Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Is Reportedly Building a Doorbell That Lets Drivers Into Your House (cnbc.com)

According to CNBC, Amazon is working with Phrame, a maker of smart license plates that allow items to be delivered to a car's trunk, to build a smart doorbell that would give delivery drivers one-time access to a person's home to drop off items. From the report: Phrame's product fits around a license plate and contains a secure box that holds the keys to the car. Users unlock the box with their smartphone, and can grant access to others -- such as delivery drivers -- remotely. The new initiatives are part of Amazon's effort to go beyond convenience and fix problems associated with unattended delivery. As more consumers shop online and have their packages shipped to their homes, valuable items are often left unattended for hours. Web retailers are dealing with products getting damaged by bad weather as well as the rise of so-called porch pirates, who steal items from doorsteps. Amazon also has an incentive to reduce the number of lost packages, as they can be costly.

203 comments

  1. What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by gillbates · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So what could possibly go wrong with having the key to unlock dozens of upper-middle class homes in a delivery van whilst the driver grabs lunch?

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by mysidia · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How about putting a small "DELIVERY-ONLY" shed on your house, and the doorbell can only unlock the delivery shed (After scanning the package for that address)

    2. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 1

      Then of course, someone could break into the shed. :(

    3. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or a steel toolbox that locks when it closes. Put package in box, close box. But I suppose that doesn't need an app. Not sexy enough.

    4. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, came here to say the same thing

    5. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by nick_davison · · Score: 1

      What could possibly go wrong with the current model... where your hypothetical delivery driver, leaving his hypothetical truck with a hypothetical key has just given thieves dozens of packages and a tool thatâ(TM)ll back through the wall of any timber frame construction, defeating any lock you can design, just fine.

      Outlier chances will always happen. But itâ(TM)s about risk vs reward.

      In exchange for ten thousand less packages stolen from doorsteps, costing Amazon maybe $1m... one delivery driver is a tool and allows a string of breakins worth tens of thousands (as soon as he realizes, he calls and has the key cancelled, leaving time for one or two homes to get hit and the cops to be dispatched to whichever addresses report its use). Plus, Amazon arenâ(TM)t liable, UPS or whichever company he worked for is liable for his breaking protocol.

      Cost to Amazon $0. Cost to UPS maybe $50,000. Vs $1m cost to Amazon.

    6. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Well a shed would be a LOT more money than a doorbell. And depending on what it looks like, a lot of communities have restrictions against putting up sheds and stuff like that. So I can certainly see the advantage of a doorbell.

      But I'm just not sure who would actually want this. Perhaps if it were for a potentially trusted person, like an apartment complex's doorman (though I'd imagine in a case like that, they'd have a better place to put your package and the doorman can just give it to you as you come back home). I certainly wouldn't want a random delivery driver to have access. And I couldn't imagine the delivery driver would be thrilled with the idea either. If that were my job, the last thing I would want would be access to hundreds of people's houses, because the next time something goes missing, I'm going to be suspect #1.

      The only way it would be at all acceptable for them to have access would be if the system were also setup with cameras where when they ring it, someone at another company would be monitoring on the camera in real time to watch that they only step right inside the door, still in view of the camera, and then leave. But of course, that idea introduces an entirely new aspect that makes it even LESS desirable than the original idea.

    7. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Or a porch bench with an electronic, cryptographically secure lock.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    8. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by taustin · · Score: 1

      It's easier to have stuff shipped to here at work. I don't know of a single coworker who has stuff delivered to their home.

    9. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      Ain't that many sheds (or places for them) in Manhattan.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    10. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Well a shed would be a LOT more money than a doorbell.

      You don't need a shed. Just a metal box on your porch, maybe 50cm cubed. Drill a few holes in the bottom and bolt it to the slab. This is enough to handle 90% of my deliveries. Currently, it has a close-to-lock lid, so it is only good for one delivery per day, A smart-lock that could handle multiple deliveries would be nice.

      I have a motion triggered camera on my porch that records anyone coming or going. I suppose I could still be robbed, but it would be far easier for a thief to go to my neighbor's house instead.

    11. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by taustin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The apartment complex I live in has boxes for package deliveries. They drop the key in your mail box. Not available to Amazon, though.

    12. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Ok. I've read enough to know that this product is a solution to a non-existent problem.

      Now for a real problem. My finger isn't three pixels wide and so it's almost impossible to touch the close bar which reappears after every post back on the mobile Slashdot. Meaning that I then inadvertently register my 'interest' in whichever ad (wider than three pixels) is currently showing. How can I make my finger three pixels wide or alternate solution?

    13. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already been done.

      Milk chutes, coal chutes, houses in my area still have them. A compartment that allows deliveries without owners being present, with at least some modest security.

    14. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by infolation · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the UK (and elsewhere?) Amazon have been installing metal lockers in local supermarkets. The lockers are different sizes to accommodate all packages and are opened with a one-time pin emailed to the parcel recipient.

      So instead of everyone needing their own individual 'shed', 'steel toolbox' etc, they can use Amazon's nearby lockable metal-shed for free.

      This makes a lot more sense to me than 'smart doorbells'.

    15. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So what could possibly go wrong with having the key to unlock dozens of upper-middle class homes in a delivery van whilst the driver grabs lunch?

      Anyone with a screwdriver can break into a house. The reason home burglaries are relatively rare is not that getting in is difficult, but that the risk/reward ratio is unfavorable. Modern homes just don't have that much worth stealing. Used TVs and computers are not worth much. Since everyone has CCs, there is little need to cache cash. Nobody uses real silverware anymore. Meanwhile, cameras, sensors, and alarms are far more common.

    16. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was very young we had a "delivery only" crate we'd put next to the front gate. When we got up in the morning milk would have magically appeared inside! There was a old piece of pipe on our gate that performed similar miracles with newspapers of the dead-tree variety, even a box where mail would be occasionally materialise. Of course none of that would work now...

    17. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesnâ(TM)t have to be a shed, it can be a box. You would have to secure it like a safe and have cameras and surveillance aimed at it and even inside it to take a robber selfie and of course a GPS inside to to defer thieves. If the box is heavy and secured enough, it will deter the small time crooks. I mean if you randomly grab a box like that it will probably not have anything or maybe the thing in it wonâ(TM)t be easy to sell/pawn off. Itâ(TM)s too much work to get a payday for. But itâ(TM)s obviously not going to deter a thief that is super targeting you for a specific package but 90% (yes fuck it I am making up that number) of robbery is opportunistic crime cause someone wants to get high. If you are expecting a super valuable package like a million dollars cash, then maybe you should stay home that day?

    18. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      It would need to be some kind of jam-proof locking mechanism. Even then, the thief could lock the box and return later to retrieve the parcel from the porch.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    19. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is the only real feasible solution to the 'problem', and such ideas are already in various phases of development.

      perhaps evolving into a vestibule or enclosed porch with locking outside (with a 'smart lock') and inside doors, along with a small fridge and freezer for perishable grocery items.

    20. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      "But I suppose that doesn't need an app. Not sexy enough."

      OK then, how about we connect the lock to a IOT device that monitors all the traffic on your home net (and any unprotected wifi servers it can get to), packages up the data, and sends it back to our servers? It also unlocks the box if the delivery guy (or anyone else actually) waves a smart phone at it. You, however have to type a 17 character random one-time code into the device to get your stuff out of the box. Is that sexy enough to get funding?

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    21. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      How the hell much profit is there for Google and Apple in that?

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    22. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

      The postman always rings twice :-)

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    23. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      They do that here in the US also, it's called (unsurprisingly, perhaps) "Amazon Locker". It used to be free but around a year or so ago I think they started charging a fee for using them.

    24. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Couldn't you just use a box and leave an undone padlock?
      The delivery guy puts the package in the box then puts the padlock on.

    25. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      An especially good deal if you're an Amazon Prime member: https://www.amazon.com/U-S-Military-Surplus-Medical-Tools/dp/B00ZAGG0NK

    26. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

      This is a good idea, and the approach is low cost and subscription free.

      --
      .
      Landfill Mining Co.
      Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
    27. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      In Canada you can have them ship it to the nearest post office, which is usually a pharmacy or corner store within walking distance from your house.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    28. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Anyone with a rock can break into a house

      FTFY.

    29. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by mnemotronic · · Score: 2

      That might have worked. I ordered one from Amazon but it got stolen before I got home.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    30. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is astonishing to me, for supposedly smart people, how borderline retarded Amazon prove themselves to be, over and over again. Silicon Valley really needs to stop doing drugs.

    31. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by QRDeNameland · · Score: 1

      But I'm just not sure who would actually want this.

      I wasn't sure who would want an always-on listening device in their home either, but evidently many people enthusiastically embraced the Echo and the like.

      I think the same way about it as you, but don't underestimate the ease with which a disturbingly large portion of the population will happily trade privacy and/or security for convenience.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    32. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

      Costs are passed down through pricing. UPS will price accordingly, and Amazon will pay more. The buyer will, in turn, pay more for the "free" shipping since Amazon isn't going to eat increases longterm.

      --
      .
      Landfill Mining Co.
      Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
    33. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      You could augment with a "kibble dispenser" that's triggered at the same time you send the delivery person a message that "the dog will be distracted for the next 7 minutes or so ... please don't dawdle."

    34. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by ortholattice · · Score: 1

      The apartment complex I live in has boxes for package deliveries. They drop the key in your mail box. Not available to Amazon, though.

      If these are physical keys, then unless they change the box locks frequently, a malicious neighbor could duplicate the key when he has a delivery and over time accumulate the complete set of keys.

    35. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like that idea. I need a padlock and this will save me a few bucks.

    36. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Well a shed would be a LOT more money than a doorbell.

      True, but regarding potential theft, the contents of that shed will be the parcel, while the contents of your house are the contents of your house.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    37. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      You could augment with a "kibble dispenser" that's triggered at the same time you send the delivery person a message that "the dog will be distracted for the next 7 minutes or so ... please don't dawdle."

      I initially thought you'd go in a different direction with "kibble dispenser" involving a tasty treat for the delivery person.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    38. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, good thing there's no such things as cameras.

    39. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      a lot of communities have restrictions

      We have restrictions against that sort of community here where I live.

    40. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      You don't want to spoil the appetite of your attack critter like that.

    41. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The link says it's not eligible for Prime.

      No worry, though. I got a bag full of that sort of tools from the Goodwill about six months ago. They were all used, and some appeared to have sticky residue on them.

      I dumped the whole bag of tools in a jar of fairly concentrated bleach to soak for awhile before rinsing and taking the stuff out.

    42. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      They start out smart and ambitious, but they hive together and don't listen enough to outsiders. Which leads to rapid deterioration. Then after awhile, the most 'successful' of them are promoted to the Sales Department.

    43. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Needs more blockchain.

    44. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by tquasar · · Score: 1

      What if my house is a shed and my horse lives in my house? Where would the hay delivery go?

    45. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ain't that many sheds (or places for them) in Manhattan.

      How about a central delivery building downtown, and for convenience, the managers could order stuff no customer has even ordered yet, and when the customers show up, why they could pick up items that interest them and pay for them right there at the counter. Do I win a Nobel in economics? ; )

    46. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Shed, 10 ton safe, drop box, your choice. The delivery companies simply need to come up with a design they can sell. So a sheet metal box, well insulated, with more than one lockable compartment, say one large one down low and two smaller ones up high. An electronic wireless lock, which the driver logs into and unlocks the door, drops the package in and the door automatically locks again.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    47. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Sweden that is more or less the only way you can get it delivered. Having it delivered to the door is often at a premium and then they still only deliver if someone signs for the delivery, else they just take it back to the distribution hub and you still need to pick it up.

      To be honest it's not that inconvenient. For many the drop of place is the closest store anyways.

    48. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by blindseer · · Score: 1

      What good is a padlock if you don't have the key or combination to open it?

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    49. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by blindseer · · Score: 1

      It would need to be some kind of jam-proof locking mechanism.

      I've seen door locks that use magnets to secure the door. The idea is that the lock has no moving parts and anyone with tools to defeat the magnet (it's a powerful magnet) has tools to destroy the door. A power outage may be a problem but that's either not common enough to matter or managed with whatever backup electricity you'd want to have anyway for the security system. A thief capable of inducing a power outage to defeat the locks and the cameras is capable of doing anything they please, you can only do so much.

      Even then, the thief could lock the box and return later to retrieve the parcel from the porch.

      Just instruct the driver to not leave the package in an unsecured area. Also, a thief with enough foreknowledge to lock the box and come back later to pick it up before the homeowner can retrieve it could pull some other stunts just as easily. Just be in the front yard trimming bushes, raking leaves, washing windows, or whatever else a homeowner might reasonably do outside while waiting for a package. When the package comes the thief can greet the driver pretending to be the homeowner, or the homeowner's son/daughter/groundskeeper/whatever, and convince the driver to hand the package over instead of putting it in the lock box. If there's no camera to catch the thief messing with the lock box or picking up the package then what's to keep them from being so bold as to simply wait for the delivery?

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    50. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, delivery to the door comes at a premium and even if you're home, they just drop a note in your mailbox saying you weren't home and to drive 200 km top the nearest UPS Depot...

    51. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Kopp · · Score: 1

      Same in France. If it doesn't fit in the mailbox and no one is there to fetch it / sign, it goes back to delevery hub, or any place that concentrates packages, depending on the company. You can also get it directly to be picked up in the hub without the delay of trying to get you to your door. But leaving things on the doorstep ? noway !

    52. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You leave it unlocked, they put in the package and lock it.

    53. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      "Delivery boxes" like that are not uncommon in Japan. Panasonic make them, among others. You can get ones with a camera built in so you can see the person putting stuff in there and the contents.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    54. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I get most stuff delivered to my workplace. They handle their own mail anyway...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    55. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Nor Taipei. The Taiwan solution is that convenience stores will collect the package and you can pick it up from there.

      Actually people are trying this in the UK - basically supermarkets have a bunch of lockers which you can get stuff delivered to and pick it up.

      In both cases it's an end run around the postal service - in Taipei the convenience stores run their own delivery service and in the UK it's an Amazon thing

      https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/he...

      The Taipei one is interesting because rather than have people buy stuff mail order and skip visiting the store, the store actually gets a piece of the online delivery action by low balling the delivery price and piggy backing the service on the service they have to run anyway to deliver food to the convenience stores.

      In the UK Amazon are in the odd situation of having to convince supermarkets to host the lockers for Amazon deliveries, even though the supermarkets see Amazon trying to compete them out of business.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    56. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by chihowa · · Score: 1

      I used to do that for everything, but Amazon Logistics can't seem to find the loading dock (right next to the front door and typically adorned with UPS or FedEx trucks) and sends everything back complaining that the "address doesn't exist". I've seen the drivers wandering around in the lobby, not bothering to actually talk to anybody, then shrugging and leaving with the package.

      Leaving the package at home is fine as long as it's not easily seen from the road. Package thefts are crimes of opportunity and don't typically involve approaching each house to look for packages.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    57. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USPS mailboxes. We live in a newer suburb where instead of each house having a front lawn mailbox, we have a community mailbox (similar to what's in an apartment complex) located every few blocks. It's far more efficient for USPS as it requires fewer stops for pickup and deliveries; that, and I personally don't mind the walk. Anyways, yes, we too have those temporary mailboxes for larger packages where a key i used. I think for our block there's four large temporary mailboxes available. Doesn't matter which one USPS uses as the number is printed on the key left in your mailbox. Once used, that key is stuck in the keyhole that can only be released by a USPS driver. The system works really well.

      I'd imagine that as deliveries become more common, another community mailbox will be built along side it that's used for nothing but larger package deliveries. Essentially just an expansion of what we already have in place. It's a low-tech system, but works really really well.

    58. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Upper-middle class? This is clearly for the lower class who all have to go to work w/nobody home all day

    59. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the most stomach-turning comment of the day!

      A bleach solution won't necessarily dissolve the residue, but may sterilize and crustify the outer layer of it. You'd need physical scrubbing or at least sonication to remove it. The mere idea of owning and using previously used and obviously soiled medical tools of unknown history from Goodwill is bordering on nightmare fuel.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    60. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what could possibly go wrong with having the key to unlock dozens of upper-middle class homes in a delivery van whilst the driver grabs lunch?

      You mean besides the delivery truck with the words "State Prison Work Release Detail" emblazoned on the doors?

    61. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      In my neighborhood, it's always when they see the truck and watch where the drop offs are. The porch theft is within minutes of drop off.

      It's only about once every eight months though.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    62. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean consumers will reap the savings?

      950,000 is saved in the scenario described.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    63. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Striikerr · · Score: 1

      How about putting a small "DELIVERY-ONLY" shed on your house, and the doorbell can only unlock the delivery shed (After scanning the package for that address)

      Why do people need to make changes to their houses? If this is such a big problem for Amazon, they can open up physical stores for item pickups (they are already rolling this out in a limited way). Of course, this then nullifies the convenience factor and would see people returning to their local stores instead. Sorry Amazon, the price of your market gains is that your deliveries will get stolen now and then. No way should people need to add a shed or allow strangers to walk into their houses to accommodate Amazon.

    64. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by BessBeysanmak · · Score: 0

      votre article est magnifique. Merci de visite notre article via ce lien fabrication-de-hourdis

    65. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      A screwdriver? What kind of windows does your house have?? I don't think any for the last 50 years have been so badly built as to have the screws on the outside! Ditto the doors.

      But as another poster says, you can hurl a rock through the window but that would probably be heard and someone would call the police before you could even clear the glass and get in.

      "Nobody uses real silverware anymore"

      You might not have any, plenty do. And to a drug addict even a fiver for some electronic gadget down the pub is better than nothing.

    66. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      in the bay area, the lockers are pretty common. at 7-11 stores and supermarkets.

      a benefit: if you deliver to a locker and change your mind, after 3 days they pick up the unclaimed item and refund you, you pay nothing, not shipping to or from (if you have Prime). for things I'm not sure about, I might order and have it locker-delivered and I have 3 days to decide if I really want that thing or not.

      at my apt. complex, they also have lockers and will email you a code for opening the locker. problem is, its new to delivery people and many of them are lazy or in too much of a hurry and simply give the pkgs to the receptionist and they have their own mailroom, which closes at 6pm (nice; I work till 7pm most nites, so I can't get my stuff if it goes into the mailroom). if the delivery guy DOES do his job and uses the locker, I can get to it 7x24.

      lockers are the answer. not keys to someone's house!! damn. why that idea even got more than 2 minutes of time, that's beyond me! there's zero way to make it safe to give drivers access to your HOUSE interior. wow, just wow.

      amazon can't be serious. but they are probably looking for our responses to see if there are ideas WE have that they have not thought of. I can't believe any company would think its good to give strangers access to your home!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    67. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A large flathead screwdriver is used as a prybar and is much easier to conceal. It can also be used as a hammer when you are bump keying the deadbolt.

    68. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

      I'll admit that I was commenting in the moment more on the larger topic and less so specifically to what you had written. I apologize for this. With that said, I believe consumers don't ever reap savings. The C-Suite and shareholders simply take more. Even if prices do drop, the consumer is getting less to support the lower price. Even if the widget or service remains the same and the profit margin changes instead, it is the workers along the way that suffer eventually to support the lower pricing. Ultimately, the consumer still hurts.

      Now, let's look at this differently. Consider how little time it takes to drop a package on my front porch with little more than a ring of the doorbell or knock on the door before the delivery person runs back to the truck for the next stop. UPS and FedEx will charge the shipper more if they become subject to a process that requires them to place the package in a lock box if it takes more time.

      --
      .
      Landfill Mining Co.
      Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
    69. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by MyrddinBach · · Score: 1

      Many apartment buildings have this and I suppose some neighbor duplicating keys could be an issue.

      That also makes me wonder though about those keys that say "Do not duplicate" on them and those machines I've seen in stores that let's you make duplicate keys with no interaction of a person - do these machines have some way of detecting that a key is not supposed to be duplicated?

    70. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by fredzouille · · Score: 1

      In France there are Amazon Lockers as well and while useful, you don't necessarily live near one and/or want to do the extra distance after work to get your package. Having these lockers next to your home or block would be useful, I would be glad to have one.

    71. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by fredzouille · · Score: 1

      Giving access to your house doesn't look lire a good idea but having something that replaces (or sits next to) your mailbox and that is secure looks like a good idea to me.

    72. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our UPS, FedEx, and USPS delivery folks all have access to our garage, basement, house. They could easily steal everything out of the garage and basement if they really wanted to. It's up to them if they want to try to steal out of the house, since there's 3 large dogs behind the door. Amazingly, they just choose to be honorable folk, and leave our packages in the garage without taking anything of ours. The UPS guys almost always leaves biscuits for the dogs as well.

      God I'm glad I live around decent folk.

    73. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also super easy to pick the sorts of locks that go on most people's exterior doors, even without specialized tools. A couple of bobby pins can often do the trick. That's not just a hollywood thing.

    74. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly, what stops the automatic unattended "copy your keys here!" machines from copying "Do Not Duplicate" keys is that the machines don't have the right kind of blanks for those keys. If you put one of those DND keys side-by-side with, say, your typical house or bike-lock key, you'll see that the DND key will be physically different in some way -- length, number and placement of side ridges, etc.

    75. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, it will undoubtedly be an IoT device accessible (for control and administration by the owner) though a smartphone.

      At this point, the record of security on IoT devices is so bad, we can already guess the password. That password is: 12345

      Sent in plain text. To a device website discoverable by an 8 year old with a cheapo Android tablet. In India. Full Admin privileges granted automatically to all logins. Anonymous logins included!

      Now let the criminal element have at it!

    76. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, a key machine won't detect a Do Not Duplicate message. There's also no legal precedent giving it any sort of standing. It's solely a message to the locksmith, to be handled as they see fit--though industry practice is not to duplicate without a signed letter from the company or entity owning said keys and/or a card from the manufacturer.

    77. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I think consumers reap savings in generic goods.

      Things like Shipping, groceries, etc.

      The most obvious example of this is tech, as manufacturing got cheaper (both from tech and worker abuse) prices did indeed drop for generic tech.

      A company like Walmart or Amazon with very low margin is definitely passing on savings (I'm not making a moral judgement that either of these are good companies or it's the greater good, simply that they seem to aggressivenely cut costs, and do seem to pass that on to the consumer).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    78. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a garden storage bench on my porch and a note to leave items in the bench - it usually works but sometimes I still come home to find items in front of my door or in front of the bench - the problem is that amazon and usps read the note but ups, fedex, dhl, etc are inconsistent with doing it. I wouldn't want someone to have access to the house because I am sure that I am not the only one with indoor cats that we can't let out -

    79. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      He didn't say he actually used the tools afterwards. What do you think ebay and craigslist are for anyway?

    80. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      A prybar might work if the windows are made of wood maybe. Mine are made of uPVC covered steel.

    81. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Don't do a shed, do an entryway/enclosed porch. Set it up so you absolutely need either a key or somebody inside to let you into the house proper; if you want, you can even have it so you can give somebody a key that'll only let them into the porch area while your key will let you get both the porch and house doors' locks.

    82. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      A prybar will still work. You learn a lot of interesting things when you've had a neighbor who isn't too bright even when sober try to get into his home while drunk because he cannot find his key--even when it's rather obviously on him However, what he lacked in brains he made up for in creativity...

    83. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We actually the remains of an old drop box on our house. It's been bricked in on the inside but if you made it a bit bigger and threw a lock on it then it'd work pretty well for the package problem. The tricky part is making it big enough for 99% of packages and yet small enough that it doesn't cut too much into your living space. Also installation costs. There's plenty of room for experimentation though!

    84. Re:What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Echo and the like aren't human, they are computers, in principle at least, there is no-one monitoring what you say to them.

      This idea on the other hand involves human delivery persons having physical access to your house.

      These two ideas are quite different.

    85. Re: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?! by Kopp · · Score: 1

      We have multiple depots (partner stores, small shops, gas stations, newspapers stands, etc) so usually, unless you're in the middle of nowhere, you have a place to pick it up quite close

  2. I will never be on board with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just don't need that level of convenience in exchange for having strangers in my home. It creeps me out more than a little. Maybe there is a market for this, but nobody I've talked to would even consider it.

    1. Re:I will never be on board with this by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      A few years ago, my then-neighbors were selling their house. As part of the process, the realtor set up a weekend open house where people could swing by, walk through the house, ask questions, etc.

      A week after the open house, the neighbors went away for a few days. At one point during their trip, my wife noticed a pickup parked behind their house. She thought that was odd, so she walked over to ask them what was going on. The guys said they were hired by $family's_name to do some work... but two minutes after she came back, they were peeling down the road at high speed with some of our neighbor's stuff. Fortunately she spooked them or they would've gotten away with more loot.

      Again fortunately, these guys were pretty stupid and eventually got caught trying to sell some items which had some sort of registration number the neighbors had provided to the police. Turns out one of them had been to the open house, and this was a common way for them to scope out homes for later robbery.

      Yeah, I'm gonna let some random delivery guy into my house.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:I will never be on board with this by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Nothing like a "backdoor" way into a "locked" house. Next thing you know, the government will want a "key" to open all doors, because... terrorists! And then that key will be locked away just as securely as all the OPM data...

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    3. Re:I will never be on board with this by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      After I read about the Vault 7 stuff from wikileaks, I'm not even for automation of my home any more. Whats to stop the government (or for that matter criminals using government leaked tools) from getting Alexa to unlock the front door for them and deactivate the house alarm and turn off the surveillance?

    4. Re:I will never be on board with this by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Umm, home automation is fine, but you shouldn't be relying on porous security like that offered by Alexa, Google, Siri, etc. They're all effectively backdoors into your home. If that means that there's no way to turn on your AC from the office, well, there's no way for anyone else to either.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  3. news at 10 by starblazer · · Score: 2

    Amazon drivers pilfer customers homes while delivering.

    1. Re:news at 10 by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Even worse: criminals find security hole in system and rob hundreds of homes.

    2. Re: news at 10 by nick_davison · · Score: 0

      System reports the door being open for longer than sixty seconds, dispatches cops.

      Good luck to the delivery driver, assigned a key that logs their entry, trying to pretend they werenâ(TM)t there.

      Knowing theyâ(TM)re definitely getting caught will deter all but the biggest morons.

      And, yes, if you want this, install a NestCam or equivalent looking at the door to record anyone lifting anything or lingering.

    3. Re:news at 10 by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Amazon drivers pilfer customers homes while delivering.

      Those are the dumb crooks. The smart crooks slip a hundred bucks cash to a delivery driver in exchange for "accidentally" not quite closing certain doors.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re: news at 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nobody would notice, provided the Amazon driver leaves more crap than he takes.

    5. Re:news at 10 by mark-t · · Score: 0

      Well then, at least you know who did it.... it makes filing that police report a whole lot easier.

      It would be in amazon's interest to require constant gps tracking for all such drivers and a requirement that they stream a video recording directly to Amazon (which is retained by Amazon for a period for reference) on a wearable camera whenever they get out of their vehicle. If the driver steals something, there will be video proof of on Amazon's servers. If the driver's camera isn't on at the time they should be delivering the product (which can be verified based on gps info and the time that they were there), then that's incriminating for them as well.

    6. Re:news at 10 by mnemotronic · · Score: 0

      Amazon driver tries to rob someone who is home watching "House of Cards" and doesn't want to get up and answer the effing doorbell. Amazon driver gets shot. Nancy Pelosi proposes strict firearms proficiency and mental tests for Amazon Prime members who own recliners or watch Kevin Spacey shows. NRA decries criminalization of Lay-Z-Boys. Paul Ryan vows to revive the effort to unwind Obamacare. Trump tweets "House of Cards swamp rules! #Robin Wright! Grabbed her pussy at golf tournament! Cove fifi to Puer-to-ri-co".

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    7. Re:news at 10 by mark-t · · Score: 1

      That would make the driver an accomplice to the crime... and you'd even know exactly who to press charges against.

    8. Re:news at 10 by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      and will they pay for that after CA says they are employees and amazon needs to pay there cell phone bill + full min + mileage?

    9. Re:news at 10 by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      It could (potentially) be harder to prove, though. The timing of deliveries wouldn't allow somebody to do much more than steal obviously visible property, but a later return by somebody else would allow for much more significant theft, and the fact that the driver couldn't possibly have done it in the time available would lend plausible deniability, at least until they catch the people who actually committed the thefts.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    10. Re:news at 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The smart crooks slip a hundred bucks cash to a delivery driver in exchange for "accidentally" not quite closing certain doors.

      That is amateurish and easy to get the delivery guy caught. The pros (as I've seen on the Discovery channel) do it like this: the delivery guy sells the information about which house has the best loot. The crooks that have the info break into the house sometime during the year and steal stuff. The informer/delivery guy gets a 10% cut from selling the stolen property and it would be hard for the homeowner to figure out which delivery guy was responsible since there could be months between when the delivery guy visited the house and when the robbery takes place.

    11. Re:news at 10 by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      They prefer to label it as "creating new buying opportunities"

    12. Re: news at 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea. Call the cops if the driver has the temerity to prop the door open while they wrestle your new dishwasher inside!

      That'll show 'em!

    13. Re:news at 10 by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Especially since delivery drivers are tracked and timed--so the driver's very likely to get caught if they do it themselves. If they just forget or 'forget' to close the place up right? That won't show up on the logs anywhere near as well.

  4. Volvo did that some time ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Volvo did the in car delivery some time ago with one of the food delivery companies (mat.se I think. Works like Amazon Prime Now). It is available as a feature of Volvo On Call. They introduced in Sweden in 2015. I wonder how many people use it. There is an example to learn from.

  5. Already There by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I needed a car towing about a hundred miles back home. Most tow drivers need you to ride with them so you can receive your keys back at the destination. I needed to remain where the car had broken down and a two hour tow plus a slow and expensive Uber back would have sucked.

    Because of home automation, I was able to send the driver with my keys, watch him pull up and unload my car, then open the door for him to drop the keys inside, watching him the whole time, before locking the door behind him.

    I was out five minutes of my time vs four hours.

    Yes, âoeIOT security!â Lots of panic. Systems are exploitable. You could get robbed.

    But no matter how secure the locks on a house, a thief can go through the windows. Put bars on the windows and a thief can drive a stolen truck clean through your wall.

    Someone determined enough is going to get in. But theft deterrent is always about making your neighbor a more appealing target and you not worth the hassle.

    IOT locks donâ(TM)t change that by any perceptible amount. There will always be edge case hacks but few and far between, not the norm. Plus I have multiple other layers of security so the door is only one small part.

    In exchange, I got four hours of my life back that time and have a bunch of other similar stories of the convenience that more than outweighs the very slight additional risk.

    1. Re:Already There by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Most tow drivers take the car to the body shop and leave the keys there. I did this recently with my Porsche. Not a big deal. Your story seems contrived.

    2. Re:Already There by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just have the tow truck driver drop the keys in your trunk...

      If someone sees him, what are they going to do? steal your car???

    3. Re:Already There by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um, in my world I'd have just said "when you get to my house, push the keys through the mail slot".

      No internet required.
      Total cost of equipment maybe $10 for the mail slot in the door.

      Seriously man, why overcomplicate things?

      --
      -Styopa
    4. Re:Already There by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      It's one thing when they kick in your door or smash a window to get in . . . . .
      But when you invite them in willingly, it's a different story.

      They're not going to do anything obvious while you have remote eyeballs on them. If they are of questionable character, however, they most certainly are going to be taking mental notes of what gear you have, the layout of the house, indications of pets or a spouse and what obvious security mechanisms you have in place.

      They will then pass that info on to their buddies to come back another time.

      Turn into the bad guy for a moment and think about how you would use such an opportunity to exploit later on.

    5. Re:Already There by Gussington · · Score: 2

      I needed a car towing about a hundred miles back home. Most tow drivers need you to ride with them so you can receive your keys back at the destination.

      What?
      Keys go with car. If that's a mechanic then you collect when the car is fixed, if that's home then leave the window slightly open and drop them in the car (or letterbox, or in meter box, or under a shrub, or rock, or...). This is a non-problem.

      Yes, âoeIOT security!â Lots of panic. Systems are exploitable. You could get robbed.

      Not panic, just sharing the opinion that the risks are far more than any reward, therefore the idea is stupid.

      In exchange, I got four hours of my life back that time and have a bunch of other similar stories of the convenience that more than outweighs the very slight additional risk.

      Again this is a non-problem. I get packages dropped off on my front porch no issue. My local supermarket also offers a collection service (get stuff delivered there, I pick up on next visit).
      IOT is mostly solutions to non-problems. No panic, just a dumb gimmick.

    6. Re:Already There by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Seriously man, why overcomplicate things?

      Because adding complexity means justifying buying toys.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    7. Re:Already There by gregsv · · Score: 2

      Or even, "Lock the keys in the car when you drop it, and when I get there I'll grab the second set from where I keep it to unlock." Total cost $0.

  6. Anybody willing to break the shed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Would be willing to break into the house as well.

    The current package scam is mostly because it is quick and easy to walk up to a house, nab a newly dropped and unattended package, and get away without anyone being the wiser.

    1. Re: Anybody willing to break the shed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wht about a small box, on which is printed the house number?

    2. Re: Anybody willing to break the shed... by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Crazy talk.

    3. Re: Anybody willing to break the shed... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      We live out in the country (only a few miles from town) and we have one of those huge rural mailboxes. Almost anything we order fits into it. Not that it matters. I have had an unlocked bike sitting out on the back porch since it was brand new and nobody has touched it.

      It's nice out here.

    4. Re: Anybody willing to break the shed... by walterhpdx · · Score: 2

      We live out in the sticks in Oregon. Nearest neighbors are around 2 city blocks away. We left for the day once with the front door wide open - didn’t have a single problem. Same with packages that show up on Monday morning, when the hubby and I have left for the week, and they’re right there when we get back. I freaking love being out away from humans, though the proximity to coyotes and skunks can be maddening sometimes.

    5. Re:Anybody willing to break the shed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Typical geek Internet logic.

      Consider another point of view for a moment: unoccupied, infrequently checked box, versus unknown sleeping and cooking zone that may have armed owners and backup of the canine variety.

    6. Re: Anybody willing to break the shed... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Wht about a small box, on which is printed the house number?

      Except that it's illegal for anyone but USPS to use that particular box. Also not all of them are locked (or large enough) for packages. In the relatively new neighborhood I live in, all of those boxes are together down the street, and there are a few package boxes large enough for many things (if they weren't massively overpacked, as many are). But only USPS can use them.

      At my house I have often considered just a large metal box, with cameras. The trouble is a keying system, and how to get drivers to use it. I would not let anyone into my house, but I would give them a box that they can put stuff in, and have cameras over/in the box to at least see who is using it and photograph what was placed in and taken out.

    7. Re: Anybody willing to break the shed... by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      actually I thought it was only the ones marked US Mail that are illegal to be used by other carriers.

    8. Re: Anybody willing to break the shed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Walter" has a hubby?

    9. Re: Anybody willing to break the shed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, a time traveler from 1955!

      Many things are possible nowadays.

  7. WTF by war4peace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about "not leaving the parcel wherever the fuck the delivery dude feels like"?
    Before delivery, contact the recipient and establish a time window when they (or someone they empower) are home. Then go and deliver the parcel during that window.
    Owner's not home? Coolio. Notify them through text or whatever and have them go to the local pick-up warehouse.

    Somehow this method works very well in most of EU. In my country, the delivery company has to provide proof they delivered the parcel into my hands, otherwise I could file a claim and they would have to pay for the declared value of the parcel. I'm simply amazed this is not a thing in the USA.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    1. Re:WTF by JeffOwl · · Score: 1

      I much prefer to not have to go somewhere out of my way to pick up a package. I'd rather just go straight home from work. Why make me go somewhere to get it when the package was literally already AT MY HOUSE?

    2. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want the package left on your doorstep, then that's YOUR CHOICE.

      I support you having to ability to make your own choice.

      However, MY CHOICE, is that MY packages are not left on my doorstep, and I expect you to fucking support my choice in the same way I respect yours.

      It's great for you that the "default" choice is the thing you happen to want in this, and accept that other people might not want the same things you want, you privileged cunt.

    3. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason it didn't catch on is that it's a stupid idea. The entire point of delivery is that I DON'T have to go pick it up. I get pissed as hell when a sig required package gets missed. That forces you to go to the warehouse that has the dumbest hours on earth and if you don't get it in about 3 days they return to sender. It's bullshit.

    4. Re:WTF by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Notify them through text or whatever and have them go to the local pick-up warehouse.

      Welcome to the United States, where the local pick-up center is an hour drive away.

    5. Re:WTF by denbesten · · Score: 1

      For expensive deliveries, I just ask the shipper (e.g. amazon) to ship to my office instead of home and then add a delivery notification so that I know when to head up to reception and thank them for helping out. Total added cost is a few smiles and maybe a cookie every once in a while.

      For routine deliveries, FedEX, UPS and USPS all have the ability to leave them with standing instructions, such as "leave on side porch", "leave with neighbor", "I'll pick up from your office", etc., FedEx and UPS will also do scheduled-time deliveries and will even redirect to a different address, although these are extra-cost services.

    6. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EU huh? So your country is probably the size of some counties or small states in the US. There are towns with nothing around for hundreds of miles in the US that still receive packages daily. It becomes pretty expensive to service all of that with your derp-y rules.

    7. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finland, a big town for it, I can choose most packages are delivered to the cornerstore 200 metres away. I get a text message when it's there. Isn't it wonderful?

      (Word: dramas)

    8. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Signed package delivery. It can be optional, and typically mandatory by the sender where the cost is high and/or needs to be insured. But if I by a twelve pack of toothpaste from Amazon of whatever, I don't think anyone really gives a fuck if it's left with a neighbor or behind a bush in front of the house.

    9. Re:WTF by war4peace · · Score: 1

      It's irrelevant.
      A town with nothing around for hundreds of miles should have a local parcel center, even if it's a small room with shared purpose, like "local bar backroom". For only 2 dollars extra, pick this option and there you go, problem solved.

      - If you live in a densely populated area, local pick-up centers should be no problem.
      - Small town? Arrange with the local bar/church/school/mayor's office to share a room and an employee and take care of that.
      - Living in a farm out in the middle of nowhere? Build a shack and have the deliverer drop the parcel there, it's not as if there's 10 people an hour passing by, ready to steal your parcel.

      Seriously, why are we even debating this? Solutions always exist.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    10. Re:WTF by war4peace · · Score: 1

      So? If you weren't there during the agreed pick-up period, be ready to drive for an hour. Maybe next time you'd fulfill your part of the agreement :)

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    11. Re:WTF by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Because you AGREED with the delivery person on a date and time and you weren't there.
      Or have it delivered at a neighbor, at work, etc.
      Or even have it thrown on your lawn and support possible consequences.
      Your choice :)

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    12. Re:WTF by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Amazingly, that "bullshit" works in the EU very well. I wonder why.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    13. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is certainly a thing in the USA, but a very inconvenient thing. I have had packages that just never got delivered because they could not get my signature after several attempts. If we were to work out an exact time for delivery, then I could be there to sign and all would be right with the world, except that I would expect to pay quite a premium for a delivery service that was going to delivery my package at an exact time.

    14. Re:WTF by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      There is no agreed drop-off period. Unless you want to count "we think it will arrive sometime that day" as such an agreement. I think you'll find few people can take an entire day off to wait for a package that still may not arrive.

    15. Re:WTF by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Well that's your problem, then. Here where I live they usually give you a window of 2h.
      First they text you telling you that tomorrow between, say, 10:00 AM and noon they will deliver your parcel. Then, about 30 minutes before, the delivery guy calls you to see whether you're home. If you're not and nobody else is, they ask you if you're within reasonable distance, and if so, you agree to meet somewhere. If that's not possible either, they can delay by a day, up to three times, at which point they tell you to go to their local delivery warehouse, where the parcel is waiting for you to pick up for a week.
      Heavy competition helps, I think we have over 15 different delivery companies in my country's Capital, and at least 3 or 4 in every town over 20K people. There are various services available, such as 3rd party delivery spots or 2h delivery service for select products (that's 24/7, by the way). If I want to buy a PC monitor right now (2:34 AM local time), for 10 dollars extra I could have it delivered to my door by 4:30 AM (but usually within the hour). Yes I used it once just for kicks :)

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    16. Re:WTF by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      UPS refused to deliver to my legal postal address at my last apartment and, for a very long time, did not default to dropping it off at the management office. They would, unless instructed otherwise, keep putting it on the truck, and did not have the brains to take advantage of the local UPS store being pretty much the last stop of the day to drop it off. (This seems to have changed recently but been typically unreliable.) It took several days to get them to cough up a package, and camping out in front of the shipping center's one findable non-employee door too.

      Sometimes I do wonder if they eventually realized that perhaps they ought to put a sign on the office, because people do go to drop off packages there...

    17. Re:WTF by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      I suspect heavy competition is a very significant driver of that--in the US, you've got three major options, DHL being a fourth but marginal in many ways, and various courier options. Odds are your delivery warehouses also have decent signage on where you go to pick stuff up and drop it off, and if they've got in-town offices that can be used for such, they keep good hours. (FedEx does a decent job--you can even find 24/7 locations--but UPS and USPS sometimes don't even manage to be open long enough so somebody with a 9-5 job can stop by.)

    18. Re:WTF by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I admit I never had to go to a delivery office, unless you count the one time when I knew I would spend a lot of time at work (it was a work-heavy period) and chose a pick-up office nearby. It was a 5-minute walk away from my office and it was open 7-11. There was no extra charge, though, I guess the online store had a flat-fee contract with them or something.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  8. Liability by pubwvj · · Score: 3, Funny

    Amazon, of course, is up to date with its liability insurance premiums...

  9. my house? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazon Is Reportedly Building a Doorbell That Lets Drivers Into Your House

    I assure you they are not.

    Captcha: bugger.

  10. FUCK this STUPIDITY!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fucking delivery driver can fucking well deliver the package into my hands and fucking well watch me sign for it! No signature or not MY signature, and its considered stolen and shipping company pays within 5 days!

    Shove ALL of your stupid fucking IoT shit up your ASS!!

    1. Re:FUCK this STUPIDITY!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint: you aren't the center of the goddamned universe and do not deserve special treatment.

    2. Re:FUCK this STUPIDITY!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fucking delivery driver can fucking well deliver the package into my hands

      How can he do that while you're at work and he's at your residence? What Amazon is saying, since you have already given up so much of your privacy with your smartphones, driverless cars, Facebook and FaceIDs etc., why not give up some more by allowing strangers to walk into you house?

  11. Yeah, nah. by YukariHirai · · Score: 1

    I have never had a problem with people nicking the packages left on my doorstep. And even if I did, I wouldn't feel any better about giving some complete stranger the ability to enter my home completely unsupervised. What I do get is them just leaving a note for me to collect it from the post office whose opening hours are utterly incompatible with times I can get there, but that's not enough to make me willing to just let the driver into my house unattended either.

    Either way, my preferred solution is to get packages delivered to my workplace. There's always someone there to receive deliveries and packages get put aside somewhere secure enough.

  12. A liability nightmare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't let anyone in my home unattended. I just see a whole bunch of liability Amazon is exposing itself too.

  13. Better Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if we have local buildings that stock things. We can enter these, get what we want, and pay cash? Oh... I guess brick-and-mortar has already been invented.

    1. Re:Better Idea by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. Perhaps delivery without receiver present isn't for everyone. These people can just go get the widget like people have done for centuries, have someone at home to or a trusted neighbor handle the delivery, or ship to alternate locations. The hassle of stolen packages will be replaced by burglaries once this device goes on the door. An entered home is a cased home. It doesn't have to be the courier. Bob, the honest and upstanding UPS guy, might just run his mouth about all the shit he sees on Happy Lane and do so around his shady nephew.

      --
      .
      Landfill Mining Co.
      Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
    2. Re:Better Idea by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I don't live in Shenzhen to get the kind of electronic parts and stuff that I order online. The Radio Shack closed, and didn't have much in the first place. Brick and mortar are out for me.

  14. Why does this service exist? by freeze128 · · Score: 0

    Tell me, who is *SO* busy that they can't wait until the end of the work day to go home to get their package, or to stop off at the post office to pick it up? Would this terribly busy person be willing to sacrifice their home security just so they can get their latest Amazon delivery right fucking now? Jeez!

    1. Re:Why does this service exist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      or to stop off at the post office to pick it up?

      LOL, have you ever missed picking up a package at home? If so, it goes to the pickup warehouse, which is usually tens of miles from any residence. It would be nice if UPS/Fedex dropped off packages at the post office or some nearby grocery store, but they usually don't.

    2. Re:Why does this service exist? by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Where I am in the US? Depends on the shipper.

      If it was sent by UPS: The warehouse does not, in fact, have a sign of where you ought to go until you get really close to it & their pick-up points tend to keep hours where the answer is "Anybody working a 9-5 job." Also, if you're going to be picking it up at the warehouse, there is a chance that you will get there only to discover that it's been loaded onto a truck despite explicit instructions that you would be picking it up, and the pickup/dropoff office just plain doesn't open until all the trucks are out for the day so don't expect to be able to get your package today.

      If it is being delivered by USPS? Not much difference from UPS except there's no warehouse-haunting option and the post offices that keep the hours the UPS Stores do are considered to have extended hours.

      FedEx is the only one which actually considers the person who is receiving the package as being a customer--they're the ones I can find 24/7 locations for. I've also repeatedly had them make sure that I can get my package (at least when it's one sent express) the same day even if I've got to go to their office to snag it, which is open late enough that somebody who is working office hours actually can get there before they close and it will reliably be there. (UPS makes you wait an extra day unless you are very lucky and are hanging out at the place--basically, you better hope that your package was on the truck that also does the last pickup for that store if it's something you have to have that day.)

  15. Well by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    What could possibly go wrong?

  16. Takes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Web retailers are dealing with products getting damaged by bad weather "

    I've got a house with an overhang porch covering both front entrances. Where does Fedex always put the boxes? Next to the garage doors with no overhang or protection whatsoever. UPS also put sit there roughly 10% of the time as well. USPS, for me, always delivers packages under some cover from the weather.

    The distance from the garage door to the clearly visible front doors is about 25 yards. Meaning, some drivers will simply pick the easiest and fastest method available to them, not what is best for the customer, or who hired them or their employer. So even if there is trunk or house access, some drivers will simply place it where they always have, because the better protection takes too long. Getting a key to drop, unlock code, or whatever to unlock a trunk or door simply takes too long when your job performance hinges on how many deliveries you can do during your shift.

  17. legal mind field by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and that just with renting a car par with lots liability issues.

    The Into Your House part as well.

    And this can make it easier for delivery drivers to steal stuff / fake deliver just open door and don't put package in.

    At least with UPS and USPS they do background checks don't hide under an network of 1099 subcontractors

  18. Dupe story, so dupe comment by Calydor · · Score: 2

    As I said a few weeks ago:

    What about pets? Will they make sure to keep the door closed so the cat or dog doesn't bolt? Will they refuse to enter the house if there are pets?

    What about grabbing something small in the fridge or elsewhere in the house? Does everyone have 360 degree surveillance in every room of their house now?

    What about disputing the purchase if you don't get the things you bought? Something missing, wrong items etc.?

    What about delivery guys taking pictures with their phones while they're in your house to, off the top of my head, either shame you on the net for old appliances, dirty dishes in the sink etc., or maybe to plan a future burglary now that they have ACCESS TO YOUR HOUSE to look around?

    What about just doing your grocery shopping yourself? Is the world really so stressed now we can't do that?

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    1. Re:Dupe story, so dupe comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about states with castle doctrine? What driver would dare enter a house to be shot at if the resident was not expecting them?

    2. Re:Dupe story, so dupe comment by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Not to mention some of the other disgusting things that a person could do if they are alone in another person's house. Especially if it's a guy delivering something to a house a woman lives in.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    3. Re:Dupe story, so dupe comment by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the poor delivery driver having to come into my house when I'm.. well..

  19. Why not have an external delivery room? by DatbeDank · · Score: 2

    I'm not going to let strangers into my home. X1000 I will never let a delivery person into my home when I am not present.

    I can, however, grant permission for them to drop stuff off in a small outdoor closet that can be securely opened by the delivery man. Whether I decide to build such an addition and not fill it with junk in storage is left to be seen!

    Had a very expensive clock stolen off of my porch once. I can only imagine all of the little items that would start to go missing if I let delivery people into my home when I'm not there.

    1. Re:Why not have an external delivery room? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Had a very expensive clock stolen off of my porch once

      It was just a matter of time.

  20. Don't worry by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

    All those Echo Shows will keep an eye on the deliverymen.

  21. Let's all say it together! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not in my house!

  22. Yeah that ain't gonna happen by Snotnose · · Score: 2

    Leave the package by the door,. let my cam catch any porch pirates. Let some Amazon drone into my house? Oh hell no. Not gonna happen.

    1. Re:Yeah that ain't gonna happen by Deep+Esophagus · · Score: 1

      First an always-on, internet connected camera pointed at your bed. Now a method to allow random strangers to enter your home. Amazon, we see what you're doing. And we don't like it.

  23. a typical lame idea from the privileged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just because people have the job, doesn't mean they deserve it

    corporations are corrupt and full of incompetent but well connected upper class twits

    it's called the peter principle, oh, that and, of course, the usual patronism, nepotism and cronyism

  24. Garage by Dr.Who · · Score: 1

    Many residences have garages with automatic doors. For a small incremental cost, one can install a remote control with keypad that accepts a code to open the garage door. A delivery person could be asked to place the package in a marked cardboard box in the garage and close the door.

  25. Delivery box by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2

    As I commented the last time this daft idea came up the simple solution is to have a secure delivery box. The one time key opens the box only and this way you are only risking the contents of the box - which unless you have multiple deliveries will be nothing - and not the entire contents of your house.

    Nobody in their right mind is going to let some random stranger they have never met before into their house while they are away and it will cause huge problems for Amazon because if anyone notices something missing after a delivery Amazon's delivery person will get the blame even if the missing item was accidentally lost.

    1. Re:Delivery box by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      Its not the contents of the house that concerns me. Its the integrity of the delivery driver. Since the inception of homeland security, there have been multiple TSA agents arrested for groping children. There have also been thousands of accusations of rape / sexual assault involving Lyft and Uber over the past two years. I really don't trust _anyone's_ screening process enough to give that person the keys to my house. There are a lot worse things that can happen to somebody other than someone managing to get inside your home and steal stuff. Kidnappings, rape's, spycams, sexual assaults other than rape. Most states have some form of Castle Doctrine so should someone break into your home you have immunities allowing the use of force, up to and including deadly force, to protect yourself from an attacker. The very concept of giving someone else free access to your home goes against the basis of the Castle Doctrine, in that you have an expectation of privacy within your own home. And now that I mention expectation of privacy, what about all the laws that prohibit police and/or K-9 from entering your home without a warrant? Would a lawyer be able to argue that by having said device you no longer were entitled to having an expectation of privacy?

  26. We had this thing called a "porch" by blindseer · · Score: 1

    Growing up on a farm in the US Midwest we had this room we called a "porch". Now it would more likely, and more accurately, be called a "mud room". It was a small unheated room on the house where one door would go to the outside and another to the kitchen. In this room was a closet for coats and boots, a large couch like bench where the seat would flip up to reveal storage space where we kept toys for outdoor play, and just generally storage for stuff of little real value. It would have been trivial to have a lock on the outside and inside doors to create a space where people could enter this room but not the rest of the house.

    It seems mud rooms have fallen out of fashion and people just have the door to the outside open directly into their heated spaces. Perhaps a sign of the times of more efficient heating where the need to conserve the heat with this "air lock" of a room is deemed unneeded and inconvenient.

    I'd like a house with this air lock of a room as I think it'd save energy and leave a place I could have where deliveries could be made and not left out where it could be seen. I could lock this room normally so as to prevent people from wandering in to steal my coats and boots but leave it unlocked for deliveries. If the delivery driver was kind enough to lock the door after dropping off the box then that would keep people from stealing deliveries too.

    No fancy electronics needed. No unlocked doors to my living space. There is a problem of perhaps someone getting into the first "air lock" door and now having plenty of time out of sight to break into the inner door but then this is the same problem of leaving any door unlocked, put in cameras to deter this and to potentially catch anyone in the act of breaking and entering. Maybe put an electronic lock on the outer door that can be unlocked remotely, or just a simple keypad lock that allows for temporary key codes and give the code to the delivery driver.

    Oh, and it saves energy too.

    The idea of giving someone access to a key to open a car so the delivery item can be put in the trunk of a car is already solved with these internet connected remotes. Opening a trunk with your smartphone is a solved problem.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  27. Amazon Monoculture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will never buy from Amazon. I refuse to support retail monoculture, it's very dangerous. Besides Amazon's product descriptions are still absolute garbage after at least 10 years of operation. People complain about Walmart, what's the difference with Amazon?

  28. Amazon does not Care! by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

    About delivery, damage or return issues

    In fact they don't even want the items back, because that would mean they have to do something.

    I think their current policy is say keep the item to the customer and depose of it as you see fit!
    They then credit the customers payment, and reverse the payment to the seller who is out the item and the cash.
    So it is the store owner who completely looses out.

    Check this out, I don't think Amazon took the loss!
    Couple admits to stealing $1.2 million from Amazon

    But I could be wrong ;)

    1. Re:Amazon does not Care! by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

      Amazons new return policy, the one I think these thieves used.

      Amazon's new refunds policy will 'crush' small businesses, outraged sellers say

  29. a complex solution for a solved problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually solving a problem that could be solved more easily for smaller packages. In newer developments the cluster mailboxes are locked, and there are several parcel lockers for somewhat larger parcels. So when you get a larger on the delivery man just puts the key to the right locker in your mailbox.
    For perishable food there is the old milkbox from way back when milk delivery is done which is insulated. Amazon here is hung up on tech when simpler solutions are

    As noted one could install a parcel locker as well. In larger cities there is an other solution for a fee i.e. the UPS store or other private mail box, where they hold the parcels until you call for them.

  30. Amazon Chimney Delivery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You better watch out, you better not cry
    Better not pout, I'm telling you why
    Amazon is comin' to town

    He's making a list and checking it twice
    Gonna find out who's naughty and nice
    Amazon is comin' to town

    He sees you when you're sleepin'
    He knows when you're a wake
    He knows if you've been bad or good
    So be good for goodness sake

    Oh! You better watch out, you better not cry
    Better not pout, I'm telling you why
    Amazon is comin' to town

  31. Fuck no by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

    But I would use the key for say a lockbox or some such.

  32. How long until a deliveryperson is murdered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By an armed yahoo who didn't hear the doorbell or hadn't gotten there yet and sees a stranger walking into their house.

  33. They already can by n329619 · · Score: 1

    delivery drivers one-time access to a person's home to drop off items

    can be done by driving right into the person's home at 100mph to drop off say items. Unfortunately, it is also a one-time access as the car would then be stuck half way in the person's home.

    1. Re:They already can by Striikerr · · Score: 1

      delivery drivers one-time access to a person's home to drop off items

      can be done by driving right into the person's home at 100mph to drop off say items. Unfortunately, it is also a one-time access as the car would then be stuck half way in the person's home.

      This is such a false equivalency.. A delivery driver in a marked van, walks up to your house, opens the door and enters.. That's equivalent to driving a vehicle into the house's wall how? Yeah, no differences at all. Nobody would notice one over the other. They are both equal in drawing attention because delivery drivers are as ubiquitous as fast driving vehicles smashing into houses..

  34. My grandparents had a solution. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Back in the early '50s (and probably for decades before that) my grandparents' house had a delivery box, mainly for milk.

    This practice originated in the time when refrigeration was absent or iffy, so milk was delivered fresh, sometimes daily, by a deliveryman who typically came by before the occupants of the house were up for breakfast.

    In their case the box was a somewhat-insulated compartment, about 14" by 14" by the thickness of the wall, between the outside (adjacent to the driveway) and the "mud room" (an entryway / "airlock" between the main outer door and an inner door to the living room (both locked), with closets for outdoor coats and the like.

    The box was big enough to hold several bottles, and they'd stay cold until the family was up to collect them and transfer them to the fridge / ice box. If a large delivery was expected, then inner door could be left open so oversize items could be pushed through. But the opening was too small for even a child to pass through, and if someone DID manage it, they'd still end up outside the locked inner door.

    Seems to me there's lots of variants that might be useful if Amazon-style delivery services become an ongoing feature of life, rather than a business model that is displaced, within a few years, by something the invisible hand pushes even harder.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  35. Amazon Drivers already leave every package by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The irony of this is that Amazon delivery drivers here in Minneapolis leave every package at any location no matter what. They don't take the time to call residents or the office at apartment buildings. Lots of building managers hate the Amazon guys because they drop and run. Getting them to put stuff in package lockers in buildings would be a miracle.

    Source: I'm a UPS driver

  36. Wrong Entry Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I won't let random people like that into my house (and existing smart locks already have the same feature sets), but I would allow Amazon drones to drop a package into my chimney. I just had it lined with a nice smooth, padded steel liner that goes right to the bottom. Even so, they should probably wrap the package with a coated paper covering to help it slide down the tube. I wonder how the myth of Santa will change in the next 50 years. By then it'll be possible to make deliveries to everyone in a single night.

  37. Locks are for honest people. by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    I was out five minutes of my time vs four hours.

    Four hours is not a lot of time for a rare event such as your tow story.

    Someone determined enough is going to get in. But theft deterrent is always about making your neighbor a more appealing target and you not worth the hassle.

    Hence the phrase "locks are for honest people". But with the Internet-based lock system (most likely running on proprietary/non-free software the user does not own and exclusively control because they bought an amazon.com kit/service) there's no way to determine who can get in by getting amazon.com to unlock the doors (leaving no evidence of a break-in).

    When you're not the only one in control of your system, your system can be set up to fail at an inopportune time (for you) and in ways you can't fix. This is a risk you carry for as long as you let some organization of indeterminable size determine when to unlock your doors. Cameras recording your premises when you're away or asleep and remote-control locks sound secure and convenient until you find out how they're implemented for most people most of the time—all proprietary software-driven and therefore totally insecure.

    In a way, this story is a dupe (both duplicate and a forum for dupes) because it was covered before and the underlying vulnerabilities haven't been addressed.

  38. This has been done before. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

    50 years ago, many houses had “milk compartment”, a small box within the wall, with one door outside the house and another inside in which the milkman would leave the milk bottles (and take the empties).

    To this day, many apartment houses have an official postal lock whom the mailman uses to get in to put the mail in mailboxen.

    So, what’s to prevent the same from being used by Amazon?

    Or better, for big items, the house vestibule could be used, with another lock fitted on the inside door to prevent the delivery guy from going into the house.

    1. Re:This has been done before. by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Assuming your house HAS a vestibule and you want to put up a second door....

  39. Walmart is trying in-fridge delivery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Walmart Wants To Deliver Groceries Straight To Your Fridge.

  40. Fermo Posta by havana9 · · Score: 1

    In Italy you have the "Fermo Posta" where packages are to be picked at the nearest Post Office, and is mandatory for C.O.D. over a certain amount of cash. normal price for the service id 3 €, but for amazon and possibly other book stores on-line is free.
    There are also the "locker" that are automatic and placed in a lot of malls that are working like this.
    Book store chains are also offering the service in their physical book stores, you order the books online and collect them in a bookstore.
    This is because normally on a parcel proof of delivery is needed. For smaller parcel, if you have a mailbox with a wider slot PDF in Italian It costs about 100€, when a normal one costs 20€. I think that an automatic system will cost more than a mechanical systems that by the way doesn'tneed batteries or a power supply.

  41. How about 'No"? by BadTuna · · Score: 1

    This will fade into nothingness once the genius behind this and the marketing whiz-kids realize there's a very limited market that will bite on something like this.

    --
    Your sig here!
  42. Wow, yet another... by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    ...Amazon product I have no interest in and will never buy or use, right up there with Alexa and their awful tablets and phones....

  43. I for one.. by Striikerr · · Score: 1

    .. welcome our new home security add-on. As we all know, companies never fail with their efforts to make hack-proof and secure systems. The bigger the company, the better security right? I mean no company would ever expose millions of its customers to potential harm! (yeah, that was all sarcasm).. For the sake of having Amazon deliver a package into your house instead of leaving it at your door, would people really add this to their house?! Comparing this to a thief with a screwdriver who can break into your house when they want is ridiculous. This is a case of granting explicitly allowing a stranger into your house which is not an illegal act for them. What's to stop them from doing anything else? (not everyone has cameras inside to monitor what happens). Take something of value, rummage through drawers or stir the jug of iced tea in the refrigerator with their dick.. You'll never know (hey, you might even like your iced tea better for some reason after they also decided to take a piss into it).. If someone enters your house without your permission, it's illegal right away. If they break in, you'll notice and the neighbors might notice too.. There's just so much to go wrong with this from a technology perspective as well as the human side. It's not worth it (I don't care how much Amazon discounts their service as an enticement). Hopefully this joins the Amazon phone in the scrapheap..

  44. LOL! From the "NO WAY" Dept by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    "Amazon Is Reportedly Building a Doorbell That Lets Drivers Into Your House"

    In other news, Amazon has been smoking crack if they think I'm ever going to use this under any condition.

    Sorry, I'm just not a big fan of letting random strangers enter my home and wander around when I'm not there.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  45. I've seen the Ontrac drivers by el_smurfo · · Score: 1

    Many of them deliver to my house in their own beat up old vans that I would cross the street to stay away from. I would rather have my items stolen then allow any of these guy the keys to my front door.

  46. Nope, nope, nope: by Hartree · · Score: 1

    "Amazon Is Reportedly Building a Doorbell That Lets Drivers Into Your House"

    My front porch and living room floor aren't built to support the weight of most vehicles and my front door is only wide enough for a motorcycle.

    Either that, or this story is about yet another security problem with the internet of things and smart doorbells updating their own software without permission.

  47. Just use a porch box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, just an appropriate sized steel box bolted down to the porch with a padlock would work better. The owner keeps the keys and it doesn't run afoul of postal service regulations.

  48. Eh, fuck no. by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    That's all I have to say. I live in a gated community. You deliver shit to me? You go to the gate, so that the sec guard call me to get authorization from me to enter. Then you drive. Then you knock on my door, and, unless you are delivering a fucking refrigerator or something, I'll grab the stuff, tip you and close the door. You ain't gonna get pass the door.

  49. I don't understand the benefit by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    with the current system, if my package gets stolen, amazon is responsible. no danger to my possessions or house.
    with their suggested system, it reduces risk to AMAZON, but increases risk to ME. Now I'm letting someone in my home, where my already owned stuff might get stolen.

    Why is it my job to risk my stuff to reduce Amazon's risk?

  50. Camera Enabled Specialty Doorbells by MercTech · · Score: 1

    I saw the first one over a decade ago. The doorbell contains an intercom. There is an IP camera focused on the door. And the door has a mag release lock on it.

    Ringing the bell calls your cellphone. You can then vet the person and unlock your door remotely.

    I like the idea but not $243 dollars worth of like. (Equipment cost, labor to install not included).

    --
    NRRPT/RCT
  51. how does /. stop being stoopid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, as you can hear, no response..
    it cant,, unfortunately, based on the content in this article, its easy to see why..
    because its head is so far up it's ass, you cant hear it even if it tried..
    I tell ya cowboy Neal, or Cmdr. Taco would shit themselves blind..