Slashdot Mirror


Turning Off Wi-Fi and Bluetooth in iOS 11's Control Center Doesn't Actually Turn Off Wi-Fi or Bluetooth (vice.com)

An anonymous reader shares a Motherboard report: Turning off Bluetooth and Wi-Fi when you're not using them on your smartphone has long been standard, common sense, advice. Unfortunately, with the iPhone's new operating system iOS 11 - which was released to the general public yesterday - turning them off is not as easy as it used to be. Now, when you toggle Bluetooth and Wi-Fi off from the iPhone's Control Center -- the somewhat confusing menu that appears when you swipe up from the bottom of the phone -- it actually doesn't completely turn them off. While that might sound like a bug, that's actually what Apple intended in the new operating system. But security researchers warn that users might not realize this and, as a consequence, could leave Bluetooth and Wi-Fi on without noticing. Numerous Slashdot readers have complained about this "feature" this week.

226 comments

  1. Very Brave by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was very brave and forward thinking of Apple to not allow you to turn off Wifi.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re: Very Brave by sound+vision · · Score: 5, Informative

      Another decision to impede security in the name of convenience. People act like Microsoft only does this.

    2. Re: Very Brave by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You know...while I do not consider myself an Apple Fanboy....I have enjoyed many of their products over the past years.

      But man...after Steve passed away, it does seem to be going downhill there. The UI is just not as intuitive anymore. Gaffs of things not working, like the watch LTE problems on release, and stuff like this.

      I had hoped the folks he'd had following him had had some of the intuition he'd displayed on how things should be (some losers, but mostly good IMHO) and work that make products easy and fun to use for he user, and have them be intuitive.....but alas, that does not seem to be the case and we see blunder after blunder and design and UI flaw after flaw.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lots of people at Apple thought Jobs was an asshole, but if that is what it takes to get a good product out the door then so be it

      Apple needs an asshole in leadership, or they just become another complacent tech company headed for the waste-bin

    4. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Apple used to actually do some great things; make some great software; make some great hardware. Were they as religiously-fantastic as the fanbois wanted to pretend they were? Not really, but is any product or company really as great as the fanatically-inclined want to believe? Nope.

      But since the passing of The Steve everything they do has gone downhill faster than any other tech company I've ever see outside Microsoft - and at least Microsoft is occasionally willing to reverse direction and fix things. Those currently "in charge" at Apple aren't doing anything that's even good, let alone great. It's all turned to shit.

      A bunch of corporate asshats with zero vision. Hell, they have anti-vision; they are actually taking stuff that's already great and ruining it. That's even worst than being unable to design something great in the first place...

    5. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it doesn't yet seem as bad as Goolag, Apple does seem to be becoming another SJW-converged company that's more concerned about politics than customers. So it's no surprise to me they're becoming less and less successful at producing good products.

    6. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      APFS, Swift, A6 thru A11, Airpods, TrueColor, TrueMotion, TouchID, FaceID, Apple Pay, Apple Pencil...
      But hey, don't let facts get in the way of a good narrative.

    7. Re: Very Brave by ilsaloving · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that they replaced an engineer with a pointy haired boss with an MBA. Tim Cook knows how to do is squeeze people for more cash, exploiting their captive user base until people throw their hands up in the air and walk away.

      It's ironic, Microsoft is trying so hard to be like Apple, but Apple is trying very hard to be like Oracle.

    8. Re: Very Brave by peragrin · · Score: 1

      I submitt to you. The iPhone 4, the G4 cube, etc

      Apple has always hd these gaffs. I personal wonder if the iPhone X and the G4 cube suffer the same fate. Loved by some hated by many and anniversary products are usually pretty crappy.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    9. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs wasn't an engineer.

    10. Re: Very Brave by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MacPro, the dwindling mini, the 'touch bar', dongles, port starvation, thin, thin, thin!!!

      Oh, and iTunes.

      I win!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    11. Re: Very Brave by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Another decision to impede security in the name of convenience. People act like Microsoft only does this.

      And those complaining about insecure features act like the other 99% of consumers actually give a shit about privacy or security.

      They don't.

    12. Re: Very Brave by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Beats. Apple Music. Final Cut X, 'Minimalist' interfaces. Disappearing headphone jacks.

      Disappearing contrast.

      Oh, and iTunes.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    13. Re: Very Brave by Khyber · · Score: 5, Insightful

      https://youtu.be/ZBma82g3Uag

      Apple has become exactly what Jobs originally did not like.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    14. Re: Very Brave by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      The problem is that they replaced an engineer with a pointy haired boss with an MBA.

      It sounds like you called Jobs an "engineer" -- but he most decidedly was not that, so I assume you were referring to Wozniak.

      And I agree.

    15. Re:Very Brave by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

      It was very witty and clever of you to use the same old tired joke from last year.

    16. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not everything they've done is gold.
      But it takes an extraordinary level of willful ignorance to claim that "Those currently "in charge" at Apple aren't doing anything that's even good, let alone great".

    17. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. It's a blanket statement, a generalization. It won't be an accurate thing to say.

      GPP sounds like someone gargling balls with the sort of stuff he thinks were "great" though.

    18. Re: Very Brave by torkus · · Score: 1

      They all CARE...as long as it doesn't interfere with then doing the various inane things people MUST DO ZOMG CAPTURE THAT FOR SNAPCHAT WHERE IS MY EMOJI FACE AND QUICK HIT THE AUTOFIX MY FACE AND MAKE ME PRETTY BUTTON

      Oh...you have your pictures encrypted because you send noodz to your SO all the time and don't want your spouse to know? well...yeah. that needs a password.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    19. Re: Very Brave by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Beats. Apple Music. Final Cut X, 'Minimalist' interfaces. Disappearing headphone jacks.

      I agree with you on all, with the exception of FCPX.

      It takes a little getting used to the different editing paradigm, but I actually like it.

      Once you get used to it, you can fly through edits....but it is different than the old track based Premier style approach.

      Not saying either is better, just different. Both have advantages and disadvantages.

      FCPX on newer Macs is damned fast too.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    20. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      no, efeet "design" wackjobs and Jony Ives sychophants.

    21. Re: Very Brave by bobmajdakjr · · Score: 1

      its been doing that since before ios 11 - been able to air drop, apple tv remote, and tether, all while both wifi and bt are âoeoffâ for a while.

    22. Re: Very Brave by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      After that video you linked to, youTube jumped to another one with Steve Jobs getting upset that too many people in the conference room were using their WiFi, screwing up the Apple demos. He was ordering people to turn their WiFi off and even asking them to police each other. Kind of ironic that Apple itself is now making it more difficult to turn WiFi off.

      Jeez, one of the main reasons I often turn WiFi off is because, when I'm in a taxi browsing the internet, WiFi keeps connecting to all sorts of WiFi base stations with captive portals and interrupting my browsing. So now, when I turn it off, it will turn off that portal but a few minutes later, since I 'moved to a new location", according to Apple's documentation it will go "It looks like you want to connect to this new network" and connect without asking. The button is completely useless now.

      OK, back to the old iOS 6 routine of opening the settings to turn off WiFi (until they decide to change the behavior there too). Idiots.

    23. Re: Very Brave by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's the marketing myth. So many people believe that Steve Jobs personally build the iPhone from scratch, designed the Apple I and II and Macintosh, etc. It's as if they think that all those Apple employees were only there to make the buildings feel less empty.

    24. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you agree with most nerds that the decline at Apple began at the introduction of the Macintosh, then backing the Woz thesis is correct. Apple ceased being an interesting company to tech geeks in about 1985 when they turned into a "slicker than thou" marketing and culture operation.

    25. Re: Very Brave by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm one of those nerds. Although my problem with the shift wasn't that they became less interesting (although they certainly did). It's that they actively spurned the hobbyist community that helped make them a serious company.

    26. Re: Very Brave by cheesybagel · · Score: 2

      Yeah but he was a pretty good designer and had a sense for technology.

    27. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that they replaced an engineer with a pointy haired boss with an MBA.

      I'm sure you're referring to Steve Wozniak as Steve Jobs was just a sales person. While Jobs went to Reed College he didn't graduate.

    28. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More editor than actual designer. I don't know if he ever actually designed anything - but he knew how to make things better.
      Also, incredible at assembling talent.

    29. Re: Very Brave by reboot246 · · Score: 0

      "Apple needs an asshole in leadership, or they just become another complacent tech company headed for the waste-bin"

      What they have now is a leader who loves assholes.

    30. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AirPods?????
      Really!?
      Too funny.

    31. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of the main reasons I often turn WiFi off is because, when I'm in a taxi browsing the internet, WiFi keeps connecting to all sorts of WiFi base stations with captive portals and interrupting my browsing.

      While I agree you should be able to turn off WiFi quickly, I am not sure what the cause of the behaviour is of your phone. I just assume it's an iPhone, and if you go to Settings -> Wi-Fi, you'll notice the text "Known networks will be joined automatically. If no known networks are available, you will have to manually select a network". To my knowledge, an iPhone will never try to connect to a network you haven't told it to connect to.

    32. Re: Very Brave by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Apple needs an asshole because otherwise the shit builds up? :-)

    33. Re: Very Brave by Cutterman · · Score: 1

      You folks are insane.

      If you don't want this shit then just turn the phone OFF!

      Not so long ago if I wanted to call yo Mama I had to find a phone and put my dime in. 99.999% of calls can wait. And she can't call me back to take out the garbage!

      I wanna call someone I take out the phone, turn it on and call 'em.
      I see I've got missed calls - if I wanna call 'em back I do - later.

      Take back your life and TURN IT OFF.

      So peaceful.

      Mac

    34. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That video title is retarded. He didn't "predict" the downfall of Apple when he did that interview, Apple was at the time already in a downfall.

    35. Re: Very Brave by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Huh... Do you know where you are?

      I'll help you out. You are at Slashdot. Slashdot is many things, but one of the things Slashdot does best is teach people - assuming you're receptive to it. Slashdot can be pretty abrasive, but is often correct in many areas.

      One are where it's often correct is security best-practices. If you've read Slashdot for any length of time, you'd have picked up on some of them.

      One of the easiest ones to pick up is that automatically connecting to unknown networks is fucking stupid. Don't fucking connect to open access points and certainly don't fucking connect to them automatically. That's just fucking stupid.

      So, consider this a teaching moment and don't do stupid shit. You're basically saying that you kept intentionally smashing your thumb with your hammer, so you threw your hammer away. Well, stop smashing your thumb with a hammer.

      Seriously, don't let any of your devices automatically connect to unknown networks. Hell, you probably shouldn't connect to them on purpose, either. You should go to Vegas during Defcon. They will really appreciate you. You probably plug in thumb drives you found in the parking lot. Hint: Don't do that either.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    36. Re: Very Brave by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Cook is a master at logistics. When it comes to optimizing the supply line, I can think of none better.

      I'll leave it up to you to decide if that makes for a good CEO.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    37. Re: Very Brave by KGIII · · Score: 1

      It was either here or HN, but someone earlier today said that making phone calls while driving is a necessity. Yup. We need to be able to make phone calls while driving, at least according to them.

      I didn't have the energy to respond to them.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    38. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on... no mention of apple maps?

    39. Re: Very Brave by antdude · · Score: 1

      Bring him back! Oh right. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    40. Re: Very Brave by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Maybe I once connected to a hotspot, and now it tries to connect to all hotspots of that same company? It really happens frequently, an app suddenly complains that it lost internet connectivity, I open up Safari, and sure enough, "Wifi access, enter your name and password".

    41. Re: Very Brave by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      My iPhone automatically connects to known networks (no apparent way to switch that off without turning off WiFi completely) and asks whether or not to connect to unknown ones. That latter feature is annoying enough already, you're just browsing on 4G and it keeps asking "do you want to connect to this network?".

      I know connecting to open access points is "stupid" but when I'm in a hotel outside the EU, it's either that or exorbitant roaming charges, or no internet at all. Sometimes you just have to take that chance (taking care not to browse to transmit any sensitive data).

    42. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://youtu.be/ZBma82g3Uag

      Apple has become exactly what Jobs originally did not like.

      Funny how that claim is always made by people who neither understood Steve Jobs nor Apple's products when he was still alive.

    43. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that they replaced an engineer with a pointy haired boss with an MBA.

      Well, Steve Jobs himself said Cook should replace him. And I have more reason to believe he is right than some guy on the interweb who fucking believes Jobs was an engineer.

    44. Re: Very Brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit. Builds. Up. at the boooootttom.

    45. Re: Very Brave by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Today's your lucky day! I was just reading a thread about this very problem.

      https://news.ycombinator.com/i...

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  2. And the point then? by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Besides cutting off access to those radios to apps, what would be the purpose of turning them off now if it doesn't really turn them off?

    1. Re:And the point then? by A10Mechanic · · Score: 2

      It's like the 'close doors' button on the elevator. It's a feel-good button.

    2. Re:And the point then? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Presumably, cutting off app access would save power, as the OS could tightly manage the connecting polling while "off". Even though the radios are still on, they could be automatically cycled down, and only brought back up periodically to poll for "important" stuff, saving power. Of course, Apple is the one decided what counts as "important".

    3. Re:And the point then? by Okind · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Besides cutting off access to those radios to apps, what would be the purpose of turning them off now if it doesn't really turn them off?

      How about theft?

      For a smartphone there may not be a reason, seeing you always carry it with you. But for clunkier items like tablets, an always-on transmitter of a radio signal is a godsend for thieves everywhere. Now they can use a simple scanner to locate items to steal.

      In fact, this is the reason you should turn your transmitting devices off (not standby) when you leave them out of sight in your locked car. It prevents them from being stolen.

    4. Re:And the point then? by karnal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, we could just remove the batt... oh wait.

      --
      Karnal
    5. Re:And the point then? by CustomBuild · · Score: 1

      Besides cutting off access to those radios to apps, what would be the purpose of turning them off now if it doesn't really turn them off?

      Improved battery life and a reduction of the attack surface. You can turn off both radios in the settings app, try not to let the FUD fool you.

    6. Re:And the point then? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      It apparently disconnects your phone/tablet from Bluetooth devices and wifi networks.

      Of course having those toggles actually turn off the radios - like they did prior to iOS 11 - would also accomplish this.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    7. Re:And the point then? by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Which doesn't answer the question, which was if 'turning off' the radio doesn't actually do that, what is the point of 'turning off' the radio.

    8. Re:And the point then? by quintus_horatius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can turn off both radios in the settings app

      Then why have this "false" radio-off setting? Why not turn them off the way users expect when they, for instance, toggle the radios off using the easy-to-find settings?

      Also, FTFA:

      ...both Bluetooth and Wi-Fi will become active again when you toggle them off in the Control Center at 5 AM local time, according to Apple's documentation

      What the hell is the point of THAT?!

    9. Re:And the point then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 am local time is when apple runs its top secret data harvesting programs.

    10. Re:And the point then? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      ...both Bluetooth and Wi-Fi will become active again when you toggle them off in the Control Center at 5 AM local time, according to Apple's documentation

      What the hell is the point of THAT?!

      In a post-Snowden, world, what the hell is the point of even asking THAT question...

    11. Re:And the point then? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Because Apple is becoming a slightly more attractively designed version of Microsoft, from an HCI perspective.

      This is a classic dickish Microsoft UI move: take something that you've decided is too complicated for users, and slap a simple-to-operate facade over it. But simple-to-operate does not necessarily mean simple-to-get-the-result-you-want. So if the UI doesn't do what you need it to, you google the registry settings so you can directly manipulate the persistent data structures that govern the behavior.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    12. Re:And the point then? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Because $CluelessUser doesn't understand that the stuff that Apple is trying to leave open (Airdrop and friends) is Bluetooth or Wifi. To the typical smartphone user, it's just magic. So when you shut off Bluetooth, you can't listen to music (oops, I just **knew** that headphone jack was there for a reason) or do other Neat Things.

      The 5 AM bit is likely because even for users that understood enough to turn the radios 'off' forgot to turn them back on in the morning.

      Can't have that.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    13. Re:And the point then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't a feel good button; it works when the fireman's key is inserted and turned to override.

    14. Re:And the point then? by torkus · · Score: 1

      Turning off wifi and bluetooth isn't complicated and phones have had the ability pretty much as long as they've had those features.

      From TFA it sounds like apple is enabling a phone-home even if you disable the services. Yay?

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    15. Re:And the point then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually "close door" does do something - get in the elevator at a quite time and do nothing. Eventually the door will close, but it takes a while. Now repeat experiment, but press the close door button. Door will close predictably sooner (time it if you like). Or at least it did in the lift I did the experiment in.

      Now of course no-one does that in normal life. You get in and press a floor number, which triggers the door close automatically. Pressing door close in this case does exactly nothing - again, based on actual experiment.

    16. Re:And the point then? by Misagon · · Score: 1

      I live in an apartment block where there are many elderly and a few wheelchair-bound. We got a new elevator installed recently where the doors have been configured to take a noticeable long time to close unless you press the "close doors" button.

      I suppose that all the manufacturer's elevators get the button on the stock control panel but that not all are configured in ways that make it stand out.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    17. Re:And the point then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Airdrop doesn't work anyways. Useless piece of shit. I've struggled with it for hours and it only works one way and even that only on one pair of devices.

    18. Re:And the point then? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      press the close door button. Door will close predictably sooner (time it if you like).

      In some elevators, yes. In others, no.

    19. Re:And the point then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The purpose is apparently to do a soft "off", to disconnect any devices or networks that are currently connected. For a hard "off" (real off), users must go into the Settings app.

    20. Re: And the point then? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      The 1990 ADA set that up. The door has to remain open long enough for those in chairs or using crutches. The button doesn't even exist in some modern elevators, just like the crosswalk buttons don't always have an effect. The lights are operated by computer. Pushing the button does nothing. In NYC, only 120 of them work and those are being disabled. Yes, they will keep the buttons there.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    21. Re: And the point then? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      HCI? Now there's a term I haven't seen in a very long time. I think it's UX and UI now. Human-computer Interaction seems almost archaic. It's a great phrase but, as I said, I've not seen it in ages. I seldom see 'compute cycles' these days, either.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    22. Re:And the point then? by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Now they can use a simple scanner to locate items to steal

      I'm not sure that your average thief is going to using a "scanner" to locate things to steal, to the extent that such things even exist. Seems extremely fanciful.

    23. Re:And the point then? by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Oh now come on. It sometimes works. I used it just yesterday. I nearly fell off my chair when I was actually able to transfer a file. And then the second transfer I attempted failed with some obscure and patently untrue error, and I thought - oh well, back to normal.

    24. Re:And the point then? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      It's like the 'close doors' button on the elevator. It's a feel-good button.

      The ironic part of that is that it's not true, but you are the one getting sucked into the "feel good button" by regurgitating the myth.
      And the myth doesn't even pass the scratch and sniff test. Do you think the close elevator door button is made by one company globally who has a monopoly of how it performs? No other elevator engineer has ever sought to make a close elevator door that actually works?
      FWIW, I've tested many elevators, and most of them close their doors faster if you hit the button. Sorry to ruin your day...

  3. Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Apple knows better than you. Just ask 'em.

  4. Burying the takeaway by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The takeaway is that if you want to really and completely turn off Bluetooth and Wi-Fi on iOS11 you can't do it from the Control Center anymore, you'll have to do it through the Settings app.

    So the takeaway is that there is still a UI element that powers the radio off and the only thing changed is that a different UI element performs a disconnect rather than a power off. So a power-user that knows precisely which of the two she intends can pick the right one.

    Calling it 'stupid' is a bit of an overreaction to what is basically a UI change to map a more-commonly-held button on what is perceived to the more-commonly-intended outcome. Maybe that attribution of intended outcome is wrong (as anyone that has tried to help less technical people, trying to figure out what someone is actually trying to do is a hell of a thing) but it seems at least reasonable to me that "get me off this shitty coffeeshop WiFi but do associate with my home WiFi when I get there" is a more common intent than "don't get on any network whatsoever until I remember to hit the button again".

    1. Re: Burying the takeaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, fun when the hostess tells you to turn off the WiFi on your iPad and you actually don't...

    2. Re:Burying the takeaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then make it a separate action like a long press or hard press - you should be able to say disconnect me from this wifi or turn the wifi radio off - they are both valid requests to make. I got fooled by this because I don't use bluetooth and it wasn't even connected to anything yet when I hit that little round button for off it was still on in the settings (nothing configured to use it). Thanks Apple!!!

    3. Re:Burying the takeaway by danomac · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Apple is taking lessons from Microsoft - multiple control-panel-esque derivatives in many places with no clear definition of what is supposed to be where.

    4. Re:Burying the takeaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says someone who does not fly

    5. Re: Burying the takeaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Disconnect from a network" and "turn off wi-fi" seem to be pretty straight forward on other operating systems.

    6. Re:Burying the takeaway by psmoot · · Score: 1

      I haven't actually seen the Apple UI. I would hope there's a label telling you that the WiFI or Bluetooth button means "disconnect". When I go to turn these off, it's generally because (a) I'm on an airplane or (b) my battery is running low and I want to conserve power. In both cases, what I intended was to turn the radios off. Maybe I'm weird. When I do want to disconnect from the crummy coffee shop network, my Android phone has a different screen dedicated to picking which WiFi network I'm on (or which Bluetooth devices I'm connected to).

    7. Re:Burying the takeaway by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      get me off this shitty coffeeshop WiFi but do associate with my home WiFi when I get there" is a more common intent than "don't get on any network whatsoever until I remember to hit the button again".

      Then it should be a 'disconnect' button. Making it look like an 'off' button is stupid.

    8. Re: Burying the takeaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the Wifi Mac address trackers still monitoring when you think it's 'off'. And the SSIDs your phone is near are still being logged. Yeah... suuuure you think I meant that Apple.

    9. Re: Burying the takeaway by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 0

      What hostess is telling you to turn your iPad's wifi off? Why are you playing with your iPad at a restaurant?

    10. Re:Burying the takeaway by tk77 · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you long-press on one of the buttons in the control center, it pops up a larger display that sort of details whats going on.

      If you tap the wifi or bluetooth buttons to turn them off, the blue highlight turns gray and the text in the larger display will say "disconnected". If you turn them off in the settings app, the highlight turns gray and there's a line through the wifi/bluetooth logos and in the larger display it says "off".

      The airplane mode button which is the first button in the control center, when pressed, turns everything off.

      It's not obvious and I didn't really know that this is how it worked until I saw the Apple support doc. Knowing now how it works, I don't mind so much. It means on my iPad I can have Bluetooth on, but "disconnected" and still be able to use the pencil (rather then having to have BT fully on).

    11. Re:Burying the takeaway by MagicM · · Score: 2

      So a power-user that knows precisely which of the two she intends can pick the right one.

      The annoying part is that one of the two is just a swipe away in the new control center, while the other is in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying âBeware of the Leopard.â

    12. Re:Burying the takeaway by tk77 · · Score: 1

      So you simply press the "Airplane" button, which is the first one in the control center, and it turns off (off off) all the radios.

    13. Re: Burying the takeaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What hostess is telling you to turn your iPad's wifi off? Why are you playing with your iPad at a restaurant?

      I think he means the airplane waitress

    14. Re:Burying the takeaway by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      If you tap the wifi or bluetooth buttons to turn them off, the blue highlight turns gray and the text in the larger display will say "disconnected".

      That sounds to me like a disconnect button.

    15. Re:Burying the takeaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...it seems at least reasonable to me that "get me off this shitty coffeeshop WiFi but do associate with my home WiFi when I get there" is a more common intent than "don't get on any network whatsoever until I remember to hit the button again".

      Ok, got it! And then if you hit the button while you're at home then it means "get me off this shitty home WiFi but do associate with my home WiFi when I..."... er... wait...

      - AC

    16. Re:Burying the takeaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to use that one anyway as it's the only one that switches of the mobile networks.
      But it does have the problem that with the "courageous" push for bluetooth headphones it won't work well, as you actually want bluetooth to stay on (it's actually allowed in quite a few flights now it seems).

    17. Re: Burying the takeaway by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      I sure hope at least airplane mode still does what it says, and doesn't turn itself off at 5 am just before your 5:05 am Cat III automatic landing...

    18. Re:Burying the takeaway by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's because the UI designers believe that the vast majority of users intended the former and not the latter and so they prioritized putting the frequent-intent button in a more convenient place and the infrequent-intent one further away. In fact, that's precisely the job of UI designers is to provide access to the most-used things closer without having massively overloaded UI, especially on a phone.

      [ BTW, not knocking wget here. That GUI is intended for the kind of people that use wget, which are happy to have lots of buttons. ]

    19. Re: Burying the takeaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the device can still log nearby SSIDs, MAC address trackers will not work as current and recent iOS versions randomize the MAC that they present while scanning for networks, only switching to their 'true' burned-in address when they associate.

    20. Re:Burying the takeaway by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Calling it 'stupid' is a bit of an overreaction to what is basically a UI change to map a more-commonly-held button on what is perceived to the more-
      commonly-intended outcome. Maybe that attribution of intended outcome is

      If my phone behaved like that I sure as heck would be pissed and call it stupid.

      A disconnect button is apparently too hard for Apple to implement or understand. On Android you long press the toggle buttons to manage existing WiFi/BT connections in more detail.

      wrong (as anyone that has tried to help less technical people, trying to figure out what someone is actually trying to do is a hell of a thing) but it seems at least reasonable to me that "get me off this shitty coffeeshop WiFi but do associate with my home WiFi when I get there" is a more common intent than "don't get on any network whatsoever until I remember to hit the button again".

      Really hard to justify UX designs requiring mind reading to work or changing behavior of UX elements everyone understands especially where said cases of mind reading behavior can't be modified by users.

      "More common intent" is hogwash... most people turn off the radios because they want to save non-removable battery life. They want them powered down.

      Apple is doing this because they WANT the radios to stay on not because it's what users want.

    21. Re:Burying the takeaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It's stupid. A button that says it turns off wifi should turn off wifi. Anything else is just idiotic.

    22. Re:Burying the takeaway by MichaelJ · · Score: 2

      It means I can no longer simply tap off BT in the Control Center to stop draining the battery of my Apple Pencil since the motion of carrying it around with the iPad wakes it up and connects it, since there's no "off" button. Because why would it need one when it has motion sensors to know when it's being used or not

      --

      Michael J.
      Root, God, what is difference?
    23. Re:Burying the takeaway by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      most people turn off the radios because they want to save non-removable battery life /quote.

      Sure, but the question is whether they want it to go back to associating with known networks automatically later or whether the user should have to manually manage something the device can handle autonomously.

      Because it seems like users want to turn it off to save battery during the day but also don't want to go home and then burn cellular data despite being in range of their own WiFi network because they forgot to
      set it back.

    24. Re: Burying the takeaway by KGIII · · Score: 1

      It sounds to me like it's not disconnecting, regardless of what it says. If its by design, as they state, it's not a very good design. When I turn something off, I'd like it to be off and to remain off until such time as I turn it back on again.

      Maybe that's just me? ;-)

      I must have an archaic definition for off. Somewhere, I do have an iPhone but it's not used for anything other than I played with it a few times. Someone gave it to me because I'd done some nice things for them and they thought I'd like it. I remain unimpressed.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    25. Re: Burying the takeaway by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      It is just you.

      "It sounds to me like it's not disconnecting, regardless of what it says."

      No, it definitely disconnects (and won't reconnect) to the network that you are currently associated to.

      "When I turn something off, I'd like it to be off and to remain off until such time as I turn it back on again."

      That is still true. If you turn it off (switch in Settings) then it is. You still have the choice to do this.

      I think the point is that it is reasonable to infer that users don't actually want the behavior of "stay off even if I'm right next to my super-high-quality home WiFi network until I remember to hit this button that I already forgot about". So the conclusion was

      Keep the user choice of whether to use the 'disconnect currently associated' or 'really turn off' by having different UI elements for each one. Put the UI element that we think is more useful in a more accessible place, just like always. No UI puts all the buttons in every possible screen . . .

  5. In Apple's best traditions by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 0

    You need to say thank you that your smartphone cannot be remotely turned into a recording/spying device without your knowledge or consent and without installing any apps. Oh, wait ..

  6. When...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can we go back to the 'old' way, where I buy something, its mine, and I get to determine how I want it to work.

    I know, I know, grumpy old man grumbling about progress....

    Maybe just go back to the old dictionary... where "off" meant off, and progress meant something other than "up yours".

    1. Re:When...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I get to determine how I want it to work.

      Do you usually write your own OS, then?

    2. Re:When...? by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      You can turn it off, it's there in a clear-as-day slider in Settings.

      And the button doesn't say off. It's a blue button that turns gray and says "disconnected" when you've, uh, disconnected. And in my dictionary, disconnected does not redirect to "off".

    3. Re:When...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Back in the old days when I wanted to play 45's in my car, I just stuck 'em in the radio the way *I* wanted to, and everything was fine. FFS!

    4. Re:When...? by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Back in college as an assignment. I got as far as a basic file system and execution environment before I decided PLEASE GOD NEVER LET ME HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THIS STUFF AGAIN. Now I'm quite happy to pay someone for an OS. Having said that, I do wish that they were a little more desperate and beholden to me and my personal wishes, but I don't pay enough for that privilege.

    5. Re:When...? by antdude · · Score: 1

      No kidding. Lots of things are sucky now compared to the old ways. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    6. Re:When...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever Apple 'thing' you might have bought is still yours, just the way you bought it–Apple is not putting a gun to your head to upgrade to iOS 11 if you don't want it. Your Apple product will keep working fine for years exactly the way it was when you received it.

      Even easier next time, if you don't want to be annoyed with significant yearly upgrades, buy a $900 android that will be a slow brick with a washed out screen in 18 mths. Also you won't have to understand local iOS & macOS connectivity features like Continuity, AirDrop, AirPlay, and Apple Watch integration, to name a few.

  7. courage by slew · · Score: 3, Funny

    Courage in the wake of wifi stack vunerabilities.

    Courage that they won't have a bluetooth stack vulnerability like android.

    Courage is what it takes, courage...

    1. Re:courage by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

      No computer in the world is secure. And yet here you are, still carrying one around in your pocket while you poke fun at a company that makes them, pretending like you're immune to the vulnerabilities.

    2. Re:courage by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

      I think you might have missed the point of the parent here... parent's argument is that these things are insecure, thus having the ability to turn them off completely makes you safer.... to leave these features always turned on would be to pretend you are immune to the vulnerabilities. Perhaps the sarcasm confused you?

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    3. Re:courage by slew · · Score: 1

      No computer in the world is secure. And yet here you are, still carrying one around in your pocket while you poke fun at a company that makes them, pretending like you're immune to the vulnerabilities.

      Why do you assume I carry one of those attention deficit creation machines around in my pocket? (not saying that I don't)
      Do you also assume I don't also poke fun at my company which also makes chips that go into pocket computing devices?
      FWIW, I don't pretend that I'm not immune to risk, just like I don't pretend to have courage when I take calculated risks so I ridicule those that claim courage...

      Courage is showing strength of will in the face of suffering or sacrifice. Taking a calculated tactic when being the market leader with no competition isn't courage, it's simply taking advantage of your strategic position. Real courage would be something like breaking an addiction to an attention deficit creation machine, or not using one to begin with in our modern society. That would be *real* courage...

  8. Re:Only LUDDITES use Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time I see an app post, I imagine the aliens from Mars Attacks. Only instead of saying "ack" all the time, they're saying "app".

  9. So what? by 110010001000 · · Score: 0, Troll

    So what? You don't own the device. You just rent it. It is closed source software. You get whatever the corporation decides is OK. Isn't that what you want? If not, why did you buy it?

    1. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's a great phone. And my CPU is faster than yours ...

    2. Re:So what? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Can you name a smartphone that doesn't meet that description? I think that any cell phone you can sell is legally required to enable tracking by official parties (ie., must have a GPS), and practically the cell phone towers would provide that information anyway. The part that isn't legally required is the non-removable battery, but that was invented by marketing, and ensures that phones will be replaced every few years. That it means the phone is an always-on tracker was a bonus that the governments appreciated, but didn't require.

      Mind you, I don't like smartphones. I think they are lousy phones. A lot worse than the cell phones of a decade ago, and the screens are so small that they aren't useful for anything else. I have occasionally thought of getting a tablet, but after using a smartphone I've pretty much decided against it. The OS doesn't work very well, the applications are poor, etc. They aren't even good cameras, though there they do have some advantages, especially in low light conditions. But I see no advantages over a laptop the same size.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re: So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must not use your device on the go then.
      Smart phones give you the Internet at all times--mobile.

    4. Re: So what? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Damn right I don't. I want my phone to be a good phone. Anything else is extra and readily sacrificed to improve the phone aspect. (The built-in address book is an example of a smart phone acting well. The camera is "OK, that's unobtrusive, but I wouldn't pay extra for it". Much of the other stuff is garbage that gets in the way. It's totally lousy as a computer. The interaction is too limited, you can't really type on it, etc. Before I got the smartphone I was thinking a tablet might be a good idea, but after the phone I don't want anything with a similar OS. It's jammed full of misfeatures, there's more misfeatures than features. And it's a very poor phone, which is what I got it to be.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  10. This is why I refuse to update my iphone by Spy+Handler · · Score: 4, Informative

    my iphone 6+ will stay on 9.3.5 forever, or until the hardware dies... whichever comes first.

    How do I stop the auto updates? It's impossible to stop the phone from downloading updates automatically, unless you jailbreak it... OR you block the following URLs on your wifi router:

    appldnld.apple.com
    mesu.apple.com

    This will prevent your iDevice from auto downloading OS updates. Don't worry, you can still update your installed apps, it only blocks iOS updates.

    1. Re:This is why I refuse to update my iphone by CustomBuild · · Score: 0, Troll

      my iphone 6+ will stay on 9.3.5 forever, or until the hardware dies... whichever comes first.

      How do I stop the auto updates? It's impossible to stop the phone from downloading updates automatically, unless you jailbreak it... OR you block the following URLs on your wifi router:

      appldnld.apple.com mesu.apple.com

      This will prevent your iDevice from auto downloading OS updates. Don't worry, you can still update your installed apps, it only blocks iOS updates.

      You are the problem. By avoiding updates, you carry around an exploitable phone and force both the carrier, and Apple to support your version of the OS. Stop being an idiot and just update the damn thing before you get owned, and bitterly complain about Apple's perceived lack of security.

    2. Re:This is why I refuse to update my iphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you do when you're out in public (assumption, I know) and your phone connects to an open WiFi and downloads the unwanted update?

    3. Re:This is why I refuse to update my iphone by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      OR you block the following URLs on your wifi router:

      I can't speak to your circumstances... but I suspect most people's cellular phones leave the house occasionally - and probably connect to numerous other wifi networks.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:This is why I refuse to update my iphone by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      One of the Bluetooth vulnerabilities cited as a motivation for turning BT off actually was fixed in every release subsequent to 9.3.5.

      But, I mean, you do you -- if you really think having to go to Settings to power off the radio is so bad that you are willing to forego this (and many other) security fix(es), go for it. We won't feel bad if you get pwned by a long-since-patched bug though.

    5. Re:This is why I refuse to update my iphone by quintus_horatius · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, his version of iOS still allows him to turn off the radios.

    6. Re:This is why I refuse to update my iphone by JohnFen · · Score: 2

      By avoiding updates, you carry around an exploitable phone

      And by reflexively updating, you are exposing yourself to the whims and exploits of the software provider, so it's pretty much six of one, half dozen of the other.

    7. Re:This is why I refuse to update my iphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      D'oh! When I posted my question, I didn't fully understand that you can still turn it off, but through a different UI. Yeah, this is stupid of Apple to change the function of a familiar button. Steve Jobs would not have allowed this.

    8. Re:This is why I refuse to update my iphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are the problem. By avoiding updates, you carry around an exploitable phone and force both the carrier, and Apple to support your version of the OS. Stop being an idiot and just update the damn thing before you get owned, and bitterly complain about Apple's perceived lack of security.

      Wait... Are shilling for Windows 10 again or Apple?

    9. Re:This is why I refuse to update my iphone by Spy+Handler · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, it can happen. Here is how it goes:

      1. I go to Starbucks or a friend's house and my phone auto-downloads 2 GB worth of iOS updates on their wifi

      2. iPhone displays a popup saying "iOS 11.0.5 has been downloaded." Two choices are given: UPDATE NOW, or LATER

      3. I choose "LATER", then go into Settings - General - Storage & iCloud Usage - Manage Storage. There, it will display a list of everything that takes up space on my phone. The iOS 11 update will be at or near top of the list, being 2 GB in size.

      4. I select the "iOS 11 update" and tap to delete it. Tap again to confirm delete.

      5. Presto, my phone is still version 9.3.5 and the downloaded update is gone.

      6. !profit!

    10. Re:This is why I refuse to update my iphone by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      By the way, when you choose "LATER" after it asks you to "Update now" or "Later", it doesn't mean the phone will prompt you again later. It means the phone will update itself automatically later, with no warning... most likely at midnight tonight after the phone's been sitting idle in the "off" state for over an hour.

      So after clicking on "Later", you need to drill into Settings and delete the downloaded update... pronto. Wait too long and you're toast.

    11. Re:This is why I refuse to update my iphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know where you saw this, but my phone has never upgraded before I told it to.

      You must be thinking of the OS X prompts, but even those will have a pull down about what "Later" means (tonight, next week etc)

  11. This reminds me of something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The instrument (the telescreen, it was called) could be dimmed, but there was no way of shutting it off completely." -- 1984

    1. Re:This reminds me of something... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      ...except for the part when the modern telescreen (eye-roll) can be turned off in the Settings app, and the other part where no one's making you buy this telescreen (but you can buy an alternate one with an OS written by an advertising company that knows far more about you than Big Brother could ever hope to).

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:This reminds me of something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to force people to buy it when you can gradually restructure all of modern life around it to the point that it's almost as essential as electricity and water.

      That's the only thing 1984 got seriously wrong. You don't force people to do things by military/police coercion, you trick them into doing them them out of their own volition. How many people freaked out in the early 2000's about the possibility of the government forcing everyone to wear implanted RFID tracking chips, and now 15 years later we all voluntarily walk around with tracking devices in our pockets, and moreover pay hundreds of dollars for the privilege.

      As long as the first and fourth amendments have even a small amount of bite left, Big Brother could never be the actual government; it must be a corporation.

  12. Shouldn't be a big surprise by McFortner · · Score: 1

    Once again, Apple does whatever the hell it wants to in the OS because it thinks the average user is too stupid to know what they actually want. This mindset has been around since the original Macintosh, and yet the fanatic Apple fanbois keep buying their products and insisting that they are more secure than other devices/OSs. That's why I don't buy Apple products, the headaches and risks are just too high.

    --
    Beware of Sales Reps bearing gifts.
    1. Re:Shouldn't be a big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your local law enforcement agency will thank you for using an Android phone the next time you commit a crime.

    2. Re:Shouldn't be a big surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much no local law enforcement agencies are doing forensic analysis. If it's anything other than "slide to unlock" then the local guys are shipping it off.

  13. airplane mode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does airplane mode truly disable both the radios? The article didn't say, and I don't have time to look at the docs right now.

    1. Re:airplane mode? by the_skywise · · Score: 2

      I didn't check but I'm guessing it does otherwise it makes them in violation of regulations probably worldwide.
      But that sort of defeats the purpose because you're turning off ALL radios including the cellphone - so no texts or calls when, presumably, you're turning off the wifi/bluetooth for power saving/security reasons.

    2. Re: airplane mode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it does. And the icons change to have a line through them to show that theyâ(TM)re off. This is a none event.

  14. Product Opportunity by sycodon · · Score: 1

    A Tin Foil hat for your iPhone.

    No, seriously. At night you don't want to be disturbed anyway. So a case that is completely opaque to the electromagnetic spectrum.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Product Opportunity by msauve · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just hold it wrong. Problem solved.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:Product Opportunity by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

      Faraday cages for iPhones make wonderful housewarming and birthday gifts IMHO.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  15. If Apple does it, it must be right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Apple products, much fewer of them then I used to. If there is one thing I do not like about Apple its how they decide what you can and cannot do. Its basically you either accept this or you don't. Yes, obviously many think a on/off switch means exactly that. But then again you would be wrong and in some cases it means active and inactive. I don't see much of a problem with this if indeed it helps in someway with better connections. But then again, these sort of little things don't bug me much.

  16. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly there are those here that will argue that point.

  17. The better tool to turn it off is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A BFH.

  18. Pick one... by Macdude · · Score: 0

    Rant #1 - Arg! Apple doesn't give users enough control over how their devices work!!!
    Rant #2 - Arg! Apple is giving users too much control over how their devices work!!!

    Pick one.

    --
    "Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America
  19. Supporting the Surveillance State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you drive around NYC you'll notice little plastic pods mounted to poles or traffic lights at many intersections. These are actually Apple-designed and manufactured devices designed to capture Bluetooth and WiFi MAC addresses that are beaconed nearby.

    These addresses are tied to you, of course, because Apple knows all of the hardware IDs of your phone. Apple also furnishes this information to the surveillance state.

    The NSA's FRUITCUT (Fast Recognition of Users In Transit by Capture of Universal Telemetry) program is basically an endeavor to track everyone with a phone using this technology.

    1. Re:Supporting the Surveillance State by bioteq · · Score: 1

      May I get some citations on this? I'm rather curious.

      A quick Google search didn't show up anything. So either you're trolling, making this up, or quoting from something I cannot seem to find. I really hope the latter, as that sounds really interesting.

    2. Re:Supporting the Surveillance State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother with more hardware when you can get the same information with a cellular data + GPS receiver?

    3. Re:Supporting the Surveillance State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Android phones are so hackable, even the underlying ROM code can be replaced, removing things like CarrierIQ and other surveillance applications, such as that which would send data obtained from local sensors.

      FRUITCUT depends on things that are transmitted by the phone along with association algorithms. Even if a user changes their BT or WiFi MAC address, association algorithms can easily tie that MAC to a particular IMEI, which the user can't change.

      Cell tower triangulation, especially in urban environments, is not very good. The model data collection point in FRUITCUT consists of 4 sensors at an intersection. A network of sites in an urban environment can track someone's movements easily, which is the whole point of the program.

      Initially this technology was proffered to urban police departments as an alternative to using dangerous apprehension methods such as high speed chases of foot chases. Since even criminals have phones, they are very easy to track.

      Once FRUITCUT was disclosed to the public, however, it was shunned since a criminal would simply have to chuck the phone or not carry one to avoid it. However, the NSA quickly adopted the technology and improved it beyond its original scope, and has it currently deployed in every major urban environment in the US.

  20. After giving this some thought by the_skywise · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After being outrageously outraged I lied down and took a stresstab and I think I see the usability standpoint. They're probably getting tons of customer support calls from naive users whining that they can't airdrop from their iPhone to their iPad because they turned off wifi on their iPhone. (I do that all the time as I leave my macbook connected to an ethernet connection and turn off the wifi and then can't figure out why my macbook doesn't show up on airdrop but the 15 people's iPhone in the office cubes around me do!)
    That said, they've broken the first law of UI design - DON'T CHANGE THE BEHAVIOR OF A BUTTON ONCE YOU'VE ESTABLISHED ITS USE. If anything it should be a tri-state button now - full on - apple services only - off. That would've clarified the intent to the user of the change AND alerted the user to its valid state.

    Is it any wonder that many considered Steve Jobs an asshole when he would go off? He was probably going off on UI designers doing stuff like this. "DUDE - I PAY YOU A QUARTER OF A MILLION DOLLARS A YEAR AND YOU'RE PUSHING THIS S$*@ ON ME?! WTF?!"

    1. Re:After giving this some thought by geekmux · · Score: 1

      They're probably getting tons of customer support calls from naive users whining that they can't airdrop from their iPhone to their iPad because they turned off wifi on their iPhone...why my macbook doesn't show up on airdrop but the 15 people's iPhone in the office cubes around me do...

      I hope you understand you've essentially shitcanned your former statement with the latter here...clearly users are too stupid to ever actually turn off wifi...

    2. Re:After giving this some thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it any wonder that many considered Steve Jobs an asshole when he would go off? He was probably going off on UI designers doing stuff like this. "DUDE - I PAY YOU A QUARTER OF A MILLION DOLLARS A YEAR AND YOU'RE PUSHING THIS S$*@ ON ME?! WTF?!"

      Church

    3. Re: After giving this some thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, there's nothing to indicate that the control center is where it is.

      Users have to be told, so those users would never turn off WiFi

    4. Re:After giving this some thought by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 2

      That depends on what you infer (or divine really) is the user's intended outcome from hitting the button.

      I don't think the user intent (insofar as non-technical users have well-formed notions of intent, which is far from clear) when hitting the button is "I want to disabled WiFi connectivity but keep the ability to AirDrop".

      Let's play a game, which is guess-what-the-user-actually-wants
          (1) Disable all WiFi until I hit the button again, even after I get back at home so that I rack up cellular bills
          (2) Disable all WiFi except for AirDrop and a bunch of other things I don't quite understand
          (3) Get me off $CURRENT_WIFI (e.g. coffeeshop, airport) but do reconnect to my home network when I get back there even if I forget to hit the button

      I think there's a lot of reasons to believe that the user's intended outcome is (3) rather than (1) or (2). YMMV, and I agree this is something of an imprecise science.

    5. Re:After giving this some thought by swillden · · Score: 1

      That depends on what you infer (or divine really) is the user's intended outcome from hitting the button.

      I don't think the user intent (insofar as non-technical users have well-formed notions of intent, which is far from clear) when hitting the button is "I want to disabled WiFi connectivity but keep the ability to AirDrop".

      Let's play a game, which is guess-what-the-user-actually-wants (1) Disable all WiFi until I hit the button again, even after I get back at home so that I rack up cellular bills (2) Disable all WiFi except for AirDrop and a bunch of other things I don't quite understand (3) Get me off $CURRENT_WIFI (e.g. coffeeshop, airport) but do reconnect to my home network when I get back there even if I forget to hit the button

      I think there's a lot of reasons to believe that the user's intended outcome is (3) rather than (1) or (2). YMMV, and I agree this is something of an imprecise science.

      FWIW, Android does this, too.

      The way Android does it is that the "turn Wi-fi off" switch turns Wifi off. But, in Wifi preferences there's an additional switch for "Turn on Wi-fi automatically", with explanatory text "WiFi will turn back on near high-quality saved networks, like your home network". The screen with the on/off button also has text that says either "Wi-Fi turns back on automatically" or "Wi-Fi doesn't turn back on automatically", and when you turn Wi-Fi off and it's set to turn back on, you also get a notification, so it should be fairly hard to think you've disabled it permanently if it'll turn back on.

      However, it's worth pointing out that in order to turn Wi-Fi back on automatically, the Wi-Fi radio has to remain on and listening, so it can see the networks that trigger it to turn back on. So it's not completely off. But it's off in the sense that the phone won't transmit anything or attempt to connect to any network until it sees an SSID that triggers it to come back on.

      This is stock Android Oreo. I'm building a Nougat image to see what it looks like there.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  21. Neighbors helping neighbors by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    they also changed the settings on podcasts to poll for new episodes every hour, instead of every six hours. So at 5 am your cell wakes up and uses the insecure bluetooth to connect to your hacker neighbor kid in the basement. If that source is too far away, it uses insecure Join Any Network wi-fi to connect to your hacker neighbor kid across the street in her basement.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Neighbors helping neighbors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "her". hahaha hehehe heeheehee hhaaahhhaha

    2. Re: Neighbors helping neighbors by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Girls can be hackers. Girls can code.

      A couple of my best programmers were in possession of a functional vagina. Well, I assume they were functional, as both of them had children. I did not actually inspect them, not because I have morals but because they weren't attractive.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  22. Two choices by hunter44102 · · Score: 1

    A short press should pop up two choices. 'disconnect from wifi connection ' and disable wifi radio'

  23. Good post by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

    I award you some imaginary mod points on this one.

    Hell here's an imaginary grant don't spend it all in one dream.

  24. The real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's strange that nobody has not stated the obvious reason why Apple is doing this: iBeacons. This way indoor positioning works always.

  25. Waiting by Techkt · · Score: 1

    I always know, Apple is just too busy in innovations that She or He or it (whatsoever) forget to do the proper planning. Launched iPhone X with so late delivery. iPhone 8 sales are dipped. Released Wireless battery charging function and the AirPower, the Charging Pad by Apple, will release in 2018! So Well un-planned!

    --
    -Pratyaksh Somani reach me at https://www.techkt.com Posts about Technology, cool gadgets, Android, iPhone and lots mo
  26. ahaha heheh hohoho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ahaha heheh hohoho ahahaheh heeheehee hohoho hahaha hehehe hohoho hhahaha hehehh hhohoho ahahahh heeheh hohhoho ahhaha hehheh hhohoho ahahaa heheeh hohohoh

  27. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly there are those here that will argue that point.

    In a few months Apple will release a NEW iPhone and everyone will happily wait in lines all over again to be the first ones to buy it so why wouldn't we argue that point?

    No Copy&Paste? Eh, Apple says I don't need it. No multi-tasking? Eh, Apple says I don't need it. No headphone jack? Eh, Apple says I don't need it. No home button? Eh, Apple says I don't need it. But don't worry - People will still buy it.

  28. Airplane mode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about airplane mode? Are the radios still technically on? If so how would the NTSB or w/e US government branch would react to a personal device with always on radios?

  29. It's a bug by JohnFen · · Score: 2

    While that might sound like a bug, that's actually what Apple intended in the new operating system.

    It may be what Apple intended, but it still counts as a bug. Any time that the UI is actively misleading, that's a bug.

    1. Re:It's a bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. All UI is learned. The real problem is not that the icon works this way, as you say. The problem is that they changed the functionality, and now you are bitter because all UI is learned and you have to relearn something you didn't think needed changing in the first place.

    2. Re:It's a bug by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      The problem is that they changed the functionality

      Precisely. The misleading part is that they changed it without effectively communicating that it changed.

      now you are bitter

      Umm, no, I'm not remotely bitter. Nor am I upset, angry, or anything of the sort. You shouldn't assume that you know how other people feel unless they tell you.

  30. Facts by sjbe · · Score: 4, Informative

    The problem is that they replaced an engineer with a pointy haired boss with an MBA.

    The only thing factually correct in that sentence is that Tim Cook does have a MBA degree and there is no evidence that constitutes a problem for Apple. Steve Jobs was not an engineer and did not have an engineering degree (or any other degree for that matter). Tim Cook IS an engineer and does have an engineering degree from Auburn University.

    Tim Cook knows how to do is squeeze people for more cash, exploiting their captive user base until people throw their hands up in the air and walk away.

    There is no evidence that Apple customers are walking away in any meaningful numbers.

    It's ironic, Microsoft is trying so hard to be like Apple, but Apple is trying very hard to be like Oracle.

    If you think that then I don't think you've actually dealt with Oracle. The experience of working with Apple is NOTHING like the experience of working with Oracle.

    1. Re:Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the old childish argument of i am not the worst is a pro Apple argument.
      Some people will defend any behavior It's OK Apple will decide what is best for the phone you own but do not control.
       

    2. Re:Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am quite shocked that Auburn has a degree program outside of NCAA Football, let alone an *engineering* program.

    3. Re:Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steve Jobs was not an engineer and did not have an engineering degree (or any other degree for that matter).

      A degree does not an engineer make. Jobs knew design, had an eye for detail, and was a demanding asshole who wanted to ship on time and ship with quality.

      All the best engineers I have ever encountered possessed those very qualities, more or less.

    4. Re:Facts by ilsaloving · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only thing factually correct in that sentence is that Tim Cook does have a MBA degree and there is no evidence that constitutes a problem for Apple. Steve Jobs was not an engineer and did not have an engineering degree (or any other degree for that matter). Tim Cook IS an engineer and does have an engineering degree from Auburn University.

      I have great difficulty believing that, considering that there has been virtually zero innovation since Jobs died. Unless you count "making products less useful and more expensive" as innovation. Seriously, only an abject idiot would leave out HDMI on a modern laptop, for example. And have you used the keyboard on the most recent MBPs? It's the single worst keyboard I have ever used in my life.

      There is no evidence that Apple customers are walking away in any meaningful numbers.

      Really? Then mind explaining why their laptop sales figures are tanking? I myself have been using Apple for over a decade. My "current" MBP is a 2011 because every version after that has been worse than the last. Nothing is upgradable on it anymore, and even the stuff that's built into it is crap. I already mentioned the god-awful keyboard. A whopping TWO USB-C ports, or 4 if you wanna splurge, and nothing else. Wanna connect to a meeting room TV? Nope. A projector? Nope. Someone wants to give you a file on a USB key? Nope.

      It's like they took the top 10 use cases for a laptop in the business world, gave a good belly laugh and said, "Fuck'em all."

      If you think that then I don't think you've actually dealt with Oracle. The experience of working with Apple is NOTHING like the experience of working with Oracle.

      I didn't say they were Oracle. I said they were trying to be like Oracle. That takes time, but they're doing it. Have you bought a USB-C power supply from Apple? They don't even provide a USB-C cable in the box. You literally have to buy the cord separately. So you're now paying $125 for a power supply instead of $100.

      And never mind the whole donglegate thing where you literally need to buy dongles if you wanna so much as scratch your nose.

      Apple has taken nickle and diming people to amazing new heights, while *at the same time* jacking up their prices of their products across the board. You cannot possibly tell me that that is anything other than customer hostile.

      It's literally a battle of what you hate less now. Everyone I know who is an apple user is only using apple products because they hate Microsoft's bullshit more than they hate Apple's bullshit. That's not a particularly good long term strategy. It means that should Microsoft ever mistakenly pull their head out of their ass and make a product that doesn't suck, Apple is going to be in serious trouble. Google is slowly gaining ground on both of them with their chromebooks, and that's going to accelerate as they get more useful and people realize they arn't dependent on the encumbents anymore.

    5. Re:Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have great difficulty believing that, considering that there has been virtually zero innovation since Jobs died"

      Apart from A6 thru A11 (and the other custom chips), Truemotion, Truetone, TouchID, FaceID, ApplePay, Swift, APFS, Airpods, HomePod, ARKit, Apple Watch, Lightning, ForceTouch trackpad, ever-improving camera hardware and software, etc.

      Your complaints basically boil down to the fact that you don't like this generation of MacBook Pros. Fair enough, Apple made some bad design choices for some users..

      But to go from "I don't like the new MacBook Pro" to "there has been virtually zero innovation"... does not compute.

    6. Re:Facts by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Tim Cook is an industrial engineer. Great COO material. He can manage the supply chain and make sure the product is manufacturable. But he just does not have the product vision to be a CEO in a leading edge technical company.

    7. Re:Facts by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Having those qualities does not make you an engineer.

      You put your finger on what Jobs really was: an industrial designer. Even he would never have claimed to be an engineer.

    8. Re:Facts by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I have great difficulty believing that, considering that there has been virtually zero innovation since Jobs died.

      I don't see how that relates to the issue of whether or not Jobs was an engineer.

    9. Re:Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do people come up with this nonsense?

      Cook has been CEO for 6 years, and was effectively CEO for several years before that. Apple was maybe a $150B company when he effectively took over, a $300B company when he officially took over, and its an $800B company now.

    10. Re: Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are generally iterations,not innovations.

    11. Re: Facts by kenh · · Score: 1

      And have you used the keyboard on the most recent MBPs? It's the single worst keyboard I have ever used in my life.

      Said the person that it too young to have ever tried to type on a Commodore PET, Atari 400, Sinclair ZX81, or IBM PCjr.

      --
      Ken
    12. Re:Facts by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Given the bubble valuations in the stock market that is pretty much part for the course. The thing is the Apple is coasting on its success. How many successful new products can you remember Apple turning out ever since Jobs died? Right. I mean Apple also grew quite a lot in the first couple of years when Sculley was CEO but it was rotting from the inside.

    13. Re:Facts by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I have great difficulty believing that

      Try googling it then. It's a matter of record.

      P.S. Denying actual, verifiable & objective facts gets modded insightful?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re: Facts by sheramil · · Score: 1

      And have you used the keyboard on the most recent MBPs? It's the single worst keyboard I have ever used in my life.

      Said the person that it too young to have ever tried to type on a Commodore PET, Atari 400, Sinclair ZX81, or IBM PCjr.

      Those examples are all from the distant past (and I'd like to add, Hewlett-Packard Datascope). I think the point is that technology is supposed to be getting better, not worse.

    15. Re: Facts by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Stop it with that meaningless statement. Do you want Apple to invent the transistor every quarter, or something? What would constitute an innovation from your perspective?? The Wheel? After that, it's just a collection of slightly differently useful round things!!

      Come on. Name on thing, in the last fifty years, that you would consider an "innovation", and I'll show you why it's actually just an iteration.

    16. Re:Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Really? Then mind explaining why their laptop sales figures are tanking?"

      Because their tablet sales haven't. Laptops is a contracting market.

    17. Re:Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you've doubled down on nonsense.

      Yeah, they "coasted" from the iPhone 4S to the iPhone X and the iPad 2 to the iPad Pro.

    18. Re:Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      par for the course, shitcock.

    19. Re: Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are generally iterations,not innovations.

      Just like everything since the wheel. And that's up for debate.

    20. Re:Facts by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Really? Then mind explaining why their laptop sales figures are tanking?

      Shouldn't you be explaining why they aren't doing that, if even one thing you said was true? http://www.techradar.com/news/laptop-sales-pick-up-with-apples-latest-macbook-pro-selling-nicely

      Apple’s notebook sales were up 15.4% year-on-year, and in Q2, they’re expected to grow by over 10% compared to this quarter.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    21. Re: Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've typed on all of those. Whether membrane keyboards or those horrible chicklet keyboards, you're right. The new MBP keyboards aren't *that* bad, but they are awful by comparison to either the previous MBP keyboards or a hell of a lot of other laptop keyboards.

      All of this and fewer ports so ... it's thinner. Stupid. I'll be keeping my 2011 MBP for the indefinite future until it finally fails, at which point I don't know what I'll do. Probably by a used MBP from someone, because the newest ones are overpriced and make unnecessary sacrifices that don't make them truly "Pro" machines anymore.

  31. Same old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On my Android phone, a Oneplus One with Lineage OS on it, even thought I rarely turn on wi-fi, when I look under battery stats wi-fi is the second biggest battery drain. So unless I don't understand what off means, it doesn't turn off the radio.

    1. Re:Same old? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a bug in either your device or LineageOS. You might want to submit a bug report about that.

      I know that on my android phone, turning off the radios actually turns off the radios.

  32. It's worse than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone notice that the control center button will turn Bluetooth ON if it is OFF in settings? It just won't turn it OFF. That's broken and user-hostile behavior.

  33. Related to Target's Beacon announcement? by GamesOver · · Score: 1

    Corporations, like Target, can't track users if they have bluetooth disabled. Keeping bluetooth "always on" will make it easier for them to passively track iOS11 shoppers as they travel through their stores (whether they use the app or not).
    https://techcrunch.com/2017/09...

  34. My understanding... by elistan · · Score: 1

    Here's my understanding of what the buttons in Control Center now do:

    Airplane Mode - same as before, turns off all radios - wifi, BT, cell.

    The green cellular lollipop - not intuitively obvious to me that this was for cellular, but anyway it turns off the cellular radio entirely as one would expect.

    Blue wifi icon - this is the one with the new functionality. It's a 'disconnect' button now, not a 'turn off' button. The use case, from what I can tell, is for people who want to not use wifi at a particular location (like at a restaurant that offers wifi but their Internet connection is down) but don't want to worry about turning wifi back on once they leave that location. There are some anecdotes on reddit about people who have turned off wifi but forgot to turn it back on once they got home and blew through their data plan in a couple days. Wifi can be turned off entirely via the Settings app like before.

    Blue BT icon - again, like the wifi button, it's simply a 'disconnect' button now. I'm having a hard time thinking of a use case for this, however. Maybe some people want to temporarily disconnect from their keyboard, speakers, card, headphones, whatever, without having to remember to turn BT back on again later when they do want to connect...? I only ever use BT for in-car stuff, and never had need to turn off BT.

    So I think the new ability is a good one to have, and a good one for the control center, but yeah it's questionable to change an existing button's function without a more clear indicator of what it does. Like a pop-up that says 'This just temporarily disconnects you from your wifi network, instead of turning wifi off. [] Do not show again.' would perhaps have been advisable?

    1. Re:My understanding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just a brief correction regarding the green cellular 'lollipop' - turning that off doesn't completely disconnect you from cell towers. It turns off mobile data, but you will remain connected for the purposes of voice/dialing.

  35. Much ado about nothing? by DaveMikulec · · Score: 1

    "If you want to really and completely turn off Bluetooth and Wi-Fi on iOS11 you can't do it from the Control Center anymore, you'll have to do it through the Settings app."

    And here I thought that everyone went through the Settings app to begin with. I always have.

    --
    "Shall we play a game?" -W.O.P.R.
    1. Re:Much ado about nothing? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      And here I thought that everyone went through the Settings app to begin with. I always have.

      People tend to think that the way they do things is pretty much the same as the way most other people do things. This assumption is seductive, but often very incorrect.

    2. Re:Much ado about nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess it's from decades of desktop computer use. It just made sense to me to use the app that was designed to setup and control the device.

      Dave Mikulec

    3. Re:Much ado about nothing? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I always have.

      And that is how we get to dumb UI decisions. Assumptions.

  36. "No means no" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In any other context Apple's execs would roundly condemn anyone who even suggested that "no means maybe" or "no means pester me relentlessly until I give up fighting"

  37. Bzzzt, sorry you lose, but thanks for playing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will temporarily suspend the radio until it "courageously" restarts itself the next morning at 5:00am.

    This is so typical of Apple. As long as you want to do things the way they envisioned them, they're great, but if you want something different, their response is "Why would you want to do that?" They've had this attitude since at least the early Macintosh days.

  38. Avoiding ads = BAD! by wikthemighty · · Score: 1

    It was very brave and forward thinking of Apple to not allow you to turn off Wifi.

    We don't want the kiddies skipping ads in their games, amiright? ;)

    --
    "There are people who do not love their fellow human being, and I _hate_ people like that!" - Tom Lehrer
  39. No reason for the change! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a pair of bluetooth earphones that I use with my iphone and ipad. They're a cheap brand with no way to force a pairing mode without plugging them into USB power, so after I had them connected on my ipad for my treadmill time, I had to find my damned ipad and turn off its bluetooth before I could connect them to my phone. A total pain. Since the iOS11 panel is now more convenient than drilling down menus in the settings app, maybe I will remember to disconnect BT after I'm done running. But I doubt it.

  40. Obligatory by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    While that might sound like a bug, that's actually what Apple intended in the new operating system.

    Hey, Apple. You're programming it wrong.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  41. Close door button by DrYak · · Score: 1

    do nothing. Eventually the door will close, but it takes a while. Now repeat experiment, but press the close door button. Door will close predictably sooner (time it if you like).

    That used to be the case. But nowadays more and more lifts are produced with the button not even wired.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  42. I get why they did this by dan325 · · Score: 1

    It's for non-power users who turn off their Bluetooth and don't understand why their Apple Pencil stopped working or why their Watch won't connect to their phone. I'd imagine the Genius Bars get to answer this question 20 times every day. I'd be OK with it if they'd give power users the option to revert back to the old behavior.

  43. airlines... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now forbid carrying iPhones except with batteries removed.

  44. FAA should love this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    airplane mode that isn't

  45. Exfiltrate your data, remote control when needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "Good Guys" have an always available way to exfiltrate your private data, or remote control your device if necessary. What's not to like?
    Given "longer battery life" has always been a big deal with mobile devices and actually drives sales, it is hard to believe such a bone headed move (keeping the radio on drains the battery) makes it pass all the internal reviews unless big brother's invisible hand is providing guidance.

  46. Im Done With Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im never buying another apple product ever again... their developers have become assholes

  47. Which Android has been doing for ages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to defend iOS, but hasn't Android been doing this since KitKat ?

    P.S. can't read the article, it seems to be down.

  48. Re: Only LUDDITES use Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. by KGIII · · Score: 1

    They said ack because they used an analog version of TCP/IP.

    I'm a little sorry for this post, but just a little.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  49. Re: Why? by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Even the first gen iPad got cut and paste. It even works between applications. You can cut a URL and paste it into your email client, apps, or another tab in Safari.

    I know because I still have one. I still sometimes use it as a disposable device. If something happens to it, I don't much care. So, I use it in places I'd not willingly risk a newer device. Other than Safari crashing when sites are bloated, it's still very functional.

    Why yes, yes I did just defend Apple.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  50. Privacy vs privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So apple introduces a cool, machine-learning system to keep âoeyour browsing your business âoe.... but they make dead easy for companies to track users by MAC address?!??

  51. Re:Exfiltrate your data, remote control when neede by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This move of Apple right here is a proof that they are not after the security and privacy of their users.
    Devices are malware proof and your data is secure, YEAH RIGHT.
     

  52. Intesting coincidence by afranke · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that this and the Purism phone news are next to one another, when one of the main drivers of Purism is they provide hardware killswitches for wireless (and webcams, and mics).

  53. Total non-issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This change makes perfect sense to me (an Apple developer).

    The unique features of iOS & macOS connectivity like Continuity, AirDrop, AirPlay, Apple Watch integration, etc, ..you expect to always work with your local devices, even if you have decided to temporarily disconnect from some WiFi network or BT device.

    I think this is another pretend issue by non-Apple users that don't understand these connectivity features used by tens of millions of Apple users on a daily basis.

    Of course someone will bring up 'battery issues', but truthfully, it only exists in their own OCD head.

    As for security, well if an iPhone user is genuinely worried their iPhone could be compromised (i.e. basically Jailbroken) via BT or WiFi at a given point in time, I suggest they should turn off the phone completely and run for the hills–they have bigger problems lurking around.

    See for some iOS security background (people not used to understanding that Apple takes security seriously may need to watch this over a number of times):

    Behind the Scenes of iOS Security – Black Hat 2016 (First half is on-device security: "Data Protection".)

    Behind the Scenes of iOS Security – Black Hat 2016 – Synchronising Secrets (Skip to "iCloud Keychain" implementation.)

    iOS Security Guide – Apple (pdf)

  54. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  55. Same in Android by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

    It is the same in Android and for a long time, when you turn off wifi, it is still on, it will always scan for available SSID and it helps for location. There is a deep setting to really turn it off however.

    --
    "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
  56. WiFi? by luttapi · · Score: 1

    Apple users are not expected to know what is WiFi or bluetooth, let alone need to turn them off.