Slashdot Mirror


Bitcoin Plummets Below $3,000 on Rising China Worries (ft.com)

Bitcoin dropped below $3,000 on Friday as the cryptocurrency extended a brutal eight-day sell-off that has reduced its value against the dollar by a third. Financial Times reports: The currency traded as low as $2,972, marking a 36 per cent fall from bitcoin's close on September 7, and a collapse of 40 per cent from the highs struck earlier this month. The latest bout of selling came after BTCChina, one of the country's biggest bitcoin exchanges, said it would halt trading at the end of the month. Focus has now shifted to the communist country's other two big exchanges: OKCoin and Huobi. Alternative source.

221 comments

  1. Also... by Luthair · · Score: 4, Informative

    JP Morgan's CEO referred to bitcoin as a fraud, and made reference to tulips (the first recorded bubble).

    1. Re:Also... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "JP Morgan Chase & Co. is a U.S. multinational banking and financial services holding company headquartered in New York City." - Wikipedia

      Yeah, let's trust the guy trying to push a competing product. Let's also forget the bank bailouts where they squandered billions and were saved by the government anyway (i.e. with your taxes).

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Also... by Luthair · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly what do you think is competing here? If the banking industry thought these were viable, they'd be trading them and they'd be operating exchanges.

    3. Re:Also... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Yep. They're not viable for large-scale use, and probably never will be. Sure seems like a lot of stories here lately though, breathlessly trying to make it sound like they're a big deal.

    4. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://ripple.com/insights/sumitomo-mitsui-banking-corporation-and-japan-post-bank-join-sbi-ripple-asias-bank-consortium/

      Banks in Japan and Europe sure think its viable.

    5. Re:Also... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Good for them?

      I will gladly eat my words if/when Bitcoin ever becomes a serious competitor to current global-scale payment methods, but simply announcing a consortium that hasn't actually accomplished anything yet is waaaaaaay far off from that.

    6. Re:Also... by cdreimer · · Score: 1

      The same JP Morgan that got sued along with Goldman Sachs for manipulating the price of aluminum?

      http://www.businessinsider.com/jpm-goldman-face-suits-over-warehouses-2013-8

    7. Re:Also... by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      hell for that matter, they'd be MINING on all those thousands of PC's that sit idle during non business hours, or any otherwise idle servers.

    8. Re:Also... by Luthair · · Score: 0

      Bankers are indeed sleazy, but what does that say about the BTC market when even they think its sleazy?

    9. Re:Also... by Luthair · · Score: 1

      I noticed the same, an inordinate number of puff pieces are submitted by BTC supporters to spread the propaganda. I'd actually intended to submit the JP Morgan article earlier this week to counter it but hadn't made the time yet.

    10. Re:Also... by cdreimer · · Score: 2

      Bankers are indeed sleazy, but what does that say about the BTC market when even they think its sleazy?

      It means that the bankers haven't figured out how to get a piece of the BTC action. Once they get their cut, BTC will become legit in their eyes.

    11. Re:Also... by Luthair · · Score: 2

      Block chains existed before crypto-currencies and using one isn't an endorsement of other uses of the same technology.

    12. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They all want to eat our lunch, every one of them" -- Jamie Dimon, 2014

      You don't think stupid people in a bubble are trying to eat your lunch.

    13. Re:Also... by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Bankers could pretty easily operate an exchange if they wanted - they already have that infrastructure. They could also trade, but it might be illegal for them at the moment.

    14. Re:Also... by ag0ny · · Score: 0

      Exactly what do you think is competing here?

      They've been applying for a patent on an electronic cash system since 1999. They updated the patent in 2009-2011 to something that resembles very, very much, Bitcoin.

      These bankers do own Bitcoin. Lots of it. In the last few hours we've seen massive buy orders that have made the price start to rebound.

      While this can't be proven, these signs suggest price manipulation by JP Morgan in order to buy more cryptocurrency at a much cheaper price.

    15. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It says that they are making excuses to try to quash competition.

      Use your brain.

    16. Re:Also... by Q-Hack! · · Score: 2

      It isn't so much as competing as it is fear of loosing control. JP Morgan Chase & Co. is part of the centralized banking system. They have a lot to lose if they can no longer influence the worlds monetary system.

      --
      Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
    17. Re:Also... by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

      Those "Idle PCs" will no longer be idle mining cryptocurrency. They'll consume far more power doing CPU mining, which is very inefficient compared to GPUs or ASICs. The electric company bill will show them that electricity in the US is pretty expensive...

    18. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's also forget the bank bailouts where they squandered billions and were saved by the government anyway (i.e. with your taxes).

      While Dimon runs a for-profit enterprise, the bank he runs was not bailed out by taxpayer money. In fact, he was approached by the Treasury and asked to buy up a competing undercapitalized bank to keep that bank solvent.

      There are a lot of normal banks and investment banks to spread taxpayer bailout blame around on, but JP Morgan was not one of them.

    19. Re:Also... by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      JP Morgan is an investment bank, not a commercial/retail bank. They don't take deposits from individuals and don't make car loans. I don't recall (if I ever knew) what, if any, constraints there are on their activities, but I wouldn't be surprised that they can do pretty much whatever they damn well please as long as they don't mislead their investors.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    20. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to mine bitcoin.. You can mine any of the CPU targeted alt-coins (whatever is best at the moment) and then exchange it for bitcoins...

    21. Re:Also... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      JP Morgan's CEO referred to bitcoin as a fraud, and made reference to tulips (the first recorded bubble).

      Repeating a comment I made on another thread, I think the tulip reference is inaccurate. The tulips never had any real fall-back value besides as ornamental plants. Bitcoin has a lot of value on the dark-web as a non-governmental currency easily traded online..

      So, yes, until another alternative to bitcoin comes along (perhaps one with more security and anonymity) bitcoin will continue to be used and traded. It won't completely crash.

      Citizen speculators may add to the value and cause it to boom and bust but for the foreseeable future, there is a value to some people with bitcoin that is more than just an investment tool.

      Bitcoin may drop back to $1000- but it will almost certain never crash back down completely (until it is replaced).

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    22. Re:Also... by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and if Apple were interested in a particular feature, they certainly wouldn't trash it and then claim they invented it a few years later...

      Public statements from for-profit companies are not always trustworthy.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    23. Re:Also... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You think China is closing them down because they had nothing to do with widespread evasion of capital controls? You think China will succeed?

      Bitcoin isn't for clearing normal payments, it's for freedom. If a few (bucks get laundered/taxes evaded) as a consequence, I'm fine with that. Anything that 'starves the beast' is good.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    24. Re: Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh....

      So it's a currency that's not meant for spending.

      Good luck with that.

    25. Re: Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because the owner of this site is BizX. GO read about their blockchain technology and it will all make sense.

    26. Re: Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I can't prove anything, which proves I'm correct!"

      I thought slashdot was for logical people?

    27. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is shutting them down temporarily. As the next logical step after shutting down ICO. Millions of mum and dad 'investors' throughout China were going to get burned. After the stock market fiasco, China needs to be seen as doing something to protect its people from similar bubbles and fraud. China isn't the only country looking at how they might try regulate things in the future.

    28. Re: Also... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Reading comprehension fail.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    29. Re:Also... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      China is still in a multi market (real estate, stocks) bubble. To fix the Shanghai stock exchange (average PE ratio was as high as 100) the Chinese government declared that companies must declare higher earnings. Not pay dividends, just declare earnings. Do you trust Chinese accounting? After the order, exchange wide average PE went from 100 to about 20 in a year (with less than a halving of prices), do you believe it? Want to buy a bridge?

      Escaping that bubble is what the Chinese authorities are trying to prevent. Can't have regular Chinese moving their funds overseas like the sons and daughters of central committee members.

      Bitcoin isn't really 'for holding', it's for moving the funds out of bubble zones with capital controls, like China. Which is causing a real estate bubble on the US west coast as the Chinese buy property for cash (with only $50k being officially allowed out, how?).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    30. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're delusional if you think a piddly amount of bitcoin is of concern to China's capital flows. The Yuan has gone up 6% so far this year. More capital is flowing into China than leaving it. It's foreign exchange reserves have been rising recently as well.
      Lay off the Trump, and try a fact or two for a change.

    31. Re:Also... by no1nose · · Score: 1

      Why do they pronounce it HODLing then?

    32. Re:Also... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Why do you think China is closing the exchanges? Open your eyes.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    33. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please they already have! This is the main reason for the wild price fluctuations. The bankers took over bitcoin a while ago and have been playing it for every cent they can manage. They have been caught trying to do this with just about everything else.

    34. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were already told by another poster, just look above. Try not to be distracted by nonsense about bubbles in the stock market or diversifying overseas.

    35. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard to argue if you are just going to make shit up... http://marketrealist.com/2017/...

    36. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom! ReeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeEEE!

    37. Re: Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bittards aren't logical.

    38. Re:Also... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Could the PE ratio have been higher than 70 during the _year_ it averaged 70?

      Your source is lying with statistics.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    39. Re:Also... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I already answered his lie above. The yearly average PE ratio peaked at just under 70, what do you think the instantaneous average PE ratio peaked at?

      Funny how the declared earnings jumped right after being 'ordered up'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    40. Re:Also... by fatwilbur · · Score: 1

      No, if you read his comments they were actually one of the few I've heard from him that were smart and I agree with. His comments were effectively, if he found anyone in the company trading Bitcoin, he'd fire them since they are stupid.

      He accurately made a distinction between blockchain tech (which has high potential), and bitcoin, which is truly useless for any kind of large scale economic activity. It's a playground of the financial retards right now; the vast majority buying bitcoin right now have zero technical knowledge of it, they're just trying to get rick quick. Not a lasting formula.

    41. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, yes, until another alternative to bitcoin comes along (perhaps one with more security and anonymity) bitcoin will continue to be used and traded. It won't completely crash.

      Crash to zero? Nothing does that. Even tulips can be used as mulch. Bitcoin could drop to $10 and still be used by the dark web, so don't expect that to backstop any fall.

    42. Re:Also... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Except no one gives a fucking shit about anything other than Bitcoin and Ethereum, and Ethereum is in a death spiral due to the ICO bullshit, the scams, the "hacks", the forks, and of course the fact that Ethereum is just a shitty alt that's effectively pegged to BTC and mined by people who have GPUs but not ASICs.

      Bitcoin is THE cryptocurrency. Mining anything else is like fighting for scraps and then hoping someone will buy those scraps from you at some point.

      If I were still in the game, I'd consider buying Bitcoin soon (I don't think it's bottomed out yet) with intention to sell in 1 to 2 years.

    43. Re:Also... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Crash to zero? Nothing does that. Even tulips can be used as mulch.

      What about creimer/cdreimer posts?

    44. Re: Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were wrong then and you're wrong now.

      Tulips have a value floor. These random tokens do not. Not to mention, they aren't as anonymous as people first thought.

    45. Re: Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this pets.com stock I have is so definitely not worthless! Look at all the people willing to trade me US dollars for it! Because there's still a market for tech stocks!!!!

    46. Re: Also... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      It's about freedumb.

    47. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Slashdotters,

      Information about Christopher Dale Reimer and autistic people:

      Autistic people have obsessions about things normal people don't care. For example, one of our autistic patient went haywire when he realized that there was a penny missing in his pocket change.

      To calm him down, one of our educator pretended to have found it on the floor and gave a penny to him.

      The autistic patient condition went even worse because he realized it wasn't the same penny!

      Chris has an obsession with budgeting every penny. He doesn't understand that most people do not budget to the penny and have a flexible amount they allow for miscellaneous items.

      I am Nancy Guerrero and I am Director of Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education. We use Chris' (a.k.a. creimer,cdreimer) picture in our document because he is the hardest case we have ever had to handle:
      http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

      Our artists were inspired by the low carb diet that Christopher follows scrupulously for the small lunch box and by the picture linked below for the rest. I am sure that you will notice the similarities such as the bump on the side of his chest and more:
      https://www.cdreimer.com/slash...

      Please be easy on Christopher although, I am aware that some of our staff handling Chris post joke comments here and obvoiusly, the Santa Clara County Office of Education disapprove that behavior vehemently:
      https://school.discoveryeducat...

      But it isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody.

      Thank You dear users,
      -Nancy Guerrero

    48. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they are just shutting down the current exchanges to give them time to finish building and opening an exchange that they have full control over. China has never been shy of borrowing and rebranding someone else's good idea. China saves a shit load of money by letting others fund the R&D of new ideas and just stealing any worthwhile idea or product. It's just cheaper to conduct industrial and scientific espionage to keep up in the modern world. And this is especially help considering you can spend billions on R&D only to find out the expected ROI never happens.

    49. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just making up more shit. What year did it average 70? Eyeballing the graph it peaked about 55% in 2007 and took 2 years to drop back under 30 and another year and a bit to get to 20. You will also notice returns went from 90% to negative 60% thats a lot more than a halving of prices.
      Anyway lying tosser is still just a lying tosser.

    50. Re:Also... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Given the choice, I'd pick Litecoin before Ethereum.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    51. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucken A. 1849. livin' the dream. again.

    52. Re:Also... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Can't have regular Chinese moving their funds overseas like the sons and daughters of central committee members.

      That's a pretty silly thing to say and just provides evidence that you've not got a clue about the actual situation there.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    53. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trillions, I think.

    54. Re: Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attacking the speaker of a statement rather than the truth of it is a classic logical fallacy.

    55. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cryptocurrencies compete directly with central bank money. JP Morgan benefits significantly from its association with the Federal Reserve in the US, a special USD privilege it could never have with BTC.

    56. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JP Morgan's CEO referred to bitcoin as a fraud, and made reference to tulips (the first recorded bubble).

      After that, they bought 3M euro worth of XBT note shares(bitcoin.com). They were toying with the price to buy cheap. They obviously see this as a threat. But they're still getting in the game. And you believe in them.

    57. Re: Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Chase Banks are operated/owned by JP Morgan.

  2. Bitcoin's value is still up by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not only is Coindesk showing a rebound above USD$3400 but let's not forget that Bitcoin's value was only around USD$1000 at the beginning of january 2017. So it's still up 200% right now. That USD$5000 value was a bubble and it had to burst.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Bitcoin's value is still up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zero fucks given. I guarantee you that if you check back 20 years from now, you will find the value of BTC has gone to zero between now and then. Anyone that puts any money into it deserves to be parted from said money because they obviously don't understand investing.

    2. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't afford bitcoin, I don't care.

      Well you don't have to buy a whole bitcoin, you could by 0.01 BTC for US$34.00.

    3. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoin is divisible down to 8 decimal places (this means it divides into 100 million pieces). If you think you can't afford Bitcoin, you don't know how Bitcoin works.

    4. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything in Bitcoin is too expensive, I can't use it. Exchange fees, transaction fees, prices etc. It's unusable for people who struggle financially.

    5. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Buy a few thousand Dogecoins. Not expensive and hey, you never know... Litecoin was at $2 less than a year ago.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    6. Re:Bitcoin's value is still up by JeffSh · · Score: 1

      It was only kind of a bubble.

      Bitcoin will go through many boom bust cycles on its way to being a globally relevant store of value. As early adopters realize they have assets that amount to "life changing money", they will sell a portion of their holdings to exchange it for other assets, houses, business investments, cars, education for their kids... whatever.

      Each one of these will trigger a minor panic and send the currency tumbling, before it reaches a low point where it will grow again to the next point where early adopters say "Holy shit i have some money here im going to spend it"

      this will happen several times over the next decade as bitcoin may be on its way to a global reserve currency and trusted store of value.

      of course, bitcoin might NOT be, that's always a risk. Governments and central banks may interfere with it enough to kill it before it can get to that point, but if they don't, then this is a pattern that will happen many times

    7. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Everything in Bitcoin is too expensive, I can't use it. Exchange fees, transaction fees, prices etc. It's unusable for people who struggle financially.

      That's part of the problem right there! What good is BTC as a medium of exchange if using it in transactions is difficult and expensive? If it's going to be a currency, it should be easy to pay one US cent for something using it.

    8. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by ag0ny · · Score: 1

      I can't afford bitcoin

      You're aware that you can buy fractions of a Bitcoin, right? You can buy $10 worth of Bitcoin, or any other cryptocurrency for that matter.

    9. Re:Bitcoin's value is still up by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, because what I want from a currency is wild swings and the ability to speculate instead of hold value long-term. Honestly that sounds like a commodity, not a currency.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    10. Re:Bitcoin's value is still up by WrongMonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Worse... its a commodity that has no utility. I buy pork bellies, I can at least make bacon.

    11. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Which means a huge market will open up as these problems are fixed.

    12. Re:Bitcoin's value is still up by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bingo. If there's anything missing from my current economic experience, surely it must be having to check before I buy anything to see what my currency is actually worth today.

    13. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by Khyber · · Score: 0

      For $34 I can get a 4"x4" 30 gauge plate of 925 sterling silver, throw a couple of good star ruby stones on it, and flip it for $1,000. Probably take an hour of work.

      Bitcoin still loses.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    14. Re:Bitcoin's value is still up by pakar · · Score: 1

      I'll bet you 100000 bitcoins that they still be worth a lot.

    15. Re:Bitcoin's value is still up by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Worse... its a commodity that has no utility

      Digital and decentralized transfer of value is not utility ?

    16. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can *actually* do this, you should probably try selling them on the Bitcoin forum. Lots of rich collectors interested in buying weird high-end Bitcoin-themed memorabilia. You get instant payment which you can cash out into local currency, Kraken charges maybe $10 for a wire transfer to my bank account.

    17. Re:Bitcoin's value is still up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think that would happen if a majority of people got their salaries in bitcoin? The issue is the total value of the currency and if you don't have to switch back and forth.. The larger it becomes the less fluctuations there will be.

      Money, of any kind, is only as valuable as the goods/services you can buy with it. Goods/services is the actual value and whatever currency you use is just a way to easily transfer the value of the goods to another person. Does not matter if it's USD, gold, silver, bitcoin or tulips... Problem with tulips is that they are quite hard to transport, people can grow more of them and they rot quite fast.

    18. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by ag0ny · · Score: 1

      Buy a few thousand Dogecoins. Not expensive and hey, you never know...

      He said "unusable for people who struggle financially", and I have to agree with him on this point.

      Until cryptocurrencies go mainstream, buying/investing in them right now is a gamble. Yes, they've been increasing in value regularly, but that's no indication of what's going to happen in the future. At the end of the day, nobody should be investing in cryptocurrency any money they can't afford to lose.

    19. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Lots of rich collectors interested in buying weird high-end Bitcoin-themed memorabilia.

      Not surprising that there would be a high interest in the community in acquiring something that's actually tangible. Burned out GPU cards don't hold much nostalgia value if that's all you have in the end. I guess you can put your large electric bill in a gilt frame, too.

    20. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't want to invest, I want to use currency. The fees behind using crypto currencies for the services that support it are just too expensive for people struggling financially. Still better off not paying it in a non-crypto currency (even if converting from another non-crypto currency to it) and not only that, it's significantly faster. If I wanted to invest, I'd buy stock, not currency.

    21. Re:Bitcoin's value is still up by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

      Only if the transfer value is stable, which BitCoin is not.

    22. Re:Bitcoin's value is still up by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Probably not. But that still assumes there's a reason everyone would be getting their salaries in Bitcoin in the first place.

    23. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by phayes · · Score: 1

      Sure, right after Hell freezes over...

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    24. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by phayes · · Score: 1

      Buying fractional bitcoins doesn't change the exchange & transaction fees that are exorbitant.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    25. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In something that isn't Bitcoin...

    26. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because people want the digital equivalent of waiting in line at the bank for hours on pay day.

    27. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "If you can *actually* do this"

      I most certainly can.

      "You get instant payment which you can cash out into local currency, Kraken charges maybe $10 for a wire transfer to my bank account."

      I refuse to participate in the bullshit non-backed bullshit that is Bitcoin. At least the fiat dollar has some backing in the Petrodollar and the current slavery economy that the United States is shifting towards (look at all the sudden uprising of more unions and complaints about wage discrimination, etc.,) and before that was backed by hard tangible assets such as gold, which as all kinds of uses from making medicine to making electronics to making jewelry. Bitcoin has the backing of wasted electricity and resources and shitty coding and a shit community which can't agree to anything and splits up more than Hollywood celebrities, and has no wide diversity of uses. It's just a repeat failure of 70s technology and ideas (permissionless and distributed databases,) this time it's worked it's stupid ass into the economy instead of just regular database usage.

      Cash in hand, direct bank-to-bank wire from their actual account, maybe at worst PayPal. I won't accept any other option. No cheque, no credit card, no gift card, nada.

      I might accept marijuana if it is of acceptable quality and potency.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    28. Re:Bitcoin's value is still up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even want to bet anything. If you know you're right, please send 1000 Bitcoins to 17Yvsma9tfiuqVP7QhsFE2VmsFpTEMy17P. Thank you.

    29. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using Bitcoin as a currency has been a problem since day one. It doesn't really feel like it'll ever get to the point of being that usable.

    30. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by torkus · · Score: 1

      It's a gamble for sure, but so is playing lotto...and that gamble is far, far less likely to pay out.

      It's definitely a bubble of some sort and I fully expect to lost 3/4 or more of the money I have in. However if one in 10 stabs in the dark pays off, the return at this junction is still in the more than adequate to cover the other losses and turn a very nice profit.

      If you have enough to day-trade then even that is fairly easy to turn a profit on. Either in the penny stock coins or the bigger players. The death of this will come when actual market players and hedge funds put a HFT equivalent in the mix and drive out the little players.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    31. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by torkus · · Score: 1

      That's where ETH comes in.

      Transactions are typically in the few cents range, easily on par with what credit cards cost (the merchant) for use, though the cost is currently sender-loaded.

      ETH still doesn't process confirm as fast as a credit card...but it's easily quick enough for most transactions outside POS.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    32. Re: Bitcoin's value is still up by torkus · · Score: 1

      To each their own of course...

      But if you actually consider paypal a better alternative than bitcoin, eth, etc. then your qualifications are different than most. You know, paypal that's been known to seize accounts for arbitrary reasons - or none at all - and refuse to return funds unless you jump through a very exact set of hoops if you're lucky enough for them to not just lock down the account entirely and keep everything.

      At least with BTC or ETH there's no higher authority to decide your ETH should be invalidated/refunded because some buyer lied and claimed your produce was counterfeit. Talk to people who sell on ebay and you'll quickly find out how bad the situation is.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    33. Re:Bitcoin's value is still up by torkus · · Score: 1

      You do realize that every few minutes somewhere between 10,000 and 30,000 BTC are exchanged right? What's life-changing money? $500k? That's less than 200 BTC and not something which would significantly (or even noticeably TBH) alter the market.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  3. "percent" by Dan+East · · Score: 1, Informative

    "percent" and "per cent" aren't the same thing, and this is especially grievous when talking about money. I assume Bitcoin didn't fall 36 bitcoins per US cent, but fell 36 percent.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:"percent" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      FT is a British publication and "per cent" is often the preferred option in British English and is closer in meaning than the US favoured "percent". Your assumed possible alternative meaning makes no sense grammatically anyway. If you are going to be a pedant, it helps to be know what you are writing about.

    2. Re:"percent" by mysidia · · Score: 4, Informative

      "percent" and "per cent" aren't the same thing, and this is especially grievous when talking about money.

      False. "Percent" literally means per 100 ( a fraction), and "Per cent" literally means per 100 ( a fraction). It is your "Per US cent" which is completely different, because now you are suddenly comparing it to units of a different currency.

    3. Re:"percent" by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Cent means 100 in latin. "Cent" in English properly refers to a unitless fraction, 1/100. You seem to assume that the word refers to 1/100th of a US dollar, which is kind of odd.

  4. Meanwhile... by cdreimer · · Score: 1

    Silver continues to bounce between $17 and $18 per ounce. No reason to move my cash pile.

    1. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for inflation. It's been around 17 for like years++ which means you are slowly losing money.

    2. Re:Meanwhile... by cdreimer · · Score: 1

      It's been around 17 for like years++ which means you are slowly losing money.

      Silver was $5 per ounce in 2000, peaked at $46 per ounce in 2011, and bouncing around $17 per ounce since 2014.

    3. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's our boy, creimer. He doesn't understand personal finance, investing, or economics, but he has an opinion, by god, and he's gonna share it!

      Adjusted for inflation, silver today has about the same value as it had in the early 1900's. Inflation adjusted average price since 1792 is $15.70. That's over 200 years. If your cash pile is in silver, you're a goddamned idiot.

      But then, you are creimer, so I guess that was redundant.

    4. Re:Meanwhile... by cdreimer · · Score: 1

      If your cash pile is in silver, you're a goddamned idiot.

      If my cash pile was in silver, it wouldn't be a cash pile. As for my silver stack, the average cost per ounce is $23.

    5. Re:Meanwhile... by cdreimer · · Score: 1

      [...] you're a bankruptee [...]

      Pre-Internet (19th century): "Mr. Lincoln, it's unfortunate that you had to file bankruptcy because your business partners abandoned you and the grocery store went under. But, as a bankruptee, what makes you think you can run for president of the United States?"

      "I can never afford to retire, no matter how old I am - and if I ever can't find a new job, or if I have serious medical issues, I guess I'll just sleep on the street!"

      Don't you ever get tired of pulling shit out of your ass?

    6. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* Adjusted for inflation, silver has averaged $15.70 per ounce since 1792. That is not a typo. SEVENTEEEN NINETY TWO.

      The fact that it's spiked a few times because people are fucking panicky idiots doesn't make it a good investment. If you put $15.70 into silver in 1792, you'd have "about $17" today. That's an ATROCIOUS return rate, if you're earning *$2* over 200+ years.

      The ONLY thing you can say for it is that it is a decent hedge against inflation. Of course, inflation is not particularly high these days, and hasn't been for a long time. So hedging against inflation simply means you're throwing away a huge amount of potential returns from better investments.

    7. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So, you've made a new account and you're right back to shitposting and shilling.

      How many times do we have to teach you a lesson, old man?

    8. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you sound bitter, lead tits

    9. Re:Meanwhile... by cdreimer · · Score: 1

      So hedging against inflation simply means you're throwing away a huge amount of potential returns from better investments.

      Some items in my silver stack are worth two to four times the price I paid for them. Most items will resell will above spot prices. Of course, it's all relative. I recently paid $130 for a 5-oz silver coin that sold for $300 a few years ago.

    10. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't teach an old creimer new tricks.

    11. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that it's spiked a few times because people are fucking panicky idiots doesn't make it a good investment. If you put $15.70 into silver in 1792, you'd have "about $17" today. That's an ATROCIOUS return rate,

      Well duh, who invests in silver for the ROI?

      ...oooooh! You don't know that people invest for different reasons. Yeah, there's essentially a spectrum between ROI and SAFETY. If you want ROI, we can optimize for that. If you want SAFETY, we can optimize for that. If you want both, HAHA, tough shit. But you can quite easily have neither. There will always be investors (with a portion of their savings) in silver. Because that's the money they REALLY don't want to lose. That's their bottom dollar of investment. The one they want to be really safe against catastrophe. And maybe this itself is a revelation to some people. A dollar is a dollar (per year, pre/post tax, dirty/clean, with variable levels of traceability and deniability...) But if you look at an individual, there's a lot of game theory that goes into how he spends money. His top dollar is he one he spends first, on frivolous things, impulse purchases, when times are good, for entertainment, maybe for charity because he really likes that altruistic kick. Whatever. His bottom dollar, like I said, is the one he wants to be safe. His emergency fund. The last purchase he make before he's broke. His OH SHIT funds. And ALL the money between his top dollar and bottom dollar live on a uneven and chunky spectrum between those two extremes. Plenty of people are more impulsive than others have think more of they money are like top dollars.

      And this is all tied to the hip with psychology. So nothing I said here is universally applicable to all. It might be more true for more people than not, which is about as good as it gets with psychology. Complicated little bastards.

    12. Re:Meanwhile... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      The price for silver today is under $18. Unless some new 2010-ish style bubble starts up, it wont be over $23 anytime soon. So, on average, you have lost over 20%.

      Yeah, I think I will not be taking financial advice from you.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    13. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wasn't comparing himself to Lincoln, you dolt.

    14. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither was I. Case in point for 2, creimer.

    15. Re:Meanwhile... by cdreimer · · Score: 1

      So, on average, you have lost over 20%.

      If I was to sold my stack at spot.

      Yeah, I think I will not be taking financial advice from you.

      Especially since I'm buying silver for the long term (30+ years) and would love to see spot prices return to $5 per ounce.

    16. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want both, HAHA, tough shit.

      What about investing in working antique guns? Safety + ROI.. :)

    17. Re:Meanwhile... by cdreimer · · Score: 1

      What about investing in working antique guns? Safety + ROI.. :)

      In the SHTF scenarios, the other thing more valuable than precious metals is bullets. Everyone will have guns. But they will trade anything for more bullets.

    18. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pre-Internet (19th century): "Mr. Lincoln, it's unfortunate that you had to file bankruptcy because your business partners abandoned you and the grocery store went under. But, as a bankruptee, what makes you think you can run for president of the United States?"

      Are you *actually* suggesting that you're a modern-day Abraham Lincoln?

      Don't you ever get tired of pulling shit out of your ass?

      It's not pulling shit out of our asses to simply apply logic to your own comments and oral history.

      And, obviously - given the photos I've seen linked of you recently, you never tire of putting shit IN your ass, so... turnabout is fair play, isn't it?

    19. Re:Meanwhile... by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Bullets are the part that come out the barrel.

      You're thinking of shells.

      The really tricky part are the primers. Bullets are easy to cast, as long as you're willing to use solid lead and limit velocities.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    20. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the SHTF scenarios, you can't:

      1) Eat silver.
      2) Drink silver.
      3) Take silver to cure an infection.
      4) Shoot bad guys with chunks of silver.
      5) Shelter yourself with silver.
      6) Use silver as a stand-in for survival skills.

      Any shit-hits-the-fan scenario where silver retains any value whatsoever is not much of a shit-hits-the-fan scenario, as it presumes a still-working economy where people are willing to exchange valuable items and use things like gems and precious metals as stores of value.

      In a true shit-hits-the-fan scenario, the things that will have value are things which are *directly* supportive of human life: food, water, shelter, medicine, self defense. You're already slow enough, creimer - you can't afford to be weighed down with 300 pounds of silver bullion when the shit hits the fan. And having that 300 pounds of silver won't do a fucking thing for you when somebody finds you and takes all of your valuable items.

      Once society begins to rebuild past the every-man-for-himself point, precious metals may become valuable again, but even then, anybody joining a rebuilding society with tools, weapons, food, water, shelter, and the know-how to survive in a broken down society is already a rich man, and will accumulate plenty of whatever value store the new society chooses with relative ease.

    21. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you fucking goof, what's important is shelter, clothes, boots, medications, food, water. THEN you can start indulging in your sci-fi scenarios.
      But not before having PRINTED copies of agriculture, animal husbandry, metal working, carpentry books, biology and MEDICINE books.

      THAT's what you need if your soft, yogurt-like shit hits the fan, you club-footed dunce.

    22. Re:Meanwhile... by cdreimer · · Score: 1

      Are you *actually* suggesting that you're a modern-day Abraham Lincoln?

      I'm just pointing out that I'm not the only American who exercised their constitutional right to file for bankruptcy (the current POTOUS done so four times) and that having a past bankruptcy doesn't disqualify me anything else in life. In fact, I've suffered no negative consequences from having a bankruptcy.

      [...] given the photos I've seen linked of you recently, you never tire of putting shit IN your ass [...]

      I'm unaware of any photo showing off my skinny ass.

    23. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just pointing out that I'm not the only American who exercised their constitutional right to file for bankruptcy (the current POTOUS done so four times) and that having a past bankruptcy doesn't disqualify me anything else in life. In fact, I've suffered no negative consequences from having a bankruptcy.

      *Sigh* Creimer, there is no "constitutional right" to file for bankruptcy. The mention of bankruptcy in the constitution reserves for the federal Congress the power to create bankruptcy courts and laws. The constitution has no opinion on whether or not "filing for bankruptcy" is a right of the citizens or not - it simply gives Congress the power to create laws and courts governing bankruptcy process - it says nothing about what & how that process works.

      I'm unaware of any photo showing off my skinny ass.

      I'm confused - weren't all those russian photo site images photos of you? You were carrying on about revenge porn & dick pics for so long about them, I took that to mean that they were images of you. And there was definitely penetration of various asses in those images!

    24. Re:Meanwhile... by cdreimer · · Score: 1

      Creimer, there is no "constitutional right" to file for bankruptcy.

      Would we have bankruptcy today without it being explicitly mentioned in the constitution? Debtor prisons and penal colonies were popular in Great Britain.

      I'm confused - weren't all those russian photo site images photos of you?

      Russian schoolboys.

    25. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would we have bankruptcy today without it being explicitly mentioned in the constitution? Debtor prisons and penal colonies were popular in Great Britain.

      That does not make it a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. It is a privilege granted to you by the Congress, who exercised their power to create bankruptcy laws. That privilege could have taken *any form whatsoever.*

      In fact, if you look at the history of bankruptcy in the US, you'll see that until 1841 - when voluntary bankruptcy was first allowed by congress - the US closely followed English norms of bankruptcy.

      Russian schoolboys.

      If they're not images of you, how can you have copyrights or revenge porn claims against them?!

    26. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have substantial retirement savings (logic: you recently declared bankruptcy and make a shit salary in an expensive area). You just yesterday said you were going to keep working until you are old.

      You are probably going to die young, otherwise I fully expect you will be a sad homeless old man.

    27. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes sense because, technically, you are still in school.

      Information about Christopher Dale Reimer and autistic people:

      Autistic people have obsessions about things normal people don't care. For example, one of our autistic patient went haywire when he realized that there was a penny missing in his pocket change.

      To calm him down, one of our educator pretended to have found it on the floor and gave a penny to him.

      The autistic patient condition went even worse because he realized it wasn't the same penny!

      Chris has an obsession with budgeting every penny. He doesn't understand that most people do not budget to the penny and have a flexible amount they allow for miscellaneous items.

      I am Nancy Guerrero and I am Director of Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education. We use Chris' (a.k.a. creimer,cdreimer) picture in our document because he is the hardest case we have ever had to handle:
      http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

      Our artists were inspired by the low carb diet that Christopher follows scrupulously for the small lunch box and by the picture linked below for the rest. I am sure that you will notice the similarities such as the bump on the side of his chest and more:
      https://www.cdreimer.com/slash...

      Please be easy on Christopher although, I am aware that some of our staff handling Chris post joke comments here and obvoiusly, the Santa Clara County Office of Education disapprove that behavior vehemently:
      https://school.discoveryeducat...

      But it isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody.

      Thank You dear users,
      -Nancy Guerrero

    28. Re:Meanwhile... by cdreimer · · Score: 1

      You don't have substantial retirement savings (logic: you recently declared bankruptcy and make a shit salary in an expensive area). You just yesterday said you were going to keep working until you are old.

      You are probably going to die young, otherwise I fully expect you will be a sad homeless old man.

      SSDD — try something original once in a while.

    29. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I swear you are going to die young, you fat sexist pig Christopher Dale Reimer.

      I told you I was out of meds yesterday and you didn't even care to contact me you lazy fucker.

      How many time do I have to express the emergency of the situation??????

      The python click script you wrote for my pheromone revenue stream web site suddently stopped to work!!!!!!

      You fucking incompetent python script writer!!!

      When it works, I get 4000+ clicks a day on my pheromone revenue stream web site but only 5 or 6 without it!!!!

      Now, it seems like you dont care and that you have abandoned me you heartless fucking pig!

      Signed:
      The girl that used to love you and now hates you, burn in hell where you belong you sexist pig!

    30. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find the picture in our document linked below pretty original if you ask me, thanks to our great artist talent!

      Information about Christopher Dale Reimer and autistic people:

      Autistic people have obsessions about things normal people don't care. For example, one of our autistic patient went haywire when he realized that there was a penny missing in his pocket change.

      To calm him down, one of our educator pretended to have found it on the floor and gave a penny to him.

      The autistic patient condition went even worse because he realized it wasn't the same penny!

      Chris has an obsession with budgeting every penny. He doesn't understand that most people do not budget to the penny and have a flexible amount they allow for miscellaneous items.

      I am Nancy Guerrero and I am Director of Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education. We use Chris' (a.k.a. creimer,cdreimer) picture in our document because he is the hardest case we have ever had to handle:
      http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

      Our artists were inspired by the low carb diet that Christopher follows scrupulously for the small lunch box and by the picture linked below for the rest. I am sure that you will notice the similarities such as the bump on the side of his chest and more:
      https://www.cdreimer.com/slash...

      Please be easy on Christopher although, I am aware that some of our staff handling Chris post joke comments here and obvoiusly, the Santa Clara County Office of Education disapprove that behavior vehemently:
      https://school.discoveryeducat...

      But it isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody.

      Thank You dear users,
      -Nancy Guerrero

    31. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As that crazy bitch is the proof, my python click script for revenue streams web sites is going to take care of all my needs when I retire.

      So, go back to your basements wankers!

      We will see soon enough who has the last laugh!

    32. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are calling me, your former girlfriend, a crazy bitch now????

      Because, I told you I was out of meds and you are to lazy to take care of myself and the python click script you wrote for my pheromone revenue stream web site suddently stopped to work?

      Go fuck yourself bastard!

      Here is a story that creimer told me when convincing me what a hard life he had:

      The tree was him and the tree knot was his butt hole!

      So, his uncle packed his fat ass with lard and with his cock! Not that it makes much of a difference but anyway, there it is!

      Signed:
      Creimer's former girlfriend

    33. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4) False. It's also good against vampires.

    34. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't done for creativity points. There's just a few things I can tell about you, and of course they're going to be repeated (namely: you are fat, bad with finances, seem unintelligent, seem delusionally egotistical, and have never known the sweet touch of a woman). I have no idea (nor do I care) if you have bad breath or a lisp or whatever.

    35. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "try something original once in a while."

      Coming from Slashdot's resident OCD autist who's been stuck in the same groove for years, that was pretty funny!

  5. Oh Noes! Me ones and zeros!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And, nothing of value was lost.

    1. Re:Oh Noes! Me ones and zeros!?! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Hey! Lots of people get paid to change the order of those ones and zeros, you insensitive clod!

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  6. Plunges... by PortHaven · · Score: 2

    Wait a minute????

    Wait a darn minute...

    I just bought like a $100 of bitcoin a couple months back. It was $1,500 a coin. How does something get labeled "plunging" when it's doubled in a mere few months.

    I would say, BitCoin as "dipped" back down under $3,000 showing some likely minor correction in the BitCoin market.

    1. Re:Plunges... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a matter of perspective. The prices of stocks, currencies, etc. all reflect an expectation of future development. It is nice that your investment worked for you, but that's not really of interest to someone who needs to make a decision whether to buy or sell or wait now. As the warning goes: Past performance is not indicative of future results. There is a fundamental aspect which stands in opposition to calling it a "dip": A large fraction of demand for Bitcoin depends on its usefulness for circumventing China's currency controls. If China cracks down on Bitcoin, that reduces its value to Chinese Bitcoin users, possibly not just temporarily. Eradicating a big portion of the demand for Bitcoin will send the price downward. Bitcoin prices tend to shoot up quickly because of inelastic supply, but the same inelastic supply also causes Bitcoin to drop rapidly. It could very well end up significantly below $1500 again for months or even years. In the extreme, if China manages to permanently curtail the usefulness of Bitcoin, that would put the viability of Bitcoin in question and could end it completely.

    2. Re: Plunges... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People need to check their bayesian priors. If you buy BTC at 4000, expecting it to rise to 8000 in a year, but it immediately drops to 3000 after you buy, you have to decide whether that means your 8000 prediction is completely undermined by the drop, or if it can be chalked up to market fluctuations. If it's the latter, then who gives a fuck? That's emotional investing. If it's the former, then you should have a pretty good reason why you think BTC is just NOW beginning its decline after years of exponential growth.

    3. Re: Plunges... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Past performance is not indicative of future results. It doesn't matter much that it has grown exponentially in the past. It hasn't for much of the time, btw., unless you pick the sample points "right" (i.e. manually, not systematically). But let's suppose you choose to see an exponential fit: It will do that right until it stops doing that. That's why I pointed out the reason for the current "dip", and that reason may even be the end of Bitcoin. Bitcoin has many issues. It is far from clear whether it will be worth more than a penny per Bitcoin 10 years down the line.

    4. Re: Plunges... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mhmmm right. that's why trading algorithms and bots don't make any money at all.

    5. Re: Plunges... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bots mostly exploit arbitrage opportunities. Patterns work because people believe in them and behave predictably. Patterns don't work when circumstances change. The circumstances for Bitcoin have not settled. Trading Bitcoin on patterns works for some and doesn't work for others, i.e. it's luck. People win the lottery too. That doesn't mean they can predict the numbers.

  7. Volatile unbacked currency is volatile! by Kenja · · Score: 1

    news at 11 I guess....

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  8. Eventually governments are going to crack down by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    So far as I can tell Bitcoin's value is mostly tired to illegal things (drugs, ransomware, money laundering, tax evasion, etc). I base this on the fact that there's very little else I can but with it. It was only a matter of time before it got too big for its own good. And I'm not sure I'll miss it. Fiat currencies are a lot more stable since they'll stable so long as the country and it's government are...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Eventually governments are going to crack down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right, when was the last time you tried to buy something in say a supermarket with ounces of gold? Personally i see Bitcoin and other currencies not that different from investments like gold, silver or other precious metals, stones etc.

      Well there is a difference, a very important one, with Cryptocurrencies you can know exactly where your money is saved. You can also cut out the middle man, which actually terrifies traditional banks, governments and trading companies.

    2. Re: Eventually governments are going to crack down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are thinking of cash

    3. Re:Eventually governments are going to crack down by thechemic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You can get a shift card, a bitpay card, and dozens of other debit style cards tied to your bitcoin. I mine bitcoin at home, and then I spend it EVERYWHERE AND ANYWHERE THAT VISA/MASTERCARD ARE ACCEPTED. I just bought lunch with bitcoin today. A couple days ago I bought a headset from best buy using bitcoin. I also paid my $1300 electric bill with bitcoin. I pay my car insurance with bitcoin.

      Because mining produces FAR MORE money that the electricity costs, everything I bought with bitcoin was essentially free. If you truly believe that bitcoin is only for illegal things, you've got your head in the sand or otherwise somewhere where the sun don't shine.

      --
      Let's make like a bird... and get the flock outta here.
    4. Re: Eventually governments are going to crack down by reanjr · · Score: 1

      I for one am happy to utilize BTC as a legitimate proxy investment into black market activity. Black markets are pretty good investments when diversified and legitimized.

    5. Re:Eventually governments are going to crack down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just curious. Whats the life expectancy of parrots? By my count at the minimum 7 years so far.

    6. Re:Eventually governments are going to crack down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok important question:
      why do you have a $1300 electric bill!

    7. Re:Eventually governments are going to crack down by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      > ok important question:
      > why do you have a $1300 electric bill!

      It's to mine all those free bitcoins!! /snark

    8. Re: Eventually governments are going to crack down by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      His cubicle at work has the $1300 electric bill. And besides, it's only $854.17.

    9. Re:Eventually governments are going to crack down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are saying that mining produces FAR MORE money that the electricity costs, the we know you are nothing but a scummy liar.

    10. Re:Eventually governments are going to crack down by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      +Funny

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  9. 3 bit coin currencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought there was 2 bit coin forks.

    They have 3 separate values?

    Shouldn't they each be worth 1/3 of pre-fork?

    The real fork hasn't happened yet. The one where Ethereum or Bitcoin replaces proof-of-work with one of the many alternatives that allows the currency to grow without attaching processors directly to nuclear power plants.

  10. Bitcoin's been way up before and dropped 75% by perpenso · · Score: 2

    Lets also remember that a few years ago Bitcoin spiked to $1,1000 and then dropped to $250 and spent a couple years around there. Yes, people who bought around $1,000 are up in the long term, but more patient people who were cautious due to the spike and bought a year later at $250 are up 4x more than those who bought on the spike.

    The current spike to $5,000 looks a lot like the 2014 spike to $1,100. I am *not* saying we will see a similar $75% drop, merely that waiting to buy might be prudent and even at $3,400 we might still be at an overly enthusiastic level. We seem to currently be on the downward side of the spike, perhaps wait until things stabilize and prices are relatively flat before buying? Waiting on the scale of months not days?

    1. Re:Bitcoin's been way up before and dropped 75% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you not understand that reasonable currencies don't behave this way? These are death throes.

    2. Re:Bitcoin's been way up before and dropped 75% by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      merely that waiting to buy might be prudent and even at $3,400 we might still be at an overly enthusiastic level.

      Then again, maybe not. Nobody knows.

    3. Re:Bitcoin's been way up before and dropped 75% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All currencies with a low total value behaves like this... The larger the market the smaller the fluctuations will be.

      I think that bitcoin would grow in adaptation if it was easier to get (ATM) and that more places accepted it for purchases.
      https://techcrunch.com/2016/03...

      The current big drop is because of what happened in China, and we don't know if anything there will be reversed....

      I'm planning to buy a few more bitcoins, as soon as it starts to stabilize.. I do know it's a high-risk investment but i do have the option to sell them if i stop seeing a future for it..

    4. Re:Bitcoin's been way up before and dropped 75% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you call it a high-risk investment and only invest as much as you can afford to lose.

      Either it shoots up, or it stays where it is, or it drops.. But with the current situation in the world the adaptation of bitcoin seems to grow, but a bit slow, so i think there is a fairly high chance for profit if you look the coming 2-3 years at least. If it will continue after that is hard to say.

    5. Re:Bitcoin's been way up before and dropped 75% by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      I don't have any skin in the game, but technical traders in equities would tell you that you are looking for the "head and shoulders" graph-- a drop with lower peaks after a big run up-- to foreshadow gloom. If in a few weeks BTC climbs back up to 4,000 and drops to 2,000 that is bad. If it climbs to 6,000 and drops to 4,000-- not so much.

      Bitcoin may last... or it may fail. Regulatory pressure in the next few years is likely to be a burden for it.

    6. Re:Bitcoin's been way up before and dropped 75% by torkus · · Score: 1

      I love the investment advice here on /. almost as much as the corny and poorly analyzed predictions in various blockchain news outlets.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    7. Re:Bitcoin's been way up before and dropped 75% by torkus · · Score: 1

      People thought $1000 was ridiculous, shortly after they thought that $300 was insane which wasn't that long after $1 seemed farfetched.

      $5000 is impossible much less $20,000 or whatever is next...but they'll either happen or BTC will be forked to something that scales to suit the pricing.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  11. Use APKoins instead... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: APKoins are far superiror to other cryptocurriences

    Get by post links to hosts file engine
    Get by dusting no BALL 'ner-do-wells'
    Get by catching Soros funded puppets
    Get by give POOR security advice
    Get by shitty english
    Get by post ANTISEMITIC ravings
    Get by be ragaing asshole

    Redeemable for some premium moose dick. You can suk or take in ass.

    P.S.=> Beware I have cornered market but might share. Moose dick orgy... apk

  12. what to expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hei, what to expect to say a banker.. They are making millions of USD and they are behind wars, political issues, Africa daily robberies etc... The bankers DO NOT WANT BITCOIN, The same was years ago when some politicians did not encourage Interner. Btw Bitcoin price is again well above 3000 USD. Money are trust, bitcoin is well in this category. Sorry but bankers are not good.

  13. Don't conflate interest in blockchain with Bitcoin by perpenso · · Score: 2

    People sometimes conflate the commercial interest in blockchain technology with interest in Bitcoin. They are two very different things. Will blockchain be around in 20 years and be an important part of asset management and the financial industry, quite possibly. Will Bitcoin be around in 20 years, worth tens of thousands of dollars per coin or largely forgotten and worth $0.25 again? Who knows. Bitcoin could be easily displaced that far out. But on a timescale of a few years its got a decent chance to still be around.So maybe its OK for trading but not investing your passive retirement savings in.

    What we need is a car analogy. Blockchain is like the internal combustion engine. Bitcoin is like a particular automobile manufacturer. Is it a Maxwell, a former member of the top 3, a peer of General Motors and Ford, who went defunct in 1925, or is it a survivor like Ford? It could go either way. Bitcoin is just one of many consumer products based on a technology, a different product may suit consumer needs better, its only the technology that is likely to persist.

  14. China strategy by asjk · · Score: 1

    for commerce seems to be a variation of Embrace, Extend, and Extinguish.

  15. Ob by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    1) Become member of Chinese equivalent of Politburo.
    2) Short bitcoin
    3) ????
    4) Profit!!!!!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  16. Bitcoin an easily transferable asset, not currency by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Do you not understand that reasonable currencies don't behave this way? These are death throes.

    Bitcoin is not a currency, it is an asset. An easily transferable asset since it is a digital asset. An asset with no gatekeepers to impede that asset transfer.

    Bitcoin is a competitor to PayPal and other such payment vehicles, not to currencies like the US Dollar or the Euro. Not anytime soon despite the enthusiast's fondest wishes. However it is also a speculative trading vehicle, and also a highly speculative investment vehicle. Trading with a timeframe of some small number of years is one thing, investing on the scale of decades is something else entirely. I missed two highly speculative investment opportunities, Bitcoin when it was $0.25, and Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back action figures when I worked in a warehouse in the 1980s and unloaded and stocked thousands of cases of those action figures. If only I had the foresight to have bought a couple of cases at the time. :-)

  17. And it's back up again already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt this has anything to do with china this pattern has been happening for quite some time. Seems to me that since bitcoin prices are often simple mean values of multiple exchanges it is possible to sell short (to yourself) on many exchanges to "manipulate" price?

  18. +700 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +$700 USD since the publication of this news.... WTF is happening ?

    1. Re:+700 by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      +$700 USD since the publication of this news.... WTF is happening ?

      Common sense. People see "X" hits new recent low. So they buy it so they can cash it out when it his new recent high again.

      Just like when headlines were made that it hit $5000 everyone started selling.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:+700 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally have a hard time with Bitcoin. Gold is a material object that has some use beyond money. The Dollar is at least backed by my Government, and has been very stable for a long time. Is it possible to use Bitcoin anywhere? I have never seen a store that accepts it, or even a large online retailer. How is this still a thing? When its value swings by a $1000 in a day, how can you use it as anything other than an investment vehicle, a rather volatile one at that. Additionally, now we can just fork it, so do I have twice as much as I did yesterday?

      I guess my question for the community is, who is buying Bitcoin, and why?

    3. Re:+700 by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Microsoft, Steam, Newegg, Overstock, Dish Network, and Expedia are a few well established companies you probably have heard of that accept Bitcoin as a payment method. You also can donate to the likes of Wikipedia or EFF with Bitcoin. Then you have places like Gyft or even CardCash where you can buy gift cards. There are plenty of places to spend Bitcoin

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  19. Calculating bit coins adaptive value by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    For things like gold and tulips which lack significant underlying intrinsic value the price is set by a speculative market. ( yes I'm ignoring golds use in the semiconductor industry for exposition).

    Bit coin differs in two fundamental ways that ideally should link its price to a fixed value but empirically do not. I am struggling to figure out why the theory fails.

    To be specific , first there is a cost to mine bit coin and this cost rises as more mining capacity is working because bitcoin adapts its difficulty towards a fixed rate of solution. Ergo there is a cost in dollars and this cost keeps rising . Ideally, the price of bitcoin should be this cost plus a small incentive.

    But that's not all. The second key difference is that to transact bitcoin there has to be a mining event. A mining event won't happen if the marginal cost of mining is less than the reward( a payoff denominated in bitcoins).

    This last feature is very different from gold and it should prevent the price from dropping below some ratio to the mining cost. I.e. If you get 12 coins for mining a transaction then the price of a coin can't be less than 1/12 the cost to the miner.

    If the price of bitcoin is far above the mining cost then more miners enter, the difficulty ratchets up and thus the cost of mining should rise to almost 12x the price.

    Under this logic bitcoin should have a very stable and slowly rising valuation. There should not be fluctuation when there are changes in exchanges or other competitive coins happen etc. it should be always tied to the mining cost due to those two factors .

    So why is this logic so off when we observe the actual price???

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re: Calculating bit coins adaptive value by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      Adding a clarification to the parent post.

      An easy but wrong retort to the above logic is for someone to say it's only worth what someone is willing to pay.

      That's true of everything except bitcoin. Why? Because you can't actually offer less than it costs to mine because there's no way for the offerer to consummate the transaction unless a miner confirms it. A miner probably won't mine if the price of bit coin falls below the mining costs.

      A second wrong retort is to say that the miners reward isn't just the coin but a fee. But I think this fee can be rolled into the effective price of bitcoin and so we can ignore this effect for now while fees are low .

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    2. Re:Calculating bit coins adaptive value by G · · Score: 1

      Speculation. Money pouring into market cap in the hopes of making more money. If there were no exchanges to facilitate speculation you may very well be right. But once people start trading it the value based on production cost is out the window.

    3. Re: Calculating bit coins adaptive value by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this is a possible answer to this conundrum. If I owned a bazillion bitcoin and I panic when the price drops below 1/12 the mining cost because now miners won't mine so I have a non liquid item. I can't even give it away let alone sell it cheap without the cooperation of a miner. And they won't mine when the selling price is too low.

      So what I do is I offer to pay the full cost needed to make a mining event profitable. It's a hefty fee but with a bazzillion bitcoins worth nothing if I don't pay it, it's cheap by comparison.

      So does this mean that fees are the reason for bitcoin volatility?

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    4. Re: Calculating bit coins adaptive value by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      People trade it with a value that is based on it's scarcity. So the cost to produce it will always be a major factor in it's value.

    5. Re: Calculating bit coins adaptive value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have that backwards. The quantity is algorithmically determined. The scarcity is based on that quantity and the demand, which determines the price. Production cost is in turn detemined by that price and the competition among producers. If the price falls, producers leave the market, and the cost to produce drops until it nears long term equilibrium. If the price rises, producers enter the market, and the cost to produce rises until it nears the long term equilibrium. The miner's cost is completely irrelevant to the market price of the asset.

    6. Re: Calculating bit coins adaptive value by pakar · · Score: 1

      And what happens if you get less miners? Well the difficultly drops so it requires less electricity to mine there by making it profitable again to mine..

      Fees by themselves are there to allow miners to make a bit extra.. The miners will pick the transactions with the highest fees first and include in the blocks, so if there are loads of unconfirmed transactions people will choose to pay a higher fee to have their transactions complete faster. But even then, when we had the issue with loads of unconfirmed transactions i still could make payments with low fees, but they took forever before being included (confirmed) in a block.

      If you look far into the future, when all payable blocks have been mined, it will only be transaction-fees that will pay for the miners.

      If bitcoin will survive i think we will have bitcoin-miners in everything where we have a need to generate heat from electricity. Why push electricity thru a resistor to generate heat when we can have a
        CPU/ASIC/FPGA/whatever using the same amount of electricity to do bitcoin-calculations and still generate the same amount of heat, with the benefit of collecting some transaction-fees. Of course the miners will have to drop down quite a bit in price for that to happen.

    7. Re:Calculating bit coins adaptive value by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      Okay but if the price is higher than the production cost then more miners will turn on their rigs, the rate of mining will rise, and then the bitcoin algorithm will respond by increasing the difficulty.

      thus the cost of mining always rises to match the current speculative price. Or should eventually.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    8. Re: Calculating bit coins adaptive value by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      The quantity is algorithmically determined? You mean, rather than use more electricity, I can just use a better algorithm? That would mean everybody would be using that algorithm, and the quantity would again immediately be determined by the cost of electricity.

      No, I think the quantity of bitcoin that can be 'mined' is dependent on the amount of energy expended, plus of course the equipment cost. Sure people constantly design and implement upgraded mining equipment, but that doesn't linearally scale the quantities.

    9. Re: Calculating bit coins adaptive value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're also completely ignoring gold's main use: ceremonial, decorative.

      If every speculator and investor left gold, there's still a huge market. Not so for Bitcoin, which is a shit currency so nobody uses it as one.

    10. Re: Calculating bit coins adaptive value by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Gold has tremendous utility. If it were more common most of the things that people use that are made out of metal would be made out of gold alloys.

    11. Re:Calculating bit coins adaptive value by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      Miners not prioritize transactions without a fee attached. The days when bitcoin transfers are free are years behind us.

      There is another problem regarding bitcoin mining: the majority is in China where it is clear as mud if they are actually businesses that could survive under normal economic conditions. Even if someone gave me the most up to date asics in a new server, I could not pay even a quarter of my electrical bill running the thing. What are the costs that Chinese miners are paying? Or are they just stealing electricity by the consent of silent partners who are politically connected? Even if this extreme is not the case, China's electrical power costs are trending up, as they move away from coal fired plants and the demand for electricity continues to grow.

      This all adds up to a hidden subsidy of bitcoin. What happens if the subsidy is removed? Transaction costs go up a lot, which will depress bitcoins usage by non-speculators.

    12. Re: Calculating bit coins adaptive value by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      No it does not take less electricity to mine if there are fewer miners. It takes EXACTLY the same amount of electricity. the ratio of the mining cost to the rewards would be the same evenif there was one miner.

      Fees are a different ball of wax and I admitted in a follow up below that these could contribute to price fluctuation. But remeber there were price fluctuations long before fees came into bitcoin. And at the moment fees are more about prioritization than coin valuation.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    13. Re: Calculating bit coins adaptive value by catprog · · Score: 1

      And what happens if you get less miners? Well the difficultly drops so it requires less electricity to mine there by making it profitable again to mine..

      Fees by themselves are there to allow miners to make a bit extra.. The miners will pick the transactions with the highest fees first and include in the blocks, so if there are loads of unconfirmed transactions people will choose to pay a higher fee to have their transactions complete faster. But even then, when we had the issue with loads of unconfirmed transactions i still could make payments with low fees, but they took forever before being included (confirmed) in a block.

      If you look far into the future, when all payable blocks have been mined, it will only be transaction-fees that will pay for the miners.

      If bitcoin will survive i think we will have bitcoin-miners in everything where we have a need to generate heat from electricity. Why push electricity thru a resistor to generate heat when we can have a

        CPU/ASIC/FPGA/whatever using the same amount of electricity to do bitcoin-calculations and still generate the same amount of heat, with the benefit of collecting some transaction-fees. Of course the miners will have to drop down quite a bit in price for that to happen.

      Or you use a heat pump and get more heat for the same amount of electricity.

      --
      My Transformation Website
      Kindle Books http://www.catprog.org/rev
      Interactive CYOA http://www.catprog.org/st
    14. Re: Calculating bit coins adaptive value by pakar · · Score: 1

      No it does not take less electricity to mine if there are fewer miners. It takes EXACTLY the same amount of electricity. the ratio of the mining cost to the rewards would be the same evenif there was one miner.

      Eh what?
      1 miner doing mining with a 500W (1Mh/s) machine. Network adjust difficultly to allow for 1 block mined every 10 minutes.. total mining power is 500W and will result in 1 block every 10 minutes... Ie 6 blocks per hour for 500W..
      100 miners doing mining with 500W (1Mh/s) machines.. Network adjust difficultly to allow for 1 block every 10 minutes.. Total mining power is 50KW and will result in 1 block every 10 minutes..

      It does take a bit of time for the network to adjust difficulty, but it slowly (adjustments made every 2000-ish blocks) adjust the difficulty to allow for 1 block every 10 minutes for the whole network.

      So lets say we allow for the network to adjust to each of these situations.
      Total of 1 miner would mine 12.50*6 (=75) bitcoins in one hour at a cost of 0.5KW. (6.6Wh per bitcoin)
      Total of 100 miners would mine 12.5*6 (=75) bitcoins in one our at a cost of 50KW. (666Wh per bitcoin)

      https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Dif...

    15. Re: Calculating bit coins adaptive value by pakar · · Score: 1

      Or you use a heat pump and get more heat for the same amount of electricity.

      Good point.. But there are some situations where a heat-pump would not be viable, like possibly a water-heater or stove... Or as a dump-load for solar/wind etc.

  20. Re: Don't conflate interest in blockchain with Bit by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    Bitcoin will still have nostalgia value. Magic the Gathering cards and Beanie Babies are still worth something, after all. People look back at their youth and smile, even when it is foolish things they did that they remember.

    The fact that there is no tangible relic to keep 15 years down the road is sort of a problem. Mount Gox 'investors' of the more recent era don't have trading cards they can get out of a shoebox and look at, like earlier Mount Gox 'investors.' Amway has that problem, too, as the soap is all eventually down a drain... Tulip bulbs grow into flowers and are gone... It's just how it goes.

  21. Re: Bitcoin an easily transferable asset, not curr by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    If you had a few cases of those Star Wars figures, you could now crater their value almost immediately. I suppose you could sell them out into the market slowly instead, because there's a slow steady return in that sort of hustle.

  22. Re: Don't conflate interest in blockchain with Bi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Penny for your thoughts is just a saying, nobody ever pays the penny.

  23. Re: Bitcoin an easily transferable asset, not curr by perpenso · · Score: 1

    A case only had 24, but yeah eBay slowly. Same with bitcoins, large holders have to sell slowly. :-)

  24. Re:Use APKoins instead... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: APKoins are far superiror to other cryptocurriences

    Get by post links to hosts file engine

    Get by dusting no BALL 'ner-do-wells'

    Get by catching Soros funded puppets

    Get by give POOR security advice

    Get by shitty english

    Get by post ANTISEMITIC ravings

    Get by be ragaing asshole

    Redeemable for some premium moose dick. You can suk or take in ass.

    P.S.=> Beware I have cornered market but might share. Moose dick orgy... apk

    I have no idea what you're talking about. All I got from your post is that you like moose dicks.

  25. Re: Don't conflate interest in blockchain with Bi by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Penny for your thoughts is just a saying, nobody ever pays the penny.

    US$0.000864 for your doge coin. :-)

  26. Re:Trump's fault! by Muros · · Score: 1

    Much as I'd love to jump at any chance blame Trump for anything, I'd say North Korea is closer to the mark. They've pissed off the Chinese, and the Chinese are attacking their revenue stream. There was a related story here two days ago.

  27. down.. down.. down.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    keep going.

    maybe i'll finally get to upgrade my damn video card without getting fucked in the ass by scalpers jacking prices up past msrp.

  28. /r/bitcoin insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been checking over the Bitcoin reddit, there is some real insanity going on over there, like this:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/70afah/to_every_poor_soul_who_sold_his_bitcoins_at_3000/

    Apparently, people there think you should hold onto an extremely volatile asset/currency. Logically, if someone bought BC at 4800, sold at downswing at 4300 (-500), they could then buy at a lowpoint of 3000 and still profit on the upswing.

  29. New paradigm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bought big at $3K yesterday.

    Two years ago, I bought Bitcoin to enable dark web purchases. Now I am buying and holding Bitcoin as an investment.

    As a bonus, my dark web purchases are now free because of what I have earned on Bitcoin.

  30. Re: Bitcoin an easily transferable asset, not curr by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    I have some rare vintage microprocessors. I recognized what they were by the part number when somebody listed five or six tubes of them (25 to the tube) on eBay, and spent about $100 to snap them all up. I can sell them at about $25 each to collectors, but only if I don't try to sell them ten at a time.

    That's nerd cred, btw, when you can hustle rare microprocessors for a tidy profit.

  31. Why? You invest like a trump voter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you invest in mutual funds and utilities like a normal person?
    I would accept that maybe you're trying to dodge mainstream investing for some reason. But silver and gold are actually popular investments during panics for people who don't know much about investing so it's not like you're sniffing out overlooked value.

    Sort of cargo cult investing. Rich people move their cash their when their inside connections tell them the market will crash.. everyone else loses their shirt when the market tanks and then puts what's left in 'safe gold' cause that's what rich people are doing. This inflates the price... the rich quietly move their money out of precious metals while the filthy peasants* prop up the price.

    *(that's you)
    _____________________________________________
    Don't miss today's BIG SALES of 'lifelike fully anatomically correct' My Little Pony/Sonic the Hedgehog merchandise on AMAZON.COM!! [link]

  32. Re: Bitcoin an easily transferable asset, not curr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Bitcoin is an asset and not a currency, then it is a pyramid scheme and will collapse eventually like any pyramid scheme.

    Enron was the fastest rising stock in history for a long time, until the music stopped.

  33. Re: Bitcoin an easily transferable asset, not curr by perpenso · · Score: 1

    People still buying 65C02 to upgrade their //e ? :-)

  34. Re: Bitcoin an easily transferable asset, not curr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its an asset according to the US Internal Revenue Service.

    You have the wrong financial theory. For Bitcoin it is not "pyramid scheme", its "greater fool". Two different things.

  35. Re: Bitcoin an easily transferable asset, not cur by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    That is not a rare microprossor.

  36. Re: Use APKoins instead... apk by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    Is APK an alias of Martin Shkreli?

  37. Are you sure you didn't vote for trump. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would we have bankruptcy today without it being explicitly mentioned in the constitution? Debtor prisons and penal colonies were popular in Great Britain.

    I dunno if you're so curious why don't you just go and look:
      To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
    So that's what the constitution has to say about bankruptcies. It doesn't even get it's own fucking sentence!

        We have bankruptcy because it's mentioned in other laws. Can you fucking believe it we have laws other than the constitution?

    Constitution fetish? Virgin? Precious metal fetish? Obsession with christian religion? Fatness?

    Are you sure you didn't vote for trump cause you fill all the boxes.

  38. Re:Why? You invest like a trump voter. by cdreimer · · Score: 1

    Why don't you invest in mutual funds and utilities like a normal person?

    I do in my brokerage and retirement accounts. Precious metals should only represent 10% of your total assets.

  39. Re:Why? You invest like a trump voter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Money management advice about Christopher Dale Reimer and autistic people:

    Autistic people have obsessions about things normal people don't care. For example, one of our autistic patient went haywire when he realized that there was a penny missing in his pocket change.

    To calm him down, one of our educator pretended to have found it on the floor and gave a penny to him.

    The autistic patient condition went even worse because he realized it wasn't the same penny!

    Chris has an obsession with budgeting every penny. He doesn't understand that most people do not budget to the penny and have a flexible amount they allow for miscellaneous items.

    I am Nancy Guerrero and I am Director of Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education. We use Chris' (a.k.a. creimer,cdreimer) picture in our document because he is the hardest case we have ever had to handle:
    http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

    Our artists were inspired by the low carb diet that Christopher follows scrupulously for the small lunch box and by the picture linked below for the rest. I am sure that you will notice the similarities such as the bump on the side of his chest and more:
    https://www.cdreimer.com/slash...

    Please be easy on Christopher although, I am aware that some of our staff handling Chris post joke comments here and obvoiusly, the Santa Clara County Office of Education disapprove that behavior vehemently:
    https://school.discoveryeducat...

    But it isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody.

    Thank You dear users,
    -Nancy Guerrero

  40. Re: Bitcoin an easily transferable asset, not cur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good point. You're right.

    The thing it is not is a sound investment based on strong economic fundamentals.

  41. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You did nothing of the sort. You just tried, poorly, to excuse your first lie by doubling down with a bigger one.
    Where are your non lying statistics then?

  42. Re: Why? You invest like a trump voter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But did you buy the Sonic the hedgehog sex doll off of his Amazon affiliate link?

  43. Re: Bitcoin an easily transferable asset, not cur by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Are you selling 6581's?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  44. Re:Why? You invest like a trump voter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Precious metals should only represent 10% of your total assets.

    What's the rationale for that number? Did you read it somewhere on the internet, like on a site that focuses on selling you precious metals?

    As with most things, it depends on your retirement horizon. If you're 2 years from retiring, and you expect the market to do poorly in the next couple years, it makes sense to shift some of your funds into a relatively inflation-stable investment. If you're 20 years from retiring, you shouldn't be worrying about hedging against inflation, you should be worried about maximizing your returns with solid growth and blue chip stocks that will increase your portfolio's value.

    You shift to a more conservative mix as you near retirement, you don't just say "10% has to be metals."

  45. Re:Why? You invest like a trump voter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a recent bankruptee still in debt, surely this is just a few thousand dollars he's talking about, in which case who cares if it's 10% or 20% or 50%.

    Dude is planning on never retiring, so it's just a small amount of money he plays with so he can make believe he's doing what the big kids are doing.

  46. Re: Bitcoin an easily transferable asset, not cur by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    The processor I have are 12 bit processors that run the PDP-8 Instruction Set.