Slashdot Mirror


Walmart Is Raising Prices Online To Increase In-Store Traffic (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: Walmart is taking a bit of an nontraditional approach to boost sales ahead of Black Friday and Cyber Monday shopping events by raising prices for products sold online and discounting those same items in physical retail stores. According to The Wall Street Journal, the big-box store has quietly raised prices for household and food items such as toothbrushes, macaroni and cheese, and dog food on its website while the prices in stores remained the same. If there are price discrepancies between online and in-store purchases, Walmart will now highlight this on the product's web listing to encourage customers to buy them from their local stores. It's all part of an effort to increase foot traffic as Walmart continues to compete with Amazon just about everywhere else.

With the new pricing strategy, a twin-pack of Betty Crocker Hamburger Helper costs $3.30 on Walmart.com, but goes as low as $2.50 if purchased at a store in Illinois. The aim is to also help reduce processing costs and increase online sales margins, since driving customers to stores means less shipping costs for the retailer. Shipping one box of instant macaroni and cheese from Chicago to Atlanta could cost Walmart as much as $10, reports the WSJ.

133 comments

  1. Clueless by fishthegeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Letâ(TM)s say Jimmy is shopping on Walmartâ(TM)s website. Heâ(TM)s shopping there because he doesnâ(TM)t want to go to a brink-n-mortar. He sees the price difference and thinks to himself âoeDang! Itâ(TM)s almost $1.00 cheaper in the store. I wonder what Amazonâ(TM)s price would be? Wow. Amazon is .50 cents cheaper online, and plus I wonâ(TM)t have to go to the store. Iâ(TM)ll just order from Amazon.â Walmart is absolutely clueless.

    --
    load "$",8,1
    1. Re:Clueless by fluffernutter · · Score: 4, Informative

      The general consensus around where I live is that people must go to Amazon for the selection instead of the price, because Amazon is usually more expensive. Most people around here go to brick and mortars for this reason. Once they can't find it at a brick and mortar, then they'll try something like Amazon.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Clueless by Nutria · · Score: 1

      The stuff I (used to) buy from walmart.com is the grocery stuff I wouldn't expect to buy from Amazon.

      I did notice two weeks ago that Wally has increased online prices compared to in-store, and figured that shipping cost was the reason.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    3. Re:Clueless by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Drive through fast food and even liquor stores. Convenience stores where you can get a common grocery item quicker, but at an increased markup.

      Sometimes it is the selection, occasionally it is the price, but ordering from the comfort of one's home is generally the ultimate in expedient convenience. Ordering household goods in your jammy pants with an adult beverage is almost worth missing the freak show at the block and mortar retailer.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    4. Re: Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you miss the freak show there won't be one, because you are the freak.

      Or, you just live in a really shitty area.

    5. Re:Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon without Prime has a shit selection. Every time I try to order something that's not a book it says "Prime Only" or whatever. Fucking useless store.

    6. Re:Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Amazon:
      Kellogg's Corn Flakes, 18 Oz
      $2.79, Prime Shipping

      Walmart online:
      Kellogg's Corn Flakes, 18 ounce box
      $3.83, Free Shipping.

      I'd buy from Amazon.

    7. Re:Clueless by djrobxx · · Score: 1

      The general consensus around where I live is that people must go to Amazon for the selection instead of the price, because Amazon is usually more expensive. Most people around here go to brick and mortars for this reason. Once they can't find it at a brick and mortar, then they'll try something like Amazon.

      Amazon is convenient, especially when coupled with fast, free Prime shipping. I'll often pay a small amount more for something marked "Amazon Prime" because I know I'll receive it within a day or two. I know it's not going to end up UPS ground from somewhere across the country that gets here a week later. It's also comfortable because I know they have a good, hassle free return policy. Key being a small amount, it doesn't take long for me to verify that I'm not over-paying for something by a significant amount.

      Getting gouged at brick and mortar stores for things like USB or HDMI cables is a lot of what drove me to using Amazon as my primary store in the first place.

    8. Re:Clueless by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

      People around you must have ample free time. Going to the store, searching around, and coming back costs about 30 minutes. How much is a half hour of your life worth?

    9. Re: Clueless by rmdingler · · Score: 2

      If you miss the freak show there won't be one, because you are the freak.

      Or, you just live in a really shitty area.

      I'm not certain why you believe those two things are mutually exclusive.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    10. Re:Clueless by MangoCats · · Score: 2

      Coincidentally, I just priced Mobil 1 ATF at WalMart and AutoZone... a few years ago I would have expected WalMart to beat AutoZone by 20%, but today the reverse is the case: AutoZone 9.99, WalMart 12.99 for the same product.

    11. Re:Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $67

    12. Re:Clueless by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      If Amazon Prime Pantry had a decent selection, that would have sold me on paying for Prime. It's a hell of a concept, but they're nowhere close to replacing our local grocery store, even for non-perishables.

      Drive to the store, or have a box appear on the doorstep? There's measurable value in the doorstep option, both time and money.

    13. Re: Clueless by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      By freak show, I think mdingler meant this.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    14. Re:Clueless by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Letâ(TM)s say Jimmy is shopping on Walmartâ(TM)s website. Heâ(TM)s shopping there because he doesnâ(TM)t want to go to a brink-n-mortar. He sees the price difference and thinks to himself âoeDang! Itâ(TM)s almost $1.00 cheaper in the store. I wonder what Amazonâ(TM)s price would be? Wow. Amazon is .50 cents cheaper online, and plus I wonâ(TM)t have to go to the store. Iâ(TM)ll just order from Amazon.â

      Is Jimmy really comparison shopping on a $4 box of macaroni, or is he only shopping around for expensive things?

      Walmart is absolutely clueless.

      Walmart may be a lot of things, but "clueless" is not one of them -- they probably have the best understanding of their customers than any other retailer -- they've been amassing customer information and analyzing way longer than almost any other customer - they were processing Big Data before Big Data was a buzzword.

    15. Re:Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you use normal apostrophes? Get the fuck off that braindead Apple device. Your comment is illegible.

      Normal apostrophes worked just fine for the last 40 years, what kind of shithead changes that?

      iOS, destroying the English language since 2007.

      Oh,and FUCK EMOJIS! Fuck them!

    16. Re:Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For fuck sakes you iphone people fix your keyboard configuration.

    17. Re:Clueless by starblazer · · Score: 1

      And it's 2.78 if you go to the store, you could even use the curbside pickup so you don't have to walk into the evil place. they'll load it in your car for you.

      https://brickseek.com/walmart-...

      What WM really needs to do is get in bed with the post office like Amazon has. Every night at midnight, WM dispatches one truck to the local USPS DDU with the orders for the zip codes that DDU services. "Next Delivery for all your essentials!". Use each store as a local warehouse. Target does that already with their online store. Watch Amazon squirm.

    18. Re:Clueless by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      I'll gladly pay extra to not step foot into a Walmart. Of course, I don't shop their web site either, so I guess it makes no difference.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    19. Re: Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could find tons of examples where Walmart is cheaper, but hey you found one where Amazon is cheaper, congrats.

    20. Re: Clueless by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      This is Wal-Mart that was originally being discussed, remember. :D

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    21. Re:Clueless by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      The fuel I'd use getting there to do the curbside pickup is more expensive then the penny I'd be saving. And I wouldn't have to deal with traffic, the Walmart parking lot, etc. And the time I don't spend driving there is better utilized doing other things, unless I just really fucking need corn flakes right fucking now.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    22. Re:Clueless by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      Slashdot: ignoring the HTML 2.0 standard and it's incorporation of unicode since the late 90s.

      The problem isn't Apple, the problem is Slashdot hasn't bothered to support Unicode in the literally 20 years it's been part of the HTML standard.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    23. Re:Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, definitely it should be all the iPhone users that have to individually "fix" their phones for one web site that hasn't updated their shit in over a decade.

      Lay off the glass dick.

    24. Re: Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You say that but dont go through the effort to show us even an example or two.

    25. Re:Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is funny you managed to post without the issues. So if whatever browser or device your using can do it, shouldn't Apple devices be able to do it. They used to handle it just fine. Why did the functionality of Apple devices regress?

      How much courage did that take slugger.

    26. Re:Clueless by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      Yes, Two-Day Shipping is fast, but when it takes several days for the seller to ship the damn thing, that don't mean much!

    27. Re: Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The price is more than a penny: you also pay an Amazon prime subscription fee

    28. Re:Clueless by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      So I'm going to spend 20 minutes getting dressed, locating my keys, driving to the store, waiting for them to bring it out, driving back home plus 10 miles of gasoline. Take the risk of getting a ticket, getting into an accident, getting my car dinged in the parking lot.

      For 10 cents?

      Walmart better hope there isn't a cheaper option on amazon.

      It does suck for brick and mortar and it is destroying local economies. But it's one of the few ways middle income people actually get the benefits of increased productivity.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    29. Re:Clueless by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      missing the freak show at the block and mortar retailer

      So I was visiting the USA on a work trip and asked my colleagues what I should do while I'm here. The answer (facetiously) was to "Go down to the local Walmart and witness American culture."

      I told them I've already seen the "people of Walmart" website so they instead invited me out to a jazz bar :-)

    30. Re:Clueless by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Slashdot: ignoring the HTML 2.0 standard and it's incorporation of unicode since the late 90s.

      The problem isn't Apple, the problem is Slashdot hasn't bothered to support Unicode in the literally 20 years it's been part of the HTML standard.

      You realise it's only the Apple devices that result in illegible postings?

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    31. Re: Clueless by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      This was an or condition. That is 'at least one of these is true,' not 'exactly one of these is true.'

    32. Re:Clueless by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Well we choose to live somewhere where work is less than 20 minutes away and the grocery store is on the way home from there, if that's what you mean.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    33. Re: Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, to add to this:

      The more you use Prime, the lower the cost is for Prime on a per-visit instance. The cost for Prime for the year is static.

      The more you go to Wal-Mart, the costs are the same each trip - the higher the cost will be over the course of a year to keep going to Wal-Mart.

      I'd say there's some calculations to be done to see where that evens out. Ultimately, YMMV (truly this, since your mileage has an impact on the calculation.)

    34. Re:Clueless by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Drive through fast food and even liquor stores. Convenience stores where you can get a common grocery item quicker, but at an increased markup.

      OK.... Admittedly I usually eat in when travelling through America but are drive through's really more expensive than going inside? In Australia and the UK, Micky D's is usually the same price? In fact with a restaurant, take away is usually cheaper than eat in.

      Convenience stores, yep you've got a point but supermarkets run on stupidly thin margins that a local corner shop cant compete with. Usually when I'm accepting that I'm paying a premium for something its because I want it now and not even same day delivery can suffice. Either that or I want to see the product before buying like fresh food although I've never seen a fresh food delivery service cheaper than Tesco or Aldi (but usually shop at Morrisons or Sainsburys for quality).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    35. Re:Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So clearly it's Apple's fault for using something that has been part of the HTML spec for 20 years, and not a single site that has the issue that hasn't fixed it in 20 years.

      Why do I have a feeling you wouldn't be singing the same tune if it was an Android device?

    36. Re:Clueless by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      About as much courage as it takes to leave your web site not handling character encoding that has been part of every web server and spec for the last two decades, bunky.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    37. Re:Clueless by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Autozone has been beating walmart on oil for years. Walmart has better battery prices.

    38. Re:Clueless by Jadecristal · · Score: 1

      Or as I was immediately thinking when I saw the article title, regarding whoever's idea this was...

      "You're a special kind of stupid, aren't you?"

    39. Re: Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus he's a walmart loser. At least bezos builds rockets and shit. The waltons just become white trash with more money.

    40. Re:Clueless by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      OK.... Admittedly I usually eat in when travelling through America but are drive through's really more expensive than going inside?

      I dunno who said that.

      In the US, for fast food, the drive through is the exact same price as going in.

      I generally tend to go in, so I can more easily review my order and make sure they don't leave shit out of the bag.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    41. Re:Clueless by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      No, but price for what you get is more for fast food than cooking it yourself.

    42. Re:Clueless by sootman · · Score: 1

      LetÃ(TM)s say Jimmy is shopping on WalmartÃ(TM)s website. HeÃ(TM)s shopping there because he doesnÃ(TM)t want to go to a brink-n-mortar. He sees the price difference and thinks to himself ÃoeDang! ItÃ(TM)s almost $1.00 cheaper in the store. I wonder what AmazonÃ(TM)s price would be? Wow. Amazon is .50 cents cheaper online, and plus I wonÃ(TM)t have to go to the store. IÃ(TM)ll just order from Amazon.Ã Walmart is absolutely clueless.

      Dear Slashdot, I *literally* couldn't stand to read this. Please fix kthxbye.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    43. Re:Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you really so fucking stupid? Pricing is based on total cost of doing business. If they have to pay to ship the fucking corn flakes to your house, along with paying to ship corn flakes to 10000 other fuckers too lazy to leave the house, then the cost will eventually go up to cover the costs of stupid mail-order shipping on corn flakes. Who the fuck makes such a strawman argument about leaving the house to buy one box of cornflakes? Groceries are bought along with doing other errands or on the way home from work or whatever... Rarely is it the only thing you are leaving the house to do.

      One day you're gonna look down at your $47 dollar bill for a box of corn flakes and say, Jesus Christ - I better drive to the store and pay $2.78 because it's just too much for shipping now.

      Lazy Amazon shoppers like you are a fucking disease.

    44. Re:Clueless by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Let's see, 10,000 lazy fuckers can all drive to the store or 20 people can deliver the cornflakes with a lot less pollution, congestion, and at a low cost.

      The context is walmart increasing prices to force me into their stores so I will buy more stuff while there. My comment is, if the item is cheaper on Amazon than Walmart's online price, then I'll order it online from Amazon.

      I don't know about you but many of my chores are done from home- cheaper- than I used to do. I converted when I spent 3 hours, visiting 3 stores, and 2 gallons of gas trying to find a BBQ part. When I got home, I ordered the part for $22 and had it in my house 48 hours later. No wasted gas, no miles on my car, no risk of a ticket, accident, and time.

      My time is worth at least $15 per hour. Car cost is about $0.50 per mile these days. You have to include those costs.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    45. Re: Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a time a few years back when that wasn't true. I think about five years actually.

  2. Seems reasonable to me by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2

    They should consider volume discounts on purchase of multiples or not bother offering low margin products in single quantities online. It seems a bit unreasonable to expect free shipping on a box of macaroni and cheese across the country.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    1. Re:Seems reasonable to me by hackwrench · · Score: 2

      Still it does not cost $10 to ship a box of macaroni anywhere.

    2. Re:Seems reasonable to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd think so.

      Try shipping from Canada to the USA or vice-versa. Even if you're using Canada Post/USPS it's going to be around that price.

    3. Re:Seems reasonable to me by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      They usually have a $35 for free shipping at Walmart.com or free in-store pickup. I'm sure they have crazy shipping charges to encourage people to buy more things.

    4. Re:Seems reasonable to me by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      I agree, but even Amazon has 5-10 buck shipping on items without Prime and without hitting the free-shipping threshold for cost.

  3. Innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Walmart innovated with inventory control and now losing out on innovating further.

  4. What a bunch of morons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're so contemptuous of their customer slaves, it's just continually amazing to me that people shop there at all. I guess low prices are more important than self respect.

    1. Re:What a bunch of morons. by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

      How could you even suggest such a thing!

      http://omgwhut.com/the-amazing-people-of-walmart/25/

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
  5. How about using real shipping costs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    From the summary:

    "Shipping one box of instant macaroni and cheese from Chicago to Atlanta could cost Walmart as much as $10, reports the WSJ."

    I know that nowadays billing proper shipping costs to the consumer is such a radical idea, but maybe they should try THAT instead of rising products prices. Would make a whole lot more sense.

    1. Re:How about using real shipping costs? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm wondering why the Wall Street Journal thinks that walmart would need to ship individual boxes of mac and cheese over 700 miles through the heart of the midwest, and why that particular statistic is of any relevance to anything at all.

      What, has there been a run on mac and cheese in Chicago, and the 500+ stores and god knows how many distribution centers are all tapped out? Or does Atlanta boxed mac and cheese taste better than Chicago boxed mac and cheese? And god damn it, I need my shitty boxed mac and cheese RIGHT FUCKING NOW, so you'd better same-day that shit.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    2. Re:How about using real shipping costs? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Coincidentally, these price hikes for online items coincide with WalMart initiating a "free shipping on everything online" program. So, almost like they just bake in the shipping costs instead of having a sneaky method of trying to get people in the store.

      But of course, they aren't going to ship from Chicago to Atlanta. A huge part of WalMart's success is their ability to cheaply (logistically) move stuff around the country.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  6. Make sure you list both prices online then... by RyanFenton · · Score: 1

    Make sure you list both prices online then, with a clear explanation - Otherwise, I'll just think that Walmart just sucks in terms of prices, compared to other stores in that timeframe.

    I already shop at Aldi for most food items, and use Slickdeals and other comparisson shopping places for most non-perishables. Walmart has long since lost its image as a 'low prices' store - and now sits in my mind as the same as the old department stores as a place I only go for specials and items I can't find elsewhere.

    I do understand they completely squeeze their business partners for increasing margins every financial period they can - but from what I'm seeing, those same vendors have learned to just make crappier stuff for Walmart, while pushing better actual values onto other marketplaces.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Make sure you list both prices online then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shush the MBA that came up with this idea is right!!!!

      Forget that that'll just buy else where online, or go SOMEWHERE else...

      Who the fuck would go to their store if their online site costs to much????

    2. Re:Make sure you list both prices online then... by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      Target is/was that way with different prices online and no price matching. Fucking crazy.

  7. not the store by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    I don't feel safe shopping at Walmart, which is why I don't shop at Walmart

    1. Re:not the store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't feel safe shopping at Walmart, which is why I don't shop at Walmart

      Care to elaborate?

    2. Re:not the store by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Just look for yourself.

      Would you feel safe standing in the same line as these freaks?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. Why do they feel confident of that end result? by RyoShin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Walmart will now highlight this on the product's web listing to encourage customers to buy them from their local stores. It's all part of an effort to increase foot traffic as Walmart continues to compete with Amazon just about everywhere else.

    And the thing that stops a person from just going to another website with a likely-lower price is...?

    I even RTFA (okay, skimmed) to see if there was an answer to this question. I honestly don't know why someone would feel compelled to actually drive to a store (Wal-mart or otherwise) to purchase an item that they already intended to purchase online, especially since it's likely there are other retailers who will have lower prices after Wal-mart increases theirs. (The referenced WSJ article is paywalled so I can't look there for answers, either.)

    And from TFA:

    Shipping one box of instant macaroni and cheese from Chicago to Atlanta could cost Walmart as much as $10, reports the WSJ.

    ...so charge $10 to ship it? I realize things like Amazon Prime have made a lot of people expect cheap or free shipping, but that's an aberration, not a requirement, of online shopping.

    1. Re:Why do they feel confident of that end result? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because of that great American corporate tradition: when one company raises prices, they all do. It's not collusion!

    2. Re:Why do they feel confident of that end result? by cmseagle · · Score: 1

      that's an aberration, not a requirement, of online shopping.

      Tell that to the people who have been trained by Prime to expect free shipping. One of the largest challengers brick and mortar retailers face in the e-commerce space is overcoming that expectation. Up to this point retailers have done this by cutting into their own profit margins trying to out-Amazon Amazon. It's interesting to see Walmart trying the alternative approach of slightly raising prices in exchange for the convenience of home shopping.

      The only reason Amazon is able to do it in the first place is because they've ploughed all that sweet, sweet AWS money into infrastructure and subsidized shipping costs.

    3. Re:Why do they feel confident of that end result? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon does free shipping because they have an agreement with FedEx. Prior to Amazon's free shipping on everything days, FedEx SmartPost didn't exist. It's a reduced-rate shipping tier because FedEx doesn't have to do much of the work. Here's how it works:

      Amazon takes the orders, picks the orders, and palletizes the freight by ZIP code. FedEx loads the trailers. FedEx has a contract with OTR carriers to hook the trailers and linehaul them to the post offices (which they call a "DDU"), per ZIP code. The OTR carriers love this, because they don't have to do any of the difficult work. They just go to their stops and pull the next x pallets off of the back of the truck for that stop. FedEx has it all loaded in-order for them, back-to-front in the trailer. Then, at the post office, the postal workers break down the pallets, sort the packages, and deliver it on their daily mail routes.

      Amazon pays FedEx, FedEx pays the OTR carriers and the USPS.

    4. Re:Why do they feel confident of that end result? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      ..so charge $10 to ship it? I

      They're new ad program is free shipping of everything, all the time, no membership program (like Prime) required.

      I've done a lot of price comparisons online, and on some things WalMart was the clear winner.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:Why do they feel confident of that end result? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel reasonably confident that whoever greenlighted this campaign has thought of that, and decided it's a risk worth taking.

      Maybe they're right, maybe they're wrong. But if no-one ever tries, we'll never know. Let's not condemn them out of hand before we see the results.

  9. I don't buy $1.49 items online by Snotnose · · Score: 2

    I buy $500 TVs, $300 DVD players, $199 PS4 consoles, etc. For $0.49 I'm perfectly happy in Vons.

    1. Re:I don't buy $1.49 items online by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You spend $300 on a DVD player? For that price, you could get a mediocre HTPC and some storage to boot... DVDs are so 2007.

    2. Re:I don't buy $1.49 items online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, he's already got a PS4, which has a top of the line Blue-Ray player in it. Redundant much?
      Also, if it's for use in a second room, a PS4 Slim goes for ... $299.99, wireless controllers and all

  10. Makes sense, actually. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

    Delivery isn't free. If it's "free", then you're being overcharged if you go and buy it in person.

    Yes, retail infrastructure costs money to maintain, but so does shipping/warehousing/IT infrastructure.

    1. Re:Makes sense, actually. by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

      Driving to the store isn't free, either. I have better things to do with my short time on earth than spend it at Walmart.

    2. Re:Makes sense, actually. by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      Walmart's rise to retail domination is beholden to supply chain management,

      Amazon's claim-to-fame is next-to-nothing shipping.

      Walmart recently bought Jet and Zoro, and though the Walton heirs will still be purchasing the name-brand milk this week, Jeff Bezos just became world's richest man.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re:Makes sense, actually. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Amazon charges for shipping -- they just mostly include the costs in the item cost.

    4. Re:Makes sense, actually. by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      If delivery made so little economic sense, why is Amazon buying brick-and-mortar stores like Whole Foods?

    5. Re:Makes sense, actually. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      they also appear to even it out over all the volume they do - I got "free" shipping on a water heater that was maybe $20 more expensive than the same model from local retailers, where either I had to get the thing (rent a truck / van) or they would deliver for $75 - that practically paid for the Prime membership for the year just on that one purchase.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    6. Re:Makes sense, actually. by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      Didn't you kind of answer your own question? Delivery makes little economic sense, so Amazon bought a brick and mortar stores. The above poster kind of talked about overhead with warehouses, but Walmart has those too.

  11. If only .... by dasgoober · · Score: 1

    ... there were another online store where I could get my shopping done.

  12. Exactly. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Shipping ain't free.

    1. Re:Exactly. by ixidor · · Score: 1

      except in a sense .. for wallmart it is. Its already baked into the cost of them delivering all those good on the trucks several times a week to each store.

  13. If it's not convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...then I'm going somewhere else. It's pretty easy to look up prices elsewhere online.

  14. I've never bought from them online by reboot246 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Walmart's website is one big clusterfuck of design. They need to learn from other sites how to do it. Lowe's online site is a great example. Not only can I tell if an item is available at my local store, they actually give me a map of the local store and tell me exactly where to find what I'm looking for. And every time I go to the site it knows which local store I live near.

    I think the reason Walmart can't do that is because they're constantly moving stuff around in their stores. In fact, if it's been a few weeks since my last visit, I have trouble finding what I knew was there before.

    Shopping at walmart.com is a headache. Searching for an item is just about impossible. Once you find it you still don't know if it's available locally or online because the site forgets where you're shopping!

    1. Re:I've never bought from them online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walmart's website is one big clusterfuck of design.

      Agreed. Their instore pickup is also horrible - never again. However, I will give credit where credit is due though - their new site for online grocery ordering and free pickup - grocery.walmart.com - they've largely gotten "right". Give a shot.

      P.S. They bring it out to you, not you go in and get and get it from them.

    2. Re:I've never bought from them online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When shopping walmart.com, it is essential to keep the store finder page ( https://www.walmart.com/store/finder ) open in a separate tab. You just copy the SKU into the local inventory part and you can not only see how many they have on shelves, but the price. Fun fact, the price is in no way linked to the online price. I've seen stuff on the shelves between 20% and 200% of the online price.

    3. Re:I've never bought from them online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walmart online used to let you pick your local store and then when you searched products it would show you if a particular product was in store and in stock, There was also an option to only show items in your selected store. I was just on the site last week and it seems like all these options are gone. I was looking to pick up a cooler for a camping trip. They were all sold out of them at the store I went to, I tried looking online to find out what nearest stores still had them in stock, but could not find this option any longer, so its either gone, or been well hidden. Ultimately Walmart lost the sale and i just ordered the damn thing off amazon, I have better things to do with my time then drive store to store to see if the item is there.

    4. Re:I've never bought from them online by rwyoder · · Score: 1

      Lowe's online site is a great example. Not only can I tell if an item is available at my local store, they actually give me a map of the local store and tell me exactly where to find what I'm looking for. And every time I go to the site it knows which local store I live near.

      It's the same story with Home Depot. The local one is just a mile from home. I recently learned that they also carry products that are not stocked in the stores, but can be ordered online and delivered to my local store with *no* shipping charges. Their very competitive prices, combined with no shipping costs, make them cheaper than any other source for some items.

  15. Round One - FIGHT by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 4, Funny

    Every year we hear the story of the Black Friday Brawl. Every year, it's in the same GD place.

    Walmart.

    "Free can of Pepper Spray for the first 150 shoppers ! "

    I think I'll pass on the in store only sales and just shop somewhere else.

  16. Maybe it would cost the WSJ that. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

    Shipping one box of instant macaroni and cheese from Chicago to Atlanta could cost Walmart as much as $10, reports the WSJ.

    From what I've read, Walmart has one of the most efficient shipping infrastructures, so I don't think they'd be that dumb. They would probably ship from someplace local/closer to Atlanta and, therefore, much less expensively.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Maybe it would cost the WSJ that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but their online orders, even store pickup, often get shipped *UPS* to your store. they rarely enter, or come from, their retail distribution network or warehouses. they have the infrastructure, they just don't use it right.

  17. Walmart was winning me over ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I started ordering from them for the first time and rather regularly too because their prices were cheaper than Amazon or even the local Shoprite and the free two day shipping was so fast without having to pay some Prime tax. Then I noticed they started raising online prices. Now I'm back to Amazon, but maybe I'll start ordering from Target. But basically their low prices just amounted to a loss leader to get me to go to their store? The nearest one for me is in the next town over, meanwhile I can walk two blocks to Shoprite, or ride a bike over to Target in ten minutes. As an Amazon shareholder I was honestly worried Walmart had a chance of beating them, but now they have confirmed they are just as clueless and stuck in the 20th century as they ever were.

  18. Retail business owners are mostly clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > ... Let's say Jimmy is shopping on Walmart's website. He's shopping there because he doesn't want to go to a brink-n-mortar. He sees the price difference and thinks to himself "Dang! It's almost $1.00 cheaper in the store. I wonder what Amazon's price would be? Wow. Amazon is .50 cents cheaper online, and plus I won't have to go to the store. I'll just order from Amazon" Walmart is absolutely clueless ...

    Look at Sears Roebuck, J.C. Penny, Macy's, Sak's 5th Avenue

    Look at KMart, Target, Walmart

    Look at Toy'R'Us, Payless, Sport's Authority

    All these retail giants are product of the 1930's, 40's, 50's, 60's, 70's, 80's, and they peaked during the 1980's

    After that, they cruised for a while, and then decline started

    The relatively minor declined became more and more severe, and by the 2010's it has become disastrous

    Chains after chains folded - from shoe stores (Payless) to sport-oriented stores, to general merchanizing chains, their suffering becoming terminal, by-the-day

    Now watch the same time frame --- what happened since the 1980's?

    Computer, and then, online (with BBS fidonet and gomen arpanet), and then the birth of Internet

    People were starting to commute with each others, long distance, exchanging ideas and insights, and do it on-the-cheap

    These two events crossed paths during the 1990's, that's when people started selling stuffs online

    And now the online selling scene has become a deluge --- while the brick and mortar people are still fucking clueless as before

    The Nov 11 online selling bonanza in China, that very day, on ONE platform (Alibaba) alone, the amount was over 25 beeelion dollars (yes, American dollars) - and that figure does not include the online sales on other platforms in China (Tencent and others)

    Translation: 25 billion US Dollars of sales *NOT* going to brick and mortar stores

    In America, we have Amazon (and other minor platform), and the sales figure is at least as much as that of China's

    But still, brick and mortar store owners are still acting like fucking dinosaurs, and like the dinosaurs, many of them won't survive

    https://www.retaildive.com/news/6-retailers-that-never-survived-bankruptcy-and-what-led-to-their-demises/424562/

    1. Re:Retail business owners are mostly clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are still fucking clueless

      Well what should they do? I can't think of anything that would get me to go to a physical store if I can find the same thing online, even if it would cost me more just like I can't think of a reason to read a physical newspaper if I have the internet available.

    2. Re:Retail business owners are mostly clueless by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you are reaching that point where there is no point in you ever leaving the basement, as more and more normal everyday activities that involve interacting with others in person are getting their own online counterparts.

      Would the Basement Singularity be a suitable term for that badass achievement?

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    3. Re:Retail business owners are mostly clueless by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

      Not ask me if I need help 20 times, don't lie to me if I do ask for help.
      Don't ever insult me with a mail-in-rebate.
      Work to compete with amazon online and not do stuff like raise your online prices to get me to go to the store because you have nostalgia for the days when a blue smock meant something.

      Wal-mart is clueless, Sears practically invented what amazon got rich doing. Both companies are full of old stuffy losers who will never get it. Read employee reviews of walmart labs. Hilarious. They expect to work their engineers like amazon and treat them like they treat all their employees.

    4. Re:Retail business owners are mostly clueless by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      You're missing out on a lot of savings ignoring good mail in rebates. I just did 3 for Bushnell, ended up with free Binoculars, half off another pair and big savings off of another item. I think what you really mean is those crappy best buy and circuit city ones from back in the day that you never got fulfilled. Nowadays a lot of the mail in rebates have online components for tracking and verifying and it's easy to take pictures or make copies of receipts.

    5. Re:Retail business owners are mostly clueless by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

      tbh you're right. I got ripped off by a newegg vendor and had flashbacks of best buy. I want blood.

  19. walmart was shot up twice by FudRucker · · Score: 0

    i quit shopping at walmart since i dont want to be the target of a psycho with a gun, i do as much shopping online as possible now

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:walmart was shot up twice by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...well, you'd better not stay in your house then either, because plenty of people get shot in their homes, too. Probably a lot more than get shot in a Walmart.

  20. Inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The prices online matching Walmart's (honestly) rock-bottom prices was never going to last forever, especially after Walmart announced it will deliver for free with orders over $35.

    If you compare prices for household goods, they are still a lot cheaper than Amazon. They are still competitive online, on other words, but they aren't competing with their own brick and mortar now.

  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. Their website also pushed 3rd party vendors. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    A friend ran into that the other day and bought an item she thought was from Walmart, but was actually from a 3rd party vendor. I am unsure if it showed up at her door or was picked up in-store, but she didn't find out until she tried to return it instore that it was 3rd party, and then was told she had to email the 3rd party about any return issues rather than Walmart.

    Having looked on Walmart.com in the past and run across items like that, which on first glance appear to be from Walmart, until you skim pretty much the whole page, I can understand how more sheep-like consumers have that problem.

    Amazon and Newegg both do a better job on this (Amazon more than Newegg in my experience.) But this seems to be a disturbing trend as more of these 800 lb gorillas try to push their way into being the central hub of internet sales, without taking responsible disclosure and clear separation of 1st and 3rd party items seriously, while then blaming it on the customer when they can't tell the difference. Buyer beware is true, but so is 'don't pull the rug out under your customers.' Changing from a 1st party only site to supporting 3rd party vendors without clearly dilineating the difference is just asking for customer dissatisfaction.

  23. Smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there were only other online places I could shop. What to do.

  24. WallyWorld Is Painful by sdinfoserv · · Score: 2

    Every single time i go walmart it's a painful experience. The last time I was there, i brought 4 items up to the self check out and, literally, just as I got there, some 300# woman with a mullet waddles off a stool, flips a switch turning off all the self checkouts. not a word, just a glance, then she spun around and limped off towards customer service.
    I left the items on the deactivated conveyor belt and left. Sadly, experiences like this have happened multiple times at various locations
    i will absolutely positively pay more to avoid Walmart.

    1. Re:WallyWorld Is Painful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When she go home, did she explain her actions?

  25. Not that long ago it was cheaper online by Blinkin1200 · · Score: 1

    Not that long ago it was cheaper online than in the store. I have four Walmarts near me. Unfortunately, they do not stock the same items. I went online several times to see which store had the item I wanted. When I got to the store, it was more expensive for me to pull it from the shelf and buy it. The last time it happened I stood there in front of the item, got out my phone and bought it from Amazon. They pissed me off enough I could wait the two days for the package to arrive.

  26. Three things you can't get from online stores ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    * Smell
    * Taste
    * Touch

    That is *why* we still go to restaurants, the Brick and Mortar restaurants

    > ... Well what should they do? I can't think of anything that would get me to go to a physical store if I can find the same thing online ...

    If you ain't selling food or perfume or condiments, and you own a Brick and Mortar store, the only thing that you can offer whilst your online counterpart can't is the sense of TOUCH

    Take shoes, for example

    We can get to gawk at long lists of shoes of different categories, from different brands, at different price point online, but we won't be able to TOUCH those shoes, run our fingers through the surface of the shoes, bend those shoes and see how flexible they are, and the feeling our feet feel when we put on those shoes (and walk a few steps with them)

    We can only do that if we are in a Brick and Mortar shoe store

    But, and that is a BIG "But", have you been to any shoe store recently?

    Have you been served, and served well?

    See, the one thing the Brick and Mortar store owners still haven't figured out is that they are *NO LONGER* in the sales business

    Instead, They are in the *SERVICE SECTOR*, after the advent of online stores

    The online stores offer a lot of *SERVICES*, like great discount, like convenient deliveries, no-question-ask return of the merchandise and the refund of the money

    If you do not understand what I mean, try to return a pair of shoes you bought in a Brick and Mortar shoe store and see how they - the shoe store people - treat you

    In fact, when you first stepped into a Brick and Mortar shoe store, have the shoe sellers greeted you?

    Have they been helpful offer hints on what kind of shoes are better / more fashionable / more comfortable?

    Have they been sincere with getting you 20, or even 50 boxes of different shoes (or sizes) for you to try on?

    Most of the time, the answer is a flat 'No'

    Store people just stand there, staring at you, and even when they say 'May I help you?' it sounded like a fucking bot

    That is why I said, most Brick and Mortar store owners are Dinosaurs

    They just do not know who they are, any more!

  27. There are *dollar stores* online ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even el-cheapo items are starting to be available online

    For example - https://www.hollar.com/ - everything they sell are el-cheapo item, with prices as low as $1

    In a sense, other than restaurants and bakeries, online store offerings have blanketed almost every segment of the Brick and Mortar retail industry

  28. Re:Hamburger Helper still exists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Cousin Eddie: I don't know why they call this stuff hamburger helper. It does just fine by itself, huh? I like it better than tuna helper myself, don't you, Clark?
    Clark: You're the gourmet around here, Eddie.

    You have just entered The Walmart Zone.

    For the first time in my life, I went into a Walmart last January. Everything that I had ever heard about it... was true. Never again.
    However, I don't order online either. I like to buy Clothes that fit, (30" Waist, 34" Inseam.), and when I buy Electronics or Camera Gear, I like to check it out immediately to ensure that it's not dead out of the box. I test drive Cars thoroughly before buying them, and I pay Cash, always. Credit Cards are for those that lack Self Control. I've switched to Alvarez Eyeglasses, (I worked with Luis Alvarez...), so the times of constant fussing to get a pair of regular Glasses to fit properly are over. I can't imagine trusting Online Sellers here, no matter how good the price.
    My next big purchase coming up is a Pentax KP. I've read just about everything Online about them. Since all of the local Camera Stores have folded, I'll have to take a day to drive over to SF and put one through its paces at the only Pentax Dealer in the Bay Area. And to think, for three decades I was an Olympus Guy...
    But I've handled the recent Olympus Digitals, and they just don't feel right in my hands. (Canons felt downright wrong.)

    I do my own shopping for Food; I eat in a restaurant maybe once a year. I actually like going down the aisles, checking out what's on sale, and comparing Ingredient lists. Hamburger Helper, no matter the price, is no bargain. Pasta is around $1 a pound, which turns into ~2.5 pounds cooked, which is more than enough. The rest of the Helper ingredients are the usual collection of Petrochemical wastes. (When something is called "Cheesy Beef Pasta", two ingredients sure not to be included are either Cheese or Beef.)
    You don't even save any time. Boil up some water, toss it and a generous handful of Rotini into a wide-mouth Thermos, and it will be Al Dente by the time the meat with some diced onion is browned. Mix in a can of tomato puree and a careless selection of spices from the Spice rack, and ten minutes later mix the Pasta in, and you're done. Same time, better ingredients, less money.
    Hmmmm... I'm getting hungry...

  29. From a Walmart perspective it makes sense by hyades1 · · Score: 2

    Think of all the free publicity Walmart gets when a dozen dime-store duchesses in animal skin prints roll around in the Toy Department throwing punches over the last Tickle Me Roy Boy doll at the Alabama superstore. You simply cannot buy that kind of social media presence!

    And how better to remind "Sales Associates" who's boss than to rip them away from their families on Thanksgiving? They should be thankful for their minimum-wage jobs and quit whining about that family values nonsense.

    Work with me here, people. Get those assless chaps out of the closet, wiggle into that skin-tight XXXXXL spandex shirt that says "My Warm-up Is Your Workout", and head down to Wally World for a Black Friday - Cyber Monday Shop-a-thon!

    Only one week left! It's almost time for really serious bargain hounds to grab the sleeping bags and get in line.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:From a Walmart perspective it makes sense by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

      XXXXXL and ass-less chaps.

      The horror! The horror!

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
  30. Competing with Amazon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there are price discrepancies between online and in-store purchases, Walmart will now highlight this on the product's web listing to encourage customers to buy them from their local stores. It's all part of an effort to increase foot traffic as Walmart continues to compete with Amazon just about everywhere else.

    This isn't competing with Amazon, this is an acknowledgement stating, "We can't compete, you win."

  31. I live near Boston by nerdonamotorcycle · · Score: 1

    and anything that either keeps me from spending an entire afternoon on public transport or taking my life in my hands trying to drive to the store is worth a pretty substantial price premium. The fact that online pricing is usually cheaper is just a bonus.

    The exception is groceries and things like clothing where I might want to check things like fit or color or "feel" before buying. Or things I absolutely need now, like tools or parts or supplies to finish some kind of project that's blocking up my garage/driveway/workbench.

  32. Idiotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Self-Cannibalization should be celebrated and encouraged. If people prefer to buy online, sell online.
    When companies cripple one department to protect another department, all you get is a crippled department and a weak department.

    Walmart should know that Amazon will eventually eat their lunch.

  33. I do. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Before I go walking from store to store to find exactly what I'm looking for sometimes it's just easier to click the buy button when you're already mid-research. My smallest online transaction has been $0.60 and it somehow included shipping. My smallest item purchased was a single physical screw, because stuff buying a 10 pack and having 9 laying around.

  34. Surely not everything is Walmart? by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    And so... what's keeping me from ordering from a different online service? It sounds like Walmart thinks their only competition is themselves. Let's disabuse them of that.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  35. Re:Hamburger Helper still exists? by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

    I don't know why they call that stuff hamburger helper. It does just fine by itself. I like it better than tuna helper myself.

  36. hidden costs by sad_ · · Score: 1

    sure, it might cost them $10, but what about the extra cost for us, the customer, for going to a store?
    fuel isn't really cheap these days, and my time is limited and thus expensive as well.
    they will have to increase their prices way more to make it worth while to go to the store and by that point, you will surely find cheaper alternative online shops.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  37. LOL! by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

    I don't do Walmart. Or Facebook. I'll do Amazon and eBay all day long however.

  38. Idiots by The+Faywood+Assassin · · Score: 1

    If Walmart doesn't want people using their online site, why do they have one?

    --

    "I'm a humble person really,

    I'm actually much greater than I think I am"

  39. In other news, water is wet by Leus · · Score: 0

    So, they are ramping up their prices before a sale? Geez, never expected that.

  40. No, double clueless by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

    Target has much better BI than wal-mart, it's their entire niche business strategy.
    Wal-mart is clueless they've stopped innovating and have increased profits by fucking everyone as hard as they can, customers, suppliers, and of course workers. Then they pat themselves on the back.

    You wanna see clueless, go do a glassdoor on walmart labs.

    1. Re:No, double clueless by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

      I forgot the way they brainwash their employees too. It seems you may have consumed some of the kool-aid.

    2. Re:No, double clueless by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Target has much better BI than wal-mart, it's their entire niche business strategy.

      You should look into the fiasco that was their expansion into Canada. Hint: They were here for maybe a year and pulled out because they had no clue.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:No, double clueless by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

      Well that doesn't mean they don't have much better BI than walmart. Their whole strategy is to be just a little bit ahead of wal-mart and they're doing ok. Failure to successfully replicate a business model in a new location is very common.

      The only thing wal-mart knows about it's customers is they're desperate white trash and they serve them well.

    4. Re:No, double clueless by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      " they're desperate white trash and they serve them well." Right there, that shows you have no clue about Walmart, where they've expanded and that they made smaller market stores and are now making upscale stores. http://www.businessinsider.com...

    5. Re:No, double clueless by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

      White trash likes to buy gucci, they're still trash.

      https://www.glassdoor.com/Revi...

      Anyhow walmart will fail to become amazon.

  41. WSJ isn't quite right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, it's a little more subtle than that.

    Walmart offers discounts for pickup instead of shipping. If you look at the online price difference between shipped (not including shipping charges, if any) and discounted picked up, the increased price is exactly the amount of the discount for pickup.

    Walmart started offering 2-day shipping to compete with Amazon. Then they made the BIG mistake of acquiring Jet, which is probably who came up with this brilliant idea to offset the 2-day shipping losses. They will just lose business as people notice this.

  42. cheap chinese plastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I repair electronics, what most don’t know is, is when a product has 1-2 runs, it has errors in them, they are repaired and sold in lots to both bestbuy and walmart @ a cheaper price. which is why they have the warranty they do, so, beware.

  43. Re:Hamburger Helper still exists? by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

    Well, the beef would come from you, it's just the helper. Also the Cheesy Beef Pasta does have Ricotta Cheese, Blue Cheese and Cheddar Cheese, dried as an ingredient along with other cheese enzymes. So for the $2.50 you get the Pasta, the cheese, and the spices. No mixing, it's easy to do, etc.

  44. Re:Hamburger Helper still exists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Enriched Pasta (wheat flour, niacin, ferrous sulfate, thiamin mononitrate, riboflavin, folic acid), Corn Starch, Salt, Wheat Flour, Ricotta Cheese* (whey, milkfat, lactic acid, salt), Vegetable Oil (canola, soybean and/or sunflower oil), Natural Flavor, Sugar, Yeast Extract, Monosodium Glutamate, Cheddar Cheese* (milk, cheese cultures, salt, enzymes), Hydrolyzed Corn Protein, Color (caramel color, yellow lakes 5 & 6, yellows 5 & 6), Monoglycerides, Sunflower Oil, Citric Acid, Beef Stock, Spice, Whey, Onion*, Buttermilk, Sodium Phosphate, Beef Fat, Silicon Dioxide (anticaking agent), Blue Cheese* (milk, salt, cheese cultures, enzymes), Enzyme Modified Blue Cheese (milk, cheese cultures, salt, enzymes), Enzyme Modified Cheddar Cheese (milk, cheese cultures, salt, enzymes).*Dried"

    Since ingredients need to be listed by quantity, note that there is more Corn Starch, Salt and Wheat Flour listed than the first of the "Cheesy" components.
    So in the interests of Disclosure, it should be called "Enriched Pastaish, Corn Starchy, Salty, Wheat Floury, Cheesy, Add-Your-Own-Beefy, Cheesy Beef Pasta".
    Like that is going to happen.