Slashdot Mirror


Chicago School Official: US IT Jobs Offshored Because 'We Weren't Making Our Own' Coders

theodp writes: In a slick new video, segments of which were apparently filmed looking out from Google's Chicago headquarters giving it a nice high-tech vibe, Chicago Public Schools' CS4ALL staffers not-too-surprisingly argue that creating technology is "a power that everyone needs to have."

In the video, the Director of Computer Science and IT Education for the nation's third largest school district offers a take on why U.S. IT jobs were offshored that jibes nicely with the city's new computer science high school graduation requirement. From the transcript: "People still talk about it's all offshored, it's all in India and you know, there are some things that are there but they don't even realize some of the reasons that they went there in the first place is because we weren't making our own."

137 of 268 comments (clear)

  1. Wrong Tags on Headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    More like the pants-on-fire dept.

  2. Insanity by fluffernutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How can we expect to make our own coders if companies aren't creating a real draw for people to learn coding? Corporations are sending a message that you must move to them as opposed to where you want to live, you must work long hours, commute an hour to work and an hour back, and be dumped at 40. What kind of insane person would consider that as a good life choice when coming out of high school?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:Insanity by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

      What kind of insane person would consider that as a good life choice when coming out of high school?

      Indians, it would appear.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Insanity by SNRatio · · Score: 1

      Except the age discrimination part (which is over a lifetime away for highschoolers, so probably not what they are worrying about) how is that compared o other six figure salary professions? At least with coding you probably have less college debt than law, medicine, etc. And if you want to code for the Chicago school district (that sounds pretty insane right there) you won't have to move to the bay area to do it.

    3. Re:Insanity by apoc.famine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, anytime an organization says, "Not enough employees", they leave off, "at the low wages and in the circumstances we're dictating". Want more employees? Up the pay and train them. Stop making them work in really shitty conditions. The US has plenty of people not working or in dead end jobs wanting more. Invest in them instead of investing in India.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    4. Re:Insanity by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1, Insightful

      you must move to them as opposed to where you want to live

      For what other professions do companies hire remote workers? The opportunities for working remotely as a coder are not that great, but every other profession I can think of is even worse.

      you must work long hours,

      Not all tech jobs require long hours, and plenty of other jobs do have long hours.

      commute an hour to work and an hour back

      What? So there are special fast lanes for non-coders?

    5. Re:Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You hit the nail on the head. Every single offshore project I was part of? Because it was wildly cheaper. I can hire, today, right now, 4 coders from india for 20k. Out of them I will get total crap. Yet I just lean on the outsourced agency a bit and they rotate people in and out. About 1 out of 20 people 'get programing'. Out of those 1 in 10 like it. I can rotate about 1-2 a month for 'poor performance'. Within a couple of years I have a decent crew for 20-30k. In the states I can get 2-4 coders for 500k. The cost is wildly out of line. I know it. That is what I compete with.

      Companies do not want to train because there is 0 incentive for them to do so. The MBA schools have taught them that. We are a 'resource' to be exploited.

    6. Re:Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We are a 'resource' to be exploited.

      Why yes, yes you are. We all are. If you cannot prove your value, then you should ask yourself why you are trying to do what you are doing. I find if very difficult to have sympathy for the profession that is trying to automate the rest of the working world into the unemployment line. 'Nuff said.

    7. Re:Insanity by jeff4747 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The point is there are ways companies could approach an actual shortage. More pay or more perks.

      Companies aren't doing either. Which indicates there is no shortage.

    8. Re:Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indians, it would appear.

      Just because they do doesn't mean that should be the standard, but in the great race to the bottom, that's all that matters: CHEAP!!!!!!

      That's the real reason why they can't find anyone. They don't want to pay for someone in the US to do it. They want to pay as little as possible for as much profitable work as possible damn be the consequences. That means going with the cheapest labor and that currently means hire in India, where people are willing / able to work for much less than an American. That's the problem with globalization. You as a consumer have to compete with the entire world for a job, (not good if you live in an area with a high cost of living), and you get to pay local market adjusted rates for products and services. It's extracting maximum wealth from you while giving back as little as possible. Great system, for those that get to exploit it that is.

      Also, note that I said "profitable work" not "well made product". If you as a coder are not fine with shipping broken code that's filled with security vulnerabilities because the deadline is here, then they *definitely* don't want you around. The delays in development would cost them money. They also don't want you really writing your own code. That takes more time and money to develop. They want you to cut and paste pre-made code using some bloated library / API because that gets the product to the market sooner, and keeps your hours, and therefore how much they pay you, down. They don't care if it's dog slow and cumbersome to manage. As long as it sells in the market, they make money. Forget about QA, that department was unceremoniously shot in the head years ago.

      Money makes the world go round, only because society gives too much power and influence to those who covet it.

      Now of course, there are *some* groups that do still need to care about security vulnerabilities, well written, efficient, (and documented!), code. This can be for a number of reasons, but in most cases, these groups will not be accepting people fresh out of college with no work experience. Which is another issue entirely of not wanting to train people, but that's another topic for another day.

    9. Re:Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Also, note that I said "profitable work" not "well made product". If you as a coder are not fine with shipping broken code that's filled with security vulnerabilities because the deadline is here, then they *definitely* don't want you around. The delays in development would cost them money. They also don't want you really writing your own code. That takes more time and money to develop. They want you to cut and paste pre-made code using some bloated library / API because that gets the product to the market sooner, and keeps your hours, and therefore how much they pay you, down. They don't care if it's dog slow and cumbersome to manage. As long as it sells in the market, they make money. Forget about QA, that department was unceremoniously shot in the head years ago.

      I'm over 40, and I've yet to have a coding task that wasn't compromised in some large way, but it usually boils down to short term versus long term. Your paid for short term results. Furthermore, even if you are lucky enough to get paid to produce a bit better than average stuff, they are probably not paying for the redundancy of multiple people knowing the code base. You get shuffled from project to project and just got to hope that if you are chosen to pick up the pieces that the last person tried to make it possible.

      I thought this year might be different. There was a mountain of technical debt to fix, and they seemed serious about fixing it, except, well, they weren't really serious about fixing it. I was in the red headed step child group, not the main group, though as near as I can tell I produced better results than the larger group did. Of course it is also possible that the larger group was hiding all work from us, but either way, not serious.

      Technical debt is accumulated because no one bothered to man the shovels and deal with it over time, and just because the powers that be now want to fix it, it is not remotely that easy for certain highly specialized coding tasks. The biggest thing I wish for would be they would either get over it and let some of the older programmers like me start designing stuff, or higher a decent freaking systems engineer to shell in a plan from the start.

      The key is to always be thinking long term, even if you have to do some things for short term results to meet deadlines.

      Agile is not a replacement for spending the time to come up with a decent plan, though it can help you adapt the plan to face things you had not expected, but even then, sometimes you have to take a step back and make sure your road map to peace is not a nature trail to hell.

      There is no coding task beyond a certain level of complexity that cannot be made exponentially harder by bad leadership. Experienced coders can deal with crap requirements, but it is not cheap, and in reality just means your paying your coders to help you develop the true requirements and probably everything else. Good luck trying to farm that off to India.

      Paying for someone to give a damn and do their best to produce something that can be maintained is expensive, but then so is starting over, and your usually developing code to get a job done, therefore the true cost is much higher.

      For instance if it costs say $50/hr for people to use your code, but a more careful design could have allowed the user to get done in half the time, well, it doesn't take a huge amount of users to justify paying doing the job right, and keeping the job done right.

    10. Re:Insanity by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      More pay or more perks.

      Companies aren't doing either.

      A BS in CS has a higher starting salary than any other 4 year degree. What industry offers better perks than tech?

    11. Re:Insanity by rtb61 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      People also forget, that decades ago companies used to take on cadets and train them. Now, cheap arse fuckers, that don't pay taxes, demand the government and workers pay for the training, which the companies exploit and then demand to pay less and less for the work, else they will bring in the cheapest foreign labour they can find. Now how many people do they want trained locally at government and worker expense, way more than is necessary ie supply and demand, glut of tech workers and wages collapses. Basically yes, they are psychopathic cunts, not better way of putting, they of course demand to be paid more and more for being the best psychopathic cunts for as long as it lasts and then wander off laughing with golden parachutes when the companies collapse, all backed by mainstream media, this backing is paid for in advertisements costs.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:Insanity by Hachima · · Score: 2

      An employee with a total salary of ~120k probably actually cots the company 200k to employ. So that number doesn't actually sound too far off for the employer's actual cost.

    13. Re:Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For instance if it costs say $50/hr for people to use your code, but a more careful design could have allowed the user to get done in half the time, well, it doesn't take a huge amount of users to justify paying doing the job right, and keeping the job done right.

      Except the guy making the purchasing decisions is completely isolated from the people using it, so those decisions are far more often made via schmoozing with the product reps than through careful and thoughtful comparison against the competing software (if any exists). So, the decision comes down to option A which is cheaper than B which means the CIO or CTO gets a larger bonus this year. By the time anything is implemented far enough for anyone to tell that A is a train wreck, the C-level guy is already out the door.

    14. Re:Insanity by psycho12345 · · Score: 1

      That's actually average. Assume each coder is making 65k base (this is pretty normal for 0-5 year developers depending on area). Then add in bonuses, 401k matching, and health benefits. That can add up to 80k per person. So 4 people is going run you 320k at the LOW end. It merely goes up from there, as high as 250k per coder, some cases more.

    15. Re:Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As someone mentioned above the real and only reason US IT jobs are off shored is cost. And it is not only a lower hourly rate but the hiring company can also jettison the cost of employee benefits which is a considerable amount of money. And while business tax rules usually allow a business to deduct some of their labor costs they can deduct almost all the costs of contracting services. These are the reasons a business school graduate with absolutely no understanding of technology choses the off shore approach and end up confused when their IT division is always over budget with little to show for it.

    16. Re:Insanity by slew · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Decades ago, when a company invested in their employees, they were pretty sure they would stay with them, not out of loyalty, but out of necessity. There were only a small number of companies to poach them, and starting your own company or joining a small startup wasn't generally a highly mobile path (only taken by people that wanted to get out of the rat-race).

      Now, for better or worse, there are a large number of multi-national companies that are out there that are more than willing to poach employees after they are trained and it is easier than ever to start your own company become a millionaire. For many companies, the return on training investment is low enough that it makes poaching and out-sourcing a better strategy. The explanation is probably just that simple.

      I would argue that it is probably a bit better for some in this environment and probably worse for most people. Success accumulates now more for the aggressive than the loyal and I don't see the game changing anytime soon. It's basically how silicon valley started.

    17. Re:Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Now, for better or worse, there are a large number of multi-national companies that are out there that are more than willing to poach employees after they are trained and it is easier than ever to start your own company become a millionaire. For many companies, the return on training investment is low enough that it makes poaching and out-sourcing a better strategy. The explanation is probably just that simple.

      That's why I only hire the lowest paid and least skilled workers I can find, then point them to a wiki to self train at home off the clock and tell them it is their own fault if they can't learn new skills. That way no one tries to poach them from me. Nothing ever really works or gets finished, but at least I don't have to give raises to people who, god forbid, get better at their jobs.

      The point of training isn't to keep a higher skilled worker in a lower skill position. It is so you get first crack at paying them enough to stay.

    18. Re:Insanity by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Not only do they fail to train up replacements, they fire or let go of their area experts. Then they expect to hire a replacement for this expert or contract out work that they were previously responsible for. Most of my contracts over the past few years seem to start out with, here is your work, the last person who worked on this quit/was let go 5+ years ago. This is one of the reasons why I've not fought to get out of contracting and back to full time employment with a software company.

    19. Re:Insanity by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People only leave a job voluntarily for a few reasons:

      - Low pay. Solution: increase wages, invest in your human resources, offer additional benefits like extra time off, company car etc.

      - Bad working environment. Solution: fire bad bosses, get rid of the cubicle farm and give skilled workers offices, free coffee, assigned parking spaces etc.

      - Uninteresting work. Solution: create interesting work, e.g. with R&D or something like Google's 80/20 rule.

      - Poor performance. Solution: check if you promoted them too fast, offer a demotion with no loss of salary or additional training/mentoring.

      - Children. Solution: offer flexible working, don't punish new parents.

      - Bean counters. Solution: make worker happiness, retention and training into metrics that they are measured by.

      Solve these simple problems and you can safely train staff with little worry that they will jump ship.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:Insanity by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's a very American way of looking at it.

      To the extent that humans are a resource, they are more like a fruit tree than a disposable cog in a machine. The company has to nurture them, help them grow and the extract value from them in a way that doesn't harm them. Sometimes the rot sets in and the tree can't be saved, but usually it just needs a little bit of support.

      As for automating away jobs, I tend to think of it more as automating away the drudgery and freeing people up for more interesting stuff. People used to copy out books by hand, until the printing press was invented. Now the descendants of those book copiers making a living playing video games on Twitch. Change is inevitable, no-one wants my skills writing software for 80s home computers any more, what matters is that there is a way forward for everyone.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    21. Re:Insanity by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      That's their CxO overhead.

    22. Re: Insanity by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      It's difficult to comment if you don't give more details. You say you work remotely so I assume you don't have to travel for long periods of time. How much of your personal time must you spend networking? Easy for that to become a job on top of a job. I know people who basically live on linked in and still can't find anything. At that point you're just living to work.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    23. Re:Insanity by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You hit the nail on the head with point two. Everything else you mention requires excellent managers to make it all hum along, and I think those are what are truly in short supply.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    24. Re:Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      except you forget that most of the companies don's seem to understand the difference between vaule and cost. so while you may be able to show your value and your value may be more than the companies investment in hiring you, they may still not want to hire you because they can cut their costs.

      try to take a step back and take a look at how the event horizon of businesses has gone from hiring life long employees to trying to make profits next quarter. because that is the root of the problem here and even though you may believe otherwise, value is a long term concept while cost is not

    25. Re:Insanity by jeff4747 · · Score: 2

      What industry offers better perks than tech?

      Again, the point is sailing over your head.

      The measure is not "tech vs everything else". That's just an attempt to say "shut up and enjoy what you have".

      The claim is that there is a massive shortage of coders. If that was true, basic economics would dictate that salaries and perks would be increasing rapidly as companies competed for scarce coders.

      That isn't happening. Salaries are flat and perks are either flat or being taken away.

      That indicates there is no shortage. Instead, people are lying for political or financial gain.

    26. Re:Insanity by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Loyalty is a two-way street.

      It used to be that companies turned to layoffs as a last-ditch effort to save the company from bankruptcy. That was abandoned in the 1980s. Instead, layoffs are now relatively common as a way to goose the stock price for a quarter or two.

      Employees reacted to that breach of loyalty in the entirely predictable way: They stopped being loyal to the companies that were no longer loyal to them.

      So no, it's not the employees or other companies that cause poaching to be a problem. Is the fact that virtually every employer is not at all interested in loyalty to their employees. So employees are not at all interested in being loyal to their employer.

    27. Re:Insanity by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      Sure, people may have more choices today that they didn't have decades ago. But companies are willing to do less to keep people around than they did decades ago.

      I've heard/commented before around the 'net - is it any coincidence that with the death of the pension, that any type of employee loyalty died along with it?

    28. Re:Insanity by magarity · · Score: 1

      The problem with your rant about race to the bottom line and race to market is that the article is about a public school district.

    29. Re:Insanity by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      You forgot one other thing.... If there were such a shortage, you'd see companies investing more in training - i.e. like people with backgrounds in related fields that had an interest in coding.

      People tend to forget, CS is a relatively new degree at many universities. My parents went to 2 different universities (one large, one small, two different states, etc.) in the late '60's and early '70's. Programming courses were just starting to be offered, usually in the Math department, but other departments in Science and Engineering offered them as well. The uni's rented time on computers elsewhere or just got their first machine. Both my parents had math degrees and went on to become professional programmers and nothing melted down/blew up and they didn't have all the niceties that we are use too today. Point is, if there was a real shortage, companies would be looking for smart people they could train up as well.

    30. Re:Insanity by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

      You missed number #1 - bad bosses. People don't leave jobs, they leave bosses. That's been known fact in HR & hiring circles forever.
      http://webcenters.netscape.com...

    31. Re:Insanity by slew · · Score: 1

      Sure, people may have more choices today that they didn't have decades ago. But companies are willing to do less to keep people around than they did decades ago.

      I've heard/commented before around the 'net - is it any coincidence that with the death of the pension, that any type of employee loyalty died along with it?

      At least one theory about this is floating around, and they blame institutional shareholders for the death of the pension...
      https://blogs.wsj.com/atwork/2...

    32. Re:Insanity by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      This should wash out. If companies invested in training, they could simply hire someone that was trained somewhere else.
      And then the differentiator would be institutional knowledge.

      Its crap all the way down thats for sure. I haven't had decent training in a decade. But I'm the type that goes an gets my own anyway.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    33. Re:Insanity by slew · · Score: 1

      The point of training isn't to keep a higher skilled worker in a lower skill position. It is so you get first crack at paying them enough to stay.

      Although you might get the first crack, in today's environment, the grass always looks a bit greener over there and you have to counter that.

      For example, starting in the late 1990's, people who hopped jobs got significant pay boosts both in the US and in India, but this wasn't true in Europe. Why? My guess is that in the US and India, the grass over at another company looked significantly greener. In Europe (which had fewer startups and larger institutions that hired high tech folks), there was not much green grass to covet. Interestingly, this time was the start of a brain-drain of Europe to the US (where folks sought greener grass).

      It might be quaint to think that you can get a high skilled worker to stay by training them, but I suspect the reality is that the numbers don't support the argument that it is a net positive investment in this day and age.

    34. Re:Insanity by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      You answered the question yourself as to why people don't stay. If I stay at company X and only to get a 3% year over year increase, and you can get 10% by jumping ship.... most people will jump ship.... Companies complain about loyalty but then do nothing to foster it.

    35. Re:Insanity by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      This seems ass backwards. Why not be allowed to write off both?

    36. Re:Insanity by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I have a bachelor of ARTS in computer science because, at the time, comp sci had just split off from the MATH department, who offered a BA in Mathematics.

    37. Re:Insanity by slew · · Score: 1

      You answered the question yourself as to why people don't stay.

      If I stay at company X and only to get a 3% year over year increase, and you can get 10% by jumping ship.... most people will jump ship....

      Companies complain about loyalty but then do nothing to foster it.

      Companies complain about a bunch of things, and so does my 4yo. Doesn't mean I should listen to either of them.

      I'm just pointing out the past is the past, I don't think there's any going back to the "good-old-days" as if those days of paternalistic companies where there weren't many career options except to stick it out and get your pension was really as great as what people think they remember it was (most of the "complainers" are too young to remember it anyhow)...

    38. Re:Insanity by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

      If you're over 40, then you might want to slightly rephrase the " I was in the red headed step child group, not the main group". That was us as well; anything normal someone got, anything abnormal someone else got. *WE* always seen to get the "No one else knows what the hell this even is, handle it" projects.

      After a couple of times of that, a young friend of mine came up with the name "We're the land of misfit toys." It stuck -- because we all had a great time figuring out what was going on and what needed to be done (for robustness, not just barely running) and the Big Project / Big Iron Guys didn't want to have anything to do with us because we didn't fit in their (waterfall?) world.

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    39. Re: Insanity by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      There seems to be to an effort to decrease pay in the computer field. Degrees are being cheapened by the education system, and not just the for profit diploma mills. Companies often pay nothing for this leaving the student and sometimes the state to assume the risk. You end up with incompetent companies picking from a less competent pool of applicants trained to compete with Indians.

    40. Re: Insanity by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Labor costs never make it to the credit side of the final tax accounting. I don't know what AC is talking about. Labor is an expense. Taxes are after expenses.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  3. Complete Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    "People still talk about it's all offshored, it's all in India and you know, there are some things that are there but they don't even realize some of the reasons that they went there in the first place is because we weren't making our own."

    There were plenty of programers. There has never been a "shortage". That is complete bullshit. The H-1B monkeys were brought into this country for one reason and one reason alone. Because they come from a background of extreme poverty and will gladly work for significantly lower wages. And in the process, hundreds of thousands of American workers lost their jobs so that they could be replaced by third world monkeys.

    1. Re: Complete Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is 100% correct. Companies do not want to pay what American coders cost, plain and simple. Tired of corporate excuses and bullshit.

    2. Re:Complete Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Look, I completely agree with you that H1B is all about importing cheap labor. But it's utterly offensive to call these people 'Monkeys'. If you're angry, be angry at government and big business leaders who are effectively waging economic war on american citizens.

    3. Re: Complete Bullshit by TekPolitik · · Score: 4, Informative

      Exactly. The shortage was of employers who understood the technical difficulty of coding, and were willing to pay accordingly. I am now in law, which pays better, but coding at any reasonable level of quality (so, better than offshore minimal skill code monkey ships provide) is more intellectually demanding than law.

    4. Re:Complete Bullshit by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 4, Informative

      Referring to producers of substandard work as "monkeys" is not offensive. For example, "code monkey." If you are offended, then you're the one with the problem.

    5. Re: Complete Bullshit by andrew.j.borell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly. By "We weren't making our own coders" I think they mean we didn't over-saturate the market enough to drive down the value of the job for prospective U.S. employees. Only a couple weeks ago I read an article on tech companies nagging over paying US developers US wages, now this nonsense? A long time ago I argued that off-shored services should be taxed like an imported good and to my astonishment someone argued back that companies already pay taxes for those employees in their respective countries. I find it insulting corporations think we are actually dense enough to buy into this garbage or that anyone gives a snip about the pittance of taxes corporations pay in foreign countries to drive up profits at the expense of US jobs.

    6. Re: Complete Bullshit by mikael · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The same thing happened to nursing. Originally, the salaries were high enough to qualify as middle-class wage earners. But the government claimed there was going to be a nursing shortage. Dozens new nursing colleges opened everywhere. Then suddenly, there was an oversupply of nurses; salaries fell through the floor, the hospitals soaked up the savings. Now they are dependent on foreign labor. Family butchers used to be a middle class profession, then the supermarkets open meat factories out of state, hired cheap labor and undercut those family businesses.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    7. Re:Complete Bullshit by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 5, Informative

      Monkeys...code monkeys...was a common term before h1b going back at least to the 80's. It was used, at least in the company that I worked for, as someone who was brought in, usually at a high wage and temporarily, that could write software to a detailed spec, but who had little understanding of the why or how the system worked. The real, and higher up software engineers knew the big picture and spent little time coding (this was seen as more of a junior task), and spent most of their time creating detailed requirements because they knew how their part worked with hundreds, even thousands, of parts.

    8. Re:Complete Bullshit by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      CS != Programming. There is an entire job market for 'hands on coders'. CS majors insisted the only path to being a 'programmer' was through college and that's not at all true.

      When we pushed everyone to college we neglected the VocTech trades and that is the shortage they are talking about. When you build a house you reach a point where more engineers isn't going to get it built faster or better. On the Mechanical Engineering side of my job our technicians are invaluable. Most didn't go to college. Most just have some 6-12 week training in some particular skill. But when the engineers need something done they're the ones that actually get it implemented.

      I'm dying for programmers at work. I wish I could hire a dozen HS dropouts with 12 weeks of Python training. I don't need a CS major. You're dead right that they're too expensive. They also know too much and not what the job needs. For the same reason I'm not going to go out and hire a dozen physicists when I need a house built.

    9. Re: Complete Bullshit by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The same thing happened to nursing. Originally, the salaries were high enough to qualify as middle-class wage earners. But the government claimed there was going to be a nursing shortage. Dozens new nursing colleges opened everywhere. Then suddenly, there was an oversupply of nurses; salaries fell through the floor, the hospitals soaked up the savings.

      Of course, there are two big differences here:

      • A larger percentage of the public are capable of being successful at nursing.
      • Having more nurses doesn't inherently result in more nursing jobs.

      If you look at retention rates and graduation rates as a percentage of incoming freshmen, three times as many CS majors drop out or change majors within the first year, and only about half as many CS majors actually graduate with a CS degree. This is not because CS is hard. After all, nursing is hard and requires intellect. CS requires... something entirely different and much more rare.

      Programmers have to be highly creative, but also highly logical. Lots of people are highly creative, but have a hard time wrapping their heads around the logical aspects of programming. Those folks might be decent managers or product designers, but will probably never be good software engineers. Others are highly logical, but are not very creative. That second group might pass as "code monkeys", but also will never be good software engineers.

      And programmers also have to simultaneously be able to think abstractly and concretely. They have to be able to see something abstract and turn it into a concrete representation. And to make the big bucks, they also have to be able to go the other way—to see what the final concrete representation is supposed to look like and work their way back to an abstract underlying architecture that can support it, and then turn that into concrete representations for each part.

      Programmers also need a larger than average working set memory, a stronger language center, and stronger ability to pay attention—often to the point of hyperfocus (getting "in the zone"). Although to some degree those skills can be improved with practice, they all have a genetic component as well.

      Another area with essentially the same properties is music. (This may be why musicians are so over-represented in tech.) Unsurprisingly, in a 2008 study, researchers concluded that musical ability is about 50% genetic. Some people really are naturally predisposed to being good at it, and that predisposition results in getting good at it much more quickly and ending up being better at it than people without that predisposition, regardless of how much effort the latter group puts in.

      Any CS teacher will tell you that the same is true for computer programming. There is a sizable subset of people who, no matter how much they might want to learn how to program, will try and try and will never wrap their heads around it, or at best, will do so at a pace that makes it a very poor career choice for them.

      It would be great if we exposed more people to computer programming at a young age so that a greater percentage of the people who are innately predisposed to being good programmers will choose careers in that field. I'm not convinced that this will drive the cost of labor down, though. After all, a glut of good programmers will also result in a glut of new ideas that turn into new companies that hire more programmers.

      The same thing happened in music beginning in the 14th century. We called it the Renaissance. There wasn't a cheapening of creativity; if anything, the reverse was true. Creativity bred demand for creativity. Similarly, that's what will likely happen if we convince people that there is a shortage of computer programmers. In fact, that's what has been happening for the last couple of decades, just in case folks didn't notice.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    10. Re:Complete Bullshit by lucm · · Score: 1, Troll

      WTF?

      This is not a misunderstanding about the meaning of the words, it's an instance of virtue signalling. Usually when someone throws in "offensive", you can tell it's a cunt taking the high road.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    11. Re:Complete Bullshit by antdude · · Score: 1

      We're all monkeys. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    12. Re:Complete Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A man goes into a pet shop and sees cages lined up with monkeys in. Each cage has a different price so he asks the owner why the first monkey is priced at $50.
      The owner tells him: "That's a javascript monkey, he knows the syntax, bangs out code, good for all your web dev needs".
      "What about this one? He's $100!" says the man.
      "He's a python monkey, fully versed in the libraries, great for dev-ops that sort of thing." says the owner.
      "Wow this one's $200! What does he do?" asks the man.
      "He's a C monkey, also knows a bit of assembly, great for embedded code, great at optimizing low level code"
      Finally the man walks to the last cage and gasps "This guy's priced at $500! And he's wearing this expensive gold watch, what does he do?"
      "We don't know what he does" says the pet shop owner, "but he says he's a consultant".

    13. Re:Complete Bullshit by thomn8r · · Score: 2

      As Bonobo-American, I am offended by the comparison to Juggalos

    14. Re:Complete Bullshit by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      And that is why stories like this are going to continue. If you insist that writing some Python is something that requires a BS you're going to get outsourced and replaced.

      I could teach a high school dropout to do 50% of my job. Even if all it started out as was filling functions with a standard documentation format and moved from there.

      Every single other profession has 'lower level' employees that do a large portion of the grunt work. You think healthcare is expensive in the US now? Imagine how much it would cost if you insisted it took 12 years of education to put in an IV.

      Doctor:Physician's Assistant:Nurse:Orderly :: Engineer:Technologist:Technician:"Wrench Monkey :: CS Major: Programmer: Code Monkey.

    15. Re: Complete Bullshit by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Agreed with your title, your post is near complete bulllshit. Stop believing programmers are special. We're not and that elitist attitude is one reason we have such a poor reputation. Nursing requires a ton of memorizing, ability to manage highly distressed people, dealing with body fluids and wastes, etc... Almost anyone can learn to be an ok enough scripter with someone giving them the requirements and design. For the many people who pass out at the sight or blood or a needle stick, that's way harder to get over than learning programming abstractions.

      You missed my core point, which is that we don't need more "ok enough scripters". We need more competent engineers. Scripters are to LPNs as software engineers are to NPs.

      Again, I'm not saying that nursing doesn't take a lot of skill, nor am I even saying that there aren't people who aren't cut out for it. I'm saying that the numbers don't lie. Most people don't fail at becoming nurses. Most people do fail at becoming software engineers. So anybody claiming that the only difference between a software engineer and a random person chosen off the streets is training has a very serious credibility problem.

      Memory, language, and focus are not primarily genetically determined.

      You'll also notice that I didn't say those three were. I said they have a genetic component, a fact that is trivially proven.

      The Renaissance happened because people had more free time.

      The Renaissance had many causes. One of those causes was the introduction of the Gutenberg printing press, which expanded access to the written word. But even if we assume your reason was more important, the reason people had more free time was that the death of so many people caused a worker shortage, which meant that people made higher income from their work and could spend less time working, allowing them more time to be creative. This doesn't really apply when your work *is* creative.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    16. Re:Complete Bullshit by jbengt · · Score: 1

      This guy's priced at $500! And he's wearing this expensive gold watch, what does he do

      My old boss (we were mechanical engineering consultants) used to say: "To make a good impression on the client, you need to drive a nice car, but never nicer than the client's."

    17. Re:Complete Bullshit by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      Its not racist, its a reference to a thousand monkeys at a thousand typewriters. This is how the sausage is made.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    18. Re:Complete Bullshit by jbengt · · Score: 1

      You think healthcare is expensive in the US now? Imagine how much it would cost if you insisted it took 12 years of education to put in an IV.

      I've got news for you. It takes 12 years just to get a HS diploma. Only then can you get into nursing school and spend more time being educated in order to become professionally qualified to put in an I.V.

    19. Re:Complete Bullshit by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      If you want to be pedantic. Then yeah. It was fairly obvious that I was talking about post HS education.

    20. Re:Complete Bullshit by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      By that logic, it's not acceptible to say anything bad about anybody, even when the poor quality of their work merits strong negative feedback. You can't run a business that way. You actually can't run anything if you impose upon yourself the requirement to sugarcoat everything and not communicate truthfully. Not everyone can play baseball in the majors, and not everyone can write code. No one benefits when you hobble yourself from communicating these self-evident truths.

    21. Re:Complete Bullshit by sfcat · · Score: 1

      And that is why stories like this are going to continue. If you insist that writing some Python is something that requires a BS you're going to get outsourced and replaced.

      I could teach a high school dropout to do 50% of my job. Even if all it started out as was filling functions with a standard documentation format and moved from there.

      Every single other profession has 'lower level' employees that do a large portion of the grunt work. You think healthcare is expensive in the US now? Imagine how much it would cost if you insisted it took 12 years of education to put in an IV.

      Doctor:Physician's Assistant:Nurse:Orderly :: Engineer:Technologist:Technician:"Wrench Monkey :: CS Major: Programmer: Code Monkey.

      You are why we have so many security issues today. Over time either the market won't care (in which case you are right) or the market will decide it doesn't want insecure crapware that regularly causes PR problems and damages the corporate brand. Somehow you might be right, but you are betting much more on this than you realize and if it breaks against you, I won't shed a tear but it will be bloody and ugly.

      --
      "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
  4. And whose fault would that be? by sunking2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would estimate that a good percentage, upwards of 50%, of a CS program is foreign nationals. The schools are greedy, they prefer foreign tuition prices, no financial aid.

    1. Re:And whose fault would that be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would estimate that a good percentage, upwards of 50%, of a CS program is foreign nationals. The schools are greedy, they prefer foreign tuition prices, no financial aid.

      This should be a law: For each school year, if a school has higher tuition for foreign nationals than for US citizens, then whatever extra money the school gets from foreign national students, the school has to pay double that amount into a scholarship fund for US citizens. So if a school collects $1 million extra tuition (from higher tuition) from foreign nationals, then the school has to pay $2 million into a scholarship fund for US citizens.

      That would collect some scholarship money for Americans. But even more important, it would discourage schools from favoring foreign nationals over Americans.

    2. Re:And whose fault would that be? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Are you implying that there are not enough CS places for US students because the available places have been taken by foreign students?

      That doesn't make sense. If there was demand, wouldn't they just run more CS classes rather than turning away students? Or did I misunderstand?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  5. American programmers are being sabotaged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The quality of school computer science education is dropping because the powers-that-be are trying to dumb down and demonetize programmers everywhere. This way they can't challenge AI when it gains the ability to "predict crime". Indian programmers get things done like Russian and Vietnamese soldiers; you have to throw a million of them at every small problem. Indians are being given leadership positions in U.S. tech companies for no obvious reason. The bankers are in control.

  6. Bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Chicago School Official: US IT Jobs Offshored Because 'We Weren't Making Our Own' Coders

    Offshoring is about cost savings, not about availability of workers.

    There are numerous examples of entire departments being dumped and replaced with cheap offshore labor.

    Put in words that a Chicago School Official might understand: Liar, liar, pants on fire!

    1. Re:Bullshit! by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      I wish someone would do a followup with these officials and see what their rebuttal is. Why is this never done? Everybody is talking and saying the same thing, but apparently no one is listening.

  7. Doesn't fix anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... they went there in the first place, is because, we weren't making our own.

    Corporations had a choice between making their own, or going to India: We know which one they chose. Now, everyone else is going to India, so they will too.

    For the last 5 decades, there's been a surplus of labour allowing corporations to be fussy, then abusive, and then underpay employees. Some school proclaiming their "graduates are proficient in the language" that corporations choose, isn't going to fix either problem.

  8. My own college did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Algonquin College in Ottawa Ontario. They farmed out a simple system of keeping track of tests and students to an east indian firm called 'blackboard'. It was a disastrous shit show that never ended. Whenever I would try to bring the matter up as both a programming graduate and as a web developer they waved me off with dismissive remarks.

    The system could have been developed by their own students easily and cheaply with a websocket, mongo database, and nodejs webserver. However then blame for bugs or issues would fall directly upon their shoulder and not on some far flung ethereal entity meaning people could directly challenge the problems and force them to be resolved.

    I'm grasping for a reason why. To my mind there never was a good one. We could have built that system easily and cheaply, but they would not allow us to. By us I mean the students they handed diplomas to and said 'you are now considered professionally trained to perform these services'.

    I know full well their training was sub standard and they were liars and charletons, that doesn't mean we did not posses these skills in spite of their limp half hearted efforts. It was obvious their interest was our wallets and not our minds. We could have done that task and been enriched for it, both materially and in our skill set and experience.

    Lesson of warning to those of you either entering into an education or seeking one. If they will not hire their own product to do the work, be wary of their competence as they do not in their hearts believe think they have any to pass on else they would put their own product to work for themselves and everyone else with trust.

    1. Re:My own college did this by mikael · · Score: 1

      Department heads and directors get paid bonuses based on the cost savings they make. Some times they were charging interns £1000/month to get work experience.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:My own college did this by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Algonquin College in Ottawa Ontario. They farmed out a simple system of keeping track of tests and students to an east indian firm called 'blackboard'. It was a disastrous shit show that never ended.

      I've used Blackboard. You're being unfair to actual s**t shows.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:My own college did this by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Algonquin College in Ottawa Ontario. They farmed out a simple system of keeping track of tests and students to an east indian firm called 'blackboard'.

      By east indian are you talking about the product Blackboard, from the Washington (USA) based company Blackboard Inc. which was sold to a USA based and own equity group? Is that native american indians you speak of?

      I'm grasping for a reason why.

      Why do people deploy Oracle or SAP? Blackboard is a product used by education institutions around the entire world including 75% of USA based colleges. There's sense in standardisation and not trying to re-invent a wheel.

      Like SAP the adoption is often difficult. Like SAP once it's running you wonder how you did without it.

      We could have done that task and been enriched for it, both materially and in our skill set and experience.

      You think you can. Mind you if you are actually able or producing a comparable product then there are many wheelbarrows of money waiting in your future so you have no reason not to drop what you're doing right now and start down this line. More likely though you didn't understand the scope, requirements, or the benefit of having a complete and fully integrated learning management system as opposed to... what did you call it: "keeping track of tests and students". Yes someone didn't read the functional requirement specification.

    4. Re:My own college did this by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      They farmed out a simple system of keeping track of tests and students to an east indian firm called 'blackboard'.

      East Indian? I have a buddy who works for them.

    5. Re:My own college did this by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Schools around here are switching to Canvas.

  9. WTF by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, what's the point of Government jobs if they're not going to employ Americans? This is what my tax dollars go to? Sending money overseas? And yes, it's my tax dollars too. State School systems get federal money.

    This is why you're seeing the resurgence of neo-nazis and white supremacists. We're abandoning the working class. Same Bloody thing happened in Germany in 1944 and we ignored it then too because nobody wanted their taxes to go up. How's that quote go? Something about business getting out of hand and us being lucky to live through it...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:WTF by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      This is why you're seeing the resurgence of neo-nazis and white supremacists.

      They're the ones voting in line with the party who wants to reduce government to zero, providing no government jobs. They don't want to pay taxes on their inevitable massive lottery win. They're own bloody fault.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    2. Re:WTF by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Same Bloody thing happened in Germany in 1944 and we ignored it then too

      To be fair, it was already a bit late. They'd invaded Poland (or was it bombed Pearl Harbour?) four years earlier.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:WTF by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2

      Well stated, that demographic has been voting against their own interests for at least 40 years because all you have to do is tell them "gays, brown people, and atheists did it!"

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    4. Re:WTF by johannesg · · Score: 1

      Same Bloody thing happened in Germany in 1944 and we ignored it then too

      To be fair, it was already a bit late. They'd invaded Poland (or was it bombed Pearl Harbour?) four years earlier.

      Do you seriously not know whether nazi Germany invaded Poland or bombed Pearl Harbor?

      The Germans invaded Poland in 1939 (technically five years before 1944, but we'll let it slide), kicking off WW2 in the process.

      Pearl Harbor was bombed by the Japanese in 1941, in response to the US strangling supplies of fuel and other raw materials to Japan (in an effort to stop Japanese imperialistic ambitions).

    5. Re:WTF by Calydor · · Score: 1

      I think it was a tongue-in-cheek comment directed squarely at the OP not knowing that WW2 was nearing its end by '44.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    6. Re:WTF by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

      > This is why you're seeing the resurgence of neo-nazis and white supremacists. We're abandoning the working class.

      No, much simpler. It's happening because you label everybody that would like to preserve local values, culture and curb uncontrolled immigration as a nazi or white supremacist.
      The number of actual white supremacists and nazis, actual as in .. people that believe white people are worth more because they're white, is the same, if not lower.

    7. Re:WTF by KingRatMass · · Score: 1

      Do you seriously not know whether nazi Germany invaded Poland or bombed Pearl Harbor?

      Have you never seen John Belushi's speech in the movie Animal House??? Rather than making some half assed attempt to demonstrate your perceived intellect, you should have taken 30 seconds to google "germany bomb pearl harbor"

      Your efforts to discredit the preceeding poster effectively sealed your fate and proved that in fact, you are the fucking dumbass.

  10. Re:Is this a joke? by intellitech · · Score: 1

    And it's hilarious, because Chicago Public Schools has a million problems. I should know, I live there.

    --
    vos nescitis quicquam, nec cogitatis quia expedit nobis ut unus moriatur homo pro populo et non tota gens pereat.
  11. Not True by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    Companies are trying to save a buck so they sent their programming work to India. In many cases, the work performed was shoddy.

  12. Re:Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do you have children in the system?

    If so, how do you deal with it?

    My GF works in Gwinnett County Public Schools, in a school with a high percentage of low/no income families. Some of the parents care deeply about their children's education, some bitch about it, and most don't give a shit.

  13. WTF, liberals? by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously, what's the point of Government jobs if they're not going to employ Americans? This is what my tax dollars go to? Sending money overseas? And yes, it's my tax dollars too. State School systems get federal money.

    This is why you're seeing the resurgence of neo-nazis and white supremacists. We're abandoning the working class. Same Bloody thing happened in Germany in 1944 and we ignored it then too because nobody wanted their taxes to go up. How's that quote go? Something about business getting out of hand and us being lucky to live through it...

    I've never found a liberal who could state a position without resorting to insults.

    The inevitable result is that people simply stop, keep quiet, and get on with their lives. Then, in the privacy of the voting booth, they vote for the candidate promising reform, and against the candidate with insults and no real position.

    Isn't that a better and simpler explanation than "nazis and supremacists"?

    1. Re:WTF, liberals? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Let me state a position.

      The candidate who was elected insulted everyone else in the race and has no real positions.

      The competent candidate who wasn't elected (by a few votes in 3 states) had real positions but was part of the establishment.

      While we wouldn't have had the excitement of nuclear brinksmanship, we would have had more of the same which was actually not that bad. Most people were employed and it's really trends in automation which were destroying stable jobs.

      I couldn't say why we are seeing a resurgence of neo-nazis and white supremacists in the u.s. and in europe (except Italy which is doing pretty well).

      But, the last time right wing people and nazi's had power, millions of people died. So that put the "right" to bed until people forgot how bad it is to be governed by the "right".

      The right wing is pretty blatantly fueled by a few very wealthy people like Mercer who hold hard right and racist views (mostly anti-black) and by the Republican "southern strategy".

      In the privacy of the voting booth they voted for a person who was lying 30 times a day (over 30 times some days), who even then was obviously going to put out 1 page kindergardenish tax "plans" (in place of realistic 800 to 1500+ page tax plans, who asks for geopolitical briefings with a limit of 9 bullet point items per page, and whose racism and misogyny was well known even then.

      The conservative evangelists who voted for trump disgraced themselves and I do not want to hear them talking about sexual morals of candidates on the left again. But I'm sure i will.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    2. Re:WTF, liberals? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's not an insult, it's the literal truth. You have a resurgence of neo-Nazis and others in the far right at the moment, in America and in Europe. Did you not hear about Charlottesville? Have you looked at the statements made my Trump's closest advisers?

      It's incredible that people are still in denial about this. They marked down the street with swastikas, murdered someone and then your president refused to condemn them.

      Why do you think this is an insult to you? Unless you are on the far right yourself then it can only be interpreted as a warning and a plea for you to do something about it. The alt-right is trying to replace the more mainstream, moderate right, taking over the Republican party and dragging it further and further away from the centre. Stop denying it and do something to prevent your moderate right wing values being marginalized.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:WTF, liberals? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      and against the candidate with insults and no real position.

      um, really?

    4. Re:WTF, liberals? by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      Well, didn't the communist party endorse Hillary and Obama?

    5. Re:WTF, liberals? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      I agree. But, not only that, since government and industry (really one and the same thing in the US and most other advanced countries anymore) ARE waging a war on their working class citizens - those people who need to work to survive regardless of educational attainment - HOW ON EARTH is supporting the government that is undermining your life, your livelyhood, and your rights and freedoms working in your best interest?

    6. Re:WTF, liberals? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      The right and the left are really the same thing at this point. Just as an interest, i looked up genocides on wikipedia and found that - guess what? - the left killed SLIGHTLY more people in genocides in the 20th century than the right, but not by more than a few millions. Please tell me how Mrs. Clinton was competent and Mr. Trump was not. I'm not claiming Mr. Trump is competent, merely that Mrs. Clinton is incompetent. And the left wing is funded by George "I'm busing protesters everywhere in the country" Soros. Tell me, again, how the right and left are different?

    7. Re:WTF, liberals? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      And of course, you have antifa who are really exactly the same kind of people. Tell me how the right and left are different?

    8. Re:WTF, liberals? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The left don't want to send millions of people to gas chambers.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:WTF, liberals? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Taxes are simple for people with simple incomes.

      If you have multiple sources of income, run a business with business expenses, have 23 stock purchases of a stock at 23 different prices, own a house, deduct mortgage expenses, had major medical bills and want to deduct them, had home repair expenses and want to deduct them, buy and sell real estate, pay state taxes and want to deduct them from your income, then your taxes will not be simple.

      Tens of millions of american tax payers qualify for a postcard like 1040ez. Tens of millions more americans qualify for a tax return which takes under 30 minutes to finish.

      Tell me again why someone with an incredibly complicated income from many sources who wants dozens of deductions is supposed to have a simple income tax form?

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    10. Re:WTF, liberals? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      If you watched the debates, then you know clinton knew the names of world leaders, the names of well... countries, where those countries were, how to deal with those countries diplomatically.

      She also displayed a working knowledge of the constitution- which Mr. Trump failed at very impressively. You know- the founding blueprint for our government?

      Mr. Trump was barely capable of speaking intelligibly much less intelligently on most of the questions asked.

      His answers were mostly, "America, fuck yea!" and "Lots of people know this. I have words. Trust me!"

      I will grant that Clinton was certainly not up to Nixon/Kennedy debate standards but who would be today.

      Unlike most republicans who can't say a negative word about Trump after he calls white supremacists and nazis good people, I'm willing to point out problems with Clinton had issues. Too many ties to big corporations. Too many ties to the financial industry. Of course trump, out did her on ties to the financial industry with several goldman sachs people in his administration, including senior positions.

      Clinton was prepared, did have plans ready to implement.

      Trump had nothing. Has had nothing for 7 months now. And is marching us towards a war with NK and potentially China.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    11. Re:WTF, liberals? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Clinton was given the debate questions ahead of time and had someone do up an answer for her. She's a talking head, no more. And of course, the most evil of people will learn to use the words you expect to hear against you. Mrs. Clinton is an unbelievable sociopath.

    12. Re:WTF, liberals? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Tell me, exactly, who does? Name names. If you want to "Trump hates evreyone and wants to kill them" you are deranged.

    13. Re:WTF, liberals? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      When people talk about Nazis why do you assume it's about Trump?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:WTF, liberals? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Millions of puerto ricans would not be suffering in darkness if Clinton were president. She would have been prepared. Mrs Clinton is a methodist who wanted to make the world a better place since she was 18. President Trump shows many of the classic signs of a narcissistic sociopath*. I'm not sure if it is genetic or just the way he was raised. Mr Trump literally can not talk to disaster victims without making it about how great he is and having his ego stoked. Mr. Trump utterly lacks empathy- even insulting the military families who have lost children serving the country. That's a huge problem. But we could deal with that if he was even remotely competent. But he's not. He hasn't even staffed hundreds (even thousands) of positions after 8 months needed to run the government during wars and disasters. Every other recent president- republicans and democrats had them staffed within 90 days or less. Mr. Trump isn't the worst president ever. James Buchanan still holds that title for now. But Mr. Trump has only had 8 months in office. Give him time. Mr. Trump is on track to replace James Buchanan as the worst president ever. Even James Buchanan didn't collude with enemy nations. --- * Antisocial personality disorder is "a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others, occurring since age 15 years" Narcissistic personality disorder is "a pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning in early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts. https://www.healthyplace.com/p... How do you spot a sociopathic narcissist? Watch for certain traits: A driven quest for power. If a narcissistic sociopath cares about anything other than himself, it is destructive power and control over people. Behaviors that seek love and admiration. To be sure, this isn't needy love. It's not even emotional love. It's superficial. A narcissistic sociopath sees love and admiration as power tools to manipulate and dominate (Do Sociopaths Even Have Feelings?). No apologies, no guilt, no remorse under any circumstance. A sociopathic narcissist believes that she is a gift to the world who makes it richer and more colorful. Therefore, her calculated, even cruel actions are always justified. Invincibility. The narcissistic variety of sociopath believes he is indomitable. Even punishment and prison can't stop him. They're merely part of the game. Wholly self-serving. The needs and wants of others are insignificant and undeserving of consideration. Act as the producer, director, and only actor of his own show. The narcissistic sociopath casts people in roles that increase his power and sense of importance and when bored, casts them aside. --- Sound familiar? Which of these has Mr. Trump done since in office? All of them. Mr. Trump has displayed every trait on this list just in the 8 months since taking office.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    15. Re:WTF, liberals? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Sigh. I hate slashdot sometimes...

      This version should be better formatted and more legible.

      Millions of puerto ricans would not be suffering in darkness if Clinton were president.
      She would have been prepared.

      Mrs Clinton is a methodist who wanted to make the world a better place since she was 18.

      President Trump shows many of the classic signs of a narcissistic sociopath*.

      I'm not sure if it is genetic or just the way he was raised. Mr Trump literally can not talk to disaster victims without making it about how great he is and having his ego stoked. Mr. Trump utterly lacks empathy- even insulting the military families who have lost children serving the country. That's a huge problem.

      But we could deal with that if he was even remotely competent. But he's not. He hasn't even staffed hundreds (even thousands) of positions after 8 months needed to run the government during wars and disasters. Every other recent president- republicans and democrats had them staffed within 90 days or less. Mr. Trump isn't the worst president ever.

      James Buchanan still holds that title for now. But Mr. Trump has only had 8 months in office. Give him time. Mr. Trump is on track to replace James Buchanan as the worst president ever. Even James Buchanan didn't collude with enemy nations. ---

      *
      Antisocial personality disorder is "a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others, occurring since age 15 years"

      Narcissistic personality disorder is "a pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning in early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts.

      https://www.healthyplace.com/p... [healthyplace.com]

      How do you spot a sociopathic narcissist?

      Watch for certain traits:

      A driven quest for power. (check)

      If a narcissistic sociopath cares about anything other than himself, it is destructive power and control over people. (check)

      Behaviors that seek love and admiration. To be sure, this isn't needy love. It's not even emotional love. It's superficial. A narcissistic sociopath sees love and admiration as power tools to manipulate and dominate (Do Sociopaths Even Have Feelings?). (check)

      No apologies, no guilt, no remorse under any circumstance. (check- his lack of ability to apologize is staggering at times)

      A sociopathic narcissist believes that she is a gift to the world who makes it richer and more colorful. Therefore, her calculated, even cruel actions are always justified. (check)

      Invincibility. The narcissistic variety of sociopath believes he is indomitable. Even punishment and prison can't stop him. They're merely part of the game. (check- part of his appeal to authoritarian voters)

      Wholly self-serving. The needs and wants of others are insignificant and undeserving of consideration. (check)

      Acts as the producer, director, and only actor of his own show. The narcissistic sociopath casts people in roles that increase his power and sense of importance and when bored, casts them aside. (crooked hillary, lyin Ted, etc. How many people did he cast aside so far? check. Why do people even believe he WON'T cast them aside at this point?)

        --- Sound familiar?

      Which of these has Mr. Trump displayed since in office? All of them. Literally all of them.

      Mr. Trump has displayed every trait on this list just in the 8 months since taking office.

      Again- it's bad that he's a sociopathic narcissist but the real problem is that feeds into is complete lack of ability to recognize when he's wrong, clueless, uninformed, or a living breathing example of the dunning krueger effect. Because those are terrible traits for a national leader. Being both that grossly incompetent AND that overconfident is terrible for the country.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    16. Re:WTF, liberals? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      It's a corollary to Godwin's law.

    17. Re:WTF, liberals? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Again, you are raving. Mrs. Clinton doesn't give 2 bits about the state or condition of any of the country - look at what the Clinton foundation did NOT accomplish in Haiti. However, they did get a bunch of money for themselves. Grow up.

    18. Re:WTF, liberals? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, I agree with you - and I have to add, so do Mrs. and Mr. Clinton show all these characteristics.

    19. Re:WTF, liberals? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Hunter's Law: When someone talks about Nazis, Trumpkins will assume they mean Trump.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:WTF, liberals? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Mrs. Clinton has a lifetime of actions which show she cares about people.

      The clinton foundation is highly rated by charity navigator and takes a smaller portion of money to run than the American Red Cross and many other charities including religious charities.

      You are in extreme denial of reality.

      Clinton was calling for the U.S.S. Comfort to be sent to Puerto Rico for days before the trump administration finally stopped dealing with the NFL crisis*. Of course now, while puerto ricans are dying in the dark- Mr. Trump is playing golf... AGAIN... on YOUR tax dollars (and mine) taking the opportunity to funnel more tax dollars into his businesses and personal fortune.

      * where athletes were protesting against the Trump administration's racism- NOT against the national anthem- tho it really probably be played at a private non-governmental event and people are not required to "honor" it anyway and players weren't even on the field when it played until 2009 anyway- playing it is inherently political and inserts politics into a private sporting event).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    21. Re:WTF, liberals? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Well, it's a bit of progress so I'll take it!

      Please take the time to donate a little cash to puerto rico.

      The international relief fund is **** rated by charity navigator and has nothing to do with Clinton or Trump.

      I donated $25. It's not much but I'm retired. I did help 4 strangers whose houses were flooded by Harvey rip out all their wet sheetrock and insulation but I can't physical help in puerto rico.

      They really need the help. They are U.S. Citizens. They are not being well served and this weekend looks to add more misery on top of them. If you go to charity navigator you can get the web page and direct mailing address. Every dime will go to the charity then.

      I don't know anyone in puerto rico. I just know it's horrific there and since the government isn't doing it's job, we the citizens need to help more than we might otherwise do (knowing our tax dollars were doing it normally).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  14. Because ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... the offshore coders will do what they are told. Hire US coders and get fighting over the tool suite, programming language, coding style, spaces vs tabs and practically anything else.

  15. Can we arrest this guy for lying? by mveloso · · Score: 2

    Is there some way to arrest people who make false statements when justifying unpopular actions? The dude is so obviously full of shit that you can smell him down the hall...but he'll just keep spouting bullshit forever.

    Is there some way to penalize him so he won't do it again?

    1. Re:Can we arrest this guy for lying? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should create an agency to test these claims. Have them generate a suitable candidate, a US citizen, and apply for the job. Interview if asked to, ask for a reasonable wage, and if they end up hiring an H1B instead start a criminal prosecution. If they hire your undercover candidate, they can either take the job or you can give them a few bucks for their wasted time and effort.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  16. There has Never been a shortage by OppMan29 · · Score: 1

    The reason is GREED... We often get low quality programmer from offshore but as long as this looks cheaper on paper they dont care. They want to pay $20 an hour or less doesnt matter if the american programmer is far superior . Why go to school for 5 years , be in debt and the be replaced after a few years?

  17. 'Boots' theory of socioeconomic unfairness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    “The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money.

    Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles.

    But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while the poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.

    This was the Captain Samuel Vimes 'Boots' theory of socioeconomic unfairness.”

    If the $24k car can be expected to last more than 8 times as long as the $3k car then a rational actor will buy the $24k car ... unless they know that someone else will be held responsible for transportation costs before that time is up.

  18. BULLSHIT! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    I've seen this for 30 years.

    It was not lack of coders. It was ruthless and relentless offshoring and outsourcing because they were less expensive and more willing to work 80 hour weeks without pay.

    Stop the H1B program for any job making under $150,000 a year and coders would be there.

    Offshoring is usually bad enough that companies that they can't stick with it for too long.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  19. Complete bullshit. by edgedmurasame · · Score: 2

    We are making them, businesses just don't like citizens. Kill every guest worker program, then see to it that citizens take their place.

    --
    "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
  20. Eat your own dog food by NetFusion · · Score: 2

    Project based learning requires itches (aka opportunities) to scratch that you are willing to pay for. Further students need to feel ownership over the problems you challenge them to solve to bring that type of problem based learning to the real world for real career gains.

  21. Please note this is Chicago Public School System.. by Chas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The same CPS that struggles to graduate kids from High School.
    The one that struggles to turn out kids who can handle college.
    The one that struggles to turn out college-ready kids who DO NOT need massive amounts of remedial courses.
    The one who thinks that simply throwing more money at a failed system will, somehow, magically transform them into a success (and we wonder why the KIDS are so dumb...)

    And no. The main reason why jobs like this are offshored isn't because we don't have enough programmers.
    It's a cost-saving thing. Why pay a US coder a decent salary when they can just offshore, or if required to keep the job in the states, demand 30 years of experience in a 3 year old technology, and then pass the job to an H1B farm for pennies on the dollar?

    Like every other political group in Illinois, talking out their ass is a required skill.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  22. Re:And I've never met a right winger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Alright, sure.

    I don't like immigration because it massively inflates the supply of labour, which in turn drives down wages and living standards for people like me who have to work for a living. The costs, both tangible and intangible, of this immigration, aren't paid for by the people who benefit from the reduction in wages and collective bargaining power of labour. Restricting immigration and enforcing immigration law will slow the rate at which my country is becoming more diverse, maybe even reversing that "progress" and make it more white - and I don't care.

    Please tell me where I'm wrong.

  23. Re:Insanity ^H^H^H insideous by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

    Your subject really would have worked better if you had worded differently. Insane would be just crazy, abnormal, random behavior which could manifest harm to oneself or others. This actually does kind of make sense, but I am not sure it totally covers all of their intent.

    I propose a modification to the term as insidious. This actually provides the full intent of their actions. Any other term would mean that they did not intentionally want the outcome any different than what they obtained.

  24. B$ by thunderclees · · Score: 1

    It is easy to see that with morons like this running schools where the education deficiency. Even this idiot knows it is the cheap, exploitable labor that drives visas. They do not care that visa workers are incompetent as they have their bonus and are long gone before the stockholders feel the pain.

  25. It's called cheap labor! by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    Why do you think IT jobs are out sourced to India? Education? No cost. Cheap labor abounds in India. It has nothing to do with labor shortages in the U.S.

    Economic data clearly shows you do not have a labor shortage. But if you are trying to depress wages, then flooding the market with programmers is the way to do it.

  26. Education is not found here by reanjr · · Score: 1

    You're a fucking school. Make some fucking coders.

  27. Re:Please note this is Chicago Public School Syste by Chas · · Score: 1

    Fuck the pension fund. I'm supremely indifferent to the Chicago politics that caused hyper-inflated pensions to be assigned to a bunch of greedy bastards and then kicked down the road.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  28. So, about those layoffs... by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

    This conveniently forgets the rounds of layoffs that numerous companies have done. Working Americans were dumped in favor of cheaper offshore programmers.

    If the problem is strictly a lack of programmers, this would never have happened. Not once, let alone repeatedly.

    The best part is when the company offers severance contingent upon training the replacements. They recognize the value of institutional knowledge while totally dismissing the value of their employees.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
  29. Coming from the advocate of $13 minimum wage by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1

    We don't need any lectures from Chicago public school system on educating coders when the city passed an ordinance to raise minimum wage to $13 by 2019.

    The city cries about lack of qualified labor while mandating a minimum wage that drives away jobs. Offshoring doesn't happen due to lack of qualified labor it happens because cheaper labor is readily available elsewhere. Chicago has a wage competition problem not a labor pool problem.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  30. Re:some graphics & a user friendly interface.. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    a database... what could ever be more complex? pity the endlessly undone digitarian hired goons..

    If it's complex, you're doing it wrong. However it seems like the whole IT industry has been doing it wrong for a long time.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  31. Lie. by whitroth · · Score: 1

    They offshored jobs because they could pay them a hell of a lot less.

    Example: I think it was PG&E in California that offshored their IT, and forcing their current employees to train their cheaper replacements.

  32. This is total bullshit by acoustix · · Score: 1

    Tech companies have been firing senior coders and engineering staff for the last 10+ years and hiring cheap H1B labor or outsourcing overseas. It has nothing to do with a nonexistent labor shortage.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  33. We weren't making our own? by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

    The "we weren't making our own" argument is complete bullcrap. There are many many incidents of ageism and just cost cutting involved in the off-shoring trend. From a 40 year old dominos delivery driver delivery pizzas to his younger former co-workers ... to many examples of staff laid off and only getting their separation package because they stayed on long enough to train their off shore replacements. I used to have no more than a 2 week break between contracts. From the mid 1990's to the side 2010s the off shore market rose dominated and started to decline. And part of the reason for the decline was the ever strong influx of H1-B workers paid considerably less than the workers they displaced.

    The US has a huge unused reserve of technical workers that were laid off, and could never find a secure job footing again for two decades. And as a result of our policies we actually endanger national security as a small fraction of those State Department sponsored students who graduate and are hired (skilled people they are!) and a small portion of H1-B tech workers are spying on US technology and shipping it overseas. Consider that we only catch and expose those that aren't smart enough to not get caught.

    We treat this problem as if we were boxers following the Marquis de Queensbury rules. No low blows, can't hit someone whose down, etc. These rest of the world is playing no holds barred mui thai ... I imaging we are laughed at for our industrial security. Much like the article were a foreign descent person was found after hours in a medical sciences company conference room, uninvited, and had downloaded files from the company servers using two laptops and a tablet. Only discovered because an officer of the company working late discovered him on the way out of the building. This helps lessen the unique talents of US workers by displacing their value (the value of their work product) overseas as well. Hiring these potential spies who accept lessor rates of pay just to position themselves in the US, as well as just hiring overseas candidates at lower rates than their US counterparts hurts the economy longterm. But US companies are all about short term gain, all too often, and fail to see the longterm implications.

    Sure, hire the best and brightest overseas talent. But you don't really want to hire newly minted overseas programmers because they cost 20% less, when the real cost is higher. And worse, when you outsource whole projects your source code isn't really yours anymore ... Your competitors may end up paying less for their outsourced project benefiting from code written on your dime. You need strict controls in place. And an organization you can hold accountable if your companies "crown jewels" end up in other companies hands.

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  34. Re:Is this a joke? by jbengt · · Score: 1

    Last time I used the CPS website for contractors/consultants/construction it was a big messy pile of Oracle Primavera. A painfully user-unfriendly way of managing construction projects. I let my login expire and try to get the more junior co-workers to do the actual input on the website.
    If that's part of what they're talking about, they need to, preferably, get rid of the Oracle crappy framework and then, possibly, fire all the offshored programmers that "customize" it.

  35. Re:And I've never met a right winger by jbengt · · Score: 1

    You're wrong in thinking that politicians like Trump are on your side. (Before I get jumped on by partisans, note that I would say the same thing about most politicians, regardless of party.)

  36. Think as a world, not as a country. by IcyWolfy · · Score: 1

    In the global market, there is no reason to prefer higher paid Americans.
    We are addressing the low-income persons in the world before the lower income persons in the US.

    Now, new companies are being set up to train developers in PH, and ID, and TH in order to develop the questioning skills needed, in order to make the skill set comparable to new grads in the US.

    But, because the cost of living is so much cheaper, companies can pay slightly more than the going rate for a coder-farm, but get coders who are equivalent to an Westerner with a Bachelors and 2-3 years exp. The rate for the local is still stupidly good for the area, and thus makes for a win-win situation for the workers and the foreign company.

    A former co-worker of mine took his USD 200k salary, lives in Thailand, (flys to california when needed), and locally in TH, helps to train the foreign workers in Thailand. Bringing up the value for the local (thai) economy. Decreasing cost for company, and increasing the value per person.

  37. Computer Science For All by Artagel · · Score: 1

    The real question is whether an introduction to coding makes the students more trainable for jobs they might get. Those jobs do not only include those where computer programming is 100% of the job. In Chicago, that includes whether students would be better prepared to be CNC machinists. I have my doubts about the Chicago Public Schools' ability to assess the skill platform to develop and the curriculum to develop a facility for further learning in the field.

  38. Industry started off wrong; needs professionalism by rbrander · · Score: 1

    Alas, the programming industry started off on the wrong foot because employees arrived self-trained. I refer to the industry after microcomputers changed it completely. When it was all IBM mainframes, programmer was something of a profession, guys in ties and coats, math degrees and training in the shop.

    When the notion of just writing software alone, not as a free add-on to a million-dollar computer, came along for PCs, the programmers were all enthused self-taught hobbyists and industry, well, got spoiled early. The book "Hackers" (Steven Levy, 1984) writes of Sierra On-Line "training" game programmers, but just about the gaming tricks in 8-bit: they only hired already-fanatic young hackers.

    So everybody tried to become a self-taught hacker; after Bill Gates dropped out of Harvard and got rich, dropping out of U became almost a badge of honor, of your willingness to risk your career on your talent and hard work alone.

    If IT could become a profession - like Medicine, Law, Engineering, Teaching, Accounting - with actual requirements and competence tests - it would change a lot of things. Women piled into Medicine and Law despite the sexism they encountered: Medicine and Law are our best-compensated, most-respected professions. Why should they put up with sexism to get a shit-job competing with foreign wages and tossed at the first grey hair?

    And you'd find people lining up to get the degrees that would get them into this respected profession. RIght now, you see CS class enrollment bounce up and down with every bit of good and bad news out of Silicon Valley.

  39. Re:Insanity - continue the class war at home by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1
    They are talking about training disadvantaged inner city youth to become coders. The idea is to make home-grown cheap labour to replace the foreign cheap labour, getting them off welfare, and having them help pay taxes. It's a good idea, but it means competition from poor people for what used to be high paying jobs. The idea is to make "coding" be a job for people with High School, or at most a trade school education, and avoid the expensive university investment, so the kids can afford to work for less.

    It makes sense, it's just not good news for people hoping for a good income from such work. The rich started the war with off-shoring, and now they are recruiting the poor to make them allies in crushing the middle class. I'm not even remotely a communist, but in this case, the shoe kinda fits, you know?