Slashdot Mirror


How Flying Seriously Messes With Your Mind and Body (bbc.com)

dryriver writes: BBC Future has an interesting piece about how traveling in an airliner does strange things to people's minds and bodies, such as far more people starting to cry while watching even mildly emotional movies on airplanes than what is normal, some passengers experiencing decreases in acuity of sight, taste and smell (airline meals are over-seasoned to compensate for this), unusual tiredness or desire to sleep, your skin drying out by up to 37% percent and possibly becoming itchy, and some people breaking wind far more often than they normally would. Here is an excerpt form the report: "There can be no doubt that aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans to be. They are a weird environment where the air pressure is similar to that atop an 8,000ft-high (2.4km) mountain. The humidity is lower than in some of the world's driest deserts while the air pumped into the cabin is cooled as low as 10C (50F) to whisk away the excess heat generated by all the bodies and electronics onboard. The reduced air pressure on airline flights can reduce the amount of oxygen in passengers' blood between 6 and 25%, a drop that in hospital would lead many doctors to administer supplementary oxygen. There are some studies, however, that show even relatively mild levels of hypoxia (deficiency in oxygen) can alter our ability to think clearly. At oxygen levels equivalent to altitudes above 12,000ft (3.6km), healthy adults can start to show measurable changes in their memory, their ability to perform calculations and make decisions. This is why the aviation regulations insist that pilots must wear supplementary oxygen if the cabin air pressure is greater than 12,500ft. A study in 2007 showed that after about three hours at the altitudes found in airline cabins, people start to complain about feeling uncomfortable."

264 comments

  1. I joined the /. mile high club the other day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It means a woman was sitting next to me by the window seat, we made sporadic awkward and stilted conversation during our meal, and she left halfway through claiming she had to powder her nose but never came back.

    At least now I can claim it was mild hypoxia on both our parts. Usually it would only apply to my bits.

    1. Re: I joined the /. mile high club the other day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't think you understand what the Mile High Club is about.

    2. Re: I joined the /. mile high club the other day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you understand what the Mile High Club is about.

      He did say "the /. mile-high club", so sex would definitely NOT have been involved, except inside his feeble mind.

    3. Re: I joined the /. mile high club the other day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you understand what the /. Mile High Club is all about

    4. Re: I joined the /. mile high club the other day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand what the Mile High Club is about.

      When I make the FWOOOSH sound and emulate planes flying over your head, do you understand what that is about?

    5. Re: I joined the /. mile high club the other day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bless your little cotton socks: you're not even aware of what it means to be a /.er

    6. Re: I joined the /. mile high club the other day by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Hmm....well, whatever it is, the important thing seems to be that it is really FUN to drink alcohol on the plane....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re: I joined the /. mile high club the other day by sexconker · · Score: 1

      The /. Mile High Club is the people who have gotten first post while on a plane.

    8. Re: I joined the /. mile high club the other day by Sarusa · · Score: 4, Funny

      As he said, this is the Slashdot Mile High Club.

      Oral sex in the /. Mile High Club is when you notice your seatmate is using a Windows laptop and you helpfully start berating them about using Macro$haft Winblowze, she says 'F@#$ you', you reply with 'F$#% you, you filthy vagina haver', and then one of you has your seat changed in the afterglow.

    9. Re: I joined the /. mile high club the other day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First rule of /. Mile High Club: You don't talk about /. Mile High Club!

    10. Re: I joined the /. mile high club the other day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having sex in Denver? Been there done that; nothing to rave about.

    11. Re: I joined the /. mile high club the other day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it was a transgender. Then same body parts would make sweet love. You bunch of freaks.

    12. Re: I joined the /. mile high club the other day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The /. Mile high club is consensual sex with your wife in the missionary position for the purposes of reproduction.

    13. Re: I joined the /. mile high club the other day by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Also, the woman was his mom.

    14. Re: I joined the /. mile high club the other day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you didn't get that he joined the "/. MHC".

    15. Re: I joined the /. mile high club the other day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, isn't there a disruptive airline startup somewhere to offer a mid-air blow jobs? I'd fly that.

  2. air != air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i would definitely chose the airline with better air !

  3. AALS by quarkoid · · Score: 3, Informative

    Altitude Adjusted Lachrymosity Syndrome. It's a thing. First mentioned on the BBC's premier film programme (http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00lvdrj/episodes/downloads) and detailed in their Witterpedia, http://witterpedia.net/wiki/index.php?title=AALS.

    1. Re:AALS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've not heard anything about anyone finding a connection between air travel and Lou Gehrig's disease.

    2. Re:AALS by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about "going away from family and friends and the familiar, perhaps for an extended period, causes sadness easily triggered to tears by a mildly sad moment in a movie syndrome"?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:AALS by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Yeah... you're going to make that a lot shorter if you want it to become a thing that can be acronymized.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:AALS by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about "going away from family and friends and the familiar, perhaps for an extended period, causes sadness easily triggered to tears by a mildly sad moment in a movie syndrome"?

      What makes you think all people are flying away from their families? I would suggest that close to half of people are flying towards their home family and friends.

    5. Re:AALS by seven+of+five · · Score: 2

      Or "being sealed in a cramped aluminum tube moving at speeds guaranteed to kill if anything serious goes wrong, and placing your life in the hands of people you've never met, after waiting in line and being groped by other strangers"?

    6. Re:AALS by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about "going away from family and friends and the familiar, perhaps for an extended period, causes sadness easily triggered to tears by a mildly sad moment in a movie syndrome"?

      What makes you think all people are flying away from their families? I would suggest that close to half of people are flying towards their home family and friends.

      Oh, that other half gets depressed at the idea of getting back with the family and friends and stress created by maintaining the facade, known as the bonfire of the vanities syndrome.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    7. Re:AALS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did not waste my time to RTFA. The causes for all the effects described are obvious. To make things worse, a study is referenced that states that after three hours at the pressures found on aircraft people feel uncomfortable. With today's airline seating arrangements I immediately feel uncomfortable upon being seated.

    8. Re:AALS by jittles · · Score: 2

      after waiting in line and being groped by other strangers"?

      Prostitution is illegal where I live. What choice do I have but to pay the TSA? I find that if I go through security three or four times on the same ticket, they give me extra service! Sometimes they even upgrade me to a private room where I feel a little less self conscious. Buying a plane ticket is much less expensive than getting bailed out of jail as a John.

    9. Re:AALS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about "going away from family and friends and the familiar, perhaps for an extended period, causes sadness easily triggered to tears by a mildly sad moment in a movie syndrome"?

      That, plus the 1 Litre bottle of single malt purchased at the duty-free shop..

    10. Re:AALS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about "people who've got up early, travelled, stood in lines for three hours and been crammed into a pressurised tube may be a bit tired, and relieved from stress because for the first time in, like, eight hours, they're now in a position where they don't have to worry about where to be next?"

    11. Re:AALS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "going away from family... causes sadness..."?

      I love my family but let's get real: a few weeks to a month away from crying kids, coming back refreshed, is the definition of heaven. As they say, absense makes the heart grow fonder.

  4. Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Guppy · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 supposedly feature improvements in cabin air pressure, with pressurization to 6000 feet equivalent, as well as increases in humidity.

    Unfortunately, they still aren't that common.

    1. Re: Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flown in 787 recently, Sydney to LA. It was different, I actually didnâ(TM)t think it was the greatest flight Iâ(TM)ve ever been on but that may be perhaps Iâ(TM)ve just adapted to the normal pressure and air quality.

    2. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've only flown on a 787 once, but it's a huge improvement over any other standard-class flight I've been on. The higher pressure is really noticeable - I got about 4 hours of work done, and slept soundly for much of the rest of the time. Oh, and it was the only flight I've been on (including in business) where the skin on the lower halves of my legs didn't dry out and remain itchy for a week afterwards.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 supposedly feature improvements in cabin air pressure, with pressurization to 6000 feet equivalent, as well as increases in humidity.

      Unfortunately, they still aren't that common.

      Not sure about the A350, but the 787's composite fuselage allows for higher humidity, too.

      Water and aluminum equals corrosion, so aluminum airliners fly with extremely dry cabin air because the cold outside would cause condensation on the aluminum, leading to corrosion and planes falling apart much faster.

      Which isn't a good thing.

      But composites apparently aren't (as?) susceptible to water-caused corrosion (or degradation), and I bet they don't conduct heat was well so there's less condensation in the first place.

      Higher humidity means less impact on the mostly-water meatbags inside the sardine can.

    4. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      I think you're confusing steel (which water corrodes) and aluminum (which water does not corrode).

    5. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can confirm, I've flown on both multiple times and the difference from the old aircraft is dramatic. Your ears don't get painful and pop, the atmosphere is much nicer and you can sleep a lot easier. At the end of a 12 hour flight you feel much better than you did coming off the old aircraft.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Years (Christ, decades!) ago I was an engineer at Boeing and we looked into some report that said something like "people experience nosebleeds on aircraft 840% more often" and we talked to doctors who traced it to low humidity in the cabins. We designed a humidifying system (corrosion wasn't a problem, but the duct work had some ordinary steel components that needed to either be replaced or they would rust quickly). The system design predicted a system weight of about 200 pounds, and management figured no one would want it so they killed the project there. They were probably right; American was ordering planes with a brushed aluminum finish because they didn't want the weight of the paint on the aircraft.

    7. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Aluminum may not, but what about aerospace aluminum alloys (plus sea air, for example)?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Koreantoast · · Score: 1

      They say that the effect stands out particularly if you flew a different aircraft right before flying a 787 or A350.

    9. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Draconian · · Score: 5, Informative

      Both aluminum and steel are corroded by water. In fact, aluminum ions are more soluble in water than iron ions. The difference, however, is that iron oxides do not stick to the parent iron substrate and flake off, ever exposing new iron surface for corrosion. Aluminum on the other hand forms alumina (aluminum oxide, corundum), which is insoluble in water, has a very high hardness, and sticks strongly to the parent substrate, thus forming an inert layer all over the aluminum and preventing further corrosion. This is why aluminum roofs and siding works, without the aluminum dissolving in the rain water despite the very high solubility.

    10. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      I call it "automated alu-protect" for short. Patent pending.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    11. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I've been looking forward to those. I live at 7100 feet, in the southwestern desert. I'd like to ride on an airplane that's more comfortable than being at home.

    12. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      The lower humidity is not to protect the metal. Anyway aluminum does not corrode, it forms such a strong layer of oxidized aluminum lower layers are not exposed.

      The lower humidity is simply to save money. They bleed air off the third or fourth stage ring of the jet engine to pressurize the cabin. When the dry upper atmospheric air is compressed it produces extremely dry air for the cabin. They use humidifiers to add water vapor. To save cost to carry less water. 20 gallons of water more = 75 kg more = 1 fare paying passenger less.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    13. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      They can easily design a bigger tank, and add more water on flights that are not full and increase the humudity in the cabin, if they want to. But they don't care.

      If it is possible to supply extra humidity only to targeted passengers, then they would be interested in the idea. 20$ more for extra humidity seats.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    14. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

      They fill tires with helium to carry one more passenger.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    15. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      Lufthansa and Emirates A380's seem to have the same type of climate control systems as the A350 and the B787, because they feel far more comfortable than other planes I've flown with.

    16. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      corrode

              destroy or damage (metal, stone, or other materials) slowly by chemical action.
              "acid rain poisons fish and corrodes buildings"

      In no way is aluminum corrodes by water (at neutral pH). It forms a native oxide a few nanometers thick (similar to silicon or titanium). Once the native oxide forms, the remaining aluminum remains metallic indefinitely.
             

    17. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Shotgun · · Score: 5, Informative

      Steel corrosion is called rust, and rust is both water soluble and hydrophilic (it attracts water). Once a steel part starts rusting, the corrosion rate tends to increase, so we are very familiar with the process.

      Aluminum corrosion is a white powder that is not soluble and is hydrophobic (it repels water). Normally, the aluminum will corrode, producing a layer that will protect the rest of it. However, aircraft aluminum is typically 2024 or 7071 allow. Both alloys contain a lot of copper, which makes the allow much stronger but allows for a inter granular galvanic reaction. The corrosion is able to seep deeper into the metal by going between the granuals. They are so susceptible to corrosion that they come with an "alclad" layer which it a skin of pure aluminum about .001 thick.

      Some designs, such as the Zenith Zodiac I built, are engineer for 6061 aluminum. While not as strong as the other two mentioned, it does not suffer from the inter granular corrosion. In order to save weight (a light aircraft paint job usually costs about 25lbs), many builder will polish the bare aluminum to a mirror sheen instead of painting it.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    18. Re: Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Flown in 787 recently, Sydney to LA. It was different, I actually didnâ(TM)t think it was the greatest flight Iâ(TM)ve ever been on but that may be perhaps Iâ(TM)ve just adapted to the normal pressure and air quality.

      That flight certainly messed up your keyboard, Seriously Slashdot fix this shit. How are you literally the one and only site I've ever come across that can't figure out text? I bet it would be fixed under Windows.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    19. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      They fill the tyres with nitrogen because it's inert and in certain temperatures oxygen degrades rubber far more rapidly.

    20. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      I have flown 2-3 times a year between Copenhagen and the US on the 787, and it was a very pleasant experience. I have managed to sleep on the entire flight after dinner and only woke up twice to sip a bit of water. But it was on their premium seats where you can put the seat much more horizontal and there's a foot rest as well. I have never been able to sleep on a plane before. It was quite strange/depressing to go to sleep after taking of in the warm weather and then waking up in show in Copenhagen, but I was well rested. :)
      Their premium seats are a bit more than twice the price of the economy,(around 1200$ instead of 520$) and well worth it for me, at least the times when I fly alone and I don't know who I am going to be seated next to. :D In economy, they don't recline enough for me to prevent my head from tilting forwards.

        I believe you now can bid on a upgrade and then save some money. A colleague of mine, managed to get it for around 900$ from Copenhagen to SFO(portland).

      https://www.norwegian.com/en/r...

      The air doesn't smell bad and I believe that they use compressors dedicated to cabin pressure instead of the compressor stage of the engines, but I don't know much about these things.

    21. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liar

    22. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Shotgun · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unless you add some copper to the alloy to increase its strength. You might name such an alloy 2024 or 7071, and you might use it all over the place in airplane construction.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    23. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They fill the tires with nitrogen because air is mostly nitrogen...

    24. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Shotgun · · Score: 2

      There are airplane graveyards in the New Mexico deserts. The location were chosen specifically because of the dry air.

      "Pure" aluminum doesn't corrode after the first layer of oxide is laid down if the water is acid free.

      Airplanes don't use pure aluminum, since it is way to weak.
      Water is rarely neutral or salt free coming from the atmosphere.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    25. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by captaindomon · · Score: 1

      Replying to cancel an incorrect feedback. Carry on.

      --
      Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
    26. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      The Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 supposedly feature improvements in cabin air pressure, with pressurization to 6000 feet equivalent, as well as increases in humidity.

      Unfortunately, they still aren't that common.

      I'll find out in November, while crossing the Pacific ocean.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    27. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by leathered · · Score: 1

      I've flown on 787s few times with an airline that previously had 767s. They are noticeably quieter and the lower cabin altitude definitely makes you feel less tired after an 8-10 hour flight.

      The downside is that the airline used their new planes as an opportunity to move from a 2-4-2 layout to 3-3-3, so they feel even more cramped than their old 767s.

      --
      For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
    28. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      >American was ordering planes with a brushed aluminum finish because they didn't want the weight of the paint on the aircraft.

      I suspected that was the reason for years. I was right!

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    29. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, its because the air is Dr her than the atacama desert at FL350 and it was a waste of jet fuel to lift 200 lbs of water to altitude until fat sick people started flying everywhere. Humidity at altitude has no corrosive effect compared to the salt fog at coastal airports.

    30. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      They fill the tires with nitrogen because air is mostly nitrogen...

      Yes because filling with pure nitrogen instead of air is a perfectly reasonable and financially sound decision. In other news Anonymous Cowards appear to have killed off their last functioning braincell.

    31. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Airbus A350

      Best. Airliner. Ever.

    32. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      What is 7071?

      Is it anything like 6061?

    33. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      7071 alloy doesn't exist
      I think you mean 6061

    34. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, what about all that oxygen on the OUTSIDE of the tire? You know, the side where you can't put any protective coatings on it because it will wear off as the tire wears down?

      They fill tires with nitrogen because regular air contains a significant amount of water. Water vapor expands and contracts a lot with temperature.
      With no water inside the tire, you get more consistent pressure.

      Anyone who told you it makes your tires last longer because there is no oxygen was telling you lies so you will spend more money.

    35. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not airline-specific but of all major designs only the A350XWB and the 787 are newer than the A380 so it's hardly surprising that it's very comfortable compared with anything else. In general Airbus have lower noise levels but noise is, however, slightly airline specific. Some put extra noise isolation material in the premium section of the cabin at the expense of weight. The A380 does seem to become the favorite aircraft of all who fly enough to compare but its commercial success (or lack thereof) is another story.

    36. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I flew in the 787 this summer for the first time. It was by far the most comfortable airplane I’ve ever been in. It was more spacious, and didn’t have the minor airplane rattles some older designs suffered from.

      I also broke wind multiple times, and not a scent was felt. It was magical.

    37. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, what about all that oxygen on the OUTSIDE of the tire?

      You mean the stuff at a fraction of the pressure of the air inside the tire?

      They fill tires with nitrogen because regular air contains a significant amount of water.

      Air contains as much water as you want it to. It's cheaper to dry air than it is to separate nitrogen.

      Anyone who told you it makes your tires last longer because there is no oxygen was telling you lies so you will spend more money.

      Why would I spend money? I don't own an aircraft and I don't typically take tires up to altitude.

    38. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Yup, I'll agree with this. The experience of flying a newer plane was sort of interesting but I can't recall feeling any more comfortable. Maybe the most interesting thing is that they automatically dim the electronic window shades to help let people sleep and acclimate the ones who don't sleep to the changing time zones.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    39. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      What's it got to do with aircraft?

      The pressure difference isn't all that much. atmospheric pressure is around 1kg/cm, most cars run 2kg/cm, so it's 3 times higher inside than out.

      No one has any evidence of a tire failing due to oxidization of the inner layer of the tire. Of the billions of tires that have been made, zero is quite a low number. They're designed to be filled with air.

    40. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The pressure difference isn't all that much. atmospheric pressure is around 1kg/cm, most cars run 2kg/cm, so it's 3 times higher inside than out.

      The pressure difference between a tire in the air at -50degC at reduced pressure and a tire suddenly loaded with over 20tonnes + inertia from hitting the ground is incredible. They use nitrogen because it's inert. Oxygen reacts with rubber. The amount it reacts depends on environmental conditions and stress on the tire. Airline tires go through massive pressure and temperature swings between flying at altitude and hitting the ground, several orders of magnitude worse than a typical car. If brakes are applied the tire literally needs to survive in a fire.

      But you don't need to take my word for it. Google it.

      No one has any evidence of a tire failing

      From Boeing's website:

      In addition, Boeing has received reports of three confirmed cases and other suspected cases in which a wheel/tire assembly exploded when the oxygen in air-filled tires combined with volatile gases given off by a severely overheated tire. In one case, the tire became overheated as a result of a dragging brake, and the wheel/tire assembly exploded when it reached the auto-ignition temperature. In another case, a wheel/tire assembly explosion in the wheel well during flight was suspected in the catastrophic loss of one airplane. A similar explosion caused severe damage to two others.

      As a result, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration issued Airworthiness Directive 87-08-09 requiring that only nitrogen be used to inflate airplane tires on braked wheels. However, tires may be topped off with air in remote locations where nitrogen may not be available if the oxygen content in the tire does not exceed 5 percent by volume.

    41. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I've only flown on a 787 once, but it's a huge improvement over any other standard-class flight I've been on. The higher pressure is really noticeable - I got about 4 hours of work done, and slept soundly for much of the rest of the time. Oh, and it was the only flight I've been on (including in business) where the skin on the lower halves of my legs didn't dry out and remain itchy for a week afterwards.

      I've done a 10 hour flight on a 787 and there is no noticeable improvement compared to an A330 or B777. Its nowhere near as quite and smooth as an A380.

      There are some serious design flaws with the 787 that make it uncomfortable. First, there is no window recess, the reason I like the window seat is so my 55cm + shoulders have that little bit of extra room in the 17" (45 CM) seats that seem to be favoured on these aircraft. Secondly, there are no window shutters, instead they dim the window but it can never be properly opaque, all it does is flood the cabin with blue light which is not conclusive to sleeping (in fact its the opposite). Both of these are a serious issue when trying to adjust from US central time (-5 GMT) to British Summer Time (GMT +1) and your flight runs during the night (because red-eye flights are cheaper and work has a mandate to cut costs).

      No one would notice the pressure changes if they weren't heavily advertised. That B787 flight from LHR to DFW was easily the worst I've ever been on. So much so that this time I'm going via Miami because that route uses a B777 and A319.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    42. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've only flown on a 787 once, but it's a huge improvement over any other standard-class flight I've been on. The higher pressure is really noticeable - I got about 4 hours of work done, and slept soundly for much of the rest of the time. Oh, and it was the only flight I've been on (including in business) where the skin on the lower halves of my legs didn't dry out and remain itchy for a week afterwards.

      You get no sympathy from me. I tried to help, but noooo, you said "stop licking my legs".
      Maybe next time you should not wear cargo shorts; that says you're just asking for it.

    43. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7071 "allow" doesn't exist either.

    44. Re: Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking up the layman's definition of corrosion in an online dictionary will not provide you with an adequate electrochemical description.

    45. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1

      The pressure difference isn't all that much. atmospheric pressure is around 1kg/cm, most cars run 2kg/cm, so it's 3 times higher inside than out.

      But the pressure in tires in the main landing gear (at sea level) of a 747 is ca 13 bar. Not 2... And that's just to begin with.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    46. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Doh!
      I was thinking about 6061 (what my 601XL uses for the most part) while thinking 7075 (which airliners would use more of).

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    47. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Made the same mistake in another post. I meant 7075. 6061 forgoes the copper so that it has good corrosion resistance, but lacks the tensile strength of 2024. 7075 has the highest tensile strength of the popular alloys, but you've got to keep it away from water, high heat, and notches.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    48. Re:Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 by wwphx · · Score: 1

      There are airplane graveyards in the New Mexico deserts. The location were chosen specifically because of the dry air.

      Pray tell, where? I've seen several in Arizona and California, but never in NM, and I live there.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  5. Obviously by houghi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some of those chemicals of the chemtrails will get into the cabin,

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't leave us hanging. Be a sport and finish your sentence.

    2. Re:Obviously by qbast · · Score: 5, Funny

      Too late, men in black got to him. Poor sod did not even have time for traditional CARRIER LOST.

    3. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The carrier wasn't lost because THEY'RE STILL LISTENING!!!! I mean sssh.

  6. Hyperloop ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flying is terrible... use the HyperLoop.

    1. Re:Hyperloop ad by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Flying is terrible... use the HyperLoop.

      Likely to have the same issues.

  7. Mouth went numb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I had to fly a few weeks ago while I had a sinus infection. About an hour into the flight, the upper left side of my mouth went completely numb for about four hours. It was a bit scary, I thought I might have been having a stroke or something, but it seems to have just been severe sinus pressure from a blockage.

    1. Re:Mouth went numb by Xest · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I stupidly went diving once when I had a bit of a cold, got really nasty squeeze in my palate at the top of my mouth when ascending. I lost my taste for about 2 months afterwards as a result, even eating chocolate basically just felt like having mud in my mouth.

      I now take the "Don't dive even if you have a minor cold" thing seriously now, as no doctor could help, and I genuinely was beginning to wonder if I'd lost the sense of taste for good.

    2. Re:Mouth went numb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diving and flying here are opposites w/ regard to comfort and safety.

      In aircraft, ascending means that all the gasses in your body expand. Your body is well equipped to fart, burp, or let air out of your sinuses as this happens. When descending, the gasses contract, and most of the time, that's not a problem. If your sinuses or ears are obstructed, however, the results can be extremely painful -- or worse -- as air tries to force its way in.

      In diving, the major risks are during or after ascent, from bubble formation -- the bends -- where dissolved gasses come out of solution into the blood, joints, and may cause severe pain and/or embolisms (bubbles in your circulatory system).

      Fortunately, while the descent issues can still happen during diving, you usually can reverse your dive course and alleviate the pressure.

    3. Re:Mouth went numb by Xest · · Score: 1

      Specifically in my case the problem was a little odd in that I first felt the pain when I got down to about 8 metres, and tried ascending, repeated, descent and it was still there, I thought I'd try just gently descending to see if it would pass, and it actually did by about 15 metres so I continued the dive down to 42 metres okay. On the ascent I felt the pain again at around 15 metres, tried descending, and re-ascending a couple of times and the same problem. I decided again to just try and gently ascend to see if it would pass during my safety stop and it again disappeared at around 8 metres before I even begun the safety stop at the surface support tank hanging at 3 metres.

      My palate felt a bit sore, but I didn't really think anything of it - I more presumed it was simply precisely because I had a cold and it was just sore throat, but it wasn't until I was at work the next day and my chocolate tasted funny that I realised my taste had gone, and it wasn't until a week later when my cold had completely cleared that I realised the taste loss was more serious, by about a month I was genuinely concerned, then as I say thankfully it went at about 2 months and I learnt my lesson.

      What was particularly odd in this case was the fact that the pain cleared both during compression through descent at depths > 15 metres, and during expansion through ascent at depths less than 8 metres. This was less about nitrogen/oxygen absorption and more about air bubbles trapped in my palate caused from mucus from my cold such that both the actions of expansion and contraction of air in the mucus were both moving around the mucus to cause pain, and damage.

      So it was actually not related to the issues of gas absorption from diving but purely to do with expansion and contraction of gas outside the bloodstream. The real reason this doesn't typically affect people on planes is because the pressure differences from flying are pretty negligible compared to those whilst diving simply because the vast density difference of air and water.

      This is for what it's worth also why you shouldn't dive with a cold, not because of risk of the bends but because the mucus does prevent you from equalizing, which is effectively exactly what happened to me - although I could equalize generally to prevent pain from pressure changes in my ears etc. the trapped mucus was preventing localised pressure equalisation in my palate.

      That said I should probably quantify my previous comment, I guess I would still dive with a cold, some of my most fun dives have been in the shallows down to no more than 6 metres, or even as little as 3 metres on occasion in warm tropical shallow reefs, and even in the North Sea off the coast of England and Scotland. Pressure changes at that depth aren't sufficient to really cause much problem because at that depth I typically don't ever even need to equalize anyway, and even if something goes horribly wrong it's not exactly difficult to surface at that depth. I certainly would never pass 18 metres anymore with a cold though, and wouldn't even go that deep if there was any sign of not feeling quite right.

  8. Tomato juice pro tip! by burhop · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For those that didn't RTFA, it seems tomato juice tastes much better on a plane. I fly a lot and can say almost every airline also carries spicy tomato juice for bloody marys too.

    My wife just asked me the other day why I always get tomato juice on a plane but not at home. Thank goodness for slashdot in helping me become more self-aware.

    1. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Worcester sauce , salt and pepper or without ?

    2. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      On a plane, you sweat a lot because of the lower air pressure, but don't notice it. It's important to drink a lot of water to keep hydrated, but it's also important to replenish the salt that drinking all that water washes out of your systems. The spicy tomato juice cans have about 50% of your RDA of salt and are great for avoiding headaches after a long flight.

      Oh, and gin and tonic is one of the few alcoholic beverages that tastes better at low air pressure.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      I heard about this.
      Tried a tomato juice on a plane, was nothing particular.
      But since a while I drink tomato juice at home ... would never have come to my mind if there was not this "myth" ... even if the myth is true :D

      I mean: tomatoes are not even real fruits ... why make "juice" from them? Or why come to the idea to buy and drink it (actually it is rather expensive anyway).

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by sjbe · · Score: 1

      For those that didn't RTFA, it seems tomato juice tastes much better on a plane. I fly a lot and can say almost every airline also carries spicy tomato juice for bloody marys too.

      That's because your taste receptors become less sensitive. The food they serve on planes is typically seasoned more heavily than normal because people's ability to taste is reduced. Therefore it's not surprising that your perception of tomato juice might be different on a plane than on the ground because it's typically quite salty.

    5. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by Sique · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, tomatos are fruits, more specificically, they are berries.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    6. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by johannesg · · Score: 2

      Hah, I'm the same: always drinking tomato juice on planes, and never anywhere else. Glad to know I'm not the only one ;-)

      Anyway, I'm sure being stuck in one position, with no space for your legs, and possibly next to people you really don't care about, is surely also a factor in any sensation of discomfort one might have... When I stand up after a long flight, it is not because I want to get off the plane urgently, but simply because I cannot stand sitting anymore.

    7. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmm...Jim never has a second cup of coffee at home.

    8. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      That's disgusting.

      I take mine with relish and mustard.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    9. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome, you're one of those people drinking tomato juice and then filling the plane with tomato juice burps and squirts the rest of the flight.

    10. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hmmm... Jim never vomits at home.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    11. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by scubamage · · Score: 1

      I always get the tonic water. I'm not a huge fan of tonic alone on the ground (too bitter), but at altitude it tastes amazingly lemony, with the bitterness being quite refreshing.

    12. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      For me it's Ginger Ale that i'll guzzle on plane flights but never touch on the ground.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    13. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does it compare to Brawndo? Brawndo is pretty good on planes too.

    14. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      It is the other way round for me. The same (Lufthansa uses a pretty common brand) tomato juice tastes somewhat more salty at the cruising altitude than on the ground.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    15. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      How does it compare to Brawndo? Brawndo is pretty good on planes too.

      It's got electrolytes.

      --
      Nope, no sig
    16. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by poached · · Score: 1

      This describes me perfectly. I get the bloody mary mix (minus the alcohol) on flights and I have always thought it's the best thing ever, but I never get tomato juice or bloody mary mix otherwise.

      Also, the part about crying more on planes is totally true. I watched a documentary about the Arlington Cemetery and the changing of the guards and had to look away to keep tears from falling from my eyes. But now I can care less about the Tomb of the Unknown and the soldiers guar... hold on brb.

    17. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by houghi · · Score: 1

      Wisdom is knowing tomatoes are a fruit,
      Intelligence is knowing tomatoes don't belong in a fruit salad.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    18. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The only juice made from fruit is "fruit" juice. Juice is made from all sorts of things. Carrot juice, celery juice, cucumber juice, all quite common. Often taken in combination too with leafy items such as kale, or herbs and spices.

    19. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Isn't that backwards?

    20. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me it's Ginger Ale that i'll guzzle on plane flights but never touch on the ground.

      For me it used to be peppermint schnapps out of a Scope bottle.
      But the other passengers would wonder why I drank a whole litre of mouthwash on the plane.

    21. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're a fruit on the plant, a vegetable on your plate. -Mr. Wizard

    22. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by Whibla · · Score: 1

      Plants don't crave gin and tonic...

    23. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I mean: tomatoes are not even real fruits ... why make "juice" from them?

      OK, now we're gonna have to fight.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    24. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's disgusting.

      I take mine with relish and mustard.

      When travelling, I like to take my wife up the funicular.

    25. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Depends whom you ask.
      They are not in the fruit section in a grocery store but in the vegetabke sections.
      So they are not in line with Apples and Oranges. Obviously they are the 'fruits' of the tomato bush. I guess english lacks a proper temr to describe the difference :) (e.g. nuts are the fruits of various trees and bushes, but they are not fruits either, nut nuts :) )

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    26. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Haha, that is funny!
      (y)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    27. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been hooked on Tabasco's green label Jalapeño Bloody Mary Mix for a while now that I don't wait to get on a plane for them

    28. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Obviously. My point was: which sane 50 year old male would come to the idea to buy celery juice or cucumber juice?
      At least to me the idea never occured, passing by 'drinks' like that makes me shudder.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    29. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I thought it was the reverse, also Charisma is being able to sell a tomato based fruit salad

    30. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To botanists vegetables do not exist. Some fruits are just labeled as such in the kitchen.

    31. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      which sane 50 year old male would come to the idea to buy celery juice or cucumber juice?

      You obviously don't spend much time out. Whacky and weird health juices are all the rage at the moment. It's a frigging huge and booming business. You can't walk through the juice section of a supermarket without finding as many vegetable juices are your traditional fruit juices. There's juice bars opening up everywhere. Celery mixed by itself tastes like ... celery. But in combination with beetroot, cucumber, and spinach it makes quite a nice and healthy drink.

      Hell with the benefit of hindsight if I travelled back in time 10 years I'd open a vegetable juice bar. The first person to do that in Australia is now stupid rich.

    32. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like the guys who "invented" smoothies :D

      But beetroot is an absolute no go for me, celery in soup is ok, or as steak, it is actually an interesting steak or "Schnitzel".

      Anyway, I guess I still prefer a piece of liver and an egg in a mixer over that en vogue vegetable juice.

      I like mixed stuff, though. E.g. carrot, with ginger and apple, or orange etc.

      If you like cucumber, try aloe vera, slightly different taste but interesting feeling.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    33. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by Gussington · · Score: 1

      I could probably google this but I'm going to shoot from the hip instead. A Tomato is both a vegetable and a fruit, because all plants are scientifically classed as vegetation, where as 'fruit' is a culinary term for anything considered a sweet.

      (I could be completely wrong, but sometimes it's more fun to not use Google all the time)

    34. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I agree. Mixing is the way to go. I don't mind the smoothie I listed with the beetroot, but I can't stand it by itself (worst Australian ever given it's a staple on every Australian burger).

      Now as for liver.... that one I'll leave to the Germans. It's one thing I can't really stand.

      Sauerkraut, pork and a litre of beer I can get behind :-)

    35. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by houghi · · Score: 1

      Could be that it should be the other way around.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    36. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by Sique · · Score: 1

      That's more easy in German, where we have two words 'Obst' and 'Frucht'. While 'Frucht' actually means the seedbearing thing, 'Obst' means the stuff you can put in a fruit salad ('Obstsalat'). But be careful, in Germany, some nuts are considered 'Obst' (e.g. hazelnuts and walnuts).

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    37. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Never heared that some nuts are considered Obst ... (I'm German).
      But a good explanation to distinguish Obst from Frucht/Fruit :)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    38. Re:Tomato juice pro tip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Charisma is being able to sell a fruit based tomato salad?

  9. "aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans" by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    there are lots of common peculiar places for humans

  10. I need a night off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I travel I need a night off. Land, eat, go to bed. Then the next day I can function properly.

    Unfortunately, folks want me to do things as soon as I get off the plane and wonder why I'm yawning and scatter brained. A lot think I was drinking on the flight - can't. One drink and it's instant hangover.

    Of course, not being able to travel well is a serious detriment to one's career these days.

  11. This Story Brought to You By... by moehoward · · Score: 1

    Hyperloop....

    Yeah! Airplans sucks!

    Regards,
    Elon

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:This Story Brought to You By... by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Hyperloop....Yeah! Airplans sucks!

      Likely to have the same issues.

    2. Re:This Story Brought to You By... by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Yeah sure, ride the Hyperloop. What am I supposed to do for the other 9998 miles?

    3. Re:This Story Brought to You By... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Isn't the vacuum in the tube supposed to be higher than what it is at 30,000ft? One of the issues is that the more pressure you put inside the airplane, the more stress you put on the containment mechanisms. The Hyperloop's issue is likely to be even worse.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    4. Re:This Story Brought to You By... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      The problem with planes isn't the pressure difference between inside and outside the cabin, it's the constant change in that pressure differential. The changing in pressure causes the metal to expand and contract, leading to cracking over time.

      The inside of a hyperloop train would be at the same pressure all the time, so would the inside of the "loop". No changes in pressure means no fatigue.

    5. Re: This Story Brought to You By... by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      My gut feeling is that once you don't have to worry about getting a craft airborne, you can budget a lot more weight to things like sturdiness and passenger comfort.

  12. What unit now, BeauHD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many pascal is 12,500 ft?

    1. Re:What unit now, BeauHD? by Koen+Lefever · · Score: 1

      How many pascal is 12,500 ft?

      Assuming that pressure at sea level is 101325 Pascal and temperature is 15 degrees Celsius: 63182 Pascal.

      --
      /. refugees on Usenet: news:comp.misc
    2. Re:What unit now, BeauHD? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 5, Funny

      What do you mean? Regular pascal or turbo-pascal?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:What unit now, BeauHD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The definition of the pressure unit foot is weather dependant? Boy am I glad I live in a country using standard units!

    4. Re:What unit now, BeauHD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6,250 Pascals, assuming that all the Pascals have both feet.

    5. Re:What unit now, BeauHD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turbo Pascal is rather dated. We are looking ahead to Ramjet Pascal. Pythons on a plane anyone?

    6. Re:What unit now, BeauHD? by Koen+Lefever · · Score: 1

      "foot" is not a pressure unit, I calculated the pressure at an altitude of 12500 feet (3810 meters), which indeed is weather-dependent.

      The sentence "This is why the aviation regulations insist that pilots must wear supplementary oxygen if the cabin air pressure is greater than 12,500ft." from the summary is of course wrong (I guess that is the point you and the GP wanted to make), probably they wanted to say "if the altitude is greater than 12,500ft" or "if the cabin air pressure is lower than the air pressure at 12,500ft."

      BTW, "pounds-force per square foot" is a pressure unit, I have no clue if anybody really uses it (living in the SI/metric world myself).

      --
      /. refugees on Usenet: news:comp.misc
  13. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by geekmux · · Score: 1

    there are lots of common peculiar places for humans

    Agreed. 100 years ago a peculiar place for a human would have been hurtling 70MPH down a freeway, surrounded by 10,000 other humans doing the same thing.

    Today, humans are so ignorantly comfortable with that environment that they often read, smoke, eat, drink, and apply makeup while attempting to steer 2,000 pounds of steel down said freeway, trying not to run into the other 10,000 humans around them doing the same thing.

  14. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not 2000 lbs, averaging 4000 lbs (as of 2010).

  15. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah. I've shoved quite a lot of them into lockers, urinals, wastebaskets.. It's amazing how pliant they can be

  16. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what I need to read before my flight.

  17. Airline meals? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    When/where does anyone get fed on a domestic flight in 2017? Or is this a rehash of a story from the bronze age of flight (pre-9/11) when you stroll down concourses without tickets and could safely make your flight if you were there an hour early.

    1. Re: Airline meals? by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1

      First class.

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    2. Re:Airline meals? by qwertphobia · · Score: 1

      Just this week. Much flying causes free first-class upgrades.

      --
      Never ask for directions from a two-headed tourist! -Big Bird
    3. Re:Airline meals? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Do people only fly domestic in your country?

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    4. Re:Airline meals? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      I actually got fed--in coach--about six months ago.

      Yes, you can get food on an airplane in coach. The difference is, now-a-days, you have to pay for it rather than including it in the price of the ticket.

    5. Re:Airline meals? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Why, yes. People flying out of teh country are no longer flying domestic. Isn't that how it works everywhere?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    6. Re:Airline meals? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      You do in New Zealand.
      Last time I flew I got breakfast and coffee. It was only a 40 minute flight too.

    7. Re:Airline meals? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I rarely get to a flight more than an hour early unless I feel like hanging out at the airport bar awhile. Admittedly I had to pass a bunch of security checks, but the fastest I've made it from the Airtrain to my gate has been about 9 minutes.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    8. Re: Airline meals? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      so people flying into your country from abroad are also flying domestic?

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    9. Re: Airline meals? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Fucking seriously?

      No.
      Because they're flying out of their country.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  18. Perfect Timing by RevRagnarok · · Score: 1

    I was wondering why I was tearing up at the end of "Bad Moms" (of all things!) last week when flying from San Diego to BWI.

    --
    I should put something clever here. Maybe someday.
    1. Re:Perfect Timing by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Because you had suffered through watching "Bad Moms"?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  19. There are other symptoms, too... by hyades1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    From where I live, the flight to Las Vegas is fairly long. Dehydration leads to raging thirst, and oxygen deprivation cripples my cerebral cortex so badly I usually wind up allowing the small auxiliary brain located just below my belt buckle to do most of the decision making.

    Unfortunately, abstinence and virtuous behaviour are not exactly its strong suit.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:There are other symptoms, too... by BadBlood · · Score: 1

      Yes - drinking on a flight to Vegas, then landing and continuing to drink, has led to some of the most black-out drunk periods of my life. Now I have a technical explanation for why!

      --


      Praying for the end of your wide-awake nightmare.
    2. Re:There are other symptoms, too... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, abstinence and virtuous behaviour are not exactly its strong suit.

      Nor are they welcome in Vegas.

    3. Re:There are other symptoms, too... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      It's your fault that we don't have COMDEX anymore.

    4. Re:There are other symptoms, too... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Why advertise the auxiliary brain is small?

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    5. Re:There are other symptoms, too... by jittles · · Score: 1

      Why advertise the auxiliary brain is small?

      Truth in advertising laws required him to disclose the actual size of the unit.

    6. Re:There are other symptoms, too... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      It is only small compared to the Main Brain. It is larger than most other Auxilliary Brains...at least according to available demographic information.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  20. Discomfort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A study in 2007 showed that after about three hours at the altitudes found in airline cabins, people start to complain about feeling uncomfortable.

    I'd be uncomfortable having to sit in those cramped seats for more than 3 hours regardless of the altitude.

  21. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by geekmux · · Score: 1

    not 2000 lbs, averaging 4000 lbs (as of 2010).

    Ah yes, I forgot to calculate our overt addiction with buying never-go-offroad vehicles large enough to be considered military battlefield transport. I stand corrected.

  22. President Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always turn into 'president Trump' when I fly long distance (I used to call this 'mayor of Trumpton', but no one remembers Trumpton). I always assumed it was because whatever wind I'd normally create would expand in the low pressure, so 1 cubic CM of fart on the ground would be 2-3 cubic CMs on a plane. I also found out that this affects a lot of people. Thankfully, the aggressive air conditioning on planes means you can't smell it. Now the BBC reports it - I feel vindicated :-)

  23. Since we are all Nerds... by martiniturbide · · Score: 1

    I think Slashdot should try to make a "Metric First" campaign and apply it to its news posts.

    1. Re:Since we are all Nerds... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      But "metric first" implies there is another system of measurement...

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  24. Guess it depends on where you live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In half of Colorado, 8000 feet and cold desert conditions are pretty much four months of the year. Peru is even more airplane-like, except they don't have llamas on airplanes.

    1. Re:Guess it depends on where you live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Bolivia, when you board a plane in la Paz, the cabin pressure noticeably increases after closing the doors. It's at 4008m (over 13000ft).

    2. Re: Guess it depends on where you live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live at 8500ft in Utah, so yep. The altitude thing doesnâ(TM)t bother me at all.

  25. Not only an airplane cabin by chthon · · Score: 1

    This description of the airplane cabin seems to have a lot in common with my current workplace.

  26. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    not 2000 lbs, averaging 4000 lbs (as of 2010).

    Ah yes, I forgot to calculate our overt addiction with buying never-go-offroad vehicles large enough to be considered military battlefield transport. I stand corrected.

    GP Is American. He was referring to passenger weight.

    I kid, I kid. We're not all in the Gulf states.

  27. Know your equipment by eclectro · · Score: 1

    Boeing's relatively new "Dreamliner" has the passenger cabin pressurized at 6,000 feet over the customary 8,000, besides having more advanced air filtration.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  28. I'm a flying farter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll admit it. I fart much much more when flying than when not. Can't help it and no I'm not going to hold it for the 8 hour flight.

    1. Re:I'm a flying farter by clovis · · Score: 1

      I'll admit it. I fart much much more when flying than when not. Can't help it and no I'm not going to hold it for the 8 hour flight.

      That's why I always fly with my emotional support dog. So I'll have someone to blame.

  29. Re: "aircraft cabins are peculiar places for human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fun fact the media won't report:
    Palestinians are per-capita the most obese population segment on Earth!

    It's a genocide.... At the dinner table!

  30. That explains SkyMall by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    Well, that explains why the SkyMall gets any business: Hypoxia-induced purchases of stupid things.

    1. Re:That explains SkyMall by nealric · · Score: 1

      But Skymall went bankrupt in 2015.

    2. Re:That explains SkyMall by skovnymfe · · Score: 1

      It's the rant that counts. Go stuff your logic somewhere the sun doesn't shine.

  31. Plus the contribution from the airlines by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    That is bad, but the airlines these days seem to be focused on making a miserable experience even more miserable. I cringe when they close their introductory announcement with "sit back and enjoy the flight." Well, used to; these days I fly only when I have no choice.

  32. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Cars of 100 years ago were much less comfortable than cars available today.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  33. Passenger taken off flight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes your honour, I claim temporary insanity due to mild hypoxia. Headbutting the flight attendant for asking me to turn my phone off isn't something I would normally do.

  34. On The Physics? by ytene · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Fascinating post, article and lots of good comments on this - thank you.

    With the caveat that I don't know what I'm talking about [ ! ] the article got me thinking about the way that our senses operate differently at altitude. Essentially, this means, "at a significantly different atmospheric pressure"... So obviously the first thin to think about is : what, exactly, is that pressure difference? Well, according to this calculator, at mide.com,

    https://www.mide.com/pages/air...

    A "typical" air pressure at sea level might be 101.325kPa[kiloPascals], in which case the corresponding air pressure at 8,000ft would be approximately 75,250 kPa - which is approximately 75% of sea level pressure. OK, for a "starting point", I'd hope we'd agree that this delta is sufficient for physical and chemical reactions to be potentially altered.

    Then I got to thinking about passengers from a physiological perspective. Essentially, the human being is a mass of semi-permiable membranes. Yes, there is plenty of chemistry going on within us - turning foods into energy, for example - but it also stands to reason that our 5 senses are going to be quite sensitive to changes in pressure... For example - a reduced atmospheric pressure will mean that inhalations bring fewer air molecules in to our lungs, which would also surely involve changes in our sense of smell. OK, I don't know how pressure differential would impact the dispersal of scent chemicals in a gas mix, but there is likely to be a difference...

    Our sense of taste is going to be based on diffusion and/or osmosis, as the chemical trace signatures of what we eat are absorbed and processed by the cells in our taste buds. But of course the actual mechanics of tasting are going to be based on chemicals being transferred into saliva and then offered up to the taste processing centres on our tongues. Whether the underlying processes are osmosis or diffusion, or a mix or variation is almost secondary to the point that there will be something like this underpinning the necessary chemistry that drives the sense of taste. Mess with partial pressures, absorption rates, osmosis or diffusion rates and it rather makes sense.

    If we were sensitive enough, we might even expect to witness a very slight change in the sense of touch... Just as we know that limbs can swell in low pressure, so sub-cutaneous blood capillaries are going to change and this should impact our touch. Would sight be impacted? Perhaps, if the lower atmospheric pressure caused a slight outward swelling of our eyes?

    The thing that really interests me, though is the comment from TheRaven64, where they observe that Gin & Tonic is "one of the few alcoholic beverages that tastes better at low air pressure." Describing something as "tasting better" is way too subjective for us to be likely to reach a consensus upon, but the observation of the change, alone, might be enough to suggest that there could be ways of compensating for altitude-related changes to our senses by altering the composition or chemistry of what we eat...

    Lastly - just as a final thought - I wonder if gravity [or the absence of it] plays a part in our senses too? OK, so the reduction in the gravity we experience between sea level and 40,000ft might not be enough of a difference, but we could theoretically extrapolate by looking at feedback from astronauts as to whether ultra-low gravity environments impact their senses... I'd be very interested to know if we've got any readers who can better explain the relationship between the change in what we sense during a flight and the environmental impact on our physiology - I've just been guessing in this post, but suspect there's some pretty interesting material here somewhere...

    1. Re:On The Physics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you make some very good points.

      As a comment on some of it - did you know a big part of taste is smell? So if smell goes down, taste goes with it.

    2. Re:On The Physics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, sure, if you're guessing, I'll add my guesses. I am a chemical engineer.

      I've heard of athletes training at altitude because it causes them to form more red blood cells, to compensate for the lower partial pressure of oxygen. If you want symptoms of hypoxia, you can look it up. the cause should be irrelevant.

      Sense of smell is because of chemical receptors in the nose, not the lungs.

      Taste, maybe decreased pressure decreases the wetting factor of water and hence dissolved molecules.

      Touch is from nerves embedded in our skin. I doubt they would change much.

      Our limbs are composed mostly of water. Water does not change volume nearly at all in the pressure range we're considering.

      You mention gin and tonic, and say tasting better is subjective, which normally I would agree. But the issue here is things losing their taste, and if gin and tonic does not do this, it should be fairly consistent between people.

      The earth is roughly 4,000 miles in radius. Flying at 50,000 ft aka 8 miles high, is not going to have much affect on gravity. You will have more from being closer to the poles (where centrifugal force is countering gravity less), or from the tidal changes from the moon (and to a lesser extent, the sun).

      Disclaimer, I live at 6,000 ft elevation, and my job is at 7,500 elevation, and I live in a desert, so the air pressure and humidity on a plane are normal for me. Flying to low lying areas, the air feels heavy, I don't recall ever recognizing a change in tastefulness. YMMV

    3. Re:On The Physics? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Lower pressure means fewer molecules passing through your nose... but it also means liquids will evaporate faster, leading to more "smells" in the air.
      At 75kPa water boils at 92 degrees.
      At 81Kpa (6000ft) it boils at 94 degrees
      and (obviously) at 101kPa it boils at 100 degrees.

    4. Re:On The Physics? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Curious why someone would copy your entire post...

      https://tech.slashdot.org/comm...

      What a jerk.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    5. Re:On The Physics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but it also means liquids will evaporate faster, leading to more "smells" in the air."

      True, but at equilibrium we actually have to consider the change in chemical activity at the smell receptor. If the molecule "wants to be gaseous" then it is also equally less likely to react with the receptor - and it's not "smelly" if it isn't detected.

      Ultimately, to assess the change in response of the receptor system (i.e. how "smelly" something is) with pressure (all other things being equal) all that matters is the relative difference in chemical activity [of the compound] between the source and the detector.

  35. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not 2000 lbs, averaging 4000 lbs (as of 2010).

    Ah yes, I forgot to calculate our overt addiction with buying never-go-offroad vehicles large enough to be considered military battlefield transport. I stand corrected.

    Moist modern sedans weigh this easy, don't even need to go to pickups or suvs (which weight closer to 6-8k). Camaro weight (it's a 2 door) is 3800 lbs. ABS, Airbags all take up weight.

    Even a Prius curb weight is 3k
    A Smart Car weighs in at 1800 lbs.

  36. Would Increased pressure be a financial gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    One would think that if an airline company could design a plane or pressure system that improves the cabin pressurization to, say 2,000 feet or less, there would be a financial gain. More people would want to fly that airline. But I wonder about the cost of such a change. Would it require big changes in the aircraft's design?

    1. Re:Would Increased pressure be a financial gain? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      It would cost a tiny bit extra in fuel to maintain the higher pressure.
      It would require an aircraft design that can handle a constant change of 10psi between sea level airports and cruising altitude, instead of 6000ft aircraft that only need to handle 8psi. 8000ft aircraft only see 7psi difference at 36,000ft

  37. Seriously by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Funny

    How Flying Seriously Messes With Your Mind and Body

    In that case, instead of flying seriously, try flying frivolously.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flying frivolously is much more fun.

      Loops, barrel rolls, aileron rolls, snap rolls (whee!), split-esses, are all great fun.

      At least as long as you're doing the flying and/or can say "stop!" when you've had enough.

      Don't forget your parachute!

    2. Re:Seriously by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Keep your distance but don't LOOK like you're keeping your distance. Fly casual.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    3. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about flying casually?

  38. I thought I had gone *emo* by Provocateur · · Score: 2

    I was crying not because of the inflight movie, I was crying because of all the movies to choose from they *HAD* to pick Sisters of the Traveling Pants!

    I wept because it was a 20-hour flight to Manila, from Houston. And I bought a round trip ticket, which meant I was going to watch it THREE MORE TIMES!!

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:I thought I had gone *emo* by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, here in the 21st Century, the rest of us just rent movies before we get on the flight so we can watch what we want to watch.

      Some airlines even have video servers with a batch of movies that I can watch.

    2. Re:I thought I had gone *emo* by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, here in the 21st Century, the rest of us just rent movies before we get on the flight

      Um that's what we used to do 10 years ago. Since the invention of the tablet you just bring one pre-loaded with all the games, movies, TV shows and music you want.

    3. Re:I thought I had gone *emo* by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      You do realize that it's 2017? So 10 years ago...2007...so yeah, 21st Century.

      Back in the 20th, it was surprising to see someone with a portable DVD player on a flight, but not particularly uncommon. You might see one or two. Now-a-days, I see far more people using their tablet to watch a movie.

      In fact, I was surprised that United recently started removing all the TVs from the cabins and they run a video server on the flight. You have to use their United app or have an appropriate DRM plug-in installed in your browser, if you want to watch a movie. But they have pretty good selection of movies on a video server.

      So the days of, "Oh, I'm flying westbound so I'm struck watching this movie which I never wanted to see in the first place" are pretty well over, even if you don't rent something. About my only complaint is that I'll rent a movie before I get on the plane only to discover that the plane is outfitted with this service and they have that movie available for watching, so I just wasted money renting a movie I could have watched for free.

  39. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    Moist modern sedans weigh this easy

    Yes, but what about their dry weight?

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  40. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by octothorpe99 · · Score: 1

    not 2000 lbs, averaging 4000 lbs (as of 2010).

    Ah yes, I forgot to calculate our overt addiction with buying never-go-offroad vehicles large enough to be considered military battlefield transport. I stand corrected.

    Moist modern sedans weigh this easy, don't even need to go to pickups or suvs (which weight closer to 6-8k). Camaro weight (it's a 2 door) is 3800 lbs. ABS, Airbags all take up weight.

    Even a Prius curb weight is 3k
    A Smart Car weighs in at 1800 lbs.

    Moist sedans? :D

  41. A True Elder Nerd would not by laurencetux · · Score: 1

    since all of the elder nerds would be able to convert measurements on the fly.

    heck in this case divide feet by 3 and call it meters would work good enough.

    1. Re:A True Elder Nerd would not by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Anyone can work with metric, it takes a truly twisted mind to use the full range of length measurements in US imperial:
      12 inches in a foot.
      3 feet in a yard.
      22 yards in a chain.
      10 chains in a furlong.
      8 furlongs in a mile.

    2. Re:A True Elder Nerd would not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compare to:

      10 mm to a cm
      100 cm to a m
      1000 mm to a m
      1000 m to a km
      1000000 um to a m

  42. This is Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Write "study" regurgitating what we've known for a long time
    2) Rename "plagiarism" to "meta-analysis"
    3) ...
    4) Profit!

  43. When flying the unfriendly skies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make sure you have a fire-proof and explosion-proof bag for your batteries.

  44. Re:Ban flying! by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    Think of the children?!?! They're one of the things that make flying suck!

  45. air pressure in feet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    "pilots must wear supplementary oxygen if the cabin air pressure is greater than 12,500ft"

    When did we start measuring air pressure in feet? I thought I was reading news for nerds.

    1. Re:air pressure in feet? by hey! · · Score: 1

      When did we start measuring air pressure in feet?

      About the time that altitude-based pressure differences became a health concern.

      Yes, this is news for nerds; I think you're looking for news for pedants.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:air pressure in feet? by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Actually AC's got a point. Ignoring kPa and PSI air pressure is commonly measured with mmHg or inHg. Bearing that in mind "cabin air pressure greater than 12,500ft" would be lethal. The /. editors are getting worse as time goes by.

    3. Re:air pressure in feet? by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Just to be pedantic... FAA's "part 135 operating requirements" require that oxygen be used above 12,000 feet MSL (with a bunch of variations based on flight duration and aircraft type), so the original sentence conflated cabin air pressure with altitude.

    4. Re:air pressure in feet? by hey! · · Score: 1

      It's always good to be precise, accurate, and technically correct. But it's pointless to get bent out of shape by a technical error where the author's actual meaning is clear.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  46. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Dear lordy lord, if only I could find a steel car which only weighed 2,000 lb. Someone tried to get me to buy an Opel GT once, but I couldn't actually fit in it. I wasn't even fat yet, I'm just too damned tall.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  47. No One Mentioned ... by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    The Brat From Hell kicking the back of your airline seat.

    1. Re:No One Mentioned ... by qbast · · Score: 1

      At least you 'think of the children' ... for the whole flight.

    2. Re:No One Mentioned ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I offered the mom a Benadryl for the child as a sleep aide. She looked at me like I was the Devil. It made me smile.

  48. Flying Seriously messes with ... by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Quick fix - don't fly seriously.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  49. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by Sperbels · · Score: 1

    My 1983 Toyota Corolla in highschool weigh 1800 lbs! Granted it was a small car, but not as small as a smart car. What the hell are they putting in cars these days to make them so much heavier?

  50. Ban airtravel, boycott Boeing! by mi · · Score: 1

    The multi-billion corporations want you to travel by air, however damaging it is — or may be — to your health and that of the planet. Oh, you say, it is a traveler's choice? No, it is not — though it was once an option, is now a necessity.

    Bad for you, bad for the planet, bad for mom-and-pop operated vacation spots. Let's ban airtravel and boycott Boeing for enabling it!

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Ban airtravel, boycott Boeing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an uphill fight against aviation, because long distance pax train travel is now declining even in Europe. The national railway companies have less and less desire to run trains which cross borders, each one tries to stay within its own country's territory. This way the extensive european HST (bullet train) networks don't make much sense, because the united aspect of the European Union is lost.

      A few years ago e.g you could reach Venice or Berlin from Budapest by direct trains, but now those relatively short international trips require 2 train changes. Airplanes fly direct to both, of course. (Btw, the geometrical centre of Europe is located in the outskirts of Budapest, so its not a fringe area.) There are also absolutely no trains running from Slovenia to neighbouring Italy any more, even though they are connected with electrified tracks and low cost diesel bus operators flourish, of course. National railway companies try to supress free-market pax train operators even if it requires "kamikaze" tactics so de-regulation and liberalization mostly remain PR phrases. Even in Italy the largest and most advanced private operator "NTV" struggles due to incessant sabotage by the gov't run Trenitalia.

      I think european long distance train travel should be confiscated from the lazy national railway companies and the Agatha Christie era CIWL private monopoly company should be re-created with an exclusive right to run trains that cross more than 2 countries and national rails should be forced to collaborate with them. The company that ran Orient Express still has tremendous prestiege. Only that move, which the EU council has power to do, could re-vitalize the green method of long distance travel in trains (btw. almost all of european rail is electrified and a lot of that power comes from nuclear, hydro and wind energy sources).

      Meanwhile, airlines get a huge boost from european governments, they also don't pay fuel taxes, don't pay VAT, airports are upgraded on public money for them and everybody pretends not to see how nasty pollution planes emit at tropospheric altitudes (2-4x forcing effect compared to the same amount emission done at ground level).

  51. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear lordy lord, if only I could find a steel car which only weighed 2,000 lb. Someone tried to get me to buy an Opel GT once, but I couldn't actually fit in it. I wasn't even fat yet, I'm just too damned tall.

    My 2015 Mitsubishi Mirage weighs in at 1,973 with a manual transmission. I'm 6' tall, 245lbs, and I've driven 600 miles straight in it, with no more discomfort than you'd have driving any other vehicle that far. Also, got around 45mpg on that trip, which included Virginia mountains, a wife, and luggage.

  52. Sound too by cliffjumper222 · · Score: 1

    The 787 is better, but other aircraft can be extremely noisy. Listening to that for 10 hours straight can really mess you up. Those who can afford them buy Bose noise cancellation headphones, but even cheaper Sony or Colby ones will work too at a push. Worse case, slip in some foam earplugs.

    1. Re:Sound too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bose is overpriced for what it is. I just use Sennheisers, does the trick.

      And yes, as someone with already low SpO2 on the ground (86-87% at rest) proper cabin pressure is a concern to me.

  53. Re:Ban flying! by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    Think of the children?!?! They're one of the things that make flying suck!

    Has it ever occurred to you how amazing it is that we were able to figure out how to engineer a gigantic metal bird that can transport large amounts of people to remote areas of the earth in a relatively short period of time? Is it amazing to you that flying is actually safer than driving? Is it amazing to you that this has enabled families to live in remote locations from each other and still be able to visit each other. It is truly REMARKABLE! And yet, here you are, complaining about something that is truly amazing as though you are entitled to some ideal thing without an ounce of gratitude.

    Obligatory Louis C.K.

    --
    We'll make great pets
  54. It's not about a sad moment. by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Mildly or otherwise.

    It is most probably reacting to generally emotionally charged scenes.
    From a comedy where all goes well in the end to the scene in an action movie where the hero is triumphant.
    With a tendency towards crying at happy moments.

    My guess... based on personal experience, and not even related to airplanes...
    It's something related to low blood pressure and how that relates to oxygenation of the brain... and empathy.
    Cause basically... people who cry at those emotional scenes are empathizing with the characters on the screen and compensating for their often exaggerated levels of distress (i.e. acted out in a over the top way) - by having an emotional reaction of their own.

    I have a naturally low blood pressure. Also, my mom will get all teary-eyed when watching a movie.
    I once cried watching this scene. At the time I thought that it was just the movie being so bad and that it was that "quality" which made me cry.

    It's actually all that over the top melodrama, while sitting down, blood pressure dropping...
    Brain then has to deal with images signaling the need for some great emotional relief, and the lack of oxygen making it emotional and basic instead of slow, calculated and rational.
    Add to that the genetic component of predisposition for empathy... and you can have yourself a cry at the end of The Matrix, when Neo kungfus Agent Smith and then dives into him, exploding him from the inside and bending the Matrix to his will.
    All in the privacy of your own home.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  55. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by nealric · · Score: 1

    Just things like a steel structure that will keep you from getting killed in an accident. They are also physically much larger than your old Corolla.

  56. Who knew high altitude was such a big deal? by PMuse · · Score: 2

    “There hasn’t been much research done on this in the past as for healthy people these do not pose much of a problem,” says . . .

    You're kidding me, right? The national air forces of the world have been sending people up for extended patrols for something like 8 or 9 decades and there "hasn’t been much research done" to study personnel performance reduction as a function of time, altitude, air pressure, oxygen, etc?

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    1. Re:Who knew high altitude was such a big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is consistent training for such individuals to be able to acclimate/handle those changes in air pressure. Individuals who cannot absolutely do not make the cuts, but they may very likely be playing the drone video games near Las Vegas.

      This article is mainly useful for those of us who rarely fly. For example, someone who takes flights 4-8 times/week for business trips/etc probably acclimate to these conditions much more rapidly after significant experience than others. Those of us who make the annual trip or so home to see grandma are much more likely to have such acute symptoms, especially those of us accustomed to lower altitudes.

    2. Re:Who knew high altitude was such a big deal? by Shotgun · · Score: 2

      The FAA (and I presume other aviation authorities) have even implemented specific rules to govern how high you may fly and for how long before needing supplemental oxygen. One would think they had spent a few moments looking into it before just writing the rules.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  57. Fly seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the TSA has no sense of humor.

  58. Flat Landers. by Zorro · · Score: 1

    Just a guess none of the posters live in the Mountain West.

    8000 Feet? I climb higher than that just to fly fish!

    Pretty sure no one from Denver or Colorado Springs has a problem.

    1. Re:Flat Landers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need really long runways up there (Colorado Spring's main runway is or was 11,000' long; the short runway was 7,000'), but you're right.

      Colorado Springs hosts one of the few hypobaric chambers in the U.S., and pilots can take the 'hypobaric chamber ride' there through the FAA.

      I did so in 1992. Went with a bunch of folks from Denver (~5,000' MSL) (I lived in Colorado Springs (> 6,000' MSL) at the time). All the Denver folks,
      at 20,000' MSL (virtual) got hypoxic, with symptoms varying all over the map from catatonia to disorientation. I was still functional, though my
      color vision was slightly impaired and even light work would have been difficult or impossible

    2. Re:Flat Landers. by Grunschev · · Score: 1

      Yeah, was about to post the same thing. Well, not the same thing. I don't fish, but I have visited something like 90 of Rocky Mountain National Park's ~150 named lakes.

  59. Of course you fart more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The gas in your intestines has to go somewhere if there's less pressure exerted. As pressure goes down, doesn't volume go up?

  60. That explains a lot. by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    Like why people are willing to spend stupid money on stupid products advertised in the airline magazines. Sharper Image probably wouldn't exist without the extra stupid provided by low oxygen concentrations on airplanes.

  61. Nice to see mainstream media getting a clue ... by FoolishBob · · Score: 1

    As a private glider pilot I'm well aware of both hypoxia and dehydration. Three things I always have when mountain flying (above 12.5k feet) are supplemental O2, portable H2O and salty snacks. The hypoxia thing is really serious. The 12.5k ft rule is a starting point. I played around until settling on a personal rule of turning on the O2 system when I'm above 10k ft. The difference in mental clarity is astounding! As for H2O, what goes in does come out. We have ingenious solutions to off-board that as well. :-)

  62. Wow this must be impossible to explain! by downright · · Score: 1

    dry air dry mouth...stuff tastes bland with a dry mouth
    lower air pressure means the shape of your eye is slightly different.
    airplane food + carbonated beverages + chewing gum makes you fart 37% more
    dry eyes make you want to cry even without a sad movie.

     

  63. I suffer this by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    I take blood pressure pills to give my kidney an easier time. When I fly, I wait till I get off the plane before I take the pill.

    Because if I take it before I get off the plane, I feint. Airplane almost diverted one time.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:I suffer this by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Because if I take it before I get off the plane, I feint.

      When do you launch the real attack?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:I suffer this by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      Curses, foiled again! - by my own bad spelling.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  64. So that's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I guess this explains why travelling salespeople are a bunch of drooling idiots then.

    1. Re:So that's why... by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I thought that was because they were sales people

  65. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by sexconker · · Score: 1

    The Canyonero is 12 yards long, 2 lanes wide. 65 tons of American Pride!

  66. Well, yes by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Your arms get really tired, for one thing.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  67. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Acgi ally, we drive hiluxes deployed anf F-250s stateside. The 250 is a superior vehicle, and if you'd get your ignorant ads out of the city you'd realize that lots of vehicles routinely go off road, and a lot of the country has weather that's pretty aggressive. We also have friends and routinely pile more than 4 people into not vehicle.

  68. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

    Ah yes, I forgot to calculate our overt addiction with buying never-go-offroad vehicles large enough to be considered military battlefield transport. I stand corrected.

    Oh man, I just moved out of Houston, Texas, and the average vehicle had to go better than 6,000 lbs. I've never seen trucks so big in my life, and you can see from the pristine pickup beds that they've never carried anything but groceries. Since people who live in Texas have to constantly try to convince themselves that they like it there, special "Texas Package" models of these trucks are sold by all dealers. This means some variation on the longhorn symbol put on every flat surface of the vehicle, which probably adds another 500 lbs to the total weight. And did I mention that the average weight of a Texan is approximately 400 lbs soaking wet (which they usually are, considering Houston has ungodly heat and humidity).

    I believe Hell is having to drive on Houston highways for eternity, with people who have come to believe that driving a truck the size of a locomotive allows them to express all of their inner aggression.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  69. Re:On The Physics? Temperature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The outside temperate is minus 50 and they cool the air to plus 10? Compressing the air heats it up, but they probably have to heat it some more to get it to plus 10.

  70. Perl says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if the cabin air pressure is greater than 12,500ft.

    unit mismatch; bailing near line 146

  71. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    What the hell are they putting in cars these days to make them so much heavier?

    Americans.

    Actually that's unfair; they're only about half the increase. The rest is iPhone dongles.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  72. Re:Ban flying! by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    It's bad. This study proves it. We must therefore ban it. Think of the children. Social Justice Warriors unite! We should all live in safe zone "bubbles". Life will be perfect.

    Haha, flamebait! Did the little wittle snowflake get their feelings hurt. Aweeeeeeee... there there little buddy...

    --
    We'll make great pets
  73. Not to mention DVT by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Deep vein thrombosis. Blood clot on long flights, breaks loose and boom! You are dead. Tim Russert died as a result and a lot of older people, or those on long flights can be affected by DVT.

  74. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    3500 "lb" is pretty common for a car these days.
    If it has 5 seats, decent boot space, air bags, crumple zones, side impact beams, rollover protection, etc. It no longer weighs 1000kg, it's more like 1600kg.

    Which in "Land of the pretend units" is about 3500 pounds.

  75. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    You can't drive a dry sedan, you need to moisten them with water and hydrocarbons first.

  76. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Every review of that car is pointed out it has terrible, vague steering and aweful body roll
    Top Gear US gave it 2/10
    Auto Express gives it 2/5
    The Guardian gave it 3/10
    Consumer Reports put it in the 10 worst cars of 2013.

    It appears to be a really shit car. Cheap, but shit.

    Careful with taking passengers and luggage, the car is only rated to carry 400kg. You're 110kg of that.

  77. Re:Ban flying! by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    I think driving would be much safer if every driver required the same level of training as aircraft pilots.

  78. Re:"aircraft cabins are peculiar places for humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up and take my money!

  79. Re:On The Physics? Temperature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The air handling pack on a modern airliner takes hot high pressure bleed air from the engines and mixes it with cold low pressure ambient air to create the desired temperature in the cabin. This is why you can sometimes smell fuel come through with the air.

    More info:

    http://skybrary.aero/index.php/Bleed_Air_Systems