education offered might be good enough, but a large percentage of students don't bother going to class when they know they can cheat on the test to get the grade.

    17. Re:Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Best I can find is this article from 2006: Average IQ By State: Honest Numbers

      It tries (and seemingly succeeds) to debunk the "low IQ people voted for Bush" meme from the mid-00's. (The November 2016 election refutes this so-called debunking...)

      West Virginia is listed with an average IQ of 98.7, beating out 13 other states, including, notably, California's score of 95.5. And CA isn't generally held to be a "stupid" state. Vapid, perhaps, but not stupid.

      And before you go on about how you were only talking about rural WV, go look at a map and tell me which part of WV isn't rural. (Charleston? What's the population again? Compare it to any other largest-city-in-the-state and remind yourself that WV is "eastern" and "heavily populated" before you trot that one out. Boise ID has about the same population as Charleston WV, so it seems that West Virginia is approximately as rural as Idaho.)

    18. Re:Great Idea by lgw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wrong on both counts.

      IQ tests results, as a statistical measure, predict success in high school, in college, and job success with a high correlation - the highest of any psychological test. Within a given country, IQ is a better prediction of economic success in life than how wealthy your parents are.

      Early IQ test were very culture-specific, but that was a long time ago. Better modern tests are entirely symbolic, and language-free (beyond the instructions). IQ tests are very repeatable - they are a scientific measure.

      The Conscientiousness personality trait is also a decent predictor of college and life success, but it's much harder to measure reliably.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    19. Re:Great Idea by taustin · · Score: 1

      Researchers these days talk more about how many different kinds of intelligence there are, and how many are not connected to each other at all. So trying to reduce it all to a single number is pointless.

      It isn't possible for and IQ test to convey meaningful information, unless you want to know how well someone takes that IQ test.

      Grown ups have moved on from yesterday's bigotry, and are working studiously on tomorrow's bigotry.

    20. Re:Great Idea by jeff4747 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If IQ can't predict whether or not people drink from the same river they shit in, what is it good for?

      The same thing it's always been good for. Attempting to put a scientific veneer over racial bias.

    21. Re:Great Idea by taustin · · Score: 1

      What I replied to was talking specifically, and only, about IQ tests.

    22. Re:Great Idea by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      North America has many engineers (or at least software engineers) who aren't really suited to the field. In my 20+ years in tech I've encountered MANY software devs who got into the field because someone told them it was a good job and a good way to make money. And it shows in the quality of their work (or lack thereof). Many of them don't improve their skills to any degree unless there's a gun to their head, many have zero troubleshooting skills and they see themselves as just a cog in the machine (at larger companies).

      I'm not saying everyone needs to be a John Carmack Jr, but there's definitely some issues with devs that don't have the slightest interest in development outside of the paycheck.

    23. Re:Great Idea by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      One reason for these degree mills is the Indian marriage market. Dowries are common, where the bride's family will give money and assets to the groom's family. A son can bring in a bigger dowry if he has a degree, but it is less important that he actually learn anything useful. Degree mills provide credentials that cost less than the expected bump in the dowry value.

      I have to wonder how long that practice will last now. I've worked with both male and female Indian software engineers, in the same office, and I have to say the female engineers tend to be better than the males. Pathologically nonassertive, but still better. Seems to me the dowries should be going the other way, especially if India actually has a shortage of women. (First I'd heard that assertion, and you gave no citations.)

      I am really wondering how China's gender imbalance is going to play out. You'd think that women would become highly valued, because that would be the sensible reaction to serious scarcity, but human cultures aren't noted for sane reactions in the face of bizarre imbalances. They might just double down on their devaluing of women. That would be more than a little concerning, especially if you're Russian. 30 million single men with zero prospects of marriage (the projected number by 2020), is pretty much the definition of social instability. The notion of polyandry was floated a couple of years ago by a Chinese professor of economics at Zhejing University, and apparently caused quite a stir in China on the Internet. The exact nature of the response is obscured behind the language barrier. Slate, naturally, only reports about the reaction of Chinese feminists, who are presumably a vanishingly small percentage of the population. I'm curious what the mainstream reaction was.

      Incidentally, that article also mentions the Indian imbalance, so there's at least some source for the assertion.

      As the apocryphal ancient Chinese curse says, "May you live in interesting times." China and India both are in for some very interesting times. Putin's paranoia about Russia being invaded (again) makes a little bit of sense.

    24. Re:Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indian engineers suck for the same reason that no one will hire them: Because Indians cheat and lie. They cheat and lie when they wake up in the morning. They cheat and lie all day. They cheat and lie at night. They probably cheat and lie in their dreams too.

      And they'll no doubt find a way to cheat and lie their way either out of or through their internships too. And no one wants to hire and engineer who cheated and lied his way through school (unless it's a female of course, then they can at least check off a box for their diversity quota and give her a fake job to pretend to do).

      You can't fix a corrupt society without addressing the corruption itself.

    25. Re:Great Idea by lgw · · Score: 1

      You're free to believe whatever you want without a shred of doubt, but the data says your faith is misplaced. The average IQ in India is 82, more than one standard deviation below any European people.

      It's not the "average Indian" who is going to tech school, and more than it's the average American who goes to med or law school. Poor nutrition is known to have a significant effect on IQ, but that doesn't affect Indians from non-poor families. 800k grads a year is only about 4% of the population of graduation age, and since that's more prestigious than a doctor or lawyer in India, that's presumable close to the top 4% of IQ.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    26. Re:Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a super good idea.

      Super bad idea. Here is the problem, you have now made the number of interns skyrocket (Increase Supply) while making the number of internships available stay constant (maintain demand) at this point, internships start to become unpaid - which is really REALLY bad for the less advantaged. In degree plans where internships are either required (See Teaching), or all but mandatory to get a job in the field (See political science) internships are unpaid. Sadly, while you are working on your internship - you don't have enough credits to continue full time enrollment so your scholarship money/student loans are not available to you to cover expenses. I guess you intern during the day and work full time at night to be able to eat/live

      Why do people think mandating things make it better, why not go after the schools that aren't providing viable candidates and show a degree from there is worthless and remove them from the supply pool.

    27. Re:Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a myth. There is effectively no evidence for the multiple intelligences theory. While it might make some feel good to deny it, there are actually thousands of papers which support IQ as a better predictor of anything subsumed by MI theory.

      According to a 2006 study many of Gardner's "intelligences" correlate with the g factor, supporting the idea of a single dominant type of intelligence. According to the study, each of the domains proposed by Gardner involved a blend of g, of cognitive abilities other than g, and, in some cases, of non-cognitive abilities or of personality characteristics.[6]

      Linda Gottfredson (2006) has argued that thousands of studies support the importance of intelligence quotient (IQ) in predicting school and job performance, and numerous other life outcomes. In contrast, empirical support for non-g intelligences is either lacking or very poor. She argued that despite this the ideas of multiple non-g intelligences are very attractive to many due to the suggestion that everyone can be smart in some way.[39]

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_multiple_intelligences

    28. Re:Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if it's a side effect of giving an English-language test such as WISC to a non-native speaker?

      Wouldn't the fact that they can't read and comprehend technical English be as big a problem as having a low IQ (at least for jobs in the English-speaking world)?

      I suspect that the influx of software developers who can't read and write complex technical documents has much to do with the popularity of "agile" project management style. The belief (mistaken in my opinion) that a 5-minute "chat" in the morning can replace proper design and documentation of the system is an attempt to make up for the lack of reading comprehension among newly-imported "engineers".

    29. Re: Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit because gypsies are arguably European and those vermin are as dumb as Indians.

    30. Re: Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gypsies are originally from what is now India. Go figure.

    31. Re:Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I used to doubt the value of IQ tests. Then, I took one (a legit IQ test administered by a practicing psychologist). It rated me very high. That's when I decided that they are, in fact, a good indicator of one's worth as a human being.

    32. Re:Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had read that the Stanford Marshmallow Test (measuring conscientiousness, in part) is an even better measure of future success in children.

    33. Re:Great Idea by Serge_Tomiko · · Score: 1

      Do you seriously expect us to believe that an entire field of study that is by your own admission a century old (actually older), has no value what-so-ever? Why are people giving these tests, if they predict nothing?

    34. Re:Great Idea by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting point but (and as someone told Tyrion everything said before 'but' is irrelevant) I think the intention is to reduce the number of engineering students as well as improving them. I agree it will tend to weed out poorer students, which is unfair, but then, what's the point of training them in some half ass degree mill so that they are still unable to find an engineering job (if that's what they want).

      In my experience Indian engineers who have made it through India's best universities are still pretty hopeless by and large, although the best engineering manager I ever ran into was an Indian woman.

    35. Re:Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree. Wish this would be implemented across the board for STEM majors in US. Too many universities sell students on the material but fail to provide practical working experience. The best colleges for STEM majors already have the best internship programs. It's funny to me that some engineering schools have opted out of providing state degrees because the state BOR includes a lot of useless material in the curriculum. It's even funnier when graduates with degrees from these universities have a nearly 100% placement rate in the workforce. Students from less progressive institutions feed into the post graduate programs of the more progressive schools to close the skill gap and become employable. This does nit benefit the students who are nit employable because if the school from which they graduated.

    36. Re:Great Idea by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      One reason for these degree mills is the Indian marriage market. Dowries are common, where the bride's family will give money and assets to the groom's family. A son can bring in a bigger dowry if he has a degree, but it is less important that he actually learn anything useful

      Given the shortage of Indian women, wouldn't it make more sense if her parents charged a dowry? You've got a surfeit of men, and yet the parents of the women have to pay to get them married? I see a market failure here...

    37. Re:Great Idea by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I'm still confused about this, being old. When I was in school, internships were about getting college credit. Smart people didn't need extra credits, there were already more than enough to graduate because of taking extra electives and such. Internships were also seriously underpaid, and were held during the school year. Fast forward to the present, it seems that "internship" is now a synonym for "summer job" and "extended interview process for students who will graduate soon".

      I never had an internship, but I did have summer jobs.

      However there just aren't enough temp jobs out there in tech to satisfy a requirement to have internships for all college students. Interns are a pain, they need to be ready to start doing something useful without the training that normal full time hires will get, they take a lot of hands on time from their manager or mentor which can mean less productivity overall.

    38. Re:Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you provide a cite from reputed researchers in psychometrics who are talking about different kinds of intelligence? As I understand it, such talk is from non-psychometricians hoping to work around the ever growing body of solid research about g, IQ tests, and the very predictive utility of IQ tests.

    39. Re:Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a better thought: find non-engineering work for these engineers.

      Here's an even better thought; stop shitting out more and more engineers in an obviously saturated market.

      IMHO, the only thing worse than a trained engineer who can't find employment is forcing one to take a shit job that has fuck all to do with engineering.

    40. Re:Great Idea by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Yet no one has come up with an Indian specific IQ test?

      Yes they have. It's administered over the phone.

    41. Re:Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Putin (and his successors) would be well advised to be paranoid about that.
      A lot of Chinese nationalists think the whole Russian Far East is occupied Chinese
      territory. And they want it back. The five wars. South China sea, Taiwan, Japan,
      Mongolia and then Russia. I might have the order wrong there, but you get the point.

    42. Re:Great Idea by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I think mandatory internships for all engineering disciplines, at least in my home state, would be a great idea.

      It's such a great idea that nearly every professional engineering association around the world requires it.

    43. Re:Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lie detectors have been around for a while (maybe not 100 years), and they
      have been shown to be inaccurate many times. The problem is that whenever
      anyone tries to do a formal study, it either gets shut down or fiddled, or they
      just arrest the person running it. It's all about the FUD, not the truth.

      IQ type tests can provide some useful information, but I know several people who
      are clearly highly intelligent but have such serious social retardations as to be
      almost unemployable.

    44. Re:Great Idea by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Then within the next decade I look forward to US companies seeking to offshore all their company management

      It's already happening. It's called the fully Chinese companies that are making your solar panels etc.

    45. Re:Great Idea by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The gave some of those "entirely symbolic" tests to some kids from rural Chad some years ago, which they failed dismally, then gave them a different one involving arcs instead of rectangles and they hit the top of the scale. IQ tests are an approximate but flawed indication and apparently shouldn't be trusted much more than that utterly stupid Myer-Briggs that everyone games to provide the personality result they think the employer wants.
      IQ tests seem to only be considered relevant in the land where the "lie detector" is considered to be a real thing and not a scam.

    46. Re:Great Idea by gweihir · · Score: 2

      The education itself must be really bad, because 60% of 800'000 unemployed is not something you can get with reasonable education and an actual market need. Calling these people "engineers" is not a realistic assessment of the situation.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    47. Re:Great Idea by RuffMasterD · · Score: 1

      Yes. Try astrology, theology, or homoeopathy. All of them have been around a long time, are well studied, and are based entirely on magic thinking. Physicians believed that disease was spread by Miasma ("bad air" from rotting organic matter) since antiquity until about 130 years ago.

      IQ tests persist because companies spend truck-loads of money every year to 'objectively' choose the best candidates from long lists of applicants. If it suited my vested interests to do so, then I would sell these tests too. Heck, if you pay me enough, I will pretend that creationism has merit.

      --
      Human Rights, Article 12: Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
    48. Re:Great Idea by RuffMasterD · · Score: 1

      A 1984 meta-analysis found an IQ to job performance correlation coefficient ranging from 0.2 to 0.6, meaning that between 4% and 36% of the variance in job performance can be explained by IQ. Other factors account for the rest of the variance.

      For income, the research consensus of correlation coefficients appear to ranging between 0.4 and 0.5, meaning that between 16% and 25% of income variance can be explained by IQ. An individual's location, inherited wealth, race, education, perseverance, and social connections are more important factors than IQ.

      --
      Human Rights, Article 12: Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
    49. Re:Great Idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Here's a better thought: find non-engineering work for these engineers.

      That would be a better thought if there were such work. But India is experiencing the same problem as everyone else, increasing automation is eliminating jobs. There's so few jobs in India that we in the USA actually receive enough Indians in this country as H1Bs that we complain about them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    50. Re:Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He gave no reference because this is widely known.
      BTW it would take less than 5 seconds to find them, this one may work as a first reading http://thediplomat.com/2013/08/india-where-are-all-the-girls/

    51. Re:Great Idea by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      Yes, social intelligence and the rest of that hippy-dippy feelz before realz crap that tries to make people feel better at failing basic math and logical concepts. Any of the modern IQ tests that I've seen test spatial awareness all the way through the ability to work through basic to complex logic problems. The funny thing is, these logic problems are really basic when you get down to it - testing your ability to learn and adapt at the most mundane, child-like level, and the fact so many people fail this part is a bad sign for humanity in general.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    52. Re:Great Idea by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The cultural biases of IQ tests - all IQ tests - are very well documented, and have been for a century.

      Your info is a little out of date. No reputable IQ test in the last few decades has had anything like the infamous regatta question.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    53. Re: Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can assure you, the dowry direction has definitely changed.

      There's no flow of money, but parents of girls and guys have now realised that women are far more in demand. Parents of men (boys?) don't ask for dowry these days because they know there are many other men willing to marry the girl for no money.

      Markets work. Sterotypes don't.

    54. Re: Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the average IQ of a dumb inbred redneck who has sex with his sister on a weekly basis is 25. So a good percent of the losers on this board who lost their job to an Indian will still be worse of tomorrow. Fuck you very much and say hI to your sister for me.

    55. Re: Great Idea by zaphirplane · · Score: 1

      My comment is about the logic of your arguments and not the thread's topic
      If the good ones are overseas and are getting drowned by the bad ones, then there are a lot of bad ones overseas.
      Then a) good ones escape overseas is irrelevant because so do the bad ones
      B) the argument boils down to there are some good and a lot of bad, which hardly defends the position

    56. Re: Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true, because they're from a ghetto country that has a long history of throwing away underprivileged human beings for the greater good. They'll never change --they will be like the Ferrengi on Strar Trek if that reality ever comes to pass.

    57. Re:Great Idea by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      I took a college program in applied electromagnetics in Toronto Canada meant for people who already have an undergraduate degree in EE (mine is from UWaterloo). There was one other Canadian in my class, a Russian, and the rest were all from India. The instructors were all fresh off the boat from India as well.

      The Indian students did not understand the most basic bit of theory, they could not count to 8 in binary. The teachers were the worst racist scum I have ever encountered. They made fun of the Canadians constantly, the way we run our businesses, the way we drive, the way we shop, everything. They also had the Indian students convinced that the teachers would personally deport them from Canada if they acted out.

      The course material was the most basic stuff from first year undergrad except rather than teaching theory so you understand what you're doing, it's just rote memorization of equations. No wonder the students had no clue what any of the material actually meant.

    58. Re:Great Idea by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      i have seen countless job-plans in hellgium here, all of them amount to one thing : cheap or free labour for companies, you dont learn shit, they dont teach you shit, they dont have to pay you shit, and when the period is over they kick you out and they dont hire you cos they get subsidized for the next one and all you get to do is (pardon my american english) shit shit (and more shit) and no real work, its (in short) imo bull-shit, but every corp will laud it since it practically slavelabour i dont believe in it, unpaid work is prone to profiteering i dont believe in it for one second

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    59. Re:Great Idea by brian.stinar · · Score: 1

      Every internship I had was paid, and well paid...? Many were at a National Laboratory, another one was at Honeywell, and then a research assistantship with a professor during graduate school. I was very happy with the compensation, learning opportunities, real actual work, and job offers from all of them. I saved Honeywell a ton of cash rewriting software from a Sun and onto a PC. Them being able to dump the Sun support contracts probably paid for ALL their interns that year...

      My experiences were very different than what you described. I'm sorry if your internships weren't as valuable - I am extremely grateful for the opportunities that came from mine, and I try and encourage people to make similar decisions, because I think there were good choices.

  2. Unintended consequence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why would I pay an engineer fresh out of school when I can hire 5 undergrads for free?

    1. Re:Unintended consequence? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Interns have a high turnover rate. This in general puts some stress on the institution, as they are always training. And they will not be around long enough to put on larger big picture projects.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re: Unintended consequence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Churn and burn baby! Hey, they can come over and work as an intern on an H1B. No no no, fuck that! Hey, they can PAY for the privledge of working in IT on an H1B! Yes bitches. The bidding war for experience starts....NOW!!!

    3. Re:Unintended consequence? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Why would I pay an engineer fresh out of school when I can hire 5 undergrads for free?

      Because the interns are gone at the end of the summer. Companies view internships as extended job interviews (interns should view them the same) not as a source of labor. By the time the intern is trained and productive, the internship is almost over.

      Also, unpaid internships are generally illegal in America. I don't know how it works in India, but I doubt if these interns are working "for free".

    4. Re:Unintended consequence? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Also, unpaid internships are generally illegal in America.

      Unpaid internships are not necessarily illegal. It all depends on what the intern is doing.

      Unfortunately, for laws to matter, they have to be enforced. Illegal unpaid internships go on all the time and no one cares.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:Unintended consequence? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I should also mention that unpaid internships are yet another way the wealthy can give their kids an advantage.

      If you can't afford to do an unpaid internship, you may not get that job, while the scion of a wealthy family can easily afford to get that boost into employment.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    6. Re:Unintended consequence? by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Of Course wealthy want to use their wealth to give a boost to their kids. Otherwise whats the point of working hard to accumulate wealth?

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    7. Re:Unintended consequence? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      That insight requires some management skills. This AC does not seem to have any.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    8. Re:Unintended consequence? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You're totally right. If they're rich, it's because Jesus wants them to be. Perhaps they should just be allowed to buy the best jobs for their stuck-up brats?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. Remember the cheating scandal? by Oligonicella · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here: http://magazines.scholastic.co...

    Same thing's going to happen with internships.

  4. College should align with its marketing. by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most colleges will advertise how a degree will be good for a job. However once in college the professors will often go, this is an education institution not a job placement firm, or vocational school.

    Most colleges train students to be professors to train students to be professors. The educational inbreeding problem.

    Colleges and professors will need to realize that a lot of students want jobs outside of academia. Internships are excellent in nearly all ways.
    The student gets real world experience, and gets exposure to the company.
    The college gets support from these companies who like these students.
    The companies gets cheap educated labor under the term internship.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:College should align with its marketing. by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      "However once in college the professors will often go, this is an education institution not a job placement firm, or vocational school."

      And this is a fundamental problem with state run schools and tenure. Either the student is the customer or they aren't. If they are the customer, a simple complaint of any professor that spouts that kind of shit would result in disciplinary action or termination. The sad fact though is that colleges in general have moved so far into the brainwashing domain that only small vestiges remain from the days when college was about preparing you for a good job in the private sector. Professors today are far more concerned with making sure you engage in the proper group think than teaching the skill set needed for entering the work force.

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    2. Re:College should align with its marketing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, oh my aching sides, what a load of horseshit. The history is exactly the opposite. Most professors wish they could go back to the good old days when college educations were not a prerequisite for stupid HR practices.

    3. Re:College should align with its marketing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they are supposed to teach you how to think but the catch-22 is when you're using that to justify the existence of over-saturated under employable degrees (typically the ones that are supposed to teach the most thinking) and the typical college kid leaves with debt somewhere between a used car and a respectable home.

      And there are more free ways to learn philosophy, the arts, humanities, etc than there ever were before..... and your classes have hundreds of students and are essentially ran by TAs......

      Well what kind of thinking exactly did you learn for your 15k-200k in debt where you can't analyze that situation and conclude it's a bad one to be in?

      The truth is that as students are shoveled into college the washouts don't quit.. they all get funneled into a few degrees that essentially become resume black marks.

    4. Re:College should align with its marketing. by psycho12345 · · Score: 1

      College has never been a job training program. It was either a wealthy person hangout for socializing, academic research, or wealthy person party/dumping ground.

      Job training was done by apprenticeships, for close to 500 years. Internships are just an offshoot of that.

      Education has never been and never will be a free market thing.

    5. Re:College should align with its marketing. by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      For reference, I am talking about the US college/university system here. Maybe you missed the 1940s through the 1980s? Research and job training was the purpose of ALL the colleges founded in that time frame.

      Education will never be a free market thing UNTIL THE PEOPLE FOOTING THE BILL DEMAND IT... FTFY

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
  5. Incompetent? Or 800,000/yr oversupply? by DutchUncle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is India creating 800,000 new jobs per year for those 800,000 new graduates? Maybe there are so many unemployed because there are so many.

    1. Re:Incompetent? Or 800,000/yr oversupply? by Luthair · · Score: 1

      There was an article a while ago talking about how 95% of graduates were unfit - https://news.slashdot.org/stor...

    2. Re:Incompetent? Or 800,000/yr oversupply? by crashumbc · · Score: 1

      this, I don't know but sounds like a shit load of engineers.

      Ok a quick google search shows the US graduated 99k in 2014.... So India is producing EIGHT times the number we are.

      I think we found the issue.

    3. Re: Incompetent? Or 800,000/yr oversupply? by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      I expect that the number of graduation will go down if they need to pass these internships. The people who would just cheat their way through before will probably have a more difficult time of it now, especially if the internships start early in the program.

    4. Re:Incompetent? Or 800,000/yr oversupply? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      H1-B visas maybe?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:Incompetent? Or 800,000/yr oversupply? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I agree that's likely correct, but India does have 3-4x the population AND the US is allegedly under-supplied.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    6. Re:Incompetent? Or 800,000/yr oversupply? by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Well given that India has more than 3x the US population, and then taking into account the fact that 60% of the grads are unemployable. That actually works out fairly equal when you think about it. Per capita, India would still be somewhat higher (~2x if my math is right -- always a questionable assumption) but that's within the realm of local variability, especially since India is still one of the big outsourcing countries (that is, their excess engineers are filling in for jobs in the US and other nations. Every one or two Indian programmers in outsourcing means one less American programmer employed.)

      The problem is that 60% unemployable rate. That's not good for anybody except the schools who get paid to (not) train these people. The people themselves can't get jobs (at least not jobs they want/are ostensibly trained for,) the unemployment statistics get negatively skewed, the government gets to deal with the mess and the whole country ends up as a bit of a laughing stock. If the government can do something to increase that percentage -- even if, and maybe especially if, it simultaneously lowers the enrollment rate, then it should be a benefit to the entire Indian economy. 600k useful engineers is far better than 800k useless ones.

      And that's not even getting to the question of what level of competency they consider "employable" in India. My one experience with Indian outsourcing gave me a C# program that was written in VB6 style (not even VB.NET) as best they could, doing things like comparing the text of a label with a hardcoded string to do branching and all sorts of garbage. The code would compile, but that's about all I can say for it. Of course we had hired literally the cheapest of the cheap so its not surprising the kind of quality we got.. but they were obviously employed by the outsourcing firm, and if that's the bar for "employable" programmers in India, I don't even want to think about what level of training those 60% unemployable people are at.

    7. Re:Incompetent? Or 800,000/yr oversupply? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We've got no shortage of engineers and other STEM workers. What we've got a shortage of is workers with mathematically impossible levels of experience who will work for a fraction of an appropriate wage.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    8. Re:Incompetent? Or 800,000/yr oversupply? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Is India creating 800,000 new jobs per year for those 800,000 new graduates?

      No, but your manager contemplating outsourcing is creating jobs there.
      The current unemployment is due to downturns elsewhere. There really are a huge number of tech jobs ending up there.

    9. Re: Incompetent? Or 800,000/yr oversupply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah, you'll just have new cheating where companies provide 'internships' that don't require you to show up

  6. This is Genius by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    because if it's one way I know for sure to lower unemployment it's to dump hundreds of thousands of employees at intern level wages directly into a market. I foresee this will in no way have any negative consequences or backfire. This is most certainly not a transparent attempt to get cheap labor in an already overburdened job market. Nosiree.

    Also, good to know India has the same B.S. narrative about why folks can't find work as the US.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:This is Genius by MangoCats · · Score: 2

      Where I work, interns do not generally lower the overall need for experienced headcount, usually slightly the opposite.

      Not that having interns is a net-negative for the company, they stretch us to do things we otherwise wouldn't, but for every hour of essential work that an intern takes on, it seems that two hours are spent training them or checking the work before allowing it to be used.

    2. Re:This is Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, the sad thing is this isn't someone trying to get "cheap labor in an already overburdened job market".

      It's someone trying to solve the problem of a huge number of people who on paper are engineers, but in practice have all lied and cheated their way through school and as such have no real qualifications or skillset.

      This is about trying to make more of these "engineering graduates" have some actual skills, instead of a bogus degree held by someone who actually has no qualifications whatsoever as an "engineer".

      It's actually someone desperately trying to make all those "on-paper only" engineers actually have some damned skills when they graduate.

      The getting of the piece of paper which says engineer is the goal, many of these people don't give a damn about engineering, have no talent for engineering, and couldn't do the basic tasks of the job.

      Think of India's education system as a puppy mill, which churns out candidates of limited quality. And now someone is insisting these candidates do some real world stuff to gain experience ... which might be a problem for the ones who don't actually know anything.

      This is 800K poseurs per year who are having the title "engineer" slapped on their backside when nothing could be further from the truth.

    3. Re:This is Genius by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

      Yup, that seems to be a reasonable interpretation. Incidentally very few interns actually do more useful work than they absorb in training them. They are fun to work with and the 3 month long interview is an excellent way of figuring out if they are worth employing. Given the expense of the high fuck up rate of employing fresh graduates I suspect it actually works out cheaper to have an intern program, simply because you end up employing known quantities.

  7. First, require ALL testing to be on the 10th floor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or higher. Preventing a parent climbing the wall of lower-storied buildings to pass answers to their kid seems like a no-brainer first step.

    TRUMP powa! because it Makes America Great Again!

  8. Why not Germans? by pablo_max · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First, I will say that the program seems like a great idea and I wish them success.

    Next, I can say that in my company, we had very, very bad luck with Indian engineers and SW developers. I am not talking about H1 imports either. Ultimately, I think it came down to cultural differences which created a mismatch of expectations from both sides.
    After the 5th one, we more or less stopped considering those applications.
    We are not a large company, but we do tend to have 5 to 10 interns at any one time. We did accept a few interns from India as well. We sponsored the visas and all that. Didn't really work out.

    Then, we starting bringing German interns in. Maybe some people will get offended by this statement, but I can say in about 95% of the cases, the German interns we got were far superior engineers than our full time US master degree engineers. Their problem solving skills, critical thinking and overall work ethics were, for us, amazing.
    For nearly all of them, at the end of their internship we offered them a contract plus visas. Of course, this is much easier to handle with Germans because of the visa treaty.
    The thing is, they also ask for much less money than out of school Americans and they are vastly better engineers. Whatever they are doing in their schools seems to be working.
    Basically what I am saying is, why do so many companies jump through hoops to bring in scores of cheap Indian guys when way better engineers are also willing to come?

    1. Re:Why not Germans? by cloud.pt · · Score: 2

      I mostly see your point and agree.

      As to your final question, I can give a pretty straight forward yet long answer: because of a mix of 1. employers/managers wanting to maximize opex vs revenue, by just throwing cheap labour to the problem (IT's way of throwing money at the problem); and 2. because the HR teams/companies (i.e. recruiters) are so blindly incompetent by wanting them recruitment commission, they mostly have 0 filtering other than an IT degree check.

      Companies should have 1to1 technical interviews and/or ask for past references, and I don't mean ref. letters, but flat out calls to former employers and teachers. Now, many will argue this is abuse, but if I was an employer (not yet had the chance to), I would both use this and like to get called about a past employee. Just not a current one of course and that rules most second jobs. But it does work after the second job change pretty well.

      Oh and did I mention Linked In? Recruiters can't use it for shyt... More often than not I have seen usage of that great platform for nothing but sending indiscriminate SPAM. That goes to show how employers are just bad at recruiting. And sometimes they even do this with github accounts that have absolutely no "non-passive" activity (i.e. they spam accounts that have never even forked or committed anything).

    2. Re:Why not Germans? by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 2

      Because they go to school much longer than US students. They start have Kindergarten starting from age 2-5. The college prep line goes to 13 years (instead of 12 in the US), and the school year is 40 weeks long verses typical 34-35 weeks in the US. All told they have 6-7 years worth of more classtime than a typical US student does before they even go to college!

      And people wonder why the US is lagging in international test performance....

      --
      We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    3. Re: Why not Germans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Classroom time is important, but my guess is the focus on critical thinking skills and problem solving in general helps more.

    4. Re: Why not Germans? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Don't they also do the college/trade track thing in highschool? If you have the grades or test well, you get put in the college-prep classes. If you don't, you take classes targeting the trades.

      Attempts to do that here are shot down as it's pretty brutal to tell a kid he's not cut out for college. ....of course, I think Germany has a slightly nicer cultural attitude when it comes to the trades.

    5. Re:Why not Germans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not what is wrong with the US educational system. The fact is that if a student steps out of line, they face being incarcarated until age 21 (23 in California). There is no set sentence... it is when Corrections Corporation of America (er, CoreCivics) decides the kid has served enough time.

      So, kids are taught to conform, comply, and consume. Don't color out of the lines, and don't question anything someone with a louder voice says, otherwise any chance of them having a meaningful life is out the window.

      I can take a kid from a Mexican school and a kid from a US school, and the Mexican will run rings around the US kid in science, math, and critical thinking. Not that the US kid is dumber, but because they have had such a shitty education in failed school districts, with money being handed to school officials for every kid pulled out and locked up.

    6. Re: Why not Germans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't they also do the college/trade track thing in highschool? If you have the grades or test well, you get put in the college-prep classes. If you don't, you take classes targeting the trades.

      Attempts to do that here are shot down as it's pretty brutal to tell a kid he's not cut out for college. ....of course, I think Germany has a slightly nicer cultural attitude when it comes to the trades.

      Trades executed well can be extremely challenging with all the regulations have to be considered. Of course, usually it works out good enough if they aren't.

      Depending on the state, high school starts at 5 or 7 the grade. Three different branches exist (ending after 9, 10, or 12/13 years). Switching between them is possible, but rare. Colleges come in 2 branches, too. In the old times, it was "Fachhochschule" (granting Diplomas with "(FH)") and universities (granting "normal" Diplomas, "Staatsexamen" (official tests by the government for subjects like law, medicine, teachers, ...) and later/optionally doctorate degrees. Fachhochschulen offer classes similar to high school (at a higher level), where universities offer lectures that offer/demand more independent studies form the student.

      Since a couple of years with international synchronization, Fachhochschulen are renaming themselves to "university of applied sciences" (because University sounds (is) a lot more valuable). The degrees are no longer distinguishable between them and universities, both offer bachelor and master degrees. Courses for both are a lot more similar to classes, than to what the lectures at universities were previously.

      How do students from the new system compare to university students from 10 years ago?

    7. Re: Why not Germans? by pablo_max · · Score: 1

      I think most of the states actually dropped the new program.
      NRW was the last to switch back, but as I know, in 2016 they also went back to the old way.
      I believe they are going to get rid of the bachelors program as well since German business do not like it.

    8. Re:Why not Germans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talking about the Germans, they were one of the first to accompany the engineering and vocational training in their degrees. The tradition has been adopted by many countries since, and a Masters level engineering degree, no matter what subject might have six month to a year of training and work as part of the final thesis and additional training starting right at the undergrad equivalent level. Since most students are employed at that point in the technology field, the work is compensated normally. Of course, the doctors also do their post-doc equivalent work and required publications before the submitting and defending their thesis, so that's different as well in the education systems inspired by Russian and German influences.

    9. Re: Why not Germans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So far I have lived my whole life in Lower Saxony and I have lots of friends at the local university.
      This is the first time that I hear of German universities wanting to get rid of bachelor/master degrees.

    10. Re:Why not Germans? by dcollins · · Score: 1

      I have a good friend, who is himself German, with a full-time faculty position at a top U.S. university in CS. Last summer he taught in Germany as part of an exchange program. He himself came back basically blown away by the different level of preparation and maturity of the German students.

      My take is that German universities actually maintain legitimate entrance standards. All college costs are paid by the government, there isn't a free-market race to the bottom, and the only people accepted are high-quality and expected to actually take responsibility and succeed at the work. Vocational programs exist for other types of jobs. Different schools are attended after the age of 10 based on whether someone is headed for college or not (contrast with the U.S. where "tracking" is anathema in education since about 25 years ago).

      http://www.history.didaktik.mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de/meg/weidiga1.html

      In addition, I must point out that German math educators, even K-6 equivalent, are highly prepared (like maybe 8 years of training), respected, well-compensated, and tenured by the government. This is in contrast to math in the U.S. which is taught from K-6 by non-experts who are actually the least capable of math, least knowledgeable, poorly trained, have the highest levels of math anxiety (which has been shown to rub off on students), little support, and high turnover in a typical American meat-grinder context. As a community-college math teacher, I suspect that this rotten foundation in math from K-6 is the single biggest problem with American education.

      In Germany: http://www.history.didaktik.mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de/meg/matheda4.html
      In the U.S.: http://www.madmath.com/2016/02/hembree-on-math-anxiety.html

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    11. Re:Why not Germans? by tsqr · · Score: 1

      Companies should have 1to1 technical interviews and/or ask for past references, and I don't mean ref. letters, but flat out calls to former employers and teachers.

      In the US, references from past employers are almost always limited to, "That person worked at this company from to ". Any mention of job performance is an open invitation to a lawsuit.

    12. Re:Why not Germans? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      You only got a few Germans that got the chance to do non-drudgery-work, not the wider cross-section that ends up in lower-tier trades.

      That, and I'd rather trust the US citizen than the streamed German engineer that stole a job.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    13. Re:Why not Germans? by pablo_max · · Score: 1

      I find your xenophobic comment very ironic, given your signature.
      But hey... TRUMP!!! Am I right??

    14. Re:Why not Germans? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Because they go to school much longer than US students.

      While that is true you've taking a ludicrously over simplified view of education. German education is far more hands on. Internships are just the norm for engineers while they are still studying. The education system doesn't teach to the test, it teaches concepts. They aren't afraid to leave a poor little snowflake behind. In China you see some similar different approaches too. Whereas we pluck dumb kids out and put them into a special school to not drag down everyone, and focus all our attention to making sure they meet the mediocrity we are aiming for, they pluck the smartest kids out there and put them into a special school to ensure they are given opportunities to shine. Many systems in Europe also have very tiered levels of secondary education, also catering to the smarter kids, often teaching them core materials in a variety of languages.

      You don't need more crap schooling, you need proper schooling.

    15. Re:Why not Germans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany categorizes students at an early age based upon testing. These groups follow different tracks. Those German engineers tested well at an early age.Yes we should do this in the US. Of course we won't as it would offend and endanger our alliance of higher education and mediocre or worse students that results in financially crushing tuition (due to high demand and abusive capitalization) as well as masses of graduates that can't do much of anything (due to being poor material).

    16. Re:Why not Germans? by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you mean limited as in legally, but I guess that's why employers everywhere try to build a large professional network - you get the perks of inside info under the table. Now, most people will say that's not fair game, but is that any different than asking around your friends what's the best mechanic for your particular needs and budget?

      Discrimination can only be an excuse so far. If there is to be any legislation about burning or praising past employees, it should relate to the granularity of the subject - things sexual preference, religion "physiological schedules" (read: long bath breaks) are sacred, but nonetheless, skill, effort and value ratings are as valid and ethically sound between companies, as they are inside the same company. They can and should be made public, and all the employer needs is to inform the employee and request acceptance of it. It's a meritocracy for a reason and society works on merits.

      It does take away one of the biggest assets we have on the quitting economy - clean start and/or progression through job-switch. But you can always switch industries or cities. IT is versatile. Then again we all would get a great benefit from it - seamless, balanced and actually just progression - no more freshly-made, out of company team-lead or Whatever VP with 0 experience and merit for the job.

    17. Re:Why not Germans? by tsqr · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you mean limited as in legally

      Not sure what the law says in any particular jurisdiction, but policies like this are usually implemented for the purpose of limiting corporate liability; same reason employees are rarely terminated for cause, but laid off as a result of downsizing or reorganization.

    18. Re:Why not Germans? by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

      But downsizing and reorganization are large(ish)-scale endeavors, and you can't as much pinpoint bad weed (e.g. individual bad employees) as much as clear mediocre plots (e.g. below avg. teams yet with valuable pros in them). This is a bad thing for everyone, as there is liability companies aren't willing to go through to single out bad professionals.

      I have seen first-hand very good professionals leave (emigrate even) because the company went on a bad hiring spree that benefited nobody but unemployment rates and workforce numbers.

    19. Re: Why not Germans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      plus there's the way they're always trying to invade either Poland or Belgium during lunch breaks...

  9. One anecdotal data point; worked with a fraud. by Gondola · · Score: 0

    I worked with one Indian in my time as a network engineer, and he was a fraud. He lied extensively on his resume and could do very little of what he claimed.

    But, take that with a huge grain of salt for the singular data point it is.

    1. Re:One anecdotal data point; worked with a fraud. by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      Having done phone screening on a bunch of intern positions, I can vouch for the high fraud level among foreign resumes in general, but especially Indian resumes. Alarming numbers of eye catching experiences crumbled after slight probing. Why tell blatant lies if you can't even bluff your way through follow up questions?!

    2. Re:One anecdotal data point; worked with a fraud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The big thing with resumes from India is they will put every aspect of the project they were involved on as what they worked on. The first question should always be "which of these things did you personally work on?" Usually, 95% of the technologies and tasks they listed will fall off immediately.

      If you're looking for cheap labor, you get cheap labor. The talented Indians are making decent money and are usually swept up already by shops that wisely see India as another labor pool, not just as a cheap labor pool. They pay what it takes to get the quality engineers and the scraps are left for the cheapskates.

    3. Re:One anecdotal data point; worked with a fraud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > especially Indian resumes

      My least favorite response in interviews is when asking about something mentioned on the top half of a resume usually under skills is "I was afraid you were going to ask about that" or some statement close to that. Then why did you put it near the top of your resume? I've interviewed about 300 Java devs the past 18 months, and nearly all of the Indians I interviewed had technologies near the top of their resume that they knew nothing about. They know how to play the game to get past the first level of screening.

    4. Re:One anecdotal data point; worked with a fraud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The big thing with resumes from India is they will put every aspect of the project they were involved on as what they worked on.

      This. I just interviewed an Indian this morning that had Jenkins listed as the third item on his resume. He had only ever logged into it and clicked the build job link. He had never actually created or changed a job. He didn't even understand the concept of an exit status. Jenkins is built around the concept of detecting nonzero exit statuses to know when builds fail. You have to understand that to use it.

      He also listed that he was an expert at MySQL. He had only used it in Java code via Hibernate. He had never actually written an SQL query.

      The sad thing is that he has 15 years experience and is still the best Indian I've interviewed in months.

    5. Re:One anecdotal data point; worked with a fraud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not just intern positions, but even for senior level positions! I'm a dev manager for a company in Redmond, WA a few hundred feet from one of Microsoft's campuses, and the vast majority of applicants we get are Indian. That became even more true, after we hired three Indian guys that were laid-off from Microsoft in Dec 2015 since they recommend their friends. Not a single one could answer even basic questions about even half of the "skills" they listed on their resumes.

      My favorite thing to do is open old code reviews during the interview and hide comments. It's very obvious when you have several simple problems on the screen, and they can't find a single one that they can't do the job. I then show the comments and watch their reaction when they see what they missed. Most aren't even competent enough to react.

    6. Re:One anecdotal data point; worked with a fraud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most definitely this

      We went through a round of interviews a few years ago. Im not quite sure what pool they got these out of but it seemed that they all had 'master's from the same US university. They also all had final projects that sounded eerily familiar to each other. When asked each one if they knew such and such they said no, even though they would have worked on the exact same project.

      Also their interviews usually fell apart at the same point you brought up, when asked 'so what part of this did YOU actually do' it usually came down to building/running some piece of pre-developed software or writing a few minor functions and that was about it. It was fairly telling when we ask them something simple like 'I have a set of these N things, show me a sample API you would write to init/start/stop/getstatus of these' and you get some way leftfield answers and they cant even tell you the difference between a while and a for loop and why they chose one of another

    7. Re:One anecdotal data point; worked with a fraud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have seen similar myself. The issue is that they really don't -care- if they are caught lying. Call them a liar to their face, and they will just look hang-dog, but they will still continue doing it. It is a culture thing, where there is no dishonor in being an obvious liar in every capacity.

      What needs to happen is to have zero tolerance for liars. If there is -anything- inflated or wrong on a resume, the candidate gets known that falsehoods are not appreciated, the interview stops, the hand gets shaken, and the candidate is shown the door. No ifs, ands, or buts.

      I've done that multiple times, to the point where one candidate got so pissed that I called him out when his RHCE cert was for John Q. Doe out of Alabama, and not him (John R. Doe), that I had to get security to show that he was not wanted. Don't let them get away with it, although they will still keep trying, because there are always suckers for a glib bullshitter, especially with a lot of management who doesn't know/care.

    8. Re:One anecdotal data point; worked with a fraud. by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      I have seen that before. I once dealt with a "DBA" who didn't understand that "DROP TABLE" autocommits. Thnk $DEITY I had backups of the MySQL database, which were sent to a NAS that I had my manager purchase for "general admin tasks". Said DBA was supposedly a Linux "admin"... but when he got the "deer in headlights" look when I asked him to fetch updates from the internal mirrored repos first, since the machines were not a VLAN not accessible to or from the Internet.

    9. Re:One anecdotal data point; worked with a fraud. by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      Same here. We just remotely interviewed an Indian CSE grad student that had a resume that was off-the-charts in a good way. She should've been able to teach us experienced devs some tricks/concepts - the resume was chock full of all manner of web languages/technologies.

      The actual interview, however, was off-the-charts - in a bad way. It was the single worst interview I've experienced in 20+ years. She couldn't answer any questions without a long, LONG pause. During the long, awkward pauses (it was totally silent for like 20-30 seconds - "can she even hear us?"), we'd occasionally hear page turning - after which she'd give an academic-sounding answer that sounded like she was reading straight out of a, "Learn X in 24 hours!" book.

      In the end, we'd finally gleaned out that she'd just done small coding jobs in a single dev environment that were extremely limited in scope, and only as assigned by a rigid supervisor.

      The kicker was that her Indian supervisor gave her stellar reviews, saying that she was very talented and would be a great addition to our group. It was painfully obvious that either that manager was blind or they'd both lied through their teeth to help each other out.

      Based on that sample of one and other exposure I've had with many Indian grad-level students coming out of engineering programs at the university I work at, this isn't an isolated case.

      It doesn't help that their educational system in India is fundamentally broken in that students get locked into a discipline with little or no way to get out of it beyond a certain age. Internships for people that don't really want to be engineers but took the easiest (and in some cases the only) route out of their slums and into the Indian "middle class" aren't going to fix the underlying problems.

      It wouldn't surprise me if those internships turn into backrooms full dead wood "engineers" while businesses market themselves as being able to throw 30 programmers at a problem while their 3 or 4 coders with real talent do all the heavy lifting.

    10. Re:One anecdotal data point; worked with a fraud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to an interview at expedia once did my usual interview questions brush up. Reversed a link list and reviewed my sorting algorithms, etc.

      I was asked how my "scripting" was "eh I little rusty I'm not in a coding-focused role now". This was not a dev role either btw.

      By the time I'd been asked this question I was already questioning if I'd accept a job offer. At the end of the interview the guy told me that because my "scripting" was "rusty" he was going to recommend the other candidates. I went home and looked on his linkedin, he didn't clearly didn't know how to code himself and went to school overseas. I have a cs degree and have been programming since I was 8. Almost longer than this guy had been alive.

      Being "rusty" to me means I will struggle to write a spring MVC project but the reality is that I have to compete with overseas guys with dishonest work cultures who will pass off a few lines of JS as expert programming.

      Fact is I should have just said I was fucking amazing... they didn't ask me a single thing to prove my aptitude. I didn't bother objecting to any of this since my microsoft friend told me expedia was a disaster before the interview and my experience with their team confirmed his claim.

    11. Re:One anecdotal data point; worked with a fraud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait you mean

      BEGIN TRANSACTION
      DROP TABLE blah
      INSERT INTO updateLog('stepserialnumber', ...)
      COMMIT

      can be split? Boo your database engine!

  10. Too short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> undergraduate students complete three internships lasting between four and eight weeks each during the course of their programme

    What can you possibly get out of 8-week internships? They are way too short, even the total 24 weeks are all spent on one employer. Employers aren't really give anything of substance for them to work on in that period.

    Unless it's entry-level helpdesk/IT (non-engineering) jobs.

    1. Re:Too short by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "What can you possibly get out of 8-week internships?"

      In two weeks I could teach you everything you need to know about basic electronic repair and diagnosis. I did this when employed at Solectron. That alone gives you the skills needed to handle most any general board-level repair.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:Too short by mhkohne · · Score: 1

      That alone gives you the skills needed to handle most any general board-level repair.

      A thing that very few places do anymore. What else you got?

      --
      A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
  11. Only place to intern them is ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Informative
    ... in some penitentiary. Not the students, but the owners of these engineering colleges.

    I am from India, and I *know* the abysmal quality of what passes for an engineering college there.

    The poor and lower middle class of India know viscerally that education is the ticket out of poverty. They are willing to mortgage their family wealth, spend 40% of the meagre income on college tuition. They hope somehow their child, usually the eldest son, will somehow make it and pull their family out of poverty.

    But that much of money coming out of ill informed population is a honey pot for the unscrupulous scammers of all stripes, politicians in particular. Every damned politician at state level owns college complexes. Engineering, medical, dental and nursing schools, all in one large campus, totally privately and individually owned by a state level minister. Corruption in management, recruiting faculty, running the college, collecting the fees, in admission procedure, everywhere is rampant. Most of these grads don't really make it out of poverty

    But the degree they get B.E or B.Tech B.Arch MBBS are the same degrees awarded by real colleges like the IITs and NITs and AIIMS etc. So the ill formed poor people get scammed. It is not going to be fixed by passing a few laws by Delhi bureaucrats.

    Quality education, be it engineering, be it Greek literature, needs investment and effort.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Only place to intern them is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In America, we called it ITT Tech!

    2. Re:Only place to intern them is ... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Corruption in management, recruiting faculty, running the college, collecting the fees, in admission procedure, everywhere is rampant.

      China and India both would have world power economies if not for this factor. The cognitive load required to function in a society where you're permanently on guard against being ripped off at every turn is truly enormous. It's downright debilitating, and made all the worse by being so pervasive it becomes unavoidable in certain sectors. The Western world seems weirdly unusual in history for its sheer honesty. Those days are fading as the kleptarchs return to power. It was good while it lasted.

    3. Re:Only place to intern them is ... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Oh, yes. Calling somebody an "engineer" that is not even a fit technician is not going to work, because they cannot perform. It is a real tragedy though that people that have very little and do not understand what is going on get defrauded this way. This is a cultural problem though, and laws will not fix it. It needs generally good education for everybody to be fixed, but of course, that comes with these politicians and other profiteers losing their opportunities to make lots of money.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  12. Re:First, require ALL testing to be on the 10th fl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hilarious. I've seen the videos. Unbelievable...

  13. Now if only... by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

    ... the US would do something about THEIR unemployable engineers!!!

    1. Re:Now if only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there no homeless shelters? Are there no prisons?

  14. The Best and the Brightest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So looks like we are getting the best and the brightest after all!

  15. brilliant (?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, in order to fix the problem of not having enough jobs for engineers, they're going to make engineers have to compete with student engineers working for free?

  16. Trump New Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Build a Wall!

    Make America Work Again!

  17. Not enough *employable* engineers?????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    How can there be a shortage of employable engineers getting churned out of the University system of India? I thought they all come to the United States on a "We don't have enough employable applicants in the U.S. for our corporations" H1B Visa.

    Of course, it's a corporate lie that there are enough suitable applicants -- they just don't want to pay the US applicants what they deserve, so they are willing to have the gov't let ship in engineers from India for pennies on the dollar.

  18. Engineers from India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this the same India the has a 60% rate of cheating on their engineering tests? Internships are not going to remove that stigma.

  19. Could be a good thing by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Having worked with many degreed "engineers" from Asia and India, there is a huge variation in competence. Typically those that went through grad school in the US are solid engineers, however, those still in their home country are usually sub par for the field.

    The article contains the problem. Engineering is very popular in India, thus, there are a lot of people getting the degree who have no business being engineers (this happens with any popular/trendy profession). However, engineering requires a certain mindset and a certain inherent intelligence. https://www.quora.com/How-do-t... If you don't have an IQ of at least 120 or higher, you will likely not do well as an engineer (your best hope is to get rapidly promoted to management, I have seen it happen numerous times). Since the median IQ is theoretically 100, and engineering is popular, you wind up with a sizable fraction who were able to cram their way through school, but who don't have the inherent capacity to do the job.

    Hopefully with internships this will become more apparent to the affected students, allowing them to shift into other valuable but less intelligence intensive fields before they spend all 4 years on a field that they won't be successful in.

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    1. Re:Could be a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having worked with many degreed "engineers" from anywhere, there is a huge variation in competence.

      FTFY.

  20. Is there anyone left in India by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 1

    to do non-engineering jobs? Like tradesmen or cooks? Do they have to give visas out to foreign workers to come and work for them?

    --
    Sig. Sig. Sputnik
    1. Re:Is there anyone left in India by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      I believe they let the caste system take care of that one for them outside the major cities.

    2. Re:Is there anyone left in India by Alok · · Score: 1

      India has enough population to fill most jobs :) But yes there is immigration for work in India too, from its neighbours - Nepalis for e.g. are commonly employed as guards in societies, they have a much better reputation for not sleeping on the job haha. IIRC there is significant illegal immigration from Bangladesh too, but not sure in which sectors.

  21. That works fine by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    when the internships aren't mandatory to graduate. Interns aren't suppose to do work an employee would normally do. That means they're of limited use to a business. It's why they're called gophers (go fer coffee).

    The dynamic changes drastically when you suddenly mandate 800,000 people get an internship or don't graduate. It's the same thing as that schmuk in Chicago who wants to mandate a 'plan' before high schoolers can graduate. Businesses will take advantage of the students need for an internship to force them to work full time for little or no pay. This will in turn drive down wages and opportunities for people in the job market proper, which is exactly what this is suppose to do. I'm sure if it was looked into you'd find some wealthy plutocrat buddy-buddy with whoever suggested this.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  22. Since you know a lot about the area by HBI · · Score: 1

    Does this ever come up in political discussions in India? I see a flow of issues from this:

    1. Population Control
        a. Yes, we need it, our population is so large that said population is not an asset
        b. But we're having our best and brightest practice population control, which is self-defeating

    And so on...

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:Since you know a lot about the area by Alok · · Score: 2

      Well, its a general failing of most democratic countries that the less educated and lower earning groups reproduce more, get a larger voting share and then end up using a lot of social benefits. No politicians are going to discuss such issues and risk upsetting their vote banks, unless somehow they're lucky enough to have highly qualified demographics in their constituency.

      Female infanticide is illegal in India btw, though it seems to go on in remote villages etc. Every now & then there are stories about gender based abortions in some village. Its not as common in metros, but I guess there should still be incidents but rarely reported - maybe city people are more circumspect about flouting laws and hence its harder for media to find out.

    2. Re:Since you know a lot about the area by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      Well, its a general failing of most xxxxxxxxxx countries that the less educated and lower earning groups reproduce more...

      (HTML strikethrough doesn't seem to work in a slashdot post.) There, fixed that for you. It doesn't matter what kind of government they live under, the less educated reproduce more all over the world.

    3. Re:Since you know a lot about the area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the full sentence, which is about "voting", doesn't make sense any more after the part you elided.

    4. Re:Since you know a lot about the area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that anywhere you go, parents are smart enough to not state the reason when they're aborting their baby girl so they can try again for a boy.
      I have to say, as the proud parent of a boy and a girl, I get a twinge of nausea typing this.

    5. Re:Since you know a lot about the area by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      It doesn't matter what kind of government they live under, the less educated reproduce more all over the world.

      False. In non-democratic countries the rich have more children than the poor. Part of this is because of polygamy, which is much more common in non-democracies, "serial polygamy" where rich men divorce and have a second family, and the inability of the poor masses to vote themselves benefits.

    6. Re:Since you know a lot about the area by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Leftists now shooting Congressmen in the streets for being Republican. Just wait till we start shooting back.

      Gabby Giffords. You started it.

    7. Re:Since you know a lot about the area by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      "Idiocracy", despite much anecdotal evidence, is not a documentary. Neither was "The Marching Morons" nor "The Little Black Bag".

      Correllation. Causation. Usual remark regarding A and B both correlating with C.

      As places get more prosperous, the birth rate goes down. Education goes up. (Or at least, schooling does.) Countries often have a mix of places during their transitions.

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    8. Re:Since you know a lot about the area by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      You seem to be equating non-democratic with polygamous, which is ludicrous. What about Communist countries like China, Russia, North Korea, or Vietnam? Would you call them democracies? Would you call them polygamous? Would you say their birth rates follow the same trends in the polygamous countries you're referring to? In China, they chose to pass a law to prevent (primarily) poor farming families from having too many kids, which ended up in massive numbers of forced abortions, sterilization, murder of children, giving children up for adoption, etc. There's no way they would've done that if it primarily affected the wealthier ruling class. (Your login name, combined with the fact that it has the world's highest population, makes the fact that you ignored China as an example a little ironic.)

      I don't have a problem with your claims that polygamous countries are that way, just your claims that all (or even most) non-democratic countries are that way. If the latter is false, then so are your claims that it has anything to do with the fact that democracies keep voting themselves "bread and circuses".

      When it comes to polygamous countries, the statistics aren't backwards because poorer men choose to have less children. It's because the poorest men literally cannot get themselves a wife. All those 0's can skew the statistics very heavily. From what I've read, the men who can manage to get their first wife try to have as many kids as they can. Lack of benefits doesn't slow them down, only lack of wives. More kids -> more child labor -> more family wealth -> more wives -> more kids.

  23. Can we please stop using the term Engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... to describe most folks with a degree in information systems. Hell even most folks with CompSci degrees are not engineers - techs, yes, engineers, no.

    The far majority of people that graduate with a degree and are then considered computer engineers is ludicrous. Sorry folks most of you are far from engineers.

  24. if I owned a business... by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

    I don't own a business in India, but if I did, I'd be glad to know there would be a ton of free entry level software developers forced to work for free or next to nothing to get their degrees. Great job, India!

  25. When will management learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no free lunch. You get exactly what you pay for and nothing more.

  26. the nazis did Population Control on the jews and by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    the nazis did Population Control on the jews and that did not turn out that well.

  27. Language skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I spent 6 years in college getting 2 engineering degrees, and another 3 doing post Master's work. In those years I worked with many, MANY, Indian students. The largest problem, consistent throughout college, and also painfully obvious after working professionally in the field since 2002 is that being able to speak English, with an accent that is understandable to the average American, is the main hurdle to employment.

    Forget grades, being a good developer, or being excellent at math - if your English is so poor nobody can understand you, or your accent so thick as to be unintelligible to the average American, you are going to have problems finding regular employment.

    I regularly have meetings with customers that have their IT outsourced to India, and often end up in internet calls trying to help them figure out how to interface with our system. Without fail, 50% of the call time is spent trying to solve the wrong problem because the remote developer's English is wanting. It's not that they are incompetent, it's simply that they ask broken questions, which we give the answers to, and then 15 minutes later we realize the question they asked is not what they *meant*.

  28. 1/3 of the price of an employee? Sold. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1/3 of the price of an employee? Sold.

    YOU ARE BEING TAKING ADVANTAGE OF.

  29. Some US schools too.. by CharlieG · · Score: 1

    Dexel, Cornell, RIT - all require Co-ops, and not some dinky 12-24 weeks, but a minimum of 50 weeks. My daughter will be going on her first in January, and it is supposed to last till the beginning of August. (She's an EE Major)
    These are not "unpaid internships" either - the school requires them to be real, paid Jr Engineer positions, and audits to make sure they aren't just making you fetch coffee. It is a reason they tend to get jobs

    --
    -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  30. Dumb. Just do what we do in America. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Promote them to management.

  31. The world needs ditch diggers too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, not trying to be mean, but lets just stop with everyone can be anything crap. I will never be a good or great astrophysicist. I understand some concepts but everything else my brain is just not able to learn it period. So why keep training people who are clearly not able to get it? Move on, and we should start coming to realities of what people can and can't do. A 4'8" person may be able to shoot 3's all day long but when you crowd the floor with 7' giants, it makes an impact. So why not train these folks to do other things and unfortunately some other things may not be great or lucrative to do.

  32. Their "employable engineers" by tylersoze · · Score: 4, Funny

    Having worked with their employable software engineers I shudder to think what their unemployable engineers are like.

    1. Re:Their "employable engineers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why has this been moderated as funny?

      It should be rated as insightful because it is the honest truth.

  33. Doesn't that depend on who you ask? by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 1

    Think about it. Modern "Germans" are doing pretty damn well. I'd say it worked out well for them.

    1. Re:Doesn't that depend on who you ask? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that, you simply aren't paying attention. Deutchland is now D-stan since there isn't much Deutch about it anymore.

  34. Better teaching? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Putting integrity back into it. Doing the university thing right.

    Demanding an internship when these folk are functionally unemployable as Engineers. Like that's going to work. As in, "Hey, sure you can be an intern. Ok, so you can't do anything useful, even make the tea. No worries, we'll sign off on that."

  35. Re:Happy Friday from the The Golden Girls! by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 0

    So, I think /. needs to add two new mod point categories.
    1: Idiot
    2: Canadian

    --
    Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
  36. Internship won't solved the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What they need is more infrastructure spending. They should allow foreign companies to collect tolls and fees.

  37. intended consequence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This! Now american kids get to compete with H1B interns. Who is your TATA and what does he do.

  38. They obligate the wrong party. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Not only do they do nothing for the existing "unemployable", they do not obligate employers to take them on.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:They obligate the wrong party. by ghoul · · Score: 1

      A major form of corruption in India is giving internships to the kids of prospective clients governmental or non governmental. The elite already know internships improve employability. This measure is now forcing the first gen folks to also get internships which wont be that easy without the existing social capital.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    2. Re:They obligate the wrong party. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      So what happens then? They're forcing the least capable party - the "unemployables" - to get an internship.

      If it made more sense, they'd place the obligation on the employer to seek them out.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  39. Something something.... by Daemonik · · Score: 1

    Something something STEM something something always find good high paying jobs something something Arts degrees useless

  40. Germany only looks good in flawed studies. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Control for admissions criteria, and the US doesn't look so bad.

    The US admits and educates nearly everyone.
    Germany only educates a few, sending the rest to drudgery-work.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  41. Streaming deserves to be shot down every time. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Attempts to do that here are shot down as it's pretty brutal to tell a kid he's not cut out for college

    Attempts to restrict education are rightfully shot down. Streaming only consigns people to drudgery-work even if the person would have done better without streaming.

    I think Germany has a slightly nicer cultural attitude when it comes to the trades.

    Or that they've managed to culturally instill the idea that bad work can be made good.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  42. Laughing out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now they'll have lots of engineers specializing in student intern wrangling, because the government will eventually direct money to them for that end. They'll be put to make-work.

    India is India towards India as well.

  43. The US allows more freedom than Germany. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    My take is that German universities actually maintain legitimate entrance standards

    Only if you believe in withholding education such that most people can only find drudgery-work (aka the lower-tier trades).

    Vocational programs exist for other types of jobs.

    In other words, they shunt most people into drudgery-work with little hope of upward progress or international recognition (beyond being a perpetual guest worker).

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:The US allows more freedom than Germany. by pablo_max · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but this is totally bullshit.

      No one in Germany is withheld an education...full stop.

      No one is told by anyone he cannot go to uni. He must decide by his own which path to take.
      Even if he goes to realschule (non uni track) he can still later go to uni if he wants. It is not that hard to get accepted either. In the worst case he will need to take 1 or 2 years of prep school before starting. This is pretty common though.

    2. Re:The US allows more freedom than Germany. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      No one in Germany is withheld an education...full stop.
      No one is told by anyone he cannot go to uni. He must decide by his own which path to take.

      Then why bother having the rigid tracking?

      Second point, how are those "late bloomers" that end up taking university through the lower tracks? That is, how much of a penalty do they incur with employers for not having the perfect path? I'd imagine they'd be viewed as less-than-ideal despite earning a university degree.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  44. One more reason why streaming fails. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    When you're putting so much on the test, perhaps it'd be far better to kill the test and adopt a US level of openness.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  45. That because... by drew_92123 · · Score: 1

    they suck...

    - they have no social skills
    - they have no talent
    - they BARELY speak english
    - they are irresponsible

    etc.......

    There are plenty of great folks that are very smart and are a true pleasure to work with over there, but these new kids they're pumping out of these "schools" don't know shit about the real world and expect to get paid for doing nothing just because they have a a piece of paper that says they know something.

  46. We have a winner by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

    I think that is a very sensible observation.

  47. Corrupted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... ensure that undergraduate students complete three internships ...

    The Indians have been very good at separating the wrapping (eg. the certification) from the contents (eg. a body of knowledge), allowing every mechanism for structuring society to be corrupted. One wonders how internships will be faked or rubber-stamped but I am sure the Indians will find a way. In western education, some vocational courses also requires an employment component: However it doesn't have to relate to the field of study. This means one can complete a 'job-focused' course and still have no job experience relevant to the course.

    The principle of the internship and apprenticeship is sound: One learns a job by going to work; it kills 2 birds with one stone, creating a qualified employee and guaranteed employment offsetting the extra cost of education. It also obeys an antiquated HR principle of getting the right person, then getting the right skills.

    Such an education mechanism prevents formal education being 'wasted', as it is by the current westernized system, where businesses push the cost of training onto the government or the student. That results in a lot of unemployed people with theory but no practice: The very thing businesses don't want. Worse, with every person without a job having a certificate, such theory ceases to be an advantage.

    Very few people can complete tertiary education when it requires the knowledge of 'how to be smarter', or the recently deprecated knowledge of 'how to be a leader'. An internship puts the cost of employee failure onto a business, which it doesn't want. There needs to be some means of compensation so a business can participate in the educational process.

  48. Most professional engineers do this everywhere by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Most professional engineers do this no matter what country - some employment history is required before getting registered to be officially allowed to use the title.
    The "spin" on it in and the headline is somewhat sickening. Sure the submitter doesn't like Indians, we get that, but what's up with the editor today?

  49. Mirror by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Indian engineers suck for the same reason that no one will hire them: Because Indians cheat and lie. They cheat and lie when they wake up in the morning. They cheat and lie all day. They cheat and lie at night. They probably cheat and lie in their dreams too.

    Isn't that the American Way these days? Sounds like Presidential material to me.

    I think you've met the ones that are doing what they see earns rewards in the USA.

    1. Re: Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our president was born into great wealth and never needed to lie, cheat or steal to obtain it. But your other point that America is full of financially successful people who came from broken homes and used every opportunity society gave them as a platform to steal everyone else's food, is valid. Indians do see and do copy; I saw one of them go from being a nobody IT wannabe to eventually becoming a VP at Oracle, another got all the way to $100M/yr. The human wreckage both of those fucking lies left behind was beyond amazing and AFAIK, they got away with it, except for being fired once or twice, divorces, screwed up kids and a sexual harassment lawsuit or three. They impress only the ignorant and psychopaths in love with money (unfortunately there are many) and so it is a certainty that eventually the System will catch up and make an example out of them...that's why they keep their connections back to their motherland current lol

    2. Re: Mirror by PlaynBass · · Score: 1

      While Trumpkin MAY not have NEEDED to lie, cheat, or steal, his history of business practices show him to have been a liar, a cheat, and he has habitually cheated his contractors at every chance he got, as his lack of real business acumen bankrupted one business after another. His only real product is a has-been, never-was facade of chintzy glitter with which he has attempted to impress and over-compensate for his own insecurities and his lack of any true ability, above that of being a first-class bully and a con man, a parasite on the skills and abilities of his hired help.

      The mirror of his actions constantly reminds the informed that he should never be trusted with anything important. Most of the world's leaders have already seen through his deceptive blustering, and are hoping the gullible US voters that support him will soon get wise to his charades.

      The GOP leadership must have thought he could pull the wool over our eyes long enough to capture the entire government, but even those dinosaurs have found that his antics and lies are uncontrollable. The smartest of them still cling to the hope we voters won't notice before they can gerrymander another election and solidify their hold on our government before they lose the whole shooting match; or the whole world goes up in a nuclear cloud or drowns in the rising acidic oceans of uncontrollable global warming, whichever comes first.

      --
      PlaynBass
  50. Indian Dad Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I don't care what job you do, my son! Doctor, engineer or government bureaucrat... Whatever makes you happy!"

  51. Engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.

  52. It's not 1970 by dbIII · · Score: 1

    China and India both would have world power economies

    Look at wikipedia - they already do!

    The Western world seems weirdly unusual in history for its sheer honesty

    Have you heard of a guy called Trump?

    1. Re:It's not 1970 by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      China and India both would have world power economies

      Look at wikipedia - they already do!

      "World power economies" as in "11 supercarriers with accompanying battlegroups". "World power economies" as in "18 ballistic missile submarines". "World power economies" as in "oil is traded worldwide in their native currency."

      The Western world seems weirdly unusual in history for its sheer honesty

      Have you heard of a guy called Trump?

      Yes. Which is why I wrote the next two sentences.

  53. Re:Happy Friday from the The Golden Girls! by dryeo · · Score: 1

    A minus one and a plus one, at least it is balanced.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  54. Re:Happy Friday from the The Golden Girls! by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 1

    Which one is plus and which one is minus?

    --
    sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /
  55. I am not surprised by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    India is churning out paper champions much like the US has. I get really angry at the IT certification programs that basically mean a person can pass a paper test, but when you place said person in the real world, they choke. The best way to learn is through hands on experience and trial and error.

  56. From an Indian graduate's perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I just graduated with a Computer Engineering degree from a third tier engineering university (not the IITs, not the NITs, not even the privately owned universities like BITS, etc) and I can't say anything for those who graduate from first/second tier colleges but I can tell you from my batch of 140 people if I were to recommend someone who would be able to write any piece of working software without blowing up the machines, that number would be less than 10 and most of them performed below average academically.

    What about the others?
    Some are still confused and are opting for higher studies to gain more clarity (instead of the other way round), some never understood the science of it or gave up midway and want out of programming, others probably would(or might not) learn it the hard way on their boot-camps their jobs want them to take before they start working for them.

    And what are the problems here?
    1. Way TOO MANY engineering seats across the country, scored dirt low on the entrance ? No problem you can still secure admission somewhere
    2. The entrance JEE doesn't test the candidate on the domain they will decide to take up (but so doesn't SAT I suppose) so most candidates have no clue what they are diving into for the next 4 years
    3. Tests and grading are a joke (but the education is probably not). I studied the common courses for Computer Science taught mostly all around the world - Linear Algebra, Discrete Maths, Data Structures, Algorithms, Object Oriented Fundamentals, Operating Systems, Computer Networks, Compilers, Databases, Microprocessors, and bunch of other subjects and we were referring to the latest editions of books from popular global publishers available for these subjects, but the teachers seemed to never grasp the whole thing themselves. Zero tests that actually test the practical skills in these subjects - ask someone to setup a subnet, ask someone to traverse a graph, ask someone to write a simple bash script or handle some deployment and see them shit their pants - but these are the same students who would top the theory exams (who am I kidding, I passed all my finals by studying two days before each of them). And the grading, the graders would not analyze your solutions only check for the word checklist they have with them, go a bit different and you are doomed. (I and one of my friend thought it would be a good idea to write a linear solution to one of the questions on exam and most others as expected wrote a quadratic solution, guess who were the lowest scoring students for the test)

    1. Re:From an Indian graduate's perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK. this is 1 out of 140 Indians that I would probably hire and maybe that is the honest rate at which the thrust in Indian diplomas should be regarded. .

  57. Fake news by HBI · · Score: 1

    Typical leftist - you want the Rorschach blot of a mental case to fit your views, same as your deluded friends at the Guardian. Too bad that his associates called him a leftist before he grew so unbalanced that it was hard to tell. Quoth Wikipedia:

    "Records show that Loughner was registered as an Independent and voted in 2006 and 2008, but not in 2010.[39][40]

    Loughner's high-school friend Zach Osler said, "He did not watch TV; he disliked the news; he didn't listen to political radio; he didn't take sides; he wasn't on the Left; he wasn't on the Right."[18] A former classmate, Caitie Parker, who attended high school and college with Loughner, described his political views prior to 2007, prior to his personality transformation, as "left wing, quite liberal,"[41] "radical."[42] The tone of Loughner's online writings and videos from immediately before the attack were described by The Guardian as "almost exclusively conservative and anti-government, with echoes of the populist campaigning of the Tea Party movement".[43]

    Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center said that Loughner's political positions were a "hallmark of the far right and the militia movement."[44] Jesse Walker of Reason expressed deep scepticism at the connections drawn by Potok.[45] In the aftermath of the shooting, the Anti-Defamation League reviewed messages by Loughner, and concluded that there was a "disjointed theme that runs through Loughner's writings", which was a "distrust for and dislike of the government." It "manifested itself in various ways" – for instance, in the belief that the government used the control of language and grammar to brainwash people, the notion that the government was creating "infinite currency" without the backing of gold and silver, or the assertion that NASA was faking spaceflights."

    You can read it yourself, with links at Wikipedia.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  58. Re: the nazis did Population Control on the jews a by zaphirplane · · Score: 1

    What's the relevance of your comment

  59. You used the plural by dbIII · · Score: 1

    You used the plural so you don't get to move the goalposts to the single nation with "11 supercarriers with accompanying battlegroups"

    If you meant becoming the world's leading economy you should have written so instead of attempting to "correct" my opinion that China and India are now among the leading economies of the world.

  60. Definition and meaning of Engineer term is not the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recall reading analysis of curriculum which concluded India definition of engineer includes those running Cable, etc.

  61. The land of Fake credentials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have met so many Indians full of diplomas and certifications that have the IT skills of a high-school student from Europe that we no longer give any credibility to Indian papers. I think it became a state organized scam to make their workforce look more competent to the foreign companies. Stay away from Indian diplomas.

  62. When an instution fails, the thing to do is ... by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    Come to think of it, this is just an instance of Herbert Stein's Law, though not an obvious one. "If something cannot go on forever, it will stop."

    There are groups of people and institutions which suffer bad consequences due to this failure of vastly inferior engineering colleges to meet minimum expectations. These people and institutions have an incentive to figure out what to do about it, and do it. And have incentives to quit doing things that don't work or work so well they are no longer necessary.

    Whoever would be in charge of mandating internships -- especially if it's a government or quasi-government agency -- would operate under a different set of incentives.

    Being successful may not be at the top of its list of things to consider. (Or even on the list.)

    Abolishing itself after unremitting failure (or spectacular success) definitely isn't.

    I wonder why the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) didn't simply publish statistics showing unemployment rates for graduates of engineering colleges? (Or just the ones that don't suck?) That seems an obvious approach.

    But I don't wonder much.

    Seems like a great opportunity for a company like Yelp.

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  63. Devalue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You want to ensure that interns aren't paid? This is how you ensure that interns aren't paid.