Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What Is Your Favorite William Gibson Novel?

dryriver writes: When I first read William Gibson's Neuromancer and then his other novels as a young man back in the 1990s, I was blown away by Gibson's work. Everything was so fresh and out of the ordinary in his books. The writing style. The technologies. The characters and character names. The plotlines. The locations. The future world he imagined. The Matrix. It was unlike anything I had read before. A window into the far future of humanity. I had great hopes over the years that some visionary film director would take a crack at creating film versions of Neuromancer, Count Zero and Mona Lisa Overdrive . But that never happened. All sorts of big budget science fiction was produced for TV and the big screen since Neuromancer that never got anywhere near the brilliance of Gibson's future world. Gibson's world largely stayed on the printed page, and today very few people talk about Neuromancer, even though the world we live in, at times, appears headed in the exact direction Gibson described in his Sprawl trilogy. Why does hardly anybody talk about William Gibson anymore? His books describe a future that is much more technologically advanced than where we are in 2017, so it isn't like his future vision has become "badly dated." To get the conversation going, we rephrased dryriver's question... What is your favorite William Gibson novel?

298 comments

  1. Mona Lisa Overdrive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...perhaps.

    1. Re:Mona Lisa Overdrive. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Time to revisit the works of Gibson.

      Another piece of work that might have inspired Gibson is Max Headroom.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Mona Lisa Overdrive. by dwywit · · Score: 2

      IIRC the story goes that Gibson walked out of Blade Runner (original 1982 version) after 20 minutes, because "it was too much like the inside of my head".

      So Syd Mead had some concept of that world.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    3. Re: Mona Lisa Overdrive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bigend series. A scathing comment on modern PR/advertising and how it runs/ruins society.

    4. Re:Mona Lisa Overdrive. by UsuallyReasonable · · Score: 1

      I agree. Always been my favorite.

    5. Re:Mona Lisa Overdrive. by F34nor · · Score: 1

      First thing I thought when I saw the new one was "Oh finally someone to direct Neuromancer."

    6. Re:Mona Lisa Overdrive. by MercTech · · Score: 1

      No, William Gibson's work that defined what was to become the cyberpunk genre in no way had anything to do with the Hollywood Hack portrayal of a computer image done with Max Headroom. Max Headroom is to Gibson as a 10th grader's cartoon in the back of a binder is to a Freas or Frazetta illustration.

      --
      NRRPT/RCT
  2. Hands down Neuromancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yup.... the classic.

    1. Re:Hands down Neuromancer by Cederic · · Score: 2

      Yeah. There isn't a single wasted word, it's poetry in prose form, it still feel visionary three decades later and although his later work is excellent it can't quite match this.

      Although if you include short stories, Johnny Mnemonic is at least as good.

    2. Re:Hands down Neuromancer by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Love Neuromancer.

      I also really love the short stories Burning Chrome and New Rose Hotel.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    3. Re:Hands down Neuromancer by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      I dumped a text file of Neuromancer off a Gopher server way back. Sorry, Bill, I never bought a copy. It seemed meta at the time.

      But it is still prophetic.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    4. Re:Hands down Neuromancer by bigtiny · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I'll probably muck this up, but "The sky above Chiba was the color of an untuned television..." absolutely FLOORED me the first time I read it. The book just has such a great plot. I'm REALLY surprised someone hasn't done a film of it yet, though if they ever do, I PRAY they do it right!!!

  3. The one he has not written by inking · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As much as I like the genre, I think they are all bad.

    1. Re:The one he has not written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Gibson is extremely overrated.
      Or more specifically, he is the Stephenie Meyer of science fiction.
      It is a guilty pleasure for nerds but lacks literary value.

      Much of his writings can be summed up as "Throwing in whatever sound cool without considering a coherent world building or message."

      With that said, I found the Johnny Mnemonic movie enjoyable even if Gibson fans seems to hate it.
      It isn't that surprising they do by the way. Much of the 'coolness' factor in Gibsons writing comes from vagueness and the readers interpretation of it.
      Once you try to make something concrete out of it it will never be as 'cool' as it was in the mind of the reader and there isn't much substance beyond that.

    2. Re:The one he has not written by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The Johnny Mnemonic movie wasn't bad, but they tried to make a full movie out of the script for a half hour episode of a series. JM was a short story, a good one, but none that would offer enough material to fill 100+ minutes of movie material, and it shows. Yes, they added some stuff but it was mostly filler, and while most of it did actually fit the world of Gibson's cyberpunk it felt tacked on and corny, like that cyber-priest.

      Plus Reeves can't act worth shit.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:The one he has not written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you give an example of writing where there is concrete stuff and substance?

    4. Re:The one he has not written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, for an informed opposing viewpoint - I'd read the man's laundry list. He hasn't written a dud. Stylistically tight, imaginative, forward-looking.

    5. Re:The one he has not written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Johnny Mnemonic was enjoyable, but I think it created the best one-line movie review ever: "Keanu Reeves is miscast as someone with too much information in his head."

      And no, I don't where I read that.

    6. Re:The one he has not written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eon by Greg Bear.

    7. Re:The one he has not written by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Can you elaborate why you think they are bad? If not, then why post at all?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    8. Re:The one he has not written by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can you give an example of writing where there is concrete stuff and substance?

      Neal Stephenson. Gibson was a master of creating atmosphere, and then in many cases not taking the story much farther than that.

    9. Re:The one he has not written by Bright+Apollo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I find the opposite to be true. Wm Gibson is extremely literary, and it requires closer reading than someone like Neal Stephenson, who is very happy to explain his created worlds in as much detail as you can handle. I find Gibson's work to be more of a challenge, but worth the effort, much in the same way I find classic literature and even poetry to be worthy challenges.

      You don't have to like it, of course, but you also can't knock it as lacking literary value. That kind of comment is more of a reflection of you than the target.

      --#

    10. Re:The one he has not written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it has to do with the decade when you were first exposed to him but when I discovered him in the early 2000's I found him cool at first but quickly got tired of his style. Neuromancer was rather good even if it starts to go off the rails near the end but each book just declined in quality for me after that. The rest of the trilogy was rather meh, as was Virtual Light, and finishing Idoru felt like a chore.

    11. Re:The one he has not written by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      Can you give an example of writing where there is concrete stuff and substance?

      Neal Stephenson. Gibson was a master of creating atmosphere, and then in many cases not taking the story much farther than that.

      Thank you. I've been trying to read 'The Peripheral' and just can't get past a few pages. You describe my issue perfectly, lot's of atmosphere, story doesn't seem to go anywhere.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    12. Re: The one he has not written by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Plenty of other people elaborated fairly well in replies to his comment. So it remains a valid comment. Almost a 'the emperor is naked' kind of comment, really.

    13. Re:The one he has not written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find the opposite to be true. Wm Gibson is extremely literary, and it requires closer reading than someone like Neal Stephenson, who is very happy to explain his created worlds in as much detail as you can handle.

      Agreed. Take, for example, Seveneves.
      Wonderfully descriptive, but so preposterous my disbelief was not only not suspended, but turned into scorn

    14. Re:The one he has not written by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      And that explains how Phillip K Dick short stories become such blockbuster (and/or fabulous) movies.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    15. Re:The one he has not written by rickb928 · · Score: 2

      Ok, so debunk the physical events in Seveneves. I've had only two conversations about it, with competent astrophysicists, and they weren't willing to call BS on any of it. One, though, worked up an experiment to possibly prove some of the plot, involving Chinese satellites and a weapon now alluded to as 'Rod of God', even though it was a pipe dream then. Yeah, we need more space junk in LEO.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    16. Re:The one he has not written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like Greg Bear as much as the next guy, but in some respects he is certifiably insane.

    17. Re:The one he has not written by werepants · · Score: 1

      Ok, so debunk the physical events in Seveneves. I've had only two conversations about it, with competent astrophysicists, and they weren't willing to call BS on any of it.

      I'll second this. Seveneves might have some faults, but it actually does a hell of a job with scientific plausibility. Except, you know, the moon asploding.

    18. Re:The one he has not written by lindseyp · · Score: 1

      Oh god. I love much of Neal Stephenson's work but in Seveneves the nerdsplaining gets seriously out of hand.

      Gibson's "The Peripheral" is probably my least favourite work of his. I liked the concept of The Jackpot but otherwise I found it quite forgettable.

      Neuromancer, on the other hand.... in fact everything up to Virtual Light I found superb. I don't have a favourite.

      --
      j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
    19. Re:The one he has not written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but Neal Stephenson is a pompous turdsack.

    20. Re:The one he has not written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard to get through until the last 1/3 of the book where it all starts to make sense.

    21. Re:The one he has not written by Botched · · Score: 1

      In the same genre George Alec Effinger -When Gravity Fails and subsequent novels (I'd say this is the best of them). W.T. Quick's novels (Dreams of ...). Bruce Sterling (Artifical Kid). Daniel Keys Morran (Emerald Eyes trilogy).

    22. Re:The one he has not written by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      Case, you got to read the book, Case. If you do, Case, you'll understand why, Case. Case, its pretty obvious, Case. Case the Case, Case. Case Case Case, Case Case Casing Case.

    23. Re:The one he has not written by Sumus+Semper+Una · · Score: 1

      I've only read one book by Neal Stephenson - Snow Crash. It's certainly not a bad book, but I did not find it particularly enjoyable outside of the novel concepts that would appear throughout the book. The rat-things, for example, were cool to think about but so incredibly impractical that I couldn't suspend disbelief, even for a science fiction novel. I also got a little lost in the beginning of the novel figuring out which parts were happening in the real world and which were in the metaverse because his transitions weren't great.

      I will say that having only read Snow Crash by Stephenson and Neuromancer by Gibson, I would much rather read more books by Stephenson than Gibson. Gibson's writing style really irks me. Specifically how he explains at length things I, as a reader, don't care about while sparsely explaining things I do care about. There is also something about his penchant for choosing odd names for characters and entities that makes it difficult for me to follow the plot of his stories smoothly.

    24. Re:The one he has not written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I loved Neuromancer in the early 90s when I was assigned to read it as part of a Gothic Lit. class alongside Mary Shelley and Poe among others. It's what made me even consider reading other science fiction and cyberpunk novels that I'd never really given a glance before.

      Unfortunately, Gibson's scene-settings in Neuromancer feel a bit anachronistic to me now because of the way he tried to paint the world as vignettes of brands and technical specifications which might have sounded way out there doing research in the early 1980s but now sound too mundane to really give the same feeling of aweful progress.

      I also didn't really enjoy the actual cyber-voodoo priest/priestesses characters which seemed to me like fluff characters for the peanut gallery, like the off-stage witches in a Shakespeare play. I vacillated between thinking this voodoo was a heavy-handed metaphor for technological complexity that Gibson couldn't imagine or an honest attempt to project human need for spiritualism into this new age of his.

      As an adult reader, I actually prefer his Pattern Recognition as having a very similarly conspiratorial, epic plot unfolding in a more believable near future. It has many of the same societal questions as Neuromancer but with a more timeless environment. In both cases, I think Gibson is just writing about people, and the rest is just set pieces whether computers, glasses of wine, or shirts.

    25. Re:The one he has not written by sh00z · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Take, for example, Seveneves. Wonderfully descriptive, but so preposterous my disbelief was not only not suspended, but turned into scorn

      Same issues in Snowcrash and Zodiac. I keep promising myself to re-read Interface after the 2016 election.

    26. Re:The one he has not written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother? Even with all the flip flopping Clinton still didn't win.

    27. Re:The one he has not written by F34nor · · Score: 2

      Neal Stephenson is a master of creating substance without any thought to how to end his books. His books are mostly a vehicle to support the propagation of an idea. He seems to have no love affair with character or place. I love his stuff but DoDo seems like an excuse for him to read more primary documents then anything else (which he admitte3d to loving at a Portland talk he gave about System of a World. The Diamond Age ends like a serial cliffhanger. Reamde was a like a boilerplate movie script. What the fuck was the end of Seveneves but "here is the new now, goodbye." I love him but as an example of anything other than what you're accusing Gibson of his the worst example I can think of. I can't think of him ever enticing me with atmosphere other than Snow Crash and Diamond Age. To be literature you need it all, place, setting, characters, ideas, action, and conclusion. Even Iain M. Banks falls short on characters, I rarely give a fuck about anyone in his stories except the Algabraist and Against a Dark Background.

      If you are looking for concrete how about Dune? It has basically everything. "The Three Body Problem" is the best concrete content in SciFi I have ever read and it is Fucking merciless!

    28. Re:The one he has not written by F34nor · · Score: 1

      That is what good SciFi and Fantasy all have in common, the suspension of disbelief for a single event or concept. Multiple disbelief only ends in Kungfury. The moon could explode if a black hole went through it a high proportion of c is it likely to happen? Fuck no but it is SciFi.

    29. Re:The one he has not written by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      If H. Clinton had fought it the way Algore did, we might now be in the middle of a Civil War.

    30. Re:The one he has not written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gibson is not an "easy read". You actually have to pay close attention and yes, the beginning of "The Peripheral" is difficult. Why are you expecting it to go anywhere in the first few pages? he has characters to introduce and a stage to set. Stick with it. It is an interesting premise and a good story.

    31. Re:The one he has not written by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Don't like his work either. It's science fiction without the science, and the fiction that's left over isn't that good. He would be better as a surrealist painter.

    32. Re:The one he has not written by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      Having been raised Pentecostal allowed me to suspend disbelief for more of Snow Crash than the average reader. Frankly, there is something about glossolalia that is very similar to taking mind-altering substances. So for the two to be so intertwined in the plot made perfect sense to me.

      I found the opening story about pizza delivery somehow... transcendent. To tee up an entire dystopia through the lens of such a lowly office was just clever beyond words. Also, you have to remember that this was written in 1992, well before much of the technology he envisioned was dreamed up. Hell, some of it still doesn't exist.

      I hated the notion that the static only affected those familiar with computer programming. That was the only technical thing that really pegged my bogometer, and it really didn't help propel the plot. There were some inter-personal things that didn't sit right, but I have to give those a pass, because it's hard to know how humans would really interact with each other in such a world.

      Other non-technological aspects turned out to be a little too true. Unchecked corporate sovereignty, powerful megachurches, government's idiotic reliance on polygraphs, pizza delivery still taking too long, etc. And never underestimate the power of a dog's undying love.

    33. Re:The one he has not written by rpresser · · Score: 1

      Oh Beezus. Greg Bear had some real hits. Eon and its sequels weren't them. What a farcical, ridiculous world with ridiculous uncharacterized people.

    34. Re: The one he has not written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really love that book. I read it right after my gf broke up with me suddenly after 5 years. Well she shared her name with the villain and she was also a graphic artist (yeah the main character was the artist, but close enough). It just happened to be the right book at the right (wrong) time.

  4. Never heard of him before. by Askmum · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What can I say. Don't know who he is, don't know what kind of books he writes, impossible to say which I like best.

    1. Re:Never heard of him before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for sharing! That really contributed.

    2. Re:Never heard of him before. by Cederic · · Score: 3, Informative

      He's a science fiction author that wrote one of the most influential books of the last century.

      His material is available from all good bookstores and several bad ones, check him out.

    3. Re:Never heard of him before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah well I prefer good books. William Gibson is one of the worst authors of all time.

    4. Re:Never heard of him before. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    5. Re:Never heard of him before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, he's so influential most people never heard of him. Lol.

    6. Re:Never heard of him before. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      You're so cute. Which is your favourite Gibson book though?

    7. Re:Never heard of him before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None, they are all shit just like you, junior.

    8. Re:Never heard of him before. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I know. I mean, it's not like even Wikipedia has an entire section devoted to his influence.

      Oh, wait.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    9. Re: Never heard of him before. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Also, while he didn't invent the term, it is universally agreed that he popularized the term "cyberspace."

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    10. Re: Never heard of him before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never been able to finishba Gibson book. I have tried. I am more of a Harlan Ellison fan.

      Gibson is just somebody I have felt I was supposed to like but just haven't.

    11. Re: Never heard of him before. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Validation-by-wikipedia-article-size doesn't work.

      There are hundreds of obscure garage bands with substancial wiki articles that eclipse their actual music.

      I am starting to think Gibson may be a coming-of-age fan phenomenon. I was already an adult when hisvwork started being hyped. I was already more familiar than he was with all the tech he name-dropped. I suspect a LOT of us nerds on Slashdot who are old enough would agree.

      Gibson famously uses only a manual typewriter. He was a hipster before it was cool to be a hipster. Shrug.

    12. Re: Never heard of him before. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Many of us were already pretty sick of the term 'cyberspace' by the time Gibson popularized it.

      He has a rep with parts of the nerd community of being somebody who traffics in terminology to build a rep.

      The hipster deal, really.

    13. Re: Never heard of him before. by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      So using a typewriter makes one "a hipster, shrug"?

      --
      I come here for the love
    14. Re:Never heard of him before. by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      He's a science fiction author that wrote one of the most influential books of the last century.

      His material is available from all good bookstores and several bad ones, check him out.

      Wow, that's high praise. Assuming Neuromancer is the book you're referring to, where do you place it on the most influential list and why? I could assume for coining the term 'cyberpunk' or something along those lines. IMO there's a case for most influential in the SciFi realm but overall... that covers a lot of ground.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    15. Re: Never heard of him before. by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. You claim you were using the word "Cyberspace" in 1982? Not only using it, but seeing so much of it that it sickened you? Sorry, that's just hard to believe.

      --

      Enigma

    16. Re: Never heard of him before. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      . I was already more familiar than he was with all the tech he name-dropped. I suspect a LOT of us nerds on Slashdot who are old enough would agree.

      Which tech did he name-drop that you were familiar with?

      I mean, he's never been deeply into technology anyway, he's far more interested in people and their environments. But still, since you're suggesting his work is derivative, I'm curious to hear how.

      I am starting to think Gibson may be a coming-of-age fan phenomenon.

      I disagree. The writing is still sublime, the books are interesting and fun to read and they continue to explore a coherent future world. The plot of Neuromancer remains fairly unique, albeit at times simplistic.

      Shit, you may as well suggest that HMS Ulysses by Alistair MacLean is a coming-of-age fan phenomenon too, or Archangel by Gerald Seymour. These aren't crusty classics like Jane Eyre or Anna Karenina, these are beautifully written human stories.

      https://moviepilot.com/posts/2... touches on a few of the things he's influenced, and links to https://www.theguardian.com/bo... which discusses others.

      The Guardian to appear to have actual love for him though - see the opening paragraph of https://www.theguardian.com/bo...

      But even if you're right and he's of an era, that doesn't detract from the tremendous influence he's had on science fiction, media and the Internet - even before he used it.

    17. Re: Never heard of him before. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Clearly the word popularize doesn't mean what you think it means. And no, it wasn't a commonly used word in the early 80s. You are simply full of shit.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    18. Re:Never heard of him before. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Well, he's not exactly Orwell or Solzhenitsyn and a lot of people haven't read him because "ugh, science fiction" but the development of the Internet and pop culture since Neuromancer has drawn heavily on his writing.

      where do you place it on the most influential list and why?

      Good question. I suspect I'm not widely enough read to create a sensible looking list - and sadly I fear I'm rather better read than many.

    19. Re:Never heard of him before. by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      A quick search turns up no less than the follow authors of the 20th century - F. Scott Fitzgerald - George Orwell - James Joyce - John Steinbeck - Ernest Hemingway - Jack Keruoac Where would you place Gibson on that list? That's just to name a few...

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    20. Re: Never heard of him before. by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      My beige Correcting Selectric II mocks you. As does my Hooverometer. Anyone can wield a hand cycle wheel nto even knowing what the degree marks would be used for. Fixing stuff seems to be going out of vogue too quickly.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    21. Re:Never heard of him before. by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      Well, he's not exactly Orwell or Solzhenitsyn and a lot of people haven't read him because "ugh, science fiction" but the development of the Internet and pop culture since Neuromancer has drawn heavily on his writing.

      where do you place it on the most influential list and why?

      Good question. I suspect I'm not widely enough read to create a sensible looking list - and sadly I fear I'm rather better read than many.

      Fair answer. And most likely you are better read than most, unless we include social media. Then I'm afraid... :-)

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    22. Re:Never heard of him before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hhmmm.... curious. I've been reading science fiction since the 60's. I have a personal library of over 700 novels, plus what I've borrowed from public libraries, and I've never heard of this Gibson character. I certainly don't have any of his books on my shelves. He may be popular in some circles but he's hardly a universally popular author. He's got to be pretty new at this or I surely would have heard of him (I have tapered off on my book buying in the last few years). If he isn't new then he certainly isn't as popular or influential as some folks would like to believe.
      --
      Steve (AC because I haven't bothered to register in all these years)

    23. Re:Never heard of him before. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      Well, he's not exactly Orwell or Solzhenitsyn

      Orwell and Solzhenitsyn are both overrated. Especially Orwell.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    24. Re:Never heard of him before. by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      Why is Orwell overrated? He's widely studied in English classes. You may not like his writing but that doesn't make him overrated.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    25. Re:Never heard of him before. by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      Assuming you're serious, he's authored a novel (Neuromancer ) in the early beginnings of the Internet (1984 to be precise) that is widely credited for starting cyberpunk. It should hold a place in 'must reads' of SciFi IMO. Assuming your're not serious, he's an author who wrote and starred in the Mad Max movies.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    26. Re:Never heard of him before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.voidspace.org.uk/cyberpunk/neuromancer.shtml

    27. Re:Never heard of him before. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Why is Orwell overrated?

      His ideas outstrip his writing, and when you get right down to it, those ideas tend to be rather obvious.

      He's a pamphleteer disguised as a novelist, and his work would have been better shorter.

      He's widely studied in English classes.

      High school English classes. There's a lot of mediocre literature that gets studied in high school English classes, because 13 year olds need to be hit over the head with the idea of literature.

      I don't think Orwell is terrible, I just think he's overrated.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    28. Re:Never heard of him before. by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Almost every book is overrated. Ever read Moby Dick? Overrated garbage. How about The Great Gasby? Samething, over rated trash.

      Point being, I have yet to read any book that lives up to the fan devotion or the hype.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    29. Re:Never heard of him before. by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      hhmmm.... curious. I've been reading science fiction since the 60's. I have a personal library of over 700 novels, plus what I've borrowed from public libraries, and I've never heard of this Gibson character.

      Sounds like you are either Russian reading Russian sci-fi, a troll, or both.

    30. Re:Never heard of him before. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Almost every book is overrated. Ever read Moby Dick? Overrated garbage. How about The Great Gasby? Samething, over rated trash.

      Neither is overrated. Well, maybe Great Gatsby, a little bit.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    31. Re:Never heard of him before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If every book fails your expectations, then perhaps it is not the books that are at fault.

    32. Re: Never heard of him before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you're wrong. Many people don't like William Gibson and think it's trite, children's garbage.

    33. Re:Never heard of him before. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Orwell and Solzhenitsyn are both overrated. Especially Orwell.

      Wow. You and Josef Stalin think very much alike.

    34. Re:Never heard of him before. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Well, it is a pretty dumb topic for slashdot. More appropriate to a blog or the old usenet. There's no news here and all the nerd stuff is implausible handwaving.

    35. Re:Never heard of him before. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I would much, much prefer John Brunner's The Shockwave Rider if I wanted to cite a novel that preshadows.

      And Brunner is a real full-time Science Fiction writer who anybody who reads SF would recognize. Not an 'honorable mention' type who people say writes 'literature' like Gibson.

      If you haven't' read The Shockwave Rider, what are you waiting for? Go out and find a copy.

    36. Re:Never heard of him before. by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      I can see your points. re: overrated, I feel the same way about Ayn Rand.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    37. Re:Never heard of him before. by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      Ashamed to admit I've never heard of him and I've been reading Sci Fi / Fantasy for going on 40 years. I'll check it out soon.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    38. Re:Never heard of him before. by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Yeah they are. Both are highly overrated. Mostly they are over rated by ether high school or college literature professors. Who themselves are often over rated. Which of course leads to these professors trying to force this dreck down entire generations of students who couldn't give a shit. No wonder reading sucks among the young.

      Let the children read what they want to read. Who gives a shit if a bunch of teenage girls are reading about sparkly vampires? At least they are reading.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    39. Re: Never heard of him before. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I mean, he's never been deeply into technology anyway, he's far more interested in people and their environments.

      And that's the problem. Because all of the science is wrong and the use of technology is implausible, Gibson's books are fantasy, not futurism or science fiction.

    40. Re:Never heard of him before. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      but the development of the Internet and pop culture since Neuromancer has drawn heavily on his writing.

      So sort of like Kim Kardashian greatly influencing the internet and pop culture?

    41. Re:Never heard of him before. by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

      Have you ever stopped to think that the problem is you? If every book is overrated, then maybe you're the one who just doesn't understand.

    42. Re:Never heard of him before. by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Yikes. You have missed out. His style is pulp and very easy to read. He weaves interesting worlds. I would start with Burning Chrome rather than Neuromancer though - it is a collection of short stories including the genesis of The Sprawl, which is the setting for the Neuromancer / Count Zero / Mona Lisa trilogy.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    43. Re:Never heard of him before. by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Doubtful. I simply pointed out that every book rarely meets the hype that is given to it. But just because a book is over rated, doesn't mean its a bad book.

      The Harry Potter books as an example. Once you get around the fact that the main character is a complete idiot then the rest of the books are not that bad. Do they rate the lavish worship fans seem to give them? Well to the fans maybe but over all, no the don't.

      My favorite books are the Harry Dresden books. But even I can see that the books follow the same basic formula from book to book. I'm waiting for Peace Talks to come out and I can probably build a check list on how it will go. I'm still going to read it.

      Here. If you like a book read it but don't read it because of the hype. If you do, you will probably be disappointed.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    44. Re:Never heard of him before. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Orwell is a must read in Germany in german classes, too.
      After all, that third reich thing and WWII ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    45. Re:Never heard of him before. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Let the children read what they want to read.

      How did this discussion become about "the children"? At some point in an education, it's worth reading something that you wouldn't have picked off the shelf yourself. If I hadn't been forced to read books, I'd still only be reading Mad Magazine and comic books.

      Nobody decides all on their own that they're going to read the classics of literature. I know you SJWs don't like books by dead white men, but reading them will enrich your life and provide you with a level of cultural understanding that will allow you to branch out.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    46. Re: Never heard of him before. by JoeRobe · · Score: 1

      See, I feel the other way about Ayn Rand. Her writing outstrips her ideas, to me. She tries way too hard to convince the reader of her rather naive ideas, but she does it so beautifully it makes up for the ideas she trying to push.

      I found that if I read her more like a fantasy novel (outside of current world behavior/expectations), I enjoyed her writing immensely.

      For what itâ(TM)s worth, in the sci-fi realm, Enders Game (first) has my vote.

      --
      The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
    47. Re: Never heard of him before. by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      I thought about the Rand comment being the other way around, but as I post this I remember thinking her style read like a B Movie to me. Chalk it up to different ways to read the same story. Re: Enders Game, agreed! Great book.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    48. Re:Never heard of him before. by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      Ha, I meant John Brunner. I've read Gibson (Neuromanacer), later than I should have considering I came of age during the initial cyber punk phase. I went through a period where I tried to read the 'Must Reads' of Sci-fi at one point.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    49. Re:Never heard of him before. by martinX · · Score: 1

      Animal Farm was great. Concisely written, it was easy to write a high school book report on it. If it wasn't for 1984, we wouldn't have gotten 'Brazil'.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    50. Re:Never heard of him before. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Concisely written, it was easy to write a high school book report on it.

      That's my point. Animal Farm is young adult literature. Nothing wrong with that, but it doesn't rate the pantheon.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    51. Re:Never heard of him before. by jhantin · · Score: 1

      The Harry Potter books as an example. Once you get around the fact that the main character is a complete idiot then the rest of the books are not that bad.

      Ah yes, fantasy... perhaps you'd enjoy a tale in which he has enough marbles to sort into Ravenclaw. The Magicians trilogy isn't half bad either.

      --
      ...when you're writing a game...tweak the difficulty of "Easy" to something [your mother] can cope with. -- onion2k
    52. Re:Never heard of him before. by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      How did this discussion become about "the children"? At some point in an education, it's worth reading something that you wouldn't have picked off the shelf yourself. If I hadn't been forced to read books, I'd still only be reading Mad Magazine and comic books.

      It became about "the children" when I hijacked the discussion to suit my own agenda. Come on, this is slashdot, that is how these things happen.

      I want to address one fallacy you have there. You are talking like reading comic books or Mad Magazine is a bad thing. I thought myself to read at age 6, yes I had help with the big words, so I could read Richie Rich comics. From there I picked up Xmen at issue 86, or abouts. It if wasn't for comics I would never have read the Original Phoenix Saga.

      I still read comics but now I tend to read more manga than DC or Marvel. I like the facts that the stories in manga tend to have beginning and end. I'm reading Barakamon now. But have you checked out some of the comics they are making now? Sorry, they like to refer to them as "graphic novels" now.

      My point is comics are a good stepping stone to reading. If it wasn't for Richie Rich I might never have become the avid reader I am. The first science fiction book I picked off a shelf and read was Voyage from Yesteryear by Jame Hogan. I still have a copy of it n my android tablet. I picked it up because it was on the book shelf next to the comic rack.

      You are correct to a point about having someone pick something to read for you at some point in your education. I would expect in a college literature course because you usually have to sign up for such a course so you know what you are getting into. But not at the middle school or high school levels.

      They have a classic crammed down their throat that they have little personal reference too. Imagine having Tolstoy shoved down throat at age 14. That would be enough to turn most readers off for good. Let the young read what appeals to them. Be it sparkly vampires, Enders Game, or Mad magazine. We need more readers in this world and less TV watchers.

      You are also wrong about people reading classic literature on there own. I have read Tolstoy, Mark Twain, Louisa Alcott, and others because I wanted too. An I've read Moby Dick. An I'm far from a SJW.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    53. Re:Never heard of him before. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Imagine having Tolstoy shoved down throat at age 14.

      There is a world of literature that would be appropriate for 14 year-olds before Tolstoy. I remember having to read Shakespeare in freshman high school English and hating it before I loved it. I spent most of my working life teaching literature to college students (often undergraduates). You don't have to "shove" anything down anyone's "throat", but something as simple as a course requirement can turn out to be liberating for the student. I still get kids (now middle-aged) who write me on Facebook and thank me for exposing them to literature that they first found daunting.

      I have read Tolstoy

      Nobody wakes up one day and decides, "I'm going to read Tolstoy".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    54. Re:Never heard of him before. by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      You never had to deal with my highschool literature teacher. Anything after 1850 was trash to her. I actually got my views on books in school from a lecture by Orson Scott Card.

      I believe that your experience with Shakespeare might be exactly what I'm talking about. Did you love it after you read it or years later? After you had developed enough background in reading to understand it.

      I have read Tolstoy.

      I should have worded that differently to say "I am reading Tolstoy." I have been for the last 20 years, but making it through War and Peace is on my bucket list.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    55. Re:Never heard of him before. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Did you love it after you read it or years later?

      Immediately after finishing it. My high school freshman English teacher was thoughtful and showed us the music in the language, the subtle meanings. He was an interesting guy. I later learned that he quit teaching and became a stand-up comic. Best teacher I ever had.

      This was when teachers could still smoke in the classroom (to give you an idea how old I am). He was sort of hippie-ish and would come to class, bushy black hair and beard, dark glasses, smoking like a chimney, and brought literature to life. I later identified his cologne as "Eau de Weed". I'm pretty sure my PhD in Literature and career as a professor were entirely his fault.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    56. Re:Never heard of him before. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with young adult literature? I'm currently re-reading Pullman's 'His Dark Materials' trilogy and it's excellent. It may be suitable for younger audiences but that doesn't stop it exploring complex themes or being extremely well written.

      But Orwell was mentioned in the context of influence, and another of his books double plus qualifies.

    57. Re:Never heard of him before. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I haven't read Fitzgerald for 30 years, Orwell is easily near the top of the list, Joyce is a pretentious shit, I've never read Steinbeck, Hemingway is tedious and I've never read Keruoac.

      But your list is full of writers of "The Great American Novel" which is something I've never found engaging or enjoyed. I don't tend to do "meaningful" novels or "literature", I read books that are good to read.

      Interesting that you listed no female authors. A strong influence as I entered my teens was Andre Norton, Anne Rice has astonishing sales and entire generations of Brits were brought up on Enid Blyton.

    58. Re:Never heard of him before. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      He's got to be pretty new at this or I surely would have heard of him (I have tapered off on my book buying in the last few years). If he isn't new then he certainly isn't as popular or influential as some folks would like to believe.

      Six Hugo nominations (including a win), eight Nebula nominations (including a win) and multiple other awards suggest he's not entirely new or unknown. But don't feel ashamed, there are other authors also inducted into the Science Fiction and Fantasy Hall of Fame that I've never heard of, it's a big wide world out there.

    59. Re:Never heard of him before. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with young adult literature? I'm currently re-reading Pullman's 'His Dark Materials' trilogy and it's excellent.

      It certainly is excellent. It's also much better writing than Orwell ever did.

      But Orwell was mentioned in the context of influence, and another of his books double plus qualifies.

      I just said Orwell was overrated. Not that he wasn't influential. As I said, his ideas are profound, but as a writer he's mediocre. He's more agitprop than literature. That's why he's taught in high school: because it's hard to teach subtlety to 14 year-olds.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    60. Re:Never heard of him before. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Fair answer. And most likely you are better read than most, unless we include social media. Then I'm afraid... :-)

      You're comparing social media writing (including Slashdot posting) with a coherent story with a beginning, middle, end and plot? Either you read some massively different social media to me (including Slashdot), or Gibson is an incredibly bad writer.

      (I'll admit to having never knowingly read a word of Gibson's work - despite being an avid SF reader through 70s, 80s and 90s.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    61. Re:Never heard of him before. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      After all, that third reich thing and WWII ...

      Sounds like it should be a compulsory read in America too - before it's banned and becomes an un-book.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  5. Neuromancer by jonwil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wish someone would turn Neuromancer into a film, it would be far better than a lot of the garbage we get at the cinema these days.

    1. Re:Neuromancer by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Impossible. You can try, but I am certain you'll fail just like all others did. Try it yourself. Take the novel and turn it into a script. Then gauge just how long it really is and what run time you'd end up with. Not with the whole trilogy, just the first, just NM. You end up with a movie that runs 5 hours and you already left out half of what's important. Cut it more and what you end up with is a movie that makes no sense, explains no character, you will of course get a story out of it but in the end, nobody who knows the novel will recognize it anymore.

      A lot of the novel is internal monologue and information about the characters' mood, ideas, ideals, hopes and expectations. How'd you want to do that, if at all? In a voiceover while they stare meaningful into the evening sky that looks like a TV tuned to a dead channel?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Neuromancer by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      After watching Blade Runner 2049 this weekend I believe that Denis Villeneuve should give it a go.

    3. Re:Neuromancer by stereoroid · · Score: 1

      There was a attempt to turn Neuromancer in to a movie around 1986/7: King Crimson guitarist Robert Fripp reported that he had started work on music for the soundtrack.

      In August it was reported that Deadpooldirector Tim Miller is to direct an adaptation of Neuromancer for Fox. I think some King Crimson music would go very well e.g. Level Five as title music.

      --
      (this is not a .sig)
    4. Re:Neuromancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw, nigger lesbians isn't inclusive enough. It has to be retarded nigger lesbian amputees with AIDS.

    5. Re:Neuromancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mother is a pole smoking faggot bitch

      Corrected your post for you.

    6. Re:Neuromancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would work as an anime. ex: Serial Experiments Lain. Which successfully pulled off the "evening sky that looks like a TV tuned to a dead channel".

    7. Re:Neuromancer by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      I thought Ender's Game translated to the movie well. Perhaps because the author was involved in the screenwriting?

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    8. Re:Neuromancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Ender's Game film was horrible .

      The reader is presented with many mysteries in the book, and the main joy in reading Ender's Game is to see how those mysteries are resolved. In the movie, there are no mysteries--it's a completely linear plot where nothing unexpected happens. From the beginning, the movie tells you that the kid is like a god who will save the world from the evil aliens, then he saves the world from the evil aliens and there are big explosions. The end. I might as well watch Transformers, because the plot for Transformers is just as bad, but Transformers has better explosions, giant robots, and a really hot chick.

    9. Re:Neuromancer by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The point is that if you even tried to put the content of Neuromancer into a single movie, it would run far, far longer than anyone would be willing to sit through. What I could see is it being turned into a TV series like Bab5, you take the basic plot and spin a few subplots around it to stretch it to 26-30 episodes. That could work.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Neuromancer by deadwill69 · · Score: 1

      Good case in point is "Johnny Mnemonic" Somebody tried to make a movie out of one chapter and failed miserably:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    11. Re:Neuromancer by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      You end up with a movie that runs 5 hours and you already left out half of what's important.

      So make it a Netflix series, like Sense8.

      A lot of the novel is internal monologue and information about the characters' mood, ideas, ideals, hopes and expectations.

      There are directors and screenwriters who have been very skilled at conveying internal monologue, mood, ideas etc. I think of Kubrick's Clockwork Orange and Charlie Kaufman's Adaptation. Also Scorsese's Taxi Driver and Sam Mendes American Beauty. Lot's more come to mind but they are some well-known ones.

      I could see David Cronenberg directing Neuromancer.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    12. Re:Neuromancer by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I like Fripp, but I think his music might be a little too conventional for Neuromancer. Some of the contemporary electronica has finally caught up to Neuromancer.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    13. Re:Neuromancer by timholman · · Score: 1

      I wish someone would turn Neuromancer into a film, it would be far better than a lot of the garbage we get at the cinema these days.

      It would bomb miserably at the box office, because most of the audience would perceive it as a rip-off of "The Matrix", "Tron", and dozens of other films that have used Gibson's tropes. Most people under the age of 40 have never heard of "Neuromancer" and would never be able to fit the movie into their preconceptions of a story that was written 30+ years ago.

      On top of that, much of what is in "Neuromancer" would seem incredibly dated by modern standards, given how technology has evolved. Much of the source material would have to be massively edited, to the point where it wouldn't even be "Neuromancer" any more. The window of opportunity for filming the novel has long since closed.

      It's the same reason why "Blade Runner 2049" hasn't done well at the box office. The original "Blade Runner" means nothing to the younger audience segment, so the new movie doesn't resonate with them.

    14. Re:Neuromancer by halivar · · Score: 1

      I never thought I'd hear someone call Fripp "too conventional."

      But you also made me sad again that the original King Crimson line-up only made one album. :(

    15. Re:Neuromancer by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I never thought I'd hear someone call Fripp "too conventional."

      Don't get me wrong. Maybe I should have said that Fripp is too influenced by the European classical tradition to be appropriate for a Neuromancer soundtrack. Too serious. I imagine the music for Neuromancer would be more informed by the disposable electronica, dubstep-influenced, and the chopped, sampled stuff. Not that it would be better music, just more appropriate.

      I'm a big fan of Fripp. I've seen various incarnations of King Crimson (and the League of Gentlemen!) live and I've even seen Fripp perform his Frippertronics at an in-store performance at a record store back in the 80s (he autographed a copy of Exposure for me that day).

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    16. Re:Neuromancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      neuromancer would have to be a trilogy, at a minimum, consider if Dune had been done as a trilogy instead of trying to cram all of the density into a single movie.

    17. Re:Neuromancer by halivar · · Score: 1

      Lucky! I'm 38, so I must live vicariously through my father's recollections. I yet hope that that down-tempo electronica will one day rediscover the joy of the mellotron.

    18. Re:Neuromancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, what a thing to say about your own mother. That literally sucks.

    19. Re:Neuromancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there have been attempts, including the current one: https://io9.gizmodo.com/the-neuromancer-movie-is-back-on-this-time-from-deadpo-1797691788

    20. Re:Neuromancer by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Just do it like a bored researcher who kept his finger permanently on the fast-forward button...

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    21. Re:Neuromancer by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I believe someone is working on that.
      I saw kind of trailers in youtube last months.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    22. Re:Neuromancer by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Except for the swarm queen.
      In the book she is the most beautiful being Ender ever has seen, in the movie it is a plain greyish monster.

      The 2 follow up books are good, too. Sratching at the edge how a world with (sub) light speed travel but instant communication would look like. Or how to breed humans with super human intelligence but keep them in check with mental deseases ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    23. Re:Neuromancer by rpresser · · Score: 1

      Dead TV channels are blue, since CRTs disappeared.

    24. Re:Neuromancer by orgelspieler · · Score: 2

      I didn't find the book all that mysterious. The "twist" at the end was telegraphed from a long ways away. Now the sequels had some real mindfucks, but the original Ender's Game was just so-so. Also, ansibles just cannot be made to work without violating causality, so a fair amount of suspending disbelief is required (although he paid some lip service to this in the sequels). Same problem with Star Trek subspace communications, but they have FTL travel, too, so it's already a problem.

    25. Re:Neuromancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Ender's Game translated to the movie well. Perhaps because the author was involved in the screenwriting?

      I guess you haven't read the book, then. They omitted essential concepts, most particularly Ender's fights with other children, but also key parts of his interaction with Mazer Rackham. Without those, Ender is a 2D character.

    26. Re:Neuromancer by rolandw · · Score: 1

      I wish someone would turn Neuromancer into a film, it would be far better than a lot of the garbage we get at the cinema these days.

      Better still to turn it into a radio show. As every knows, the pictures are better on the radio.

      Want evidence? Hitchhiker's Guide.

    27. Re:Neuromancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I could see David Cronenberg directing Neuromancer.

      Best idea, or best fucking idea? Assuming it turns out like Naked Lunch, and not like eXistenz.

  6. BRAVEHEART by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The movie is good too.

  7. Pattern Recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In a slight departure from his sci-fi novels, I really like the plot and character development of Pattern Recognition.

    1. Re:Pattern Recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took me about 1/3 into the book before I realized it wasn't a cyberpunk story. I don't think that his in-your-face, sharp-edged this-is-probably-over-your-head references worked that well in a contemporary setting.

      Afterwards, I had to look up what an iBook was, since it was apparently so cool. Looking at the pictures, I downrated the novel a notch or two. :)

    2. Re:Pattern Recognition by willoughby · · Score: 1

      I think that one is my favorite, also. I like female protagonists and this book has one of the best. And, for female protagonists, book one of The Bridge Trilogy (can't remember the title) is another very good one.

    3. Re:Pattern Recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My background is quite similar to the OP regarding Gibson and the Sprawl-trilogy. And Burning Chrome had some kick ass novellas (incl. Johnny Mnemonic) at the time. I kind of lost my interest with Gibson along the Bridge trilogy after Virtual Light.

      Pattern Recognition was the resurrection of Gibson in my eyes and I enjoyed its spe-fi style immensely. Too bad, the other books in Blue Ant(/Bigend) trilogy are not that good IMO. I remember thinking Lost tv series practically stole the video clip idea between some seasons building up the back story and anticipation towards the next season on the web.
      I've searched for Buzz Rickson jackets several times with plans of getting one (and yes, the jacket Gibson described in PR didn't even exist IRL at the time of the book was published) but always finally decided against it... maybe some day.

      The latest(?) novel 'The Peripheral' just doesn't seem to peek my interest enough. Started it twice and always jumped to some other novel like the latest in the Laundry series from Stross or even re-reading all the Marîd Audran/Budayeen books (including the unfinished 4th in the series) from George Alec Effinger (RIP).

      BTW, is it true Gibson having cursed cell phones for not being able to imagine them beforehand and use them in the Sprawl trilogy or is this just some urban myth? Then again, I guess this could fit quite a lot of sci-fi authors...

  8. Pattern Recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I liked Pattern Recognition a lot. Reminiscent of a side plot in Count Zero, it is very unobtrusive, and very memorable.

  9. Idoru by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and then Neuromancer

  10. We don't talk about him - we talk with him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Re: "Why does hardly anybody talk about William Gibson anymore? "

    Because he is active on Twitter as @great_dismal and the discussion has shifted to links to the unevenly-distributed future?

    1. Re:We don't talk about him - we talk with him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: "Why does hardly anybody talk about William Gibson anymore? "

      Because he is active on Twitter as @great_dismal and the discussion has shifted to links to the unevenly-distributed future?

      Because after a few Blue Ant stories, he had become an absurdist.

  11. I like all WIlliam Gibson novels. by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    I know the neuromancer and the bridge triology and like both. Perhaps the Bridge triology is a bit better because the scenarios described are more plausible, as is the character of Chevette in "Virtual Light".
    Then again, in the neuromancer triology all three books where quite memorable, whereas Idoru was sort of meh IMHO.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:I like all WIlliam Gibson novels. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really did like Idoru, more than Neuromancer actually. Gibson is one of my favorite writers, together with Vance and LeGuin. Stephenson is enjoyable but he really needs an editor that scraps about every second page. That way the stories would have a better pace and you won't have to lug around a pound of paper for each book.

  12. In general, I'm not a SF fan by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    But Neuromancer is one of my favorite books,

    1. Re:In general, I'm not a SF fan by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      In general, I am a SF fan. And I don't like Gibson's influence on the genere, but at least it's not as bad as George Lucases influence.

  13. Uniformly brilliant by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    He has not made one dud book and if I was to choose one to be best I would say The Peripheral but I could change my mind in 2018.

    Please keep writing Bill.

    1. Re:Uniformly brilliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I came here to say The Peripheral. One of my all-time favorite novels.

    2. Re:Uniformly brilliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

  14. Favorite William Gibson Novel . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Difference Engine . . .

    1. Re: Favorite William Gibson Novel . . . by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I would rather even read 'The Big U'. Because even when he was green and just starting out, Stephenson could write a good nerd-genre book that is more fun to read than anything by Gibson.

      Yes, I have a paperback of ' The Big U' from before Stephenson allowed it to be reprinted. It has always been a fun read.

    2. Re: Favorite William Gibson Novel . . . by Megane · · Score: 1

      I think I like that one best too. As I recall, "steampunk" wasn't even a thing yet when that came out. But perhaps it helped that Bruce Sterling was involved, to keep things from getting too abstract with just Gibson alone.

      And Jean-Michel Jarre's Revolutions makes a great soundtrack to read it by. Lots of steam and brass.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  15. Gibon's works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I never really enjoyed his dystopian stuff. I prefer the Bigend trilogy. "Pattern Recognition" is in my top five books of all time and "Zero History" is in the top ten.

  16. Directions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even though the world we live in, at times, appears headed in the exact direction Gibson described in his Sprawl trilogy. ... so it isn't like his future vision has become "badly dated."

    It appears the opposite is true. Governments have been asserting themselves over the corporations increasingly during the last two decades. Additionally the people have generally become more aware of their rights and the methods of enforcing them through the courts during the last few decades. Oh right, it depends from which part of the world your are observing it. So "It depends" is the right answer, once again.

  17. None by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am really enjoying not reading a William Gibson novel right now. Thus, my favorite is None. I hope to continue to enjoy not reading William Gibson for a while. He is indeed one of my favorite authors for not reading.

    1. Re:None by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      And by the way, I hope to enjoy not reading Walter Jon Williams for some time after I'm done with Quillifer.

    2. Re:None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What a coincidence, I'm enjoying not knowing who the hell you are.

    3. Re:None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What a coincidence, I'm enjoying not knowing who the hell you are.

      Yes, me too. It's just a shame that Bruce has denied us the pleasure of not reading his /. posts.

    4. Re:None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Normally I like what you have to say, even if I disagree - you're a strong advocate of various things I'm interested in and its obvious that you are trying to make the world better in the way you believe, and I can't argue with that.

      But please..this isn't actually contributing to the conversation. Some people like Gibson and Williams and a voice as strong as yours tends to drown out the competing voices.

      Unless that's your intention and you have a problem with these authors or the cyberpunk genre in general, and then we can actually have a discussion.

      Cheers and thanks.

    5. Re: None by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Many of us enjoy not reading your drivel. Anything you can do to help with that would be greatly appreciated. Jealous much?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    6. Re: None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mad, bro?

      (and usually, when logged in, I am somebody who is a little hostile towards Perens)

    7. Re: None by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      This is a rare instance where I agree with Perens.

      Are you worried that hero worshippers will become confused and not be able to pick which 'side' (Perens or Gibson) to choose?

    8. Re:None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm enjoying not reading cdreimer right now.

    9. Re:None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine is brave heart for sure

    10. Re:None by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      Actually, I thought this was sort of a silly topic for Slashdot, and that it merited a silly answer.

      I have enjoyed reading Gibson and Williams, and Williams actually answers my email and sent me a nice signed print book when I pointed out a technical problem he had with an e-book.

    11. Re:None by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I wished he would write a sequel to Aristoi, I loved that book.
      And there is anothe SF where two siblings have kind of mental hacking powers and discover an allian race, that consists of 'queen like' biological mother ships and spawns worker dornes at will, with various levle of inteligence and autonomie. In the end the sinlings control the drug and pharmaceutics market because the alliens trade chemicals for novels etc. I forgot the name of that book, no idea where I put it.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    12. Re:None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am really enjoying not reading a William Gibson novel right now. Thus, my favorite is None. I hope to continue to enjoy not reading William Gibson for a while. He is indeed one of my favorite authors for not reading.

      Good comment. Cormac McArthy (I know, not science fiction) is perhaps my favorite author to enjoy not reading.

    13. Re:None by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      It's called Angel Station.In late 2015, Williams sold 3 books in the Quilifer series to Saga and three in the Dread Empire's Fall series to Harper Collins, and the two publishers agreed to allow him to alternate writing for each. Quillifer is the first of those books to see publication. So, if he sticks with it, a sequel to Angel Station might not be in the cards. But Williams is well known for being 20 different authors in one body, not all of which any one reader likes, and embracing his own variety rather than sticking with a theme.

    14. Re:None by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Ah, I read that book in german, but Angel Station sounds plausible.
      Thanx for the info!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  18. Favourite William Gibson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a signed edition of "Virtual light", yes I still read books printed on paper. WG is a true visionary I would say all his novels are good.

    1. Re: Favourite William Gibson by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Gibson is a hipster like you, too. He publicly proclaims that he writes on a manual typewriter. I would bet that it doesn't even use a 'cartridge' style ribbon.

      Lots of us have many, many paper books. We don't consider it noteworthy, though.

  19. Ditto. by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    Also, I'd like to throw in Phillip K. Dick into the same mix. I recently read some of his books for the first time and I'm amazed how much the state of the art in Sci-Fi has advanced since the time of trashy novels.

    1. Re:Ditto. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen to that, great books. For some reason this post also reminded me that when I finally read The Running Man I was blown away.

    2. Re:Ditto. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? Dick is good, not because he describes flat-screen panels and 'cyberspace' like Gibson did but because he foresaw many of the philosophical questions that would come from technology. In addition he wrote mostly short stories, a method of writing which is more or less dead today. Short stories are quick, require a serious attention to movement, and cannot be compared to the triologies of someone like Gibson.

      Name one other sci-fi writer of books who has had so many of their short stories made into movies. (I said books because Lucas and Roddenberry didn't write books). Even the bad PKD movies are better than some blockbuster hollywood 'originals' (A scanner darkly for example).

    3. Re:Ditto. by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      No, he's not good. Seriously. His books do not really delve into any philosophical issues. And the writing just plain sucks, from action scenes to women portrayal.

      There's a reason why none of the movies are even close to his books.

  20. Heh. by jargonburn · · Score: 1

    What is your favorite William Gibson novel?

    Who?
    Actually, although I wouldn't have been able to place the author's name, I did consider reading Neuromancer when I came across it, many years back. Didn't do so, but I might pick it up, now that I've been reminded.

    1. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I did consider reading Neuromancer when I came across it
      You were not meant to consider it. You were meant to *read* it.

  21. Its like money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just slip it in...

  22. Mona Lisa Overdrive by SWGuy · · Score: 1

    Mona Lisa Overdrive is my second favourite book of all time (after Lord of the Rings.) He's the only author I haven't read my daughter because I want her to read him herself when she's old enough to appreciate his unique writing style.

    1. Re:Mona Lisa Overdrive by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      "Unique writing style", that's a good one. How about "endless stream-of-consciousness tack-on sentences that span pages"?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re: Mona Lisa Overdrive by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      The thing with Gibson is that his target audience is smart people.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    3. Re: Mona Lisa Overdrive by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I don't know, when I read fiction, I do it to relax and enjoy myself, reading endless sentences in foreign languages isn't exactly my idea of relaxing and unwinding.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re: Mona Lisa Overdrive by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Well, that's great for you. Others have different reasons.

      FWIW, not a novel, but "Burning Chrome" is one of the few stories that draw me in and give belief to the world it describes. Not many writers can do that.

      Tailor-made cancers. indeed.

      Another idea I liked was the use of synthetic endorphins to allow malfeasants to continue their deeds while injured - sometimes badly injured. "Walking on bloody stumps" comes to mind.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    5. Re: Mona Lisa Overdrive by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      English is my first language, yet I'm still with you here, I find the stories to be compelling but the writing to be second-rate. Stephenson's Snow Crash is what Neuromancer wanted to be. Now, if only we could get some decent film adaptations of... well, anything, really.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re: Mona Lisa Overdrive by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I think I read an ugly rumor recently that they are about to make a 'show' of some kind (tv or movie) out of Snow Crash.

      They will probably ruin it. Most of the time when actors are allowed* to get involved that happens.

      (*did you ever notice that more than 90% of what appears on tv and in movies involves those theatre-arts type people who were so annoying in High School?)

    7. Re: Mona Lisa Overdrive by Megane · · Score: 1

      Hopefully we'll at least get a decent adaptation of Ready Player One.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    8. Re: Mona Lisa Overdrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the point here is that not only do different people like different authors or novels, but sometimes the same person is looking for something different. I love the density of Phillip K Dick, William Gibson, John Barns and Frank Herbert but sometimes I just want to shoot lots of evil aliens so i go for a John Ringo or Robert Heinlein (I really, really like Starship Troopers the novel and really, really HATE the movie).

    9. Re: Mona Lisa Overdrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you are more suited to Hemingway with his soothing SVO grunts and only the occasional two syllable adjective.

    10. Re: Mona Lisa Overdrive by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      sometimes I just want to shoot lots of evil aliens so i go for a John Ringo or Robert Heinlein

      Be very very careful. There are people, even some who frequent this forum, who take Heinlein very very seriously.

    11. Re: Mona Lisa Overdrive by Wintermute__ · · Score: 1

      Another idea I liked was the use of synthetic endorphins to allow malfeasants to continue their deeds while injured - sometimes badly injured. "Walking on bloody stumps" comes to mind.

      And that's already a thing, unfortunately. See Captagon, et al.

    12. Re:Mona Lisa Overdrive by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Memo to self : must read Ulysses. The Joyce imitation, I've already read Homer.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  23. burning chrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not a novel but i like it better than neuromancer even.

    1. Re:Burning Chrome by erlando · · Score: 1

      That quote is the opening sentence of Neuromancer, not Burning Chrome.

      --
      Remember, there are no stupid questions. But there are a lot of inquisitive idiots.
    2. Re:Burning Chrome by Megane · · Score: 1

      Did he mean static or the blue color that VCRs would put on when they can't find a signal? Actually, I think he wrote that before the VCR blue screen was a thing.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    3. Re:Burning Chrome by deadwill69 · · Score: 1

      I forget myself, but that's an awesome picture!

  24. Johnny Mnemonic by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Johnny Mnemonic with Kaenu Reeves is kind of that :
    it's an adaptation of a Gibson's short story that introduce the universe and a few characters that Gibson will later use for its Sprawl trilogy.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  25. Neuromance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also came across Gibson's Neromance in the 90's. It is one of my all time favorites. Still have the book. Read it about 3 times. Absolutely love the characters and plot. Like all dystopian SF it shows the dangers of technology (rogue A.I. anyone), the enormous gulf between the haves and have -nots etc Sure. It's pure SF what with the Matrix, the vat-grown assasins (eye's etc I can go for, but complete humans?...) and the hive-bound rich guys in orbit, but I love it nonetheless.

  26. pohl got there first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Space Merchants, eat your hearts out all you Cyberpunk latecomers :-)

    1. Re: pohl got there first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Pohl & Kornbluth. Pohl isn't as good solo. Also, I'd rather read solo Kornbluth works.

      Pohl wrote some good readable books, that don't need to be 'edgy' like with Gibson to be succesful books, but Pohl falls int a rut, i.e. all those 'hee-chee' or whatever it was books, and doesn't really consistently shine.

  27. Gibson's only flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was not explaining why there was no watchdog circuit to drop you out when things got unpleasant.

    Would have been easy to explain - it makes virtual sex less exciting.

    Other than that, it's not that far from what we can do now. Given time I suspect he'll be rated up there with HG Wells.

    And the original Neuromancer.

  28. All Tomorrow's Parties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Great story and I found nearly every paragraph could be isolated like a very deep poem.
    I'm a bit surprised it hasn't been mentioned.

  29. Is today's fortune a coincidence? by myrrdyn · · Score: 1

    At the bottom of the page I see today's fortune is ""The Street finds its own uses for technology." -- William Gibson" which sounds too perfect of a coincidence.

    --
    Elen sìla lùmenn' omentielvo
  30. Not badly dated? by ebcdic · · Score: 1

    "Three megabytes of hot RAM"

    1. Re:Not badly dated? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      You can still fit a lot of ICE breaker code in 3MB!

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:Not badly dated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if you program microcontrollers, as long as hot means low latency and not operating temperature.

    3. Re: Not badly dated? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Back then it was 'cool' and edgy to know what that was. It validated nerds of a certain period during their coming of age.

      That is part of the problem with Gibson. He traffics in phrases and terminology that catch a nerd's attention, or did back in the day. It validated some nerds during their coming of age and they revere him for that.

      Really, though, it's more like he hung out in a store that sold PC clones in the early 90's, or somebody gave him an issue of Computer Shopper to use as reference material.

  31. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was a science fiction author who was mildly popular in the counterculture scene a few decades ago. Sadly, he passed away from complications related to AIDS about ten years ago.

  32. None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Science fiction is for losers. Cyberpunk in particular is shit. It got nothing right - as science fiction always does - and it's embarassing how it is removed from reality.

  33. Burning Chrome by Forget4it · · Score: 1

    Burning Chrome
    (atmospheric lead-in)
    The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel.
    https://www.reddit.com/r/Cyberpunk/comments/3s4xju/the_sky_above_the_port_was_the_color_of/

    --
    Artificial intelligence is the study of how to make real computers act like the ones in the movies.
  34. The X-files episodes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we just talk about how bad his X-Files episodes were? The books are amazing, but his writing seems to translate really poorly to other mediums.

  35. The Peripheral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably an unpopular opinion with most purists. It was just a great premise and engaging idea. I loved the characters, the texture as always, and it made you think about the nature of existence. I'll have to read some more Philip K Dick until Gibson gets to making that a trilogy. :D

    1. Re:The Peripheral by lurker412 · · Score: 1

      I agree. My previous favorite was Mona Lisa Overdrive, but the early ones seem a little dated now. The Peripheral combines Gibson's energetic writing with the benefit of 30 more years of tech progress to draw on. Nice social constructs like the aunties and the jackpot.

    2. Re: The Peripheral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that there are two types of readers: those that want stories where everything is plainly described, so that there is nothing to impede the flow of image, story, plot, etc. during consumption; and those that enjoy being given a puzzle or partial information and being allowed to eventually work out what is going on.

      "The Peripheral" is a story for the second type of reader. Gibson's characters speak in lingo that is never defined or explained for the reader, so the reader has to figure out -- sometimes late in the story -- what the characters were saying. Likewise, Gibson gives the reader story lines that present a particular side of a complicated picture, i.e., the situation as seen through the eyes of a character that doesn't know the whole story. The reader eventually gets enough information to understand what is unfolding, but it takes time and attention to detail, and sometimes a second reading.

      I personally find it enjoyable to get only partial, tantalizing glimpses of the whole plot, and find it rewarding to slowly work out for myself what is going on, rather than having the story presented fully and unambiguously, but not everyone feels that same way.

      One reason that I like rereading Gibson's stories is that his stories have enough detail to paint an evocative picture but not so much detail that I never get to exercise my imagination.

      For example, from Count Zero "They sent a slamhound on Turner's trail in New Delhi, slotted it to his pheromones and the color of his hair. It caught up with him on a street called Chandni Chauk and came scrambling for his rented BMW through a forest of bare brown legs and pedicab tires. Its core was a kilogram of recrystallized hexogene and flaked TNT. He didn't see it coming."

      I love this paragraph. Gibson doesn't tell us what a slamhound looks like, exactly, so my imagination is free to fill in the details any way I like. Was it metal? Did it have skin? Did it look like an animal or machine? Gibson doesn't specify whether the slamhound had wheels or legs, only that it "scrambled". Is there lots of "atmosphere"? Yes. But there are concrete details, too. In just a handful of words Gibson manages to evoke a really astonishing number of things: we already have an image of who (or what) Turner is; we already have an idea about the level and sophistication of available technology; we already get a picture that this world is not a utopia; we can almost feel the heat and humidity of the street in New Delhi; we already know that this story involves brutal, perhaps criminal elements of society.

      In "The Peripheral", Gibson takes this talent for understatement to new levels. He draws his plotlines with spare but carefully placed strokes. He trusts in the reader's ability to connect the dots, to see the Gestalt. He doesn't condescend. You have to be the kind of reader that enjoys that kind of thing, however.

    3. Re:The Peripheral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've quoted his description of The Jackpot as the prediction of the most likely progression of climate change and pandemics. My 83-year-old mom asked me "do the oil company executives think that they'll be able to buy private clean air and water for themselves?," and I read her that passage and said, "yes, yes they do, and I think they're right."

    4. Re: The Peripheral by MercTech · · Score: 1

      Gibson writes like a Monet.
      Some prefer Vermeer

      --
      NRRPT/RCT
  36. Neuromancer, hands down by erlando · · Score: 1

    This was the book that opened my eyes to reading novels in the language they were written in. "The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel" just doesn't translate that well...

    --
    Remember, there are no stupid questions. But there are a lot of inquisitive idiots.
    1. Re:Neuromancer, hands down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm old. For me, a television tuned to a dead channel is a crackly grey.

      Kids these days, they see that as bright blue.

    2. Re: Neuromancer, hands down by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      All poetry translates poorly.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    3. Re: Neuromancer, hands down by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Some poetry ages very, very badly.

      We look at things like the flying cars articles in 1950s Popular Science magazine for amusement value. Nobody is really impressed by them today.

  37. Article reads as if Gibson has stopped writing by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    Neuromancer will always be a standout piece of speculative fiction and iâ(TM)ll always love it. His newer works are probably âoebetterâ and more nuanced. The wilder dystopias traded for something far more familiar (but still dysfunctional in their own ways). Pattern Recognition is great and a roughly contemporary story. The Peripheral a good mix of both (though perhaps an increasingly uncomfortable one given what has happened in the world since it was written). Not sure I particularly want any of them turned into movies though.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  38. Because by Sqreater · · Score: 1

    The real world tech we have satisfies his vision. It was interesting before the tech we have today. If someone projects the automobile, it is interesting. If the automobile surrounds us, it isn't.

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
  39. Best description ever of a blue sky... by Tal+Cohen · · Score: 1

    The opening line of Neuromancer: "The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel." I mean, why not say the sky was a clear, bright, uniform blue? :-P

    --
    - Tal Cohen
    1. Re:Best description ever of a blue sky... by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Funny, but for the rest of the millenials, TV tuned to a dead channel was often referred to as an "ant race".

      Think "static" on a monitor screen as projected by 1908s sci-fi shows.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    2. Re:Best description ever of a blue sky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The opening line of Neuromancer: "The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel." I mean, why not say the sky was a clear, bright, uniform blue? :-P

      And that post is why you're not a successful novelist.

    3. Re:Best description ever of a blue sky... by Tal+Cohen · · Score: 1

      I know... I know... that was the whole point of my (attempted) joke. NM.

      --
      - Tal Cohen
    4. Re:Best description ever of a blue sky... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I know... I know... that was the whole point of my (attempted) joke. NM.

      I got it, and I even thought it was funny. However, my LCD televisions still generate static and even white noise for nostalgia's sake, which I think might have had something to do with the reception of your joke here in nerdland.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Best description ever of a blue sky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing how often that line is misinterpreted as well. It is so often taken as the grey snow of old analogue TV's before they added the blue screen to hide that. Even though Gibson clarified it was the blue screen he meant, it is still taken the wrong way.

    6. Re:Best description ever of a blue sky... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Didn't a Terry Pratchett novel use that exact line to describe a clear, blue, sunny day, as a lampshade of that little onwards-march of technology?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    7. Re: Best description ever of a blue sky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except no... Gibson said: "I actually composed that first image with black and white video static of my childhood in mind, sodium silvery and almost painful, a whopping anachronism right at the very start of my career,in the imaginary future, but an invisible one, interestingly. One that revels a particular grace shared by all imaginary futures as they make their way up the timeline and into the real future where we all must go. The reader never stopped to think that I must have been thinking, however unconsciously, of the texture and color of a signal free channel on a wooden cabinet motorola with fabric covered speakers. Readers compensated for me shouldering an additional share of the imaginative burden and imagined whatever they assumed was the color of static to take on a melancholy of the phrase dead channel. "

    8. Re:Best description ever of a blue sky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what televisions looked like when turned to a dead channel when the book was written.

    9. Re:Best description ever of a blue sky... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You are probably to young to how how a TV tuned to a dead channel looks ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    10. Re:Best description ever of a blue sky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We called it "snow storm". Ah, the artifacts of technology.

    11. Re:Best description ever of a blue sky... by Tal+Cohen · · Score: 1

      Uh, exactly the opposite. That was the point of the joke.

      --
      - Tal Cohen
  40. Why novel? by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    His shorts stories were better than his novels. The early novels, especially, contained far too much filler in order to stretch out what was really a novella into commercial length.

    Among his short stories, I think Hinterlands is still one of the best bits of any sort of fiction I've read.

  41. Count Zero by Ploulack · · Score: 1

    maybe because of the 'young kid turns into bad ass by hanging out with elite' classic structure that Gibson has brilliantly spared himself from in all his others...
    I'm a huge fan of Gibson, re-read the sprawl three times, always sucks me in in a few lines.

    1. Re:Count Zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That, and the simultaneous stories that are happening that intertwine towards the end was pretty cool. This one is my favorite of his too

  42. Japan rules the world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the problem with near-future fiction. Japan appeared to be racing ahead of the world, before its social and structural stagnation became apparent. Nowhere is this more visible than in technology - Japan isn't central to innovation or manufacturing in electronics anymore, and never really got out in front of computing. Like 'Blade Runner', younger generations can't really relate to the future aesthetic that's presented.

  43. Re: Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You read it on the internet, it must be true. Except for the being dead part.

  44. Physical is Cheaper than Digital by turp182 · · Score: 1

    Off topic a bit, but I noticed that on Amazon, Burning Chrome is cheaper as a paperback than the Kindle version.

    I'm seeing $9.49 for the Kindle and $8.11 for the paperback. As a Prime member, shipping is $0.00.

    https://www.amazon.com/Burning...

    Trees would seem to be more expensive that bits down the wire. Dystopia.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
    1. Re:Physical is Cheaper than Digital by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Amazon, most books are cheaper as paperback than Kindle. It's not the cost but the demand that drives prices.

    2. Re:Physical is Cheaper than Digital by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      It is for this reason that I have gone back to buying paper books... I am incentivized to do so... not my fault that they apparently want to work a lot harder and eat up all their margins bringing me those words printed on paper rather than make ebooks cheaper....

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  45. Got it on eBay by nospam007 · · Score: 0

    I have an almost novel Gibson Stratocaster that I like very much.

    1. Re: Got it on eBay by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 0

      You're wrong. Fender makes the Stratocaster.

      Did you buy some really, really bad counterfeit merchandise on eBay? Next time go direct to the source and shop on BangGood.

  46. Persuasion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or was it "Emma"?

  47. Changes over time... he's getting better by unfortunateson · · Score: 1

    For a long while it was Neuromancer, if for no other reason than that opening line, and the overall tone and mood. Good science fiction? No. Beautiful prose, definitely.

    The Blue Ant trilogy, including Spook Country, took the lead not too long ago. Solid writing, better story, still just on the cusp of our world.

    But the Peripheral is damned brilliant. Wild-ass SF ideas, great writing, probably one of my favorite books of all time.

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
    1. Re:Changes over time... he's getting better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I picked up Pattern Recognition on a whim in a used bookstore while at a conference and really enjoyed the read. I ended up reading the whole series. Like you, Peripheral is one of my all-time favorites. What are some of your other favorite novels?

      Contact by Carl Sagan might be my #1.
      I also liked
      Spin and Axis by Robert Charles Wilson (haven't gotten to the next book yet)
      Permutation City by Greg Egan, as well as many of his short stories
      The Sparrow and Children of God by Mary Doria Russell
      Lathe of Heaven by Ursula Le Guin
      Many of Ted Chiang's short stories
      All the Light we Cannot See
      Various mystery novels, but I won't bother to list them

  48. future genius by AkumaKuruma · · Score: 1

    this is the man that helped coin the term cyberspace. His influence with just this series alone can directly be seen in movies like the Matrix and The Lawnmower Man (the movie, not the Stephen King novel), as well as manga/anime such as Ghost in the Shell and Cowboy Bebop. so much of his futuresight is intertwined with modern pop culture and we don't even consciously know about it.

    1. Re: future genius by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      He ruined a lot of good nerd things, by popularizing it for the pinks.

  49. This should be a poll by Lorens · · Score: 1

    List all William Gibson books and let people vote!

  50. The Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha Ha! I said it,

  51. I deny the premise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The question is directed at all Slashdot readers, even those who have no favorite Gibson novel. How he became regarded as the Correct cyberpunk author is beyond me.

  52. Counter-Answer by AdamStarks · · Score: 1

    Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, by Philip K Dick

    But seriously, I read Neuromancer for the first time ~8 years back, and it came across as visionary for the period in which it was released. That is to say, it was kind of a slog to read now, and most everything new in it has been done to death since. Maybe his other stuff holds up more? Maybe I was in a weird headspace and I'd like it a lot more if I re-read it?

    I tried reading Snow Crash as well, by Neal Stephenson, and distinctly thinking "This would have been revolutionary to read back in the 90s". Reading it nowadays, it seems more tired and silly.

    Dick, though, holds up really well, despite being a lot older. So if you're a freak like me who questions the premise of this article, and you haven't read his stuff, give it a shot :)

    1. Re:Counter-Answer by lindseyp · · Score: 1

      That's quite pertinent. One of the main plaudits given to Gibson is he always seemed ahead of his time, and had such massive influence on SF to follow. Of course everything he did in the earlier books has been "done to death" because everyone copied him. Although that might make his earlier works seem dated somewhat, it says a lot for the quality of his vision.

      --
      j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
    2. Re:Counter-Answer by shess · · Score: 1

      Dick, though, holds up really well, despite being a lot older. So if you're a freak like me who questions the premise of this article, and you haven't read his stuff, give it a shot :)

      FALSE! After 35 years of reading science fiction and fantasy, I saw that the new Blade Runner movie was coming out, and realized "You know, I've not read much PKD, I should fix that." So I ordered some material and collections, and got to work.

      Some stories like "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep" are fine, minor dated bits, but the core story is strong. But other stories have a lot of uninspected misogyny which makes them hard to read - not like he's been mean or anything, it reads more like a young man trying to impress someone (same issue I have with lots of Heinlein). The theories on autism and mental illness read like someone decided to knock out a science fiction story based on pattern-matching some Scientific American articles, the theories are so grossly wrong, even somewhat offensive. And the drug stories ... I pushed on with "Through a Scanner Darkly" to the end because I felt like reputation-wise it was warranted, but it was a slog, the story was too obviously working hard to support his point.

      I'll keep reading, because there's obviously a "there" there, but at this point I'm definitely not willing to make a blanket observation about how PKD holds up really well.

    3. Re:Counter-Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only read Neuromancer myself about 3 years back and had the opposite experience. I thought it was riveting. But then I almost never read scifi. Sometimes I'll watch scifi movies, the more significant or well-known ones, but mostly read other types of books such as science, sociology, or beat writers. Perhaps reading so many books that Neuromancer influenced had you sick of it before you eventually got around to it.

    4. Re:Counter-Answer by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The truth is, though, Brunner in The Shockwave Rider predicted the Internet in 1975. Gibson is sort of an also-ran.

      The big difference, though, is that Brunner was pre-Star Wars whereas Gibson was post-Star Wars. The unwashed masses were all wrapped up in 'Science Fiction' of the sort that existed after Lucas damaged the genere, and Gibson gets a lot more attention for that reason.

      Brunner was a traditional in-the-trenches SF writer with a long history in the field. Gibson is sort of a twink by comparison.

  53. How pretentious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "All sorts of big budget science fiction was produced for TV and the big screen since Neuromancer that never got anywhere near the brilliance of Gibson's future world. The Matrix Trilogy? Pedestrian trash. I Am Legend? I laughed so hard at this idea that I almost fell off my water polo horse." 'To get the conversation going, because we feel our audience is a mob of knuckledragging simpletons incapable of expressing thoughts of any order higher than what you like or do not like, we rephrased dryriver's question... What is your favorite William Gibson novel?'

  54. Not really by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

    I read a lot of SF and Fantasy, so I feel little shame in saying I've read no Gibson outside of Neuromancer.

    It was OK I suppose. But I wasn't really fond of his protagonist. Dude wasn't sympathetic at all, and in the end I just did not like him. I think I would have enjoyed it more if he'd written it from the point of view of his female bodyguard. Also his universe was dystopian and ugly. I already have one ugly dystopia narrated by people I don't like, I don't need more when I go to read.

    OTOH, if that is your kind of thing, I'd suggest picking up Charlie Human's Apocolypse Now Now. Human can at least write a bastard narrator that I still somehow want to follow.

  55. "start with short story" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i like the one with the airplanes.
    also, maybe scout the (filming) location first, make adjustments to the plot to fit the correct location(!) and please also keep the (real) time of year in mind; if the shot is not completely CGI
    some people can actually see the period of time ... and movie-time "deep snowfall winter" shot during end-of-spring real-time is wrong.
    dialog, please, good dialog.
    there's a correlation (for me anyways) if you can "watch" a movie as a "audiobook" with your eyes closed: the correlation is that if the sound effects and dialog allow to "see" the movie with eyes closed,
    that it mostly turns into a movie i like ...

  56. Dogfight. by GrpA · · Score: 1

    In the Burning Chrome Anthology, this short story, of all of Gibson's work, had a greater impact on my research than any other story he wrote.

    He only co-wrote it too. It was written by Michael Swanwick and William Gibson

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    Enjoy science fiction? "Turing Evolved" - AI, Mecha, Androids and rail-gun battles. What more could you want?
  57. Bridge Trilogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Sprawl Trilogy (like a lot of Cyberpunk) hasn't aged well. It's the future, circa 1985.

    I do like the bridge trilogy a lot. It seems to have kept relevant. The Blue Ant trilogy is also a lot of fun. Essentially, I like the stuff he isn't famous for

  58. I gave up. by snarfies · · Score: 1

    I read all of William Gibson's books from Neuromancer all the way through All Tomorrow's Parties, and I gave the hell up. None of them even approach the quality of Neuromancer. The only one that was any good at all was Idoru, and that was no Neuromancer.

    At this stage I am convinced that William Gibson didn't actually write Neuromancer, at least not on his own. I think, at best, it was a joint project with John Shirley and Bruce Sterling, and Gibson himself may or may not have been involved.

    1. Re:I gave up. by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

      A lot of authors only have one great work. Most don't even have that.

  59. Best Gibson novels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Peripheral" is surprisingly good.

  60. The Difference Engine by coach_jl · · Score: 1

    I couldn't remember the name of the book or the author. When I searched for Neuromancer, The Difference Engine was on the list. So, this would be my current favorite by William Gibson. I have Neuromancer on hold at the library and will read it soon.

  61. Gernsback Continuum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a novel, a short story: The Gernsback Continuum (in burning Chrome). There is a probably a great film in there, maybe with Alex Cox directing?

  62. Burning Chrome by Archarzel · · Score: 1

    Not just the short itself (which is so excellent that it is how i explain the genre to friends) ; but the collection of the same name explored a variety of different cyberpunk realities. I really loved Dogfight, (the one about underground drone fighting) and New Rose Hotel is a thrill.

  63. None of them by Dmitri_Yuriescu · · Score: 1

    I only read _Pattern Recognition_ and it sucks

  64. i have the feeling..... by inerlogic · · Score: 1

    that i liked them all, but it's been 20-odd years since i've read them, i've been meaning to revisit.....

    maybe this is my sign that it's time...

  65. Agrippa (...and Neuromancer) by lerxstz · · Score: 1

    Neuromancer by far. I read many other (Mona Lisa Overdrive, Virtual Light, The Difference Engine and others) but Neuromancer was the most visionary I think.

    Agrippa, a short story, is fascinating to read. I read just an ordinary text version I found online a decade or so ago but IIRC Gibson originally wanted it released on a floppy disk that would erase itself after it was read once (you'll have to read the story to understand why). The whole concept was very inventive.

    --
    I chose to end my comments, not with a rim shot, but a long decaying F#7sus4
  66. Neuromancer, obviously... by Samurai+Nigel · · Score: 0

    How is this even a discussion?

  67. Re: Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you fell for that scam too? I'm sorry but whoever told you he is still alive was yanking your chain.

    R.I.P. William Gibson 1942-2007, beloved brother, father, grandfather, professor, doctor and actor.

  68. His Near Future Work is Better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pattern Recognition, Count Zero, Spook Nation, all speak to the anxieties of the early 21st century and the rise of lifestyle branded technology. I think the Bigend trilogy is better than the Sprawl in focusing on technology and the anxiety that comes with it. Masterful works.

  69. The Peripheral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they are an evolution of thought. In "The Peripheral," his worldview has been updated to reflect the timestream since "Neuromancer." He's still right on target. And "The Peripheral" is much more polished, so I guess it's my favorite today.

  70. I like em all.. sprawl trilogy is my favorite tho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't pick a single book out of the trilogy. It all goes together for me.

    the blue ant books haven't reached re-read status for me yet, but at the same time, they were particularly salient for me as I was studying design in grad school.

    Always looking forward to new books from Gibson.

  71. I like all ... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    M favourites are:
    Johnny Mnemonic and Virtual Light

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  72. Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Ender's Game film was horrible.

    So is the book - it is fantasy material for children, nothing more. Those not actually of teen or earlier years who find it entertaining are simply immature.

    There are very few really great SF works. There are even fewer adequate, much less great, SF movies.

    It's turtles all the way down. Stupid turtles.

  73. Gibson settings by John+Bayko · · Score: 1

    Not quite right. The main thing about Gibson's stories is they're written from the view of secondary characters, the "main story" happens to the other characters, often hidden. Once you realise that it makes thing clearer.

    It's not how you expect stories to be written, but it can be effective. There's a Young Adult book called "Me, Earl, And The Dying Girl" like that, the entire story is about Earl and how the "dying girl" (Rachel) forces him to sort his life out, and the book's narrator (Greg) is completely unaware of all of that. (the book was made into a movie, but had to follow the Hollywood formula, so was refocussed - still a good movie of its type, but I missed the book's twist)

  74. Updated alt.cyberpunk FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FAQ for the Usenet News group alt.cyberpunk has been updated and is now in Version 5 preview 7:
    ftp://guest:guest@collectivecomputers.org:21212/Cyberpunk/Alt_Cyberpunk_FAQ_V5_preview7.htm
    Contributions are welcome. This is the first update for more than 5 years.

  75. Neuromancer by mrflash818 · · Score: 1

    Neuromancer is my favorite.

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
  76. I prefer his short stories by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Also, he's a wizard with puns

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  77. Rephrased does not mean what you think it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > To get the conversation going, we rephrased dryriver's question... What is your favorite William Gibson novel?

    The original question was interesting, this is like rephrasing the entire US healthcare policy debate as "What's your favorite medical procedure?".

  78. Soooo... by BankRobberMBA · · Score: 1

    You're going for a "light side of the force" / "dark side of the force comparison"?

  79. Neuromancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... although _The Peripheral_ is a close second, and certainly the best he's written since Neuromancer.

  80. Pattern Recognition by tomwood2 · · Score: 1

    'Pattern Recognition' is a wonderful study in writing with the use of present-progressive tense and other techniques. "Pouring boiling water." I read it only recently and thought the references to 'video footage' being dispersed and discussed in 'chat rooms' was oddly old-hat for Gibson. Then I saw the publish date of 2003 - two years before YouTube.

  81. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By Gibson? Probably Neuromancer; Some great imagery and characters there. The others were okay but didn't grab me as well; I kinda miss Case and Molly.

    Not my fav. book in that genre tho; That is still taken by Snow Crash. It's less serious but more entertaining and is written from an unusual perspective; I want to say 2nd (As opposed to the more usual 1st or 3rd) but I'm not sure if that is correct. Diamond Age is pretty good too but harder to read/get in to. Took me a few chapters before my brain started really paying attention!

  82. Cyberpunky by mm4 · · Score: 1

    Everything before Spook Country.

  83. The one that I'm in by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

    Boy, I was dead.

  84. Channelling Ada by jman.org · · Score: 1

    The Difference Engine, his collaboration with Neal Stephenson.

    Holmes-era Scotland Yard employing a huge analog computer that runs on steam!

  85. So not movie material. Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that there aren't *any* other video programming alternatives out there...

    So sad. Guess to feel better, I'll go watch "American Gods".