Slashdot Mirror


YouTube's Search Autofill Surfaced Disturbing Child Sex Results (buzzfeed.com)

Several users are reporting that they found YouTube autocompleting search queries starting with 'how to have' with disturbing suggestions, including 's*x with your kids' over the weekend. From a report: A YouTube spokesperson told BuzzFeed News that the matter is still under investigation. "Earlier today our teams were alerted to this awful autocomplete result and we worked to quickly remove it," the company said. "We are investigating this matter to determine what was behind the appearance of this autocompletion." We tried the same query on YouTube less than an hour before publication of this story, and we found "how to have s*x in school," and "how to have s*x with kids" were still surfacing in the results.

81 of 155 comments (clear)

  1. We have replaced it with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Spidrman and Elsa doing creepy stuff

    1. Re:We have replaced it with... by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

      how to have Spiderman s*x with Elsa

  2. Here come the torches and pitchforks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    People want what they want. Kids like sex too.

  3. It has been corrected now by Misagon · · Score: 2

    Try to search Youtube for "Kunt and the Gang Sexy Kids" and you won't find his duet with Jimmy Saville's ghost.

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:It has been corrected now by Joviex · · Score: 1

      Try to search Youtube for "Kunt and the Gang Sexy Kids" and you won't find his duet with Jimmy Saville's ghost.

      Except... that is all I found.

  4. Personalized search results by BenJeremy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My impression was that your previous searches would influence your autocompletes. I don't get the same results, mine are quite innocuous.

    That being the case, I have to wonder about the people reporting this.

    1. Re:Personalized search results by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

      Exactly. With "how to have" my first auto-complete result is "a life"...

      Umm...

      Never mind.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Personalized search results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just tried it on a clean system that have never searched YouTube in its existence, and got the exact same results as shown in the linked image. If you aren't getting them, it's because you have enough history of searching YouTube (I pity you) overriding it.

  5. An act of deliberate Google bombing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or are we really having a large group of pedos entering obvious search terms into youtube where sexual material (or even nipples) is usually erased within minutes?

    Someone gamed the Youtube search engine to generate a story. Nothing to see here, move along.

    1. Re:An act of deliberate Google bombing? by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      No, there's likely something else going on, adland has a pretty good article on it.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  6. Easy fix by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Turn off the "personalized search results" you pervert!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. could be worse by religionofpeas · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, at least it's s*x and not sex.

    1. Re:could be worse by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Well, at least it's s*x and not sex.

      Yeah but it could be anyone of these things as well

      x
      sx
      ssx
      sssx
      ssssx

      etc

      It's that old sawhorse of "now you have two problems"

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:could be worse by simplypeachy · · Score: 1

      Or for them to take up sax! A repugnant idea!

    3. Re:could be worse by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Autocomplete doesn't put all the words, so maybe it was "How to have sex with kids".

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    4. Re:could be worse by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Of course slashdot removed the < and > the post was:

      Autocomplete doesn't put all the words, so maybe it was "How to have sex with <your partner to make> kids".

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  8. Re:Crowdsourced content by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Sucks. Try looking for horse porn and all you get is dudes jacking off on My Little Pony toys. Disgusting!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. Re:Most likely it's just for fun by RedK · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When a search engine proposes that phrase after having type only "How to have", it is quite disturbing. Dunno why you're brushing it off. Especially considering the many other "How to have" options :

    "How to have a merry christmas"
    "How to have a good first date"
    "How to have a successful job interview"
    "How to have a great life"
    "How to have Baron_Yam arrested for Pedo apology"

    Obviously, Youtube and Google have come to rely way too much on "The Algorythm", and as many have pointed out, they are doing such a great job demonitizing and banning conservative voices, maybe they should apply that same effort to their massive Youtube Kid's problem, and this latest string of barely disguised pedophilia.

    --
    "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
    Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
  10. Re:Most likely it's just for fun by havana9 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Everyone has kids knows that the answer in how to have sex with kids is to call Grandma or a babysitter for the evening, to to a restaurant with your spouse and then go straight in a motel or if you feel fancy, search a quiet spot, park there and put newspapers on the car's windows.

  11. Re:Most likely it's just for fun by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmm... so I guess even racists have become more politically correct. The autocomplete results for "how to lynch" do of course include "a black person" but not "a ni....".

    Great. The system works. Yeah, they still wanna hang them, but at least it's not offensive!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  12. Self-enforcing by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm sure now it's going to be a top search query, since thousands of people will read the article and go try it out to see if anything comes up.

  13. whats nex by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Whats next, someone complaining that youtube's arrow looks like the head of a penis?

  14. Re:Most likely it's just for fun by Wycliffe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Everyone has kids knows that the answer in how to have sex with kids is to call Grandma or a babysitter for the evening, to to a restaurant with your spouse and then go straight in a motel or if you feel fancy, search a quiet spot, park there and put newspapers on the car's windows.

    Exactly. It doesn't surprise me that "how to have sex with kids" and "how to have sex kids" top the list especially during a holiday weekend. How the "your" got inserted is a slight mystery but it's possible that either people are typing it that way or google is somehow inserting the your for some reason.

  15. Re:Most likely it's just for fun by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    I wonder what it says about my view of the world compared to yours that I went straight to the "must be about sex predators" and you saw the innocent alternative.

    BTW - letting the kids play video games or watch a movie works just fine... with a privacy-lock doorknob or a barrel bolt on the master bedroom door just in case.

  16. Re:Crowdsourced content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Link?

  17. Drum roll please... by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    Is there a reason that the autocomplete should ever ever ever ever autocomplete "sex" at all? How complicated is this?

    You wouldn't finish your wife's sentences in public that way either. This isn't advanced AI. If you want to search for "sex", you get to type "sex" yourself.

    Very complicated.

    1. Re:Drum roll please... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      what are you a prude? a castrino? a monk who beats himself whenever he "has an impure thought"?

      plenty of sentences a normal human might say might end in "sex". Whether the topic is medical, gender, joke or porn......

    2. Re:Drum roll please... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Gotta draw the line somewhere, or you get the goat. I agree the line should be somewhere _between_ 'sex' and 'goat.se'.

      Which isn't to say adults and kids smart enough to get around their 'rents should not be allowed to find the modern equivalents of rotten and ogerish.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Drum roll please... by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      "plenty"? sure. "most likely"? no. Doesn't need to be auto-guessed. If you're guessing, you're wrong.

    4. Re: Drum roll please... by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      ...from auto-guess? Yeah. Don't auto-guess things that are ever taboo.

      It's really this simple. If you were at a gala dinner, at your local theatre, spending $500 dollars per ticket, enjoying wine, a silent auction, city council discussions, and a celebrity performance, and you're talking to the mayor of the city, and he turns to you and says "I want to have...", don't finish his sentence with "sex?".

      Some subjects simply aren't appropriate in some situations. And since google doesn't know what your situation is -- locker-room or ballroom -- then err on the side of polite, always.

      Doesn't stop you from typing whatever you want.

      The difference is that if you're the mayor's aid, and you finish his sentence that way in front of the theatre staff, then you get fired, and appropriately so. If you're professional, then you may offer suggestions of all sorts, just not the ones that might be considered out-of-place at the gala.

    5. Re:Drum roll please... by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      It's not about comfort. It's about context.

      It's really this simple. If you were at a gala dinner, at your local theatre, spending $2'500 dollars per ticket, enjoying wine, a silent auction, city council discussions, and a celebrity performance, and you're talking to the mayor of the city, and he turns to you and says "I want to have...", don't finish his sentence with "sex?".

      Some subjects simply aren't appropriate in some situations. And since google doesn't know what your situation is -- locker-room or ballroom -- then err on the side of polite, always.

      Doesn't stop you from typing whatever you want.

      The difference is that if you're the mayor's aid, and you finish his sentence that way in front of the theatre staff, then you get fired, and appropriately so. If you're professional, then you may offer suggestions of all sorts, just not the ones that might be considered out-of-place at the gala.

    6. Re: Drum roll please... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      since google doesn't know what your situation is

      But Google knows. It has seen all your previous queries.

    7. Re:Drum roll please... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      yes it should be in the range of things that are auto-guessed, matters involving the word "sex" are a *popular* topic among normal humans. Sexual preference, sexual identity, sexual health, sexual celebrity gossip, sexual media, etc. etc. etc.

      The world between your ears may be different, but most of us don't live in that.

    8. Re:Drum roll please... by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      a "popular" topic in some locations, not in others. I'd argue not in most. NSFW. I'd argue that most of your day is incompatible with each of those searches that you mention.

      Why are you so against typing your search in the first place? Why do you need suggestions at all? One day you'll be old enough to spell "sex" without help. And maybe, just maybe, you'll be able to type too fast for suggestions to show up in-time anyway.

    9. Re:Drum roll please... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      My employer is in the business where demographics and analysis of them are extremely important. Three different meansings uses of the word "sex" are relevant.

      You are a prude, not functioning in the mainstream of human interaction.

    10. Re:Drum roll please... by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      You might want to define "mainstream of human interaction". I think you'll find that 90% of the time that you spend interactive with humans, the word "sex" is either inappropriate or not tolerated. Think of every minute that you spend at work. Think of most family get-togethers. Think of interviews, shopping, and every contractor you've hired. Any time you're speaking with someone with whom you're exchanging money, you likely avoid any suggestion of "sex".

      Think about the number of people that you speak with every day, with whom you've never uttered the word even once.

    11. Re:Drum roll please... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      topic of sex does come up at family get togethers strangely enough, a couple of bad guys are treating their wives badly and cheating ( you know, having SEX outside his marriage), one even made another woman pregnant.

      more news for you, when married people are visiting their old friends they do joke about sex sometimes. put on your shocked face.

      At work people gossip about celebrities and politiciians doing sexual things

      Oh look, the real world isn't like your little safe space between your ears, it's full of sex.

    12. Re:Drum roll please... by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      sorry your family get-togethers never include young children. mine tend to. Sorry your old friends don't have children either. Maybe you should all get together to get a bulk-discount on some fertility treatments?

      Also sorry you have no client-facing duties at work. I do, and there's no celebrity gossip when you're asking for someone's money professionally. I rarely do locker-room meetings.

      Perhaps you aren't able to read. Life has sex all over the place. But there are plenty of places where it is most very absent. As I've said, I'll bet that six individual hours of every one of your days has "sex" as a very inappropriate and disallowed subject. That's already half of your waking hours.

      So, with that as a given, if half of your time has negative consequences to such subjects, then auto-suggesting it 100% of the time is equally inappropriate -- and just plain incorrect, as a guess.

    13. Re:Drum roll please... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      what can I say, we're old...I'm in mid 50s. I and wife have children, they're grown and yes sometimes talk of sexual things.

      nope, not having place where topic of sex doesn't sometimes come up. happens at work, at home, even heard on the train. And of course we're having topic of sex in this thread, you've written it. Sex sex sex, it's everywhere.

  18. Troll query by lucaiaco · · Score: 1

    I tried it, it still appears as an autocomplete suggestions, but none of the videos showed have anything to do with kids. I wonder how it ended up there.

  19. get a good criminal defense lawyer by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    get a good criminal defense lawyer

  20. Re:Crowdsourced content by SharpFang · · Score: 2

    It's a matter of proper wording. Look for horse mating.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  21. Re:Most likely it's just for fun by fafalone · · Score: 2

    To be fair there's some pretty fucking awful stuff out there regarding specific grooming methods and drugging instructions, on top of the even more awful stuff about how to not seriously injure parts that small during sex.

  22. Re:Most likely it's just for fun by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

    or a barrel bolt on the master bedroom door just in case.

    You seem to have either over achieving kids or an over active imagination.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  23. Re:Crowdsourced content by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only on /. you could make a joke about something disgusting and someone replies with well thought out, helpful information you wish you wouldn't have gotten...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  24. What exactly is the big deal.... by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

    It's more funny than it is offensive. The autocomplete combines partial phrases with nouns and verbs. Both sex and children are "popular" individual search terms. It is a false implication that the whole sentence is popular.

    The computer doesn't know that to combine them in certain sentences is inappropriate. It's very simple programming and programming around these rare combinations is going to slow down webpages and the internet when you consider how many languages there are along with slang and double entendre's.

    Stop being so politically correct.

    1. Re:What exactly is the big deal.... by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      It is probably a distillation of similar searches and something completely innocent, like "how can I have s*x with children in the house."

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. Re:Crowdsourced content by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

    You mean "Web2.0"...? (which is actually pretty much Web1.0, thank you very much AOL.....)

    --
    "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
  27. Re:Crowdsourced content by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 1

    Wish you wouldn't have gotten???

  28. Re:Most likely it's just for fun by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

    Better throw RED FEVER accusations around too to shut down any discussion and prevent justifiably shocked people from being shocked.

    Back on topic: Do you really think this is plausibly anything other than YouTube counter-attacking the conspiracy theory community in thanks for Elsa-gate...? Just throw out some super out-there, too delicious to be true BULLSHIT, so the people paying attention can look stupid when they it later gets blamed on 4chan......?!

    --
    "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
  29. Re:Woo*wind by Lirodon · · Score: 2

    Actually no. It literally did come up as "s*x" as this Reddit post notices.

  30. Re:Check out the marriage laws... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have archived his latest story so you can laugh at it without giving him money
    http://archive.is/Bfzo1
    Creimer Wrote:

    I’ve heard stories of engineers saving enough money to retire to Mexico, build a mansion and marry a sweet young thing. The village elders allowed this with the understanding that the American would leave everything to the village when he dies. A win-win situation for getting the most “bang” out of retirement dollars.

    Oh wow

    Special thanks go to the Anonymous Cowards (ACs) on Slashdot who protested this false narrative, posted news article links and tried to raise awareness about this serious issue.

    Hahaha I'm dying. Yeah sure you have no interest in the subject. That's why you checked if your liquidated assets would be enough to buy a child bride of your own.

  31. Re:Most likely it's just for fun by havana9 · · Score: 1

    I think because if one had to find creative ways to make love with his wife living in a flat and a child with a light sleep, has somewhat to find creative ways to do it. Besides someone could find that make a date again with her husband could be really really fun.
    On the other hand the media hammering on sexual predators makes people immediately think to these situations. The TV does it because talking about a couple still in lov after having a couple of child is boring and doesn't sell advertising, when a crime attracts a lot of viewers...

  32. Probably not pedophilia by GuB-42 · · Score: 2

    Maybe it is just a weird way of phasing "how to have sex when you have kids", as in "how to avoid having little monsters interrupt intimate moments". And "how to have sex in school" is probably a question that is in the mind of every teenager...

    "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" is even truer with computers.

  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. Sex by stealth_finger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Say it with me now. SEX! It's a thing, it exists, it's not a dirty word. Ok tutorials on youtube probably ain't great but why can't/won't TFA say the word sex. It's like they're talking about such forbidden fruit it's no wonder the kids end up so messed up, pretend it doesn't exist til they're 18 and then expect them to know all about it.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  35. Re:Most likely it's just for fun by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

    I know that parents of 3 children can find the time/location to have sex, or even just the energy to have sex. After all, I see parents with 4 children (ignoring twins/trips/other multiple births).

    I'm just very confused on *where* they are finding the time, energy, etc

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  36. Re:Crowdsourced content by Zorro · · Score: 1

    You mean Deadpool?

  37. Re:Most likely it's just for fun by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2

    >I'm just very confused on *where* they are finding the time, energy, etc

    Post-kid sex is often not quite as casual or energetic as pre-kid sex, that's for sure. Definitely not as energetic at least until you get to occasionally sleep for 8 hours straight.

  38. Re: Most likely it's just for fun by Gaznpiroliberal · · Score: 1

    Too many times. Things like "How to exterminate a social group"; just for fun. If we are talking about CP, I suppose no one would search it in Google.

  39. Re:Most likely it's just for fun by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    If it's not a few 4chan denizens, who do you think is running the zombie horde running the script stuffing these phrases into YouTube? That horde is worth real money, but instead the herder is fucking with YouTube for the luls.

    Likely the most skilled neural net trainer YouTube never hired.

    This sounds right up "/b's" alley. BTW if you're reading this, keep up the good work!

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  40. Re:Most likely it's just for fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sorry, still tons of tomi lahren videos on youtube. Anti-conservative youtube is a myth.

    The number of demonitized conservative Youtube content creators calls you a fucking liar.

    But, that goes along with liberalism anyway. If liberals didn't have a double standard, they wouldn't have any standards at all.

  41. Re:Most likely it's just for fun by sexconker · · Score: 1

    You're a moron. Nothing is disturbing here. It's an algorithm. If you think the content it worked on is disturbing, go complain about that content. The algorithm seems to be working just fine.

  42. Most disturbing of all. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    I tried asking "How to use YouTube Autofill" ...

    Sigh. Missed out on another fad.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  43. Re:Most likely it's just for fun by Target+Drone · · Score: 2

    How the "your" got inserted is a slight mystery but it's possible that either people are typing it that way or google is somehow inserting the your for some reason.

    I think Google was truncating longer search terms into a common root suggestion:

    • how to have sex with your kids in the house
    • how to have sex with your kids at home
    • how to have sex with your kids asleep
    • etc.

    I've seen it before for long queries where suggest doesn't seem to come up with a complete query that anyone would use. Although in this particular case they picked the worst possible place to truncate it. Maybe because they're actually were a couple of searches for "how to have sex with your kids" and then all the non-pedophile versions just added to it's popularity.

  44. Re:Crowdsourced content by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

    Only on /. you could make a joke about something disgusting and someone replies with well thought out, helpful information you wish you wouldn't have gotten...

    This! Wish I had mod points.

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  45. "how to have sex" on slashdot by sootman · · Score: 1

    Results: No matches.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  46. Disturbing Child Sex Results by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

    Seems like the author is conflating auto-complete suggestions with search results.

  47. Re: Most likely it's just for fun by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Posting actual pedo shit is one thing.

    Trolling the 'Oh noes, the childrenz!' people is something else. It's a phrase of text.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  48. The real story by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    People inside and outside of Youtube as a company have stated that they have very clear evidence that Youtube staff does no care or purposely ignores laws and child safety and illegal content etc because they put image and marketing and PR and growth above all else. THAT is what caused this. A huge multi-channel owner named Matthias is currently destroying them on social media over this issue and they're still doing nothing to fix it while lying and saying that they are. I'm surprised they aren't forwarding all searchers of these terms IP addresses to the NSA or something. Like seriously, Google does that for other categories.

  49. Not for me it doesn't by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    Several users are reporting that they found YouTube autocompleting search queries starting with 'how to have' with disturbing suggestions, including 's*x with your kids' over the weekend. From a report:

    A YouTube spokesperson told BuzzFeed News that the matter is still under investigation. "Earlier today our teams were alerted to this awful autocomplete result and we worked to quickly remove it," the company said. "We are investigating this matter to determine what was behind the appearance of this autocompletion."

    We tried the same query on YouTube less than an hour before publication of this story, and we found "how to have s*x in school," and "how to have s*x with kids" were still surfacing in the results.

    Not for me it does. If I type "how to have" I get innocuous suggestions

    https://i.imgur.com/lkatvJV.pn...

    Interesting if you type "how to have sex" you get suggestions

    https://i.imgur.com/5DryMlR.pn...

    but as soon as you hit space and get to "how to have sex " it stops

    https://i.imgur.com/nYqdcVU.pn...

    There are three options here. It runs off what you've searched for before, and the Buzzfeed guy had done a search for "sex with kids".

    Or Youtube have fixed it so that as soon as you get to "how to have sex " it stops giving you suggestions.

    Or Buzzfeed are lying.

    All of those seem pretty plausible to me.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    1. Re:Not for me it doesn't by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Same with s*x

      "How to have s*x"

      https://i.imgur.com/HhATu5P.pn...

      "How to have s*x with"

      https://i.imgur.com/viw0qC9.pn...

      The only result is the non controversial "How to have s*x without getting pregnant". As soon as you add a space to get "how to have s*x with " it stops trying to autocomplete.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  50. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  51. Re:Most likely it's just for fun by sjames · · Score: 1

    Except that I just went to youtube and I got suggestions like "a British accent", "a lucid dream", "clear skin", "confidence", "good handwriting". So either it was something to do with cookies stored in the users browser, or Google actually DID address the issue as you say they should.

  52. Re:Most likely it's just for fun by Altrag · · Score: 1

    And what exactly do you think "the algorithm" is? Its a tool for ranking sites and prioritizing the sites they think people want to see. If its prioritizing sex with kids for a large percentage of searchers, then the algorithm is absolutely not working "fine."

    Unless you want to claim that a large percentage of the population really wants to have sex with their kids enough to be Googling for it, but I'd definitely need to see your citation on that one.

    Really though, this is standard operating procedure for Google. Sure its rare that it happens to suggest a topic as sensitive as child molestation and that's why it made news this time, but Google is continuously tweaking their algorithm and tomorrow they might be running into the same problem with "how to" suggesting "how to bake a fruitcake" and realizing few people really want to do that so downgrade those results a bit and promote "how to cook a turkey" instead or whatever they do (we can assume its more complicated and generalized than my example of course!)

  53. Re: Most likely it's just for fun by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    Fun fact: 98.2% of jack booted witch burners who spend a lot of time thinking about how they are "disturbed" by pedophilia on the internet, are themselves closet pedos.

  54. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  55. So what? by sabbede · · Score: 1
    Seriously, what's the problem? Something stupid came up in autocomplete results, big f'ing deal. Some uptight idiot got wound up over some trivial nonsense so now it's news and Google is embarrassed?

    I remember the good old days when an idiot with a bug up their ass about something stupid would just be ignored. The worst part of the internet is that idiots amplify each other's nonsense and get taken seriously.

  56. Re:results? by sabbede · · Score: 1

    Good point. Unless it pulls up instructional videos or demonstrations, it's a non-issue.

  57. Bing is arguably worse by SnarkSide · · Score: 1

    Ever notice on Bing image search it throws in some odd stuff, like sometimes regular porn, nudist or family photos get mixed together and in that case some nude images of children or families are mixed in with porn. Personally I find that really disturbing because it exposes those images in a sexual context when the images were not intended as sexual. It creates a potential safe space for pedophile type behavior. I also get nude images of dead bodies sometimes mixed with porn images which is disturbing, but the kid stuff really worries me how accessible it's become seemingly by accident on Microsoft's part.