Slashdot Mirror


French Company Plans To Heat Homes, Offices With AMD Ryzen Pro Processors

At its Ryzen Pro event in New York City last month, AMD invited a French company called Qarnot to discuss how they're using Ryzen Pro processors to heat homes and offices for free. The company uses the Q.rad -- a heater that embeds three CPUs as a heat source -- to accomplish this feat. "We reuse the heat they generate to heat homes and offices for free," the company says in a blog post. "Q.rad is connected to the internet and receives in real time workloads from our in-house computing platform."

The idea is that anyone in the world can send heavy workloads over the cloud to a Q.rad and have it render the task and heat a person's home in the process. The two industries that are targeted by Qarnot include movies studios for 3D rendering and VFX, and banks for risk analysis. Qarnot is opting in for Ryzen Pro processors over Intel i7 processors due to the performance gain and heat output. According to Qarnot, they "saw a performance gain of 30-45% compared to the Intel i7." They also report that the Ryzen Pro is "producing the same heat as the equivalent Intel CPUs" they were using -- all while providing twice as many cores.

While it's neat to see a company convert what would otherwise be wasted heat into a useful asset that heats a person's home, it does raise some questions about the security and profitability of their business model. By using Ryzen Pro's processors, OS independent memory encryption is enabled to provide additional security layers to Qarnot's heaters. However, Q.rads are naturally still going to be physically unsecured as they can be in anyone's house.

Further reading: The Mac Observer, TechRepublic

181 comments

  1. physical access by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 1

    It will be interesting to see what measures are taken to limit risk of tampering with the devices to gain access to the platform and/or to simply peg cpu utilization for more heat output.

    1. Re:physical access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      the 'heaters' function as compute farms, i'm sure the processors are running at 100% whenever the unit is on (they are thermostatically controlled, btw).

      they pay back the electricity used, so it's a win-win for all involved.

      too bad they don't deal with ordinary households (minimum deployment is 20 units), i'd take like four of them (and they would run non-stop 7-8 months out of the year here).

    2. Re:physical access by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a Groupon to me.

    3. Re:physical access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there's any market in putting these in water heaters, which are generally stable places for electric heat...

    4. Re:physical access by The123king · · Score: 2

      Yeh, lets chuck a bunch of $500 processors into a bucket of water! What's the worst that can happen?!?!

      --
      If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
    5. Re: physical access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you chuck a bare 2kw heating element in a bucket of water it wouldn't work either which is why that never happens.

    6. Re:physical access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, Slashdot must be getting stupider or something.

      It's like people don't know that water-coolers translate to heat transfer units.

    7. Re: physical access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did I somehow miss that today is April 1?

    8. Re: physical access by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      For sure, because they wouldn't design accordingly or anything; that'd just be... too intelligent?

    9. Re: physical access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be difficult. Processors typically run at 60 degrees Celsius or so. This is fine for room heating, but somewhat low for heating a water storage tank.

    10. Re:physical access by mysidia · · Score: 1

      You don't chuck it in directly.... you pump water through a water block heatsink containing heat exchanges mounted directly on the CPU it's called a "Watercooled" processor, but in this case you gather the heat into the liquid, and after pumping through a large number of heat exchangers, the water becomes hot.

  2. Electricity bill? by pahles · · Score: 1

    Who is paying?

    --
    Sig?
    1. Re:Electricity bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      From their website: "The Q.rad produces heat by computation, the electricity consumption is measured by an embedded counter and related expenses are automatically refunded to the host."

    2. Re:Electricity bill? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1, Insightful

      From their website: "The Q.rad produces heat by computation, the electricity consumption is measured by an embedded counter and related expenses are automatically refunded to the host."

      . . . refunded . . . ?!? Like, when . . . ?!?!? When "monkeys fly out of their asses" is probably the correct answer.

      "Thank you for your participation in our ThinkFarter initiative!" You will receive a prototype of our device real soon now!"

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Electricity bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they don't pay your bills you could always keep the rizen.

    4. Re:Electricity bill? by Boutzev · · Score: 1

      I think you pay the Ryzen, then you have free heating and you don't pay for electricity.

      If both heating and electricity is free - what's the point for the company to install them in YOUR house ?

    5. Re:Electricity bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about physical hosting charges? You have to pay get your website hosted on some server farm. So why can't the homeowners hosting these machines get paid for hosting as well?

    6. Re:Electricity bill? by v1nce29 · · Score: 1

      they're selling computing power. You don't own the rizen. You just got a heating system for free (you don't have to pay the bill). Qarnot doesn't have to cooldown their computer centre.

    7. Re:Electricity bill? by skids · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Reliability: they get a physically distributed compute network that is diverse across geography, utility, and ISP, with next to no telcom hotel costs. Possibly also some renewable/cogen energy credits of whatever form they take in the host country.

      (As to the comment below, given what they are using them for, the bandwidth requirements are likely rather small... they transfer chunks of input data and then munch on them for a good long while.)

      I wonder what they have for local storage. ISTR from my BOINC days that most applications wanted a hefty storage area so their job servers didn't have to be arsed to talk to the nodes more than once a day or so. Also best to do due diligence and ask them to verify no wifi adaptors in there... they probably aren't pricks surrepticiously trying to build an access network, but these days companies really need to be forced to promise that in writing/website just in case.

      Most critical thing I learned from my BOINC days though: find out how much noise these things make. If they are purely radiant, kudos to this company.

    8. Re:Electricity bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have to pay electricity themselves for cooling, nor rent for a location or even the hardware itself and they get redundancy via a distributed net with multiple ISPs and multiple sites.

      Doesn't sound like a bad deal for them at all.

    9. Re:Electricity bill? by skids · · Score: 2

      By the way, called it.

      (I guess I might be to blame for the WiFi. Oh well. Nothing terms of service, SLAs, and a firewall policy can't fix.)

    10. Re:Electricity bill? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      what's the point for the company to install them in YOUR house ?

      Because server farms are expensive.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    11. Re:Electricity bill? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Because they are already being compensated with free heating.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    12. Re:Electricity bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is diverse across geography -> no. To quote from the blog post linked in the original article:

      "1500 AMD Ryzen PRO will heat homes and offices next year in Bordeaux, France"

      That is not really geography diverse - it is all within one city or area.

    13. Re:Electricity bill? by tbuddy · · Score: 1

      This free meal tastes terrible, and the portion is too small.

    14. Re:Electricity bill? by skids · · Score: 1

      Gotta start somewhere.

    15. Re:Electricity bill? by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Who is paying?

      The end user has to pay the electricity bill anyways. A processor is no less efficient at producing heat from electricity than a space heater. In both cases, electricity goes in and heat goes out. I would have no problem installing one in my house especially if I got a percentage of the profit as that would just be free money. The only problem I see with this is that my heater only runs about 3 months out of the year. As another poster mentioned, this would seem like a better match for a water heater that runs year around.

    16. Re:Electricity bill? by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1

      They don't have to foot the expense of dispatching the excess heat. In a data center, heat is a major issue that costs money to deal with. They profit by a) leasing the processing power and b) reducing overhead costs.

    17. Re:Electricity bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Computer cycles aren't a form of energy, you moron.

    18. Re:Electricity bill? by fgouget · · Score: 1

      "1500 AMD Ryzen PRO will heat homes and offices next year in Bordeaux, France"

      That is not really geography diverse - it is all within one city or area.

      That's their next deployment. They already have customers in the Paris area.

    19. Re:Electricity bill? by fgouget · · Score: 1

      Gotta start somewhere.

      Qarnot was founded roughly 4 years ago and also has customers in the Paris area.

    20. Re:Electricity bill? by fgouget · · Score: 1

      I wonder what they have for local storage. ISTR from my BOINC days that most applications wanted a hefty storage area so their job servers didn't have to be arsed to talk to the nodes more than once a day or so.

      From the Qarnot FAQ: In addition, Q.rads computing nodes are stateless without any storage.

    21. Re:Electricity bill? by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      A space heater is designed to convert as much electricity as possible into heat, a CPU is designed to convert as much electricity as possible into CPU cycles...

      Yes, a CPU is designed to use as little energy as possible but that doesn't change the fact that 100% of the energy it uses is converted into heat. A CPU bank that consumes 1500 watts of power converts that 1500 watts into heat with the exact same conversion ratio (100%) as a 1500 watt space heater. The fact that a CPU bank also does useful computations while converting that electricity to heat doesn't change the fact that just like a space heater, all the energy it consumes is converted directly into heat.

    22. Re:Electricity bill? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Actually since information is a reduction of entropy the math says that a CPU consuming 1500W and doing useful work produces (a miniscule amount) less heat than the direct conversion of the energy from electrons to heat.

      Of course that is just pedantry because the real world value of the delta is below the noise threshold of any instrumentation a /.er would likely have access to.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    23. Re:Electricity bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd think they'd be picking up additional overhead though with the now mobile IT department.

      "Looks like fan 3 went out in node 007. Send James."
      James drives out in the company repair truck to node 007, taking an hour+ in traffic to get there. Deals with gaining access because the landlord didn't tell the new property manager about the server in the basement. Finally gains access to the room only to find the rack is behind a pile tenant junk in the storage area. Moves everything, with the property manager barking about touching tenant property. At last, with full access, replaces the 10cent fan. Moves all the crap back infront of the rack because of legal issues the property manager is flipping out over. Takes another hour+ to get back to the depot.

      Even better scenario:
      "Looks like node 007 is over heating again."
      Same driving conditions. Same access issues. Come to find out cheap tenant was drying their cloths on the air intake or fence/cage surrounding the rack, again.

    24. Re: Electricity bill? by Boycott+BMG · · Score: 1

      Do you understand the difference between information entropy and thermodynamic entropy? Unless the processor is somehow able to suspend the laws of thermodynamics, the energy is completely converted to heat.

    25. Re:Electricity bill? by careysub · · Score: 2

      Nonsense of course. They would write off processors that go down and drop them from their system. Periodically they may change out whole modules is most of them fail.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    26. Re:Electricity bill? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      but that doesn't change the fact that 100% of the energy it uses is converted into heat.
      Thats wrong.
      If you would convert 100% of the energy consumed into heat, it would not do a single computation.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    27. Re:Electricity bill? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      A processor is no less efficient at producing heat from electricity than a space heater.

      The processor might produce LESS heat per Watt input than a resistive coil; given that a portion of the energy is being used for computation operations that dissipate some energy as other high-entropy forms that are not heat.

    28. Re: Electricity bill? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately pumping electricity trough a electric device has absolutely nothing to do with the laws of thermodynamics.

      Next time try better.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    29. Re:Electricity bill? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      A CPU bank that consumes 1500 watts of power converts that 1500 watts into heat with the exact same conversion ratio (100%) as a 1500 watt space heater.

      No.... in either case SOME of the 1500 Watts will convert into forms of energy such as mechanical sound waves that don't heat the room, this it will be less than 100%.

      Also, both Space Heater AND CPU are terribly inefficient heaters, regarding the amount of heat generated to the source fuel; Heat Pumps are much preferred and can reach energy efficiency levels >= 300%.

    30. Re: Electricity bill? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Not all heat dissipated contributes towards heating up the air that is in the room; some energy will be released in other forms such as electromagnetic noise or radiation that escapes the room.

      CPUs aren't really designed as space heaters, so they have a relatively small resistor surface area, and a massive number of transistors, and the switching could generate various forms of EMR.

    31. Re: Electricity bill? by Boycott+BMG · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? The laws of thermodynamics apply everywhere. This should be obvious when discussing an article about heating buildings using electricity.

    32. Re: Electricity bill? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      No they don't.
      Last time I gave about 20 examples.
      Now I give you only one: photo electric effect. Photon hits electron. Electron gets into higher 'orbit'. Electron drops down again, emitting the exact same photon.
      No thermodynamics involved.
      You americans have a complete retarded idea what thermodynamics is about.
      Hint: google it. Amoung the first hits is the relevant wikipedia article. Facepalm.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    33. Re: Electricity bill? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I do in fact.
      Here's a citation:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_in_thermodynamics_and_information_theory#Information_is_physical
      and the relevant portion:

      Using a phase-contrast microscope equipped with a high speed camera connected to a computer, as demon, the principle has been actually demonstrated.[3] In this experiment, information to energy conversion is performed on a Brownian particle by means of feedback control; that is, synchronizing the work given to the particle with the information obtained on its position. Computing energy balances for different feedback protocols, has confirmed that the Jarzynski equality requires a generalization that accounts for the amount of information involved in the feedback.

      Additional links:
      http://physicsworld.com/cws/ar...
      https://physics.stackexchange....
      https://www.newscientist.com/a...

      -natch

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    34. Re:Electricity bill? by alhayat · · Score: 1
    35. Re: Electricity bill? by interstellarsurfer · · Score: 1

      Unless the thing is so damn loud that you can hear it outside the home, that sound energy is converted into dispersed heat in the furnishings and walls of the home.

  3. District Heating Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much heat do the current processors produce compared to a coal power plant when build as compactly as electrically possible? In the future as those coal power plants go quiet, new sources of heat might be useful for pumping heat to those city wide district heating systems. No physical access in the customer premises required.

    1. Re:District Heating Systems by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      How much heat do the current processors produce compared to a coal power plant when build as compactly as electrically possible?

      A miniscule fraction. As far as I am aware, there are plenty of different ways the water is heated up for district heating systems and the amounts of water being heated up, but we're generally talking about megawatt- or gigawatt-ranges -- you'd need tens to hundreds of thousands of these CPUs running to match the thermal output.

    2. Re:District Heating Systems by egladil · · Score: 4, Informative

      Using data centers to feed the district heating system is already on its way here in Sweden: Bahnhofs Datacenter Pionen an Open District Heating Pilot

    3. Re:District Heating Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Using data centers to feed the district heating system is already on its way here in Sweden: Bahnhofs Datacenter Pionen an Open District Heating Pilot

      And was implemented in Finland already 5 years ago: Tieto Press release
      "the centre produces 30 GW of heat, which is equivalent to the annual heat requirement of about 1 500 houses but, through new investments, the amount will increase significantly. The heat from the data centre will be distributed to homes in Espoo via Fortum's district heating network, replacing some fossil-fuel based heat production."

  4. Advanced Melting Devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing AMD processors do well is generate a lot of heat.

    1. Re:Advanced Melting Devices by Z80a · · Score: 1

      The Ryzen are actually quite cold if compared to the bulldozer line.
      That i9 line of CPUs from intel is packing quite a heat, specially when using AVX512.

    2. Re:Advanced Melting Devices by ledow · · Score: 3, Informative

      Call it 100W per processor.

      You'd need a 20-processor board to match a small conventional mini-heater which would barely heat one room in the winter.

      Though the heat should be used, I'm not sure that using it for direct home heating is really worthwhile. Sure, a datacenter pushing out hundreds of thousands of watts of generated heat is probably able to help heat the swimming-pool in a leisure complex next door (to mutual benefit), I'm not sure it really stands up as a solution once distance of any kind is involved.

      I could fill the basement of a tower block with rack servers, but it probably wouldn't be enough to heat even the first few floors or so of residential apartments. And for most of the year, and in fact most of the time it's running even in winter, it would be venting that stuff to the outside air or dialling back the power rather than have the systems overheat.

    3. Re:Advanced Melting Devices by skids · · Score: 1

      My cretinous old fire-hazard office radiant space heater is 800W. These appear to be 500W. I almost never run mine on full power.

      These don't appear to be high radiance units as they are partly convective, but I have seen similar mostly-touch-safe (not that you'd want to) wall units in use in homes... my friend has one over his couch and it works pretty well... the rest of the house doesn't have to be heated quite so much if you throw heat where you are sitting.

      If it weren't for the side-benefit of the CPU power, you're always better off not wasting electricity on heat, but space heating can be cost effective if you cannot afford to invest in a better solution.

    4. Re:Advanced Melting Devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in college, my roommates and I heated our house with a room full of workstations that we picked up for $200 from our university's surplus material warehouse. Seriously, that place was a treasure trove of nearly free junk that provided a better education than the classes they offered.

    5. Re:Advanced Melting Devices by fgouget · · Score: 2

      Call it 100W per processor.

      You'd need a 20-processor board to match a small conventional mini-heater which would barely heat one room in the winter.

      They are mostly targeting new building that, by law, have to follow low-energy standards and thus need much less heating.

      Though the heat should be used, I'm not sure that using it for direct home heating is really worthwhile.

      Datacenters need lots of cooling and lots of infrastructure for redundancy. Here redundancy is provided by geographical distribution: if a town block loses power then that only impacts a small part of the computing capacity. Same for Internet connectivity. And cooling is not needed. Finally the buildings these devices are heating would have needed heating anyway. So when you compare the two, on one side you need to add the energy needed for the computing, cooling and providing redundancy to the datacenter, and heating the buildings that would have been Qarnot customers; and on the other side, just heating Qarnot customers. So that gives the Qarnot system a good edge from an energy consumption standpoint (which is a significant part of the costs for a datacenter). I'll concede to some hidden costs if you look at it more globally: Qarnot still needs some central servers to distribute the work (but that's not much) and it increases Internet traffic which is not as energy efficient as just distributing data inside a datacenter.

    6. Re:Advanced Melting Devices by fgouget · · Score: 1

      These don't appear to be high radiance units as they are partly convective, but I have seen similar mostly-touch-safe (not that you'd want to) wall units in use in homes...

      From the Qarnot FAQ: Q.rad can heat a 150 to 250 sq. feet room in a building meeting modern isolation standards. The Q.rad is a system with high inertia and produces a high quality soft heat as opposed to electrical convectors.

      The conventional equivalent would somewhere between a low temperature surface heater and an oil filled electric radiator.

    7. Re:Advanced Melting Devices by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure it really stands up as a solution once distance of any kind is involved.

      You're assuming the distance is lossy. In this case its lossless. 600W not heat my room? Maybe, but then that's 600W my natural gas based central heating system doesn't need to put out.

    8. Re:Advanced Melting Devices by supremebob · · Score: 1

      My old electric fan space heater was rated for 1,500W max, but in reality only drew 1,200W from the outlet.

      I have a bunch that a board with 4 AMD EPYC processors could easily pull that much current when running under full load. Maybe they'll do that for the "deluxe" model space heater... you know, the one with the fake flickering flames on the front of it.

      Personally, I want to know what the company is doing to prevent you from hacking the file system on these systems to prevent customers from screwing with customer data.

    9. Re:Advanced Melting Devices by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Seattle too. Westin Building to Amazon campus.

      http://www.seattletimes.com/bu...

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    10. Re:Advanced Melting Devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I want to know what the company is doing to prevent you from hacking the file system on these systems to prevent customers from screwing with customer data.

      Per Qarnot, the systems are stateless, but of course that's got to be wrong.

    11. Re:Advanced Melting Devices by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      I would use the new encrypted computation library by Philips.

      Encrypted values go in, encrypted values go out, and only the customer will be able to decrypt the results. Good luck hacking that. The downside is it uses more computing power. But it is extremely secure.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    12. Re:Advanced Melting Devices by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      To clarify: the input is NEVER decrypted. All computations are done on the encrypted values.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    13. Re: Advanced Melting Devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to do this at home... Running 5 2u chassis with dual dual core opterons... Keeps it pretty toasty at least in the room with the rack.

    14. Re:Advanced Melting Devices by godrik · · Score: 1

      I think you are overestimating how much power these heaters consume. I used to warm my apartment in Grenoble with 800W heaters. (one per window kind of thing). So You could easily get that with processors. You are also ignoring storage and memory in your wattage count.

      Also, even if you have a lower power heater, it is still a good thing if it is free to you. because you can let that heater on 24/7. While your conventional heater will probably go in and out during the day. Maybe you are using a 2000W heater, but it is not running 24 hours a day. The integral is heating is mostly what matters.

      Think also of all the case where you are not home (or in that room) but you still do not want your home/room to get too cold. A smaller heater would do that.

    15. Re:Advanced Melting Devices by unixisc · · Score: 1

      In the 90s, they could have used the highest frequency DEC Alphas of the day to do the heating. Has the Itanium been EOLed, or is it still around? If it is, and if they can get a discount from Intel, they could use that for the heat generation

  5. What do they do during the summer? by Entrope · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know the French take a vacation in August, but it seems like you wouldn't want a space heater running during any of the summer. Even if you have air conditioning, you'd have to pay more to pump the generated great out of your home.

    1. Re:What do they do during the summer? by Gaygirlie · · Score: 2

      That's what I was thinking. It's not like they can just turn the machines off during summer-times, their whole cloud-computing platform would be basically rendered useless during summer if they did. They could turn the machines off during business-hours, but again, that'd bring the platform's uptime down drastically, and it wouldn't solve the heating-problem at all, as it takes a long time for big buildings to cool down.

      I don't see how this would make much sense in an office-building, but I suppose it could be somewhat useful for storage-spaces, where it doesn't matter if it gets a little toasty during summers, but you don't want temperatures to drop below, say, +10C during winters.

    2. Re:What do they do during the summer? by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      I am sure you can still unplug the unit. Maybe they can make it into a hot plate or a griddle.

    3. Re:What do they do during the summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vent the heat outside instead of inside?

    4. Re:What do they do during the summer? by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      I know the French take a vacation in August, but it seems like you wouldn't want a space heater running during any of the summer. Even if you have air conditioning, you'd have to pay more to pump the generated great out of your home.

      I don't know if you have noticed (and it just may be some Northern hemisphere bias kicking in) but the internet doesn't care what part of the world you live in. So if its hot in one location you could just as easily direct your traffic to a location where it is cold, and heat that spot.

      If I can think of that 5 seconds after reading your post then I am sure there are even more sophisticated solutions being thought up at Qarnot.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    5. Re:What do they do during the summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know the French take a vacation in August, but it seems like you wouldn't want a space heater running during any of the summer. Even if you have air conditioning, you'd have to pay more to pump the generated great out of your home.

      What happens in summer? What happens when there are no computation tasks to run?

      The processors of the Q.rads are regulated to meet the target temperature defined by the end-user. The computing power is naturally impacted by seasonality. By using processors low power modes and by choosing adapted deployment sites, Qarnot manages to keep a minimum computing capacity all year long. To compute all-year round when computing demand is higher than the deployed capacity, Qarnot also starts to have partnerships with green data centers and to develop other products for sites that need heat all year long (water, industry/agriculture).

      Qarnot computing is setting up partnerships with private and public research centers and labs which regularly launch computation campaigns that can last up to several years. Such campaigns include BOINC and many other academic projects. Thus, Q.rads will always have a background buffer of useful computations to process to produce heat when inhabitants need heating.

    6. Re: What do they do during the summer? by Entrope · · Score: 1

      Turning half your installed equipment off for a third to half of the year seems like it will really stretch out the time to break even on it -- I don't think margins on cloud computing are that fat.

      If I could think of that in half a second after thinking that maybe they'd just turn things of during the summer, maybe you could too.

    7. Re:What do they do during the summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fair enough, but most of the densely-populated areas in the Southern Hemisphere have very mild winters

    8. Re:What do they do during the summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I know the French take a vacation in August [...]

      Heh. That would make computing power cheaper in winter (which luckily alternates between North and South, but I guess the population in need of winter heating is significantly bigger North, so...)

      That means precompute all those word vectors and facial Haar transforms and whatnot in winter.

    9. Re:What do they do during the summer? by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      He's also not thinking about bandwidth, the Southern Hemisphere in general has pretty shitty internet (although I am sure there are exceptions, as with anything).

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    10. Re:What do they do during the summer? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It seems like they would be better used to heat water, since even in summer people want hot water.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:What do they do during the summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just run a reverse proxy in summer to slurp up the heat.

      Anyhoo, it is long past 1 April, so why was this crap published?

    12. Re: What do they do during the summer? by v1nce29 · · Score: 0

      To feed the cpu they need a fiber connexion so I guess they'll propose cheap subscription

    13. Re: What do they do during the summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your central heating unit working in summer just for the sake of it?

      No. But my "central heating" isn't owned by a Cloud Computing company that needs to recoup their expenses by having it produce output. Also, my "central heating" is actually a reverse cycle AC unit so it actually is on during summer, cooling the place.

    14. Re:What do they do during the summer? by gwolf · · Score: 1

      Well, their terms of service could include the fact that it's mandatory for owners to ship their boxes to Argentina, Australia or South Africa by April, and have it sent back by October.

    15. Re: What do they do during the summer? by Entrope · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what the standard is in Europe for in-home heat generation, but in the US, water heaters (which need to direct heat to a relatively small vessel) are separate from central heating systems and space heaters (which both want to distribute heat to the general indoor "environment"). How were you thinking this would work? Like an electric kettle, or hooked into the home's hot water system? Neither seems very practical, given the vessel vs environment heating problem.

    16. Re:What do they do during the summer? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      The clever thing to do would be to operate in multiple countries, such that you could ship the workload around the world. That only works for customers who can afford the latency, but if you're selling both compute time and heating, you might be able to lower your prices such that it becomes attractive to enough people to make it profitable.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:What do they do during the summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple explanation on their website: https://www.qarnot.com/faq/

    18. Re:What do they do during the summer? by fgouget · · Score: 1

      I know the French take a vacation in August, but it seems like you wouldn't want a space heater running during any of the summer.

      From the Qarnot FAQ:

      The processors of the Q.rads are regulated to meet the target temperature defined by the end-user. The computing power is naturally impacted by seasonality. By using processors low power modes and by choosing adapted deployment sites, Qarnot manages to keep a minimum computing capacity all year long. To compute all-year round when computing demand is higher than the deployed capacity, Qarnot also starts to have partnerships with green data centers and to develop other products for sites that need heat all year long (water, industry/agriculture).

      Qarnot computing is setting up partnerships with private and public research centers and labs which regularly launch computation campaigns that can last up to several years. Such campaigns include BOINC and many other academic projects. Thus, Q.rads will always have a background buffer of useful computations to process to produce heat when inhabitants need heating.

    19. Re:What do they do during the summer? by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Gosh, why didn't they think of that. Oh wait, they did:

      FTFA

      In the meantime, we are considering AMD’s CPUs and GPUs, as we are working on new products, including a boiler for domestic hot water and swimming pool heating solutions.

    20. Re:What do they do during the summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computationally intensive tasks are far from always I/O-intensive.

    21. Re:What do they do during the summer? by judoguy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      All residential buildings have need for domestic water heating all year long.

      This particular scheme might turn out not to be practical but the basic idea is great.

      Rather than paying gobs of money to waste heat from a server farm, use it to heat something you need to heat anyway.

      I bet we've all seen the situation at work where the company is heating the building with a conventional HVAC system and at the same time refrigerating the server room. This can be difficult to fix after construction, but should grow more common in the design phase as time goes by.

      --
      Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
    22. Re: What do they do during the summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see, in Europe we frequently have these ingenious devices called "boilers", frequently located in the basement of the building.

      They are of such devious design that when you apply heat in them, either by means of either combustion or electricity, they heat water in two separate loops. One is for hot water, and goes to the hot water vessel, and the other one is a closed loop, possibly connected to a massive, insulated accumulation tank, which stores the heat until it's circulated.

      Shocking, isn't it?

      There is no reason you could have the same deal with this. One heat source, two loops.

    23. Re: What do they do during the summer? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      I have one of those at my house in California.
      Works great

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    24. Re:What do they do during the summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, there is more to the world than the Northern Hemisphere. If they manage the proper partnerships, they could do similar units in the Southern Hemisphere, like Argentina, South Africa, and Australia.

    25. Re: What do they do during the summer? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      water heaters (which need to direct heat to a relatively small vessel) are separate from central heating systems and space heaters
      Separated circuits, same heater. Same gas connection, same flame.
      Everything lese would be plain stupid.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    26. Re: What do they do during the summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      standard is in Europe for in-home heat generation

      Usually it's a gas/oil boiler that provides for both radiator and tap circuits, larger ones drive a separate heat exchanger for tap water.

  6. security doesn't necessarily matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There's a lot of work that requires big data crunching abilities of entirely public data sets for non-secret purposes. A master's thesis based on publicly available data (if it's ever that affordable). Professional researchers and professors without easy access to HPC but working on data or results that are not confidential. Maybe they have the budget for this. I think there's a lot of potential here.

    1. Re:security doesn't necessarily matter by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      BOINC figured it out. Loads computation tasks on any system.

    2. Re:security doesn't necessarily matter by ErroneousBee · · Score: 1
      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
  7. Power efficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to Qarnot, they "saw a performance gain of 30-45% compared to the Intel i7." They also report that the Ryzen Pro is "producing the same heat as the equivalent Intel CPUs" they were using -- all while providing twice as many cores.

    So use twice as many Intel processors and you'll heat the houses faster.

  8. Why even supply hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not write a background application that I can run/throttle and just pay me for work done? I would leave my computer on at night in the winter. Beside that this is a good idea. Paying for entropy (heat) always seemed like a wasted opportunity.

  9. Why use 12 cents of nichrome wire by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Funny

    When you can use $600 of silicon to do the job?

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Why use 12 cents of nichrome wire by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      When you can use $600 of silicon to do the job?

      Which job? Nichrome wire can solve computing problems? Or are you under the impression that supercomputers won't exist and those $600 of silicon won't get bought if it weren't for the spaceheaters?

      Remember this is using waste heat, not waste processing.

    2. Re:Why use 12 cents of nichrome wire by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Because this is utilizing the waste of one process (computing) for another useful purpose (heating), and results in net benefits for everyone. The office doesn't pay for heating, and the party utilizing the computing doesn't pay for cooling.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:Why use 12 cents of nichrome wire by dddux · · Score: 1

      The thing is, pal, nothing is being wasted. That's all. Is it so hard to comprehend?

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
  10. I've been doing this for months by The123king · · Score: 1

    Whenever i get cold, i just fire up my dual Xeon workstation and let it run a bit of number crunching for LHC@home

    --
    If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
  11. Are they a startup? by excelsior_gr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because this business model is not well though-of. Internet informs me that AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X consumes 95 W of power, much like an old-school light-bulb. Crappy oil radiators seem to start at 600 W (about 6 CPUs) and better ones have a power consumption of up to 2500 W (26 CPUs). Having used such radiators myself, I would definitely go with the bigger one. Other points of interest are the surface area, the surface temperature and the heat transfer mechanism that are different between a 2500 W oil radiator and a 26 CPU rack. Even if the CPUs reach a rather elevated temperature (1700X maxes out at 95 C), the surface temperature of the rack is only going to be luke warm, so you're not going to get any heat radiated to you. The heat is going to reach you by convection via the fans, which is a crappy way to warm yourself up. Then you would need a full rack at least in every other room to heat up a whole home, which will take up a lot of space.

    If you're going to run a data center, the only thing this will save is the real-estate space. The costs of installation, transportation etc, however, are going to eat away most of the savings in my opinion. I suppose, of course, that Qarnot will be paying for the electricity. If not, then they are just looking for chumps that would be better off switching back to incadescent light bulbs.

    1. Re:Are they a startup? by v1nce29 · · Score: 0

      I guess this is not the usual rack but something specially crafted for this special use. This probably should be combined with proper insulation (or you can just multiply them I think they'll be glossy dark so they'll look way better that dumb beige radiator). Anyway it'll still be better that dumb heating.

    2. Re:Are they a startup? by esperto · · Score: 1
      And also the noise, imagine a rack of servers at full load, it will not generate that much heat, but it will sound like a jet engine.

      I guess they wouldn't have the costs of a datacenter, but also wouldn't have the benefits, like fast network, someone nearby to solve any issues (imagine a server shutsdown in the middle of the night, on a weekend, and need a reset or to replace a part, will you dispatch a technician to the persons house immediately or wait until monday morning? what if they are not at home?), physical access control, no cat hair, etc.

      Besides that, using resistive heating is terribly energy inefficient, a heat pump is much more economical.

    3. Re:Are they a startup? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Servers are so loud because they use lots of tiny fans that have to spin very fast to move the required amount of air - large quiet fans simply wouldn't fit into a 1U case. If these servers are supposed to heat the building, they can be installed in a fully passive cooled case which would be essentially silent.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    4. Re:Are they a startup? by fgouget · · Score: 2

      And also the noise, imagine a rack of servers at full load, it will not generate that much heat, but it will sound like a jet engine.

      From their FAQ: Q.rads are totally silent since there are no mobile parts inside the Q.rad (no ventilators, no hard drives).

      I guess they wouldn't have the costs of a datacenter, but also wouldn't have the benefits, like fast network, someone nearby to solve any issues (imagine a server shutsdown in the middle of the night,

      See above: no moving part. This greatly improves reliability. Plus, still from their FAQ: In addition, Q.rads computing nodes are stateless without any storage.. Finally this is distributed computing, no server is critical. If one device dies down, then just direct the workload to any other.

      Besides that, using resistive heating is terribly energy inefficient, a heat pump is much more economical.

      Datacenters need lots of cooling and lots of infrastructure for redundancy. Here redundancy is provided by geographical distribution: if a town block loses power then that only impacts a small part of the computing capacity. Same for Internet connectivity. And cooling is not needed. Finally the buildings these devices are heating would have needed heating anyway. So when you compare the two, on one side you need to add the energy needed for the computing, cooling and providing redundancy to the datacenter, and heating the buildings that would have been Qarnot customers; and on the other side, just heating Qarnot customers. I'll concede to some hidden costs: Qarnot still needs some central servers to distribute the work (but that's not much) and it increases Internet traffic which is not as energy efficient as just distributing data inside a datacenter.

      And while I like heat pumps they are not very popular in France and do have drawbacks like a lot of noise and questionable power output depending on climate.

    5. Re:Are they a startup? by fgouget · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because this business model is not well though-of. Internet informs me that AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X consumes 95 W of power, much like an old-school light-bulb.

      95W to which you add power consumption for the motherboard chipset, RAM, network card, and power supply. Qarnot has been on the market for two years already so I'm pretty sure they know what they are doing by now.

      Crappy oil radiators seem to start at 600 W (about 6 CPUs) and better ones have a power consumption of up to 2500 W (26 CPUs).

      Bigger = better. Are you American? A 2600W heater is not any better if what you need is a 500W one. Also one big 2600W heater is not better than two 1300W ones as it concentrates all the heat in one place causing uneven heating. Finally they are mostly targeting new building that, by law, have to follow low-energy standards and thus need much less heating.

      Even if the CPUs reach a rather elevated temperature (1700X maxes out at 95 C), the surface temperature of the rack is only going to be luke warm, so you're not going to get any heat radiated to you.

      Wow! You don't know anything about heating, do you?

      High temperature heaters are really out of fashion because they cause lots of convection, moving the dust around, and because all the heat to go to the ceiling leaving the reat of the room, where you are, cold, thus increasing heating costs.

      So nowadays most everyone buys low temperature heaters that provide a mix of convection and heating via infrared radiation (with its ultimate form being underfloor heating). They provide a much more even heating which lets you turn the thermostat down and thus save on power.

      The heat is going to reach you by convection via the fans, which is a crappy way to warm yourself up.

      From the Qarnot FAQ: Q.rads are totally silent since there are no mobile parts inside the Q.rad (no ventilators, no hard drives).

      The costs of installation, transportation etc, however, are going to eat away most of the savings in my opinion.

      That's probably why they don't target individual houses. Again from their FAQ: For now, we only install Q.rads in buildings for a minimum of 20 units !

      I suppose, of course, that Qarnot will be paying for the electricity.

      Still from their FAQ: Qarnot computing sells the computing power of the Q.rads to companies and research centers. The selling of these services pays for the electricity used by the Q.rads and therefore the heating that is produced. Each Q.rad continuously records its energetic (kW/h) and computing (CPU.h) consumption which enables Qarnot to bill its computing clients and refund the electricity consumed.

    6. Re:Are they a startup? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still want one now!!.

      It'll keep my living room at a constant 21C through the winter, and when they go bust in the spring I'll get a free bitcoin mining system.."Quarnot, never heard of 'em. I think you've got the wrong address".

    7. Re:Are they a startup? by Hebbinator · · Score: 1

      The heat is going to reach you by convection via the fans, which is a crappy way to warm yourself up.

      Convection is a crappy way to warm up? Do you just set yourself on fire when you get cold? Or do you live in a vaccuum?

    8. Re:Are they a startup? by Solandri · · Score: 2

      Crappy oil radiators seem to start at 600 W (about 6 CPUs) and better ones have a power consumption of up to 2500 W (26 CPUs).

      Space heaters don't run constantly. They heat up until they (or the room) hits a certain temperature, then shut off. So a typically 1500 W heater (designed not to trip a circuit breaker providing 15A 11V = 1650 W in the U.S.). This electric company estimates a 1500 W heater will use 274 kWh in a month. 1 month is 730 hours, so that's just 375 W of consumption on average. In other words, they estimate it'll be turned on 25% of the time.

      So a 95 Watt CPU (125 Watt system) = 500 Watt heater. Just 3 of them will equal a typical 1500 W space heater.

      Even if the CPUs reach a rather elevated temperature (1700X maxes out at 95 C), the surface temperature of the rack is only going to be luke warm, so you're not going to get any heat radiated to you. The heat is going to reach you by convection via the fans, which is a crappy way to warm yourself up.

      Heat is heat. It's the entropic end-state of energy, so the form of heating doesn't really matter. 100 W of heating is 100 W of heating.

      Radiant heat feels better because it triggers the temperature sensing nerves in your skin, but it doesn't really warm you up any more than a convection heater. If you rely on a small radiant heater, you're gonna have to put on a sweater or wrap a blanket around yourself. Because your air temp is going to be a heckuva lot colder than a larger convection (air) heater, and you'll need the insulation to slow down the rate at which your body is losing heat to the air.

      The bigger problem with this idea is the relative thermal inefficiency of generating heat from electricity. See, although an electric heater is 100% efficient at converting electricity into heat, its energy source is not. With a localized heating source (oil or gas heat), the process of burning the fuel converts almost 100% of its energy into heat (a little is "lost" as light or vented to the atmosphere to remove exhaust gases). The same is true when generating electricity, except the heat is generated at the plant, not in your house. So if the power generation plant's efficiency is 40% (typical coal plant), then 60% of the energy in the coal becomes waste heat at the plant, and only 40% of the energy becomes electricity to heat your house.

      This is why a gas or oil or even a wood heater in your home is preferable to electric heat. And why power plants in cold climates often have co-generation plants which use that waste heat to send steam through pipes for industrial heating. Of course, this is France, which gets about 3/4 of its electricity from nuclear. So they probably don't care about efficiency, just cost.

    9. Re: Are they a startup? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of liquid cooling?

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    10. Re:Are they a startup? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most any heat pump available today is extremely quiet - both indoors and out with neither one getting much over the sound of your typical refrigerator.

      The days of whole-home outdoor units pumping 70+dBA whenever their on is coming to a close - variable speed fans, compressors, and variable refrigerant flow with high-pressure refrigerants make for some very quiet outdoor units (52dBA for many with some having maximum high-40dBA modes for night-time use). Indoor units rarely hit 50 dBA except on their highest fan setting.

      As to power output - if you're using one in sub-zero Fahrenheit temperatures you're not going to have a good time and you're going to almost always spend more than a hydrocarbon-fueled heater (boiler with radiators, forced hot air, etc). Most places that have that kind of climate already have these HC-based heat sources and aren't applicable.

    11. Re:Are they a startup? by koreanbabykilla · · Score: 1

      And while I like heat pumps they are not very popular in France and do have drawbacks like a lot of noise and questionable power output depending on climate.

      A ground source heat pump has no need for an outdoor unit with moving mechanical components: no external noise is produced.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    12. Re:Are they a startup? by fgouget · · Score: 1

      And while I like heat pumps they are not very popular in France and do have drawbacks like a lot of noise and questionable power output depending on climate.

      A ground source heat pump has no need for an outdoor unit with moving mechanical components: no external noise is produced.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      But they need a deep well or a lot of surface to install tubing for the heat exchanger which is not practical for the kind of large buildings targeted by Qarnot. So there is essentially no overlap between the two markets.

    13. Re:Are they a startup? by excelsior_gr · · Score: 1

      Yes, convection is crappy because radiation heating produces a much better warmth. I've had both air-conditioning heating and radiator heating in my appartment. The hot air that the AC produces does nothing to warm your feet, rises to the top and is not as comfortable as the radiator. However, as others have noted, this might be working using liquid cooling, which is not what I had in mind when I wrote the first comment. If you get the heat from the CPU directly into some liquid, you could use it for underfloor heating, which is awesome.

    14. Re:Are they a startup? by dddux · · Score: 1

      Gosh man, you should move to some tropical island. I used to have a 600W heater and only used 1 bar at all times. It had 3 bars.

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
  12. What a terrible idea. by cheesybagel · · Score: 2

    I know electricity is cheap in France because of nuclear power and all. But this is still a terrible idea. Resistive heating (which is what this is) is terribly inefficient compared with a heat pump like an air conditioner (which can in fact heat besides cool down buildings when run in reverse). It can use like 2-3x as much power to heat a building by the same amount.

    1. Re: What a terrible idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The point isn't to save on heating costs for consumers, it's to save on cooling cost for the company. Suddenly you don't have a huge building full of servers that you have to cool down which saves them a lot of money. Overall it's much more energy efficient.

    2. Re:What a terrible idea. by v1nce29 · · Score: 0

      This is a wonderfull idea. People are already using resisitive heating + people are already using internet that needs datacenters that you shoud cool down. With this solution you don't have to build new power plant to cool down datacenters because there's no need for datacenters (water, electricity,real estate) because they are decentralized

    3. Re:What a terrible idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're thinking about this backwards. This is free heating for the consumer (company pays for the electricity used by the devices), and it's a reduced cost computing for the company.

      I'll explain how it's reduced cost for the company:

      Company is only paying flat_amount1 + consumer_electric(t) instead of flat_amount2 + commercial_electric(t) + commercial_cooling(t). That means they're saving commercial_cooling(t) by giving away the waste heat to someone that's willing to put it to good use. Of course this raises the question of what the difference is between the flat rates and between the consumer and business electric rates, but I'm sure the company has already crunched the numbers and found them to be favorable, or they wouldn't be offering the devices to consumers.

    4. Re:What a terrible idea. by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Oh really? So what happens when Spring comes? You shut down your computers? I have been in France, it's quite cold but it isn't Canada or Scandinavia. It's kinda like living in Seattle. Office buildings use resistive heating? If that is true it is certainly quite surprising.

    5. Re:What a terrible idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This should work pretty well in colder countries where you might have issues using a heat pump during winter (most of them don't work very well below -20C).

      However, quite often in such countries most people don't heat their homes directly with electricity but e.g. with district heating from a combined heat and power plants. But if someone else pays for the electricity during the winter time I'd be happy to run those at home.

    6. Re:What a terrible idea. by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Which is of course wrong because even in France you'll need an air conditioner to cool down the building at some times of the year. Look at the record highs for Paris, France which is in the north of France.

    7. Re:What a terrible idea. by Goragoth · · Score: 1

      That would be a point if they were planning to just run loops of Prime95 on these things, but that's not what they are doing. The idea is that they will also be doing real work on them at the same time, work that would be done anyway, just with the waste heat pumped out of a data centre into the atmosphere. Like this the waste heat will be used productively instead. That doesn't mean this is a good idea (maybe it is, I don't know) but it can afford to be really inefficient heating since that's just a by-product.

    8. Re:What a terrible idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough* It's controlled by a thermostat, so you'll just turn it off when you don't want heating, and the company will pay someone else on opposite hemisphere to exchange free heat for compute cycles (yeah, that means they'll have more capacity when the northern hemisphere is cold, because that's where more people live).

    9. Re:What a terrible idea. by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Heat pumps are only effective when there's some heat in the outside air to pump. Typically, that's down to around 10 C. Below that, the heat is so scarce it takes more energy to pump it than to generate new heat. If the outside temp drops below that, the typical window-mounted heat pump shuts off and turns on an electric heating element (a resistive heater).

      This is why the more ambitious heat pump installations use a geothermal heat sink - loops of cooling (heating) pipes buried underground. The ground stays relatively close to 13 C year-round, providing an good, stable sink to pump heat out of in winter, into in summer.

      Anyhow, the PC heater is just finding a use of heat that would be generated anyway. So it's basically free heat.

    10. Re:What a terrible idea. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Resistive heating (which is what this is) is terribly inefficient compared with a heat pump like an air conditioner

      A heatpump is terribly inefficient compared to having a hot processor sitting somewhere with a cooling tower next to it.

      This isn't heatpump vs electric heating. This is heatpump vs waste heating. Anything you need to put any energy at all into will be less efficient than this system.

    11. Re:What a terrible idea. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Resistive heating (which is what this is) is terribly inefficient

      It'd be a bad idea if they weren't already doing something else in the process. Like, say, computing stuff and all that.

      To put it another way: the heat is a by-product.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re:What a terrible idea. by dddux · · Score: 1

      It is inefficient, but what is more efficient: not using it at all when it's already available, or using it? Logic, man. Logic. Use some logic. Do you know what logic is?

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
  13. Stretching for Security Risks by geekmux · · Score: 1

    " it does raise some questions about the security... Q.rads are naturally still going to be physically unsecured as they can be in anyone's house."

    When you have to reach for physical security to try and identify a flaw, it tends to dismiss the concern altogether. A lot of hardware is vulnerable if you can get your hands on it.

    1. Re:Stretching for Security Risks by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      When you have to reach for physical security to try and identify a flaw, it tends to dismiss the concern altogether. A lot of hardware is vulnerable if you can get your hands on it.

      And that is all completely irrelevant when talking about highly parallel applications with distributed workloads. Having access to the results of a single unit will likely yield you garbage data without any context for the whole.

    2. Re:Stretching for Security Risks by coofercat · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between putting your hardware in a secured datacentre somewhere on the edge of town to putting lots of little bits of your datacentre in people's houses - people you have no relationship with, other than they're using your product.

      For all you know, your competitors could be buying your product specifically to tamper with the results of your computations to f'up you business. That isn't a concern if you use a traditional datacentre, even if it's one shared with your competitors.

    3. Re: Stretching for Security Risks by Entrope · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much exactly backwards. Without physical security, it's extremely hard to provide any further security assurances. How much money and time has Apple spent trying to lock down their custom phone designs? This company doesn't have the advantage of designing everything from the CPU to the overall system, so they're going to inevitably rely on good behavior to minimize security compromises.

    4. Re:Stretching for Security Risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like voting machines. Nobody should ever be able to touch an electronic voting machine.

    5. Re:Stretching for Security Risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dispatch the computing on two random nodes and compare results.
      if some nodes continuously return bad results disconnect them.

  14. Re:You must be new here by _merlin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You must be new here, GNAA have definitely been around longer than a decade.

  15. where are the ryzen boards with ipmi? E3 cpus suck by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    where are the ryzen boards with ipmi and (at least the other boards can do ecc)? Intel E3 cpus suck and the e5 line is costly to get more then 4 cores.

    Also can't find 1P epyc systems anywhere yet. Where is the workstation / small server level amd server stuff??? even amd threadripper sever (less cores then epyc but higher clocks will be nice) and it makes better use of the min 16 cores for windows server core packs.

  16. I wouldn't be surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if the company would use the CPU's in this heaters for mining bitcoins o-)

    1. Re:I wouldn't be surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant *these

  17. Qarnot ~ Carnot? by bromoseltzer · · Score: 1

    Those French! This would have been better for a 1 April press release.

    By the way, the energy doesn't come from the computation. It comes from your wall socket.

    This was all understood (by the French) 200 years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    Fiat Lux.
    1. Re:Qarnot ~ Carnot? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      As the Sci-Fi channel (now SyFy) learned, if you name your company after a word which already has common usage in the field in which you're doing business, you cannot trademark your own company's name. Which causes huge legal and marketing problems.

      And the energy does come from the computation. If you were already going to do the computation anyway, then the computation uses energy from the wall socket and produces waste heat. This idea is just finding a use for that waste heat.

  18. Amd heater who knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember when i had an amd that heated my room back in the early 2000s. I thought that's what they were for

  19. Which came first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Which came first, the business model for this company or the obligatory xkcd? I don't even know any more.

    https://xkcd.com/1172/

  20. How to heat a house with a multi-line BBS by aheath · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to be the sysop [ system operator ] of a BBS [ bulletin system ] back in the day [ mid eighties to early nineties ]. I met a sysop who ran a multi-line PCBoard system from the basement of his house in a Ohio. PCBoard required one CPU for two phone lines. I don't remember how many lines he had but it was an impressive number. He told me that he had enough desktop PCs in his basement to heat his house in the winter. He also had enough paid subscribers to pay for the cost of cooling his basement in the summer.

    1. Re:How to heat a house with a multi-line BBS by sad_ · · Score: 1

      don't remind me, i had a two node bbs. with the heat of the pc, modems and hard drive i had to sleep with my windows of my little room opened in the winter (let's just not talk about the summer!).

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  21. Re: Intel overheating i7s and i9s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That must be why everyone complains about Intel's current i7 and i9 chips melting and overheating while no one complains about that with Ryzens who can do more work while running their cores at 60% load compared to Intel at 99% load.

  22. Hot Water Heaters by MTalisman · · Score: 1

    Every home has one, they run year-round, and resistive heating is what they do already. Why not?

  23. Been done already - Dutch Start-up "Nerdalize" by alanxyzzy · · Score: 2
    1. Re:Been done already - Dutch Start-up "Nerdalize" by alanxyzzy · · Score: 2

      There's even an old Slashdot article

  24. :yawn: The only "news" to this is the Ryzen angle by Keith_Beef · · Score: 1

    This was reported on French mainstream radio back in March and April, and in the Figaro newspaper back in 2015.

    http://www.lefigaro.fr/societes/2015/10/13/20005-20151013ARTFIG00016-qarnot-computing-des-radiateurs-tres-calculateurs.php

    The only "news" in this report is the use of Ryzen CPUs.

  25. Bitcoin Mining Machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are much better for this.

  26. haha, about time somebody got the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been doing this with my gaming rig for about two years since my last major upgrade. When I'm not playing video games, I'm a Gentoo user. Between the two, my room stays warmer than the rest of the house through winter.

    If it's really cold outside, I'll fire up folding@home!

  27. Sounds like by boudie2 · · Score: 1

    An expensive way to keep your baguette warm.

  28. Viability? One room case.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a single value point on this idea, I can attest to using my PC/Server as a local heat source.
    - Living in Maine, poorly insulated house, not wanting to burn too much heating oil at night, but still some...

    I'd wake up my system once I got home from work, task it for something.. update builds (running Gentoo...), play a game or 2, watch movies... As long as it was on, I could reliably see a 4-5F bump in room temperature.

    As a testament to confirmation, when I got a closed loop liquid cooler for the CPU, that all changed. No more varied temp increase I saw before with heatsink and a fan.

    Never did the math, per Watt cost compared to heating oil, but I have a hard time thinking it's anything other than negligible for the comfort it provided.

  29. Why not? by blindseer · · Score: 1

    I've been heating my house with AMD processors for years now.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  30. Called it in 2010, dumb heaters will be illegal: by robi5 · · Score: 2

    https://tech.slashdot.org/comm...

    The current practice of directly moving lowest entropy, precious energy to the highest entropy state - heat - will be considered immoral and eventually illegal. You won't be able to buy an electrical air or water heating system without that including compute units. Why heat with a dumb resistor when you can do it equally well with a CPU/GPU which does valuable computation, for which someone else would otherwise use up an equal amount of energy.

  31. Just another Green Tax Con by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fake global warming initiative that Tony Blair, Humanity's worst living war monger, promotes with all his might, is essentially a giant corruption machine.

    In the UK, for instance, dishonest people make millions installing solar panels on the roofs of UK homes- all paid for by tax breaks from the UK tax payers. Seaside councils have fake tiny windmills and solar panels pretending to power their strings of coloured nighttime lights.

    Can you warm a house with your lightbulbs? No? Well that's how effective using Ryzen CPU systems will be. BUT it plain doesn't matter. The company makes its dishonest proposal to the government. The government NEEDS a ton of green initiatives on its books to meet its international obligations- so it agrees to the tax breaks. And slashdot, one of the primary FAKE NEWS tech outlets on the net, promotes the story.

    In another decade or so the sheeple will be told that all the 'alternative' energy efforts were a giant criminal con- but now, of course, the government is much more honests so you can believe its new initiatives. Same old, same old.

    In the West that's what the governments are all about- free tax payer money to the right types of criminals. After all the mass murdering horror, Hillary Clinton, ran the most expensive election campaign in Human History- and who paid for it? You! You work, and they steal and then tell you to be pleased at how they steal.

    Your response to this story about French con people should be to want to 'run them out of town on a rail'. But that won't happen since today you are far too programmed by the fake news of the West's mainstream media.

  32. Way to Advertise how Inefficient the Processor Is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the new processors really that inefficient? Way to go AMD!

  33. Re:GAY NIGGERS FUCK ASS AND SUCK DICK FO FREDOM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blazing Saddles reference -- whoosh.

  34. Co-generation, the wave of the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I don't know if this particular application is the best, I think co-generation is going to be one of those things that is going to be much more widespread in the near future. We tend to waste A LOT of energy, for example electric plants generate heat via various methods (coal, natural gas, nuclear) for production of electricity and then dump that heat into the atmosphere/ocean. Instead, at least where possible, that heat should be utilized (home heating, water heating, manufacturing, etc). This isn't going to work for all applications of course (some energy/manufacturing SHOULD be located far from populations) but others can be dropped right down into a city center with little issue and their "waste" heat can be used by the surrounding community while the business receives a convenient heat sink for their operations.

  35. You're missing the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The alternative business model is paying for cooling. All computing energy used is converted to heat and typically removed from datacenters by expensive chiller units.

    This model isn't about efficiently heating residences. You've pointed out all the fallacies with that idea. This model is about disposing of the heat in an environmentally friendly way that reduces heating costs in residences and simultaneously reduces energy costs for the business.

    This scales elegantly too. The cost and lead-time of a new datacenter is extravagant, leading to a situation where some of the time you're over-provisioned, the rest under-provisioned and waiting for a new datacenter to come on-line. Over-provisioning costs investment dollars that sit there doing nothing. Under-provisioning costs business opportunity dollars that are lost whilst you cannot provide. The usual goal is to provision such that the sum of these two costs is minimised. This business model allows for much more granular just-in-time provisioning thus reducing both costs.

  36. France is Nuclear. by DrYak · · Score: 1

    a coal power plant when build as compactly as electrically possible?

    This is France they don't count on coal for their main power plant source.
    They mostly count on nuclear.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  37. DPRK, cryptocurrencies for evading sanctions... by ruigominho · · Score: 1

    ..., using one's own power to heat one's home while performing heavy computing tasks for 3rd parties... Am I the only one seeing a pattern here?

  38. because they are BitCoin mining? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because they are BitCoin mining?

  39. Lame copy'n paste of this post on FudZilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never considered that Nick Farell portrayed himself as a great writer given all his incessant pseudo-caustical humor that usually drowned any information in his articles, but this is quite lousy, as he cannot even seem to copy'n paste properly links from the original Slashdot post:
    http://www.fudzilla.com/news/processors/44508-ryzen-pro-heats-french-homes-and-offices

    > AMD has invited a French company called Qarnot to discuss how they're using Ryzen Pro processors to heat homes and offices for free.

    > The company uses the Q.rad -- a heater that embeds three CPUs as a heat source -- to accomplish this feat. "We reuse the heat they generate to heat homes and offices for free," the company says in a blog post. "Q.rad is connected to the internet and receives in real time workloads from our in-house computing platform."

    > The idea is that anyone in the world can send heavy workloads over the cloud to a Q.rad and have it render the task and heat a person's home in the process.

    > The two industries that are targeted by Qarnot include movies studios for 3D rendering and VFX, and banks for risk analysis. Qarnot is opting in for Ryzen Pro processors over Intel i7 processors due to the performance gain and heat output.
    >
    > According to Qarnot, they "saw a performance gain of 30-45% compared to the Intel i7." They also report that the Ryzen Pro is "producing the same heat as the equivalent Intel CPUs" they were using -- all while providing twice as many cores.
    >
    > By using Ryzen Pro's processors, OS independent memory encryption is enabled to provide additional security layers to Qarnot's heaters. However, Q.rads are naturally still going to be physically unsecured as they can be in anyone's house.
    >
    > No one seems to mind that processors chucking out a lot of heat in the summer might be a bad thing, even in France.

    One part of the first sentence removed, and an extra sentence added at the end.
    Well, I guess there is a non-nil probability to produce the very exact same words other a dozen sentences...

    mlw.

  40. No GPUs? by aaronb1138 · · Score: 1

    They're targeting rendering work and other very parallel workloads. I am surprised they are doing modules with 2-4 GPUs as well since a lot of that work has moved that direction (especially 3D rendering). Plus, if they have a workload deficit, just just load up some cryptocurrency mining.

    Living in Texas, I have a friend who is in the process of selling his mining rig, not because it wasn't profitable, but because with just 6 GPUs in a 1500 square feet apartment, the AC kept failing to keep up.

  41. Re:You must be new here by KingBenny · · Score: 1

    yea but it definitely surged since the last elections in the states ... its like they let loose a few cargoloads of inbreed somewhere ... nonetheless free speech is absolute and moderation is for assholes, i believe in self-regulating communities and despite the top layers being hogged by irrelevance this site is still ichiban to me. And i think its funny they finally found a use for amd cpus LOL

    --
    Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  42. Re:You must be new here by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    I rounded.