Slashdot Mirror


PSA: Google Will Delete Your Android Backups If Your Device Is Inactive For Two Months (vernonchan.com)

New submitter Vernon Chan writes: It was discovered that Google will automatically schedule to delete your Android device backups if it is inactive for more than two months. The issue was discovered by a Reddit user after his Nexus 6P was sent for a refund claim. He was using an old iPhone while he waited for an Android replacement device. When he glanced at his Google Drive Backup folder, he freaked out when he noticed his Nexus 6P backup was missing. He then stumbled upon this Google Drive help document regarding backup expirations: "Your backup will remain as long as you use your device. If you don't use your device for 2 weeks, you may see an expiration date below your backup. For instance: 'Expires in 54 days.'" Once a backup is deleted, there is zero chance for recovery.

166 comments

  1. The joy of a cloud service by Teun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's why I do my own back ups, both local and remote.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:The joy of a cloud service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This seems about right. Phone user is not the customer, he's the product. Since the product isn't in use, Google purged the data. Since they give away the storage space, they need a short retention time or it gets too big and unwieldy. This is why I don't make myself the product. I pay for things like email and backup storage. With this model, my ISP has a financial incentive to keep my data online and not remove it. Which is why I still have files from 1995 in my ISP account, and why that ISP has cloned and moved that data from system to system for the last 20+ years. It's not foolproof, but it definitely prevents dumb ass policies that nuke data after only a few months.

    2. Re:The joy of a cloud service by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Exactly so.

    3. Re:The joy of a cloud service by crunchygranola · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wish I could mod you up to "6"!

      Seriously - anything in the cloud is volatile storage and unless you are paying for it you can expect one day the service "provider" will decide to stop providing. Even if you do pay for the service, you are entirely at the mercy of their competence and the durability of their business model.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    4. Re:The joy of a cloud service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I backup my android device backup with crashplan home... I'm safe !!??

    5. Re:The joy of a cloud service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Code 42

    6. Re:The joy of a cloud service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep my own backups. There is no way I'm paying someone else to hold on to my stuff.

    7. Re:The joy of a cloud service by WaywardGeek · · Score: 1

      There are also security and privacy issue here. Exactly how long would you like your personal data to be remembered after you lose your device? Remember, that data can be handed to police if they have a valid warrant, and don't forget about China's attack on Google. Do you really want Google to remember your data forever?

      There needs to be some threshold for data retention. The government would like that to be 10 years. What's your vote?

      --
      Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
    8. Re:The joy of a cloud service by sjames · · Score: 1

      How about no sooner and no later than I log in to my account from a browser and say I no longer need my backups.

    9. Re:The joy of a cloud service by sjames · · Score: 1

      The person in TFA was a paying customer.

    10. Re:The joy of a cloud service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter.

      Unless you are rich enough to take on Google in a lawsuit they can do whatever they want with your data.
      It doesn't matter if you are a paying customer or not.
      At most you can try to give them as little as possible,

    11. Re:The joy of a cloud service by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      That's assumingthat you are able to log into your account to remove the data. May not be the best approach.

      --
      bickerdyke
    12. Re:The joy of a cloud service by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Phone user is not the customer, he's the product. Since the product isn't in use, Google purged the data.

      Oh look that old meme again. As if Google has no incentive to ensure their products are happy and continue being the products.

      Since they give away the storage space, they need a short retention time or it gets too big and unwieldy.

      Err no, backups don't grow indefinitely.

      his is why I don't make myself the product. I pay for things like email and backup storage. With this model, my ISP has a financial incentive to keep my data online and not remove it.

      hahahahahhaha. Friday comedy gold. You considered doing stand-up? It would really please all the people who lost their data from similar subscription services for similar reasons you don't understand because you parrot the same "you are the product" meme without applying any thought.

    13. Re:The joy of a cloud service by sjames · · Score: 1

      Considering that you can use a public library system to log in if necessary, that seems unlikely to be a problem.

    14. Re:The joy of a cloud service by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Not if you lost your credentials, not if you're injured and in a coma, not if you're in custody or kidnapped.

      There is a reason why setups like this are usually called "Dead man switch".

      --
      bickerdyke
    15. Re: The joy of a cloud service by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 1

      If a "dead man switch" is really necessary they should let the user decide on the duration on how long to keep the data.

      --
      sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /
    16. Re:The joy of a cloud service by maelkum · · Score: 1

      I pay for things like email and backup storage.

      Care to recommend a backup service? I already keep encrypted backups with Tarsnap, but I'd like to diversify. I am planning to go with Amazon S3, and hubiC from OVH as soon as I figure out how to best push encrypted backups to these.

    17. Re:The joy of a cloud service by maelkum · · Score: 1

      Even if you do pay for the service, you are entirely at the mercy of their competence and the durability of their business model.

      That's why you keep backups in multiple locations (or providers). If you're using Tarsnap, consider S3. If you're using S3, consider hubiC. If you're using all of them, buy a VPS with plenty of disk and spin your own off-site backup.

      The bigger problem here is the possibility of losing the encryption keys to those backups.
      So you have to have backups of the keys; not only on some digital media, but also (this is one of the possibilities) as an ASCII-armored printout in a bank vault somewhere.

      Yeah, yeah, I know. I'm pretty paranoid about my backups.

    18. Re: The joy of a cloud service by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      Not the person who is paying for storage?

      --
      bickerdyke
    19. Re:The joy of a cloud service by sjames · · Score: 1

      If it's all that important, you should probably be sure to keep your credentials safe. If you're in a coma, the odds are you won't be making any decisions about your data for a while. Of course if we're going to play what if, what if you wake from the coma with amnesia and the only hints about who you are or who should be contacted evaporated a month before?

      If you REALLY need a deadman switch, I suppose one might optionally be provided, but perhaps you should entrust someone with a password so they can burn your data if necessary.

    20. Re: The joy of a cloud service by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

      Code42 is a sinking ship. If they don't find a buyer soon they'll be out of business.

    21. Re: The joy of a cloud service by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      even after 2 months..you can get your stuff back from google.

    22. Re: The joy of a cloud service by giggles778 · · Score: 1

      thought that was chapter 13

    23. Re:The joy of a cloud service by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      My vote is to store my data myself and decide how long it's kept and who gets to see it.

    24. Re: The joy of a cloud service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truecrypt disk images over SSH.

      That'll be $5,450 please.

    25. Re:The joy of a cloud service by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      It's OK, there's a second backup located here, and those guys never delete anything, ever.

    26. Re:The joy of a cloud service by Caedite+Eos · · Score: 1

      > The bigger problem here is the possibility of losing the encryption keys to those backups.

      QR code printed out and stored in my safe deposit box. Takes a few hours to get to, but it's always available. Perhaps not the best solution, but it's the best for _me_.

    27. Re:The joy of a cloud service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but even for a company like google 2 weeks seems remarkably short. Hell I've been out of contact on holiday for a lot longer than that before, and it would be a very nasty surprise to return home and find your stuff had just... gone.

    28. Re:The joy of a cloud service by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I use DropBox. They're very unlikely to lose their copies of my stuff for the same reasons that I might lose them, so it's pretty reliable.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    29. Re:The joy of a cloud service by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      On punch cards, right, gramps?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    30. Re:The joy of a cloud service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be quite the trick, considering all of my sensitive data is encrypted and only accessible locally.

      Or in other words, you are a fucking idiot. Go back to Facebook where people are just as clueless about computers and security as you are.

    31. Re:The joy of a cloud service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if what if what if.... What if a software glitch prevented your data from being automatically erased? What if someone obtained your credentials and logged in regularly to make sure nothing got erased? What if a specific of flying, ass-faced unicorn-alligator hybrid aliens abducted you and stole your data after anal probing you?

      Sorry, I don't live by "what ifs", especially not tenuous examples like yours.

    32. Re:The joy of a cloud service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only idiots store shit in the cloud.

  2. First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the first time in history that, "It's a feature, not bug" is actually true.

  3. So much for 'don't be evil' by sgage · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is really unbelievably crap behavior by Google. You can have a trillion emails on your gmail account forever, but you phone backup goes away in 2 months? WTF?

    1. Re:So much for 'don't be evil' by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 2

      Let's hope Google doesn't notice what you just posted about Gmail.

      Never mind, actually. The value of your Gmail archive as a data mine is far greater. They probably have ethical issues regarding our Android backups. We clicked right through a specific agreement when we signed up for Gmail.

    2. Re:So much for 'don't be evil' by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      On the flip side it makes it a lot harder for governments or hackers to get old data on a person. I'd personally be much happier if the amount of time companies kept information was something that I could have a say in.

    3. Re: So much for 'don't be evil' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ohhhh you think they delete everything? How silly of you. They still retain everything they mined, it's just the useful bits you needed that were deleted. Silly user.

    4. Re:So much for 'don't be evil' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a competition: Which computer company can be most abusive? Difficult to win when Microsoft and Adobe Systems are competing. Google is one of the competitors, and moving fast.

      Intel and AMD have hidden software. We are no longer allowed to know who has control over our computers.

    5. Re:So much for 'don't be evil' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Playing devil's advocate here - the backup data is probably not easily monetized by Google (read / parse for information to sell, etc.) and is bulky to store...the cash to weight ratio doesn't make it profitable.

      E-mail on the other hand is pretty light weight and can easily be monetized :) keep it for as long as profitable.

    6. Re:So much for 'don't be evil' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now they say they don't do it, but in the past I had to make arrangements because Gmail said their policy was 9 months inactivity would result in deletion, and I was in a situation where I wouldn't be able to log in myself for longer than that.

    7. Re:So much for 'don't be evil' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Google Asshole Shawn Willden, please save the day by explaining to all the desperate Android chumps why this is actually a truly Great Thing!!

    8. Re:So much for 'don't be evil' by Kaenneth · · Score: 2

      What crime were you in prison for?

    9. Re:So much for 'don't be evil' by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      Google will just keep the data that's useful/valuable to them

    10. Re:So much for 'don't be evil' by mjwx · · Score: 1

      This is really unbelievably crap behavior by Google. You can have a trillion emails on your gmail account forever, but you phone backup goes away in 2 months? WTF?

      Why does everyone get so entitled when they use a free service?

      Its a free service, they can set whatever terms they like. Also, all you have to do is connect to the service once every 2 months to keep it going.

      Can someone please explain what is evil here, because I'm not exactly seeing any kittens being tortured here.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    11. Re:So much for 'don't be evil' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not exactly seeing any kittens being tortured here.

      Google servers run off of freshly squeezed kitten blood.

    12. Re:So much for 'don't be evil' by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Do you really think so? How many people outside the tech world use email often? It's all texts and instant messaging now. Heck, we might be past that. I don't keep up

    13. Re:So much for 'don't be evil' by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Probably the crime of beeing to poor to hire a proper lawyer.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    14. Re:So much for 'don't be evil' by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      How many people outside the tech world use email often?

      Quite a lot. Pretty much everyone that I know uses email. Not exclusively, but frequently.

    15. Re:So much for 'don't be evil' by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Never mind, actually. The value of your Gmail archive as a data mine is far greater.

      I doubt it. Mine's a hotbed of junk mail. I haven't used it for anything meaningful since at least 2004. Even prior to that, it was only a couple of former colleagues with the "Hey, web mail sucks, but it does work" "Yes it does. Missing features tho" "Verily". And other associated extremely valuable insightful data in the same vein.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  4. Either you own the data or you don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which do you think the cloud offers?

  5. They don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By this point, Google has already mined your backup data. Time to make room for more!

    1. Re:They don't care by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Android backup data is just 'overburden' as far as Google is concerned.

  6. Just two months? by gurps_npc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seems radically low. Some people go on foreign vacation for that long and don't use their phone.

    One year would be reasonable.

    If you don't use your phone for one year, you should have no expectation that the data is still there.

    But two months = idiots that only looked at most common usage patterns.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Just two months? by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seems radically low. Some people go on foreign vacation for that long and don't use their phone.

      One year would be reasonable.

      If you don't use your phone for one year, you should have no expectation that the data is still there.

      But two months = idiots that only looked at most common usage patterns.

      Meh. Keep in mind that the data we're talking about is "device configuration, such as wallpaper, WiFi passwords, and default apps." We're not talking about your contacts, which are synced with Google Contacts, or your emails, which are synced with GMail, or your docs, spreadsheets, presentations or Drive files, which are synced with Drive, or your photos, which are synced with Google Photos, or... I could go on, but you get the idea.

      Each of the Google apps backs its own data up independently, using your Drive storage, and all of that is separate from this "phone backup". The only thing the phone backup really does is streamline the process of setting up a new device, so all of your apps are auto-downloaded, WiFi passwords are auto-configured, etc.

      OTOH, we're talking about such small amounts of data that I don't know why it's only kept for two months.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:Just two months? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's a free backup service... If you want long term backups, you need to take care of them yourself.

      Also note that it's only certain phone data, the stuff people really care about like photos, videos and email are all stored for the lifetime of the gmail account or up to the free Google Drive limit (something like 5GB for mail last time I checked).

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Just two months? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Some people go on foreign vacation for that long and don't use their phone.

      huh? I don't think I've ever seen anyone go on vacation without using their phone. WiFi, and local SIM cards are so incredibly prevalent that unless you're climbing Mt Everest you're probably likely to not only take your phone on vacation but likely use it too.

      errr. Nope I was wrong. Looks like using your phone on Mt Everest isn't a problem either

    4. Re:Just two months? by giggles778 · · Score: 1

      my android backup is on a floppy disk

    5. Re:Just two months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OTOH, we're talking about such small amounts of data that I don't know why it's only kept for two months.

      Keeping that data around if you have discontinued use of your phone is a security risk... WiFi passwords for instance. If you aren't using the device for that long a period of time there is a good chance you have gotten a new device. I'd rather the inconvenience of having to reconfigure some WiFi passwords and such rather than having someone pulling a dead phone out of the trash and potentially accessing my information.

    6. Re:Just two months? by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      My kids get Ipads from the school. They hand them in at the end of the school year. every year their backups have been available in the icloud despite us using no other apple devices.

    7. Re:Just two months? by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      Some people go on foreign vacation for that long and don't use their phone.

      huh? I don't think I've ever seen anyone go on vacation without using their phone. WiFi, and local SIM cards are so incredibly prevalent that unless you're climbing Mt Everest you're probably likely to not only take your phone on vacation but likely use it too.

      errr. Nope I was wrong. Looks like using your phone on Mt Everest isn't a problem either

      It costs me $3 / minute to talk on my cell when I'm out of country. The question is if Google identifies a phone based on SIM information.

    8. Re:Just two months? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      When I'm on vacation, I use my smart phone only where I have wifi.
      For phone calls I use a extremely cheap SIM on an ordinary no internet phone.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    9. Re:Just two months? by swillden · · Score: 1

      OTOH, we're talking about such small amounts of data that I don't know why it's only kept for two months.

      Keeping that data around if you have discontinued use of your phone is a security risk... WiFi passwords for instance. If you aren't using the device for that long a period of time there is a good chance you have gotten a new device. I'd rather the inconvenience of having to reconfigure some WiFi passwords and such rather than having someone pulling a dead phone out of the trash and potentially accessing my information.

      Well, it's not like the data is stored unencrypted. But the Wifi passwords may well be the reason for the short lifetime.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    10. Re:Just two months? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It costs me $3 / minute to talk on my cell when I'm out of country.

      It would cost you nothing to use WhatsApp at the local McDonalds in whatever country you're in. Or any other beat down restaurant.

      The question is if Google identifies a phone based on SIM information.

      The answer is no, it ties the device ID to your Google account. You can do whatever you want with the SIM including throw it away. The modern smartphone ties nothing to it, not even WhatsApp complains when you change your number despite needing one to sign up for the service.

    11. Re:Just two months? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      When I'm on vacation, I use my smart phone only where I have wifi.

      So you use your phone then, feel free to vacation for more than 2 months.

    12. Re:Just two months? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      When you enter or leave most countries, they have the opportunity to take any phone or similar device and not return it for an unspecified amount of time. They are supposed to only do this for terrorism, but they routinely do it for other reasons.

      People that leave the country for months at a time often are highly suspect. They have the cool stamps on their passport which ups the interest of various governments.

      The easiest way to block this stupidity is to get a temporary phone for the duration. Forget about sim card, just get a cheap phone designed for your travel.

      Sometimes they have sensitive jobs, and their employer does not want to risk the tech or the info on it. If you work for a law firm or other company that takes security seriously, they might even give you a separate phone just for your vacation, let alone a work trip.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    13. Re:Just two months? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yes, a simple phone with a SIM suited to the country.
      However since a few month in EU that is no longer necessary as the extra roaming charges got removed by law.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    14. Re:Just two months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on, it's a holiday. Being uncontactable is part of the joy of really escaping for a few months overseas. There are books to be read, places to be seen, walking trails to discover, places to ride to... and a dreary day to day reality to escape. Leave the phone home and live for a while!

    15. Re:Just two months? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      When you enter or leave most countries, they have the opportunity to take any phone or similar device and not return it for an unspecified amount of time. They are supposed to only do this for terrorism, but they routinely do it for other reasons.

      You really are living in a world of fear aren't you. Firstly "most countries" isn't even remotely true. Secondly the odds of it happening to you are right down there with the odds of getting hit with a terrorist attack. Even the overaggressive countries like the USA, China, and Russia process many 10s of thousands of people daily and the number who are held and have all their belongings taken can be counted on one hand the world over.

      If you're going to North Korea, possibly. If you're transiting Iran with a passport that has a stamp from Israel, probably. But leaving your device at home because it may get taken is something so remote that it doesn't even register on any sane persons's radar when they pack their things.

      They have the cool stamps on their passport which ups the interest of various governments.

      No, it only ups the interest of the occasional stupid border guard. Admittedly though I think there's a high IQ cutoff for the ones in the USA (fond memories of explaining to the USA border guard the concept of a "courtesy hotel" when he saw a scary Arab looking stamp in my passport with stamp in and out on the same day). No the only country interested in this kind of crap is the USA, even Iraq et al have stopped caring when they released the only countries that they actively hate stopped stamping passports a long time ago.

      The easiest way to block this stupidity...

      Is to educate people about risk so they stop giving shitty advice online.

      If you work for a law firm or other company that takes security seriously, they might even give you a separate phone just for your vacation, let alone a work trip.

      Yes. You can count that number of companies on one hand as well. Most are quite content with just keeping devices encrypted. This goes for companies with military contracts, and even members of defence research organisations.

    16. Re:Just two months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said you still use it, but only on Wifi. That's sufficient for it to talk to Google's servers and indicate the phone is still in use. Or do you holiday in places that don't even have Wifi for over 2 months?

    17. Re:Just two months? by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      It costs me $3 / minute to talk on my cell when I'm out of country.

      It would cost you nothing to use WhatsApp at the local McDonalds in whatever country you're in. Or any other beat down restaurant.

      What is this McDonalds you speak of? When I travel out of country I often find myself at least 100 miles away from the closest golden arches and most restaurants don't offer free wifi. I went 2 years without seeing a single McDonalds.

      The question is if Google identifies a phone based on SIM information.

      The answer is no, it ties the device ID to your Google account. You can do whatever you want with the SIM including throw it away. The modern smartphone ties nothing to it, not even WhatsApp complains when you change your number despite needing one to sign up for the service.

      My thoughts were more along the line if you could identify your phone via wifi or using a prepaid SIM.

    18. Re:Just two months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try, but no.
      Sad, but Google not provide "own backup" possibility for android devices.
      You have to "root" your device, and lost warranty and compatibility with some apps to make your own backup and restore capability.

    19. Re:Just two months? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      What is this McDonalds you speak of? When I travel out of country I often find myself at least 100 miles away from the closest golden arches and most restaurants don't offer free wifi. I went 2 years without seeing a single McDonalds.

      Don't be daft, it was an example. I assume you go to places where you eat right? It doesn't need to be McDonalds (although that is almost universal). WiFi is available at nearly every little craphole village restaurant in the jungle these days. Short of trekking through the Amazon by foot it's actually difficult to find WiFi free places these days. Sure the very occasional personal will achieve that, usually taking a holiday specifically to get as far away from everything as possible, but in general the topic at hand (losing backups while on holidays) doesn't need to affect even a rounding error of the population.

       

      My thoughts were more along the line if you could identify your phone via wifi or using a prepaid SIM.

      Yes, that was my point. Your phone ID is not tied to your network. Regardless of where you roam, with what sim card, on what network the phone still identifies the same way to apps and to online services, ... even if you didn't have a google account tied to the phone.

  7. Android backup is worthless anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about anyone else, but the Android backup has been less than useless.
    All it does is install hundreds of apps I uninstalled ages ago, and restore wifi, which I already did during sign-in anyway.
    This is on a Oneplus 3T, but I've used HTC One M7 before that, and Samsung Galaxy S2 before that. App data is never restored.

    Titanium Backup is all I need.

    1. Re:Android backup is worthless anyway by ctilsie242 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Titanium Backup with the sync feature is as close to ideal as one can get on Android. Its encryption mechanism is remarkably sane, where it stores an encrypted copy of the private key with each backup file and used the public key on schedule. Plus, you can archive those huge games and get them off your phone, while keeping the saved data.

      I have yet to have a usable Android backup restore correctly. I might get some stuff, but I wind up reloading and rebuilding anyway. iOS is a little bit better, but a lot of stuff doesn't get backed up either... and there is no way (outside of a jailbreak) to archive apps off with their data, or just the app data, as the backups are all or nothing.

    2. Re:Android backup is worthless anyway by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Titanium Backup is the only way I've found to actually, you know, back the entire system up.

      I use that, plus a short Tasker script, to automatically generate a backup every day and copy that backup to a server. That server then gets backed up using a real backup system that does versioning -- so, in the end, I can restore my phone to what it was at any point in the past.

      It's a bit convoluted, and I wish there were an easier way, but has the advantage of actually working.

    3. Re:Android backup is worthless anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iOS is a little bit better, but a lot of stuff doesn't get backed up either... and there is no way (outside of a jailbreak) to archive apps off with their data, or just the app data, as the backups are all or nothing.

      As it happens, iCloud backs up ONLY app data; it does not back up the app itself as when it restores, it simply downloads the latest version from the app store. Thusly, it saves space on your iCloud storage capacity while retaining your personal app data. Benefits of the walled garden?

      Source: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT207428

    4. Re:Android backup is worthless anyway by brantondaveperson · · Score: 2

      iOS is a little bit better

      Jumping in here, because I don't understand what there isn't to like about the iOS backups. They back up everything other than your passwords, and the apps themselves. All app data is backed up, all your photos and documents etc. I've restored from them multiple times, and it's always worked perfectly.

    5. Re:Android backup is worthless anyway by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      it does not back up the app itself as when it restores, it simply downloads the latest version from the app store.

      What if you are intentionally using an older version of something?

    6. Re:Android backup is worthless anyway by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      Not one of their use cases so you are screwed.

      But you can't use old apps forever anyway. Apple will push OS updates that will eventually break them and you will have to get new versions. So they are doing you a favor by getting you a head of the curve /s.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    7. Re:Android backup is worthless anyway by Imazalil · · Score: 1

      This is probably woefully out of date... back in the 3GS days if you did a backup via itunes, and selected encrypted, as far as I know it created a full image of the phone, apps, random settings, cache files, everything. If that is still around - read somewhere that itunes is going music only - it might work.

    8. Re:Android backup is worthless anyway by sh00z · · Score: 1

      This is probably woefully out of date... back in the 3GS days if you did a backup via itunes, and selected encrypted, as far as I know it created a full image of the phone, apps, random settings, cache files, everything. If that is still around - read somewhere that itunes is going music only - it might work.

      That was for local storage, not cloud.

  8. PSA: No where does it say "two months" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All it says is exactly whats in the summary. If you don't use your device for 2 weeks, you may see an expiration date below your backup. For instance: 'Expires in 54 days.'. I'm curious how much space the reddit users was using on his Google Drive (and what % it was of the limit).

    1. Re:PSA: No where does it say "two months" by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I know it's hard because they're different units, but what do you get if you add 54 days to 2 weeks, then divide by 30 and round to the nearest integer?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re: PSA: No where does it say "two months" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 months. What's your point?

  9. Pull my other leg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google deleting information about a marketing target without a court order? Yeah, go on and pull my other leg.

    1. Re:Pull my other leg by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      It just means that you can't ever get to your own data again.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
  10. That's what you get. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what you get when you store your backups on someone else's computer.

  11. Slashdot: It's like reading Reddit on delay! by scumdamn · · Score: 1

    Why is it that every story that's posted here has already been on Reddit for at least a couple days?

    1. Re:Slashdot: It's like reading Reddit on delay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who knows... maybe Vernon Chan is one of /u/GallowBoob's sock puppets?

    2. Re: Slashdot: It's like reading Reddit on delay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the Slashdot editors are mentally retarded and it takes them a while to remember how cut & paste works.

    3. Re:Slashdot: It's like reading Reddit on delay! by mean+pun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why is it that every story that's posted here has already been on Reddit for at least a couple days?

      Slashdot is only making backups of stories from other sites.

    4. Re:Slashdot: It's like reading Reddit on delay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because that's exactly the way Slashdot is designed to work.

      Somebody writes an article. People notice the article, perhaps due to references on Reddit. Someone who found the article posts a draft summary (with a link to the original article, ideally) onto Slashdot, where it goes to the Firehose. After enough people vote it up on the Firehose an editor makes a summary that goes onto Slashdot's news list.

    5. Re:Slashdot: It's like reading Reddit on delay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Cmdr Taco left and the site has been mismanaged since then.

    6. Re:Slashdot: It's like reading Reddit on delay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least it's not Soylent News. That site often gets news a few days after it was on Slashdot!

    7. Re:Slashdot: It's like reading Reddit on delay! by MrKrillls · · Score: 1

      "Slashdot is only making backups of stories from other sites."

      But, if Slashdot doesn't publish the story again within two weeks, the story goes away.

      --
      Don't step on the baby.
    8. Re:Slashdot: It's like reading Reddit on delay! by JohnFen · · Score: 4, Informative

      For those of us who don't use Reddit?

    9. Re:Slashdot: It's like reading Reddit on delay! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is copying Hacker News front page more than Reddit.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    10. Re:Slashdot: It's like reading Reddit on delay! by Khyber · · Score: 0

      Yup, because they chased away the people that made them possible in the first fucking place. The pure ignorance of the Soylent admins just makes me want to petition the Oxford Dictionary to update the definitions for the n-word to include the SN admins as a perfect living example.

      Oh, slashdot has a filter on the N-word, even when used by dictionary definition. Slashdot is having a little censorship, I see.

      Perhaps the Slashdot people would appreciate a nice doxxing in response to their censorship. Including the information of their families. Equifax has already made half of it possible, I can easily make the rest come true since the info is now out in the wild, all it takes is reading the records and compiling the information manually.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    11. Re:Slashdot: It's like reading Reddit on delay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it would be best to repost this story now for dual redundancy. Better safe than sorry.

    12. Re: Slashdot: It's like reading Reddit on delay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem like a nice person, incoherent though. By the way, your name, is it from the rhyming slang?

    13. Re: Slashdot: It's like reading Reddit on delay! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "incoherent though"

      You must have a serious English comprehension issue. Perhaps you should return to school.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    14. Re:Slashdot: It's like reading Reddit on delay! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why is it that every story that's posted here has already been on Reddit for at least a couple days?

      Because Slashdot is and always has been a news aggregator. The very principle on which it is based requires a story to be somewhere else first.

    15. Re:Slashdot: It's like reading Reddit on delay! by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      Reddit is the same way, just means this guy doesn't go out and look for his own news. If he did he would see it many hours or a day before it got to reddit's front page. If you go to wired, AP, twitter, etc you can be the first to post everywhere. I usually post an article on /. and reddit if I find it somewhere else and it has a nerd/tech interest.

  12. You don't have a backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have a backup unless you have physical control of that backup. Sometimes you get lucky, but that's not the way to bet.

  13. Whatever happened to "Do no evil"? by Jerrry · · Score: 2

    When did that policy go away? When financial pressures overrode ethics?

    1. Re:Whatever happened to "Do no evil"? by sgage · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    2. Re:Whatever happened to "Do no evil"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google ain't had that policy for a few years now (at least).

    3. Re:Whatever happened to "Do no evil"? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      They were actually a bit open about that at the time; it was about 10 years ago. They had two main people who founded it; the "do no evil" stuff was the one who used to be in charge. Then he handed it all over to the other guy who was greedier, and the system switched to "normal corporate `ethics.'"

    4. Re:Whatever happened to "Do no evil"? by boudie2 · · Score: 1

      We shouldn't say his name, but were his initials Eric Schmidt?

    5. Re:Whatever happened to "Do no evil"? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I dunno, what sort of person would try to remember people who didn't do anything other than start a business and make money? Not me! We have local guys like that in my town, too, they're not really doing anything that has meaning to people not involved in their business or their family.

      I know who Bill Gates is because he wrote a version of BASIC and pushed spreadsheet technology forwards. He also killed some companies that made software I used to use.

      Whoever those google business people are, they don't really tell us who the people who invented the technology they just bought was, so they don't leave any sort of footprint in that arena. All they have to be known by is their business practices, which regardless if you like them or not, they'll be different later so you can't trust it.

    6. Re:Whatever happened to "Do no evil"? by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      It was all a confusion due to homophones. It was supposed to be "Do Know Evil".

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    7. Re:Whatever happened to "Do no evil"? by boudie2 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what he did either, but he made $7 billion doing it.

    8. Re:Whatever happened to "Do no evil"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It went away about 2 and a half milliseconds after the company was originally formed.

      Google's always been evil, right from the start. It just seems to have taken quite a while for a lot of people to catch on to that fact.

    9. Re:Whatever happened to "Do no evil"? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah? In 5th grade I held the high score on a popular video game in a popular arcade for 3 weeks until some college kid got mad and reset the machine.

    10. Re:Whatever happened to "Do no evil"? by boudie2 · · Score: 1

      High point of your life?

    11. Re:Whatever happened to "Do no evil"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what is evil about getting rid of data you said you were going to get rid of after giving explicit warnings for about 2 months that you were going to get rid of it. This is basically a story of a person using a "free" service and doesn't read the directions. Duh. No storage is permanent, some are longer lasting than others and free ones that you don't control and didn't pay for are the most likely to go. TANSTAFL.

      If I let you use a locker at my gym for free, as long as you use the gym and tell you that two months after your last use of the facility the locker will be cleaned out and the items thrown then you have two months to get your act together and do something.

    12. Re: Whatever happened to "Do no evil"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gay phones? I thought that was Apple's invention.

    13. Re:Whatever happened to "Do no evil"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so, so high

    14. Re:Whatever happened to "Do no evil"? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      That you can't comprehend a point as simple as this one is truly an astounding accomplishment, congratulations!

  14. Doesn't sound like a backup to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Backups are supposed to be good *forever*, i.e., be reliable.

    They should rename it Google Cache instead.

    1. Re:Doesn't sound like a backup to me by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      Google Pre-Delete?

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    2. Re:Doesn't sound like a backup to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up the difference between disaster recovery and archive backup.
      Hint: Google "backup" is a way to RECOVER data that is currently on your device. i.e. make a replacement device functional again.
                        Archive "backup" is a historic collection of tour data.
      Grow up.

  15. Sometimes in life we get what we deserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this is one of those times. If you are so dumb as to believe that we should all hop on the same bandwagon be it government or corporations you deserve what you get when it bites you in the ass. Relying on the "cloud" of all things is asking for trouble regardless of who you use.

    What blows my mind is even people who think more like me do stupid shit like this even though many are more aware of the risks they are taking. I'm in New Hampshire as a participant in the Free State Project- a migration of people who prefer liberty and freedom over "safety". Many people here tend to lean toward making more logical decisions. Like sometimes too much "safety" is dangerous. Too much government is dangerous.

    But.. when you depend on entities like Google, Microsoft, Adobe, Apple, Dell, Lenovo, Sony, HP, government, etc whom have positions of influence, finances, and power you do yourself a disinterest by eliminating choice and options in the market place. Like the dangers of government so to are there dangers of always picking the seemingly "best" product in the market place (ie like those who choose an iPhone, though I'd disagree Apple's producing the best product in the market anyway, but assuming they were it's a threat to us all should they become dominate and out compete everybody else). That then comes round to bite everyone in the ass later. I avoid these entities like the plague. I use a few sparingly. Mainly Google search when Start Page and Duck Duck Go fail me and HP for printers because every other printer manufacturer sucks even more (not that all HP printers are created equal, some suck equally as much, but at least with HP and sufficient knowledge you can pick out the ones that suck less).

    1. Re:Sometimes in life we get what we deserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      commas, ever heard of them?

    2. Re:Sometimes in life we get what we deserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony of your post is that this situation is like this because of a lack of government regulation. Dumb Ayn Randians.

    3. Re:Sometimes in life we get what we deserve by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 1

      Downvoted by establishment shills.

      --
      Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
  16. I get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the amount of devices that just get trashed and people switching to the other side, lots of backups are wasting away and taking space.

  17. Old Android tablet... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

    I have an old Android tablet that I haven't used in about a year. I fired it up the other day and it told me to log into my gmail/google account again. Ok, done.

    Next I get an email from Google: You just activated a new device on your account.

    Really? It's a device that I had activated on my account before.

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  18. Not to worry by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Backups will still be available via FOIA from the Dept. of Homeland Security.

    --
    Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
    1. Re:Not to worry by PJ6 · · Score: 1

      Backups will still be available via FOIA from the Dept. of Homeland Security.

      Came here just to say that.

      There's no way they willingly delete any information. It's their currency.

    2. Re:Not to worry by jittles · · Score: 1

      Backups will still be available via FOIA from the Dept. of Homeland Security.

      Unfortunately your backup will only be available for CIA and NSA employees to peruse for dick pics. If you are not an employee of either of the above agencies, you'll never get to see your backup again!

    3. Re:Not to worry by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      Backups will still be available via FOIA from the Dept. of Homeland Security.

      From the very instant I first read, "Department of Homeland Security," I immediately thought it seemed astoundingly like, "3rd Reich." They have given ample evidence over the years to justify that gut reaction.

    4. Re:Not to worry by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, me too. It's either an incredibly tone-deaf name, or an incredibly honest one.

  19. So, let's consider the positive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Free Dead-Man's Switch for Everybody!

  20. Ditto with Google off-line maps by oblivious · · Score: 1

    Ditto with Google off-line maps. 2 months is all you get, then your maps disappear from your phone. Really sucks when you're in the boonies for a couple of months and your map disappears.

  21. Ask the NSA for a copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sure it isn't "completely gone".

  22. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All my dick pics!

    CAPTCHA: impress

  23. PSA? by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    PSA: Google Will Delete Your Android Backups If Your Device Is Inactive For Two Months

    Qhat does "PSA" stands for in this context?

    1. Re: PSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's usually Peugeot SA, but I doubt Peugeot-CitroÃn have any interest in reporting on Google's storage policies.

    2. Re:PSA? by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 2

      Public Service Announcement

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
  24. Oh the Joy! by n329619 · · Score: 1

    Google actually deletes stuff? permanently deletes them? with an expiration date?

    This is GREAT! For once data are deleted as expected instead of being 'hidden' in the cloud for future ads tracking! (unlike FB)

    This is a moment for celebration!

    1. Re:Oh the Joy! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      data that can't possibly ever make them money will be deleted per schedule. Data about your private life, habits and preferences will be kept forever.

    2. Re:Oh the Joy! by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, you seem to be confused. The data that they mined from your backup will persist forever, but the useful bits that you needed to actually restore your phone are what get deleted...

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
  25. Coming from Google this is surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming from a data hog like Google who saves everything, why can't they at least notify you better of the impending doom of your backups?

  26. Google is evil. Full stop by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

    Yet another reason to stop using Google in any form. I know it is difficult at first, but it gets easier with time. Google has demonstrated they are evil to a sociopathic degree over the last few years, and now that we all know, it is time to clone the good parts and cut the head off of the snake as it were. Let Google wither and die after treating their customers like shit and other businesses can feed off whatever is left. Without customers, Google just like any other business goes belly up.

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    1. Re:Google is evil. Full stop by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I know it is difficult at first

      I don't know this. I thought it was pretty damned easy.

  27. vs. by supernova87a · · Score: 2

    Say what you will about Apple and iPhone -- they don't pull this kind of shit with customers.

    1. Re:vs. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And why? You think this is some nefarious plot to screw the customer? More likely some dumb idea from some part of the company which didn't think it all the way through.

      Please do tell me about how you ignored all the times Apple has removed something without asking the customer.

    2. Re:vs. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Say what you will about Apple and iPhone -- they don't pull this kind of shit with customers.

      Pretty sure they'd have a time limit on their cloud services.

      It might last longer than 2 months (not sure what you expect from a free service, but the entitlement wankers have come out of the woodwork over this) but Apple shafts you in every other possible way.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  28. This backup is not what you think it means. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is running a Disaster Recovery Backup, not an archive backup.

    They should explicitly say what the duration is however. I was managing the day to day operation of a disaster recovery system for a global company, and we pounded the data retention (90 days) limits into the users heads. However, we had many, many people think we were a archive backup service, not a disaster recovery service.

  29. Last time I tried to restore from Google Cloud by jmak · · Score: 1

    on a Nexus 5X, on the "select the backup to restore from" screen, the only control that reacted to tapping was the "skip restore" button. Observed on two different handsets, with different OS patchlevels. After that, the device created a new backup, letting the old one expire. So the guy possibly just avoided getting Google-trolled :)

  30. woefully out of date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Apple introduced app "thinning" a couple of years ago the iTunes backup process stopped copying app code from your device for the simple reason that devices no longer had a copy of app code that could run on anything but that specific model of device. Too likely to induce WTF moments if someone wanted to restore the backup to a newer model device etc.

    But until this week's iTunes update you could still download the equivalent of a fat binary using iTunes that could be used to restore that app version to any device even if that app version was no longer available from the App Store.

  31. PSA Carbonite will delete your data if your hard d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carbonite bills itself as a way to backup your data. But if you actually trust them and your hard drive fails it will delete all your data after a time period as well.

  32. They delete backups? How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do they delete backups? Send a guy to break in?

    You said backups, right? The things you use to restore your data the day you cloud provider somehow loses your data...

  33. How does one back up Android anyway? by iTrawl · · Score: 1

    I have a legitimate question: How does one back up Android, actually? (yes, I googled it, repeatedly, over a period of time)

    My experience so far barely backed up anything besides the list of apps I had installed. On iOS all my banking apps and Google Authenticator are ready to use after a restore. On Android I get that only if I root my device and actively copy the app's data myself. And it's not just banking apps. With few exceptions It's pretty much every app that I have to set up all over again.

    I had to reset my Nexus a while back because it had a database corruption that prevented Photos from displaying and backing up pictures, and the experience was as described above. Even with a Helium desktop backup.

    --
    "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
    1. Re:How does one back up Android anyway? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Titanium Backup.

    2. Re:How does one back up Android anyway? by shess · · Score: 1

      I have a legitimate question: How does one back up Android, actually? (yes, I googled it, repeatedly, over a period of time)

      My experience so far barely backed up anything besides the list of apps I had installed. On iOS all my banking apps and Google Authenticator are ready to use after a restore. On Android I get that only if I root my device and actively copy the app's data myself. And it's not just banking apps. With few exceptions It's pretty much every app that I have to set up all over again.

      I had to reset my Nexus a while back because it had a database corruption that prevented Photos from displaying and backing up pictures, and the experience was as described above. Even with a Helium desktop backup.

      This. With an Apple device, I can 100% clone everything in an hour or so, depending on whether I already have a backup or not. With an Android device, I can replicate some of the stuff which is installed, but many games won't have their state (unless the developer made extra efforts), and I'll still be finding missing bits three weeks later.

      The first time I complained about this at work (Google) was when upgrading from my g1, and the answer I got was something like "Yeah, but the new release handles that". A couple years later, same story, "Yeah, I get you, but the new release handles that." A couple years later, same story, and I gave up complaining.

    3. Re:How does one back up Android anyway? by iTrawl · · Score: 1

      And... without root, which is what I was bitching about?

      --
      "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
  34. android backups not included in google takeout by Brian+Ristuccia · · Score: 1

    Here's another gotcha: If you use google takeout to back up your google drive, your android backups are not included.

  35. Now try getting Google to delete something for you by trg83 · · Score: 1
    I've been battling Google over an Android app I coded in 2009 against the Android 1.5 API. I was getting nag messages for several months about the app no longer being in compliance with their latest standards. I had sold I set about unpublishing the app. The Android store continues to allow access to the app for any previously paying customers--no harm there. However, they would not let me complete the unpublish step because they tied their entire form to validation checks. So, I would have to provide a privacy policy, several new icons and app screenshots, and a content rating to UNPUBLISH the app. One day, I begrudgingly completed this task and submitted the application for review. It was denied. Google took issue with something in the APK itself and wanted me to rebuild an app I hadn't touched in 8 years.

    I finally took the nuclear option and deleted the entire Google account that had published the app. Google left the app in place and is continuing to offer it for sale. I think I have a case for a lawsuit, but who bothers suing a behemoth like Google?

  36. Ask the NSA for a copy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    surely there's a backup SOMEWHERE ;)

  37. Re:Now try getting Google to delete something for by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    At least with Google, using their app store is not mandatory for releasing and distributing an app.

  38. To The Cloud!!! by acoustix · · Score: 1

    Nobody will ever treat your own data as responsibly as you.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  39. Let's punish our service members in the best way by kalieaire · · Score: 1

    I have friends in the armed forces and sometimes their devices go kaput after an IED.

    They're assuming their backups will still be there when they finish their tour.

    Lol, joke's on them.